Category: BLM

  • Confer Books publishes material that’s “designed to deepen our understanding of psychological, relational and emotional processes”. And on 4 March, it released a new title named, The Race Conversation: An essential guide to creating life-changing dialogue.

    This fascinating read dives into a world of new vocabulary coined to initiate conversations around race. And it seeks to discuss “the race construct” which keeps “the discomfort of race oppression out of white people’s minds and bodies”.

    Author Eugene Ellis is the director and founder of the Black, African and Asian Therapy Network (BAATN). It’s the UK’s largest independent organisation of its kind. Trained as a psychotherapist, Ellis focuses on “body-orientated therapies” such as body awareness, mindfulness, and healing. Narratives in the book explore “race and mental wellbeing” through an alternative non-verbal lens which doesn’t always involve speaking.

    Credit: Confer Books

    Ellis told The Canary:

    Since George Floyd’s killing, people with mixed families have been pressured to have [race] conversations they might not necessarily have had as a family before. A lot of people feel an ethical pull towards dismantling racism in their workplaces or institutions.

    Just last week, the reaction to Oprah Winfrey’s interview with Meghan Markle showed how rife racism is in Britain.

    “Being colour conscious”

    Opening the discussion with everyday racism, Ellis shows how today’s political and social climate has forced race conversations to the forefront. Whether we like it not, topics of race have become unavoidable as the media has suddenly taken an interest in pursuing race-related coverage.

    Ellis wrote:

    Talking about race had always been hard work, but, after George Floyd’s killing, it had somehow become hard work not to.

    Black Lives Matter protests took place across the world in the wake of George Floyd’s death at the hands of Derek Chauvin, a Minneapolis police officer. Millions gathered to protest for justice, with 15-26 million people in the US alone according to the New York Times.

    On 13 March, CNN reported that Floyd’s family accepted $27m after Minneapolis city council voted to settle the lawsuit.

    The report also said:

    Chauvin has pleaded not guilty to second-degree unintentional murder and second-degree manslaughter charges. He has also pleaded not guilty to third-degree murder, which was reinstated in the case on Thursday.

    For many People of Colour (POC), the global shift to support anti-racism has been a confusing time of feeling both liberated and overwhelmed. Ellis wrote:

    I went through a phase of dislocation and mourning, even paranoia as these narratives played out on the world stage

    Credit: Confer Books
    Mindfulness

    Examining the impacts of racism, the book talks about how trauma can occur “on a mental and physical level due to just existing in a racialised society”.

    Mindfulness is a technique that involves a “body-mind” connection. Ellis said it can be used as a way to “almost retune your body” to lessen the fear that arises when speaking in race conversations.

    And in this race conversation, he wants to include everyone’s experiences. He wrote:

    I also experienced first-hand that, even though white people embody conscious and unconscious race privileges, it doesn’t necessarily mean that they are free from pain and suffering.

    White guilt and suffering from racism are often shunned, but Ellis said:

    That’s a taboo area you can’t talk about but why? I genuinely believe that suffering is across the board. You can’t talk about it because the race construct says you can’t. For it [the race conversation] to move [forward] that aspect needs to come in.

    Another concept deployed in the book is how “the race construct” influences individuals to “attend to white people’s hurt and pain before the hurt and pain in people of colour”.

    “It was whiteness on display”

    It’s natural that frustration weaves its way into these conversations. In comparing ‘black rage’ and ‘white rage’, Ellis wrote:

    White rage steps forward when people of colour step forward to take control of their lives and their financial circumstances. It is predictable, brutal and unforgiving.

    People of colour understand that if they put their foot on the accelerator of their lives, they can only get so far before they run the risk of losing their reputation, their possessions or even their lives.

    The recent increase in news outlets covering topics of race has put a spotlight on racism in the US. This has also sparked people in Britain to dig deeper into racism here.

    Ellis said:

    The storming of the Capitol and the US elections… I was absolutely gripped by the whole thing. It was whiteness on display. It’s easy for us in the UK to say, ‘oh it’s not like that over here’. In the US racism is brash, big, bold and the UK is a little more subdued. There’s more of a conscious effort in the UK to keep it hidden.

