Category: Alt Protein

  • beyond burger
    9 Mins Read

    Californian plant-based giant Beyond Meat has unveiled its first product reformulation in three years, with the Beyond IV burger and beef now featuring avocado oil, fava beans and lentils. It’s a more nutritious product, but it’s also more expensive.

    Beyond Meat is reformulating its mince and burger SKUs to match consumer demands for better-tasting and healthier plant-based meats, which will roll out in the US this spring.

    Fuelled by the fourth generation of its core beef platform, the new Beyond Burger and Beef will replace the existing iterations on retail shelves, and their launch is headlined by improved nutritional credentials. There’s less saturated fat, less sodium, more calcium, more potassium, and slightly more protein.

    The El Segundo-based company has now bid adieu to canola and coconut oils, replacing them with avocado oil. Plus, it has added fava beans and red lentils to its ingredient list, marginally shortening the ingredient list from 18 to 17. All this plays into key consumer concerns and demands: research has shown that people want better-tasting vegan burgers that are also better for their health.

    Beyond Meat’s revamp comes with the backdrop of heightened criticism around the additives, ‘unnatural’ ingredients and ultra-processing used in meat alternatives. To ensure that its claims live up to scrutiny, the company worked with medical and nutrition experts in a multi-year research effort to improve its offerings and meet guidelines set by national health bodies and experts.

    “We’re incredibly proud of what we’ve accomplished with Beyond IV as it marks our most significant renovation and step forward to date,” Shira Zackai, the company’s chief communication officer, told Green Queen. “As part of Beyond Meat’s rapid and relentless approach to innovation, we’re always working to advance the taste and nutrition of our products.”

    Beyond Meat IV means more nutritious plant-based beef

    beyond burger nutrition
    Courtesy: Beyond Meat | Graphic by Green Queen

    In the last year, brand strategies for plant-based meat have shifted drastically. There’s a bigger focus on health than ever before, in direct response to consumer attitudes and concerns about vegan alternatives. In August, with its first marketing campaign in years, Beyond Meat opted to subtly push back against targeted attacks from meat industry lobby groups, shining a light on the farmers who grow its ingredients.

    However, it quickly changed tact two months later, with a new marketing drive honing in on its steak product, which was certified as ‘heart-healthy’ by the American Heart Association (AHA). It has continued that rhetoric, as has its biggest rival, Impossible Foods.

    “There is a considerable gap between the strong health credentials of our products and a broader counternarrative that is now afoot, and this gap appears to have widened,” Beyond Meat CEO Ethan Brown said in its Q2 earnings call. “This change in perception is not without encouragement from interest groups, who have succeeded in seeding doubt and fear around the ingredients and processes we use to create our and other plant-based meats.”

    In retrospect, this served as a precursor to today’s announcement. Behind the scenes, Beyond Meat has been intent on answering critics of plant-based meat, and the belief is that its newest products are its strongest response yet. The Beyond Burger IV is an upgrade on the existing one on multiple counts: there’s 60% less saturated fat (2g per serving), 30% less sodium (310mg), 20% more calcium (120mg), and 12% higher potassium content (370mg).

    Plus, the new Beyond Beef has 21g of protein, a gram more than its predecessor. This, by the way, is higher than most 80/20 beef products on the market. The company claims the saturated fat content is 75% lower than standard 80/20 beef too.

    “The development of the new products occurred within an ecosystem of leading medical and nutrition experts, and were designed to meet the standards of national health organisations to create a product that delivers the taste, satisfaction, and utility of 80/20 beef – yet is demonstrably healthier,” said Beyond Meat CEO Ethan Brown.

    The company has been able to do so by rejigging its ingredient list. Gone are the canola and coconut oils – the former is a seed oil that has high amounts of linoleic acid, which has been linked to inflammation and related diseases, while the latter is a fat infamous for its high saturated fat content. With avocado oil, there’s less saturated fat, less linoleic acid, and more monounsaturated fat (also known as one of the healthier fats). The new products have 8g of the latter, versus 6g in the 3.0 versions.

    Half of Americans found plant-based meats to be healthy in 2020, but that dipped to 38% in 2022. The loss in faith has since continued, with a Mintel survey from last year showing that nutrition is the second-biggest reason (35%) for Americans’ reticence to try meat alternatives. Yet another poll revealed that health is the major factor behind Americans eating meatless diets, with six in 10 choosing it.

    Beyond Meat’s beef is now recognised by the American Diabetes Association’s evidence-based nutritional guidelines for its Better Choices for Life programme, and now features Good Housekeeping’s Nutritionist Approved Emblem. Unlike its steak, the ground beef and burger aren’t yet certified by the AHA, but they have been included in a catalogue of ‘heart-healthy’ recipes by its Heart-Check initiative.

    All this will no doubt appeal to a country where one citizen dies from cardiovascular disease every 33 seconds, over a third are clinically obese, and over 11% suffer from type 2 diabetes.

    beyond meat ingredients
    Courtesy: Beyond Meat

    Beyond Meat leans into the whole-food trend, but there’s a snag

    The other major additions to Beyond Meat’s mince and burger are fava beans and red lentils. The company joins a raft of others incorporating whole foods into their plant-based offerings, playing into a trend connected to the increased consciousness around health and ultra-processed foods.

    Among different protein sources, those originating from whole plants experienced the sharpest rise in consumption among Americans between 2022 and 2023, with 28% eating them ‘somewhat’ or ‘much more’. These foods also had the second-lowest drop (11%) in intake, behind plant-based meat and seafood analogues (10%).

    There is a lot of misconception about ultra-processing and plant-based meats, with consumers linking the former with healthfulness to explain their dismay about the latter. This outlook chimes with “concerns some people have around foods that are new – often called food neophobia“, Churchill Fellow Jenny Chapman told Green Queen earlier this month. “Some [marketing] campaigns really hone in on this, by using words like ‘fake’ and ‘unnatural’ to describe plant-based meats (which are safe, nutritious foods).”

    With fava bean, pea protein and avocado oil, Beyond Meat is aiming to appeal to people looking for clean-label foods. Research by ingredients supplier Ingredion has found that 78% of consumers would spend more money on products with ‘natural’ or ‘all-natural’ packaging claims.

    It’s important to note that there’s no agreed definition for what constitutes a ‘clean-label’ food, though the common understanding is that it means there are fewer ingredients and fewer ultra-processed elements. The 17-ingredient Beyond Beef and Burger IV don’t suggest they meet the former criterion, but the removal of ‘expeller-pressed canola oil’ and ‘refined coconut oil’ indicates they could fit the latter.

    Backing up this claim is a Clean Label Project certification, the first such accreditation for plant-based meat – although the initiative is more focused on screening products for environmental toxins and ingredient quality.

    However, there is one drawback with the inclusion of fava beans: it makes Beyond Meat products more susceptible to allergies. Estimates suggest that around 4% of the world’s population have favism, a genetic disorder characterised by allergy-like reactions to these beans. The company did not respond to Green Queen’s query about whether the inclusion of fava beans raised any internal concerns about allergies.

    beyond meat
    Courtesy: Beyond Meat | Graphic by Green Queen

    Avocado oil pits flavour against cost

    Using avocado oil doesn’t just come with health gains – it opens up more culinary attributes too. This is important: flavour is by far the biggest deterrent and attraction for alt-meat consumption. This is illustrated by an international survey from 2022, which suggested that plant-based meat’s taste and texture are as important as their conventional counterparts for over 75% of consumers. And remember that Mintel poll from above? Nutrition was second on the list to flavour, which drives 48% of consumers away from these products.

    But by using this fat, Beyond Meat is hitting the taste vertical, with the neutral flavour and smoother mouthfeel allowing it to “unlock an even meatier, beefy flavour” for the new products. Plus, given avocado oil has a higher smoke point of any fat (270°C/521°F, versus 230°C/446°F for canola oil, on average), the new Beyond Beef is designed to sizzle and barbecue better.

    If you’re worried about the change in ingredients meaning a change in your beloved Beyond Burger’s flavour, fret not. A 93-person taste test last September indicated that consumers preferred the meatier taste and texture of the new vegan beef. And at last month’s FoodFluence conference in Edinburgh, 29 out of 31 registered dietitians said they enjoyed the taste of the new Beyond Burger, found it healthful, and would recommend it.

    “We are excited to be adding more nutrient-dense plant-based ingredients including red lentil and faba
    bean protein in the Beyond IV platform,” Zackai told Green Queen. “The interplay of the proteins with the avocado oil allowed us to deliver our meatiest product yet while significantly advancing the nutritional benefits.”

    Moreover, according to its latest life-cycle assessment, the Beyond Burger 3.0 generates 90% fewer GHG emissions, requires 37% non-renewable energy, uses 97% less land and consumes 97% less water than a conventional 80/20 quarter-pound beef patty produced in the US. But the reformulation doesn’t necessarily signal a shift in Beyond Beef’s environmental credentials. “While more research is still needed, we don’t expect there to be a significant change,” he said.

    beyond meat stock
    Courtesy: Beyond Meat

    Okay, taste? Check. Nutrition? Check. Sustainability? Check. Price? Well.

    We’re in an era of increased cost of living, and people are looking for wallet-friendly food. In the UK, inflation has bitten plant-based meats already. While Beyond Meat’s yearly accounts are due next week, the company’s previous financials have shown that it struggled last year, with a 26.5% sales fall in Q3 (over already declining sales in the previous quarter) forcing it to abandon its target of becoming cashflow-positive, lay off more staff, and cut back its full-year forecast.

    There was always going to be one major issue with avocado oil – for all its benefits, it’s significantly more expensive. So, Beyond Meat had to make a decision: absorb the added costs, or pass them on to the consumer. “As avocado oil is a more premium ingredient, the new platform will be priced to reflect that,” revealed Zackai. “However, based on the significant nutritional benefits and elevated taste profile of these new products, we feel confident in the value we will be providing to consumers relative to their cost.”

    So, it’ll be interesting to see whether consumers really are willing to pay more for healthier, tastier meat alternatives. The new products are initially exclusive to retail, and their foodservice path remains unclear. “It will be available at all retailers where the Beyond Burger and Beyond Beef are currently sold, replacing the previous version in grocery stores,” confirmed Zackai. “We are excited to get these products into the market and clearly communicate these benefits to consumers, so they can make a choice that not only tastes great, but is substantially better for them and the planet.”

    Could platform IV be a catalyst for the year 2024 for Beyond Meat?

    The post Beyond Meat IV: Meatier, Healthier & Costlier Plant-Based Burgers appeared first on Green Queen.

    This post was originally published on Green Queen.

  • meati layoffs
    6 Mins Read

    US mycelium meat maker Meati has appointed a new CEO and cut 13% of its workforce in a right-sizing move aimed at reaching profitability.

    Meati has switched up its C-suite by making Phil Graves its new CEO. The former Patagonia executive, who joined the alternative meat startup just two weeks ago as CFO, takes over from Meati co-founder Tyler Huggins, who will move into the role of chief innovation officer. It follows ex-COO and president Scott Tassani’s exit earlier this month.

    Amid restructuring in the wider food industry, the Colorado-based company has also let go of 13% of its workforce, marking the business’s third round of job cuts in nine months. The decision to right-size has been made with an eye towards accelerating the company’s path to profitability. The details of any severance packages are unclear, but Meati said it doesn’t expect any supply chain disruptions due to the layoffs.

    Graves argued that although such changes are challenging, they’re essential for aligning resources with profitability objectives. “These changes allow us to better serve our customers and pave the way for long-term, sustainable growth,” said the new Meati CEO.

    Meati layoffs come after a challenging year for plant-based meat

    meati steak
    Courtesy: Charlie McKenna/Meati

    In June last year, Meati laid off 17 employees (about 5% of its workforce), followed by another round of cutbacks in September that saw 30 staffers (10% of the total at the time) lose their jobs. This was accompanied by a reshuffle that meant the elimination of 60 positions, as well as the shuttering of its pilot plant.

    Striking a similar tone to Graves now, a Meati representative told Green Queen at the time: “These job cuts, while incredibly difficult, are a necessary part of ensuring we achieve a sustainable business model. Despite creating incredible products and an excellent commercial start in the market, we must be nimble and focus on near-term profitability.”

    They added: “Meati is a young, disruptive company navigating uncharted territory – bringing a novel food to the forefront of a highly competitive industry in a challenging economic climate. Each of these factors requires us to regularly evaluate every aspect of our operations.”

    Meati is not the only plant-based meat company to have cut its workforce over the last year, which has been incredibly challenging for the industry in terms of both funding and sales. Beyond Meat, one of the sector’s leading companies, laid off 19% of its global non-production workforce (about 65 employees) last year in an effort to reduce operating expenses and improve its cost structure, after reducing its annual sales forecast. A few months prior, rival company Impossible Foods let go of 20% of its staff.

    Circana data crunched by 210 Analytics reveals that retail sales of meat analogues dipped by 11.1% to $1.05B in the 52 weeks ending January 28, 2024, while volume was down by 16.5%. In comparison, sales of fresh meat declined only by 0.5%, with volumes decreasing by 1.5% in the same period.

    Investment has also slowed down in the plant-based protein space, as part of a wider funding hurdle for food tech. In the first half of 2023, plant-based companies attracted just $124M in investment – while data for the second half is yet to be updated, it still represents an alarming drop from the $1.2B injected in the sector for the full year of 2022.

    Meati – which has raised over $275M in total investment – said its latest cutbacks follow precedents set by other leading companies “navigating transformative market shifts”. Last month, over 6,650 layoffs were publicly announced in the food sector, which is the highest number of monthly cutbacks in the sector since November 2012 (which were a result of factory closures), according to data from Challenger, Grey & Christmas Inc.

    Meati continues to grow, targeting 10,000 retailers by year-end

    plant based meat sales
    Courtesy: Meati

    Graves’ move from CFO to CEO leaves the company without a dedicated chief financial or commercial executive, but a spokesperson for Meati told AFN that the departure of Tassani, who joined TreeHouse Foods after two years at Meati, wasn’t sudden: “He took another role that was offered to him that he couldn’t pass up. Scott left before Phil was brought in as CFO, and that hiring process had been ongoing.”

    The reshuffle sees Huggins, who founded Meati alongside CSO Justin Whiteley in 2017, move to a product-focused position. He will oversee the launch of a new foodservice Chef Cut product and drive the business’s sustainability initiatives. “I am incredibly proud of what we have achieved to date, and I am confident that in Phil we have found the right individual to lead the company to our next exciting chapter,” said Huggins.

    Despite the layoffs last September, though, Meati added nearly 100 positions to amp up production capacity for its mycelium-based chicken and beef alternatives, which have been produced in a ‘mega ranch’ facility in Thornton, Colorado since January 2023. This will ultimately be capable of manufacturing 40 million lbs of meat analogues annually to rival the output of animal farms, which will help the company achieve its goal of $1B sales, which was previously earmarked for 2025, but may now be pushed back.

    “Our future is bright. This category-defining product is already in 3,600 stores nationwide after just one year of production, showcasing its boundless potential,” revealed Graves. Its products are available in Whole Foods Market, Meijer, Cub Foods and Sprouts Farmers Markets, among other retailers, while it launched a D2C marketplace in September alongside a subscription service for new product trials. By the end of this year, it aims to enter 10,000 retail doors.

    The company added chicken nuggets, jerky SKUs, and more flavours to its roster ahead of Christmas, all powered by its patented MushroomRoot ingredient, its commercial name for the Neurospora crassa strain of mycelium. An AI-led study has shown that this ingredient, whose whole-food nutritional density could address “prevalent nutritional deficiencies” and enhance “cardiovascular health”, also boasts certain “exceedingly rare/non-existent” compounds in food that present “pointed” health benefits.

    It’s a leading company in the red-hot mycelium protein space, which has seen a bunch of innovations and developments in the last year, including Esencia Foods‘ whole-cut seafood analogues, Better Nature‘s soybean mycelium chicken, Libre Foods‘ whole-cut chicken breast, and Bolder Foods‘ cheese alternatives. Plus, investors have shown heightened interest in the sector, with MyForest Foods bagging a $15M Series A extension in June and Infinite Roots securing $58M in Series B funding last month.

    It speaks to the potential of mycelium, with a study authored by Meati employees revealing that the fungi can take on different desired tasting notes through biochemistry and flavour chemistry, while being high in protein with all essential amino acids and micronutrients. It has been shown to lower LDL cholesterol too, with the potential to reduce food waste by valorising the sidestream and be produced in a cost-effective manner.

    The study argued that mycelium could resolve global hunger and food insecurity if scaled effectively with enough investment and consumer education: “Once achieved, mycelium will certainly be appealing as an environmentally friendly, nutrient-dense protein source that can aid in the reduction of global hunger.”

    The post 10,000 Locations by Year-End: Meati Appoints New CEO, Lays Off 13% Staff in Bid for Profitability appeared first on Green Queen.

    This post was originally published on Green Queen.

  • cultivated meat thailand
    5 Mins Read

    Israeli cultivated meat leader Aleph Farms is advancing its Southeast Asia strategy with an “asset-light” approach through a deal that will involve the first production facility dedicated to cultured meat in Thailand.

    Aleph Farms has partnered with biomanufacturer BBGI and synbio research and manufacturing company Fermbox Bio to increase its production capabilities in Southeast Asia. The collaboration will initiate Thailand’s first plant for cultivated meat production.

    The deal complements Aleph Farms’ growth strategy in the region, with the company implementing a capital-efficient approach for manufacturing to drive down costs and accelerate scalability. The Israeli startup explains that the production of cultured meat is “conducive to value chains that are decentralised, compact, predictable, and conveniently located near end consumers”. This helps mitigate supply chain vulnerabilities, bolster food security and fuel economic prosperity for local communities.

    “A prudent, capital-efficient scale-up lets us navigate infrastructure investments thoughtfully, enabling sustainable penetration into key regions,” said Aleph Farms co-founder and CEO Didier Toubia.

    Cost and scale-up the cornerstones of Aleph Farms’ deal

    aleph farms facility
    Aleph Farms opened a 65,000 square ft facility at the Stratasys building in Rehovot, Israel in 2022 | Courtesy: Amit Goren

    With a total of $118M in funding, Aleph Farms is one of the most well-financed cultivated meat companies. But it has chosen an asset-light approach towards manufacturing, which is centered around a hub-and-spoke model based in key markets. It acquired a production facility in Modi’in, Israel last year and penned a deal with ESCO Aster in Singapore (the world’s only approved industrial manufacturer for cultured meat) based on this approach, and has now added Thailand to its list of hubs.

    “This strategy aligns with our commitment to scaling up responsibly, avoiding abrupt, extensive CAPEX investments in the process,” explained Toubia. “Ultimately, this progression aligns with our overarching goal: ensuring food security through an equitable and inclusive transition to sustainable, resilient food systems.”

    Explaining this strategy, he told AFN last year: “We believe that in the next five to 10 years, companies will focus either on operations and production or on product development and branding. It will be difficult for companies to do both efficiently – especially in the current funding environment – so at Aleph Farms, we decided to focus on product development and branding and rely on external partners for production.”

    This is why it decided to team up with BBGI, which focuses on cooking-oil-based biofuels and high-value bio-based products, and Fermbox Bio, which leverages microbial fermentation and synthetic biology to help businesses mitigate supply chain risks. Aleph Farms stated that collaboration with value chain partners is a pivotal element of its asset-light strategy, and the partnership will focus specifically on production enhancement, including cost optimisation and operational scale-up.

    Figuring out ways to bring down prices is a key next step for cultivated meat, which needs to reach production costs of $2.92 per pound to be cost-competitive with conventional meat. While companies have managed to cut manufacturing costs by 99% in less than a decadeMcKinsey analysis estimates that it will still take until 2030 for these proteins to reach parity.

    “Of common animal proteins, beef delivers the highest value in global markets, so by focusing on cultivated beef, we are able to shorten the timeline to price parity,” Yoav Reisler, senior marketing and communications manager at Aleph Farms, told Green Queen last month.

    “This agreement aims to support the sustainable development of Thailand and the region in every aspect, focusing on the new S-Curve, with expected governmental support,” noted BBGI CEO Kittiphong Limsuwannarot, referring to the 10 industries (including food processing) that form a pillar of Thailand’s Eastern Economic Corridor. “Drawing upon our extensive experience in designing and operating large-scale biomanufacturing facilities, we are well-positioned to operationalise the shared objectives of this collaboration,” added Fermbox Bio founder Subramani Ramachandrappa.

    A milestone for Thailand’s alternative protein industry

    aleph farms thailand
    Courtesy: Aleph Farms

    “I think that four or five companies in this space, including Aleph Farms, have already developed scalable processes, have done a lot of work on cost reduction, and have already built facilities where they can make cultivated meet at the commercial level and comply with all the regulatory requirements,” Toubia told Green Queen founding editor Sonalie Figueiras on the Green Queen in Conversation: Cultivated Meat Pioneers podcast in September.

    Aleph Farms made history last month after becoming the first company in the world to receive regulatory approval for cultivated beef, and only the third in the cultured meat sector (after California’s UPSIDE Foods and Eat JUST). It means that the startup can sell its Black Angus Petit Steak to consumers in Israel, whose production will be supported by the 65,000 sq ft plant it moved to in Rehovot, Israel, which can produce between 10 to 20 tonnes of product annually.

    While research on cultivated pork is ongoing at Bangkok’s Chulalongkorn University and Mahidol University, there are no companies or manufacturers working with cultivated meat within Thailand, meaning Aleph Farms’ partnership marks a milestone for the country’s alternative protein sector. But it’s not the first time there has been a link between Thai businesses and overseas cultivated meat startups – Bangkok’s Charoen Pokphand Foods is developing hybrid proteins with Israel’s Future Meat, while seafood giant Thai Union is an investor in Aleph Farms.

    A 2021 survey conducted by the latter two companies revealed that 97% of Thai consumers are willing to try cultivated meat. Meanwhile, in December last year, a 1,500-person survey revealed that only 24% of the population was aware of cultured meat. However, while 76% of them eat meat, 67% want to reduce their intake within the next two years, primarily for health reasons.

    “Thailand has food technology, and we are a top player in the world, especially when compared to our population and country size,” said Jacques-Chai Chomthongdi, Southeast Asia director at Madre Brava. “Therefore, if you want to develop further in any area, the existing potential should be considered, along with changes and needs at the international level as well.”

    The post Israel’s Aleph Farms Partners with Thailand’s First Cultivated Meat Manufacturing Facility appeared first on Green Queen.

    This post was originally published on Green Queen.

  • califia farms complete
    5 Mins Read

    In our weekly column, we round up the latest news and developments in the alternative protein and sustainable food industry. This week, Future Food Quick Bites covers South Korea’s vegan tourism drive, a new hybrid cultivated beef rice, and plant-based meat brand THIS’s financing plans.

    New products and launches

    Nordic dairy giant Arla has relaunched its JÖRĐ brand of plant-based dairy products in Sweden, comprising oat milks and flavoured oat yoghurts.

    jord oat milk
    Courtesy: Arla

    In the US, Califia Farms has introduced a new Complete plant-based milk to its portfolio, a blend of chickpea, fava bean and pea protein boasting all nine essential amino acids and vitamin B12, alongside half the sugar content.

    British producer MYCO is working on a line of burgers with Hooba, a protein mince made from oyster mushrooms. It comes after a funding round of £1.5M, with a launch date set for the end of March.

    In the Netherlands, The Vegetarian Butcher has launched three new SKUs: vegan alternatives to cordon bleu, bratwurst and battered fish fillet.

    Swedish mouldable plant-based meat producer Havredal has entered the US market through an agreement with Virginia-based distributor Performance Food Group. Its fava-bean-based beef and chicken burgers and mince will soon be available in East Coast states including Virginia, New York and Massachusetts.

    future food quick bites
    Courtesy: Havredal

    Also in the US, Delaware-based Superbrewed Food has partnered with Döhler for commercial-scale fermentation capacity to produce its Postbiotic Protein, which will be part of products launched by multiple CPG companies this year.

    Vegan gelato maker NuTTi, which makes clean-label ice creams from cashews and maple syrup, has landed on the shelves of over 80 retail stores in the US, and is now in talks with Whole Foods and another leading national distributor.

    And UK vegan dog food brand HOWND has expanded its Plant Powered Superfood range with a high-protein, low-fat dry food lineup in pumpkin, quinoa and moringa flavours, which contain Phytodroitin an algae-based alternative to chondroitin, to support joint health.

    Finance and markets

    New York-based VC firm Big Idea Ventures has changed the name of its new fund from New Protein Fund II to Global Food Innovation Fund II to emphasise that its thesis area covers proteins, fat, ingredients, sweeteners, and more.

    In its bid for profitability, UK plant-based meat player THIS is set to begin its final crowdfunding campaign later this month, ahead of a larger eight-figure financing round later this year.

    Indian plant-based milk startup The Alt Co appeared on the ongoing season of Shark Tank India, but couldn’t manage to get a deal with the investors.

    Speaking of, the plant-based milk market was estimated to be worth $20B in 2022, and will expand annually by 10% to reach $51.9B in 2032, according to a new estimate.

    Cultivated meat news

    Cultivated meat pioneer Upside Foods has paused construction of its commercial-scale facility and has conducted a few layoffs as it doubles investment in its existing EPIC plant in California.

