Category: China

  • china alternative protein
    6 Mins Read

    China’s annual Two Sessions summit is underway, and two documents released in the lead-up indicate drummed-up government support for alternative proteins.

    As political leaders from across China convene at the annual Two Sessions summit, alternative proteins have received another significant boost in documents released ahead of the meetings.

    Over 10 days, the Two Sessions – so named for the annual meetings of the National People’s Congress and the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference – will see decision-makers ratify legislation, review government work, and set an economic agenda for the forthcoming year.

    Already the global leader in renewable energy, China has been expanding its support for alternative proteins like plant-based or cultivated meat, with experts suggesting that if the country wants to decarbonise, half of its protein consumption must come from alternative sources by 2060.

    Leaders in the US have already highlighted fears of being overtaken by China’s biotech prowess. The government’s current five-year agriculture plan encourages research in cultivated meat and recombinant proteins, while the bioeconomy development plan aims to advance novel foods too. And President Xi Jinping has called for a Grand Food Vision that includes plant-based and microbial protein sources.

    cellx bacon
    CellX’s mycelium bacon prototype | Courtesy: CellX

    Building on this, one of the new documents is an official notice from the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, which outlines key areas for national agricultural science and tech innovation through to 2028.

    The second document came just over a week later. Dubbed the No. 1 Central Document, it is published every February as the year’s first policy statement released by the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and the State Council.

    According to alternative protein think tank the Good Food Institute (GFI) APAC, this is the single most influential document signposting what China considers its top policy goals for agriculture.

    We spoke to Mirte Gosker, managing director of GFI APAC, to break down what the new documents mean for the alternative protein sector in China and the wider Asia-Pacific region.

    This interview has been lightly edited for clarity and concision.

    Green Queen: What did last year’s Two Sessions conference say about alternative proteins?

    Mirte Gosker: Shortly before the kickoff of last year’s Two Sessions conference, China’s Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs (MARA) convened the first meeting of its new Science and Technology Innovation Strategic Advisory Committee, which has been tasked with supercharging food innovation nationwide.

    A few days later, National People’s Congress deputy Xiong Tao, who is also chairman of the publicly traded Angel Yeast Co., submitted a formal proposal to accelerate the development of microbial proteins – an emerging category that harnesses the power of fermentation to create everything from Quorn nuggets to animal-free dairy. His proposal is now under review at MARA.

    lab grown meat china
    Courtesy: Eat Just

    GQ: What is GFI APAC’s take on the official notice issued by the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs?

    MG: This can be interpreted as a blueprint from the highest ranks of China’s agricultural authorities about what they believe are top domestic priorities.

    Among the priority areas identified were:

    1. “Agricultural processing and food manufacturing”, including “research on novel food resource development technology”, which the document says can “create a new generation of food to meet new scenarios and special needs”;
    2. “Agricultural product quality and safety”, including studies to assess the safety and nutritional efficacy of alternative proteins and other novel resources.

    These explicit mentions of novel foods are expected to drive more R&D funding towards alternative proteins. Reading the full document in context, analysts anticipate a special emphasis on the development of technologies like microbiomics and AI, which can optimise food production processes, identify new protein formulations and raw materials, and reduce costs.

    GQ: What does the No. 1 Central Document say about alternative proteins? What’s your take on this?

    MG: Among this year’s goals outlined in the No. 1 Central Document is “building a diversified food supply system” including efforts “to cultivate and develop biological agriculture and explore novel food resources.”

    (“Biological agriculture” in this context can be interpreted as agriculture enhanced by biotechnology, rather than conventional farming methods.)

    The document’s authors specifically mention a need for “expanding food sources through multiple channels”, including fungal and algae-based protein extraction techniques used in the development of many plant-based and fermentation-derived products.

    Additionally, the No. 1 Central Document calls for strengthening “supervision” of food safety and agricultural product quality – a step seen as important to establishing broad consumer trust and market adoption of new protein sources.

    The fact that food safety was specifically referenced in both documents sends a clear message to national regulators: Now is the time to develop comprehensive approval frameworks that can enable emerging food categories to thrive.

    plant based milk china
    Courtesy: Viee

    GQ: How do you view China’s alternative protein ecosystem and the government’s support?

    MG: As the world’s single largest meat market, China has huge incentives to transition towards smarter ways of satisfying soaring protein demand. Conventional methods are highly inefficient: feeding up to 100 calories of crops to a cow produces just one calorie of beef.

    This squandering of resources also creates an uneasy dependence on the West, as millions of tonnes of soybeans and corn are imported to satisfy the demand for animal feed. 

    In other words, by mastering the art of making delicious and affordable protein from plants, microbes, and other novel sources, China can produce a whole lot more of it, while bolstering its self-sufficiency.

    GQ: Do you expect any novel food approvals in the country this year?

    MG: While there is currently no regulatory process through which Chinese companies can apply for the market approval of novel proteins like cultivated meat, representatives from the corresponding regulatory body, the China National Center for Food Safety Risk Assessment, have mentioned at recent conferences that they are paying close attention to international developments and working to create a robust framework for cultivated meat safety assessment. 

    In the meantime, the development of cultivated meat has continued to accelerate across the country. Last August, GFI APAC worked with Chinese partners to co-organise the first-ever China-Singapore scientific symposium, which brought together dozens of experts from academia, industry, and government.

    At the closed-door event, Chinese and Singaporean scientists exchanged insights on techniques to scale up alternative meat industrialisation, including layering flavour pockets from cultivated animal cells into plant-based protein sheets to make hybrid products, and designing innovative bioreactors that reduce cultivated meat production costs by leveraging computer simulations to test for optimal growth conditions.

    GQ: What makes you hopeful about the APAC future food system in 2025?

    china new protein centre
    Courtesy: Fengtai District Media Integration Center

    MG: Across Asia, countries are investing in R&D and manufacturing infrastructure that could thrust the alt protein sector into commercial viability – pulling from the proven playbook used to scale up solar energy and electric vehicles.

    South Korea is expected to issue its first cultivated meat approvals this year, and Thailand is hot on its heels. China just opened its first alt-protein innovation centre in Beijing; Malaysia’s prime minister commissioned a cultivated-meat industry feasibility study; and GFI is leading efforts to coordinate regional regulatory frameworks, so that startups can simultaneously roll out products in multiple markets. 

    Just as renewables are central to satisfying soaring energy demand, there is enormous economic opportunity in producing protein more efficiently. As our planet warms, countries will need innovative ways to make more meat with fewer resources – and Asia is once again laying the groundwork to sell the world what it needs.

    The post Two Sessions: Why China is Betting on Alternative Proteins in Its Annual Political Summit appeared first on Green Queen.

    This post was originally published on Green Queen.


  • This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Radio Free Asia.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Trump’s trade war against the US’s neighbors Mexico and Canada, as well as China, continues with sweeping tariffs on the three countries going into effect just after midnight on Tuesday, March 4. A 25% tariff was added on all imports from Canada and Mexico, and an additional 10% tariff on imports from China.

    On March 5, Trump granted a one-month exemption on imports from Mexico and Canada for US automakers, following a conversation with the three largest auto manufacturers in the country: Ford, General Motors, and Stellantis, according to an announcement by White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt. Other levies remain in place.

    The post Trump’s Trade War Escalates, Canada Responds With Retaliatory Tariffs appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • The Donald Trump administration has made it clear that the top two priorities of the US government are to weaken China and to strengthen Wall Street.

    The small Central American nation of Panama has found itself at the center of Trump’s strategy.

    In his inauguration speech on January 20, the US president falsely claimed that “China is operating the [Panama] canal”, and he insisted “we’re taking it back”. In a press conference two weeks before, Trump implied that he was willing to use military force to take over the canal if Panama refused to give the United States effective control.

    The post Trump Helps BlackRock Buy Panama Canal Ports To Weaken China appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • Hong Kong’s Court of Final Appeal on Thursday overturned the convictions of jailed human rights lawyer Chow Hang-tung and two fellow organizers of a candlelit vigil for victims of the 1989 Tiananmen massacre, although the three have already served their sentences.

    The ruling was a rare legal upset for the government’s ongoing crackdown on dissent.

    The court ruled unanimously that Chow, a former leader of the now-dissolved Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements in China, and former alliance members Tang Ngok-kwan and Tsui Hon-kwong, hadn’t received a fair trial.

    The ruling relates to charges of failing to hand over alliance documents to national security police, a requirement that only applies to “foreign agents.”

    Chow, Tang and Tsui were jailed in 2023 for four-and-a-half months each for refusing to comply with the request.

    The Court of Final Appeal cited the use of documents by the prosecution that were “heavily redacted” as a key plank in its decision.

    Tang Ngok-kwan, center, a core member of the Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements of China, and Medina Chow Lau Wah-chun, left, mother of Chow Hang-tung, a core member, leave the Court of Final Appeal in Hong Kong, March 6, 2025.
    Tang Ngok-kwan, center, a core member of the Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements of China, and Medina Chow Lau Wah-chun, left, mother of Chow Hang-tung, a core member, leave the Court of Final Appeal in Hong Kong, March 6, 2025.
    (AP)

    “The Court held that in such circumstances the redactions were not only self-defeating by removing from evidence the only material relied upon for establishing that the [Alliance] were foreign agents, but also made it impossible for the Appellants to have a fair trial as they were deprived of all knowledge as to the nature of the prosecution’s case on an essential element of the offense,” the judgment said.

    “Accordingly, the Court unanimously allowed the appeals, and quashed the convictions and sentences.”

    ‘Convincing reasons’

    Chow made a V sign for “victory” in court after hearing the decision.

    Former Alliance member Tang Ngok-kwan told reporters outside the court on Thursday that the ruling had proved that the Alliance was never a “foreign agent” as accused by police.

    “Chow Hang-tung … played a leading role in the process and put forward very convincing reasons to explain why the police’s request was an abuse of power, which made us more confident,” Tang said. “She was hugely important in bringing this about.”

    “If we hadn’t persisted, we would have been forced to give in, and in the end, the Court of Final Appeal also checked and prevented this abuse of power,” he said.

    RELATED STORIES

    Jailed Hong Kong activist Chow Hang-tung says judges ‘complicit’ in ‘police state’

    Hong Kong police arrest six people for ‘seditious’ Facebook posts

    Third foreign judge to quit Hong Kong’s final appeal court

    Embattled Hong Kong women rights defenders deserve support and solidarity

    Overseas-based lawyer Kevin Yam said the police had acted “outrageously” in demanding the Alliance’s documents.

    “The Hong Kong police went too far,” he said. “They were deliberately testing how far the National Security Law would allow them to go.”

