Category: China


  • This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Radio Free Asia.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Radio Free Asia announced this week that its radio broadcasts have been drastically cut as transmissions were halted from relay stations owned or leased by the U.S. government.

    RFA informed listeners on Thursday that shortwave radio broadcasts for its Mandarin, Tibetan and Lao language services have stopped entirely. The broadcaster, which is funded by the U.S. Congress, said a heavily reduced schedule remains in place for RFA Burmese, Khmer, Korean and Uyghur language services.

    The U.S. Agency for Global Media, or USAGM, which oversees RFA, abruptly terminated its federal grant on March 14. RFA has since been forced to furlough most of its staff, and filed a lawsuit last week, seeking to restore the funding on the grounds that the termination violated federal laws.

    The Trump administration has moved to slash news organizations funded by the U.S. Congress, including Voice of America and those funded through federal grants like RFA and Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, as part of its drive to reduce government spending.

    With its reducing staffing, RFA is still providing limited news updates on its website and social media in all nine languages it serves. The broadcaster was established in 1996, and sends news to countries and regions across Asia that have little or no press freedom, such as North Korea, China, Myanmar and Vietnam.

    Monitoring of radio frequencies previously used by RFA indicates that transmissions from shortwave and mediumwave relay stations owned or leased by USAGM have halted in the past week, meaning the hours of radio broadcasts have been slashed from 63 hours in March to just seven hours now.

    That is based on review of an online Remote Monitoring System that is maintained by USAGM that provides short audio samples of radio frequencies in regions served by the broadcasters it oversees.

    In late 2023, RFA had 126 hours of transmissions per day, before an earlier slew of shortwave cuts.

    The few remaining broadcast hours are based on transmissions from relay stations not owned or leased by the U.S. government.

    ‘Lost a lifeline to the truth’

    Audience research and anecdotal reporting by RFA suggests that over the past decade or more, use of shortwave and mediumwave radio has reduced but it remains an important option in regions where internet access is poor or subject to official censorship and scrutiny.

    “For millions living in North Korea and China’s Tibetan and Uyghur regions, RFA’s exclusive news and content can only be accessed through shortwave transmissions. Now those populations are being cut off, as are people in Myanmar who are reeling in the wake of a devastating earthquake when radio is a crucial medium,” said Rohit Mahajan, RFA’s chief communications officer.

    “They have lost a lifeline to the truth precisely at a moment when it’s needed most,” Mahajan said.

    RFA Burmese has received growing requests since the March 28 earthquake in central Myanmar for more radio broadcasts because of disruptions to the internet since the 7.7 magnitude temblor that killed more than 3,000 people.

    Kyaw Kyaw Aung, director of RFA Burmese, said that in the aftermath of the earthquake, the service had received requests for more shortwave broadcasts in Rakhine state, a conflict-hit area of western Myanmar which largely escaped the quake but has poor internet access.

    “Only a few people with access to the military-run, state-owned MRTV shortwave radio knew about the disaster after it happened, and the reporting was heavily censored,” said Kyaw Kyaw Aung, who has been anchoring a 15-minute RFA daily news broadcast since the earthquake. “Our followers were strongly requesting RFA radio.”


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by RFA Staff.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • On March 26, Congressman Jim Banks sent a letter to Attorney General Pamela Bondi requesting that CODEPINK be investigated for our alleged funding from the Chinese Communist Party. According to him, our activism against the genocide in Gaza is antisemitic and undermines US-Israel relations, and therefore must mean we are acting on China’s behalf.

    To state it very clearly: CODEPINK is in no way funded by China, nor any other foreign government or agency. We are funded primarily by donations from concerned citizens that support peace over war. Anyone can check. We pass every audit, unlike the Pentagon.

    China is merely the newest figure in a long line of state-crafted boogeymen. Before China, there was Russia, Iran, Venezuela… the list goes on. Point being: wherever we advocate for peace, the government throws accusations of foreign funding. Why? Because they seek to delegitimize our opinion and silence us, just like they are currently attempting to silence student activists by detaining and threatening them with deportation. But we will not be silenced.

    As the coordinator of the “China Is Not Our Enemy” Campaign at CODEPINK, I would like to address some of the accusations Banks made in his letter to the attorney general.

    “Code Pink has a demonstrated track record of operating in the interests of the CCP.”

    Response: We do not care about the interests of the CCP. Our campaign was created in response to the US “Pivot to Asia” and subsequent preparation for a future war with China. China only became our “enemy” once its success began to challenge US global hegemony. We say “China is not our enemy” because the US government and media are saying that China is our enemy, leading us straight into war. We believe open diplomacy and dialogue is the only way forward, not military escalation.

    “Code Pink routinely lobbies for conciliatory US policies on China and aggressively denies reports of CCP atrocities, including the CCP’s genocide against the Uyghur people in Xinjiang.”

    Response: We advocate for diplomatic solutions to address any human rights abuses in China. The Uyghur people must not be used to justify war.

    “In January 2025, Code Pink acknowledged that it had organized a 10-day
    “community trip” to Xinjiang.”

    Response: We organized a 10-day community trip to China in November 2024 through a travel agency. The attendees traveled to Shenzhen, Ruijin, Shanghai, and Beijing. You can check out the report back webinar with everyone who went.

    “Codepink argued that US bases in Asia were like Japan’s World War II mass abuse of “comfort women” and that the Americans were the ‘invaders” in the Korean War.”

    Reponse: In a previous article, I wrote about the US military prostitution system in South Korea, which was created from the remains of Japan’s comfort women system. South Korean women were systematically abused and mistreated by US service members. There’s heaps of evidence. Read the article.

    “Code Pink operatives regularly disrupt congressional hearings on subjects which the CCP wants to suppress.”

    Response: We regularly interrupt any and all hearings on subjects that push for war. We have no idea which ones the CCP cares about, if any.

    “Code Pink also receives significant funding and likely receives direction from agents of the CCP.”

    Response: We do not receive funding, nor any direction from agents of the CCP. Our staff makes all our decisions internally.

    “Code Pink’s position on China has switched from skeptical to unquestioningly supportive.”

    Response: Ever since CODEPINK was founded in 2002, we have been anti-war. The fact that we are against war with China is nothing new or surprising.

    Congressman Banks also asked the attorney general to investigate and provide answers to the following questions. I will answer the questions for him instead.

    1. Has Code Pink or any of its employees ever registered with the DOJ as a foreign agent acting on behalf of the Chinese Communist Party or any agency, official, or agent of the government of the People’s Republic of China?

    Response: No. The CODEPINK staff does not act on behalf of the PRC, nor any other foreign government or agency. CODEPINK  is composed of concerned citizens who act only in the interest of peace.

    1. Is it the view of the DOJ that CODEPINKis legally obligated to disclose its status as a foreign agent under FARA, considering the organization’s extensive efforts to lobby members of Congress and US Federal agencies for conciliatory US policies toward China?

    Response: CODEPINK is not a foreign agent and is not legally obligated to register as one. Our educational efforts around China have focused solely on encouraging diplomacy and cooperation to work through differences and avoid physical confrontation. We believe war between the US and China would be devastating for the entire world, and therefore wish to avoid it at all costs.

    1. What actions is the DOJ taking to counter the CCP’s efforts to expand its influence in the United States through funding far-left entities that oppose US foreign policy interests and advocate the interests of foreign adversaries?

    Response: While I cannot speak on behalf of other organizations, CODEPINK is a nonpartisan organization primarily concerned with avoiding and ending war. We do not believe any war is in the interests of US citizens. War is not, and should never be, the predominant foreign policy strategy. Many “foreign adversaries” are also against war, but war is no rare thing to oppose. We advocate for peace because we believe in peace, not because of the interests of foreign entities.

    1. What actions is the DOJ taking to address FARA violations committed by US-domiciled entities that lobby against the foreign policies interests of the US while simultaneously receiving funding from foreign adversaries?

    Response: This is a great question that I would also like to know. What is the DOJ doing to address the billions of dollars Congress members are receiving from the Israeli lobby to act in its interests, despite the increasing likelihood of regional war? Is it not against US foreign policy interests to fund genocide? I believe the correct answer is nothing, which is disappointing. I wonder also what the DOJ is doing about the arbitrary detainment of lawful permanent residents of the United States for the mere act of speaking out against the genocide in Gaza—is the freedom of speech no longer one of our foundational constitutional rights?

    I think we can agree—the letter from Congressman Jim Banks is not only full of inconsistencies and lies, but is also a reeking pile of garbage that belongs in the shredder. Unfortunately, as stupid as the accusations are, these attempts to silence organizations like us are serious, and are part of an ongoing project to silence activists speaking out against the genocide in Gaza. Today, it’s Palestine, and tomorrow it will be China. We must fight back against the crackdown on anti-war voices and demand that the government not be complicit in the disregarding of our constitutional freedoms.

    So what can you do? Right now, we are asking our supporters to write to Senator Tom Cotton, who continues to perpetuate these accusations in live hearings, saying that CODEPINK activists are “lunatics” funded by China. Tell Tom Cotton to stop lying about CODEPINK & trying to intimidate anti-war activists! 


    The post Codepink: Funded by the CCP? first appeared on Dissident Voice.

    This post was originally published on Dissident Voice.

  • Hundreds of Tibetans have taken to social media to demand that China restore Tibetan language studies in schools, just days after Beijing released a white paper claiming that the right to use Tibetan language is guaranteed in Tibet.

    In the March 28 report about human rights in Tibet, China said the use of Tibetan language is widespread in government documents, public notices, media and schools, and that courses on both Mandarin and Tibetan are taught in primary and secondary schools in the region.

    But Tibetans say that isn’t true, and that China has actively moved to suppress use of the language — which they see as part of a wider plan to eliminate Tibetan cultural identity entirely.

    In 2020, for example, Mandarin was made the primary medium of instruction in all the primary and secondary schools in Tibet. It was called “bilingual” education but in reality Mandarin was used much more.

    Netizens (their names blurred for security reasons) demanding the Tibetan language to be reinstated as a requirement in college entrance exams, taught in schools, and used in workplaces on a Chinese social media platform, March 31, 2025.
    Netizens (their names blurred for security reasons) demanding the Tibetan language to be reinstated as a requirement in college entrance exams, taught in schools, and used in workplaces on a Chinese social media platform, March 31, 2025.
    (Composite image by RFA)

    In 2023, China started a Mandarin-only policy for students taking the annual college entrance exam, putting many ethnic minorities including Tibetan children -– who were previously allowed to take the test in their native language –- at a disadvantage.

    Even the title of the white paper — “Human Rights in Xizang in the New Era” — used the term Beijing-promoted term “Xizang” to refer to Tibet, another clear sign of attempts to assimilate Tibetans under Han Chinese culture.

    ‘Precious wealth’

    In reaction to the white paper, Tibetans left thousands of angry comments underneath several videos posted on the WeChat social media platform showing Chinese officials discussing the contents of the white paper.

    “Language and culture are the most precious wealth in the world…Restore Tibetan language in college entrance exams,” a netizen from Tibet posted.

    “No matter which nationality, as long as there is a language, it needs to be supported by the government and included in textbooks so that children can learn their mother tongue,” wrote another Tibetan.

    Students attend class at Nyingchi City Bayi District Middle School, during a government-organized tour, in Nyingchi, Tibet Autonomous Region, March 31, 2025.
    Students attend class at Nyingchi City Bayi District Middle School, during a government-organized tour, in Nyingchi, Tibet Autonomous Region, March 31, 2025.
    (Go Nakamura/Reuters)

    “The Tibetan script and language carries a long and rich history and culture of the Tibetan people,” said another post. “However, at present, Tibetan language is not seen in college entrance examinations and many workplaces do not use Tibetan language.”

    Outside experts also said that Beijing has actively tried to suppress the use of the Tibetan language.