    After a rough year for alternative protein and food tech as a whole, preliminary data by AgFunder has revealed that investment in cultivated meat startups dropped by 88% Deon 2021 to 2023, with producers in the space raising $177M.

    In more positive news, Brazilian cultivated meat ingredient company Cellva has raised R$6.5M ($1.3M) in funding to support R&D and scale-up for its cultured pork fat.

    Australia’s Vow Food, which is in the advanced stages of regulatory approval for cultivated meat in its home country, hosted a tasting of its cultured Japanese quail in collaboration with Iceland’s ORF Genetics in Reykjavik.

    lab grown beef rice
    Courtesy: Yonsei University

    In a new front for cellular agriculture, scientists at the Yonsei University in South Korea have created a hybrid rice variety with cultivated beef and cow fat cells.

    Policy, manufacturing and awards

    If you feel like becoming a millionaire, all you have to do is come up with the next concept for the Whopper at Burger King – and you can participate by using Impossible Foods‘ beef too.

    impossible whopper
    Courtesy: Impossible Foods

    Finnish brand Oddlygood’s vanilla-flavoured barista oat milk has been chosen as the Best Plant-Based Milk by 8,000 Brits in the 2024 Product of the Year awards.

    Researchers at Finland’s Lund University are hoping to make better plant-based meat by replicating muscle fibres through the extrusion of a combination of ingredients – they found a combination of hemp protein and gluten to be the most suitable.

    Singapore’s Float Foods, which makes vegan eggs under the OnlyEg line, has received a food safety certification for its Halal-certified facility, allowing it to offer its tech to other food producers looking to eliminate eggs from their lineup.

    Spanish plant-based meat maker Heura has partnered with food industry giant Upfield on a tech agreement to to accelerate innovation in the vegan sector.

    In Austria, Revo Foods landed a legal victory after a judge dismissed a case against the 3D-printed seafood maker filed by the City of Vienna, which accused the startup of misleading consumers with its ‘vegan’/’plant-based’ product label for its whole-cut salmon.

    south korea vegan tour
    Courtesy: Green Earth Travel

    Looking for a nice holiday? Green Earth Travel is organising an eight-day vegan food tour across multiple cities in South Korea on behalf of the Korea Tourism Organisation to explore what the country has to offer in terms of plant-based cuisine. The $4,120 package includes accommodation and 15 meals.

    Check out last week’s Future Food Quick Bites.

    The post Future Food Quick Bites: Million-Dollar Whoppers, Korean Vegan Tours & Plant-Based Cordon Bleu appeared first on Green Queen.

    This post was originally published on Green Queen.

  • rubisco protein
    5 Mins Read

    Israeli startup Day 8, which produces upcycled plant-based proteins from Rubisco, has secured a pre-seed investment of $750,000 from food tech incubator and investor The Kitchen Hub.

    Day 8 has closed a $750,000 pre-seed financing round and formed a partnership with The Kitchen Hub, a food tech incubator and investor from Israel, which will help the startup produce plant proteins from agricultural waste.

    Day 8’s USP is Rubisco, which is found in green crops like duckweed and said to be the most abundant protein on the planet. Unlike most plant proteins that are extracted from the seeds, Rubisco is derived from the leaves. The company is taking it a step further by making use of discarded crop leaves as the raw material, which resolves “economic efficiency”.

    “Within the food industry, Rubisco is the most craved plant-based protein due to its superior qualities and abundance, and it has been a focus of The Kitchen for a while,” said Amir Zaidman, chief business officer at The Kitchen Hub. “When we met Day 8, we felt that this is the right team with the right technology to materialise the enormous business potential of Rubisco protein and create a more sustainable global food system.”

    The funds will enable the startup to scale up to pilot production and carry out proof-of-concept work with what co-founder and CEO Daniel Rejzner described as “a long list of food manufacturers that have signed up to try the product”.

    The multi-pronged benefits of Rubisco

    day 8 rubisco
    Courtesy: Day 8

    Founded in July 2023, Day 8 is the brainchild of Rejzner and Dana Marom. Marom, who is the company’s chief technology officer, is a food manufacturing veteran with previous experience in soy protein production and the medical cannabis sector. Rejzner comes from the CPG space, and previously founded Zollo, an app helping consumers compare grocery prices.

    The name comes from the Biblical belief that the world was created in seven days. On day eight, it becomes humans’ “responsibility to protect and nurture it”. This underlines the startup’s goal to create more scalable, sustainable and functional plant-based products for the mass market.

    This is where Rubisco, possibly the most abundant enzyme on the planet, comes in. You’ll find this in all green plants: alfalfa, broccoli, spinach, kale, you name it. Nutritionally, it is a complete protein, with high amounts of essential amino acids, resulting in an amino acid profile similar to beef, egg whites, and dairy proteins like whey and casein. It’s also rich in vitamins, minerals, antioxidants and micronutrients, and easily digestible, a major plus point in the gut wellness era.

    It boasts multiple culinary benefits too, with foaming, gelling and emulsification properties that can be key to many foods, including plant-based meat and dairy products, as well as baking and functional foods. Moreover, the enzyme is responsible for carbon fixation and has been targeted in studies looking to increase crop yields, which represents its positive potential to produce climate-friendly foods that preserve food security.

    Its omnipresence means this is a naturally available source of plant protein everywhere in the world. All of us have eaten a lot of Rubisco without even knowing it, especially since it has very low allergenicity.

    Overcoming the challenges of Rubisco protein production

    the kitchen foodtech hub
    Courtesy: Day 8

    It’s not like the plant-based industry hasn’t tried to work with Rubisco before. One of the world’s leading alternative meat makers, Impossible Foods, experimented with alfalfa-derived rubisco in its early years. Speaking to the New Yorker in 2019, founder and then-CEO Pat Brown explained: “For a year, our prototype burgers used RuBisCo, and it worked functionally better than any other protein, making a juicy burger.”

    In fact, the company filed a patent in 2015 describing the use of Rubisco as a binding agent, as well as an example of Rubisco isolation and purification. Brown predicted that the ingredient could help meet the world’s protein requirements using just 3% of the world’s land. The company eventually went to market with soy protein, of course, but mainly because no one was producing Rubisco at scale.

    And that is because it’s hard to do so. The enzyme needs to be isolated from indigestible cellulose, but isn’t easy to extract in the first place, given it is enclosed in tough cell walls of leaves. It also needs a large amount of biomass to be extracted as a protein source for food, which is where crops like alfalfa, moringa, sugar beets and duckweed come in. But even then, these leaves tend to rot in storage. This is before you tackle the removal of chlorophyll and other molecules to produce a colourless compound without any bitter or vegetal notes.

    Day 8 says its extraction technology can make the “most taste-neutral protein available today”. And to make things more affordable, it eliminates the cost of growing raw materials – green plants, in this case – by upcycling discarded leaves from existing crops. While Rejzner remained tight-lipped when asked what plants the startup is using, he offered: “Our process is cropagnostic, so we are able to work on multiple crops.”

    In the long term, it claims products made from its Rubisco protein will be so cheap that they could replace soy protein entirely. “We estimate that approximately 2.7 trillion tons of discarded leaves can be upcycled annually,” he explained. “This vast resource has the potential to produce protein equivalent to 11 times the entire global soy protein consumption without requiring any incremental land, much less water, or energy.”

    Expanding on this, Rejzner told Green Queen: “Initially, as our production scale is small and production costs are higher, the product will be similar to other functional ingredients. As our production scale gets larger, the cost will be at par with bulk soy protein powder.”

    He added that Day 8’s protein has a wide range of applications. “Most promising are protein-enhanced products, whether these are bars, dairy products, plant based dairy, etc.”

    With the plant-based world still reeling from post-pandemic headwinds, and cultivated meat weathering its own legislative storm, could Rubisco prove to be a viable solution for companies, consumers and investors alike? Day 8 will hope so, armed with the backing of The Kitchen Hub, which has 26 companies under its portfolio and has helped them raise over $345M to date.

    It’s a trend identified by other companies too, not least California’s Plantible Foods, which has made significant strides with its duckweed-derived Rubisco. In 2021, it raised $21.5M in Series A funding to build a commercial-scale production facility and launch its nutrient-dense Rubi Protein. Currently, the startup is focusing on replacing eggs in applications like baking and pasta-making with Rubi Whisk, and providing a cleaner-label binder to plant-based meat with Rubi Prime.

    Dutch startup Rubisco Foods is also tapping duckweed for its protein, while New Zealand’s Leaft Foods (which has secured $15M in investment) uses alfalfa as a base.

    The post ‘World’s Most Abundant Protein’ Cheap Enough to Replace Soy: Upcycled Rubisco Protein Startup Day 8 Nabs $750K Pre-Seed appeared first on Green Queen.

    This post was originally published on Green Queen.

  • meat the mushroom
    6 Mins Read

    Black-owned plant-based meat company Meat the Mushroom secured investment from two Sharks in the ongoing season on Shark Tank – here’s the inside story on how it all went down.

    “In Shark Tank, we have so many plant-based products – they all taste like crap. This actually tastes good.”

    As far as stamps of approval go, this one from Kevin O’Leary – known on the internet as Chef Wonderful – took the cake for Meat the Mushroom, the Baltimore-based startup that appeared on Shark Tank’s ongoing season. Owned by husband-and-wife duo Marvin and Aleah Rae Montague, the three-year-old brand’s flagship product is Shroomacon, a vegan bacon with only five ingredients: king oyster mushrooms, olive oil, natural smoke flavour, salt and black pepper.

    The clean-label aspect drives the company’s nutrition-focused marketing strategy, with Aleah highlighting bacon’s association with high blood pressure and heart disease, its high saturated fat and cholesterol content, and the presence of nitrates and preservatives. With heart disease being the leading cause of death in the US – one American dies from cardiovascular disease every 33 seconds, and African Americans are 30% more likely to do so than non-Hispanic white people – the health focus on food is higher than ever.

    1,022-person survey by the International Food Information Council (IFIC) last year found that health is the major factor behind Americans eating vegan or vegetarian diets, with six in 10 choosing it. And in terms of plant-based meat, ‘healthy’ is the most appealing description on product labels.

    When it comes to protein intake, whole-plant sources saw the sharpest rise among Americans between 2022 and 2023, with 28% eating them ‘somewhat’ or ‘much more’ now. There’s also greater sensitivity around ultra-processed foods and their impact on health, a link that is extended to meat alternatives. All this has brought whole-food plant-based proteins into sharp focus recently.

    For Marvin himself, going vegan was a health thing. Within a year of transitioning to a plant-based diet in 2014, he managed to overcome his lifelong battle with asthma and reverse a diagnosis of early heart disease. Giving up bacon was the hardest part, though, which led to him creating a mushroom-based version in preparation for a future restaurant. That has now evolved into Meat the Mushroom.

    Two Sharks for the price of one

    vegan shark tank
    Courtesy: Christopher Willard/ABC

    The Montagues’ appearance on Shark Tank – which has platformed many vegan brands, including Wild Earth, Everything Legendary, Project Pollo, Mrs Goldfarb’s Unreal Deli and The Cinnamon Kitchen – was two years in the making. “We applied two years in a row and got the call in the spring of 2023 that we were moving forward to the next round in the process,” Aleah tells Green Queen. “And it is a process.”

    They received a call to find out they’re moving forward past the application stage, a moment she describes as “surreal”. “This entire experience is a real ‘pinch-me’ moment,” she notes. The nerves gave way to adrenaline as she and her husband walked down the famous Shark Tank hallway. “All of our practice really kicked in… and we made it all happen.”

    Pitching to Mark Cuban (a known vegetarian and alternative protein investor), Lori Greiner, Daymond John, Daniel Lubetzky and O’Leary, Marvin and Aleah were seeking $150,000 for a 7.5% stake in their vegan bacon company.

    But although the Sharks were impressed by the bacon, they didn’t have the same feeling about the $2M valuation. O’Leary offered the full $150,000, but for a 33.3% stake, valuing the company at $450,000 instead. “I have zero flexibility,” he warned. Were the Shroomacon makers surprised by that? “No, they are Sharks for a reason,” says Marvin. “Everything is negotiable, and just having an offer meant we had a chance to walk out of there with one on our team.”

    Quickly, however, Cuban and John pulled out – for the former, it was a conflict of interest, given he’s an investor in Unreal Deli, while John believed it would be too hard to maximise profits. O’Leary followed up with a ‘mushroomed’ offer of 33.67%, and then 34%. Lubetzky then took himself out of the running too, encouraging the Montagues to take O’Leary’s offer.

    Meat the Mushroom experiences the ‘Shark Tank effect’

    shroomacon
    Courtesy: Meat the Mushroom

    You could sense the hesitation on the entrepreneurs’ minds, who knew they’d need to raise more money down the line, which is proving to already be an uphill task in the food tech sector. Things took a turn soon, though, when Greiner came in matching O’Leary’s original offer for a 33.3% stake.

    Aleah explained that a third of the company is a lot more than they were willing to give. After O’Leary outlined the challenging financial landscape, Greiner sweetened the deal by offering to join his 33.3% offer. As the saying goes, two Sharks are better than one.

    The Montagues countered with 25%, but the investors stood their ground. Their next counters – $200,000 for 33.33% and 34% – was unsuccessful too, before Cuban chimed in and warned that they were overnegotiating. While still looking a little uncertain, the Meat the Mushroom founders agreed to O’Leary and Greiner’s joint deal.

    “We could see the value that having two Sharks could really bring,” explains Marvin. “Our goal has always been to make Shroomacon more accessible and to make it easier for people to really transform their lives by changing their eating habits. We felt two Sharks can get us there, and it felt worth the equity.”

    While many deals end up gaining investment from the Sharks, roughly half of them never close after due diligence. But things look to be going positively for Meat the Mushroom. “We are in the process of finalising the details and are excited about what this partnership will bring forth,” reveals Aliah.

    The startup was also subject to what’s become known as the ‘Shark Tank effect’, when businesses who appear on the show receive a huge uptick in sales and website visits after the segment’s airing. “In the 12 hours after our episode aired, we did over $60,000 worth of online sales. That’s more sales than we did in any month in the history of our business,” notes Marvin. For context, at the time of their pitch the startup’s all-time sales were $360,000. “Our minds were blown.”

    Vegan bacon isn’t an easy game – in a $1.3B market crowded by innovators like THIS, La Vie, MyForest Foods, Prime Roots, the Vegetarian Butcher and Lightlife, to name a few, Meat the Mushroom would need to double down on the clean-label aspect for its Shroomacon to really stand out. Having a couple of Sharks on board will go a long way in doing so.

    Since the pitch, the business has progressed nicely. “We’ve gone from about 25 stores to over 100 and closed 2023 with over a half million in sales,” Marvin says. “Our team has grown too – we now have over 12 people on our team, and we are very proud to be creating jobs in our city of Baltimore.” The city became the first in the US to officially proclaim January as the month of Veganuary earlier this year.

    “We are working hard to get our product into grocery stores and restaurants nationwide,” adds Aleah. Currently, Shroomacon is available in Central Market, Green Life Market, MOM’s Organic Market and Jungle Jim’s stores. “But more than that, we want to continue to be a resource to anyone looking to live longer and healthier by making eating choices that are better for their body.”

    The post Inside Meat the Mushroom’s Vegan Bacon Pitch on Shark Tank appeared first on Green Queen.

    This post was originally published on Green Queen.

  • miruku
    6 Mins Read

    New Zealand food tech startup Miruku has raised $5M in a pre-Series A financing round to expand its molecular farming platform for dairy proteins and fats, and conduct field trials in Australia.

    The $5M pre-Series A fundraiser was led by Motion Capital and included returning investor Movac and new investor NZVC. It brings Miruku’s total raised to $7.4M, following a $2.4M pre-seed round in March 2022.

    Lachlan Nixon, Managing Partner of Motion Capital told Green Queen via email: “We are delighted to be supporting Miruku to re-write the rules of dairy production. Miruku’s molecular farming technology enables the production of bio-similar dairy proteins and fats at a significantly cheaper cost, as well as with significantly less environmental impact, than traditional animal agriculture.”

    Michal Klar, Founding Partner at Better Bite Ventures, which invested in Miruku’s pre-seed round, added: “From the start, we were impressed with the combination of technical and business experience in Miruku’s founding team.”

    “Great to see new investors on board – this round will give the team the funding necessary to bring their unique molecular farming platform closer to the market, and cut the climate impact of dairy production,” he continued.

    The molecular farming company will use the capital to advance its dairy seed system, co-develop products with industry partners, and strike a collaboration with the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, the Australian government body responsible for science research. This will entail Miruku testing its modified safflower varieties in field trials in Australia to support regulatory approval.

    “Miruku is committed to innovating at the intersection of agriculture and biotechnology,” CEO Amos Palfreyman said in a statement. “Our technology offers a scalable solution to meet the growing demand for sustainable dairy alternatives, supporting the global transition towards a more sustainable food system.”

    Using plants as bioreactors to reinvent dairy molecules

    molecular farming
    Courtesy: Miruku

    Founded in 2020, Miruku blends the lines of biotech and agriculture for future food, with the aim of disrupting New Zealand’s giant dairy industry, which is responsible for one in every four export dollars earned by the country (totalling $25.7B). The startup wants to work with farmers to help pivot to more planet-friendly farming processes.

    It is Asia-Pacific’s only molecular farming company and among just a handful around the world. The tech involves modifying plant cells into mini-factories that can replicate animal-derived proteins, fats, sugars and other molecules, which can then be harvested from leaves or other plant tissues. It’s akin to the process of microorganisms infecting plants and transferring some of their genes.

    Molecular farming has several advantages over animal cell cultivation and precision fermentation, especially in terms of cost and scalability, given that it eschews bioreactors for plants themselves. For its dairy elements, Miruku is reengineering safflower due to its climate resilience (the crop is resistant to droughts and can be grown in residual moisture in semi-arid conditions).

    Like precision fermentation, molecular farming does entail genetic engineering. But speaking to Green Queen in 2020, Palfreyman noted that this tech has made “huge progress over the last decade”. “While the plants we grow have been genetically transformed, the proteins that our plants produce are the same as normal dairy molecules. That’s the point,” he said. “They are safe, clean, friendlier to the planet and as nutritious and delicious as the same dairy molecules from a cow.”

    Klar gives additional context on how molecular farming could “reinvent how dairy is made”, highlighting its benefits: “Because it is using plants as a production vehicle, it can do it at scale and ultimately at price parity – or even price advantage – to animal-derived dairy. And most importantly, in a much more sustainable way.”

    Other companies working on molecular farming include Nobell Foods and Mozza, both of whom are developing dairy molecules, while Moolec, Tiamat Sciences, Bright Biotech and ORF Genetics are using the tech for other applications.

    Palfreyman told TechCrunch that Miruku differs from the rest in a few ways: it has a B2B model, focuses on both proteins and fats within the same plant, and uses safflower crops. He previously revealed to Green Queen that Miruku aimed to eventually make a broad range of dairy alternatives, including yoghurt and cheese.

    Taking on New Zealand’s massive legacy dairy sector

    new zealand vegan
    Courtesy: Miruku

    Since its pre-seed financing, the company has advanced its tech, which previously programmed plants to produce proteins that could be extracted from seeds, but now can make use of interactions between recombinant dairy casein protein and native plant proteins, with or without improved fatty acid profiles. Casein, which makes up 80% of the protein content found in dairy, is key from a textural perspective, giving cheeses their signature melting and stretching properties.

    “This breakthrough allows us to utilise a larger portion of the seed, transforming it into a range of versatile ingredients tailored for the food and beverage industry,” said Palfreyman. “We’ve now reached several key proof-of-concept milestones demonstrating the viability and potential of the dairy seed system.”

    Moreover, the startup has tripled its team, cultivated relationships with food manufacturers for co-development opportunities, and expanded its footprint to Israel and Australia, the latter being its initial launch market. “Miruku has not only aimed to navigate the challenges presented by the shifting climate impacting traditional dairy production but has also broadened our focus to address critical issues of food security and nutrition,” Palfreyman explained.

    New Zealand is the world’s largest exporter of dairy proteins, and per capita: milk consumption reaches 400 million litres a year, with 190 two-litre bottles of milk sold every minute in supermarkets, according to Fonterra, the leading dairy producer globally and New Zealand’s biggest company. But there is a huge environmental trade-off, with half of the nation’s emissions coming from agriculture, three-quarters of which are a direct result of methane from livestock.

    This is something locals recognise, with 51% of respondents in a 2022 survey agreeing that plant-based alternatives are better for the environment than dairy. However, 66% of consumers find dairy to be higher in nutritional value, with 78% calling it better value for money and 70% labelling it to be better for the national economy.

    According to Scott Day, co-founder of Free Flow Manufacturing Grocery – which opened New Zealand’s first dedicated alt-milk facility last year – plant-based milk sales increased by 44% from 2019 to the end of 2022, rising from NZ$61M ($37.4M) to NZ$88M ($54M). But this is still a fraction of the country’s conventional dairy sector.

    It’s what makes technologies like Miruku’s so important. One thing the company will have to figure out is regulatory approval from the bi-national Food Safety Australia and New Zealand, which has previously approved Impossible Foods’s modified heme ingredient for commercial sale. “Navigating the regulatory processes for the introduction of all new crops and the marketing of all foods with new ingredients is super important,” Palfreyman told this publication in 2022. “Fortunately, the regulatory environments for both growing, formulating and selling to consumers have opened up in major continents and are widening every year.”

    “Our priority is to advance our technology and progress towards market readiness,” Palfreyman told TechCrunch. “This includes expanding our footprint in Australia and looking at establishing a presence in the United States.”

    The post Miruku: New Zealand Startup Raises $5M in Pre-Series A to Create Dairy Products with Molecular Farming appeared first on Green Queen.

    This post was originally published on Green Queen.

  • cultivated meat korea
    5 Mins Read

    South Korean cultivated meat startup Simple Planet has raised ₩8B ($6M) in a pre-Series A funding round to optimise its technology for its powdered ingredient, secure regulatory approval, and expand internationally.

    Simple Planet’s ₩8M ($6M) pre-Series A funding round saw participation from POSCO Technology Investment, DCP Private Equity, Hyundai Technology Investment, Prologue Ventures, Pathfinder H, and Samho Green Investment, among others.

    The latest capital injection brought the South Korean startup’s total financing to ₩10B ($7.5M), after a previous ₩2B ($1.5M) round led by tofu giant Pulmuone. It will help accelerate its R&D efforts to produce ingredients like powders and fats for cultivated meat, facilitating the optimisation of its manufacturing processes, its path to regulatory approvals, and overseas expansion.

    “Despite the challenging investment climate, our pre-Series funding round was overbooked,” said Simple Planet co-founder and CEO Il Doo Jeong. “We are in the process of establishing a GMP [good manufacturing practices] facility for the mass production of cell-cultured food ingredients.”

    Serum-free medium drives down costs for Simple Planet’s ingredients

    simple planet
    Courtesy: Simple Planet

    Founded in 2021, Simple Planet takes the approach of making cultivated meat ingredients like proteins and unsaturated fats in powdered or paste forms, instead of creating finished products. These ingredients are said to be highly versatile, helping absorb and improve the flavour and nutritional structure of conventional proteins. They can also be used as part of functional ingredients for seniors and infants.

    The company has established 13 different floating cell lines so far – including cows, chickens, pigs, ducks and fish – and developed a probiotics-based serum-free edible culture medium. Apart from being controversial for its sourcing, fetal bovine serum (FBS) makes up over 80% of costs in cultivated food manufacturing, according to Simple Planet. Its technology has lowered the price of its serum-free culture by 1/60th, which – alongside controlling nutrient release and density – enables it to bring down the costs of its commercial ingredients too.

    In October, the APAC Society for Cellular Agriculture (APAC-SCA) released a 1,110-person survey of South Koreans, finding that 84% of consumers preferred a plant-based growth culture for cultivated meat, although 35% wouldn’t mind seeing FBS being used, and 21% called the latter their most preferred option. “However, we see that FBS ranks lower in the preferred cultivation medium overall, suggesting that negative perception of FBS still remains among the surveyed South Korean population,” says Calisa Lim, project manager at APAC-SCA.

    “We expect to accelerate the development of serum-free edible culture media, which we are also researching,” said Simple Planet’s Jeong. “Moreover, we have been collaborating with global food companies since last year to utilise cultured meat prototypes. We aim to create significant outcomes through new business planning and international expansion by building cooperative relationships with global companies.”

    The startup aims to launch its high-protein cultivated meat powder both domestically and internationally, and has previously stated plans to set up branches in the US and Canada to enable faster entry. Last September, it unveiled B2C convenience food brand Balboa Kitchen, with the aim of directly incorporating its cultivated food ingredients into consumer products. Now, it is looking to aggressively expand its distribution network.

    In January, it entered strategic partnerships with accelerator and investment firm Plug and Play and South Korea’s S&S Lab, which operates private-led shared laboratory IRIS lab. And last year, it linked up with Pulmuone to co-produce hybrid meat products, with a targeted 2025 launch.

