Category: China

  • Hong Kong’s Democratic Party, which was once the largest party in an active opposition camp, held a meeting on Thursday at which it said it would discuss its own dissolution, amid an ongoing crackdown on all forms of public dissent under two national security laws.

    Party Chairman Lo Kin-hei told journalists that the topic will be up for discussion at the meeting, describing the topic as “inevitable” in the current climate.

    The party’s central committee will also discuss many other matters, including its suggestions ahead of the government’s budget on Feb. 26, Lo told a news conference on Wednesday.

    The news came just weeks after a court in Hong Kong sentenced 45 democratic politicians and activists to jail terms of up to 10 years for “subversion” after they took part in a democratic primary in the summer of 2020.

    The ongoing political crackdown has already seen the dissolution of the Civic Party, which disbanded in May 2023 after its lawmakers were barred from running for re-election in the wake of the 2020 National Security Law.

    The pro-democracy youth activist party Demosisto disbanded in June 2020.

    The logo of the Democratic Party is seen in its office, in Hong Kong, China Sep. 26, 2021.
    The logo of the Democratic Party is seen in its office, in Hong Kong, China Sep. 26, 2021.
    (Tyrone Siu/Reuters)

    Lo has previously suggested that the Democratic Party, which was formed in 1994, should try to hold on despite the threat of being targeted by national security police.

    “I have no baggage here,” Lo said. “If we really need to [disband], then we will.”

    “I’ve said publicly many times over the past two or three years that if the day comes, we will just have to face up to it.”

    Few remaining options

    A person familiar with the workings of the party told RFA Cantonese that the Democratic Party can only be formally dissolved after multiple discussions and procedures involving the members and the central committee, and after a general assembly vote with 75% attendance.

    Exiled former Democratic Party lawmaker Ted Hui said there are few options left for his former party.

    “I understand that a lot of party members and central committee members are becoming more and more worried about their personal safety,” Hui said. “They run the risk of arrest at any time.”

    He said if the party does eventually disband, the move would show “the total destruction of any democratic process in Hong Kong.”

    RELATED STORIES

    Jailing of 45 Hong Kong democracy activists sparks international outcry

    Hong Kong seizes assets of exiled former lawmaker, citing ‘national security’

    Police arrest former opposition councilor amid call to boycott poll

    The government has blamed several waves of pro-democracy protests in recent years on “foreign forces” trying to instigate a democratic revolution in Hong Kong.

    Recent electoral reforms now ensure that almost nobody in the city’s once-vibrant opposition camp will stand for election again, amid the jailing of dozens of pro-democracy figures and rule changes requiring political vetting.

    The last directly elected District Council, which saw a landslide victory for pro-democracy candidates amid record turnout that was widely seen as a ringing public endorsement of the 2019 protest movement.

    The first Legislative Council election after the rule change saw plummeting turnout, while Chief Executive John Lee was given the top job after an “election” in which he was the only candidate.

    Since Beijing imposed the two national security laws banning public opposition and dissent in the city and blamed “hostile foreign forces” for the resulting protests, hundreds of thousands have voted with their feet amid plummeting human rights rankings, shrinking press freedom and widespread government propaganda in schools.

    ‘Not surprised’

    Democratic Party founding chairman Martin Lee, who has been dubbed the “father of Hong Kong democracy,” told the Ming Pao newspaper that he hasn’t heard from the central committee on the matter, but that he was “not surprised” by the talk of dissolution.

    The Communist Party-backed newspaper Ta Kung Pao said the party was heading for dissolution, accusing it of having “committed many evil deeds over the years.”

    “If this political cancer isn’t completely eliminated, it will inevitably endanger national security and bring disaster to Hong Kong,” the paper warned.

    The party has survived threatening op-eds before.

    A 2022 article in the Ming Pao by Lu Wenduan, who plays a leading role in the Chinese Communist Party’s United Front influence operations, warned that the party would be doomed if it “turns a deaf ear to warnings issued by the Wen Wei Po and the Ta Kung Pao.”

    Following the jailing of 45 opposition activists in December 2024, the Wen Wei Po said the party was incompatible with the principle of “patriots ruling Hong Kong,” adding that “disbandment is the only option.”

    The party has made some nods toward the new political climate, trying to demonstrate its “patriotism” and and being careful not to run afoul of security laws.

    But the calls for its demise haven’t let up.

    Party members have received harassing and threatening emails and text messages from people describing themselves as “patriotic, Hong Kong-loving citizens,” Lo told the news conference.

    And its attempts to hold fundraising events have been forcibly canceled by venues, likely under pressure from the authorities, putting it under financial strain and limiting the scope of its activities.

    Translated by Luisetta Mudie.


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Ha Syut and Yam Chi Yau for RFA Cantonese.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Radio Free Asia.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • MAE SOT, Thailand – Two hundred Chinese nationals were due to be flown to their homeland on Thursday in aircraft laid on by their government after leaving online fraud centers in an eastern Myanmar district on the border with Thailand, Thai officials said.

    The Chinese people were brought on buses, 50 at a time, from Myanmar’s Myawaddy district, over a border bridge to the Thai town of Mae Sot, and then taken to a nearby airport for their flight home, witnesses said.

    “Myanmar authorities and the Border Guard Force have brought Chinese nationals to the second Thai-Myanmar Friendship Bridge, and are handing them over to Thai officials,” Maj. Gen. Maitree Chupreecha, commander of the Thai military’s Naresuan Task Force, told reporters.

    “A total of 200 people will be repatriated today in groups of 50 every two hours,” he said.

    It was not clear if the people being flown back to China were organizers of the online fraud that has proliferated in recent years in Myanmar and other parts of Southeast Asia, or were victims of human traffickers and forced to work in the centers defrauding people online and over the telephone.

    A first flight left Mae Sot bound for China shortly before noon and three more were due to leave through the day. More flights to China are due on Friday and Saturday, taking more than 1,000 Chinese people home, Thai officials said.

    Thursday’s flights were the latest in a series of actions over recent weeks aimed at ending the scam center operations that have flourished largely unimpeded in different parts of Southeast Asia for several years.

    The scamming, known as “pig butchering” in China, involves making contact with unsuspecting people online, building a relationship with them and then defrauding them. Researchers say billions of dollars have been stolen this way from victims around the world.

    Huge fraud operation complexes are often staffed by people lured by false job advertisements and forced to work, sometimes under threat of violence, rescued workers and rights groups say.

    Researchers have said governments and businesses across the region have been enabling the operations by failing to take action against the profitable flows they generate.

    RELATED STORIES

    China pushes Thailand to act on cross-border scam centers

    EXPLAINED: What are scam parks?

    Myanmar militia hosting scam centers says it will deport 8,000 foreigners

    Thousands of victims

    But that has changed in recent weeks amid a blizzard of bad publicity triggered by the kidnap and rescue last month of Chinese actor Wang Xing, who was lured to work one of Myawaddy’s fraud operations.

    The growing public alarm across Asia about kidnapping and forced labor threatened to damage Thailand’s tourist industry and forced China to insist on action by authorities in its southern neighbors to crack down.

    China’s Assistant Minister of Public Security Liu Zhongyi visited Thailand in late January to focus efforts to combat the call center operations and the human trafficking that supplies their labor force.

    Thailand took its most decisive action ever against the fraud networks on Feb. 5, cutting cross-border power and internet services and blocking fuel exports to the Myanmar scam zones.

    The Myanmar junta also stopped fuel shipments to the Myawaddy district controlled by an ethnic minority militia force that is allied with the military government.

    The ethnic Karen militia that controls Myawaddy and has been hosting and profiting from the online fraud operations said last month it was going to stop fraud and forced labor and send back thousands of the people who have been working in the centers.

    A Thai activist group, the Civil Society Network for Victim Assistance in Human Trafficking, which has been helping scam center victims, said it has identified at least 2,000 people from more than a dozen countries forced to work at defrauding people around the world.

    But many thousands more people are believed to be still in the scam centers, in eastern Myanmar and beyond.

    A Thai member of parliament and head of its National Security Committee said it was important to gather as much information as possible from people being brought out of the scam centers to identify the kingpins and end their operations once and for all.

    “We need to gather information,” legislator Rangsiman Rome told reporters.

    “We must verify if they are victims or criminals and whether they know who is behind the call center gangs. This information is crucial for dismantling the transnational crime syndicates,” said Rangsiman.

    Edited by Mike Firn.

    RFA Burmese Service contributed to this report.

    BenarNews is an RFA-affiliated news organization.


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Nontarat Phaicharoen for BenarNews and Pimuk Rakkanam for RFA.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Pacific Media Watch

    A New Zealand-based community education provider, Dark Times Academy, has had a US Embassy grant to deliver a course teaching Pacific Islands journalists about disinformation terminated after the new Trump administration took office.

    The new US administration requested a list of course participants and to review the programme material amid controversy over a “freeze” on federal aid policies.

    The course presentation team refused and the contract was terminated by “mutual agreement” — but the eight-week Pacific workshop is going ahead anyway from next week.

    Dark Times Academy's Mandy Henk
    Dark Times Academy’s co-founder Mandy Henk . . . “A Bit Sus”, an evidence-based peer-reviewed series of classes on disinfiormation for Pacific media. Image: Newsroom

    “As far as I can tell, the current foreign policy priorities of the US government seem to involve terrorising the people of Gaza, annexing Canada, invading Greenland, and bullying Panama,” said Dark Times Academy co-founder Mandy Henk.

    “We felt confident that a review of our materials would not find them to be aligned with those priorities.”

    The course, called “A Bit Sus”, is an evidence-based peer-reviewed series of classes that teach key professions the skills needed to identify and counter disinformation and misinformation in their particular field.

    The classes focus on “prebunking”, lateral reading, and how technology, including generative AI, influences disinformation.

    Awarded competitive funds
    Dark Times Academy was originally awarded the funds to run the programme through a public competitive grant offered by the US Embassy in New Zealand in 2023 under the previous US administration.

