During the COVID-19 pandemic-imposed lockdowns, reports of air quality improvements in certain locations gave many of us the impression that we may have somehow been able to mitigate the effects of global warming. In reality, experts from the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) analyzed atmospheric and ice core concentrations of carbon dioxide and found an increase in levels. Turns out, reduced industrial activity and air travel have hardly had any impact. Our pollution levels are continuing to drive animal and plant species to extinction and degrade soil fertility at a worrying rate.
In April 2021, the average concentration of carbon dioxide was 416.21 parts per million (ppm), the highest since records first began in Hawaii in 1958. Ice core measurements indicated that such levels had not been recorded for the past 800,000 years.
In a recent scientific paper, researchers predicted that the planet is headed for a ‘ghastly future’ unless drastic and effective action is taken to reverse the effects of climate change and ecological degradation. We stand to lose our ‘entire biosphere and all its lifeforms’ including our own existence coming under threat.
Listing four steps that each of us can take, a research paper led by the University of Oxford has spoke of the four ‘Rs’, one of which is to invest in renewing and revitalizing the natural world. That’s where rewilding comes in, a restoration strategy that works to increase biodiversity and strengthen conservation efforts.
Rewilding: where does it come from?
Back in the 1970s and 1980s, conservationist Dave Foreman coined the term rewilding as a way to highlight the importance of it as a way to restore nature’s balance. Speaking about the concept, Foreman said at the time: “Some 30 years ago, Dave Brower was promoting Global CPR (Conserve – Protect – Restore) and ecological restoration was being widely promoted. Ecological restoration was about restoring the ecological process (such as making a wetland) but not so concerned with the native species that may have been lost. I meant rewilding to instead be about wilderness restoration – restoring wildness with native species and processes. So, let us all remember that rewilding comes from wilderness recovery (or restoration).”
Rewilding is a strategy that can help increase biodiversity, create self-sustainable environments, and control the effects of climate change. It can help restore lost species by giving them space to thrive, by population enhancement, and by reintroducing key native species. This way, rewilding creates wilder and more biodiverse habitats.
Another definition of rewilding explains the effort in ‘3 C’s’ — conservation of Cores, Corridors, and Carnivores, with conservationist John Davis observing that “Rewilding, in essence, is giving the land back to wildlife, and wildlife back to the land”.
How can rewilding help restore biodiversity?
Rewilding provides nature with an opportunity to re-establish its natural state of abundance and biodiversity.
Ecosystems can become high functioning and self-sustaining, along with finding a natural balance letting all the elements thrive.
Rewilding protects species from extinction.
Restoration provides us, humans, with a chance to interact with nature improving our overall health and well-being.
Source: Rewilding Europe
How can we practice rewilding?
To begin rewilding, you have to ensure that all barriers that could affect nature’s ability to exist and thrive should be identified and addressed. These can include dams, dykes and ending dangerous activities such as deforestation. Building wildlife overpasses, for example, can be a way to address such barriers.
The second way would be to reintroduce certain species such as wolves, jaguars, elephants and bears in order for these animals to keep the bottom of the food chain in check and limit overpopulation, as this too can disturb the ecosystem. For instance, a successful example of wildlife reintroduction is the Yellowstone National Park’s thriving wolf population. Data shows that the 1995 reintroduction of 14 Canadian wolves (there were none before), has resulted in 11 packs and 108 individual wolves as of 2016.
Other methods include the development of spaces that can connect similar areas of wilderness that were once part of the same landscape and the reintroducing of native plants and native insect species.
Over in North America, the Y2Y initiative aims to implement rewilding in areas such as Yellowstone Park and the Yukon in northern Canada by removing any kind of human interference from the ecosystem to encourage wildlife to return and thrive again.
There’s Rewilding Europe, an organization that implements rewilding projects from the Iberian peninsula to the Swedish Lapland, from the wetlands on the coast of the Black Sea in Ukraine and is already seeing progress as bears, ibex, and wolves come back to these ecosystems after decades of absence.
In India, there are parts of the country where you can find leopards and tigers roaming freely despite close proximity to villagers and livestock thanks to rewilding efforts. Several organizations are working to form a healthier ecosystem that can help benefit tourism, create jobs and improve livelihoods.
As of yet, no government has come together to support rewilding as a conservation strategy through funds or policies.