    Some institutions have put in place initiatives at certain times to speak about race. In the book, Ellis refers to the “dreaded race day”. He said:

    For race or any oppression there should be conversations around that all the time. It shouldn’t be for one day; you need to reflect about it and that’s not enough time.

    Mental health services have a responsibility to engage in race conversations

    Mental health services that work with Black, Asian, Ethnic Minority and POC also have a responsibility to actively engage in race conversations.

    An article written for the Guardian addresses the problem that Black and Ethnic Minority communities “are more likely to develop mental health conditions but less likely to access counselling – or find it fit for purpose”.

    Ellis wrote about his thoughts on the problem which is “the internal discomfort of mental health professionals, and their profound feelings of not feeling safe during the race conversation”.

    In the book he mentions that POC who then seek mental health services notice this discomfort. He said:

    For a lot of people of colour, a big part of their mental health experiences are not necessarily [impacted by] their families but in society by political structures and systems of oppression. This needs to be included as a part of psychotherapy, training and counselling.

    Then if their client wants to talk about race, they will feel that the therapist is available for it and most of the time, that’s not how it feels.

    PAUSE … and breathe

    If creative language, thought-provoking theories, and an honest breakdown of how we can all participate in race conversations is what you’re after, then this is the read for you. Its forward-thinking narrative aims to normalise conversations about race, highlights the significance of historical oppression, and proposes different solutions to healing from race-related trauma.

    “PAUSE … and breathe” is noted throughout the chapters and is a respectful reminder to all that taking a break from race conversations is ok; in fact it’s healthy.

    Confer UK and Ellis are holding a live webinar specifically for psychotherapists to talk about “racial divides in our society” on 20 March, and they’ll be running another event in June as a part of their Summer Programme 2021.

    You can find other publications from this author here.

    Featured image Confer Books / Thomas Allsop via Unsplash

    By Aaliyah Harris

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • A Tory councillor is being investigated by his party over his comments on the Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement.

    Portsmouth’s The News reported on 25 February that online comments by local councillor Ken Smith were being scrutinised.

    Smith is said to have posted a comment in relations to athletes taking a knee during a recent England Vs Scotland Rugby match. The Conservative politician posted:

    Why are all the Scottish players taking the knee? Can it really be to commemorate the life time criminal, high on drugs, who was inadvertently killed four thousand miles away in America?

    Smith appears to have been referring to George Floyd, the African-American man whose police killing sparked global protests against state violence and structural racism in 2020.

    “I get Christmas cards from Muslims”.

    Smith has since expanded his criticisms of BLM, telling The News that the practice of kneeling in solidarity

    was all motivated by the Black Lives Matter organisation. It’s not just a means of paying homage to the person who died, it’s actually a nasty group of left-wing extremists who are exploiting this, and a lot of people are doing the taking-the-knee thing and they don’t know what it’s about.

    People have jumped on the bandwagon – troublemakers, I’m talking about – and are using the kneeling as way of causing alarm and dissent, I really believe that I truly believe that sports and politics should not go together.

    He also denied being a racist, citing past business dealings and Christmas cards as evidence:

    No one has any grounds to call me colour prejudiced in any way. In 30 years of business I have visited and done business with every country in the world, except China, South America, and Myanmar. I get Christmas cards from Muslims, and Buddhists, and Jewish people, because I am never, ever racial or critical of other nations.

    It is not clear if Smith comprehends that South America is not itself a country.

    Dreadful protests?

    There has been resistance to the BLM movement at all levels of the Conservative Party.

    Only recently, home secretary Priti Patel told LBC Radio she had been appalled at the 2020 protests.

    Last summer was quite a moment actually with all the protests that we saw taking place. You saw policing coming under a great deal of pressure through some of the protests… those protests were dreadful

    Asked if she would take a knee in solidarity, Patel said:

    No I would not, I would not have at the time either. There are other ways in which people can express their opinions.

