Category: Australia

  • plant based meat protein
    4 Mins Read

    Two new studies have found that plant-based meat can match or outperform beef on many nutritional fronts, while also making you full faster.

    A vegan mince product can have the the same protein quality and digestibility as conventional ground beef, but is more filling and better for gut health, two new studies have found.

    Sydney-based vegan startup v2food collaborated with the Australian national science agency, CSIRO, to compare the health benefits of its soy protein beef with its animal-derived counterpart.

    The studies entailed detailed analysis of the composition and nutritional attributes of v2food’s mince, and examined the effects of reformulating the product to enhance these health gains even further.

    “With health being the top reason Australians choose plant-based meat, this research highlights how v2food mince can support a healthy lifestyle,” said Lisa-Claire Ronquest-Ross, chief science officer of the company.

    A recent survey showed that 54% of ‘meat reducers’ in Australia were cutting back on animal proteins for health reasons, a sentiment echoed by 58% of flexitarians – making it by far the most popular dietary driver.

    v2food’s plant-based meat aids gut health improvements

    v2food mince
    Courtesy: v2food

    One of the studies analysed the protein quality, amino acid profile, fibre composition, iron absorption, and effects on the gut microbiota.

    The total amino acid content was found to be comparable between conventional beef and the four formulations of the v2food mince tested (three of which were supplemented with different nutrients). While animal-derived beef had 26g of amino acids per 100g, the plant-based version had 18.65g, with the reformulated editions going as high as 20g.

    The conventional beef had higher amounts of nearly all the individual amino acids, but v2food’s mince has a greater concentration of sulphur-containing acids.

    Similarly, there was not much disparity in the protein digestibility scores either. Ground beef had a total rating of 71.7, while v2food’s alternative scored 73.6.

    The vegan mince outperformed conventional beef on several factors. Animal products don’t contain any fibre, so the plant-based beef came out on top by default, featuring 6.7% of fibre by wet weight (mostly insoluble). These dietary fibres helped modulate the production of short-chain fatty acids, which brings about a favourable shift in the composition and activity of the gut microbiota, and therefore improved gut health.

    Finally, intestinal absorption of iron from the v2food beef was three times lower than that of conventional mince, but the authors note that the former (alongside many other plant-based competitors) is formulated to achieve a total iron content in line with the requirements of Food Standards Australia and New Zealand to have a ‘source of iron’ claim.

    Fortified meat analogues also provide a superior source of iron compared to vegan products that don’t have supplemental iron. Moreover, the v2food formulations that contained ferrous sulphate increased iron absorption by the intestine by 50%.

    Vegan beef makes you full and satisfied faster

    vegan protein digestion
    Courtesy: v2food

    The second study focused squarely on satiety, measuring the amount of pasta eaten by 24 men on separate visits, containing a Bolognese sauce made either from v2food’s mince or conventional beef.

    Both meals had a near-identical calorific value, while the protein made up 45% of the cooked meal’s weight. After the meal, they were given access to a well-stocked buffet to eat as much as they wanted for the next 30 minutes.

    “The research also reveals that v2food mince induces feelings of fullness more quickly than traditional beef mince, with participants consuming significantly less pasta Bolognese made with v2food mince compared to beef mince after having a standard breakfast,” revealed Ronquest-Ross.

    The participants were found to eat 72g less of the plant-based mince dish, as well as 586 fewer calories. Those who ate the v2food bolognese also consumed lower amounts of fat and starch, and higher amounts of fibre, while the amount of protein was similar between the two options.

    But the energy intake at the buffet meal, and the measure of fullness, satiety and satisfaction after the pasta were not found to be different between the two beef dishes. In fact, the plant-based mince was more satiating and did not result in greater energy intakes at the subsequent buffet meal.

    “Individuals need to consume lower volumes and amounts of energy to achieve satiety when consuming a meal prepared with plant-based mince, compared to an equivalent meal prepared with beef mince,” the researchers wrote.

    This is an important finding at a time when one in five Australians identify themselves as meat reducers. In 2024 alone, a quarter of citizens have cut back on meat, with 12% planning to do so now, while 2% have eliminated it altogether – for these people, health is the main motivator (cited by 61%). It’s a welcome finding for a country with one of the highest per capita meat consumption rates globally.

    “These plant-based protein products are complementary to our existing protein sources such as red meat and fish,” said Crispin Howitt, lead of CSIRO’s Future Protein vertical. “It’s important that these products are developed so that they are as healthy as possible and with nutritional claims backed by evidence. We need new protein options to sustain the world’s growing population into the future.”

    The post Plant-Based Meat Matches Beef on Protein Quality and Fills You Up More Quickly, Finds Research appeared first on Green Queen.

    This post was originally published on Green Queen.

  • It was done for the Viet Cong in numerous countries during the US involvement in Vietnam.  It was done for the African National Congress (ANC). It was done for the Irish Revolutionary Army (IRA).  Across the United States, Europe and Australasia, all three organisations, demonised as terrorist outfits, received tacit, symbolic support from protestors.  In some cases, support was genuine and pecuniary.  Now, the Lebanese Shia militant and political group Hezbollah, designated a terrorist organisation in a number of Western states, has inspired flag holders to appear at protests against the expanding conflict in Gaza and Lebanon.

    In the previous first three instances, all outfits were integrated into the political fold of their countries, revealing the flimsy nature of badging organisations as terrorist entities.  War makers and practitioners of violence can become peacemakers and creatures of paper pushing officialdom.  Such transformations take time and an acid bath of reality.

    That backdrop offers context in understanding, and sternly critiquing, the hysteria of critics keen to press charges against those sporting Hezbollah symbols.  At the very least, it should consider the mockery that is free speech in a country such as Australia, awash with authoritarians concerned about the watery concept of social cohesion.  Down under, the skimpy protections for free speech are being whittled away year by year. The Counter-Terrorism Legislation Amendment (Prohibited Hate Symbols and Other Measures) Bill 2023, passed in December last year, makes it an offence to publicly display and trade in prohibited symbols, along with the Nazi salute.  Prohibited symbols are defined as prohibited Nazi symbols or “a prohibited terrorist organisation symbol.”

    The Criminal Code Act 1995 as amended, offers a number of glutinous elements that must be made out in such a charge.  They are thickly unclear and, it follows, difficult to apply.  To be charged with a prohibited symbol offence, a reasonable person (drafters can never resist this feeble term) would have to consider that any public display would involve dissemination of ideas based on racial superiority, hatred or constitute incitement “to offend, insult, humiliate or intimidate”.  That same inscrutable reasonable person would also consider the display to involve “advocacy of hatred of a group of persons distinguished by race, religion or nationality or a member of the targeted group” with the incitement element also present. Thirdly, such conduct must be “likely to offend, insult, humiliate or intimidate a reasonable person who is a member of a group distinguished by race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion or national or social origin.”

    These elements are nonsensical, attempting to impose unmeasurable standards about feelings that are rarely reasonable and always almost subjective.  Subjectively, people are constantly offended by what they disagree with.  The whole field of political opinion is one lengthy record of taking offence.  It quickly follows that some might also be intimidated, insulted, or humiliated by an opponent’s contrary view, notably when it comes to discrediting a position.  Freedom of speech, axiomatically, requires the exclusion of the offended from consideration.  But the concept is fragile in Australia’s regulation-crazed environment.

    Arrests have already been made.  On October 2, a 19-year-old woman was arrested and charged for publicly displaying the symbol of a prohibited organisation at a Sydney demonstration.  The question, however, is whether did so with the requisite intention, absurdly determined by the hypothetical reasonable person, to incite offence, insult, humiliation and intimidation. Ahead of protests scheduled for October 6 and 7, Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, not wishing to find himself in a messy quagmire of prosecution and confusion, warned that they should not take place.  “It would not advance any cause.  It would cause a great deal of distress.”  Again, free speech, felled by the concept of hurt feelings.

