Reform chairman Zia Yusuf has sashayed out of the party – after he called Reform MP Sarah Pochin’s parliamentary question on banning the burqa “dumb.” In a classic show of Reform policy cohesion and unity, Yusuf’s remarks come as Pochin received firm pushback over her Islamophobic question.
Yusuf flounced out of Reform, saying trying to get it elected was “not a good use of his time”.
During Prime Minister’s Question Time, Pochin used the opportunity to ask her first ever question as an MP with the following nonsense:
Given the prime minister’s desire to strengthen strategic alignment with our European neighbours, will he in the interests of public safety, follow the lead of France, Denmark, Belgium and others and ban the burqa?
At the time, other MPs gasped at her question and Starmer himself said:
I’m not going to follow her down that line.
Reform eating itself
Now, Reform chairman Zia Yusuf has taken to social media to have a go at Pochin’s question:
Nothing to do with me. Had no idea about the question nor that it wasn’t policy. Busy with other stuff.
I do think it’s dumb for a party to ask the PM if they would do something the party itself wouldn’t do. https://t.co/AUjwT8GqqD
— Zia Yusuf (@ZiaYusufUK) June 5, 2025
It’s worth noting that Yusuf is responding to a question from noted shithouse, Katie Hopkins. And, despite being chairman of the Reform party, many commenters online will often refer to Yusuf’s full name (Muhammad Ziauddin Yusuf) as a racial dogwhistle. Yusuf, presumably in a doomed attempt at ingratiation to his fellow racists, goes by the nickname ‘Zia.’ Hopkins, however, addresses him as “Mohammed” – despite his actual name being Muhammed. You hang in there though Zia, you’ll definitely win these twats round.
And, in an earlier tweet, Yusuf had claimed that it’s not actually Reform policy to pursue a burqa ban:
Just to be clear, I learnt about the question and the party’s position re it not being policy for the first time on my X feed.
I’m busy with UK DOGE. https://t.co/dvLnmyqiHk
— Zia Yusuf (@ZiaYusufUK) June 4, 2025
Busy with UK DOGE? Great. You get on that Yusuf, it’ll definitely go really well. Just like the original DOGE which has been deemed a:
colossal failure.
Reform: a hatred of Muslims
However, worry not Sarah Pochin. Just because your party is busy fighting amongst itself, we haven’t forgotten you. Pochin won a by-election in Runcorn by just 6 votes last month. Her first question was apparently a specific choice:
Thank you to everyone who sent in questions for the Prime Minister.
I’ve chosen one and will be asking it just after 12 noon today in the House of Commons. pic.twitter.com/tbozif4oQO
— Sarah Pochin MP (@SarahForRuncorn) June 4, 2025
Runcorn is administered by Halton Borough Council – just 3.5% of its population is non-white. 1 in 4 children in Runcorn live in poverty, yet apparently Pochin seems to think Muslims are the problem. This wasn’t lost on commenters on social media:
1 in 4 children in runcorn live in poverty (up to 1 in 3 in some areas) but this racist drivel is what @SarahForRuncorn decided to use her first question on? these hate mongers do not have the answers to the real problems facing people of this country. https://t.co/wgj3H6Q2Yp
— Ben Smoke (@bencsmoke) June 4, 2025
One person said they’d lived in Runcorn for 20 years and hadn’t ever seen anyone there wearing a burqa:
Its bizarre. I've worked in and around runcorn for over 20 years and haven't seen a burka even once in that area.
I'd have thought a question relevant to her constituents would have been more acceptable.— bugle in G (@bugleing) June 4, 2025
It’s almost as though Pochin is reaching for Muslims as a handy scapegoat without actually doing much about the real problems her constituents face. Given she only won her by-election by 6 votes, you might think she’d be focused on actual issues people in Runcorn have to deal with. But, why do that when you can ask a fear-mongering question about Muslim women?
Faux concern
One commenter claimed to simply be a concerned party:
Of course the burka should be banned—not just for public safety and identification, but to stand against gender oppression and support women’s rights.
Well done Sarah Pochin.
Keir Starmer is a coward. pic.twitter.com/ypDi7cpvBv
— Sammy Woodhouse (@officialsammyuk) June 4, 2025
To stand against gender oppression? Maybe Reform would be better off sorting out their own policies and in-fighting instead of pretending to care one bit about the rights of Muslim women? What is this, 2001? Does anyone genuinely believe that these racists care about the rights of women? How many times do we have to explain how Islamophobic and abhorrent it is to claim that Muslim women are innately oppressed for choosing to wear a scarf?
As for public safety? Muslims are heavily policed and surveilled as it is. Spare us the faux concern Sammy.
Grassroots organisation Save Our Citizenships had a swift takedown ready:
Sarah Pochin wants Starmer to back a burqa ban “for public safety.”
This isn’t about safety. It’s racist, misogynist obsession with controlling Muslim women. Strip them to “free” them? Get stuffed.
They wanted Brexit & yet, now they’re desperate to copy their most Islamophobic… pic.twitter.com/xqTXfTVGRy
— Save Our Citizenships
(@LetsStopC9) June 5, 2025
Orientalism: right at home in Reform
No Reform MP cares one bit about the safety or rights of Muslim women. Pochin’s question and her supporters online are drawing on one of the most British traditions in modern memory: using Muslim women as symbols of oppression to win points in a race war only they’re fighting. Pochin’s question is a disgrace. Reform’s in-fighting and murky approach to policies reflects a party more interested in getting headlines than actually making anyone’s lives better.
Amongst the media circus around Reform, it would be helpful if, for once, mainstream media could see these attacks on Muslims for what they are. Pochin may well want to dehumanise Muslim women by suggesting stripping them of their burqas, but it’s an obvious gambit to normalise Islamophobia.
Go sort your own shit out, you daft racists.
Featured image via the Canary
This post was originally published on Canary.