In the late afternoon of 10 February 2015, local police in Chapel Hill responded to a report of fired shots. They entered a Finley Forest condominium to find the lifeless bodies of three young Arabs. The first, Deah Barakat, lay dead in the front doorway. The others, his wife Yusor and her sister Razan Abu-Salha, had been slain in the kitchen. All three had been killed with gunshots to the head in an execution-style murder. Over the coming hours and days, as details emerged on social media, it became clear that these young Muslims had been murdered in a hate crime. Seeing this in the context of state-sponsored islamophobia, which had fueled a growing climate of harassment and hate-crimes against Muslims in the US, as well as the mass slaughter of civilians in drone attacks across the Middle East, activists online started using #MuslimLivesMatter, which was tweeted over one hundred-thousand times, to challenge the lack of coverage.
People around the UK are in a state of shock after hearing that Black Lives Matter activist Sasha Johnson has been shot in the head. 27-year-old Johnson is fighting for her life after being attacked early on Sunday morning.
there is nothing to suggest that the woman who was shot was the subject of a targeted attack or that she had received any credible threats against her prior to this incident.
But activists insist otherwise. Johnson’s Taking The Initiative Party (TTIP) released a statement, saying:
The attack happened in the early hours of this morning, following numerous death threats as a result of her activism.
“Fighting for black people”
TTIP is asking everyone to pray for Johnson. It said:
Sasha has always been actively fighting for black people and the injustices that surround the black community, as well as being both a member of BLM and a member of Taking the Initiative Party’s Executive Leadership Committee. Sasha is also a mother of 2 and a strong, powerful voice for our people and our community.
Johnson is vocal in fighting for systemic change. Highly critical of capitalism, she has argued that:
Racism thrives on capitalism. The back of racism is capitalism.
We’re no longer at just one incident. We’re looking at the systemic structure that means that those incidents happen. So it’s not just George Floyd died, because we’ve lost many black people, and the UK disassociates from racism.
What is TTIP?
But while Johnson’s speeches are revolutionary, the party she is linked to is a different story. Some activists have been vocal in pointing out that TTIP actually holds conservative values.
The TTIP are not an equal rights party; they are not BLM activists, which BLM have said themselves. I was at the Million People March. They are right-wing nationalists who are anti-immigration, anti 5G, antisemitic and believe we need thousands more soldiers.
— Moya Lothian-Mclean (@mlothianmclean) May 24, 2021
In fact, parts of TTIP’s manifesto sound they’ve been lifted directly from Farage’s Brexit Party. TTIP argues for more robust policing and increased military recruitment. It states that:
We will look carefully at increasing the number of personnel in all areas of the military: Royal Navy, Armed Forces, and Royal Air Force…
The Taking the Initiative Party will always stand shoulder to shoulder with our international allies –most importantly the USA, with whom Britain has enjoyed a lasting and meaningful relationship.
The party also argues for racist controls on who can access vital NHS healthcare and state support. It says:
We want to see strict controls in place to ensure that welfare support is first and foremost reserved for citizens. In these times where the people of the UK are struggling with debt and homelessness and foodbank use is at an all-time high, we do not believe that there are sufficient resources to justify prioritising the needs of newcomers over and above those who already live and work here.
It goes on to say:
We will therefore take a firm stance on limiting migrant access to public funds and would seek to deport anyone who enters the UK purely to gain access to these resources. There would be no right to reside for anyone who does not have a clear plan at six months after their arrival in the country.
“A panther and a warrior”
Regardless of the TTIP’s politics, activists are united in hoping that Johnson can recover. People are taking to social media to express their grief at the attack:
We are saddened to hear that Sasha Johnson is fighting for her life after a critical wound and following numerous death threats.
While Sasha wasn't part of our organisation, she impressively founded a new Black led political party and was dedicated to resist anti-Black racism.
Really praying that Sasha Johnson makes it She is such a force for good in this world, would be a huge loss to the whole BLM movement. Her story has been very inspiring so far and I truly believe her testimony will be even greater.
Sasha Johnson you are a Panther & a Warrior. If anyone can survive this, it's you. You've come this far Queen, please keep fighting, fight to live! We are praying that you pull through, come on girl. Your childen need you. We need you to keep fighting. #BLM#prayforsashajohnsonpic.twitter.com/wIKzDPGHJA
This is heartbreaking and deeply disturbing. Sasha Johnson is a passionate activist for the #BlackLivesMatter movement and an inspiration to us all – my thoughts are with Sasha as she fights to recover, her family and friends at this difficult time. #PrayForSashaJohnson#BLMhttps://t.co/fAVH9tPLUM
Horrifyingly, the attack on Johnson has seen voices of hate crawling out of the woodwork, celebrating the shooting:
I cant believe how many so called "patriots" are rejoicing at the news of BLM activist Sasha Johnson's brutal attack after she was shot in the head this morning. How can people cheer the attempted murder of a mother is beyond me. I truly hope she pulls through #SashaJohnson#BLM
The attack on Johnson has once again highlighted exactly what we need to fight against: the rise in white supremacy and fascism, and a systematically racist government that is enabling racist ideas to flourish. Let’s pray for Johnson, while at the same time fighting for radical change.
Racial equality in the UK has worsened since George Floyd’s police killing in the US sparked protests in 2020, activists have said.
Campaign group leaders have pointed to examples of where the government has “undermined” progress over the past year. They include the controversial Commission on Race and Ethnic Disparities Report and the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill.
Last summer’s protests saw thousands of people in cities across the UK march for greater equality following Floyd’s murder in the US on 25 May.
‘One step forward and five steps back’
Imarn Ayton founded the Black Reformist Movement (BRM), a group which marched alongside Black Lives Matter and others last summer. Ayton said the UK has taken “one step forward and five steps back” in terms of progress for race relations since then.
Speaking in Trafalgar Square, the site of several protests last summer, Ayton said:
The recent report on race and ethnic disparities which is commissioned by Boris Johnson ultimately said that institutionalised racism does not exist in the UK.
So what that report has done is it has undermined those pivotal conversations that have taken place over the past year.
We were just about making progress, and now we’re actually going backwards, we’re in a regressive state.
We’ve taken one step forwards and five steps back due to that recent report
Imarn Ayton has said racial equality in the UK has taken a step backwards since last summer’s Black Lives Matter protests (Aaron Chown/PA)
She added:
The only progress I would say categorically is the fact that we now have a greater level of societal consciousness, that I think is the biggest thing that I can take away from the BLM movement, that we are so much more open to having these awkward conversations around institutionalised racism.
Distraction
Kwadwo Kyerewaa, a Black Lives Matter UK activist in London, agreed the report and Bill had set Britain back.
When asked whether anything has changed in the UK since last summer, Kyerewaa said:
In the UK, I wouldn’t say nothing has changed – I would say things have got even worse.
Kyerewaa criticised the Commission’s report for its “statement of intent to deny that there is such a thing as structural racism in the police, in the criminal justice system, in employment” and for stating that “we need to talk about the positive aspects of the experience in the African slave movement”.
He said:
It tries to wilfully misunderstand the problems so that we don’t tackle the root of racism.
We’re instead distracted by other things like people saying the wrong phrases, as opposed to systems of power that discriminate, cause premature deaths that we can see in statistics in lots of ways.
By denying that structural racism exists, the Government is saying the reason why there are disproportionalities, is due to the deficiencies of particular communities – it’s a form of victim blaming.
Protests
The comments come as campaign groups and the Trades Union Congress (TUC) prepare for a fresh crop of peaceful protests on Saturday 22 May. These are to to mark the upcoming one-year anniversary of Floyd’s murder on 25 May. Locations will include the US Embassy in London, Sheffield Town Hall and Brighton Police Station.
Saturday’s protests are due to take place in cities including Manchester, London, Glasgow and Swansea. And they’ll be followed by an online rally. It will include speeches from university professors, solicitors, race equality campaign groups and former shadow home secretary Diane Abbott MP.
Joya Stuckman returned home late at night after visiting her friend. It was Labor Day weekend but there was little to celebrate. She felt exhausted after spending the entire day loading a moving truck in order to escape what had become an untenable living situation. Her landlord and his sister had spent the better part of two years harassing Stuckman, who is a Black mother of three boys.
She walked up to her house, which is nestled in the working class First Street neighborhood of Rome, New York, and glanced over at her U-Haul truck. The tires were slashed and the truck was completely covered in racist and neo-Nazi graffiti: thinly veiled death threats, racist slurs, an SS symbol, and swastikas. The numbers “1488,” which is a popular neo-Nazi code, were sprayed on the sides of the truck. Stuckman was terrified.
As events unfolded, Stuckman found her footing in the tumultuous small town politics of Rome, and the growing Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement. She joined with a small group of tenacious activists to navigate a minefield created by a corrupt police department, white supremacists, and a moribund political establishment—all three groups united in preventing any meaningful reforms.
Her mind raced as she tried to figure out who would have done this to her. Was it her landlord Keith Tlod? Or was it his sister Noelle Heinig, who lived in the apartment downstairs?
Stuckman said that she was always called racial slurs by Heinig. “As time went on the comments got worse, and she would complain about anything and everything.”
The continued harassment was not limited to words. Stuckman is also convinced her landlord stole her son’s cat after its sudden disappearance a few days after Keith Tlod threatened to steal it.
But for all of the transgressions of the landlord and his sister, it was Stuckman who was repeatedly reported to the police. She told Shadowproof that the police arrived at her house “18 times in 16 months,” all over fabricated complaints from Heinig.
Stuckman recalled a jarring late night encounter with the police who “basically bamboozled their way” into her house, pushing her out of the way. The officers responded to a false report that Stuckman’s children were locked in the basement.
She brought the police officers upstairs to her children’s bedrooms. Startled, they awoke to three cops standing over them. Confused and frustrated, the officers eventually asked Stuckman why she thought Heinig called in so many false reports. The only obvious answer to her was that Heinig was racist.
Stuckman filed multiple complaints to the Rome Police Department and informed city officials about the repeated harassment. Nothing ever came of it so she decided to move out.
The night Stuckman discovered the vandalized moving truck, officers finally showed up after two hours of repeated calls to the police. They did not appear to share her sense of urgency or concern.
One officer told her that the swastika was simply “a sign of peace” and surmised the act was a case of “teenage mischief.”
The police declined to start a hate crime investigation, opting instead to look into the matter as mere graffiti. Stuckman felt hopeless but was determined to do something.
She spoke out about the incident on a Facebook livestream. It went viral locally and the news rapidly spread. By the end of the following day, an impromptu rally was organized on her block.
Her neighbor Connie Kangas heard about what happened from her son. “I immediately contacted Joya and she briefly told me what happened,” said Kangas. “Without knowing too much more I created my sign and ran down there.” Outside of Stuckman’s house, Kangas met over 40 neighbors and activists, including local BLM activist Jasmine Millner.
At only 24 years of age, Millner, who worked as a model and actress, became well known in the BLM movement locally. She helped establish activist groups and delivered fiery speeches at rallies. Millner was also a social media influencer and delivered impassioned, unsparing statements condemning white supremacy and the actions of local police.
When the police appeared on scene, Millner noticed RPD Officer Fred Pacicca sitting in his parked patrol car. Millner had recently learned about a series of racist, anti-Muslim, and anti-BLM posts Pacicca made on his Facebook page. Seeing an opportunity, she seized the megaphone. Millner read out loud many of his posts, and demanded Pacicca be investigated and fired.
White Supremacy In Rome, New York
As the activists left the neighborhood, and Joya Stuckman, Connie Kangas, and their neighbors went back inside their homes, a man named John Smalden, who was circling the block earlier, parked his pick-up truck and started livestreaming on Facebook. He talked to Donald DeCarolis, one of Stuckman’s neighbors who acted aggressively during the protest.
DeCarolis demanded the police arrest the demonstrators. Witnesses claim he also made threats that he would use his “Second Amendment rights” against them.
Smalden then walked over to Officer Pacicca’s car, where the two complained to each other about the protest.
Video showed Pacicca initiating the conversation and identifying Jasmine Millner, her father who is a retired New York state trooper, and other BLM activists. He then shared information with Smalden about where and when another protest was scheduled for the following day.
Many local BLM activists already knew about Smalden. The previous week he made his presence known at a “Blue Lives Matter” rally held in the nearby rural town of Schuyler.
Claudia Tenney, the recently elected Republican congresswoman for the 22nd District, was the main speaker that day. She ran on a “law-and-order” platform and was a close ally of former President Donald Trump.
That rally descended into violence after Smalden and others surrounded a smaller group of BLM counter-demonstrators. Following the rally, BLM activists in Utica received anonymous death threats and the addresses of some were made public by unknown sources following the event.
Smalden’s Facebook page includes several pictures of him decked in military fatigues and III% militia patches posing with other armed III% militia members, as well as frequent white supremacist posts.
The III% militia movement is considered extremist by the Southern Poverty Law Center and other experts on the subject. Many militia members were involved with the January 6, 2021 siege at the US Capitol.
Lifelong Rome resident Sarita Ruiz was one of the activists who was mentioned by Smalden when he again went live on Facebook, along with her food truck business.
Smalden “became very irate and angry and agitated and said he is not going to let this protest happen. It was basically a call to arms and he was calling people to action,” Ruiz stated. She saw people post openly and brazenly plans to shoot and kill the BLM activists. “He tried to organize against us. That’s when it got scary. They were out for blood.”
Adding Fuel to the Fire
Joya Stuckman and her friend and fellow activist Anya Colón filed a complaint with the RPD that night about Pacicca’s conduct. Colón recalls the Rome police officer on duty telling them that there was “no racism” on the police force.
“He kept bringing up the BLM protests in Rochester and asked about something that was thrown at the police,” she said, frustrated by the exchange. Colón thought the police would be at Rome’s Triangle Park the following day, where the rally was scheduled to be held, especially in light of the threats. When the protest started however, the police were nowhere to be seen.
The activists were relieved Smalden and his supporters did not appear. Still, many activists remained concerned with how the police enable white supremacists in the area.
“Pacicca and Smalden were an instigator and agitator,” commented Ruiz. “All Pacicca did was add fuel to the fire. Pacicca’s words did a lot of damage.”
This was not the first time the RPD displayed fundamentally different approaches to addressing BLM and racial justice activists on the one hand, and white supremacists, “Back the Blue” enthusiasts, and Trump’s base of support on the other. On July 8, 2021 local Trump supporters staged a “Back the Blue” and Donald Trump reelection rally in front of the Rome police station. Similar events were a weekly occurrence that roamed from town to town in Central New York, much to the ire of BLM activists.
Many uniformed police officers along with Chief Beach, were at the rally, not so much as observers, but in the view of Ruiz and others, as participants. “That whole day sickened me,” said Ruiz. “Listening to the speeches that were being given and watching the cops chuckle. You knew exactly where they stood and they stood with Trump.”
Again, Trump supporters confronted BLM counter-demonstrators across the street. Again there were threats of physical violence. And yet again, the RPD stood idly by. So goes the struggle of organizing in rural, conservative communities.
Activists remain concerned about people like John Smalden. The far right has been growing in the region for a number of years. An array of neo nazi and fascist gangs and political groups have an organized presence, including the KKK, as well as the Proud Boys who have held protests that erupted into violence in Ithaca and Albany. In 2018, local residents organized a protest in response to the distribution of KKK recruitment flyers in Rome.
A number of militias, not just III%ers, are active in the state. The Guardian reported that a high concentration of militia members live just north of Rome in the state’s North Country. Residents from the area were also arrested following the Unite the Right protests in Charlottesville, Virginia, in 2017, and more recently following the January 6 siege on Capitol Hill.
The actions of Stuckman and other activists, in what was later dubbed the “Justice for Joya” campaign, appeared to pay off. The RPD decided to change course, and started to investigate the incident as a hate crime. They ended up arresting Donald DiCarolis, the same neighbor who became aggressive during the protest, as the primary suspect.
Stuckman found out during the grand jury investigation that two other neighbors were the victims of white supremacist threats, both allegedly from DiCarolis. However, although attorneys started to gear up for a potential trial, Stuckman felt entirely shut out of the process. She often wondered if any justice would ever be found through the court system.
The Strange Career of Officer Pacicca
Following Officer Pacicca’s actions, matters became even more strained between the RPD and local activists. “There has been no transparency at all when it comes to the Pacicca case,” Joya Stuckman claimed, adding that “this man should not be walking the streets.” She has become more wary, and ever more vigilant about the safety of her family.
At first her main concern was over a racist neighbor, but the actions of Pacicca pushed her to take extra safety precautions. “I’ve been trying to keep my address private because I don’t trust officers like him.”