    The Australian Federal Police (AFP) has created a dedicated taskforce to investigate nine allegations of prohibited symbols being displayed in Victoria, demonstrating how vagueness in legislation is always good for creating work for idle authorities.  Operation Ardana will consider the display of such symbols “while potentially inciting or advocating violence, or hatred, based on race and religion.”

    AFP Deputy Commissioner Krissy Barrett offers her view about what behaviour would satisfy the test.  “The context around the conduct is extremely important … If they’re holding the flag, what are they saying?  What are they chanting?  What are they wearing? What sort of physical behaviour are they demonstrating?”

    The Home Minister Tony Burke is only too grateful to leave it to Barrett and her colleagues, given his own muddle about how such laws are to apply.  Instead of offering any clarifications, he has warned mischievous Hezbollah flag wavers that they risk losing their visas.  “We don’t know whether they are actually on visas … [but] we do have a higher standard if you’re on a visa.”

    Opposition Leader, Peter Dutton, all sledgehammer and no grace, senses room for political exploitation, ostensibly calling for legal improvements to an already shabby law.  “The laws already exist, and if the laws are inadequate then the Australian Federal Commissioner should advise the minister and the parliament should deal with it as a matter of urgency.”

    In addition to the Commonwealth law, states laws also exist to layer the prosecution case.  The Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan, for instance, is convinced that Victoria police had the relevant powers to deal with those who “may be displaying terrorist flags”.

    With the paranoid authoritarians in charge, the very concept of valid protest has been reduced to a hint, a suggestion.  Keep it anodyne and any relevant arguments humbly polite.  Avoid the inherent brutality of a broadening bloody conflict hostile to international law.  Most of all, make social cohesion a license to muzzle.

    The post License to Muzzle: Taking Offence at Flag Wavers for Hezbollah first appeared on Dissident Voice.

    This post was originally published on Dissident Voice.

  • It was done for the Viet Cong in numerous countries during the US involvement in Vietnam.  It was done for the African National Congress (ANC). It was done for the Irish Revolutionary Army (IRA).  Across the United States, Europe and Australasia, all three organisations, demonised as terrorist outfits, received tacit, symbolic support from protestors.  In some cases, support was genuine and pecuniary.  Now, the Lebanese Shia militant and political group Hezbollah, designated a terrorist organisation in a number of Western states, has inspired flag holders to appear at protests against the expanding conflict in Gaza and Lebanon.

    In the previous first three instances, all outfits were integrated into the political fold of their countries, revealing the flimsy nature of badging organisations as terrorist entities.  War makers and practitioners of violence can become peacemakers and creatures of paper pushing officialdom.  Such transformations take time and an acid bath of reality.

    That backdrop offers context in understanding, and sternly critiquing, the hysteria of critics keen to press charges against those sporting Hezbollah symbols.  At the very least, it should consider the mockery that is free speech in a country such as Australia, awash with authoritarians concerned about the watery concept of social cohesion.  Down under, the skimpy protections for free speech are being whittled away year by year. The Counter-Terrorism Legislation Amendment (Prohibited Hate Symbols and Other Measures) Bill 2023, passed in December last year, makes it an offence to publicly display and trade in prohibited symbols, along with the Nazi salute.  Prohibited symbols are defined as prohibited Nazi symbols or “a prohibited terrorist organisation symbol.”

    The Criminal Code Act 1995 as amended, offers a number of glutinous elements that must be made out in such a charge.  They are thickly unclear and, it follows, difficult to apply.  To be charged with a prohibited symbol offence, a reasonable person (drafters can never resist this feeble term) would have to consider that any public display would involve dissemination of ideas based on racial superiority, hatred or constitute incitement “to offend, insult, humiliate or intimidate”.  That same inscrutable reasonable person would also consider the display to involve “advocacy of hatred of a group of persons distinguished by race, religion or nationality or a member of the targeted group” with the incitement element also present. Thirdly, such conduct must be “likely to offend, insult, humiliate or intimidate a reasonable person who is a member of a group distinguished by race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion or national or social origin.”

    These elements are nonsensical, attempting to impose unmeasurable standards about feelings that are rarely reasonable and always almost subjective.  Subjectively, people are constantly offended by what they disagree with.  The whole field of political opinion is one lengthy record of taking offence.  It quickly follows that some might also be intimidated, insulted, or humiliated by an opponent’s contrary view, notably when it comes to discrediting a position.  Freedom of speech, axiomatically, requires the exclusion of the offended from consideration.  But the concept is fragile in Australia’s regulation-crazed environment.

    Arrests have already been made.  On October 2, a 19-year-old woman was arrested and charged for publicly displaying the symbol of a prohibited organisation at a Sydney demonstration.  The question, however, is whether did so with the requisite intention, absurdly determined by the hypothetical reasonable person, to incite offence, insult, humiliation and intimidation. Ahead of protests scheduled for October 6 and 7, Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, not wishing to find himself in a messy quagmire of prosecution and confusion, warned that they should not take place.  “It would not advance any cause.  It would cause a great deal of distress.”  Again, free speech, felled by the concept of hurt feelings.

    The Australian Federal Police (AFP) has created a dedicated taskforce to investigate nine allegations of prohibited symbols being displayed in Victoria, demonstrating how vagueness in legislation is always good for creating work for idle authorities.  Operation Ardana will consider the display of such symbols “while potentially inciting or advocating violence, or hatred, based on race and religion.”

    AFP Deputy Commissioner Krissy Barrett offers her view about what behaviour would satisfy the test.  “The context around the conduct is extremely important … If they’re holding the flag, what are they saying?  What are they chanting?  What are they wearing? What sort of physical behaviour are they demonstrating?”

    The Home Minister Tony Burke is only too grateful to leave it to Barrett and her colleagues, given his own muddle about how such laws are to apply.  Instead of offering any clarifications, he has warned mischievous Hezbollah flag wavers that they risk losing their visas.  “We don’t know whether they are actually on visas … [but] we do have a higher standard if you’re on a visa.”

    Opposition Leader, Peter Dutton, all sledgehammer and no grace, senses room for political exploitation, ostensibly calling for legal improvements to an already shabby law.  “The laws already exist, and if the laws are inadequate then the Australian Federal Commissioner should advise the minister and the parliament should deal with it as a matter of urgency.”

    In addition to the Commonwealth law, states laws also exist to layer the prosecution case.  The Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan, for instance, is convinced that Victoria police had the relevant powers to deal with those who “may be displaying terrorist flags”.

    With the paranoid authoritarians in charge, the very concept of valid protest has been reduced to a hint, a suggestion.  Keep it anodyne and any relevant arguments humbly polite.  Avoid the inherent brutality of a broadening bloody conflict hostile to international law.  Most of all, make social cohesion a license to muzzle.

    The post License to Muzzle: Taking Offence at Flag Wavers for Hezbollah first appeared on Dissident Voice.

    This post was originally published on Dissident Voice.

  • The US State Department has cleared a potential sale of up to 100 Northrop Grumman AGM-88G Advanced Anti-Radiation Guided Missiles-Extended Range (AARGM-ERs) worth approximately US$405 million for Australia under the Foreign Military Sales (FMS) mechanism. According to a US Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) announcement on 27 September, the Australian government requested the purchase of […]

    The post Australia seeks to boost anti-radiation missile inventory appeared first on Asian Military Review.

    This post was originally published on Asian Military Review.

  • As Israel begins another invasion of Lebanon, Australian officials from both sides of the imaginary partisan divide have been falling all over themselves to get Australians punished for speech crimes about the Lebanese resistance group Hezbollah.

