The public has deliciously ratioed Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) minister Stephen Timms on X. In a galling and wilfully obtuse piece of PR damage control, he crooned honeyed exaltations to the government’s so-called Pathways to Work ‘reforms’.
People weren’t having it – and rightly so. They were quick to set Starmer-stooge Stephen straight on a few things. Not least, what the stinking reforms he has much-lauded actually mean in practice, AKA: vicious cuts.
DWP cuts: Timms’ Pathways to Work PR stunt
Social security and disability charlatan and first-rate hypocrite Timms inanely garbled into the camera how:
There are 2.8 million people in the UK out of work on health and disability benefits. And hundreds of thousands of them would love to be in a job. But up till now, the barriers have been too high, the support hasn’t been there, to make those jobs accessible for them.
"We're on a mission to give disabled people and people with health impairments opportunities in work" – Minister for Social Security and Disability Sir Stephen Timms
Our Pathways to Work reforms will give people the chance to find work and thrive pic.twitter.com/Asl2j7lm6s
— Department for Work and Pensions (@DWPgovuk) August 13, 2025
Predictably, it was the same old figures the government has been bandying about to back the case for its brutal welfare cuts. This would be the “hundreds of thousands” who would love a job the Canary has previously debunked as total bullshit. It’s based on a survey of a miniscule fraction of claimants. And the DWP and its ministers regularly conveniently forget to mention how they said they ‘want’ to work, but not that they physically can.
To background music with all the nauseatingly emotive overtones of a John Lewis Christmas ad, Timms in high-vis vest took a LARP at global supply chain company Yusen Logistics.
Why Yusen? Because the company is a so-called ‘Disability Confident’ employer. Of course, the minister was holding Yusen up like some shining example of a system actually working for disabled people. The reality of course is that this couldn’t be further from the truth.
Rather handily, on 14 August, the DWP published a list of employers who’ve signed up for the scheme. There’s just over 19,000 on the list.
And while that might sound like a lot, it’s not considering there’s 1.4 million employers with employees across the UK. In short, ‘Disability Confident’ companies make up just 1.3% of the UK’s employers.
‘Disability Confident’: a sham scheme that marks its own homework
To make matters worse, ‘Disability Confident’ employers aren’t all made equal either. Notably, the scheme has three levels, and the first – ‘Committed’ – only requires that employers:
identify at least one action that you’ll [the employer] carry out to make a difference for disabled people.
That can be as non-committal as sticking on some work experience or work trials, traineeships, or job shadowing. So it doesn’t mean the employer ACTUALLY employs disabled workers in full-waged roles. They make up more than 14,000 – nearly three quarters – of Disability Confident employers by the way:
Oh, and did we mention, that includes Yusen – level one ‘Committed’! You’d think the DWP might have tried to at least show off a ‘Leader’ on its pioneering scheme. Not that it gets better from there. Level two employers have to SELF-assess that they’re:
going the extra mile to make sure disabled people get a fair chance.
Even by the top level, employers only have to confirm they are employing disabled people. Obviously, it’s a disgracefully low bar. But it’s not surprising. It’s characteristic of a capitalist system that treats hiring disabled people as some magnanimous gesture, regarding disabled people who don’t fit its rigid, profit-making boxes as lesser value.
Granted, level three does require the self assessment is validated by someone outside the business. But wait for it… they choose this ‘validator’ for themselves. This can be other Disability Confident employers for example. Corporations all marking their own sector’s homework? That seems legit. So the scheme is all but a voluntary performative charade, with no proper regulation.
We also might question the integrity of any company willing to farm out their learning disabled employees to furnish the image of the DWP. That goes doubly so for a DWP that has just made disgusting cuts to disabled people’s benefits.
What jobs exactly, Timms?
The toxic Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) that’s committed “grave and systemic” violations of disabled people’s rights has validated its ‘Leader’ status. We’ll just leave this here:
DWP staff with disabilities aren't thriving https://t.co/ZFc1WpVtt8
— 0x0x (@krotchrot) August 14, 2025
Other ‘Leaders’ make a mockery of the scheme too, namely, the likes of ‘kill yourself’ scandal Work Capability Assessment (WCA) assessor Maximus for just one outrageous example. Don’t worry though, it employs disabled people, folks!
But all aboard the (likely) inaccessible train to Disability Confident work, just mind the disability employment gap:
Unfortunately it won't and if you sincerely believe it will may I refer you to the countless other such programmes that have made scarcely a dent in disabled people's rate of employment, Doing the same thing & promising different results fools no one.
— Dr Sally Witcher (@SalWitcher) August 13, 2025
That disability employment chasm – because gap is an understatement – has stayed stubbornly large (floating around 27.8%).
Many previous DWP work programmes have done precisely the opposite of leveling the playing field. Instead, they’ve actively harmed chronically ill and disabled people. You only have to look at the recent failures of the government’s ‘Restart’ scheme to get an idea of this. As I previously pointed out:
more than a decade of successive Conservative government’s callous welfare cuts and punitive conditionality regime work programmes have in no way helped disabled people into employment. Which means that Labour aren’t going to increase disability employment by using the same rebranded model.