    Simple Planet has won plenty of recognition for its tech, including being named in the UK’s Forward Fooding FoodTech 500 list (described as “the Fortune 500 of agrifood tech”), being selected in the Sustainable Food Challenge 2023 by MassChallenge in Switzerland, and winning first place in the food tech category of US startup pitch competition WKBC and sustainability category at Singapore’s X-Pitch.

    Cultivated meat on the rise in South Korea

    cellmeat
    Courtesy: Cellmeat

    Simple Planet is among a host of startups elevating South Korea’s burgeoning cultivated meat space. In February 2023, industry stakeholders signed an MoU to advance the country’s cultivated meat sector, and a month later, the North Gyeongsang province opened the North Gyeongsang Cellular Agriculture Industry Support Center. The 2,309 sq m facility was built over six years with a total investment of ₩9B ($7M) to develop biomaterials and support cultivated meat companies.

    These developments came after the nation’s Ministry of Food and Drug Safety included official guidance for alt-protein in its National Plan 2022, covering the safety, manufacturing processes and regulatory approval of cultivated meat.

    In October, South Korea’s Society for Food Sustainatech signed on to the APAC Regulatory Coordination Forum, which aims to facilitate cross-border dialogue between stakeholders for cultivated foods. On the regulatory front, the South Korean government is expected to be the next (alongside Japan) to develop a framework for companies. “Both nations are proactively seeking input from industry groups to craft clear and efficient safety review processes,” said Mirte Gosker, managing director of the Good Food Institute APAC, which co-established APAC-SCA.

    The APAC-SCA poll also that 90% of respondents were willing to try cultivated meat at least once (though only 5% said they’d definitely eat it regularly). Plus, 39% were supportive of cell-based meat being sold at supermarkets and restaurants (with 14- to 29-year-olds leading the way), and just 10% were opposed to its commercialisation.

    In terms of purchase drivers, price tops the list – cited by 65% of Koreans – followed by taste and texture (62%) and health/nutrition (48%). This ties into Simple Planet’s focus on cost reductions as well as flavour and nutrition (0.3g of its cultivated meat powder contains the same essential amino acids as 1kg of beef).

    Apart from Simple Planet, at least eight more startups are working with cultivated meat in the country, including CellMEAT – which has created prototypes of cultured Dokdo shrimp and caviarTissenBioFarm, CellQua, Space F, and SeaWith. Meanwhile, Korean noodle giant Nongshim invested $7.4M in food tech VC funding with a focus on cultivated meat, and CJ CheilJedang has teamed up with KCell Biosciences to build a cell culture facility in Busan.

    The post South Korea’s Simple Planet Raises $6M in Pre-Series A Round to Speed Up R&D for Cultivated Meat Powder appeared first on Green Queen.

    This post was originally published on Green Queen.

  • new wave foods
    6 Mins Read

    San Francisco-based New Wave Foods and Germany’s Ordinary Seafood have become the latest casualties in the alternative protein sector, spotlighting the troubles experienced by the vegan seafood category in recent times.

    In a short space of time, New Wave Foods and Ordinary Seafood have been forced to cease operations. In what is already a tiny space in the alternative protein world, plant-based seafood has faced major headwinds lately.

    New Wave Foods said it was unable to pay its debts in full, and is now set to liquidate its assets, while Ordinary Seafood fell victim to the increasingly volatile funding landscape for food tech. It has left the alternative seafood sector reeling, but industry members are hoping to mobilise efforts to continue its growth in the face of climate change.

    New Wave Foods and Ordinary Seafood cease operations

    ordinary seafood
    Courtesy: Ordinary Seafood

    In November, New Wave Foods entered into a voluntary assignment for the benefit of the creditors (ABC), an alternative to formal bankruptcy proceedings that involves transferring assets from a debtor to a trust to liquidate them and distribute the proceeds. In effect, the company was “indebted to various creditors” and “unable to pay its debts in full”.

    Creditors have a mid-May deadline to submit claims against the business, which rolled out its vegan shrimp in US foodservice through a partnership with Dot Foods in 2021, months after closing an $18M Series A fundraiser. “Although we were gaining momentum in 2023 and had secured a major customer for 2024 sales, we couldn’t outrun industry headwinds,” New Wave Foods co-founder and CEO Michelle Wolf told AFN.

    “Our focus had been on healthy business fundamentals since I became CEO in late 2021 and I’m proud of what we achieved. I believe New Wave has been one of the stepping stones toward more sustainable eating, whether by delighting diners, inspiring competitors, or advancing plant-based innovation,” she added. “I continue to have faith in the industry’s long-term success, but the environment we’re in will continue to push companies to prioritise like we did and explore innovation horizons.”

    Similarly, earlier this month, German player Ordinary Seafood’s operations came to a head, with founder and CEO Anton Pluschke announcing the development on LinkedIn. The two-year-old brand had just introduced its vegan tuna and smoked salmon at METRO outlets across the country in November, but a bleak, “dramatically changed” funding landscape led to its demise. “We have had to make the incredibly difficult decision to wind down operations and let go of our outstanding team,” wrote Pluschke.

    In a email to Green Queen, Pluschke underlined the importance of industry collaboration and cautioned that major food system change will take time: “While we have seen tremendous recent improvements in conventional animal-based food analogues, we should not pretend that transforming global food systems will happen overnight. While entrepreneurs focus on developing new ingredients, engineering novel processing technologies, build new brands and sales channels, the successful transformation of the food industry requires collaboration and involvement from all stakeholders including government and policymakers, producers and farmers, food industry companies, consumers, research institutions, supply chain partners and investors and financial institutions. Getting this right will require a unified voice, a true collaborative effort for improved planetary health. We do not have time for dangerous hype cycles, we need a deeper understanding with real commitment and true partnership.” 

    In a statement sent to Green Queen, Marissa Bronfman, founder of alternative seafood association Future Ocean Foods, which counts over 30 members, said: “We at Future Ocean Foods are all saddened that Ordinary Seafood is ceasing operations, an event precipitated by an extremely difficult fundraising environment for plant-based food and not reflective of the company’s fantastic alt-seafood products and passionate team.”

    She added: “I applaud Anton for his exemplary leadership and know that we will continue to see incredible innovation from this visionary founder.”

    The vegan seafood sector is dwarfed by plant-based meat and conventional seafood

    vegan seafood market
    Courtesy: The Good Food Institute

    It marks the end of two brands that were helping disrupt the $8.5B global seafood market. Despite vegan seafood outpacing the plant-based meat sector to deliver growth in both unit and dollar sales from 2021-22, its retail sales only hit $14M, a minuscule 1% of the $1.2B made by the overall meat analogues category. Its contribution to the overall seafood sector is even smaller, representing just 0.2% of total sales.

    plant based seafood market
    Courtesy: The Good Food Institute

    There have been some success stories recently, of course. Yves Potvin’s Konscious Foods has its frozen vegan sushi and poke bowl SKUs in over 4,500 retail doors in North America; Nestlé – the world’s largest CPG brand – introduced three plant-based seafood products in Europe and Asia recently; and Sweden’s Hooked Foods expanded into Germany with a listing in 400 REWE West stores in November.

    But New Wave Foods and Ordinary Seafood’s fate underlines the seafood sector’s unique adoption problem. While many consumers are looking for plant-based alternatives to red and processed meat due to their associated health risks, for others, seafood is the solution. Research by the Aquaculture Stewardship Council in 2022 – covering over 12,000 consumers in 12 countries – revealed that health is the primary driver for buying seafood, with over 80% agreeing that including fish in their daily shopping is important for health.

    This highlights a lack of awareness from consumers about the ills of the seafood industry. Microplastic pollution, toxic chemical runoff, antibiotic and pesticide use, sea lice and mercury all affect the seafood we consume, which inevitably enter our bodies too. This is before you consider the environmental impact of overfishing, which exacerbates biodiversity loss and could lead to a collapse of global fisheries by 2048, as well as the human rights abuse rampant in the industry.

    Last month, a new study by agrifood campaigner Feedback International and a coalition of West African and Norwegian organisations accused Norway’s seafood salmon industry of ‘food colonialism’. A significant portion of fish oil for feed comes from Northwest Africa, a region suffering from acute food insecurity. But if these fish hadn’t been turned into oil, they could have provided four million people in the area with a year’s supply of fish.

    And in the US, the Supreme Court is considering overturning the Chevron deference, after hearing two cases from fishing vessel operators appealing against a lower court ruling that mandates commercial fishing companies to pay for a government-run programme to monitor for overfishing. If the doctrine is overturned, it would allow unchecked overfishing and remove accountability from the sector, leaving global waters open to exploitation.

    vegan seafood
    Courtesy: Konscious Foods

    Turning crisis into opportunity

    We need alternative seafood more than ever as global appetites for fish are stymied by environmental and ethical concerns. With at least 120 companies working with alternative seafood (as of 2021), consolidation may be key. This is exactly the path Wicked Kitchen has taken, first taking over Good Catch in 2022, followed by its Current Foods acquisition last year.

    “Despite challenging times for the category, there is no denying that we are in a climate emergency and that our oceans are in peril,” said Bronfman. “We must ensure that the international venture community continues to fund alternative seafood across plant-based, fermentation and cultivated, if we are to protect our oceans and feed 10 billion people by 2050.”

    Maarten Geraets, a food industry executive veteran and former managing director of alternative protein at Thai Union, compared the seafood sector’s issues with that of plant-based meat last year, which saw companies shut down, lay off staff, lose money, and consolidate. “It’s not so surprising,” he said.

    “Alternative seafood companies should focus on resizing to lengthen runways/match sales forecasts, engage existing investors with renewed plans, seek support to handle the dip, prepare for eventual growth (which will come), and explore collaborations/partnerships with like-minded players, making an opportunity out of the crisis.”

    The post Unhooked: Alt-Seafood Startups Face Headwinds Despite Urgent Need for Fish-Free Solutions appeared first on Green Queen.

    This post was originally published on Green Queen.

  • cargill enough
    5 Mins Read

    Cargill has added to Scottish-Dutch food tech startup ENOUGH’s Series C funding round with an undisclosed sum to expand their existing partnership, which will see the meat giant co-create and market products with the latter’s ABUNDA mycoprotein.

    Cargill, which is one of the Big Four meat producers in the US, has topped up the Series C funding pot for ENOUGH to earn a single-digit stake in the mycoprotein startup and extend its alternative protein portfolio. The investment adds to ENOUGH’s €40M/$43M financing round last August, and sees Cargill sign a commercial agreement to co-create and market plant-based meat products with the startup’s ABUNDA mycoprotein.

    ENOUGH’s 160,000 sq ft Dutch manufacturing facility in Sas van Gent is co-located with a Cargill starch plant, which provides glucose syrup from sustainably sourced grains as feedstock for the former’s fungal biomass. The mycoprotein is centrifuged to remove most of the sugary wastewater, which is supplied to Cargill’s neighbouring bioethanol plant in a zero-waste process.

    The collaboration is part of the EU-funded PLENITUDE consortium, with Cargill leveraging ENOUGH’s plant-based proteins, texturisers and fats, and its formulations and applications capabilities, and ENOUGH benefitting from the meat giant’s global footprint and feedstock technology expertise, enabling it to scale up faster.

    “Expanding our partnership with Cargill is an exciting step to accelerate the great strides we’ve already made through the co-location of our Sas van Gent facility,” said ENOUGH CEO Jim Laird. “The alternative protein market is a multi-billion-dollar opportunity, and efficiency will come from collaboration with partners such as Cargill to leverage existing demand and supply chain to gain scale.”

    A climate-friendly protein looking to overcome sector challenges

    enough mycoprotein
    Courtesy: ENOUGH

    ENOUGH was founded in 2015 and makes its ABUNDA mycoprotein using the same fungi strain as Quorn’s via biomass fermentation. This is said to be high in protein and fibre, contain all nine essential amino acids, and comprise a neutral flavour and meat-like texture to create plant-based meat and fish, as well as dairy alternatives.

    Plus, the startup claims ABUNDA is 15 times more efficient than beef thanks to its zero-waste, circular production process, which uses 93% less water, 97% less feed and has 97% fewer carbon emissions than beef. This drives down costs to produce the mycoprotein.

    ENOUGH’s facility, which began production last year, was initially producing 10,000 metric tonnes of ABUNDA a year, with plans to scale up to 60,000 tonnes annually by 2027 – the equivalent of one cow’s worth of protein every two minutes. By 2033, the producer aims to amp up yearly production to one million metric tonnes, which it says equates to replacing five million cows or over a billion chickens.

    With a total of €95M/$102M raised to date, ENOUGH has been in conversations with multiple manufacturers for its protein, with over 30 sampling the ingredient. Among its customers are European poultry processor Plukon Food Group, which is making chicken and meat analogues using ABUNDA; Unilever, which will test the mycoprotein for The Vegetarian Butcher products; and manufacturers supplying to UK supermarket M&S.

    ENOUGH’s partnership with Cargill comes at a challenging time for the plant-based meat sector, which has been rocked by closures, layoffs and bleak sales. In the US, meat alternatives saw a 7.8% decline in year-on-year sales by the end of 2023, according to NielsenIQ data. But speaking to AFN, Laird, an industry veteran, noted that “for every horror story in this market, there are also success stories out there”, adding that while there was “a bit of a hype cycle”, the underlying trends driving alternative protein still exist.

    “I’m not your average 25-year-old startup CEO,” he said. “We’ve been developing this technology for eight years. There are capex costs, but what we’re doing is very scalable. We take a 200,000-liter tank full of water, sugar and micronutrients, we inoculate it with fungus and it doubles in size every four to six hours. In a couple of days, we get up to [critical mass] and then we start to harvest on a continuous basis.”

    Cargill’s alt-protein footprint, and controversies

    cargill plant based
    Courtesy: Cargill

    Cargill is the largest privately held company in the US, in terms of revenue, which reached $177B last year. The food processing behemoth supplies around 22% of the domestic meat market in the US, and has committed to reducing apply chain emissions by 30% per ton of product sold by 2030.

    It has made numerous investments in the alternative protein industry, including cultivated meat pioneers UPSIDE Foods, Aleph Farms and Wildtype, pea protein producer Puris (which supplies to Beyond Meat), 3D-printed meat startup Cocuus, and plant-based meat company Bflike. The company has also partnered with Cubiq Foods to co-develop and commercialise plant-based fat technologies, and teamed up with KFC to launch vegan chicken nuggets in China in 2020.

    In 2019, it created an in-house alternative protein division, and has been offering its plant proteins to foodservice and retail customers since 2020. Plus, it has a vegan range called PlantEver for the Chinese market. However, it is not a company free from controversies, with Mighty Earth chair and former US Congressman Henry Waxman calling Cargill “the worst company in the world” in 2019, driving problems like deforestation, pollution, climate change and exploitation “at a scale that dwarfs their closest competitors.”

    The multinational has been embroiled in multiple scandals over the years. It was among a group of companies facing boycotts from major food corporations (including McDonald’s) against the supply of soybeans grown from newly deforested land in the 2000s. It has been accused of buying cocoa grown illegally in national parks and protected forests in the Ivory Coast, endangering the habitats of wildlife species including chimpanzees and elephants. Plus, Cargill sells massive volumes of palm oil, which is linked to widespread tropical deforestation.

    In 2020, one of its meat processing plants in Canada was linked to over 358 cases of Covid-19, with reports alleging that the company denied personal protective equipment to employees. And while it has pledged to cut greenhouse gas emissions in its North American beef supply chain by 30% by 2030, it could prove to be a tall order considering its climate footprint was once found to be greater than the entire country of the Netherlands.

    Focusing on alternative protein investments and partnerships is just one step towards its climate goals, but nevertheless significant. “Cargill is strengthening its partnership with ENOUGH because the world needs more protein that is grown more sustainably to keep pace with global population growth,” said Belgin Köse, managing director of meat and dairy alternatives at Cargill.

    “Mycoprotein is an emerging ingredient with a disruptive role to play due to its many benefits including a meat-like texture, protein profile, scalability and sustainability,” she added. Other companies working with such mycelium-based proteins include Meati, Libre Foods, Infinite Roots, Bolder Foods and CellX.

    The post Cargill Invests in ENOUGH’s Series C & Expands Partnership to Create Mycoprotein Products appeared first on Green Queen.

    This post was originally published on Green Queen.

  • japan cultivated meat
    6 Mins Read

    Over four in 10 Japanese consumers are willing to give cultivated meat and seafood a taste as long as it’s safe, but 58% have never heard of it, highlighting the challenge for the country’s alternative protein sector.

    In April, the regulatory framework for cultivated meat in Japan will become more complicated. While continuing to oversee food safety, the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare will transfer its food hygiene standards division to the Consumer Affairs Agency. This means companies must liaise with two agencies on regulatory conversations, but makes prime minister Fumio Kishida the ultimate authority on these matters.

    But if a new survey by the APAC Society for Cellular Agriculture (APAC-SCA) is anything to go by, stronger regulations to determine the safety of these foods are a must for Japan’s population. The 1,000-person poll revealed that as long as they’re safe, 42% of consumers are willing to try cultivated meat and seafood products.

    However, 64% of respondents don’t know if cultivated proteins are safer than their conventional counterparts (though 19% found no difference in safety). For 44%, the presence of Japanese government regulations is the most important element in determining the safety of cultivated meat and seafood, with women in their 20s, 40s and 60s chiming most with this sentiment.

    lab grown meat survey
    Courtesy: APAC-SCA

    If international organisations or academia can assure safety, that would satisfy 38% and 24% of consumers, respectively. However, safety assurances from the industry and the sale of these products in other countries would have little effect in swaying these consumers, with only 19% being satisfied with these options. Conversely, 34% would not find these foods safe, whatever the case.

    Health and price important, and youth attitudes encouraging

    APAC-SCA’s survey highlights that 91% of Japan’s consumers eat meat, mirroring the figure from a Food Frontier report from December. Interestingly, there are more vegans (1%) than flexitarians (0.4%) or pescetarians (0.3%). But there is a gap in consumer awareness about cultivated meat, with 58% of people in Japan having never heard of it. And while 39% are familiar with it, only a further 3% understand the concept in detail.

    Apart from the food safety aspect, health and price are key for these consumers when it comes to trying cultivated meat, cited by 25% and 23%, respectively. But an even greater number (30%) say they will not try these products. Safety (44%) and health (33%) are similarly the top concerns for respondents, followed by taste (27%).

    Taste represents the leading expectation from these foods too, followed by a diversification of food options, and appearance – although 37% chose the ‘none applies’ option, further highlighting their unfamiliarity with the concept. of cultivated proteins and lack of experience in consuming such products.

    cultivated meat survey
    Courtesy: APAC-SCA

    A fifth (21%) of consumers are willing to buy cultivated meat products if they’re priced the same as their conventional versions, but only 6% would be willing to pay for them if they cost double or more. Understandably, 40% would purchase them if they’re cheaper, though 33% wouldn’t buy them at all. Research by McKinsey has shown that it will take until 2030 for cultivated meat to reach price parity, outlining the importance of scaling up production and increased funding for the sector.

    There was a notable shift in acceptance with age, as younger Japanese consumers exhibited a more welcoming attitude towards cultivated meat and seafood. In terms of concerns about these foods, 35% did not select any options from the list – higher than the overall average. Men in their 20s also expressed the greatest interest in buying these products, with 18% willing to do so even if they cost double.

    apac sca
    Courtesy: APAC-SCA

    “This survey reveals interesting characteristics about the next generation of Japanese consumers. More than half of men in their 20s have heard of ‘cell-based foods’, nearly 30% are interested in trying them, and a whopping 62% answered that they would eat these products if they were cooked,” said Akira Igata, director of APAC-SCA partner the Japan Association for Cellular Agriculture and the survey’s analyst. “Understanding the proclivities of the next generation of Japanese consumers would be critical for companies interested in breaking into the Japanese market.”

    What about feeding cultivated meat to children? Half of the respondents are unsure if they’ll do so, while 33% definitely wouldn’t. “For the industry, this signifies the importance of capturing the interest of consumers who are neutral but not opposed to the concept of cultivated meat and seafood,” the report stated.

    Collaboration and direct communication key to establishing food safety

    Prime minister Kishida already endorsed cellular agriculture last year, with plans to boost the sector to reduce the country’s climate footprint. And between 2020 and 2023, private investment in Japan’s alternative protein sector was dominated by cultivated meat, which made up 76% ($54M) of the total, according to the Good Food Institute APAC. A host of food giants are getting involved in cellular agriculture, including Nipponham and Nissin.

    In December, the Japanese government invested ¥1.87B ($13.1M) in local cellular agriculture company IntegriCulture, which claims to have grown cultivated chicken and duck via a tech platform that can bring down costs to under $3 per kg of meat by 2025, and under $1 soon after.

    But although the price aspect is important, safety is still crucial for consumers in Japan, which is why APAC-SCA recommends establishing a direct line of communication with regulators to convey information that can exhibit the safety potential of cultivated meat and seafood, which can be in the form of pre-market consultation services or a regulatory sandbox framework.

    “Communicating the safety of cultivated meat and seafood products has always been the key focus for the industry,” said APAC-SCA programme director Peter Yu. “The 2023 report released by the Food and Agriculture Organisation and the World Health Organisation concluded that many of the hazards identified in cultivated foods already exist in conventionally produced foods and livestock agriculture. Cultivated meat and seafood are safe for consumption if produced and handled well.”

    cultivated seafood
    Courtesy: Wildtype

    The report also suggests regulators and industry players can find common consensus on topics to support consistent approaches to safety assessments by participating in activities like the APAC Regulatory Coordination Forum. Likewise, regional collaboration between government agencies, academia and companies can help accelerate R&D efforts via resource and knowledge sharing.

    Developing “message maps” for awareness of the benefits of cultivated meat and seafood can help raise consumer confidence and trust too, and socialising international reports can increase public awareness and assure the safety of these products.

    “There is a great opportunity and incentive for close collaboration between the government and industry to engage consumers in the food safety dialogue for cultivated meat and seafood,” added Yu. “This will increase consumer confidence and drive widespread acceptance in the long run. Ensuring that cultivated meat and seafood is available as a complementary food option in Japan is vitally important for food security without environmental and ethical concerns associated with conventional meat production.”

    The post 42% of Japanese Consumers Open to Trying Cultivated Meat, But Safety Remains Key Concern appeared first on Green Queen.

    This post was originally published on Green Queen.

  • jack and annie's smashburger
    5 Mins Read

    US fast-casual chain Smashburger has partnered with jackfruit meat producer Jack & Annie’s to debut a new burger across its locations nationwide, the latest example of a QSR embracing whole-food plant-based products.

    With health and nutrition top of mind for consumers, whole-food plant-based products have been cropping up across the globe in the foodservice world. In the latest instance, Colorado-based companies Smashburger and Jack & Annie’s have linked up to launch a new burger spotlighting the latter’s jackfruit-based meat.

    The collaboration marks the fast-casual debut of Jack & Annie’s – whose products are already available in over 5,000 locations across the US, including Whole Foods, Safeway and Target. Smashburger will add its jackfruit patty as a permanent menu item across its 235 locations nationwide.

    “Plant-based alternatives have continued to show up on menus throughout the industry, so making sure we offer more diverse and plant-forward options was the natural transition to expand our menu,” said Smashburger’s chief restaurant support officer, Eric Marcoux.

    Keying into health-conscious Americans with jackfruit

    jack and annie's funding
    Courtesy: Jack & Annie’s

    Smashburger and Jack & Annie first tested the partnership with a limited-time offering last summer in the chain’s Colorado, New York, New Jersey and Chicago locations. Following positive consumer feedback, it decided to make the jackfruit burger a permanent fixture on its menu nationally.

    The burger patty itself is plant-based, but the default Classic Smash Veggie Burger contains American cheese, alongside lettuce, tomatoes, red onions, pickles, Smash Sauce (which isn’t vegan), and ketchup. It is part of a burger range that also includes Truffle Mushroom Swiss and Colorado Veggie burgers, as well as Bacon Smash, BBQ Bacon Cheddar, Avocado Bacon Club burgers (which are not meat-free).

    So although the branding makes it seem like these are all veggie burgers, it’s important to note that Smashburger uses conventional bacon. But the jackfruit patty can be subbed in for any chicken, beef or black bean burger on the menu, which could be an appealing option for many health-conscious consumers, given that the Jack & Annie’s burger has 47% less fat than a traditional beef patty.

    While not exactly what you’d call an entirely clean-label option – the Jack & Annie’s burger has jackfruit, soy flour, coconut and canola oils, alliums, spices, natural flavourings and colourings, and methylcellulose – it is a whole-food, plant-based meat rich in fibre and micronutrients like potassium, iron and calcium. Moreover, a 100g patty contains 8g of protein, just 9g of total fat (with 5g saturated fat), and 150 calories. Plus, being animal-free, it’s free from cholesterol.

    Health is a topic entrenched in the American mainstream consciousness, given the alarming rise in rates of obesity and type 2 diabetes – over two-thirds (69%) of Americans are overweight and 36% are obese. Additionally, there’s greater sensitivity around ultra-processed foods and their impact on health. Last year, research revealed that more Gen Zers in the US want to go vegan for their health than the environment – a key target demographic for Smashburger.