    The Australian political-media class have been in an uproar ever since footage surfaced of people waving Hezbollah flags at a protest in Melbourne over the weekend and displaying pictures of the group’s deceased leader Hassan Nasrallah, who was assassinated by Israel in a massive airstrike on Friday.

    After initially stating that no crime had been committed in these acts of political speech, Victoria police are now saying they have identified six potentially criminal incidents related to the demonstration. These incidents reportedly involve “prohibited symbols” in violation of the Counter-Terrorism Legislation Amendment which was enacted last year.

    Needless to say, free nations do not have “prohibited symbols”.

    This development follows numerous statements from various Australian leaders denouncing the protests as criminal.

    “I expect the police agencies to pursue this,” Victorian premier Jacinta Allan said of the protests, adding, “Bringing grief and pain and division to the streets of Melbourne by displaying these prohibited symbols, is utterly unacceptable.”

    Australia’s foreign minister Penny Wong took to Twitter to denounce the protesters, saying Australians must not only refrain from supporting Hezbollah but from even giving “any indication of support”.

    “We condemn any indication of support for a terrorist organisation such as Hizballah,” Wong tweeted, adding, “It not only threatens national security, but fuels fear and division in our communities.”

    Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke wants to deport any international visitors displaying prohibited symbols in Australia, saying “I won’t hesitate to cancel the visas of visitors to our country who are spreading hate.”

    On the other side of the aisle, opposition leader Peter Dutton is on a crusade to get new laws passed to ensure the elimination of banned symbols from public view, saying “enforcement for law is required and if there are laws that need to be passed to make sure that our values are upheld then the Prime Minister should be doing that.”

    “Support for a proscribed terrorist organisation has no place on the streets of Melbourne,” tweeted Labor MP Josh Burns. “Anyone breaking counter-terrorism legislation should face the full force of the law.”

    “Australians cherish the right to peaceful protest,” tweeted independent MP Zoe Daniels. “However, there is no justification for supporting a proscribed terrorist organisation. Those who were seen doing so on the streets of Melbourne at protests yesterday should be investigated and prosecuted.”

    In an article titled “Hezbollah flags at protests shape as test of new hate-symbol laws,” the ABC reports that these legal efforts to stomp out dissenting political speech are made possible by laws which were recently passed with the official intention of targeting Nazi symbols, but which “also cover the symbols of listed terrorist organisations such as Hezbollah.” Which is about as strong an argument on the slippery slope of government censorship as you could possibly ask for.

    Hezbollah is listed as a “terrorist organisation” on the say-so of the Australian government, not because of its actions or methods but because it stands in opposition to the US power alliance of which Australia is a part. This arbitrary designation is smeared across any resistance group on earth which opposes the dictates of Washington, and can then be used to suppress the speech of anyone who disagrees with the murderous behavior of the western empire.

    And it should here be noted that Australia is the only so-called democracy in the world which has no national charter or bill of rights of any kind. A tremendous amount of faith has been placed in state and federal legislators to simply do the right thing, which has proved foolish and ineffective. Professor George Williams wrote for the Melbourne University Law Review in 2006:

    “Australia is now the only democratic nation in the world without a national bill of rights. Some comprehensive form of legal protection for basic rights is otherwise seen as an essential check and balance in democratic governance around the world. Indeed, I can find no example of a democratic nation that has gained a new Constitution or legal system in recent decades that has not included some form of a bill of rights, nor am I aware of any such nation that has done away with a bill of rights once it has been put in place.

    “Why then is Australia the exception? The answer lies in our history. Although many think of Australia as a young country, constitutionally speaking, it is one of the oldest in the world. The Australian Constitution remains almost completely as it was when enacted in 1901, while the Constitutions of the Australian states can go back as far as the 1850s. The legal systems and Constitutions of the nation and the Australian colonies (and then states) were conceived at a time when human rights, with the prominent exception of the 1791 United States Bill of Rights, tended not to be protected through a single legal instrument. Certainly, there was then no such law in the United Kingdom, upon whose legal system ours is substantially based. This has changed, especially after World War II and the passage of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, but by then Australia’s system of government had been operating for decades.”

    If you ever wonder why Australia so often stands out as a freakish anomaly in the western world with its jarring authoritarianism and disregard for human rights, this is why.

    The powerful abuse our civil rights because they can. We are pummeled with propaganda in the birthplace of Rupert Murdoch and increasingly forbidden from speaking out against the atrocities of our government and its allies overseas. We are being groomed into mindless, obedient sheep for the empire.

    The post Australian Officials Push Authoritarian Crackdown on Pro-Hezbollah Speech first appeared on Dissident Voice.

    This post was originally published on Dissident Voice.

  • mycelium meat
    5 Mins Read

    Israel’s Kinoko-Tech has partnered with Australia’s Metaphor Foods to commercialise a range of mycelium protein products – including sausages, flapjacks and chips – down under.

    How would you like some fungi in your morning granola bar?

    Kinoko-Tech, an Israeli mycelium protein startup, is asking why not. Growing mycelium on grains, legumes, nuts, and food industry sidestreams, it is gearing up to launch a new kind of protein that serves as an alternative to both meat and plant-based foods, as well as a base for innovative functional foods.

    The company has signed a strategic commercial agreement with Metaphor Foods, an accelerator and innovation arm of ingredient manufacturer Hela, to produce large-scale quantities of mycelium protein and supply it to manufacturers, ahead of a rollout in 2025.

    Kinoko-Tech’s clean-label “meat-like” products are highly nutritious and better for the planet, while tackling our growing food waste problem. Think burgers, sausages, patties, chunks and cubes rich in protein and fibre, but made by fungi fed on grains, lentils and often-discarded items like vegetable peels.

    “We are trying to get them to be meat-like but instead come in a way that is familiar for people to use,” explains co-founder and CEO Jasmin Ravid. “These products all have a very short ingredient list of substrate and mycelium. One example is patties of black lentils, mycelium, and salt. Another example is chickpea, vegetable cutoffs (side stream), mycelium, and spices.”

    These centre-of-plate foods will be complemented with products like flapjacks, nut and protein bars, and chips, which leverage side streams like okra and use natural sweeteners. “These offer consumers convenient, healthy, unprocessed, protein-packed options for everyday snacking,” Ravid tells Green Queen.

    Hitting on taste, health and sustainability with clean labels

    mycelium protein
    Courtesy: Kinoko-Tech

    Kinoko-Tech leverages solid-state fermentation in a process licensed from Yissum, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem’s tech transfer company.

    “The uniqueness of the technology is the ability to use locally supplied ingredients (including side streams) for the fermentation process,” says Ravid, who co-founded the startup with CTO Daria Feldman and COO Hadar Shohat in 2019. “This method efficiently converts the substrates into high-protein, fibrous products.”

    The startup suggests that its production process is zero-waste, since the “end products combine mycelium and substrate”. It means everything that goes into the fermentation platform comes out as part of the product. Moreover, the fermentation tech produced “minimal emissions” compared to other manufacturing processes.

    A life-cycle assessment conducted on data from its pilot site found that even at a small scale, the mycelium protein’s greenhouse gas emissions are lower than growing tomatoes.

    But while sustainability is important to many consumers, how food tastes and feels is an even more crucial consumption driver. In Australia, where Kinoko-Tech is aiming to enter the market, 46% of people are dissuaded from eating plant-based meat due to its unsatisfactory flavour, and another 30% say the same for texture.

    Kinoko-Tech is hoping to break that mould by offering a new kind of meat replacement. But while it resembles tempeh – another fermented food that is based on soybeans – Ravid says the mycelium protein offers more: “Our products are designed to be versatile. The centre of the plate products has a juicy, fibrous texture that is quite different from tempeh. The taste is also more umami and rich.”