    “The Chinese government has made sure that the Tibetan language remains practically useless in daily life, whether it is for education or to earn a living,” said Dawa Tsering, Director, Tibet Policy Institute, told Radio Free Asia.

    Government claims don’t square with reality

    The white paper focused on the use of Tibetan in the Tibetan Autonomous Region, or TAR, a Chinese government-designed administrative region that makes up part of the larger region that Tibetans refer to as “Greater Tibet,“ which includes chunks of Sichuan, Gansu, Qinghai and Yunnan provinces.

    It claimed that there are 17 periodicals and 11 newspapers available in Tibetan language, and that government published 46.85 million copies of 8,794 Tibetan language books by the end of 2024.

    Officials from the State Council Information Office release the white paper titled ‘Human Rights in Tibet in the New Era’ in Lhasa, March 28, 2025.
    Officials from the State Council Information Office release the white paper titled ‘Human Rights in Tibet in the New Era’ in Lhasa, March 28, 2025.
    (Chinese government media)

    “The right to study and use the Tibetan language in public administration is guaranteed,” Karma Tsetan, chairman of the TAR government, said during the March 28 press conference.

    “The right to study and develop the Tibetan language is also guaranteed in education and in the standardization of important terms. Courses on both standard Chinese and Tibetan are taught in primary and secondary schools,” he said.

    But that doesn’t square with the reality on the ground.

    In July 2024, Chinese officials announced the closure of Gangjong Sherig Norling School, known for its education on Tibetan culture, philosophy and religion, in Golog county in the historic Amdo region of Tibet.

    That same month, monastic schools of Kirti Monastery in Ngaba county and Lhamo Kirti Monastery in Dzoge county were closed and a total of 1,600 young monks were forced to enroll in state-run residential schools that analysts say are aimed at making young Tibetans more loyal to the Chinese Communist Party than to Buddhism.

    And across Tibetan regions, children as young as 6 are required to enrol in boarding schools which now have military veterans posted as “solder instructors” to instill loyalty to the party.

    Restricted access

    China has severely restricted outsiders from entering Tibet, making it extremely difficult to describe the situation on the ground.

    But outside experts who have managed to visit Tibet say that Mandarin has become the dominant language.

    In December 2024, three members of the New Delhi-based think tank India Foundation, who went on a supervised visit to Tibet’s capital Lhasa, told Radio Free Asia that Tibetan now “plays second fiddle” to Mandarin and is treated as second language, with all main signages in Mandarin.

    China’s claims about human rights in Tibet does not reflect the reality on the ground, and urged Beijing to enable unfettered access for outside observers, independent researchers, said Maya Wang, associate China director at Human Rights Watch.

    “Over the past two decades, the Chinese government has implemented increasingly tightened control over Tibetans, as part of its wider efforts to forcibly assimilate minorities,” she said.

    “This high level of repression long documented by human rights organizations and media organizations in exile is in sharp contrast to the Chinese government’s claims about protecting human rights in Tibet.”

    The white paper titled
    The white paper titled “Human Rights in Tibet in the New Era” released by the State Council Information Office of the People’s Republic of China on March 28, 2025, in English, Tibetan, and Mandarin language. March 28, 2025.
    (Chinese government media)

    The United States has pressed China to open up access to Tibet.

    On March 31, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Washington was imposing visa restrictions against Chinese officials engaged in efforts to restrict American diplomats, journalists, and other international observers access to Tibet, even as China’s diplomats and journalists enjoy broad access in the United States.

    “I urge the Chinese Communist Party to immediately address the lack of reciprocity and allow diplomats, among others, unrestricted access to the TAR and other Tibetan areas,” Rubio said.

    A State Department spokesperson told RFA it cannot name the Chinese officials affected by the visa restrictions as U.S. law requires individual visa records to be kept confidential.

    “We continue to call on the Chinese government to protect the human rights of Tibetans, preserve their unique identity, and resume dialogue with His Holiness the Dalai Lama or his representatives, without preconditions, to work toward a negotiated solution and meaningful autonomy for Tibetans,” the State Department spokesperson told Radio Free Asia.

    Tenzin Lekshay, spokesperson of the Central Tibetan Administration — the Tibetan government-in-exile — in Dharamsala, India, welcomed the U.S. move, calling it “timely” as it comes just days after the Chinese government claimed it has made “all-round and historic progress” in ensuring human rights inside Tibet.

    “The Chinese government claimed that Tibetans in Tibet enjoy complete freedom, but unrestricted access for impartial international observers into Tibet will prove that’s not the case,” Lekshay told Radio Free Asia.

    Additional reporting by Tenzin Norzom and Dorjee Dolma. Edited by Malcolm Foster.


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Tenzin Pema and Dickey Kundol for RFA Tibetan.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • BANGKOK – China is imposing retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods a day after President Donald Trump announced sweeping taxes on trade with most countries – the latest escalation of a trade war that could stunt economic growth worldwide.

    China’s State Council Tariff Commission said an additional 34% tariff on imports from the U.S. will be imposed from April 10 – matching the new U.S. tariff on China.

    “This practice of the U.S. is not in line with international trade rules, seriously undermines China’s legitimate rights and interests, and is a typical unilateral bullying practice,” the commission said in a statement announcing its retaliatory tariffs.

    China, the world’s second-largest economy after the U.S., was already subject to a 20% tariff the U.S. imposed earlier this year when Trump demanded the country buy more U.S. goods and stop the flow of the deadly synthetic opioid fentanyl.

    Stock markets have cratered worldwide after Trump’s tariff announcement, indicating fears of a global recession. U.S. stock futures predicted markets would fall further Friday following China’s announcement.

    Southeast Asian nations were some of the hardest hit by the new U.S. tariffs, at nearly 50% in some cases.

    Some corporations moved production to Southeast Asian nations such as Vietnam and Thailand from China after the first Trump administration, from 2016 to 2020, imposed tariffs on its global rival.

    When he announced the latest tariffs at a White House event, Trump singled out China as one of the “nations that treat us badly,” according to news agency reports.

    The U.S. has a higher trade deficit with China than with any other country – US$295.4 billion last year.

    Trump’s tariff shock therapy is aimed at encouraging a revival of American manufacturing, which fell as a share of the economy and employment over several decades of global free trade and competition from production in lower-cost countries.

    Any changes could take years as many U.S. corporations have made substantial investments in overseas production. Manufacturing in the U.S., like elsewhere, also is reliant on components produced in other countries.

    Edited by Taejun Kang.


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Stephen Wright for RFA.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Liberation Day, as April 2 was described by US President Donald Trump, had all the elements of reality television perversion. It also had a dreamy, aspirational hope: that factories would spring up from rust belt soil in a few months across the United States; that industries would, unmoored from the globe, become vibrant and burgeoning. The world’s largest importer had decided to turn back the tide.

    The imposition of what Trump calls reciprocal tariffs was broadly savage. Over 180 countries fell within their scope. A baseline tariff of 10% was applied on goods imported by the US. Countries were then singled out for being particularly mischievous, in the eyes of the administration, not so much for having their own tariffs on US goods and products so much as having an unsporting surplus. For China, the new rate is 34%. For Vietnam: 46%. Taiwan: 32%. Cambodia, a stunning 49%.

    The malleable rules of reality television intruded with Trump’s chart of countries and tariff rates, as revealed in the White House Rose Garden. (He would have had a bigger chart, but for the wind.) “Reciprocal – that means they do it to us, and we do it to them,” the president ventured to explain. “Can’t get simpler than that.”

    Simple it was, given the rough and ready formula used to arrive at the figures. The Office of the United States Trade Representative offered a rationale: “Reciprocal tariffs are calculated as the tariff rate necessary to balance bilateral trade deficits between the US and each of our trading partners. This calculation assumes that persistent trade deficits are due to a combination of tariff and non-tariff factors that prevent trade from balancing. Tariffs work through direct reduction of imports.”

    This, however, did not evidence itself in the final calculations. Central to the approach was a simple examination of trade in goods deficit from 2024, divided by the value of imports. Professing kindness, Trump offered to discount the amount by halving the arrived at figure. To illustrate, the goods trade deficit with China was US$291.9 billion, and total goods imports US$438.9 billion. When divided, the figure arrived is 0.67 or 67%. On being discounted, the final tariff rate is 34%.

    This method seemed to eschew the promised, detailed evaluation that would have accounted for tariff and non-tariff trade barriers, including distortions allegedly caused by currency manipulation, local regulations and laws, and taxes such as value added tax. This is despite theremarks by the Office of the Trade Representative that the rates were calculated taking into account such matters as “[re]gulatory barriers to American products, environmental reviews, differences in consumption tax rates, compliance hurdles and costs, currency manipulation and undervaluation”.

    Theories are being offered for the absurdly high rates being applied to certain poorer countries, notably those in Southeast Asia and Africa. The most logical point is that the applied rates arise because the countries in question are, as economic historian Adam Tooze explains, relatively poor. “The US does not make a lot of goods that are relevant to them to import.” They are hardly likely to redress any trade imbalance by increasing their consumption of goods produced in the US.

    Siwage Dharma Negara of the ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute in Singapore assumes there is a lurking strategy at work. “The administration thinks that by targeting these countries, they can target Chinese investment in countries like Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, Indonesia. By targeting their products maybe it will affect Chinese exports and the economy.”

    If that is the plan, then it risks doing quite the opposite. In the first instance, American brands have set up factories in a number of states in the region, encouraged by the adoption of the “China plus one” strategy. In line with that approach, manufacturers shifted production from China to alternative countries. Apple, Nike and Samsung Electronics, for instance, have established lucrative operations in Vietnam. Apparel companies such as Gap, Abercrombie, Adidas and Lululemon are reported to source 27 to 47% of their goods from the same country.

    A similar pattern is to be found in Africa, where companies were encouraged to invest on the continent as part of the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA), a trade scheme due to expire in September. The AGOA, in place since 2000, grants eligible sub-Saharan African states duty-free access to the US market for over 1,800 products to complement over 5,000 products deemed eligible under the Generalized System of Preferences program.

    The second likely outcome is pushing these bruised countries into eager Chinese arms. Those in Southeast Asia would, suggests Stephen Olson, former US trade negotiator, gravitate away from Washington. “A closer tilt to China could be the result. It’s hard to have constructive, productive relations with a country that just dropped a ton of bricks on your head.” Ditto Africa, where Beijing already occupies an influential role in trade and investment. The law of unintended consequences looks set to apply.

    The post The Oddities of Trump’s Tariffs first appeared on Dissident Voice.

    This post was originally published on Dissident Voice.

  • A Chinese court has sentenced rights activist Chen Mingyu to 2 1/2 years in prison for attending a celebratory dinner last year marking the inauguration of Taiwan’s President Lai Ching-te, according to the Chinese rights advocacy group Weiquanwang.

    Technically, she was convicted by the court in Chongqing of “picking quarrels and provoking trouble,” a vague, catch-all charge often used by Chinese authorities to punish government critics or dissidents.

    The case stems from a dinner last May attended by Chen and more than 20 other rights activists in Chongqing, said Weiquanwang, or the Rights Protection Network, a loose network of volunteers in China and abroad seeking to promote legal reforms in China.

    They were later summoned by authorities, several were detained and Chen was arrested on July 4, over a month later. She was held in detention until her trial last month, was sentenced on March 26, Weiquanwang said.

    After the ruling was announced, Chen expressed shock and anger, insisting on her innocence and immediately appealed, according to Weiquanwang.

    She argued that her activities, including celebrating Taiwan’s election and past protests against alleged fraud by a natural gas company and hosting a reception for fellow rights activist Liu Fuxiang, were all protected by China’s Constitution.

    Chen has appealed the decision, and her family and supporters hope that the international community will continue to pay attention and pressure the Chinese government to uphold the rule of law and release her and other detained rights activists.