    1,022-person survey by the International Food Information Council (IFIC) found that health is the major factor behind Americans eating vegan or vegetarian diets, with six in 10 choosing it. In terms of plant-based meat products like Jack & Annie’s, ‘healthy’ is the most appealing labelling description to these consumers.

    According to Jack & Annie’s – which has previously been ranked as the third-largest player in the frozen plant-based category – two in three fast-casual customers say a jackfruit-based menu item would make them more likely to purchase from a restaurant. There’s the environmental aspect too: the company’s independent life-cycle assessment has shown that jackfruit’s global warming potential is 94% better than beef, 87% better than pork, and 60% better than chicken.

    “With jackfruit, we’ve found a path for consumers that is sustainable, healthier, and provides the tasty experience they are looking for,” said Jack & Annie’s namesake founder and CEO Annie Ryu.

    Whole-food plant-based on the up

    smashburger vegan
    Courtesy: Smashburger

    The IFIC poll also showed that when it comes to protein intake, whole-plant sources saw the sharpest rise among Americans between 2022 and 2023, with 28% eating them ‘somewhat’ or ‘much more’ now. These foods additionally had the second-lowest drop in consumption rates (behind plant-based meat and seafood analogues), with only 11% of consumers eating them less during this period. (In comparison, red meat consumption was down by 32%, and poultry 15%).

    It highlights the growing importance of whole-food plant-based options for Americans, with protein choices ranging from tofu and tempeh to jackfruit itself. While Jack & Annie’s isn’t the only company working with jackfruit-based proteins – Karana (Singapore), Jack & Bry (UK) and Upton’s Naturals (US) are among a few others – it is the most well-funded, with $28M in total investments following a $23M Series B round in late 2021 after debuting its products in 2020.

    Its partnership with Smashburger signals two opportunities. First, long-standing whole-food plant-based meat brands like Jack & Annie’s parent The Jackfruit Company (which was founded in 2011, the same year as Impossible Foods) might be able to find success with consumers looking for such options. This includes the likes of Upton’s Naturals, NoBull Burger and Big Mountain Foods.

    Second, it’s a marker of the growing prevalence of the whole-food plant-based trend in foodservice. Just earlier this year, Dave’s Hot Chicken released its first meat-free options with cauliflower sliders and bites, and Hard Rock Cafe in Broadway introduced a Veganuary menu with cauliflower wings and a mushroom primavera pasta. Chipotle’s braised tofu (Sofritas) and Shake Shack’s veggie burger also come to mind, as does Chipotle founder Steve Ells’ new chain Kernel, whose menu is focused on whole foods too.

    This is a trend being seen internationally as well. In the UK, Veganuary saw a whole-food plant-based boom. Burger King brought back its black bean burger, Wagamama and Pret A Manger spotlit mushrooms, Leon went all-in on gut health with a bhaji wrap, while Pizza Express introduced a veggie-packed calzone and Zizzi’s new Rustic pizza featured Fable Foods’ pulled shiitake mushrooms.

    With the Smashburger partnership, Jack & Annie’s hopes to make 2024 a significant growth year, and close in on profitability. “We’re excited that consumers across the nation will get to taste what we have known all along: our jackfruit offerings make for delicious and simple plant-based, plant-forward food with naturally meaty taste and texture,” said Ryu. “We are thrilled to move the plant-based category forward.”

    The post Smashburger Jumps on Whole-Food Plant-Based Trend with Jack & Annie’s Jackfruit Burger at All 235 US Locations appeared first on Green Queen.

    This post was originally published on Green Queen.

  • turtletree
    5 Mins Read

    Singaporean startup TurtleTree has become the first precision fermentation dairy company to earn a vegan certification, with its animal-free lactoferrin protein LF+ now sporting the Certified Vegan logo by Vegan Action.

    Called LF+, TurtleTree says its lactoferrin is the first precision-fermented dairy protein to be accredited as a vegan product globally, months after it earned self-affirmed GRAS status in the US.

    This also marks the first time Vegan Action – the most recognised vegan certification body in the US, with over 15,000 accredited products in its catalogue – has provided its stamp to a novel protein in the 24 years since its launch. The accreditation confirms that TurtleTree’s lactoferrin protein is indeed free from animal products, byproducts and testing.

    “As conscious consumers increasingly prioritise ethical choices, we aim to provide food and beverage brands with the unwavering confidence that our products align seamlessly with those evolving values,” said TurtleTree co-founder and CEO Fengru Lin.

    Why vegan certification became important for TurtleTree

    precision fermentation vegan
    Courtesy: TurtleTree

    TurtleTree said its vegan certification has “solidified its unwavering commitment” to animal welfare and meeting evolving consumer demands. While most precision fermentation products don’t involve any animals, their bioidentical nature and the genetic codes required in production can make interpretations complex, especially when adhering to standards originally designed for plant-based products, the startup explained.

    There is certainly a case for clarity here. A 2022 consumer acceptance study by German precision fermentation company Formo, Mercy for Animals, and the University of Bath revealed that respondents wondered how best to categorise animal-free dairy, and whether they’re vegan, plant-based and free from animal involvement at all, or if they should be considered ‘real’ dairy?

    “Preoccupation with broken rules of categorisation was a factor for many of the participants, and many called for regulatory bodies, labelling standards, and transparency in the production process to deliver clarity on these questions,” the authors wrote.

    TurtleTree called vegan certification a “hot-button issue”, explaining that regulatory approval demands extensive safety testing, and some companies choose quicker, cheaper animal studies and preclude products from being accredited as vegan. The startup aims to set a precedent to help create a standardised definition of veganism in the context of precision fermentation.

    Krissi Vandenberg, director of Vegan Action, said this sets a “clear benchmark” for the rest of the industry: “This certification demonstrates the tangible steps companies can take to validate and communicate their values to customers, underlining a collective commitment to ethical standards.”

    Irina Gerry, chief marketing officer of US-Australian precision fermentation company Change Foods and vice chair of the board of directors at industry association Precision Fermentation Alliance, told Green Queen that while vegan certification is a great way to demonstrate a company’s product satisfies strict ethical standards, all companies in the sector might not want to go down this path.

    Whether a food is vegan-friendly is separate from whether it should be labelled as vegan because it transcends just ethical factors. Until now, seeing a vegan product was a sure sign that it was free from dairy – and thus lactose – making it suitable for people with lactose intolerance, but with precision fermentation, the lines are more blurry. While TurtleTree’s dairy protein is lactose-free, that may not be the case for every producer in the space. Furthermore, for folks allergic to dairy proteins themselves, a vegan label may cause added confusion.

    “Given that to date, consumers tend to understand ‘vegan’ as ‘plant-based’, and therefore not expect to encounter a milk allergen, labelling milk protein made via fermentation as vegan could lead to confusion around allergenicity,” explains Gerry. So should all startups aim for vegan certification? “It depends on the company, the specific molecule, and the target consumer.”

    Disrupting the coveted lactoferrin market

    vegan lactoferrin
    Courtesy: TurtleTree

    The startup argues that being the only vegan lactoferrin on the market, LF+ will challenge the dominance of bovine lactoferrin. One of the main whey proteins found in human milk and bovine colostrum produced just after birth, it is also known as ‘first milk’. It’s a highly sought-after protein, as it takes at least 10,000 litres of milk to produce just 1kg of purified lactoferrin and currently retails for $750-$1,500 per kg.

    Due to its limited supply, lactoferrin is only used in a few essential foods and beverages like infant formula and supplements. But it is said to have many functional benefits, including antiviral, antibacterial, anti-carcinogenic, immunity-boosting, gut-strengthening and iron regulation properties. The latter is a major USP, with the protein earning its ‘pink gold’ moniker due to the colour derived from its rich iron content.

    One estimate predicts a 15.8% annual growth for the lactoferrin market, growing from $772.3M in 2023 to $3.3B in 2033. TurtleTree has claimed that its animal-free version will be more affordable and that it has managed to scale up production of the protein, which allows the company to alleviate “the global shortage of lactoferrin”, and attract new consumers previously unable to access the protein due to cost and supply barriers.

    The company has previously said its clients are interested in purchasing $500M worth of LF+ over the next five years. It claims its protein will be more affordable and that it has managed to scale up production to alleviate “the global shortage of lactoferrin”. This will help attract new consumers previously unable to access lactoferrin due to cost and supply barriers.

    Apart from infant formula, multivitamins and supplements, LF+ could be used in protein powders, functional beverages, meal replacements for the elderly, and animal-free dairy products. Vegan Action’s Certified Vegan logo now appears on the product’s packaging, validating its animal-free claims through a third party.

    “Producing milk proteins without farming animals is a big part of the value proposition of precision fermentation,” says Gerry, but she reiterated that whether every company would want to obtain such accreditation is a more nuanced matter. “I always look at it from the end consumer in mind. If a company is targeting a vegan audience, then obtaining vegan certification would be highly beneficial.”

    “However, it may not be needed if a company is targeting a broader set of consumers, especially if these consumers have varied reasons for seeking animal-free products. For some, it could be animal ethics, for others, it could be dairy allergen avoidance… climate or targeted nutrition needs.”

    The post TurtleTree Achieves First Vegan Certification for Precision-Fermented Dairy Proteins appeared first on Green Queen.

    This post was originally published on Green Queen.

  • plant based meat australia
    6 Mins Read

    Despite facing a tough time globally, Australia’s plant-based meat sector has proliferated in the last few years, with the number of products on sale in retail channels growing by 14% from 2022-23, according to alternative protein think tank Food Frontier.

    Out with the burgers, in with the deli meats. That’s the way Australia’s plant-based meat sector has gone over the last few years, according to research by Food Frontier, which found that between September 2022 and 2023, the number of meat analogues on sale down under increased by 13.7%.

    Ahead of the release of its third State of the Industry report in mid-2024, the think tank has released its analysis of audit results of major supermarkets in Melbourne and Sydney in mid-2023, revealing that the volume and types of plant-based meats have changed significantly over the last three years.

    With Australia and New Zealand leading Asia’s alternative protein investments last year, garnering $20M in funding in the first half of 2023, the former country has bucked the global retail trend for plant-based meats, with a threefold increase in on-shelf products over the last few years, from less than 90 to just under 300.

    gfi state of the industry report
    Courtesy: GFI APAC

    Where companies like Beyond Meat and Quorn have struggled overseas, brands like Heck have reduced their plant-based offerings, and labels like Nestlé’s Garden Gourmet have withdrawn from certain markets, the plant-based meat category in Australia has gone from fewer than five Antipodean brands in 2017 to more than 30 in 2023.

    Food Frontier’s 2020 State of the Industry report revealed that plant-based meats alone could generate nearly AU$3B in sales and provide 6,000 full-time jobs by 2030.

    Convenience takes over utility for Australia’s plant-based meat sector

    Food Frontier’s analysis reveals a shift in product categories as well. While burgers and sausages were all the rage a few years ago, the growing need for convenience has seen formats like snacking and finger foods, deli slices and ready meals come to the fore.

    Versatile, functional products that can be integrated into multiple dishes – beef strips and chunks, and whole-cut meats – have proliferated, although there are still fewer than 10 products of each format in the retail market. Between July 2020 and September 2023, the number of burger and uncrumbed seafood analogues has remained the same, while sausage products have just witnessed a 36% increase.

    However, there are 132% products in the crumbed chicken pieces category (nearing nearly 60 on-shelf offerings), with even greater increases for ready meals (254%), whole cuts (350%), deli slices (400%), meatballs (1,000%), and snacking and finger foods (1,100%).

    food frontier
    Courtesy: Food Frontier

    “The market has seen a growth in interest in products presenting more options and greater versatility than the traditional utility products such as burgers and sausages,” Food Frontier CEO Simon Eassom told Green Queen. “Manufacturers have moved to meet the consumer with an increase in chicken-style products both as ready-to-use finished products, but also for inclusion in their cooking (for example, chicken-style strips and chunks), as well as in chicken-based ready meals.”

    Asked whether he expected this shift in format popularities, he said: “We weren’t surprised to see the evolution from burgers and sausages to formats that are more flexible and adaptable to different cuisines. This again reflects a maturing of a market in which consumers are expecting more. The increased provision of deli meats has been interesting to observe, as well as the growth in utilisation of plant-based meats into convenient ready-meal formats.”

    The report suggests that the number of meat alternatives in Australia peaked at about 350 in early 2023, which was followed by consolidation in a few categories. Eassom explained that when these products first appeared on retail shelves, they were utility foods, but with too many manufacturers of the same products, Australians have “voted with their tastebuds and their wallets”.

    Local companies dominate the alt-meat market down under

    The data indicates that formats beyond burgers and sausages that can be incorporated into a much wider range of dishes are gaining favour, and manufacturers are responding accordingly. “We know that the early adopters of plant-based meats in Australia and around the world are flexitarians – they are the cohort, used to centre-of-plate proteins or protein-based dishes, that are now looking for healthier alternatives to those conventional protein sources and for products that mimic what they’re used to buying,” said Eassom.

    A November 2022 YouGov Australia poll revealed that 19% of respondents called themselves flexitarians, while a further 9% were vegan, vegetarian or pescetarian. Taste and health were the top priorities for flexitarians, indicating the challenges for plant-based food manufacturers. Meanwhile, a study from Queensland’s Griffith University in October found that nearly a third (32.2%) of Australians have reduced their meat consumption over the last year, with 71.3% eating either completely meatless diets, mostly plant-based, or having some plant-based dishes in an overall omnivorous diet.

    Food Frontier also found that the lion’s share of the market is now dominated by a few strong brands. And there has been a marked rise in homegrown brands too. With at least 31 plant-based meat manufacturers and ingredient suppliers in Australia – including v2food, The Aussie Plant Based Co and Fable Foods – the companies now make up 56% of plant-based products in major retail in Australia – up from less than half in 2019. International manufacturers like Beyond Meat, Impossible Foods and Fry Family Food are "holding their own" too.

    australia plant based meat market
    Courtesy: Food Frontier

    "A number of factors have affected the decline of international brand products in relation to the growth of Australian manufactured products," Eassom told this publication. "First and foremost, the products from the big, well-known US brands have always been viewed as premium products with a price tag that has been difficult for consumers to meet under recent financial conditions. The relatively weak Aussie dollar has not helped.

    "In addition, several major international food manufacturers have withdrawn their early plant-based meat offerings or are reviewing their strategy within the sector. At the same time, a handful of Australian brands have seized the opportunity to consolidate their position in the market and take advantage of the rise in demand for new formats, such as crumbed chicken-style products.

    "v2food has been extremely successful in its brand positioning within the retail sector as retail buyers have sought to consolidate their relationships around suppliers that can provide the whole range of products; i.e., beef-style as well as chicken-style across a multitude of formats from mince to schnitzels."

    Food Frontier expects the category to keep evolving, with changes in company integration and product formulations not out of the question. “This is a food industry that’s continuing to innovate and adapt to consumer tastes and budgets," said Eassom. "The availability of more sophisticated ingredients will help manufacturers improve products to meet expectations around taste and texture, as well as price."

    The post Plant-Based Meats Grow by 14% in Australian Retail, with Burgers Making Way for Deli Meats & Ready Meals appeared first on Green Queen.

    This post was originally published on Green Queen.

  • plant based meat ultra processed
    6 Mins Read

    A new 17-country survey says that 65% of Europeans are concerned about the health implications of ultra-processed foods, with over half of respondents avoiding plant-based meats because they are ultra-processed.

    With an increasing focus on nutrition and health, the debate around ultra-processed foods (UPFs) and plant-based meat rages on with a new 9,787-person, 17-country poll by European research hub the EIT Food Consumer Observatory.

    The survey has found that 65% of Europeans believe UPFs are unhealthy, and 60% think they’re bad for the environment. And when it comes to plant-based meat, their association with ultra-processing deters 54% of Europeans from buying them.

    The study highlights a lack of awareness of what constitutes UPFs, as well as a misconception about the connection between UPFs and health – despite UPFs taking up a majority of consumers’ diets. In the UK alone, UPFs make up 57% of an average person’s diet, and up to 80% when it comes to children or people with lower incomes. And according to the survey, 55% of Europeans consume UPFs at least once a week.

    “Whether it’s a pre-packaged pasta sauce for a quick meal at home, or a fast-food treat meal out with the family, ultra-processed foods are part of the day-to-day fabric of consumer diets across Europe. However, it’s evident from these findings that people have real concerns about the health and sustainability aspects of these foods,” said Sofia Kuhn, director of public engagement at EIT Food.

    Europeans link UPFs to health conditions but continue to eat them

    ultra processed food consumption
    Courtesy: EIT Food Consumer Observatory

    UPFs originate from the Nova classification. Established in 2009 by a Brazilian group led by nutrition and public health professor Dr Carlos Monteiro, it classed food into four subgroups: unprocessed/minimally processed foods, processed culinary ingredients, processed foods, and UPFs. The latter comprised industrial formulations and techniques like extrusion or pre-frying, combined with cosmetic additives and substances of little culinary use, like high-fructose corn syrup, hydrogenated oils or modified starch.

    The discourse around UPFs has amplified since British infectious diseases physician Dr Chris van Tulleken‘s book, Ultra-Processed People: The Science Behind Food That Isn’t Food, came out in April 2023. Here, he suggested that large food companies are pushing consumers towards an increasingly processed diet.

    Experts have found that UPFs can raise the risk of heart disease, stroke, obesity, type 2 diabetes, breast and colorectal cancer, and hypertension. Along these lines, the EIT Food Consumer Observatory survey found that a third of Europeans believe UPFs contribute to obesity, diabetes and other lifestyle-related health issues, while 65% think they will cause issues later in life.

    ultra processed food healthy
    Courtesy: EIT Food Consumer Observatory

    Additionally, a third dislike it when their foods have ingredients they can’t recognise. But despite that, only 56% make special efforts to avoid UPFs. There are three key reasons for this: convenience, price and taste. The ease of preparation (or none at all) means 41% of Europeans find UPFs convenient compared to minimally processed foods, while an even greater 49% think the former are cheaper than the latter. Many also call UPFs like fast-food takeouts to be tastier than homemade food, while some see them as a treat or comfort food.

    Nearly a third (31%), meanwhile, believe UPFs can be healthy, chiming with a study published in The Lancet last year, which based its findings on the dietary and disease history of 266,666 people in seven European countries to suggest that some UPFs can be good for you. However, 40% of consumers polled by the EIT Food Consumer Observatory don’t trust that UPFs are regulated well enough by authorities to ensure they’re safe and healthy in the long term.

    The UPF link with plant-based meat

    There is a lack of awareness when it comes to the world of UPFs, particularly with their links to healthiness, as well as what foods are actually ultra-processed. The survey found that 54% of Europeans avoid meat alternatives due to their status as UPFs, particularly those who don’t follow meatless diets.

    The gap in education is highlighted by the fact that 61% of consumers correctly identified energy drinks as ultra-processed, but only 34% did so for vegan cheese and 36% for vegan chicken. A hyperawareness of UPFs towards the end of the survey project may have influenced consumers less familiar with traditional plant proteins like tempeh and tofu to label those as UPFs too.

    ultra processed foods survey
    Courtesy: EIT Food Consumer Observatory

    More surprisingly, the climate impact of meat and plant-based analogues is not a persuasive argument for many, with only 27% of Europeans believing vegan alternatives to be better for the climate, and 57% feeling they have a worse impact. This is despite research showing that animal-derived foods like meat and dairy cause twice as many emissions as plant-based foods and vegan diets can reduce emissions, water pollution and land use by 75% compared to meat-rich diets.

    Some have pushed back against a simplistic black-and-white perspective on UPFs, calling them necessary to feed the world and arguing that the lack of an agreed definition spurs confusion about what is or isn’t a UPF. Others have noted that the NOVA system is based on the degree of processing of a certain food but does not speak to nutrition.

    “Some campaigns have deliberately chosen to make a link between plant-based meat and the term ‘ultra-processed’. Their communications suggest – incorrectly – that the term ‘UPF’ is a synonym for ‘unhealthy’,” Churchill Fellow Jenny Chapman told us earlier this month. These campaigns play into concerns some people have around foods that are new – often called ‘food neophobia‘… Some campaigns really hone in on this, by using words like ‘fake’ and ‘unnatural’ to describe plant-based meats (which are safe, nutritious foods).”

    UPF recommendations for food companies and health authorities

    The report offers some key recommendations for authorities, manufacturers and retailers around UPFs. Health institutions and scientists need to define UPFs and make more conclusive and substantiated statements about their short- and long-term healthiness. Health authorities also need to consider the best way to educate consumers about food processing, what it can look like, and its health effects.

    National food recommendations need to emphasise the difference between whole foods and UPFs, and clarify whether plant-based substitutes are UPFs and if that matters for their overall healthiness. Policies can also include restricting UPF promotions, like the UK’s plans to ban two-for-one deals on junk food.

    Manufacturers, meanwhile, can look into cleaner labels for processed foods with fewer “artificial-sounding” ingredients. Plant-based meat makers need to consider that their association with UPFs is hindering them, and thus should explore cleaner labels without additives or transformation of ingredients (like protein isolates).

    plant based meat healthy
    Courtesy: Planted

    As for retailers, they can bring attention to packaged foods that aren’t ultra-processed (like tempeh or tofu), while also deciding against promoting UPFs in discount deals, instead pushing minimally or moderately produced equivalents.

    “The latest findings from the EIT Food Consumer Observatory demonstrate a clear knowledge gap in how consumers identify, understand and engage with how their food is produced,” said Klaus Grunert, director of the EIT Food Consumer Observatory.

    “Giving consumers clearer labelling, guidance and education could help them to better understand and engage with this issue, but it’s also important that concerns over processed food are considered in the wider context of people’s diets and wellbeing. It’s also crucial that we continue to bolster our understanding and agreement of how we classify, evaluate and label foods, so that our advice to consumers is informed by the latest science.”

    Kuhn added: “As a sector, we need to create an environment which empowers individuals to make informed decisions about their diets, and foster a dialogue that not only educates but also inspires positive choices. That way, we can drive forward a healthier and more sustainable food system for all.”

    The post 54% of Europeans Avoid Plant-Based Meat Because It’s Ultra-Processed, with 65% Concerned About Health Impact appeared first on Green Queen.

    This post was originally published on Green Queen.

  • future food quick bites
    7 Mins Read

    In our weekly column, we round up the latest news and developments in the alternative protein and sustainable food industry. This week, Future Food Quick Bites covers Dr. Praeger’s new veggie-forward offerings, Applewood Vegan’s reformulated cheese, and a landmark legal ruling for veganism in Denmark.

    New products and launches

    In Canada, Danone has launched a Silk Greek yoghurt made from locally sourced pea protein in vanilla and key lime flavours. The new products contain 12g of protein per 175g pack.

    silk greek yogurt
    Courtesy: Danone

    Championing the same ingredient, fellow Canadian manufacturer Louis Dreyfus has announced the construction of a pea protein isolate production plant for its Plant Proteins business at the site of its existing industrial complex in Yorkton, Saskatchewan

    Protein Industries Canada, meanwhile, has partnered with Konscious Foods, Avena Foods and Canadian Pacifico Seaweeds to improve the nutritional credentials of existing vegan seafood products and develop new offerings.

    In the US, Plant-based meat giant Impossible Foods will soon begin serving its new beef hot dogs to the Blue Devils basketball team and dining halls on Duke University’s campuses.

    Next Level Burger and its now subsidiary Veggie Grill have launched a new limited-edition Classic Steak sandwich with Meati’s mycelium meat.

    Mycelium bacon producer MyForest Foods has expanded its flagship MyBacon into 57 Whole Foods stores in the northeast, which comes on the heels of a listing at MOM’s Organic Market. It means the product is available in over 350 locations across eight states.

    dr praeger's veggie fries
    Courtesy: Dr. Praeger’s

    Dr. Praeger’s is celebrating its 30th anniversary with two new ranges spotlighting vegetables: Crunchy Burgers and Veggie Fries. The former is available in Southwestern Sweet Potato and Cauliflower variants, made with six vegetables in a gluten-free rice coating, while the latter is offered in California and Cauliflower Broccoli options.

    In Israel, bioprinting startup Steakholder Foods has partnered with tofu producer Wyler Farms to use industrial-scale 3D printing tech to make plant-based steaks, with the former’s printer set to be installed at the latter’s facility between Q4 2024 and Q1 2025.

    There could be an all-veggie KFC in India’s religious city of Ayodhya, where tourism is exploding after the unveiling of the Ram Mandir last month, with a local government official indicating the city would allow KFC to set up a fully vegetarian location, as it has done with Pizza Hut and Domino’s.

    German brand ChoViva‘s cocoa-free chocolate is part of private-label products by retail giant Rewe and its subsidiary Penny, with the innovations now available in select stores.

    Barcelona-based plant-based butchery chain El Vegans has opened a new branch in Málaga, a first-of-its-kind butcher in the southern Spanish cities.

    In the UK, Applewood Vegan has reformulated its plant-based smoked cheese ahead of its fifth anniversary, with the new recipe rendering a “creamier” product that better replicates conventional cheese.

    swiss airlines vegan meal
    Courtesy: Swiss International Air Lines

    And if you’re flying business on Swiss International Air Lines, you can now get a vegan pumpkin and chestnut goulash with spaetzli (egg noodles) dish, made in collaboration with local plant-based egg producer EggField and Zürich vegetarian eatery Hiltl.

