Category: China

  • Read RFA coverage of this topic in Burmese.

    Villagers and rare earth miners are trapped on the Myanmar-China border following a battle between allied rebel forces and junta troops, residents told Radio Free Asia on Friday. 

    The Kachin Independence Army, or KIA, is one of dozens of ethnic armed groups fighting the junta for territory and autonomy. Since the 2021 coup, it has seized 220 bases and 11 towns across Kachin and Shan states. 

    Fighting has centered on the region’s lucrative rare earth and gem mining sites, as well as major trade routes leading to Kachin state’s capital, Myitkyina, and further north to China. 

    The KIA seized control of nearly all of Shan state’s Chipwi township in early October but continue to try to take control of the remaining junta camps and border posts in the area. 

    While Chinese officials have previously allowed those displaced by fighting to enter the country and later be repatriated, 1,000 residents and workers trapped by fighting on Thursday were met with closed borders near Chipwi’s Pang War town, said one resident, asking to remain anonymous for security reasons. 

    “The Chinese haven’t opened the gate from yesterday until early today. Along the border, everyone is sleeping in tents and it’s very crowded,” he said, adding that KIA forces had captured Chanyinku village, nine kilometers (five miles) from Pang War. “Now, they’ve nearly arrived in Pang War. The junta is also shooting with heavy weapons.”


    RELATED STORIES:

    Rebels seize junta base near Chinese rare-earth mine in northern Myanmar

    As fighting wears on, many in Myanmar are focused on a new government

    China fires into Myanmar after junta airstrike on border, group says


    Residents began fleeing when fighting broke out near a stream in Chanyinku, he said. They can’t escape along the Chipwi-Myitkyina Highway or other vehicle routes due to heavy fighting, leaving them stuck at the Chinese border. 

    Ethnic armed groups and Myanmar’s junta have asked for China’s help, but the neighboring giant has declined to take sides, instead brokering short-lived ceasefires and peace talks. Conflict on the border and throughout the country has encroached on Chinese investment, trade, territory and infrastructure, causing Chinese border officials in Ruili to warn armed groups in northern Myanmar to stop fighting or it would “teach them a lesson.”

    In a video posted on social media on Thursday a woman said Chinese authorities allowed their own nationals to enter the country, but Myanmar nationals were not allowed near the border gate. Another video showed Chinese authorities had blocked the border crossing with barriers tied together with rope to prevent Myanmar citizens from entering. 

    Border 1.jpg
    Myanmar refugees and Chinese rare earth workers try to enter China at the China-Myanmar border gate in Pang War on Oct. 18, 2024. (Kachin New Group)

    The Chinese embassy in Yangon did not respond to emails from RFA requesting more information about the border closure. 

    Some Pang War residents are sheltering in nearby forests and a church, residents said as fighting continued Friday about a kilometer from the town. 

    KIA forces have been trying to capture junta border guard posts in the area, said Information Officer Naw Bu.

    “I’ve heard that from Pang War to Chanyinku village, KIA forces are doing a ground clearance operation,” he said. “But we don’t know some of the battle details.”

    KIA and allied forces turned their attention on Pang War after capturing a border guard post 16 kilometers (10 miles) away on Tuesday, residents said.

    They are also trying to seize a border guard post in Waingmaw township’s Kan Paik Ti town, 160 kilometers (100 miles) southwest of Pang War, they added.

    RFA attempted to contact Kachin state’s junta spokesperson Moe Min Thein for more information on the offensive, but he did not respond.

    Translated by Kiana Duncan. Edited by Mike Firn. 




    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by By RFA Burmese.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • China is developing one of the contested Paracel Islands into a major intelligence base in the northern part of the South China Sea, new satellite images analyzed by a British think tank revealed.

    A new report by Chatham House found that Beijing has been building a massive new radar system on Triton – the westernmost and southernmost island in the Paracel archipelago, less than 250 kilometers (155 miles) from Vietnam’s coast. 

    Vietnam and Taiwan also claim sovereignty over the Paracels but China controls the entire island chain after seizing it from the South Vietnam government in 1974. Beijing’s deployment of a drilling platform near Triton island in May 2014 led to a serious standoff with Hanoi and triggered an unprecedented wave of anti-China protests in Vietnam.

    Triton Island, called Zhongjian Dao in Chinese, also serves as a base point that China uses to draw a straight baseline to claim its territorial waters around the Paracel Islands. A U.N. arbitration tribunal in 2016 rejected this claim and the United States challenges it with its freedom-of-navigation operations in the area.

    map triton.jpg
    (Google Maps)

    The enhanced radar facility on Triton, according to Chatham House’s report, would “offer a challenge to China’s competitors in the region and internationally.”

    Satellite images provided by U.S. firm Maxar Technologies and analyzed by the report authors show the “striking development” of an advanced radar system known as SIAR, or synthetic impulse and aperture radar, “which purportedly detects stealth aircraft.”

    The SIAR is characterized by its distinctive octagonal shape, similar to the one that the Chinese military built in 2017 on Subi Reef in the Spratly islands.

    Several other structures on Triton have been identified as a radar tower, currently under construction, and facilities to store and launch anti-ship missiles or portable radars.

    Implications for Vietnam

    The radar system on Triton is the latest in a network of at least three counter-stealth radars, including those on Subi and Hainan islands, and “would significantly increase China’s signals intercept and electronic warfare capabilities across the disputed Paracel Islands archipelago and add to a wider surveillance network spanning much of the South China Sea,” said the report.

    Michael Dahm, a senior resident fellow at the U.S. Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies, was quoted as saying that as SIAR radars cannot see over the curve of the Earth, the one on Triton – monitoring the area between those covered by the other two radars – will help close the surveillance gap between Subi Reef and Hainan Island and “give China contiguous counter-stealth radar coverage of the South China Sea.”

    Vietnam would be the first at the receiving end with the report predicting that intelligence structures on Triton “would significantly diminish” the country’s capacity to operate undetected in the area.

    “Alongside existing radar on Triton which can detect sea-going vessels, Beijing now has the potential to track Vietnamese air movements and gain forewarning of Hanoi’s maneuvers in the area, including efforts to access oil and gas deposits,” it said.

    osint triton.jpg
    Construction of a radar tower on Triton Island, October, 2024. (Maxar Technologies/Chatham House)

    Chatham House analyst Bill Hayton suggested that new developments on Triton “might be a warning that China is planning to mount another drilling expedition.” 

    Radio Free Asia tried to contact Vietnamese authorities for comment but has not yet received a reply.


    RELATED STORIES

    EXPLAINED: What are the Paracel Islands and why are they disputed?

    Vietnam says China attacked fishing boat near disputed islands

    China’s newly built Paracels airstrip could host drones, analyst says

    Report: Taiwan plans upgrade of runway on disputed island


    Last August, international media reported on the construction of a 600-meter (656 yard) runway on Triton that, albeit too short for patrol aircraft, could host drones. 

    The assumed “runway” turned out to be a road but Hanoi at the time voiced concern, saying that, “all activities in the Paracel Islands conducted without Vietnamese permission are violations of Vietnam’s sovereignty.”

    Vietnam has also accused China of attacking one of its fishing boats near the Paracels last month, injuring 10 fishermen. China denied the accusation, and said the Vietnamese men were fishing illegally in Chinese waters.

    Edited by Taejun Kang and Mike Firn.


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by By RFA Staff.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Private Chinese technology group United Aircraft has revealed a prototype large tiltrotor vertical take-off and landing (VTOL) capable uncrewed aerial vehicle (UAV) called the R6000 Lanying. Its name is directly translated into “Lanthanum Shadow” and apparently inspired after the rare-earth element. United Aircraft released imagery of the full-scale R6000 prototype in an 11 October social […]

    The post China unveils large tiltrotor UAV protoype appeared first on Asian Military Review.

    This post was originally published on Asian Military Review.

  • Exclusive: Party drops plan for formal recognition laid out last year by David Lammy, who will visit Beijing on Friday

    Labour has backtracked on plans to push for formal recognition of China’s treatment of the Uyghurs as genocide in the run-up to David Lammy’s trip to the country this weekend.

    The foreign secretary is expected to arrive in Beijing on Friday for high-level meetings before travelling to Shanghai on Saturday.

    Continue reading…

    This post was originally published on Human rights | The Guardian.

  • Joint exercise Sama Sama, led by the Philippines and the United States, entered a crucial phase that simulated realistic scenarios in the South China Sea on the same day that China held military drills around Taiwan.

    On Monday, China’s Eastern Theater Command held a large-scale exercise – Joint Sword-2024B – in the air and waters of the Taiwan Strait and around Taiwan island to send “a stern warning to the separatist acts of Taiwan independence forces,” a term China normally uses to refer to the Taiwan government.

    Just hours later, participating naval forces from the Philippines and the U.S. “successfully conducted a series of advanced maritime drills,” the Armed Forces of the Philippines, or AFP, said in a statement on social media.

    They focused on “anti-submarine warfare and joint patrol operations,” it added. 

    Sama Sama, or Togetherness in the Tagalog language, began last week and continues for two weeks in the waters off northern Philippines facing Taiwan. Its 2024 exercise also involves personnel from Australia, Canada, France and Japan, and observers from the United Kingdom.

    The exercise’s area and those of the Chinese drills seemed quite distant from each other but analysts noted that China’s Liaoning aircraft carrier group had sailed into seas around Bashi channel between the Philippines and Taiwan a day earlier and was present to the east of Taiwan during Joint Sword-2024B.


    RELATED STORIES

    China completes large-scale drills around Taiwan

    Six countries join naval drills amid tension with China

    US Navy flies maritime patrol aircraft through Taiwan Strait


    Key phase

    According to the AFP’s statement, the drills on Monday included a Combined Anti-Submarine Exercise, or CASEX, where troops engaged in torpedo drills using the expandable mobile anti-submarine warfare training target, which simulates the characteristics of a submarine. in order to “hone their anti-submarine warfare techniques in a realistic and controlled environment.”

    In addition to CASEX, they also conducted a joint and combined night-time patrol that simulated “real-world scenarios of patrolling contested waters.”

    The U.S. Navy said in an earlier statement that ​​​​specialized teams, including ​diving and explosive ordnance disposal units​, “will conduct high-intensity drills focusing on anti-submarine warfare​, ​anti-​surface warfare​, ​anti-​air warfare​, and maritime domain awareness,” – which it said set Sama Sama apart as a more sophisticated exercise in both complexity and scope.

    The participating personnel also conducted search-and-rescue, and shipboard casualty care drills, showing that they were “not only focused on combat readiness but also on humanitarian assistance and disaster response, integral aspects of modern naval operations.” 

    Philippine troops.jpg
    Personnel of the BRP Jose Rizal (FF150) during Exercise Sama Sama on Oct. 14, 2024. (Armed Forces of the Philippines)

    The Royal Canadian Navy, Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force , and other allied navies will take part in later exercises, the AFP said.

    Six parties including Brunei, China, Malaysia, the Philippines, Taiwan and Vietnam hold claims to parts of the South China Sea but China’s claim is by far the most expansive. Tensions have risen recently between Beijing and Manila over some reefs, around which both sides have increased patrols.

    Sama Sama, now in its eighth iteration, “reflects ​​the spirit of the decades-long partnership between allies in the region” and is not targeted at any country, the U.S. Navy said.

