Category: China

  • By Caleb Fotheringham, RNZ Pacific journalist, in Avarua, Rarotonga

    More than 400 people have taken to the streets to protest against Cook Islands Prime Minister Mark Brown’s recent decisions, which have led to a diplomatic spat with New Zealand.

    The protest, led by Opposition MP and Cook Islands United Party leader Teariki Heather, has taken place outside the Cook Islands Parliament in Avarua — a day after Brown returned from China.

    Protesters have come out with placards, stating: “Stay connected with New Zealand.”


    The protest in Avarua today.    Video: RNZ

    Some government ministers have been standing outside Parliament, including Foreign Minister Tingika Elikana.

    Heather said he was present at the rally to how how much Cook Islanders cared about the relationship with New Zealand and valued the New Zealand passport.

    He has apologised to the New Zealand government on behalf of the Cook Islands government.

    Leader of the opposition and Democratic Party leader Tina Browne said she wanted the local passport to be off the table “forever and ever”.

    “We have no problem with our government going and seeking assistance,” she said.

    “We do have a problem when it is risking our sovereignty, risking our relationship with New Zealand.”

    This article is republished under a community partnership agreement with RNZ.

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • An architect working on China’s controversial plans for a new ‘mega-embassy’ in London has revealed some of the details of the project, including a tunnel connecting two of the former Royal Mint buildings, basement rooms and accommodation for hundreds of staff.

    Plans submitted to a government inquiry indicate large-scale remodeling of the buildings on the former Royal Mint site, including a large basement area with a security airlock for vehicles, suites of basement rooms and a new tunnel connecting two of the existing buildings.

    Police stand outside Royal Mint Court, the controversial site of China's proposed new
    Police stand outside Royal Mint Court, the controversial site of China’s proposed new “super-embassy” in London on Feb. 8, 2025.
    (Matthew Leung/RFA Cantonese)

    A political commentator told RFA Cantonese that underground embassy and consular facilities can be much harder for security services in host countries to monitor, citing Ireland’s refusal of a Russian Embassy planning application in 2020 on national security grounds.

    China purchased the former Royal Mint — near the Tower of London — in 2018 with plans to build what would become Beijing’s largest diplomatic facility globally. Plans showed that it was expected to be 10 times the size of a regular embassy.

    Beijing has made two applications to build the massive new facility in London both of which were rejected by the Tower Hamlets Borough Council — the local council overseeing the neighborhood — amid a vocal campaign by rights groups.

    British Metropolitan Police had earlier spoken against the planned embassy due to safety and security concerns, but withdrew its objections last month after the central government took over responsibility for the decision.

    Then the council said it won’t argue against the project at a planning inquiry.

    On Oct. 8, an estimated 4,000 people gathered in front of the proposed site to protest the plans, saying China would use the ‘mega-embassy’ to monitor dissidents and ordinary Chinese living outside the country.

    What’s the tunnel for?

    Oliver Ulmer, director of David Chipperfield Architects, told the planning inquiry in London on Feb. 12 that a new tunnel would link the main basement to that of the Siemens Registry building “to provide access.”

    Oliver Ulmer of David Chipperfield Architects speaks at the planning inquiry for China's proposed new
    Oliver Ulmer of David Chipperfield Architects speaks at the planning inquiry for China’s proposed new “super-embassy” in London, Feb. 13, 2025, in this image made from a live webcast.
    (Tower Hamlets Borough Council)

    “The basement … will be reconfigured to provide support spaces to the embassy functions on the floors above,” he said. “These will consist primarily of facilities to support the catering of events.”

    Changes will be made for “the provision of necessary security required for the embassy use,” Ulmer told Planning Inspector Claire Searson as part of a 10-day inquiry into the plan.

    The plans show a large basement with a security airlock, with access to two suites of unlabeled rooms, one via the new tunnel.

    Police stand outside Royal Mint Court, the controversial site of China's proposed new
    Police stand outside Royal Mint Court, the controversial site of China’s proposed new “super-embassy” in London, on Feb. 8, 2025.
    (Matthew Leung/RFA Cantonese)

    However, the plans are labeled as having been “redacted for security reasons,” making any further public information on the facility unlikely.

    The new ‘super-embassy,’ if approved, will include 200 residential units, from studios to three-bedroomed apartments, suggesting a large increase in the number of embassy personnel compared with current staffing levels.

    Transnational repression

    The planning application comes amid growing concerns over Chinese Communist Party infiltration of various aspects of British life, and warnings from Hong Kongers in exile over growing acts of violence by Beijing supporters and officials alike.

    Overseas activists frequently report being targeted by agents and supporters of the Chinese state, including secret Chinese police stations in a number of countries.

    RELATED STORIES

    London council won’t argue against China’s ‘super-embassy’ at key hearing

    Thousands rally against China’s ‘mega-embassy’ in London

    London council rejects China’s ‘super-embassy’ plan – again

    Activists vow to fight China’s bid for new ‘super embassy’ in London

    China is currently believed to have 116 diplomats in the United Kingdom with diplomatic immunity, according to Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office figures from 2020, cited in The Times newspaper.

    The number of apartments suggests that number could see a very sharp increase if the embassy plans are given the go-ahead by Angela Rayner, Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government.

    In March 2020, the Irish government revoked an approved planning application for a massive expansion of the Russian Embassy in the city, saying it was “likely to be harmful to the security and defence of the State and the State’s relations with other states.”

    The Russians called the decision “ludicrous” at the time.

    Royal Mint Court, the controversial site of China's proposed new 'super-embassy' in London.
    Royal Mint Court, the controversial site of China’s proposed new ‘super-embassy’ in London.
    (Matthew Leung/RFA Cantonese)

    But political scholar Benson Wong said the use of basement facilities for espionage-related activities was highly likely.

    “Underground tunnels can effectively prevent host country security forces from conducting surveillance of foreign diplomatic missions to collect intelligence or carry out wiretapping,” Wong said. “This means the embassy can carry out any espionage or intelligence work in a secure environment.”

    “If the Labour government does nothing and allows the new Chinese Embassy to take liberties, I think the impact could be disastrous,” Wong said.

    The project plans also include a formal entrance hall with ‘screening facilities’ for diplomatic visitors, a cultural exchange center and a ‘heritage interpretation center’ and conference and exhibition facilities, Ulmer told the inquiry.

    A new visa application center is also planned, along with “student service” and “business services” facilities, he said.

    The outdoor space includes plans for a courtyard garden with increased biodiversity and “Chinese influences,” Ulmer said.

    Translated by Luisetta Mudie. Edited by Malcolm Foster.


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Matthew Leung for RFA Cantonese.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • For decades, Hong Kong Public Opinion Research Institute, or HKPORI, tracked public attitudes on sensitive political topics that revealed a public perception of disappearing press freedom and poor popularity scores for the city’s leaders.

    But after its premises were searched and the family members of a former director were questioned by police, it has decided to halt all research activities and review its situation.

    The decision is the latest fallout from a crackdown by Beijing on public dissent in Hong Kong under two security laws.

    “HKPORI will suspend all its self-funded research activities indefinitely, including its regular tracking surveys conducted since 1992, and all feature studies recently introduced,” the institute said in a statement on its website.

    The pollster said it will “undergo a transformation or even close down.”

    “HKPORI has always been law-abiding, but in the current environment, it has to pause its promotion of scientific polling,” the statement said.

    The announcement came a few weeks after police took away and questioned the wife and son of U.K.-based pollster and outspoken political commentator Chung Kim-wah, who has a HK$1 million (US$128,500) bounty on his head.

    Chung Kim-wah, deputy chief executive of Hong Kong's Public Opinion Research Institute, during an interview, August 2020.
    Chung Kim-wah, deputy chief executive of Hong Kong’s Public Opinion Research Institute, during an interview, August 2020.
    (RFA)

    President and CEO Robert Chung said “interested parties” are welcome to take over the institute, adding that he plans to “promote professional development around the world” until his current term ends after 2026.

    “The research team hopes there will be another opportunity to resume its work,” the statement said, adding that the Institute will “announce its final decision when the time is right.”

    Accused of incitement

    Chung, 64, a former researcher for the HKPORI and co-host of the weekly talk show “Voices Like Bells” for RFA Cantonese, left for the United Kingdom in April 2022 after being questioned amid a city-wide crackdown on public dissent and political opposition to the ruling Chinese Communist Party.

    He is accused — alongside Carmen Lau, Tony Chung, Joseph Tay and Chloe Cheung — of “incitement to secession” after he “advocated independence” on social media and repeatedly called on foreign governments to impose sanctions on Beijing over the crackdown, according to a police announcement.

    RELATED STORIES

    Hong Kong police question wife, son of wanted exiled pollster

    Hong Kong Police Raid Public Opinion Pollster Linked to Pro-Democracy Primaries

    Hong Kong pollster ‘had no choice’ but to leave city amid crackdown on dissent

    U.K.-based Hong Kong political scholar Benson Wong said the move was a huge loss to the people of Hong Kong.

    “The biggest loss for the people of Hong Kong that of a professional, neutral and scientific polling organization that once played the role of doctor to the political, economic and social aspects of life in Hong Kong,” Wong told RFA Cantonese in a recent interview.

    “If all of that is going to disappear, I think it will do catastrophic damage to Hong Kong’s … political development,” he said.

    Public opinion research viewed as a threat

    Wong said the move is likely linked to the authorities’ view of public opinion research as a threat.

    He said Hong Kong and Macau Affairs Office director Xia Baolong and Beijing’s Central Liaison Office director Zheng Yanxiong don’t seem to want to know what Hong Kong public opinion is.

    Police announced a warrant for Chung Kim-wah’s arrest and a HK$1 million (US$128,400) bounty on his head in December, making him one of 19 overseas activists wanted by the Hong Kong government.

    Since Beijing imposed two national security laws banning public opposition and dissent in the city, blaming “hostile foreign forces” for the protests, hundreds of thousands have voted with their feet amid plummeting human rights rankings, shrinking press freedom and widespread government propaganda in schools.

    Some fled to the United Kingdom on the British National Overseas, or BNO, visa program. Others have made their homes anew in the United States, Canada, Australia and Germany.

    Current affairs commentator Sang Pu said the move would have a “chilling” effect on the rest of society.

    “Public opinion surveys are … are a very important weather-vane,” Sang said. “If those can’t even be done any more, then it blurs the boundaries between what is regarded as political and non-political, or what are seen as sensitive and non-sensitive [topics].”

    “I think this is going to have a chilling effect on a lot more people, and that nobody will dare to do public opinion surveys any more,” he said.

    Translated by Luisetta Mudie. Edited by Malcolm Foster.


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Yam Chi Yau for RFA Cantonese.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • TAIPEI, Taiwan – China urged the United States on Monday to “correct its mistakes” after it removed wording on a State Department website stating that it did not support Taiwan independence. The U.S. brushed off the change as an update.

    The State Department’s latest “fact sheet” for Taiwan, a self-governing island claimed by China, used to include the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence,” but that was dropped on Thursday.

    The State Department also modified a passage in the fact sheet to suggest broader support for Taiwan’s inclusion in international organizations, by dropping the words “where statehood is not a requirement.”

    It added that Taiwan’s dispute with China should be resolved “free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.”

    “As is routine, the fact sheet was updated to inform the general public about our unofficial relationship with Taiwan,” said its spokesperson, as cited by Reuters news agency.

    The spokesperson added that the U.S. remained committed to its “One China Policy,” which acknowledges China’s position that there is only one Chinese government, and “preserving the peace and stability of the Taiwan Strait.”

    But Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun said the revisions were a “big step backwards” that “sends a seriously wrong message to Taiwan independence separatist forces.”

    “The U.S. State Department updated its fact sheet on relations with Taiwan and gravely backpeddled on its position on Taiwan-related issues. Its move severely violated the one-China principle,” Guo told a regular briefing in Beijing.

    “This is yet another example of the United States’ stubborn adherence to the erroneous policy of ‘using Taiwan to suppress China.’ We urge the United States side to immediately rectify its mistakes,” said Guo.

    Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun takes a question from a journalist at a press conference in Beijing, China, Jan. 7, 2025.
    Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun takes a question from a journalist at a press conference in Beijing, China, Jan. 7, 2025.
    (Florence Lo/Reuters)

    Taiwan, officially known as the Republic of China, operates as a self-governing democracy but is formally recognized by only a small number of countries.

    However, it maintains unofficial diplomatic relations with much of the international community, including the U.S.

    Although Taipei functions as a de facto independent state, it has never officially declared independence from Beijing, which has warned that such a declaration would trigger military action.

    Under the 1979 Taiwan Relations Act, the U.S. is committed to assisting Taiwan to defend itself but it has long maintained a policy of “strategic ambiguity” on whether it would intervene militarily to protect Taiwan in the event of a Chinese attack.

    Even subtle shifts in how U.S. officials refer to Taiwan are closely monitored by both Beijing and Taipei.

    ‘Message’ to China

    Chen Fang-Yu, an assistant professor in the Department of Political Science at Taiwan’s Soochow University, said he believed the change to the reference was a message from the U.S. to China that U.S.-Taiwan relations were determined by Washington not Beijing.

    “While the presence or absence of this phrase in the State Department’s statements may not be critical on its own, its removal is important because China has long used the Clinton-era ‘the U.S. does not support Taiwan independence’ stance for its propaganda,” said Chen, referring to the former U.S. President Bill Clinton’s administration.

    In 1998, Clinton explicitly stated a “Three No’s” policy: no support for Taiwan independence, no recognition of “two Chinas” or “one China, one Taiwan,” and no support for Taiwan’s membership in international organizations requiring statehood.

    “Now that the phrase is gone, China can no longer manipulate it for its narrative,” Chen added.

    On Sunday, Taiwan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs welcomed the State Department’s “positive and friendly” update as a sign of the “close and friendly Taiwan-U.S. partnership.”