    It’s also delivering on the nutrition front, with high amounts and fibre (a nutrient many of us underconsume), and all nine essential amino acids, making it a complete protein. The short ingredient lists, meanwhile, will allay fears of overprocessing and appeal to the 68% of consumers who are happy to pay more for products that only contain recognisable ingredients.

    The startup plans to market the mycelium protein to consumers as “a sustainable, nutrient-dense alternative that’s easy to prepare in various cuisines, celebration legumes, vegetables (if those will be part of the substrates), and fermented food”.

    Who are these consumers? “Health-conscious individuals, flexitarians, and vegetarians seeking high-quality, unprocessed, protein-rich foods that align with their health and wellness goals,” says Ravid. “We aim to provide options that not only meet their dietary preferences, but also enhance their overall lifestyle.”

    Kinoko-Tech plans Europe expansion post Australia launch

    kinoko tech mycelium
    Courtesy: Kinoko-Tech

    Ravid reveals that Kinoko-Tech is producing its mycelium starter kit at a facility in Israel, and can already produce enough protein to manufacture 120,000 tonnes of end products annually. These final products will be produced by Metaphor Foods at a site in Melbourne.

    “We aim to begin commercial production in Australia in 2025, beginning on a small scale of 24-48 tonnes annually and reaching 700+ tonnes annually once the partnership is fully established, positioning us strategically to serve growing markets,” she says.

    The scale-up would also help Kinoko-Tech bring down the price of its protein, another key pain point for consumers. “The key differentiation of the technology is the unit economics and low capex needed for production. As we scale the production, we will get price parity with traditional animal proteins,” suggests Ravid. “Our goal is to offer a cost-effective, sustainable alternative without compromising quality.”

    The company is focusing on “forging strategic partnerships” to enable local production utilising its fermentation technology and mycelium starter kit. The partnership with Metaphor Foods is part of this strategy, which will enable it to produce the mycelium in Australia, followed by an expansion into Malaysia, Singapore, Indonesia, and New Zealand.

    “We are currently in discussions with several food manufacturers across Europe and the US to create more partnerships like these,” outlines Ravid. “Our plan is to launch in Australia with Metaphor in 2025, and in Europe with one of our other partners.”

    kinoko tech
    Courtesy: Kinoko-Tech

    The agreement with Metaphor Foods also includes a strategic investment. “We have successfully completed an initial funding round and are currently focusing on scaling our operations and supporting our market launch alongside our partners,” she says. “As we move forward and sign more partnerships, we will evaluate opportunities for additional funding to further accelerate our growth and expand our reach.”

    Investors have been doubling down on fermentation startups amid a dip in interest in the larger alternative protein space. In the first three quarters of this year, fermentation protein companies have exceeded their funding totals from all of 2023, surpassing $550M in nine months (versus last year’s $443M).

    Meanwhile, more and more companies are looking to mycelium for cleaner-label meat analogues, including Beyond Meat and Nosh.bio, whose Koji Chunks are made from just one ingredient. Similarly, Elmhurst 1925 has forayed into plant-based meat with its single-ingredient TerraMeat hemp chicken. And in the UK, Vegbloc has come up with a whole-food-based protein that’s designed to replace, not imitate, meat.

    The post Kinoko-Tech Inks Deal to Roll Out Fungi Products in Australia, From Zero-Waste Burgers to Mycelium Muesli Bars appeared first on Green Queen.

    This post was originally published on Green Queen.


  • This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Radio Free Asia.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • India will set up a trade promotion office in Sydney to act as a single-front door for investors and businesses as the two countries look to double two-way trade to $100 billion by 2030. The office, part of a wider push by the world’s fastest growing economy to deepen investment ties in South-East Asia, will…

    The post India to deepen trade ties with Sydney investment office appeared first on InnovationAus.com.

    This post was originally published on InnovationAus.com.

  • With the InnovationAus Awards for Excellence finalists now locked-in for 2024, the voting has now opened to the public to find a worthy winner of the prestigious People’s Choice Award. The People’s Choice Award is how we identify the crowd favourite from among all of our 2024 finalists. The voting is open to the public…

    The post Voting now open for InnovationAus People’s Choice Award appeared first on InnovationAus.com.

    This post was originally published on InnovationAus.com.

  • Australia increasingly favours the issuance of major defence policy documents, but whether they improve military readiness is questionable. Defence white papers were issued in 1976, 1987, 1994, 2000, 2009, 2013 and 2016. A Defence Strategic Update was issued in 2020 and the Defence Strategic Review last year. Numerous directional changes and deficient planning are perhaps […]

    The post Can Australian Naval Planning Create Order From Disarray? appeared first on Asian Military Review.

    This post was originally published on Asian Military Review.

  • veef plant based meat
    5 Mins Read

    In Australia, vEEF has introduced a new range of meat analogues that are priced lower than animal-derived meat, keying into consumer trends.

    Nearly a year after its merger with Love Buds, vEEF is rolling out a new range of meat analogues that tackle a key consumer pain point: cost.

    Available at Woolworths, the new beef mince and sausages are on par with conventional meat, at AU$4.50 per 300g pack. This is much lower than Woolworths’ own-brand lean beef and beef sausages (ranging from AU$16-22 per kg, versus AU$15 for vEEF).

    They are housed in renewed packaging that uses 50% less plastic than previous vEEF products and features a Carbon Neutral label, a reference to the brand’s carbon neutral certification by the eCarbon reductio Institute last year.

    “We recognise that high costs have historically deterred many conscious consumers from embracing plant-based alternatives. In these challenging times, we’re committed to striving towards making delicious, nourishing plant-based foods accessible to all Australians,” said co-founder and CEO Alejandro Cancino, who received a Michelin star during his time in Tokyo, as well as three chef’s hats, Australia’s equivalent to the Michelin star.

    “By offering vEEF at a fair price, we’re empowering more people to make choices that align with their values and dietary preferences. It’s about making plant-based eating an accessible option for everyone, not just a select few,” he added.

    vEEF cuts profit margins to offer cheaper plant-based meats

    veef sausages
    Courtesy: vEEF

    Cancino founded the company as part of Fenn Foods in 2018 with his wife, Paolo Moro, with a range that now includes nuggets, bacon bits, roast chicken, steaks and burgers across chilled and frozen formats.

    Last year, vEEF merged with All G Foods’ Love Buds brand to form the Aussie Plant-Based Co. “This union combines our strengths, enabling significant growth in both retail (vEEF) and foodservice (Love BUDS) sectors,” said Cancino.

    “Our consolidated resources and shared expertise have positioned us for continued expansion. We remain committed to delivering top-quality plant-based products across both channels, leveraging our enhanced capabilities to meet growing consumer demand,” he added. “This strategic alliance strengthens our market presence, allowing us to better serve our customers and drive innovation in the plant-based food industry.”

    The latest soy-protein-based products are vEEF’s first new launches since the merger. They include a beef mince for use in tacos, pasta sauces, and more, as well as three sausages. The classic sausages are ideal for stir-fries and barbecues, the Smokey ones can be added to soups and casseroles, while you can top up pizzas and breakfast scrambles with the Chorizo version (which is much cheaper than conventional branded Chorizo sausages, which range from AU$26-50).

    The company has managed to bring down the prices and overcome challenges like high raw material costs and supply chain instability through a multi-faceted approach. Its manufacturing hub streamlines production and reduces reliance on external suppliers to cut intermediary costs, while it has been working on addressing efficiencies in the supply chain.

    vEEF has also continued to refine its manufacturing process, allowing it to increase output while maintaining its quality, and the economies of scaling up this way also bring down prices. Notably, it is accepting a lower profit margin to offer competitive pricing, with a long-term focus on market share and consumer accessibility.