    Featured image via Wikimedia Commons/Kwh1050

    By Joe Glenton

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • An illustration of a woman breathing in toxic gas

    For $33, you can buy a Defense Technologies hexachloroethane (HC) smoke canister for crowd control purposes.

    This is what the City of Milwaukee paid per unit for 60 “Max Smoke” canisters in preparation for the Democratic National Convention in August 2020. It is what Portland Police bought in 2018, and what Denver Police likely used on Black Lives Matter (BLM) protesters this summer.

    However, nowhere in the U.S. experienced more HC smoke during the summer of 2020 than Portland, Oregon, where Homeland Security and Border Patrol forces deployed at least 26 such munitions against BLM protesters in July 2020.

    BLM protesters were no strangers to tear gas and smoke — after all, the Portland Police had gassed them many times since the George Floyd protests began in late May. But once the feds arrived, protesters knew almost immediately that something was different. People reported new, strange effects that lasted days or weeks after exposure. “I puked. All night,” Gregory McKelvey, activist and campaign manager for Portland mayoral candidate Sarah Iannarone, tweeted on July 26. “This gas feels different and sneaks up on you.” Other protesters and journalists on the ground reported similar bouts of nausea and vomiting, along with loss of appetite, hair loss and a burning sensation that lasted days after exposure.

    Dr. Juniper L. Simonis, a Portland-based ecologist and evolutionary biologist, suspected that a new chemical used by federal agents might explain these troubling ailments. To find out, they collected and tested samples from plants, soil, gas mask filters and protesters’ clothing.

    Ultimately, they discovered this chemical, while relatively new to Portland, was not new at all. Nor were its side effects unprecedented. On the contrary, scientists and doctors have known about HC smoke — and its potentially lethal side effects — for nearly a century.

    Marines erect a deadly flag in an illustration

    Chemical Concealment

    The opportunistic use of smoke or fog in battle to conceal movement and supplies is as ancient as war itself. Chemical smoke, however, originated in World War I, when E.F. Berger developed the precursor to HC canisters for France. The munition, which combined powdered zinc and carbon tetrachloride to generate opaque clouds of molten zinc chloride smoke, was intended to obscure troop movements, not for crowd control.

    During the interwar years, scientists stabilized the smoke canister by replacing carbon tetrachloride with hexachloroethane, or HC. The improved smoke device still generated zinc chloride along with smaller quantities of phosgene and carbon monoxide. The munition saw heavy use in World War II as a way to obscure harbors, hide supply routes or signal to other units.

    Reports of the lethal danger of HC smoke, especially in enclosed areas, began accumulating almost immediately. In 1943, 70 people exposed to HC munitions smoke developed nausea, vomiting, chest tightness and a cough. Ten victims died in the incident. According to a study published in 1954, an 18-year-old man spent six weeks in the hospital after 10 minutes of HC smoke exposure in an enclosed space. A 1963 report found that a fireman died after exposure to the smoke.

    Numerous reports from the 1980s showed the dangers of HC exposure. Two elderly women exposed to zinc chloride for 75 minutes fell violently ill, one of whom eventually died. Two soldiers exposed to the smoke required ventilators after inhalation. A 21-year-old man took two months to recover from HC smoke. A different zinc chloride incident killed two men. Five soldiers experienced severe symptoms after breathing HC smoke. Two of these men developed acute respiratory distress syndrome and died.

    Evidence of the often-deadly hazards of HC smoke accumulated within the civilian world as well. In 2017, scientists conducted a survey of academic documentation of HC smoke exposure and found that, of 31 documented cases, eight victims died and three experienced permanent lung injury.

    The clear and well-established danger of high concentrations of HC smoke inspired the military to issue strict guidelines around its use in 1983. When deploying HC munitions, military personnel must wear gas masks. They must “restrict HC deployment to areas of the installation as far as practically possible from … populated areas” and “Take special precautions to protect higher risk individuals such as those highly allergic, children and the aged.”

    So why are police forces across the U.S. using HC smoke in densely populated urban areas against protesters?

    “Minimal Hazard”

    Given the many documented cases of injury and death from HC smoke, the National Fire Protection Association’s (NFPA) health rating for the device comes as a bit of a shock: 0 out of 4, or “minimal hazard.”