    Taiwanese Foreign Minister Lin Chia-lung also thanked the U.S. for its “support and positive stance on U.S.-Taiwan relations” and “commitment to peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait, Taiwan-US economic, trade, and technology partnership and Taiwan’s international space.”

    RELATED STORIES

    North Korea vows to bolster nuclear forces as US, Japan hold summit

    Beijing changes Rubio’s Chinese name, perhaps to get around travel ban

    Beijing sees Trump presidency as ‘critical’ juncture for Sino-US ties

    Japan also makes a Taiwan change

    Separately, Japan, one of the closest U.S. allies in Asia, said it would allow Taiwanese citizens to list their nationality or home region as “Taiwan” instead of “China” on household registries from May.

    After Japan severed diplomatic ties with Taiwan in 1972, both Taiwanese and Chinese people were classified under “China” as Japan at the time rejected both “People’s Republic of China” – China’s official name – and “Republic of China”, for political reasons.

    Under the new rule, however, Japan will use “nationality/region” instead of country names, aligning with its residence certificates and cards, and it will allow individuals to change to “Taiwan.”

    While foreigners are generally not included on household registrations unless they naturalize or are adopted, their nationality is recorded if they marry a Japanese citizen. The change allows Taiwanese spouses of Japanese people to have “Taiwan” listed in official records.

    Taiwanese people have long urged the Japanese government to allow Taiwan to be recorded, emphasizing the importance of preserving their identity. According to Taiwan’s Ministry of the Interior, up to 1,000 Taiwanese people marry Japanese citizens every year.

    In response, the Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson urged Japan to uphold the “One China” principle.

    “Taiwan is an inseparable part of China’s territory, and people on both sides of the Taiwan Strait are all Chinese,” Guo said.

    “We urge Japan to uphold the ‘One China’ principle and the spirit of the four key China-Japan political documents, refrain from making petty moves on the Taiwan issue, and avoid sending contradictory and erroneous signals,” referring to agreements that shape diplomatic relations between Beijing and Tokyo, including the 1972 Joint Communiqué, which established diplomatic ties, with Japan recognizing the People’s Republic of China as the sole legal government of China.

    Edited by Mike Firn.


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Taejun Kang and Alan Lu for RFA.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • TAIPEI, Taiwan – A Taiwanese court jailed a former army officer for 13 years for attempting to recruit an active-duty military pilot to defect to China with a helicopter, the latest in a series of national security cases involving retired military and law enforcement personnel.

    The government of the democratic island accuses China of systematically cultivating retired military and police officers. It said in January that 85% of national security cases were linked to retired officers.

    Former Taiwanese military officer Hsiao Hsiang-Yun was found guilty of attempting to persuade a military pilot to defect to China with a helicopter. He was also found guilty of coercing soldiers to film propaganda videos for China.

    “The convicted individuals were found guilty of violating Taiwan’s National Security Act, Anti-Corruption Act, and Criminal Code of the Armed Forces,” the judge said in the Feb. 13 ruling.

    According to the ruling, the Chinese Communist Party, or CCP, worked with Hsiao to orchestrate the defection of Lt. Col. Hsieh Meng-Shu, who was encouraged to fly a CH-47 Chinook military helicopter to China. Hsieh drew up a plan to defect but was caught before he could carry it out.

    Hsaio and Hsieh received bribes of 620,000 New Taiwan dollars (US$19,500) and 600,000 New Taiwan dollars (US$18,900), respectively, according to the court.

    Ho Cheng-Hui, the deputy secretary-general of Taiwan National Security Institute, said that the CPP was using a psychological warfare tactic by targeting the officer corps, with a view to subverting Taiwan’s military.

    “Piloting a military aircraft is quite challenging. The Taiwan Strait is roughly over 200 kilometers wide, and evading Taiwan’s air defense system requires low-altitude, sea-skimming flight, which reduces speed and makes maneuvering more difficult,” Ho told Radio Free Asia.

    “The primary goal of the PLA in doing this is to undermine the psychological resilience of Taiwan’s military,” said Ho referring to the Chinese People’s Liberation Army.

    Ho noted that this case showed Taiwan’s military personnel were at high risk of being targeted by Chinese infiltration and psychological warfare.

    “It is crucial to focus on improving military welfare, fostering a sense of honor, and ensuring related personnel’s isolation from encounters with sensitive or suspicious individuals,” he said, stressing that early warning measures such as exposing individuals, groups, or organizations linked to China would be crucial.

    “Regulations must be put in place to safeguard military personnel and prevent their exposure to Chinese infiltration.”

    Taiwan’s national security focus is on threats like espionage and interference from China, which considers the island a breakaway province that must be reunified, by force if necessary. Taiwan has governed itself since 1949.

    China has not commented on the case.

    RELATED STORIES

    Taiwan says 85% of national security cases involve retired army, police

    Taiwan to scale up annual military drill as China tensions mount

    Taiwan warns internet celebrities on collusion after video uproar

    In January, Liang Wen-chieh, spokesperson of Taiwan’s Mainland Affairs Council, which oversees relations across the Taiwan Strait, said the island’s government was “very concerned” that 85% of national security cases were linked to retired military and police.

    China had been “systematically and methodically cultivating” such people, he said.

    The number of people in Taiwan prosecuted for Chinese espionage increased from 16 in 2021 to 64 in 2024, Taiwan’s main intelligence agency, the National Security Bureau, or NSB, said in a report this month.

    In 2024, 15 military veterans and 28 active service members were prosecuted, accounting for 23% and 43%, respectively, of all Chinese espionage cases.

    Edited by Taejun Kang.


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Alan Lu for RFA.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • By Caleb Fotheringham, RNZ Pacific journalist in Avarua, Rarotonga

    Cook Islands Prime Minister Mark Brown hopes to have “an opportunity to talk” with the New Zealand government to “heal some of the rift”.

    Brown returned to Avarua on Sunday afternoon (Cook Islands Time) following his week-long state visit to China, where he signed a “comprehensive strategic partnership” to boost its relationship with Beijing.

    Prior to signing the deal, he said that there was “no need for New Zealand to sit in the room with us” after the New Zealand Foreign Affairs Minister raised concerns about the agreement.

    Responding to reporters for the first time since signing the China deal, he said: “I haven’t met the New Zealand government as yet but I’m hoping that in the coming weeks we will have an opportunity to talk with them.

    “Because they will be able to share in this document that we’ve signed and for themselves see where there are areas that they have concerns with.

    “But I’m confident that there will be no areas of concern. And this is something that will benefit Cook Islanders and the Cook Islands people.”

    He said the agreement with Beijing would be made public “very shortly”.

    “I’m sure once the New Zealand government has a look at it there will be nothing for them to be concerned about.”

    Not concerned over consequences
    Brown said he was not concerned by any consequences the New Zealand government may impose.

    The Cook Islands leader is returning to a motion of no confidence filed against his government and protests against his leadership.

    “I’m confident that my statements in Parliament, and my returning comments that I will make to our people, will overcome some of the concerns that have been raised and the speculation that has been rife, particularly throughout the New Zealand media, about the purpose of this trip to China and the contents of our action plan that we’ve signed with China.”

    1News Pacific correspondent Barbara Dreaver was at the airport but was not allowed into the room where the press conference was held.

    The New Zealand government wanted to see the agreement prior to Brown going to China, which did not happen.

    A spokesperson for New Zealand’s Foreign Minister Winston Peters said Brown had a requirement to share the contents of the agreement and anything else he signed under the 2001 Joint Centenary Declaration.

    ‘Healing some of the rift’
    Brown said the difference in opinion provides an opportunity for the two governments to get together and “heal some of the rift”.

    “We maintain that our relationship with New Zealand remains strong and we remain open to having conversations with the New Zealand government on issues of concern.

    “They’ve raised their concerns around security in the Pacific. We’ve raised our concerns around our priorities, which is economic development for our people.”

    Brown has previously said New Zealand did not consult the Cook Islands on its comprehensive strategic partnership with China in 2014, which they should have done if the Cook Islands had a requirement to do so.

    He hoped people would read New Zealand’s deal along with his and show him “where the differences are that causes concern”.

    Meanwhile, the leader of Cook Islands United Party, Teariki Heather, said Cook Islanders were sitting nervously with a question mark waiting for the agreement to be made public.

    Cook Islands United Party Leader, Teariki Heather stands by one of his trucks he's preparing to take on the protest.
    Cook Islands United Party leader Teariki Heather stands by one of his trucks he is preparing to take on the planned protest. Image: Caleb Fotheringham/RNZ Pacific

    “That’s the problem we have now, we haven’t been disclosed or told of anything about what has been signed,” he said.

    “Yes we hear about the marine seabed minerals exploration, talk about infrastructure, exchange of students and all that, but we haven’t seen what’s been signed.”

    However, Heather said he was not worried about what was signed but more about the damage that it could have created with New Zealand.

    Heather is responsible for filing the motion of no confidence against the Prime Minister and his cabinet.

    The opposition only makes up eight seats of 24 in the Cook Islands Parliament and the motion is about showing support to New Zealand, not about toppling the government.

    “It’s not about the numbers for this one, but purposely to show New Zealand, this is how far we will go if the vote of no confidence is not sort of accepted by both of the majority members, at least we’ve given the support of New Zealand.”

    Heather has also been the leader for a planned planned today local time (Tuesday NZ).

    “Protesters will be bringing their New Zealand passports as a badge of support for Aotearoa,” he said.

    “Our relationship [with New Zealand] — we want to keep that.”

    This article is republished under a community partnership agreement with RNZ.


    This content originally appeared on Asia Pacific Report and was authored by APR editor.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Earlier this week, China’s tariffs on some US products came into effect, in response to the 10% increase in tariffs that the Trump administration imposed on all Chinese products, starting on February 1st.

    China created a 15% tariff on coal and Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) and a 10% tariff on crude oil, agricultural machinery, cars with large engines and pickup trucks.

    On February 4, Xi Jinping’s government filed a lawsuit against the US government’s tariff imposition with the World Trade Organization’s dispute settlement mechanism.

    China has also implemented export controls on five metals: tungsten, tellurium, bismuth, molybdenum, and indium.

    The post US Sectors Hit By New Chinese Tariffs And Restrictions appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • United States President Donald Trump’s tariffs against Canada are understandably causing much consternation and debate. Some business leaders are forecasting dire warnings, union officials are calling for retaliation and relief while also sidling up with their corporate counterparts to present a united front. But these developments are about much more than tariffs. Trump’s tariff plan exposes the perils of Canada’s dependency on the US and the price of integration within the American Empire.

    To discuss these issues, last week I sat down with Sam Gindin. For more than 25 years, Sam was research director of the Canadian Auto Workers union.

    The post Trump’s Threats Expose Canada’s Utter Dependency On The US appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • A Lao woman who traveled to China for an arranged marriage warned others to demand legal documents and to have in-person meetings with potential husbands before leaving the country.

    Any woman who enters into what she called a “sham marriage” runs the risk of being trafficked to another man after they arrive in China, she told Radio Free Asia.

    “To those who may want to come to China, they should think and do research carefully,” she said, requesting anonymity for security reasons. “They shouldn’t decide without knowing what they could be facing. I experienced that myself.”

    A newlywed man shows marriage books for him and his wife in Luliang, northern China’s Shanxi province on Feb. 11, 2025.
    A newlywed man shows marriage books for him and his wife in Luliang, northern China’s Shanxi province on Feb. 11, 2025.
    (Adek Berry/AFP)

    The woman said she jumped at the chance to move to China two years ago for an arranged marriage. But eventually she realized that a promised 60 million kip (US$2,750) payment was never going to come.

    “I heard many people say marrying a Chinese man would help to solve financial problems and make life more comfortable,” she said in an interview on Feb. 4. “I had too much excitement from a lack of experience at that time.”

    Arranged marriages between Chinese men and young Lao women have become more common in recent years as the women and their families seek financial security amid Laos’ bleak economy.

    A Lao anti-human trafficking activist who goes by the name Ms. Dee told RFA last month that a middleman is usually involved in forming an agreement. The young women and their families are paid at most 30,000 yuan (US$4,150) while the middlemen keep the remainder of the fee, which can be around 200,000 Chinese yuan (US$27,500), she said.

    “After being sent to China, the Lao girls of course expect to receive some money that they can send home to support their families. But in fact, their Chinese husbands refuse,” Ms. Dee said.

    ‘Just go with him’

    Another Lao woman told RFA in a separate interview that a middleman sold her to a man three days after she arrived in China.

    “I was told not to be too particular,” she said on Feb. 10. “Just go with him. I have no choice at all.”

    The middleman added that she would get paid for the marriage after about six months, and could then “run away with a new man and get paid again,” she said.

    But the money never came, and she said she worries that a typical 16-year-old Lao girl could also be easily tricked by middlemen who promise monthly payments of 2,000 yuan (US$275) to send to family back in Laos.

    “The middlemen always gave them nice images of being married to Chinese men. ‘He’ll buy you a smart phone, nice clothes, new shoes,‘” she said. “All those materialistic things plus thinking of being out of poverty.”

    RELATED STORIES

    Lao police stop 3 women from boarding flight to China in trafficking case

    Three human traffickers to stand trial in northern Laos

    Lao official: Gov’t can’t afford to address rise in human trafficking

    Vientiane police arrest taxi driver and woman, rescue 4 teenagers

    The woman who spoke to RFA on Feb. 4 said Lao women could end up with a Chinese man who has a criminal record and isn’t able to provide legal marriage documents.

    “If the Chinese man cannot come to Laos and provide you with any legal documents, be aware and never believe that,” she said. “Don’t believe it if a middleman told you they will provide all needed documents when you have arrived in China.”

    She added: “You cannot trust the middleman. They will not pay you after you are sent to China.”