A recent campaign byScottish Rewilding Alliance urged the Scottish Government to declare Scotland as the world’s first Rewilding Nation. A short film narrated by wildlife presenter and filmmaker Gordon Buchanan depicts the benefits of rewilding, showing how wildlife can return with both nature and humans prospering.
The Alliance wants the government to commit to rewilding 30% of the country’s land and sea within a decade. In a recent survey they conducted, 76% of Scots have come forward to show their support to rewilding and the campaign around it.
Rewilding: the travel opportunity
In the travel space, Rewilding Europe is working to make rewilding a part of mainstream travel. One of their goals is to return nature to a wilder state across eight regions of Europe. They plan to achieve this by transforming the tourism industry, driving tourists’ attention to remote areas, such as the southern Carpathians in Romania or the Velebit mountains on the Croatian coast, which at the same time would create new employment opportunities within these local communities.
Back in 2017, the organization also set up a travel agency via which tourists can visit its rewilding projects. This kind of tourism can help to replace the income once generated through extractive jobs, such as forestry.
Eco-tourism would not happen without rewilding and the development of the former with the latter should be carefully planned from the beginning. Below is a quick list on how to begin –
Only a certain number of tourists should be allowed in a particular area.
While constructing ecotourism sites, only sustainable materials should be used.
Renewable energy sources such as solar, wind, or water should be used as much as possible, with fossil fuels avoided at all costs.
Government officials and ecotourism operators should seek cooperation from conservation groups and nongovernmental organizations and look at providing start-up funding, training, and technical assistance for eco tourism projects.
As travellers, we can choose to reduce our carbon offsets by travelling locally, reducing air travel, opting for sustainable stays and activities.
According to a recent report, 20% of all countries in the world are now threatened with ecosystem collapse as biodiversity continues to be eroded, and over half (55%) of the world’s GDP – equal to US$41.7 trillion – is dependent on biodiversity and ecosystem services is also at stake.
Lead image courtesy of Vincent van Zalinge/Unsplash.
3Mins Read Some of Hollywood’s biggest names have joined forces to make Fin, a new environmental documentary. The film, whose trailer just dropped, is set to debut on U.S. subscription streaming service Discovery Plus next month. Directed by lauded horror filmmaker Eli Roth, the movie charts the dark underworld behind the plight of sharks and aims to […]
24Mins Read Errol Schweizer has spent decades in the food industry, over 25 years in fact. He has held down many positions, from grill cook to stock clerk to purchasing manager. A native of New York’s the Bronx who studied biology and got his start in community organizing, Schweizer was thrust to the (inter)national food stage when he […]
4Mins Read Responsible chocolate brand Alter Eco is taking the lead in radical transparency, releasing its annual sustainability report to document its environmental and human impact – both good and bad. Being “brutally honest” about failing to achieve its initial goal of 100% compostable and recyclable packaging in 2020, the company committed to continue to improve until […]
4Mins Read Israel has announced that it has banned the sale of fur in the fashion industry with environmental protection minister Gila Gamliel signing an amendment that will go into effect in six months. Animal rights group PETA says this marks the “first entire nation” to completely ban sales of fur. PETA senior vice president of campaigns […]
3Mins Read A new 56-metre-long Manta sailboat will help fight the ocean plastic pollution crisis with its first-of-its-kind collection and processing capacities. Presented by the environmental nonprofit the SeaCleaners and French adventurer Yvan Bourgnon, the catamaran is equipped with everything from waste-collecting conveyors to microplastic collection “mobulas” and fitted with a hybrid system featuring wind turbines, hydro […]
3Mins Read A new 56-metre-long Manta sailboat will help fight the ocean plastic pollution crisis with its first-of-its-kind collection and processing capacities. Presented by the environmental nonprofit the SeaCleaners and French adventurer Yvan Bourgnon, the catamaran is equipped with everything from waste-collecting conveyors to microplastic collection “mobulas” and fitted with a hybrid system featuring wind turbines, hydro […]
3Mins Read The city of Lahti in Finland is “giving nature a seat at the table” by inviting scenes of wilderness to their video meetings during the pandemic. After being named the European Green Capital of 2021 by the E.U. commission, the city has come up with a new service to allow its employees to bring nature […]
3Mins Read The city of Lahti in Finland is “giving nature a seat at the table” by inviting scenes of wilderness to their video meetings during the pandemic. After being named the European Green Capital of 2021 by the E.U. commission, the city has come up with a new service to allow its employees to bring nature […]
3Mins Read Just released on Netflix, the new documentary Breaking Boundaries: The Science of Our Planet shows viewers the devastating consequences of our continued destruction of nature. Led by Sir David Attenborough, the film is focused on the work of renowned Swedish climate scientist Professor Johan Rockström on “tipping points” that the world must not exceed if […]
The UK government is spending over £23m of taxpayers’ money on expanding its naval base at Duqm port in Oman. As the investigative media outlet Declassified UKreported on 3 June, the expansion could have a “large adverse” impact on an endangered whale population.