    The US Embassy grant was focused on strengthening the capacity of Pacific media to identify and counter disinformation. While funded by the US, the course was to be a completely independent programme overseen by Dark Times Academy and its academic consultants.

    Co-founder Henk was preparing to deliver the education programme to a group of Pacific Island journalists and media professionals, but received a request from the US Embassy in New Zealand to review the course materials to “ensure they are in line with US foreign policy priorities”.

    Henk said she and the other course presenters refused to allow US government officials to review the course material for this purpose.

    She said the US Embassy had also requested a “list of registered participants for the online classes,” which Dark Times Academy also declined to provide as compliance would have violated the New Zealand Privacy Act 2020.

    Henk said the refusal to provide the course materials for review led immediately to further discussions with the US Embassy in New Zealand that ultimately resulted in the termination of the grant “by mutual agreement”.

    However, she said Dark Times Academy would still go ahead with running the course for the Pacific Island journalists who had signed up so far, starting on February 26.

    Continuing the programme
    “The Dark Times Academy team fully intends to continue to bring the ‘A Bit Sus’ programme and other classes to the Pacific region and New Zealand, even without the support of the US government,” Henk said.

    “As noted when we first announced this course, the Pacific Islands have experienced accelerated growth in digital connectivity over the past few years thanks to new submarine cable networks and satellite technology.

    “Alongside this, the region has also seen a surge in harmful rumours and disinformation that is increasingly disrupting the ability to share accurate and truthful information across Pacific communities.

    “This course will help participants from the media recognise common tactics used by disinformation agents and support them to deploy proven educational and communications techniques.

    “By taking a skills-based approach to countering disinformation, our programme can help to spread the techniques needed to mitigate the risks posed by digital technologies,” Henk said.

    Especially valuable for journalists
    Dark Times Academy co-founder Byron Clark said the course would be especially valuable for journalists in the Pacific region given the recent shifts in global politics and the current state of the planet.

    Dark Times Academy co-founder and author Byron C Clark
    Dark Times Academy co-founder and author Byron Clark . . . “We saw the devastating impacts of disinformation in the Pacific region during the measles outbreak in Samoa.” Image: APR

    “We saw the devastating impacts of disinformation in the Pacific region during the measles outbreak in Samoa, for example,” said Clark, author of the best-selling book Fear: New Zealand’s Underworld of Hostile Extremists.

    “With Pacific Island states bearing the brunt of climate change, as well as being caught between a geopolitical stoush between China and the West, a course like this one is timely.”

    Henk said the “A Bit Sus” programme used a “high-touch teaching model” that combined the current best evidence on how to counter disinformation with a “learner-focused pedagogy that combines discussion, activities, and a project”.

    Past classes led to the creation of the New Zealand version of the “Euphorigen Investigation” escape room, a board game, and a card game.

    These materials remain in use across New Zealand schools and community learning centres.

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • In January, the Chinese tech startup DeepSeek stunned the world with the release of its R1 artificial intelligence model, which outperforms its major US-based competitors, at a fraction of the cost of development, requiring orders of magnitude less energy, and not relying on the latest and greatest semiconductors. The model is fully open source, and has been made available for free worldwide. The release of DeepSeek R1 led to an unprecedented drop in share price for several US tech giants, most notably chip-maker Nvidia, which has been attracting enormous investment on the premise that the future of AI relies on faster and better semiconductors.

    The post While China Uses AI To Benefit Humanity, The US Uses It To Wage War appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • In January, the Chinese tech startup DeepSeek stunned the world with the release of its R1 artificial intelligence model, which outperforms its major US-based competitors, at a fraction of the cost of development, requiring orders of magnitude less energy, and not relying on the latest and greatest semiconductors. The model is fully open source, and has been made available for free worldwide. The release of DeepSeek R1 led to an unprecedented drop in share price for several US tech giants, most notably chip-maker Nvidia, which has been attracting enormous investment on the premise that the future of AI relies on faster and better semiconductors.

    The post While China Uses AI To Benefit Humanity, The US Uses It To Wage War appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.


  • This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Radio Free Asia.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • The son of jailed pro-democracy media magnate Jimmy Lai has warned that “time is running out” for his father’s health, and called on Britain and the United States to push for his release.

    “His body is breaking down … It’s akin to torture,” Sebastien Lai told Reuters ahead of the Human Rights and Democracy summit in Geneva on Feb. 18. “Time is running out for my father.”

    Lai, 77, has spent more than 1,500 days behind bars, and is diabetic. He is a British citizen.

    In jail since his arrest in December 2020, Lai is currently standing trial for “collusion with foreign forces” under Hong Kong’s National Security Law. He has also been handed separate sentences for lighting a candle and praying for the victims of the 1989 Tiananmen massacre, for irregularities in the use of his newspaper’s office space, and for taking part in the 2019 protests.

    Media tycoon Jimmy Lai, founder of Apple Daily, looks on as he leaves the Court of Final Appeal by prison van, in Hong Kong, Feb. 1, 2021.
    Media tycoon Jimmy Lai, founder of Apple Daily, looks on as he leaves the Court of Final Appeal by prison van, in Hong Kong, Feb. 1, 2021.
    (Tyrone Siu/Reuters)

    Sebastien Lai called on global leaders, including U.S. President Donald Trump — who has pledged to help get Lai out of jail — and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, to take urgent action, as his father faces his fourth year of solitary confinement.

    “We are incredibly grateful that [Trump] said that. It gives us a lot of hope,” Sebastien Lai said, but called for a stronger response from the United Kingdom.

    “If (Britain) wants to normalize relations, they shouldn’t normalize citizens being arrested for standing up for democracy,” he said.

    The Hong Kong government told Reuters that Hong Kong “strongly disapproves of and rejects misinformation and smearing remarks made by Sebastien Lai,” while China’s permanent mission in Geneva described the claims about Lai’s health as “slanderous.”

    Sebastien Lai called on governments to “champion” his father, who decided not to flee the city when Beijing imposed the first of two national security laws in 2020, despite knowing he’d be a target.

    RELATED STORIES

    China hits back at Washington over call for Jimmy Lai release

    Detained Hong Kong media tycoon Jimmy Lai denies foreign collusion

    Evidence against Jimmy Lai ‘obtained through torture’: UN expert

    Jimmy Lai’s security trial begins in Hong Kong amid international uproar

    “He refused to leave,” he told Voice of America. “Six decades after landing on the shore of this island in pursuit of freedom, he decided to stay and stand with his fellow protesters.”

    Human rights groups say Lai’s trial is a “sham” and part of a broad crackdown on dissent in Hong Kong that has all but destroyed its reputation as the only place in Greater China where the rule of law and freedoms of speech and assembly were preserved.

    In November 2024, a Hong Kong court jailed 45 democracy supporters at the end of the city’s biggest national security trial to date.

    Those sentences drew international condemnation and calls for further sanctions on Hong Kong and the expansion of lifeboat visa schemes for those fleeing the political crackdown in the city.

    Translated by Luisetta Mudie. Edited by Roseanne Gerin.


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Alice Yam for RFA Cantonese.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • China on Wednesday voiced opposition to Vietnam’s recent developments in the Spratly archipelago in a rare public protest.

    Foreign ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun said that the Nansha Qundao are China’s inherent territory, referring to the group of islands and reefs known internationally as the Spratlys.

    Hanoi has been reclaiming several features within the Spratlys, and is building a 3000-meter (10,000-foot) airstrip on one of them, Barque Canada Reef.

    Guo said that the Barque Canada Reef, or Bai Jiao in Chinese, “is a part of the Nansha Qundao and China always opposes relevant countries conducting construction activities on illegally-occupied islands and reefs.”

    The reef is actually a rock under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, or UNCLOS, and Vietnam first took possession of it in 1987. It has undergone development at a fast pace since 2021 and the total landfill area more than doubled in one year to nearly 250 hectares (620 acres), as of October 2024.

    The Washington-based Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative, or AMTI, said that between November 2023 and June 2024, Hanoi created a record 280 hectares (690 acres) of new land across 10 of 27 features it occupies in the Spratly archipelago.

    Beijing until now has stayed quiet as China was the first country in the region that built up artificial islands in the South China Sea and militarized them.

    By 2021, when Vietnam began its island building program, China had already completed the construction of its “Big Three” artificial islands in the South China Sea – Fiery Cross, Mischief and Subi reefs – and equipped them with runways and military facilities.

    Hanoi’s overall dredging and landfill in the South China Sea is roughly half of China’s, according to AMTI.

    Vietnam’s ‘Look West’ policy

    The Vietnamese government has said little about its work at the features apart from it is intended to protect them and provide typhoon shelter to fishermen.

    Vietnam has not responded to the Chinese spokesperson’s rebuke but a Vietnamese analyst said that China’s first known public and official protest may stem from Beijing’s disapproval of the Vietnamese leadership’s ‘look West’ policies.

    Hanoi and Washington in 2023 established a comprehensive strategic partnership, on par with Beijing’s partnership with Hanoi.

    The new general secretary of the ruling Vietnamese communist party, To Lam, has repeatedly expressed his willingness to develop a strong relationship and cooperation with the United States, said Hoang Viet, a South China Sea analyst.

    RELATED STORIES

    Vietnam builds islands in South China Sea amid tension, challenges

    Vietnam builds airstrip on reclaimed island in South China Sea

    Vietnam’s South China Sea island building sets record in 2024: report

    Lam has recently also made an unprecedented visit to a war cemetery, where thousands of soldiers who lost their lives fighting invading Chinese troops between 1979-1989 were buried.

    “The Chinese must not be pleased with such a visit by Vietnam’s party chief,” said Viet, adding that the protest over Vietnam’s island building revealed that the China-Vietnam relationship, “although it appears close and strong on the outside, has deep cracks inside.”

    Another Vietnamese analyst told RFA that in his opinion, “Vietnam is aware of the risks brought by its activities in the South China Sea in relation to China.”

    “I hope that the leaders in Hanoi will be wise enough not to be caught up in the middle of the U.S.-China strategic competition,” said Dinh Kim Phuc.

