Category: Climate Action

  • 4 Mins Read

    Are fossil fuels really on the way out?

    For years, climate scientists and environmental activists have been calling for the end of fossil fuels as the number one thing that must happen if we are to save the planet. They have fought tooth and nail to push back against the dirty energy industry’s billion-dollar efforts to spread disinformation and sow public doubt over climate change, campaigned to raise awareness about the devastating health, environmental and economic consequences of continued inaction. But now, it looks like fossil fuel giants are going to be facing some dark days ahead. Here’s why. 

    1. Shell ordered to cut emissions by 45%

    In what many industry watchers have described as a “turning point” for fossil fuels, the world’s largest private oil trader Royal Dutch Shell was ordered to slash its greenhouse gas emissions by 45% by the end of the decade by a court in the Netherlands. It marked the very first time that a company has been legally bound to change its business practices and align its policies with the Paris agreement. 

    2. Investor rebellion at ExxonMobil 

    At ExxonMobil’s annual shareholder meeting in 2021 activist hedge fund Engine No. 1 managed to rally up enough support – including the world’s largest asset manager BlackRock and New York’s state pension fund – to force the company to diversify away from dirty oil and gas. The biggest American oil company now has two dissidents on its 12-member board who are going to hold the firm accountable over climate action. 

    Teenagers involved in the class action lawsuit against the Whitehaven coal mine. (Image: ABC News / Brendan Esposito)

    3. Australian teenagers’ case against Whitehaven coal mine establishes duty of care to future generations 

    Eight teenagers went to court to stop the Australian government from approving the giant Whitehaven coal mine project. While the federal court didn’t issue an injunction as the teenagers sought, Justice Mordecai Bromberg agreed that the Australian environment minister Sussan Ley had a legal obligation not to cause younger generations “startling” harm by exacerbating climate change with new coal mines. Experts say that there is now a legal precedent of duty of care being set, opening the door to claim damages as a result of inaction over the climate crisis. 

    4. Another rebellion – this time at Chevron

    Chevron’s shareholders rebelled against the company’s board, with 61% voting in favour of a proposal put forward by activist group Follow This to force the company to slash its carbon emissions. It’s the third successful campaign Follow This coordinated this month, after it won votes to ensure ConocoPhillips and Phillips 66 would also slash its emissions. Quite remarkably, Chevron won’t just have to reduce its own emissions – the big oil giant is also going to have to slash the footprint coming from its oil and gas-burning customers. 

    5. World energy watchdog orders no more new fossil fuels

    The global energy watchdog International Energy Agency (IEA) has spoken out clearly this time, saying in a landmark report that there must be no more new oil, gas or coal if we are to reach net-zero emissions by 2050, as outlined under the Paris agreement. From now, IEA says there should no longer be any investments into fossil fuel projects and no more sales of internal combustion engines by 2035. It followed an earlier call from the agency that renewables have proven over the pandemic to be the only source resilient to energy shocks.

    ExxonMobil polyethylene production plant. (Image: ExxonMobil)

    6. Divestment gains momentum at universities 

    After years of campaigning, a number of prominent U.S. universities have pledged to divest from fossil fuels. Yale has announced that its multibillion-dollar endowment will now follow ESG guidelines, while Rutgers University says it’ll divest from all fossil fuel investments and reinvest in renewable energy projects within one year. These moves come shortly after similar commitments made by the USC, Brown, Columbia and Georgetown.  

    7. Fossil fuel’s plastic pollution role exposed

    Beverage giants like Coca-Cola and Pepsi are often the first companies that come to mind when plastic waste is mentioned. Now, a new report has exposed the real culprits who are the source of the problem: the small group of twenty petrochemical businesses who are behind more than half of global single-use plastic pollution. Topping the list was ExxonMobil, followed by Dow and Sinopec. 

    The post 7 Big Signals That Prove The End Of Fossil Fuels Is On The Horizon first appeared on Green Queen.

    The post 7 Big Signals That Prove The End Of Fossil Fuels Is On The Horizon appeared first on Green Queen.

    This post was originally published on Green Queen.

  • 4 Mins Read In a landmark ruling, global oil and gas giant Royal Dutch Shell (RDS) was ordered to reduce its emissions by 45% by 2030 compared to its 2019 levels to mitigate its effects towards climate change and to bring the company in alignment with the goals listed in the Paris Agreement which aim to curb global heating […]

    The post In Landmark Ruling, Multinational Oil Firm Shell Ordered To Reduce Emissions By 45% By 2030 appeared first on Green Queen.

    This post was originally published on Green Queen.

  • 15 Mins Read Mark Maslin, a Professor of Earth System Science at University College London, has made it his career to study climate change and has authored hundreds of academic papers and multiple books on the topic. But now, the renowned climate scientist has taken a rather different approach with his new book, How To Save Our Planet, […]

    The post Q&A w/ Renowned Climate Scientist Prof. Mark Maslin On How To Save The Planet: ‘I’m Incredibly Optimistic’ appeared first on Green Queen.

    This post was originally published on Green Queen.

  • 3 Mins Read A new British government scheme to pay older farmers to retire has been launched in hopes of welcoming a new greener, younger generation to enter the agricultural sector. Under the exit scheme, farmers who are “standing in the way of change” could receive a sizeable payment to also make way for a number of “public […]

    The post New U.K. Scheme Pays Older Farmers ‘Standing In The Way’ Of Sustainable Change To Retire appeared first on Green Queen.

    This post was originally published on Green Queen.

  • Shell Canada says it really cares about climate action. No really. It keeps telling us how much it cares so it really must.

    And yet, as the old adage goes, “Tell us who your friends are, and I’ll tell you who you are.” One of Shell Canada’s longest standing relationships is with the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP), an industry lobby group that is quite possibly the biggest barrier to climate action in Canada. 

    Every year Shell reviews its membership in industry associations. In 2019 and again in 2020, Shell found that CAPP was out of step with Shell’s principles because of lack of support for the Paris Agreement and climate policies such as carbon pricing. Over 15,000 Canadians sent letters to Shell telling the company it was time to break ties with CAPP. 

    And then, last month Shell decided that it would remain a member for at least another year. A real head scratcher. Despite Shell’s insistence that it’s a climate champion, it has chosen to stay aligned with CAPP, whose toxic, secretive influence has killed or undermined laws that were designed to protect public health, cut pollution, and curb carbon emissions – including during the COVID-19 crisis. 

    Here are three ways Shell’s climate principles are just greenwashing:  

    1. Shell “supports” the Paris Agreement on climate change, limiting warming to 1.5 degrees C., and Canada achieving net-zero emissions by 2050. And in the last federal election, CAPP lobbied for a rollback of environmental protection and a massive expansion of oil and gas development that would increase Canada’s carbon emissions by more than 100 million tonnes by 2030. You know what isn’t a pathway to zero emissions? Increasing them a lot.

    2. Shell “supports” an energy transition with a larger role for renewables: CAPP’s laughably vague and weak approach to addressing climate change discusses no other forms of energy other than oil and gas. Someone should tell CAPP, and Shell, that fossil fuels cause climate change rather than provide solutions to the crisis. Meanwhile, Shell decided that another industry association it belongs to, WindEurope, was offside with its principles because WindEurope takes a cautious approach to techno fixes like carbon capture and storage and the potential for forests to absorb fossil’s fuels’ carbon emissions. You can’t make this stuff up.
    3. Shell “supports” transparency when dealing with the government and public: And yet in the middle of the pandemic, CAPP sent a secret memo to the federal government with a long list of demands, including the suspension of lobbying rules so that meetings between Big Oil and the government could be undertaken in secret. The irony is palpable. CAPP had many other egregious demands including suspending environmental monitoring, deferring the implementation of Indigenous rights, and delaying the implementation of rail safety regulations for oil trains. 

    And lo and behold, CAPP ended up forming a secretive committee with the federal government to discuss environmental and energy policy during the pandemic, which government officials initially lied about when contacted by the press.

    It’s time for the public to ignore Big Oil’s greenwashing

    CAPP’s actions directly contradict Shell’s corporate sustainability principles. As long as Shell remains a member, the public should know that its principles are an empty PR exercise.

    Oil giants like Shell keep saying publicly they want to be part of the climate solution, but lobbying groups like CAPP work behind the scenes to block climate action on their behalf. You should be wary of claims you see from Shell and other big oil players…this case shows their claims can be a lot of greenwashing.

    The post Shell keeps hiding behind Canada’s Big Oil lobby appeared first on Environmental Defence.

    This post was originally published on Environmental Defence.