    A Lao official at the Anti-Trafficking Department told RFA that the middlemen often target young women from hill tribes who lack awareness and whose families have financial hardship.

    Translated by Khamsao Civilize. Edited by Matt Reed.


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by RFA Lao.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • By Lydia Lewis, RNZ Pacific presenter/Bulletin editor

    Former New Zealand Prime Minister Helen Clark maintains that Cook Islands, a realm of New Zealand, should have consulted Wellington before signing a “partnership” deal with China.

    “[Cook Islands Prime Minister Mark Brown] seems to have signed behind the backs of his own people as well as of New Zealand,” Clark told RNZ Pacific.

    Brown said the deal with China complements, not replaces, the relationship with New Zealand.

    The contents of the deal have not yet been made public.

    “The Cook Islands public need to see the agreement — does it open the way to Chinese entry to deep sea mining in pristine Cook Islands waters with huge potential for environmental damage?” Clark asked.

    “Does it open the way to unsustainable borrowing? What are the governance safeguards? Why has the prime minister damaged the relationship with New Zealand by acting in this clandestine way?”

    In a post on X (formerly Twitter), Clark went into detail about the declaration she signed with Cook Islands Prime Minister Terepai Maoate in 2001.

    “There is no doubt in my mind that under the terms of the Joint Centenary Declaration of 2001 that Cook Islands should have been upfront with New Zealand on the agreement it was considering signing with China,” Clark said.

    “Cook Islands has opted in the past for a status which is not independent of New Zealand, as signified by its people carrying New Zealand passports. Cook Islands is free to change that status, but has not.”

    Sione Tekiteki in Tonga for PIFLM 2024 - his last leader's meeting in his capacity as Director of Governance and Engagement.
    Sione Tekiteki in Tonga for PIFLM 2024 . . . his last leader’s meeting in his capacity as Director of Governance and Engagement. IMage: RNZ Pacific/ Lydia Lewis

    Missing the mark
    A Pacific law expert said there was a clear misunderstanding on what the 2001 agreement legally required New Zealand and Cook Islands to consult on.

    Brown has argued that New Zealand does not need to be consulted with to the level they want, something Foreign Minister Winston Peters disagrees with.

    AUT senior law lecturer and former Pacific Islands Forum policy advisor Sione Tekiteki told RNZ Pacific the word “consultation” had become somewhat of a sticking point:

    “From a legal perspective, there’s an ambiguity of what the word consultation means. Does it mean you have to share the agreement before it’s signed, or does it mean that you broadly just consult with New Zealand regarding what are some of the things that, broadly speaking, are some of the things that are in the agreement?

    “That’s one avenue where there’s a bit of misunderstanding and an interpretation issue that’s different between Cook Islands as well as New Zealand.”

    Unlike a treaty, the 2001 declaration is not “legally binding” per se but serves more to express the intentions, principles and commitments of the parties to work together in “recognition of the close traditional, cultural and social ties that have existed between the two countries for many hundreds of years”, he added.

    Tekiteki said that the declaration made it explicitly clear that Cook Islands had full conduct of its foreign affairs, capacity to enter treaties and international agreements in its own right and full competence of its defence and security.

    There was, however, a commitment of the parties to “consult regularly”, he said.

    For Clark, the one who signed the all-important agreement all those years ago, this is where Brown had misstepped.

    Pacific nations played off against each other
    Tekiteki said it was not just the Joint Centenary Declaration causing contention. The “China threat” narrative and the “intensifying geopolitics” playing out in the Pacific was another intergrated issue.

    An analysis in mid-2024 found that there were more than 60 security, defence and policing agreements and initiatives with the 10 largest Pacific countries.

    Australia was the dominant partner, followed by New Zealand, the US and China.

    A host of other agreements and “big money” announcements have followed, including the regional Pacific Policing Initiative and Australia’s arrangements with Nauru and PNG.

    “It would be advantageous if Pacific nations were able to engage on security related matters as a bloc rather than at the bilateral level,” Tekiteki said.

    “Not only will this give them greater political agency and leverage, but it would allow them to better coordinate and integrate support as well as avoid duplications. Entering these arrangements at the bilateral level opens Pacific nations to being played off against each other.

    “This is the most worrying aspect of what I am currently seeing.

    “This matter has greater implications for Cook Islands and New Zealand diplomatic relations moving forward.”

    Mark Brown talks to China's Ambassador to the Pacific Qian Bo,
    Mark Brown talking to China’s Ambassador to the Pacific, Qian Bo, who told the media an affirming reference to Taiwan in the PIF 2024 communique “must be corrected”. Image: RNZ Pacific/Lydia Lewis

    Protecting Pacific sovereignty
    The word sovereignty is thrown around a lot. In this instance Tekiteki does not think “there is any dispute that Cook Islands maintains sovereignty to enter international arrangements and to conduct its affairs as it determines”.

    But he did point out the difference between “sovereignty — the rhetoric” that we hear all the time, and “real sovereignty”.

    “For example, sovereignty is commonly used as a rebuttal to other countries to mind their own business and not to meddle in the affairs of another country.

    “At the regional level is tied to the projection of collective Pacific agency, and the ‘Blue Pacific’ narrative.

    “However, real sovereignty is more nuanced. In the context of New Zealand and Cook Islands, both countries retain their sovereignty, but they have both made commitments to “consult” and “cooperate”.

    Now, they can always decide to break that, but that in itself would have implications on their respective sovereignty moving forward.

    “In an era of intensifying geopolitics, militarisation, and power posturing — this becomes very concerning for vulnerable but large Ocean Pacific nations without the defence capabilities to protect their sovereignty.”

    This article is republished under a community partnership agreement with RNZ.

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • An investigation has exposed the tech firm’s cooperation with autocratic regimes to remove unfavourable content

    Google has cooperated with autocratic regimes around the world, including the Kremlin in Russia and the Chinese Communist party, to facilitate censorship requests, an Observer investigation can reveal.

    The technology company has engaged with the administrations of about 150 countries since 2011 that want information scrubbed from their public domains.

    Continue reading…

    This post was originally published on Human rights | The Guardian.


  • Illustration: Liu Rui/GT

    In recent years, cooperation between China and Africa in the space field has deepened. However, some Western media outlets have tried to distort the nature of this cooperation. On Tuesday, Reuters reported that China is “building space alliances in Africa to enhance its global surveillance network and advance its bid to become the world’s dominant space power.” The article also cited remarks from the Pentagon, claiming that China’s space projects in Africa and other parts of the developing world are a “security risk.”

    The real security risk is not cooperation or the sharing of technology, but the ideological prejudice of the West that clings to hegemony and obstructs progress. For a long time, space and other high-tech fields have been dominated by the US and its allies. Behind the smear campaigns of Western media lies the West’s fear of China-Africa cooperation.

    The cooperation between China and Egypt in space technology, referred to by foreign media as “China’s secretive overseas space program,” has been open and transparent. Public records show that Egypt is the first country to carry out satellite cooperation with China under the framework of the Belt and Road Initiative. At the end of 2023, the jointly designed and developed satellite MISRSAT-2 was successfully send into orbit. An Egyptian Space Agency official said that the project has promoted the training of Egyptian space professionals, helping Egypt become a leader in the field of space satellites in Africa and the Middle East. This “teach a man to fish” approach is a key step for Africa to achieve autonomous industrialization and modernization.

    Western media’s smear campaign against China-Africa space cooperation ignores the legitimate need for African countries to develop space technology. Space technology and monitoring systems can be used for weather monitoring, agricultural planning, environmental protection, and disaster management, helping Africa address climate change, improve agricultural productivity, optimize resource management, and enhance national emergency response capabilities.

    More broadly, China-Africa space cooperation reflects the changing global technological cooperation landscape and the reshaping of development rights. In the past, developing countries often had to rely on Western countries for technological aid, which came with many restrictions. However, through the concept of South-South cooperation, China has provided a more equal and sustainable cooperation model, helping African countries achieve self-development in critical fields such as space technology. This not only enhances Africa’s position in the global technology system, encouraging developing countries to participate in global technology governance, but also contributes to advancing the global multipolarization process.

    “Space is not a club for the rich,” said Song Zhongping, a Chinese military expert. Through win-win cooperation with Africa, China is helping more developing countries to quickly enter the mainstream of global technological development, embodying the democratization and multipolarization trend of modern technology, he noted.

    The focus of African and Global South countries is on more practical and sustainable development needs, rather than geopolitical games. The US and Western countries must choose the right path – abandoning the mind-set of technological hegemony, adopting a more open and inclusive approach, and actively participating in the global technological cooperation process.

    From infrastructure construction to focusing on modernization and cutting-edge technology, the “sour grapes” narrative of foreign media cannot conceal the fruitful outcomes of China-Africa cooperation. While the West is busy weaving lies, China and Africa have already woven a network of development and illuminated an autonomous future with technology, writing a new chapter of unity and development for the Global South.

    The post China-Africa Space Co-op Shows Tech’s Multipolarization, Democratization Trends first appeared on Dissident Voice.

    This post was originally published on Dissident Voice.

  • By Caleb Fotheringham, RNZ Pacific journalist

    Cook Islands Prime Minister Mark Brown says the deal with China “complements, not replaces” the relationship with New Zealand after signing it yesterday.

    Brown said “The Action Plan for Comprehensive Strategic Partnership (CSP) 2025-2030” provides a structured framework for engagement between the Cook Islands and China.

    “Our relationship and engagement with China complements, not replaces, our long-standing relationships with New Zealand and our various other bilateral, regional and multilateral partners — in the same way that China, New Zealand and all other states cultivate relations with a wide range of partners,” Brown said in a statement.

    The statement said the agreement would be made available “in the coming days” on the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Immigration online platforms.

    Brown said his government continued to make strategic decisions in the best long-term interests of the country.

    He said China had been “steadfast in its support” for the past 28 years.

    “It has been respectful of Cook Islands sovereignty and supportive of our sustained and concerted efforts to secure economic resilience for our people amidst our various vulnerabilities and the many global challenges of our time including climate change and access to development finance.”

    Priority areas
    The statement said priority areas of the agreement include trade and investment, tourism, ocean science, aquaculture, agriculture, infrastructure including transport, climate resilience, disaster preparedness, creative industries, technology and innovation, education and scholarships, and people-to-people exchanges.

    At the signing was China’s Premier Li Qiang and the minister of Natural Resources Guan Zhi’ou.

    On the Cook Islands side, was Prime Minister Mark Brown and Associate Minister of Foreign Affairs and Immigration Tukaka Ama.

    Meanwhile, a spokesperson for New Zealand Minister for Foreign Affairs Winston Peters released a statement earlier on Saturday, saying New Zealand would consider the agreements closely, in light of New Zealand and the Cook Islands’ mutual constitutional responsibilities.

    “We know that the content of these agreements will be of keen interest to the people of the Cook Islands,” the statement said.

    “We note that Prime Minister Mark Brown has publicly committed to publishing the text of the agreements that he agrees in China.

    “We are unable to respond until Prime Minister Brown releases them upon his return to the Cook Islands.”

    This article is republished under a community partnership agreement with RNZ.

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • Lost in a colonial fog of inferiority, writers across Asia imagined a world that was beyond the reach of colonialism’s devastation.

    In 1835, Kylas Chunder Dutt (1817–1859) wrote a remarkable story called ‘A Journal of Forty-Eight Hours of the Year 1945’; the story, published in The Calcutta Literary Gazette, came out when the great French science fiction novelist Jules Verne (1828–1905) was only seven years old. Dutt’s account is not strictly science fiction, but largely futuristic. The eighteen-year-old opened his story with this line: ‘The people of India and particularly those of the metropolis had been subject for the last fifty years to every species of subaltern oppression. … With the rapidity of lightning the spirit of Rebellion spread through this once pacific people’.

    The post Clean Waters And Green Mountains As Valuable As Gold And Silver Mountains appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.


  • This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Radio Free Asia.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. President Donald Trump offered to act as a future mediator between China and India when asked about recent tensions on the border between the two countries.

    Trump spoke to reporters on Thursday after meeting with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi at the White House.

    “I look at India and I do see the skirmishes on the border and I guess they continue to go on,” he said. “If I could be of help, I would love to help.”

    Modi met with Chinese President Xi Jinping in Russia last October on the sidelines of a summit for leaders of developing nations shortly after their governments reached an agreement over a disputed area along their shared border.

    Thousands of Indian and Chinese troops faced off in June 2020 at three or four locations in the western Himalayas after Beijing’s forces intruded into Indian territory, according to Indian security officials and local media.

    China denied intruding into Indian territory near the Galwan River in the mountainous Ladakh region.

    At a joint press conference in the Oval Office, Trump emphasized strengthening U.S.-India ties.

    Trump was also asked on Thursday about how he expects the United States to compete with China if it also implements tough trade measures on India.

    “We are in very good shape to beat anybody we want, but we are not looking to beat anybody. We are looking to do a really good job,” Trump said, adding that he expects to have a “very good relationship with China.”

    Modi noted the summit of leaders from the Quad — made up of the United States, India, Australia and Japan — is scheduled to be held in India this year, possibly in September.

    The grouping formally convened in 2007 but it was largely dormant until Trump revived it a decade later during his first presidency. The Quad was a pillar of the Biden administration’s efforts to counter China.

    China has derided the grouping as a relic of what it calls a U.S.-driven “Cold War” mindset and insisted that it has no designs for territorial expansion or aggression in the vast Indo-Pacific region.

    Modi said he looked forward to hosting Trump in New Delhi for the summit.

    “The partnership between India and the U.S. strengthens democracy and democratic values and systems,” he said.

    Trump’s comments about engagement with China appear reflective of the “different approaches he’s contemplating, and different voices among those around him, on how much to engage or compete with Beijing, and in what manner,” said Dhruva Jaishankar, executive director of the Washington-based Observer Research Foundation America.