    He said the police actions hadn’t even met the standards of courts in mainland China, which are tasked with doing the bidding of the ruling Chinese Communist Party.

    ‘Crime’ of organizing a vigil

    Chow remains behind bars pending a separate trial for “incitement to subversion” under the 2020 National Security Law, alongside two other former Alliance leaders, rights lawyer Albert Ho and labor unionist Lee Cheuk-yan.

    “Their ‘crime’ is being the organisers of the large public annual vigil which was held in Hong Kong every year on 4 June from 1990 to 2020, to commemorate the victims of the Beijing Massacre on 4 June 1989,” former Hong Kong Bar Association Chairman Paul Harris wrote in a March 6 op-ed piece for the British legal paper The Counsel.

    Harris criticized British Prime Minister Keir Starmer for not stopping to listen when he tried to raise Chow’s case with him in 2024.

    “This was a bad omen for the attitude of a new Labour government towards Hong Kong,” Harris wrote. “Since then my fears have been realised as I watched Chancellor Rachel Reeves’ trade promotion visit to Beijing in which Hong Kong seems to have been studiously ignored.”

    Chow has been behind bars since 2021, when she was a recently engaged 36-year-old, with most of that time served in pretrial detention, he said.

    “Like her co-defendants, she is detained simply for exercising the rights of free speech and freedom of assembly which were guaranteed to them by Britain and China in 1984, and which are exercised by everyone in the U.K. all the time,” he said.

    The United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention has stated that her detention is arbitrary, and Amnesty International has recognized her as a prisoner of conscience, he added.

    Setback for free speech

    The Court of Final Appeal also ruled on Thursday in the sedition case of talk-show host and People Power activist Tam Tak-chi, the first Hong Kong person tried on a sedition charge since the city’s handover from British to Chinese rule in 1997.

    Tam had appealed on the basis that free speech must be protected, and that incitement to violence must be proven in sedition cases, but the court rejected that argument on Thursday, upholding his conviction.

    Tam, also known by his nickname Fast Beat, was found guilty on eight counts of sedition linked to slogans he either spoke or wrote between January and July 2020.

    Hong Kong talk show host Tam Tak-chi is escorted, in hand-restraints, to court from Lai Chi Kok Reception Centre, March 2, 2021.
    Hong Kong talk show host Tam Tak-chi is escorted, in hand-restraints, to court from Lai Chi Kok Reception Centre, March 2, 2021.
    (Kin Cheung/AP)

    He is also being tried for “inciting an illegal assembly” and “disorderly conduct,” after he gave a number of public speeches calling for the “liberation” of Hong Kong, some of which were peppered with Cantonese swear-words.

    Tam also stands accused of using the now-banned slogan of the 2019 protest movement — “Free Hong Kong, revolution now!” — and of saying that the authorities should “delay no more” in disbanding the police force, using a homonym for a Cantonese epithet involving the target’s mother.

    Tam allegedly also shouted: “Down with the [ruling] Chinese Communist Party (CCP)!”

    1938 law

    In the sweeping colonial-era legislation under which Tam’s charges were brought, sedition is defined as any words that generate “hatred, contempt or dissatisfaction” with the government, or “encourage disaffection.”

    The law was passed under British rule in 1938, and is widely regarded as illiberal and anti-free speech. However, by the turn of the century, it had lain dormant on the statute books for decades, until being resurrected for use against opposition politicians, activists, and participants in the 2019 protest movement.

    The Court rejected Tam’s appeal on Thursday, in a move that the overseas-based Hong Kong Democracy Council said would have “wide-ranging implications” for future sedition cases in Hong Kong.

    “It’ll allow the regime to continue to easily convict for sedition,” the Council said via its X account. “Up to now it has a 100% conviction rate … The regime’s used sedition to throttle political speech.”

    Kevin Yam said the decision had “set human rights protections in Hong Kong back 70 years, to the 1950s.”

    “The chances of being found guilty … are now much greater,” he said, in a reference to “sedition” charges.

    Exiled former pro-democracy lawmaker Ted Hui, who is himself wanted by national security police, said the use of “sedition” charges was tantamount to a “literary inquisition” in Hong Kong.

    “The door is wide open for the government to use sedition as political retaliation against anyone who says some embarrassing to the government, for example criticizing the budget for cutting bus concessions for the elderly,” Hui told RFA Mandarin.

    “The court has made the threshold for sedition convictions very low indeed,” he said.

    Translated by Luisetta Mudie. Edited by Malcolm Foster.


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Chen Zifei for RFA Mandarin.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Lauded by supreme leader Mao Zedong as a role model, 1960s exemplary soldier Lei Feng is getting renewed attention in China under President Xi Jinping’s push for patriotic education.

    The ruling Communist Party’s propaganda machine has been churning out stories about Lei washing his comrades’ feet and darning their socks after a long march, propaganda posters of him helping villagers lay sandbags or wielding hand-grenades in a snowstorm, as well as a slew of books and patriotic movies about his life.

    Much of the story is fiction, many commentators say, but it’s officially sanctioned and may not be questioned.

    March 5 has been designated “Learn from Lei Feng Day,” and young people across the country attended ideological courses on him, “so that the Lei Feng spirit will shine in the new era,” state broadcaster CCTV said.

    Meanwhile, volunteers turned out in cities and rural areas to offer their skills and expertise for free, from haircuts and blood pressure checks to lessons in how to use technology, it said.

    “Young volunteers are … patiently teaching the elderly to use smartphones, and popularizing anti-fraud knowledge,” CCTV said. “In the fields, volunteers bring professional agricultural technology training to growers [and] deliver practical agricultural knowledge to farmers.”

    The party-backed Global Times newspaper described Lei as “a late soldier renowned for his generosity and altruistic deeds” in a post to X on March 5.

    “Groups of volunteers, including soldiers, police officers and lawyers, provided various free services for residents and visitors, such as hairdressing, legal consultation and career planning in downtown #Shanghai,” the post said.

    Image protected by defamation laws

    Lei’s image as an icon of Chinese communism is protected by laws banning the “defamation” of People’s Liberation Army personnel, and of the Communist Party’s “revolutionary heroes and martyrs.”

    In 2017, TV host Liang Hongda sparked a furious backlash in state media for “defaming” Lei after he suggested that much of the propaganda around the soldier was staged.

    Chinese 'model worker and soldier hero' Lei Feng is shown in an undated photo.
    Chinese ‘model worker and soldier hero’ Lei Feng is shown in an undated photo.
    (Public Domain)

    “Lei Feng is a role model that all Chinese young people learn from,” state news agency Xinhua wrote in a 2023 feature article about people who take Lei’s reported selflessness as a model.

    “Times change, but we still need the Lei Feng spirit,” the article said. “The things he did may seem trivial, but behind them was a nobility that we can all achieve.”

    It cited the sacrifice of a character in science-fiction author Liu Cixin’s blockbuster novel The Wandering Earth who gave his life to save the planet, saying Lei’s spirit of self-sacrifice still has a place in an age of high technology.

    Born to poor peasant family

    According to the official account, Lei Feng was born in a poor peasant family in Hunan’s Wangcheng county in 1940, and “lived a life of hunger and cold from childhood.”

    After Mao proclaimed the People’s Republic of China in 1949, Lei became a diligent disciple of Mao’s political writings, the story goes, although there is widespread skepticism around the official hagiography of Lei.

    Pictures of late People's Liberation Army soldier Lei Feng, Chinese President Xi Jinping and late Chinese Chairman Mao Zedong overlook a courtyard in Shanghai, China, September 26, 2017.
    Pictures of late People’s Liberation Army soldier Lei Feng, Chinese President Xi Jinping and late Chinese Chairman Mao Zedong overlook a courtyard in Shanghai, China, September 26, 2017.
    (Aly Song/REUTERS)

    “Under the nourishment of Mao Zedong Thought, he grew up to be a great proletarian revolutionary fighter, an outstanding member of the Communist Party of China, and a good son of the motherland and the people,” according to the description of a 1963 book about Lei Feng’s life titled: Lei Feng: Mao Zedong’s Good Soldier.

    The official account of his death in 1962 — that a power pole fell on him — was overturned in 1997 when his former comrade Qiao Anshan confessed to having crushed Lei by reversing into the power pole with a truck that the pair of them had been ordered to wash.

    RELATED STORIES

    China passes ‘patriotic education’ law to reinforce party line

    Comics Chief Pays Tribute at Chinese Hero’s Memorial After Internet Ban

    Chinese Media Denounces TV Host Who ‘Defamed’ Communist Hero

    China moves to boost ‘patriotic education,’ including in Hong Kong

    The ongoing veneration of “revolutionary heroes” is part of a nationwide enforcement of patriotic feeling under Communist Party leader Xi Jinping.

    The Patriotic Education Law, which took effect on Jan. 1, 2024, was passed in a bid to boost patriotic feeling among the country’s youth, and applies to local and central government departments, schools and even families.

    It also forms part of the government’s “ethnic unity” policy, which has included forcible assimilation schemes targeting Uyghur Muslims in Xinjiang, along with bans on ethnic minority language-teaching in Inner Mongolia and among Tibetan communities in Sichuan.

    Little interest

    Li Meng, a resident of the eastern province of Jiangsu, said there is scant interest in Lei Feng among ordinary Chinese, however.

    “They’re promoting learning from Lei Feng, but ordinary people living in the real world don’t buy it,” Li told RFA Mandarin in an interview on Thursday.

    “Telling the truth, doing good deeds and helping others don’t always have a good outcome.”

    The government has to work extra hard to get people to think about Lei, said a resident of the eastern province of Shandong who gave only the surname Lu for fear of reprisals.

    “Everyone knows that local governments are just intervening to get people to [learn from Lei Feng],” she said. “It’s all fake, and not worth bothering with.”

    “They tell so many lies, they even believe them themselves,” Lu said.

    Scholar Lu Chenyuan said Lei Feng’s image is a product of the party propaganda machine.

    “Lei Feng’s actions, including the photos, were staged,” Lu said. “Anyone with a little bit of intelligence knows that.”

    “There’s no way that such a fake idol can improve the morality of the Chinese people.”

    He said figures like Lei Feng are a feature of totalitarian rule.

    “They promote illusory moral idols and try to reshape social morality with the help of past propaganda models,” Lu said. “But it won’t have any practical effect.”

    Translated by Luisetta Mudie. Edited by Malcolm Foster.


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Qian Lang for RFA Mandarin.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • China holds hundreds of thousands of its own officials in solitary, incommunicado detention each year, depriving them of legal representation in a practice known as “liuzhi,” according to overseas-based rights groups.