    Chen’s son, Yuan Chang, was present during the trial. Upon learning about this mother’s sentence, he became emotional, saying he had been deceived and threatened by the police, according to Weiquanwang.

    A Chongqing resident who asked only to be identified as Zhou said that whether people were celebrating Lai’s election or criticizing Russian President Putin’s invasion of Ukraine, expressing such opinions was increasingly getting people in trouble.

    “This shows the fragmentation and atomization of protests in China is becoming more widespread. To deal with this situation, the authorities are expanding their crackdown, arresting more people who express dissatisfaction,” he said.

    History of activism

    Chen’s activism stems from a personal tragedy. 25 years ago, her brother, Chen Minghua, was shot and killed by police over a land dispute, and his body was forcibly cremated. His ashes have yet to be returned.

    In 2014, the local government demolished her family’s home, prompting Chen to petition extensively, which led to authorities trying to suppress her.

    Anyone who speaks out against the Chinese government or engages in activities deemed critical of are typically placed on a “blacklist” by state security and punished under the charge of “picking quarrels and provoking trouble,” said Chinese dissident Guo Min, who now lives in the United States.

    Human rights organizations have criticized the ruling, arguing that it highlights the absurdity of China’s repression of free expression. The severe punishment for a private gathering to celebrate Taiwan’s election is seen as a clear instance of political retaliation under the guise of legal measures.

    Edited by Malcolm Foster.


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Lian Qian for RFA Mandarin.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • The new US administration is set to announce its reciprocal tariffs on Wednesday local time, prompting widespread concern and opposition over the uncertainty they could unleash, according to media reports.

    As the date approaches, global financial markets including the US stock market have experienced a rollercoaster ride as investors’ anxiety continues to worsen.

    Asia-Pacific markets were mixed on Wednesday. Japan’s benchmark Nikkei 225 edged up 0.28 percent higher to close at 35,725.87, and the broader Topix index closed down by 0.43 percent at 2,650.29. Meanwhile, South Korea’s Kospi slipped 0.62 percent to close at 2,505.86 while the Kosdaq declined 0.95 percent to close at 684.85.

    As for European markets, the benchmark STOXX 600 was trading down as of press time.

    US stocks dropped Wednesday as Wall Street braced for the expected rollout of the US tariffs. The Dow Jones Industrial Average lost 333 points, or 0.8 percent. The S&P 500 slid 1 percent, and the Nasdaq Composite pulled back by 1.5 percent, CNBC reported.

    It followed a volatile session on Monday as investors awaited clarity on US President Donald Trump’s tariff rollout. The S&P 500 and the Nasdaq Composite posted on Monday their worst quarterly performances since 2022, as uncertainty around the Trump administration’s economic agenda roiled US equity markets in the first quarter of 2025. For the quarter, the S&P 500 slumped 4.6 percent, while the Nasdaq Composite plummeted 10.5 percent, Reuters reported.

    In the bond market, the yield on the 10-year Treasury fell to 4.16 percent from 4.23 percent late Monday and from roughly 4.80 percent in January, the AP reported.

    Gold prices on Monday surged above $3,100 per ounce for the first time as concerns around the US tariffs and the potential economic fallout, combined with geopolitical worries, drove a fresh wave of investments into the safe-haven asset. Spot gold prices hit a record high of $3,106.50 per ounce, according to a separate Reuters report.

    Growing backlash‌ 

    The tariff plan has also drawn widespread opposition from the US’ trading partners, with officials from various countries speaking out to safeguard their interests while potentially retaliating if necessary.

    Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney pledged to fight unjustified trade actions, protect Canadian workers and businesses and build Canada’s economy, including through increased trade between Canada and Mexico as he spoke with Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum on Tuesday.

    “With challenging times ahead, Prime Minister Carney and President Sheinbaum emphasized the importance of safeguarding North American competitiveness while respecting the sovereignty of each nation,” Carney’s office said in a statement.

    Other economies have also threatened countermeasures.

    The EU has “a strong plan to retaliate if necessary,” European Commission (EC) President Ursula von der Leyen said on March 20 in a speech, according to the speech released by the EC on Tuesday.

    “Our objective is a negotiated solution. But of course, if need be, we will protect our interests, our people and our companies,” von der Leyen said.

    The sweeping tariff measures adopted by the US will not work because they are built on a flawed assumption and “completely mistaken” diagnosis on its economy, and it wrongly blames global trade for domestic struggles, which will only lead to negative consequences, Pascal Lamy, former Director General of the World Trade Organization (WTO) told the Global Times in an exclusive interview.

    Sharp tariff hikes can indeed disrupt global value and supply chains, adversely affecting other nations while simultaneously impacting the US itself, Gao Lingyun, an expert at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, told the Global Times on Wednesday.

    Experts warned that the tariffs will backfire, disrupting global supply and industrial chains and saddling US businesses and consumers with higher costs.

    Lamy cautioned that the US itself stands to suffer most. “If the US triggers a trade war, it will primarily hurt the US economy by raising prices, driving inflation and likely pushing up interest rates,” Lamy said, adding that this fallout could also trigger pushback from US financial markets and the general public.

    Gao noted that after tariff hikes, domestic US producers often raise prices, leaving consumer welfare unimproved.

    According to Gao, studies indicate that 25 percent tariffs could raise consumer costs by $5,000 to $10,000, exacerbating uncertainty for both the US and global economies. The price of a typical car could rise by between $5,000 to $10,000 “out of the gates” due to the new tariffs, according to a March 31 estimate from Wedbush Securities analyst Dan Ives, CBS News reported.

    Gao pointed to recent market volatility, low consumer confidence and rising recession risks as evidence.

    Goldman Sachs said in a report released on Sunday US local time “We now see a 12-month recession probability of 35 percent [in the US]. The upgrade from our previous 20 percent estimate reflects our lower growth baseline, the sharp recent deterioration in household and business confidence, and statements from White House officials indicating greater willingness to tolerate near-term economic weakness in pursuit of their policies.”

    Tariffs are a double-edged sword. On the one hand, they can suppress imports of foreign products into the US. On the other hand, tariffs do not offer as many advantages for the development of the US as Washington might imagine, Liu Weidong, a research fellow at the Institute of American Studies at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, told the Global Times on Wednesday.

    Tariffs fuel inflation and stifle innovation among local firms. Moreover, due to potential retaliation from other countries, US exports can also be affected, and the impacts of tariffs on the US would be mostly negative, Liu said.

    However, former WTO chief Lamy downplayed the tariffs’ potential to reshape global trade, noting that the US accounts for just 15 percent of world imports. “The rest of the international trading system – 85 percent of global imports, involving trade between countries like China, India, Mexico, and Canada – can remain largely unaffected,” he said.

    As for China, Liu said that as the detailed measures have not been disclosed, the specific impacts remain uncertain, though it will likely target specific sectors.

    Regarding China’s response, Liu said that the country is well-prepared, with ample technological, industrial and strategic reserves.

    Chinese authorities, including the Foreign Ministry and the Commerce Ministry, have stated multiple times that trade and tariff wars have no winners and the unilateral imposition of tariffs by the US undermines the multilateral trading system, as well as disrupting normal international trade order.

    China-US trade ties are based on reciprocal interactions. Cooperation will bring about mutual benefit and win-win, and China will definitely take countermeasures in response to arbitrary pressure, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning said on March 12.

    The post US so-called “Reciprocal” Tariffs Set to Take Effect, Triggering Widespread Opposition, Market Uncertainty first appeared on Dissident Voice.

    This post was originally published on Dissident Voice.

  • cellx mycelium
    5 Mins Read

    Chinese food tech player CellX has self-determined its first-of-a-kind morel mycelium ingredient as safe in the US, launching high-protein snacks under new consumer brand Mourish.

    Chinese startup CellX is entering the US with what it claims is the world’s first morel mushroom mycelium, rolling out a line of jerky products under new consumer brand Mourish (Mushrooms That Nourish).

    The firm has self-affirmed its morel ingredient under the Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) provision in the US, a regulatory pathway that lets companies sell products based on independent scientific evaluations. While these must adhere to the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) requirements, they don’t legally mandate a review by the agency.

    The future of self-affirmation is uncertain, with health secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr calling it a loophole and asking the FDA to potentially scrap it. It would require food producers to submit their safety conclusions to the FDA and wait for a no-objections letter before they can commercialise ingredients.

    “It’s unfortunate, but… the change will likely take years to take effect,” Ziliang Yang, co-founder and CEO of CellX, tells Green Queen. He confirmed that the firm plans to notify the FDA “in the near future”.

    Right now though, Yang is looking forward to building Mourish- jerkies are now available on its website and Amazon- with plans to enter US supermarkets later in the year.

    Yang aims to make the morel mycelium available to other manufacturers further down the line. “We have started exploring B2B opportunities since last year, and have a few active partners that we are testing the ingredient with,” he says. “We hope to enable brands to create innovative products with our mushroom mycelium protein.”

    morel mushroom mycelium
    Courtesy: CellX/Mourish

    How CellX grows its mycelium

    What began as a cultivated meat company expanded into mycelium fermentation in 2023. “Our team initially used mycelium as a scaffold for cultivated meat, but we quickly realised the exceptional taste and efficiency of this ingredient,” explains Yang.

    “Mushrooms are a superfood, offering incredible nutritional and functional benefits,” he adds. Mycelium has become the darling of the alternative protein world, revered for its ability to assume animal-like flavours, offer complete protein, lower cholesterol, and cut production emissions, among other benefits.

    CellX leverages biomass fermentation to grow its ingredient. It first separates mycelium – the root-like structure of filamentous fungi – from the fruiting body, then experiments with different strains and growing conditions to balance flavour and protein content.

    It cultivates the mycelium in large fermentation tanks, where it grows and multiplies into nutrient-rich protein. At this stage, it’s carefully separated from the fermentation broth and steamed alongside shiitake mushrooms to enhance the natural flavour of the final ingredient.

    mourish
    Courtesy: CellX/Mourish

    Why it chose morel mushrooms

    “By harnessing mycelium fermentation, we significantly increased its protein content, making it an ideal protein alternative,” says Yang. The morel mycelium boasts 5% protein, 25% fibre, and essential vitamins and minerals, giving a makeover to what are historically known in France as the “mushrooms of kings”.

    Morels, CellX explains, are held in high regard by foragers and chefs for their umami, earthy and nutty flavour, and meaty texture. They’re relatively rare, making them some of the most expensive wild mushrooms available.

    “Our decision to focus on morel over other fungi species was deliberate,” Yang says. “We selected our strain from thousands of options, following years of research and development with our university partner. Our proprietary morel strain was isolated from Shangri-La. Our asset-light approach, combined with strategic partnerships, enables cost-efficient, high-quality production.”

    The firm uses a mix of spices to zhuzh up the mycelium before shaping it into snackable bites and baking it on low heat (which helps preserve the nutrients and umami notes). The jerkies – which also contain lion’s mane mushroom powder and pea protein – are available in teriyaki, lemon-pepper, and Sichuan peppercorn flavours. Each 1oz pack contains 8g of protein, 4g of fibre, and zero saturated fat.

    mushroom jerky
    Courtesy: CellX/Mourish

    CellX pivots to licensing model for cultivated meat

    CellX, which has relocated its headquarters from Shanghai to San Francisco, has scaled up production of its mycelium to 12,000-litre fermenters, with immediate plans to expand to 30,000 and 120,000 litres.

    “We are looking at additional products to add to our portfolio later this year, anywhere from snacks and meat alternatives, to protein beverages,” says Yang. The company had initially targeted hybrid meats – mixing its mycelium with cultivated meat – however, that is no longer a focus for its consumer brand.

    “If there are B2B customers who want to use our morel mushroom mycelium ingredient to create these products, we are happy to sell the ingredient,” he says.