    “But they should be firm and decisive when it comes to Vietnam’s sovereignty in the South China Sea,” he added.

    Edited by Mike Firn.


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by RFA Staff.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Emile Dirks, Noura Aljizawi, Siena Anstis and Ron Deibert wrote in the The Globe and Mail of 10 February 2025 about the problem of transnational repression.

    The final report of the public inquiry into foreign interference (the Hogue Commission) offers a measure of reassurance to Canadians; there is no evidence that Canadian MPs worked with foreign states to undermine the 2019 or 2021 federal elections. Justice Marie-Josée Hogue’s findings, however, are cold comfort to people at risk. While the commission’s work has ended, distant autocrats continue to target Canadians and Canadian residents with transnational repression, the most coercive form of foreign interference.

    Commissioner Justice Marie-Josee Hogue Patrick Doyle/Reuters

    Through digital harassment, assault and even assassination, authoritarians reach across borders to silence their foes abroad. Victims include activists, human-rights defenders, exiled critics and asylum seekers tied by citizenship or ancestry to repressive states like China, Russia, India or Saudi Arabia. For authoritarians, these people are not citizens, but disloyal subjects to silence.

    The danger that transnational repression poses is not new. A 2020 report by the Canadian Coalition on Human Rights in China demanded the Canadian government address threats against pro-democracy activists, while a 2022 report by the Citizen Lab highlighted the lack of support to victims of digital transnational repression. Prior to the 2024 election, the Biden-Harris administration adopted a whole-of-government approach to ensure government agencies like the State Department, Department of Homeland Security, Department of Justice, and the FBI worked together to provide recommendations to victims on how to better protect themselves.

    Researchers and civil society have long worried that Canadian authorities are overlooking transnational repression as a unique challenge that requires tailored responses. Considering the seriousness of the threat and the stark absence of action by the government, many researchers anticipated the commission’s final report would explore transnational repression as a distinct form of foreign interference. Yet, while Justice Hogue wrote that “it would be challenging to overstate the seriousness of transnational repression,” she ultimately reasoned the issue lay outside her mandate.

    This was a mistake. The final report was a missed opportunity to fully explore the corrosive impact of transnational repression on Canadian democracy. A recent report by the Citizen Lab highlights the profound toll transnational repression takes on vulnerable people, especially women, in Canada and beyond. Intimidation, surveillance and physical attacks prevent victims from participating fully in civic life and create a climate of persistent fear.

    Transnational repression harms victims in more subtle ways, too. Our research shows that the mere threat of an online or offline attack is enough to frighten many diaspora members into silence. Victims become wary of participating in social media or even using digital devices. They report being afraid to engage with members of their communities, leaving them increasingly isolated. It has an insidious, chilling effect on targeted communities.

    Unfortunately, the future looks bleak. Democratic backsliding in the United States threatens to deprive Canada of an ally in the fight and reverse whatever measures U.S. agencies might have taken on the issue. Our research shows that suspicion of law enforcement discourages victims from contacting authorities. Proposed moves by the Trump administration – including halting asylum hearings, ending resettlement programs, and sending “criminal” migrants to Guantanamo Bay – will further erode victims’ confidence in the U.S.’s willingness to protect them.

    Big Tech is also worsening the problem. Across social-media platforms, state-backed harassment of vulnerable diaspora members is rife. Elon Musk’s X tolerates and even promotes hate-mongering accounts, while Mark Zuckerberg’s announcement that Meta will stop using “politically biased” fact-checkers signals a worrying disinterest in robust content moderation. We should expect a tsunami of digital transnational repression targeting vulnerable Canadians now that tech CEOs are loosening the restraints.

    Canada cannot rely on outside leadership or corporate actors to tackle this problem. What is needed is a commission on transnational repression. On Jan. 24, the British parliament’s Joint Committee on Human Rights launched such an inquiry. Once our House of Commons sits again we can follow our British counterparts and resume the Subcommittee on International Human Rights’s work on transnational repression. The new Parliament should launch a multiparty inquiry into the crisis, with a mandate to examine repression outside of federal elections. Crucially, it must earn the trust of victims, something the Hogue Commission lacked. The Uyghur Rights Advocacy Project and the Canadian Friends of Hong Kong both pulled out of the inquiry, citing the participation of three legislators with alleged links to the Chinese government.

    This is not a partisan issue. Whoever wins the next federal election will have a duty to contend with the continuing threat transnational repression poses to Canada. With global authoritarianism on the rise, the problem is only likely to worsen in the years to come.

    see also: https://humanrightsdefenders.blog/2024/03/19/transnational-repression-human-rights-watch-and-other-reports/

    https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/article-the-final-hogue-report-was-a-missed-opportunity-to-tackle/

    This post was originally published on Hans Thoolen on Human Rights Defenders and their awards.

  • The signs aren’t good so far, but playing on Trump’s desperation to be seen as a great dealmaker would pay dividends

    • Kenneth Roth is a former executive director of Human Rights Watch. His book, Righting Wrongs, is published on 25 February

    The common wisdom is that Donald Trump’s foreign policy will be a disaster for human rights. Certainly his penchant for embracing autocrats and breaching norms bodes poorly, such as his outrageous proposal to force two million Palestinians out of Gaza – which would be a blatant war crime – or his suggestion that Ukraine is to blame for Russia’s invasion. But Trump also likes to cut a deal, as shown by his paradoxically positive role in securing the current (precarious) Gaza ceasefire. If Trump the dealmaker can be nudged in the right direction, he might, against all odds, be brought to play a productive role for human rights.

    As executive director of Human Rights Watch, I spent more than three decades devising strategies to pressure or cajole leaders to better respect rights. I have dealt with brutal dictators, self-serving autocrats and misguided democrats. My experience shows that there is always an angle – something the leader cares about – that can be used to steer them in a more rights-respecting direction.

    Kenneth Roth is a former executive director of Human Rights Watch. His book, Righting Wrongs, is published on 25 February

    Continue reading…

    This post was originally published on Human rights | The Guardian.

  • Wow. In a series of rapid-fire developments last week, the new Trump regime has decisively joined the battle with the deep state on the national security side. This is big, or could be. Either Donald Trump will begin to exert political control over the invisible government or the invisible government will sink Donald Trump just as it did during his first term as president. Let us be attentive.

    The attack on USAID, the telephone call with Vladimir Putin, the incipient alienation of the Kiev regime, new talk of talks with the Islamic Republic, Tulsi Gabbard’s confirmation as director of national intelligence: I don’t know if these events and their timing reflect a concerted plan, back-of-an-envelope inspirations, or the president’s thinking but not necessarily the thinking of those around him.

    The post Trump Vs. The Deep State appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • MANILA, Philippines — A Chinese military helicopter flew dangerously close to within 3 meters (10 feet) of a Philippine aircraft in the skies above the contested Scarborough Shoal, a Filipino coast guard spokesman said.

    A Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources, or BFAR, Cessna turboprop plane was conducting a low-altitude tracking flight on Tuesday over the shoal, which is within South China Sea waters of the country’s exclusive economic zone, when the standoff took place. It saw the Chinese helicopter hovering close to or above the Filipino aircraft.

    About 90 minutes into the flight, a People’s Liberation Army Navy helicopter “performed dangerous flight maneuvers toward the BFAR aircraft,” coast guard spokesman Jay Tarriela said.

    The Chinese helicopter “came as close as three meters [10 feet] to the port side and above the BFAR aircraft,” he said in a statement, adding that the Chinese flight blatantly disregarded international aviation regulations established by the International Civil Aviation Organization.

    “This reckless action posed a serious risk to the safety of the pilots and passengers during the MDA flight,” Tarriela said, referring to a maritime domain awareness flight.

    “The PCG [Philippine Coast Guard] and BFAR remain committed to asserting our sovereignty, sovereign rights and maritime jurisdiction in the West Philippine Sea, despite the aggressive and escalatory actions of China,” he said. Manila refers to South China Sea waters within its EEZ as the West Philippine Sea.

    Filipino journalists working for international news agencies were on the BFAR flight, which involved Philippine Coast Guard personnel. During the encounter, a photographer for Agence France-Presse, who was aboard the Philippine plane, took a photo showing a member of the Chinese helicopter crew aiming a camera at the BFAR Cessna (pictured below).

    The Associated Press, which had a television cameraman aboard the Filipino aircraft, said the Filipino pilot warned the Chinese helicopter on radio that it was flying too close.

    A Chinese Navy member takes photos as his helicopter passes within a few meters of a Philippine Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources aircraft in the South China Sea, Feb. 18, 2025.
    A Chinese Navy member takes photos as his helicopter passes within a few meters of a Philippine Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources aircraft in the South China Sea, Feb. 18, 2025.
    (Jam Sta Rosa/AFP)

    Scarborough Shoal, considered a rich fishing ground by Filipino fishermen, is a triangular chain of reefs about 125 nautical miles (232 km) from Luzon, the country’s main island. It has been under Beijing’s de facto control since 2012, but in 2016 an international arbitration tribunal ruled against all of China’s claims to the area.

    The ruling also said that the Scarborough Shoal was a rock – not an island – meaning that even if it was entitled to a 12-nautical mile territorial sea, it couldn’t generate its own EEZ. Instead, the shoal is recognized as part of the Philippines’ EEZ and continental shelf.

    The Chinese Embassy in Manila said the Philippine aircraft had “intruded into China’s airspace” without permission. It confirmed that the military organized naval and air assets to track, monitor and “drive away” the Philippine aircraft.

    “Without the approval of the Chinese government, the Philippine aircraft illegally intruded into Chinese airspace,” military spokesman Tian Junli said, according to Xinhua, China’s state news agency.

    Air incident last week

    Tuesday’s incident came days after Australia protested what it called an “unsafe and unprofessional interaction” involving a Chinese J-16 fighter aircraft on Feb. 11. An Australian Air Force P-8A Poseidon aircraft was patrolling over the Paracel islands in the South China Sea when the incident occurred.