Jasmine Millner took to social media and launched a series of statements and short videos criticizing the RPD in what she called a pattern of racism.
Just as Anya Colón and Stuckman filed a complaint with the RPD, Millner followed suit. “When I filed my complaint, one of the first things I was told was, ‘what did you expect?’” Millner recalled.
Millner and other activists were vexed and felt that Pacicca faced “no consequences” for his actions.
She expressed frustration at the entire complaints process. She felt that the “only reason” she was able to successfully file the complaint was because she was the daughter of a former New York state trooper. She was convinced that if she was “some other Black resident” who came in from off the street that she would be turned away.
Connie Kangas shared Millner’s concern over Pacicca and the same broken complaints process. “That weekend I started writing a whole bunch of letters. I knew the police were not going to do anything,” stated Kangas. So she contacted Rome mayor Jacqueline Izzo, New York State Attorney General Letitia James, Governor Andrew Cuomo, and the state’s Hate Crimes Taskforce. She is still waiting for a response.
Kangas also opened up about her past interactions with Pacicca, followed by futile attempts to file complaints with the RPD over his conduct. For three years, Kangas rented an apartment from Pacicca’s ex-wife, who lived in the same building.
A year after moving in, Pacicca and his ex started seeing each other again, and his presence became common. She heard frequent fights from her neighbor’s apartment, and constant shouting and swearing from Pacicca. Kangas could see that his ex-wife “lived in a state of fear.” He soon turned his temper on Kangas.
“One day I was working from home and heard pounding on my door,” recalled Kangas. She was shocked to see a police car outside and ran downstairs, fearing something had happened to one of her children. When she opened the door, she saw Pacicca standing there. He yelled at her to take in the garbage cans from the front of the house. Kangas politely told him she was busy at work and would take care of it later. She recalls an irate Pacicca who threatened: “You do this now or I’ll throw you out. I know people.”
She then saw Pacicca go to the back of the house where he proceeded to slash every tire and cut the brakes to her bike and her children’s bikes. She immediately called the police and attempted to file a complaint but they discouraged her from doing so. Just as he would later do so to Millner, Pacicca retaliated against Kangas.
“Multiple times, he sent cops to do a well check on me,” recalled Kangas. He eventually followed through on his threat to evict her.
According to Kangas, on moving day, he pulled up with his police car and stole her AC from inside her moving truck. She told him not to, and again called the police who informed her they could not do anything about it.
While she moved to her new residence, Pacicca followed in his patrol car and walked over to her new landlord, warning her that Kangas “was a problem.” Kangas said the landlord didn’t believe him and had her own issues in the past with unwarranted searches from the RPD. “She laughed at the whole situation.”
When asked where Pacicca’s apparent resentment of her came from, Kangas replied, “I didn’t cow down. I didn’t cower. I wasn’t afraid of him and I stood up to him. He hated me from that point on.” Multiple emails and letters she sent to the chief of police, mayor, and council members never received a response.
To date, the public has never been made aware if Pacicca was reprimanded. No officers ever followed up with any of the activists who filed complaints. FOIA requests were filed in December 2020 in an attempt to dig into the matter but the City of Rome has yet to release any information. The Rome Police Department declined to comment for this article after multiple requests for an interview were sent by Shadowproof.
Activists feel that the RPD is plagued with a culture where police brutality is both encouraged and celebrated. Just one month after the protest in Stuckman’s neighborhood, they would be proved right.
Yadana May, Robert Perry Wright, and Randall Beavers lead a Black Lives Matter march around Fort Stanwix in Rome, New York on June 6, 2020. (Credit: Brendan Maslauskas Dunn)
Catalysts for Forming A Grassroots Network
On October 2, local residents held an anti police brutality rally at the police station in response to an incident that occured the day before where RPD officers brutalized a group of teenagers of color who were playing football. Mayor Jacqueline Izzo, sent out a press release in response to the incident, stating “I’m very comfortable with the actions of the police. Our police did a good job dispersing the crowd.”
Irony was not lost on those at the protest when the police yet again brutalized the demonstrators. Three were arrested and charged, including teenager Juan Gonzalez who was given a black eye.
These cases of police violence pushed Jasmine Millner and Sarita Ruiz to reach out to other activists with a plan to have a more deeply connected and strategic approach to organizing in Rome. Out of this loose network of activists formed the Copper City Collective. The new organization is just one of countless such groups that the Black Lives Matter movement gave birth to across the country.
While much attention has been given to BLM as the movement exists in larger cities – New York, Chicago, Portland, Seattle, Atlanta – as it ebbed and flowed since its inception in 2013, the true litmus of a mass movement may be measured in small cities, towns, and rural areas where there is often less of an organized progressive and leftwing presence.
Since the eruption of BLM into a national, then international, rebellion against police violence and racism, the entirety of Upstate New York was also swept up in the fervor. The level of sustained mass protests in rust belt cities and the mere presence of protests in small farm towns across Upstate NY over the summer of 2020 has not been seen in the region since the 1960s-1970s.
While some of the locally based organizations are called BLM, most, like Copper City Collective, have different names but still claim their position in the broader movement against police violence.
The movement in Upstate NY is decentralized, multiracial, and multigenerational. The politics that animate BLM range from a progressive and reformist wing to a Black revolutionary, socialist, anarchist, and abolitionist one.
It is a very pluralistic movement that rests largely on collective action and grassroots community organizing. Many of the groups are connected in a loose, ever changing network.
Mass protests were held in virtually every city in the state. Troy, NY, with a population of just over 50,000, held a protest of 11,000 people. Rochester had daily protests, marked by arrests, highway shut downs, and the occupation of streets surrounding city hall in response to the police killing of Daniel Prude on March 23, 2020.
Protests in Albany were cleared by the police with pepper spray and tear gas. Martin Gugino, a 75 year old peace activist and anarchist, was shoved to the ground by police in Buffalo. Officers walked by him, refusing to offer aid, as blood gushed from his head onto the sidewalk. He was hospitalized for a month and treated for sustained injuries from a fractured skull.
Indigenous activists in Syracuse pressured the city to take down a statue of Christopher Columbus and won. Demonstrators formed a 1,000 person strong protest in the nearby City of Utica where shouts to find justice for Walter Washington and Jessie Lee Rose, two local victims of police violence, echoed calls to find justice for George Floyd.
Nearby rural and suburban communities, most of which have a white population of around 98%, held a series of protests: New Hartford, Clinton, Westmoreland, Oneida, Camden, Little Falls, and Hamilton were just a few.
In Rome, over 300 protestors gathered in June and marched around Fort Stanwix, the wood stockade fortress in the middle of the city where several battles were fought during the 1700s.
The number may seem small, but protests are rare in the Copper City.
‘A Small Town With Big Hate’
The membership of the Copper City Collective is solidly working class, and predominantly women of color. This stands in stark contrast to the makeup of the city government which is exclusively white and leans to the right politically. Like elsewhere across the nation, members of the collective were drawn into the movement, spurred on by their convictions and desire to push for change. Many, however, have their own experiences with racism and police brutality. The year 2020 was a tipping point for them.
Sarita Ruiz’s pride for Rome runs deep. Her grandfather was a union laborer and helped rebuild Fort Stanwix in the 1970s, City Hall, and other iconic structures in the city. But growing up in Rome as a person of color was difficult, she said. “Sometimes you’re under a magnifying glass because you stick out. Rome is a small town with big hate.” Her family’s direct encounter with police brutality goes back generations. Her grandfather was brutalized by a Rome police officer and falsely arrested in the 1960s.
In recounting her family’s past, Ruiz opened up about a long repressed memory. She said her father, who was in the Air Force and worked as a correctional officer, was “very strict” and abusive. When she was 14, she was caught rollerblading away from the house at night, an act that angered her father. He beat her so she fled to the police station. She ran inside and “begged the police for help.” Her father followed her inside and continued to hit her.
“I run outside and all of the sudden all these cops come out and they all started beating me up, restraining me. I end up getting arrested, put in handcuffs, and they put me in this room,” stated Ruiz. “‘That was my early interaction with the police.”
Ruiz added that when she witnessed the police brutalizing then arresting activists in front of the police station, “it was on those same exact steps—and that was years ago. This is still happening. It’s like reliving this”
The most painful memory is that of her brother. In the mid-2000s, Ruiz’s brother Alexis went to hang out with friends at a Dunkin Donuts. According to her, the police “were looking for a young man who met a completely different description” over an alleged crime. The police questioned him and he gave them his nickname, Antonio, instead of his real name. He was arrested for giving a false name to the police.
“They cavity searched him. That freaked him out and he never trusted the police after that. He was very young, and because of his autism and his epilepsy, he didn’t understand what was going on. It was a traumatic experience for him,” said Ruiz.
Her brother was only 17 at the time. Although he won a lawsuit against the RPD, Ruiz said her brother “was never the same after that.” He passed away in 2015. Ruiz believes that the trauma from his encounter with the police led to his untimely death.
Every other member of the group has their own trauma. Elyssa Bolt talked about what she calls the “suspicious, strange circumstances” that surrounded the death of her Latina and Indigenous girlfriend seven years ago in Arizona.
“I believe her ethnic background played a role in the police and coroner not really taking her death seriously and essentially deciding that her life didn’t matter,” she said. “So when the Black Lives Matter movement began to take form… I’ve always wanted to take a part in this,” she stated in an interview with the Hudson Mohawk Magazine.
Connie Kangas, who has had a lifelong interest in Indigenous rights and sovereignty, discussed a visit from the FBI in 2001. She alerted the American Indian Movement about flyers that were distributed locally where a group anonymously threatened to bomb the Oneida Indian Nation’s Turning Stone Casino. The FBI seemed more concerned that she was trying to warn people about it than the threat itself.
Ruiz said that what the police did to her brother touched a nerve. “It just made it more meaningful to continue to fight.” She also said, ”I was born into activism. My mother was very involved with politics her entire life. My mother had me going to protests from a very young age.”
Joya Stuckman was similarly introduced to activism at a young age, noting that she and her sisters joined the NAACP when she was in elementary school. Black elders in the community, particularly Tuskegee Airman Herbert Thorpe, had a major impact on her. “We knew about the struggles and there was a fight,” she said. Their collective experience molded them and prepared them for the long fight ahead.
Copper City Collective member Elyssa Bolt holds a Black Lives Matter flag outside Fort Stanwix in Rome, New York on October 2, 2020. She was later assaulted then arrested by Rome police officers after the protestors marched to the police station. (Credit: Brendan Maslauskas Dunn)
You Can’t Reform This
Along with the local chapter of the NAACP, the group has been the organization most vocal against institutional racism, police violence, and other injustices in Rome.
One issue in particular that the group has been organizing in response to is the push from the state government for police departments to adopt and implement reform plans. In response to the BLM wave of protests and civil unrest, on August 17 Governor Andrew Cuomo announced the implementation of the New York State Police Reform and Reinvention Collaborative.
The act requires that police departments collaborate with the wider community to create robust reforms. And while there appeared to be a genuine attempt to include legitimate reforms elsewhere in the state, Rome proved to be a different situation.
For over two years, the NAACP in Rome reached out to the chief of police in hopes they could meet to discuss issues of racial justice. Not once did the chief agree to sit down with them.
It came as no surprise to Sarita Ruiz when the NAACP and other activists never got the invitation to be a part of the reform committee. They felt shut out and so created their own focus group to propose a more far reaching set of reforms.
Ruiz, who is part of the NAACP’s focus group, stated that the group was formed so that local residents “could have a voice.” She found that the RPD pushed back against just about every mild reform that was suggested, including an expansion of mental health resources, and implementing the use of body cams.
“It’s unacceptable that the RPD does not have body cameras but everybody around us does,” said Ruiz. She complained that the RPD has spent the better part of a year coming up with excuses to delay the process to implement body cams.
Recently, the RPD announced that they finally purchased four body cams to test out. However, the Rome NAACP called out the city government for transferring excessive funds for ammunition, instead of equipping the entire police force with body cams.
After half a year of meeting behind closed doors, the RPD and their appointed reform committee finally made their plans public. Ruiz and others were outraged. She believes that the reform plan was essentially “written by the police department.”
“There should have been more community inclusion from the beginning,” stated Ruiz. While the governor encouraged prolonged input from the wider public, little attempt was made for a mass democratic, inclusive, or even transparent process, according to activists. “There were only two short opportunities to comment via zoom, said Ruiz. “The RPD, I don’t believe, really took this seriously enough. They had a golden opportunity to connect with the community and they missed it.”
Complicating matters is the refusal of the RPD to comply with state law following the June 12, 2020 repeal of section 50-a of the New York Civil Rights Law. That section of the law enabled police officers, fire fighters, and prison guards to shield disciplinary records from public view.
This change was a major win for activists who organized for years trying to have 50-a repealed. Momentum from activists grew after the 2014 NYPD killing of Eric Garner.
Cuomo responded to the sustained pressure. It was viewed as a major grassroots win.
While nearby cities such as Utica publicly released disciplinary records of officers over the summer, the RPD has yet to release records and refuses to explain to the public why they are violating state law.
Activists from both the NAACP and Copper City Collective spoke out against RPD’s refusal to release these records, as well as issues surrounding the reform plan. While the city council listened to the criticism, nothing was changed and the plan was unanimously approved. It is still unclear what the process for approval and implementation of these plans are from the governor’s office.
In Rome and elsewhere, activists feel discouraged that most reform plans are a far cry from what many people demand—defunding, demilitarizing, and in some cases, the abolition of police altogether.
The Copper City Collective is currently working on their own plan, based in part on a list of reforms listed on the website 8toabolition. They plan to release their vision soon.
‘She Would Want Us to Fight’
Recently, the collective faced a number of setbacks. A major blow to morale came in late March when activists received the heartbreaking news that group cofounder Jasmine Millner unexpectedly passed away.
For weeks, activists were in a state of bewilderment and grief. “She was out there and voiced her opinion with no shame,” said Sarita Ruiz of Millner. “She made it feel like there was a team behind you, even if it was just Jasmine.” Other activists echoed Ruiz’s sentiment, and shared the conviction that Jasmine Millner helped build the foundation of BLM activism locally, and was a key movement leader.
Still grieving over this tragedy, on April 13 Joya Stuckman learned that the case against Donald DeCarolis was dismissed for lack of evidence a whole month earlier. The district attorney never bothered to inform her. Everyone in the group shared a sense of anger and frustration.
As time slowly marches on in Rome, the Copper City Collective pushes to pick up the pace of political change.
The group organized the first May Day rally in Rome in over a century. Plans are currently underway for a Juneteenth celebration, as well as a public tribute to Jasmine Millner. Several Black tenants at the sprawling Park Drive apartment complex reached out to the group for assistance over harassment and death threats they received from racist white neighbors. The friends and family of loved ones killed by local police maintain contact with the organization, hoping for some semblance of justice.
Although an insurmountable wall of injustice remains in this rustbelt city, the will to tackle it head on is unshakeable in the Copper City Collective. “I want us to keep fighting,” said Sarita Ruiz. Her desire and grit are shared by her fellow activists. She stated there are times when she feels like walking away from everything, “but Jasmine wouldn’t want us to do that. She would want us to fight.”
In September 2020, Donald Trump issued an executive order targeting institutions that teach critical race theory. I took that personally. As an academic and as a school board president of a district that has taken on the moral and ethical work of educational racial equity, the tenets of critical race theory (rooted in decades of academic research and scholarship) have been foundational in our pursuit of ensuring access to high-quality educational opportunities for every child in our district, with the goal of eliminating the racial predictability of achievement and outcome data. For four years, we have been under attack by anti-racial equity individuals and organizations, such as Fox News and white supremacists, as we’ve pursued what is good for all of the children and families in our schools, rather than a small exclusive subset. I believe it is because opponents do not want to see our model of policy making and leadership in opposition to white supremacy replicated in other places.
The year was 2017; I’d been elected vice president to the Evanston Skokie/District 65 (D65) School Board in Evanston, Illinois, a suburb north of Chicago (a role I maintained for three years until being elected board president in 2020). School Board President Suni Kartha and I, two women of color, were elected on a platform of a commitment to transparency and inclusivity in governing through a racial equity lens. In Spring 2017, two months after the election, a room filled with educators, community representatives, school board leaders, administrators and caregivers — not exclusively, but largely white — packed into a conference room to listen to Sean Reardon. Reardon, a Stanford professor, was brought by the Family Action Network, a local nonprofit that brings thinkers to provide local learning opportunities that are free and open to the public and whose mission is to present “fresh ideas that elevate minds, expand hearts, and make the world a better place.” Reardon came to discuss his meta study of racially disaggregated metrics from every state’s assessment data in the nation. He shared upward of 20 slides along with some meaningful analysis.