The UK is also hosting the G7 summit from the 11 to 13 June. The government says one of its policy priorities for the summit is “tackling climate change and preserving the planet’s biodiversity”. The UK’s actions in Oman, however, are threatening ocean biodiversity and its ability to tackle the climate crisis. So too are the actions of other G7 countries in areas of the ocean.
“Failing in its most basic responsibilities to nature”
Declassified UKreported that it had asked the Ministry of Defence (MoD) for the environmental impact assessments it had undertaken for the base. As the outlet pointed out, the base appears to have been operationalsince at least 2018, with the £23.8m cash injection for expansion announced in September 2020.
It took the MoD six months to answer Declassified UK‘s request. In January this year, the ministry confirmed it had not yet carried out an environmental impact assessment. It’s international security directorate said the ministry would conduct these assessments “as the bases developed”, DeclassifiedUK reported. Green Party peer Natalie Bennett commented:
We hear endlessly from this government that it is ‘world-leading’ on environmental issues, yet once again on a crucial issue for a keystone species it is trailing behind others, failing in its most basic responsibilities to nature.
Whale species at “high risk of extinction”
Other studies have assessed the situation for Arabian Sea humpback whales. One 2016 analysis by the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), for example, highlighted that the population is “in the ‘at high risk of extinction’ category’”. Unlike many other whales, they don’t migrate and live in a “relatively constrained geographic location” that ranges from the coastal waters of Yemen and Oman to Iran, Pakistan, and India. The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) says that the whale’s population numbers less than 100 in the coastal waters of Oman.
A 2017 study carried out in relation to an oil refinery at the port, meanwhile, asserted that further construction there would harm the ocean’s wildlife. As Declassified UK reported:
The consultants found there was a “large adverse” risk to the whales from “ship strikes, underwater noise and changes in prey distribution and abundance arising from disturbance and dispersion of sediments during dredging”.
The outlet also noted that the port says “it has put measures in place to protect marine life, such as a speed limit”.
A video by the Environment Society of Oman says that the country’s coastline is home to “20 species of whales and dolphins, and also four species of turtles”.
UK not alone
There are similar extinction worries for whales living in waters around other G7 countries, such as North Atlantic right whales. These critically endangered whales numbered less than 250 mature individuals as of 2018. They live mainly in the eastern coastal waters off the US and Canada. As the New York Times recently reported, these whales regularly get entangled in fishing gear or hit by ships and a new study suggests this may be “stunting their growth”. The analysis found that the whales’ body length is currently around 7% shorter than in 1981, based on an evaluation of 129 whales in comparison to earlier generations. As the outlet highlighted, this is “reducing their chances of reproductive success and increasing their chances of dying”.
On the other side of the US, meanwhile, the critically endangered population of beluga whales who live in Alaska’s Cook Inlet are in serious decline. An article in Anchorage Daily Newsargued that “climate change, prey availability, coastal development and pollution” are potentially contributing to their demise. On pollution specifically, the outlet explained that Alaska issues permits:
that allow the dumping of billions of gallons of toxic substances into the inlet, where critical habitat has been designated for belugas. It’s the only coastal water body in the country where a loophole allows oil and gas companies to dump toxic waste.
Whales are critical to the planet’s health and an essential ally to humans in their fight against the climate crisis. They are a keystone species. That means they support the ecosystem they exist in and if they vanish ecological systems can collapse because so many other species are dependent on them. Those ecosystems in turn prop up the wider climatic stability of the Earth.