    Edited by Taejun Kang and Mike Firn. 


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by By RFA Staff.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Radio Free Asia.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Read RFA coverage of this topic in Chinese.

    Authorities in China are moving to seize more than 3 billion yuan (US$435 million) in assets belonging to a former high-ranking official from the northeastern province of Heilongjiang who has fled to the United States, claiming to be a persecuted critic of the government.

    According to the Mudanjiang Intermediate People’s Court, former Jixi vice mayor Li Chuanliang stands accused of holding illegal assets including real estate, companies and engineering equipment worth 3.1 billion yuan, according to details it published in the Oct. 11 edition of the People’s Court Daily, a specialist legal newspaper.

    Li, 61, who has served as vice mayor of both Jixi and Hegang cities, stands accused of embezzling public assets, accepting bribes and appropriating public funds by awarding contracts to companies he secretly owned, the state-run China Daily newspaper reported.

    Li fled China in 2018, two years before China issued an international “red notice” arrest warrant for him via Interpol.

    But unlike many former officials targeted by ruling Chinese Communist Party leader Xi Jinping’s anti-corruption campaign, Li has fought back, lawyered up, had the red notice canceled, and claims he is being persecuted because he witnessed widespread official corruption during his time in office.

    Now, the authorities are moving to confiscate what they say are his “illegal gains,” something that usually takes place only after a person has been convicted of corruption by a court.

    “Since the investigation began in 2020, authorities have frozen over 1.4 billion yuan (US$197 million) of his funds and seized 1,021 properties, 27 parcels of land, eight forest plots, 38 vehicles and 10 sets of mechanical equipment,” the China Daily reported.

    The confiscation of the assets will go ahead if Li fails to present himself for trial within the next six months.

    ‘Let the bullets fly’

    But Li told Radio Free Asia that he hasn’t received any legal papers regarding the alleged case against him.

    “They haven’t actually taken any action against me,” he said in an interview on Tuesday.

    “The point of weaving this yarn about these assets and these apartments is firstly revenge, secondly, robbery, thirdly, to intimidate and fourthly, to send out a warning,” Li said. “Let the bullets fly — I’m a free agent now and have the opportunity to clarify and explain.”

    “I think the whole system is rotten to the core, and that these officials are lawless,” he said. “I definitely want more democracy, more freedom, more transparency, more openness, and more justice in China.”


    RELATED STORIES:

    Calls grow for parole of ailing dissident property mogul Ren Zhiqiang

    PRC at 75: Mao Zedong’s mass political campaigns still drive Chinese politics

    China revokes license of former Xu Zhiyong defense attorney


    While the investigation began in 2020, Li hasn’t even been able to hire a lawyer in China to represent him.

    “They would need to formally prosecute me and notify me before I can hire a lawyer,” Li said. “But they never have.”

    Since Li fled the country, the authorities have prosecuted dozens of Li’s relatives and former associates instead, according to a lawyer representing one of them, who asked to remain anonymous for fear of reprisals.

    The lawyer said that the authorities are acting illegally, and that many of the accused had done nothing wrong.

    “You say this person has committed a crime, so you need to convict him first,” a lawyer representing the family who asked not to be identified told RFA Mandarin in a recent interview. “Only then can you start the process for confiscating his assets, according to the Criminal Procedure Law.”

    “Right now, they’re trying to confiscate his assets before the trial has even been held, which is totally illegal,” the lawyer said, adding that they are worried the authorities could try him in absentia.

    Online searches by RFA Mandarin turned up no cases against Li filed by the Heilongjiang provincial state prosecutor’s office, which approved his formal arrest in absentia in September 2020. 

    Guilty by association

    The sheer scale of the allegations has sparked a storm of outrage on Chinese social media platforms, but Li claimed many of the properties listed were legitimately owned and operated by him and his relatives.

    “A lot of those funds and assets were run in total compliance with the law and regulations by either myself, my relatives or my friends,” Li told Radio Free Asia. But he said he had never heard of many of the assets listed by the Mudanjiang court.

    “I don’t know anything about a lot of them, but they may belong to my partners or their affiliated companies,” he said. “All of the assets I know about are unproblematic.”

    The lawyer said some of the properties listed were part of a residential complex developed by Li but still unsold, but that the authorities had listed each apartment separately, giving the impression of a much longer list.

    He said the government appears to be considering the assets of anyone connected to Li as fair game, as if they were guilty by association.

    “How come everyone else’s money is all included in there?” he said. 

    2 China seize assets exile mayor Li Chuanliang.jpg
    Former Jixi Vice Mayor Li Chuanliang at a meeting of the Jixi municipal People’s Congress in 2013. (Courtesy of Li Chuanliang)

    Xia Ming, politics professor at New York’s City University, said Xi Jinping’s anti-corruption drive typically targets Xi’s political rivals, rather than seeking to root out rampant graft throughout the system.

    “Xi Jinping wants to enhance his personal reputation and build his legitimacy by playing the anti-corruption card, but I don’t think it’s working,” Xia said, adding that public anger is simmering over the current economic downturn.

    “This decline has done damage to everyone, and people are disgusted,” he said. “They link the current failure of Xi’s anti-corruption campaign to the incompetence and hypocrisy throughout the Communist Party system.”

    Criticizing the Chinese government

    In a 2022 statement, Li’s U.S. lawyer Michelle Estlund said he was being targeted for giving media interviews criticizing the Chinese government after he arrived in the United States.

    Li fled to the United States in 2020 with the assistance of the U.S.-based Chinese Democratic Party, Estlund’s law firm said in a news release at the time. 

    “Upon his arrival to the United States, Mr. Li spoke out against the Chinese government and its corruption,” the statement said. “He gave multiple interviews, criticizing both the CCP and the Chinese government’s corruption and its attempts to cover up certain aspects of the COVID-19 outbreak.”

    The authorities filed the first charges against Li “a few weeks” after his first media interview, it said.

    In 2020, Li gave an interview (in Chinese) to RFA Cantonese, in which he spoke about rampant official corruption during his tenure, with officials snapping up confiscated private-sector assets like coal mines after targeting the owners with allegations of corruption or other wrong-doing.

    “The local leaders have the final say in who gets investigated; they are selectively anti-corruption,” he said. “Take a look at some of these departments and check out their families’ assets; take a look at what they’re wearing, what kind of car they drive, where they live and what kind of food they eat.”

    Li is now challenging the Chinese authorities to take him to court in the United States, and make all of the evidence against him public.

    “I just want everything to be made public, for an open trial, and for the chance to defend myself in public,” he said.

    Translated by Luisetta Mudie. Edited by Joshua Lipes.


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by By Chen Zifei and Wang Yun for RFA Mandarin.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • China hosted a global media summit in Xinjiang this week, bringing together over 500 participants to discuss artificial intelligence, but also used the event to criticize Western reports about the forced labor of Uyghurs and an ongoing genocide were “fabricated lies.”

    Representatives from over 200 media outlets — including executives from Reuters and The Associated Press — government agencies and international organizations attended the 6th World Media Summit, which opened Monday in Urumqi, Xinjiang’s capital, to discuss how artificial intelligence, or AI, is transforming the media industry.

    The summit was organized by China’s official Xinhua News Agency and the Xinjiang regional government.

    In addition to speeches about AI, Chinese officials blasted Western news reports that have shed light on the oppression of the 12 million Uyghurs who live in Xinjiang, or East Turkistan, as Uyghurs prefer to call it.

    Journalists work at the opening ceremony of the 6th World Media Summit in Urumqi, capital of northwestern China's Xinjiang region, Oct. 14, 2024. (Chen Yehua/Xinhua via Getty Images)
    Journalists work at the opening ceremony of the 6th World Media Summit in Urumqi, capital of northwestern China’s Xinjiang region, Oct. 14, 2024. (Chen Yehua/Xinhua via Getty Images)

    The United States and some Western parliaments have said there is credible evidence that China’s treatment of the Uyghurs is a “genocide” and “crimes against humanity.” The U.S. Congress has also passed a law banning the import of goods and materials suspected of being made by Uyghur forced labor.

    But Ma Xingrui, Communist Party secretary of the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, rejected the accusations, saying all ethnic groups in the region live peacefully.

    “Some anti-China forces in the world have disregarded the facts, wantonly fabricated lies such as ‘genocide’ and ‘forced labor’ in Xinjiang, China, and maliciously imposed unilateral sanctions,” he said in a speech, according to a post on the Xinjiang government website.

    “At present, Xinjiang has a stable society, a prosperous economy, and people of all ethnic groups live and work in peace and contentment, and the development situation continues to improve,” he continued.

    Amplifying a narrative

    Ma’s comments are an example of how China is amplifying its own narrative about the Uyghurs living happily and enjoying prosperity despite evidence to the contrary, including many stories by Radio Free Asia.

    China does not permit journalists to travel freely in Xinjiang and convincing Uyghurs contacted by phone to talk to reporters outside the country puts them at considerable risk of punishment.

    Representatives from Al Jazeera, Russian news agency TASS, the Malaysian National News Agency, the Kyrgyz State News Agency, South Africa’s Independent Media, Hungary’s ATV and media organizations from China-friendly countries also attended the event.


    RELATED STORIES

    Uyghurs sentenced to cumulative 4.4 million years in prison: study

    China pushes ‘Sinicization of Islam’ in Xinjiang as Ramadan arrives

    Visiting Xinjiang, Xi Jinping doubles down on hard-line policies against Uyghurs


    “Their fundamental purpose is to drag the people of all ethnic groups in Xinjiang into poverty and backwardness, and then realize the plot of ‘using Xinjiang to control China,’” Ma said, according to comments from the speech published in Chinese by the Xinjiang government. 

    The report went on to make comments that weren’t clearly attributed to any one person, saying, “Everyone appreciates China’s Xinjiang’s remarkable achievements in various fields and fully recognizes Xinjiang’s important contributions to regional social stability, economic development and cultural prosperity.

    It said that “China’s Xinjiang has repeatedly been the target of false propaganda and malicious attacks. But it turns out that the narrative about human rights violations in Xinjiang is based on false information and is purely for political purposes.”

    Harnessing AI

    Also, it comes as no surprise that China is interested in harnessing the power of AI — the theme of the conference — to spread its narratives, said Henryk Szadziewski, research director at the Uyghur Human Rights Project in Washington.

    The 6th World Media Summit opens in Urumqi, capital of northwestern China's Xinjiang region, Oct. 14, 2024. (Li Xiang/Xinhua via Getty Images)
    The 6th World Media Summit opens in Urumqi, capital of northwestern China’s Xinjiang region, Oct. 14, 2024. (Li Xiang/Xinhua via Getty Images)

    “Urumqi is, of course, a strategic place because the Uyghur region is one of the leading spaces in China where China is spreading disinformation about conditions on the ground,” he told RFA. “It’s a leading part in China’s messaging to the globe.” 

    China’s efforts to promote its narrative appears to be paying off.

    Bassam Zakarneh, a member of Fatah’s Revolutionary Council of Palestine, who led a delegation of Palestinian and other Arab politicians on a visit to Xinjiang in March, told Xinhua in an interview on Monday that the West was “trying to exploit anything to undermine China’s progress and development” through a smear campaign against Beijing’s Xinjiang policy.  

    “Our visit and observation on the ground were proof that Western propaganda is false,” he said.   

    Translated by RFA Uyghur. Edited by Roseanne Gerin and Malcolm Foster.