    Edited by Tenzin Pema and Matt Reed.


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Tenzin Dickyi and Passang Dhonden for RFA Tibetan.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Radio Free Asia.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • The breakthroughs in China’s artificial intelligence (AI) technology have sparked ongoing reverberations internationally. Sam Altman, chief executive of OpenAI, publicly praised DeepSeek in recent days, saying it did some “nice work.” In a surprising 180-degree shift, he also expressed a desire to “work with China.” At the recently concluded Paris AI Action Summit, the French startup Mistral, also using an open-source model, was placed under high expectations. Moreover, when news broke of Apple collaborating with Alibaba to develop localized AI functions, both companies experienced a surge in their stock prices.

    The fact is, China’s AI companies’ “embrace of open source” has not only paved new paths for their own growth but has also spurred demand for cross-border AI collaborations among enterprises. It is driving the global AI ecosystem to transform toward “open-source inclusivity.”

    By offering some of its models for free, DeepSeek has ensured that the digital dividends of the AI era are shared equitably among all internet users. This decentralized, open-source strategy stands in stark contrast to the closed ecosystems, high resource barriers, and monopolization by a few players that have characterized AI technology in Western countries. It aligns with the global process of technological democratization. Silicon Valley venture capitalist Marc Andreessen wrote on social media platform X that as open-source, DeepSeek R1 is “a profound gift to the world.”

    In recent years, China has been actively developing multiple national-level AI open innovation platforms, providing open access and shared computing resources. It can be said that the success of “open-source” large models is deeply rooted in the rich soil of “open source.” We observe that the development of AI technology follows a spiral progression of “open source-innovation-iteration,” a logic that also underpins global technological and economic development.

    Today, from DeepSeek’s open-source ecosystem to Baidu’s Apollo autonomous driving open platform, from cost reduction and efficiency improvement in the pharmaceutical industry to collaborative innovation among multinational enterprises, these practices collectively illustrate a fundamental truth: The future of AI belongs to openness and sharing. Open source and inclusivity can certainly become a model for collaborative win-win scenarios in the global AI field, empowering and promoting sustainable development in the era of intelligence.

    On February 12, The Conversation, a news website based in Australia, published an article stating that Chinese enterprises’ embrace of open-source AI “promises to reshape the AI landscape almost overnight.” The key drivers behind China’s rise in AI, in addition to being “fast” and “collaborative,” also include being “market-driven.” Thanks to China’s robust industrial supply chain, AI technology is being implemented at an astonishing pace. This is evident in the recent wave of adoption sparked by DeepSeek in China: Over a dozen local cloud-based AI chip manufacturers have announced compatibility or launched DeepSeek model services, several cloud computing giants have pledged support for DeepSeek, and industries such as telecommunications, automotive, brokerage, and education are rapidly integrating DeepSeek. This signifies that AI will play a leading role in driving the development of new quality productive forces, acting as a catalyst for broader innovation and overall economic quality improvement in China. It will also create new opportunities and possibilities for international cooperation.

    At the recent Paris AI Action Summit, representatives from over 60 signatories, including China, jointly released a document titled “Statement on Inclusive and Sustainable Artificial Intelligence for People and the Planet.” Notably, only the representatives from the US and the UK did not sign. This indicates that the self-centered, exclusive and hegemonic logic of AI development has little market appeal internationally, while China’s advocated concept of open, inclusive, mutually beneficial and equal AI governance is recognized and accepted by the vast majority of global members.

    Isolating oneself to pursue development without an environment for communication and competition risks being replaced by entirely new pathways, regardless of how high computational power is amassed. Only through open collaboration can we address global issues such as the distribution of computational power and the establishment of ethical standards. Attempting to maintain a competitive advantage in the AI era by digging “moats” is akin to dreaming, let alone opening the “interstellar gate.”

    Moreover, closing the door on China means losing opportunities for exchanges involving advanced technologies. Some media outlets have pointed out that American companies’ further utilization of China’s open-source technology potential may be constrained by domestic political barriers.

    Currently, the global development of AI is at a crossroads. Should we continue to rely on the hegemony of computing power to build technological barriers, or should we strive for common prosperity through inclusive cooperation? China’s answer is to promote innovation through open-source initiatives and seek development through inclusivity. As China integrates into the global technology network with a humble and open attitude, the world becomes more vibrant due to the convergence of diverse forces. The future of AI development may be defined by “symbiosis in competition.” The dawn of technological equality is beginning to emerge, and China looks forward to joining hands with the world to create a more inclusive era of intelligence.

    The post China’s AI “Embracing Open Source” Offers Insights to the World first appeared on Dissident Voice.

    This post was originally published on Dissident Voice.

  • Australia and China traded blame over an incident above the disputed Paracel archipelago in the South China Sea, adding to an already volatile situation in the region.

    On Feb. 11, a Royal Australian Air Force P-8A Poseidon maritime patrol aircraft experienced an “unsafe and unprofessional interaction” with a Chinese J-16 fighter aircraft, the Australian Defence Force, or defense department, said in a statement.

    The P-8A Poseidon was conducting a routine maritime surveillance patrol in the South China Sea at the time, it said.

    Australia said the Chinese aircraft had released flares close to the Australian aircraft.

    “This was an unsafe and unprofessional maneuver that posed a risk to the aircraft and personnel,” the Australian department said.

    No crew member was injured in the incident and the aircraft was not damaged but Australia said it “expects all countries, including China, to operate their militaries in a safe and professional manner.”

    Australian Defense Minister Richard Marles told Sky News that the Chinese J-16 was “so close that there’s no way you could have been able to ensure that the flares did not hit the P-8.”

    “Had any of those flares hit the P-8, that would have definitely had the potential for significant damage to that aircraft,” he said.

    Flares, when fired at an aircraft at close proximity, could get into the engine and cause the plane to crash. Yet they are regularly used by the People’s Liberation Army Air Force against foreign assets.

    In May 2024, Australia protested to China after one of its fighter jets intercepted and dropped flares close to an Australian helicopter in international waters in the Yellow Sea.

    In late October 2023, a Chinese warplane also used flares against a Canadian shipborne maritime helicopter over the South China Sea.

    RELATED STORIES

    South China Sea: 5 things to watch in 2025

    Vietnam builds islands in South China Sea amid tension, challenges

    South China Sea: Massive chunk of coral reef destroyed by island-building rivals

    Disputed Paracel islands

    China rejected Australia’s latest complaint, saying the Australian military aircraft “deliberately intruded into China’s airspace over Xisha Qundao.”

    The archipelago that China calls Xisha, known internationally as the Paracel islands, is claimed by China, Vietnam and Taiwan.

    It has been under Beijing’s control since 1974 when Chinese troops took it from South Vietnam in a battle that killed 74 Vietnamese sailors.

    Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun said the Australian aircraft’s operation “violated China’s sovereignty and harmed our national security.”

    “China’s response to warn away the airplane was legitimate, lawful, professional and restrained,” Guo said. “Our message is quite clear: stop the provocations and infringement on China’s sovereignty, and stop turning the South China Sea into a less peaceful and stable place.”

    Defense Ministry Spokesperson Zhang Xiaogang accused Australia of “spreading false narratives.”

    “It should be pointed out that the Australian military aircraft ignored the main road in the South China Sea and intruded into other people’s homes,” Zhang told reporters.

    “China’s expulsion of them is completely reasonable, legal and beyond reproach, and is a legitimate defense of national sovereignty and security,” he added.

    The P-8A Poseidon’s surveillance patrol is a normal activity that does not violate any regulations, said Abdul Rahman Yaacob, research fellow at Australia’s Lowy Institute think tank.

    “Australia has an interest in an open and free maritime domain as it is an island,” Rahman told Radio Free Asia. “Also the Paracel archipelago is a disputed territory, China’s claims over it were rejected by an international tribunal in 2016 so legally China doesn’t have the right to respond aggressively like that.”

    Separately from the protest, the Australian defense department issued a note on Chinese vessels operating in waters to the north of Australia.

    People’s Liberation Army-Navy Jiangkai-class frigate Hengyang in Australia's exclusive economic zone on Feb. 11, 2025.
    People’s Liberation Army-Navy Jiangkai-class frigate Hengyang in Australia’s exclusive economic zone on Feb. 11, 2025.
    (Australian Defence Force)

    PLA naval task group near Australia

    The department said it could confirm the Chinese warships were the PLA Navy’s Jiangkai-class frigate Hengyang, the Renhai cruiser Zunyi and the Fuchi-class replenishment vessel Weishanhu.

    The Henyang is a guided-missile frigate carrying medium-range air defense and anti-submarine missiles, as well as sophisticated radar and sonar systems. The Zunyi is a stealth guided-missile destroyer of the Type 055 class, considered one of the most capable surface combatants in the world.

    The three ships are believed not to have intruded into Australian territorial waters and only transited its exclusive economic zone, or EEZ – the sea boundary that extends 200 nautical miles (370 km) from the coast.

    “They could be trying to familiarize themselves with the waters around Australia,” said Lowy’s Abdul Rahman Yaacob. “But the most likely reason is to test Australian surveillance capabilities, such as how fast can Australia detect their movements.”

    Rahman said Chinese submarine drones had long been suspected to be operating in Indonesian and Philippine waters.

    “I would not discount that in the future we may find Chinese submarine drones operating close to or within Australia’s EEZ.” he said.

    In 2022, Chinese spy ship Haiwangxing was tracked within 50 nautical miles of Australia’s west coast after crossing into its EEZ, setting off alarms.

    In the latest development, U.S. Indo-Pacific commander Adm. Samuel Paparo is expected to visit Canberra next week, reported the Australian Broadcasting Corporation, adding that Paparo is the man in charge of U.S. preparations for any conflict with China.

    New Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth, meanwhile, said that his country was shifting military priorities from Europe’s security to deterring war with China in the Pacific, according to media reports.

    Edited by Mike Firn.


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by RFA Staff.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • lever foundation
    4 Mins Read

    More than 175 food businesses across Asia have committed to improving their sourcing policies in light of sustainability and animal welfare, supported by a US non-profit.

    A total of 83 food companies committed to implementing improved sourcing and production policies across Asia in 2024, as a result of campaigning by sustainability NGO Lever Foundation.

    This is in addition to the 95 such corporate policies secured by the charity in 2022 and 2023 from food companies based or operating in Asia, impacting production covering “several million farm animals per year”.

    “We’re encouraged by the growing commitment from food companies across Asia to adopt more sustainable and humane sourcing practices,” said Lily Tse, corporate outreach manager at Lever Foundation.

    “These 83 new corporate policies generated last year represent meaningful progress. By working closely with companies of all sizes, from major producers to local restaurants, we’re seeing real transformation in how food is sourced and produced in Asia.”

    China plant-based partnerships in focus

    accor group china vegan
    Courtesy: Accor Group

    Among the corporate policies Lever Foundation says it generated last year are 17 shifts towards improved production systems, and five pledges to significantly ramp up the use of plant-based foods.

    According to its website, it has helped shift 29 million corporate meals to plant-based and prevented 82 million kgs of CO2e from businesses each year.

    Its impact in China is particularly notable. Lever Foundation partnered with IHG Hotels & Resorts Greater China to make 30% of the group’s offerings plant-based by 2025, a commitment that was matched a few months later by Dossen Hotel Group, and bettered by Orange Hotels, which pledged to convert 70% of its menus to plant-based options at 750 hotels.

    Lever China also signed a strategic partnership with the Low-Carbon Hotel Development Institute, a state-affiliated organisation in China, to boost the adoption of plant-based foods in the country’s hotel industry.

    These efforts come at a time when plant-based food is becoming more popular in local diets, making up a majority of the country’s protein supply. Polling shows that almost all (98%) Chinese consumers would eat more plants if they were informed about the benefits of a vegan diet.

    China may be world’s largest meat consumer – making up 28% of the global consumption growth in the decade to 2023, with intakes set to increase further until 2030 – but experts suggest that half of all protein consumption in the country must come from alternative sources by 2060, if it is to decarbonise.

    Both national and local governments are promoting plant-based and novel foods, with Beijing now home to the first cultivated meat and fermented protein R&D centre. And the China Vegan Society is gearing up for V-March, a monthlong vegan challenge inspired by Veganuary.

    “The steady growth in corporate commitments throughout 2024 reflects the value of sustained engagement and clear communication for driving positive progress in the food system,” added Kertna Tharmaraja, communications manager at Lever Foundation.

    Can Asian hospitality meet the sustainability moment?

    cage free asia
    Courtesy: Patarapong/Getty Images

    The remaining 51 commitments generated by Lever Foundation in 2024 came from companies small, medium and large – including retailers, hospitality groups, bakeries, cafés and foodservice operators – to remove “particularly destructive practices” like caged farming from their supply chains.

    Surveys by GMO Research show that at least three-quarters of consumers prefer cage-free eggs in markets like Hong Kong, Malaysia, Singapore, and the Philippines.

    In South Korea, Accor Hotels has removed caged eggs from 90% of its operations, and will fully eliminate them by this year, with support from Lever Foundation. This would speak to the 79% of Koreans who believe businesses should use cage-free eggs, and 69% who’re willing to spend more on them in restaurants.

    So far, about 40% of the corporate policies it helped introduce have been implemented, with the remainder set to be rolled out in the years ahead, within publicly announced timelines. Of the 83 companies, 77 are based in Asia, with the rest having headquarters in Oceania, Europe or the Americas.

    “Lever’s approach of working closely with partners across the supply chain has helped facilitate practical, implementable change that aligns with both business goals and sustainability imperatives,” said Tharmaraja.