    This is reflective of CellX’s cultivated meat pivot too. While it operates a 2,000-litre pilot facility in China – the country’s largest – it doesn’t plan on selling its own products, and is instead focusing on a tech licensing model. It aims to help cultivated meat startups scale up by offering an end-to-end production solution, proprietary cell lines, culture media and bioprocesses, and support for regulatory filings.

    “The underlying thinking behind the shift is that we want to generate revenue and even profits faster, and engage with consumers and customers faster to prove product market fit,” says Yang.

    china lab grown meat
    Courtesy: CellX

    Breaking even without further outside capital

    “I think cultivated meat is still a relatively nascent industry that needs a significant amount of capital, and patience from all stakeholders. It’s unfortunate that the overall sentiment has shifted, and the fundraising environment makes it extremely difficult for companies to go from R&D to commercialisation,” he adds. Indeed, cultivated meat startups attracted 40% less investment in 2024, following a 75% dip the year before.

    CellX itself has raised $20M to date. “We are open to raising more capital, but it won’t be the focus. Our focus is to generate revenue through our B2C brand Mourish, B2B sales of mushroom mycelium ingredient, and licensing cultivated meat technologies,” says Yang.

    “It’s our goal to break even without additional outside capital. However, additional capital is always welcomed as it can help us expand to additional channels, products, and markets,” he adds.

    “We are also fortunate to have started the mushroom mycelium pipeline three years ago, and it’s ready to commercialise now. So the choice to focus on commercialising mushroom mycelium, and pivoting to licensing the cultivated meat tech is natural, as we shift our focus to generating revenue, and finding product market fit.”

    The post CellX Debuts World’s First Morel Mycelium Jerky with New US Brand Mourish appeared first on Green Queen.

    This post was originally published on Green Queen.


  • This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Radio Free Asia.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Radio Free Asia.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • A US Senate investigative subcommittee opened a review on Tuesday into efforts by Facebook parent Meta Platforms to gain access to the Chinese market and is seeking documents from the company. Senator Ron Johnson, who chairs the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, joined by Senator Richard Blumenthal, the top Democrat, and Senator Josh Hawley, asked Meta…

    The post US Senate investigates Meta’s market access efforts for China appeared first on InnovationAus.com.

    This post was originally published on InnovationAus.com.

  • China is placing army veterans as so-called “on-campus instructors” in schools across Tibet to impart military and political training to Tibetan children as young as 6, sources inside Tibet say, confirming state-run media reports about the new system.

    The move is a bid to instill loyalty to the Chinese government from a young age -– an initiative that experts say highlight an escalation in Beijing’s assimilation policies aimed at erasing Tibetan identity.

    State-run TV segments show Tibetan students marching in fatigues, raising the red Chinese flag and standing in formation while responding to commands from the instructors.

    Other footage shows children diving under their desks for air raid drills and evacuating down stairs with notebooks held over their heads for protection against falling objects.

    Military personnel are being deployed to schools in Lhasa, Chamdo, and Nagchu in the Tibet Autonomous Region, or TAR, Ngaba and Kyungchu counties in Sichuan province, Sangchu county in Gansu province as well as other regions in Qinghai province, the sources told RFA Tibetan.

    There, they are tasked with providing “patriotic education” and preparing Tibetan children for future military service, the sources said.

    Formerly an independent nation, Tibet was invaded and incorporated into China by force over 70 years ago. Ever since, Chinese authorities have maintained a tight grip on the region, restricting the Tibetan people’s peaceful expression of cultural and religious identity and use of the Tibetan language.

    A Chinese military veteran posted as an “on-campus instructor” at a state-run middle school in Sernye District in Nagchu, Tibet Autonomous Region, leads a flag hoisting ceremony, March 18, 2025.
    A Chinese military veteran posted as an “on-campus instructor” at a state-run middle school in Sernye District in Nagchu, Tibet Autonomous Region, leads a flag hoisting ceremony, March 18, 2025.
    (Chinese state media)

    “It’s no longer just about China swapping out Tibetan language in textbooks for Mandarin, the first source told Radio Free Asia, speaking on the condition of anonymity for fear of reprisals.

    “Now, they are sending military personnel and Chinese Communist Party cadres to schools across Tibet to provide ideological education to thoroughly change Tibetan children’s values, way of thinking, and overall mannerisms in order to build their loyalty to the party,” he said.

    Instilling ‘correct values’ in children

    In Nagchu, for example, 13 retired Han Chinese army veterans were installed as “on-campus instructors” at seven different schools, ranging from primary to middle school, to help instill “correct values” in children, local state-run media reported.

    At least such two video reports showed that during such training periods, instructors blew whistles in the early mornings to wake up the children and instill army style culture in schools. TV footage also showed instructors dressed in fatigues inspecting bunk beds to see if the beds are made properly.

    The new system seeks to “let national defense education take root from childhood” and to ready Tibetan children for future military service, in what authorities said creates a “new win-win situation for veterans’ services and youth ideological and political education,” state-run media reports said.

    “Usually, the Chinese Ministry of Education creates a list of primary and secondary national defense education demonstration schools,” Anushka Saxena, a research analyst at Bengaluru, India-based Takshashila Institution, told Radio Free Asia.

    “Such schools are those where the PLA feels it needs to inculcate a sense of unity” with the Communist Party’s cause, she said, referring to the People’s Liberation Army.

    “Hence, schools in Tibet become an important target, given the need to assimilate and have younger generations feel a sense of loyalty to the country and the military,” she said.

    Goal: Sinicization

    Experts said the proliferation of uniformed military personnel in various local Tibetan primary and middle schools is a direct result of the recently amended National Defense Education Law, which was passed by the National People’s Congress Standing Committee, China’s top legislature, and came into effect in September 2024.

    Under the amendments, branches of the People’s Liberation Army will be stationed in colleges, universities and high schools across the country to boost a nationwide program of approved military education and physical training to prepare young people for recruitment, state news agency Xinhua reported at the time.

    “Together with other coercive means… this law is now being abused as an auxiliary tool to achieve the CCP’s – yet still elusive – goal of full Sinicization of Tibetans, by both militarizing and brainwashing the generation of young Tibetan who are coming of age in the current decade,” said Frank Lehberger, a Germany-based Sinologist and senior research fellow at Indian think tank Usanas Foundation, referring to the Chinese Communist Party.

    China has long had a culture of military training in schools and universities, with Tibetan school children aged 8-16 forced to attend military training programs during vacation and Tibetan university students made to participate in military drills and training exercises.

    But the “on-campus instructor” system is a first, experts say.

    Chinese authorities chose Sernye district in Nagchu as the first pilot area in Tibet to implement the system, which they refer to as “…the innovative practice of integrating veterans’ management with school education.”

    ‘Reshaping children’s values and thought processes’

    This, experts say, is in line with goals outlined in China’s government work report for 2025, in which Premier Li Qiang said the government will draw up and implement a three-year action plan to strengthen education by adopting “integrated reforms and new approaches” in the “political education curriculum at all levels, from elementary school to university.”

    “These efforts at reshaping Tibetan children’s values and thought processes go beyond the classroom,” a second source from Tibet told RFA.

    Retired military veterans who will be posted as
    Retired military veterans who will be posted as “on-campus instructors” at seven schools in Sernye District in Nagchu, Tibet Autonomous Region, March 18, 2025.
    (Chinese state media)

    “These party cadres with extensive military experience enter students’ dormitories even after school hours to enforce Han Chinese ideologies and teach their social norms and conducts,” he said. “This is aimed at deconstructing Tibetan children’s existing thought patterns and cultural practices, which they have learned from their parents and traditions.”

    In Ngaba and Dzoge county in Sichuan province, for example, where Chinese authorities recently closed two monastic schools and forced young monks from these schools into state-administered boarding schools, sources say there is a greater emphasis on providing political education to Tibetan children.

    The closure of the two schools in July 2024 affected about 1600 students who were then forced to enrol in state-run boarding schools.

    “I’ve received essays written anonymously by Tibetan teachers from inside Tibet who have expressed their frustration at seeing the complete changes in school curriculum with heavy propaganda messages. This includes showing soldiers of the People’s Liberation Army in a heroic light,” said Tsewang Dorji, Research Fellow at the Tibet Policy Institute.

    The “on-campus instructors” in Tibetan schools serve multiple roles, including as national defense education counselors, behavioral norms instructors, and ideological and political lecturers, local Chinese state media reported.

    Some of the training they provide and activities they lead in the schools, include Chinese flag-raising march, singing of military songs before meals, and provision of political and ideological education, with an emphasis on stories that glorify the ‘Chinese nation’ and service to it, reports said.

    The PLA finds relevance in cultivating soldiers from Tibet given Tibetan’s natural and habitual adjustment with climates of high altitude. When it comes to cultivating professionals capable of conducting mountain warfare against adversaries like India, Tibetans can be an important asset for the PLA,” Saxena said.

    Chinese state media also celebrated the success of the pilot project in Nagchu, saying more than 300 Tibetan students have applied to be “future military service volunteers.”

    Translated by Tenzin Norzom. Edited by Tenzin Pema and Malcolm Foster.


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by By RFA Tibetan.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • TAIPEI, Taiwan – Taiwan urged democracies worldwide to condemn China for being a “troublemaker” after Beijing launched military drills around the island.

    China’s military said Tuesday it had kicked off joint exercises involving its army, navy, air force and rocket force around Taiwan as a “stern warning,” days after U.S. defense chief Pete Hegseth vowed to counter “China’s aggression” on his first visit to Asia.

    Forces from China’s People’s Liberation Army, or PLA, were approaching Taiwan from “multiple directions,” according to a statement from the Eastern Theater Command, which oversees military operations in the region, posted on the command’s official WeChat account.

    It said the drills would focus on “combat readiness patrols at sea and in the air, seizing comprehensive control, striking maritime and land targets and imposing blockade controls on key areas and routes.”

    Taiwan’s defence ministry said it had detected 19 PLA ships around Taiwan by 6 a.m. on Tuesday, including the Chinese aircraft carrier Shandong. It deployed aircraft, Navy ships, and coastal missile systems in response.

    “Taiwan’s military vowed to remain vigilant and adhere to the principle of not escalating conflicts or provoking disputes while effectively countering gray-zone threats,” the ministry said in a press release.

    Taiwanese defense minister Wellington Koo Li-Hsiung said that the PLA’s actions undermine regional peace and stability, making it evident that they are a “major troublemaker.”

    “Recent reports have exposed widespread corruption within the Chinese military, suggesting that they should focus on addressing their internal issues rather than engaging in activities that disrupt regional peace,” he told journalists at a press conference Tuesday.

    Joseph Wu, secretary-general of Taiwan’s National Security Council under the chairmanship of the island’s president, condemned the drills as “reckless” and “irresponsible” in threatening Taiwan as well as peace and stability in the region.

    “It came without justification, violates international laws and is totally unacceptable. Democracies need to condemn China for being a troublemaker,” Wu said in a post on the social platform X.

    The latest Chinese military drills came days after Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth vowed to enhance America’s military alliance with the Philippines to counter “China’s aggression” in the Indo-Pacific region during his first trip to Asia last week.

    He also called Japan an “indispensable partner in deterring communist Chinese military aggression,” including across the Taiwan Strait.

    RELATED STORIES

    US to send advanced military hardware to Philippines

    Hegseth: US committed to defense of Pacific territories against China

    Pentagon chief Hegseth heads to Philippines amid South China Sea tensions

    Beijing asserts that Taiwan is part of its territory and is steadily developing the military capacity to take it by force. While analysts say China hasn’t yet reached that point, it has made notable progress. In the meantime, it employs military pressure – such as drills – and other coercive tactics to try to compel Taiwan into submission.

    China has conducted numerous military drills targeting Taiwan in recent years, typically in reaction to what it views as separatist or pro-independence actions.