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by By Shadia Suzuk for RFA Uyghur.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • China hosted a global media summit in Xinjiang this week, bringing together over 500 participants to discuss artificial intelligence, but also used the event to criticize Western reports about the forced labor of Uyghurs and an ongoing genocide were “fabricated lies.”

    Representatives from over 200 media outlets — including executives from Reuters and The Associated Press — government agencies and international organizations attended the 6th World Media Summit, which opened Monday in Urumqi, Xinjiang’s capital, to discuss how artificial intelligence, or AI, is transforming the media industry.

    The summit was organized by China’s official Xinhua News Agency and the Xinjiang regional government.

    In addition to speeches about AI, Chinese officials blasted Western news reports that have shed light on the oppression of the 12 million Uyghurs who live in Xinjiang, or East Turkistan, as Uyghurs prefer to call it.

    Journalists work at the opening ceremony of the 6th World Media Summit in Urumqi, capital of northwestern China's Xinjiang region, Oct. 14, 2024. (Chen Yehua/Xinhua via Getty Images)
    Journalists work at the opening ceremony of the 6th World Media Summit in Urumqi, capital of northwestern China’s Xinjiang region, Oct. 14, 2024. (Chen Yehua/Xinhua via Getty Images)

    The United States and some Western parliaments have said there is credible evidence that China’s treatment of the Uyghurs is a “genocide” and “crimes against humanity.” The U.S. Congress has also passed a law banning the import of goods and materials suspected of being made by Uyghur forced labor.

    But Ma Xingrui, Communist Party secretary of the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, rejected the accusations, saying all ethnic groups in the region live peacefully.

    “Some anti-China forces in the world have disregarded the facts, wantonly fabricated lies such as ‘genocide’ and ‘forced labor’ in Xinjiang, China, and maliciously imposed unilateral sanctions,” he said in a speech, according to a post on the Xinjiang government website.

    “At present, Xinjiang has a stable society, a prosperous economy, and people of all ethnic groups live and work in peace and contentment, and the development situation continues to improve,” he continued.

    Amplifying a narrative

    Ma’s comments are an example of how China is amplifying its own narrative about the Uyghurs living happily and enjoying prosperity despite evidence to the contrary, including many stories by Radio Free Asia.

    China does not permit journalists to travel freely in Xinjiang and convincing Uyghurs contacted by phone to talk to reporters outside the country puts them at considerable risk of punishment.

    Representatives from Al Jazeera, Russian news agency TASS, the Malaysian National News Agency, the Kyrgyz State News Agency, South Africa’s Independent Media, Hungary’s ATV and media organizations from China-friendly countries also attended the event.


    RELATED STORIES

    Uyghurs sentenced to cumulative 4.4 million years in prison: study

    China pushes ‘Sinicization of Islam’ in Xinjiang as Ramadan arrives

    Visiting Xinjiang, Xi Jinping doubles down on hard-line policies against Uyghurs


    “Their fundamental purpose is to drag the people of all ethnic groups in Xinjiang into poverty and backwardness, and then realize the plot of ‘using Xinjiang to control China,’” Ma said, according to comments from the speech published in Chinese by the Xinjiang government. 

    The report went on to make comments that weren’t clearly attributed to any one person, saying, “Everyone appreciates China’s Xinjiang’s remarkable achievements in various fields and fully recognizes Xinjiang’s important contributions to regional social stability, economic development and cultural prosperity.

    It said that “China’s Xinjiang has repeatedly been the target of false propaganda and malicious attacks. But it turns out that the narrative about human rights violations in Xinjiang is based on false information and is purely for political purposes.”

    Harnessing AI

    Also, it comes as no surprise that China is interested in harnessing the power of AI — the theme of the conference — to spread its narratives, said Henryk Szadziewski, research director at the Uyghur Human Rights Project in Washington.

    The 6th World Media Summit opens in Urumqi, capital of northwestern China's Xinjiang region, Oct. 14, 2024. (Li Xiang/Xinhua via Getty Images)
    The 6th World Media Summit opens in Urumqi, capital of northwestern China’s Xinjiang region, Oct. 14, 2024. (Li Xiang/Xinhua via Getty Images)

    “Urumqi is, of course, a strategic place because the Uyghur region is one of the leading spaces in China where China is spreading disinformation about conditions on the ground,” he told RFA. “It’s a leading part in China’s messaging to the globe.” 

    China’s efforts to promote its narrative appears to be paying off.

    Bassam Zakarneh, a member of Fatah’s Revolutionary Council of Palestine, who led a delegation of Palestinian and other Arab politicians on a visit to Xinjiang in March, told Xinhua in an interview on Monday that the West was “trying to exploit anything to undermine China’s progress and development” through a smear campaign against Beijing’s Xinjiang policy.  

    “Our visit and observation on the ground were proof that Western propaganda is false,” he said.   

    Translated by RFA Uyghur. Edited by Roseanne Gerin and Malcolm Foster.


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by By Shadia Suzuk for RFA Uyghur.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • China has sanctioned a lawmaker and rights activist, a civil defense group and a retired chip magnate from democratic Taiwan, adding their names to a list of ‘pro-independence diehards’ who are banned from traveling to the country.

    Beijing’s Taiwan Affairs Office said it will punish and sanction Legislative Yuan member and rights activist Puma Shen, retired chip billionaire Robert Tsao and their civil defense organization the Kuma Academy for “inciting separatism,” a term used by the Chinese Communist Party to describe views that aren’t in keeping with its territorial claims.

    “The punishment of Puma Shen, Robert Tsao and the Kuma Academy in accordance with the law is a just act of punishing those who support independence,” Office spokesperson Chen Binhua told reporters in Beijing on Wednesday, as China wrapped up its latest military exercises around the island.

    Trainees simulate giving first aid to 'injured' patients as part of Kuma Academy's 2023 civil defense drill 'Operation Magpie' in Taiwan. (Hsiao-wei for RFA Mandarin/The Reporter)
    Trainees simulate giving first aid to ‘injured’ patients as part of Kuma Academy’s 2023 civil defense drill ‘Operation Magpie’ in Taiwan. (Hsiao-wei for RFA Mandarin/The Reporter)

    “It is a powerful punishment and resolute blow to Taiwanese pro-independence forces and their provocations,” Chen said. “Our determination to smash all Taiwanese pro-independence secessionist plots is unswerving … those who stubbornly continue such provocations will pay a heavy price.”

    The Taiwan government’s Mainland Affairs Council said the island is already governed by the 1911 Republic of China as “a sovereign and independent country.”

    “The Beijing authorities have no right to impose any punishment on our people,” the Council said in a statement on Wednesday. “The people of Taiwan enjoy living under a free and democratic political system.”

    “This will do nothing to aid healthy communication,” it said.

    Chen had earlier accused the Kuma Academy, which was founded by Shen and financially supported by Tsao, of “brazenly cultivating violent pro-independence elements in Taiwan and … openly engaging in separatist activities in the guise of lectures, trainings and outdoor drills,” with the support of the island’s government and “interference from external forces.”

    The measures come days after Taiwanese President Lai Ching-te vowed to resist China’s claims on the democratic island, which has never been ruled by Beijing nor formed part of the People’s Republic of China.

    Retired microchip magnate Robert Tsao speaks at a protest against Hong Kong's national security law, in Taipei, Taiwan, March 23, 2024. (Chiang Ying-ying/AP)
    Retired microchip magnate Robert Tsao speaks at a protest against Hong Kong’s national security law, in Taipei, Taiwan, March 23, 2024. (Chiang Ying-ying/AP)

    In an Oct. 10 National Day speech marking the 113th anniversary of the founding of the Republic of China by the nationalist Kuomintang under Sun Yat-sen, Lai said his government, which fled to the island after losing a civil war with Mao Zedong’s communists on the Chinese mainland in 1949, would continue to defend Taiwan’s diverse and democratic way of life.

    Civil defense

    The US$33 million Kuma Academy program aims to train up 3 million civilians in civil defense, including 300,000 snipers, to fight alongside regular and reserve forces in the event of a Chinese invasion.

    Other civil defense organizations have sprung up in recent years across Taiwan, in preparation for war or other disaster scenarios.

    Chen warned Lai on Wednesday that China would continue to step up sanctions targeting the island “until the total unification of China is achieved.”

    “This is one of China’s many acts of intimidation against Taiwan, including economic coercion and military threats,” a spokesperson for Taiwan’s ruling Democratic Progressive Party said in a statement to Reuters. “These irrational acts will only further hurt the feelings of the Taiwanese people and damage cross-strait relations.”

    Under the sanctions, Tsao and Shen are now barred from traveling to China, Hong Kong and Macau, while any affiliated enterprises and businesses linked to the pair will be barred from “seeking profit” in China.

    Puma Shen, who heads Taiwan's influence-tracking think tank Doublethink Lab, attends a forum on China’s methods of warfare against Taiwan in an undated photo. (Chen Zifei/RFA)
    Puma Shen, who heads Taiwan’s influence-tracking think tank Doublethink Lab, attends a forum on China’s methods of warfare against Taiwan in an undated photo. (Chen Zifei/RFA)

    Shen told reporters in Taiwan that the move was an attempt to “intimidate” the island’s 23 million people.

    “China is particularly wary of Taiwan’s civil defense campaigns and the development of civil defense awareness, and is also very concerned about any courses or investments in that area,” he said.

    By contrast, Beijing appears to have wiped the slate clean for Taiwanese actor Wu Kang-ren, who recently reposted an Oct. 1 article from the ruling Chinese Communist Party’s official newspaper, the People’s Daily, congratulating the People’s Republic of China on its 75th anniversary.

    Asked about Wu’s background as a student leader during the 2014 Sunflower Movement against closer ties with China, Chen said Beijing would welcome anyone who considers themselves Chinese, and agrees with China’s claim on Taiwan, “as long as they can draw a clear line between themselves and pro-independence views.”

    Translated by Luisetta Mudie. Edited by Roseanne Gerin.


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by By Lucie Lo for RFA Mandarin and RFA Cantonese.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Radio Free Asia.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Regional domestic small arms manufacturers are competing well against their global rivals. With large armies to equip, the Asia-Pacific region offers a major market for both foreign and domestic manufacturers of small arms. The region represents the whole gamut of domestic development and manufacturing, through licensed production to the full importation of weapons such as […]

    The post Sourcing the Best Small Arms From Near and Far appeared first on Asian Military Review.

    This post was originally published on Asian Military Review.


  • This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Radio Free Asia.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • China’s military launched a large-scale exercise around Taiwan on Monday, just days after Taiwanese President Lai Ching-te reaffirmed the island’s independence in his National Day speech.

    The Chinese Eastern Theater Command announced the launch of the Joint Sword-2024B exercise in the air and waters of the Taiwan Strait and around Taiwan island early in the morning.

    “Ships and aircraft will approach Taiwan island from multiple directions, with joint strikes by various military services,” the command’s spokesperson, Senior Col. Li Xi said. 

    “The exercise focuses on training in maritime and air combat readiness patrols, blockade of key ports and areas, sea and land strikes, seizing comprehensive control, and other subjects, testing the joint combat capabilities of the theater’s forces.”

    Li said the exercise should serve as “a stern warning to the separatist acts of Taiwan independence forces,” a term China normally uses to refer to the Taiwan government.