    No one was injured in the incident, but Australia criticized the unsafe maneuver by the Chinese fighter jet. China rejected Australia’s complaint, saying that its aircraft flew into Chinese airspace over Xisha Qundao, its name for the Paracels that is also claimed by Vietnam and Taiwan.

    China has controlled the territory since 1974 when its troops took it from South Vietnam in a battle that killed 74 Vietnamese sailors.

    Manila’s foreign department spoke out on behalf of Australia last week, and said all countries must avoid “interference in legitimate activities” in international waters and airspace.

    BenarNews is an RFA-affiliated online news organization.

    RELATED STORIES

    China warns Philippines of ‘red line’ in the South China Sea

    Australia protests to China about ‘unsafe’ aircraft maneuver over Paracels

    Philippines says it won’t let China normalize ‘illegal’ ship deployments in EEZ


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Jason Gutierrez for BenarNews.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • A court in Hong Kong has seized the assets of exiled former pro-democracy lawmaker Ted Hui, claiming they were “obtained from committing offenses endangering national security.”

    Hui’s assets–funds totaling more than US$300,000–were frozen by court order on Feb. 17 after an application by the city’s Department of Justice, the government said in a statement on Tuesday.

    Hui had transferred this amount to his wife and mother prior to leaving the country in 2020, while he was out on bail.

    The move comes amid an ongoing crackdown by Beijing on public dissent in Hong Kong under two security laws.

    The statement said Hui had committed “numerous heinous crimes,” including “conspiring with foreign politicians in 2020 to forge documents and deceive the court with false information in order to obtain the court’s permission to leave Hong Kong while he was on bail,” and added that he had “jumped bail and absconded overseas.”

    But Hui is also accused of committing offenses “endangering national security” overseas, the statement said, adding that he stands accused of “inciting secession” and “inciting subversion of state power,” as well as “colluding with foreign or external forces to endanger national security.”

    Hui said the confiscation order was “absurd and a blatant violation of my human rights,” and a form of political retaliation amid the crackdown.

    According to the government, Hui had transferred nearly $2.5 million Hong Kong dollars (US$321,500) in personal assets as gifts to his mother and wife before he skipped bail.

    Under Hong Kong law, if a defendant benefits from committing an offense endangering national security and makes a gift at any time from six years before the date of prosecution onwards, the property held by the recipient of the gift may be regarded as the defendant’s property and confiscated, the spokesman said.

    Laws against dissent

    Since Beijing imposed the two national security laws banning public opposition and dissent in the city and blamed “hostile foreign forces” for the resulting protests, hundreds of thousands have voted with their feet amid plummeting human rights rankings, shrinking press freedom and widespread government propaganda in schools.

    Some fled to the United Kingdom on the British National Overseas, or BNO, visa program. Others have made their homes anew in the United States, Canada, Australia and Germany.

    Many are continuing their activism and lobbying activists, yet they struggle with exile in some way, worrying about loved ones back home while facing threats to their personal safety from supporters of Beijing overseas

    Hong Kong’s leaders have vowed to pursue activists in exile for life.

    RELATED STORIES

    Hong Kong police question relatives of exiled lawmaker Ted Hui

    Hong Kong issues arrest warrants, bounties for eight overseas activists

    Hong Kong police question wife, son of wanted exiled pollster

    Hui said in a post to his Facebook page that the money he had given to his mother and wife had been intended as living expenses in his absence.

    “That works out at 10,000 Hong Kong dollars (US$1,286) a month over the six years since I left Hong Kong,” Hui said. “Some people might not even think that’s very much.”

    “The people of Hong Kong can see all too clearly what is happening, and they’ll be sure to take their money overseas.”

    He told RFA Mandarin in a later interview: “Luckily, my parents sold their home in Hong Kong a few years ago and transferred the proceeds elsewhere.”

    ‘No Money left in Hong Kong is safe.’

    He said the authorities had already frozen his bank accounts in Hong Kong after he fled the city amid a crackdown on dissent and political opposition.

    “What they confiscated on this occasion was our only asset left in Hong Kong,” he said. “This has shown us that our concerns were reasonable.”

    “A regime that violates human rights will do anything, and no money left in Hong Kong is safe,” Hui said.

    The government has also hit back at criticisms of the move.

    “The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government has noted the unfounded smear and malicious attacks online regarding the actions taken by the Court in accordance with the law,” the statement said. “The HKSAR Government strongly condemned and opposed this.”

    The authorities “will do everything possible and use all legal means to pursue and combat criminals who endanger national security,” he said.

    Current affairs commentator Sang Pu said the authorities’ claim that Hui’s writings on Patreon had somehow paid for the money given to his wife and mother were ridiculous.

    “Now this precedent has been set, as long as they can attach a ‘national security’ label to it, everyone’s assets and personal freedom are under threat,” Sang said.

    Taiwan-based Hong Kong activist Fu Tong said the move on Hui’s assets is very worrying for Hong Kongers in exile.

    “I’m worried because their methods are escalating,” Fu said. “Anyone who continues to speak out overseas will find they can go after people you care about back in Hong Kong, to silence you.”

    But he said he would continue to protest and advocate for the return of Hong Kong’s former freedoms.

    Translated by Luisetta Mudie. Edited by Eugene Whong.


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Alice Yam for RFA Cantonese, Chen Zifei for RFA Mandarin.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • TAIPEI, Taiwan – Taiwan is in the process of negotiating a new arms deal worth billions of dollars with the United States, Reuters news agency reported, citing unidentified sources.

    Meanwhile, the top US military commander in the Indo-Pacific, Adm. Samuel Paparo, has warned that Chinese military drills around Taiwan were actually “rehearsals” for an attack on the island.

    Three sources familiar with the situation, who wished to stay anonymous due to the sensitivity of the topic, told Reuters that Taipei was “in talks with Washington” about an arms purchase worth between US$7 billion and US$10 billion and that the package could include coastal defense cruise missiles and high mobility artillery rocket systems, or HIMARS.

    Taiwan’s ministry of defense declined to confirm the news but said Taipei was committed to strengthening national defense.

    Defense ministry spokesperson Sun Li-fang told reporters in Taipei that all defense budgets follow government policy and that plans would be disclosed to the public when they had been finalized.

    There was no confirmation from Washington either.

    There remains still a large backlog of arms sales from the U.S. to Taiwan. According to the Cato Institute think tank, the backlog is valued at US$21.95 billion, mostly of traditional weapons such as tanks and aircraft.

    At the annual Munich Security Conference on Saturday, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Japan Foreign Minister Takeshi Iwaya and South Korea Foreign Minister Cho Tae-yul “emphasized the importance of maintaining peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait as an indispensable element of security and prosperity for the international community,” they said in a joint statement.

    They said their countries supported Taiwan’s “meaningful participation” in appropriate international organizations, and encouraged the peaceful resolution of cross-Strait issues, and “opposed any attempts to unilaterally force or coerce changes to the status quo.”

    RELATED STORIES

    China condemns US ships in Taiwan transit, conducts drills

    Taiwan to scale up annual military drill as China tensions mount

    China rehearses attacks

    The top commander of the U.S. Indo-Pacific Command warned at a security forum in Hawaii last week that China’s increased military activity around Taiwan were not exercises but “rehearsals for the forced unification of Taiwan to the mainland.”

    U.S. Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Samuel Paparo attends the International Military Law and Operations Conference, in the Philippines, Aug. 27, 2024. (REUTERS/Lisa Marie David)
    U.S. Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Samuel Paparo attends the International Military Law and Operations Conference, in the Philippines, Aug. 27, 2024. (REUTERS/Lisa Marie David)
    (Lisa Marie David/Reuters)

    “We’re very close to that [point] where on a daily basis the fig leaf of an exercise could very well hide operational warning,” Adm. Samuel Paparo said.

    The Chinese People’s Liberation Army, or PLA, has been conducting regular military drills around Taiwan, especially at the times of heightened tensions on the island such as major political events or during visits by senior U.S. officials.

    Between Jan. 28 and Feb. 12, the PLA’s Eastern Theater Command held so-called combat patrols with aircraft and warships around Taiwan, the same time as U.S. Navy destroyer USS Ralph Johnson and oceanographic survey ship USNS Bowditch made a north-to-south passage through the Taiwan Strait.

    Paparo said that the U.S. must move quickly to close military capability gaps with China.

    “Our magazines run low. Our maintenance backlogs grow longer each month … We operate on increasingly thin margins for error,” he said, calling for reforms of the Pentagon’s procurement system.

    The Taiwanese ministry of national defense, meanwhile, stated that the island’s army “will continue to work hard to build up the army and prepare for war, and enhance asymmetric deterrence capabilities.”

    The ministry said in a statement to the media that it would “use joint intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance methods to closely monitor the dynamics of the sea and airspace around the Taiwan Strait, and dispatch appropriate troops to respond, and have the ability, determination and confidence to ensure national defense security.”

    Edited by Mike Firn.


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by RFA Staff.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • China appeared to have sent two more warships to the Ream naval base in southwest Cambodia, indicating that transfer of two vessels to Cambodia may be imminent.

    Satellite images obtained by Radio Free Asia from the Earth imaging firm Planet Labs show two more vessels docked at a new, Chinese-developed pier at the base, opposite the two corvettes Aba and Tianmen that have been there since last year.

    Details of the ships were not clear in the images but they are about 90-meters long, similar in size and shape to the Chinese Type 056 missile corvettes.

    The two new ships were not there on Feb. 15.

    Cambodia’s defense ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

    Sources told RFA last year that China was expected to hand over new facilities at the base, together with the pier and two warships. In return, analysts said it was likely that the two countries had reached an agreement giving the Chinese navy privileged access to the new base.

    The Cambodian military later confirmed that China would transfer two corvettes and train Cambodian crews on how to operate them.

    The Chinese navy has 49 such corvettes, 20 of them in the South Sea Fleet responsible for the South China Sea.

    Two vessels of the same class arrived in Ream for the first time in December 2023. Those were replaced by the Aba and the Tianmen, which were used for on-ship training for Cambodian naval personnel.