    The liuzhi system, which means “retention in custody,” is run by the ruling Communist Party’s disciplinary arm, the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection, or CCDI.

    It allows party investigators to “forcefully disappear, arbitrarily detain and torture individuals for up to six months,” the Spain-based rights group Safeguard Defenders said in a March 3 report.

    “All without any judicial oversight or appeal mechanism, the system is specifically designed to force confessions from the victims,” it said.

    Who can be detained in this way?

    The liuzhi system is part of the Communist Party’s internal investigation system.

    That means that anyone working in state or party organizations, from school administrators and hospital managers to executives at state-owned enterprises, can be disappeared in this way.

    Even private business owners with close ties to government officials have been netted by the liuzhi system, according to a CNN investigation.

    Disappeared former Foreign Minister Qin Gang is a possible victim of the liuzhi system, although the government has made nothing public about his sacking.

    And Beijing has yet to shed any light on the fate of disappeared former Defense Minister Li Shangfu, despite a storm of media and social media speculation, since firing him from his post as defense minister on Oct. 24, 2023 with no explanation given.

    Qin, 57, has been absent from public view since he met with the foreign ministers of Sri Lanka and Vietnam, and with the Russian deputy foreign minister in Beijing on June 25, 2023.

    RELATED STORIES

    Where is Foreign Minister Qin Gang? China’s foreign ministry ‘has no information’

    China fires defense minister Li Shangfu with no replacement

    Rights groups call for release of Chinese lawyer who’s been missing for 6 years

    Is liuzhi a new kind of detention?

    According to Chinese Human Rights Defenders, or CHRD, the liuzhi system isn’t new, but has expanded in scale and scope under President Xi Jinping.

    Some 200,000 people are believed to have been held under the system since 2018, when it replaced the “shuangliu” investigation system, according to compilations of official figures.

    The liuzhi system was among reforms brought in since Xi took power, and “rapidly started moving the country even further away from the most basic human rights standards,” Safeguard Defenders said in its report this week.

    First authorized under the 2018 National Supervision Law, the liuzhi system allows party investigators to forcefully disappear any person of interest for up to six months, under mandatory solitary confinement, it said.

    “The vast majority of victims are kept from any type of communication with the outside world and their family members are not informed of their whereabouts (or even the retention itself),” it said, adding that people can be held anywhere from custom-built facilities to government-run hotels, guesthouses or offices.

    And the system operates wholly outside the the criminal justice system, there is no way to appeal or exercise oversight, the report said.

    Why are rights groups highlighting this now?

    The number of people in liuzhi keeps rising every year, with the number of detainees rising from 26,000 in 2023 to 38,000 in 2024, an increase of 46%, CHRD said, describing it as “the harshest form of investigation.”

    “All are victims of the CCDI’s systematic and widespread use of arbitrary detention, enforced disappearances and torture (due to the prolonged use of solitary confinement),” the group said.

    CHRD said the sheer scale of arbitrary detention in China could amount to a “crime against humanity.”

    “These patterns echo a concern set out since 2017 by the United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention: that the scope and scale of wrongful detention by Chinese authorities may constitute crimes against humanity,” the Chinese Human Rights Defenders network said in a statement launching the report on Wednesday.

    It called for independent, international investigations into the Chinese government’s use of arbitrary detention as possible crimes against humanity.

    Translated with additional reporting by Luisetta Mudie. Edited by Malcolm Foster.

    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Lucie Lo for RFA Mandarin.

  • TAIPEI, Taiwan – Chinese authorities have arbitrarily detained thousands of people for peacefully defending or exercising their rights over the past six years and convicted 1,545 prisoners of conscience, a rights group said on Wednesday.

    Chinese Human Rights Defenders, or CHRD, a non-government organization of domestic and overseas Chinese rights activists, said the scope and scale of wrongful detention by Chinese authorities may constitute crimes against humanity.

    “They were sentenced and imprisoned on charges that stem from laws that are not in conformity with the Chinese government’s domestic and international human rights obligations,” the group said in a report.

    “Their cases proceeded through the full criminal justice system, with police, prosecutors, and courts arbitrarily depriving them of their liberty in violation of their human rights.”

    Prisoners of conscience have faced severe penalties, with an average sentence of six years, increasing to seven for national security charges.

    Three people, identified as Tashpolat Tiyip, Sattar Sawut and Yang Hengjun, were sentenced to death, while two, Rahile Dawut and Abdurazaq Sayim, received life sentences, the group said, adding that 48 were jailed for at least a decade.

    Map of sentenced prisoners of conscience across mainland China excluding Hong Kong and Macao.
    Map of sentenced prisoners of conscience across mainland China excluding Hong Kong and Macao.
    (CHRD)

    Among the convicted, women activists and marginalized groups, including ethnic Tibetans and Uyghurs, were disproportionately represented among those wrongfully detained, the group said.

    Out of all the prisoners of conscience aged 60 or older, two-thirds were women, it added.

    “Human rights experts and international experts have raised that people over the age of 60 should generally not be held in custody due to the effects on their physical and mental health,” Angeli Datt, research consultant with CHRD, told journalists in a press briefing Wednesday.

    “That two-thirds of them are women was really shocking to me,” she said.

    “Worse still, the impunity Chinese government officials enjoy at home emboldens them to commit abuses abroad,” the group said.

    China dismissed a Swiss report last month alleging that it pressures Tibetans and Uyghurs in Switzerland to spy on their communities.

    ‘Endangering national security’

    The CHRD said that under Chinese leader Xi Jinping, the scope and scale of the use of arbitrary detention to silence critics and punish human rights personnel had grown.

    The organization documented a total of 58 individuals known to have been convicted of “endangering national security.”

    “The overall average prison sentence for a national security crime is 6.72 years, though this figure excludes those sentenced to death with a two-year reprieve or life imprisonment,” it said.

    In Hong Kong, more people were convicted of “subversion” and “inciting subversion” — terms that the U.N. describes as “broad and imprecise, making them prone to misapplication and misuse.”

    In one 2024 case, authorities convicted 45 people for participating in a primary election, an act fully protected under both domestic and international law. Subversion charges accounted for 37% of all prisoners of conscience sentenced in Hong Kong during this period.

    RELATED STORIES

    Report: China has half a million Uyghurs in prison or detention

    Hong Kong’s Democratic Party plans to disband amid ‘political environment’

    China extends prison term for Tibetan environmental activist after he rejects charges

    China also punishes individuals for political activities related to Taiwan under broad judicial guidelines that criminalize discussions on Taiwan’s status, advocacy for referendums, and support for its international participation. These rules allow trials in absentia and the death penalty, instilling fear among Taiwanese citizens who uphold democratic freedoms.

    In August 2024, for instance, a Zhejiang court sentenced former Taiwanese activist Yang Chih-yuan, 34, to nine years for separatism.

    A former Taiwanese politician turned pro-independence advocate, he moved to China in 2022, avoiding politics to teach a strategy game.

    Despite this, he was detained in August, placed under “residential surveillance,” and arrested in April 2023 – reportedly the first Taiwanese convicted under China’s new rules targeting Taiwan-related political activities.

    “When defenders are imprisoned for this work and silenced, people and governments around the world are left without information about domestic developments, and without allies for reform,” said CHRD.

    Edited by Taejun Kang.


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Alan Lu for RFA.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Donald Trump’s second term may not be all bad for all nations, especially China. According to many Chinese internet users, Trump’s policies have unwittingly strengthened their country. This is why he has earned the popular nickname “Chuan Jianguo,” which means “Make China Great.”

    Trump’s first term made at least three notable contributions to China’s rise:

    First, his presidency shattered the image of the US as a paragon of democracy for many Chinese, revealing political chaos and deep societal divisions in the US. For decades, some Chinese idealized the United States as a “beautiful country”: the literal translation of the Chinese name for the US.

    The post Trump 2.0: The View From China appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • China’s health care system has recently come to public consciousness in the US with “TikTok Refugees” on Red Note comparing healthcare in the two countries.

    In today’s China report, we will explore health care under China’s health system and contrast it with that of the US’s privatized system.

    Our understanding of China — and U.S.-China relations — has become a defining feature of all global politics. The China Report is a new show produced in collaboration with Pivot to Peace where every week, journalist Amanda Yee and political analyst KJ Noh will be helping you through all the propaganda with an independent view of the country we are taught to hate, but know so little about.

    The post People vs Profits: China And US Health Care Systems Compared appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • BANGKOK – Thailand had received offers from three countries, including the United States, to accept 48 detained Uyghurs for resettlement but it instead deported most of them to China last week, at Beijing’s request, a Thai opposition member of parliament said on Wednesday.

    Thailand repatriated 40 of the Uyghurs to China on Feb. 27, ignoring warnings from the U.S., the U.N. and human rights groups that they risked torture when they were returned to the northeastern region of Xinjiang, which they fled more than 10 years ago. Five other Uyghurs are in a Thai prison and the whereabouts of three have not been disclosed.

    Thailand said it agreed to what it said was the voluntary repatriation of the 40 men after a formal request from Beijing, and after getting Chinese assurances they would be safe, and because it had received no offers from other countries to resettle them.

    But opposition lawmaker Kannavee Suebsang told RFA affiliate BenarNews that Thailand had received offers from three countries to take the men.

    “We’re revealing this because the government has consistently claimed that no country was willing or that they contacted countries but no one would accept the Uyghurs,” Kannavee said.

    “However, the information from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs is clear on this matter,” he said, referring to a meeting with ministry officials on July 10, 2024, on the plight of the detained Uyghurs during which Kannavee cited the officials as saying “there were three countries … that had expressed their readiness to accept Uyghurs for resettlement.”

    He identified the three countries as the U.S., Sweden and Australia.

    The Thai foreign ministry spokesman did not respond to a request for comment.

    BenarNews was not able to contact the U.S. State Department but the Reuters news agency cited a department official as saying the U.S. had offered to resettle the 48 Uyghurs.

    BenarNews was also not able to contact Swedish or Australian spokespeople.

    Kannavee said Thailand had declined the offers from those countries as China had requested that the men be sent there.

    “China also wanted the Thai government to send them back,” he said.

    “China asked Thailand not to send Uyghurs to any country and wanted Thailand to consider returning them to China.”

    RELATED STORIES

    Thai rights activists criticize government for deporting Uyghurs to China

    Uyghurs in Thai prison ‘heartbroken’ to learn friends deported

    Thailand’s repatriation of Uyghurs signals tilt towards China, analysts say

    ‘Play with words’

    Kannavee added the Thai foreign ministry had repeated during a parliamentary committee meeting in July last year the U.S., Sweden, and Australia had expressed their willingness to accept Uyghurs for resettlement.