    Taiwan’s President Lai Ching-te, elected last year to continue the leadership of the pro-sovereignty Democratic Progressive Party, has adopted a firm stance on cross-strait relations.

    Just last month, he labeled China a “foreign hostile force” under national security law and introduced several initiatives aimed at curbing its expanding influence and espionage activities.

    Edited by Taejun Kang and Stephen Wright.


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Alan Lu for RFA.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • TAIPEI, Taiwan – The collapse of a China-built skyscraper in Bangkok has reignited long-standing concerns over construction safety and Beijing’s ability to police quality standards in its overseas projects. Yet in China, those conversations were quickly silenced.

    A 7.7-magnitude earthquake struck Myanmar and neighboring countries, including Thailand, on Friday. Among the damage was a 32-story office tower in Bangkok that crumbled entirely. The building was being constructed by the China Railway No. 10 Engineering Group, a subsidiary of a Chinese state-owned enterprise, as part of a joint venture.

    News of the collapse spread rapidly on Chinese social media, where users began questioning the structural integrity of Chinese-led projects abroad. But the discussion didn’t last long. Posts were deleted, search results filtered, and even official news reports quietly removed.

    One article titled “Under-construction audit building collapses in quake, Thai contractor faces liquidity crisis” published by Chinese outlet Sina Finance, for instance, was removed from the platform’s website after a short-lived stay.

    Chinese state-run outlets such as People’s Daily and CCTV both published reports on the collapse on the same day, but the links to the reports are no longer accessible.

    Searches for collapse-related keywords on Chinese social media platforms also yielded no results, suggesting that relevant content has been removed or suppressed.

    Keyword searches found no result related to China’s construction of the Bangkok audit office building on Chinese social platform Weibo.
    Keyword searches found no result related to China’s construction of the Bangkok audit office building on Chinese social platform Weibo.
    (Weibo)

    ‘Tofu-dreg project’

    Construction of the new premises for Thailand’s state audit agency was overseen by state-owned China Railway No. 10 Engineering Group, which secured the building contract in 2020 as part of a consortium, according to Seatao, a Chinese site that reports on Beijing’s Belt & Road global infrastructure plan.

    It said the 32-story tower was the largest building project undertaken by the group. The consortium included the Thai construction company, Italian-Thai Development Company.

    On Sunday, Thailand’s Industry Minister Akanat Promphan, who inspected the scene, said the cause of the building collapse could stem from flawed materials, poor design or bad construction. An investigation is underway.

    Wang Kuo-Chen, assistant research fellow at Taiwan’s Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research, shares a similar view.

    “None of the surrounding buildings in Bangkok collapsed – only that one did,” he said. “Moreover, the way it collapsed was extremely dramatic; it was pulverized rather than tilting to one side. This is a classic sign of substandard construction and cost-cutting,” Wang said, using the term “tofu-dreg project.”

    Derived from “tofu dregs” – a soft, crumbly food – the phrase refers to poorly built structures that are weak and prone to collapse.

    In the summer of 1998, China experienced severe flooding, and during his inspection of the breached levees in Jiujiang, former Chinese Premier Zhu Rongji angrily criticized the collapsed floodwall as a “tofu-dreg project.”

    Since then, the term has been widely adopted in Chinese media to describe substandard construction, often associated with corruption and regulatory failures.

    “In recent years, the so-called high-speed rail miracle and China’s advancements in high technology have gradually overshadowed the impression of tofu-dreg projects,” Wang said. “However, the collapse of this audit building has reminded people that the high-tech reputation might just be inflated hype.”

    The Chinese embassy in Thailand has not responded to Radio Free Asia’s request for comments.

    RELATED STORIES

    Search for survivors continues 3 days after massive quake hit Myanmar, Thailand

    Migrant workers face grim wait after Bangkok high-rise collapse

    Building collapses in Bangkok from Myanmar earthquake

    Long-standing censorship

    But insights, including Wang’s, find no place to thrive in China. Beijing has a long-standing pattern of tightly controlling public discourse after major accidents, especially those involving construction quality and public safety.

    In the wake of deadly incidents, online discussions are often swiftly censored, with keywords blocked, social media posts deleted, and news coverage heavily restricted.

    After a 2021 gas explosion in Shiyan, Hubei Province, which killed 25 people, posts demanding accountability were quickly taken down, and online discussions were muted.

    Similarly, when a hotel being used as a COVID-19 quarantine site collapsed in Quanzhou in 2020, killing 29, authorities removed posts questioning construction practices and safety oversight.

    A 2015 landslide in Shenzhen, triggered by a pile of construction waste, and the 2009 collapse of a newly built 13-story apartment building in Shanghai, also saw online censorship of posts highlighting regulatory failures.

    One of the most prominent examples remains the 2008 Sichuan earthquake, where the collapse of poorly constructed school buildings sparked public outrage. Parents who demanded answers were silenced, and independent reporting was swiftly curtailed.

    Tzeng Wei-Feng, an associate researcher with Taiwan’s National Chengchi University Institute of International Relations, said the widespread media coverage of the collapse of the Bangkok skyscraper is likely to deal a major blow to China’s reputation in Southeast Asian infrastructure development.

    In recent years, China has significantly expanded its infrastructure and construction investments across Southeast Asia, primarily through its Belt and Road Initiative, also known as BRI, that is intended to advance China’s economic interests globally.

    “Southeast Asian nations might reassess their collaborations with Chinese firms, scrutinizing project details more carefully,” Tzeng said.

    Edited by Taejun Kang and Stephen Wright.


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Alan Lu for RFA.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • China is probably one of few states which flipped its diplomatic stance on the “Palestinian-Israeli conflict” in the most dramatic manner from the 1950s to 1970s. In only 20 years, the People’s Republic of China (PRC)’s official foreign policy dramatically changed from almost establishing diplomatic relations with Israel in 1950 to denying any legitimacy of the Israeli state in the 1960s to 1970s. As I aim to demonstrate in this article, the Maoist era, especially from 1955 to 1976, established the foundation of China’s diplomatic support for the Palestinian liberation movement, and this legacy is still one of the main factors guiding China’s official stance on Palestine today.

    The post From Global Anti-Imperialism To The Dandelion Fighters appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • In January 2025, a 79-year-old man went viral on social media after testing positive for HIV at a hospital in the southern Chinese province of Guangdong where he was being treated for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

    Asked when he could have become infected, the man told the Yangcheng Evening News that he had found a lover after his wife died 10 years ago, but had “never used condoms.”

    News of the case quickly went viral on social media, registering in the list of hot search topics on Sina Weibo.

    The social media reaction betrayed considerable social prejudice about the sex lives of older people, experts told RFA Mandarin in recent interviews.

    And the case highlighted a public health problem that has been brewing in China for many years.

    Studies have shown that older people are a fast-growing high-risk group for HIV infection.

    HIV testing kits are seen in a vending machine in Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China, Nov. 27, 2016.
    HIV testing kits are seen in a vending machine in Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China, Nov. 27, 2016.
    (Reuters)

    A 2020 report in the journal Microbiology found that 58.4% of new HIV infections reported in the southwestern megacity of Chongqing were in the over 50s, while 46% of newly reported cases in the southwestern region of Guangxi were in men aged 50 and over.

    Some studies have predicted that nearly 33% of HIV positive people in China will be over the age of 60 by 2035.

    “The proportion of older people among among newly reported HIV or AIDS patients in China has been gradually increasing since 2015,” former China Red Cross official Ren Ruihong told RFA Mandarin in a recent interview. “It’s just that nobody has paid that much attention.”

    Changing transmission patterns

    Huang Yanzhong, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, said patterns of HIV transmission in China have changed drastically since the 2000s, when it was mostly driven by rural blood-selling schemes.

    “Before about 2010, the spread of HIV/AIDS in China was mainly due to blood selling, which was more likely to attract media attention,” Huang said. “But the spread of HIV/AIDS in China has undergone very significant changes, with the increase in the number of elderly HIV patients the most important challenge.”

    A nurse gives medicine to an HIV patient at the YouAn Hospital in Beijing, Dec. 1, 2011.
    A nurse gives medicine to an HIV patient at the YouAn Hospital in Beijing, Dec. 1, 2011.
    (David Gray/Reuters)

    As of June 30, 2024, China has more than 1.32 million people confirmed to be living with HIV/AIDS, exceeding the number of infections in the United States (which stand at around 1.2 million) — nearly 1% of the population, according to a report from China Radio International.

    Infection rates among the over 50s stand at around 2.1%, twice the prevalence in the wider population, and higher than in most other countries.

    While younger at-risk groups may be more aware of the need to take precautions or get tested, the danger of getting HIV as an older person in China is that you may not find out until it’s too late.

    “The thing about older HIV/AIDS patients is that they usually don’t find out until the disease is very advanced,” Chinese AIDS expert Wan Yanhai told RFA Mandarin.

    “It shows that prevention campaigns shouldn’t only target specific high-risk groups, but should target the entire population, including older people,” he said.

    According to China’s Statistical Communiqué on the Development of Civil Affairs in 2023, the number of people aged 60 and above in China was 297 million in 2023, or 21.2% of the total population.

    Yet there is almost no mention of their sex lives in the mainstream media.

    A 2019 survey by the Shenzhen University’s School of Communication found that around 40% of respondents think older people are “pure,” while others believed they were “healthy.”

    The results suggest that social attitudes don’t expect people of a certain age to have sex lives at all.

    The latest figures show a marked gender difference when it comes to reported HIV infections.

    Between 2012 and 2018, the number of cases in older men rose threefold, while they only doubled in women.

    Yet Chinese women over 50 are also increasingly getting infected with HIV, accounting for 38.1% of cases in the over-50s in 2016, compared with 17.8% in 2010.

    There are also obvious regional differences, too. According to the Chinese Journal of Epidemiology, from 2015 to 2022, HIV infections in the over 60s were mainly concentrated in the southwest and southern parts of the country.

    Shenzhen Center for Disease Control and Prevention data for January-October 2023 shows a total of 198 cases in the over-50s, 75.8% of whom were men. The number accounted for 15.1% of total new HIV cases for that period.

    According to Huang, those figures are likely just the tip of the iceberg.

    “These are just the officially released data, so the real figures are probably higher,” he said. “Many of them don’t find out until they develop other infections due to decreased immunity, and go to hospital for treatment.”

    “But a lot of people may not have symptoms at all, and the older people are unlikely to take the initiative to get tested for HIV,” Huang said, citing the case of the 79-year-old man whose case was reported by the Yangcheng Evening News.

    Relationships with sex workers

    More than 90% of cases in this age group are the result of heterosexual transmission, most commonly during “commercial or extramarital sex,” according to a recent report in the Chinese Journal of Epidemiology.

    This is borne out by a survey by sociologist Pan Suiming, whose survey of the nation’s sexuality found that 53% of Chinese people aged 55-61 have sex at least once a month, and 14% have sex more than once a week.

    A stock image of an elderly couple.
    A stock image of an elderly couple.
    (Pexels)

    Some 47% reported never having sex at all, while 40% of men over 50 told the Shenzhen University survey they had used the services of sex workers. Nearly half were married.

    The data point to a growing number of older men across China engaging in commercial sex, while a 2012 study by the journal Population Research found that many older men who seek out sex workers become long-term clients, and feel as if they have a relationship with them.

    The sense of cosy familiarity means people are far less likely to use condoms. And surveys have found that more than 40% of sexually active people in China said they would never use protection at all.

    Yet the perception of older people as somehow “pure” means that many who seek out sex workers or find lovers are castigated by their families.

    And there is a general lack of education around HIV/AIDS, according to a 2020 survey by the World Health Organization and the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention.

    Researchers interviewed 45 people over 60 in three rural areas, nearly half of whom were HIV positive. They found that none of the respondents knew much about HIV.