    Funding and finance news

    The US Department of Defense has announced a new funding opportunity for food tech companies to apply for biomanufacturing grants worth up to $2M under the new Distributed Bioindustrial Manufacturing Investment Program.

    Netherlands’ Future Food Fund II has closed with a total of €40M, with the European Investment Fund investing €20M in the final close. It has already invested in precision fermentation and cultivated meat businesses like EV Biotech and Extracellular, respectively.

    Austrian 3D-printed seafood producer Revo Foods is crowdfunding, offering a discounted valuation until Sunday, February 18. The startup has already raised €850,000 of its €1.5M goal.

    3d printed salmon
    Courtesy: Revo Foods

    Ontario-based vegan ramen company Borealis Foods – which counts Gordon Ramsay as brand ambassador and shareholder – has commenced trading on the US NASDAQ exchange under the ticker ‘BRLS’.

    US vegan shrimp producer New Wave Foods has ceased operations, with its assets now set to be liquidated and distributed after the company was unable to pay its debts in full.

    In similarly sad news, fellow US plant-based seafood company Ordinary Seafood has wound down its operations and let go of its staff, with founder and CEO Anton Pluschke blaming the bleak funding landscape for food tech.

    Meanwhile, after closing half of its UK stores last year, Lewis Hamilton-backed vegan fast-food chain Neat Burger has rebranded to Neat, dropping the latter word as it diversifies its offerings and prioritises health-focused options.

    neat burger
    Courtesy: Neat

    In New Zealand, Bruce Craig, owner of the county’s rights to Aussie vegan fast-food chain Lord of the Fries, has put the company up for sale for $1.2M after experiencing sales drops post-pandemic.

    Research and manufacturing developments

    Chicago-based Believer Meats has expanded its leadership team, appointing Heather Hudson as chief product and growth officer, Frida Grynspan as chief science officer, and Marc Shelley as chief legal officer. The company expects its commercial-scale facility in Wilson, North Carolina to be operational later this year.

    Danone has completed the conversion of its dairy-based yoghurt plant in Villecomtal-sur-Arros, France to oat milk production for Alpro, in a €43M move that will see workers retain their jobs. It will be capable of producing 100,000 litres of oat milk daily, eventually rising to 300,000 litres.

    Israeli startup ProFuse Technology has launched non-GM bovine cell lines optimised for muscle growth, demonstrating high efficiency in proliferation and differentiation and targeting cultivated meat manufacturers.

    Fellow Israeli company Redefine Meat has revealed the technology and science behind its 3D-printed plant-based meat products in a new paper published in the Frontiers journal, focused on its tissue engineering approach.

    redefine meat
    Courtesy: Redefine Meat

    A report by the European Scientific Advisory Board on Climate Change has advised that funding should be redirected from animal agriculture towards “lower-emitting products and activities”. Currently, farmers in the EU receive 50% of their income directly through government subsidies.

    A new interdisciplinary study will assess the societal impact of cultivated meat, including production costs, commercialisation, safety and regulation. Funded by the British Academy, the Royal Academy of Engineering and the Royal Society with support from the Leverhulme Trust, the research has been selected for an APEX award.

    In New York, UPSIDE Foods hosted an exclusive tasting for its cultivated chicken, which received a rousing endorsement from TED head Chris Anderson, who also took a shot at a New York Times piece targeting the industry.

    Policy progress and awards

    With Plant Based Universities launching in the Netherlands, over 200 Dutch academics have backed calls from students at several universities to transition towards fully plant-based catering. Total signatories – including academics, healthcare professionals, politicians and other public figures – number 1,200.

    In Denmark, a lower court in the city of Hjorring has recognised veganism as a protected belief under Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights, in a case that sparked from a school denying a kindergarten child the right to plant-based meals and refusing to allow her to bring a packed lunch too.

    hungry planet
    Courtesy: Hungry Planet

    Plant-based meat brand Hungry Planet has been nominated for Prince William’s Earthshot Prize, which added vegan experts to judge its 2024 awards, to be announced in November.

    French whole-cut plant-based meat maker Umiami has achieved B Corp certification, ahead of inaugurating its factory in Alsace, eastern France later this year.

    Finally, McDonald’s says it has reached its 2025 goal of 100% cage-free eggs ahead of time, with all locations in the US now featuring these eggs.

    Check out last week’s Future Food Quick Bites.

    The post Future Food Quick Bites: Vegan Earthshot Prize, Dr. Praeger’s Turns 30 & A Neat Rebrand appeared first on Green Queen.

    This post was originally published on Green Queen.

  • marbled steak
    7 Mins Read

    As more and more companies focus on whole-cut plant-based meats, some are relying on fat to produce highly desired marbled textures for consumers – could it be the new ‘holy grail’ for vegan steak?

    Last year, scientists at Texas A&M College of Agriculture and Life Sciences explored how people eat and chew their food, with the goal of discovering what they really wanted in terms of mouthfeel. Dividing them into chewers, crunchers, smooshers and suckers, the researchers found vast differences in texture preferences among Americans.

    They then dove into burgers to find out what the perfect burger for all kinds of eaters could be. Chewers didn’t want a soggy bun, crunchers resented overly dry or chewy burgers, smooshers didn’t care for any gristle, and suckers wanted a burger that’s seasoned before it’s cooked. The distinct tastes are perhaps why it was surprising that when it came to steak, there was a common aspect favoured by all eaters: marbling.

    Even for different reasons – the ageing process produces big gaps among mouth behaviours – higher-marbled steaks were preferred by all respondents. And it speaks to a wider issue in the plant-based meat industry, where texture is highly sought-after. Whole cuts have long been touted as the ‘holy grail’ of meat analogues, but with a host of startups now making these products, we may need to look at what it is that makes these cuts so desirable.

    Plant-based meat’s texture is important, but marbling is tough

    plant based consumer survey
    Courtesy: V-Label

    In marbled products like steak, the fat melts into the meat as it cooks, which results in a juicy, tender mouthfeel. Keying into texture is extremely important for plant-based meat brands, given that in the US alone, texture is the aspect of vegan food consumers dislike the most. In the UK, 51% of people say taste/texture is the biggest factor driving them away from meat alternatives.

    Globally, too, plant-based meat’s texture is as important as their conventional counterparts for 75% of consumers, but only about 60% are actually satisfied with the former. “Consumers want a texture and mouthfeel that’s close to meat,” Shannon Coco, strategic marketing director at Kerry, told FoodNavigator last year. “Without this, the overall experience will be disappointing.”

    But creating heterogenous products like marbled meat is a complex process, with companies facing difficulties “creating solid fat differentiated from protein and with a melting temperature gradient above room temperature”, as explained by the Good Food Institute.

    Juicy Marbles’ whole-cut filet mignon

    plant based whole cut steak
    Courtesy: Juicy Marbles

    So what do you do? Some are working on specific technologies to overcome this hurdle. When Slovenia’s Juicy Marbles launched its filet mignon in 2022, it grabbed headlines across the world for its trademark marbled texture, which is created with its patent-pending, 3D-assembled ‘reverse grinder’ technology.

    “Our business is based around the concept of protein texture – this is the defining factor that draws people to steak, when compared to a cheaper cut,” the startup told TechCrunch in 2021. “In the plant-based meat vertical, there has not been as much innovation in the whole-cuts space, and no one has come close to inventing a steak that resembles anything high-end.”

    Using a grinder it calls the Meat-O-Matic 9000, plant protein fibres are layered on top of each other to mimic animal muscle fibres, with deposits of hardened sunflower oil adding a realistic fat-marbling mouthfeel. But if you go by anecdotal evidence, for many, Juicy Marbles’ steak resembles more of a brisket, braised beef or even pulled pork – demonstrating the challenge plant-based meat producers face in satisfying consumers’ textural preferences.

    Nourish Ingredients’ precision-fermented fat

    nourish ingredients
    Courtesy: Nourish Ingredients

    So, the key is fat – which is exactly what some companies are trying to innovate with. At SXSW Sydney in October, Australian startup Nourish Ingredients unveiled a “breakthrough fat” called Tastilux, which is designed to help plant proteins deliver the same taste, smell and experience as conventional meat. The proprietary fat relies on naturally occurring lipids scaled through precision fermentation, and enables similar cooking reactions when used in plant-based chicken, beef, pork and other alternatives.

    “Tastilux represents a quantum leap in making plant-based meats live up to the rich, fatty taste and cooking performance consumers want and love,” said Nourish Ingredients founder and CEO James Petrie. “We saw an opportunity to revolutionise plant proteins by focusing on the power of fat. Most alternative fats simply can’t replicate the rich, authentic flavour of cooked meat.”

    He explained: “So rather than take a plant-based approach, we analysed the most flavourful animal fats in their uncooked state. Then identified where we could find these in nature, without the animal. By fermenting only the most potent fats, we’re able to recreate the authentic meat experience.”

    Swiss scientist’s pea protein beef

    marbling meat
    Courtesy: ETH Zürich

    In 2022, Swiss material scientist Martin Hoffmann developed technology to create marbled plant-based meat, using a combination of fats and pea protein to make innovative alternatives to meat dishes like steak. He processed the pea protein with biochemical engineering techniques, turning it into a plant ‘dough’ that is pushed through a proprietary attachment and combined with other ingredients like fat.

    The quantity of the oil – added as an emulsion – could be tweaked to ensure flavour-comparable as well as health-forward alternatives to beef. “You have to imitate something highly irregular,” Hofmann said. “Because when we look at one half of a steak, it tells us nothing about what the other half looks like.”

    At the time, he predicted the technique would be market-ready within one year, with his technology assisting B2B customers in developing more realistic meat alternatives to persuade “people to give up cheap, factory-farmed meat”. So far, though, this tech is still in the development stage.

    Project Eaden’s fibre-forward tech

    plant based whole cut meat
    Courtesy: Project Eaden

    Meanwhile, German food tech startup Project Eaden has also been banking on its technological prowess for its vegan steak, with a novel bio-fibre tech that’s similar to fibre-spinning for synthetic fibre, which is used across textile, aviation and automotive industries, among others.

    Project Eaden is using the same technology for meat – and claims it’s highly scalable and affordable. It explains that these fibres can be designed with precision to meet technical requirements like elasticity, water-binding ability and strength. The ultra-thin fibres are bundled into strands replicating conventional muscle tissues and then blended with vegetable fats for a near-identical marbled plant-based steak.

    “Both plant and muscle fibres are versatile building blocks with fascinating material properties, which is why so many of today’s high-tech materials are natural fibre-inspired,” said co-founder David Schmelzeisen. “For example, we use carbon fibre for rockets and satellites, and biomaterial-based implants for humans. Now, for the first time, we’re replicating meat, fibre by fibre, using proven and easily scalable textile industry technologies.” The company planned to go to market at the end of last year, but that hasn’t happened yet.

    Planeteers and Handtmann’s novel solution

    plant based meat marbling
    Courtesy: Planeteers/Handtmann

    Most recently, German companies Planeteers and Handtmann teamed up to provide a way for plant-based manufacturers to develop meat analogues that feature not just marbling or fat layers, but also an authentic, fine fibrous structure.

    Producers can merge a newly developed attachment for Handtmann’s filling and portioning systems with system solutions from Planteneers’ fiildMeat and fiildTex series. The latter is the basis for these meat and fat alternatives to steak, filet strips and bacon, which are produced with a flexible coextrusion system.

    Manufacturers can adjust the size and shape and define the fat layers of the final products based on consumer needs. And depending on the fat ratio and the machine setting, asymmetrical fat marbling is possible. Plus, with a throughput of over a ton per hour, they can churn out large quantities of steak alternatives and meet the demands of larger trade partners.

    Fat is crucial for marbled vegan steak

    lypid fat
    Source: Lypid

    These are just a few examples of what companies are doing to meet consumer demands for texture and mouthfeel. Swedish startup Melt&Marble is leveraging precision fermentation to make realistic animal-free fats, while California’s Yali Bio uses the same tech to engineer alternatives to animal and plant-based lipids and fats for plant-based analogues, including meat.

    Similarly, San Francisco-based Lypid has created a proprietary PhytoFat for plant-based meat, and is now launching meatballs to the US market. Sweden’s Mycorena makes fermented fungi-based fat to replace animal fats, while Barcelona’s Cubiq Foods is developing omega-3 fats for alternative protein. Hong Kong-based OmniFoods makes a vegan OmniNano fat to mimic the juiciness of conventional meat, and AI-led startup Shiru‘s OleoPro plant fat is geared at alt-protein applications.

    And outside vegan applications, Silicon Valley’s Mission Barns is making cultivated animal fat, Dutch startup Upstream Foods makes cell-cultured salmon fat, while Singapore’s ImpacFat makes cultivated fish fat.

    There’s a lot going on in the vegan marbled steak world, but the importance of fat is growing by the day. Can somebody claim the holy grail?

    The post Is Marbling the ‘Holy Grail’ for Plant-Based Steak? appeared first on Green Queen.

    This post was originally published on Green Queen.

  • 6 Mins Read

    With leading beauty conglomerates announcing new beauty lines featuring recombinant collagen, the potential for China to be a leader in the synthetic biotechnology ingredient industry.

    In December 2023, the leading international beauty brand, L’Oréal launched the second generation of its Age Perfect Collagen Royal Anti-Aging Face Cream, tailored exclusively for the discerning Chinese market. This groundbreaking release marked a pivotal moment for L’Oréal Paris skincare as it introduced the pioneering inclusion of recombinant collagen into its product line for the very first time, and also marks an important step in the commercialization of the recombinant collagen industry. The recombinant collagen incorporated into this formulation is said to feature an amino acid sequence that claims 100% homology to type III collagen found in human skin. Its touted unique triple-helix flexible bending structure purportedly allows this collagen variant to seamlessly interact with the skin’s natural collagen, potentially stimulating collagen production at its core. 

    L’Oréal’s launch of this product seems to underscore their commitment to capitalizing on scientific advancements and biotech innovations in skin care. More importantly, the entry of international brand L’Oréal has made China’s hot recombinant protein market even more topical. 

    What is collagen?

    There are at least 28 identified types of collagen, classified according to homology and biological function, each characterized by distinct structures and varying prevalence in the animal body. Collagen is crucial for various functions, including skin elasticity, joint flexibility, hair and nail well-being, and overall tissue health. Its versatility is evident in skin care, where collagen is a common ingredient, potentially imparting anti-ageing effects and promoting smoother, resilient skin. The pharmaceutical field utilizes collagen in medical treatments, wound healing, and regenerative medicine due to its biocompatibility and bioactive properties. Collagen’s influence extends beyond healthcare into the food industry, where it plays a role in dietary supplements, functional foods, and beverages. This multifaceted protein serves as a cornerstone in addressing diverse health and cosmetic needs, highlighting its significance across healthcare, skincare, and nutrition. Moreover, in the culinary world, collagen is used as a gelling agent and thickener, particularly in broths and gelatinous desserts.

    Collagen can be manufactured through two primary methods: natural extraction and synthetic biotechnology. In the natural extraction process, collagen is derived from animal sources like cattle, pigs, and marine animals. Typically, collagen is extracted from specific animal parts, such as the skin, bones, or scales. On the other hand, synthetic biotechnology employs genetically engineered microorganisms, such as bacteria and yeast, to express collagen. The resulting product, known as recombinant collagen, undergoes fermentation and downstream purification processes.

    The ascent of recombinant collagen has captured significant attention, driven by its advanced biotechnological approach that ensures precise control over collagen characteristics and the production of high-purity products. Noteworthy advantages encompass enhanced safety features, such as heightened hydrophilicity, reduced immune rejection, and robust processability, addressing concerns linked to animal-derived collagen. Its positive environmental impact is evident in the elimination of the need for animal husbandry and fishing practices, thereby contributing to marine biodiversity conservation and improved animal welfare. This innovation also eliminates the requirement for cold chain transportation, facilitating easy storage and offering a more sustainable alternative. As fermentation preparation scales up, the economic viability of recombinant collagen increases. 

    Despite these advantages, challenges persist in the commercialization process, focusing on the expression of the triple helix structure, gene fragment selection, triple helix structure construction, and overcoming obstacles in cell transfection and protein purification. While recombinant collagen is still in its early commercialization stage, the current emphasis is on scaling up production and reducing costs to facilitate broader adoption.

    Courtesy: L’Oréal China

    The history of recombinant collagen in China

    Research into recombinant collagen in China has a substantial history. In the 2000s, a research team initiated the exploration of synthetic biology technology for developing recombinant collagen. This effort eventually culminated in the establishment of the first publicly listed company in this domain, Xi’an Giant Biogene. Notably, in 2014, Nanjing University of Science and Technology collaborated with Jiangsu Jland Biotech to jointly undertake the “Key technologies for high-density fermentation of genetically engineered bacteria to express collagen, efficient separation processes, and their Industrialization” project as part of the China National High-tech Research and Development Program, commonly known as the 863 Program. This initiative has since led to the incubation of numerous research and commercialization projects in the field.  

    The start of 2024 brings optimistic developments to the industry. Jiangsu Trautec, a recombinant collagen company backed by Japanese beauty brand Shiseido and French luxury brand LVMH, initiated the process of registering for listing guidance with the Jiangsu Securities Regulatory Bureau on January 8. This marks a promising start for the sector. As of today, it is estimated that more than 30 companies are actively developing and commercializing recombinant collagen pipelines in China. Jiangsu Trautec, Jiangsu Jland Biotech, Shanxi Jinbo Biopharmaceuticals (a supplier of recombinant collagen ingredients to L’Oréal), and Xi’an Giant Biogene currently stand at the forefront of the industry.

    Vegan Collagen Broth; courtesy: Liven Proteins

    Recombinant collagen: the economic opportunity

    According to research by Frost & Sullivan, the retail sales for China’s animal-derived collagen and recombinant collagen markets in 2021 are projected to be 17.9 billion yuan (2.77 billion USD) and 10.8 billion yuan (1.67 billion USD), respectively. The CAGRs from 2017 to 2021 of animal-derived collagen and recombinant collagen markets stand at 21.8% and 63.0%, respectively. The collagen market is anticipated to sustain a robust growth trajectory in the coming years. By 2027, the overall size of China’s collagen product market is estimated to reach 173.8 billion yuan (24.42 billion USD), exhibiting a CAGR of 34.3%. Within this, the CAGR for recombinant collagen is forecasted to be 42.4%, surpassing that for collagen derived from animal sources at 25.3%. The expected increase in the penetration rate of recombinant collagen from 37.7% in 2021 to 62.3% in 2027 is noteworthy, indicating a substantial market shift. Consequently, the market size for recombinant collagen is predicted to reach 108.3 billion yuan (15.22 billion USD).

    Courtesy: Liven Proteins

    The recombinant collagen startup landscape

    For example, Liven Proteins is a Canada-based company focused on the production of animal-free collagen ingredients for China and the global market. Liven uniquely plays in the food and nutrition sector, particularly focusing on functional foods, beverages, and nutraceuticals to support healthy ageing. In comparison with collagen for skin, hair and nails, collagen ingredients for health benefits, such as Type II collagen for joint health, are premium ingredients with 10-100x price compared with commodity collagen. Odourless and completely soluble, Liven’s ingredients also offer adaptability for creating consumer-friendly products that meet the increasing demand for health-conscious choices.

    Other recognizable international players in the field of recombinant collagen encompass Avantor, ProColl, Merck, ACROBiosystems, Geltor, and Jellatech. Still, with the fast development and commercialization in China, it will be difficult for China to be left behind, not only for collagen but in all coming applications in the recombinant protein space. As of today, there are numerous examples of Chinese companies’ successful commercialization of fermentation products and holding leading positions in the subsectors, such as hyaluronic acid, amino acids, and erythritol.

    The development of the recombinant collagen market in China for skincare applications is indicative of the increasing power of synthetic biology to replace traditional animal-based sources. The application of recombinant collagen in the medical and cosmetics industries is just the beginning. We expect that with the development of technology and the expansion of production scale, recombinant collagen will soon be applied in other areas with lower cost structures, such as nutraceuticals, functional foods and beverages, and even bulk raw materials for food production. 

    This post was authored by Rouyu Wu, Director of Investment and Innovation at Dao Foods. For a more in-depth view of China’s developments in fermentation and new proteins, download The New Protein Adoption in China Report.

    The post L’Oréal Launches Animal-Free Collagen Skincare in China, As Recombinant Technology Gains St appeared first on Green Queen.

    This post was originally published on Green Queen.

  • 6 Mins Read

    Swiss multinational Nestlé SA has debuted its first precision fermentation dairy protein powder, an animal-free and lactose-free whey isolate product dubbed Better Whey under the Orgain brand, which it acquired a majority stake in back in early 2022 to strengthen its foothold in the functional nutrition space.

    The limited edition product was announced in a social media post by the company’s Research & Development team: “Developed in our R&D Center for Nestlé Health Science in partnership with Orgain the product includes a precision fermented whey ingredient that is bio-identical to whey protein, it is lactose-free and easier to digest.”

    Customers can order Orgain’s Better Whey on the company’s website. It is priced at $29.99 for a 13.3-ounce tub, around $2.3 per ounce. The brand’s plant-based whey, which has the same amount of protein per serving, costs approximately $1.2 per ounce, close to half of the fermented whey version.

    The whey comes in a Creamy Chocolate Fudge flavour. Other ingredients include alkalized cocoa, organic guar gum, and Orgain’s organic creamer base made from acacia, sunflower lecithin and sunflower oil.

    According to Statista, the global whey protein market was valued at approx. $19.6 billion as of 2022 and pundits expect the sector to continue to grow as health-forward consumers in geographies like Asia Pacific drive demand for personal nutrition products. Most whey protein products contain lactose, a sugar found in cow’s milk that around 68% of the global population is intolerant to. There is a growing demand for lactose-free whey isolate powders such as Orgain’s Better Whey.

    Nestle’s dairy decarbonization goals

    Back in September 2022, Nestlé shared its plans to “explore emerging technologies for animal-free dairy proteins” via its newly launched US R&D Accelerator, promising that it would bring it to “the U.S. market later this year as a test-and-learn”. The new product was to be developed by its R&D teams in Switzerland and use Perfect Day’s whey protein. In December of that year, the company debuted two flavours of Cowabunga Animal-Free Dairy Beverages in select Safeway grocery stores. It’s unclear whether these products are still available today – they no longer appear on the supermarket chain’s website.

    Joanna Yarbrough, head of Nestlé’s R+D Accelerator said at the time the company wanted to serve a more climate-conscious consumer: “While this category is still very young, we know consumers are looking for products that have a reduced environmental footprint, and we are evaluating this avenue as a future growth opportunity for our business.”

    The announcement post for the new Orgain Better Whey made direct reference to the company’s commitment to reducing the carbon footprint of its dairy products, stating: “Through investing in initiatives to reduce the carbon footprint of dairy, launching more plant-based dairy alternatives, and exploring emerging technologies for animal-free dairy proteins, Nestlé will be able to transform its portfolio as a part of its broader commitment to provide food that’s good for people and the planet.”

    Mandatory reporting of Scope 3 emissions under the EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) Scope 3 emissions regulation will no doubt have played a role in the company’s foray into food tech innovations that can help lower the emissions footprint of mainstream food products. Conventional dairy products are one of the worst offenders in terms of greenhouse gas emissions. Multiple LCA reports have shown that precision fermentation dairy products, which involve using microbes to produce bio-identical dairy proteins without the need for animals, have a vastly lower impact.

    On the Orgain website, the product description touts the Better Whey Protein Powder as containing “21 grams of sustainable protein per serving”, adding that it is “easier to digest compared to traditional whey protein” and is “10 times more sustainable” than traditional whey protein made from cows”. The page features fairly detailed additional information about the product’s environmental impact claims. The company does not specify if it partnered with a third party, such as Perfect Day, on the animal-free whey itself.

    A ‘BIG deal” for the precision fermentation category

    Irina Gerry, Chief Marketing Officer for US-Australian precision fermentation company Change Foods and Vice Chair of the Board of Directors at industry association Precision Fermentation Alliance, called the announcement a “BIG deal.”

    She told Green Queen that “seeing a major brand like Orgain launch whey made via precision fermentation signals category transition into mainstream distribution.”

    She said she was “particularly excited to see the dual benefit communication around nutrition and sustainability”, adding “We know consumers are seeing products that are both good for them and for the planet, and this product delivers on both with ease and simplicity.”

    Christian Poppe, director of Global Public Affairs & Sustainability at German precision fermentation leader Formo and Founder & Policy Lead at industry alliance Food Fermentation Europe, told Green Queen it was brilliant to see Nestlé “join the mission all FFE members are on”, namely, to “developing bio-identical proteins that are better for the planet and humans alike.”

    In addition, Poppe underlined that the significant environmental challenges facing global food systems could not be solved by startups alone. “Decarbonizing the food sector requires all hands on deck. We salute our colleagues at Nestlé and invite them to work with us on creating a European policy shift that helps accelerate the transition to an equitable and healthier food system.”

    Precision fermentation dairy startups find limited commercial success to date

    The precision fermentation dairy sector, which comprises a few dozen companies worldwide, most of which are still at pilot stage, has had minimal mainstream commercial success with a handful of limited edition trials but few long-term breakouts.