Furthermore, whales can play an immense role in capturing and storing (sequestering) carbon dioxide (CO2). CO2 emissions, mostly created by the burning of fossil fuels, are the main driving force behind global warming. As an International Monetary Fund (IMF) article pointed out, great whales sequester an average 33 tons of CO2 in their bodies during their lifetime (all living things are made of carbon). Their activities also impact other aquatic life-forms in ways that can massively increase the ocean’s ability to sequester carbon. As the IMF article explains, this means that:
When it comes to saving the planet, one whale is worth thousands of trees
Holistic policy priorities
Most of the issues whales currently face are within governments’ power to change or mitigate. By saving whales, governments would in turn also be greatly bolstering their efforts to tackle the climate crisis and restore ecological equilibrium.
If the world’s governments wholeheartedly started factoring in and prioritising potential ecological impacts in their policy-making, such cyclical and mutually beneficial outcomes would be possible. That’s the sort of holistic policy priorities that global political leaders, like those assembling for the G7 summit, should have on their agenda.
3Mins Read Due to a nitric acid leak in a cargo ship and the subsequent failure to deal with it, vast stretches of Sri Lanka’s western beaches are currently submerged in millions of plastic pellets and debris with several of the country’s Navy personnel working round the clock since last two weeks collecting 200 bags of plastic […]
4Mins Read With the launch of the United Nations (UN) Decade on Ecosystem Restoration 2021-2030, the UN has called on nations to meet their sustainability commitments by 2030 with the warning that collectively, at least 1 billion degraded hectares of land must be restored, the equivalent to an area around the size of China. Furhter, and to further add […]
4Mins Read After a century of land loss, there’s now a rising movement of young Black Americans reclaiming their agricultural power and ownership of farmland. It combines the dismantling of racism and marginalisation amid the social justice movement sweeping across America with the growing awareness of the linkages between a sustainable food system and equality. From California […]
4Mins Read Led by Hong Kong’s very own acclaimed plant-based chef Peggy Chan and her sustainable food consultancy Grassroots Initiatives, and in partnership with non-profit climate organization Zero Foodprint, Zero Foodprint Asia has officially launched in Hong Kong with a ‘1% pledge to restore the planet’, a program that aims to fund local farming projects in order […]
3Mins Read A new British government scheme to pay older farmers to retire has been launched in hopes of welcoming a new greener, younger generation to enter the agricultural sector. Under the exit scheme, farmers who are “standing in the way of change” could receive a sizeable payment to also make way for a number of “public […]
4Mins Read With the International Day for Biodiversity just around the corner, new research conducted by the Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU) and commissioned by World Wildlife Fund (WWF) shows that over the past five years, there has been a significant 16% increase regarding concerns about nature among the public and continues to keep increasing even during the […]
The UK government requested that the International Energy Agency (IEA) produce a report on how the world can meet its net zero commitments to instruct the COP26 climate talks in November. The IEA has recently published that report, entitled Net Zero by 2050: A Roadmap for the Global Energy Sector.
One of the IEA’s most eye-catching demands for achieving zero emissions is the end of all new exploration for fossil fuels immediately. As the instigator of the report, and the host of the COP26 climate talks, the UK government has responded to its findings. That response shows, yet again, that the country is not ‘leading the world’ on the climate crisis.
End exploration
Numerous media outlets pickedupon the IEA’s call for an end to new fossil fuel investment. It’s of course blindingly obvious that new fossil fuel projects shouldn’t go ahead, given that fossil fuels are the main cause of the climate crisis. Indeed, some experts argue that much of the fossil fuel extraction already planned or underway needs to halt if we are to limit global warming. But the IEA typically produces analysis that is fossil fuel industry-friendly. As Climate Home Newspointed out in 2020, it “continues to appeal to its oil-producing funders, ducking hard questions about the endgame for dirty energy”. Until now.
In its net zero roadmap, the IEA states that there can be no “new oil and gas fields approved for development” and “no new coal mines or mine extensions” from 2021 onwards. As World Oilpointed out, this is not what the fossil fuel industry is planning. It said that Europe’s “top three oil companies” – BP, Shell, and Total – all “intend to keep on seeking out and developing new oil and gas fields for many years to come”. They aren’t alone either. Canadian oil company ReconAfrica is currently searching for oil in a highly biodiverse wilderness area in Namibia with further exploration in Botswana moving foward too. Ultimately, the company plans “to develop an area roughly the size of Belgium into an oil field”, according to activists against the exploration. And on and on the fossil fuel developments go.