    In December 2022, Practical Preventive Medicine conducted a survey on AIDS-related knowledge, sexual behavior, and acceptance of HIV testing among people aged 50 and over who participated in community health examinations in an unnamed province.

    It found that the overall awareness rate of AIDS prevention and control knowledge was only 32.9% among city-dwellers. Out in rural areas, that number was just 23.3%.

    And there is scant support for HIV/AIDS awareness campaigns.

    “Even back in the day when there were a lot of NGOs, there wasn’t much support for HIV/AIDS prevention work or publicity,” Ren said.

    “A lot of organizations didn’t want to be associated with it, and non-government organizations have been declining in China since 2012,” she said.

    “There aren’t any younger or middle-aged people to publicize this stuff.”

    Translated and edited by Luisetta Mudie. Edited by Malcolm Foster.


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Zhu Liye for RFA Mandarin.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • TAIPEI, Taiwan – The China National Offshore Oil Corporation, or CNOOC, has discovered an oilfield in the South China Sea with proven reserves exceeding 100 million tons, Chinese state media said on Monday.

    The oilfield in the eastern South China Sea – the Huizhou 19-6 oilfield – was about 170 kilometers (106 miles) from the city of Shenzhen in southern China’s Guangdong Province, the Xinhua News Agency reported.

    Test drilling of the oilfield, which sits at an average water depth of 100 meters, has yielded a daily production of 413 barrels of crude oil and 68,000 cubic meters of natural gas, it added.

    Xinhua described it as “China’s first large-scale integrated clastic oilfield discovered in deep to ultra-deep layers.”

    CNOOC told Xinhua that offshore oil and gas exploration in deep to ultra-deep layers faces multiple challenges, including high temperatures, high pressures, and complex conditions.

    Xinhua cited Peng Guangrong, a geologist at CNOOC’s Shenzhen branch, as saying that 60% of the world’s newly discovered oil and gas reserves have come from deep layers.

    The South China Sea is mostly underexplored because of territorial disputes, but most discovered oil and gas reserves are in uncontested areas, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration.

    China claims almost all of the South China Sea – through which US$3 trillion in commerce moves annually – overlapping with sovereignty claims by the Philippines, Malaysia, Taiwan, Vietnam and Brunei.

    Military patrol

    On Friday, the Chinese military said it conducted a patrol in the South China Sea, an exercise that came on the same day U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth reaffirmed Washington’s commitment to Manila.

    Separately, a spokesman for the Southern Theatre Command of the People’s Liberation Army said on Saturday that the Philippines frequently enlisted foreign countries to organize “joint patrols” and “disseminated illegal claims” in the region, destabilizing the area.

    Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth met his Filipino counterpart Gilberto Teodoro and Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr on Friday in Manila, as part of Hegseth’s Asia tour that also included Guam and Japan.

    Hegseth reaffirmed Washington’s “ironclad” commitment to its defence treaty with the Philippines, vowing to deploy advanced military capabilities to bolster deterrence against threats, including Chinese “aggression.”

    “Deterrence is necessary around the world, but specifically in this region, in your country, considering the threats from the communist Chinese,” Hegseth said.

    RELATED STORIES

    US to send advanced military hardware to Philippines

    Pentagon chief Hegseth heads to Philippines amid South China Sea tensions

    Philippine envoy: Manila’s defense alliance with Washington ‘remains intact’

    The same day, the U.S., Japan, and the Philippines conducted joint naval drills near the disputed Scarborough Shoal in the South China Sea to enhance crisis preparedness when a Chinese military vessel reportedly monitored the exercises from a distance.

    At one point, a Chinese frigate attempted to approach the area where warships and aircraft from the three allied nations were carrying out maneuvers.

    However, a Philippine frigate issued a radio warning, prompting the Chinese vessel to keep its distance.

    For the first time since these joint naval exercises began last year, known as the Multilateral Maritime Cooperative Activity, a select group of Manila-based media was granted access to observe the drills at sea.

    Edited by Mike Firn.


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Taejun Kang for RFA.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • From Russia to the US, those who seek to uphold the law are coming under increasing pressure

    What the law says on paper is irrelevant if it cannot be upheld, or even stated clearly. That is why lawyers are targeted – with harassment, disbarment from the profession or even jail – by repressive regimes.

    Russia’s attempts to suppress the voice of the opposition leader Alexei Navalny did not end with his death in an Arctic prison colony. In a bleak coda, three of his lawyers have been jailed for several years. Vadim  Kobzev, Alexei Liptser and Igor Sergunin were found guilty of participating in an “extremist organisation” for relaying his messages to the outside world.

    Continue reading…

    This post was originally published on Human rights | The Guardian.

  • Elon Musk’s aerospace giant SpaceX allows investors from China to buy stakes in the company as long as the funds are routed through the Cayman Islands or other offshore secrecy hubs, according to previously unreported court records. The rare picture of SpaceX’s approach recently emerged in an under-the-radar corporate dispute in Delaware. Both SpaceX’s chief financial officer and Iqbaljit…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • A young Uyghur rapper and singer-songwriter not seen since his arrest 20 months ago is imprisoned in China, serving a three-year sentence for composing lyrics that “promoted extremism,” according to the Chinese rights advocacy group Weiquanwang.

    Yashar Shohret, 26, who previously participated in the 2022 “White Paper” protests in China, has been missing since his arrest on Aug. 9, 2023, in Chengdu, Sichuan province, where he had been going to university.

    A new report by Weiquanwang, or Rights Protection Network, a loose network of volunteers in China and abroad seeking to promote legal reforms in China, found that Shohret had been sentenced on June 20, 2024, to three years in prison on charges of “promoting extremism” and “illegally possessing items promoting extremism.”

    He appealed the verdict, but the second trial upheld the original sentence, with the prison term lasting until Aug. 8, 2026. He is currently serving his sentence at the Wusu Prison in Xinjiang, the group said.

    Radio Free Asia could not independently confirm that. Calls to the prison and the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region Prison Administration Bureau were not answered. Chinese search engines yielded no public records of Shohret’s arrest, trial or sentencing.

    Overseas Uyghur youth activist Aman, who prefers a pseudonym for safety reasons, said the Chinese Communist Party has used high-profile arrests to set an example, but now they often make people “disappear quietly,” without announcing charges or public sentencing.

    ‘White Paper Protests’

    Shohret originally hailed from Bole city, in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region of northwestern China, where 12 million Uyghurs live and face widespread persecution and surveillance under Beijing’s rule.

    Previously, Shohret had been detained for three weeks for participating in the November 2022 “White Paper” protests, when thousands took to the streets of Chinese cities to protest harsh COVID-19 restrictions.

    The rare public protests were triggered by a big apartment building fire in Urumqi in which several Uyghur residents died. Many demonstrators held up white sheets of paper to express that their voices were stifled.

    Shohret sang a memorial song in Uyghur language for the fire victims and was immediately suppressed by the police and detained for 21 days on suspicion of “gathering a crowd to disrupt social order” before being released, Weiquanwang said.

    ‘Charged out like cheetahs’

    Shohret, who performed under the stage name “Uigga,” seems to have gotten in trouble for songs he composed.

    One of them, a 2023 song titled “Wake Up” that was listed on NetEase Cloud Musica popular Chinese music streaming service, contained the following Uyghur lyrics:

    “They charged out like cheetahs.

    Who? A group of hunters…

    When I woke up,

    The surroundings made me sink into deep thought.”

    In his lyrics, Shohret appears to metaphorically refer to himself as prey in a hostile environment, his fate already decided, said Sawut Muhammed, director of East Asian Affairs at the advocacy group World Uyghur Congress.

    Those words were probably viewed as threatening to the Chinese Communist Party, or CCP, said Muhammed.

    “In the CCP’s view, emphasizing the Uyghur language could lead to a rise in Uyghur nationalism,” he said. That’s “detrimental to Xi Jinping’s vision of building a unified Chinese nation.”

    Sawut pointed out that after 2017, when there was mass internment of Uyghurs in camps, China arrested many Uyghur scholars, singers, poets and writers. Many were accused of using politics in their art.

    Although China’s constitution guarantees the right to use one’s mother tongue, the implementation of bilingual education after the year 2000 effectively requires Uyghur students to learn Mandarin and suppresses the Uyghur language, he said.

    Gong Zi Shen, a Chinese current affairs commentator living in the United States, said Shohret’s lyrics are not explicitly political, but describe inner emotions. While the White Paper movement was sparked by dissatisfaction with the lockdown and zero-COVID policies, Shohret was not a leading student figure, he said.

    However, Beijing cannot tolerate even the suggestion of dissent, and sentenced him for “extremism,” a punishment far more severe than would be applied to majority Han Chinese, Shen said.

    Edited by Malcolm Foster.


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Xiaohua Xia for RFA Mandarin.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • A young Uyghur rapper and singer-songwriter not seen since his arrest 20 months ago is imprisoned in China, serving a three-year sentence for composing lyrics that “promoted extremism,” according to the Chinese rights advocacy group Weiquanwang.

    Yashar Shohret, 26, who previously participated in the 2022 “White Paper” protests in China, has been missing since his arrest on Aug. 9, 2023, in Chengdu, Sichuan province, where he had been going to university.

    A new report by Weiquanwang, or Rights Protection Network, a loose network of volunteers in China and abroad seeking to promote legal reforms in China, found that Shohret had been sentenced on June 20, 2024, to three years in prison on charges of “promoting extremism” and “illegally possessing items promoting extremism.”

    He appealed the verdict, but the second trial upheld the original sentence, with the prison term lasting until Aug. 8, 2026. He is currently serving his sentence at the Wusu Prison in Xinjiang, the group said.

    Radio Free Asia could not independently confirm that. Calls to the prison and the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region Prison Administration Bureau were not answered. Chinese search engines yielded no public records of Shohret’s arrest, trial or sentencing.

    Overseas Uyghur youth activist Aman, who prefers a pseudonym for safety reasons, said the Chinese Communist Party has used high-profile arrests to set an example, but now they often make people “disappear quietly,” without announcing charges or public sentencing.

    ‘White Paper Protests’

    Shohret originally hailed from Bole city, in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region of northwestern China, where 12 million Uyghurs live and face widespread persecution and surveillance under Beijing’s rule.

    Previously, Shohret had been detained for three weeks for participating in the November 2022 “White Paper” protests, when thousands took to the streets of Chinese cities to protest harsh COVID-19 restrictions.

    The rare public protests were triggered by a big apartment building fire in Urumqi in which several Uyghur residents died. Many demonstrators held up white sheets of paper to express that their voices were stifled.

    Shohret sang a memorial song in Uyghur language for the fire victims and was immediately suppressed by the police and detained for 21 days on suspicion of “gathering a crowd to disrupt social order” before being released, Weiquanwang said.

    ‘Charged out like cheetahs’

    Shohret, who performed under the stage name “Uigga,” seems to have gotten in trouble for songs he composed.

    One of them, a 2023 song titled “Wake Up” that was listed on NetEase Cloud Musica popular Chinese music streaming service, contained the following Uyghur lyrics:

    “They charged out like cheetahs.

    Who? A group of hunters…

    When I woke up,

    The surroundings made me sink into deep thought.”

    In his lyrics, Shohret appears to metaphorically refer to himself as prey in a hostile environment, his fate already decided, said Sawut Muhammed, director of East Asian Affairs at the advocacy group World Uyghur Congress.

    Those words were probably viewed as threatening to the Chinese Communist Party, or CCP, said Muhammed.

    “In the CCP’s view, emphasizing the Uyghur language could lead to a rise in Uyghur nationalism,” he said. That’s “detrimental to Xi Jinping’s vision of building a unified Chinese nation.”