    In November 2021, General Mills announced it was the first major food brand to debut a PF dairy product with Bold Cultr, a cream cheese spread made with Perfect Day’s animal-free whey protein and developed by its corporate venture studio G-Works. The product was discontinued in February 2023, with the company stating it had made “the difficult decision” to “de-prioritizing funding” for the project.

    French dairy giant Bel Groupe invested in PF startup Standing Ovation in late 2022 and promised to work closely with the latter to bring precision fermentation into its catalogue of products including popular brands Laughing Cow, Boursin and Babybel but as of now, no product launches have been confirmed. Bel Brands USA collaborated with Perfect Day on a line of animal-free whey cream cheeses under the brand Nurishh in late 2022 but they appear to be no longer available. Similarly, in mid-2022 Mars said it was partnering with Perfect Day on CO2COA, a vegan chocolate bar targeted at millennials and Gen-Zs but as of today, the site still says coming soon.

    While this marks Nestlé’s first fermentation-derived whey product, Californian precision fermentation pioneer Perfect Day had previously launched a line of fermentation whey protein powders under the brand California Performance Co, though the company has since ceased operations. Perfect Day’s whey protein also appears in MyProtein’s animal-free, lactose-free Whey Forward range, which is still available on the latter’s website and features in Unico Nutrition’s hybrid protein powder Apollo II.

    Steve Molino, Principal at Clear Current Capital, a food tech venture capital fund that invested in Change Foods, told Green Queen that Nestlé’s new Orgain Better Whey was an “exciting development for the sustainable food space.” At the same time, he warned: “It’s a bit of a sobering wake-up call for the startup community, as it’s one thing for a large corporation to be doing R&D around a new technology and another to launch a product in the market. It shows that large incumbents won’t necessarily only innovate through acquisitions.”

    The post Nestlé Debuts Orgain Better Whey, Its First Animal-Free Protein Powder appeared first on Green Queen.

    This post was originally published on Green Queen.

  • one planet pizza
    7 Mins Read

    One Planet Pizza co-founder Joe Hill tells Green Queen about the company’s uphill battle in the face of Brexit, war and a pandemic; going on The Apprentice; his trouble with misinformation about veganism, and selling a million pizzas.

    Friday night was always pizza night at the Hills’. Joe Hill and his sister made everything from scratch: the dough, the sauce, the works. Their dad Mike, however, was missing out on what is every kid’s favourite thing about pizza: the cheese. “He had always been a passionate and devoted vegan,” explains Joe, recalling how he himself was vegetarian, before Cowspiracy convinced him to make the switch to plant-based.

    Soon after, though, Mike came to him with a “crazy idea”, as he puts it: he wanted to “set up a vegan pizza company together and try to save the world one slice at a time”. That was 2016, and since then, they have sold a slice or two – recently, Joe announced that One Planet Pizza has shipped a million frozen plant-based pizzas.

    “It actually took me by surprise that we’d hit that number recently,” he tells me. “We’re still a small team, but we’ve always punched above our weight and aimed for the stars. Selling a million vegan pizzas has given us even more motivation to keep pushing forward and sell the next million.”

    vegan margherita
    Courtesy: One Planet Pizza

    Eight years since launch, One Planet Pizza is available in over 1,000 locations across Europe – from Gibraltar, Sweden and Spain to Iceland, Malta and Cyprus. But in its home country, the UK – a country that eats over 5,000 pizza slices per capita in their adult life – it has made a huge splash through Asda and Getir.

    “We’re also listed with three major wholesalers who distribute our pizzas out to smaller retail and food service customers,” notes Hill. “The big volume for pizza comes from the major retailers and so my focus this year is to win that second listing here in the UK.” (One Planet Pizza has been campaigning to get onto Sainsbury’s shelves.)

    Turning the tide with passion and pizzas

    You don’t see many father-son duos in business leadership – at least in the alternative protein space. Wonder what that’s like? “Great fun,” Hill says of his dad, who turned 60 last weekend. “We have plenty of disagreements and heated debates as we’ve grown the business together, but we’ve always remembered to have a laugh and enjoy ourselves along the way,” he explains. “I’d like to think we’re closer than ever, but you’d have to ask him for his take on that!”

    As a food company – especially a vegan one – One Planet Pizza has had its fair share of challenges, especially in the last few years. The company was launched the same year the UK voted to leave the EU, though that wouldn’t actually happen until 2020, the year all CPG brands had to pivot to online as the world shut down. “But I think 2022 was our hardest year to date,” says Hill.

    “With a war in Europe, soaring inflation, ingredient shortages, staff shortages, nervous investors, [and] retailers reluctant to take on new brands, we hit rock bottom,” he recalls. “Within a few months, our outgoings had rapidly overtaken our income, and it was only going to get worse. Fellow vegan brands were collapsing around us and, if I’m being honest, we were pretty damn scared.”

    mike hill
    Courtesy: One Planet Pizza | Graphic by Green Queen

    It was sink or swim for the business. “The only way we could keep the company alive was to close down our family kitchen and office, and move our production out to a contract manufacturer in the Netherlands,” says Hill. He likens it to a chicken-and-egg situation: “Manufacturers always required the volumes that came from a major listing, but to get those listings we often needed the support and backing of a manufacturer.”

    After pushing its Norwich facility to its limits with the Asda listing, One Planet Pizza quickly made hay out of Brexit, moving production overseas and ensuring an overlap to avoid any stock issues. “This was by far the hardest project we’ve ever tackled,” suggests Hill. “But now, it’s been over a year and we’re starting to see the many benefits: freeing up our time as founders, reducing our overheads, protecting our margins, and hugely improving our capacity. Not to mention opening up new opportunities abroad through our manufacturer’s existing sales channels.”

    The move also allowed the company to achieve accreditation from the British Retail Consortium, certifying it is a supplier with high food safety standards in place. Plus, shifting operations to the Netherlands likely made the frozen pizza producer’s partnership with local vegan cheesemaker Willicroft. “This B Corp is 100% plant-based and they work with local farmers to incorporate white beans into their delicious cheezes,” he explains. “They can make cheeze better than we ever could and it pairs perfectly with our range of pizzas. Healthier, sustainable, and melts perfectly – what’s not to love?”

    It’s this pragmatism that has propelled One Planet Pizza to its current heights. “As long as we’ve got air in our lungs, passion in our hearts, and pizzas in the oven, Mike and I have always believed in each other and our mission,” notes Hill. “It’s this unwavering belief that’s kept us going through all these years and against all the odds.”

    Misinformation is confusing consumers and hurting the vegan sector

    vegan pizza
    Courtesy: One Planet Pizza

    The global vegan frozen pizza market was estimated at $854M last year, and is set to cross $1.9B by 2033. In the UK, even in 2021, 35% of consumers said they’d want to try vegan pizza toppings. Clearly, Brits want pizza, and as more of them eat plant-based – the number of vegans in the UK rose by 78% from 2022-23 – restaurants, companies and retailers have come up with an increasing number of plant-based options to satiate consumers’ wishes and appetites.

    “We currently divide our competition into three groups,” explains Hill. “Supermarket own-label pizzas (cheap and not-so-cheerful), smaller brands (White Rabbit and Zizzi), [and] bigger brands (Chicago Town and Goodfellas). But we see our real competition as the big multinational corporations that fill the shelves with cheap and unhealthy meat and dairy pizzas that are harming our health and planet.”

    Speaking of big multinational corporations, One Planet Pizza partnered with Unilever-owned ice cream brand Ben & Jerry’s last month for an Asda-exclusive bundle offer. “We’re always keen to partner with bigger brands to reach as many people as possible. And Ben & Jerry’s have always been a fun, exciting, taste-first brand that we’ve been inspired by from day one,” says Hill.

    “After a couple of emails and a lot of favours, I was absolutely chuffed to get a call with the right person on their team. They have a fantastic dairy-free range of ice creams and were keen to work with a challenger brand in this space to show customers just how delicious and indulgent vegan food is and can be,” he adds, before teasing that more such meal-deal partnerships are incoming.

    Collaborations like these will certainly build exposure for the vegan pizza startup, and – forgive the pun – help it make some dough. Hill says was the first UK vegan company to crowdfund, back in 2016/17: “Since then, we’ve gone through several rounds of investment and added a few major private investors to our board.” This includes a £360,000 ($490,000) funding round in 2021.

    frozen vegan pizza
    Courtesy: One Planet Pizza

    One Planet Pizza is fundraising again currently to fuel its global expansion, supporting “a couple of new listings this year, one in the UK and another in the UAE”. Moreover, it will launch a new product to complement its four-strong pizza portfolio (which comprises Margherita, Peppernomi, Tex Mex and Hawaiian). Plus, Hill is appearing on BBC show The Apprentice this month (he has previously pitched the business on Dragons’ Den years ago, but the episode never aired).

    “Expect more partnerships with big brands in frozen this year and plenty of embarrassing pizza costume stunts across social media,” he adds. Social media is a place where misinformation about alternative proteins is rampant. Hill has trouble with the narrative that the “plant-based bubble has burst”, which he believes confuses consumers and hurts the sector.

    “Here in the UK right now, a government-backed campaign is targeting younger people and encouraging them to eat British meat and dairy for their own health,” he points out. “This goes against what many experts and scientists are saying and is leading to wide mistrust amongst consumers who are looking to make healthier and more sustainable food choices.”

    Looking to the future, Hill hopes to see One Planet Pizza as a go-to vegan pizza brand available “in every freezer in the country”. “Mike may be retired and working on his animal sanctuary,” he predicts. “But I’ll probably still be handing out pizza samples to the masses and working on new products that will keep raising the bar for plant-based food.”

    The post One Planet Pizza’s Joe Hill: ‘Selling A Million Vegan Pizzas Took Me By Surprise’ appeared first on Green Queen.

    This post was originally published on Green Queen.

  • green alliance
    7 Mins Read

    With agriculture’s impact on the climate becoming clearer than ever, there are distinct views on how best to tackle the problem and enable a healthy, affordable and sustainable food system. A new report looks at the most ideal approach.

    With agrifood systems accounting for a third of all global emissions and awareness about climate change finally becoming starker by the day to more and more people, there is radical disagreement on the best way to fight the crisis. For example, food security stems from local production for some, while for others, it means raising demands to meet a Western-style diet.

    The result of these contrasting opinions is stasis, according to a new report by British think tank Green Alliance. Titled Crossing the Divide, the report argues that policymakers are confused over the best course of action for agriculture, and end up doing little to nothing about it for that reason.

    So how can we harmoniously agree to disagree and fix our food system? Green Alliance identified four competing worldviews, and how they can work together to create viable solutions.

    The four differing worldviews for the future of agrifood

    food climate change
    Courtesy: Green Alliance

    The first worldview – and the most dominant in Europe – belongs to Traditionalists, who are resistant to fast-paced and large-scale changes. For them, farmers need to be valued as food producers and guardians of the countryside and traditions. They take a pragmatic, conservative approach to farm technologies and practices, and don’t see climate change as a specifically big issue for agriculture.

    Traditionalists are largely opposed to meat and dairy reduction, arguing that they are nutritionally important and downplaying their climate impact by focusing on the role of ruminants in soil carbon sequestration. This group also believes in free trade for exports, as well as restrictions on imports to protect local systems. But the report outlines their approach – which regards changes to the food system as attacks on farmers – as defensive and resistant to shifts needed to address climate change.

    The proponents of the next worldview are Agroecologists, who believe a complete restructuring of the food system is key to shifting power from big businesses to family farmers more in touch with nature. They promote food sovereignty, social justice, and low-intensity, chemical-free farming, alongside localised food systems and ‘slow food’ culture.

    For Agroecologists, land sharing is the best way of preserving nature. Since agroecological systems have a lower yield, this group agrees that a significant reduction in meat consumption is needed to live off land without chemicals, and proposes a whole-food plant-based approach that uses meat as flavour instead of a centrepiece. They’re also capitalism-sceptic and reject free trade in favour of local food production, and are thus suspicious of Big Food and Big Agriculture – though their worldview is more comprehensive and demanding than the rest.

    Then there are the Technovegans, who see food tech as central to tackling climate change by displacing meat and dairy with alternative proteins and eliminating food production from land and ecosystems. They favour high-tech, capital-intensive solutions, are strong opponents of land sparing, and are at ease with today’s trade and economic systems.

    Technovegans don’t believe eating habits will significantly change, so find alternatives to meat, dairy and eggs as the only way to change diets and land use at the pace and scale necessary. This is a more scientific outlook seeing ‘natural’ food as marketing hype, but the idea of plant-based meats being ultra-processed food means they’re often seen as ‘Frankenfoods’. And their wish for Big Food to scale up their products could be seen as enabling corporate control.

    Finally, Sustainable Intensifiers mirror the technophilia and land-sparing support of Technovegans, but champion innovations in farming rather than food manufacturing. The focus is first on maximising yield, and then on minimising climate impacts, using agtech solutions like genetic modification, marker-assisted breeding, and remote sensing to predict yields and precisely dose pesticides, irrigation and fertilisers.

    This group thinks wealthy countries have a duty to feed the world, and promote the export of cheaply produced grains, dairy and meat to global consumers. Sustainable Intensifiers are okay with farming subsidies if they go towards yields, and promote a switch to “more efficient” livestock (like chicken over beef). But this cohort is split into two: those with strong eco credentials, and ‘true intensifiers’ primarily concerned with intensifying production with sustainability as a secondary goal.

    Alliances between worldviews can lead to progress

    vegan vs meat
    Courtesy: Green Alliance

    Very few people will fit neatly into a single category, and the report suggests an alliance between certain worldviews could drive forward environmental progress (though one such collaboration might lead to negative outcomes).

    The first progressive alliance is between Technovegans and Agroecologists, whose strength lies in mirroring each other’s weaknesses. Agroecology needs radical dietary change to be scaled up, which Technovegans can provide, while the latter needs to avoid being perceived as ‘anti-farmer’, which would be helped by joining forces with the former.

    There are three potential areas of agreement: the need to reduce meat and dairy consumption, restoring nature in a culturally sensitive way, and a shared enemy in the industrial meat lobby. However, there are some disputes that would need to be set aside, including the involvement of Big Meat in buying vegan companies to scale up plant-based products, and the fear that alternative protein products could displace agroecologically produced meat.

    One possible solution is to encourage more diversity in the alternative protein industry and ensure that the protein transition follows a food justice approach (which could require significant policy change). “The simplest accommodation on both sides would be the understanding that, from an environmental and animal welfare perspective, ‘Big Veganism’ is preferable to the status quo of industrially farmed livestock,” the report states.

    Another alliance that could bring about environmental benefits involves Technovegans and Sustainable Intensifiers, marrying their enthusiasm for food tech and land sparing. This could keep land use at low levels, especially in countries like the US, where less land is dedicated to agriculture as intensive farming is the norm.

    There are some challenges here too, of course: Sustainable Intensifiers don’t believe widespread dietary change is required, suggesting intensive farming of more efficient livestock as a solution to meet increased demand, which runs counter to the worldview of the Technovegans who find animal agriculture as the most environmentally destructive activity. Plus, alt-protein products are directly competing to displace industrially farmed meat, and this partnership threatens any potential Agroecologist–Technovegan alliance – if it becomes dominant, it would be difficult to change course.

    The best-case scenario is for Sustainable Intensifiers to capture the meat market that alternative proteins can’t easily replicate, like steak, while the latter could dominate the processed meat market and displace demand growth from the former, sparing more land.

    However, there is one alliance that could make things worse for the environment. Agroecologists and Traditionalists are already loosely forming alliances in Southern Europe based on a shared enemy: Technovegans. Their interests lie in reducing the threat posed by the industrialisation of alt-proteins to keep demand for meet high, emphasising the role of livestock in rural culture and diet, and being sceptical of non-traditional foods or farming methods.

    Why collaboration is vital among polarisation

    agriculture climate change
    Courtesy: Vaclav Volrab/Getty Images

    The Green Alliance outlines that the current trajectory of food, agriculture and land use is not sustainable, and business as usual would result in the worst outcomes for all four worldviews, including for the Traditionalists, as well as make it impossible to meet climate goals.

    To illustrate its point, the report takes the example of the Netherlands, whose government’s failure to tackle nitrogen pollution led to a 2019 court case that forced it to take drastic action; Italy, which has banned cultivated meat in the interest of protecting food heritage and health; and the UK, whose prime minister Rishi Sunak has rallied against an imaginary meat tax.

    “Polarised debates between different approaches to the future of food production and agriculture are leading to paralysis,” reads the report. “At present, the four worldviews we have characterised here are, mostly, uncompromising… Finding common ground between these different perspectives could provide a route forward.”

    The study shows that the “current impasse in food and land use policy is pernicious, arising from a superficial agreement about goals which disguises deep division amongst people who hold very different worldviews”. Experts, advocates and philanthropists looking to make progress should explore ways to create alliances between these different worldviews to bring change, instead of focusing on promoting their ideal food and land systems individually.

    The post ‘Crossing the Divide’: The Four Worldviews for the Future of Agriculture, and How to Combine Them appeared first on Green Queen.

    This post was originally published on Green Queen.

  • hill's pet nutrition
    4 Mins Read

    US companies Bond Pet Foods and Hill’s Pet Nutrition have announced a milestone development in their partnership, trading two tonnes of precision-fermented proteins to create animal-free products for our furry friends.

    Colorado-based Bond Pet Foods has made its first delivery to Kansas-based industry giant Hill’s Pet Nutrition, shipping two tonnes of its animal-free protein made from precision fermentation. The latter will formulate test products with this protein for market evaluation and regulatory review.

    It represents a landmark moment for commercialising Bond’s fermentation tech for pet food applications. “Producing tons of product at the 45,000-litre scale is a major milestone in the Bond-Hill’s collaboration,” said Bond founder and CEO Rich Kelleman. “Additionally, Hill’s commitment to expand on our work together demonstrates the opportunity we collectively see in Bond’s ingredients for their and the pet industry’s food future.”

    The need for alternative pet food

    vegan pet food
    Courtesy: Bond Pet Foods

    The companies have also announced a second joint development agreement, which will see them develop another animal protein for potential use in Hill’s products. This extends the link-up between the two brands, which began in late 2021 with the aim to create more sustainable proteins to fulfil the dietary needs of dogs and cats.

    In the US, producing dry cat and dog food equates to between 25-30% of all emissions related to animal consumption by Americans. And globally, these two categories emit around 64 million tons of carbon per year – that’s the equivalent of more than 13 million cars. Research has also found that dogs and cats consume about 9% of all land animals slaughtered for food (numbering seven billion annually).

    In fact, if all the world’s canines and felines were put on a nutritionally complete vegan diet, it could help feed nearly 520 million people, conserve land the size of multiple countries, and also save billions of animals from slaughter.

    “Increasing concerns about environmental sustainability, farmed animal welfare and competition for traditional protein sources are driving considerable development of alternative pet foods,” suggested one study last year, which found that vegan diets for cats may be healthier than meat-based ones. It followed research published in 2022 suggesting that vegan diets are the healthiest and least hazardous choice for dogs.

    This is why a host of companies are working on alternative proteins for pets, including Wild Earth, Noochies, Omni and The Pack. These producers will be hoping to disrupt the $9.2B vegan cat food and $14.1B plant-based dog food markets, both of which are expected to nearly double over the next decade.

    Meanwhile, startups like BioCraft Pet Nutrition, Marina Cat and Bene Meat are making cultivated meat for pets. But the only other company developing precision-fermented ingredients for pet food is Belgium’s Paleo, which makes an animal-free, yeast-based myoglobin for these applications.

    Preparing for market evaluation and regulatory review

    bond pet foods
    Courtesy: Bond Pet Foods

    Founded in 2017, Bond has raised $20M in total funding, including a 17.5M Series A round in 2022, backed by the likes of Agronomics, ADM Ventures, Lever VC, Genoa VC, Cavallo Ventures, and Plug and Play Ventures, among others. And Hill’s, a subsidiary of Colgate-Palmolive, recorded $1.11B in net sales in Q4 2023, up by 5% year-on-year, with $231M in profit.

    According to the companies, 74 million dogs and 56 million cats in American households currently consume large amounts of animal-based protein. The former’s precision fermentation platform – similar to craft brewing – is looking to change that, with an ability to efficiently reproduce high-quality meats like chicken, turkey and beef for pet food applications.

    Bond harvests these proteins to better meet the nutritional requirements of companion animals, and supplies the ingredients to manufacturers for pet food, treat and supplement applications. The scale of its delivery to Hill’s will allow the latter to develop a variety of products at its Pet Nutrition Center in Topeka, Kansas. Once this protein is evaluated, the data will be used for the ingredient’s eventual review by the FDA’s Center for Veterinary Medicine, and to prepare prototypes for market evaluation.

    “Hill’s is known for its leadership in precise, complete and balanced, science-based nutrition,” said Dave Baloga, Hill’s executive VP of science and technology. “We are excited to continue our relationship with Bond and support their truly novel approach to produce animal proteins in a more sustainable way that meets our high-quality standards.”

    The post Bond Pet Foods and Hill’s Pet Nutrition Reach Scaling Milestone for Precision-Fermented Proteins appeared first on Green Queen.

    This post was originally published on Green Queen.

  • 8 Mins Read

    Veganuary has been a great success, but after a decade of expansion, growth has plateaued. Dissecting the playbook of Dry January, the other global January phenomenon, gives us important marketing lessons we can apply to break into the mainstream and make an even greater impact.

    Editor’s Note: This article is a collaboration with Unstuck, a thought piece platform bringing the missing consumer mindset and skillset needed to take sustainable foods mainstream; all views are the authors’ own.

    Veganuary, a movement encouraging people to try a plant-based diet, has racked up impressive results since its birth in York ten years ago. The vision, passion, and dedication of the team behind the annual challenge has gotten 1.8 million people to attempt going vegan across virtually every country on Earth and has even gone to space. Over time, however, the movement has started to plateau, with its founder saying in a recent Guardian interview that “the pace of growth has levelled off; progress has slowed.” So how do we get it unstuck?

    As luck would have it, we have a parallel example in Dry January, a movement that promotes alcohol abstinence. Both are cleansing rituals timed to start after a period of excess. Both were started in the UK about a decade ago, a mere year apart. And both have ambitions to expand their reach globally and affect longer-lasting behaviour change. But Dry January has been uniquely able to build on its growth, going from a niche phenomenon to an early majority of adopters.

    We can see this in a crude measure like worldwide Google Trends search volume, with Dry January doubling over the past five years while Veganuary has declined in relative terms. We can also see it in self-reported participation data in key markets. The latest comparable data from You gov in the UK, the home market for both movements, shows 15% of Britons who drink planned to give up alcohol in January, while 3% of meat and dairy eaters said they would attempt to go vegan for the month. The picture in the US is less clear, with a range of “alternative facts” suggesting different participation rates. The consensus, however, seems to be that Dry January has crossed the 20% threshold taking it from a niche phenomenon into the early majority of adopters, while Veganuary is still somewhere in the single digits.

    Let’s be clear on one thing – going vegan for a month is more difficult than laying off booze. Having to plan for breakfast, lunch and dinner every day, as well as take into account the fact that meals are shared, makes it a bigger behaviour change than ordering a mocktail or leaving the bottles in the cellar for a little while longer. 

    Despite this difference, there are core marketing lessons in comparing the two that Veganuary could benefit from and use to drive more traction. Imagine what 20+% of major markets going plant-based could do for the planet. Some disciplined marketing – we’re talking the fundamentals of targeting, positioning, identity, tonality and partnerships – could help us get there.

    If you want to go broad, you have to target broad

    All marketing strategy starts with segmentation and targeting. Dry January has excelled at this by identifying a broad but specific audience: social drinkers who see the new year as a reset button for healthier habits. Its inclusive appeal, avoiding the teetotaler label, invites a diverse demographic and has taken on a life of its own to become part of popular culture. Veganuary, to mirror this success, must refine its targeting. Currently, the main motivation for participation according to the movement’s own data is animal welfare followed by environmental reasons, suggesting a relatively narrow segment of conscious consumers. And let’s face it, the vegan label hasn’t won many friends among the general public. Veganuary should instead target health-conscious individuals curious about plant-based diets, a much broader starting point, especially after festive over-indulgence.  

    Make the positioning about them, not about you

    A marked difference in the positioning of the two campaigns is the benefits they call upon. Landing on Dry January’s website you are immediately hit with the opportunity to save money, sleep better and have more energy. Where do I sign up? By contrast, Veganuary invites you to join their movement – vote for veggies, along with people from 228 countries. And if that hasn’t convinced you, they tell you 6,800 media stories were published last year about the campaign. Sounds impressive, but what’s in it for me?  

    Source: Company Websites

    During the first week of January, the Netflix documentary You Are What You Eat garnered 639 million streaming minutes, demonstrating through a rigorous twin study that a plant-based diet is better for you than a healthy omnivore one on multiple metrics. Over four episodes this narrative was interspersed with stories of animal cruelty and the environmental impact of eating animal products, but the main takeaway was clear: plants are better for you, and can be just as tasty. Compared to previous Januaries, searches for plant-based recipes soared 300%. Veganuary needs to pivot its messaging to what’s in it for you, not the movement or the greater good of a vegan diet. Dry January doesn’t tell you that the cost of National Health in the UK would fall if you stopped drinking.  