  • 14 Mins Read By: Bonnie Waring One morning in 2009, I sat on a creaky bus winding its way up a mountainside in central Costa Rica, light-headed from diesel fumes as I clutched my many suitcases. They contained thousands of test tubes and sample vials, a toothbrush, a waterproof notebook and two changes of clothes. I was on […]

    The post There Aren’t Enough Trees In The World To Offset Society’s Carbon Emissions, & There Never Will Be appeared first on Green Queen.

    This post was originally published on Green Queen.

  • 3 Mins Read Forbes has launched a new channel dedicated to covering sustainability, as the mainstream media landscape begins to sound the alarm on the climate crisis. The channel, Forbes Sustainability, comes in response to “rising global interest in environmental reporting” and is part of the business media giant’s “commitment to social responsibility”.  Last month, Forbes decided to […]

    The post Forbes Launches Sustainability Channel Amid Media’s Climate Crisis Wake-Up Call appeared first on Green Queen.

    This post was originally published on Green Queen.

  • 4 Mins Read Germany has proposed a more ambitious climate goal, cutting the original deadline five years short to reach net-zero emissions by 2045. It comes after the country’s top court decided the existing plan continues to place huge burdens on young people and future generations to grapple with the climate crisis.  German officials have set a new […]

    The post Germany Raises Bar With Net-Zero By 2045 Target After Court Ruling Underlines ‘Huge Burden On Young People’ appeared first on Green Queen.

    This post was originally published on Green Queen.

  • 4 Mins Read Humanity must act now on climate change and “reinvent our relationship with planet Earth”, say Nobel laureates and experts in a statement. The letter, co-signed by dozens of leading international scientists, summarises the conclusions made during the Nobel Prize ‘Our Planet, Our Future’ Summit hosted in late April, which stresses the “existential need” to act […]

    The post Humanity Must Act Now To ‘Reinvent Relationship With Planet’, Urge Nobel Laureates appeared first on Green Queen.

    This post was originally published on Green Queen.

  • 8 Mins Read OUR 4°C-ABLE WORLD is a new student-led theatrical production that has premiered on YouTube on May 1, centred on the disproportionate impact of the climate emergency on marginalised communities. Following the fictional story of teenage climate activist Jane, the film takes viewers on her journey to discovering the intersectionality between the climate crisis, poverty and […]

    The post Q&A: Makers Behind Student-Led Climate Inequality Film ‘OUR 4°C-ABLE WORLD’ – ‘The Problem Lies In The Communication Of This Issue’ appeared first on Green Queen.

    This post was originally published on Green Queen.

  • I’ve also made a video about this! Click here to watch it on Instagram, or see below.

    Last week, at President Biden’s climate summit, Canada strengthened its emission reduction target under the Paris Agreement. The new commitment is to reduce Canada’s carbon emissions by 40 per cent by 2030.

    This is the third time in five months that Canada has strengthened its 2030 target, so the federal government is clearly feeling pressure. And for good reason. Even with this higher ambition, Canada is a clear laggard on climate change compared to our closest allies.

    Amongst G7 nations, Canada:

    Canada’s climate target falls short

    While greater climate ambition is welcome, Canada is still a long way from committing its fair share in terms of reducing the emissions that cause climate change. That target would be 60 per cent domestic reductions by 2030, complemented with significant investments to reduce international emissions a further 80 per cent.

    The combined reductions are high because Canada, like other industrialized countries, is a rich country that has greatly benefited from centuries of burning fossil fuels and filling up the atmosphere with carbon. We need to leave a majority of the remaining carbon budget to poor, developing countries.

    Environmental Defence and six other environmental organizations just published research showing that Canada can reach 60% domestic reductions, and how to get there. The research shows that these deep cuts to pollution are:

    • Necessary: Canada must do its fair share to limit average global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius and avoid catastrophic climate change.
    • Doable: It will be hard, but technologies and policies exist to allow Canada to achieve that higher ambition.
    • Worth it: All kinds of benefits will come with much greater action: the economy continues to thrive, communities are healthier because of lower levels of air and water pollution, and household energy costs go down as we all become more energy efficient and rely on cheaper and cleaner renewable energy technologies.

    We need a plan to reach our climate target

    Setting climate targets is just the first, small step. More important is strong action by governments to reduce emissions by reducing our production and use of fossil fuels.

    Fossil fuels are the cause of climate change. So gradually reducing our reliance on these dirty fuels is the solution. For Canada, that is primarily oil and gas, the greatest source of carbon emissions.

    Prime Minister Justin Trudeau rightly identified the problem in his speech at the Biden summit. The reason Canada can’t go further on climate change is because the country produces and exports a lot of oil and gas.

    The federal government has implemented many policies to reduce Canadian use of fossil fuels but has failed entirely in reducing their production.

    Other jurisdictions have made this commitment. At the Biden Summit, California committed to phase out its oil and gas production. California has about the same population as Canada, and is also a major oil and gas producer. So clearly it’s doable.

    Other important and related actions

    No matter what Canada’s target, we also need climate accountability to ensure that we stay on track to our climate commitments. That is possible with the introduction of a climate accountability bill in Parliament. But it needs to be so that:

    • Accountability starts right away and not near the end of the decade
    • Progress is regularly assessed by a panel of independent experts
    • The government is required to act on the advice of those experts if Canada is off-track on emission reductions

    The other crucial element is a full strategy that ensures that the economic and energy transition away from oil and gas is fair and takes care of workers and communities. Some of the most important programs would provide training for workers, economic development opportunities for communities, and early retirement for older workers.

    Unifor, the union that represents many oil and gas workers has supported our call for 60 per cent reductions in domestic GHGs, but insisted that action needs to include a fair and comprehensive transition plan. This is incredible leadership from Unifor, which puts a lie to oil and gas executives and government officials who continuously talk about jobs in oil and gas and at the same time refuse to either take action on climate change or develop a fair transition strategy for workers and communities.

    The post Canada needs to do much more to stop being a climate laggard appeared first on Environmental Defence.

    This post was originally published on Environmental Defence.

  • 6 Mins Read On an overcast August morning, the world watched as Greta Thunberg set sail from a quaint port city in southwest England aboard a racing yacht en route to the 2019 UN Climate Action Summit in New York City. The voyage marked a year since the start of Greta’s weekly school strikes. She had come a long way […]

    The post Greta Thunberg On Her Gap Year Climate Change Tour, Joe Biden & Turning 18 appeared first on Green Queen.

    This post was originally published on Green Queen.

  • RNZ Pacific

    The Marshall Islands has issued a plea for help and a call to action at the US Leaders Summit on Climate Change.

    Addressing the virtual meeting on Friday, President David Kabua laid out the existential threat facing his country and the Pacific.

    Kabua was the lone Pacific leader invited by US President Joe Biden to the two-day talks.

    Leaders Summit on Climate Change
    Leaders Summit on Climate Change 2021

    Kabua shared the stage with the world’s biggest economies and pressured those he said held the Pacific’s future in their hands.

    President Kabua said there were a series of island nations already feeling the effects of rising oceans.

    He said the Pacific now faced an even greater threat.

    “We are low-lying atoll nations, barely a metre above sea level,” he said.

    ‘Navigated our islands’
    “For millennia, our people have navigated between our islands to build thriving communities and cultures.

    “Today, we are navigating through the storm of climate change, determined to do our part to steer the world to safety.”

    Kabua told the world leaders their actions had a direct bearing upon the future of the Marshall Islands and others in the Pacific and beyond.

    He called for stronger emission targets, a carbon levy to help the most vulnerable and for 50 percent of climate financing to go towards adapting to the devastating effects of climate change.

    “We know what a safe harbour looks like.”

    Marshall Islands President David Kabua … “Today, we are navigating through the storm of climate change.” Image: Marshall Islands govt

    Kabua said the Marshall Islands, with AOSIS, fought for years to create consensus around a 1.5 degrees Celsius temperature goal.

    “In 2015, we brought together the High Ambition Coalition to turn the 1.5 to stay alive rallying cry into a goal shared by all parties to the Paris Agreement.”

    Role more important today
    The role of the coalition is even more important today to ensure that 1.5 remains in reach, Kabua said.

    He said the coalition’s key task this year was to ensure that updated national emissions commitments were in line with that goal.

    “NCDs are where ambition moves from promise to plan. Given how far off-track the world is today, it is vital that we come together every five years to increase ambition.

    “All nations should also be charting long-term net zero strategies and implementation pathways before COP26 in the UK in November.”

    Too often, vulnerable countries hear the excuse that steep emissions cuts are too costly, Kabua said.

    But he added political signals, especially from the major economies, shaped decisions on investment and innovations for low-carbon pathways.