    Sawut pointed out that after 2017, when there was mass internment of Uyghurs in camps, China arrested many Uyghur scholars, singers, poets and writers. Many were accused of using politics in their art.

    Although China’s constitution guarantees the right to use one’s mother tongue, the implementation of bilingual education after the year 2000 effectively requires Uyghur students to learn Mandarin and suppresses the Uyghur language, he said.

    Gong Zi Shen, a Chinese current affairs commentator living in the United States, said Shohret’s lyrics are not explicitly political, but describe inner emotions. While the White Paper movement was sparked by dissatisfaction with the lockdown and zero-COVID policies, Shohret was not a leading student figure, he said.

    However, Beijing cannot tolerate even the suggestion of dissent, and sentenced him for “extremism,” a punishment far more severe than would be applied to majority Han Chinese, Shen said.

    Edited by Malcolm Foster.


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Xiaohua Xia for RFA Mandarin.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • TAIPEI, Taiwan – Russian President Vladimir Putin said that Ukraine could be placed under a “temporary administration” as part of a peace process that could include help from North Korea and other Moscow allies.

    The announcement came as South Korea reported that the North appeared to have dispatched at least another 3,000 soldiers to Russia in January and February.

    Speaking about efforts to settle the war during his visit to Murmansk, Russia, Putin said not just the United States, but also all BRICS countries, as well as North Korea, could be partners for cooperation, according to the Russian news agency Tass.

    “This is not only the United States but also the People’s Republic of China, India, Brazil, South Africa, all BRICS countries,” Putin said.

    “And many others, for example, including the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea,” he said, using North Korea’s official name, without elaborating.

    ​The United States brokered a tentative ceasefire agreement between Ukraine and Russia this week to halt hostilities in the Black Sea and ensure safe navigation for commercial vessels.

    However, Russia’s compliance is contingent upon the lifting of certain Western sanctions, particularly those affecting its agricultural exports. European leaders have expressed skepticism about easing sanctions, saying that the time is not right for such actions.

    China has maintained a complex stance on the Russia-Ukraine war, emphasizing respect for Ukraine’s sovereignty while also acknowledging Russia’s security concerns regarding NATO expansion.

    ​North Korea has reportedly deployed up to 12,000 troops and supplied ballistic missiles to support Russia’s efforts in Ukraine, marking its first significant military involvement abroad since the 1950s. Neither Russia nor North Korea has confirmed the claims made by the U.S. and South Korea.

    Additional troops to Russia

    The Russian leader’s remarks came as the South Korean military confirmed that North Korea appeared to have additionally dispatched at least 3,000 soldiers to Russia in January and February in support of Moscow’s war against Ukraine.

    “Of the some 11,000 North Korean soldiers dispatched to Russia, 4,000 casualties have occurred, and it appears that some 3,000 or more have been additionally dispatched in January and February,” the South’s Joint Chiefs of Staff, or JCS, said.

    The JCS said the North continued to supply missiles, ammunition and artillery equipment to Russia, including “a considerable amount of short-range ballistic missiles and around 220 pieces of 170 millimeter self-propelled howitzers and 240 mm rocket launchers.”

    It added Pyongyang appeared to be making technological upgrades to launch another military spy satellite, although there were no imminent signs of such a launch.

    The JCS also noted that North Korea appeared to be carrying out a smaller number of wintertime military training sessions compared with last year, attributing the fall to troop mobilization for various construction works, preparation for additional deployment to Russia and chronic energy shortage.

    North Korea unveiled on Thursday what appears to be its first airborne radar system and suicide attack drones equipped with artificial intelligence, adding to indications that Russia has provided technical assistance in exchange for the North sending troops to fight Ukraine.

    RELATED STORIES

    North Korea unveils its first airborne radar, AI-powered suicide drones

    Captured North Korean soldier reveals use of Russian drone-jamming gun

    UK, allies sanction North Korean officials linked to Russia troop deployment

    North Korean leader’s visit to Russia

    Separately, Russia’s top official said preparations were under way for North Korean leader Kim Jong Un’s visit to Russia this year, the latest sign of deepening ties between Moscow and Pyongyang.

    Speaking to journalists in Moscow on Thursday, Russia’s deputy foreign minister Andrey Rudenko said Moscow was preparing for Kim’s visit to the country, Tass reported, without elaborating.

    It would be Kim’s third visit to Russia, following his trip to Vladivostok in 2019 and the Vostochny Cosmodrome space center in the Amur region in 2023.

    Russia and North Korea have aligned closely since Putin and Kim signed a mutual defense treaty during the Russian leader’s visit to Pyongyang last year. It elevated military cooperation and resulted in the deployment of North Korean troops to Russia.

    Edited by Mike Firn and Stephen Wright.


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Taejun Kang for RFA.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • HAGATNA, Guam – Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has reaffirmed the US is committed to defending the Pacific territories of Guam and Northern Mariana Islands and said any attack on them would be an attack on the mainland.

    Hegseth touched down in Guam from Hawaii on Thursday as part of a regional tour, his first as defense secretary, in which he is seeking to shore up long-standing alliances to counter China.

    Amid US-China competition in the Pacific, Guam and the neighboring Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands have become increasingly significant in supporting American naval and air operations, especially in the event of a conflict over Taiwan or in the South China Sea.

    Both territories are within range of Chinese and North Korean ballistic missiles and the U.S. tested a defense system in Guam in December.

    Any attack on Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands would be met with an “appropriate response,” Hegseth said during his brief visit.

    “We’re defending our homeland,” Hegseth said. “Guam and CNMI are vital parts of America and I want to be very clear – to everyone in this room, to the cameras – any attack against these islands is an attack against the U.S.”

    “We’re going to continue to stay committed to our presence here,” Hegseth said. “It’s important to emphasize: we are not seeking war with Communist China. But it is our job to ensure that we are ready.”

    U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth (left) meets with Guam governor
Lou Leon Guerrero (center) and CNMI governor Arnold Palacios (right) on his visit to the U.S. Pacific territory of Guam on Mar. 27, 2025.
    U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth (left) meets with Guam governor Lou Leon Guerrero (center) and CNMI governor Arnold Palacios (right) on his visit to the U.S. Pacific territory of Guam on Mar. 27, 2025.
    (Defense Department/Handout)

    Hegseth’s week-long tour comes against a backdrop of Chinese assertiveness. Its coast guard vessels have repeatedly encroached into the Philippines’ exclusive economic zone in the South China Sea and around the Japanese-controlled Senkaku Islands in the East China Sea.

    His visit will be closely watched in the Pacific for signs of the Trump administration’s commitment to traditional allies following a rift between Washington and Europe that has tested the decades-old transatlantic alliance.

    The trip also threatens to be overshadowed by the fallout from revelations that Hegseth and other national security officials discussed attack plans against Yemen’s Houthis on the messaging app Signal with a journalist present.

    Located closer to Beijing than Hawaii, Guam is known as the “tip of the spear,” with 10,000 military personnel, an air base for F-35 fighters and B-2 bombers and home port for Virginia-class nuclear submarines.

    The security pledge from Hegseth comes as debate on Guam’s future as a U.S. territory has intensified, with competing calls by some residents for full statehood and U.N.-mandated decolonization, led by the Indigenous Chamorro people.

    Defending Guam and CNMI, Hegseth said, aligns with President Donald Trump’s “goal to achieve peace through strength by putting America first.”

    He delivered remarks at Andersen Air Force Base and took an aerial tour of Guam before meeting with the governors of Guam and Northern Mariana Islands, Lou Leon Guerrero and Arnold Palacios, respectively.

    China’s short- and mid-range missiles cannot reach Guam, but its intermediate-range missiles, including DF-26, nicknamed the “Guam Express,” can.
    China’s short- and mid-range missiles cannot reach Guam, but its intermediate-range missiles, including DF-26, nicknamed the “Guam Express,” can.
    (Vijdan Mohammad Kawoosa/Reuters)

    Guerrero appealed to Hegseth about the “great impact” the U.S. military buildup on Guam has had on the island’s residents.

    The Defense Department controls about a quarter of Guam’s land and is preparing to spend billions to upgrade the island’s military infrastructure as another 5,000 American marines relocate from Japan’s Okinawa islands.

    “We welcome you and we welcome the position and the posture that President Trump has,” Guerrero told Hegseth, during opening statements before their closed door meeting.

    “We are the center of gravity here. We are the second island chain of defense,” she said. “We want to be a partner in the readiness effort but national security cannot happen without human health security.”

    Guerrero sought funding for a new hospital, estimated to cost US$600 million.

    “Our island needs a regional hospital capable of handling mass casualties, whether from conflict or natural disasters,” she told Hegseth.

    Guam governor Lou Leon Guerrero (left) exchanges greetings with U.S.
Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth (right) on his visit to the U.S. Pacific territory, Mar. 27, 2025
    Guam governor Lou Leon Guerrero (left) exchanges greetings with U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth (right) on his visit to the U.S. Pacific territory, Mar. 27, 2025
    (Mar-Vic Cagurangan/BenarNews)

    Afterwards Guerrero told reporters she didn’t have time to discuss the housing crisis caused by the US military buildup.

    Earlier this month Guerrero warned in her ‘state of the island’ address of U.S. neglect of Guam’s 160,000 residents, where one-in-five are estimated to live below the poverty line.

    “Let us be clear about this: Guam cannot be the linchpin of American security in the Asia-Pacific if nearly 14,000 of our residents are without shelter, because housing aid to Guam is cut, or if 36,000 of our people lose access to Medicaid and Medicare coverage keeping them healthy, alive and out of poverty,” Guerrero said.

    At the end of his Guam visit, Hegseth announced he’d also reached an “understanding” with President Wesley Simina of the Federated States of Micronesia for planning and construction of US$400 million in military infrastructure in Yap state.

    Simina’s office would not confirm to BenarNews he had met with Hegseth in Guam, saying only he was “off island.”

    As an unincorporated U.S. territory, Guam residents are American citizens but they cannot vote for the U.S. president and their lone delegate to the Congress has no voting power.

    Stefan Armbruster in Brisbane contributed to this story.

    BenarNews is an online news outlet affiliated with Radio Free Asia.


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Mar-Vic Cagurangan for BenarNews.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • china novel food regulation
    5 Mins Read

    Chinese government officials have called for a boost to the national biotech capacity and the introduction of a novel food framework at its Two Sessions summit.

    Chinese lawmakers have issued calls to speed up the development of its alternative protein ecosystem, with a focus on R&D and manufacturing, IP protection, and regulatory support.

    This month’s Two Sessions summit in Beijing convened lawmakers from across the country to ratify legislation, review government work, and set an economic agenda for the forthcoming year.

    Preceding the event were several documents indicating the government’s willingness to propel its alternative protein industry to new heights, which analysts saw as a sign of more things to come.

    At the summit, some of China’s top government officials proved them right. For example, in his opening day speech to the National People’s Congress (NPC), Li Qiang, the premier of the State Council, called for deeper integration of strategic emerging industries, which included biomanufacturing, according to industry think tank the Good Food Institute (GFI) APAC.

    This was followed by calls from several of his deputies who identified parts of the food system where China needed to ramp up its efforts. This included “strengthening IP protections for microbial proteins, leveraging underutilised ingredients like microalgae to help achieve China’s carbon neutrality goals, and redoubling efforts to upskill and grow the domestic future-food workforce”, said GFI APAC.

    National and local governments enthused about novel foods

    cultivated meat china
    Courtesy: CellX

    Perhaps the most sweeping statements came from Wei Chen, deputy of the NPC. In his address, he recommended that the country “expand the boundaries of food resources” and promote resource innovation, including “in-depth exploration, nutritional evaluation, and industrial production of alternative proteins”.

    He further highlighted the importance of increasing “the policy guarantee for the development and application” of novel foods and developing talent in this industry to upgrade the national food system and improve global competitiveness.