    Uyghurs in China’s vast Xinjiang region have been subjected to widespread human rights abuses, including detention in massive concentration camps. Beijing denies that.Sunai Phasuk, senior Thailand researcher at Human Rights Watch, told BenarNews that he too knew that other countries had offered to take the Uyghurs. He declined to identify the countries, citing diplomatic sensitivities.

    “I can confirm that several countries have expressed their willingness to accept them,” he said.

    “But there was no opportunity to make these offers a reality because Thailand did not follow up on the issue.”

    Sunai said the Thai government had “tried to play with words to suggest that sending Uyghurs to China was the only option because nobody would accept them for resettlement.”

    He added he suspected that the government had maintained the position that “only official expressions of interest through the Ministry of Foreign Affairs channels would be considered official intent.”

    China dismissed fears for the safety of the men last week saying they would be re-united with their families and resettled.

    U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who had called on Thailand at his confirmation hearing in January not to send the men to China, said Thailand’s deportation of them violated international agreements and ran counter to the kingdom’s own commitment to protect human rights.

    Thailand also faced a barrage of criticism from the U.N. and human rights groups. U.N. experts said on Jan. 21 the Uyghurs in Thailand would likely face torture if forced back to China and they urged Bangkok not to deport them.

    Thailand has been a staunch U.S. ally for decades and also has strong ties with Beijing, the region’s dominant economic player. China is among the top trading partners and foreign investors in Thailand, and its leading source of foreign tourist arrivals.

    Edited by Mike Firn and Taejun Kang.

    BenarNews is an RFA-affiliated online news service.


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Nontarat Phaicharoen and Kunnawut Boonreak for BenarNews.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Radio Free Asia.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • The waiting is almost over, Donald Trump is about to hit America’s workers with the largest tax increase they have ever seen. Trump’s taxes on imports (tariffs) from Canada, Mexico, and China will cost people in the United States somewhere around $400 billion a year, or around $3,000 a household. This is far larger than any tax increase we’ve seen in the last half-century…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.


  • This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Radio Free Asia.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Hysteria spreads as China first blockades, and later invades, one of Taiwan’s frontline islands. Some citizens race to evacuate, disinformation abounds, riots occur, and others pledge to fight for their homeland. These are all elements in a Netflix political thriller television series called Zero Day. The ten-part series is due to hit screens this year, […]

    The post Zero Day: Future Vision or Just Entertainment Fiction appeared first on Asian Military Review.

    This post was originally published on Asian Military Review.

  • One of Israel’s largest aerospace companies, Israel Aerospace Industries, has secured a contract to supply Vietnam’s military with two surveillance satellites worth US$680 million, the newspaper Haaretz reported.

    The observation satellites would help Vietnam “address China’s provocations against its neighbors in the South China Sea,” the Israeli paper quoted unidentified defense industry sources as saying.

    Radio Free Asia was not able to independently verify the information.

    A Vietnamese source, who declined to be identified due to the sensitivity of the subject, said the government-owned firm Israel Aerospace Industries, or IAI, had a long history of cooperation with Vietnam and news of negotiations over a satellite deal had surfaced as early as 2018.

    According to Haaretz, besides IAI, France’s Thales and the U.S. company Lockheed Martin were also offering surveillance satellites to Vietnam and “there could still be problems” for the Israeli contractor.

    The paper cited Israeli sources as saying Vietnam was “a tough customer” and agreements can fall through because of domestic rivalry or pressure from other foreign contractors.

    The Vietnamese client is believed to be the so-called General Department II of the Vietnamese army, or the military intelligence department, the newspaper said.

    Satellites ‘too expensive’

    Haaretz said that under the secured deal, the Israeli firm would sell two satellites to Vietnam, including “an optical imagery photography satellite and a synthetic-aperture radar satellite that provides a picture of the ground even at night or through complete cloud cover.”

    One of them could be the OptSat 3000, an advanced electro optical satellite, equipped with a 70 cm aperture telescope and sensitive sensor and capable of delivering “better than 50 cm high resolution imagery of locations on Earth,” according to IAI.

    Each satellite would cost US$300 million without launch facilities, “a price that space experts say is excessive,” the paper said, noting that in Vietnam corruption remained “rampant, even at the top.”

    An Israeli Spyder mobile air defense system at the Vietnam’s Defense Expo on Dec. 9, 2022.
    An Israeli Spyder mobile air defense system at the Vietnam’s Defense Expo on Dec. 9, 2022.
    (RFA)

    A businesswoman, Nguyen Thi Thanh Nhan, who was believed to act as an intermediary for arms procurement from Israel to Vietnam, is on a Vietnamese wanted list for bid rigging and bribery but domestic media did not mention any defense deal.

    Israel in recent years has become one of the top defense suppliers to Vietnam as it seeks to diversify its arms and military equipment procurement to reduce dependence on traditional partner Russia.

    It is estimated that Vietnam has bought about US$2 billion worth of equipment from Israeli companies, including air defense systems, drones and radar systems.

    “These technologies, especially radars, are what Israel is really good at,” said Yusuf Unjhawala, a defense analyst in Bangalore, India.

    The satellites may be costly but Vietnam “needs its own tools of surveillance,” Unjhawala told RFA.

    Vietnam and China are locked in a complex territorial dispute in the South China Sea, where China holds an expansive claim of up to 90% of the waterway.

    IAI was present at several defense exhibitions in Hanoi to showcase its products and is reportedly aiming to establish a joint venture to manufacture military hardware in Vietnam.

    Edited by Mike Firn


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by RFA Staff.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Radio Free Asia.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Radio Free Asia.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Asia Pacific Report

    The Green Party has called on Prime Minister Christopher Luxon to rule out Aotearoa New Zealand joining the AUKUS military technical pact in any capacity following the row over Ukraine in the White House over the weekend.

    President Donald Trump’s “appalling treatment” of his Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelenskyy was a “clear warning that we must avoid AUKUS at all costs”, said Green Party foreign affairs and Pacific issues spokesperson Teanau Tuiono.

    “Aotearoa must stand on an independent and principled approach to foreign affairs and use that as a platform to promote peace.”

    US President Donald Trump has paused all military aid for Ukraine after the “disastrous” Oval Office meeting with President Zelenskyy in another unpopular foreign affairs move that has been widely condemned by European leaders.

    Oleksandr Merezhko, the chair of Ukraine’s Parliamentary Foreign Affairs Committee, declared that Trump appeared to be trying to push Kyiv to capitulate on Russia’s terms.

    He was quoted as saying that the aid pause was worse than the 1938 Munich Agreement that allowed Nazi Germany to annex part of Czechoslovakia.

    ‘Danger of Trump leadership’
    Tuiono, who is the Green Party’s first tagata moana MP, said: “What we saw in the White House at the weekend laid bare the volatility and danger of the Trump leadership — nothing good can come from deepening our links to this administration.

    “Christopher Luxon should read the room and rule out joining any part of the AUKUS framework.”

    Tuiono said New Zealand should steer clear of AUKUS regardless of who was in the White House “but Trump’s transactional and hyper-aggressive foreign policy makes the case to stay out stronger than ever”.

    “Our country must not join a campaign that is escalating tensions in the Pacific and talking up the prospects of a war which the people of our region firmly oppose.

    “Advocating for, and working towards, peaceful solutions to the world’s conflicts must be an absolute priority for our country,” Tuiono said.

    Five Eyes network ‘out of control’
    Meanwhile, in the 1News weekly television current affairs programme Q&A, former Prime Minister Helen Clark challenged New Zealand’s continued involvement in the Five Eyes intelligence network, describing it as “out of control”.

    Her comments reflected growing concern by traditional allies and partners of the US over President Trump’s handling of long-standing relationships.

    Clark said the Five Eyes had strayed beyond its original brief of being merely a coordinating group for intelligence agencies in the US, Canada, UK, Australia, and New Zealand.

    “There’s been some talk in the media that Trump might want to evict Canada from it . . . Please could we follow?” she said.

    “I mean, really, the problem with Five Eyes now has become a basis for policy positioning on all sorts of things.

    “And to see it now as the basis for joint statements, finance minister meetings, this has got a bit out of control.”

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • Chinese Communist Party leader Xi Jinping has warned of “many difficulties and challenges” for China’s economy ahead of the annual session of the National People’s Congress in Beijing this week.

    In an article published in the ideological party journal Qiushi on Monday — two days before the congress opens — Xi warned of the “many risks and hidden dangers” facing China’s economy, before alluding to the threats of further U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods.

    “At present, the adverse effects of changes in the external environment have deepened, and our country’s economy still faces many difficulties and challenges,” Xi wrote in the piece.

    U.S. President Donald Trump last month imposed a 10% tariff on Chinese imports in retaliation for what he said was Beijing’s refusal to stop the outflow of precursors for the synthetic opioid fentanyl.

    Beijing then introduced a 15% retaliatory tariff on certain U.S. energy exports to China. Last week, Trump warned he would ramp that rate up a further 10% on March 4. As a presidential candidate last year, Trump vowed tariffs of “more than” 60% on Chinese imports.

    China's exports
    China’s exports
    (Reuters)

    Beijing is now “studying and formulating countermeasures” in the event that those tariffs go ahead, the party-backed Global Times newspaper cited an anonymous source as saying on Monday.

    “The countermeasures will likely include both tariffs and a series of non-tariff measures, and U.S. agricultural and food products will most likely be listed,” the paper quoted the source as saying.

    China’s economic troubles

    While they mull countermeasures, though, officials in Beijing have maintained they would prefer to forget about tariffs altogether.

    Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian said at a press briefing on Monday that there are “no winners” in a tariff war.

    “The U.S. attempt to politicize and weaponize trade and economic issues, levy tariff hikes on Chinese imports under the pretext of fentanyl and create blocks to its normal trade, investment and economic cooperation with China will only harm its own economic interests and international credibility,” Lin said.

    China is ready to engage in “dialogue and consultation on the basis of equality and mutual respect,” Lin added.

    “In the meanwhile, we will take all measures necessary to safeguard our legitimate rights and interests,” he said.

    President Donald Trump signs an executive order in the Oval Office of the White House, Feb. 25, 2025.
    President Donald Trump signs an executive order in the Oval Office of the White House, Feb. 25, 2025.
    (Jim Waton/AFP)

    The pending trade war comes at a time of economic stress in China.