    The Marshall Islands leader said the recovery from covid-19 gave the country a rare chance to invest in a safer and healthier world.

    Sector-wide transormations
    Sector-wide transformations were possible, he said.

    “Together with the Solomon Islands, we are pushing for stronger emissions action at the IMO through a carbon levy to fund research and help the most vulnerable.

    “Leading from the front-lines, we were the first to strengthen our NDCs in 2018. And we have a 2050 net-zero strategy paired with an electricity roadmap as our implementation pathway.

    “We recently celebrated the success of the Micronesia Challenge and will be joining the Local2030 Islands Network.”

    But the President said all this would not be enough if the big emitters failed to act.

    We feel the effects of climate change now, he said, and so the Marshalls is leading the way on adaptation.

    Kabua said Majuro delivered its Adaptation Communication in 2020 and developing the National Adaptation Plan.

    “Accessible financing’
    “Adequate and accessible financing is key. And so I support the call for 50 percent of climate financing to go towards adaptation.”

    Support for the world’s developing and worst-affected nations was a common theme at the virtual summit.

    The issue was raised repeatedly by Biden and leaders from India, China, Germany, the EU and others.

    Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison said his country was providing US$1.5 billion in “practical climate finance, focusing on the blue Pacific family partners in our region”.

    Morrison’s New Zealand counterpart, Jacinda Ardern, opened her address to the summit by saying her country’s “Pacific neighbours have identified climate change is the single biggest threat to their livelihoods, security and well being”.

    “Our collective goal here at this summit and beyond has to be effective global action on climate change,” Ardern said.

    ‘Collective commitments’
    “That means our collective commitments in 2021 will need to be enough to limit global warming to 1.5 degrees above pre-industrial temperatures.”

    Developing countries said the United States still owed $US2 billion in aid for transitioning away from fossil fuels that former President Barack Obama had promised but President Donald Trump didn’t pay.

    However, Biden delivered new pledges, saying the US would double climate funding help for less wealthy countries by 2024.

    That cost would be more than made up for when “disasters and conflicts are avoided,” he said.

    For the Marshall Islands and President David Kabua, it is not what the world is going to do to address the climate crisis but more when.

    “I’ll conclude by asking my fellow leaders, how will you move from plans to implementation to align with a 1.5 degree future and help others do the same?

    “Your answer will define the future for your children and grandchildren, and for mine.”

    Pope Francis spells it out
    The head of the Catholic Church warned a climate crisis will take on an even greater significance in the post-Covid-19 pandemic world.

    In a video recorded in the Vatican, Pope Francis called on the leaders invited to US President Joe Biden’s Summit on Climate Change to ‘do more to protect the gift of nature’.

    In his message, to mark Earth Day on Friday – an annual event calling for greater protection of the environment – Pope Francis said covid-19 had proved the global community could work together to tackle a catastrophic threat.

    But he said if world leaders were not courageous and truthful in their efforts to combat climate change, the result would be self-destruction.

    In 2017, then US President Donald Trump visited Rome and the Pope said said in his address that he had brought up the climate issue in their conversation.

    Pope Francis had urged on the race to save the planet.

    But a week later after meeting the former American leader, Trump announced the US would withdraw from the Paris climate agreement.

    However, Trump’s successor Biden, a Catholic, appears more on the Pope’s wavelength.

    This article is republished under a community partnership agreement with RNZ.

    Print Friendly, PDF & Email

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • RNZ Pacific

    The Marshall Islands has issued a plea for help and a call to action at the US Leaders Summit on Climate Change.

    Addressing the virtual meeting on Friday, President David Kabua laid out the existential threat facing his country and the Pacific.

    Kabua was the lone Pacific leader invited by US President Joe Biden to the two-day talks.

    Leaders Summit on Climate Change
    Leaders Summit on Climate Change 2021

    Kabua shared the stage with the world’s biggest economies and pressured those he said held the Pacific’s future in their hands.

    President Kabua said there were a series of island nations already feeling the effects of rising oceans.

    He said the Pacific now faced an even greater threat.

    “We are low-lying atoll nations, barely a metre above sea level,” he said.

    ‘Navigated our islands’
    “For millennia, our people have navigated between our islands to build thriving communities and cultures.

    “Today, we are navigating through the storm of climate change, determined to do our part to steer the world to safety.”

    Kabua told the world leaders their actions had a direct bearing upon the future of the Marshall Islands and others in the Pacific and beyond.

    He called for stronger emission targets, a carbon levy to help the most vulnerable and for 50 percent of climate financing to go towards adapting to the devastating effects of climate change.

    “We know what a safe harbour looks like.”

    Marshall Islands President David Kabua
    Marshall Islands President David Kabua … “Today, we are navigating through the storm of climate change.” Image: Marshall Islands govt

    Kabua said the Marshall Islands, with AOSIS, fought for years to create consensus around a 1.5 degrees Celsius temperature goal.

    “In 2015, we brought together the High Ambition Coalition to turn the 1.5 to stay alive rallying cry into a goal shared by all parties to the Paris Agreement.”

    Role more important today
    The role of the coalition is even more important today to ensure that 1.5 remains in reach, Kabua said.

    He said the coalition’s key task this year was to ensure that updated national emissions commitments were in line with that goal.

    “NCDs are where ambition moves from promise to plan. Given how far off-track the world is today, it is vital that we come together every five years to increase ambition.

    “All nations should also be charting long-term net zero strategies and implementation pathways before COP26 in the UK in November.”

    Too often, vulnerable countries hear the excuse that steep emissions cuts are too costly, Kabua said.

    But he added political signals, especially from the major economies, shaped decisions on investment and innovations for low-carbon pathways.

    The Marshall Islands leader said the recovery from covid-19 gave the country a rare chance to invest in a safer and healthier world.

    Sector-wide transormations
    Sector-wide transformations were possible, he said.

    “Together with the Solomon Islands, we are pushing for stronger emissions action at the IMO through a carbon levy to fund research and help the most vulnerable.

    “Leading from the front-lines, we were the first to strengthen our NDCs in 2018. And we have a 2050 net-zero strategy paired with an electricity roadmap as our implementation pathway.

    “We recently celebrated the success of the Micronesia Challenge and will be joining the Local2030 Islands Network.”

    But the President said all this would not be enough if the big emitters failed to act.

    We feel the effects of climate change now, he said, and so the Marshalls is leading the way on adaptation.

    Kabua said Majuro delivered its Adaptation Communication in 2020 and developing the National Adaptation Plan.

    “Accessible financing’
    “Adequate and accessible financing is key. And so I support the call for 50 percent of climate financing to go towards adaptation.”

    Support for the world’s developing and worst-affected nations was a common theme at the virtual summit.

    The issue was raised repeatedly by Biden and leaders from India, China, Germany, the EU and others.

    Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison said his country was providing US$1.5 billion in “practical climate finance, focusing on the blue Pacific family partners in our region”.

    Morrison’s New Zealand counterpart, Jacinda Ardern, opened her address to the summit by saying her country’s “Pacific neighbours have identified climate change is the single biggest threat to their livelihoods, security and well being”.

    “Our collective goal here at this summit and beyond has to be effective global action on climate change,” Ardern said.

    ‘Collective commitments’
    “That means our collective commitments in 2021 will need to be enough to limit global warming to 1.5 degrees above pre-industrial temperatures.”

    Developing countries said the United States still owed $US2 billion in aid for transitioning away from fossil fuels that former President Barack Obama had promised but President Donald Trump didn’t pay.

    However, Biden delivered new pledges, saying the US would double climate funding help for less wealthy countries by 2024.

    That cost would be more than made up for when “disasters and conflicts are avoided,” he said.

    For the Marshall Islands and President David Kabua, it is not what the world is going to do to address the climate crisis but more when.

    “I’ll conclude by asking my fellow leaders, how will you move from plans to implementation to align with a 1.5 degree future and help others do the same?

    “Your answer will define the future for your children and grandchildren, and for mine.”

    Pope Francis spells it out
    The head of the Catholic Church warned a climate crisis will take on an even greater significance in the post-Covid-19 pandemic world.

    In a video recorded in the Vatican, Pope Francis called on the leaders invited to US President Joe Biden’s Summit on Climate Change to ‘do more to protect the gift of nature’.

    In his message, to mark Earth Day on Friday – an annual event calling for greater protection of the environment – Pope Francis said covid-19 had proved the global community could work together to tackle a catastrophic threat.

    But he said if world leaders were not courageous and truthful in their efforts to combat climate change, the result would be self-destruction.

    In 2017, then US President Donald Trump visited Rome and the Pope said said in his address that he had brought up the climate issue in their conversation.