    This rating is especially surprising given that the NFPA rating for zinc chloride — the chemical generated by the reaction between hexachloroethane and zinc oxide — is 3 of 4: “Serious Hazard.” Phosgene and chlorine gas — both munition byproducts — have an NFPA rating of 4: “Can Be Lethal.”

    How can a chemical weapon whose byproducts are so dangerous constitute a minimal hazard? Simonis suspects the answer lies in a 2002 lawsuit against HC smoke manufacturer Defense Technologies by Timothy Gamradt, a rural Minnesota prison guard. During a 1998 training exercise, nine guards (including Gamradt) threw an HC smoke canister up a flight of stairs. The munition bounced back and exploded at their feet, where it fumigated the guards with zinc chloride as the exercise continued. Almost immediately, the guards began to experience the assorted symptoms observed in other zinc chloride victims: nausea, vomiting, breathing troubles and headaches. Garmradt’s court case dragged on until 2008, at which point Defense Technologies settled out of court for an undisclosed sum.

    The timing of Gamradt’s settlement may help explain the surprising inconsistencies over time between Defense Technology’s Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) for HC smoke. Simonis points out that both the 1993 and 2004 MSDS lists, which came out before the settlement, declare zinc chloride as a hazardous byproduct. After their 2008 settlement date, this information changed. The 2011 MSDS byproduct list does not list zinc chloride at all.

    The chemical reagents are the same. Why are the chemical byproducts different?

    Simonis, who has over a decade of experience in their field, considers this change well beyond unusual. “I have never seen a Safety Data Sheet that has had chemicals removed over time. [Material Safety Data Sheets] have intentionally become more detailed and harmonized for ease of use and interpretation, so the company removing chemicals is antithetical to the concept of safety,” Simonis said.

    An illustration of the "Portland Oregon" sign obscured by smoke

    Poisonous Portland

    According to Simonis’s research, federal agents deployed at least 26 HC smoke munitions in downtown Portland throughout late July. “While the canisters were deployed outside, which certainly prevented many deaths, diffusion was limited by crowds of thousands of people, closed tree canopies, cars and tents,” Simonis said. Little wonder protesters and those who lived in the affected area reported the same list of symptoms HC smoke victims have reported for the last 80 years: nausea, vomiting, appetite loss and respiratory distress. The use of respiratory irritants during the COVID-19 pandemic is especially concerning. According to a statement by the Oregon Health and Science University (OHSU), “Chemical means to control crowds has raised great concern among medical professionals as we simultaneously try to manage a global pandemic.” Respiratory damage not only has the potential to increase infection rates but can also lead to more severe cases when infection occurs.

    Even if federal agents never again fill the streets of downtown Portland with clouds of toxic zinc chloride, the consequences of its prolific deployment may haunt the City of Roses for many years to come. HC smoke releases heavy metals along with zinc chloride. These elements bioaccumulate in livers and kidneys, where they increase the chance of cancer. This kind of damage may not be evident for many years, but those who live downtown or protested for Black Lives in the summer of 2020 may be at higher risk for kidney and liver problems down the road.

    Simonis is also concerned about the long-term effects of these chemicals on the environment. Their analysis of soil, plants and storm drains reveal a far higher concentration of heavy metals than comparable sites elsewhere in the area. Soil samples from affected areas contain higher than normal amounts of cyanide and chromium. Samples taken in August from storm drains — which lead directly to the Willamette River — contained almost 10 times more toxins than comparable sites. Harmful chemicals such as barium, chromium, copper, lead and zinc all seem posed to contaminate Oregon’s ecosystem. Simonis is especially worried about zinc chloride, which causes bone deformities in young fish and thereby threatens Oregon’s salmon: a staple of both commercial fisheries and protected sea lions.

    Dr. Paul Tratnyek, a chemist and professor at OHSU’s School of Public Health, agrees that heavy metals may have a deleterious effect on the Willamette or Columbia Rivers short term, but believes the environmental impact will fade with time. “In the long run, [the contamination is] not really going to be noticeable because all these sediments are going to settle out in the bottom of the Portland Harbor.” Portland Harbor, already contaminated with chemical runoff from other disasters, will not be made significantly worse by heavy metal runoff from chemical munitions.