On one slide, he noted white students in 8th grade in D65 performed at the 99th percentile on average — among the top in the nation. The parents in the room beamed, and I braced myself. Next, he shared that D65 Black and Brown 8th-graders at the time were slightly below grade level (the 50th percentile) on average, and as I feared, their beaming did not dim; had they heard what I heard? There were some knowing nods, some apathetic stares and some pitying murmurs, but no sign of shame or even culpability at the systematic neglect of Black and Brown students whose families were invested in these schools and their children’s futures. Reardon’s thesis seemed to be that while every school district in the nation has a racialized gap in opportunity to achievement, D65 had “a very striking … achievement gap” that was so disproportionate to the income gap that it was an extreme outlier in the nation. He based this assertion on his comprehensive analysis of the districts he studied nationwide. While most districts’ achievement gaps are correlated to access to economic resources, Evanston’s was not.
Reardon showed that the income gap in Evanston is small compared to that of some other cities: very high-resource households (measured by the census) have, on average, an income of 2.5 times that of low-resource households (measured by free and reduced lunch data). In school districts like Atlanta, Berkeley and Washington, D.C. the income gap was much higher — with high-resource households bringing in an average of six times as much as low-resource households. Household income in our country has, unfortunately, historically been a significant predictor of access to and performance on standardized tests, not due to capabilities of the individuals, but because of the access that income provides (supplemental educational activities, reduction in household stress, relationship and access to institutions). Given that the income gap in Evanston is less than half as large as what it is in these other cities, it could be presumed that the gap in opportunity to achieve would be less than half as large as well. It is not. In fact, it is equivalent. We have had to collectively sit with that reality as an institution and as a community. D65 had the worst “achievement gap” in the nation, yet people moved here for “the schools.”
When Reardon presented his data, he explained that it pointed toward a need for three steps in D65 and wherever racialized gaps in opportunity to achieve exist. First of all, he said, it’s important to implement early childhood interventions that increase the number of Black and Brown students who are kindergarten-ready, as the data suggests that the gap started in kindergarten and became more exacerbated over the years until 8th grade. Secondly, Reardon said, we must disrupt resource and opportunity hoarding in the K-8 educational experience to address the fact that the gap was intractable and worsened as students persisted through their K-8 experience. He emphasized it was the district’s responsibility to ensure resources were being equitably distributed racially. Finally, he emphasized that schools must be acknowledged as a common good. Reardon encouraged us to consider: Are schools “good” when they are only good for some students?
As Ibram X. Kendi notes in How to Be an Antiracist,
The idea of an achievement gap is just the latest method of reinforcing the oldest racist idea: Black intellectual inferiority. The idea of an achievement gap means there is a disparity in academic performance between groups of students; implicit in this idea is that academic achievement as measured by statistical instruments like test scores and dropout rates is the only form of academic “achievement.” There is an even more sinister implication of “achievement gap” talk — that disparities in academic achievement accurately reflect disparities in intelligence among racial groups.
Over the next four years, the D65 board led a vision of policy making through a racial equity lens. We took on every single recommendation on Reardon’s list, initiating changes in outcomes and experiences for our most marginalized students and families. There is a great deal more yet to do, but a blueprint has been laid out, and given the white supremacist backlash, I think it’s fair to say that they feel threatened by our progress.
While this is a broad overview of our road map to change, it is my hope that other school districts will model our process.
Beginning Stages
School Board President Kartha and I began monthly joint meetings with our educators’ union, administration and board leadership to ensure that we could build a culture of collaboration, transparency and inclusivity among the three influential stakeholder groups that impact broader district culture and climate.
The board voted in 2017 to support the administration in adopting an educator-proposed plan to de-track middle school algebra, meaning we eliminated the use of racially predictable testing to create racially segregated “ability” grouped classes, in favor of “mixed ability classes.” We added an “Algebra Excite” class consisting of algebraic support and social-emotional learning content, which reduced the inequities that had been produced by opportunity hoarding via tutoring and hours of caregiver lobbying for placement. This increased access for all students for rigorous math a full grade level above the national average, which, in turn, opened up access to higher level math in high school for Black and Brown students. The program was a success, as measured the following year demonstrating a statistically significant increase in conditional growth on the NWEA MAP Math assessment for Black students from the 70th percentile to the 80th percentile, while sustaining progress and learning for white students (from the 86th percentile to the 87th on the same measurement tool and scale).
The school board also mandated that every employee and board member in the district complete a two-day racial justice training to better streamline our language and understandings. We made access to these training sessions available throughout the community to caregivers and other leaders allowing our community to operate with a shared understanding. (This type of training was targeted by Trump’s executive order.) Additionally, we revised the district’s discipline policy and student handbook to be rooted in restorative practices, treating children’s behaviors as opportunities for learning and repair for children and adults. As we describe on our website, we now act on this premise: “All youth need a chance to learn from their mistakes and put them right. Conflict resolution is an important social skill they will need throughout their lives.”
The Attacks Escalate, But Our Work Continues
The road to these rapid and significant changes was not always smooth. In the beginning of my tenure, one principal faced a public uproar after North Cook News and Fox News published disparaging articles circulating an internal school memo in which he encouraging staff to reflect in racial affinity spaces. Additionally, two D65 schools received anonymous postcards saying “White [N-word]s matter.”
Meanwhile, Trump-appointed Office of Civil Rights Commissioner Peter Kirsanow sent an unauthorized letter regarding racial affinity staff groups at Nichols Middle School attempting to intimidate the district into ending this work.
Yet we did not let this deter our work.
In 2018, parents from several other local Black families in D65 and I founded an African American, Black and Caribbean parent group. Families in the area also started Next Steps Evanston, a community education program offering free racial equity education opportunities to caregivers and members of the community several times throughout the school year. I have served as a facilitator, adviser and member of its planning committee since 2018 when the group discussed opportunity hoarding, anti-racism and policy change through a study of the book Despite the Best Intentions by John Diamond and Amanda Lewis, who also served as facilitators.
The board also adopted a Racial Equity Impact Assessment Tool and glossary through which to review all policy, to prevent unintended negative consequences, and to increase the specificity of our policy-making to improve experiences for our most marginalized.
In 2019, the board transitioned from our relationship with the superintendent at the time and embarked on a specifically anti-racist search process for a new superintendent with significant community engagement. At the end of that search, the board selected Devon Horton, who began his tenure with the district by adopting a framework of change called the MIRACLES framework, which emphasizes “motion towards equity,” seeks to “improve instructional methodology,” pursues a “relevant and rigorous course of study,” affirms a “commitment to accountability,” prioritizes “learning environments that support student success,” seeks to “establish expected targets driven by results,” and aims for “sound fiscal stewardship.”
That year, the teachers’ union requested collaboration with the administration to carry out D65’s first Black Lives Matter at School Week. The frame of the content for second grade that week focused on how to notice when people are being treated unfairly. It also emphasized how we are the same and also different, sought to help students to understand the intersecting oppressions facing Black women and emphasized demonstrating the ability to respect oneself and the rights of others. We also adopted an LGBTQ+ equity week. The efforts to do so were supported in partnership by the District Administration and District 65 Educators’ Council. The week-long LGBTQ+ curriculum celebrated and affirmed LGBTQ+ identities with a stated goal of “fostering a deeper sense of allyship within our schools and the creation of a welcoming, inclusive environment for every child and adult.” The curriculum content introduced children to the concept of using affirming pronouns for self and others and fostered awareness of and appreciation for different family structures. The district’s commitment to this equity work pre-dated an adopted curriculum mandate at the state level.
The board also dedicated a public meeting to hear from our community about having police, known as school resource officers (SROs), in schools. We requested that the administration end our school day relationship with the local police department, and allocate additional resources to schools to support the mental health needs of children and families rather than police those needs. We approved funding for de-escalation training for staff and appointed special services assistant principals to better facilitate students’ specialized needs as a preventative intervention rather than policing crisis behaviors at each school.
2021 saw the district’s early childhood program — which serves primarily Black and Brown students and families who receive special education services — more than double the number of graduates who were evaluated as kindergarten-ready, a predictor for long-term dissolution of the gap in opportunity to achieve.
Our district hosted a panel and discussion on adopting a resolution to read a Native Land Acknowledgement and Acknowledgment of the Contributions of the Enslaved prior to all of our meetings, and reviewed a proposal for a comprehensive rewrite of our social studies curriculum to be accurate, inclusive and affirming of the histories and contributions of the marginalized — pre-colonialism up to the present time.
That same month, D65 Caregivers of Color — a multiracial and multiethnic ad hoc collective of D65 caregivers who were activated to respond to the racism that was being expressed in some of the school board candidates’ campaigns — organized a march against racism spurred by comments from candidates that Black Lives Matter Week at School shouldn’t be taught because it could hurt the self-esteem of white children (a comment that ignored the benefit to everyone of eradicating racism and the harm that has been done to children and families of color by not doing so). One candidate said, “I’m a big believer that you have to experience things [racism], and I worry that if you tell children how to think or what to think, you’re gonna miss that experience [of racism],” thereby ignoring the terrible harm associated with racist experiences. The D65 Caregivers of Color implored our peers and community members to vote and volunteer to get out the vote for anti-racism for the safety and well-being of our children and our entire community. More than 50 caregivers and children marched 2.3 miles to the polls for a multicultural, multilingual rally and press conference, and then shared food and water supplied by local volunteers and vendors as an act of care.
However, D65 also faced some of the most vitriolic community conditions we have seen in recent years. In addition to Trump’s executive order to bar federal funds from going to institutions that teach critical race theory, resistance to the district’s anti-racist changes has included letters from Trump’s office of civil rights commissioners, death threats and hit pieces in the media. Moreover, the 2021 D65 board vice president’s car and personal belongings were ransacked and card with a homophobic message was left behind.
But after a brutal municipal election cycle, wrought with instances of racism, the three racial equity incumbents handily won seats on the D65 school board on April 6, 2021. Their electoral win confirmed our communities’ support for governing through a racial equity lens and rejection of external efforts to undermine and intimidate.
Institutional-level racial equity educational reform lives on to fight another day in D65 and as a replicable model for districts across the nation.
At a press conference last month, members of the coalition stood in front of Travis County District Court in Austin with banners highlighting her case and calling for the dropping of charges against defendants criminalized during the uprisings across the country. The coalition formally presented a petition with over 2,000 signatures demanding that Travis County District Attorney José Garza drop the charges against people who protested for Black lives in Austin last year.
In early June 2020, a young Black mother who had just finished grocery shopping with her husband and 2-year-old child in Austin, Texas, was abducted by agents in an unmarked vehicle as part of a joint mission launched by the FBI and the Texas Department of Public Safety in cooperation with former Austin District Attorney Margaret Moore.
After arresting her in the parking lot, she faced a state jail felony for burglary and a rioting charge for allegedly livestreaming a protest outside of a Target in solidarity with Black liberation uprisings in May, according to the Drop the Charges coalition, a decentralized network of organizations and individuals supporting those criminalized for uprisings against police brutality. Her bail was set at around $10,000, her attorney George Lobb told Truthout.
At a press conference last month, members of the coalition stood in front of Travis County District Court in Austin with banners highlighting her case and calling for the dropping of charges against defendants criminalized during the uprisings across the country. The coalition formally presented a petition with over 2,000 signatures demanding that Travis County District Attorney José Garza drop the charges against people who protested for Black lives in Austin last year.
“District Attorney José Garza, who was elected on the wave of the Black lives movement, is continuing to pursue these felony charges,” Drop the Charges organizer Titus Davis said at the event. “José Garza made a big promise when he ran for office claiming he would reimagine public safety, but he has made no statement about protesters’ cases and about whether or not he will drop their charges. How is it reimagining public safety to remove a mother from her child?”
Within days, her case was dropped. “Our hard work as has paid off,” Drop the Charges organizer Olympia Garcia told Truthout. Campaigns like these prove that public pressure works. Lobb’s attorney agreed that the campaign accelerated the outcome of the case.
Drop the Charges coalition groups in Atlanta, Detroit and Minnesota, and other non-affiliated organizations in Tucson, Tallahassee, and elsewhere are making similar demands. More than 17,000 people were arrested during the unrest following the police-perpetrated murder of George Floyd nearly a year ago. At least 363 people were facing federal charges, according to the open-source intelligence research platform The Prosecution Project. While the vast majority of state-level charges and citations have been dropped — in part because of pressure mounted by anti-repression campaigns — an unknown number of people are still facing misdemeanor and felony charges.
“Just because the protests are over, doesn’t mean the fight is over,” said Garcia. “These charges follow you and affect every aspect of your life, like, with housing, jobs. It’s meant to drain you mentally, emotionally and financially.”
To keep up the momentum, Drop the Charges is calling for a day of action on May 26. They list rallies, banner drops, petition launches and political prisoner letter writing as suggested solidarity events. Through this day of action, the coalition hopes to bring attention to defendants in the direst circumstances, some of whom have been, or are currently, incarcerated.
In November, the FBI and Atlanta-area police raided the homes of Richard Hunsinger, John B. Wade, Vida Jones and Ellie Brett, according to the Atlanta Anti-Repression Committee (AARC). Hunsinger was arrested for alleged actions during a protest at the Atlanta Immigration and Customs Enforcement field office; Wade, Jones and Brett were arrested and charged with arson for allegedly burning police cruisers and/or a Wendy’s restaurant where Rayshard Brooks was murdered by Atlanta Police Officer Garrett Rolfe. While Jones and Hunsinger were released on GPS monitoring months later pending trial, Wade, Brett and at least six others are still being held without bond. (Meanwhile, white vigilante Kyle Rittenhouse, who murdered two anti-racist protesters in Kenosha, Wisconsin, was released on bail in November.)
Montez Lee, a 25-year-old Black man, has been held in federal custody for around nine months without bail. He says he has been wrongly accused of arson by the federal government and is asking for financial support. “I am a father to two children who [I] have had little contact with due to being incarcerated,” he wrote in a message posted to his fundraising page. “I have lost everything I’ve had because of this situation.”
José Felan and Mena Yousif, two demonstrators who have endured racist and Islamophobic media coverage, were arrested by the FBI in Mexico in February on charges related to the uprising in Minnesota following Floyd’s murder. “These are very difficult times for me, or I should truthfully say, this is the most difficult time I’ve ever had to go through in my entire life,” Felan wrote to the Minnesota Uprising Arrestee Support group.
For the Drop the Charges coalition, it is important to support all defendants, even those who are charged with serious felonies and those who may have broken the law. “We were seeing a lot of the rhetoric of dividing between ‘good’ and ‘bad’ protesters. But we knew that these protesters had done nothing wrong,” Garcia said. “We know that without people in the streets, there would have been no change, whatsoever.”
The AARC echoed a similar sentiment in a blog post: “Without the determined acts of large crowds following the killing of [Rayshard] Brooks, it is unlikely that [Officer Garrett] Rolfe would have been [brought on] charges at all.”
Black liberation struggles have long utilized a diversity of tactics to win concessions from white supremacist systems. Slave revolts and insurrections were common leading up to the Civil War. Between 1861 and 1865, hundreds of thousands of enslaved people in the U.S. escaped their bondage in what W.E.B. Du Bois later called a general strike of the enslaved. And during the 1960s, there were at least 341 Black liberation riots alongside acts of civil disobedience.
Organizers emphasize that supporting those who take action for social and racial justice — regardless of their tactics — is vital for sustaining liberatory movements. To maximize favorable outcomes in court, legal support teams often help coordinate “mass defense” legal strategies, where defendants band together and fight charges as a cohesive unit. By refusing plea deals, defendants can clog up criminal court systems that are ill-equipped to prosecute a large number of jury trials; Roughly 97 percent of convictions are adjudicated through plea deals. Scholars have suggested that the “the criminal legal system could be brought to a halt by a mass refusal to plead guilty,” per a Vera Institute of Justice report. Red Aid, an organization that sparked the Drop the Charges coalition, helps defendants organize their legal strategy alongside attorneys.
In Minneapolis, according to Al Jazeera, defendants “coordinated with each other and mounted a unified attempt to bring the charges to trial” with assistance from the National Lawyers Guild. Many who refused to take plea deals had their charges dropped several weeks ago.
Similarly, after hundreds of people were mass arrested during Donald Trump’s inauguration in 2017 and charged with multiple felonies, “J20” defendants refused plea deals en masse, which eventually contributed to the dropping of charges a year and a half later.