    Pope Francis had urged on the race to save the planet.

    But a week later after meeting the former American leader, Trump announced the US would withdraw from the Paris climate agreement.

    However, Trump’s successor Biden, a Catholic, appears more on the Pope’s wavelength.

    This article is republished under a community partnership agreement with RNZ.

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • Asia Pacific Report newsdesk

    A Chinese official characterised the US return to the international climate scene, not unfairly, as a “truant getting back to class”, reports Climate Change News.

    Joe Biden just about scraped a pass with his first assignment this week, and inspired varying degrees of improvement from his slacker pals Japan, Canada and South Korea.

    China may have a strong attendance record but will not win any school prizes for Xi Jinping’s long overdue acknowledgment that phasing out coal is essential to climate action.

    Leaders Summit on Climate Change
    Leaders Summit on Climate Change 2021

    UK is the class swot, doing its homework with the Climate Change Committee breathing down its neck.

    It is a status Boris Johnson appears uncomfortable with, casually insulting those who actually care about the environment as “bunny huggers”, to general bemusement.

    You get the sense he would rather be sharing a cigarette with Scott Morrison behind the bike shed.

    To stretch the metaphor, Greta Thunberg is the headteacher poking her head round the door to say they’ve all let the school down.

    Except there is no authority dispensing discipline, just peer pressure.

    The lone Pacific voice, Marshall Islands President David Kabua, appealed for help for the region.

    Climate Change News live blogged all the opening speeches and US climate finance pledge.

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • Asia Pacific Report newsdesk

    A Chinese official characterised the US return to the international climate scene, not unfairly, as a “truant getting back to class”, reports Climate Change News.

    Joe Biden just about scraped a pass with his first assignment this week, and inspired varying degrees of improvement from his slacker pals Japan, Canada and South Korea.

    China may have a strong attendance record but will not win any school prizes for Xi Jinping’s long overdue acknowledgment that phasing out coal is essential to climate action.

    Leaders Summit on Climate Change
    Leaders Summit on Climate Change 2021

    UK is the class swot, doing its homework with the Climate Change Committee breathing down its neck.

    It is a status Boris Johnson appears uncomfortable with, casually insulting those who actually care about the environment as “bunny huggers”, to general bemusement.

    You get the sense he would rather be sharing a cigarette with Scott Morrison behind the bike shed.

    To stretch the metaphor, Greta Thunberg is the headteacher poking her head round the door to say they’ve all let the school down.

    Except there is no authority dispensing discipline, just peer pressure.

    The lone Pacific voice, Marshall Islands President David Kabua, appealed for help for the region.

    Climate Change News live blogged all the opening speeches and US climate finance pledge.

    Print Friendly, PDF & Email

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • World leaders are under pressure to take action on climate change – but what exactly is it they are talking about? Here are some of the commonly used climate terms and what they mean.

    – Greenhouse gases

    These are gases that trap some of the heat from the sun in the atmosphere and keep the the planet warm enough for life to thrive.

    Concentrations of these gases, which include carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide, have increased at a rapid rate in recent years.

    – Greenhouse gas or carbon emissions

    This is the release of greenhouse gases, particularly carbon dioxide, into the atmosphere, mainly from burning fossil fuels – coal, gas and oil – in things such as power stations, vehicle engines and boilers for heating buildings.

    Livestock and changes to how we use land, including cutting down or burning forests and draining peatland, industrial processes such as cement making and refrigerants are among other sources of greenhouse gas emissions caused by human activity.

    Cows
    (Andrew Matthews/PA)

    – Global warming

    Because of emissions from human activity, the overall level or concentration of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases in the atmosphere has increased.

    The higher the concentrations in the atmosphere, the more they trap heat and warm the Earth, pushing up temperatures across the land and oceans, which is known as global warming.

    In 2020 global temperatures were around 1.2C above what they were in the 19th century, before most of the industrial activity driving emissions got going.

    – Climate change

    This encompasses the rapid changes we are seeing to weather conditions and the natural world, driven by global warming and the human activities that cause it.

    Impacts we are already seeing include more frequent and extreme heatwaves and wildfires, increased rainfall and storms which can cause floods, melting ice and rising sea levels, changes to crop yields and loss of wildlife.

    As temperatures continue to rise, the impacts of climate change are projected to worsen, and the situation is increasingly being referred to as a climate crisis or emergency.

    South Africa Cape Town Fire
    (AP)

    – Net zero

    Cutting greenhouse gas emissions from human activity to zero overall, which is needed to halt the global temperature rises driven by the increase in levels of gases in the atmosphere.

    Just as you need to turn off a tap completely to stop the level of water in a bath from continuing to rise, we need to cut emissions to zero to stop the greenhouse gas levels – and therefore temperatures – rising.

    Completely stopping emissions is extremely difficult, but there are some measures, such as planting trees, which can absorb greenhouse gases from the atmosphere – the equivalent of bailing some water out of the bath to keep the water level steady even if the tap is still running slightly.

    So emissions have to be cut as much as possible, and any remaining pollution, from hard-to-tackle sectors such as aviation, needs to be “offset” by action that absorbs carbon to have the net effect of cutting emissions to zero.

    – Decarbonisation

    The process of removing the emissions associated with activities or sectors, for example decarbonising electricity generation by phasing out coal and gas plants that put out pollution, and building renewables such as offshore wind farms.

    Wind farm
    (Owen Humphreys/PA)

    – Paris Agreement

    The world’s first comprehensive treaty on climate change, agreed under the United Nations in the French capital in December 2015.

    Under the deal, all countries commit to action to limit temperature rises to “well below” 2C above pre-industrial levels and pursue efforts to keep them to 1.5C, to reduce the risks and impacts of climate change.

    – Nationally determined contributions (NDCs)

    National plans for climate action submitted by countries under the Paris Agreement.

    They outline post-2020 action to tackle climate change, with many plans running to 2030. Countries are under pressure to bring out new or updated plans because current action leaves the world way off track to meet the 2C or 1.5C goals.

    – Cop26

    This is a global climate summit held under the UN’s climate change convention, which is being hosted by the UK and is set to take place in Glasgow in the first two weeks of November.

    Cop26, delayed from last year by the pandemic, is seen as the most important international climate meeting since Paris 2015, as it aims to drive urgent and significant action to halt rising temperatures.

    There will also be negotiations to agree the final parts of the “rulebook” for implementing the Paris Agreement.

    Cop stands for “conference of the parties” and it is the 26th meeting.

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • 5 Mins Read By: Melissa Godin The Rev Scott Hardin-Nieri regularly revisits the story of Noah’s ark. “People look at that story fondly, because they focus on all the animals that were saved,” the pastor says. But for Hardin-Nieri, Noah’s ark isn’t a simple story of hope; it is principally a story about human suffering amid widespread ecological devastation. […]

    The post ‘Within Minutes I Was Weeping’ – The U.S. Pastor Using Scripture To Mobilise Climate Action appeared first on Green Queen.

    This post was originally published on Green Queen.

  • 11 Mins Read

    By: Mary Retta

    Watching An Inconvenient Truth in your middle-school science class. Hearing Greta Thunberg’s calls to join weekly school strikes. Driving away from smouldering wildfires engulfing dry California hillsides.

    These are some of the moments that made young people realize the climate crisis will define their lives — and the future of human life on Earth. We’ve heard the facts so many times that it’s easy to become numb to them. The world is steadily growing warmer, certain parts of the world are facing extreme droughts or floods, many wildlife populations are shrinking — and things are only projected to grow worse, with carbon emissions rising and countries contributing to mass deforestation. Despite these emergencies, many U.S. politicians, including Arkansas Senator Tom Cotton and Florida Senator Marco Rubio, deny the reality of climate change. And the Western world, particularly the United States, is currently the biggest contributor to the climate crisis. Though the climate crisis is affecting everyone on Earth, it’s effects have been particularly felt by those living in the global south, lower-income people, and younger people, whose futures are being shaped by how we handle the crisis.

    These overarching facts are important to reiterate. But it’s also critical to understand what climate change feels like on an everyday level — how it affects our mental and physical health. It’s a problem so enormous and disorienting that it’s often easier to just shove it into the darker corners of our minds, where we don’t want to look. Living under the spectre of climate change can make it feel surreal to try to plan an education, a career, a family, or any concrete aspect of your future.

    That’s why younger generations have risen up, calling on global leaders to treat our rapidly changing climate like the emergency it is. Last year, Teen Vogue heard from more than 80 young people about how they imagine the climate crisis might define their future. A selection of their responses is below.

    Editor’s note: These responses have been condensed and lightly edited for clarity.