    Tratnyek agrees, however, that HC smoke munitions are highly dangerous when used as crowd control. “I was surprised that it was nearly unrestricted for [police] to use these kinds of munitions on protesters.” Tratnyek says that any good-faith review of the subject must result in restrictions on what sort of chemicals police may use against protesters.

    What Can Be Done?

    Until dangerous chemical munitions like HC smoke are banned domestically as well as abroad, protesters can mitigate the danger with proper equipment. Simonis recommends covering all skin to avoid absorption of zinc chloride smoke. Eye protection is a must. Respirators are important, but even the best filter cannot block everything. The most important way to protect oneself is to move away from the smoke quickly, find fresh air and breathe deeply to expel the poisonous smoke as quickly as possible.

    When HC gas contacts bare skin, the best remedy is water — the more pressure, the better. Simonis recommends a garden hose over a shower. Clothing absorbs the smoke and should be re-soaked, then washed separately from other, non-contaminated clothing.

    Protesters often attempt to extinguish munitions with water, but Simonis cautions against this when it comes to HC smoke. Water can react with hexachloroethane and zinc oxide to explode and make a bad situation much worse.

    None of these solves the root problem, of course: The United States’s routine use of potentially lethal chemical weapons in urban areas, often during peaceful or nonviolent protests, in ways that affect the entire populace as well as the environment. “I plead with all law enforcement agencies who have HC in their arsenal to decommission it immediately,” Simonis said. “There is no reason for any police agency to possess it.”

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • A member of the Ku Klux Klan has been sentenced to three years and eight months in prison on charges of driving his pickup truck through a crowd of Black Lives Matter protesters in Virginia.

    KKK

    Harry Rogers, 37, of Hanover County, was convicted of three counts of assault and battery, one count of destruction of property, and one count of failure to stop at the scene of an accident in connection with the attack last June in Henrico County near Richmond, the state capital, news outlets reported.

    Rogers pleaded guilty on 5 February and had three felony charges and a fourth misdemeanour assault count dropped. He was originally sentenced to six years in jail in August, but he appealed that conviction.

    The authorities said Rogers struck at least two people after driving over a strip of land near a Confederate monument and then through a group of protesters in the road. Nobody was seriously injured, although officials said he ran over a man’s toe and twice hit a woman who stepped in front of the truck.

    Defence attorney George Townsend argued that the protesters who were struck put themselves in the vehicle’s way. Townsend had previously said Rogers was a member of the KKK.

    “Cockroaches”

    Before he was arrested, Rogers boasted about the incident on social media. He said on a Facebook live video played in court:

    This Chevrolet 2500 went up on the curb and through the protest. They started scattering like (expletive) cockroaches … It’s kind of funny if you ask me.”

    He told the court on 9 February that he was sorry for his actions, and said he “didn’t make the right decisions that day”. The incident came last year amid nationwide protests against racial injustice and law enforcement treatment of minorities after the police custody death of George Floyd in Minneapolis.

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • Remember when Americans shook the earth with massive protests demanding an end to the police state and the entire liberal establishment just kept saying “I hear you, I agree with you” and then did absolutely nothing to even reduce police brutality? It’s important to remember such lessons.

    People would ask me “Why are you supporting Black Lives Matter Caitlin?? Don’t you see all the corporations and corporate Dems support it? Why would they do that if it didn’t serve them?” This is why they did it. Empty words of support can defuse a situation far easier than open opposition.

    Imagine if all the plutocrats, pundits and politicians had just yelled at the BLM protesters and admonished them to stop? It would have only turned people against them with far more aggression, and it would have exposed the fact that they are the enemy. It’s much more effective to say “I hear you, I agree with you” with no intention of taking any real action.

    And really this is all institutions like the Democratic Party exist to do: defuse left populism and crush grassroots activism not with opposition, but with empty words of agreement that have no intention of action behind them. They’re just a bottomless pit that tricks people into pouring their energy into it, thereby stopping all leftward movement.

