John Woodcock – a.k.a. lord Walney – has called for the government to further clamp down on protesters:
Arms lobbyist Lord Walney wants to introduce another level of proscription so groups can be banned without having to label them as terrorists
Porritt: “Lord Walney has a long record of seeking to introduce ever more repessive legislation.. curtailing peoples right to protest”
pic.twitter.com/KXIMIFNFR3
— Saul Staniforth (@SaulStaniforth) October 28, 2025
Woodcock made a similar argument in February this year when the government sacked him from an advisory role.
Labour reject Woodcock
If you were around in the Corbyn years, you’ll remember that Woodcock was one of the leadership’s biggest critics. This is how the BBC described his exit:
Lord Walney, a long-time critic of Jeremy Corbyn, left the Labour Party under his leadership, saying the party had been “taken over by the hard left” and “tolerated” antisemitism.
What they fail to mention is that Labour was investigating Woodcock over sexual harassment claims. Woodcock stopped cooperating with the investigation before he made his exit, claiming that the investigation was ‘politically motivated’ – a claim that’s easy to make when you’re part of a political party.
Boris Johnson made Woodcock a lord in 2020; he then made him an adviser on political violence and disruption. The ‘violence and disruption’ in question was that which comes from those who oppose government actions – not the state violence which gives people reason to protest in the first place.
Here’s what Woodcock said in 2024 as part of a report into ‘extreme protest groups’:
Militant groups like Palestine Action and Just Stop Oil are using criminal tactics to create mayhem and hold the public and workers to ransom without fear of consequence.
Banning terror groups has made it harder for their activists to plan crimes – that approach should be extended to extreme protest groups too.
In Woodcock’s world, every worthwhile protest movement in history would be prohibited.
The reason we protest
People want to know why the media give Woodcock so much air time:
This guy was sacked from his advisory role in February. No-one elected him, he is a member of no political party, he is an arms company lobbyist, he has sexual harassment allegations looming over him and yet he is never off my TV. https://t.co/fYYGgFLsKf
— Tom Hatfield (@WordMercenary) October 28, 2025
Arms company lobbyist Lord Walney on Palestine Action being banned
Well done to Sky for introducing him as a former chair of Labour Friends of Israel, & Porritt was spot on – PA was banned because it was so effective in its campaign against the UKs complicity in Israels genocide pic.twitter.com/24XILjBqPk
— Saul Staniforth (@SaulStaniforth) October 28, 2025
“The government decided to ban Palestine Action precisely because it was so effective in the campaign that it brought against arms manufacturers”
Jonathan Porritt opposes the proscription of Palestine Action on Sky News, against ‘Lord’ Walney, who is funded by the arms industry. pic.twitter.com/AelRsC39kA
— Defend Our Juries (@DefendourJuries) October 28, 2025
It seems like Woodcock just hates the thought of people protesting against (or investigating) unseemly behaviour.
It’s almost as if he condones the things that people protest against, isn’t it?
Featured image via Sky News (YouTube)
By Willem Moore
This post was originally published on Canary.