    Since the start of the U.S.-China trade war under the first Trump administration, Xi has appealed for restructuring to replace exports with domestic consumption as the main driver of growth.

    But three years of zero-COVID restrictions and a slew of U.S. tariffs and restrictions has prompted many manufacturers to relocate away from China and spooked foreign investors.

    RELATED STORIES

    China welcomes Year of the Snake, but ‘nobody is spending’

    EXPLAINED: How China hopes to kickstart its flagging economy

    Tariff war escalates: China counters US with 15% duties, Google investigation

    Meanwhile, widespread unemployment and a burst real estate bubble has made life much harder for ordinary Chinese.

    Those concerns were reiterated in Xi’s article, which pulled heavily from China’s Central Economic Work Conference in December.

    “We must face up to difficulties, strengthen our confidence and strive to transform positive factors from all aspects into development results,” Xi wrote, adding that expanded domestic demand isn’t just a quick fix but “a strategic move.”

    Growth figures questioned

    Struggling Chinese exporters told RFA Mandarin that the new tariffs proposed by Trump will further harm their businesses.

    The head of an electronics factory in Shenzhen who gave only the surname Ge for fear of reprisals said that the value of her company’s exports to the United States has been slashed in half since last October, and that tariffs will make things worse.

    “Some taxes are paid by U.S. importers, which pushes up prices,” she said. “U.S. importers usually pass on the costs of tariffs to consumers, making our goods more expensive.”

    Ge has cut the number of employees from 17 to just seven, while the sales team has been slashed from 10 to four.

    “Chinese exports may lose market share to competitors in Vietnam, Indonesia and other countries as U.S. importers look for other suppliers,” she said.

    Gantry cranes stand near a cargo ship at Yangshan Port outside of Shanghai, China, Feb. 7, 2025.
    Gantry cranes stand near a cargo ship at Yangshan Port outside of Shanghai, China, Feb. 7, 2025.
    (Go Nakamura/Reuters)

    Political commentator Willy Lam told RFA Mandarin there is still hope that Trump won’t carry out his threat to impose tariffs above 60%.

    “The 10% increase in tariffs … is still lower than the rates Trump mentioned in 2024 of 60% or more,” Lam said. “In general, Trump’s attitude towards Xi Jinping is milder than expected.”

    Analysts expect growth to be set around the 5% mark during this week’s congress, and there has also been speculation about the possibility of renewed economic stimulus packages.

    “The general public in China is short of money,” Lam said. “Most importantly, they lack confidence in the government right now.”

    U.S.-based economic commentator Qin Weiping cited falling marriage rates and birth rates as an indicator of low economic confidence, as young people increasingly struggle to make ends meet.

    “People have no confidence in the economy, or in the future,” he said. “So demand for residential property is naturally weaker…. It will be hard to fix the real estate problem because this is a vicious cycle.”

    The government should consider hiring more graduates as civil servants, Qin suggested, citing the 12.22 million who graduated in 2025 alone, swelling the ranks of the young unemployed.

    Campaigners for
    Campaigners for “The Lost Voices of Fentanyl” protest outside the White House in Washington, Sept. 23, 2023.
    (Elizabeth Frants/Reuters)

    Xie Tian, ​​a professor at the Aiken School of Business at the University of South Carolina, said China’s growth figures were questionable in any case, alleging the numbers were fudged for political reasons.

    “No-one believes it — whether they say it’s 5% or 15% — because that’s basically impossible,” Xie said. “If the economic growth rate was 5%, their unemployment rate wouldn’t be that high.”

    But others noted a growing conundrum in China’s recent efforts to stimulate domestic growth without relying on traditional exports.

    Qin, the economic commentator, noted Chinese officials appeared increasingly focussed in their official documents on achieving growth through artificial intelligence, which necessitates fewer workers.

    Only further investment in labor-intensive industries would solve China’s problem of dampened domestic demand, he said, by putting more spending money into the pockets of China’s consumers.

    “Give them a level playing field and allow the economy to get on the right track … which will gradually solve the problem of unemployment,” he said. “People need to feel that business is good, money is easy to make, and that life is getting better and better.”

    “It’s that simple.”

    Translated by Luisetta Mudie. Edited by Alex Willemyns.


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Xi Zian, Qian Lang and Lucie Lo for RFA Mandarin.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • “The acquisition of wealth is no longer the driving force in our lives. We work to better ourselves and the rest of humanity,” said fictional Captain Picard of “Star Trek: The Next Generation.”

    Humanity is standing on the cusp. Climate change is presenting the U.S. with the same choice nature has gifted all its species: evolve or die; change is the only constant.

    As the cost of basic goods and, more importantly, energy continues to rise across the capitalist economies of Japan, Western Europe and North America, others have decided to utilize their economy to actually innovate. Instead of phallic vanity projects of the impotent super-wealthy, presented by SpaceX and Blue Origin, the “Chinese Academy of Space Technology” (CAST) has shown humanity a different way forward into the stars.

    The post Socialism Leads Humanity Out Of Artificial Scarcity appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • ANALYSIS: By Ali Mirin

    Last week, on 26 February 2025, President Prabowo Subianto officially launched Indonesia’s first bullion banks, marking a significant shift in the country’s approach to gold and precious metal management.

    This initiative aims to strengthen Indonesia’s control over its gold reserves, improve financial stability, and reduce reliance on foreign institutions for gold transactions.

    Bullion banks specialise in buying, selling, storing, and trading gold and other precious metals. They allow both the government and private sector to manage gold-related financial transactions, including hedging, lending, and investment in the global gold market.

    Although bullion banks focus on gold, this move signals a broader trend of Indonesia tightening control over its natural resources. This could have a significant impact on West Papua’s coal industry.

    With the government already enforcing benchmark coal prices (HBA) starting this month, the success of bullion banks could pave the way for a similar centralised system for coal and other minerals.

    Indonesia also may apply similar regulations to other strategic resources, including coal, nickel, and copper. This could mean tighter government control over mining in West Papua.

    If Indonesia expands national control over mining, it could lead to increased exploitation in resource-rich regions like West Papua, raising concerns about land rights, deforestation, and indigenous displacement.

    Indonesia joined BRICS earlier this year and is now focusing on strengthening economic ties with other BRICS countries.

    In the mining sector, Indonesia is using its membership to increase exports, particularly to key markets such as China and India. These countries are large consumers of coal and mineral resources, providing an opportunity for Indonesia to expand its export market and attract foreign direct investment in resource extraction.

    India eyes coal in West Papua
    India has shown interest in tapping into the coal reserves of the West Papua region, aiming to diversify its energy sources and secure coal supplies for its growing energy needs.

    This initiative involves potential collaboration between the Indian government and Indonesian authorities to explore and develop previously unexploited coal deposits in West Papuan Indigenous lands.

    However, the details of such projects are still under negotiation, with discussions focusing on the terms of investment and operational control.

    Notably, India has sought special privileges, including no-bid contracts, in exchange for financing geological surveys — a proposition that raises concerns about compliance with Indonesia’s anti-corruption laws.

    The prospect of coal mining in West Papua has drawn mixed reactions. While the Indonesian government is keen to attract foreign investment to boost economic development in its easternmost provinces, local communities and environmental groups express apprehension.

    The primary concerns revolve around potential environmental degradation, disruption of local ecosystems, and the displacement of indigenous populations.

    Moreover, there is scepticism about whether the economic benefits from such projects would trickle down to local communities or primarily serve external interests.

    Navigating ethical, legal issues
    As India seeks to secure energy resources to meet its domestic demands, it must navigate the ethical and legal implications of its investments abroad. Simultaneously, Indonesia faces the challenge of balancing economic development with environmental preservation and the rights of its indigenous populations.

    While foreign investment in Indonesia’s mining sector is welcome, there are strict regulations in place to protect national interests.

    In particular, foreign mining companies must sell at least 51 percent of their shares to Indonesian stakeholders within 10 years of starting production. This policy is designed to ensure that Indonesia retains greater control over its natural resources, while still allowing international investors to participate in the growth of the industry.

    India is reportedly interested in mining coal in West Papua to diversify its fuel sources.

    Indonesia’s energy ministry is hoping for economic benefits and a potential boost to the local steel industry. But environmentalists and social activists are sounding the alarm about the potential negative impacts of new mining operations.

    During project discussions, India has shown an interest in securing special privileges, such as no-bid contracts, which could conflict with Indonesia’s anti-corruption laws.

    Implications for West Papua
    Indonesia, a country with a population of nearly 300 million, aims to industrialise. By joining BRICS (primarily Brasil, Russia, India, and China), it hopes to unlock new growth opportunities.

    However, this path to industrialisation comes at a significant cost. It will continue to profoundly affect people’s lives and lead to environmental degradation, destroying wildlife and natural habitats.

    These challenges echo the changes that began with the Industrial Revolution in England, where coal-powered advances drastically reshaped human life and the natural world.

    West Papua has experienced a significant decline in its indigenous population due to Indonesia’s transmigration policy. This policy involves relocating large numbers of Muslim Indonesians to areas where Christian Papuans are the majority.

    These newcomers settle on vast tracts of indigenous Papuan land. Military operations also continue.

    One of the major problems resulting from these developments is the spread of torture, abuse, disease, and death, which, if not addressed soon, will reduce the Papuans to numbers too small to fight and reclaim their land.

    Mining of any kind in West Papua is closely linked to, and in fact, is the main cause of, the dire situation in West Papua.

    Large-scale exploitation
    Since the late 1900s, the area’s rich coal and mineral resources have attracted both foreign and local investors. Large international companies, particularly from Western countries, have partnered with the Indonesian government in large-scale mining operations.

    While the exploitation of West Papua’s resources has boosted Indonesia’s economy, it has also caused significant environmental damage and disruption to indigenous Papuan communities.

    Mining has damaged local ecosystems, polluted water sources and reduced biodiversity. Indigenous Papuans have been displaced from their ancestral lands, leading to economic hardship and cultural erosion.

    Although the government has tried to promote sustainable mining practices, the benefits have largely bypassed local communities. Most of the revenue from mining goes to Jakarta and large corporations, with minimal reinvestment in local infrastructure, health and education.

    For more than 63 years, West Papua has faced exploitation and abuse similar to that which occurred when British law considered Australia to be terra nullius — “land that belongs to no one.” This legal fiction allowed the British to disregard the existence of indigenous people as the rightful owners and custodians of the land.

    Similarly, West Papua has been treated as if it were empty, with indigenous communities portrayed in degrading ways to justify taking their land and clearing it for settlers.