    Ariana Matondo, Tampa, Florida, 20, college student

    In eighth grade, we learned about the sea levels rising in Florida, and that Florida could go partially underwater because of this. When the teacher told me this, fear plagued my body and I immediately started making plans to move out of Florida when I became a college student. Seven years later, however, and I’m still here. I’ve definitely become more sustainable in my own way since then. I started going second-hand shopping more often and started a community garden with my friends a few years ago. Some things that give me hope are going to beach clean-ups and the many sustainability options that people use in downtown Tampa Bay, such as solar panels and other energy management systems.

    Delina, Houston, Texas, 22, college student

    I live in Texas, so the recent winter-storm outage has scared people around me and made us want to take matters into our own hands. I am a coordinator for mutual aid efforts in the Austin area, and seeing people share funds, housing those in need, and sharing food and water has brought me so much hope when seeing how we can help those who are victims of climate disaster. Through social media and listening to community leaders, I am educating myself on how to live a low-waste life and having discussions with those around me to take small steps in living sustainably.

    Ace, Brooklyn, New York, 29, astrologer

    I go through moments of realizing that this will define my future, but it’s hard to understand that fully. When I was 21, I remember having a moment [in which] I learned that climate change is irreversible. COVID has been an exercise in learning that crisis happens slowly. In the past few years, NYC has been reclassified into a subtropical climate. That has been scary. I feel anger at those in power. I feel fear for my family members in the developing world.

    Mariana, El Paso, Texas 18, high-school student

    Unlike some of my friends, I don’t feel a lot of anger towards older generations. I think people conjure up very stereotypical ideas of old people that they can be mad about. But my parents didn’t do this. My grandparents didn’t do this. They are poor laborers. Certain members of the older generation were more responsible than others, and we can be mad at some of them. I just want them to understand how very serious this is and how important it is to act now. The longer we wait, the harder it will be. So even though they won’t be around, say, 40 years from now, they still can and should join with us in trying to fix this problem, for their kids and grandkids.

    Kiran Misra, Cedar Rapids, Iowa, 25, Government Partnerships Officer at the World Food Programme

    My hometown has experienced two ‘once-in-a-lifetime’ natural disasters in my lifetime — first, a flood in 2008 and next, a ‘derecho’ inland hurricane in 2020. Seeing homes underwater, roofs torn off, and more, really hit home that the effects of climate change aren’t just happening in coastal areas or deserts — it can happen in Iowa too. Of course, the impacts of these disasters are most felt by those who are non-white or low income: when a city floods, those living on higher elevations can often emerge relatively unscathed, and during the derecho, those with stronger roofs who could afford to get them replaced or repaired more often experienced less damage to their homes.

    Gloria Kisilu, Nairobi, Kenya, 26, entrepreneur

    We were getting ready for planting season with my dad on the farm but the rains delayed us for weeks, while in other parts of the country, they were experiencing a drought. The lack of rain was just the first among many effects of climate change that I’ve experienced since then. I’ve participated in clean-ups, changed my daily routine — especially in the amount of plastic I buy, reuse, and recycle — and also started a blog on how to be sustainable in Kenya. I’ve learned that responsible consumption and production goes a long way.

    Tanusha Singh Patel, Brighton, U.K., 18, college student

    As someone with a South Asian heritage, this hits me harder than it might others. It’s well-known that climate change is disproportionately affecting those who are the least able to deal with it. People I know, friends and family overseas, are being affected by this. In the west, climate change is posed as a futuristic apocalypse — but climate change is actively destroying homes, crops, and livestock. It’s destroying lives.

    Monica, Mexico City, 25, biomedical engineer

    As long as I can remember, there have been different campaigns in Mexico City to raise awareness for the lack of water, but they made it seem like it was a remote possibility in the distant future. But when I was in middle school, we couldn’t wash our hands or go to the bathroom some days because the district didn’t have water. That was the moment I realized the lack of water was already happening and at a worse rate than they made us believe.

    Rebecca, Florida, 29, political organizer

    I was a junior in high school when the BP oil spill happened, and I remember arguing with my more ignorant classmates about the effects of the spill and why it mattered for the governor to close the beaches along the Panhandle. Florida is not safe when it comes to climate change, and it will only get more unsafe as things get worse. Given our senior population, major weather events and rising temperatures are deadly, and our Republican legislature doesn’t care. But we have a president again who knows that climate change is a threat. We also have politicians who understand what a threat it really is and the structural problems that make tackling climate change difficult and are committed to fighting it. The legions of climate change activists are moving the Overton window [of what’s politically possible], and that’s really great.

    Molly, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 24, administrative assistant

    Seeing creative ways to live more sustainably has brought me hope. I’m disabled, and a lot of the methods are just so work- and time-consuming that I’m not able to do it. I can’t afford to eat vegan and I don’t have access to some options. But I’m realizing that little things in my everyday life, like using a reusable water bottle and other small things, are useful. Ultimately, I know the best thing I can do is pressure corporations and lawmakers.

    Nia, Houston, Texas, 19, high-school student

    I first learned what climate change was in policy debate in ninth grade. Debaters spoke about it as if it would be one big catastrophic day that we wouldn’t expect. They were talking about the importance of STEM education in schools so that students could grow up to become leaders in climate policy. This past February, when Texas was suddenly hit with a winter storm, I realized climate change wouldn’t happen in the distant future — t’s happening now. Being stranded in my apartment for three days with my grandmother in the cold and in the dark with no food and water, realizing that nobody was coming to save us — these were the climate disasters we argued about in debate.

    I’m going off to college soon, but I wonder how this will affect the rest of my family who have no choice but to live in the south. The conversation has been the same since President Obama: reduce carbon emissions. That’s not it…at least not all of it. How are we going to make infrastructures in the south better prepared for floods? How are we going to hold corporations accountable? Why do people have to suffer for us to learn these lessons?

    Michael, New York, 26, writer and labor organizer

    The climate disaster defined my life when Hurricane Sandy hit Long Island, my home, in 2012. I was 17 at the time, and it really dawned on me how everything can come to a standstill when we don’t invest in our infrastructure for future climate disasters. Becoming a labor organizer two years ago has helped me better develop these thoughts and feelings, and it helped me want to reach out and do more in my own way.

    EF Newsome, Los Angeles, California, 25, coordinator at a record label

    I often get frustrated when white people talk on climate change because it’s always them trying to sell you an industry — veganism, bamboo utensils, metal straws — without talking about corporate emissions, returning land to Natives, the fossil fuel industry, and the impact on poor communities.

    Katie Robertson, Frederick, Maryland, 19, high-school student

    I like to compare climate change to a computer tab at the top of your screen; you’re aware that it’s there, and may keep it open for weeks saying, ‘Oh yeah, I should probably get to that,’ and never do. Up until I was 14 or 15, climate change was this little tab in my brain; I knew it was an issue but didn’t know the magnitude of it all. Especially with the lack of climate education in schools, many students remain unaware of the severity of the state of our planet. I, among others, took our own time to watch documentaries, read articles and scientific papers, along with our good friend Google.

    Nina Haug, St. Rose, Louisiana, 27, law student

    Living through Hurricane Katrina was a big moment for me — just seeing the city underwater and knowing that probably within my lifetime, much of the area where I grew up would be uninhabitable. Then, when I was in high school, I was put onto corticosteroids for severe asthma. I grew up right by gas and petrochemical refineries in Louisiana’s “Cancer Alley.” That point in high school was when I realized that the climate crisis wasn’t something I’d be able to escape by moving away from southern Louisiana. It would live in my body forever. Nearly 10 years later, I was diagnosed with endometriosis, which is also tied to pollution. Even if we somehow miraculously start to address the climate crisis, my health problems, and those of so many other people, won’t go away.

    Deeana, 31, U.S.A., sex worker and poet

    The Land Back movement brings me hope. Native people’s knowledge of how to sustain the earth’s relationship to human life has been kept and passed on even through many centuries of capitalist colonizers committing genocide. I donate to Native activists and their causes and in general move the capital I can get my hands on into Native people’s lives. I work on my own relationship with my local environment and gardening practices. People are fleeing from the effects of climate change now, but we are going to need people-led food solutions because the government has proven it cannot be counted on to steward our food resources.

    Mae, Seattle, Washington, 26, assistant manager at homeless shelter

    I feel like I grew up hearing about Greenpeace, saving the whales, polar bears needing ice floes, and how important composting is. In terms of the actual science of climate change — the icebergs melting, the seas rising, and such — I probably became aware of that in middle school. It was several more years before I made the connection between climate change and capitalism/the global economy/imperialism.