    “The willingness of businesses to embrace better practices – from improved production systems to expanded plant-based offerings – reflects an encouraging shift in corporate priorities and consumer expectations.”

    asia sustainability survey
    Courtesy: PwC

    According to PwC, 43% of consumers in Asia-Pacific are making more eco-minded purchases, and a third are changing how they eat in line with planetary health. And 55% say they’ll spend more to stay at an environmentally friendly hotel, much higher than their counterparts in the rest of the world (around 40%).

    Meanwhile, Lever’s venture capital fund, called Lever VC, recently announced the first close of its Fund II, which will deploy an initial $50M in early-stage agrifood tech startups. Among the first five startups to receive financing are Gavan Technologies (maker of plant-protein-based Savor butter), sweet protein innovator Oobli, and mycelium meat startup Mush Foods. To date, Lever VC has completed over 100 investments in the category.

    The post Sustainability NGO Gets 175+ Food Companies to Commit to Responsible Sourcing in Asia appeared first on Green Queen.

    This post was originally published on Green Queen.

  • By Caleb Fotheringham, RNZ Pacific journalist in Avarua, Rarotonga

    China has confirmed details of its meeting with Cook Islands Prime Minister Mark Brown for the first time, saying Beijing “stands ready to have an in-depth exchange” with the island nation.

    Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun told reporters during his regular press conference that Brown’s itinerary, from February 10-16, would include attending the closing ceremony of the Asian Winter Games in Harbin as well as meeting with Premier of the State Council Li Qiang.

    Guo also confirmed that Brown and his delegation had visited Shanghai and Shandong as part of the state visit.

    “The Cook Islands is China’s cooperation partner in the South Pacific,” he said.

    “Since the establishment of diplomatic ties, the two countries have respected each other, treated each other as equals, and sought common development.”

    Guo told reporters that the relationship between the two countries was elevated to comprehensive strategic partnership in 2018.

    “Our friendly cooperation is rooted in profound public support and delivers tangibly to the two peoples.

    ‘New progress in bilateral relations’
    “Through Prime Minister Brown’s visit, China stands ready to have an in-depth exchange of views with the Cook Islands on our relations and work for new progress in bilateral relations.”

    Brown said on Wednesday that he was aware of the strong interest in the outcomes of his visit, which has created significant debate on the relationship with Cook Islands and New Zealand.

    He has said that the “comprehensive strategic partnership” deal with China is expected to be signed today, and does not include a security component.

    While on one hand, the New Zealand government has been urged not to overreact, on the other the Cook Islands opposition want Brown and his government out.

    Locals in Rarotonga have accused New Zealand Foreign Minister Winston Peters of being a “bully”, while others are planning to protest against Brown’s leadership.

    A local resident, Tim Buchanan, said Peters has “been a bit bullying”.

    He said Peters had overacted and the whole issue had been “majorly” blown out of proportion.

    ‘It doesn’t involve security’
    “It does not involve our national security, it does not involve borrowing a shit load of money, so what is your concern about?

    “Why do we need to consult him? We have been a sovereign nation for 60 years, and all of a sudden he’s up in arms and wanted to know everything that we’re doing”

    Brown previously told RNZ Pacific that he had assured Wellington “over and over” that there “will be no impact on our relationship and there certainly will be no surprises”.

    However, New Zealand said it should have seen the text prior to Brown leaving for China.

    Cook Islands opposition MP and leader of the Cook Islands United Party Teariki Heather filed a vote filed a vote of no confidence motion against the Prime Minister
    Cook Islands opposition MP and leader of the Cook Islands United Party Teariki Heather . . . he has filed a vote filed a vote of no confidence motion against Prime Minister Mark Brown. Image: Caleb Fotheringham/RNZ Pacific

    Vote of no confidence
    Cook Islands opposition MP Teariki Heather said he did not want anything to change with New Zealand.

    “The response from the government and Winston Peters and the Prime Minister of New Zealand, that’s really what concerns us, because they are furious,” said Heather, who is the leader of Cook Islands United Party.

    Heather has filed a no confidence motion against the Prime Minister and has been the main organiser for a protest against Brown’s leadership that will take place on Monday morning local time.

    He is expecting about 1000 people to turn up, about one in every 15 people who reside in the country.

    Opposition leader Tina Browne is backing the motion and will be at the protest which is also about the Prime Minister’s push for a local passport, which he has since dropped.

    With only eight opposition members in the 24-seat parliament, Browne said the motion of no confidence is not about the numbers.

    “It is about what are we the politicians, the members of Parliament, going to do about the two issues and for us, the best way to demonstrate our disapproval is to vote against it in Parliament, whether the members of Parliament join us or not that’s entirely up to them.”

    The 2001 document argument
    Browne said that after reading the constitution and the 2001 Joint Centenary Declaration, she agreed with Peters that the Cook Islands should have first consulted New Zealand on the China deal.

    “Our prime minister has stated that the agreement does not affect anything that he is obligated to consult with New Zealand. I’m very suspicious of that because if there is nothing offensive, why the secrecy then?

    “I would have thought, irrespective, putting aside everything, that our 60 year relationship with New Zealand, who’s been our main partner warrants us to keep that line open for consultation and that’s even if it wasn’t in [the Joint Centenary Declaration].”

    Other locals have been concerned by the lack of transparency from their government to the Cook Islands people.

    But Cook Islands’ Foreign Minister Tingika Elikana said that is not how these deals were done.

    “I think the people have to understand that in regards to agreements of this nature, there’s a lot of negotiations until the final day when it is signed and the Prime Minister is very open that the agreements will be made available publicly and then people can look at it.”

    Cook Islands Foreign Minister Tingika Elikana
    Cook Islands Foreign Minister Tingika Elikana . . . Image: Caleb Fotheringham/RNZ Pacific

    New Zealand Prime Minister Christopher Luxon said the government would wait to see what was in the agreement before deciding if any punishment should be imposed.

    With the waiting, Elikana said he was concerned.

    “We are worried but we want to see what will be their response and we’ve always reiterated that our relationship is important to us and our citizenship is really important to us, and we will try our best to remain and retain that,” Elikana said.

    He did not speculate about the vote of no confidence motion.

    “I think we just leave it to the day but I’m very confident in our team and very confident in our Prime Minister.”

    ‘Cook Islands does a lot for New Zealand’
    Cultural leader and carver Mike Tavioni said he did not know why everyone was so afraid of the Asian superpower.

    “I do not know why there is an issue with the Cook Islands and New Zealand, as long as Mark [Brown] does not commit this country to a deal with China with strings attached to it,” he said.

    Tavioni said the Cook Islands does a lot for New Zealand also, with about 80,000 Cook Islanders living in New Zealand and contributing to it’s economy.

    “The thing about consulting, asking for permission, it does not go down well because our relationship with Aotearoa should be taken into consideration.”

    This article is republished under a community partnership agreement with RNZ.

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • Read RFA coverage of this story in Tibetan.

    Chinese authorities have expelled over 1,000 Tibetan monks and nuns from the Larung Gar Buddhist Academy in the latest blow to the major center of Tibetan Buddhist learning, sources inside Tibet with knowledge of the situation said.

    Citing a lack of proper residency documentation, officials said they need to reduce the number of Buddhist clergy residing at the academy from 6,000 to 5,000, the sources said.

    The move is the latest in a long series of steps taken by China to destroy and shrink the academy, which by the early 2000’s was home to about 40,000 Buddhist monastics.

    In 2016, Chinese authorities destroyed half the compound and sent away thousands of monks and nuns. At the time, county authorities issued an order that spelled out the plans for the 2016-2017 demolitions and forced expulsions.

    In December 2024, about 400 officials and police were deployed to Larung Gar, which is in Serthar county (Seda in Chinese) within the Kardze (Ganzi) Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture of Sichuan province.

    Officials have pressured hundreds of Buddhist clergy to leave voluntarily, the sources said.

    “Those expelled have been ordered to leave under the pretext of lacking proper residency documents,” he said. “And to avoid drawing public attention, more than 1,000 monks and nuns have been gradually forced out over the past month.”

    An aerial view of Larung Gar Buddhist Academy in Serthar county of Kardze Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture in southwestern China's Sichuan province, July 23, 2015.
    An aerial view of Larung Gar Buddhist Academy in Serthar county of Kardze Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture in southwestern China’s Sichuan province, July 23, 2015.
    (China Stringer Network/Reuters)

    The source said that government officials have been stationed at the academy, imposing strict controls on the movement of monks, nuns, pilgrims and tourists.

    “They are strictly prohibited from taking photos freely and are only allowed to visit designated areas within the monastery.”

    Many of the residences of expelled Buddhist clergy have been marked for demolition, although they have not been destroyed yet, he said.

    Plans are in place to build a road through the monastery in April, leading to further demolitions, he said.

    Part of broader strategy

    The latest crackdown is seen as part of Beijing’s broader strategy to reduce the size and influence of religious institutions, particularly those ties to Tibetan Buddhism.

    While Beijing says such policies are meant to ensure social stability, rights activists argue they they aim to suppress Tibetan culture and religious freedom.

    Chinese authorities want to roll out a 15-year residency limit for Buddhist clergy at Larung Gar starting this year.

    They also plan to shrink the academy’s population even more by making registration mandatory, which will force Chinese students to leave, according to a report by Phayul, a news website about Tibet.

    RELATED STORIES

    Tibetan Buddhist centers linked to Larung Gar shut down under suspected Chinese pressure

    Larung Gar Buddhist Academy closes to new enrollment as China tightens controls

    China bans major prayer festival in Larung Gar for third consecutive year

    Destruction at Larung Gar greater than earlier reported

    Larung Gar has long been a symbol of resistance to Chinese control over Tibetan Buddhism — but it has suffered for that.

    When the Chinese government deployed around 400 troops from Drago county (Luhuo) and other areas to Larung Gar last December, with helicopters flown in to monitor the movement of monks and nuns, the source said.

    Beginning in 2025, strict restrictions will be enforced, preventing monks and nuns from staying at Larung Gar for more than 15 years, he said.

    Founded in 1980 by the late Khenpo Jigme Phuntsok, Larung Gar, was established as a center for Tibetan Buddhist education and meditation.

    Unlike traditional monasteries, it welcomed monks, nuns and lay practitioners from diverse backgrounds, fostering a unique blend of inclusivity and scholastic rigor that are now under threat.

    Larung Gar at one time was home to 40,000 Buddhist nuns and monks, but in 2017, over 4,000 monastics were expelled, and 4,700 dwellings were destroyed.

    “During that time, Chinese government officials stated that the Chinese Communist Party owned both the land and the sky, giving them the authority to do whatever they wanted with Larung Gar,” a second source said.

    Translated by Tenzin Palmo and Tenzin Dickyi for RFA Tibetan. Edited by Roseanne Gerin and Malcolm Foster.


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by RFA Tibetan.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Calls are growing Washington for action to loosen Beijing’s influence stemming from Chinese and Hong Kong companies’ control over key infrastructure on the Panama Canal and other port facilities in the Western hemisphere.

    At a recent meeting of the U.S. House of Representatives Homeland Security Subcommittee on Transportation and Maritime Security, Chairman Carlos Jimenez warned that Beijing has “a strategic position over one of the world’s most important waterways,” referring to the Panama Canal.

    He said this gives the Chinese Communist Party an opportunity “to exert influence over commercial shipping, gather intelligence on American and Allied vessel traffic, and potentially restrict the mobility of our Navy in a time of crisis.”

    Almost half of the leading container ports outside of China have some Chinese ownership or operations, experts told the hearing.

    (Amanda Weisbrod/RFA)

    Panama has recently announced a government audit of ports owned by Hong Kong billionaire Li Ka-shing’s CK Hutchison conglomerate, and U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has threatened Panamanian leader José Raúl Mulino with potential American retaliation if his country doesn’t immediately reduce Chinese influence over the canal.

    “While Panama has recently announced an audit of Hutchinson ports, that’s simply not enough,” Jimenez told the hearing. “We don’t need an audit. We need action.”

    “The United States cannot and will not accept the scenario where a foreign adversary, one that openly seeks to undermine our global standing, controls infrastructure critical to us, homeland security, military readiness and economic stability,” he said.

    He said U.S. allies should distance themselves from China, including from Chinese state-owned enterprises.

    (Amanda Weisbrod/RFA)

    While Mulino insists that the neutrality regime under the Panama Canal treaty has not been violated, two Panamanian lawyers have filed a lawsuit with the country’s supreme court, arguing that the contract allowing Hutchison, a subsidiary of CK Hutchison Holdings, to operate terminals in Balboa, on the Pacific side, and Cristobal on Atlantic side of the Panama Canal is unconstitutional, World Cargo News reported on Feb. 5.

    Dual-use military and civilian operations

    Experts told the Homeland Security Committee on Feb. 11 that there are concerns around dual-use military and civilian operations in any port with a Chinese corporate presence, not just in Panama.

    Chinese companies have established full or partial ownership of port facilities in seven countries in the Western Hemisphere: the Bahamas, Brazil, Jamaica, Mexico, Panama, Peru and the United States.

    RELATED STORIES

    EXPLAINED: Does China control the Panama Canal?

    Trump’s China tariffs include Hong Kong, ending city’s separate status

    China dominates in overseas ports: report

    China COSCO Shipping Corp. and China Merchants Group — both state-owned conglomerates owned and controlled by the Chinese government — hold eight of those investments, with Hong Kong’s CK Hutchison holds seven, according to testimony by Isaac Kardon, Senior Fellow for China Studies at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

    “China’s presence in U.S. ports presents unquantified but material risks to critical maritime and transportation infrastructure,” Kardon told the meeting.

    “The more pressing concerns involve vulnerabilities introduced by Chinese made equipment and software embedded in port systems,” he said. “Even facilities not owned or operated by Chinese firms, often rely on [Chinese-made] made technologies, for example, ship-to-shore cranes.”