    Indonesia’s collective view of West Papua as a wild, uninhabited frontier has allowed settlers and colonial authorities to freely exploit the region’s rich resources.

    Plundering with impunity
    This is why almost anyone hungry for West Papua’s riches goes there and plunders with impunity. They cut down millions of trees, mine minerals, hunt rare animals and collect precious resources such as gold.

    These activities are carried out under the control of the military or by bribing and intimidating local landowners.

    The Indonesian government’s decision to grant mining licences to universities and religious groups will add more headaches for Papuans. It simply means that more entities have been given licences to exploit its resources — driving West Papuans toward extinction and destroying their ancestral homeland.

    An example is the PT Megapura Prima Industri, an Indonesian coal mining company operating in Sorong on the western tip of West Papua. According to the local news media Jubi, the company has already violated rules and regulations designed to protect local Papuans and the environment.

    Allowing India to enter West Papua, will have unprecedented and disastrous consequences for West Papua, including environmental degradation, displacement of indigenous communities, and human rights abuses.

    As the BRICS nations continue to expand their economic footprint, Indonesia’s evolving mining landscape is likely to become a focal point of international investment discourse in the coming years.

    Natural resources ultimate target
    This means that West Papua’s vast natural resources will be the ultimate target and will continue to be a geopolitical pawn between superpowers, while indigenous Papuans remain marginalised and excluded from decision-making processes in their own land.

    Regardless of policy changes on resource extraction, human rights, education, health, or any other facet, “Indonesia cannot and will not save West Papua” because “Indonesia’s presence in the sovereign territory of West Papua is the primary cause of the genocide of Papuans and the destruction of their homeland”.

    As long as West Papua remains Indonesia’s frontier settler colony, backed by an intensive military presence, the entire Indonesian enterprise in West Papua effectively condemns both the Papuan people and their fragile ecosystem to a catastrophic fate, one that can only be avoided through a process of decolonisation and self-determination.

    Restoring West Papua’s sovereignty, arbitrarily taken by Indonesia, is the best solution so that indigenous Papuans can engage with their world on their own terms, using the rich resources they have, and determining their own future and development pathway.

    Ali Mirin is a West Papuan academic and writer from the Kimyal tribe of the highlands bordering the Star mountain region of Papua New Guinea. He lives in Australia and contributes articles to Asia Pacific Report.


    This content originally appeared on Asia Pacific Report and was authored by APR editor.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • ANALYSIS: By Ali Mirin

    Last week, on 26 February 2025, President Prabowo Subianto officially launched Indonesia’s first bullion banks, marking a significant shift in the country’s approach to gold and precious metal management.

    This initiative aims to strengthen Indonesia’s control over its gold reserves, improve financial stability, and reduce reliance on foreign institutions for gold transactions.

    Bullion banks specialise in buying, selling, storing, and trading gold and other precious metals. They allow both the government and private sector to manage gold-related financial transactions, including hedging, lending, and investment in the global gold market.

    Although bullion banks focus on gold, this move signals a broader trend of Indonesia tightening control over its natural resources. This could have a significant impact on West Papua’s coal industry.

    With the government already enforcing benchmark coal prices (HBA) starting this month, the success of bullion banks could pave the way for a similar centralised system for coal and other minerals.

    Indonesia also may apply similar regulations to other strategic resources, including coal, nickel, and copper. This could mean tighter government control over mining in West Papua.

    If Indonesia expands national control over mining, it could lead to increased exploitation in resource-rich regions like West Papua, raising concerns about land rights, deforestation, and indigenous displacement.

    Indonesia joined BRICS earlier this year and is now focusing on strengthening economic ties with other BRICS countries.

    In the mining sector, Indonesia is using its membership to increase exports, particularly to key markets such as China and India. These countries are large consumers of coal and mineral resources, providing an opportunity for Indonesia to expand its export market and attract foreign direct investment in resource extraction.

    India eyes coal in West Papua
    India has shown interest in tapping into the coal reserves of the West Papua region, aiming to diversify its energy sources and secure coal supplies for its growing energy needs.

    This initiative involves potential collaboration between the Indian government and Indonesian authorities to explore and develop previously unexploited coal deposits in West Papuan Indigenous lands.

    However, the details of such projects are still under negotiation, with discussions focusing on the terms of investment and operational control.

    Notably, India has sought special privileges, including no-bid contracts, in exchange for financing geological surveys — a proposition that raises concerns about compliance with Indonesia’s anti-corruption laws.

    The prospect of coal mining in West Papua has drawn mixed reactions. While the Indonesian government is keen to attract foreign investment to boost economic development in its easternmost provinces, local communities and environmental groups express apprehension.

    The primary concerns revolve around potential environmental degradation, disruption of local ecosystems, and the displacement of indigenous populations.

    Moreover, there is scepticism about whether the economic benefits from such projects would trickle down to local communities or primarily serve external interests.

    Navigating ethical, legal issues
    As India seeks to secure energy resources to meet its domestic demands, it must navigate the ethical and legal implications of its investments abroad. Simultaneously, Indonesia faces the challenge of balancing economic development with environmental preservation and the rights of its indigenous populations.

    While foreign investment in Indonesia’s mining sector is welcome, there are strict regulations in place to protect national interests.

    In particular, foreign mining companies must sell at least 51 percent of their shares to Indonesian stakeholders within 10 years of starting production. This policy is designed to ensure that Indonesia retains greater control over its natural resources, while still allowing international investors to participate in the growth of the industry.

    India is reportedly interested in mining coal in West Papua to diversify its fuel sources.

    Indonesia’s energy ministry is hoping for economic benefits and a potential boost to the local steel industry. But environmentalists and social activists are sounding the alarm about the potential negative impacts of new mining operations.

    During project discussions, India has shown an interest in securing special privileges, such as no-bid contracts, which could conflict with Indonesia’s anti-corruption laws.

    Implications for West Papua
    Indonesia, a country with a population of nearly 300 million, aims to industrialise. By joining BRICS (primarily Brasil, Russia, India, and China), it hopes to unlock new growth opportunities.

    However, this path to industrialisation comes at a significant cost. It will continue to profoundly affect people’s lives and lead to environmental degradation, destroying wildlife and natural habitats.

    These challenges echo the changes that began with the Industrial Revolution in England, where coal-powered advances drastically reshaped human life and the natural world.

    West Papua has experienced a significant decline in its indigenous population due to Indonesia’s transmigration policy. This policy involves relocating large numbers of Muslim Indonesians to areas where Christian Papuans are the majority.

    These newcomers settle on vast tracts of indigenous Papuan land. Military operations also continue.

    One of the major problems resulting from these developments is the spread of torture, abuse, disease, and death, which, if not addressed soon, will reduce the Papuans to numbers too small to fight and reclaim their land.

    Mining of any kind in West Papua is closely linked to, and in fact, is the main cause of, the dire situation in West Papua.

    Large-scale exploitation
    Since the late 1900s, the area’s rich coal and mineral resources have attracted both foreign and local investors. Large international companies, particularly from Western countries, have partnered with the Indonesian government in large-scale mining operations.

    While the exploitation of West Papua’s resources has boosted Indonesia’s economy, it has also caused significant environmental damage and disruption to indigenous Papuan communities.

    Mining has damaged local ecosystems, polluted water sources and reduced biodiversity. Indigenous Papuans have been displaced from their ancestral lands, leading to economic hardship and cultural erosion.

    Although the government has tried to promote sustainable mining practices, the benefits have largely bypassed local communities. Most of the revenue from mining goes to Jakarta and large corporations, with minimal reinvestment in local infrastructure, health and education.

    For more than 63 years, West Papua has faced exploitation and abuse similar to that which occurred when British law considered Australia to be terra nullius — “land that belongs to no one.” This legal fiction allowed the British to disregard the existence of indigenous people as the rightful owners and custodians of the land.

    Similarly, West Papua has been treated as if it were empty, with indigenous communities portrayed in degrading ways to justify taking their land and clearing it for settlers.

    Indonesia’s collective view of West Papua as a wild, uninhabited frontier has allowed settlers and colonial authorities to freely exploit the region’s rich resources.

    Plundering with impunity
    This is why almost anyone hungry for West Papua’s riches goes there and plunders with impunity. They cut down millions of trees, mine minerals, hunt rare animals and collect precious resources such as gold.

    These activities are carried out under the control of the military or by bribing and intimidating local landowners.

    The Indonesian government’s decision to grant mining licences to universities and religious groups will add more headaches for Papuans. It simply means that more entities have been given licences to exploit its resources — driving West Papuans toward extinction and destroying their ancestral homeland.

    An example is the PT Megapura Prima Industri, an Indonesian coal mining company operating in Sorong on the western tip of West Papua. According to the local news media Jubi, the company has already violated rules and regulations designed to protect local Papuans and the environment.

    Allowing India to enter West Papua, will have unprecedented and disastrous consequences for West Papua, including environmental degradation, displacement of indigenous communities, and human rights abuses.

    As the BRICS nations continue to expand their economic footprint, Indonesia’s evolving mining landscape is likely to become a focal point of international investment discourse in the coming years.

    Natural resources ultimate target
    This means that West Papua’s vast natural resources will be the ultimate target and will continue to be a geopolitical pawn between superpowers, while indigenous Papuans remain marginalised and excluded from decision-making processes in their own land.

    Regardless of policy changes on resource extraction, human rights, education, health, or any other facet, “Indonesia cannot and will not save West Papua” because “Indonesia’s presence in the sovereign territory of West Papua is the primary cause of the genocide of Papuans and the destruction of their homeland”.

    As long as West Papua remains Indonesia’s frontier settler colony, backed by an intensive military presence, the entire Indonesian enterprise in West Papua effectively condemns both the Papuan people and their fragile ecosystem to a catastrophic fate, one that can only be avoided through a process of decolonisation and self-determination.

    Restoring West Papua’s sovereignty, arbitrarily taken by Indonesia, is the best solution so that indigenous Papuans can engage with their world on their own terms, using the rich resources they have, and determining their own future and development pathway.

    Ali Mirin is a West Papuan academic and writer from the Kimyal tribe of the highlands bordering the Star mountain region of Papua New Guinea. He lives in Australia and contributes articles to Asia Pacific Report.


    This content originally appeared on Asia Pacific Report and was authored by APR editor.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • The conduct of live-fire exercises by the People’s Liberation Army Navy Surface Force (the Chinese “communists”, as they are called by the analytically strained) has recently caused much murmur and consternation in Australia. It’s the season for federal elections, and the opposition leader, Peter Dutton, thinks he’s in with more than a fighting chance. Whether that chance is deserved or not is another matter.