    Just earlier this month, a survey of 2,000 Australians found that price is the second largest barrier to the consumption of plant-based meat, with 37% deterred from choosing these products due to their high markups. That said, budgetary concerns were also the second most important reason for reducing the amount of meat Australians eat, a factor cited by 54% of respondents.

    The price problem for plant-based meat

    plant based meat survey
    Courtesy: Food Frontier

    The aforementioned poll, commissioned by Sydney-based think tank Food Frontier, suggested that nearly a fifth of Australians (21%) identify as meat reducers, while another 7% are flexitarian. Meanwhile, 15% are vegan or vegetarian – meaning more than two in five consumers are either cutting back on meat, or don’t eat it at all.

    This is on the back of a 47% hike in plant-based meats sales in Australia from 2020 to 2023 (across both retail and foodservice). With another 12% of citizens hoping to reduce meat this year, and four in five going meat-free at least once a week, the market for plant-based analogues seems ripe.

    But the latter category suffers from a major price premium, carrying a 33% higher markup than animal-derived meat. That said, this gap has narrowed from 49% in 2020, and Australian-made plant-based mince is only 8% more expensive than its cattle-based counterpart. Vegan sausages, on the other hand, have become 27% costlier in this time.

    plant based meat price parity
    Courtesy: Food Frontier

    Food Frontier found that manufacturers are prioritising health and nutrition in plant-based meat, followed by price. “Some Australian manufacturers said they absorbed price hikes whenever feasible to shield consumers from bearing the brunt, recognising the role of pricing in consumer decision-making,” the think tank’s CEO, Simon Eassom, told Green Queen in May.

    “And some companies improved efficiencies in their supply chain, while others pursued vertical integration to reduce overall expenses. Another contributor to the narrowing of the price gap is the departure of several imported plant-based meats, which were more expensive per kilo than locally produced products.”

    With continued manufacturing efficiencies, expansion in local production capacity, as well as some support from retailers, costs could be driven down even further, added Eassom: “If overseas trends are anything to go by, we think the Australian market, when it can, will see even closer price parity.”

    The post Australia’s vEEF Rolls Out Plant-Based Beef Mince and Sausages Cheaper Than Meat appeared first on Green Queen.

    This post was originally published on Green Queen.

  • The Australian government has announced plans for further investments in developing an indigenous guided weapon subsystems and rocket motor manufacturing capability to support advanced missile production within the country. The Department of Defence (DoD) said in a 16 September statement that the government will invest an initial A$22 million over the next three years to […]

    The post Australia digs in on local missile production appeared first on Asian Military Review.

    This post was originally published on Asian Military Review.

  • Austal Australia and Greenroom Robotics announced on 18 September that they have entered a strategic commercial partnership to develop watercraft platforms and solutions aimed at reduced crewing as well as possible remote and autonomous operation of vessels designed and constructed by Austal Australia. The announcement of the Strategic Partnership Agreement (SPA) comes after the successful […]

    The post Austal Australia and Greenroom Robotics team up for future naval autonomy appeared first on Asian Military Review.

    This post was originally published on Asian Military Review.

  • Thales and Underwood Innovation Labs, the inaugural Australian government-backed innovation lab, signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to establish an Advanced Air Mobility Centre of Excellence (AAM COE). Located in Queensland, Australia, the AAM COE will facilitate the growth of a scalable and collaborative UAV ecosystem in Advanced Air Mobility, create high-skilled jobs, and provide access […]

    The post Thales Australia and Underwood Innovation Labs sign an MoU to establish a collaborative Advanced Air Mobility (AAM) Centre of Excellence inQueensland, Australia appeared first on Asian Military Review.

    This post was originally published on Asian Military Review.

  • A lecture series can promise much.  But one run out of a corporatised university comes with its own burdens and blemishes.  There is the stifling sense of brand and name that hovers over proceedings.  The logo is everywhere, a permanent reminder about the role of the chief donor, sponsor or name of the individual associated with the event.  Then there is the risk of who will be the first speaker to smash the bottle against the ship before embarkation.

    For the Peter Fensham AM Lecture Series (AM is not to be confused with a radio frequency), few finer choices than Professor Peter Doherty could have been selected.  The immunologist and Nobel Laureate was intended as the glittery introduction to a series named after the inaugural chair of science education at Monash University’s Faculty of Education from 1967 to 1992.  The lecture topic: The Challenge of Public Science Education.

    Before the glitter comes the dross.  Introductions must be made by the current Dean of Faculty.  Acknowledgments made.  Paralytically boring jokes delivered with the skill of a suffocating goldfish.  The audience is also introduced to a perfect, waxwork figure behind the lecture series.  As with eulogies, juicy flaws are never mentioned, off colour jokes rarely entertained.

    When it finally comes to Doherty’s turn to speak, one is immediately disabused by the image of a tyrannical professor lording over labs, staff and students.  With mischief, he enters, unevenly, that treacherous field of educating the public about science.  In a sense, he assumes a role more popularly associated with the celluloid astrophysicist, the species of character that has colonised television and screen with their searching, almost scolding gazes (Neil deGrasse Tyson), or drawn out walks upon the earth’s surface (Brian Cox).

    What the audience gets is a healthy, even bawdy dose of stories, anecdotes and analogies.  Having made his name in a field, Doherty has every right to be dull.  Instead, he is self-deprecating and mocking.  Wit sparkles.  “I miss the obituaries.  The most interesting people are in the obituaries.”

    He refuses to punish his listeners with elaborate details on work that won him the Albert Lasker Award for Basic Medical Research in 1995 and the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1996, along with Rolf M. Zinkernagel.  The Nobel Prize committee offers a summary: “By studying mice, Peter Doherty and Rolf Zinkernagel proved in 1973 how the immune system recognises virus-ridden cells.”  The white blood T-cell eliminates virus-ridden cells, but only “if it recognises both the foreign substances, viruses, and certain substances from the body’s own cells.”  The result: vital work in vaccine production and the production of medicines against infectious diseases.

    Doherty prefers to muse about the endless dining in Stockholm following the ceremony, and the taxing of his prize money by the US Internal Revenue Service.  On being made Australian of the Year in 1997, he acknowledged criticism that such a figure would be expected to be in the country rather than domiciled or resident elsewhere.

    Sensible points are made.  With the huge literature, often of a specialist type, in such areas as virology and immunology, a modicum of scientific knowledge and literacy is needed.  School curricula should accordingly be shaped to reflect that focus.  The logic here is unimpeachable, but for a country like Australia, the shift towards what are called the STEM subjects – science, technology, engineering and mathematics – has become the hijacked province of warmongers, militarists and panic merchants.  The AUKUS agreement between Australia, the UK and the United States has made the Australian Commonwealth eager to fund “student pathways” to recruit graduates for the military-industrial complex.

    He also makes a point made trite by Giuseppe Tomasi di Lampedusa’s Sicilian epic, Il Gattopardo (The Leopard): “If we want things to stay as they are, things will have to change.”

    The audience audibly gasps at Doherty’s observations on the US scientific-industrial base.  Unlike Australia, which sports a much leaner foundation from which to pursue research and innovation, one verging on a starvation model, US scientific industry thrives on what could be described as industrial socialism.  Forget notions of free standing, pioneer scientists operating with funding drawn exclusively from the fruits of free enterprise.  Much of it has come, at least initially, from government sources, with the intention that the investment will eventually make a return for the US economy.  Australian scientific endeavours, in contrast, must migrate and exit their country of origin, often finding richer soil in the United States.

    The immunologist does, however, seem short on how to convince those hermetically sealed from scientific reason to open their minds.  Resort is made to Max Planck’s observation (Doherty misattributes the remark to Isaac Newton) that new scientific truths do not prove victorious by convincing opponents “but rather because its opponents eventually die and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it”.  So it follows that science advances one funeral at a time.