    Isaac B. Kardon, a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, testifies at a U.S. House of Representatives Homeland Security Committee hearing on transportation and maritime security, Feb. 11, 2025.
    Isaac B. Kardon, a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, testifies at a U.S. House of Representatives Homeland Security Committee hearing on transportation and maritime security, Feb. 11, 2025.
    (U.S. Congress)

    “Under Beijing’s highly acquisitive data governance regime and comparatively high levels of control over [Chinese] firms, these systems enable intelligence collection and surveillance and may cause delay or disruption to the critical operations of us,” Kardon said.

    But he warned that “unwinding it recklessly will do more harm than good.”

    Between 2010 and 2019, Chinese companies plowed US$11 billion into overseas ports and around US$130 billion into subsidies for its shipping companies $130 billion, according to a recent analysis by the Council on Foreign Relations.

    One distinctive feature, according to written testimony from Ryan C. Berg, Director of the Americas Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, is that more than half of China’s ports tend to sit on major shipping lanes and strategic chokepoints.

    China-backed companies now operate port terminals in at least three locations in Mexico, the Hutchison Ports in the Panama Canal along with a recently opened megaport in Chancay, Peru, Berg said, citing plans for a deepwater port in St. John’s Harbor, Antigua and Barbuda.

    Almost half of the leading container ports outside of China have some Chinese ownership or operations, and “Beijing intends to become a “pier competitor” by setting up a string of dual-use ports that can serve as an extensive international network of infrastructure for People’s Liberation Army vessels,” he wrote.

    China’s military-civil fusion strategy could also bring commercial espionage and military security risks, including radar and GPS jamming, physical blockades, and even containerized weapon systems, Berg said.

    Threats to American security

    Meanwhile, former CIA analyst Matthew Kroenig warned that China’s port investments, including those in Peru and Panama, “pose a number of threats to U.S. homeland security.”

    “China could restrict or block access to ports, threatening American trade and economic wellbeing,” Kroenig testified. “In the event of a crisis or war, China could hinder the passage of American naval vessels, undermining American war plans.”

    Former CIA analyst Matthew Kroenig testifies at a U.S. House of Representatives Homeland Security Committee hearing on transportation and maritime security, Feb. 11, 2025.
    Former CIA analyst Matthew Kroenig testifies at a U.S. House of Representatives Homeland Security Committee hearing on transportation and maritime security, Feb. 11, 2025.
    (U.S. Congress)

    China could also use deep water ports to host People’s Liberation Army Navy vessels, enabling the projection of military power

    into the Western Hemisphere, warned, adding that Chinese-operated ports are already used to facilitate the shipment of fentanyl precursors to the United States.

    Kroenig called on Washington to put pressure on its neighbors to adopt a “de-risking” strategy toward China, including “hard decoupling” from China in sensitive areas like critical infrastructure, while providing them with viable alternatives.

    Berg called for a “port buyback” scheme financed by the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation and multilateral financial institutions “to help countries terminate agreements early and entice more transparent operators to bid on concessions.”

    Cary Davis, President & CEO of the American Association of Port Authorities, also called on the United States to offer alternatives to Chinese investments.

    “If we want to counter Chinese influence at ports and secure a safe and prosperous economic future, we must provide a strong, attractive alternative through robust American investment,” he told the Committee.

    Congress could also offer financial incentives to trusted allies to enable them to purchase cargo-handling equipment not made in China, he said.

    Translated by Luisetta Mudie. Edited by Malcolm Foster.


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Bing X for RFA Mandarin.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • China’s soupy winter smogs used to make global headlines, and despite a fall in air pollution exposure in recent years, they may have done invisible damage that is only now coming to light.

    China tops the world when it comes to cases of lung adenocarcinoma, a form of cancer that is becoming more prevalent, possibly due to particulate air pollution, according to a recent report from a body linked to the World Health Organization.

    Lung adenocarcinoma has emerged as the predominant form of lung cancer around the world in recent years, with increasing risks observed among younger generations, particularly females, in most countries, according to a recent study by the International Agency for Research on Cancer.

    Published in The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, the study “highlights that the largest burden of lung adenocarcinoma attributable to ambient particulate matter pollution was estimated in East Asia, particularly China,” the agency said in a statement marking World Cancer Day.

    In 2022, more than 68% of global adenocarcinoma cases in men were in China, while Chinese women accounted for more than 70% of global cases in women.

    A Chinese patient looks at his medicine, after picking it up at a pharmacy, inside a hospital in Beijing, Jan. 10, 2008.
    A Chinese patient looks at his medicine, after picking it up at a pharmacy, inside a hospital in Beijing, Jan. 10, 2008.
    (Andy Wong/AP)

    The study authors think there could be a strong link to particulate air pollution.

    “We examine changes in risk in different countries across successive generations and assess the potential burden of lung adenocarcinoma linked to ambient PM pollution,” study lead author Freddie Bray said.

    “The results provide important insights as to how both the disease and the underlying risk factors are evolving, offering clues as to how we can optimally prevent lung cancer worldwide.”

    Shift to another form of cancer

    The study analyzed global, population-based cancer data for 2022, and found that adenocarcinoma was now the predominant form of lung cancer, a shift away from squamous cell carcinoma.

    It said the shift was likely linked to changes in smoking patterns and exposure to environmental pollutants, estimating that 114,486 cases in men and 80,378 in women were related to air pollution, with East Asia, especially China, being the most affected region.

    Global ambient fine particulate matter (PM2.5) air pollution is responsible for millions of annual premature deaths and trillions of US dollars of social costs.

    There has been a marked post-2011 decrease in particulate pollution, largely driven by decreasing PM2.5 exposure in China, Nature Communications reported in 2023, adding that India has become the leading contributor to global ambient PM2.5 exposure since 2015.

    But some 99% of the global population lives in an area where air quality doesn’t meet international standards for good health, currently set at 5 micrograms per cubic meter for the smallest and most lethal particle, PM2.5.

    RELATED STORIES

    Cities ‘Failing to Curb Air Pollution’ as Winter Smog Engulfs Northern China

    Outcry Over Smog Cloud

    People in Smog-Hit Northern China Die Three Years Younger: Study

    In 2017, more than 30% of Chinese households still used solid fuels for heating and cooking, suggesting that indoor air pollution could also be a driving factor behind this type of cancer.

    Charles Swanton, clinical professor at the Francis Crick Institute, a British biomedical research institute, discovered in 2022 that EGFR genetic mutations cause lung cancer in non-smokers.

    He told RFA Mandarin in a recent interview that the EGFR mutation is a common driver mutation associated with lung adenocarcinoma.

    “We don’t know why EGFR mutant lung cancer is so prevalent in Asia,” Swanton said. “One of the theories that we have is that air pollution is a contributor to the prevalence of these mutations.”

    “Data from our lab shows that, in normal tissue that’s been exposed to air pollution, it’s easier to identify EGFR mutant clones- suggesting that these clones expand preferentially in lung damaged by particulate matter,” he said.

    “In other words, the air pollution creates a fertile soil upon which the seed, which is the EGFR mutation, can grow.”

    But he said the biggest risk factor for lung cancer is still smoking.

    “[Smoking] puts you at about a 30-fold increased risk of lung cancer,” he said. “The risk of air pollution… is a lot less, probably less than threefold, (or at least 10 times lower than tobacco exposure) depending on the area you live in on the planet.”

    “The reason why it’s such a problem is that so many more people are exposed to air pollution than they are to tobacco smoke,” Swanton said.

    Cases of never-smokers

    As smoking rates decline in many countries around the world, the proportion of lung cancer cases in people who have never smoked has increased, making it the fifth most common cancer to cause death.

    Almost all cases in never-smokers are lung adenocarcinoma, which is also the most common form of lung cancer in women and residents of East Asia.

    While CAT scans have boosted survival rates with better imaging allowing cancers to be detected sooner, Swanton said his lab is also working on ways to screen non-smoking populations for lung cancer, and that concrete progress could be seen in as little as 18 to 20 months.

    The number of smokers in China has fallen significantly since the 1990s, but lung cancer edged out liver cancer as the top cancer killer in China in 2012.

    Smoking rates among Chinese adults fell from 28.1% in 2010 to 24.1% in 2022. In 2019, the smoking rate among Chinese men aged 15 and over was 49.7%, a fall of 18.2% from 1990, while the smoking rate among women was 3.5%, down 20.9% from 1990.

    A 2022 report from China’s National Cancer Center showed that of the 2.5742 million people who died of cancer that year, 733,300 died from lung cancer and 316,500 from liver cancer.

    Norman Edelman, Professor of Preventive Medicine, Internal Medicine, and Physiology and Biophysics at the State University of New York, said the change in lung cancer types was “a kind of conundrum.”

    “The evidence is pretty strong that particulate air pollution is a risk factor for lung cancer,” he said. “And it is true we’re beginning to see more women, especially young women, have lung cancer even though they haven’t smoked.”

    “The prevailing hypothesis about the cause of many cancers is the so-called inflammation hypothesis, so things that get into the lung and cause inflammation and cause outpouring of all kinds of chemicals and response to the inflammation… which applies to both cigarette smoke and air pollution,” Edelman said.

    Translated by Luisetta Mudie.


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Lucie Lo for RFA Mandarin.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • COMMENTARY: By Eugene Doyle

    The country’s leading daily newspaper, The New Zealand Herald, screamed out this online headline by a columnist on February 10: “Should New Zealand invade the Cook Islands?”

    The New Zealand government and the mainstream media have gone ballistic (thankfully not literally just yet) over the move by the small Pacific nation to sign a strategic partnership with China in Beijing this week.

    It is the latest in a string of island nations that have signalled a closer relationship with China, something that rattles nerves and sabres in Wellington and Canberra.

    The Chinese have politely told the Kiwis to back off.  Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun told reporters that China and the Cook Islands have had diplomatic relations since 1997 which “should not be disrupted or restrained by any third party”.

    “New Zealand is rightly furious about it,” a TVNZ Pacific affairs writer editorialised to the nation. The deal and the lack of prior consultation was described by various journalists as “damaging”, “of significant concern”, “trouble in paradise”, an act by a “renegade government”.

    Foreign Minister Winston Peters, not without cause, railed at what he saw as the Cook Islands government going against long-standing agreements to consult over defence and security issues.

    "Should New Zealand invade the Cook islands?"
    “Should New Zealand invade the Cook islands?” . . . New Zealand Herald columnist Matthew Hooton’s view in an “oxygen-starved media environment” amid rattled nerves. Image: New Zealand Herald screenshot APR

    ‘Clearly about secession’
    Matthew Hooton, who penned the article in The Herald, is a major commentator on various platforms.

    “Cook Islands Prime Minister Mark Brown’s dealings with China are clearly about secession from the realm of New Zealand,” Hooton said without substantiation but with considerable colonial hauteur.

    “His illegal moves cannot stand. It would be a relatively straightforward military operation for our SAS to secure all key government buildings in the Cook Islands’ capital, Avarua.”

    This could be written off as the hyperventilating screeching of someone trying to drum up readers but he was given a major platform to do so and New Zealanders live in an oxygen-starved media environment where alternative analysis is hard to find.

    The Cook Islands, with one of the largest Exclusive Economic Zones in the world — a whopping 2 million sq km — is considered part of New Zealand’s backyard, albeit over 3000 km to the northeast.  The deal with China is focused on economics not security issues, according to Cooks Prime Minister Mark Brown.

    Deep sea mining may be on the list of projects as well as trade cooperation, climate, tourism, and infrastructure.

    The Cook Islands seafloor is believed to have billions of tons of polymetallic nodules of cobalt, copper, nickel and manganese, something that has even caught the attention of US Secretary of State Marco Rubio. Various players have their eyes on it.

    Glen Johnson, writing in Le Monde Diplomatique, reported last year:

    “Environmentalists have raised major concerns, particularly over the destruction of deep-sea habitats and the vast, choking sediment plumes that excavation would produce.”

    All will be revealed
    Even Cook Island’s citizens have not been consulted on the details of the deal, including deep sea mining.  Clearly, this should not be the case. All will be revealed shortly.

    New Zealand and the Cook Islands have had formal relations since 1901 when the British “transferred” the islands to New Zealand.  Cook Islanders have a curious status: they hold New Zealand passports but are recognised as their own country. The US government went a step further on September 25, 2023. President Joe Biden said:

    “Today I am proud to announce that the United States recognises the Cook Islands as a sovereign and independent state and will establish diplomatic relations between our two nations.”

    A move to create their own passports was undermined by New Zealand officials who successfully stymied the plan.

    New Zealand has taken an increasingly hostile stance vis-a-vis China, with PM Luxon describing the country as a “strategic competitor” while at the same time depending on China as our biggest trading partner.  The government and a compliant mainstream media sing as one choir when it comes to China: it is seen as a threat, a looming pretender to be South Pacific hegemon, replacing the flip-flopping, increasingly incoherent USA.

    Climate change looms large for island nations. Much of the Cooks’ tourism infrastructure is vulnerable to coastal inundation and precious reefs are being destroyed by heating sea temperatures.

    “One thing that New Zealand has got to get its head round is the fact that the Trump administration has withdrawn from the Paris Climate Accord,” Dr Robert Patman, professor of international relations at Otago University, says. “And this is a big deal for most Pacific Island states — and that means that the Cook Islands nation may well be looking for greater assistance elsewhere.”

    Diplomatic spat with global coverage
    The story of the diplomatic spat has been covered in the Middle East, Europe and Asia.  Eyebrows are rising as yet again New Zealand, a close ally of Israel and a participant in the US Operation Prosperity Guardian to lift the Houthi Red Sea blockade of Israel, shows its Western mindset.

    Matthew Hooton’s article is the kind of colonialist fantasy masquerading as geopolitical analysis that damages New Zealand’s reputation as a friend to the smaller nations of our region.