Garcia said that their public awareness campaigns have contributed to the dropping of charges, too. But for all of the defendants who are connected to anti-repression groups, there are likely many who are isolated. Drop the Charges’s organizers are reaching out to supporters and independent anti-repression groups in hopes of building connections and forming nodes across the country to ensure all are supported.
“We really want to get in touch with as many people as we can, so we can support people’s campaigns in other places, but also help people start them if they need them,” said Garcia. “It’s just in our best interest for us to learn from other people’s cases and the way that they’re doing their campaigns so that other people can get their charges dropped.”
AQA has approved Black Learning Achievement and Mental Health UK (BLAM) to deliver educational units on Black British history. The achievement comes in the wake of government attempts to whitewash British history as set out in its recent race disparities report.
The importance of teaching Black history
The charity works to support and uplift marginalised young people through a range of projects and initiatives. It will now provide AQA award units on Black British history. The organisation is developing its own Black History module for Key Stages 1-5. This module will teach children and young people about the true history of people of African descent.
BLAM’s founder Ife Thompson told The Canary:
There are no avenues to learn about Black history outside Black history month. Our surveys from our project delivery with children across London show us that young people still do not learn about Black history in a cross-curricular way. They tell us how they feel overlooked, undervalued and unseen. Educators, community organisers and schools must do more to ensure Black narratives are included and incorporated into their own curriculums and direct project work.
She added:
It is of particular importance as academic researchers have found that when a positive Black identity is attained, it improves racial esteem, acts as a buffer against the impact of racism and reduces depressive symptoms. Teaching Black history improves the racial identity and in turn wellness of Black children.
She concluded:
By providing an AQA Accredited Black British History module we are placing educational value and currency on the learning of our narratives. It enables Black history to be given the academic respect it deserves and enables children to have their cultural specific narratives rewarded at a level of value akin to the “valued” dominant exclusionary narratives.
Black history is British history
Thompson also told The Canary:
The current educational curriculum is Eurocentric as it gives disproportionate attention to European and Western achievements and omits or white washes the existence and contributions of Black persons/communities.
Black British people, African Americans, Afro-Caribbeans, Afro-Latinx people, and many others in the diaspora, have all made significant contributions to the UK and beyond. Black history is British history. Learning about histories of race and resistance is integral to understanding the story of modern Britain. We can’t begin to tackle the vast race disparities that exist today if we don’t know why they exist. Black-led movements for justice in Africa, Britain, the Caribbean, and the Americas can give us the tools we need to disrupt and dismantle the oppressive systems we continue to fight against.
Education at the heart of Britain’s culture war
Black Lives Matter protesters in the UK organised under the banner “the UK is not innocent“. This rallying call worked to highlight the histories and present-day realities of race and racism in Britain. The school curriculum is at the heart of Britain’s ongoing culture war.
During Black History Month, equalities minister Kemi Badenoch argued that teaching children white privilege as a fact is ‘breaking the law’.
The government’s controversial and poorly received race disparities report writes off calls to decolonise the curriculum as “negative”. It incorrectly sets out that the decolonising project aims to ‘ban’ white authors and replace them with “token expressions of Black achievement”. One of the report’s most concerning passages says:
There is a new story about the Caribbean experience which speaks to the slave period not only being about profit and suffering but how culturally African people transformed themselves into a re-modelled African/Britain.
In response to this, historian David Olusoga said:
Shockingly, the authors – perhaps unwittingly – deploy a version of an argument that was used by the slave owners themselves in defence of slavery 200 years ago: the idea that by becoming culturally British, black people were somehow beneficiaries of the system.
This dangerous faux pas clearly demonstrates why we must learn about Britain’s history of slavery, colonialism, and empire in an open and honest way. If we don’t, we won’t be able to move beyond patterns of racist thinking.
Challenging historical amnesia
The government’s review on the Windrush scandal found that “institutional amnesia” was a key contributing factor. In spite of this, Black people in Britain continue to be erased, as reflected in the recent failure to commemorate troops of colour who fought in WWI. Britain’s colonial past still isn’t part of the UK’s compulsory curriculum.
Thompson said:
I believe the mandatory teaching of Black history will make these collective failings less likely to occur. History is a gateway to exploring how historical harms affect the future, whilst giving us the opportunity to learn from these mistakes and whilst placing harm reduction elements in its place. In the interim schools and community organisations must do what they can on a grassroots level to reduce the harms caused by the exclusion of Black people from the curriculum.
These unjust exclusions feed into the ahistorical narrative that Black and Brown people haven’t contributed to British history, and therefore don’t belong in its present. If we want to build a positive future, we must acknowledge everything that has happened in the past.
It’s time for us to make a concerted effort to undo the whitewashing of British history. Standing in opposition to the government’s vision for the education system – one that stifles critical thinking and dissenting voices – BLAM’s work is more important than ever.
Police have found a body in their search for missing Bristol student Olisa Odukwe. They are carrying out the formal identification process, and aren’t treating the death as suspicious.
It comes at a moment in which many are accusing the police and mainstream media of failing to provide support and answers for the families of missing People of Colour.
Olisa Odukwe, a ‘dear friend’
20-year-old Odukwe was last seen leaving his home on 1 May. His friends described his disappearance as completely out of character. Avon and Somerset Police classified him as being at ‘high risk’ of coming to harm. On 4 May, police found a body in their search for the missing student.
A spokesperson from the force told The Canary:
The death is not being treated as suspicious because a detailed investigation into the circumstances leading to it have ruled out any criminal element.
In an Instagram post, the University of Bristol Association Men’s Football Club (UBAFC) shared:
In light of new information, we are now grieving the loss of our dear friend Olisa.
They added:
Olisa was universally loved; a kind, gentle and funny character who brought a smile to the face of whoever he was with.
Race disparities in missing persons cases
In March, the National Crime Agency (NCA) found that Black people in Britain are over four times more likely than the general population to be reported as missing. Dr Karen Shalev Greene, director of the Centre for the Study of Missing Persons, explained that this is “because of a cocktail of reasons”.
Sadia Ali, founder of Minority Matters – a charity working to protect young people against criminal exploitation – highlighted that many young Londoners who go missing are the victims of childhood criminal exploitation and county lines trafficking in which criminal gangs use vulnerable children and young people to transport drugs across the country. She added that while the government and police are keen to criminalise these young people, there is no support in place to protect them from exploitation.
Stark race disparities in mental health can also go a long way to explain the overrepresentation of People of Colour in the number of missing people. Interpersonal, structural, and institutional racism work in a myriad of ways to impact people’s mental health, and compound existing issues. Meanwhile, mental health practitioners are often not equipped to support Patients of Colour. Indeed, mental health support services can be very unsafe places for People of Colour.
If you have parts of the population that are not allowed to reach their full potential… they are therefore more likely to suffer… the consequences of stress and possibly mental health issues.
She added:
People that are happy, healthy, in a good place, don’t just pack up and go missing.
In spite of their overrepresentation in missing persons numbers, concerned and grieving families from Black and ethnic minority communities face racist discrimination in responses from the police and mainstream media.
Disparities in police responses
Nicole Smallman and Bibaa Henry’s mother claimed that police failed to act when she reported her loved ones as missing. Rather than the police, Smallman’s boyfriend found their bodies. Meanwhile, officers circulated inappropriate images of the women, denying them dignity in death.
In March, police found the body of 19-year-old student Richard Okorogheye. His grieving mother told Sky News that when she first reported that her son was missing, officers treated her like a “lunatic“. She added that one officer told her:
If you can’t find your son, how do you expect police officers to find your son for you?
As of February 2020, the Met Police has spent over £12m on the then 13-year search for Madeline McCann. But Aisha Ahmed from Minority Matters says that when it comes to investigating missing young people from Black and ethnic minority backgrounds, police “claim to be under-resourced”.
I think the notion of ‘all people matter’ is absolutely right, but it’s not true. Other people have more kudos in this world than people of colour.
She added:
My girls and Sarah (Everard) – they didn’t get the same support, the same outcry.
Everard’s murder by a serving Met Police officer sparked national outrage – and rightly so. Hundreds attended the vigil held at Clapham Common to honour the lives of Everard and countless other victims of patriarchal violence. Finally, people in the mainstream set out to have serious conversations about police violence and abuses of power as institutional and structural problems.
Discussing the disparities in mainstream media reporting on missing persons cases, Dr Freya O’Brien, one of the NCA report’s authors, said:
white women are more likely to have coverage compared with other groups of people and there’s more intensity in terms of the level of coverage of these cases.
She added:
In terms of why there is this racial bias, some authors have called this ‘missing white woman syndrome’ and have postulated that people might want to help or read more about a ‘damsel in distress’.
Families need support
This is not a case of pitting victims against one another. This is not a case of saying that white victims don’t deserve the outrage and resources they receive. It is a case of highlighting institutional and systemic failures to treat each and every missing person with the respect and dignity that they’re entitled to.
The police and government need to take urgent action to address the serious disparities in disappearance rates for Black people in Britain. The answer to this crisis lies in a multi-agency response which includes health and social care services, schools, universities, and local authorities. In the meantime, the families of missing Black people need support and they need answers.
Six years after Ferguson, St. Louis hasn’t seen a single substantive police reform. A group of young Black leaders have instead set their sights higher: taking control of city politics.
In 2014, then-Ferguson police Officer Darren Wilson shot and killed Michael Brown. His death sparked reports, blue-ribbon commissions and countless police reform efforts. But so many of those reforms fell short of their stated goals. Today, St. Louis leads the nation in police killings per capita.
As the nation continues to grapple with how to save Black lives from police violence, we’re partnering with The Missouri Independent to examine why police reform efforts so often fail. We follow a new generation of leaders who, as a part of the Ferguson movement, are finding new ways to change policing in the St. Louis region. Reporters Trey Bundy and Rebecca Rivas follow local activist Kayla Reed, who went from attending protests to organizing them. After years of frustratingly slow progress toward reform, Reed transformed herself into a political powerbroker who is upending city politics.
And there’s no way to talk about police reform without talking about the power of police unions. We look how the St. Louis Police Officers Association, the city’s main union, formed to protect white police officers from accountability after beating a Black man. And we talk with James Buchanan, one of the city’s few Black police officers in the 1960s, who went on to help start the Ethical Society of Police, a union founded by Black officers to fight for racial equity in the department and community.
This show is guest hosted by Kameel Stanley, executive producer of Witness Docs, a documentary podcast network from Stitcher and SiriusXM.
Don’t miss out on the next big story. Get the Weekly Reveal newsletter today.
Ten days after Michael Brown, it was 25-year-old Kajieme Powell. Two months later, it was 18-year-old VonDerrit Myers Jr. All in the St. Louis region.
Had it not been for the Ferguson uprising, the deaths of these Black men would have likely gone unnoticed, except for a small, dedicated group of activists who have been tracking police shootings since the 1960s. They’d long been troubled by the local police’s brutal treatment of Black residents and its culture of impunity, the opaque investigations and the often mind-boggling conclusions – such as the finding that the killing of 25-year-old Cary Ball Jr., shot 25 times at close range in 2013, was justified.
After Brown’s death on Aug. 9, 2014, the activists saw an opening.
They began drafting legislation to create a Civilian Oversight Board that would review the St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department’s internal investigations into officers accused of excessive force, abuse of authority and discrimination. The group of seven city residents would also scrutinize the department’s investigations into officer-involved shootings and killings.
They’d gotten this bill passed in 2006, but the mayor had vetoed it.
This time, the reformers had some powerful new supporters – Ferguson protest leaders. For months after Ferguson, people were marching to City Hall and shutting down busy intersections almost daily, demanding police reform. Young, Black Ferguson frontliners chanting into bullhorns were soon joined by people who’d never protested before – teens marching alongside their teachers, mothers wheeling babies in strollers.
This time, the mayor not only refrained from opposing the bill, he added his name as a co-sponsor.
While the young Ferguson activists cheered at the bill’s final vote, many of the longtime Black activists – who had been advocating to pass this legislation for three decades – were more sedate.
“I was almost moved to tears, even though I know there is a hard road ahead of us,” said Jamala Rogers, co-chair of the Coalition Against Police Crimes & Repression, who helped write the bill.
St. Louis Alderman Terry Kennedy (from left), activist Jamala Rogers, Alderman Antonio French and Alderman Chris Carter confer over the civilian oversight bill at City Hall in April 2015. Credit: Wiley Price/The St. Louis American
Since 2015, St. Louis police officers have shot 53 people, killing 27 of them, according to the Police Department. Yet the Civilian Oversight Board hasn’t reviewed a single one of those cases. And the Police Department has withheld nearly all of the complaints it receives against officers, leaving the board unable to fulfill its basic function.
“We don’t know what the nature of the complaint was,” said Kimberley Taylor-Riley, the oversight board’s commissioner. “We don’t know who it was against. We don’t know any of that information about any of those complaints.”
It’s been more than six years since Brown’s killing made St. Louis the epicenter of the most promising civil rights movement since the 1960s. Yet despite stacks of studies and seemingly unprecedented public support for change, St. Louis has not seen a single substantive victory for police reform, thanks in large part to an influential police union and a larger police apparatus that has stymied accountability.
The trajectory of the Civilian Oversight Board shows just how difficult it is to reform police departments from the outside, in St. Louis and across the United States.
But the challenges for the board and the hurdles faced by a long list of other police reforms have also provided a revolutionary lesson to the new generation of activists who came of age during Ferguson. They’re leading a new movement, one being watched around the nation, with a more ambitious agenda for confronting structural racism: Rather than trying to push reform from the outside, they’re audaciously taking control of the city’s institutions from the inside.
Tishaura Jones is sworn in as St. Louis’ 47th mayor April 20. She is the first Black woman to serve as the city’s leader. Credit: Wiley Price/The St. Louis American
As a 24-year-old, Kayla Reed threw herself into activism after Brown’s killing, eventually becoming one of the reform movement’s leaders. In the beginning, she hunted down solutions to the problems she saw in each individual case of police brutality. And she quickly saw every reform she pushed for fail to fix anything.
“In Mike Brown’s case, there was no camera. And so people asked for body cameras. The officers were white. So people asked for more diversity,” she said. “There was no consequence for the officers. So people asked for a civilian oversight. But each of those solutions – more training, diversity, cameras, civilian oversight – only add more money to the police and can be derailed or controlled by the police union.”
Jones’ ascension to the mayor’s office stands as the movement’s crowning victory and is already leading to significant changes. Jones’ first executive order tackled the problems at the civilian board head on: She demanded that all complaints against police officers over the last five years be turned over to her office.
Police not turning over complaints
When the architects drew up the Civilian Oversight Board, they had a principal mission: to ensure the department was properly investigating complaints about police misconduct and excessive use of force that citizens regularly file.
It’s mostly unable to do that because the Police Department has not followed protocols outlined in the ordinance.
If people feel mistreated by a St. Louis police officer, the ordinance stated that they could find a “joint civilian complaint form” at all police facilities, which would be used by the Police Department and the board.
The police had only been providing people with a Internal Affairs Division complaint form, which stays at the Police Department.
By not using the proper form, the Police Department has effectively thwarted the intent of the oversight law. “I will never see your complaint,” said Taylor-Riley, the board’s commissioner.
The department did not respond to requests to comment for this story. The department did tell The Missouri Independent and Reveal from The Center for Investigative Reporting that it does not track the overall number of complaints.
A St. Louis Metropolitan police officer orders protesters to disperse outside City Hall in November 2014. Credit: Rebecca Rivas/The Missouri Independent
However, there’s a way to get an idea of how many are actually filed. When a person fills out a joint civilian complaint form, a copy goes to both the Police Department and the Civilian Oversight Board, where each is stamped with case numbers from both entities. So, for example, the last complaint the board received in 2016 had the case numbers: COB 16-0017 and IAD 16-0407. That suggests it was the 17th case of the year for the board and the 407th case handled by the Police Department’s Internal Affairs Division.
Using that method, from 2016 through 2019, the board saw a total of 125 cases; the Police Department received more than 3,000 complaints in that time.
Put another way, the oversight board reviewed less than 5% of residents’ complaints against St. Louis police.
In that first executive order, Jones not only demanded to get all the withheld complaints, but she also took steps to ensure that the Police Department followed the law. She ordered the Police Department to use the joint civilian complaint form that the bill had called for, effective immediately.
In a report obtained by The Missouri Independent and Reveal, the Civilian Oversight Board found that the vast majority of complaints it has received are made by Black men ages 25 to 49 against white officers. The board found that the Police Department has been interviewing fewer numbers of complainants and officers in recent years.
In 2019, the board received 25 complaints. Of those complaints, the police interviewed only one person. Board members are supposed to be invited to these interviews, but the board says members weren’t invited.