    All branches of the Eastern Theater Command, including the infantry, navy, air force and rocket force are taking part in the exercise, he said.

    A Chinese aircraft carrier group led by China’s first carrier Liaoning is also operating to the east of Taiwan island.

    Irrational provocations

    Reports of the military drills emerged last week, when President Lai was preparing to deliver his keynote speech on Taiwan’s National Day in which he asserted the island’s sovereignty and the rights of Taiwanese people to decide their future.

    Beijing often stages military exercises around the island in response to important political developments in relation to Taiwan, which it considers a Chinese province that should be reunited with the mainland at any cost.

    Days after Lai’s inauguration on May 20, 2024, China conducted a two-day exercise – Joint Sword-2024A.

    soldier.jpg
    A Chinese sailor takes part in Joint Sword-2024B drills, Oct. 14, 2024. (CCTV)

    Taiwan’s ministry of national defense on Monday strongly condemned what it called China’s “irrational and provocative actions” and said it would deploy “appropriate forces to respond and defend our national sovereignty.”

    Taiwan’s presidential office said that China should “face up to the fact of the existence of the Republic of China,” Taiwan’s formal name. 

    “China should cease its military provocations that undermine regional security and respect the Taiwanese people’s democratic and free way of life,” it said.


    RELATED STORIES

    Taiwan braces for China’s drills, satellite launch

    China conducts military drills around Taiwan

    China confirms ‘successful’ intercontinental ballistic missile test

    US Speaker Pelosi arrives in Taiwan to welcoming crowds, China military drills


    Shortly after China announced the drills, the U.S. State Department issued a statement to express concern, saying that China’s “response with military provocations to a routine annual speech is unwarranted and risks escalation.”

    “We call on the PRC to act with restraint and to avoid any further actions that may undermine peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait and in the broader region,” said the department’s spokesperson Matthew Miller, referring to China by its official name the People’s Republic of China, or PRC.

    “We continue to monitor PRC activities and coordinate with allies and partners regarding our shared concerns,” Miller said, adding that Washington “remains committed to its longstanding one China policy.”

    ‘Display of intimidation’

    The early morning announcement of the Joint Sword-2024B drills might have been aimed at the opening of a business week and the Taiwan stock market on Monday, said Shen Ming-shih, a Taiwanese military expert from the Institute for National Defense and Security Research, or INDSR, in Taipei.

    “It is mainly a display of capabilities and intimidation against Taiwan,” Shen said.

    Taiwan’s stock exchange, however, was largely unaffected, ending Monday’s session little changed from Friday’s close.

    “This was all expected,” said Ben Lewis, an independent military analyst, “Taiwan will likely do what it always does: monitor closely and ensure that the Chinese military does not violate any territorial boundaries.”

    Both analysts said they do not anticipate any dangerous escalation, with Shen noting that “all the weapons deployed this time are those used in exercises against Taiwan in the past.”

    Maps.jpg
    Operation areas of Joint Sword-2024A in May (left) and Joint Sword-2024B in Oct., 2024. (Eastern Theater Command)

    The Eastern Theater Command released a map of the current war game with six operation areas. Joint Sword-2024A in May had five similar operation areas.

    “It looks a segmented and zoned exercise, not a one-time large-scale military exercise,” said IDSR’s Shen, “The scale of this exercise is smaller than that of U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s trip to Taiwan in 2022.”

    When Pelosi, the most senior U.S. official to visit Taiwan in 25 years, arrived in Taipei in August 2022, China held a military exercise, including live-fire drills in six areas surrounding Taiwan.

    However, there are no live-fire exercises and so far no signs of any missile launches this time.

    “Whether the people of Taiwan are afraid or not, you can tell by looking at today’s stock market,” Shen added.

    Edited by Mike Firn and Taejun Kang.


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by By RFA Staff.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Chinese Premier Li Qiang wrapped up a three-day visit to Vietnam on Monday after meetings with the country’s top leaders resulted in agreements to work more closely developing transport infrastructure, technology, training and emerging industries, state media reported.

    Vietnamese leaders also called on Li to ensure China respected international laws in order to peacefully resolve territorial disputes, which have flared up in recent weeks.

    During the first trip to Vietnam by a Chinese premier in 11 years and his first official visit since taking the position, Li held talks with Communist Party General Secretary To Lam, National Assembly Chairman Tran Thanh Man and Prime Minister Pham Minh Chinh, who hold the Vietnamese government’s four most powerful positions.

    On Sunday, Li and Chinh hosted a business forum in Hanoi, attended by executives from both countries.

    China is the biggest investor in Vietnam in terms of projects and the fourth largest in terms of capital at US$4.5 billion in 2023, but Chinh told business leaders they needed to invest more to live up to the strong political and social ties between the two countries, according to the Vietnam News Service.

    Chinh said the Chinese and Vietnamese governments would promote key areas such as infrastructure links, technology transfer, personnel training and investment in emerging industries.

    China’s Li called on entrepreneurs to “actively follow the general trend, better seize opportunities and further strengthen cooperation for greater development of their own businesses and contribute to the common development of the two countries,” according to China’s Xinhua News Agency.

    After talks at Hanoi’s Presidential Palace on Sunday, Li and Chinh witnessed the signing of 10 agreements covering areas including transport connectivity, agriculture and banking, the Bao Chinh Phu news site reported.


    RELATED STORIES:

    China denies injuring ‘illegal’ Vietnamese fishing crew

    Vietnam plans new undersea cables amid security concerns

    Vietnam, China sign 14 agreements during top leader’s visit to Beijing


    Bilateral relations have been strained in recent weeks after Vietnamese fishermen said they had been chased and attacked by Chinese ships while fishing in the disputed waters of the Paracel Islands on Sept. 29. They said scores of camouflaged men boarded their boat, breaking the arms and legs of several crew members with iron bars, prompting a protest from Vietnam’s foreign ministry over “brutal treatment by Chinese law enforcement forces.”

    China claims most of the South China Sea, and its territorial claims led to a violent clash with Vietnam over the Paracels in 1974, anti-Chinese protests by Vietnam’s No U Movement in the 2010s, and Vietnamese criticism of China’s “excessive” claims after Beijing extended its baseline in the part of the Gulf of Tonkin it shares with Vietnam in March, 2024.

    Li and Chinh “exchanged sincere and frank opinions on maritime issues,” during Sunday’s meeting, the Bao Chinh Phu said, adding that the Vietnamese prime minister suggested the two sides resolve disputes peacefully in accordance with international laws such as the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, or UNCLOS.

    AP24286490455608.jpg
    Chinese Prime Minister Li Qiang (L) and Vietnamese Communist party General Secretary and President To Lam shake hands during their meeting in Hanoi, Saturday, Oct. 12, 2024. (Tri Dung/VNA via AP)

    Chinh’s comments echoed those of General Secretary and President To Lam when he met with Li on Saturday. Li and Lam agreed to cooperate more closely on defense, security and foreign affairs, Vietnamese media reported.

    Edited by Taejun Kang.




    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Mike Firn for RFA.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Radio Free Asia.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Radio Free Asia.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Radio Free Asia.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Radio Free Asia.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • An adviser to Senate President Hun Sen was arrested at Phnom Penh International Airport on Friday after returning from a business trip to China, two Cambodian news outlets reported.

    It was unclear what charges Duong Dara could be facing. Earlier this year, he was named in a complaint filed by villagers in southern Svay Rieng province that accused a Phnom Penh company of scamming them out of investments that ranged between US$40,000 and US$120,000.

    The Fresh News online news site and the Koh Santepheap newspaper reported that Duong Dara was arrested in connection with a citizen’s complaint. No further details were given.

    Duong Dara was appointed secretary of state for the Council of Ministers – the government’s Cabinet – last year and has also worked as a personal assistant to Hun Sen. 

    Duong Dara is credited with creating and overseeing Hun Sen’s popular Facebook account, where the former prime minister continues to post statements and personal observations, as well as video clips from public appearances.

    The arrest comes several days after Hun Sen wrote on Facebook that another adviser, Ly Sameth, had defrauded several Cambodians over the last two years by soliciting bribes in exchange for favors and government positions.

    03 Duong Dara Cambodia arrest Ly Sameth.png
    Ly Sameth, an adviser to former Cambodian President Hun Sen, in an undated photo. (Ly Sameth via Facebook)

    Hun Sen wrote on Facebook on Monday that Ly Sameth’s assets should be frozen and Phnom Penh court officials should issue an order to return money he accepted from people. 

    Police officers went to Ly Sameth’s house on Tuesday morning, but he wasn’t at home and authorities were unable to locate him on Wednesday, Phnom Penh Municipal Police spokesperson Sam Vichheka said. Authorities haven’t charged Ly Sameth, he said.

    Business interests

    The complaint submitted at Svay Rieng Provincial Court in June stated that the Phum Khmer Group promised that its duck farms, animal feed factories, restaurants and real estate holdings would generate a monthly 4% payment for investors.

    One investor told Radio Free Asia that he never received any interest or dividend payments, as promised in the signed contract.

    Phum Khmer’s chief executive, Som Sothea, stopped responding to messages, another investor told RFA in June. Som Sothea is believed to be a close friend of Duong Dara.

    04 Duong Dara Cambodia arrest Som Sothea.png
    Phum Khmer Group Chief Executive Officer Som Sothea in an undated photo. (Som Sothea via LinkedIn)

    Several investors told RFA that Duong Dara and his younger brother, Duong Virath, all have shares in the Phum Khmer Group.

    Duong Dara said on his Facebook page in June that – other than joining company workers in distributing food to the poor on one occasion – he has no involvement with the Phum Khmer Group’s business interests.

    RFA was unable to reach Duong Dara for comment on Friday.

    Sam Vichheka, Phnom Penh Municipal Court spokesman I Rin, Phnom Penh Municipal Police Commissioner Chuon Narin also didn’t respond to requests for comment on the arrest.

    Translated by Yun Samean. Edited by Matt Reed.


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by By RFA Khmer.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • A claim emerged in Chinese-language social media posts that U.S. Chief of Naval Operations Lisa Franchetti revealed during an internal meeting a U.S. plan to launch a war against China in 2027. 

    But this is misleading. Franchetti’s comments were part of a public statement in which she said it was important to ensure the U.S. is prepared for a potential conflict with China by 2027.

    The claim was shared on Douyin, Chinese version of TikTok in late September, 2024, alongside a 30-second video that shows U.S. Chief of Naval Operations Lisa Franchetti. 

    “A leaked video shows that Franchetti revealed U.S.’s plans to launch a war with China in 2027 during internal U.S. Navy operations meeting,” the claim reads in part.

    1 (26).png
    Chinese online users claim that in a leaked conversation Admiral Franchetti said the U.S. plans to go to war with China in 2027. (Screenshots /X, Douyin and Weibo)

    There are growing concerns about a potential U.S.-China war, particularly the assumption that such a conflict would be short and decisive. 

    War games and military novels often portray limited, quick engagements, such as battles over Taiwan, but history shows that wars between great powers are rarely brief. Instead, they tend to drag on, expanding across multiple regions and involving other nations. 

    Several factors could trigger a U.S.-China war, with Taiwan being the most significant. A Chinese attempt to invade or blockade Taiwan could prompt a U.S. response. Territorial disputes in the South China Sea, where China’s claims clash with those of U.S. allies like the Philippines, also pose risks.