    Use your design codes to drive desire

    As we’ve talked about before, design codes are a strategic point of leverage for any brand. This is doubly true when it comes to movements that have limited marketing budgets of their own and rely on word of mouth without the accompanying controlled storytelling. Dry January has executed its positioning into a brand identity with a simple call to action and a welcoming sense of playfulness – you can swap out a cup of tea for a cocktail but don’t have to eradicate all fun from your life and still get to keep the cocktail umbrella. Veganuary, on the other hand, needs to broaden its appeal by toning down the activist shock & awe aesthetic and clarifying the awkward mouthfeel and ambiguous ask in the name (is it Vegan January or Vegetarian January?). A carefully crafted tagline locked up to the logo could help.  

    Source: Company Websites

    You have to be liked before you can be heard

    Veganuary’s 2024 campaign invites consumers to “vote for veggies” with a series of “a vote for us is a vote for…”  promises: reduced emissions, improved health, lower food bill, protection of animals, a healthier eco-food system, new economic opportunities. All great promises, and you won’t be surprised we’re glad to see health and lower food bills in there.  

    However, the style in which it’s delivered is unlikely to have landed well. Trust and respect in politicians is at an all-time low. 63% of respondents in a recent global study on trust believe government leaders are purposely trying to mislead people by saying things they know are false or gross exaggerations, so why emulate their voice? Beyond that, who still believes political votes have much impact on their individual lives?

    By contrast, Dry January’s tone is one of individual motivation: you’ve made it three weeks, Sunday evening reminder, Monday motivation! Alongside continual benefit messaging, interspersed with the occasional meme that keeps things light. Another call for Veganuary to focus messaging on what’s in it for the individual, and deliver those messages in a tone of voice that people engage with.    

    Source: Instagram Feeds

    Real amplification comes when brands truly commit

    Where a movement’s impact really takes off is when major brands align in a big way, seeing the opportunity for scale and bringing budgets the movement entity can only dream of. Media and PR campaigns, packaging changes and in-store activations drive consumer reach and message amplification at huge multiples. Veganuary has successfully engaged and inspired brand activity around the month of January and since it started, has seen hundreds of new product launches in supermarkets and menu offerings in restaurants. However, these brands are still operating in the realm of line extensions, compared to the major branding event Dry January represents for alcohol. Heineken, the world’s second-largest brewer, is on the record saying they would put 25% of their nearly $3bn annual brand investment into normalizing the alcohol-free category. They have followed through with Superbowl spots, footballer deals, and aggressive sampling that have made Heineken 0.0 the leading brand in the space.  

    No doubt this enables alcohol brands to solve for a historically slow sales month coming off their festive peak. The same could be true for many food and restaurant brands, but they’re not yet embracing it at the same scale. In 2020 Heinz took its hero product, the iconic beans can, and put a limited edition “Beanz Meanz Vegan” slogan on it for the UK market. Changing your branding on pack, even for a limited run, is a major step for an iconic consumer brand. Were this deemed a success by the Heinz brand team, the campaign would have gone bigger every year since. As it was, come 2023 Heinz participated in the UK by launching alternative plant-based versions of some of their best-selling products, but left the core versions untouched. For 2024, a low-key announcement about tomato ketchup being vegan was the only UK activity we could find.   

    Source: Company Websites

    As per Heinz, there are plenty of mainstream brands now with vegan options, Veganuary should be an unmissable opportunity for them to commit to them with much bigger investments.  

    How do you get brands to go big in January? By following the steps above. Target a mass opportunity that doesn’t risk alienating core customers. Associate with ‘better for you’ messaging. Use your design codes and tonality to drive desire and likability, not political activism. Build a big tent and others will join. 

    From campaigns to lasting change

    An effective beginning of the year ritual is a remarkable opportunity for the driving behaviour change we need towards sustainable food. It’s a moment when people are open to new ideas and there’s a real chance to overcome inertia. But to make it scale, we should use all the tools in our arsenal including a disciplined approach to targeting, positioning, identity, messaging and partnerships. In doing so, and adding a sprinkle of creative magic from time to time, we can build increasing participation and move from a month-long campaign into a catalyst for lasting change.

    As always, let us know what you think, and subscribe to UNSTUCK for a bi-weekly update on the missing consumer mindset and skillset needed to take sustainable foods mainstream.

    The post Unstuck: What Veganuary Can Learn From Dry January appeared first on Green Queen.

    This post was originally published on Green Queen.

  • impossible foods army
    7 Mins Read

    Military culture has always been a dominant driver of our food and cooking habits – by partnering with the US Army, can Impossible Foods bring about a new dawn for plant-based meat?

    Today, Spam is a cult-favourite meat product in many parts of the world. It’s had some journey: it began as a military staple during World War II, created as a tasty, portable protein-rich food in lieu of hard-to-deliver fresh meat. That shot the inexpensive pork and ham blend to global popularity, with can sales eventually surpassing eight billion across six continents.

    Spam was also looked down upon by the chef world for decades – but recently, they have embraced the product and come up with new ways to cook it. This re-evolution has travelled via social media, particularly YouTube and TikTok, putting Spam on the radar of both culinary enthusiasts and those previously indifferent to it. It’s a successful food product if there ever was one – and it all began with the military. Plant-based meat is undergoing a similar bout of confidence with the mainstream, as traditionalists look to keep it out and consumers question its prices and grapple with a mainstream media filled with “overprocessed” narratives.

    If Spam’s journey is any indication, people will look past the processing eventually (especially if prices come down further) and take to meat analogues if authoritative and influential figures promote them. And that’s exactly what Impossible Foods’ partnership with the US Army could bring about.

    The Californian company’s plant-based meats have already been available to troops in various food operations for the past few years, including at the Walter Reed Medical Center in Maryland. But its latest move – which the team says was three years in the making – marks the first time it’s working directly with the US Army Central, which coordinates foodservice at the army-wide level, to serve Impossible products in various dining facilities overseas in the coming weeks.

    “Our troops in North Africa, the Persian Gulf, the Middle East, and Southwest Asia will be able to enjoy our nutrient-dense and delicious Impossible Beef and Impossible Burgers that provide high-quality protein, fibre, and iron, with no cholesterol,” Impossible Foods CEO Peter McGuinness said on LinkedIn. “This is a very proud moment for our team and company, and such an incredible win to start the year.”

    Speaking to Green Queen, the brand’s foodservice sales VP Erin Reynolds added: “It’s a real honour to bring Impossible to our troops overseas. Our work with the US Army Central has been years in the making, and this is a major milestone for us as a brand and as a category.”

    How the military has influenced food culture

    army food
    Graphic by Green Queen

    Impossible Foods will be hoping to be the new-age Spam with its US Army partnership. After all, the military has long been one of the most influential drivers of food culture globally.

    It’s not just spam – bánh mìs, condensed milk, British curry, and even Coca-Cola are all staples because of wars and the military. For instance, condensed milk was developed during the American Civil War, using a vacuum operator to kill the bacteria in fresh milk and prevent contamination. And in 1941, Coca-Cola president Robert Woodruff promised that “every man in uniform gets a bottle of Coca-Cola for five cents, wherever he is and whatever it costs the company”, which led to the company’s proliferation in Europe and beyond.

    It’s not just food either – many cooking and processing methods today are a direct result of technology developed by or for the military. Canned food was first invented to provide sustenance to troops, but its preservation and affordability led to it being popular with the masses. And the device initially designed for canning food, the pressure cooker, itself evolved into a household appliance. Similarly, microwaves exist because of World War II radar technology too. There’s also freeze drying, which was created to preserve medical supplies during the Korean war.

    Even how food gets to you today is thanks in part to military applications of GPS technology which enables efficient tracking and transportation of ingredients, reduces waste and improves the freshness of produce. There’s a precedent for meat-free meals like Impossible Foods’ products can contribute to too: during World War II, rationing in Britain popularised dishes like mock goose (made from potatoes and sausages – though sometimes pork sausage was involved) and Woolton pie (a pastry filled with a mix of vegetables).

    There are no vegan MREs in the US army

    vegan mres
    Courtesy: Wikimedia Commons/CC

    Veganism in the military has been a topic that has taken more prominence in the last couple of years, thanks to the passing of the 2023 National Defense Authorization Act by the US House of Representatives in July 2022. One of the act’s requirements is that the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) produce a report on plant-based Meals, Ready-to-Eat (MREs), which are dehydrated field rations for troops in the US.

    The act asked the DLA to conduct a study determining the demand for vegan MREs among troops by September 2023, with results expected to include cost and feasibility analysis to produce at least two plant-based MREs, service member demand, and an implementation plan.

    The details aren’t out yet, but David Accetta, a public affairs professional at DEVCOM, told the Military Times last year: “The services submit statements of need to the Combat Feeding Research and Engineering Program each year, which are used to drive innovation and research, development, test and evaluation efforts to modernise field feeding capabilities. After development, all new operational ration components are warfighter-tested and approved before being transitioned to DLA for procurement.”

    MREs have historically been meat-heavy, with vegetarian meals only appearing in 1986. The current menu of 24 dishes also only contains four meatless options, all of which are some form of pasta: vegetarian taco pasta, macaroni and tomato sauce, cheese tortellini, and spinach, mushroom and cream fettuccine.

    There are financial incentives attached to this, according to one vegan Navy officer, who told the Guardian in 2019 that many of the military’s decisions are linked to industries subsidised by the government, such as dairy and meat. In the US, livestock farming receives 800 times more public funding than alternative proteins like plant-based analogues.

    How many US soldiers are vegan?

    vegan military diet
    Courtesy: Mercy for Animals

    “There may have been a vegetarian entree that was also vegan. To date, there has been no military service requirement for vegan MREs,” the DLA told the Guardian. But in January 2022, Mercy for Animals surveyed 226 American military personnel, finding that 3.5% are vegan. More tellingly, a total of 42% either didn’t eat meat, were flexitarian, or trying to decrease their consumption of animal products.

    Likewise, 70% of the respondents said they choose climate-friendly food options if available, and 63% recognised that plant-based foods are more sustainable than their animal-derived counterparts. Many felt vegan food is healthier (52%) and provides more energy (51%) too, while two-thirds have noticed more people exploring this diet.

    In terms of MREs, 81% would pick climate-friendly meals, and the same number of people feel the military should provide plant-based MREs. This is reflected by the fact that 63% would choose vegan over meat-based ready meals. It is unclear if Impossible Foods’ meat analogues will become part of a potential plant-based MRE, but there’s hope that the footprint of vegan foods will grow in the military.

    vegan army
    Courtesy: US Army

    In 2019, one vegan soldier successfully campaigned to include a plant-based main at every meal in a US Army dining facility. While there are no clear numbers for military personnel following a plant-based diet, the US could take inspiration from Israel, where over 10,000 soldiers are vegan, and organisations like Vegan Friendly arrange plant-based meals for soldiers with dietary restrictions.

    “Now troops around the world, from the Middle East to the Philippines, have access to delicious, nutrient-dense meat from plants,” said Impossible Foods’ Reynolds. “That’s thousands of meals every day that can now be made with Impossible plant-based beef.”

    So far, it’s been impossible to get much vegan food if you’re in the military – now, Impossible’s vegan food is serving up a solution.

    The post Mission Impossible: Alt-Meat Giant Now Serves the US Army, Marking a New Avenue for Plant-Based Food appeared first on Green Queen.

    This post was originally published on Green Queen.

  • redefine meat
    6 Mins Read

    In our weekly column, we round up the latest news and developments in the alternative protein and sustainable food industry. This week, Future Food Quick Bites covers Fortnum and Mason’s cultivated scotch egg tasting, a Dragons’ Den deal for carbon-negative ice cream, and a host of executive moves.

    New products and launches

    South Korean company Armored Fresh has launched its oat milk Cheddar cheese at US fast-food chain Bareburger, with two new menu items using the brand’s Armored Fresh Melt and Impossible Standard cheeses.

    armored fresh
    Courtesy: Armored Fresh/Bareburger

    Israeli precision fermentation startup Phytolon is planning to launch a line of natural colours using genetically engineered baker’s yeast in the US this year (pending regulatory approval), following a breakthrough with partner Gingko Bioworks.

    Speaking of breakthroughs, Californian startup Checkerspot has developed a fat analogue from microalgae fermentation, which it claims can mimic the human milk fat called OPO (Oleic-Palmitic-Oleic or sn-2 palmitate). It could help provide essential lipids to offer long-term nutrition benefits for infants.

    Barcelona-based UOBO has introduced liquid vegan whole eggs for foodservice in a one-litre format nationwide, which can be used for applications like omelettes, scrambled eggs, pastries, custard and mayo.

    Indian plant-based meat brand Shaka Harry is eyeing the foodservice segment with a range called Chefsclusive, which features starters, snacks, meals, and accompaniments.

    Also in India, restaurant chains Social and Boss Burger have teamed up with Nestlé‘s across 82 outlets in six cities, using the FMCG giant’s frozen plant-based Maggi line for The New Irresistible Menu and The ImBOSSible Cheeseburger, respectively.

    vegan magnum
    Courtesy: Magnum

    In the UK, Unilever-owned Magnum has launched a new Chill Blueberry Cookie SKU, which is a vanilla-biscuit-flavoured ice cream with cookie pieces, alongside a core made from blueberry sorbet.

    In another UK launch, plant protein bar maker Trek has linked up with Biscoff for a co-branded SKU with soy protein isolate, vegan chocolate and Biscoff spread, retailing in Sainsbury’s from Valentine’s Day, before a wider rollout in March.

    If you’re looking to take vegan Valentine’s Day up a notch, meal kit startup Grubby has partnered with Redefine Meat to introduce the latter’s whole-cut beef flank for home cooks until March 22. Following this, a second Chimichurri steak dish will be introduced.

    Also for Valentine’s, US chains Next Level Burger and its now-subsidiary Veggie Grill have partnered with Colorado-based mycelium meat producer Meati to offer a Sliced Steak Sandwich at all locations from February 9. Additionally, there are two new vegan sweet treats: a strawberry whoopie pie and a strawberry cookies and cream shake.

    And San Francisco’s vegan fat tech startup Lypid has launched its plant-based meatballs for foodservice, which can be used in various cuisines, including American, Italian, and Asian fusion.

    lypid
    Courtesy: Lypid

    Finance and corporate moves

    UK plant-based meat company THIS is seeing a change in leadership, with co-founders Andy Shovel and Pete Sharman stepping back from their roles as co-CEOs and being replaced by former Ella’s Kitchen boss Mark Cuddigan. Shovel and Sharman will remain involved in the day-to-day business and at board level.

    UK cultivated fat company Hoxton Farms has appointed former Impossible Foods chief strategy officer Nick Halla to its board, following other strategic hires in recent weeks to prepare for commercialisation and expand its team of 40 to 100.

    North Carolina-based food tech company Tiamat Sciences, which is making animal-free recombinant proteins at a fraction of the cost, has an all-female executive team – a rarity in the biotech world.

    Meati has appointed former Patagonia and Wild Idea executive Phil Graves as its new chief financial officer, who will oversee the capital expenditures needed for the company’s omnichannel expansion, and help deliver positive environmental and social impact alongside profit.

    In Spain, food companies Familia Martínez, Capsa Vida and Helados Estiu, alongside startups Väcka, Wevo, Grin Grin Foods, Gimme Sabor, and Quevana, have formed The Flexitarian Project to increase the availability of plant-based products to the market.

    Greek company Plan(e)t Foods, which claims to be the world’s first carbon-negative vegan ice cream company, grabbed a deal on Dragons’ Den Greece for €42,000 for a 1% equity, which would rise to 3% if it goes to the NYSE.

    German alternative oil startup Colipi has raised €1.8M in seed funding to accelerate the development of its precision-fermented, carbon-captured Climate Oil using organic sidestreams as feed.

    NFL quarterbacks Justin Fields (Chicago Bears) and Daniel Jones (New York Giants) have invested in Chipotle founder Steve Ells’ new robot-powered vegetarian restaurant Kernel, which will open its first location in the Flatiron District of New York City on February 12.

    Cultivated meat developments

    In London, Fortnum and Mason hosted a scotch egg tasting for journalists in collaboration with cultivated meat company Ivy Farms, which contained the latter’s beef made from cultured Angus cow cells.

    Innovate UK and the Biological Sciences Research Council, meanwhile, have invested £15.6M to support a cultivated meat project by Campden BRI and cellular agriculture specialist Cellular Agriculture. It will be used to develop a hollow-fibre bioreactor system prototype and test production samples.

    The EU Commission has closed the TRIS notification process about Italy’s cultivated meat and plant-based labelling bans because the laws did not comply with the procedure’s rules, rendering them unenforceable.

    finless foods
    Courtesy: Finless Foods

    Finally, Californian cultivated seafood company Finless Foods, has reduced its headcount in reportedly a fresh round of layoffs. It has also terminated its lobby farm in Washington, DC.

    Policy, research and manufacturing news

    In a major regulatory breakthrough, Israeli startup Remilk has become the first precision fermentation company to receive a Letter of No Objection from Health Canada, allowing it to sell its dairy proteins in the country.

    Danish bioproduction leader 21st.BIO is granting access to its precision fermentation technology platform to ingredient manufacturers, helping them enable the production of sustainable dairy proteins at competitive costs.

    Belgian precision fermentation startup Paleo has opened a new R&D facility in Leuven, expanding its lab facility to 500 sq m.

    future food quick bites
    Courtesy: Paleo

    In the US, fermentation startup Superbrewed Food has secured a patent for its proprietary Postbiotic Protein ingredient, which – alongside a self-affirmed GRAS status – will enable the company to accelerate its use in CPG applications.

    Also in the US, the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association has endorsed the FAIR Labels Act (led by US Senator Roger Marshall), which aims to eradicate “deceptive labelling practices” on plant-based meat products.

    Meanwhile, the City of Amsterdam has become the first capital city in the EU to endorse a Plant Based Treaty, targeting a 40-60% plant protein ratio in the city’s diet by 2030.

    Finally, research funded by the Swedish Agency for Economic and Regional Growth and the European Cooperation in Science and Technology has found that consumers associate fungi-based foods with sustainability and wellbeing.

    Check out last week’s Future Food Quick Bites.

    The post Future Food Quick Bites: Valentine’s Specials, Scotch Eggs & Greek Dragons’ Den appeared first on Green Queen.

    This post was originally published on Green Queen.

  • dunkin lawsuit
    5 Mins Read

    Dunkin’ is being sued for $5M under the Americans with Disabilities Act, with plaintiffs alleging that the surcharge on plant-based milk discriminates against people with lactose intolerance. Do their claims stack up?

    The US’s second-largest coffee chain, Dunkin’, is facing a class-action lawsuit for discriminating against customers with lactose intolerance by charging extra for plant-based milk in its beverages. The plaintiffs argue that the surcharge for non-dairy milk violates the American Disabilities Act, mirroring a similar ongoing case levelled against Starbucks.

    Filed on December 26 in a district court in Northern California, the complaint lists 10 named plaintiffs seeking $5M in damages on behalf of all of Dunkin’s customers who opt for dairy alternatives. The suit claims that between 2018 and 2023, Dunkin’ has charged consumers between 50 cents to $2.15 extra for soy, oat, almond and coconut milk (the latter was discontinued from the menu at the end of last year).

    The plaintiffs cite the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) to support their suit, claiming that the surcharge of plant-based milks for beverages is discriminatory against people suffering from lactose intolerance, which is a disability under ADA, according to Bogdan Enica, an attorney representing the plaintiffs. “Being able to drink milk is a choice for some people, but it’s not for others,” he told NBC. But will this claim hold up in court?

    Is lactose intolerance a disability?

    lactose intolerance disability
    Courtesy: Dunkin’

    In the five years that the lawsuit covers, Dunkin’ earned $250M in revenue, and made significant profits after it “created a separate, higher-priced menu, aimed at customers who cannot ingest milk”, the lawsuit states. At the same time, the chain – which serves around three million cups of coffee daily – allows customers to modify beverages with whole or skimmed milk instead of the standard 2% milk at no extra cost.

    Similarly, the lawsuit claims that Dunkin’ allows free substitutions to make drinks caffeine- or sugar-free for people with heart conditions, hypertension, diabetes and weight-control issues. In this vein, the attorneys argue that not only is the non-dairy surcharge a federal violation, but it also breaches anti-discrimination laws in the states where plaintiffs live, including Hawaii, California, New York, Texas, Massachusetts and Colorado.

    The suit states that lactose intolerance and milk allergies are considered disabilities, noting that at least 12% of Americans suffer from the former, while over 15 million have a milk or dairy allergy. One estimate claims that between 80-90% of African Americans, Native Americans and Asian Americans are lactose-intolerant.

    The complaint further notes the Dunkin’ allergen statement, which advises patrons to inform staff if they have a food allergy. However, the plaintiff argues that “they only accommodate those with lactose intolerance or allergies to milk by imposing a surcharge”.

    “Once Dunkin’ asks about allergies, and someone with a disability requests a dairy-free product as an accommodation, they can’t impose a surcharge – as they don’t for caffeine-free drinks, etc.,” Arlene Kanter, founding director of Syracuse University’s disability law and policy programme, told NBC.

    Additionally, there is “no material difference between the price of lactose-containing milks and the price of non-dairy alternatives”, according to the plaintiffs. But according to the Good Food Institute, gallon for gallon, plant-based milk was 87% more expensive than dairy in 2022 – though government subsidies no doubt play a part here. The lawsuit calls Dunkin’s surcharge “excessively high”, claiming that companies charge consumers more than what it costs them to provide it.

    Could the ADA help abolish the plant-based milk surcharge?

    dunkin plant based milk
    Courtesy: Dunkin’

    The lawsuit states that lactose intolerance and milk allergies are disabilities, and cites the ADA by saying: “[A] public accommodation may not impose a surcharge on a particular individual with a disability or any group of individuals with disabilities to cover the costs of measures, such as the provision of auxiliary aids, barrier removal, alternatives to barrier removal, and reasonable modifications in policies, practices, or procedures, that are required to provide that individual or group with the nondiscriminatory treatment required by the Act or this part.”

    Essentially, a public entity like Dunkin’ must make “reasonable modifications” to its rules or practices when required, to allow people with disabilities to afford its goods or services – unless the company can show that these changes would fundamentally alter the nature of their offerings.

    “If a person qualifies as a person with a disability, and they’re entitled to an accommodation or modification – which in this case looks pretty simple as non-dairy milk – they cannot be charged extra,” explained Kanter.

    She added that allergies and intolerances can be disabilities if they substantially limit a major life activity, but people who are perceived to have a disability are also protected by the ADA, which came into law in 1990 and was expanded in 2008 to broaden its definition of a disability.

    “Dunkin’s policy of charging all customers a surcharge for non-dairy milks disproportionately affects persons with lactose intolerance and milk allergies,” Enica told USA Today. “The only choice for this group of people is to pay the surcharge.”

    The $5M sought by the plaintiffs is the minimum amount that lawsuits need to seek to fall under the jurisdiction of a district court. It could help them regain some of the money they have spent on plant-based milk options at Dunkin’, and force businesses like itself to eradicate the surcharge. It’s a strong sentiment: Enica has said that more than 50 people who are lactose-intolerant or have milk allergies have reached out to join the lawsuit.

    Chelsea Garland, a lactose-intolerant woman from San Diego, joined the legal filing because she felt it was unfair she had to pay more for a coffee that wouldn’t make her sick. “The Dunkin’ surcharge for non-dairy milk directly affected me, and I believed it was wrong,” she said.

    Enica’s firm previously filed a similar class-action lawsuit in 2022 against Starbucks, which has filed a motion to dismiss, which is pending approval by the court. As for Dunkin’, the company has filed a waiver acknowledging the suit, and has until March 4 to respond.

    Corporate legal watchdog ClassAction.org reports that attorneys are looking at whether other coffee companies – including Peet’s Coffee (which trialled free non-dairy modifications last April), Caribou Coffee (which dropped the surcharge in May, but only for loyalty programme members), Biggby Coffee, Dutch Bros, and The Coffee Bean & Tea Leaf – could be sued.

    But businesses would be wise to follow the lead of coffee chains like Blue Bottle, which made oat milk its default option at a third of its locations in 2022 and doesn’t charge extra for oat or almond milk, and Philz Coffee, which replaced 2% milk with oat milk and offers it for free alongside soy and almond milk.

    The post Dunkin’ Lawsuit: Is It Discriminatory to Have a Non-Dairy Milk Surcharge? appeared first on Green Queen.

    This post was originally published on Green Queen.

  • heura funding
    4 Mins Read

    Spanish plant-based meat startup Heura has raised €40M ($43M) in a Series B round, in what is one of the largest investments in a vegan company in 2023. The company is now on the path to profitability and will look to license its tech and accelerate expansion.

    Heura has closed the second-largest funding round for a plant-based company in 2023 (only behind Japan’s DAIZ), raising €40M ($43M) in Series B financing. It follows a €20M ($21.5M) pre-Series B round in 2022, with total funding for the brand reaching €88M ($94.6M).