    I remember trying to explain to my parents a year or two ago how omnipresent and generationally defining climate change feels. I was talking about how I don’t see myself ever having children or retiring because I think the world is going to change so rapidly in the next few decades, and I don’t want to be responsible for raising a child in that world even though I desperately want to be a parent, and I don’t know that there will be a functional world to retire to. I think they understood somewhat, but my dad kept saying that every young generation feels like it’s going to be the last one.

    I was, and still am, so angry. […] When I give myself the space to be scared, I’m scared, but it feels so pointless that I don’t usually let it happen. I don’t buy into the personal-responsibility solution to climate change, where, if we all shower every other day instead of daily and bring reusable bags to the grocery store and bike to work once a week instead of driving, everything will be okay. Seeing people around me of all ages radicalize themselves and one another, waking up to the effects of capitalism and imperialism, and asking, ‘What the f**k are politicians even doing for us?’ is what gives me hope. For anything to get better, everything has to change.

    This story was originally published in Teen Vogue and is republished here as part of Covering Climate Now, a global journalism collaboration strengthening coverage of the climate story.


    Lead image courtesy of Spencer Platt / Getty Images.

    The post 17 Young People On The Moment The Climate Crisis Became Real To Them appeared first on Green Queen.

    This post was originally published on Green Queen.

  • Ottawa, Ont. – Today’s federal budget follows a year of promises from the federal government to make significant investments towards putting Canada on a path to a genuinely healthier, more resilient and more inclusive future through a just and green recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic. Keeping communities safe and supported must be the priority, and many of the policies announced today aim to do just that.

    Budget 2021 contains unprecedented investments to tackle climate change and a range of measures targeting other environmental priorities, including a nearly $500 million reinvestment in the Chemicals Management Plan that will provide an opportunity for improvements to the ongoing evaluation and management of toxic chemicals.

    However, though historic for Canada – $17.6 billion allocated over 7 seven years for a green recovery –  the scale of investments falls short of the ambition we see internationally, especially from the United States. A similar level of investment here would translate into $500-$600 billion over the same period. The modest level of investment in climate action, coupled with an ongoing weak regulatory approach, explains why the federal government is only committing to 36 per cent reductions in carbon emissions by 2030, very far from Canada’s fair share of 60 per cent reductions. The budget would also benefit from some more focused commitments around helping Canadian freshwater bodies under threat, and for addressing climate change impacts in the Great Lakes and other freshwater bodies.

    Hiding in the details are some concerning elements, including a new commitment of more than $6 billion in financial support and new tax credits for high-emitting sectors. Without robust conditions, this money could support technologies, including plastic waste-to-fuel projects, carbon capture and fossil fuel-derived hydrogen, that will delay a transition away from fossil fuels and single-use plastics and lock us into decades of increased carbon pollution. These unproven and expensive technologies also obfuscate the reality that the energy transition is happening, and if we fail to prepare, it will be workers and communities who pay the price. These financial supports could provide government handouts to the very companies and activities polluting our air and water and threatening our collective future.

    The budget does also include investments to tackle the social injustices people in Canada endure everyday, such as a $15 federal minimum wage and increased affordable housing.  The introduction of an affordable national child-care plan is crucial to ensure that women can fairly participate in and benefit from green and just recovery efforts. Though some measures were included to help ensure wealthy Canadians and corporations pay their fair share, these fall short of the investments needed to create a green and just transition to a low carbon future.

    As we respond to one health crisis, we must not forget that the climate crisis is also a health crisis. Air pollution from burning fossil fuels kills nearly 9 million people a year globally, and over 30,000 in Canada. Investments in the green economy cannot tackle the climate crisis alone. We also need a plan to rapidly wind down production of fossil fuels in order to limit catastrophic levels of warming. This will require courage and leadership from our elected leaders.

    About ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENCE CANADA: Environmental Defence Canada is a leading Canadian environmental advocacy organization that works with government, industry and individuals to defend clean water, a safe climate and healthy communities.

    -30-

    For more information, or to request an interview, please contact:

    Barbara Hayes, Environmental Defence, bhayes@environmentaldefence.ca

    The post Statement from Tim Gray, Executive Director, on the 2021 Federal Budget appeared first on Environmental Defence.

    This post was originally published on Environmental Defence.

  • 12 Mins Read In 2013, when she was just twelve years old, Melati Wijsen and her sister Isabel started Bye Bye Plastic Bags, the Bali-based movement that became a global youth-driven sensation to eliminate the use of plastic bags in Bali and elsewhere. Since then, youths all over the world have been refusing single-use plastics in order to […]

    The post Exclusive: Melati Wijsen Of Bye Bye Plastic Bags & Youthtopia ‘Systemic Change Is Key, We Need To Hold Those In Power Accountable’ appeared first on Green Queen.

    This post was originally published on Green Queen.

  • 11 Mins Read By: Jeff Goodell With Joe Biden in office, a serious plan to combat climate change is finally in our sights — but the clock is ticking, and there is no more room for error. The Earth’s climate has always been a work in progress. In the 4.5 billion years the planet has been spinning around […]

    The post Now Is Our Last Best Chance To Confront The Climate Crisis appeared first on Green Queen.

    This post was originally published on Green Queen.

  • 6 Mins Read By: Oliver Milman The New York teenager has been included among a group of advisers to the president – a remarkable journey from protesting in front of the White House. If a week is a long time in politics, the past year has been an eternity for Jerome Foster. In the opening stanza of 2020, […]

    The post ‘I’m Hopeful’: Jerome Foster, The 18-Year-Old Helping To Craft U.S. Climate Policy appeared first on Green Queen.

    This post was originally published on Green Queen.

  • The Yellow Finch tree sit near Elliston, Virginia.

    Mike Ludwig speaks with Max and Caroline, two activists who have been supporting the Yellow Finch blockade of the embattled Mountain Valley Pipeline, which would carry massive amounts fracked gas across the Appalachian mountains. The multiyear direct action ended last week after two protesters were arrested and jailed without bail.

    Music by Dan Mason.

    TRANSCRIPT

    Note: This a rush transcript and has been lightly edited for clarity. Copy may not be in its final form.

    Mike Ludwig: Hello everyone, Mike Ludwig with Truthout here, politicians across the world are bickering about how to respond to the climate crisis and time is running out. For the next couple of episodes of this podcast we are asking, who are the activists fighting to stop climate change today and not tomorrow? What kinds of direct action are necessary right now to keep fossil fuels in the ground and save the planet?

    Today we go to the Yellow Finch blockade near Elliston, Virginia, a tree-sit that prevented construction of the embattled Mountain Valley Pipeline for a whopping 932 days until police finally extracted two protesters from the trees last week – and both activists were still in jail when we recorded this podcast. A tree-sit, aka an arial blockade set up in trees, is textbook nonviolent civil disobedience – keep protesters living in trees for as long as possible, and the trees cannot be cut down until the protesters leave or are removed by police. This direct action tactic was developed years ago to oppose logging out West and is now being used to prevent construction crews from cutting down trees in the path of fossil fuel pipelines.

    Pipelines endanger ecosystems, but they are also strategic chokepoints in the climate fight. Stop a pipeline, and you can prevent production of fossil fuels for decades to come. According to Appalachians Against Pipelines, the group behind the Yellow Finch Blockade in Virginia, construction of the Mountain Valley pipeline is now three years behind schedule and $2.7 billion dollars over budget. Controversial permits remain in limbo. Is a win for activists on the horizon? To find out, I spoke with Max and Caroline, two activists who have been supporting the Yellow Finch blockade. Max and Caroline are on the ground near the site of the tree-sit and they don’t have a great internet connection, so this interview has been edited for clarity and you might here some background noise, like a rooster crowing in the background. Please bear with us as we take you to the front lines of the climate fight.

    Max: Yeah. So I guess just like starting off, I’m going to be using the acronym MVP probably sometimes, which stands for Mountain Valley Pipeline. So, MVP is a 303 mile-long pipeline, with a proposed extension that goes a little bit into North Carolina, that is being built to transport liquified natural gas from the northwestern West Virginia, where the Marcellus and Utica shale fields are, all the way down to Southern Virginia. It’s 42 inches wide, which is huge when we’re talking about pipelines. and it’s a joint venture project with Mountain Valley LLC and Equitrans.

    ML: Equitrans?

    Max: Equitrans, yeah.

    Caroline: Yeah. And then, as Max mentioned, it’s a liquefied natural gas pipeline, that is fracked gas. It’s intended to transport an enormous amount of fracked gas from, the shale fields in Northern West Virginia. And, just a little background on fracking. That’s like a really environmentally devastating extraction method, it’s known to cause earthquakes and pollute drinking water. It’s also incredibly resource intensive. It turns billions of gallons of fresh water into toxic waste, which is a nightmare to dispose of.