    Additionally, alliances involving nations like Russia or North Korea could draw more countries into a broader conflict, turning a regional dispute into a larger war.

    The same claim about Franchetti was shared on X, formerly known as Twitter, and Weibo

    But the claim is misleading. 

    Original clip

    A combination of keyword searches and reverse image search on Google found that the clips of Franchetti were taken from a video released by the U.S. military on Sept. 18, titled: “CNO Release Navigation Plan 2024.”

    “Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Lisa Franchetti released her Navigation Plan (NAVPLAN) for America’s Warfighting Navy at the Naval War College, Sept. 18,” the caption of the video reads in part.

    “This strategic guidance focuses on two strategic ends: readiness for conflict with the PRC by 2027 and enhancing long-term advantage,” it reads further.

    Separately, the Navy’s navigation plan, the first update in two years, sets the year 2027 as a baseline for U.S. naval operations in response to goals stated by Chinese President Xi Jinping regarding target dates for China’s military modernization.  

    A review of the video and the navigation plan found no mention of a  U.S. plan to launch a war with China in 2027.

    Chinese military modernization

    China proposed  accelerating the modernization of its defense forces at a meeting of the Chinese Communist Party’s Central Committee in October 2020. 

    The meeting signaled that China’s armed forces should be prepared for the country’s great rejuvenation by 2027, a goal frequently mentioned by Chinese officials and reported in state-run media

    Since then, U.S. officials have debated and offered different viewpoints about whether China will attack Taiwan in 2027 or 2035. 

    When Chinese President Xi Jinping met U.S. President Joe Biden at a summit in San Francisco in November 2023, he denied that China planned to attack Taiwan in 2027 or 2035, according to media reports. 

    Translated by Shen Ke. Edited by Shen Ke and Taejun Kang.

    Asia Fact Check Lab (AFCL) was established to counter disinformation in today’s complex media environment. We publish fact-checks, media-watches and in-depth reports that aim to sharpen and deepen our readers’ understanding of current affairs and public issues. If you like our content, you can also follow us on Facebook, Instagram and X.


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by By Zhuang Jing for Asia Fact Check Lab.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • plant based milk china
    7 Mins Read

    China is on course to becoming the world’s third-largest dairy producer – what does that mean for its plant-based industry?

    People in China are eating more protein than Americans now, but a majority of this comes from plant-based foods. Despite that, the country – already the leading producer of pork, fish and eggs – is now the third-largest producer of milk.

    The country is home to two of the top 10 dairy companies in the world, Yili and Manegniu, and has an industry worth CN¥680B ($95B). However, despite milk production rising by 36% since 2018 and surpassing the 2025 target three years ahead of time, per capita consumption of milk fell from 14.4kg in 2021 to 12.4kg in 2022.

    The alternative dairy industry, meanwhile, is a burgeoning sector, with a host of brands vying for market share by putting taste and nutrition at the forefront. According to Chinese company database Qichacha, there are over 5,000 enterprises related to plant-based milk registered in China today (though some of these contain casein or milk powder, but are still classed as dairy alternatives).

    These include traditional brands like Coconut Palm and Yangyuan, young startups like Oat Plant and Oakidoki, and global giants like Danone, Vitasoy and Oatly. It’s a market set to reach CN¥300B ($42B) next year.

    “This undoubtedly attracts numerous new players, yet it remains to be seen how many of these 5,000 enterprises will successfully launch products,” says Wan Lin, marketing and research lead at Toronto-based Dao Foods International, a China-focused impact investor whose alt-dairy brands include Wow Foods, PlantNow!, and True Plant.

    The rise of China’s plant-based milk sector

    oat milk china
    Courtesy: Oakidoki

    China’s annual per capita consumption of dairy (excluding butter) reached 34kg in 2021, compared to 231kg for the US. “This amount translates to approximately 90ml per day, which is less than one-third of the 300ml daily intake recommended by the Chinese Dietary Guidelines 2022,” explains Lin. “In contrast, the Dietary Guidelines for Americans (2020-2025) recommend a daily intake of 710ml.”

    He adds: “Notably, most people in China’s rural areas, which make up 36% of the entire population, do not have a habit of drinking milk. Therefore, there is considerable potential for growth in China’s milk consumption.”

    Further, in China, nutritional guidelines play an important role in helping influence consumer dietary habits – demand for dairy is set to increase by 2.4% every year until 2032, reaching 62.2 million tonnes of liquid milk equivalent. Concurrently, the country’s milk supply is also set to grow, having reached 41.5 million tonnes last year and already showing a 5% increase in the first quarter of this year.

    The country also has a long-running National School Milk Programme to encourage children to consume more milk in schools. The programme has reached 27 million schoolgoers aged six to 15, and aims to expand to 35 million in the future.

    But there’s also room for alt-dairy. “Capitalising on the global plant-based trend in 2020, plant-based milk sales on [online retailer] Tmall surged by 965%, accompanied by a 900% increase in the consumer base,” Lin reveals. “Since 2007, plant-based milk has been the fastest-growing segment in China. In 2021, the industry generated revenue of CN¥211.72B ($29.6B), with a compound annual growth rate of 34.5% from 2007 to 2021.”

    However, sales appear to have suffered in the last couple of years, particularly for major international players like Oatly, whose struggles in China saw it withdraw low-margin SKUs and initiate a strategic reset, separating Greater China from Asia in its business operations.

    One major reason was the popularity of local brands. “Typically, when choosing a dairy alternative, Chinese consumers tend to prefer more familiar domestic options such as soy milk or walnut milk,” says Lin/ In 2022, Yangyuan (walnut milk), Coconut Palm (coconut milk), Lolo (almond and apricot seed milks), Dali (soy milk), and Vitasoy (soy milk) represented the top five alt-milk brands in the country.

    “The plant-based milk market in China, which has been established for two to three decades, is highly regionalised,” he explains. Western China is dominated by Viee (which makes nut, soy and oat milks), the eastern region by Yinlu (peanut milk mixed with milk), the south by Coconut Palm, and the north by Lolo.

    “These brands have become synonymous with their categories and hold dominant positions in their respective markets. With the emergence of numerous new brands as mentioned earlier, international brands like Oatly entering the Chinese market face significant competition,” adds Lin.

    Government support and the focus on nutrition

    china vegan survey
    Courtesy: ProVeg International

    Despite falling population numbers, animal consumption is expected to increase by 2030 in China, according to a study from last year. If the country is to meet the 1.5°C Paris Agreement goal, 50% of all protein consumption would need to be from alternative sources by 2060.

    Even so, the primary driver of vegan product consumption is wellness, rather than the environment. In June, a poll found that 46% of Chinese consumers are motivated by health reasons to eat more plant-based, followed by nutrition (39%).

    But while plant-based meat is still much more of an emerging player in China, the established milk analogue market is taking note of these trends, highlighting attributes like ‘no sugar/cholesterol/trans fat’, ‘good for brains/eyes’, and ‘high protein/calcium’ on product packaging, alongside cleaner labels. Nestlé’s recently introduced oat milk latte, for example, boasts 7g of dietary fibre. Lin says the food as medicine movement is gaining traction in this segment too.

    China’s government has been prioritising more nutritious food products as part of its Healthy China policy. In May, the theme of its 10th Nutrition Week was ‘Reduce Oil, Increase Beans, Add Milk’. Its dietary guidelines recommend consuming 15-25g of soybeans or equivalent soy products per day, but more than two-thirds of people don’t meet this intake.

    A state-backed conference held by the Chinese Nutrition Society aimed to promote a broader understanding of soy milk nutrition through a report on soy milk and health. And in the National Nutrition Plan (2017-2030), the government emphasises “plant-based proteins as the primary nutritional base, enhances efforts to innovate in research and processing technologies, and promotes the adoption of plant-based products”.

    “A significant portion of the population in China is lactose-intolerant, which also boosts the demand for dairy alternatives,” adds Lin, who points to social media as a key influence as well. “Ultimately, consumers prioritise taste and nutritional content when making their food choices.” Surpassing dairy on both these fronts is also key for repeat purchases.

    At last year’s Asia-Pacific Agri-Food Innovation Summit in Singapore, HaoFoods founder Astrid Prajogo told Green Queen’s Sonalie Figueiras that Chinese consumers are increasingly interested in plant-based dairy drinks and yoghurts.

    Soy milk dominates, but coconut explodes in popularity

    coconut milk china
    Courtesy: FreeNow

    “The range of ingredients in plant-based milk has become more diverse,” Lin says. “Recent additions to the market include rice milk, walnut yoghurt and water chestnut milk. Wow Foods… specialises in producing pea protein milk.”

    But over the last year, coconut milk has emerged as a standout, largely because it’s versatile and pairs well with milk, tea, fruits, and more. “Brands like Coconut Palm (founded in 1998) have high national recognition, while newer brands like FreeNow and Coco100 have experienced rapid growth and increasing popularity. Additionally, specialised coconut beverage chain stores such as Cococean and Yee3 have become increasingly common,” explains Lin.

    That said, soy milk – which has been consumed for over 2,000 years – is still the most recognised and dominant product in China’s plant-based milk market. It’s even more popular than cow’s milk when it comes to breakfast beverages, with 39% of people drinking soy milk with their morning meals, compared to 14% choosing conventional dairy.

    “However, a significant portion of soy milk consumption in China is sourced from breakfast vendors or homemade using soy milk makers,” states Lin. “Currently, no single company holds an absolute leading position in this market. The ubiquity of soy milk has made it too commonplace to excite mainstream young consumers.”

    In the wider market, too, product similarity is a major barrier, he says. “To overcome this, we need fresh and unique products that surpass cow’s milk in both nutrition and taste, providing consumers who typically drink cow’s milk with a compelling reason to try something new.”

    The post The State of Play: Unlocking China’s Appetite for Plant-Based Milk appeared first on Green Queen.

    This post was originally published on Green Queen.

  • A six-nation naval exercise led by the United States and the Philippines has begun in the waters off northern Philippines, the second such drills in 10 days, amid rising tensions with China.

    Exercise Sama Sama, or Togetherness in the Tagalog language, kicked off on Monday, “marking the beginning of two weeks of maritime engagements designed to enhance interoperability and strengthen security ties among regional partners,” the U.S. Navy said in a statement.

    The exercise, involving almost 1,000 naval personnel from Australia, Canada, France, Japan, the U.S. and the Philippines, takes place in the northern Luzon area facing Taiwan. The United Kingdom has sent observers to the drills.

    Just days before, on Sept. 28, four of the partners – Australia, Japan, the Philippines and the U.S. – together with New Zealand, conducted a maritime exercise within the Philippines’ exclusive economic zone, or EEZ, in the South China Sea.

    Sama 2023 troops.jpg
    U.S. and Philippine Navy Sailors pose for a photo aboard Philippine Navy guided missile frigate BRP Antonio Luna (FF 151) after a training event, September 15, 2023. (U.S. Navy)

    On the same day, China announced its own air and naval drills around Scarborough Shoal, which it gained de facto control of following a standoff with the Philippines in 2012.

    China’s Southern Theater Command criticized the earlier exercise as destabilizing outside interference.

    “Some countries outside the region have disrupted the South China Sea and created regional instability,” the Chinese military said.

    The command pledged to “resolutely defend China’s sovereignty, security, and maritime rights and interests” in the South China Sea.