    He also admits to suffering various maladies, Trump Derangement Syndrome being the most prominent of them.  In doing so, he struggles to be consistent with observing one of his own lessons: avoid belittling sceptics and conspiracy theorists.

    While Doherty is faultless in noting the former US president’s breezy tendency to mutilate science and its strictures, he is optimistic that the Democratic hopeful, Kamala Harris, will be a shining light in the field.

    With the address delivered, an appropriate sense of bonhomie established, the session moves to questions.  While the lecture is advertised as both an in person and online show, it is clear that the digital elves at the back of the room are guarding the gates and sifting through what Doherty might or should answer.  The Dean shifts and twitches nervously, hoping that no question will court controversy.  Monash Education is, after all, logo and brand.

    Up rises a man dressed in bright emerald, his shirt promising informality with menace.  He takes the mic, speaking in broad, disarming tones.  The issue: “I represent a group fighting for truth.  I heard you attack conspiracy theorists.  But we are out there seeking the truth about COVID-19.”  Doherty, with magnanimity, admitted that the study of COVID-19 was a constantly evolving one, and initially poorly understood.  No longer could it be seen as merely a respiratory virus but a coagulating one.  Corrections would have to be made over time.  The fires sadly doused, the formal end of proceedings was announced, leaving Doherty hostage to a gaggle of mobbing questioners.

    A bit of wisdom from Doherty lingers as the lecture hall empties.  “I did become more known with the Nobel Prize.  But I found that I became only as famous as a person in a coffee advertisement that had not been shown for three months.  And that’s how it should be.”

    The post Peter Doherty: Public Science Communicator first appeared on Dissident Voice.

    This post was originally published on Dissident Voice.

  • Rohde & Schwarz announced in late August that it has been contracted by BAE Systems Maritime Australia (BAESMA) to supply its IP-based NAVICS integrated communication system (ICS) for the first batch of three Hunter-class frigates being built by the latter for the Royal Australian Navy (RAN). According to Rohde & Schwarz, NAVICS will function as […]

    The post Rohde & Schwarz wins Australian frigate communications deal appeared first on Asian Military Review.

    This post was originally published on Asian Military Review.


  • This content originally appeared on Laura Flanders & Friends and was authored by Laura Flanders & Friends.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Loitering munitions featured prominently at the Land Forces 2024 exhibition. One Australian company operating in this realm is Innovaero, of which BAE Systems holds a 51 percent share. Innovaero has a growing family of three OWL aircraft, which stands for One-way Loitering Munition. The OWL-B, which is 6 feet (1.8 metres) long and possesses a […]

    The post Parliament of Innovaero OWLs grows in Australia appeared first on Asian Military Review.

    This post was originally published on Asian Military Review.

  • By Scott Waide, RNZ Pacific PNG correspondent, and Lydia Lewis RNZ Pacific journalist

    Papua New Guinea is today celebrating almost half a century of independence from Australia.

    The journey has not been easy, and the path since 16 September 1975 has been filled with challenges and triumphs, Prime Minister James Marape said in a statement.

    “In 1975, Papua New Guinea raised its own flag and took its place among the sovereign nations of the world,” he said.

    Papua New Guinea’s High Commissioner to New Zealand Sakias Tameo, said Papua New Guineans around the world were celebrating 49 years of freedom:

    “The birth of the country is very important to Papua New Guinea,” Tameo said.

    Papua New Guineans will be celebrating in red and yellow colours all throughout Papua New Guinea.

    “It’s a great day.”

    Women at PNG's Gordon's Market.
    Women and children at PNG’s Gordon’s Market in 2023. Image: RNZ Pacific/Lydia Lewis

    Unique culture
    Papua New Guinea has more than 800 languages and distinct cultures.

    In the 1970s, when a young Michael Somare, Pita Lus, Julius Chan, John Momis and other leaders decided to push for independence, they faced a mammoth challenge of uniting the land of many tribes and languages.

    They travelled widely and studied the decolonisation process in Africa and drew lessons from countries like Tanzania and Zimbabwe.

    But back home, many people still did not understand the concept of political independence.

    As Deputy Chairman of the Constitutional Planning Committee, John Momis, travelled to every district to consult with people who were going to be citizens of the new country.

    The committee incorporated their thoughts on culture, languages and family into the new constitution.

    Poverty – inequality – corruption
    The journey has not been without its difficulties, Marape said.

    “Poverty, inequality, corruption, and service delivery challenges continue to test us as a nation,” he said.

    “However, each challenge is also an opportunity-an opportunity to do better, to serve our people more effectively, and to chart a brighter course for future generations.”

    Looking to the future, Marape said he wanted to invest in education, make headway on building a robust economy, fight corruption and unite the country.

    “In the coming year, we will face challenges, but I am confident that if we remain united, focused, and committed to the vision of our forefathers, we will overcome them and continue to build a nation that our children and grandchildren will be proud of,” Marape said.

    This article is republished under a community partnership agreement with RNZ.


    This content originally appeared on Asia Pacific Report and was authored by APR editor.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Lockheed Martin confirmed the first batch of M142 HIMARS rocket launchers will land in Australia in the first quarter of 2025, ahead of schedule. This is because the U.S. Army prioritised Australian requirements and allotted it next year’s first batch of vehicles. Further batches will follow in 2026 and 2027, with all 42 HIMARS on […]

    The post Australia expects first HIMARS deliveries in early 2025 appeared first on Asian Military Review.

    This post was originally published on Asian Military Review.

  • Boeing Defence Australia announced on 9 September, just two days before Land Forces 2024 opened its doors, that the Project Currawong integrated battlefield telecommunications network (I-BTN) had achieved final operational capability. The Chief of Army made this FOC declaration regarding the Project Currawong battlespace communications system, which falls under the label of Project Land 2072 […]

    The post Australia’s Currawong I-BTN achieves FOC appeared first on Asian Military Review.

    This post was originally published on Asian Military Review.

  • Safran Electronics and Defense Australasia has been chosen to supply PASEO Joint Fires advanced day and night panoramic sight for integration on the Hanwha Defence Australia’s Redback Infantry Fighting Vehicle (IFV). The PASEO Joint Fires solution provides the long-range Intelligence, Surveillance, Target Acquisition, & Reconnaissance sensor for the Redback IFV supplied by Hanwha to the […]

    The post Australia: Safran integrating the PASEO Joint Fires on Hanwha’s Redback Infantry Fighting Vehicle appeared first on Asian Military Review.

    This post was originally published on Asian Military Review.

  • COMMENTARY: By David Robie

    Vietnam’s famous Củ Chi tunnel network was on our bucket list for years.

    For me, it was for more than half a century, ever since I had been editor of the Melbourne Sunday Observer, which campaigned against Australian (and New Zealand) involvement in the unjust Vietnam War — redubbed the “American War” by the Vietnamese.

    For Del, it was a dream to see how the resistance of a small and poor country could defeat the might of colonisers.

    “I wanted to see for myself how the tunnels and the sacrifices of the Vietnamese had contributed to winning the war,” she recalls.

    “Love for country, a longing for peace and a resistance to foreign domination were strong factors in victory.”

    We finally got our wish last month — a half day trip to the tunnel network, which stretched some 250 kilometres at the peak of their use. The museum park is just 45 km northeast of Ho Chi Minh city, known as Saigon during the war years (many locals still call it that).

    Building of the tunnels started after the Second World War after the Japanese had withdrawn from Indochina and liberation struggles had begun against the French. But they reached their most dramatic use in the war against the Americans, especially during the spate of surprise attacks during the Tet Offensive in 1968.