    A kid who doesn’t want to clean their room will tell their parents “No! I don’t wanna!” A very clever kid who doesn’t want to clean their room will say “Yes! I’ll get on that right away” and then enjoy hours of peace and relaxation without parental nagging, and without cleaning. It’s the exact same way with the powerful. It’s much more efficacious for them to pretend to be on your side than expose the fact that they’re not. In the end the result is the same: the kid doesn’t clean their room. But they don’t get the kind of pushback they’d get if they said no.

    Manipulators are good at manipulation. The people who make their way to the top in a corrupt system are manipulators. You can’t take their words at face value, mustn’t mistake vapid placation for victory. They’ll happily give you a mountain of words in exchange for your real treasure.

    They’re so used to manipulating Americans into believing narratives that wildly differ from reality they were like “We’ll tell them $1400 is $2000, they won’t notice.”

    The world would be greatly improved if Americans became far more powerful and their government/military/media became far less powerful.

    Yemen alone, just by itself, is a sufficient argument for the dismantling of the entire US-centralized power alliance.

    To be clear, Yemen isn’t some tragedy that we are passively witnessing. Civilians are being deliberately targeted and starved with the backing of the US, UK, Australia, Canada and France. Our governments are helping to inflict this horror upon innocents. And it may get worse.

    A world order which can create something as horrific as the atrocities in Yemen or the unforgivable Iraq invasion is not a world order that will lead the world in a good direction. The facts are in. The US-led world order must end.

    “You hate all US politicians Caitlin! You can’t name a single one you like!”

    That’s like wanting me to pick a favorite Nazi leader. It’s a system which only elevates assholes who will cooperate with a machine that is fueled by human blood. You just don’t see how ugly it is yet.

    Anti-imperialism makes you look like a radical, because it makes you reject even the politicians who are considered “radical” in mainstream discourse since they are all imperialists. In reality there’s nothing radical about opposing the mass slaughter of innocents; it’s just being a normal human being. Basic human sanity is often painted as “radical” because most people have no understanding of how bat shit insane our current world order is.

    The surest way to get rich in media is to spread lies which serve the interests of the powerful. The surest way to get labeled a “grifter” is to do literally the exact opposite of this.

    It’s not enough to reject mainstream politics, we need to reject mainstream culture as well. The propagandists understand that politics is downstream from culture, so we should too. The culture manufacturers in New York and LA are not your friend; they are an extension of the empire.

    We who oppose the empire must reject its manufactured culture with the same disgust with which we reject its political lackeys and news media. We must create our own culture to outshine the manufactured garbage they are shoving down everyone’s throats.

    If you want normal people to listen to an idea, you’ve got to make it easy to understand and you’ve got to make it interesting. No normal human being going about their life has any incentive to listen to you unless you do both of these things. The onus isn’t on them, it’s on you.

    Telling people to read theory doesn’t work. How narcissistic would you have to be to think you can just tell some stranger to read Marx or Lenin or whatever and they’ll go “Well that complete rando ordered me to invest my scarce time and energy in this so I’d better do it”? No. This is our job.

    Whenever I bring this up people say stuff like “It’s not a popularity contest Caitlin”. Yes it fucking is! You want your ideas to be more popular than the shitty, self-destructive, soul-crushing, world-destroying ideas which support the status quo. This won’t happen by itself.

    It’s not enough to be right. You can’t save the world just by holding the right beliefs in your obscure corner of the information ecosystem. That’s like believing life will reward you if you’re a nice person on the inside. Share the ideas. Make them simple, make them interesting.

    One of the many advantages manipulators have over sincere people is that sincere people have no idea how very, very much better at manipulation a manipulator is than them, in the same way a chess newbie has no understanding of how many skill levels they are below a chess master.

    This is why it’s so important for us to have the humility to know that we can be manipulated, and that we can be manipulated in ways we hadn’t even thought of. Ways we wouldn’t think of in a million years, because we are not that sort of creature.