    Beijing, which has just observed a lengthy national holiday, has yet to respond to Sama Sama 2024.

    ‘Not targeted at any country’

    The U.S and the Philippines are treaty allies and they conduct various  joint military drills every year.

    The U.S. Navy said in its statement that Sama Sama, now in its eighth iteration, “reflects ​​the spirit of the decades-long partnership between allies in the region.”

    “What began as a bilateral event between the United States and the Philippines has grown into a multilateral and multiplatform operation,” it said.

    “Working alongside naval vessels and maritime surveillance aircraft, ​​​​specialized teams​, including ​diving and explosive ordnance disposal units​,​​ ​will conduct high-intensity drills focusing on anti-submarine warfare​, ​anti-​surface warfare​, ​anti-​air warfare​, and maritime domain awareness.”


    RELATED STORIES

    China holds drills at disputed Scarborough Shoal

    Philippines, US launch yearly large-scale military exercises

    China stages naval drills during Philippines-US exercise


    The U.S. head of delegation, Rear Adm. Todd Cimicata, told reporters before the launching of the exercise that it was not targeted at any country.

    “The intent of these exercises is not to ruffle feathers. It’s tailored for interoperability,” Cimicata was quoted by the Reuters news agency as saying. “Across the gamut, there are people that don’t follow those rules so we have to agree so that we can set those standards.”

    China, which claims sovereignty over most of the South China Sea, has been in a tense standoff with the Philippines over some reefs inside Manila’s EEZ.

    Last week, Chinese law enforcement personnel were accused of beating and injuring 10 Vietnamese fishermen near the Paracel archipelago in what Philippine National Security Adviser Eduardo Ano described as an “alarming act with no place in international relations.”

    Navy spokesperson, Rear Adm. Roy Vincent Trinidad, told a press briefing on Tuesday that Philippine authorities “have contingency plans in place” in case similar incidents happen to Filipino fishermen.

    Trinidad urged fishermen to continue fishing in the West Philippine Sea, or the part of the South China Sea within the country’s EEZ.

    The Philippine Navy said it had spotted a total of 190 Chinese vessels, including 37 naval and coast guard vessels, in Philippine waters this week, a slight increase from 178 the week before.

    Jason Gutierrez in Manila contributed to this report.

    Edited by Mike Firn.




    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by By RFA Staff.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Chinese President Xi Jinping and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un have marked the 75th anniversary of their countries’ relations but the messages they exchanged were less effusive and shorter than in the past, hinting at cooler ties.

    Xi’s message to Kim this year, published by China’s Xinhua News Agency, was 309 characters long, compared with 435 characters in 2019, for the 70th anniversary.

    Similarly, Kim’s message to Xi, published by the Korean Central News Agency, was 497 characters this year, down from 809 characters in 2019.

    But it wasn’t just the length of the messages that was different.

    Xi told Kim that relations between their countries had “stood the changes of the times and the trials of an ever-changing international situation and become a precious asset common to the two countries and the two peoples.”

    Xi added that China was ready to further develop relations “through strengthened strategic communications and coordination, and deepened friendly exchange and cooperation.”

    But Xi did not use the phrases he used in the 70th anniversary celebration, such as “the traditional friendship between China and the DPRK has grown stronger over time and gone deep into the hearts of the people.”

    DPRK stands for the North’s official name, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea.

    Kim referred to Xi in 2019 as his “esteemed” comrade but he dropped that salutation this year. 

    “Our Party and the government of the Republic will steadily strive to consolidate and develop the friendly and cooperative relations between the DPRK and China as required by the new era,” Kim said. 

    This year, the messages between Xi and Kim were published on page four of North Korea’s state-run Rodong Sinmun daily. In 2019, they were splashed across the newspaper’s front page.


    RELATED STORIES

    Xi’s latest message to North Korea’s Kim hints at cooling ties

    North Korea bans more TV and movies. Surprise! They’re Chinese

    North Korea orders return of workers in China stranded by pandemic


    Since North Korea and China established diplomatic ties on Oct. 6, 1949, their relationship has often been described as being “as close as lips and teeth.” 

    However, there have been signals that China, by far North Korea’s largest trading partner, has become more distant towards its northeastern neighbor.

    In September, Xi, in his first message to Kim in eight months, marking the anniversary of North Korea’s founding, was also less effusive in tone on the friendship between the countries than he had been the previous year.

    South Korea’s main security agency has raised the possibility of cooler ties between China and North Korea while media has reported that China is hesitant to form a three-way, anti-West alliance with North Korea and Russia. 

    North Korea and Russia have moved significantly closer amid widespread suspicion that North Korea has supplied conventional weapons to Russia for its war in Ukraine in return for military and economic assistance. 

    This year, North Korea and Russia the two countries signed a strategic treaty that includes mutual defense elements.

    China Beijing appears to prioritize a stable regional security environment to address its economic challenges and maintain relationships with Europe and its Asian neighbors.

    China’s foreign ministry has dismissed any suggestions that relations with North Korea have cooled.

    While North Korea largely sealed itself off during the COVID-19 pandemic, this year it has been building up its diplomatic ties, apart from those with Russia.

    A top Vietnamese defense official visited Pyongyang last month and in August, North Korea took steps to patch up ties with old ally Cuba.

    In April, a North Korean delegation visited Iran

    Edited by Mike Firn. 


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by By Taejun Kang for RFA.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • The hopeless fault-finder. Illustration: Liu Rui/GT

    The hopeless fault-finder. Illustration: Liu Rui/GT

    These days the People’s Republic of China is celebrating its 75th anniversary. Over the past 75 years, China has grown from a poor and backward country to the world’s second-largest economy, with about one-sixth of the world’s population escaping poverty.

    However, as China continued to rise, the US’ attitude toward China has changed dramatically. Be it the “China threat” narrative or the “China challenge” theory, US politicians have become increasingly anxious about China’s development. This anxiety has turned into slander and attempts to portray China as a force threatening global development.

    Recently, a former American government official claimed that China aims to impose its ideology on the rest of the world, posing an unprecedented threat to the US.

    Over the past few years, many US politicians have stressed the threat of China. But what exactly has China’s development taken away from the US?

    When China was still a poor and backward country, the US never worried about China’s ideology “threatening” the world. However, as soon as China achieved economic takeoff, US politicians began exaggerating China’s “ideological threat.”

    Over the past 75 years, if China’s ideology had been detrimental to development and harmful to its own and the world’s progress, China would not be standing so proudly before the US today. China’s development demonstrates that its ideology contributes to global growth, as proven by its achievements.

    Even though China has become the world’s second-largest economy, its per capita GDP is still far below that of the US. In 2023, China’s per capita GDP was about $12,720, while the US was about $76,000, nearly six times higher. China must continue to advance steadfastly on its chosen path of development.

    In 2020, the US Strategic Approach to the People’s Republic of China (May 20, 2020) read, the CPC has “accelerated its efforts to portray its governance system as functioning better than those of what it refers to as ‘developed, Western countries.’” Based on this assumption, then such competition should contribute to global development. Indeed, only through such competition can we show that human development is a diverse process. Every country has the right to choose its own path of development.

    Isn’t it good for humanity if more countries develop through self-reliance like China? China has always adhered to the principle of non-interference in other countries’ internal affairs and has never attempted to export its ideology to other countries. However, China has proven that a country can achieve economic takeoff and social progress without copying Western models.

    This successful approach has shaken the long-held discourse power and dominance of the West, especially the US, thus posing a significant challenge to the US’ global strategy.

    Suppose the development model and path advocated by the US are no longer the only correct ones. In that case, the foundation of its global strategy and influence will be shaken.

    When some US politicians claim that China’s ideology poses a threat, they are actually making excuses for Washington’s hegemonism. The “rules-based international order” in the mouths of American politicians is actually an order where the US makes the rules and other countries obey. Any country that attempts to challenge this order, regardless of its intentions, will be labeled an “ideological threat.”

    China has chosen a suitable path for itself and achieved great success. This success should not be a reason for demonization. If Washington cannot accept and recognize a prosperous and stable China and tries to set China as an opponent or even an enemy of the US, that would be a huge threat to world peace and development.

    The post Did 1.4 billion Chinese Achieving Poverty Alleviation Cut into Washington’s Cake? first appeared on Dissident Voice.

    This post was originally published on Dissident Voice.


  • Detail of: Ye Wulin (China), 红星颂 (Ode to the Red Star), 2015.

    Seventy-five years ago, on 1 October 1949, Mao Zedong (1893–1976) announced the creation of the People’s Republic of China (PRC). It is important to note that the Communist Party of China (CPC) did not name the new state the Socialist Republic, but instead called it the People’s Republic. That is because Mao and the CPC did not foresee China being immediately ushered into socialism; rather, the country was embarking on the road to socialism, a process that would likely take decades, if not a century. That was very clear to the people who began to shape the new state and society. The People’s Republic would have to be built out of the embers of a very long war, one that began when the Japanese invaded northern China in 1931 and that lasted for the next 14 years and took the lives of over 35 million people. ‘From now on our nation will belong to the community of the peace-loving and freedom-loving nations of the world’, Mao said at the first plenary session of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference on 21 September 1949. The new China, he continued, will ‘work courageously and industriously to foster its own civilisation and well-being and at the same time to promote world peace and freedom. Ours will no longer be a nation subject to insult and humiliation. We have stood up’.

    Mao’s words echoed the sentiments of anti-colonial movements from around the world, including those of leaders of movements that were not socialist, such as Jawaharlal Nehru of India and Gamal Abdel Nasser of Egypt. For them, the decolonisation process required world peace and equality so that the formerly colonised people of the world could stand up and build their lives with dignity. Reading and reflecting upon these words in 2024 allows us to appreciate both the advances made by the world’s peoples since 1949 and the obstinacy of the old colonial powers that have long sought to prevent this new world from being built. The ongoing US-Israeli genocide against Palestinians and bombardment of Lebanon reflect the barbarousness to which the colonial powers are willing to resort as they attempt to hold us in this past that we want to transcend. The attitudes and wars imposed by the old colonial powers divert us from building our ‘own civilisation and well-being’ and from promoting ‘world peace and freedom’. Mao’s words, which are really the words of all people emerging from colonialism, offer the world a choice: either we live as adversaries with our resources poured into ugly and meaningless wars or we build a ‘community of peace-loving and freedom-loving nations of the world’.

    Ode to the Red Star, detail.
    Detail of: Ye Wulin (China), 红星颂 (Ode to the Red Star), 2015.

    The average life expectancy in the PRC – 77 years – exceeds the global average by four years, coming a long way from 1949, when the figure was a mere 36 years. This is one of many indicators of a society that prioritises the well-being of people and the planet. Another was explained to me by a Chinese official a few years ago, who told me about how his country planned to create a post-fossil fuel economy soon. The word ‘soon’ interested me, and I asked him how it would be possible to do something of that nature so quickly. He began to tell me about the importance of planning and marshalling resources but, when he realised that I was not asking him about the strategy for this new economy but about the timeframe, said that this could be done ‘within the next half century, maybe, if we work hard, by [2049,] the hundredth anniversary of the formation of the PRC’. The confidence in the PRC allows for this kind of long-term planning, rather than the short-term compulsions imposed on states by the logic of capitalism. This long-term attitude pervades Chinese society, and it allows the CPC the luxury to harness resources and plan decades into the future, rather than mere months or years.