    ML: And that’s been a huge problem. I’ve been reporting on fracking in the Utica and Marcellus for over 10 years now. And, there’s been a huge problem with the wastewater, but also now that there’s been so much natural gas produced, they’ve needed places for it to go, places to sell it. So is this part of an export scheme. They’re liquifying, which basically means they’re like concentrating the natural gas into a liquid, and piping it. Would this go to an export terminal somewhere?

    Caroline: Yes. It’s exactly what you said. It is gas for export because there is no domestic market for more natural gas. All the domestic need is filled. So this basically an intention of the MVP would be to create a huge expansion in fracking, frack, way more gas on basically all for export. And again, the MVP pipeline mainline ends in Southern Virginia. But it is intended to be follow up, followed up with what did you call it? The MVP, extension, which goes through North Carolina to export facilities there.

    ML: So this is not just a campaign against a pipeline and the ecological damage that it could cause, in its track, it’s also a campaign against fracking as an extraction method, because for there to be demand for fracked gas, they have to have actually pipelines to get it out of the shale reserves where they’re, where they’re drilling.

    Caroline: Exactly. Yep, exactly. Yeah. And I think so on the one hand, there’s the environmental threats of fracking, which MVP would cause a huge expansion in, but then on the other hand, there is also the environmental threats of the pipeline itself and specifically the terrain it’s crossing. as we mentioned, The MVP goes through the Appalachian mountains. It is, the pipeline’s route is incredibly steep and mountainous. It’s really unlike the terrain of any other high pressure gas line of that scale. And there’s really no way to build it through that terrain one, without creating massive erosion problems that, pollute like streams, but also without putting, there’s no way to build it without putting nearby residents at risk from explosions or other serious accidents, which the data shows us is incredibly common with all pipeline projects.

    ML: And have you found, people who live in the pipeline’s path who have been part of the campaign to oppose it?

    Caroline: Yes. I mean, absolutely. The MVP has faced widespread local opposition since it was first announced in 2014 you know, it almost seems like local opposition is near unanimous and, hundreds of property owners refused to, to sell the property rights to the MVP. And so again, hundreds of properties, access to hundreds of properties had to be taken through an eminent domain court process.

    ML: You know, when I tell people about eminent domain and pipelines, they almost can’t believe me. You know, people in Louisiana, kind of conservative part of the country just could not believe that they could lose their property to a pipeline easement that was coming from, you know, halfway across the country. But this is regular practice is to, is to use eminent domain, to, to build pipelines. Even if people don’t want to sell out to the company.

    Caroline: Yes, exactly. And, MVP has had to fall back on that a lot here, because there was so much local opposition.

    ML: And where are we with construction? Is any of it been built yet?

    Max: A lot of the pipeline, or some of the pipeline has been built. It’s kind of unclear how much though. I believe MVP has said that they are about 90 percent complete, but just from looking around and like driving past the pipeline route, you can see, that’s definitely not the case. A large majority of, or a large portion of the pipeline has not been built yet.

    ML: How long has this campaign been going on? It’s been a few years right? And at some point, I imagine that tactics escalated towards a more direct action approach.

    Max: This kind of direct action has been going on since about 2018, but there’s been local resistance going on since the pipeline was first proposed in 2014.

    Caroline: A little more to say. Yeah. As Max mentioned, you know, direct action against it really began as soon as construction started in February, 2018. The Yellow Finch tree-sits were not, were not the first aerial blockades against MVP construction. There was at least a handful of others, including tree-sits and a monopod that blocked Mountain Valley Pipeline construction in Jefferson National Forest, near where it’s supposed to cross the Appalachian Trail.

    And then in addition to tree-sits, monopods aerial blockades, over the past couple of years, dozens of people have also stopped construction by locking themselves to equipment on what would be active work sites.

    ML: Right. And just to kind of give a visual here, a monopod that would be like, that would be like three large branches or something. It would be like a tripod with someone sitting at, is that what a monopod is?

    Caroline: That’s a–

    ML: Tripod. Right. That makes sense. So what’s a monopod?

    Caroline: It’s a single, a single pole, that is held up with anchors, I don’t know…

    Max: Ropes holding it to the ground, I guess.

    Caroline: So it’s yeah, just a single pole that one person resides at the top of.

    ML: Yeah. Gotcha. And I know that the Yellow Finch tree-sit was going on for a long time. And, and, and so I wanted to talk about today A., what kind of a tree-sit it looks like for people who are unfamiliar and also why people will take this kind of direct action, which. Yeah, as you pointed out earlier can be like a choke point for fossils fuels. And if we’re going to avert a climate crisis, it’s only getting worse. We have to start reducing production and consumption now. So there, so this isn’t, you know, this is about Appalachian ecosystems and communities, but this is also about gas that would go across the world to be consumed and, and further our reliance on it. So there’s a lot of big picture stuff here. So I’m wondering if you can like, walk us through a little bit, what a tree-sit looks like and what kind of support that requires, from people who are not necessarily in the sit. And also why activists are dedicated to taking this kind of action.

    Max: I guess I’ll, I can start with, I guess what, trees-sit it is what it looks like and to support it. So the Yellow Finch tree-sits, were two aerial blockades, right in the easement of the pipelines. So, right where the trees would be cleared, right where the pipeline would be laid, in Elliston, Virginia, which is in Southwestern Virginia. The sitters lived on platforms about 50 feet high in the air. And they were protecting some of the last trees in the path of the entire pipeline, and the trees were supported by a small ground support camp who did things like help make them foods, bring them supplies and, really the reason the blockade was able to go on for as long as it did, was because it was because it had a really large amount of local community support.

    So people can just live really, really close by, bring nice hot meals, local treats, things like that. I remember someone brought us ramps one time, which are kind of a local delicacy here.

    ML: Oh ramps, the onions that grow in that part of the world.

    Max: Yeah. Sort of like, any kind oniony kind of grass.

    ML: Yeah. I used to live in Athens, Ohio, and we ate blanched ramps a lot and I thought they were delicious. So that’s so cool that, you know, you’ve got this like local green that’s growing out of the ground, coming to your tree-sit.

    Max: Definitely something, something really special, especially for some one living way up in that tree.

    ML: How long were they up there?

    Caroline: I mean 932 days, people lived in platforms, preventing MVP from cutting the trees they intended to, to make way for construction for 932 days. And, this past Tuesday and Wednesday so what day is it almost a week ago now? Virginia state police, used a crane after 932 days used a crane to remove and arrest the tree-sitters. And then on this past Wednesday, the patch of trees that they had been on protecting for 932 days was cut.

    Max: And to our knowledge, at 932 days, the elephants tree sets or the longest continuous aerial blockade in the United States.

    ML: Wow I, and I liked how you used the words aerial blockade along with tree-sit, because I think a lot of people might associate a tree set with a campaign to save trees or to save a forest from logging. But in this case, this was an aerial blockade not only to save these trees are being cut down, but also to prevent pipeline construction of a major fossil fuel project.

    Caroline: A big part of the yellow Finch tree sits and other direct actions against the mountain Valley pipeline, the Yellow Finch tree-sits have always emphasized that, their protests were about more than just this one pipeline, and actually saw a problem in, a system in which people and the environment are exploited and abused, for the power, profit and greed of a select few. I think we see like the ugly face of this system all around us in, jails and immigrant detention centers where hundreds of thousands. If people are held hostage in wars, this country wages, across the world, in the ongoing genocide of indigenous people on this continent and in destructive projects, such as the MVP.
    So I just, again, I do think it’s very important to take a broad, understand the broader context of that. and also to remember, that the entire, MBP route lies on land stolen from native people, such as the Monacan people, the Saponi people, the Tutelo, and many others. and the, the MVP has not gotten permission from any of those groups, to build the pipeline and in building it, they’re continuing a history of violence, exploitation, and land theft. That really began when settlers arrived, 500 years ago. And also it’s really worth noting that, a number of, local folks and impacted residents and landowners have, been arrested taking action. Against the pipeline as well. back in gosh, 2018 probably, red and Terry minor were arrested after tree sitting for a month on their own property.

    Becky Crabtree is a local, West Virginia school teacher who was arrested on locking down to stop construction again on her own property, and those are just a couple of examples of the way. impacted residents, local folks, and landowners have, been involved in direct action against the Mountain Valley Pipeline.

    Max: Oh, I was going to say, it might be worth mentioning, but I’m actually a local to this fight. I grew up, I’ve lived my whole life in Montgomery County, which is the same county that the Yellow Finch tree-sits we’re in. And. I also went through all those traditional methods of resisting this pipeline. And eventually I ended up, being part of the ground support team for the Yellow Finch tree-sits.