    Two Chinese People’s Liberation Army Navy Type 056 Corvettes and structures are seen at Cambodia’s Ream naval base in August 2024.
    Two Chinese People’s Liberation Army Navy Type 056 Corvettes and structures are seen at Cambodia’s Ream naval base in August 2024.
    (Graphic by Paul Nelson/RFA; Images by RFA and Planet Labs)

    RELATED STORIES

    Chinese warships rotate at Cambodia’s Ream naval base

    US navy ship on first visit to Cambodia in 8 years

    Chinese navy steps up training for Cambodians before ship transfer

    China-built naval base

    This month, China’s ambassador to Cambodia Wang Wenbin visited the Ream base, accompanied by Cambodian Defense Minister Tea Seiha and his father, Tea Banh, a former defense minister who now serves as personal adviser to King Norodom Sihamoni.

    Tea Seiha said on his Facebook that the purpose of the visit was to inspect progress in the modernization of the base.

    Former Cambodian defense minister Tea Banh and Chinese ambassador Wang Wenbin inspecting Ream naval base, Feb. 9, 2025.
    Former Cambodian defense minister Tea Banh and Chinese ambassador Wang Wenbin inspecting Ream naval base, Feb. 9, 2025.
    (Tea Seiha/Facebook)

    China and Cambodia began developing the base with Chinese funding in June 2021 to the alarm of the United States and some of Cambodia’s neighbors, who said they were worried that Beijing had a growing military presence close to the disputed waters of the South China Sea.

    A senior U.S. defense official told RFA that there were concerns “about the precedent of China establishing bases overseas” with Ream.

    Cambodia has repeatedly denied that China has been given exclusive military access to the base, saying that would be a violation of the Cambodian constitution.

    However, the base has been off-limits to all foreign vessels, apart from those from China.

    Cambodia and the U.S. mark the 75th anniversary of diplomatic ties this year and a U.S. congressional delegation led by former navy intelligence officer Jimmy Panetta is visiting Phnom Penh this week to promote bilateral cooperation.

    It is not clear if the subject of the Ream naval base is on the delegation’s agenda.

    Edited by Mike Firn.


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by RFA Staff.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • It is now widely acknowledged that the world is multipolar. This is so uncontroversial that the Munich Security Conference chose the title “Multipolarization” for its 2025 annual report.

    However, there is not a common definition of “multipolarity”. The Munich Security Report noted that, while “the world’s ‘multipolarization’ is a fact”, the “international system shows elements of unipolarity, bipolarity, multipolarity, and nonpolarity”, in which “multiple order models co-exist, compete, or clash”.

    Governments have radically different understandings of the meaning of multipolarity.

    The post What Is A ‘Multipolar’ World? appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • While a recent interview with the newly confirmed US Secretary of State Marco Rubio began with promising slogans, it quickly unraveled into threats of overt aggression, including outright calls to seize the Panama Canal and annex Greenland from Denmark under an implicit threat of military force.

    While the change in presidential administration is purely superficial, the intense urgency it pursues continuity of agenda with is not. It reflects the rapid rise of China, Russian resilience in the face of US proxy war in Ukraine, and an expanding multipolar world overwriting the US-led unipolar world order at ever-increasing speeds.

    The post US Seizing Panama And Greenland Aimed At China appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • By Caleb Fotheringham, RNZ Pacific journalist, in Avarua, Rarotonga

    More than 400 people have taken to the streets to protest against Cook Islands Prime Minister Mark Brown’s recent decisions, which have led to a diplomatic spat with New Zealand.

    The protest, led by Opposition MP and Cook Islands United Party leader Teariki Heather, has taken place outside the Cook Islands Parliament in Avarua — a day after Brown returned from China.

    Protesters have come out with placards, stating: “Stay connected with New Zealand.”


    The protest in Avarua today.    Video: RNZ

    Some government ministers have been standing outside Parliament, including Foreign Minister Tingika Elikana.

    Heather said he was present at the rally to how how much Cook Islanders cared about the relationship with New Zealand and valued the New Zealand passport.

    He has apologised to the New Zealand government on behalf of the Cook Islands government.

    Leader of the opposition and Democratic Party leader Tina Browne said she wanted the local passport to be off the table “forever and ever”.

    “We have no problem with our government going and seeking assistance,” she said.

    “We do have a problem when it is risking our sovereignty, risking our relationship with New Zealand.”

    This article is republished under a community partnership agreement with RNZ.

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • An architect working on China’s controversial plans for a new ‘mega-embassy’ in London has revealed some of the details of the project, including a tunnel connecting two of the former Royal Mint buildings, basement rooms and accommodation for hundreds of staff.

    Plans submitted to a government inquiry indicate large-scale remodeling of the buildings on the former Royal Mint site, including a large basement area with a security airlock for vehicles, suites of basement rooms and a new tunnel connecting two of the existing buildings.

    Police stand outside Royal Mint Court, the controversial site of China's proposed new
    Police stand outside Royal Mint Court, the controversial site of China’s proposed new “super-embassy” in London on Feb. 8, 2025.
    (Matthew Leung/RFA Cantonese)

    A political commentator told RFA Cantonese that underground embassy and consular facilities can be much harder for security services in host countries to monitor, citing Ireland’s refusal of a Russian Embassy planning application in 2020 on national security grounds.

    China purchased the former Royal Mint — near the Tower of London — in 2018 with plans to build what would become Beijing’s largest diplomatic facility globally. Plans showed that it was expected to be 10 times the size of a regular embassy.

    Beijing has made two applications to build the massive new facility in London both of which were rejected by the Tower Hamlets Borough Council — the local council overseeing the neighborhood — amid a vocal campaign by rights groups.

    British Metropolitan Police had earlier spoken against the planned embassy due to safety and security concerns, but withdrew its objections last month after the central government took over responsibility for the decision.

    Then the council said it won’t argue against the project at a planning inquiry.

    On Oct. 8, an estimated 4,000 people gathered in front of the proposed site to protest the plans, saying China would use the ‘mega-embassy’ to monitor dissidents and ordinary Chinese living outside the country.

    What’s the tunnel for?

    Oliver Ulmer, director of David Chipperfield Architects, told the planning inquiry in London on Feb. 12 that a new tunnel would link the main basement to that of the Siemens Registry building “to provide access.”

    Oliver Ulmer of David Chipperfield Architects speaks at the planning inquiry for China's proposed new
    Oliver Ulmer of David Chipperfield Architects speaks at the planning inquiry for China’s proposed new “super-embassy” in London, Feb. 13, 2025, in this image made from a live webcast.
    (Tower Hamlets Borough Council)

    “The basement … will be reconfigured to provide support spaces to the embassy functions on the floors above,” he said. “These will consist primarily of facilities to support the catering of events.”

    Changes will be made for “the provision of necessary security required for the embassy use,” Ulmer told Planning Inspector Claire Searson as part of a 10-day inquiry into the plan.

    The plans show a large basement with a security airlock, with access to two suites of unlabeled rooms, one via the new tunnel.

    Police stand outside Royal Mint Court, the controversial site of China's proposed new
    Police stand outside Royal Mint Court, the controversial site of China’s proposed new “super-embassy” in London, on Feb. 8, 2025.
    (Matthew Leung/RFA Cantonese)

    However, the plans are labeled as having been “redacted for security reasons,” making any further public information on the facility unlikely.

    The new ‘super-embassy,’ if approved, will include 200 residential units, from studios to three-bedroomed apartments, suggesting a large increase in the number of embassy personnel compared with current staffing levels.

    Transnational repression

    The planning application comes amid growing concerns over Chinese Communist Party infiltration of various aspects of British life, and warnings from Hong Kongers in exile over growing acts of violence by Beijing supporters and officials alike.

    Overseas activists frequently report being targeted by agents and supporters of the Chinese state, including secret Chinese police stations in a number of countries.

    RELATED STORIES

    London council won’t argue against China’s ‘super-embassy’ at key hearing

    Thousands rally against China’s ‘mega-embassy’ in London

    London council rejects China’s ‘super-embassy’ plan – again

    Activists vow to fight China’s bid for new ‘super embassy’ in London

    China is currently believed to have 116 diplomats in the United Kingdom with diplomatic immunity, according to Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office figures from 2020, cited in The Times newspaper.

    The number of apartments suggests that number could see a very sharp increase if the embassy plans are given the go-ahead by Angela Rayner, Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government.

    In March 2020, the Irish government revoked an approved planning application for a massive expansion of the Russian Embassy in the city, saying it was “likely to be harmful to the security and defence of the State and the State’s relations with other states.”

    The Russians called the decision “ludicrous” at the time.

    Royal Mint Court, the controversial site of China's proposed new 'super-embassy' in London.
    Royal Mint Court, the controversial site of China’s proposed new ‘super-embassy’ in London.
    (Matthew Leung/RFA Cantonese)

    But political scholar Benson Wong said the use of basement facilities for espionage-related activities was highly likely.

    “Underground tunnels can effectively prevent host country security forces from conducting surveillance of foreign diplomatic missions to collect intelligence or carry out wiretapping,” Wong said. “This means the embassy can carry out any espionage or intelligence work in a secure environment.”

    “If the Labour government does nothing and allows the new Chinese Embassy to take liberties, I think the impact could be disastrous,” Wong said.

    The project plans also include a formal entrance hall with ‘screening facilities’ for diplomatic visitors, a cultural exchange center and a ‘heritage interpretation center’ and conference and exhibition facilities, Ulmer told the inquiry.

    A new visa application center is also planned, along with “student service” and “business services” facilities, he said.

    The outdoor space includes plans for a courtyard garden with increased biodiversity and “Chinese influences,” Ulmer said.

    Translated by Luisetta Mudie. Edited by Malcolm Foster.


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Matthew Leung for RFA Cantonese.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • For decades, Hong Kong Public Opinion Research Institute, or HKPORI, tracked public attitudes on sensitive political topics that revealed a public perception of disappearing press freedom and poor popularity scores for the city’s leaders.