    Checking out the Củ Chi tunnel network
    Checking out the Củ Chi tunnel network near Vietnam’s Ho Chi Minh City. Image: David Robie/APR

    The Viet Minh kicked off the network, when it was a sort of southern gateway to the Ho Chi Minh trail in the 1940s as the communist forces edged closer to Saigon. Eventually the liberation successes of the Viet Minh led to humiliating defeat of the French colonial forces at Dien Bien Phu in 1954.

    Cutting off supply lines
    The French had rebuilt an ex-Japanese airbase in a remote valley near the Laotian border in a so-called “hedgehog” operation — in a belief that the Viet Minh forces did not have anti-aircraft artillery. They hoped to cut off the Viet Minh’s guerrilla forces’ supply lines and draw them into a decisive conventional battle where superior French firepower would prevail.

    However, they were the ones who were cut off.


    The Củ Chi tunnels explored.    Video: History channel

    The French military command badly miscalculated as General Nguyen Giap’s forces secretly and patiently hauled artillery through the jungle-clad hills over months and established strategic batteries with tunnels for the guns to be hauled back under cover after firing several salvos.

    Giap compared Dien Bien Phu to a “rice bowl” with the Viet Minh on the edges and the French at the bottom.

    After a 54-day siege between 13 March and 7 May 1954, as the French forces became increasingly surrounded and with casualties mounting (up to 2300 killed), the fortifications were over-run and the surviving soldiers surrendered.

    The defeat led to global shock that an anti-colonial guerrilla army had defeated a major European power.

    The French government of Prime Minister Joseph Laniel resigned and the 1954 Geneva Accords were signed with France pulling out all its forces in the whole of Indochina, although Vietnam was temporarily divided in half at the 17th Parallel — the communist Democratic Republic of Vietnam under Ho Chi Minh, and the republican State of Vietnam nominally under Emperor Bao Dai (but in reality led by a series of dictators with US support).

    Debacle of Dien Bien Phu
    The debacle of Dien Bien Phu is told very well in an exhibition that takes up an entire wing of the Vietnam War Remnants Museum (it was originally named the “Museum of American War Crimes”).

    But that isn’t all at the impressive museum, the history of the horrendous US misadventure is told in gruesome detail – with some 58,000 American troops killed and the death of an estimated up to 3 million Vietnamese soldiers and civilians. (Not to mention the 521 Australian and 37 New Zealand soldiers, and the many other allied casualties.)

    The section of the museum devoted to the Agent Orange defoliant war waged on the Vietnamese and the country’s environment is particularly chilling – casualties and people suffering from the aftermath of the poisoning are now into the fourth generation.

    "Peace in Vietnam" posters and photographs
    “Peace in Vietnam” posters and photographs at the War Remnants Museum in Ho Chi Minh City. Image: David Robie/APR
    "Nixon out of Vietnam" daubed on a bombed house
    “Nixon out of Vietnam” daubed on a bombed house in the War Remnants Museum. Image: Del Abcede/APR

    The global anti-Vietnam War peace protests are also honoured at the museum and one section of the compound has a recreation of the prisons holding Viet Cong independence fighters, including the torture “tiger cells”.

    A shackled Viet Cong suspect (mannequin) in a torture "tiger cage"
    A shackled Viet Cong suspect (mannequin) in a torture “tiger cage” recreation. Image: David Robie/APR

    A guillotine is on display. The execution method was used by both France and the US-backed South Vietnam regimes against pro-independence fighters.

    A guillotine on display at the Remnants War Museum
    A guillotine on display at the Remnants War Museum in Ho Chi Minh City. Image: David Robie/APR

    A placard says: “During the US war against Vietnam, the guillotine was transported to all of the provinces in South Vietnam to decapitate the Vietnam patriots. [On 12 March 1960], the last man who was executed by guillotine was Hoang Le Kha.”

    A member of the ant-French liberation “scout movement”, Hoang was sentenced to death by a military court set up by the US-backed President Ngo Dinh Diem’s regime.

    In 1981, France outlawed capital punishment and abandoned the use of the guillotine, but the last execution was as recent as 1977.

    Museum visit essential
    Visiting Ho Ch Min City’s War Remnants Museum is essential for background and contextual understanding of the role and importance of the Củ Chi tunnels.

    The Sunday Observer coverage of the My Lai massacre
    The Sunday Observer coverage of the My Lai massacre. Image: Screenshot David Robie/APR

    Back in my protest days as chief subeditor and then editor of Melbourne’s Sunday Observer, I had published Ronald Haberle’s My Lai massacre photos the same week as Life Magazine in December 1969 (an estimated 500 women, children and elderly men were killed at the hamlet on 16 March 1968 near Quang Nai city and the atrocity was covered up for almost two years).

    Ironically, we were prosecuted for “obscenity’ for publishing photographs of a real life US obscenity and war crime in the Australian state of Victoria. (The case was later dropped).

    So our trip to the Củ Chi tunnels was laced with expectation. What would we see? What would we feel?

    A tunnel entrance at Ben Dinh
    A tunnel entrance at Ben Dinh. Image: David Robie/APR

    The tunnels played a critical role in the “American” War, eventually leading to the collapse of South Vietnamese resistance in Saigon. And the guides talk about the experience and the sacrifice of Viet Cong fighters in reverential tones.

    The tunnel network at Ben Dinh is in a vast park-like setting with restored sections, including underground kitchen (with smoke outlets directed through simulated ant hills), medical centre, and armaments workshop.

    ingenious bamboo and metal spike booby traps, snakes and scorpions were among the obstacles to US forces pursuing resistance fighters. Special units — called “tunnel rats” using smaller soldiers were eventually trained to combat the Củ Chi system but were not very effective.

    We were treated to cooked cassava, a staple for the fighters underground.

    A disabled US tank demonstrates how typical hit-and-run attacks by the Viet Cong fighters would cripple their treads and then they would be attacked through their manholes.

    ‘Walk’ through showdown
    When it came to the section where we could walk through the tunnels ourselves, our guide said: “It only takes a couple of minutes.”

    It was actually closer to 10 minutes, it seemed, and I actually got stuck momentarily when my knees turned to jelly with the crouch posture that I needed to use for my height. I had to crawl on hands and knees the rest of the way.

    David at a tunnel entrance
    David at a tunnel entrance — “my knees turned to jelly” but crawling through was the solution in the end. Image: David Robie/APR

    A warning sign said don’t go if you’re aged over 70 (I am 79), have heart issues (I do, with arteries), or are claustrophobic (I’m not). I went anyway.

    People who have done this are mostly very positive about the experience and praise the tourist tunnels set-up. Many travel agencies run guided trips to the tunnels.

    How small can we squeeze to fit in the tunnel?
    How small can we squeeze to fit in the tunnel? The thinnest person in one group visiting the tunnels tries to shrink into the space. Image: David Robie/APR
    A so-called "clipping armpit" Viet Cong trap
    A so-called “clipping armpit” Viet Cong trap in the Củ Chi tunnel network. Image: David Robie/APR

    “Exploring the Củ Chi tunnels near Saigon was a fascinating and historically significant experience,” wrote one recent visitor on a social media link.

    “The intricate network of tunnels, used during the Vietnam War, provided valuable insights into the resilience and ingenuity of the Vietnamese people. Crawling through the tunnels, visiting hidden bunkers, and learning about guerrilla warfare tactics were eye-opening . . .

    “It’s a place where history comes to life, and it’s a must-visit for anyone interested in Vietnam’s wartime history and the remarkable engineering of the Củ Chi tunnels.”

    “The visit gives a very real sense of what the war was like from the Vietnamese side — their tunnels and how they lived and efforts to fight the Americans,” wrote another visitor. “Very realistic experience, especially if you venture into the tunnels.”

    Overall, it was a powerful experience and a reminder that no matter how immensely strong a country might be politically and militarily, if grassroots people are determined enough for freedom and justice they will triumph in the end.

    There is hope yet for Palestine.