    Participants in the Series B round included Upfield (owned by investment firm KKR), Unovis Asset Management, the European Circular Bioeconomy Fund, and Newtree Impact, which Heura says builds a huge plant-based alliance, with a “board that will focus on top-notch tech to set new industry standards”.

    Kim Anders Odhner, Managing Partner Europe-Asia at Unovis and Board member at Heura, notes that “the investment from Upfield is a strong validation of the company’s positioning and prospects”.

    A tech-forward, clean-label alt-meat lineup

    vegan ham
    Courtesy: Heura

    Founded in 2017, Heura makes clean-label plant-based analogues for chicken, beef, pork and fish, with a 19-strong lineup available in more than 22,000 locations in over 20 countries. One of the newest products to make a wave is its York-style deli ham slices, which were launched in October in Spain and France. Since then, the brand claims it is already the top rotating cold-cut alternative in its home country.

    The ham analogues were the result of Heura’s first patent-pending tech, led by its Good Rebel Tech division, which was unveiled in April. Leveraging a novel thermomechanical processing technique, it can create additive-free vegan products with superior sensory and nutritional values and fewer ingredients, using only protein, water and oil to structure the product.

    This isn’t really AI, but the tech relies upon using mathematical models in a similar fashion. “The main difference is that we are basing our approach and models on new scientific understanding of plant proteins that we generate in the tech lab,” Heura co-founder and CEO Marc Coloma told Green Queen in October. “We can improve [the] accuracy of our predictions, limit biases and, most importantly, develop breakthrough technological solutions which are based on new scientific knowledge; rather than optimising technologies that already exist based on published existing data.”

    The company’s CTO, Isabel Fernandez, added: “We use a transdisciplinary approach to scientific research to overcome the greatest challenges the industry is facing. Our goals are ambitious. We are not aiming for small, incremental advancements based on cumulative improvements on what already exists, but rather exponential progress from scientific discoveries yielding breakthrough technological innovations.”

    Those innovations can be applied across multiple plant-based categories, including deli meats, breaded analogues, whole-cut meats and seafood, and dairy products. “This approach enables us to not only cater to diverse tastes, but also aligns with our commitment to providing healthier, high nutrition and additive-free alternatives for consumers,” explained Coloma.

    Giving consumers – and companies – what they want

    heura foods
    Courtesy: Heura

    The latest funding round will allow Heura to “boost its impact in the food industry”, accelerate international expansion, and explore more collaborative models beyond its own meat alternatives. Most notably, it will drive the company towards profitability, allowing the brand to continue leading the alt-protein sector’s growth in Spain and consolidate its footprint across markets like the UK and France.

    Moreover, the company hopes to expand its portfolio of products as well as tech patents, while reaching new audiences through tech licensing. Its current offerings already play to key consumer concerns – health has emerged to be an increasingly important consideration for Europeans choosing to eat plant-based lately.

    The 2023 EU Smart Protein survey, which covered 7,500 respondents in 10 countries, revealed that 51% of Europeans are eating less meat, with health being the primary reason why (cited by 47%). Likewise, health was the second-biggest purchase motivator for vegan food (after taste), chosen by 46% of respondents. Moreover, concerns about nutritional inadequacies are one of the major deterrents, with 24% of consumers selecting that reason.

    Even globally, an Ingredion survey found that 78% would spend more money on products with ‘natural’ or ‘all-natural’ packaging claims. So the demand for products like the ones Heura is making is clear. “This achievement uplifts Heura’s vision of being at the forefront of Europe’s protein transition,” Coloma says about the latest funding effort.

    “To change the food system, we need to move the pressure from consumers to the food industry, placing health and sustainability as non-negotiable,” he adds. “This new chapter will drive us to profitability while allowing us to develop breakthrough technology to tackle the key challenges within the industry in a scalable way.”

    It marks a departure from a tough financial landscape for plant-based meat companies, which have seen VCs desert the space over the last year. Reflecting on this, Odhner highlights that Heura’s strengths have enabled the company to remain on strong footing. “Responding decisively to the slowing economy, the company continues to capitalise on a really strong following and robust market share in the Iberian peninsula, and is showing strong growth as it expands into France,” he tells Green Queen.

    “The major differentiator lies in the company’s products and its positioning – Mediterranean flavours, clean label offerings, and innovative technologies aimed at extending shelf life, improving nutritional density, and introducing popular new formats.”

    The post Heura Raises €40M Series B as Startup Promises Profitability in Boost to Plant-Based Industry appeared first on Green Queen.

    This post was originally published on Green Queen.

  • fda lab grown meat
    7 Mins Read

    Sparked by the infant formula crisis, the FDA is about to undergo a major overhaul that will transform its human foods programme and regulatory affairs teams – what does this mean for alternative proteins?

    In February 2022, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recalled infant formula products made in an Abbott Nutrition facility in Michigan, after finding they may have been contaminated with Cronobacter sakazakii, which led to four infants being hospitalised, and two dying.

    The FDA was roundly criticised for its oversight, not least because it first found out about the issue five months prior to the recall when a baby was hospitalised in September. In fact, in October, a former employee at the Abbott Nutrition facility had flagged concerns about food safety violations with senior FDA officials.

    But it took a while for the government agency to take action. When it first heard about the infant being hospitalised in September, its officials were at the plant for an inspection, but didn’t find any serious problems or evidence of the bacterial contamination. In January, however, they returned to find at least five different strains of Cronobacter sakazakii in the facility.

    It led to a long review process that will lead to the largest reorganisation of the FDA in history. This will mean an overhaul of the Office of Regulatory Affairs (ORA), which will be renamed and – alongside the Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (CFSAN) and Office of Food Policy and Response – will be bridged under a newly created Human Foods Program.

    It is the CFSAN’s Office of Food Additive Safety (OFAS) that is responsible for dealing with regulatory approval of alternative protein products – including cultivated meat and precision-fermented proteins – as well as handing out Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) notifications. So how does the reorganisation of the FDA affect alt-protein, if at all?

    FDA hopes to ramp up pace and implement changes soon

    fda gras
    Courtesy: Sarah Silbiger/Getty Images

    The slowness and dysfunction of the FDA’s food functions is of little surprise to experts. An investigation by Politico revealed that food regulation is no longer a high priority for the agency, with drugs and medical products dominating both the budget and bandwidth. This has only been exacerbated since the pandemic.

    “The food programme is on the back burner. To me, that’s problem no. 1,” Stephen Ostroff, a former FDA senior official who twice served as acting commissioner, told the publication. “There are a lot of things that languish. There’s nobody really pushing very hard to get them done in the same way that you’re pushing very hard to get the Covid vaccines out there and authorised. We don’t have that imperative and that pressure to actually make things happen on the food side of the Food and Drug Administration.”

    This slow pace can also be seen in the FDA’s reorganisation itself, which was announced last January, and will still take quite a bit of time. “As a federal agency, the FDA must adhere to the required processes and notifications for reorganisations. Although the proposal has been finalised by the FDA, there are several critical steps remaining before implementation of the new structure can commence,” an FDA spokesperson told Green Queen.

    “These include review by the Department of Health and Human Services and the Office of Management and Budget, providing the House and Senate Appropriations Committees with a 30-day notification period, issuing a Federal Register Notice and engaging in all necessary negotiations with Unions representing impacted staff.”

    They added that the agency hopes it can begin implementing the proposed changes now, once it completes all the necessary review and approval steps. “The FDA remains committed to keeping the public up to date as the proposal continues to be developed,” said the spokesperson. (They did not respond to specific questions about the OFAS or the regulation and importance of alt-proteins.)

    A focus on field-based operations

    fda reorganization
    Courtesy: FDA

    The reorganisation will see the ORA renamed as the Office of Inspections and Investigations (OII), with an emphasis on lab testing, field-based inspections, investigations, and import operations. It means about 1,500 ORA staff will be reassigned to product centres to work directly on inspections and investigations, with the goal of preventing the duplication of functions at the ORA.

    At a recent webinar, outgoing FDA principal deputy commissioner Janet Woodcock said: “We’re really trying to transform different aspects of the FDA to make them more efficient, more effective, and so forth… Our mission seems to continually be broadening and we really do need to be able to meet our mission as much as our resources allow.”

    This could potentially mean more frequent and more efficient inspections, which would lead to quicker resolutions and increased vigilance from companies too. In fact, businesses will need to adapt to the structure, as the FDA will likely be better equipped with investigators who are more specialised in specific product areas. In-house regulatory affairs and quality assurance staff should be well-versed with the new setup, while companies need to be aware of any updated compliance expectations and identify any new points of contact.

    As for the CFSAN, its cosmetics regulation and colour certification functions will be transferred to the Office of the Chief Scientist, a move that is said to recognise the evolution and innovation in this product space, and better align the agency’s cosmetics subject matter experts with the Chief Scientist, who is “focused on research, science, and innovation that underpins the agency’s regulatory mission”.

    What this means for alt-protein

    upside foods chicken
    Courtesy: UPSIDE Foods

    The implications for alt-protein are less clear. The FDA has previously issued GRAS notifications for UPSIDE Foods and Eat JUST’s respective cultivated chicken products, as well as ‘no questions’ letters to precision fermentation companies Perfect Day, The EVERY Co, Remilk and Imagindairy.

    Shannon Cosentino-Roush, president of the Association of Meat, Poultry and Seafood (AMPS) Innovation – a US alliance dedicated to cellular agriculture – expressed hope that the reorganisation won’t lead to “delays or a departure from FDA’s leadership” in advancing novel food technologies. “The industry remains committed to supporting the agency and this transition by advocating for [the] FDA to receive the resources it needs not only to achieve its mandate, but to ensure the US stays at the forefront of innovative advancements that are critical for American competitiveness, food security, and sustainability priorities,” she told Green Queen.

    “Key among this is ensuring that the cell-cultured consultative process is robustly staffed to reduce delays in the review process that could impede progress, especially when the industry is rapidly advancing from R&D to commercialisation and is fuelled by start-up companies aiming to demonstrate commercial viability for this technology. We applaud [the] FDA for making efforts to strengthen its food program, and we share the agency’s goal of providing safe products to consumers,” Cosentino-Roush added.

    A spokesperson for the Precision Fermentation Alliance (PFA), the US-based industry association, said that while it’s too early to comment, they expect the agency to continue to be a global regulatory leader for novel foods.

    It’s a common sentiment that the FDA is stretched for resources, given its wide remit. “We are very strong supporters of further funding the FDA,” said the PFA representative. “We would hope a significant portion of these funds would be directed to the Office of Food Additive Safety, which handles GRAS reviews for the agency so that it can continue to build its scientific teams and carry on the high-quality reviews and timelines that have made the FDA the gold standard.”

    Along similar lines, Laura Braden, associate director of regulatory affairs at alt-protein think tank the Good Food Institute (GFI), added: “GFI appreciates the cooperative approach FDA has taken in working with companies in the alternative protein industry to bring their products to market safely. As the agency reorganises its food regulation structure, adequate funding for FDA that allows it to stay at the forefront of scientific research and regulatory approaches is crucial for fostering an environment where safe innovation in the food sector can thrive.”

    Cosentino-Roush acknowledged that the FDA’s approval of UPSIDE Foods and Eat JUST’s cultivated meat products “sent reverberations globally”, signalling that cultured proteins moved “beyond theory and into reality”. “As [the] FDA embarks on its reorganisation and shift in leadership, AMPS Innovation underscores the importance of maintaining the momentum and prioritisation of the cell-cultured consultative process, which serves as the backbone of the regulatory pathway to market for this key, innovative, and advancing industry,” she said.

    “In 2024, we hope to see additional ‘no questions’ letters issued for other cell-cultured meat and fish products, bringing a range of new choices to market.”

    The post What the US FDA Reorganisation Means for Alternative Protein Regulation appeared first on Green Queen.

    This post was originally published on Green Queen.

  • cultivated meat tastings
    7 Mins Read

    The restaurants serving cultivated meat in Singapore and the US have stopped doing so – as the industry enters a crucial year for regulation and commercialisation, what’s next for consumers hoping to taste cultured meat?

    July 2023 was a landmark moment for cultivated meat. It was the month after Californian startups Eat JUST’s GOOD Meat and UPSIDE Foods received USDA approval to sell their cultured chicken nationwide, and became the month that saw the debut of these products in restaurants.

    UPSIDE Foods’ chicken made its way onto the menu of Dominique Crenn’s Michelin-starred eatery Bar Crenn in San Francisco, while José Andrés’ Washington, DC restaurant China Chilcano debuted GOOD Meat’s product, which rolled out for public tasting weeks later.

    “It represents a giant leap towards a world where people no longer have to choose between the foods they love and a thriving planet,” UPSIDE Foods CEO Uma Valeti said at the time, summing up the weight of the occasion. “I can’t wait for more people to get their first bite – it’s a magical moment that inspires an exciting world of new possibilities.”

    Now, however, people can’t get those bites anymore, not in the same capacity anyway. UPSIDE Foods and GOOD Meat have hit pause on their restaurant collaborations for now. And that’s not just in the US – GOOD Meat’s products are no longer available in Singapore either, which was the first country to approve the sale of cultivated meat anywhere in the world.

    In a year earmarked as a milestone for regulatory pathways and commercialisation of cultured meat – with Israel’s Aleph Farms becoming just the third company to earn clearance last month – where does that leave the industry?

    Cultivated meat no longer on sale – but not for long

    upside food bar crenn
    Courtesy: UPSIDE Foods

    Last week, UPSIDE Foods announced that it had “wrapped up” its dinner series at Bar Crenn, and was taking its chicken “on the road”. “This was the close of the first chapter of our journey… A chapter filled with hope, predictions, aspirations [and] incessant scepticism,” Valeti wrote in a LinkedIn post. “All of these milestones were deemed as impossible and unachievable just a few years ago.”

    This came after China Chilcano paused reservations for its tasting menu featuring GOOD Meat’s chicken in September. “Please check back soon for information on the next availability,” its website reads. Sales of GOOD Meat’s cultivated chicken in Singapore have also paused for the time being.

    “The most important activities for GOOD Meat are related to process development and lowering costs long-term. We are focusing our efforts and resources on those tasks at this time,” Eat Just’s global communications director, Carrie Kabat, told Green Queen.

    While the company couldn’t share figures like the number of dishes or diners served, Kabat said the dinners held at China Chilcano “went extremely well”. “Reviews from diners were overwhelmingly positive,” she said. These included snippets from the likes of Food Fix’s Helena Bottemiller Evich – “Tastes like chicken? It really does” – and the Good Food Institute (GFI) founder Bruce Friedrich – “The highlight of my year (no second place)”.

    “Based on the feedback from diners, we learned that people really like eating cultivated chicken instead of slaughtered chicken,” added Kabat.

    china chilcano good meat
    Courtesy: Eat JUST

    UPSIDE Foods received similar feedback at Bar Crenn, where it completed seven services in total. Critics were impressed by the product, with the Washington Post describing it as “the kind of chicken that once was common in America, before the poultry industry sacrificed flavour for rapid growth” and Eater noting that “the meat itself was less sickly white than supermarket birds, and the taste evoked the kind of nostalgic, delicate meatiness proper chicken should provide”.

    The company has hit back at the Bloomberg story, calling its claims “inaccurate and misleading”. “This occurred despite our team’s extensive efforts to educate Bloomberg’s reporters over many months and despite outreach to their editors, general counsel, and standards editor to express our concerns regarding the investigative and reporting process,” the company said. “They have refused to fairly reflect UPSIDE’s progress in the story, and the article reads more like an opinion p

    Eat JUST, meanwhile, has been embroiled in legal battles with suppliers and experiencing financial troubles, while UPSIDE Foods has been subject to negative press from Wired and Bloomberg over its progress.

    Eat JUST co-founder and CEO Josh Tetrick disputed allegations of financial stress, telling Green Queen in November that the business experienced huge EBITDA and gross margin growth last year. “we are focused on the daily execution of our zero-burn plan (i.e., cover operating costs through margin dollars) and serving our customers,” he said. “If we execute, the company and its missions win. It’ll be challenging and hard – and it’s up to us to get it done.”

    Where you can try cultured meat next

    lab grown meat approval
    Courtesy: Aleph Farms

    These developments don’t really spell doom for public tastings of cultivated meat – quite the opposite, in fact. With a considerable amount of buzz generated, the focus for these companies is now on cost-cutting, “process development” (as Kabat touched upon), and creating “next-gen, larger-scale products” (which is what UPSIDE Foods is working on).

    “We plan to resume tastings for the public this year,” said Kabat. UPSIDE Foods similarly aims to relaunch sales soon – it’s working with Crenn and other chefs to serve its cultivated chicken at events starting next month. “We are proud to have partnered with Chef Dominique Crenn to make history, from the first-ever US sale of cultivated meat to a series of UPSIDE dinners at Bar Crenn that delighted consumers with a delicious taste of the future,” a brand spokesperson told Green Queen.

    In his LinkedIn post, Valeti said: “We look ahead to the next chapter of our journey as we go from first sale to significant scale. We are again ready to take on first-of-their-kind challenges [and] sceptics, including renewed attempts to ‘ban’ our progress.”

    “We are still at the very early stages of cultivated meat’s entrance into the marketplace,” GFI’s senior VP of communication, Sheila Voss, told Wired. “As we saw in Singapore, the first country in the world to approve the sale of cultivated meat, the rollout to consumers migrated across fine dining restaurants, home delivery, and hawker stalls, highlighting the versatility of this product, and we expect similar introductory rollouts in the US.”

    But it’s not just Americans who can look forward to trying cultivated meat products soon. After gaining regulatory approval in its home country, Aleph Farms is now undergoing final labelling and mark-of-facility inspections. Once passed, it will introduce its Black Angus Petit Steak under the Aleph Cuts banner to diners, offering exclusive tasting experiences curated in collaboration with select partners.

    “At first, the product will be available in select restaurants,” Yoav Reisler, senior marketing and communications manager at Aleph Farms, told Green Queen last month. “Afterwards, it will become available at foodservice and retail locations.”

    fork and good
    Courtesy: Fork & Good

    Aleph Farms will hope to do the same in the other countries it has filed for approval in: Singapore, the US, the UK and Switzerland. The latter actually was host to its first cultivated meat tasting last month, when US food tech startup Fork & Good welcomed 40 diners at a pub in Davos to sample and tell the difference between conventional pork and its hybrid pork (a blend of 70% plant protein and 30% cultivated pork).

    According to an informal poll, more than half of the tasters preferred the hybrid meat, while the group was split when asked to guess which dish contained cultivated meat.

    Another hybrid pork company hoping to host public tastings for diners is the Netherlands’ Meatable. After holding two tasting events in Singapore in 2023 – where it plans to roll its product out later this year – the company has filed a dossier to the Cellular Agriculture Netherlands Foundation’s newly created independent expert committee. The panel is the final hurdle for companies hoping to give people a taste of their product, and would make the Netherlands the first EU country to make pre-regulatory-approval tastings possible.

    With more regulatory approvals expected this year, it’s safe to assume that you’ll be able to try cultivated meat in a restaurant again soon – and it won’t just be from two producers.

    The post As GOOD Meat & UPSIDE Foods End Restaurant Collabs, What’s Next for Cultivated Meat Tastings? appeared first on Green Queen.

    This post was originally published on Green Queen.

  • cultivated meat halal
    5 Mins Read

    The Islamic Religious Council of Singapore has issued a fatwa declaring that cultivated meat is generally halal, and Muslims can eat these products as long as they adhere to halal standards.

    The Fatwa Committee of the Majlis Ugama Islam Singapura (MUIS) has announced that cultivated meat can be considered halal, and the country’s Muslims are allowed to consume it if certain conditions are met.

    The sole entity with the legal power to issue halal certificates in Singapore, Muis’s fatwa ruled that cultured meat can be halal if the cells are sourced from animals Muslims are allowed to consume (for example, chicken but not pork), and there’s no mixing of non-halal components in the manufacturing process.

    The ruling was issued at Muis’s Fatwa Conference on February 3, and marks an important next step for cultivated meat’s progress in a country that first approved its sale in 2020, and 15.6% of whose citizens are Muslim. Halal diets refer to food consumption in accordance with Islamic law – when it comes to meat, it means animals must be slaughtered in a prescribed way, and certain types of meat and byproducts – including pork and blood products – are prohibited.

    The halal conditions cultivated meat must follow

    lab grown meat halal
    Courtesy: GFI APAC

    The fatwa comes after over a year of deliberation by the Islamic council, which – supported by the Office of the Mufti – consulted stakeholders like the Singapore Food Agency, industry bodies like the Good Food Institute (GFI) APAC, and scientists and other experts. Plus, Muis visited a local cultivated meat production facility, with scholars perusing the matter from all angles of the Islamic perspective, and taking into account Singapore’s “socio-religious realities”.

    While presenting the results of the study on Saturday, the Fatwa Committee outlined the environmental and food security benefits of cultivated meat, finding that its pros outweigh any perceived cons. Muis said its fatwa was underpinned by the Islamic principles that it serves to preserve human life and protect the environment. “The fatwa also considers the Islamic legal principle that unless proven otherwise, whatever is beneficial is permissible,” it added.

    The religious guidance on cultivated meat consumption was developed due to questions of permissibility for Muslims after the SFA approved the sale of GOOD Meat’s cultured chicken in 2020. Considering the global impetus to find alternative, sustainable food solutions and the emergence of novel food, it is necessary to establish a clear religious position from the outset in order to facilitate any future plans for the halal certification of cultivated meat,” said Muis.

    The Fatwa Committee studied three inter-related aspects – the source of the meat, the production process, and the ingredients used – and outlined requirements stipulating that the cell lines should be from a species permissible to eat for Muslims, every ingredient making up the texture and composition of the cultivated meat should be halal, and the product must be clean and non-toxic. These guidelines largely align with those released by Shariah scholars in Saudi Arabia in September.

    “Building a truly inclusive, efficient and secure protein production system requires making high-quality, nutrient-rich, and culturally relevant foods available to every facet of society,” said Mirte Gosker, managing director of GFI APAC. “With Muis’s precedent-setting announcement, Singapore is bringing that bold vision one step closer to reality.”

    Halal consumers represent 25% of the world’s population, and the halal meat market is estimated to grow by 7% annually to reach $375B in 2031. Research has found that the most important consideration for Singaporeans around cultivated meat is that it must be halal before it is consumed, with some raising concerns about whether its production can be halal, especially if they’re located close to facilities making cultured pork or other prohibited meats.

    The study further suggested that participants unanimously expressed trust in Muis to determine the halal status of cultivated meat, believing its opinion to be comprehensive. “They are doing the right thing as a Muslim authority and speaking on behalf of all Muslims in Singapore,” one respondent said.

    Singapore to create halal certification for cultivated meat

    cultivated meat halal certification
    Courtesy: GOOD Meat

    Now, Muis plans to work with government bodies like the SFA and industry stakeholders to develop guidelines for halal certification of cultivated meat – a move that would be welcomed by the sector. A 44-company survey by GFI APAC last year revealed that complying with halal requirements was a priority for 87% of the businesses. But a lack of resources outlining how products can adhere to such religious certifications would prove to be a significant entry barrier, the study added.

    Currently, no cultivated meat approved for sale on the market satisfies the council’s halal guidance yet, according to GFI APAC. While the timeline for the halal certification depends on the complexity of certifying the products, Muis explained that any locally produced halal-certified cultured meat would be available only for local sale and consumption – exports are only possible if other countries have approved the sale of these products (the US and Israel are the only others to have done so).

    “Companies applying for Muis Halal Certification must have a facility producing cultivated meat products in Singapore,” the council added. “This is the same principle applied to conventional meat-producing facilities. The halal status of imported raw materials and processing aids from overseas which are used locally must be substantiated with the appropriate halal supporting documentation, depending on the risk category, and not the country of origin.”

    The fatwa mentioned that the guidelines are intended to ensure that halal dietary rules are followed and maintained. But it added: “In all cases, Muslim consumers make their own informed choice whether to patronise any halal-certified eating establishment or consume any halal-certified food product.

    “Similarly for cultivated meat, if it is halal-certified, Singapore Muslims can choose whether to consume or otherwise. Actual Muslim consumer acceptance of cultivated meat will also depend on other considerations like personal dietary preferences, taste, and cost.”

    Gosker said: “More than a billion people around the world adhere to halal food standards, so for cultivated meat to make the leap from novelty to the norm, it is crucial that there are viable pathways to achieve this certification.”

    Muis’ fatwa follows the aforementioned advice from three leading Shariah scholars in Saudi Arabia, which told GOOD Meat that cultured meat can be considered halal if it meets certain criteria. And in 2022, the Assembly of Muslim Jurists of America adjudged cultivated meat as provisionally permissible by default, provided Halal criteria are followed.

    In terms of other religious guidance, Israel’s chief rabbi David Lau declared last January that local producer Aleph Farms’ non-FBS steak could be considered kosher and akin to eating a vegetable (parve). This wasn’t a kosher certification, however, and the company is now pursuing one for its facility from local rabbinate authorities.

    The post Singapore’s Islamic Council Rules Cultivated Meat as Halal Under the Right Conditions appeared first on Green Queen.

    This post was originally published on Green Queen.