    But after its premises were searched and the family members of a former director were questioned by police, it has decided to halt all research activities and review its situation.

    The decision is the latest fallout from a crackdown by Beijing on public dissent in Hong Kong under two security laws.

    “HKPORI will suspend all its self-funded research activities indefinitely, including its regular tracking surveys conducted since 1992, and all feature studies recently introduced,” the institute said in a statement on its website.

    The pollster said it will “undergo a transformation or even close down.”

    “HKPORI has always been law-abiding, but in the current environment, it has to pause its promotion of scientific polling,” the statement said.

    The announcement came a few weeks after police took away and questioned the wife and son of U.K.-based pollster and outspoken political commentator Chung Kim-wah, who has a HK$1 million (US$128,500) bounty on his head.

    Chung Kim-wah, deputy chief executive of Hong Kong's Public Opinion Research Institute, during an interview, August 2020.
    Chung Kim-wah, deputy chief executive of Hong Kong’s Public Opinion Research Institute, during an interview, August 2020.
    (RFA)

    President and CEO Robert Chung said “interested parties” are welcome to take over the institute, adding that he plans to “promote professional development around the world” until his current term ends after 2026.

    “The research team hopes there will be another opportunity to resume its work,” the statement said, adding that the Institute will “announce its final decision when the time is right.”

    Accused of incitement

    Chung, 64, a former researcher for the HKPORI and co-host of the weekly talk show “Voices Like Bells” for RFA Cantonese, left for the United Kingdom in April 2022 after being questioned amid a city-wide crackdown on public dissent and political opposition to the ruling Chinese Communist Party.

    He is accused — alongside Carmen Lau, Tony Chung, Joseph Tay and Chloe Cheung — of “incitement to secession” after he “advocated independence” on social media and repeatedly called on foreign governments to impose sanctions on Beijing over the crackdown, according to a police announcement.

    RELATED STORIES

    Hong Kong police question wife, son of wanted exiled pollster

    Hong Kong Police Raid Public Opinion Pollster Linked to Pro-Democracy Primaries

    Hong Kong pollster ‘had no choice’ but to leave city amid crackdown on dissent

    U.K.-based Hong Kong political scholar Benson Wong said the move was a huge loss to the people of Hong Kong.

    “The biggest loss for the people of Hong Kong that of a professional, neutral and scientific polling organization that once played the role of doctor to the political, economic and social aspects of life in Hong Kong,” Wong told RFA Cantonese in a recent interview.

    “If all of that is going to disappear, I think it will do catastrophic damage to Hong Kong’s … political development,” he said.

    Public opinion research viewed as a threat

    Wong said the move is likely linked to the authorities’ view of public opinion research as a threat.

    He said Hong Kong and Macau Affairs Office director Xia Baolong and Beijing’s Central Liaison Office director Zheng Yanxiong don’t seem to want to know what Hong Kong public opinion is.

    Police announced a warrant for Chung Kim-wah’s arrest and a HK$1 million (US$128,400) bounty on his head in December, making him one of 19 overseas activists wanted by the Hong Kong government.

    Since Beijing imposed two national security laws banning public opposition and dissent in the city, blaming “hostile foreign forces” for the protests, hundreds of thousands have voted with their feet amid plummeting human rights rankings, shrinking press freedom and widespread government propaganda in schools.

    Some fled to the United Kingdom on the British National Overseas, or BNO, visa program. Others have made their homes anew in the United States, Canada, Australia and Germany.

    Current affairs commentator Sang Pu said the move would have a “chilling” effect on the rest of society.

    “Public opinion surveys are … are a very important weather-vane,” Sang said. “If those can’t even be done any more, then it blurs the boundaries between what is regarded as political and non-political, or what are seen as sensitive and non-sensitive [topics].”

    “I think this is going to have a chilling effect on a lot more people, and that nobody will dare to do public opinion surveys any more,” he said.

    Translated by Luisetta Mudie. Edited by Malcolm Foster.


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Yam Chi Yau for RFA Cantonese.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • TAIPEI, Taiwan – China urged the United States on Monday to “correct its mistakes” after it removed wording on a State Department website stating that it did not support Taiwan independence. The U.S. brushed off the change as an update.

    The State Department’s latest “fact sheet” for Taiwan, a self-governing island claimed by China, used to include the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence,” but that was dropped on Thursday.

    The State Department also modified a passage in the fact sheet to suggest broader support for Taiwan’s inclusion in international organizations, by dropping the words “where statehood is not a requirement.”

    It added that Taiwan’s dispute with China should be resolved “free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.”

    “As is routine, the fact sheet was updated to inform the general public about our unofficial relationship with Taiwan,” said its spokesperson, as cited by Reuters news agency.

    The spokesperson added that the U.S. remained committed to its “One China Policy,” which acknowledges China’s position that there is only one Chinese government, and “preserving the peace and stability of the Taiwan Strait.”

    But Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun said the revisions were a “big step backwards” that “sends a seriously wrong message to Taiwan independence separatist forces.”

    “The U.S. State Department updated its fact sheet on relations with Taiwan and gravely backpeddled on its position on Taiwan-related issues. Its move severely violated the one-China principle,” Guo told a regular briefing in Beijing.

    “This is yet another example of the United States’ stubborn adherence to the erroneous policy of ‘using Taiwan to suppress China.’ We urge the United States side to immediately rectify its mistakes,” said Guo.

    Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun takes a question from a journalist at a press conference in Beijing, China, Jan. 7, 2025.
    Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun takes a question from a journalist at a press conference in Beijing, China, Jan. 7, 2025.
    (Florence Lo/Reuters)

    Taiwan, officially known as the Republic of China, operates as a self-governing democracy but is formally recognized by only a small number of countries.

    However, it maintains unofficial diplomatic relations with much of the international community, including the U.S.

    Although Taipei functions as a de facto independent state, it has never officially declared independence from Beijing, which has warned that such a declaration would trigger military action.

    Under the 1979 Taiwan Relations Act, the U.S. is committed to assisting Taiwan to defend itself but it has long maintained a policy of “strategic ambiguity” on whether it would intervene militarily to protect Taiwan in the event of a Chinese attack.

    Even subtle shifts in how U.S. officials refer to Taiwan are closely monitored by both Beijing and Taipei.

    ‘Message’ to China

    Chen Fang-Yu, an assistant professor in the Department of Political Science at Taiwan’s Soochow University, said he believed the change to the reference was a message from the U.S. to China that U.S.-Taiwan relations were determined by Washington not Beijing.

    “While the presence or absence of this phrase in the State Department’s statements may not be critical on its own, its removal is important because China has long used the Clinton-era ‘the U.S. does not support Taiwan independence’ stance for its propaganda,” said Chen, referring to the former U.S. President Bill Clinton’s administration.

    In 1998, Clinton explicitly stated a “Three No’s” policy: no support for Taiwan independence, no recognition of “two Chinas” or “one China, one Taiwan,” and no support for Taiwan’s membership in international organizations requiring statehood.

    “Now that the phrase is gone, China can no longer manipulate it for its narrative,” Chen added.

    On Sunday, Taiwan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs welcomed the State Department’s “positive and friendly” update as a sign of the “close and friendly Taiwan-U.S. partnership.”

    Taiwanese Foreign Minister Lin Chia-lung also thanked the U.S. for its “support and positive stance on U.S.-Taiwan relations” and “commitment to peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait, Taiwan-US economic, trade, and technology partnership and Taiwan’s international space.”

    RELATED STORIES

    North Korea vows to bolster nuclear forces as US, Japan hold summit

    Beijing changes Rubio’s Chinese name, perhaps to get around travel ban

    Beijing sees Trump presidency as ‘critical’ juncture for Sino-US ties

    Japan also makes a Taiwan change

    Separately, Japan, one of the closest U.S. allies in Asia, said it would allow Taiwanese citizens to list their nationality or home region as “Taiwan” instead of “China” on household registries from May.

    After Japan severed diplomatic ties with Taiwan in 1972, both Taiwanese and Chinese people were classified under “China” as Japan at the time rejected both “People’s Republic of China” – China’s official name – and “Republic of China”, for political reasons.

    Under the new rule, however, Japan will use “nationality/region” instead of country names, aligning with its residence certificates and cards, and it will allow individuals to change to “Taiwan.”

    While foreigners are generally not included on household registrations unless they naturalize or are adopted, their nationality is recorded if they marry a Japanese citizen. The change allows Taiwanese spouses of Japanese people to have “Taiwan” listed in official records.

    Taiwanese people have long urged the Japanese government to allow Taiwan to be recorded, emphasizing the importance of preserving their identity. According to Taiwan’s Ministry of the Interior, up to 1,000 Taiwanese people marry Japanese citizens every year.

    In response, the Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson urged Japan to uphold the “One China” principle.

    “Taiwan is an inseparable part of China’s territory, and people on both sides of the Taiwan Strait are all Chinese,” Guo said.

    “We urge Japan to uphold the ‘One China’ principle and the spirit of the four key China-Japan political documents, refrain from making petty moves on the Taiwan issue, and avoid sending contradictory and erroneous signals,” referring to agreements that shape diplomatic relations between Beijing and Tokyo, including the 1972 Joint Communiqué, which established diplomatic ties, with Japan recognizing the People’s Republic of China as the sole legal government of China.

    Edited by Mike Firn.


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Taejun Kang and Alan Lu for RFA.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • TAIPEI, Taiwan – A Taiwanese court jailed a former army officer for 13 years for attempting to recruit an active-duty military pilot to defect to China with a helicopter, the latest in a series of national security cases involving retired military and law enforcement personnel.

    The government of the democratic island accuses China of systematically cultivating retired military and police officers. It said in January that 85% of national security cases were linked to retired officers.

    Former Taiwanese military officer Hsiao Hsiang-Yun was found guilty of attempting to persuade a military pilot to defect to China with a helicopter. He was also found guilty of coercing soldiers to film propaganda videos for China.

    “The convicted individuals were found guilty of violating Taiwan’s National Security Act, Anti-Corruption Act, and Criminal Code of the Armed Forces,” the judge said in the Feb. 13 ruling.