In the past, when board members were able to sit in on the department’s interviews with the complainants, they were able to change the tone of the interviews, said John Chasnoff, co-chair of the Coalition Against Police Crimes & Repression, who also helped write the bill that created the board.
“Early on, they were able to see that the police were treating complainants more like they were suspects and interrogating them to poke holes in their story, instead of being more receptive,” Chasnoff said.
No shooting investigations
Many activists saw the board’s true potential as a check against police’s self-investigations into police shootings. The endeavor has been a total failure in that regard.
From 2015 through 2020, there were 53 cases in which a city officer shot someone in the line of duty, according to the St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department.
Police killed 27 of those people. Not a single one of those shootings has made it to the Civilian Oversight Board in the nearly five years it’s been up and running.
When a shooting like this happens, the Police Department’s Force Investigation Unit opens an investigation. The civilian board was supposed to review the unit’s investigation once it’s completed. Did the police talk to all the witnesses? Is all of the evidence there?
But right now, the investigations aren’t getting past Circuit Attorney Kimberly M. Gardner, the city’s top prosecutor and one of the leading criminal justice reform prosecutors in the country.
She can rarely close investigations, she said, because some of the cases she receives from the Police Department are so incomplete.
She says the investigations first need to be moved out of the Police Department and into an investigative unit in her office. At that point, her office would prepare a report for the civilian board and the public.
“Where is it in our criminal justice system that a defendant commits a crime and all his friends, whether they’re well meaning or not, get to investigate whether they’re going to hold them accountable?” Gardner said.
In 2017, she told the Board of Aldermen that members of the Force Investigations Unit had instructed an officer not to speak with her prosecutors about a shooting case. Additionally, one of the unit’s members told prosecutors that he had a “duty” to protect his fellow officers, Gardner said.
Oftentimes when there’s a shooting, Gardner said in an interview, her office gets notified hours after the officer’s union attorney is called.
“The police union lawyer is already on the scene before the Circuit Attorney’s Office,” Gardner said. “That is not appropriate.”
That’s why Gardner has been pushing for legislation to establish an independent investigative unit within her office, to give prosecutors more authority at the crime scenes in these cases. The new unit would take officer-involved shooting investigations completely out of the Police Department.
“The police cannot investigate themselves,” she said.
The end goal
Gardner first pushed legislation to move investigations out of the Police Department back in 2018, and it’s been strongly supported by the activists who wrote the Civilian Oversight Board bill.
In a hearing, the police union’s attorney, Brian Millikan, warned that an independent investigative unit would have a hard time earning the trust of the police officers or persuading them to give “voluntary statements,” which are crucial in criminal investigations. Officers always volunteered to give statements to the Police Department’s internal unit, he noted.
“For these officers to continue to cooperate in the fashion that they do, they need to trust the system in which they are operating under,” Millikan said. “I understand the public needs to trust the system as well. But it’s not just the public.”
The measure never got past the first round of hearings. The same thing happened to another bill, proposed by Alderwoman Megan Green, aimed at curtailing the Police Department’s use of chemical munitions at protests and establishing protocols for how police should respond to protestors.
The union then ran an aggressive campaign against Green, labeling her a communist. In one Facebook post targeting her, the union declared: “BETTER DEAD THAN RED.” Another alderwoman took it as a death threat.
The union also fought the creation of the Civilian Oversight Board. At a raucous public hearing for the bill, dozens of officers stood in unison to oppose the watchdog measure, calling it “anti-police” legislation.
Officers then refused to provide their voluntary statements to the board once it was created. The union sued to try to prevent the board from having access to the statements officers gave to Internal Affairs investigators, but ultimately lost the suit.
Jay Schroeder, president of the St. Louis Police Officers Association, said the union is unfairly accused of being anti-reform and of protecting bad officers.
“The purpose of the police union is to advocate for all its members,” he said. “Our mission statement for years was to obtain a union contract, collective bargaining rights and due process rights. That’s always been kind of our focus.”
Meanwhile, he couldn’t recall a single instance when the union has publicly denounced a police officer for misconduct.
Terry Kennedy is the longtime alderman who championed the civilian oversight bill and led the Black Aldermanic Caucus for many years. He grew up hearing stories about his enslaved great-grandparents – what they did in the struggle to “move the needle” for his generation.
Kennedy has spent his life trying to do the same for this new generation of activists, like Kayla Reed. And he understands that they have to come up with new tactics to meet the moment.
“Racism and white supremacy is adaptable,” Kennedy said. “As opposed to being so overt, it became more institutionalized. So the fight has to change.”
As Reed watched reform after reform die, she began to see where power truly resided and decided she’d been doing it all wrong.
She drew up a whole new plan back in 2016. Reed would build a movement that would become as politically powerful as the police union. Any prosecutor, alderman or mayor who wanted to get elected would need the movement’s endorsement. If they didn’t support reform legislation, they’d have to think about how it would impact her support.
They would take control of the reins of power. They would change policing as we know it. So police stop killing Black people.
“We spend too much money on police,” Reed said, “and it’s not keeping us safe. What does it mean to spend that much money on people? That’s not radical. That’s not revolutionary. That is common sense to me.”
Reveal reporter Trey Bundy contributed to this story. It was edited by Andrew Donohue, Jason Hancock and Nina Martin. Kenya Vaughn was a contributing editor. It was fact checked by Liz Boyd and copy edited by Nikki Frick.
Taking a knee or lifting a fist in support of racial equality during the games would not be allowed, the IOC said. Athletes would also be barred from wearing shirts or other apparel with the phrase “Black Lives Matter” on them.
Details were scant on how protests or political actions may be punished, but athletes competing in the Olympics can face punishment from one or more of three separate bodies: the IOC itself, the governing body of their specific sport, and their home country’s Olympic committee.
The decision is based on the IOC reaffirming Rule 50 of the games, which restricts any type of “demonstration or political, religious or racial propaganda” by athletes at Olympic venues.
“The aim of Rule 50 is to ensure that each and every athlete can experience the Olympic Games without any divisive disruption,” the IOC’s website says.
The governing authority of the games based its choice to uphold Rule 50 in part on a survey it sent out to athletes and organizations, IOC Athletes’ Commission chief Kirsty Coventry explained, noting that a majority of responses were in favor of keeping the rule in place.
“I would not want something to distract from my competition and take away from that,” Coventry, herself a former Olympic athlete, added. “That is how I still feel today.”
Despite the survey that the IOC cited for making its decision, several sports organizations spoke out against it. Global Athlete, a progressive athlete start-up movement, took note of the survey in April and released a statement at the time decrying the idea that a person’s human rights might be determined by a vote.
“One cannot survey how people feel about human rights and freedom of expression,” said Global Athlete member Caradh O’Donovan, an Irish Karate athlete and a world champion kickboxer. “These types of surveys only empower the majority when it is the minority that want and need to be heard.”
Citing the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Global Athlete added in its statement that “the Olympic podium is a media of communication to the world, and the Olympic frontier cannot be a barrier to human rights.”
Responding to the IOC’s decision, Brendan Schwab, executive director of The World Players Association, said that the organization would support athletes who still planned to protest. “Any athlete sanctioned at the Tokyo Olympics will have the full backing of the World Players,” Schwab said.
Some on social media accused the IOC of racism for its decision to take direct action against athletes who may have planned to highlight “Black Lives Matter” at the games.
The IOC “specifically deciding that Olympians can’t wear BLM attire or ‘protest’ on the podium is for what reason other than racism?” asked Shahara’Tova Dente, an English instructor at the University of Alabama, in a tweet. “Seriously needing an answer as to why that was a necessary focus when the whole Olympics was postponed because of a damn pandemic.”
Color of Change, a racial justice organization, also condemned the decision by the IOC. Their policies “are a direct assault on the free expression of Black athletes by a commission that includes no Black members,” the group noted.
Philadelphia public broadcaster WHYY (4/24/21) was one of the few outlets to report on an April 24 rally seeking the release from prison of Mumia Abu-Jamal. The story included important information on Abu-Jamal, who is serving a life sentence for the 1981 killing of Philadelphia police officer Daniel Faulkner.
It noted that the case has “drawn scrutiny” over claims of police, prosecutorial and judicial bias and misconduct. It cited new evidence released as part of the appeal process, including a note from a key prosecution witness asking the prosecuting attorney for money—the sort of evidence that Johanna Fernandez, a history professor and part of Abu-Jamal’s legal team, notes has in other instances led to a defendant either being set free or getting an immediate new trial.
Along with Fernandez, the piece includes the voices of Abu-Jamal’s brother, Keith Cook, and MOVE member Pam Africa, as well as people who traveled from around the country to call attention to Abu-Jamal’s case, his current state of health—he has number of debilitating conditions, and has just had heart surgery—and to put his story in a context of political prisoners here and around the world.
I confess I was still irked by WHYY using its lead paragraph to frame the story like this:
The case has pitted Abu-Jamal’s supporters, including a long list of national and international celebrities who say he was framed, against police and their supporters, who resent the attention given to a man convicted of murdering a fellow officer.
It bugs me, because those were the themes decades ago when Abu-Jamal was first convicted and sentenced to death (Voices With Vision, 4/27/21). That he was a “cause celebre”—and therefore, wink wink, something something about liberal Hollywood, no need to pay attention—and that the upset of anyone concerned about his deeply flawed trial or his inappropriate sentencing was merely theatrical, because, after all, he was “convicted,” wasn’t he?
Open to lies
Elite media at the time were open to straight-up lies: A 1995 Washington Post story (5/18/95) led with a macabre account from Faulkner’s widow, Maureen Faulkner, about how when her husband’s bloody shirt was held up in court, Abu-Jamal turned around and smiled at her. Except attorney Leonard Weinglass and the court record show that Abu-Jamal wasn’t in court when the shirt was displayed (Extra! Update, 8/95).
ABC‘s 20/20 (7/11/99) returned to the Mumia Abu-Jamal story with a breathless report of an improbable jailhouse confession (FAIR.org, 8/11/99).
ABC‘s investigative news show 20/20 (12/9/98) employed a number of techniques for their big 1998 piece—stating prosecution claims as fact, even when they were disputed by some of the prosecution’s own witnesses or the forensic record; stressing how a defense witness admitted being intoxicated, while omitting that prosecution witnesses said the same (Extra! Update, 2/99).
At one point, actor and activist Ed Asner is quoted saying, “No ballistic tests were done, which is pretty stupid”—but then host Sam Donaldson’s voiceover cuts him off: “But ballistics test were done,” he says, referring to tests that suggested that the bullet that killed Faulkner might have been the same caliber as Abu-Jamal’s gun. But he didn’t note that tests had not been done to determine whether that gun had fired the bullet, or whether it had been fired at all, or if there were gunpowder residues on Abu-Jamal’s hands.
Producers from People’s Video Network told FAIR at the time (Extra! Update, 2/99) that ABC not only used clips they’d recorded from Abu-Jamal without permission, but they added layers of echo, making him sound, they said, “like a cave-dwelling animal.”
No one was too surprised when it was revealed that in a letter asking permission from the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections to interview Abu-Jamal (a request that was denied), 20/20 pointed out that “we are currently working in conjunction with Maureen Faulkner and the Philadelphia Fraternal Order of Police” (Extra! Update, 2/99).
The main story has been no story
After that, the main story has been non-coverage.
For instance, in 2006, when Abu-Jamal won the right to appeal on three grounds—including a jury purged of Black people, the prosecutor lowering jurors’ sense of responsibility by saying their decision “would not be final,” and the fact that judge Albert Sabo was all kinds of biased—the Philadelphia Daily News told reporter Dave Lindorff that it was a “non-issue” (Extra!, 3–4/06)—although when a judge overturned the death sentence in 2001, the paper (12/19/01) found time to editorialize: “Let Mumia Rot in Darkness.”
The late great media critic Ed Herman (Extra!, 9–10/00) reported how the Philadelphia Inquirer wouldn’t cover rallies and tribunals in support of Abu-Jamal, calling them “stunts,” but when the Fraternal Order of Police bought a full-page ad in the New York Times, that merited a story.
In 2000, when Amnesty International declared that the original trial was “deeply flawed,” the Inky (2/18/00) made it the fifth “news brief” on page 2B.
But if Mumia Abu Jamal’s case is a non-issue that only celebrities care about, why the active silencing?
NPR‘s Scott Simon (8/19/99) “skillfully provided a brief for the prosecution under the pretense of covering both sides” (Extra!, 11–12/95).
In 1994, NPR cancelled plans for a series of commentaries from Abu-Jamal—who is, after all, a journalist, a former head of the Philadelphia Association of Black Journalists—after Senator Bob Dole threatened their funding. They said it was because it was a “highly polarized and political controversy”—which they proceeded to say nothing about for the following year (Extra!, 11–12/95).
When Democracy Now! prepared to air commentaries, station KRTI, out of Philadelphia’s Temple University, cancelled the show and all of Pacifica news (Extra! Update, 4/97), with a station VP explaining: “What’s good enough for NPR is good enough for me.”
And when a Vermont college aired a taped commencement address from Abu-Jamal, it led Philadelphia lawmakers to throw together something called the Revictimization Relief Act, allowing crime victims or prosecutors to sue inmates whose behavior behind bars “creates mental anguish” for the victims. Clearly unconstitutional, violating both free speech and due process rights, it was dubbed the Silencing Act by many, who noted that it didn’t just curtail prisoners’ right to speak, but journalists’ and all of our rights to hear them (FAIR.org, 10/22/14).
Media’s response was a shrug: The New York Times ran an AP piece (10/21/14) with the headline “Pennsylvania: Gov Signs Law to Help Protect Crime Victims.”
Elite media would have us believe they are engaged in a serious reckoning with the racism of the US criminal justice system, that they care about over-incarceration and prison conditions. And keeping people behind bars just because powerful people want them there, and not due to the merits of their case? Well, that’s what Other Countries do.
If only there were a case, 40 years’ worth of case, that would allow them to explore those ideals—if not to do justice by Mumia Abu-Jamal (they can’t return what’s been taken from him), then to do some semblance of justice by their own claims of concern.
Former police officer Derek Chauvin will be sentenced in June for George Floyd’s murder. Prosecutors are asking a judge to give Chauvin a more severe penalty than called for in state guidelines.
The prosecutors argued in court documents filed on Friday 30 April that Floyd was particularly vulnerable. And that Chauvin abused his authority as a police officer.
Defence lawyer Eric Nelson is opposing a tougher sentence. He’s saying the state failed to prove those aggravating factors, among others, existed when Chauvin arrested Floyd on 25 May.
Chauvin, who is white, was convicted last week of second-degree unintentional murder, third-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter. Chauvin had pressed his knee against Floyd’s neck for 9-1/2 minutes as the Black man said he could not breathe and went motionless.
Former police officer Derek Chauvin is awaiting sentence (Minnesota Department of Corrections/AP)
Minnesota statutes
Although Chauvin was found guilty of three counts, under Minnesota statutes he will only be sentenced on the most serious one — second-degree murder. While that count carries a maximum sentence of 40 years, experts say he won’t receive that a term that lengthy.
Prosecutors didn’t specify how much time they would seek for Chauvin.
Under Minnesota sentencing guidelines, the presumptive sentence for second-degree unintentional murder for someone with no criminal record like Chauvin would be 12-1/2 years.
Judges can sentence a person to as little as 10 years and eight months or as much as 15 years and still be within the advisory guideline range.
To go above that, judge Peter Cahill would have to find there were “aggravating factors”. And even if those are found, legal experts have said Chauvin would likely face a maximum of 30 years.
“Aggravating factors”
In legal briefs filed on Friday, prosecutors said Chauvin should be sentenced above the guideline range. That’s because Floyd was particularly vulnerable, with his hands cuffed behind his back as he was face-down on the ground. They noted Chauvin held his position even after Floyd became unresponsive and officers knew he had no pulse.
Prosecutors also said Chauvin treated Floyd with particular cruelty during the lengthy restraint. And that he abused his position of authority as a police officer.
They also wrote that Chauvin committed his crime as part of a group. And they added that he pinned Floyd down in the presence of children — including a nine-year-old girl. The girl testified at trial that watching the restraint made her “sad and kind of mad”.
Nelson responded:
Mr Chauvin entered into the officers’ encounter with Mr Floyd with legal authority to assist in effecting the lawful arrest of an actively-resisting criminal suspect. Mr Chauvin was authorised, under Minnesota law, to use reasonable force to do so.
Nelson denied the prosecution’s claims that Floyd was vulnerable and that Chauvin acted with particular cruelty.