Nothing to see here
The UK government has responded to the roadmap. President-designate of the upcoming climate event Alok Sharma said:
We must act now to scale up clean technologies in all sectors and phase out both coal power and polluting vehicles in the coming decade. Our first goal for the UK as Cop26 presidency is to put the world on a path to driving down emissions, until they reach net zero by the middle of this century.
In his comments, Sharma failed to acknowledge the report’s most headline-grabbing demand about ending fossil fuel development entirely. This omission is disappointing but not surprising. In March, the UK government announced it had struck a “landmark deal”, which will allow oil and gas companies to keep digging in the North Sea for more sources of dirty fossil fuels.
“Serious problems”
The IEA report has faced some criticism. Economic anthropologist Jason Hickel, for example, said there were “serious problems” with its assumptions on “economic growth-as-usual in rich countries”, efficiency improvements, and bio-energy with carbon capture storage (BECCS). He argued that ‘dialing down’ these assumptions shows that “the net-zero pathway will require a bigger reduction of energy and resource use in rich countries”.
The new IEA report on net-zero is a big step in the right direction, and its call to cease all new fossil fuel projects has grabbed headlines, which is welcome. But the report also has some serious problems that are worth discussing:
Others have also taken issue with the IEA’s reliance on bio-energy in its pathway to net zero. Bio-energy comes from the burning of organic materials, such as trees and plants. Hannah Mowat from the Brussels-based NGO Fern said the IEA is “proposing wholly unrealistic levels of bioenergy, which will damage forests the world over and worsen climate change”.
Wake-up call
The report’s call for an end to fossil fuel development is commendable and much needed. And, as Oil Change International’s Kelly Trout asserted, “Wealthy producers that are relatively less dependent on oil revenues should be moving first and fastest” to assist countries that are currently highly dependent on income from fossil fuels. Trout said:
It’s imperative that countries like the UK, Norway, the US, Canada and Australia take this as a wake up call to think about their role in a global equitable phase out of fossil fuel production.
However, Sharma’s initial reaction to the IEA report doesn’t inspire confidence that the UK is paying attention to that ‘wake up call’ at all.
4Mins Read Almost 59 million hectares of forests, an area that is larger than France, has been regrown over the past twenty years, scientists find in a new analysis. This area of forest bears the potential to store as much as 5.9 gigatons of carbon dioxide, demonstrating the critical importance of letting forests regenerate to protect our […]
If it wasn’t already clear, the Covid-19 pandemic has made it painfully obvious that our lives are entwined with the lives of other animals. Our health depends on theirs, not only because viruses from their bodies can enter ours, but because we survive thanks to the soil they fertilize and the plants they pollinate. And as climate disruption escalates, it’s evident that many animals are buffering us from its worst effects, maintaining ecosystems that absorb carbon and help mitigate the effects of sea-level rise.
Conservationists have long cared deeply about the survival of other plants and animals, often for reasons that go well beyond self-interest. But sociologist Carrie Friese, a researcher at the London School of Economics, speculates that in this era of intersecting crises, conservationists and others will be more and more motivated by a sense of multispecies solidarity — a profound understanding that, as Rachel Carson warned in 1963, humans are “affected by the same environmental influences that control the lives of all the many thousands of other species.”
4Mins Read Humanity must act now on climate change and “reinvent our relationship with planet Earth”, say Nobel laureates and experts in a statement. The letter, co-signed by dozens of leading international scientists, summarises the conclusions made during the Nobel Prize ‘Our Planet, Our Future’ Summit hosted in late April, which stresses the “existential need” to act […]
4Mins Read The Amazon rainforest is now having a net warming effect on climate change, after years of humanity’s destruction of our planet’s crucial carbon absorption resource. In what is the first-ever study of all the human and natural causes contributing to how the world’s largest rainforest impacts our climate, scientists warn that the impact of our […]
4Mins Read New data shows that a third of Chinese people are eating more beef since 2020. A great deal of the beef imports into China are coming from Brazil, resulting in a devastating cost to the country’s Amazonian rainforests and Cerrado savannah with 20% of the Brazilian Amazon and about half of the Cerrado region already […]
6Mins Read Due to the pandemic-induced lockdowns around the world, several human activities that are usually performed in the oceans came to a halt. To monitor and understand the behaviour changes in marine life during this quiet phase, a community of scientists have decided to use over 200 non-military hydrophones to listen to sounds made by animals […]