    According to the ruling, the Chinese Communist Party, or CCP, worked with Hsiao to orchestrate the defection of Lt. Col. Hsieh Meng-Shu, who was encouraged to fly a CH-47 Chinook military helicopter to China. Hsieh drew up a plan to defect but was caught before he could carry it out.

    Hsaio and Hsieh received bribes of 620,000 New Taiwan dollars (US$19,500) and 600,000 New Taiwan dollars (US$18,900), respectively, according to the court.

    Ho Cheng-Hui, the deputy secretary-general of Taiwan National Security Institute, said that the CPP was using a psychological warfare tactic by targeting the officer corps, with a view to subverting Taiwan’s military.

    “Piloting a military aircraft is quite challenging. The Taiwan Strait is roughly over 200 kilometers wide, and evading Taiwan’s air defense system requires low-altitude, sea-skimming flight, which reduces speed and makes maneuvering more difficult,” Ho told Radio Free Asia.

    “The primary goal of the PLA in doing this is to undermine the psychological resilience of Taiwan’s military,” said Ho referring to the Chinese People’s Liberation Army.

    Ho noted that this case showed Taiwan’s military personnel were at high risk of being targeted by Chinese infiltration and psychological warfare.

    “It is crucial to focus on improving military welfare, fostering a sense of honor, and ensuring related personnel’s isolation from encounters with sensitive or suspicious individuals,” he said, stressing that early warning measures such as exposing individuals, groups, or organizations linked to China would be crucial.

    “Regulations must be put in place to safeguard military personnel and prevent their exposure to Chinese infiltration.”

    Taiwan’s national security focus is on threats like espionage and interference from China, which considers the island a breakaway province that must be reunified, by force if necessary. Taiwan has governed itself since 1949.

    China has not commented on the case.

    RELATED STORIES

    Taiwan says 85% of national security cases involve retired army, police

    Taiwan to scale up annual military drill as China tensions mount

    Taiwan warns internet celebrities on collusion after video uproar

    In January, Liang Wen-chieh, spokesperson of Taiwan’s Mainland Affairs Council, which oversees relations across the Taiwan Strait, said the island’s government was “very concerned” that 85% of national security cases were linked to retired military and police.

    China had been “systematically and methodically cultivating” such people, he said.

    The number of people in Taiwan prosecuted for Chinese espionage increased from 16 in 2021 to 64 in 2024, Taiwan’s main intelligence agency, the National Security Bureau, or NSB, said in a report this month.

    In 2024, 15 military veterans and 28 active service members were prosecuted, accounting for 23% and 43%, respectively, of all Chinese espionage cases.

    Edited by Taejun Kang.


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Alan Lu for RFA.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • By Caleb Fotheringham, RNZ Pacific journalist in Avarua, Rarotonga

    Cook Islands Prime Minister Mark Brown hopes to have “an opportunity to talk” with the New Zealand government to “heal some of the rift”.

    Brown returned to Avarua on Sunday afternoon (Cook Islands Time) following his week-long state visit to China, where he signed a “comprehensive strategic partnership” to boost its relationship with Beijing.

    Prior to signing the deal, he said that there was “no need for New Zealand to sit in the room with us” after the New Zealand Foreign Affairs Minister raised concerns about the agreement.

    Responding to reporters for the first time since signing the China deal, he said: “I haven’t met the New Zealand government as yet but I’m hoping that in the coming weeks we will have an opportunity to talk with them.

    “Because they will be able to share in this document that we’ve signed and for themselves see where there are areas that they have concerns with.

    “But I’m confident that there will be no areas of concern. And this is something that will benefit Cook Islanders and the Cook Islands people.”

    He said the agreement with Beijing would be made public “very shortly”.

    “I’m sure once the New Zealand government has a look at it there will be nothing for them to be concerned about.”

    Not concerned over consequences
    Brown said he was not concerned by any consequences the New Zealand government may impose.

    The Cook Islands leader is returning to a motion of no confidence filed against his government and protests against his leadership.

    “I’m confident that my statements in Parliament, and my returning comments that I will make to our people, will overcome some of the concerns that have been raised and the speculation that has been rife, particularly throughout the New Zealand media, about the purpose of this trip to China and the contents of our action plan that we’ve signed with China.”

    1News Pacific correspondent Barbara Dreaver was at the airport but was not allowed into the room where the press conference was held.

    The New Zealand government wanted to see the agreement prior to Brown going to China, which did not happen.

    A spokesperson for New Zealand’s Foreign Minister Winston Peters said Brown had a requirement to share the contents of the agreement and anything else he signed under the 2001 Joint Centenary Declaration.

    ‘Healing some of the rift’
    Brown said the difference in opinion provides an opportunity for the two governments to get together and “heal some of the rift”.

    “We maintain that our relationship with New Zealand remains strong and we remain open to having conversations with the New Zealand government on issues of concern.

    “They’ve raised their concerns around security in the Pacific. We’ve raised our concerns around our priorities, which is economic development for our people.”

    Brown has previously said New Zealand did not consult the Cook Islands on its comprehensive strategic partnership with China in 2014, which they should have done if the Cook Islands had a requirement to do so.

    He hoped people would read New Zealand’s deal along with his and show him “where the differences are that causes concern”.

    Meanwhile, the leader of Cook Islands United Party, Teariki Heather, said Cook Islanders were sitting nervously with a question mark waiting for the agreement to be made public.

    Cook Islands United Party Leader, Teariki Heather stands by one of his trucks he's preparing to take on the protest.
    Cook Islands United Party leader Teariki Heather stands by one of his trucks he is preparing to take on the planned protest. Image: Caleb Fotheringham/RNZ Pacific

    “That’s the problem we have now, we haven’t been disclosed or told of anything about what has been signed,” he said.

    “Yes we hear about the marine seabed minerals exploration, talk about infrastructure, exchange of students and all that, but we haven’t seen what’s been signed.”

    However, Heather said he was not worried about what was signed but more about the damage that it could have created with New Zealand.

    Heather is responsible for filing the motion of no confidence against the Prime Minister and his cabinet.

    The opposition only makes up eight seats of 24 in the Cook Islands Parliament and the motion is about showing support to New Zealand, not about toppling the government.

    “It’s not about the numbers for this one, but purposely to show New Zealand, this is how far we will go if the vote of no confidence is not sort of accepted by both of the majority members, at least we’ve given the support of New Zealand.”

    Heather has also been the leader for a planned planned today local time (Tuesday NZ).

    “Protesters will be bringing their New Zealand passports as a badge of support for Aotearoa,” he said.

    “Our relationship [with New Zealand] — we want to keep that.”

    This article is republished under a community partnership agreement with RNZ.


    This content originally appeared on Asia Pacific Report and was authored by APR editor.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Earlier this week, China’s tariffs on some US products came into effect, in response to the 10% increase in tariffs that the Trump administration imposed on all Chinese products, starting on February 1st.

    China created a 15% tariff on coal and Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) and a 10% tariff on crude oil, agricultural machinery, cars with large engines and pickup trucks.

    On February 4, Xi Jinping’s government filed a lawsuit against the US government’s tariff imposition with the World Trade Organization’s dispute settlement mechanism.

    China has also implemented export controls on five metals: tungsten, tellurium, bismuth, molybdenum, and indium.

    The post US Sectors Hit By New Chinese Tariffs And Restrictions appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • United States President Donald Trump’s tariffs against Canada are understandably causing much consternation and debate. Some business leaders are forecasting dire warnings, union officials are calling for retaliation and relief while also sidling up with their corporate counterparts to present a united front. But these developments are about much more than tariffs. Trump’s tariff plan exposes the perils of Canada’s dependency on the US and the price of integration within the American Empire.

    To discuss these issues, last week I sat down with Sam Gindin. For more than 25 years, Sam was research director of the Canadian Auto Workers union.

    The post Trump’s Threats Expose Canada’s Utter Dependency On The US appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • A Lao woman who traveled to China for an arranged marriage warned others to demand legal documents and to have in-person meetings with potential husbands before leaving the country.

    Any woman who enters into what she called a “sham marriage” runs the risk of being trafficked to another man after they arrive in China, she told Radio Free Asia.

    “To those who may want to come to China, they should think and do research carefully,” she said, requesting anonymity for security reasons. “They shouldn’t decide without knowing what they could be facing. I experienced that myself.”

    A newlywed man shows marriage books for him and his wife in Luliang, northern China’s Shanxi province on Feb. 11, 2025.
    A newlywed man shows marriage books for him and his wife in Luliang, northern China’s Shanxi province on Feb. 11, 2025.
    (Adek Berry/AFP)

    The woman said she jumped at the chance to move to China two years ago for an arranged marriage. But eventually she realized that a promised 60 million kip (US$2,750) payment was never going to come.

    “I heard many people say marrying a Chinese man would help to solve financial problems and make life more comfortable,” she said in an interview on Feb. 4. “I had too much excitement from a lack of experience at that time.”

    Arranged marriages between Chinese men and young Lao women have become more common in recent years as the women and their families seek financial security amid Laos’ bleak economy.

    A Lao anti-human trafficking activist who goes by the name Ms. Dee told RFA last month that a middleman is usually involved in forming an agreement. The young women and their families are paid at most 30,000 yuan (US$4,150) while the middlemen keep the remainder of the fee, which can be around 200,000 Chinese yuan (US$27,500), she said.

    “After being sent to China, the Lao girls of course expect to receive some money that they can send home to support their families. But in fact, their Chinese husbands refuse,” Ms. Dee said.

    ‘Just go with him’

    Another Lao woman told RFA in a separate interview that a middleman sold her to a man three days after she arrived in China.

    “I was told not to be too particular,” she said on Feb. 10. “Just go with him. I have no choice at all.”

    The middleman added that she would get paid for the marriage after about six months, and could then “run away with a new man and get paid again,” she said.

    But the money never came, and she said she worries that a typical 16-year-old Lao girl could also be easily tricked by middlemen who promise monthly payments of 2,000 yuan (US$275) to send to family back in Laos.