Janine Jackson interviewed the International Center for Not-for-Profit-Law’s Elly Page about anti-protest legislation for the April 23, 2021, episode of CounterSpin. This is a lightly edited transcript.
Janine Jackson: The guilty verdict in the Derek Chauvin case did not leave things as settled as some would like to hope. But one thing was made clear: the power of protest. There is simply no way the prosecution of a police officer for the on-duty killing of a Black man would have gone so far without millions upon millions of people, around this country and the world, going out into the street. Some reckon protests over George Floyd’s murder were the largest in this country’s history, and the most diverse—and that’s why some are eager to shut that down.
Listeners may know about Florida’s HB1, what Gov. Ron DeSantis claims is a law to crack down on “agitators.” But that’s just the tip of the iceberg of state and federal efforts to prevent US citizens from doing what we all know we will only be doing more and more of: coming together publicly, using our numbers to fight for societal change.
JJ: Let’s leap right in. The tracker launched in 2016, I’m guessing for reasons, and I’m guessing also that the reasons have only increased since then. What are the sorts of things that you are seeing that concern you?
EP: Yeah, so thanks. We have been, as you say, tracking these anti-protest laws and bills for over four years now. And, really, what we’ve seen since this last summer is a distinct escalation from prior years. We’ve seen over 90 bills introduced in 35 states, since last summer and the killing of George Floyd, that would restrict or chill the right to peacefully assemble and protest. It’s an unprecedented number, both in terms of the number of bills that have been introduced and the extreme lengths they go to to repress protests and discourage people from turning out.
JJ: Let’s talk a little bit about more of that. The degree they go to, it’s partly the way they define “riot,” the way they define “violence,” but it’s also like the extension of what is going to be a crime. Talk a little bit more about that.
Elly Page: “These bills…use vague, sweeping language to define new criminal offenses, or redefine existing ones, related to conduct that may occur during a protest.”
EP: Absolutely, yeah. A common thread throughout these bills is that they use vague, sweeping language to define new criminal offenses, or redefine existing ones, related to conduct that may occur during a protest.
So we’ve seen bills targeting “taunting” police in Ohio and Kentucky. The new law in Florida that contains this new criminal offense around mob intimidation, which is sweepingly defined—you only need three people who are trying to get another person to do something, or to have a particular viewpoint, which sounds a lot like any kind of protest, where you’re trying to convince someone to do or think differently. Broad prohibitions on inciting or encouraging or aiding unlawful assemblies; obviously those cast a wide net.
And in many cases, these new bills and laws are relying on states’ existing definitions of “rioting,” which, in almost all states, are already very broadly defined in ways that can capture a completely peaceful protest. In many cases, you only need a small number of people, whereas most of us conceive of a “riot” as kind of a large group. In most instances, you don’t actually have to cause any damage or injure anyone for it to be a riot; you only need to pose a threat or a danger of something, property being damaged or someone being injured. This is one of the many ways that these sweeping definitions can cover, again, completely peaceful, nonviolent protest activity.
JJ: The problem that I think a lot of folks could see is the broad sweep of it. And yet at the same time—it’s not a “but,” it’s an “and”—and at the same time, we see that they’re actually specifically targeted. Florida’s law is about Black Lives Matter; it’s not about January 6, you know? We know that there are particular targets, and we shouldn’t pretend we don’t know.
EP: Right. And that’s something that we’ve seen, time and time again in this tracking project, that lawmakers are really introducing these anti-protest initiatives in the aftermath of distinct protest movements. And it’s often clear from the text of the bills themselves, as well as from what lawmakers say, what they’re targeting. And that’s true of, certainly, this wave of legislation.
I mean, you have bill after bill clearly targeting protests that take place in the streets, over 40 bills that would increase the penalty for protests that block traffic. You have, I think, 15 or so that include provisions that create new protections for drivers who hit protesters with their cars. You have provisions that target protests where there’s even nominal damage, like graffiti or even chalking, of public property, including monuments.
So all these anti-protest provisions are often accompanied by provisions that would penalize local governments that try to decrease the budget for their police departments, sort of anti- defund the police provisions. It’s easy to say that the target of these bills is pretty clear.
JJ: I know that another aspect that you look at is the methods, just the gear, the incentivization to use that gear, the militarization, you know. I wonder if you could talk a little bit about that, which of course has a direct impact on all the things we’re talking about.
EP: Yeah, absolutely. I think, as Americans saw last summer, it’s not just about the law, it’s very much about the way the law is enforced. And we saw very clearly last summer, the way many of our police departments have been militarized, have access to military-grade weaponry, and how that has been used, oftentimes overly aggressively, in response to protesters.
And we certainly have seen legislative attempts going in the opposite direction, that would try to make it harder, that would try to stop that pipeline of military-grade equipment. Yes, that’s right.
JJ: I think folks are careful around the language of “reform,” you know? I think a lot of folks are ready for a conversation about what “public safety” really means, and really a bigger vision. But that doesn’t mean that there isn’t material change that could happen that could be meaningful, that could maybe keep somebody alive. And I’m wondering what you see, legislatively, as a response to the problems you track. Statewide, federalwide, what do you see as pushback on this wave of legislation?
St. Louis Post-Dispatch photo of police in Ferguson firing tear gas (photo: David Carson).
EP: Fortunately, we have seen initiatives, most often at the municipal level, that are trying to better protect protesters in some instances. So we’ve seen lots of proposals to restrict the use of so-called “less lethal weapons,” such as tear gas, projectiles, rubber bullets, these kinds of things. We have seen attempts, both at the local and federal level, again, addressing this issue of local police departments’ access to military-grade weapons. There was a lot of concern last summer about the deployment of federal agents to respond to local protests.
And so there are initiatives ongoing at the federal level to address that as well, and restrict the ability of federal agents to intervene in certain circumstances in a protest that’s completely local.
JJ: I know that your work also involves an international focus, and I think it’s interesting that, for a lot of US citizens, the idea is that the United States, you know, “We have so much freedom we export it. We model it around the world. We’re the shining city on the hill.”
Americans don’t often see themselves as existing in an international context. But in terms of free speech, or civil liberties, what would someone with a global perspective on this set of issues say to that, in 2021, in terms of the US seeing itself as a model of free expression?
EP: Yeah, I think it’s really important that Americans don’t take these freedoms for granted, and don’t take for granted that they can freely exercise their First Amendment rights and protest. Working internationally, we’ve seen how using restrictive laws to suppress protests is really a favorite tactic of governments that are trying to minimize and repress dissent around the world. So whether that’s in Russia, or in Egypt, or in Hong Kong, when governments are looking to disrupt or suppress opposition movements, banning or restricting protests is one of the first tools they reach for.
JJ: We’ve been speaking with Elly Page, legal advisor at the International Center for Not-for-Profit Law. You can find them and the US Protest Law Tracker online at ICNL.org. Elly Page, thank you so much for joining us this week on CounterSpin.
Building global justice movements are what Angela Davis calls intersectional solidarity — bringing struggles together to end systems of oppression and exploitation across national borders. Julian Aguon’s new book, The Properties of Perpetual Light, speaks the language of intersectional solidarity; while it is geographically specific to Guam and the Pacific, it is also all about the world.
Aguon is a CHamoru writer from Guam — a territory of the United States located in Micronesia. Aguon illuminates a decolonial vision grounded in Indigenous struggle for self-determination, and one that overlaps with the fight against militarization, colonization, climate destruction and the ravages of predatory global capitalism. The Properties of Perpetual Light draws on Aguon’s life work as an Indigenous human rights lawyer and his personal history. Aguon’s essays are a reminder that Indigenous struggles are a shared struggle.
As the poet Audre Lorde once said, “There is no thing as a single-issue struggle because we do not live single-issue lives,” and this is embodied in The Properties of Perpetual Light. Through an alchemy of poetry, critical essays, memoir and manifesto, Aguon’s voice seamlessly and unapologetically blends the personal with the political, and the universal with the particular.
U.S. Militarization of Guam
The militarization of Guam is tied to five centuries of colonization and the destruction of the natural world. The U.S. Department of Defense is the biggest polluter in the world, and Aguon captures how devastating the environmental harm is for the planet, and specifically the Indigenous people of Guam. Aguon writes about the U.S. militarization of Guam, including the development of a massive firing range complex which will destroy more than 1,000 acres of native lime-stone forest — home to many endangered endemic species.
Aguon laments, “If only superpowers were concerned with the stuff of lower-case earth — like forest and fresh water. If only they were curious about the whisper and scurry of small lives. If only they were moved by beauty.” He recognizes that the destruction of the natural environment is tied to and is part of “the latest course in a long and steady diet of dispossession.” But Aguon refuses to accept dispossession — not as a human rights lawyer, and not as a writer.
Aguon writes about radical reimagining of our world: “Growing up in Guam, we constantly hear the word ‘can’t.’ We are always hearing about what we don’t have, what is not possible, what can’t change. We become fluent in the language of limitation.” He goes on, “So many of us so early on in life give up on our dreams. We place our dreams in boxes, seal them shut, and shelve them somewhere just out of sight. Maybe that’s what colonialism looks like: Dreams Under Duct Tape.” Aguon urges the Indigenous people of Guam, and all of us, to keep imagining and dreaming, and not to give in to fatalism.
Linking “Defund the Police” to Defund the Pentagon
In a book reading in March, I had the opportunity to ask the author about the connections between his work and abolition. Aguon said that he has been deeply influenced by Black feminists and abolitionists and hopes his book brings new life into the conversation around demilitarization, and how the demands to defund the police are intricately connected to the demand to defund the Pentagon. Both are shared demands to reprioritize and reallocate funds in order to sustain life-affirming services and institutions, instead of life-destroying systems. Recent reports indicate the Biden administration plans to increase the defense budget to $753 billion.
With respect to intersectional solidarity, Aguon elaborated: “If the U.S. colonies could better link our struggles, if we can have more of that intersectional solidarity so that Black Lives Matter movements can connect with the call for demilitarization in the Pacific, it would be so powerful.” Indeed, “intersectionality is not an option — it is the option. It is the only way forward.” His words remind us that if we are to survive, we must build interconnected mass movements.
Aguon’s analysis builds on critical race theory to elaborate on the meaning of self-determination, beyond the limits of law. Aguon recognizes “the law, especially American law, is limited in its power because harms like colonization, land dispossession, and racial subordination are woven into the very fabric of this country’s being. As close to this country as a jugular vein.” He brilliantly draws on a depth of experience, perspective and passion as an Indigenous human rights lawyer whose references to the law are followed by sharp critiques of the law and legal institutions.
The Personal Is Political, and the Universal Is Particular
To be clear, The Properties of Perpetual Light is not limited to political commentary or legal analysis. Weaved together with Aguon’s critical analyses of colonization and the military buildup in the Pacific are personal stories of his relationship with family, loved ones and home. He gives us a glimpse into the vulnerabilities underneath the armor of activist-lawyer. At the crux of his personal narrative are stories of loss, grief and coming of age. He writes of his father’s death from pancreatic cancer. He writes about reconnecting with his grandmother who had dementia and singing to her before she passes. He writes about his mentor “Uncle” Tony de Brum, who spent his whole life fighting for nuclear disarmament and on behalf of the Marshallese people in the face of climate destruction; and he writes about other forms of loss, like for Auntie Frances, a healer whose life’s work comes from plant medicine, now endangered by the military’s destruction of the natural world.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, Aguon finished writing The Properties of Perpetual Light. At a time when we have all suffered so much collective loss, reading Aguon’s words are a comfort. By writing in such personal terms, he tries to make sense of his grief while sharing with the world his struggles and his spirit, and for all of us to bear witness. Pulitzer Prize-winning author Alice Walker describes The Properties of Perpetual Light as “A powerful, beautiful book. Its fierce love — of the land, the ocean, the elders, and the ancestors — warms the heart and moves the spirit.”
Aguon’s writing is not prescriptive, so much as it is a call to action to reimagine, to reclaim language and to inspire young people to “do battle,” as he says. His vulnerability and the intimacy of the text draws the reader in from wherever you may be reading. Ultimately, if colonization fails the imagination, and it kills dreams and self-realization, then self-determination is the cure and Aguon inspires a future of connection and liberatory possibilities.
It’s been nearly a year since we started social distancing, staying home to make mountains of sourdough, Korean whipped coffees, and focaccia bread art. But for all the at-home deliciousness we’ve mastered, we’re ready for our favorite restaurants! So although travel is still off the table, we’re celebrating with a mouthwatering tour of the stories—and recipes—from some of the best-loved, Black-owned vegan restaurants in America. From soul food in Detroit to Ethiopian eats in Brooklyn to a stoner-inspired burger joint in Wisconsin, get ready, because it’s time to eat.
Detroit Vegan Soul
Southern eats, veganized
Kirsten Ussery never saw herself leaving her high-powered career as a public relations executive. But when her partner Erika Boyd’s father passed away in 2010 from prostate cancer, inspiration struck. She and Boyd adopted a plant-based diet to invest in their own health, and once they began creating healthier versions of the Southern eats they knew and loved, a new calling was found. In 2013, Ussery and Boyd took the leap and brought soul to Detroit, opening a small, 25-seat restaurant to share their stick-to-your-ribs platters of plant food. And it paid off; Detroit Vegan Soul (DVS) became such a Motor City success that they opened a second location in 2017.
The Detroit Vegan Soul menu
DVS has won award after award for its down-home, Southern-style fare (its Soul Platter with mac and cheese will win over any meemaw), but a dose of Asian-inspired flair shakes up the menu in the most delicious way. Tuck into the Almond Tempeh, with thick-cut tempeh smothered in brown mushroom gravy over a bed of fried rice and sesame broccoli. Or maybe indulge in shatteringly crisp spring rolls stuffed with piping-hot, tender smoked collard greens and served with sweet chili sauce.
FoodLab Detroit
Building a healthy community
Soul food can do wonders to nourish someone, so why not ramp it up and nourish an entire city? Detroit Vegan Soul is spreading its influence beyond its two locations as a founding member of FoodLab Detroit, a community of food entrepreneurs aiming to make healthy food in the city a sustainable reality. The pact commits to social and environmental policies by partnering with local producers for high-quality, Michigan-made bread, tofu, and tempeh to strengthen and unite the Detroit food economy.
George Floyd’s family lawyer and famous civil rights attorney Ben Crump hailed the recent conviction of Derek Chauvin as “a turning point in history.” House Speaker Nancy Pelosi bizarrely thanked Floyd for “sacrificing [his] life for justice.” But without the video recording by a teenage bystander, the burning down of the Third Precinct station and the most mass militant movement across the U.S. in the last 50 years, Minneapolis Police Department (MPD) Chief Medaria Arradondo would have more likely awarded Chauvin for his actions rather than testify against him. Chauvin had previously used force against civilians, including the killing of a man who allegedly brandished a shotgun, but remained on the force. Chauvin’s trial was striking for a number of city employees testifying against him, most of all other cops. It was clear by the end of the trial that after the mass upheaval spurred by Floyd’s death, the city of Minneapolis was more than prepared to wash its hands of Derek Chauvin — sacrificing one officer in an attempt to salvage and absolve policing as a whole.
We would be mistaken to see this as a moment that has effectively broken “the blue wall of silence.” Quite the opposite. Chauvin’s conviction is an anomaly. He is just one of seven officers to be convicted of murdering a civilian since 2005, comprising a mere 5 percent of all cases brought to trial — a figure which is itself a drop in the bucket compared to the thousands of yearly police shootings. Besides the potential fear of popular unrest, the narrow judicial interpretation of excessive force that served to exculpate Darren Wilson in the murder of Michael Brown worked to convict Derek Chauvin. The prosecution argued that Chauvin used more excessive force than is acceptable for a police officer. “To be very clear, this case is called the ‘State of Minnesota vs. Derek Chauvin,’ this case is not called the ‘State of Minnesota vs. the police,” Steven Schleicher told the jury in his closing comments.
It was important for the prosecution, and the state it represented, that Chauvin be split off from the ordinary racist police violence that is a daily feature of life in the United States.
Since 2014, the growth of street rebellion and the movement for Black lives have revealed two competing visions for how the U.S. social order, and its intrinsic structural racism, can be maintained. Donald Trump threatened protesters with violence when he stated: “When the looting starts the shooting starts,” a phrase previously uttered by a long line of racists, including Eugene “Bull” Connor and George Wallace. The liberal side wants symbolic representation, performative “community partnerships” with hand-picked pro-business locals, and the occasional convicted cop.
We know which side the Biden administration is on. In the immediate wake of Chauvin’s conviction, taking a page out of Obama’s playbook, Attorney General Merrick B. Garland announced a sweeping Justice Department investigation into the MPD.