    The exercise, conducted in international waters by a cruiser, frigate and replenishment ship, involved what is said to have been poor notice given to Australian authorities on February 21. But the matter has rapidly burgeoned into something else: that what the Chinese task fleet did was mischievously remarkable, exceptional and snooty to convention and protocols. It is on that score that incontinent demagogy has taken hold.

    Media outlets have done little to soften the barbs. A report by ABC News, for instance, notes that Airservices Australia was “only aware of the exercises 40 minutes after China’s navy opened a ‘window’ for live-fire exercises from 9.30am.” The first pickup of the exercises came from a Virgin Australia pilot, who had flown within 250 nautical miles of the operation zone and warned of the drills. Airservices Australia was immediately contacted, with the deputy CEO of the agency, Peter Curran, bemused about whether “it was a potential hoax or real.”

    Defence Chief Admiral David Johnston told Senate estimates that he would have preferred more notice for the exercises – 24-48 hours was desirable – but it was clear that Coalition Senator and shadow home affairs minister James Paterson wanted more. Paterson had thought it “remarkable that Australia was relying on civilian aircraft for early warning about military exercises by a formidable foreign task group in our region.” To a certain extent, the needlessly irate minister got what he wanted, with the badgered Admiral conceding that the Chinese navy’s conduct had been “irresponsible” and “disruptive”.

    Wu Qian, spokesperson for the China National Ministry for Defence, offered a different reading: “During the period, China organised live-fire training of naval guns toward the sea on the basis of repeatedly issuing prior safety notices”. Its actions were “in full compliance with international law and international practice, with no impact on aviation flight safety”. That said, 49 flights were diverted on February 21.

    Much was also made about what were the constituent elements of the fleet. As if it mattered one jot, the Defence Force chief was pressed on whether a Chinese nuclear-powered submarine had made up the task force. “I don’t know whether there is a submarine with them, it is possible, task groups occasionally do deploy with submarines but not always,” came the reply. “I can’t be definitive whether that’s the case.”

    The carnival of fear was very much in town, with opposition politicians keen to blow air into the balloon of the China threat across the press circuit. The shadow defence minister Andrew Hastie warned listeners on Sydney radio station 2GB of “the biggest peacetime military buildup since 1945”, Beijing’s projection of power with its blue-water navy, the conduct of two live-fire exercises and the Chinese taskforce operating within Australia’s Exclusive Economic Zone off Tasmania. Apparently, all of this showed the Australian Prime Minister, Anthony Albanese, to be “weak” for daring to accept that the conduct complained of was legal under international law. “Now that may be technically right, but that misses the deeper subtext, and that is China is now in our backyard, and they’ve demonstrated that we don’t have the will to insist on our national interest and mutual respect.”

    There are few voices of sensible restraint in Australia’s arid landscape of strategic thinking, but one could be found. Former principal warfare officer of the Royal Australian Navy, Jennifer Parker, commendably remarked that this hardly warranted the title of “a crisis”. To regard it as such “with over-the-top indignation diminishes our capacity to tackle real crises as the region deteriorates.” Australia might, at the very least, consider modernising a surface fleet that was “the smallest and oldest we’ve had since 1950.”

    Allegations that Beijing should not be operating in Australia’s exclusive economic zone, let alone conduct live-fire exercises in international waters, served to give it “a propaganda win to challenge our necessary deployments to North-East Asia and the South China Sea – routes that carry two-thirds of our maritime trade.”

    The cockeyed priorities of the Australian defence establishment lie elsewhere: fantasy, second hand US nuclear-powered submarines that may, or may never make their way to Australia; mushy hopes of a jointly designed nuclear powered submarine specific to the AUKUS pact that risks sinking off the design sheet; and the subordination of Australian land, naval and spatial assets to the United States imperium.

    Such is the standard of political debate that something as unremarkable as this latest sea incident has become a throbbing issue that supposedly shows the Albanese government as insufficiently belligerent. Yet there was no issue arising, other than a statement of presence by China’s growing navy, something it was perfectly entitled to do.

    The post Ho Hum at Sea: Anti-China Hysteria Down Under first appeared on Dissident Voice.

    This post was originally published on Dissident Voice.

  • In his first month back in the White House, US President Donald Trump indicated his interest in annexing Greenland and brokering a peace deal for Ukraine that would include access to Ukrainian minerals and metals. It is important to note that Greenland has already been a point of contention around its vast holdings of rare earth minerals with such remarkable names as dysprosium, neodymium, scandium, and yttrium (there are seventeen rare earth minerals that are central to any advanced technology). Given that Greenland is part of Denmark, it is therefore beholden to European Union (EU) rules.

    The post China Is Already The Leader In Advanced Critical Technologies appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • A court in Hong Kong has handed down a three-year, one-month jail term to a former pro-democracy lawmaker for “rioting,” after he livestreamed unrest at the height of 2019 pro-democracy protests.

    Lam Cheuk-ting’s footage, which appeared on Facebook, showed attacks by white-clad pro-China thugs on passengers at the Yuen Long Mass Transit Railway station on July 21 of that year.

    It depicted panicked passengers and bystanders calling for police help that took nearly 40 minutes to arrive.

    Lam, 47, who was himself attacked for his pains, was sent to the hospital with head and arm injuries that required about 18 stitches.

    Yet he was arrested for “rioting” on Aug. 26, 2020, sparking a public outcry, as part of an ongoing crackdown on public dissent in Hong Kong.

    Lam is currently serving a prison sentence of nearly seven years for “subversion” as one of the 47 pro-democracy activists prosecuted for organizing a democratic primary in the summer of 2020.

    He can expect to serve 34 months of his rioting sentence after that term finishes.

    Courts have skewed toward Beijing

    Since the imposition of the 2020 National Security Law, Hong Kong’s once-independent courts have tended to issue rulings along pro-Beijing lines, particularly in politically sensitive cases, according to a 2024 report by law experts at Georgetown University.

    Lam, a former Legislative Council member, was sentenced on Thursday alongside six other people convicted of the same charge, despite not being among the white-clad mob.

    District Judge Stanley Chan said the defendants had taken part in “another riot” inside the station that was triggered by the attacks from the men wielding sticks and clubs.

    He handed down sentences ranging between two years, one month to three years, one month.

    RELATED STORIES

    Hong Kong verdict against Yuen Long attack victims prompts widespread criticism

    EXPLAINED: What is the Article 23 security law in Hong Kong?

    Hong Kong police ‘knew about’ Yuen Long mob attacks beforehand

    EXPLAINED: Who are the Hong Kong 47?

    Referring to 2019 as “the year when the Pearl of the Orient lost its luster,” Chan said that the defendants had “responded to provocation” from around 100 men in white, about a dozen of whom have since been jailed for “rioting” and “conspiring to wound with intent.”

    Chan said Lam hadn’t tried to calm people down, but had rather added “fuel to the flames” by providing a gathering point for people trying to resist the attacks.

    6 others sentenced

    The six other defendants — Yu Ka Ho, Jason Chan, Yip Kam Sing, Kwong Ho Lam, Wan Chung Ming and Marco Yeung — were sentenced to between 25-31 months.

    They had tried to form a defensive line against the attackers, using fire extinguishers and water bottles, and pleaded self-defense during their trial.

    But Chan said their actions were “unlawful assembly” and “breach of the peace,” saying that some of them had yelled at the attackers in white to come and fight them, as well as throwing objects at them.

    “It is clear that at the time in question … the defendants became the rioters,” he told the sentencing hearing.

    During the attack–carried out by dozens of unidentified thugs in white T-shirts carrying wooden and metal poles–police were inundated with emergency calls, but didn’t move in until 39 minutes after it began.

    Pro-democracy lawmaker Lam Cheuk-ting gestures outside of Hong Kong's West Kowloon Magistrates Court on Aug. 27, 2020.
    Pro-democracy lawmaker Lam Cheuk-ting gestures outside of Hong Kong’s West Kowloon Magistrates Court on Aug. 27, 2020.
    (Anthony Wallace/AFP)

    In a recent book about the protests, former Washington Post Hong Kong correspondent Shibani Mahtani and The Atlantic writer Timothy McLaughlin wrote that the Hong Kong authorities knew about the attacks in advance.

    Members of Hong Kong’s criminal underworld “triad” organizations had been discussing the planned attack for days on a WhatsApp group that was being monitored by a detective sergeant from the Organized Crime and Triad Bureau, the book said.

    The weeks and months after the incident saw a massive wave of public anger at the police, who were later seen as legitimate targets for doxxing and even violent attacks.

    But instead of investigating, then Chief Executive Carrie Lam rejected any allegations of collusion, and later quashed a full report from the city’s police supervisory body on the handling of the protests.

    The ruling Chinese Communist Party insists that the 2019 protests were an attempt by “hostile foreign forces” to foment an uprising against the government in Hong Kong.

    Translated by Luisetta Mudie. Edited by Eugene Whong.


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by RFA Cantonese.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Radio Free Asia.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • BANGKOK – Thailand’s decision to deport 40 Uyghurs to China indicates that it sees the benefits of strengthening relations with China as worth the risk of incurring the anger of old ally the United States, analysts said on Friday.

    The U.S. condemned Thailand for deporting the 40 ethnic Uyghurs to China on Thursday, warning that the men risked torture when they returned to the northeastern region of Xinjiang, which they fled more than 10 years ago.

    But Thailand defended the decision, saying it had received an “official request” from China and only sent the men back after assurances from the “highest level” of the Chinese government on their safety.

    The United States had earlier made a request that the Uyghurs not be sent back to China. Marco Rubio had called directly on Thailand not to deport them at his Jan. 15 confirmation hearing to become secretary of state.

    Thai political analyst and former government adviser Panitan Wattanayagorn said Thailand’s decision to send the Uyghurs back after Rubio’s request carried risks.

    “It now looks like Thailand has turned its back on them,” Panitan told Radio Free Asia affiliate BenarNews, referring to the United States.

    “So we must be prepared for the consequences.”

    Thailand is the only U.S. treaty partner in mainland Southeast Asia and their relationship stretches back 200 years. The kingdom was a stalwart U.S. ally throughout the Cold War but Thailand has also developed strong ties with China, the region’s dominant economic player.

    China is among the top trading partners and foreign investors in Thailand, and its main source of foreign tourists. Panitan said the decision to send the Uyghurs back signaled a drive by Thailand for closer ties with China at the expense of relations with the U.S.

    “This government seems to have reduced the space with China while significantly widening it with America. It’s dangerous,” said Panitan.