    Yes, the Chinese have an interest in our neck of the woods — China is second only to Australia in supplying much-needed development assistance to the region.

    It is sound policy not insurrection for small nations to diversify economic partnerships and secure development opportunities for their people. That said, serious questions should be posed and deserve to be answered.

    Geopolitical analyst Dr Geoffrey Miller made a useful contribution to the debate saying there was potential for all three parties to work together:

    “There is no reason why New Zealand can’t get together with China and the Cook Islands and develop some projects together,” Dr Miller says. “Pacific states are the winners here because there is a lot of competition for them”.

    I think New Zealand and Australia could combine more effectively with a host of South Pacific island nations and form a more effective regional voice with which to engage with the wider world and collectively resist efforts by the US and China to turn the region into a theatre of competition.

    We throw the toys out
    We throw the toys out of the cot when the Cooks don’t consult with us but shrug when Pasifika elders like former Tuvalu PM Enele Sopoaga call us out for ignoring them.

    In Wellington last year, I heard him challenge the bigger powers, particularly Australia and New Zealand, to remember that the existential threat faced by Pacific nations comes first from climate change. He also reminded New Zealanders of the commitment to keeping the South Pacific nuclear-free.

    To succeed, a “Pacific for the peoples of the Pacific” approach would suggest our ministries of foreign affairs should halt their drift to being little more than branch offices of the Pentagon and that our governments should not sign up to US Great Power competition with China.

    Ditching the misguided anti-China AUKUS project would be a good start.

    Friends to all, enemies of none. Keep the Pacific peaceful, neutral and nuclear-free.

    Eugene Doyle is a community organiser and activist in Wellington, New Zealand. He received an Absolutely Positively Wellingtonian award in 2023 for community service. His first demonstration was at the age of 12 against the Vietnam War. This article was first published at his public policy website Solidarity and is republished here with permission.

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • Days after thousands of people rallied in London to protest plans for a new Chinese “super-embassy,” the local council has said it won’t argue against the project at a key government hearing, sparking allegations of political pressure from the highest levels of government.

    The Chinese government purchased the historic Royal Mint in 2018 — near the Tower of London — with plans to build what would become Beijing’s largest diplomatic facility globally. Rights groups and protesters warned that the facility would facilitate espionage and Beijing’s “long-arm” law enforcement.

    On the first day of a 12-day planning inquiry, Morag Ellis KC, a lawyer acting on behalf of Tower Hamlets Borough Council, said the council wouldn’t be offering any evidence opposing the plan, despite having previously rejected the Chinese government’s planning application on two occasions.

    She said the main reason was the withdrawal by the city’s Metropolitan Police of its objections to the project.

    “In the light of the Metropolitan Police services changed position and the external transport advice, which mirrored that of the statutory highway authorities, it would have been irresponsible to seek to pursue the putative reason for refusal,” Ellis told the hearing on Tuesday.

    The hearing was packed with observers in the public gallery, with groups of people speaking Mandarin lining up early to get a seat. At least a dozen would-be observers were turned away after the venue reached capacity.

    The planning inquiry into China's application to build a
    The planning inquiry into China’s application to build a “super-embassy” on the former site of the Royal Mint in London, Feb. 22, 2025.
    (RFA)

    Ellis also cited advice by transportation consultants iTransport, and that of government highway authorities.

    “On the 12th of January this year, the Borough issued its revised statement of case, explaining why it was no longer in a position to present evidence in support of the putative reason for refusal,” Ellis said.

    Safety and security concerns

    China resubmitted its application to build the massive new facility in London despite being rejected in 2022 amid a vocal campaign by rights groups.

    The Metropolitan Police had earlier spoken against the planned embassy due to safety and security concerns, particularly relating to expected large-scale protests outside the facility, which includes plans for offices, residential quarters and cultural venues.

    “The Metropolitan Police Service’s Public Order Command are content that, on balance, there is sufficient space for future protests to be accommodated without significantly impacting the adjacent road network,” the force said in a Jan. 17 letter confirming its change of position, which it said was based on a three-year-old council document.

    The U-turn sparked allegations that the plan is being pushed through by strong political pressure from the highest levels of government.

    Simon Bell, a lawyer speaking on behalf of the neighboring Royal Mint Court Residents Association, which opposes the plan, said it was “clear that there has been a political pre-determination of these applications at some of the highest levels of central Government.”

    He said a three-year-old assessment by the council couldn’t predict the size of future demonstrations, and cited the Met Police’s failure to contain Saturday’s protest at the proposed site.

    “Roads were blocked and considerable police presence confirmed the residents’ fear for their safety and security,” Bell told the hearing. ”If this is a taste of what is to come in respect of a proposed embassy, one can only imagine how the adverse effect of protests will impact on the residents’ safety and security, during any construction period, let alone after the embassy has come forward.”

    RELATED STORIES

    Thousands rally against China’s ‘mega-embassy’ in London

    London council rejects China’s ‘super-embassy’ plan – again

    Activists vow to fight China’s bid for new ‘super embassy’ in London

    Luke de Pulford, executive director of the cross-party Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China, said the police appeared to have been “influenced by forces other than the merits of the application.”

    “The public understanding is that the police are operationally independent and that their decisions regarding public safety ought to brook no interference,” he said.

    Infiltration and attacks

    The planning application comes amid growing concerns over Chinese Communist Party infiltration of all aspects of British life, and warnings from Hong Kongers in exile over growing acts of violence by Beijing supporters and officials alike.

    Overseas activists frequently report being targeted by agents and supporters of the Chinese state, including secret Chinese police stations in a number of countries.

    Simon Cheng, co-founder of the advocacy group Hongkongers in Britain, said the proposed embassy posed a “serious risk to public safety, local infrastructures, and fundamental democratic freedoms,” and warned that it would become a “flashpoint of large-scale protests against Chinese Communist Party human rights abuses.”

    Simon Cheng, co-founder of the advocacy group Hong Kongers in Britain, speaks at a planning inquiry into China's application to build a
    Simon Cheng, co-founder of the advocacy group Hong Kongers in Britain, speaks at a planning inquiry into China’s application to build a “super-embassy” on the former site of the Royal Mint in London, Feb. 22, 2025.
    (Tower Hamlets Borough Council)

    “This embassy will … be an extension of Chinese Communist Party’s authoritarian reach into Britain,” Cheng said. “We have already seen the evidence of Chinese diplomatic outposts being used for, for example, monitoring and intimidating exile activists like Hong Kongers, Tibetans, Chinese dissidents in the UK [and] Uyghurs.”

    “This embassy will make it even easier for Chinese authorities to track, intimidate, and suppress critics of such a regime.”

    Cheng said the embassy could also empower efforts to suppress free speech on British soil.

    “The Chinese government has a history of pressuring businesses, universities, and local institutions to align with its interests,” he said. “It is about whether Britain is willing to host and legitimise an embassy that will serve as a hub for authoritarian influence.”

    Translated by Luisetta Mudie.


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Matthew Leung for RFA Cantonese.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • China went from one of the poorest countries in the world to global economic powerhouse in a mere four decades. Currently featured in the news is DeepSeek, the free, open source A.I. built by innovative Chinese entrepreneurs which just pricked the massive U.S. A.I. bubble.

    Even more impressive, however, is the infrastructure China has built, including 26,000 miles of high speed rail, the world’s largest hydroelectric power station, the longest sea-crossing bridge in the world, 100,000 miles of expressway, the world’s first commercial magnetic levitation train, the world’s largest urban metro network, seven of the world’s 10 busiest ports, and solar and wind power generation accounting for over 35% of global renewable energy capacity. Topping the list is the Belt and Road Initiative, an infrastructure development program involving 140 countries, through which China has invested in ports, railways, highways and energy projects worldwide.

    All that takes money. Where did it come from? Numerous funding sources are named in mainstream references, but the one explored here is a rarely mentioned form of quantitative easing — the central bank just “prints the money.” (That’s the term often used, though printing presses aren’t necessarily involved.)

    From 1996 to 2024, the Chinese national money supply increased by a factor of more than 53 or 5300% — from 5.84 billion to 314 billion Chinese yuan (CNY) [see charts below]. How did that happen? Exporters brought the foreign currencies (largely U.S. dollars) they received for their goods to their local banks and traded them for the CNY needed to pay their workers and suppliers. The central bank —the Public Bank of China or PBOC — printed CNY and traded them for the foreign currencies, then kept the foreign currencies as reserves, effectively doubling the national export revenue.

    Investopedia confirms that policy, stating:

    One major task of the Chinese central bank, the PBOC, is to absorb the large inflows of foreign capital from China’s trade surplus. The PBOC purchases foreign currency from exporters and issues that currency in local yuan. The PBOC is free to publish any amount of local currency and have it exchanged for forex. … The PBOC can print yuan as needed …. [Emphasis added.]

    Interestingly, that huge 5300% explosion in local CNY did not trigger runaway inflation. In fact China’s consumer inflation rate, which was as high as 24% in 1994, leveled out after that and averaged 2.5% per year from 1996 to 2023.


    https://www.macrotrends.net/global-metrics/countries/CHN/china/inflation-rate-cpi?form=MG0AV3

    How was that achieved? As in the U.S., the central bank engages in “open market operations” (selling federal securities into the open market, withdrawing excess cash). It also imposes price controls on certain essential commodities. According to a report by Nasdaq, China has implemented price controls on iron ore, copper, corn, grain, meat, eggs and vegetables as part of its 14th five-year plan (2021-2025), to ensure food security for the population. Particularly important in maintaining price stability, however, is that the money has gone into manufacturing, production and infrastructure. GDP (supply) has gone up with demand (money), keeping prices stable. [See charts below.]


    https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/money-supply-m2Gross Domestic Product for China (MKTGDPCNA646NWDB) | FRED | St. Louis Fed


    Gross Domestic Product for China (MKTGDPCNA646NWDB) | FRED | St. Louis Fed

    The U.S., too, has serious funding problems today, and we have engaged in quantitative easing (QE) before. Could our central bank also issue the dollars we need without triggering the dreaded scourge of hyperinflation? This article will argue that we can. But first some Chinese economic history.

    From Rags to Riches in Four Decades

    China’s rise from poverty began in 1978, when Deng Xiaoping introduced market-oriented reforms. Farmers were allowed to sell their surplus produce in the market, doors were opened to foreign investors and private businesses and foreign companies were encouraged to grow. By the 1990s, China had become a major exporter of low-cost manufactured goods. Key factors included cheap labor, infrastructure development and World Trade Organization membership in 2001.

    Chinese labor is cheaper than in the U.S. largely because the government funds or subsidizes social needs, reducing the operational costs of Chinese companies and improving workforce productivity. The government invests heavily in public transportation infrastructure, including metros, buses and high-speed rail, making them affordable for workers and reducing the costs of getting manufacturers’ products to market.

    The government funds education and vocational training programs, ensuring a steady supply of skilled workers, with government-funded technical schools and universities producing millions of graduates annually. Affordable housing programs are provided for workers, particularly in urban areas.

    China’s public health care system, while not free, is heavily subsidized by the government. And a public pension system reduces the need for companies to offer private retirement plans. The Chinese government also provides direct subsidies and incentives to key industries, such as technology, renewable energy and manufacturing.

    After it joined the WTO, China’s exports grew rapidly, generating large trade surpluses and an influx of foreign currency, allowing the country to accumulate massive foreign exchange reserves. In 2010, China surpassed the U.S. as the world’s largest exporter. In the following decade, it shifted its focus to high-tech industries, and in 2013 the Belt and Road Initiative was launched. The government directed funds through state-owned banks and enterprises, with an emphasis on infrastructure and industrial development.

    Funding Exponential Growth

    In the early stages of reform, foreign investment was a key source of capital. Export earnings then generated significant foreign exchange reserves. China’s high savings rate provided a pool of liquidity for investment, and domestic consumption grew. Decentralizing the banking system was also key. According to a lecture by U.K. Prof. Richard Werner:

    Deng Xiaoping started with one mono bank. He realized quickly, scrap that; we’re going to have a lot of banks. He created small banks, community banks, savings banks, credit unions, regional banks, provincial banks. Now China has 4,500 banks. That’s the secret to success. That’s what we have to aim for. Then we can have prosperity for the whole world. Developing countries don’t need foreign money. They just need community banks supporting [local business] to have the money to get the latest technology.

    China managed to avoid the worst impacts of the 1997 Asian Financial Crisis. It did not devalue its currency; it maintained strict control over capital flows and the PBOC acted as a lender of last resort, providing liquidity to state-controlled banks when needed.

    In the 1990s, however, its four major state banks did suffer massive losses, with non-performing loans totaling more than 20% of their assets. Technically, the banks were bankrupt, but the government did not let them go bust. The non-performing loans were moved on to the balance sheets of four major asset management companies (“bad banks”), and the PBOC injected new capital into the “good banks.”

    In a January 2024 article titled “The Chinese Economy Is Due a Round of Quantitative Easing,” Prof. Li Wei, Director of the China Economy and Sustainable Development Center, wrote of this policy, “The central bank directly intervened in the economy by creating money. Seen this way, unconventional financing is nothing less than Chinese-style quantitative easing.”

    In an August 2024 article titled “China’s 100-billion-yuan Question: Does Rare Government Bond Purchase Alter Policy Course?,” Sylvia Ma wrote of China’s forays into QE:

    Purchasing government bonds in the secondary market is allowed under Chinese law, but the central bank is forbidden to subscribe to bonds directly issued by the finance ministry. [Note that this is also true of the U.S. Fed.] Such purchases from traders were tried on a small scale 20 years ago.

    However, the monetary authority resorted more to printing money equivalent to soaring foreign exchange reserves from 2001, as the country saw a robust increase in trade surplus following its accession to the World Trade Organization. [Emphasis added.]

    This is the covert policy of printing CNY and trading this national currency for the foreign currencies (mostly U.S. dollars) received from exporters.