This news came a few days after he rolled back a Trump cap on federal oversight into police departments, or what are usually termed consent decrees. Garland’s probe will examine the MPD’s oversight, internal accountability mechanisms and training, with particular attention to the issues of discrimination and Minneapolis cops’ use of force against civilians. “Building trust between the community and law enforcement will take time and effort by all of us,” Garland concluded, “but we undertake this task with determination and urgency, knowing that change cannot wait.”
Such DOJ reports can be useful sources of information. The agency’s 2015 investigation of Ferguson, Missouri, shed considerable light on the predatory policing practices that Black Ferguson residents had to deal with on a daily basis. Unfortunately, it is one thing to investigate a problem, and another thing to do anything about it. It is worth considering that the DOJ under Barack Obama, even when feeling the heat post-Ferguson, did not prosecute a single cop for shooting a Black person. Of course, as we’ve noted in relation to Chauvin, prosecuting cops will not actually stop the violence of policing, but it’s worth noting that the DOJ is not even taking action on its own carceral terms.
With Biden in power, it is safe to assume that we will see more consent decrees in the near future. And when it comes to police reform in the wake of the George Floyd rebellion, what we can expect from the DOJ will most assuredly be old wine in new jars.
The city of Minneapolis itself is a case in point. The abolitionist group MPD 150 has situated the slew of failed police reforms in the wider historical context of widespread corruption, violence and white supremacy. Before the Minneapolis Police Department became notorious around the world for the death of George Floyd, it was the site of aggressive police reform. In 2015, in the wake of Ferguson, the MPD was one of six police jurisdictions selected as part of the Obama Justice Department’s My Brother’s Keeper initiative. Then, as now, the federal government was responding post festum, not to a police shooting — a daily occurrence in the United States — but to the riotous rebellion that a police shooting had engendered. Over the course of three years, the federal government spent $4.75 million to create an “evidence-based” protocol for repairing relations between police officers like Derek Chauvin and Minneapolis citizens like George Floyd.
The MPD was led at the time by Chief Janeé Harteau, who had taken over in 2012 as a self-professed reformer. However, a 2015 DOJ investigation found the department was not disciplining abusive officers, as routine practice up and down the chain of command evaded any substantive accountability. Cops whose actions could not simply be ignored were sent to special training, consisting of reading the police manual aloud.
Nonetheless, Harteau worked with the federal government, introducing “MPD 2.0: A New Police Model,” meant to shift the department to a model of “community policing.” Community policing is a suspect concept. “The first thing that nearly all proponents of community policing say about community policing,” write David Correia and Tyler Wall in Police: A Field Guide, “is that there’s no definition of community policing.” Instead, it means just about anything that involves police interacting with the people they police, and has proven a lucrative source of federal funding for departments willing to classify the ordinary police work of street patrols and cultivating strategic relationships among the populations they police under the jargon of community policing.
Much of what the DOJ is not investigating was already investigated — and modified — during this time. In 2016, Harteau oversaw the MPD’s redrafting of its “use of force” policies. In a further detail that stands out in the wake of Floyd’s death, the department mandated that officers intervene to prevent their fellow cops from using excessive force. The revision of policy also included the usual verbiage on avoiding bias, procedural justice and so-called crisis intervention. All of this had been done already when Derek Chauvin knelt on George Floyd’s neck, while his three cop accomplices prevented passersby from saving Floyd’s life.
The summer of 2020 saw people all across the U.S. taking direct action against the police violence endemic to structural racism in the United States. The people of Minneapolis setting fire to the Third Precinct station, and the nationwide rebellion this catalyzed, are to thank for the conviction of Derek Chauvin. By contrast, the empty proceduralism of the DOJ will not put a stop to police killings in the U.S., just as years of police reform in Minneapolis did not save George Floyd.
It is only by deepening and radicalizing the mass movement against the violence of policing — and the structurally racist social order which policing upholds — that we can reverse the grisly tide of civilian deaths at the hands of U.S. police.
A police officer has entered formal not guilty pleas over the alleged murder and manslaughter of former Aston Villa star Dalian Atkinson.
The trial of PC Benjamin Monk, of West Mercia Police, is expected to open next week at Birmingham Crown Court.
Monk spoke to deny both charges against him when he was arraigned by the court clerk at a hearing on Monday, ahead of jury selection in his case.
Dalian Atkinson, who played for Aston Villa between 1991 and 1995 (PA Archive/PA Images)
Prosecutor Alexandra Healy QC told the same court last week that opening addresses to the jury are due to take place on Tuesday 4 May..
Monk was charged in 2019 with murder and an alternative charge of manslaughter after an inquiry into Atkinson’s death in 2016 in Telford, Shropshire.
The constable’s colleague, PC Mary Ellen Bettley-Smith, is also set to face trial accused of assault.
She has already entered a not guilty plea to a charge alleging she assaulted Atkinson occasioning actual bodily harm prior to his death on 15 August 2016.
The 48-year-old former footballer played for several others clubs, including Sheffield Wednesday and Ipswich Town.
Avon and Somerset police have issued an apology to four protesters they arrested for peacefully demonstrating in support of the ‘Colston Four’. The force has recognised that its blanket ban on protests and subsequent arrests of protestors was “unlawful”.
On 25 January, Avon and Somerset Police arrested Ros Martin, Paula Richardson, Rolland Dye and Taus Larsen. The force issued them with fixed penalty notices (FPNs). It had issued a blanket ban on protests, warning that demonstrators could be given a £10,000 fine. Exercising their right to peaceful protest, the four individuals demonstrated outside Bristol magistrates’ court. This was to express solidarity with the Colston Four, the people accused of toppling slave trader Edward Colston’s statue during the 2020 Black Lives Matter protests.
Unlawful arrests
Martin and Richardson wrote messages of solidarity on the pavement using chalk. Dye held up a placard, and Larsen cycled around the area playing music. According to Bhatt and Murphy solicitors, they all “wore masks and practised social distancing”.
In February, Martin told The Canary that police immediately arrested her. Moreover, they failed to follow recommended practice to engage, explain, and encourage those breaching lockdown rules to disperse. Martin said:
I was alone at the time, there was no other protester, I had a mask on and socially distanced, wrote three words and was immediately arrested.
In a statement made after Avon and Somerset police’s apology, Larsen said:
The whole thing was ridiculous. I wasn’t posing any risk to the public, but the police put me in a position which increased the risk to me and to the officers dealing with me.
Following a legal challenge, Avon and Somerset Police acknowledged that the force’s blanket ban on protests was unlawful. The ban was in breach of Articles 10 and 11 of the European Convention on Human Rights which protect freedom of expression and freedom of assembly. As a result, the arrests and FPNs were also unlawful.
According to solicitors Bhatt Murphy:
The correct approach would have been to consider whether the individual protest was safe to proceed in its particular circumstances.
‘Vindicated’ in their right to protest
A statement Avon and Somerset Police issued on 22 April said:
we now accept we misinterpreted the regulations and that the arrests and the issuing of FPNs were unlawful.
It added:
We have apologised to them and explained officers’ actions were motivated purely by a desire to protect the health of the public at the height of the pandemic.
The force has cancelled the fines for the four protesters. And it has payed compensation for their wrongful arrests in a “substantial” out of court settlement.
Martin said:
In the week that justice has been served for George Floyd, it is vital that the right to peaceful protest in support of the Colston 4 has prevailed. It is fundamental to our democracy. The locking up of peaceful protestors should never happen.
Alex Raikes, director of Stand Against Racism and Inequality (SARI), said:
It is welcome that the Chief Constable has apologised and that justice has been done for our clients. SARI supports peaceful, safe protest as it has been a key aspect throughout history for upholding and protecting human rights.
What could this mean for other protests?
Tony Murphy of solicitors Bhatt Murphy concluded:
The Chief Constable’s acceptance that an outright ban on protest will never be lawful, including during a pandemic, is important. My clients regard chalking messages of solidarity on the pavement as a peaceful, safe and lawful form of in-person protest.
According to lawyer Gus Silverman, this could be the first time a police force has admitted to unlawfully arresting protesters under coronavirus regulations. This is a significant ‘legal first’ in the wake of ‘brutal‘ policing of Kill the Bill protests in Bristol and elsewhere under coronavirus regulations.
Worker centers organize workers excluded from labor regulations and disconnected from mainstream unions. They have brought fresh energy to the labor movement.
This week on CounterSpin: It’s not hard to see—indeed, it’s hard not to see—how the initial Minneapolis police department account of George Floyd’s death, “Man Dies After Medical Incident During Police Interaction,” would have been the last word were it not for intervening factors: One was the witnessing of teenager Darnella Frazier—whose historical act deserves a serious responsive effort to protect and respect citizen reporters, and to fight racist policing—more so than pats on the head like that from the Washington Post‘s Margaret Sullivan about her “pure…motivations” and “moral core.”
And another being the unprecedented multi-racial protests Floyd’s murder kicked off. If the verdict is testament to the power of protest, so too are the vigorous efforts to squelch that power. We’ll talk about that with Elly Page, legal advisor at the International Center for Not-for-Profit Law and founder of their US Protest Law Tracker.
CounterSpin210421Page.mp3
Also on the show: After the Supreme Court ruled last summer that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act protects workers from discrimination based on sexual orientation or transgender status, the Washington Post‘s Jennifer Rubin wrote, “While we might be slow in getting there and are diverted time and again, Americans can eventually be prevailed upon to come down on the side of fairness, equality, inclusion and simple human decency.” The notion that civil rights just expand naturally without struggle—and that justice delayed is, you know, fine—isn’t serving trans kids as right-wing legislators target them at the state level. We’ll hear from Christy Mallory, legal director at the Williams Institute, based at UCLA School of Law.
Republican Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Stitt has signed a new law that would grant protections for drivers who hit and kill protesters while attempting to drive away from a protest and implements harsher penalties on people who block roads or highways during a protest. Democrats and activists decried the law as stifling protest and citizens’ First Amendment rights.
HB 1674, which Republican legislators passed earlier this week, grants civil and criminal immunity for drivers who “unintentionally” harm or kill protesters while “fleeing from a riot,” as long as there is a “reasonable belief that fleeing was necessary.”
“This legislation is not about safety,” said Nicole McAfee, director of policy and advocacy at the Oklahoma American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), in a statement. “It is about centering the convenience of people who already have the power and protections of the law. It is about responding to calls for transparency by protesters and the media with the criminalization of those transparency efforts.”
Broad language in the law may allow for clashing interpretations on how protections are granted. Without a definition in the bill for what circumstances would be deemed “necessary” or “unintentional,” the bill leaves the language up to potentially broad interpretation.
Brandon Tucker, policy director of the ACLU in Tennessee, noted the danger of laws with such broad language on CNN when talking about similar legislation being considered by legislators in Tennessee that would grant immunity to drivers who “unintentionally” kill a protester and criminalize certain forms of protest. “This vague and troubling suppression of free speech can easily be abused, leading to the criminalization of protesters’ words and beliefs,” Tucker said.
The bill also increases penalties for protesters who block roadways during a protest. It makes blocking a roadway a misdemeanor, punishable by up to a year in prison and a hefty $5,000 fine. In the wake of nationwide protests for Black lives, many have said the bill is racist and seeks to push harsher penalties on oppressed people who often need to protest in order to make their voices heard.
Oklahoma State Sen. Kevin Matthews, a Democrat, denounced the bill. It’s not right “that we’re trying to … keep people from protesting when African Americans are killed unarmed,” Matthews told The Oklahoman.
“In this state, it is oftentimes the marginalized voices that aren’t oftentimes heard, and these are why they do the protests that they’ve done,” Young Democrats of America President and Oklahoman Joshua Harris-Till told Public Radio Tulsa last month.
The bill comes as Republicans are pushing through a wave of anti-protest legislation across the country. Just in this legislative session, the GOP has filed 81 anti-protest laws in 34 states as backlash against the growing movement for Black lives. Many, such as the bill just passed in Florida, similarly grant protections to drivers who harm protesters. Others seek harsh penalties on protesters and widen the definition of the word “riot” in order to target demonstrators.
“These bills talk about ‘riots,’ but the language that they use is so sweeping that it encompasses way more than what people imagine,” Elly Page, legal adviser for International Center for Not-for-Profit Law, told USA Today. Many bills, Page said, criminalize “legitimate First Amendment-protected protest.”
Some bills also target low-income protesters by making them ineligible for government aid like student loans and food stamps if they’re convicted with protest-related charges. “It’s so devious, selectively silencing people,” Page told USA Today. “This is the kind of penalty that really impacts certain communities and not others.”
Republicans are likely passing these bills with the knowledge that right-wing protesters are much less likely to face violence and hostility from law enforcement than left-wing protesters are. Many of the states considering anti-protest laws already have punishments for rioting, so activists have been left to speculate about what Republicans are actually trying to achieve.
“These anti-freedom policies are passed with a veil over their true intentions,” said Tamya Cox-Touré, executive director of the Oklahoma ACLU, in a statement about the recently passed law, adding that the laws aim “to chill speech, criminalize accountability, and let us all know that a majority of the legislature cares more about protecting the deadly power of the state than they do about rights and liberties, or even public safety.”
As the world awaited the fate of Derek Chauvin–the Minneapolis police officer who was convicted of killing George Floyd–Black Lives Matter co-founder Melina Abdullah joined Robert Scheer on “Scheer Intelligence” to discuss what he calls the most successful social justice movement the country has perhaps ever seen. In the timely episode, Abdullah, a lifelong activist and California State University, Los Angeles professor, traces the roots of the BLM movement back to 2013 and notes that Floyd’s killing was the moment the “world was cracked wide open” for everyone to see the deep-seated systemic racism at the core of every American institution. She adds, however, that regardless of a guilty verdict there is still a lot of work to be done in order to truly achieve racial justice.
As protesters have rallied across the U.S. over the past year against police-perpetrated violence and brutality, Republicans in state legislatures have been busy cooking up anti-protest laws. Reporting has found that, just in the 2021 legislative session, Republicans have introduced 81 bills in 34 states aimed at suppressing protests.
This is double the number of anti-protest laws that have been filed in any other year, Elly Page, senior legal adviser at the International Center for Not-for-Profit Law, which tracks protest laws, told The New York Times. Many of the bills are a direct attack on the right to protest, as set by the First Amendment.
The bills range from criminalizing protests to making it easier for people to harm protesters without consequences.
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis on Monday signed a bill into law that grants protections for people who drive their car into a protesting crowd, potentially injuring the protesters, and penalizes those participating in uprisings.
The penalties are exceedingly harsh: The bill makes “aggravated rioting” and blocking traffic on a highway a felony. Those convicted of a felony in Florida get their voting rights taken away. Many other states like Oregon, Arizona and Alabama are also considering bills seeking harsher penalties for those who block traffic as part of a protest.
Republican lawmakers in Oklahoma and Iowa have passed similar protections for drivers who strike and harm protesters. In Alabama, legislators are considering a bill that allows people to kill anyone on their property as long as they “reasonably believe” that that person might attempt to trespass.
Other bills seek to take rights away from protesters in ways other than those outlined in the Florida bill. In Minnesota, where last year’s protests against George Floyd’s murder originated, the GOP is trying to make it so that those convicted on protest-related charges are ineligible for many types of government programs, like housing assistance, food stamps and student loans — programs on which many poor residents and students rely.
And yet other bills are focused on labeling protests or protesters with negative-sounding terms like “terroristic” or “riots.” Several bills, like the ones in Alabama and Georgia, seek to expand the definition of “riot” or “unlawful assembly” and seek harsh penalties for those convicted of protest-related charges.
The anti-protest bills seek to worsen a system that already allows for protesters, especially those on the left, to be treated harshly, as countless videos and activist accounts showed during last summer’s protests. They are almost undoubtedly filed as backlash to those protests, which both the right and center painted as violent, despite the fact that it was police officers who started and perpetuated the violence.
The bills, if passed into law, have the potential to seriously harm the Black Lives Matter movement that activists have painstakingly uplifted and fought for through blood, sweat and tears over the years. As activists and progressives have called for fundamental systemic change in the face of police-perpetrated murders, Republicans are seeking to stifle the growing movement, which threatens their power.
“The new Florida anti-protest law that penalizes protests puts a formidable obstacle in the path to this kind of systemic change by subverting the movements that have been the principal catalysts for change,” explains Barbara Ransby for Truthout. “It is unimaginable how such a law could be fairly enforced. Conceivably, a political argument on a street corner could be cause for arrest. If this is not censorship, I don’t know what is.”