    Dulyapak Preecharush, assistant professor of Southeast Asian Studies at Bangkok’s Thammasat University, said the deportation should be seen in the context of cooperation between the government of Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra and China on the suppression of online scam centers in eastern Myanmar.

    Chinese President Xi Jinping thanked the prime minister for helping with the crackdown when she visited Beijing on Feb. 6, while Liu Zhongyi, assistant minister at China’s Ministry of Public Security, visited Thailand to help coordinate it.

    “The deportation may indicate that Thailand is leaning more toward China than the United States, especially since the prime minister’s visit to China and the Chinese minister’s trip to Thailand to direct the suppression of scam centers, reflecting deepening cooperation,” Dulyapak said.

    The Thai foreign ministry did not respond to a request for comment on relations with China and the United States by time of publication.

    RELATED STORIES

    EXPLAINED: Thailand’s repatriation of 40 Uyghur refugees to China

    Prominent Uyghur historian sentenced to 17 years in prison

    Report: China has half a million Uyghurs in prison or detention

    Rubio’s ‘strongest’ condemnation

    Thai Deputy Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai, who is also minister of defense, said Thailand had discussed the decision with the U.S.

    “The government has explained to several Western countries, including the United States, which had discussions with me, confirming that Thailand would act according to its sovereignty and laws while also considering international principles and international law to avoid making mistakes,” he told reporters.

    But Rubio’s condemnation, “in the strongest possible terms”, was unusually forthright and Panitan said it indicated Thailand should beware.

    “The government might think they can negotiate with the United States, and it won’t make this a condition, but the fact that the U.S. government has strongly condemned it is a dangerous signal,” he said.

    “It could become a factor for imposing trade sanctions against us, or the secretary of state might downgrade our ranking in the TIP report,” he said, referring to the State Department’s annual Trafficking in Persons report.

    Thailand was kept on the Tier 2 Watch List for the third year in 2024, reflecting progress in combating human trafficking.

    Dulyapak said Thailand had to explain its decision, not only to the United States but to Muslim countries too, to try to maintain its relations.

    “What needs to be done is to clearly explain the reasons for this, especially since the current U.S. secretary of state has been closely following the Uyghur issue for so long … to help them understand the reasons and necessity behind it,” he said.

    “Thailand can’t just let this issue quietly fade away.”

    Edited by Mike Firn

    Pimuk Rakkanam and Jon Preechawong in Bangkok contributed to this report.

    BenarNews is an RFA-affiliated online news service.


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by By Kunnawut Boonreak and Nontarat Phaicharoen for BenarNews.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • BANGKOK – Thailand’s decision to deport 40 Uyghurs to China indicates that it sees the benefits of strengthening relations with China as worth the risk of incurring the anger of old ally the United States, analysts said on Friday.

    The U.S. condemned Thailand for deporting the 40 ethnic Uyghurs to China on Thursday, warning that the men risked torture when they returned to the northeastern region of Xinjiang, which they fled more than 10 years ago.

    But Thailand defended the decision, saying it had received an “official request” from China and only sent the men back after assurances from the “highest level” of the Chinese government on their safety.

    The United States had earlier made a request that the Uyghurs not be sent back to China. Marco Rubio had called directly on Thailand not to deport them at his Jan. 15 confirmation hearing to become secretary of state.

    Thai political analyst and former government adviser Panitan Wattanayagorn said Thailand’s decision to send the Uyghurs back after Rubio’s request carried risks.

    “It now looks like Thailand has turned its back on them,” Panitan told Radio Free Asia affiliate BenarNews, referring to the United States.

    “So we must be prepared for the consequences.”

    Thailand is the only U.S. treaty partner in mainland Southeast Asia and their relationship stretches back 200 years. The kingdom was a stalwart U.S. ally throughout the Cold War but Thailand has also developed strong ties with China, the region’s dominant economic player.

    China is among the top trading partners and foreign investors in Thailand, and its main source of foreign tourists. Panitan said the decision to send the Uyghurs back signaled a drive by Thailand for closer ties with China at the expense of relations with the U.S.

    “This government seems to have reduced the space with China while significantly widening it with America. It’s dangerous,” said Panitan.

    Dulyapak Preecharush, assistant professor of Southeast Asian Studies at Bangkok’s Thammasat University, said the deportation should be seen in the context of cooperation between the government of Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra and China on the suppression of online scam centers in eastern Myanmar.

    Chinese President Xi Jinping thanked the prime minister for helping with the crackdown when she visited Beijing on Feb. 6, while Liu Zhongyi, assistant minister at China’s Ministry of Public Security, visited Thailand to help coordinate it.

    “The deportation may indicate that Thailand is leaning more toward China than the United States, especially since the prime minister’s visit to China and the Chinese minister’s trip to Thailand to direct the suppression of scam centers, reflecting deepening cooperation,” Dulyapak said.

    The Thai foreign ministry did not respond to a request for comment on relations with China and the United States by time of publication.

    RELATED STORIES

    EXPLAINED: Thailand’s repatriation of 40 Uyghur refugees to China

    Prominent Uyghur historian sentenced to 17 years in prison

    Report: China has half a million Uyghurs in prison or detention

    Rubio’s ‘strongest’ condemnation

    Thai Deputy Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai, who is also minister of defense, said Thailand had discussed the decision with the U.S.

    “The government has explained to several Western countries, including the United States, which had discussions with me, confirming that Thailand would act according to its sovereignty and laws while also considering international principles and international law to avoid making mistakes,” he told reporters.

    But Rubio’s condemnation, “in the strongest possible terms”, was unusually forthright and Panitan said it indicated Thailand should beware.

    “The government might think they can negotiate with the United States, and it won’t make this a condition, but the fact that the U.S. government has strongly condemned it is a dangerous signal,” he said.

    “It could become a factor for imposing trade sanctions against us, or the secretary of state might downgrade our ranking in the TIP report,” he said, referring to the State Department’s annual Trafficking in Persons report.

    Thailand was kept on the Tier 2 Watch List for the third year in 2024, reflecting progress in combating human trafficking.

    Dulyapak said Thailand had to explain its decision, not only to the United States but to Muslim countries too, to try to maintain its relations.

    “What needs to be done is to clearly explain the reasons for this, especially since the current U.S. secretary of state has been closely following the Uyghur issue for so long … to help them understand the reasons and necessity behind it,” he said.

    “Thailand can’t just let this issue quietly fade away.”

    Edited by Mike Firn

    Pimuk Rakkanam and Jon Preechawong in Bangkok contributed to this report.

    BenarNews is an RFA-affiliated online news service.


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by By Kunnawut Boonreak and Nontarat Phaicharoen for BenarNews.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • The Chinese military held a new combat readiness exercise around a flashpoint with the Philippines in the South China Sea, its Southern Theater Command said, adding to a number of such exercises that Beijing has been conducting in the region.

    The command on Thursday “organized naval and air forces to carry out combat readiness patrols in the territorial waters and airspace of China’s Huangyan Island and surrounding areas,” it said in a statement, referring to the disputed Scarborough Shoal by its Chinese name.

    Scarborough Shoal, known in the Philippines as Bajo de Masinloc, has served as a traditional fishing ground for generations of local fishermen. It lies well inside Manila’s exclusive economic zone, just 125 nautical miles (232 kilometers) from the main island of Luzon.

    China, however, claims historical rights over the shoal as it is inside the so-called nine-dash line it displays on its maps. Vessels from both countries have been confronting each other here.

    Since the beginning of the month, Southern Command’s troops have been holding drills around the shoal in order to “further strengthen the control of relevant sea and air areas, resolutely defend national sovereignty, and security and resolutely maintain peace and stability in the South China Sea,” it added.

    The Chinese military also released a video clip depicting Thursday’s combat patrol, in which at least two warships and several aircraft, including fighter jets and bombers, were seen operating in the Scarborough area.

    The Philippine military has yet to react to the Chinese patrols.

    Chinese military aircraft during the combat patrol over Scarborough Shoal in the South China Sea on Feb. 27, 2025.
    Chinese military aircraft during the combat patrol over Scarborough Shoal in the South China Sea on Feb. 27, 2025.
    (PLA Southern Theater Command)

    Last week, Manila accused a Chinese military helicopter of flying dangerously within 3 meters (10 feet) of a Philippine aircraft over the shoal, saying the “reckless action posed a serious risk to the safety” of the Filipino pilots and passengers.

    China ramping up military operations

    Also on Thursday, the People’s Liberation Army, or PLA,- completed a four-day live-fire exercise in the Gulf of Tonkin, territory shared with Vietnam. The exercise was announced just as Hanoi released a map of territorial borders in the gulf.

    On Wednesday, Beijing unilaterally and unexpectedly designated an area for live-fire shooting just 40 nautical miles (74 kilometers) from the Taiwanese port city of Kaohsiung, prompting the island’s military to immediately dispatch naval, air and land forces while condemning the move.

    Taiwan’s ministry of defense on Friday said Beijing “has been escalating its military threats,” and has become “the biggest troublemaker” in the Indo-Pacific.

    The live-fire shooting has yet to take place, but analysts warned against the dangerous practice of conducting military exercises without giving notice. A similar incident happened last weekend in the waters between Australia and New Zealand.

    China’s frigate Sanya (574) during the combat patrol at Scarborough Shoal in the South China Sea on Feb. 27, 2025.
    China’s frigate Sanya (574) during the combat patrol at Scarborough Shoal in the South China Sea on Feb. 27, 2025.
    (PLA Southern Theater Command)

    Several commercial flights had to divert last Friday because of a live-fire exercise in the Tasman Sea that China conducted at a very short notice.

    “The live-fire exercises were a display to show that China’s military forces could cut off the air and sea links between Australia and New Zealand at any time, with no warning,” wrote Anne-Marie Brady, a professor at the University of Canterbury in Christchurch, New Zealand.

    They were “a demonstration of China’s growing sea power in the Southwest Pacific and meant to normalize the PLA presence there,” Brady wrote in The Diplomat.

    RELATED STORIES

    China sets up live-fire exercise zone near Taiwan ‘without warning’

    China conducts live fire drills in Tonkin Gulf as Vietnam draws sea border

    Manila: Chinese helicopter came within 3 meters of Philippine aircraft

    The past week’s exercises around the region are a clear example of saber-rattling, according to regional specialist Carl Thayer, an emeritus professor at Australia’s University of New South Wales.

    “Given China’s continued bullying of the Philippines, Beijing is sending a message to regional states as well as the Trump administration that it will defend its sovereign rights and interests whenever they are challenged,” he told Radio Free Asia.

    Edited by Mike Firn.


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by RFA Staff.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.