    What does the PBOC do with the dollars? It holds a significant portion as foreign exchange reserves, to stabilize the CNY and manage currency fluctuations; it invests in U.S. Treasury bonds and other dollar-denominated assets to earn a return; and it uses U.S. dollars to facilitate international trade deals, many of which are conducted in dollars.

    The PBOC also periodically injects capital into the three “policy banks” through which the federal government implements its five-year plans. These are China Development Bank, the Export-Import Bank of China, and the Agricultural Development Bank of China, which provide loans and financing for domestic infrastructure and services as well as for the Belt and Road Initiative. A January 2024 Bloomberg article titled “China Injects $50 Billion Into Policy Banks in Financing Push” notes that the policy banks “are driven by government priorities more than profits,” and that some economists have called the PBOC funding injections “helicopter money” or “Chinese-style quantitative easing.”

    Prof. Li argues that with the current insolvency of major real estate developers and the rise in local government debt, China should engage in this overt form of QE today. Other commentators agree, and the government appears to be moving in that direction. Prof. Li writes:

    As long as it does not trigger inflation, quantitative easing can quickly and without limit generate sufficient liquidity to resolve debt issues and pump confidence into the market.…

    Quantitative easing should be the core of China’s macroeconomic policy, with more than 80% of funds coming from QE

    As the central bank is the only institution in China with the power to create money, it has the ability to create a stable environment for economic growth. [Emphasis added.]

    Eighty-percent funding just from money-printing sounds pretty radical, but China’s macroeconomic policy is determined by five-year plans designed to serve the public and the economy, and the policy banks funding the plans are publicly-owned. That means profits are returned to the public purse, avoiding the sort of private financialization and speculative exploitation resulting when the U.S. Fed engaged in QE to bail out the banks after the 2007-08 banking crisis.

    The U.S. Too Could Use Another Round of QE — and Some Public Policy Banks

    There is no law against governments or their central banks just printing the national currency without borrowing it first. The U.S. Federal Reserve has done it, Abraham Lincoln’s Treasury did it, and it is probably the only way out of our current federal debt crisis. As Prof. Li observes, we can do it “without limit” so long as it does not trigger inflation.

    Financial commentator Alex Krainer observes that the total U.S. debt, public and private, comes to more than $101 trillion (citing the St. Louis Fed’s graph titled “All Sectors; Debt Securities and Loans”). But the monetary base — the reserves available to pay that debt — is only $5.6 trillion. That means the debt is 18 times the monetary base. The U.S. economy holds far fewer dollars than we need for economic stability.

    The dollar shortfall can be filled debt- and interest-free by the U.S. Treasury, just by printing dollars as Lincoln’s Treasury did (or by issuing them digitally). It can also be done by the Fed, which “monetizes” federal securities by buying them with reserves it issues on its books, then returns the interest to the Treasury and after deducting its costs. If the newly-issued dollars are used for productive purposes, supply will go up with demand, and prices should remain stable.

    Note that even social services, which don’t directly produce revenue, can be considered “productive” in that they support the “human capital” necessary for production. Workers need to be healthy and well educated in order to build competitively and well, and the government needs to supplement the social costs borne by companies if they are to compete with China’s subsidized businesses.

    Parameters would obviously need to be imposed to circumscribe Congress’s ability to spend “without limit,” backed by a compliant Treasury or Fed. An immediate need is for full transparency in budgeted expenditures. The Pentagon, for example, spends nearly $1 trillion of our taxpayer money annually and has never passed a clean audit, as required by law.

    We Sorely Need an Infrastructure Bank

    The U.S. is one of the few developed countries without an infrastructure bank. Ironically, it was Alexander Hamilton, the first U.S. Treasury secretary, who developed the model. Winning freedom from Great Britain left the young country with what appeared to be an unpayable debt. Hamilton traded the debt and a percentage of gold for non-voting shares in the First U.S. Bank, paying a 6% dividend. This capital was then leveraged many times over into credit to be used specifically for infrastructure and development. Based on the same model, the Second U.S. Bank funded the vibrant economic activity of the first decades of the United States.

    In the 1930s, Roosevelt’s government pulled the country out of the Great Depression by repurposing a federal agency called the Reconstruction Finance Corporation (RFC) into a lending machine for development on the Hamiltonian model. Formed under the Hoover administration, the RFC was not actually an infrastructure bank but it acted like one. Like China Development Bank, it obtained its liquidity by issuing bonds.

    The primary purchaser of RFC bonds was the federal government, driving up the federal debt; but the debt to GDP ratio evened out over the next four decades, due to the dramatic increase in productivity generated by the RFC’s funding of the New Deal and World War II. That was also true of the federal debt after the American Revolution and the Civil War.


    One chart that tells the story of US debt from 1790 to 2011

    A pending bill for an infrastructure bank on the Hamiltonian model is HR 4052, The National Infrastructure Bank Act of 2023, which ended 2024 with 48 sponsors and was endorsed by dozens of legislatures, local councils, and organizations. Like the First and Second U.S. Banks, it is intended to be a depository bank capitalized with existing federal securities held by the private sector, for which the bank will pay an additional 2% over the interest paid by the government. The bank will then leverage this capital into roughly 10 times its value in loans, as all depository banks are entitled to do. The bill proposes to fund $5 trillion in infrastructure capitalized over a 10-year period with $500 billion in federal securities exchanged for preferred (non-voting) stock in the bank. Like the RFC, the bank will be a source of off-budget financing, adding no new costs to the federal budget. (For more information, see https://www.nibcoalition.com/.)

    Growing Our Way Out of Debt

    Rather than trying to kneecap our competitors with sanctions and tariffs, we can grow our way to prosperity by turning on the engines of production. Far more can be achieved through cooperation than through economic warfare. DeepSeek set the tone with its free, open source model. Rather than a heavily guarded secret, its source code is freely available to be shared and built upon by entrepreneurs around the world.

    We can pull off our own economic miracle, funded with newly issued dollars backed by the full faith and credit of the government and the people. Contrary to popular belief, “full faith and credit” is valuable collateral, something even Bitcoin and gold do not have. It means the currency will be accepted everywhere – not just at the bank or the coin dealer’s but at the grocer’s and the gas station. If the government directs newly created dollars into new goods and services, supply will grow along with demand and the currency should retain its value. The government can print, pay for workers and materials, and produce its way into an economic renaissance.

    The post “Quantitative Easing with Chinese Characteristics” first appeared on Dissident Voice.

    This post was originally published on Dissident Voice.

  • TAIPEI, Taiwan – Taiwan is going to increase the scale of its main annual military exercise by mobilizing more reserve brigades, amid media reports that the number of Chinese military aircraft entering the airspace around Taiwan has doubled since the inauguration of President Lai Ching-te in May last year.

    China sees Taiwan as a breakaway province that must eventually reunite, even by force if necessary. Beijing views Lai, a pro-independence advocate, as a separatist and has increased military drills, economic pressure, and diplomatic isolation to counter his leadership.

    “This year’s drill will mobilize an entire reserve brigade with an estimated force of 2,400 to 3,000 troops to conduct regional defense operations,” Su Tong-wei, deputy director of the Joint Operations Planning Division at Taiwan’s Ministry of National Defense, told journalists at a press conference, referring to the Han Kuang exercise.

    The exercise is Taiwan’s largest annual military drill, testing its defense preparations for a Chinese invasion. It includes live-fire drills, joint operations and attack simulations, highlighting the island’s focus on asymmetric warfare amid rising cross-strait tensions.

    Previous drills only mobilized hundreds of reserve troops.

    Defense analysts said the goal of the exercise this year is to test how effectively Taiwan’s newly established county-level reserve brigades can mobilize and operate.

    “With a mobilized force of 2,400 to 3,000 troops, if the brigade can independently carry out mobilization and training without external support, it would demonstrate the ability to rapidly and effectively deploy reserved forces in response to a potential threat—this is the core focus of the exercise,” Taiwanese retired major general Arthur Kuo told Radio Free Asia.

    However, Kuo said mobilizing an entire reserve brigade also presents challenges for unit commanders and participating troops at all levels, including logistical support, command and coordination.

    “Effective command and coordination of brigade-level units, especially when integrating with nearby active-duty forces during the exercise, require careful planning, thorough rehearsals, and precise execution,” he added.

    On Tuesday, Taiwanese media reported the exercise would double the duration of its live-fire drills from 5 to 10 days, but Su declined to confirm that.

    “The duration of the exercise is still being planned and will be determined based on the level of operational plan verification, with further evaluations to finalize the training schedule,” Su said.

    US request?

    Taiwanese media also reported that the island’s latest decision was made in response to a request from the United States.

    Radio Free Asia has not been able to verify the reports.

    In March 2024, then-U.S. Indo-Pacific Commander Admiral John Aquilino was questioned about Taiwan’s military readiness at a congressional hearing.

    Then-representative Matt Gaetz referred to Israel’s rapid mobilization of 360,000 reservists within a day following a Hamas militant attack, suggesting that Taiwan could learn from this example. Aquilino acknowledged the comparison and emphasized efforts to strengthen Taiwan’s self-defense capabilities.

    Kuo said while there was no public information indicating a specific role for U.S. forces this year, they were expected to observe.

    “U.S. military observers have frequently participated in war games and live-fire drills, offering recommendations, and this time is likely no exception,” Kuo said.

    “Strengthening reserve forces does indeed help demonstrate Taiwan’s combat capabilities and determination for self-defense to traditional allies such as the U.S., thereby deterring enemy aggression,” he added.

    The U.S. military, for instance, had deployed more than 200 instructors to various units in Taiwan to assist with the 14-day reservist training program, which began in 2023, according to Taiwanese government reports.

    RELATED STORIES

    China ‘ramping up’ efforts to suppress Taiwan in South Africa, says Taipei

    Taiwan says 85% of national security cases involve retired army, police

    Taiwan’s record budget cuts raise concerns over defense readiness

    The U.S. follows the “One China” policy, recognizing Beijing while maintaining unofficial ties with Taiwan. Unlike China’s “One China Principle,” the U.S. stance remains ambiguous, neither endorsing nor rejecting Taiwan’s sovereignty.

    Under the Taiwan Relations Act, Washington provides Taipei with defensive support and opposes forced reunification. While maintaining strategic ambiguity, the U.S. has increased arms sales, military training, and joint exercises to strengthen Taiwan’s defense against growing threats from China.

    Taiwan began trialing the 14-day reservist training program in 2022. With the formation of reserve brigades across 18 counties and cities, this new training system will be fully implemented this year.

    Edited by Taejun Kang.


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Alan Lu for RFA.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Russia, Turkey and Egypt also among worst perpetrators of transnational repression around the globe

    A quarter of the world’s countries have engaged in transnational repression – targeting political exiles abroad to silence dissent – in the past decade, new research reveals.

    The Washington DC-based non-profit organisation Freedom House has documented 1,219 incidents carried out by 48 governments across 103 countries, from 2014 to 2024.

    Continue reading…

    This post was originally published on Human rights | The Guardian.

  • TAIPEI, Taiwan – China has removed a buoy it installed near disputed islands within Japan’s exclusive economic zone, raising the possibility of a Chinese shift towards improving relations with Japan.

    The islands, known as Senkaku in Japan and the Diaoyu Islands in China, are a group of uninhabited islands in the East China Sea. They are approximately 170 kilometers (100 miles) northeast of Taiwan and about 410 kilometers (250 miles) west of Okinawa, Japan.

    The islands are administered by Japan but are also claimed by China and Taiwan.

    China installed the buoy in July 2023, triggering strong protests from Japan, which condemned it as a violation of its sovereignty and demanded its removal.

    China said the buoy was for scientific research, now finished.

    “The buoy in question has completed its task at the site,” Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun said at a news conference, noting that relevant Chinese agencies had voluntarily made technical adjustments to the buoy according to the actual needs of scientific observation.

    The Japan Coast Guard also confirmed on its website the Chinese buoy northeast of Taiwan had “ceased to exist.”

    While there has been no official statement linking the buoy’s removal to any diplomatic shift, it is bound to raise speculation that it is part of a calculated effort by Beijing to stabilize ties with Tokyo, particularly in light of the recent change in the leadership of the U.S.

    Sino-Japan relations have long been complicated by territorial disputes, historical grievances, and economic competition.

    The islands remain one of the most persistent sources of tension, with Beijing frequently sending coast guard vessels into surrounding waters, while Tokyo insists on its sovereignty over the features.

    Other flashpoints have included trade disputes, China’s ban on Japanese seafood imports following the Fukushima nuclear plant wastewater release, and concerns over military activity in the East China Sea.

    In recent months, however, several signs have indicated that both countries are trying to normalize relations.

    In December, Japanese Foreign Minister Takeshi Iwaya visited Beijing, marking a significant step in diplomatic engagement. Discussions included security issues, economic cooperation, and the potential easing of China’s restrictions on Japanese seafood imports.

    Additionally, China expanded its visa-free entry program to include Japan, aiming to boost tourism and economic exchanges.

    RELATED STORIES

    Number of Japanese living in China falls to lowest in 20 years

    Japan to raise South China Sea issue with new Trump administration

    China seeks easing of Japan ties amid growing tension with US

    During his first term, U.S. President Donald Trump took a hard line on China, emphasizing economic decoupling and increasing military cooperation with Japan. His appointment of several China hawks to top jobs in his administration has led to expectations of a repeat of that tough line.

    Trump has also emphasized the importance of the U.S.-Japan alliance, particularly in facing regional challenges such as China’s assertiveness and North Korea’s nuclear ambitions.

    This alignment was evident during Trump’s recent meeting with Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba, when both leaders expressed a shared commitment to “peace through strength” in the Indo-Pacific region.

    Edited by Mike Firn.


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Taejun Kang for RFA.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.