    When you’re in an abusive relationship, leaving seems impossible. After you escape, you look back and see that most of the barriers to leaving which felt so real at the time were illusory mental constructs. Escaping our abusive relationship with our oppressors will be like that.

    Freeing ourselves and creating a healthy world is not impossible. There are no solid walls preventing us from leaving the abusive relationship. The door’s not even locked. The only thing holding us in place is mental manipulation via mass media propaganda. It’s all in our head.

    Image

    ______________________________

    Feature image via Wikimedia Commons.

    Thanks for reading! The best way to get around the internet censors and make sure you see the stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list for at  or on Substack, which will get you an email notification for everything I publish. My work is , so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around, liking me on , following my antics on , or throwing some money into my tip jar on  or . If you want to read more you can buy my new book Poems For Rebels (you can also download a PDF for five bucks) or my old book . For more info on who I am, where I stand, and what I’m trying to do with this platform, . Everyone, racist platforms excluded,  to republish, use or translate any part of this work (or anything else I’ve written) in any way they like free of charge.

    Bitcoin donations:1Ac7PCQXoQoLA9Sh8fhAgiU3PHA2EX5Zm2

    This post was originally published on Caitlin Johnstone.

  • Racial justice, police accountability, mutual aid, climate activism and warp-speed vaccines – we examine the ways our COVID-19 year changed American society. 

    Don’t miss out on the next big story. Get the Weekly Reveal newsletter today.

    This post was originally published on Reveal.

  • By Roni Roseberg

    TRIGGER WARNING: This blog discusses sensitive themes.

    My first pregnancy was perfect. When my son was two years old, I then discovered I was pregnant again.

    I wanted to give him a sibling and things were going along well until just after I announced the second pregnancy to family and friends.

    Who would have suspected that I’d be in the hospital with a miscarriage that night? But that is what happened, to our disappointment.

    It was while I was recovering that I noticed the many white blossoms on the ground around our apple tree. I then realised that not all flowers become fruit. Nature has her ways. And so, I accepted the loss.

    My personal life was in flux for a while, so I didn’t attempt another pregnancy for two more years. At the time, I’d not have admitted it openly, but I realised that I wanted another baby despite the awareness that the fate of my marriage was unsure.

    I had no illusions about the arrival of another child cementing the relationship; I simply wanted another child, and I was 34. To some, my choice might have seemed irresponsible, but I knew that life doesn’t give us unlimited chances.

    I got pregnant again.

    mateus-campos-felipe--ABgj_gy_D4-unsplash

    Halfway through that pregnancy – too soon for the baby to survive at birth but far enough along for me to have felt his vigorous kicking – I nearly went into labour. When I went to the doctor with some suspicious signs, he whisked me off immediately to the hospital, explaining that he had to sew my womb shut to keep the baby inside.

    I had something called ‘incompetent cervix’, not a confidence-building name. It was likely caused by a procedure undertaken when I had the previous miscarriage.

    The doctor explained that early in a pregnancy, sewing the uterus shut is a relatively easy and safe procedure. However, at 20 weeks (where I was), it was very risky, and I could lose the baby.

    I was briefly put under anaesthetic and woke up feeling okay, but I was lying in a bed tilted at an angle.

    I was not allowed to get up for five days. At night, I’d dream that the bed was straightening itself out. During the day, I worried about my baby.

    Sometime during that week, my doctor came to examine me and announced that things were not healing. My uterine sutures would have to come out, and I would go into labour.

    I had a deep sense that my baby was well and fighting to live. I was fighting, too, and using visualisation techniques to promote healing. I begged the doctor to give me 24 more hours.

    Because he was a good doctor, and he trusted me, he said yes. He even came in on his day off to check on me. It was that trust that saved my son.

    In those 24 hours, things took a turn for the better, and I was soon discharged and went home. I rested for a couple of weeks and was even able to return to my teaching job.

    I carried nearly to term, and my son was born healthy. Today, he is a magnificent young man, soon to be married and enjoying life.

    Had my doctor not been such a good doctor and had he not trusted me, my son wouldn’t be here today.

