New York’s Suspension of Facial Recognition Surveillance in Schools ‘Should Serve as a National Model,’ Says Advocate

Civil liberties advocates and parents across New York state celebrated Tuesday after Gov. Andrew Cuomo signed into law a first-of-its-kind moratorium on biometric surveillance tools, including facial recognition,…

Civil liberties advocates and parents across New York state celebrated Tuesday after Gov. Andrew Cuomo signed into law a first-of-its-kind moratorium on biometric surveillance tools, including facial recognition, in schools statewide until at least July 2022—legislation that supporters said should inspire policymakers throughout the U.S.

The measure signed by Cuomo was passed by state lawmakers in July on the heels of a lawsuit, filed by the New York Civil Liberties Union (NYCLU), alleging that the state Education Department violated student data privacy laws by approving the Lockport City School District’s use of such technology in November 2019.

The Democratic governor’s move will halt the Lockport surveillance system, which began in January. While the school district’s superintendent, Michelle Bradley, criticized the legislation in an email to the Lockport Union-Sun & Journal this summer, local parent and plaintiff Jim Shultz welcomed Cuomo’s signature on Tuesday.

“The Lockport school district made our students guinea pigs in an experiment in high-tech surveillance of all their movements,” Shultz said. “They wasted $2.7 million in taxpayer dollars doing it. Of course facial recognition in schools needs to be studied before any other school district—in New York or anywhere else—does this again.”

Lockport’s system—along with 11 other currently approved projects—was funded by taxpayers under New York’s Smart Schools Bond Act, according to the NYCLU.

The legislation bars the purchase or use of biometric technology by public and private schools, and orders a study of whether it is appropriate in educational institutions. The moratorium will be in effect until July 1, 2022 or the study is completed and the state education commissioner authorizes its use—whichever is later.

As the NYCLU noted:

The law will require the commissioner of education, in consultation with the New York State Education Department’s chief privacy officer, to evaluate the privacy implications of biometric identifying technology and whether the technology differs in accuracy rate depending on the race, national origin, gender, age, or any other factor of those being scanned. The bill also requires feedback from teachers, school administrators, parents, school safety experts, and data privacy experts before the commissioner makes any recommendations about the use of this technology.

In a statement Tuesday, Cuomo said that “the safety and security of our children is vital to every parent, and whether to use this technology is not a decision to be made lightly.”

The Democratic lawmakers who sponsered the legislation—Assembly Member Monica Wallace and State Sen. Brian Kavanagh—applauded the governor’s decision to sign the measure.

“It makes no sense to bring this aggressive surveillance technology into our schools when no one has made a compelling case, either that it will meaningfully improve security or that it can be used without violating the privacy and civil rights of students, staff, and visitors,” Kavanagh said. “This law will ensure that state education officials review this technology and vouch for it before any young people are subjected to it. I expect that they will conclude that it is neither necessary nor appropriate in schools.”

Leaders at the NYCLU expressed hope that the legislation will motivate other states to follow suit. As executive director Donna Lieberman put it: “The moratorium on biometric surveillance is a landmark piece of legislation that should serve as a national model to stop the proliferation of faulty, harmful facial recognition technologies in schools.”

“For children, whose appearances change rapidly as they grow, and for people of color and women more broadly, the accuracy of biometric technologies is highly questionable,” she noted. “This is especially important as schools across the state begin to acknowledge the experiences of Black and Brown students being policed in schools and funneled into the school-to-prison pipeline.”

Stefanie Coyle, deputy director for the NYCLU’s Education Policy Center, declared that “New York should never dedicate funding to invasive and biased surveillance technology, and now many more school districts across the state will be blocked from deploying these harmful systems.”

“There is such an overwhelming need for resources in the classroom and to support remote learning,” she added, “and we hope this will be a part of a shift toward a model of education that centers students’ needs rather than exposes them to law enforcement and discipline.”

This post was originally published on Radio Free.


Print Share Comment Cite Upload Translate
Coming soon, a new easy way to cite work. We are working on implementing new features in this area, in the meantime please pardon this section not finctioning properly. We are aware of the issues and working to improve service.
https://github.com/addpipe/simple-recorderjs-demo
Select a language:




A Free News Initiative

Investigative Journalism for People, Not Profits.

Discussions
Back
Send