Many have noted that the spirit of these bills is contrary to the First Amendment rights of free speech and assembly. “You have just declared war on the First Amendment in the state of Florida,” said Democratic Florida State Sen. Shevrin Jones after DeSantis signed the anti-protest bill.
There is also a glaring double standard in what issues are okay to protest about in Republicans’ eyes, and what types of crowds Republicans consider dangerous. While Republicans spewed lies about the Black Lives Matter protests for racial justice throughout last year, they downplayed the actual violence on display from supporters of former President Donald Trump on January 6.
After a jury on Monday afternoon found former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin guilty of murdering George Floyd in Minnesota, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-New York) explained on an Instagram live stream that, though the verdict may be able to bring accountability for Chauvin, it can’t bring about true justice.
“For a lot of us that have been in this fight for justice, in this fight for establishing true safety for our communities, hearing this verdict come in, I think, creates a lot of complex emotions,” Ocasio-Cortez said, standing outside of the Capitol. “On one hand, people are saying, ‘finally, yes, something’s happening.’ And on the other hand…. This isn’t justice.”
She explained that it’s not “justice” because justice would be George Floyd and Adam Toledo still alive and a school system that’s not of the school-to-prison pipeline. She also added that while the verdict represents accountability, it still doesn’t represent full accountability, since there were three other officers present when Chauvin was murdering Floyd.
“I don’t want this moment to be framed as this system working. Because it’s not working,” said Ocasio-Cortez. “We saw a murder in front of all of our eyes, and yet we didn’t know if there would be a guilty verdict — it tells you everything.”
“Verdicts are not substitutes for policy change. This one case and this one verdict, we still have people getting killed by police every single day on average in the United States,” continued Ocasio-Cortez. “And not every one of them has a cell phone, and not every one of them is a ‘perfect victim,’ as people in media seem to need and want.”
She pointed out that Chauvin is one of a very small group of officers who has ever been found guilty of murder. “A jury doing its job in its system is not a replacement for us doing our job in that system,” she said, pointing at the Capitol building, “and there are way too many people including my colleagues that think that’s the case.”
She criticized the George Floyd Justice in Policing Act, noting that it’s important, but ultimately won’t solve the systemic problems and how Black people are valued in the U.S. As Truthout has previously reported, the Justice in Policing Act calls for a set of police reforms that ultimately won’t bring about the change that will prevent police killings in the future as long as it exists in a system that is founded on white supremacy.
Ocasio-Cortez then went on to point out that while Republicans bear responsibility for many of the issues the U.S. faces today, Democrats also have to face their own demons.
“We’ve really got to talk about how Democratically controlled cities still pump and pump and pump police budgets,” she said. “We gotta talk about — even when those Democratic cities pump up those police budgets, do the rape kit logs go down? No.”
The problem isn’t whether or not police departments are funded, Ocasio-Cortez pointed out. In most cities, police department spending accounts for the largest share of a city or municipality’s budget. The problem with that, she says, lies in the fact that politicians at the federal level begin a trickle-down effect of prioritizing militarization and policing more than they prioritize things like health care or housing.
“This problem doesn’t just start with Democratically elected municipalities, it starts here,” she said, pointing at the Capitol. “It starts with the United States Congress, Democrats included, funding a military budget that’s out of control, that militarizes our government structure, and invests in military more than it invests in so many other critical services that we need as a country.”
The U.S.’s military budget is extremely high by any measure. Year by year, the U.S. often spends more than the combined military budgets of the next 10 countries, amounting to hundreds of billions of dollars each year. People like Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont) have called for a reduction in that budget, saying that it’s a communication of our national priorities.
“Budgets are moral documents,” Ocasio-Cortez said. “They communicate our priorities. And so long as health care is not number one, health care is not our highest priority. As long as education’s not number one, education is not our highest priority. And so long as weaponry remains the top thing, that’s our number one priority.” She explained that the military budget and prioritization trickles down to cities and local police departments.
“We’re willing to accept violence against some communities as a necessary cost for ‘safety,’” she went on. “Safety from what, from whom? Because what makes me feel safe is being housed. What makes me feel safe is when I’m not going to be thrown out of my home. What makes me feel safe is guaranteed health care.”
Ocasio-Cortez concluded by saying that though the verdict can bring mixed emotions for many people fighting for justice, the important thing is to keep fighting.
“We just want to fight because Black men deserve to grow old in this country. They deserve to see their grandchildren. And so do the rest of us,” she said. “It’s time to keep going. We have to keep going. We have to keep going.”
Police shot and killed a Black teenage girl on Tuesday afternoon in Columbus, Ohio, just as the verdict was being announced in the trial over the killing of George Floyd.
Officers claimed they were responding to an attempted stabbing call when police shot the girl at about 4.45pm local time. Police said the 911 caller reported a female was trying to stab them before hanging up. The girl was taken to hospital, where she was pronounced dead.
In Columbus Ohio, police killed this beautiful young girl today. This is an illustration of why convictions and reform just aren’t enough for our communities.
Demonstrators gather in Columbus after the shooting (Brooke LaValley/Columbus Dispatch/AP)
A crowd had gathered on Tuesday night at the scene in Legion Lane, which police had partially blocked off to traffic.
Others gathered at the city’s police headquarters to protest, a week after officers pepper-sprayed a group that tried to enter the HQ over the police killing of a man who had a gun in a hospital emergency department.
A woman believed to be related to the dead girl expresses her anger before a crowd of onlookers (Brooke LaValley/Columbus Dispatch via AP)
Hundreds of protesters pushed past police barriers outside the headquarters and approached officers as city officials were showing the bodycam video inside.
Many chanted “Say her name”, while others yelled “She was just a kid”.
Officers with bicycles pushed protesters back and threatened to deploy pepper spray on the crowd.
The shooting happened some 25 minutes before a judge read the verdict convicting former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin of murder and manslaughter in the killing of Floyd.
Derek Chauvin, the Minneapolis police officer who killed George Floyd last May, was found guilty of two counts of murder and one count of manslaughter at the Hennepin County Courthouse in Minneapolis on Tuesday.
The verdict, which a jury of Chauvin’s peers took 10 hours to reach, came nearly 11 months after the nation and the world watched unbearably clear video of the officer murdering Floyd in front of a crowd of up to a dozen stunned, outraged witnesses, including 17-year-old Darnella Frazier, who recorded the crime and posted the distressing images on Facebook that night.
In that sense, the formal jury of Chauvin’s peers assembled in court just reached the same verdict as the informal gathering of concerned bystanders who watched him murder George Floyd in front of them on Memorial Day last year.
Frazier and the other bystanders offered wrenching testimony at the start of the trial that the obvious injustice of what they witnessed was clear to them at the time, as they watched Chauvin press his knee into Floyd’s neck for 9 minutes and 29 seconds, until he died.
Attempts by Chauvin’s defense attorney, Eric Nelson, to argue that the bystanders were an angry mob that posed a threat to the police, were rejected by the witnesses. Asked by Nelson if she and the other witnesses were “upset or angry,” one witness, off-duty Minneapolis firefighter Genevieve Hansen, responded tersely: “I don’t know if you’ve seen anybody be killed, but it’s upsetting.” Hansen was rebuked by the judge for arguing with the lawyer, but her controlled fury resonated with many viewers of the televised trial.
The brazen nature of the murder and the video posted online sparked months of street protests against the police killings of Black people in more than 2,700 American cities and towns and in other nations.
“I would not call today’s verdict justice,” Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison said after the verdict, “because justice implies true restoration. But it is accountability, which is the first step towards justice.”
Ellison, whose office led the prosecution, said the bystanders “who stopped and raised their voices” during the crime “were a bouquet of humanity: old, young; men and women; Black and white; a man from the neighborhood just walking to get a drink; a child going to buy a snack with her cousin; an off-duty firefighter on her way to a community garden; brave young women — teenagers — who pressed record on their cellphones. … They stopped and they raised their voices because they knew that what they were seeing was wrong.”
He also invoked the names of a litany of Black victims of police violence and said, “This had to end. We need true justice. That’s not one case. That is a social transformation that says that nobody’s beneath the law and no one is above it.”
Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison invokes the memories of Rodney King, Abner Louima, Oscar Grant, Eric Garner, Michael Brown, Freddie Gray, Sandra Bland, Breonna Taylor, Daunte Wright, Adam Toledo and others.
After the conviction, President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris called Floyd’s family.
President Biden and VP Harris call the Floyd family after the GUILTY verdict! Thank you @POTUS & @VP for your support! We hope that we can count on you for the police reform we NEED in America! ?? pic.twitter.com/cg4V2D5tlI
“Nothing is gonna make it all better,” the president told the Floyd family, “but at least, God, now there’s some justice.”
News of the verdict was greeted with relief and emotion across the country, after so many previous high-profile cases had ended with the acquittal of white police officers who killed Black citizens.
Ms. L, a COTA bus driver in Columbus, Ohio, reacts after hearing the guilty charges for Derek Chauvin. Ms. L was listening to the verdict on her phone and pulled the bus over on North High Street when she heard.
Chauvin was fired days after the killing, along with the other three officers involved. He was convicted on Tuesday of second-degree unintentional murder, third-degree murder, and second-degree manslaughter.
Chauvin will be sentenced in the weeks ahead and could face up to 40 years in prison but is likely to receive far less time because of his lack of a previous criminal record. Both murder charges carry a presumptive prison sentence of 12.5 years, but prosecutors have asked for more time.
The other fired officers — Tou Thao, J. Alexander Kueng, and Thomas Lane — who were also arrested and charged within days of the crime, all face trial in August for having aided and abetted the second-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter of Floyd.
In advance of the verdict, Keeanga-Yamahtta Taylor, an assistant professor of African American studies at Princeton, wrote on Twitter that, no matter what the jury found, “nothing has changed the underlying conditions allowing for the murder of Floyd in the first place.” The recent police killings of Daunte Wright in Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, and Adam Toledo in Chicago, Taylor added, “assure that without the annihilation of the criminal punishment system, we will be here again.”
Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minnesota) sharply criticized the disparity between the seemingly endless amounts of money that government officials are willing to spend on the police while essential social programs go begging, at a press conference at the site of Daunte Wright’s murder in Brooklyn Center, Minneapolis, on Tuesday.
Calling for “policies that move us forward,” Omar said, “the current policing system that we have is not doing anything to protect and serve. What will it take for us to have a system [that] we are all protected by?”
“I am constantly appalled by the fact that it is easy — it is easy for municipalities, for the states, for the federal government to readily come up with resources to police and brutalize people,” she continued.
“But when it comes to coming up with resources to provide healthcare, to provide mental health services, to provide housing, to provide the things that we need for our wellbeing as a community so that we can thrive, they are put [on] the back burner,” Omar said. “And people oftentimes will say, this is not the time, we don’t have the resources, we’re not sure how we’re going to pay for it, we can’t get people from the other side of the aisle to agree.”
ILHAN OMAR SPEAKS AT DAUNTE WRIGHT RALLY: Rep. @IlhanMNis speaking at a news conference and rally hosted by residents of Brooklyn Center at the site where Daunte Wright was shot and killed by Brooklyn Center police. https://t.co/WnMueC1sKt
At the press conference, Omar also expressed frustration over the political stalemates that are plaguing Congress and blocking progress. She is tired of the filibuster, she said, and she’s tired of talking about the filibuster.
“I am tired [of] people talking about the filibuster. I am tired [of] people talking about the narrow margins we have in the Senate,” Omar said. “It is time for people to go beyond the press releases, to go beyond the press conferences and actually do the right thing in moving our country towards progress.”
Omar, alongside many other progressive members of Congress, have expressed frustration with the constant cycle of police brutality and immunity as Black communities have risen up against police violence over the past year and calls to defund rather than reform the police have spread.
Police reform, a concept preferred by centrist Democrats, often gives more power, resources and money to police, which ends up perpetuating the cycle. And the cycle is seemingly endless, advocates say as Minneapolis citizens rise up for the second time in less than a year to protest the police killing of another Black man in their community.
“Our communities are tired and exhausted, really, at this repeated offense and assault that continues to happen, where we continue to find ourselves in a state of mourning, in a state of exhaustion, in a state of trauma,” said Omar, who represents Brooklyn Center, where Wright was killed. “This violence isn’t taking place in some remote space. It’s taking place in the midst of communit[ies] where people are bearing witness every single time this violence is perpetrated.” Omar then went on to demand “transformational change” in response to the violence.
As the Black Lives Matter movement has called for justice, progressive lawmakers like Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez have rallied behind the movement. As Ocasio-Cortez explained last year, the change that Omar is calling for isn’t as far from reality as centrists and Republicans might claim.
“Affluent white communities already live in a world where [they] choose to fund youth, health, housing, etc more than they fund police,” she wrote. “When a teenager or preteen does something harmful in a suburb… White communities bend over backwards to find alternatives to incarceration for their loved ones to ‘protect their future,’ like community service or rehab or restorative measures.”
Lawmakers have recently cast doubt on police narratives about Wright’s death. Wright was killed last week by police officer Kim Potter when she claims she mistook her firearm for her taser, but many experts and advocates have questioned her story.
“Daunte Wright’s killing was not a random, disconnected ‘accident,’” wrote Ocasio-Cortez last week. “It was the repeated outcome of an indefensible system that grants impunity for state violence, rewards it with endlessly growing budgets at the cost of community investment, and targets those who question that order.”
Other progressives have also cast doubt on the police narrative. “Impossible that a veteran cop couldn’t tell [the] difference between taser and gun,” wrote Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Washington), the leader of the Congressional Progressive Caucus. “We need real consequences for these killings.”
Kim Potter, the white police officer who shot and killed 20-year-old Daunte Wright on Sunday, will be charged with second-degree manslaughter, a county prosecutor said Wednesday. This announcement comes after three nights of mass protests in Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, where Wright was killed.
Potter resigned from the Brooklyn Center Police Department on Tuesday along with Brooklyn Center Police Chief Tim Gannon.
Potter shot Wright, a Black man, at close range on Sunday after pulling him over for hanging air fresheners on his rearview mirror, which many activists have noted has repeatedly been used as a pretense for police to target Black people. Police later claimed that they pulled him over for expired license plate tags.
Police have claimed that they attempted to arrest Wright over an outstanding warrant and Potter shot him when he reentered his vehicle. Wright then drove a short distance away before hitting another car and was pronounced dead at the scene of the crash.
Potter, a 26-year veteran of the police force, claimed she had meant to fire a taser at Wright but confused her stun gun for her firearm and shot him instead. Advocates and reporting have cast doubt on whether or not an officer, especially someone with as many years of experience on the force, could conceivably make a monumental mistake of that nature.
Hundreds of protesters have flooded the streets for three nights since Wright’s death calling for justice. Police have retaliated against the protesters with violence and used cruel tactics like pepper spray and tear gas, despite a ban on its use, to attack the demonstrators. Police have also thus far arrested dozens of protesters.
The protests also come as Derek Chauvin, the man who killed George Floyd in Minneapolis by kneeling on Floyd’s neck for nearly 9 minutes, stands trial on murder and manslaughter charges. Though Chauvin’s trial is a flashpoint in the nation’s litigation of police brutality and police killings, activists note that imprisoning police officers who kill Black people will not necessarily bring Black communities justice and peace.
“I understand the focus on consequences for Kim Potter but they could put her in an electric chair side by side with Chauvin right now for what she did and we’ll still be left with the murderous institution of policing having been altered in no substantive way,” wrote activist and artist Bree Newsome Bass on Twitter.
Though cases like Chauvin’s and Potter’s are highly public, police officers often operate with impunity and many cases of brutality and violence go unreported. The officers who gunned down Breonna Taylor in her home in the middle of the night in Kentucky, for instance, have not faced any serious consequences for Taylor’s death. Even if Chauvin and Potter face consequences for their actions, however, many advocates say imprisonment and police reforms that only funnel more money to the police will not stop Black people from getting killed.
Progressive lawmakers have pushed back on the notion that Wright’s death was an accident.
“Daunte Wright’s killing was not a random, disconnected ‘accident,’” wrote Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez on Twitter on Tuesday. “It was the repeated outcome of an indefensible system that grants impunity for state violence, rewards it with endlessly growing budgets at the cost of community investment, and targets those who question that order.”
“Cameras, chokehold bans, ‘retraining’ funds, and similar reform measures do not ultimately solve what is a systemic problem,” Ocasio-Cortez continued.
Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Washington) similarly questioned the police department’s narrative on the shooting. “Not. An. Accident. Why was this cop wanting to pull a taser on a 20-year old kid for expired tags in the first place?” Jayapal wrote on Twitter. “Impossible that a veteran cop couldn’t tell difference between taser and gun.”