To add insult to injury, there aren’t even any safe jobs for disabled people with even non-regulated Disability Confident status. Canary columnist Rachel Charlton-Dailey has been diligently tracking this.
The latest figures on the government’s own website show just seven fully remote, part-time, Disability Confident job roles. And notably, it appears most of those are care jobs wrongly listed as work from home, rather than working in the resident’s home:
Cuts to Access to Work show a serious government, so demure, so mindful
Labour seems to be labouring (‘scuse the pun) under the impression that employers will opt for disabled employees competing in a job market against non-disabled peers who won’t require the costs of reasonable adjustments. It’s like the party hasn’t heard of neoliberal capitalism. You know, that system that plunders, pillages, and treats workers like expendable pawns for profit. Except of course it basically breathes the shit:
"Opportunities in work"…
An odd phrasing, given that there is no legislation that forces or rewards employers for employing sick people.Sick people are not great employees. They may need to work from home on reduced hours with reduced productivity and increased sick leave. https://t.co/YZddN8o4My
— Hoss (@Hossylass) August 14, 2025
Great! I look forward to finding out which job I can do for as long or short a time as I'm able, at those times when I'm able (day or night), that won't mind when it takes me 3 months to recover from a crash and pays all my bills regardless! Bring it on! https://t.co/MUURUAdPgh
— Polly Valentine
(@pvalentine592) August 14, 2025
It’s almost as if the new Labour government hasn’t spent the last year quietly cutting Access to Work:
Gaslight a go go from the DWP & Sir Timms again.
Jobs openings fell by 5.8% btw May & July, most employers will prioritise none disabled over disabled,
Access to work funding cut, wait list over 6 months & increasing,
Access to work becoming "less personalised" , https://t.co/z08peM7jUj
— Karen Dean (@kazdeanie) August 13, 2025
The DWP: bridging the disability employment gap one exploitative slave labour job at a time
The ever-brilliant Dr Jay Watts made the point that this is the same DWP that punishes disabled people with grueling sanctions to shunt them into work, or otherwise, state-sanctioned destitution:
Pathways to Work will not give the people the chance to ‘find work and thrive’ in a system that sanctions people and financially flogs them into work. That’s coercion. Stop sanctions and uplift people- then more will work. https://t.co/8uHS3LqLh5
— Dr Jay Watts (@Shrink_at_Large) August 14, 2025
Just this week, Big Issue reported the disgusting department levying a ridiculous sanction against a 23-year-old claimant. Notably, it did so because she’d failed to apply for a role – even though she’d started a new job anyway.
Grok, find me the definition of gaslighting wanker:
No Steve- you told us clearly you were cutting benefits to remove the "incentive" for a disabled person to "declare themselves unfit for work" for a "financial bonus" and to stop them being too "comfortable". Stop gaslighting everyone and go back to reading the Times eh? https://t.co/2fQEH117VF
— DWP Spin Decoder (@leith1076) August 13, 2025
Timms can’t sugarcoat that – cuts kill:
'Sir' Stephen Timms gaslighting again. Cutting vital support to a mere £50 a wk to FORCE sick & disabled people into work which could threaten their health & safety while making it sound all lovely & covered in sugar shows no low is too low for this Government minister. #CutsKill https://t.co/5FF33MrpGS
— Barnaclebum6 (@barnaclebum6) August 14, 2025
Disabled and chronically ill people are not a monolith, so the DWP’s one-size-fits-all ‘reforms’ will fail on their own terms:
A learning disability isnt a health impairment!!!
Totally support people who are healthy into work, but an internship is work experience – not a job. This is fooling no one. https://t.co/YZddN8o4My— Hoss (@Hossylass) August 14, 2025
What real support looks like for one group, or individual, is extremely different for another. What the poster on X was likely getting at is that Labour’s recent Universal Credit legislation is a disaster for people living with fluctuating chronic illnesses and conditions.
Moreover, they made another crucial point. That is, internship does not for long-term secure, safe, supportive employment make. Let’s call it what it is: more exploitative slave workfare.
Slimy Timms needs a new job, because soon he’ll be out of one
At this point, the government hasn’t got much trust left to lose in chronically ill and disabled communities. So, why not get in a bit of good ol’ disability-washing while it’s at it, eh?
Parading around learning disabled employees in a grossly tokenistic show of ‘inclusion’: check.
Utterly failing to take genuine action on systemic barriers, and superficially showing off ‘diversity hires’ while ignoring disabled communities trying to communicate their needs: also check.
That Timms thinks he can spout lofty platitudes to disabled equitability is not merely risible, but obscenely diabolical. This is the same Timms who has:
- Spent years in opposition lambasting the Tories for cutting disabled people’s benefits – only to turn around and defend cutting disabled people’s benefits. Because doing so in the name of the party of the working people (about as bullshit as Starmer’s
- Ignored a disabled person in a health crisis during a meeting about his vicious cuts.
- Promised genuine co-production with disabled people on the PIP review. All ten of them he can count on to whitewash it for him.
So, here’s some free employment advice from the Canary on the house, Timm-sy ol’ boy:
Because it sure as hell won’t be in parliament.
Featured image via screengrab
This post was originally published on Canary.