    And had my doctor, a man of African-American descent, not been accepted into medical school due to someone’s prejudice, or had not been hired by my healthcare provider, a professional would not have reached his goals of saving lives.

    An immeasurable amount of good would have been lost.

    Life in the USA: The need to challenge racism

    shutterstock_449427922

    Prior to the terrible murder of George Floyd on 25th May 2020, it was no secret how African-Americans and people of colour were facing discrimination across the United States.

    When previously questioned on the issue, around 3 out of 5 Americans said that they believe race relations in the USA are “bad”.

    Research undertaken by the Pew Research Centre in 2019 (based on the views of 6,637 adults) found that:

    About eight-in-ten blacks (78%) say the country hasn’t gone far enough when it comes to giving black people equal rights with whites, and fully half say it’s unlikely that the country will eventually achieve racial equality…

    Blacks are more likely than other groups to say their race has had a negative impact on their ability to get ahead; whites are the most likely to say their race helped them.

    The very doctor who treated me offered me kindness, understanding and a critical level of care.

    So, who could imagine not giving this man a chance to practice medicine, just because of his skin colour?

    Who can accept the mistreatment of medical students by members of staff and fellow students based on protected characteristics including race and also gender and/or sexual orientation?

    Who can support the fact that people of colour in the USA receive “less care – and often worse care – than white Americans?”

    And most critically of all: how can anyone with a conscience accept the death of poor George – and many more like him – at the hands of police brutality?

    Well, I can’t.

    George Floyd: A crucial tipping point

    munshots-_vAC0je-hKo-unsplash

    When I myself used to hear of racial discrimination, I couldn’t help but think of the soft-spoken doctor who held my hand, honoured my judgement, and critically saved my son.

    Now, several weeks after first writing this blog and following George’s death, the protests against the brutality that killed him are on my mind.

    I’m left to sadly reflect on the minuscule amount of progress those of us who favour equal rights for all have seen in the last 50 years.

    When I was an idealistic university student, I felt we could change the world, especially if the unjust could just see what we students saw. I marched, protested, and debated – sure that if others felt our commitment and appreciated the injustices, that things could and would change.

    A few things did change, but not nearly enough. Statistics and face-to-face conversations tell us that people of colour, Muslims, gay and transgender people, and those with disabilities and prison records, are still very much excluded from the good things in life.

    It is not simply a question of: “Work harder, and you will be rewarded”.

    I’ve been in the field of education for a long time, so to me: much of the answer lies in education. It’s clear to me that there is a need for a major overhaul of what is being taught in American schools.

    There would not be such massive deficits in the American public’s cultural literacy if education were better. There would be greater knowledge of Black history and divisive politics would seem less alluring.

    We need to include more subjects and communities in schools. Communities have plenty to contribute towards dialogue on individual, collective and national experiences and needs.

    Additionally, school districts need to loosen ties with publishers of academic materials. Competencies valued in schools need to include greater social awareness as well as academics.

    As an educator and American citizen, I got involved in both education and civil rights to make a better world for my children and others, following the tenet of “tikkun olam” – the Jewish belief in repairing the world.

    This is everyone’s responsibility. We’re all responsible for making the world a better – fairer, most just – place. One element of tikkun olam is therefore sharing, caring, and ending discrimination based on colour, gender, religion and sexual orientation.

    An unselfish world where these things have been abated is the kind of world I want to see my grandchildren and their grandchildren grow up in.

    Let us not put the lessons of today’s social unrest behind us. Let us convert the lessons to move forward as a society.

    Let us honour George’s memory and declare that Black lives matter.

     

    This blog is dedicated to the memory of the late George Floyd. Rest in peace dear brother.

    Take action

    Find out about how you can help the Black Lives Matters movement here.

    20% offPurpleBouquets

    This post was originally published on Voice of Salam.

  • As Americans take to the streets, we hear from the person prosecuting the police officers charged in George Floyd’s killing. We also hear from protesters around the country and remember the history of policing in black communities. 

    Don’t miss out on the next big story. Get the Weekly Reveal newsletter today.

    This post was originally published on Reveal.