    It was this sort of thinking that gripped Beijing’s city managers over twenty years ago, when the rapid rise of automobiles in the capital and the burning of coal to generate heat enveloped the population in toxic smog. The national five-year plans for 2001–2005 and 2011–2015, as well as Beijing’s own Five-Year Clean Air Action Plan (2013–2017), made it clear that economic growth could not ignore the environment. The city managers began to centre their planning around public transportation and transit corridors rooted in an older Chinese urban design that built shops and apartment buildings in a way that would promote walking rather than driving. In September 2017, the city established low-emission zones to prevent polluting vehicles from entering Beijing and created incentives for the use of new energy vehicles, which are powered by electric energy. China owns 99 percent of the world’s 385,000 electric buses, 6,584 of which are on Beijing’s streets. Though there is still a long way to go for Beijing’s air to meet its own standards, the toxicity of the air has noticeably declined.

    Comrade Cháng’é, Fan Wennan (China)
    Fan Wennan (China), 嫦娥同志 (Comrade Cháng’é), 2022.

    In Mao’s founding speech in 1949, he declared that one of the PRC’s goals would be to foster the people’s well-being. How is it possible to do that within a neocolonial world system that enforces the poorer nations’ dependency on the former colonial powers? In the global production chain, the poorer nations produce goods at a lower cost, with wages and consumption suppressed, which allows multinational corporations (MNCs) to sell commodities for higher prices around the world and earn larger profits. These large profits are then invested by the MNCs to develop new technologies and productive forces that reinforce the permanent subordination of the poorer nations. If a poor nation exports more goods in an attempt to earn higher returns, it simply digs itself into a deeper and deeper spiral of lowered living standards for its exploited workers and into a debt trap that simply cannot be exited. It is one thing to be able to plan, but how does one acquire the resources to execute a plan?

    At Tricontinental: Institute for Social Research, we have been looking closely at the experience of China and other countries in the Global South that have attempted to rattle this cage of dependency. As Tings Chak and I show in an article on the 75th anniversary of the PRC, in its first decades China marshalled whatever minimal resources were available to it, including assistance from the Soviet Union, to build a new agricultural system against landlordism, create an education and health system that improved the people’s quality of life, and fight against the wretched hierarchies of the past. That first phase, from 1949 to the late 1970s, endowed China with a culture that is far more egalitarian and a population that is far more educated and in better health than those in other post-colonial states. It is the CPC’s commitment to transform people’s lives that created this possibility. In the second phase, from 1978 to the present, China has used its large labour force to attract foreign investment and technology, but it has done so in a way that ensures that science and technology will be transferred to China and that the state’s control over exchange rates will allow the CPC to raise wages (which were improved by the 2008 Labour Contract Law), avoid the middle-income trap, enhance technological capabilities, and drive state-owned enterprises to develop high-tech productive systems. That is what accounts, in large measure, for the rapid growth that China has experienced over the past decades and its ability to lift up the well-being of its population and environment within the overall structure of the neocolonial world system.

    China 2098: Welcome Home. Fan Wennan (China)
    Fan Wennan (China), 中国2098: 欢迎回家 (China 2098: Welcome Home), 2019–2022.

    In April 2017, the Xiong’an New Area (roughly 100 kilometres south of Beijing) was officially established to accommodate five million residents in order to relieve the emergent congestion in Beijing, whose growing population of 22 million faces serious problems of scale. This is being done, for instance, by absorbing many of the non-government institutions that are currently located in the capital city (among them research, higher education, medical, and financial institutions). One of the key motivations for the construction of the Xiong’an New Area was to address the plights facing the densely populated capital without embarking on urban reconstruction that could ruin the character of this city that first emerged in 1045 BCE.

    To take advantage of the clean slate afforded by building this new city, PRC officials set a zero-carbon emissions target for the Xiong’an New Area, its landscape defined by the blue-green hues of water and vegetation rather than the grey smog of a concrete jungle. The first priority as the city was planned was to rehabilitate the Baiyangdian, the largest wetland in northern China. Its water area, known as the ‘kidney of North China’, was expanded from 170 square kilometres to 290 square kilometres; its water quality was improved from Class V (unusable) to Class III (able to drink); and the critically endangered diving duck Baer’s pochard was settled in the area and now thrives on the lake. The Baiyangdian anchors the city.

    The Xiong’an New Area is being built as ‘three cities’: a city above ground; an underground city of commercial centres, transportation, and pipelines (for fibre optic cables, electricity, gas, water, and sewage); and a cloud-based city that will provide data for smart transportation, digital governance, intelligent equipment inspection, elderly monitoring, and emergency response. As the National Development and Reform Commission of Hebei Province’s January report describes, the Xiong’an New Area is:

    creat[ing] an urban ecological space where city and lake coexist, where city and greenery are integrated, and where forests and water are interdependent. … [It e]mphasise[s] the integration of greenways, parks, and open spaces to create a city with parks within cities and cities within parks, where people can live and enjoy nature.

    Seventy-five years into its revolutionary process, China has indeed made rapid advances, though it will have to settle the many new problems that have emerged (which you can read about in the international edition of the journal Wenhua Zongheng, or 文化纵横). China’s feat of shaking the chains of dependency is worthy of detailed debate, perhaps while walking along the Baiyangdian Lake in the Xiong’an New Area.

    The post A Walk Along the Baiyangdian Lake in the Xiong’an New Area first appeared on Dissident Voice.

    This post was originally published on Dissident Voice.


  • This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Radio Free Asia.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Talk delivered for the event “Changes Not Seen in a Century: 75th Anniversary of the Founding of PRC.”

    Friends, Colleagues, Comrades,

    It’s a great honor for me to join you in this extraordinary, historical moment of celebration and reflection on the 75th anniversary of the founding of the PRC.

    As has been said, we are seeing changes unseen in a century.  Changes both great and terrible.

    We are currently seeing the unravelling of Empire–and its last desperate, violent, hideous death rattle. We are seeing the unmasking of 500 years of western “civilization”, and the laying bare of its hypocrisy and unspeakable brutality. We are seeing the true face of capitalist imperialism, not its made up public relations face, but its resting bastard face.

    It’s not pretty.

    One of the precipitating factors of the end of Empire–not the only one, but a very important one, because it allows countries to resist hegemony together–is the rise of China.

    The rise of China is one of the greatest success stories in the history of human civilization. So we could talk about China’s accomplishments all day. I’d like to highlight three.

    We all know in 1949 when China stood up, liberating half a billion people, 10-20% of China’s population was still addicted to opium.  In 4 years, the CPC eradicated opium addiction, liberating 90 million people from this colonial scourge.  It’s also one of the greatest public health accomplishments of the 20th century.  And I bet you’ve never heard of it.

    By giving everyone the means of production–at the time, by distributing land–and by offering everybody education, community, meaning, hope, purpose–and by doing it at scale–because it has to be done at scale–the Party was successful.

    You can’t do this in dribs and drabs. tinkering at the edges.  You have to do it all at once for everyone.

    The Power of People’s Solidarity

    We all know this and understand this: we don’t liberate anyone, until everyone is liberated. We liberate each other. It’s because we are fundamentally socially interconnected.

    This is our species being. 

    You don’t help anyone, until we all help each other, because we all are implicated in each other’s futures.

    We saw the same thing with extreme poverty alleviation. Poverty was not seen as an individual failing–as it is, in the capitalist west.  It was a whole of society responsibility requiring a whole of society response. It focused on everyone.

    So, 850 million were brought out of extreme poverty–which lets the world know that poverty is not an immutable, social, historical fact.  It is a policy choice.  You can raise everyone up, if we all work together.

    That’s the way it works–and it works for everything:  if we start from this approach, we can succeed, no matter how vast and immense the challenge is.

    So China is proof positive of the power of people’s solidarity, the power of a people’s leadership, the power of scientific planning according to socialist principles to overcome unthinkable challenges.

    This is how China accomplishes things, and it accomplishes them at scale–at a scale so vast that nothing under heaven–as they say–is left behind.

    Now, there is another achievement that China is working on.

    Yes, a socialist society, that’s the ultimate goal, but this is an important stepping stone on the way to it. And it is a big one.  It is the creation of an ecological civilization.

    China is literally greening the planet, creating, single-handedly, the conditions and means to transition to a sustainable energy regime, to enable sustainable development, to turn back the tide of global warming.  And it is doing it at a scale that is truly inconceivable–but necessary.

    China knows how to accomplish things at scale.  It knows how to solve problems even when the problems are unthinkably immense.  And the leadership and the people do not flinch at the immensity of the challenge.

    Ecological transition with Chinese characteristics:

    China is concretely showing us the pathway out of Global Climate catastrophe. And as I said before, none of us are safe, good or well until all of us are. Until all of us are safe from the effects of the climate crisis, none of us are.

    And China is leading the way.  All the west has to do is work together with China: China has provided the tools and the map and it is showing the path out.

    So, to reduce it to its simplest terms, going green means going red. But–and there is a but: from the US standpoint, they don’t want that.

    They do not want energy transition if it means the Chinese are going to be leading it. They would rather be dead than red. The US would rather burn up the planet than give China its place in the sun.

    If China is on the side of renewable energy, then the US has to be firmly on the side of Global Warming:  it’s more important to beat China than to beat Global Warming. 

    We can see that right now, in the massive sanctioning of Chinese sustainable technologies that could shift the balance. If the planet heats up, we’re all dead, but if China cools the planet and saves the world, then we are no longer the coolest, and that’s worse than death. That’s how the leadership in the US thinks.

    Preparing for War: Not if but When

    So we can’t talk about China’s successes, without talking about the US hostility towards China. The US sees China as the enemy. It is determined to take down China and all its accomplishments.

    Now, China has overcome–countless threats–but this one is an existential threat.

    Let’s be very clear.  The US is preparing for war–kinetic war–against China. Washington is abuzz with talk of war with China. It’s seen as necessary, inevitable, and incredibly, winnable.

    Winnable means they are planning to use nukes.

    We see with Palestine, and now Lebanon, that there are no limits to the depravity of what the Imperial ruling class will do to stay in power. Nothing is off the table. Nothing is too inhumane, too brutal, too illegal, too dangerous. Nothing shocks the conscience.  In fact, nuclear war is definitely on the table, in the policy papers being distributed, in the military table-top exercises they conduct, in the field training and air exercises that are now being conducted with the greatest intensity since WWII. We are headed towards war, towards nuclear war.

    To put it bluntly, the US ruling class would rather see the end of the world than the end of their power and privilege. So we are at a turning point in history. a crisis: both opportunity and danger, hope and terror, unseen possibility and unthinkable tragedy.

    This Imperial ruling class has actually been escalating to war against China–covertly since 2009 and now overtly.  It has calendared dates–2027.

    It’s not if, but when.

    Three Steps to War

    Now there are three distinguishable steps on the way to war:

    The first is Information war: inventing the enemy and then demonizing them: manufacturing consent, shutting down opposition, like you shut down the skies before bombing. We’re being fire-hosed and carpet bombed with lies about China.

    The second is shaping the theater logistically for war, with arms, alliance, exercises, material/fuel–pre-positioned stocks–and troops.

    The third is provocation. There is non-stop provocation by the US–in the Taiwan strait, the East China Sea, the South China Sea, on the Korean peninsula, everywhere.