    The Củ Chi tunnel network
    The Củ Chi tunnel network. Image: War Remnants Museum/APR

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • Kongsberg Defence & Aerospace announced on 5 September that it has signed a contract with the Australian government to deliver the Joint Strike Missile (JSM) for the Royal Australian Air Force’s (RAAF’s) F-35A aircraft. The initial contract is worth about NOK 1 billion (A$142 million). According to the company, the JSM is an air-launched precision […]

    The post Kongsberg expands missile work in Australia appeared first on Asian Military Review.

    This post was originally published on Asian Military Review.

  • The Australian government has been in a banning mood of late.  In keeping with an old, puritanical tradition, the killjoys and wowsers have seized the reins of power and snorting a good deal while doing so.  In important matters such as anti-corruption and environmental protection, the government of Anthony Albanese is showing fewer teeth and no gumption.  On foreign policy, it has proved craven in its Middle Eastern policy, obsequious to the United States, to which it has handed the wealth of the land to in the event of any future conflict Washington wishes to fight.

    With such an impoverished policy front, other areas for righteous indignation have been sought.  And there is no better trendy (and trending) target than the devilry that is social media, traduced for creating any number of vague maladies of society.

    Within such ills, one boringly conventional group has been found.  When the wowsers are in charge, chances are they will always pick out the vulnerabilities of children and do their utmost to politicise them.  Spare them, demands Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, from using and opening social media accounts unless they are of a certain age.  (He’s not quite too sure where to draw the line – a politician’s old dilemma.)  Keep them innocent from the horrors that lurk in the minefield that used to be quaintly called the Information Superhighway.  Let government officials, supposedly in league with parents evidently incapable of influencing let alone instructing their children, come up with appropriate ditches, moats, and other barriers to guard against the digital monsters that approach the keep.

    Inspired by South Australia’s breathtakingly naïve Children (Social Media Safety) Bill 2024 to fine social media companies indifferent to excluding children under the age of 14 from using their platforms, along with a report by former High Court Chief Justice Robert French on how this might be done, the PM told the ABC that he was “committed to introducing legislation before the end of this year for age verification to make sure we get young people away from social harm.”  Such harm was “a scourge”, involving, for instance, online bullying, or “material which causes social harm”.

    Typical to such proposals is the wistful glance to things past, preferably idealised and unblemished.  Albanese’s is curiously shorn of books and libraries.  “I want to see kids off their devices and onto the footy fields and the swimming pools and the tennis courts.”  That’s were the more traditional, good spirited bullying takes place.

    These laws are yet another effort to concentrate power and responsibilities best held by the citizenry, especially when it comes to decisions for individuals and family, in the hands of a bureaucratic-political class remunerated for reasons of paranoia and almost entirely devoid of merit.

    Even before it reaches the legislative stage, sensible heads can spot the canyon like flaws in such verification regulations.  Lisa Given, who cuts her teeth on studying information technology, calls it, with rank understatement, “a very problematic move.”  By adopting such a prohibitive position, children also risked being excluded “from some very, very helpful supports on social media.”

    Child advocacy group Alannah and Madeline take the firm view that raising the age is a sniff and a sneeze at the broader problem, band aid and the shallowest of balms.  “The real issue is the underlying design elements of social media and its algorithms, recommender systems, and data harvesting, which can expose children and young people to inappropriate and harmful content, misinformation, predatory behaviour and other damaging harms such as extortion.”

    This dotty regime is also based on the premise it will survive circumvention.  It won’t.  Children will find a way, and technology will afford them the basis of doing so.  In May, documents uncovered under Freedom of Information by Guardian Australia identified that the government’s own communications department had doubts.

    One document surveying the international state of age assurance technology dispiritingly noted that: “No countries have implemented an age verification mandate without issue.”  The UK’s Digital Economy Act 2017, which gave the regulator powers to impose penalties on websites not using age implementation systems to prevent minors accessing pornography, failed. The reasons: “multiple delays, technical difficulties and community concern for privacy”.  (A current scheme in the UK, still in early stages, only applies to adult sites, not social media.)

    Legal challenges are also noted in countries where age verification requirements have been imposed.  In France, the age verification law gives websites the latitude to decide age verification for their users. In December 2021, Arcom, the digital regulator, commenced legal action against non-compliant websites in an effort to block them.  To date, the issue remains bogged down in the courts.  A similar law in Germany has also “faced difficulty in compliance and enforcement, with attempts to block non-compliant websites currently before the courts.”

    In the United States – and here, the warning is prescient – attempts to block access in a number of states have seen defiant subversion.  In Utah, the demand for Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) merrily rose by almost 1,000% following the announcement of a law imposing age verification requirements for porn sites.  In Louisiana, VPN usage increased threefold after the commencement of a similar law.

    The lists of defects in such proposals are monumentally impressive.  Broadly speaking, they work (and fail) on the infantilisation principle.  Children must be kept childlike by adults who fear growth.  Keeping children immature and cocooned to certain realities, however ghastly, is a recipe for lifelong dysfunction and psychiatric bills.  It is an incentive to deny that actions have consequences, that learning can be damnably difficult though, in many instances, deliciously rewarding.  Instead of encouraging fine circumspection and growing maturity, these laws encourage comforting insularity and prolonged immaturity.

    The post Childish Fantasies: Age Verification for Social Media Down Under first appeared on Dissident Voice.

    This post was originally published on Dissident Voice.

  • Supacat, which has a major footprint in Australia, publicly displayed its new Medium Utility Vehicle (MUV) platform at Land Forces 2024. On display was a 6×6 variant, although a 4×4 configuration is also available to customers. The light-medium-class vehicle is designed to fit between the All-Terrain Mobile Platform (ATMP) and High Mobility Transport (HMT) in […]

    The post Supacat debuts Medium Utility Vehicle appeared first on Asian Military Review.

    This post was originally published on Asian Military Review.

  • The Australian Defence Force (ADF) is buying DAGOR 4×4 light tactical vehicles from Polaris, according to a 9 September company announcement. The contract is worth $14.6 million (A$22 million). Deliveries of all DAGORs will be completed within two years, but neither Polaris nor the Department of Defence revealed the quantity of vehicles. However, when compared […]

    The post Australia lodges order for DAGOR light tactical vehicles appeared first on Asian Military Review.

    This post was originally published on Asian Military Review.

  • Anduril, which has earned a reputation for rapidly developing innovative defence equipment, announced its new family of Barracuda cruise missiles at Land Forces 2024. According to Anduril, the Barracuda “is a highly intelligent, low-cost weapon system that is capable of direct, stand-in or stand-off strike missions in line with existing requirements, but rapidly adaptable to […]

    The post Anduril launches cruise missile at lightning speed appeared first on Asian Military Review.

    This post was originally published on Asian Military Review.

  • Australian company Bale Defence debuted its RTV6 light tactical vehicle at Land Forces 2024, a show held in Melbourne from 11-13 September. This 6×6 vehicle, whose name stands for Rough Terrain Vehicle, builds upon the DNA of RTV2 and RTV4 4×4 vehicles already in the company’s catalogue. Martyn Jones, chief operating officer at Bale Defence, […]

    The post Bale debuts RTV6 at Land Forces 2024 appeared first on Asian Military Review.

    This post was originally published on Asian Military Review.

  • BAE System stole the limelight on opening day at Land Forces 2024 in Melbourne with its new ATLAS, an acronym for Autonomous Tactical Light Armour System. The ATLAS is an 8×8 uncrewed ground vehicle (UGV) developed in-house by BAE Systems Australia. The company refers to the approximately 10-tonne-class vehicle as the Collaborative Combat Variant (CCV), […]

    The post BAE Systems embarks on new course with ATLAS appeared first on Asian Military Review.

    This post was originally published on Asian Military Review.