    Technologies like gene-editing and synthetic biology could help “create high-nutrition, high-function novel food ingredients”, according to Chen, who promoted multidisciplinary integration to realise the potential of microbial technology for nutrition, health and sustainable development goals.

    Additionally, he called upon the National Health Commission and the State Administration for Market Regulation to establish “a flexible regulatory framework” to ensure the safety and traceability of novel food resources, according to GFI APAC. Chen stressed the goal of introducing unified novel food standards “as early as possible”.

    It’s not just national policymakers promoting alternative proteins. Provincial and city governments are doing so too. The Suzhou Industrial Park, jointly governed by Chinese and Singaporean officials, this month released its 2025-27 action plans for biomanufacturing food, which state its “intent to obtain cell engineering equipment and microbial identification devices that can help scientists cultivate new food ingredients”, said GFI APAC.

    In China’s most populous region, the Guangdong province, local officials are planning to build a biomanufacturing hub to pioneer tech breakthroughs in plant-based, microbial and cultivated proteins. “The officials said that the new hub will be specifically geared towards expanding market acceptance of future foods by enhancing their ingredients, texture, and functionality,” GFI APAC noted.

    Meanwhile, the country saw its first alternative protein innovation centre open in Beijing last month, fuelled by an $11M investment from public and private investors to develop cultivated meat and fermentation-derived proteins.

    Can the statements turn into reality?

    cultivated chicken china
    Courtesy: Jimi Biotech

    The remarks at the Two Sessions summit are the latest in a long list of policy efforts to put China atop the global alternative protein race.

    In an official notice about China’s agricultural priorities before the summit, the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs (MAFRA) identified the safety and nutritional efficacy of alternative proteins as a key priority, while research in novel food tech to create the next generation of food was also highlighted.

    A week later, the No. 1 Central Document (which signals China’s top goals for the upcoming year), underscored the importance of “building a diversified food supply system”, including efforts “to cultivate and develop biological agriculture and explore novel food resources.”

    The following day, a briefing by MAFRA featured a call to action to “develop new food resources such as plant-based meat”, according to GFI APAC.

    The government’s current five-year agriculture plan encourages research in cultivated meat and recombinant proteins, while the bioeconomy development plan aims to advance novel foods too. President Xi Jinping has called for a Grand Food Vision that includes plant-based and microbial protein sources.

    Leaders in the US have already highlighted fears of being overtaken by China’s biotech prowess. And experts suggest that for the East Asian country to decarbonise, half of its protein consumption must come from alternative sources by 2060.

    How likely are all these statements to become a reality? “After a National People’s Congress deputy puts forward a suggestion during the Two Sessions conference, the Working Committee for Deputies Affairs takes these suggestions and directs them to the relevant government departments for further consideration,” Mirte Gosker, managing director of GFI APAC, told Green Queen.

    She clarified that in most cases related to alternative proteins, the relevant department would be MAFRA. “The exceptions would be for situations like regulatory supervision or judicial affairs, which are instead sent to the National Supervisory Commission,” she said.

    “After further study, the reviewing department will provide feedback on the suggestion as to whether or not it will be pursued further, but any deputy suggestions are taken very seriously. That’s why it’s so significant that deputies are lining up to show their support for deeper public investments in protein diversification.”

    The post Chinese Lawmakers Promote Alternative Protein Policies During Annual Political Summit appeared first on Green Queen.

    This post was originally published on Green Queen.

  • Several examples of upgraded Republic of China Army (RoCA) M60A3 main battle tanks were sighted at a training facility earlier in March, open-source imagery circulated on social media channels have revealed. The most obvious enhancements were the redesigned turret with shaped armour plates as well as a remote weapon station (RWS) of apparent indigenous manufacture. […]

    The post Upgraded Taiwanese M60A3 MBTs emerge appeared first on Asian Military Review.

    This post was originally published on Asian Military Review.

  • Cheering crowds thronged outside the Cape Town International Airport on Sunday, March 23, to welcome the South African ambassador expelled from the US after being subjected to repeated attacks for his stance in solidarity with Palestine.

    “Ebrahim Rasool is a race-baiting politician who hates America,” US State Secretary Marco Rubio accused in a X post on March 15.

    “We have nothing to discuss with him and so he is considered PERSONA NON-GRATA,” Rubio added, sharing the alt-right Breitbart News report on the academic observations Rasool had made on the white supremacist character of the “MAGA movement” in a webinar hosted by a South African think tank.

    The post ‘I Will Wear My Persona Non Grata As A Badge Of Dignity’ appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • Recently, when entering restaurants or leaving official events, North Korean trading officials dispatched to China have been seen taking off lapel pins featuring the smiling faces of national founder Kim Il Sung and his son Kim Jong Il and pretending to be South Korean, two sources in China told Radio Free Asia.

    All North Korean officials overseas are required to wear the “Kim Bu-ja” — or “father-son” — pins to show their allegiance to the men known respectively as “Great Leader” and “Dear Leader.”

    The Kim dynasty is now in its third generation. Kim Il Sung, who ruled from 1948 until his death in 1994, was succeeded by Kim Jong-il, who ruled until 2011, after which his son Kim Jong Un took over as supreme ruler.

    “Last week, I visited a famous restaurant in Shenyang with an executive from a North Korean trading company I knew through business,” a source from the Chinese city told RFA Korean, requesting anonymity for personal safety.

    “When he arrived at the restaurant, he took off his Kim Bu-ja badge, put it in his pocket, and asked me not to say that he was North Korean,” he said.

    “Furthermore, he not only hid Kim Bu-ja’s badge, but also asked me to introduce him as a South Korean,” he continued.

    Easy to tell

    Another source in Yanji city, in China’s Jilin province, said he had witnessed the same behavior.

    “Recently, it’s hard to see North Korean officials wearing portrait badges,” he said. “North Korean officials take off their Kim Bu-ja badges and pretend to be South Koreans when they leave official events.”

    It wasn’t clear why the North Korean officials wanted to hide their identity, the first source said. He speculated that it was because South Koreans in China are treated as wealthy.

    “We don’t know the exact reason why these officials are taking off their Kim Bu-ja badges, but they might be embarrassed to be officials from North Korea, one of the poorest countries in the world,” he said.

    Despite their efforts, the second source said that it was easy to tell that the men were from North Korea as soon as they started talking given their accent and manner of speech.

    “North Korean officials can dress like South Koreans in terms of clothing and hairstyles, but if you talk to them, it’s immediately obvious” that their from the North.

    Many Chinese can also easily tell the difference, he said.

    “Some North Korean officials who have been in China for a long time are actually lamenting their situation,” with the North Korean economy on the brink of collapse, to their acquaintances in China, he said.

    “It’s understandable how North Korean officials feel about not being able to reveal that they’re North Koreans overseas,” he said.

    Edited by Malcolm Foster.


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Kim Ji-eun for RFA Korean.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • ANALYSIS: By Valerie A. Cooper, Te Herenga Waka — Victoria University of Wellington

    Of all the contradictions and ironies of Donald Trump’s second presidency so far, perhaps the most surprising has been his shutting down the US Agency for Global Media (USAGM) for being “radical propaganda”.

    Critics have long accused the agency — and its affiliated outlets such as Voice of America, Radio Free Europe and Radio Free Asia — of being a propaganda arm of US foreign policy.

    But to the current president, the USAGM has become a promoter of “anti-American ideas” and agendas — including allegedly suppressing stories critical of Iran, sympathetically covering the issue of “white privilege” and bowing to pressure from China.

    Propaganda is clearly in the eye of the beholder. The Moscow Times reported Russian officials were elated by the demise of the “purely propagandistic” outlets, while China’s Global Times celebrated the closure of a “lie factory”.

    Meanwhile, the European Commission hailed USAGM outlets as a “beacon of truth, democracy and hope”. All of which might have left the average person understandably confused: Voice of America? Wasn’t that the US propaganda outlet from World War II?

    Well, yes. But the reality of USAGM and similar state-sponsored global media outlets is more complex — as are the implications of the US agency’s demise.

    Public service or state propaganda?
    The USAGM is one of several international public service media outlets based in Western democracies. Others include Australia’s ABC International, the BBC World Service, CBC/Radio-Canada, France Médias Monde, NHK-World Japan, Deutsche Welle in Germany and SRG SSR in Switzerland.

    Part of the Public Media Alliance, they are similar to national public service media, largely funded by taxpayers to uphold democratic ideals of universal access to news and information.

    Unlike national public media, however, they might not be consumed — or even known — by domestic audiences. Rather, they typically provide news to countries without reliable independent media due to censorship or state-run media monopolies.

    The USAGM, for example, provides news in 63 languages to more than 100 countries. It has been credited with bringing attention to issues such as protests against covid-19 lockdowns in China and women’s struggles for equal rights in Iran.

    On the other hand, the independence of USAGM outlets has been questioned often, particularly as they are required to share government-mandated editorials.

    Voice of America has been criticised for its focus on perceived ideological adversaries such as Russia and Iran. And my own research has found it perpetuates stereotypes and the neglect of African nations in its news coverage.

    Leaving a void
    Ultimately, these global media outlets wouldn’t exist if there weren’t benefits for the governments that fund them. Sharing stories and perspectives that support or promote certain values and policies is an effective form of “public diplomacy”.

    Yet these international media outlets differ from state-controlled media models because of editorial systems that protect them from government interference.

    The Voice of America’s “firewall”, for instance, “prohibits interference by any US government official in the objective, independent reporting of news”. Such protections allow journalists to report on their own governments more objectively.

    In contrast, outlets such as China Media Group (CMG), RT from Russia, and PressTV from Iran also reach a global audience in a range of languages. But they do this through direct government involvement.

    CMG subsidiary CCTV+, for example, states it is “committed to telling China’s story to the rest of the world”.

    Though RT states it is an autonomous media outlet, research has found the Russian government oversees hiring editors, imposing narrative angles, and rejecting stories.

    Staff member with sign protesting in front of Voice of America sign.
    A Voice of America staffer protests outside the Washington DC offices on March 17, 2025, after employees were placed on administrative leave. Image: Getty Images/The Conversation

    Other voices get louder
    The biggest concern for Western democracies is that these other state-run media outlets will fill the void the USAGM leaves behind — including in the Pacific.

    Russia, China and Iran are increasing funding for their state-run news outlets, with China having spent more than US$6.6 billion over 13 years on its global media outlets. China Media Group is already one of the largest media conglomerates in the world, providing news content to more than 130 countries in 44 languages.

    And China has already filled media gaps left by Western democracies: after the ABC stopped broadcasting Radio Australia in the Pacific, China Radio International took over its frequencies.

    Worryingly, the differences between outlets such as Voice of America and more overtly state-run outlets aren’t immediately clear to audiences, as government ownership isn’t advertised.

    An Australian senator even had to apologise recently after speaking with PressTV, saying she didn’t know the news outlet was affiliated with the Iranian government, or that it had been sanctioned in Australia.

    Switched off
    Trump’s move to dismantle the USAGM doesn’t come as a complete surprise, however. As the authors of Capturing News, Capturing Democracy: Trump and the Voice of America described, the first Trump administration failed in its attempts to remove the firewall and install loyalists.

    This perhaps explains why Trump has resorted to more drastic measures this time. And, as with many of the current administration’s legally dubious actions, there has been resistance.

    The American Foreign Service Association says it will challenge the dismantling of the USAGM, while the Czech Republic is seeking EU support to keep Radio Free Europe and Radio Liberty on the air.

    But for many of the agency’s journalists, contractors, broadcasting partners and audiences, it may be too late. Last week, The New York Times reported some Voice of America broadcasts had already been replaced by music.The Conversation

    Dr Valerie A. Cooper is lecturer in media and communication, Te Herenga Waka — Victoria University of Wellington.  This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons licence. Read the original article.

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.