    This follows the increasing, expanding ambit and intensity of proxy war in Europe, in the genocidal terror in the middle east, and in the building war momentum in the Pacific.  Kurt Campbell, Biden’s Asia Czar and the architect of the Pivot, has threatened to unleash “a magnificent symphony of death” across a “unified field [of war]”.

    Martial Arts in the No-Think Zone

    And we can all see and feel the shutting down of anti-war dissent, of opposing voices and alternative media. That’s a key characteristic of the information war–silencing opposition, silencing voices of peace. It’s like taking out anti-aircraft batteries, and imposing a no fly zone. You shut down the skies, before you drop the bombs. You shut down the opposition before you drop the narrative bombs. You attack opposition to war, attack those who want good relations with China, or negotiations. You attack divergent voices and platforms in order to create a no-think zone.  

    No critical thinking. No thinking, no dialogue, no peace. 

    The US literally seeks full spectrum dominance in all domains of war, but especially in the space domain: outer space, cyber space, and information space, mental space. It literally seeks to occupy your mind.

    So resistance in this critical moment–at the most fundamental level–begins with first not letting your mental space be occupied, colonized, dominated. It means resisting the narrative dominance of the dominant narrative; that China is threatening the world, that war is thinkable, that war is justified. It means resisting the normalization of war, of genocide, of terror, of atrocity, of  lies and propaganda.

    We can all be vectors of this transmission of lies of propaganda, or we can impede its transmission.

    So it’s incumbent on all of us to re-engage in the mental martial art of critical thinking: we strengthen our psychic immune system against this type of mental virus, this colonization of our mental spaces. We re-orient, de-occupy ourselves, we kick out the colonizing narratives, and we recommit to “seeking truth from facts.”

    What we need to do is tune up our critical thinking engines constantly, with the precision tools of wit, humor, parody, perspective, context–and facts.

    The flipside of this is that we can also spread the facts and the truth, as many are doing together today. Share the truth. The rise of China, and the liberation of the Global South is not a threat to the peoples of the world. It is a transformative moment of hope for human history.

    But the stakes are immense. The future of the planet is at stake. As Brian Berletic said, “A war against China is a war against the world.” And we all have a part to play. We have already been inducted.

    Where do we start? We start with our clear minds and our courageous hearts. Decolonize and de-propagandize your minds, and resist! Together!

    The future of China, the future of the Global South, the future of the world depends on it!

    The post Your Mind is a Battlefield: Decolonize Your Mind to Prevent Global Catastrophe! first appeared on Dissident Voice.

    This post was originally published on Dissident Voice.

  • China has denied that its law enforcement authorities adopted a heavy-handed approach to stop Vietnamese fishing boats from operating in disputed waters claimed by both countries in the South China Sea.

    Vietnam’s state media reported that Chinese personnel boarded a Vietnamese fishing boat off the Paracel Islands in the South China Sea on Sunday and beat the crew with iron bars, seriously injuring four of them.

    They also smashed the fishing equipment and took away the Vietnamese crew’s catch.

    China’s foreign ministry, responding to a request for comment from the Reuters news agency, said that Vietnamese fishing boats illegally fished in the waters of the Paracel Islands without permission.

    It said that Chinese authorities took measures to stop the boats and that “on-site operations were professional and restrained, and no injuries were found.” 

    Vietnam’s foreign ministry has not said anything about the incident, and the official Vietnam News Agency withdrew a report on it several hours after publishing it.

    Vietnamese media, meanwhile, ran several interviews with the captain and crew of the fishing boat QNg 95739 TS from central Quang Ngai province.

    The fishermen described a “terrifying attack” by about 40 Chinese personnel on two steel-hulled Chinese ships. 

    Crewman Huynh Tien Cong told the Tien Phong newspaper that the attackers beat him and other crew members with meter-long steel bars, breaking his arms and legs.

    The captain, Nguyen Thanh Bien, was quoted as saying that the attack on Sept. 29 was “the most brutal aggression” he’d witnessed during his 15-year career in the waters off the Paracel archipelago.

    Disputed islands

    The Paracels comprise about 130 islands and reefs about 400 kilometers (249 miles) off Vietnam’s eastern coast.

    According to Captain Bien, the QNg 95739 TS when attacked was sailing near an atoll of the Paracel Islands called Vuladdore Reef, or Yuzhuo Jiao in Chinese.

    Vietnamese fishermen consider the area their traditional fishing grounds and their fishing boats have sailed the waters for centuries.


    RELATED STORIES

    Vietnam says China attacked fishing boat near disputed islands

    Philippine coast guard ship leaves disputed shoal in South China Sea

    Chinese Coast Guard water cannon attack on Vietnamese fishing boat leaves 2 injured


    China seized the islands, known in China as Xisha, in 1974 from the government of South Vietnam and has held control over them since. In 2012, Beijing established Sansha City, headquartered in one of the Paracel islands, to administer all the features it claims in the South China Sea.

    Details have emerged that the two Chinese ships that took part in the attack on the Vietnamese fishing boat may belong to Sansha City’s comprehensive law enforcement bureau.

    Vietnamese fishermen on the QNg 95739 TS said the two attacking vessels bore hull numbers 101 and 301. Ship-tracking data obtained by RFA from the website MarineTraffic show that the bureau’s patrol vessels Sansha Zhifa 101 and 301 were present in the area on Sept. 29, just kilometers away from Vuladdore Reef.

    Fishermen.jpg
    This photo taken on August 18, 2022, shows fishermen pulling in their nets on Vietnam’s Ly Son island. the country’s closest island to the disputed Paracel archipelago in the South China Sea. (Nhac Nguyen/AFP)

    Vietnamese fishermen operating in disputed waters in the South China Sea have often complained about harassment by Chinese maritime militia and the coast guard.

    In 2020, when a Vietnamese fishing boat was rammed by a Chinese maritime surveillance vessel near the Paracel Islands and sank, Hanoi lodged an official protest. 

    Vietnamese members of the public raised questions on internet forums about the lack of immediate reaction from their government on this occasion.

    China has just appointed a new ambassador to Vietnam, He Wei, who previously served at the foreign ministry’s department of boundary and ocean affairs.

    Vietnam has adopted a flexible approach to foreign policy known as “bamboo diplomacy” and maintains good relations with the United States, China and Russia, as well as others.

    Edited by Mike Firn.


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by By RFA Staff.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • 5 Mins Read

    China’s potential biotech dominance – especially its progress with cultivated meat – has spurred Republicans to call for US action to ensure “continued leadership”.

    What would it take for a Republican to support cultivated meat?

    Could it be China’s progress in the sector? That’s one way to interpret a letter sent by 11 Republican Congress members to the director of national intelligence and the USDA’s director of homeland security last week.

    First obtained by Politico’s Morning Agriculture newsletter, the letter was led by House Representatives Andrew Garbarino (R-NY) and Dan Newhouse (R-WA), in direct response to the national intelligence director’s annual threat assessment. That report labelled China’s strategic advancements in “synthetic biology and agricultural biotechnology” as an attempt to “lead the broader biotechnological landscape”.

    China’s latest five-year plan for agricultural and rural tech development in 2021 calls for research in cultivated meat, alternative egg and dairy, and recombinant proteins, which the lawmakers described in their letter as China looking to “dominate global supply chains”.

    China’s biotech strides and focus on cultivated meat

    china alternative protein
    Courtesy: UN Geneva/CC

    China has been making moves towards alternative protein as part of its national climate, economic, and public health targets. Its citizens are already eating more protein per capita than the US now, and most of this comes from animal-free sources.

    Aside from the aforementioned agricultural strategy, the ongoing five-year bioeconomy development plan has outlined an advancement of man-made protein and novel foods. And it came just two months after President Xi Jinping called for a Grand Food Vision that included plant-based and microorganism-derived protein sources.

    In 2020, the science and tech ministry launched the Green Biological Manufacturing initiative, which set aside ¥600M ($93M at the time) in funding for research projects – around ¥20M was said to be earmarked for cultivated meat and plant-based protein companies. Similarly, in 2021, the government announced a proect focused on high-efficiency biomanufacturing tech for meat analogues, led by agricultural science institute the Jiangnan University.

    According to alternative protein think tank the Good Food Institute (GFI) APAC, the National Natural Science Foundation of China has backed many cultivated meat and plant-based research teams too, with similar funding mechanisms available at provincial and city levels.

    Last year, Shanghai was the site of a meeting convened by the UN Food and Agriculture Organization, where cellular agriculture companies engaged with regulators over production processes and safety concerns.

    GFI has further suggested that China’s cultivated meat sector has expanded in an environment that features much lower costs than Europe or the US, with local governments taking steps to ensure that the cost of equipment like bioreactors stays low.

    Meanwhile, the national government has been encouraging citizens to eat fewer animal products and more plant proteins, as part of a broader drive to connect public health with socioeconomic development, which began with the Healthy China 2030 policy.

    And then there’s the climate benefits: cultivated meat has a much lighter impact on the planet than industrial livestock production. China’s 30-60 climate policy is aimed at hitting peak emissions by 2030 and becoming carbon-neutral by 2060 – and research has shown that this will only be possible if half of all proteins consumed in the country come from alternative sources.

    Republicans highlight the importance of alternative protein

    lab grown meat china
    Courtesy: Jimi Biotech

    The Congress members’ letter implored the US intelligence community to “conduct a focused analysis” on the potential impact of China’s advancements in innovative protein technologies, and its implications for the global food supply.

    “Countries around the world are recognising the need to pursue innovative farming techniques to complement their existing agricultural structures,” the letter reads. “The innovative protein sector’s rapid evolution and its potential to reshape global food markets underscore the urgency of responding to these developments.”

    Pointing to precedents that show how rapidly global trade patterns shift, the lawmakers write: “Should China secure a dominant position in the global innovative protein market, it could fundamentally alter food supply dynamics worldwide and give China control of key aspects of global food security dynamics.

    “Put simply, we cannot allow China to control more of the world’s food supply than it already does. To cede American leadership in the global innovative protein market to foreign adversaries like China is to forfeit the food security of the United States and its allies.”

    The Congress members conclude by asking the intelligence agencies to recommend strategic measures the US should consider to “ensure continued leadership and resilience in this critical sector”.

    An indication of the US’s response to China’s biotech dominance came in May when the House of Representatives passed the Biosecure Act to prevent local biopharma companies from working with Chinese contractors due to national security concerns.

    But if the US wants to continue being a leader in the alternative protein and biotech sectors – the country is home to the highest number of companies in this sector – it would perhaps be better if its policymakers stopped bringing bills to try and ban cultivated meat.

    lab grown meat republicans
    Courtesy: Morning Consult

    Yesterday, Alabama’s ban came into effect, three months after Florida’s did (the latter is now being sued over the legislation). Policymakers in a number of other states – including Illinois, Nebraska and Arizona – have proposed similar moves, and they have almost exclusively been Republican. This isn’t a surprise, considering how a study by Morning Consult found Republicans to be much less receptive to cultivated meat than Democrats.

    These politicians would do well to encourage their GOP colleagues and heed their words, which acknowledge that alternative protein can reshape global markets, and there’s a need for governments to back this industry. Whether that falls on deaf ears, only time will tell.

    The post US Republicans Fear China’s Biotech Revolution – Are They Finally Embracing Cultivated Meat? appeared first on Green Queen.

    This post was originally published on Green Queen.