    “The middlemen always gave them nice images of being married to Chinese men. ‘He’ll buy you a smart phone, nice clothes, new shoes,‘” she said. “All those materialistic things plus thinking of being out of poverty.”

    RELATED STORIES

    Lao police stop 3 women from boarding flight to China in trafficking case

    Three human traffickers to stand trial in northern Laos

    Lao official: Gov’t can’t afford to address rise in human trafficking

    Vientiane police arrest taxi driver and woman, rescue 4 teenagers

    The woman who spoke to RFA on Feb. 4 said Lao women could end up with a Chinese man who has a criminal record and isn’t able to provide legal marriage documents.

    “If the Chinese man cannot come to Laos and provide you with any legal documents, be aware and never believe that,” she said. “Don’t believe it if a middleman told you they will provide all needed documents when you have arrived in China.”

    She added: “You cannot trust the middleman. They will not pay you after you are sent to China.”

    A Lao official at the Anti-Trafficking Department told RFA that the middlemen often target young women from hill tribes who lack awareness and whose families have financial hardship.

    Translated by Khamsao Civilize. Edited by Matt Reed.


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by RFA Lao.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • By Lydia Lewis, RNZ Pacific presenter/Bulletin editor

    Former New Zealand Prime Minister Helen Clark maintains that Cook Islands, a realm of New Zealand, should have consulted Wellington before signing a “partnership” deal with China.

    “[Cook Islands Prime Minister Mark Brown] seems to have signed behind the backs of his own people as well as of New Zealand,” Clark told RNZ Pacific.

    Brown said the deal with China complements, not replaces, the relationship with New Zealand.

    The contents of the deal have not yet been made public.

    “The Cook Islands public need to see the agreement — does it open the way to Chinese entry to deep sea mining in pristine Cook Islands waters with huge potential for environmental damage?” Clark asked.

    “Does it open the way to unsustainable borrowing? What are the governance safeguards? Why has the prime minister damaged the relationship with New Zealand by acting in this clandestine way?”

    In a post on X (formerly Twitter), Clark went into detail about the declaration she signed with Cook Islands Prime Minister Terepai Maoate in 2001.

    “There is no doubt in my mind that under the terms of the Joint Centenary Declaration of 2001 that Cook Islands should have been upfront with New Zealand on the agreement it was considering signing with China,” Clark said.

    “Cook Islands has opted in the past for a status which is not independent of New Zealand, as signified by its people carrying New Zealand passports. Cook Islands is free to change that status, but has not.”

    Sione Tekiteki in Tonga for PIFLM 2024 - his last leader's meeting in his capacity as Director of Governance and Engagement.
    Sione Tekiteki in Tonga for PIFLM 2024 . . . his last leader’s meeting in his capacity as Director of Governance and Engagement. IMage: RNZ Pacific/ Lydia Lewis

    Missing the mark
    A Pacific law expert said there was a clear misunderstanding on what the 2001 agreement legally required New Zealand and Cook Islands to consult on.

    Brown has argued that New Zealand does not need to be consulted with to the level they want, something Foreign Minister Winston Peters disagrees with.

    AUT senior law lecturer and former Pacific Islands Forum policy advisor Sione Tekiteki told RNZ Pacific the word “consultation” had become somewhat of a sticking point:

    “From a legal perspective, there’s an ambiguity of what the word consultation means. Does it mean you have to share the agreement before it’s signed, or does it mean that you broadly just consult with New Zealand regarding what are some of the things that, broadly speaking, are some of the things that are in the agreement?

    “That’s one avenue where there’s a bit of misunderstanding and an interpretation issue that’s different between Cook Islands as well as New Zealand.”

    Unlike a treaty, the 2001 declaration is not “legally binding” per se but serves more to express the intentions, principles and commitments of the parties to work together in “recognition of the close traditional, cultural and social ties that have existed between the two countries for many hundreds of years”, he added.

    Tekiteki said that the declaration made it explicitly clear that Cook Islands had full conduct of its foreign affairs, capacity to enter treaties and international agreements in its own right and full competence of its defence and security.

    There was, however, a commitment of the parties to “consult regularly”, he said.

    For Clark, the one who signed the all-important agreement all those years ago, this is where Brown had misstepped.

    Pacific nations played off against each other
    Tekiteki said it was not just the Joint Centenary Declaration causing contention. The “China threat” narrative and the “intensifying geopolitics” playing out in the Pacific was another intergrated issue.

    An analysis in mid-2024 found that there were more than 60 security, defence and policing agreements and initiatives with the 10 largest Pacific countries.

    Australia was the dominant partner, followed by New Zealand, the US and China.

    A host of other agreements and “big money” announcements have followed, including the regional Pacific Policing Initiative and Australia’s arrangements with Nauru and PNG.

    “It would be advantageous if Pacific nations were able to engage on security related matters as a bloc rather than at the bilateral level,” Tekiteki said.

    “Not only will this give them greater political agency and leverage, but it would allow them to better coordinate and integrate support as well as avoid duplications. Entering these arrangements at the bilateral level opens Pacific nations to being played off against each other.

    “This is the most worrying aspect of what I am currently seeing.

    “This matter has greater implications for Cook Islands and New Zealand diplomatic relations moving forward.”

    Mark Brown talks to China's Ambassador to the Pacific Qian Bo,
    Mark Brown talking to China’s Ambassador to the Pacific, Qian Bo, who told the media an affirming reference to Taiwan in the PIF 2024 communique “must be corrected”. Image: RNZ Pacific/Lydia Lewis

    Protecting Pacific sovereignty
    The word sovereignty is thrown around a lot. In this instance Tekiteki does not think “there is any dispute that Cook Islands maintains sovereignty to enter international arrangements and to conduct its affairs as it determines”.

    But he did point out the difference between “sovereignty — the rhetoric” that we hear all the time, and “real sovereignty”.

    “For example, sovereignty is commonly used as a rebuttal to other countries to mind their own business and not to meddle in the affairs of another country.

    “At the regional level is tied to the projection of collective Pacific agency, and the ‘Blue Pacific’ narrative.

    “However, real sovereignty is more nuanced. In the context of New Zealand and Cook Islands, both countries retain their sovereignty, but they have both made commitments to “consult” and “cooperate”.

    Now, they can always decide to break that, but that in itself would have implications on their respective sovereignty moving forward.

    “In an era of intensifying geopolitics, militarisation, and power posturing — this becomes very concerning for vulnerable but large Ocean Pacific nations without the defence capabilities to protect their sovereignty.”

    This article is republished under a community partnership agreement with RNZ.

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • An investigation has exposed the tech firm’s cooperation with autocratic regimes to remove unfavourable content

    Google has cooperated with autocratic regimes around the world, including the Kremlin in Russia and the Chinese Communist party, to facilitate censorship requests, an Observer investigation can reveal.

    The technology company has engaged with the administrations of about 150 countries since 2011 that want information scrubbed from their public domains.

    Continue reading…

    This post was originally published on Human rights | The Guardian.


  • Illustration: Liu Rui/GT

    In recent years, cooperation between China and Africa in the space field has deepened. However, some Western media outlets have tried to distort the nature of this cooperation. On Tuesday, Reuters reported that China is “building space alliances in Africa to enhance its global surveillance network and advance its bid to become the world’s dominant space power.” The article also cited remarks from the Pentagon, claiming that China’s space projects in Africa and other parts of the developing world are a “security risk.”

    The real security risk is not cooperation or the sharing of technology, but the ideological prejudice of the West that clings to hegemony and obstructs progress. For a long time, space and other high-tech fields have been dominated by the US and its allies. Behind the smear campaigns of Western media lies the West’s fear of China-Africa cooperation.

    The cooperation between China and Egypt in space technology, referred to by foreign media as “China’s secretive overseas space program,” has been open and transparent. Public records show that Egypt is the first country to carry out satellite cooperation with China under the framework of the Belt and Road Initiative. At the end of 2023, the jointly designed and developed satellite MISRSAT-2 was successfully send into orbit. An Egyptian Space Agency official said that the project has promoted the training of Egyptian space professionals, helping Egypt become a leader in the field of space satellites in Africa and the Middle East. This “teach a man to fish” approach is a key step for Africa to achieve autonomous industrialization and modernization.

    Western media’s smear campaign against China-Africa space cooperation ignores the legitimate need for African countries to develop space technology. Space technology and monitoring systems can be used for weather monitoring, agricultural planning, environmental protection, and disaster management, helping Africa address climate change, improve agricultural productivity, optimize resource management, and enhance national emergency response capabilities.

    More broadly, China-Africa space cooperation reflects the changing global technological cooperation landscape and the reshaping of development rights. In the past, developing countries often had to rely on Western countries for technological aid, which came with many restrictions. However, through the concept of South-South cooperation, China has provided a more equal and sustainable cooperation model, helping African countries achieve self-development in critical fields such as space technology. This not only enhances Africa’s position in the global technology system, encouraging developing countries to participate in global technology governance, but also contributes to advancing the global multipolarization process.

    “Space is not a club for the rich,” said Song Zhongping, a Chinese military expert. Through win-win cooperation with Africa, China is helping more developing countries to quickly enter the mainstream of global technological development, embodying the democratization and multipolarization trend of modern technology, he noted.

    The focus of African and Global South countries is on more practical and sustainable development needs, rather than geopolitical games. The US and Western countries must choose the right path – abandoning the mind-set of technological hegemony, adopting a more open and inclusive approach, and actively participating in the global technological cooperation process.

    From infrastructure construction to focusing on modernization and cutting-edge technology, the “sour grapes” narrative of foreign media cannot conceal the fruitful outcomes of China-Africa cooperation. While the West is busy weaving lies, China and Africa have already woven a network of development and illuminated an autonomous future with technology, writing a new chapter of unity and development for the Global South.

    The post China-Africa Space Co-op Shows Tech’s Multipolarization, Democratization Trends first appeared on Dissident Voice.

    This post was originally published on Dissident Voice.