    ML: And just to give people a sense of what it takes to pull one of these, aerial blockades off. How long were individual activists up in the sit? Did someone do the whole 900 and some days. But it was right, but it was one of the longest ones ever, I think that’s so I think that’s, I think that shows a lot about the momentum that you all have in West Virginia, that you were able to pull off such a longstanding blockade until the police finally came in and extracted the activists. What did that look like? And did the cops give you any kind of warning that this was happening or did you have time to strategically plan around the extraction?

    Caroline: I’d say no. I mean, they had made it clear that they wanted people out of the trees, but it really all started, early Tuesday morning when state police, shut down Pope Hollow road in Elliston, Virginia, which is the road that leads to Yellow Finch lane, where the tree sets were. So they shut down the entirety of the, of Pope Hollow road and would not let anyone through I’m without a Pope hollow address on their ID, and so they would not let media in to witness what was happening at the tree-sits. And they would not, let legal observers with the national lawyers Guild and to witness what was happening at the tree-sits it’s either. So, and both those groups, legal observers and media really pushed hard and tried to negotiate further legal, right, to observe what was going on. But. That’s kind of really how it all started was when they barred access to supporters, media and legal observers early Tuesday morning and brought in an enormous crane, which over the course of two days, they used to arrest the three centers.

    ML: And so what happens next, with the campaign and how can people support you if they’d like to, even if they’re, whether they’re in West Virginia or somewhere else.

    Caroline: I think that’s a great question. And I would love to answer that, before that I would just really love to give, an update on the tree sitters, if you don’t mind, both the tree sitters, Wren, who was formerly known as Robin and Acre they’re both currently in jail in Virginia.

    Wren was charged with one misdemeanor and Acre was charged with two, neither Wren, nor Acre were given bail. Initially, Wren had a bail hearing either. Last week and was denied bail, which means the judge is trying to keep them in jail until their court date more than a month from now. it, that is extremely unusual, it is absolutely out of the ordinary to hold someone without bail on one misdemeanor, and that decision is clearly intended to punish Wren and to scare off future resistance to the MVP. So I just think that’s a very important thing that we’re facing right now is the fact that, they’re trying to hold the tree-sitters in jail, basically indefinitely for now. And, yeah, the intention is to prevent future resistance. And I just think it’s important to emphasize how horrible it is for me to think of rent an acre in jail right now. jail is a horrible place. It’s isolating. It’s demoralizing, it’s depressing. inmates are regularly threatened, harassed, abused, even killed jails and prisons are really not places fit for human beings. And it’s, a tragedy that our society forces so many people there. And, I know getting that message out is really important to both rent and acre. there’s a beautiful statement that Wren wrote from the tree before they were arrested.

    That is on Appalachians Against pipelines Facebook page that addresses this issue a lot. And I’d like to just read a quote from Wren’s statement they said that Wren said from the tree before they were arrested that in jail, “it becomes extremely obvious who the injustice system serves. And how many of the laws that are violently upheld by the state only makes sense in the context of preserving capitalism and imperialism, and ultimately keeping the rich and powerful in control. Laws and cops, their enforcers are not about protecting people. They are about protecting illegitimate institutions, built on stolen land and with the labor of stolen enslaved people.” So, those are just some really powerful words that I want to get out there that’s really speak to the situation that ran an acre in right now.

    ML: Well, we, you know, I agree with you that incarceration and mass incarceration in general is a form of torture, right? This is, this is state torture and there’s been laws proposed or passed even in states across the country, particularly since the resistance to the Dakota Access Pipeline at Standing Rock, that would further criminalize resistance to fossil fuel infrastructure.

    We’ve seen that in Louisiana. We’ve seen that in the Dakotas, we see in a lot of places where fracking for oil and gas has exploded in recent years, including Appalachia, where you all are involved in this pipeline fight. And, I think that kind of goes to show how serious this is, right? people are fighting for a future on a livable planet, which, which means reducing and fighting against fossil fuels and the industry is so, is so intent on continuing to profit and continuing the status-quo of producing large amounts of fossil fuels and then selling them wherever they can, even if we don’t have any need for them in the United States, they are willing to throw anyone in their way in jail or prison, and they will lobby lawmakers with all of their resources to make it easier to throw people in jail or prison, for resistance. I mean, it it’s, it’s the criminalization of a movement and this is what has happened in the United States over and over and over again in various movements from civil rights to Indigenous rights and also with the environment. And I wonder if you two, want to reflect on that a little bit, that, why it was necessary to take direct action, to create a blockade and then hold it for so long, and why that was necessary. I think not only for the communities that you’re in, but also, or you’re from, but also for the planet. And, and if you have any further reactions to like the criminalization of this type of activism, the fact that, pro-industry lawmakers want to make it a crime to even go near fossil fuel infrastructure, in hopes of being able to put protesters in jail.

    Max: Sorry, I’m just like taking a moment to kind of gather my thoughts on that.

    ML: It’s a big question. it’s a big, long question. I’ve been thinking a lot about these, basically these no trespass laws and proposals that have been coming out since Standing rock, and also, basically like the vitality of this type of activism and why people feel compelled to, to do something like trespass. If, if that’s what they’re doing or, or to, to block construction, it takes some of these more aggressive tactics and, and what inspires people to go to that level? What inspires people to go beyond say letter writing and calling your lawmaker.

    Caroline: I mean, what inspires me to go beyond letter writing and calling my lawmaker is that letter writing and calling my lawmaker and even voting doesn’t work. It won’t stop. I can’t, it won’t stop these, these horrible environmental threats that we need to stop. If I could write a letter or call my lawmaker to stop construction of the Mountain Valley Pipeline, I certainly would, but it seems that the only way to stop or even impede construction of the mountain Valley pipeline is to take a stance as dramatic as locking oneself to equipment.

    Max: Yeah, the institutions in place that are supposed to theoretically be protecting the environment and people’s health from extractive industries, such as the EPA or FERC, which is the federal energy regulatory commission are only going to be doing their job as far as, making sure that the rich keep getting richer and. Some direct action is something that will actually stop something like a pipeline and they open streets. It’s for something that did that for 932 days, which is really incredible.

    ML: Is there any chance that that could have an impact, like the company could be running out of money or investments and maybe end up abandoning the project?

    Caroline: Yes. I mean, the company is running out of money and. Investors, if they haven’t fled already are probably close to it. the pipeline is billions of dollars over budget and on years behind schedule, it’s missing, key permits. I think at this point, it’s been so over budget and there’s so little demand for the gas. It will transport then no one’s really expecting to make a profit off of it anymore. so there’s really no. Reason. I don’t know. There’s really no excuse for, to be building the pipeline. In my opinion, there’s no reason to be putting environment and communities at risk in the way that it is for a totally unnecessary and basically failed pipeline.

    Max: At this point, MVP is not expecting to really be making any money off of this project. The hope of that expired long ago at this point, they’re just desperately trying to break even.

    ML: How are you inspired by direct action campaigns of the past? And what would you tell to young people who are looking to get involved in climate activism going forward, especially activism around fossil fuel infrastructure?

    Caroline: I think I would tell young people to not get fooled. I would always encourage people to focus on where what’s happening, the construction sites, the point of extraction, where the bulldozers are hitting the ground. That is where what’s really happening is happening. Elected officials, and office workers, et cetera, all these other means one might push, you know, that’s all good and great, but people, politicians will make people feel like they won or feel like their voices have been heard. And meanwhile, the destruction is still happening. So I would just encourage people to, you know, be smart and pay attention to what is happening on the ground in our environment. Is the pipeline being built or not? Is fracking continuing or not? Is the mining happening or not? Like, and to just really focus on the site where that’s happening and trying to stop it there because, You know, a politician will say out the one side of their mouth that they’ve heard you and they’ve, and you’ve won, and then they’ll sign legislation for this stuff to continue with the other hand. So, you know, that would be my advice.

    Max: These actions can really be taken by anyone. You don’t need special skills. You don’t need some sort of special, like higher education. You don’t need to. Have any sort of really intense training in order to be fighting these extractive industries, all you need is some friends that you trust and the will to do something. And you’re able to be fighting pipelines.

    ML: And do you see this as vital for basically saving the planet, like finding the choke points and fossil fuel production and trying to stop them, to prevent the overproduction of the, and the production of fossil fuels? I mean, do you see that as like an important mission for our generation?

    Caroline: I mean, there’s violence all around us violence against the planet violence against each other. yeah. Violence against the planet and violence against human beings. All around us and it has to stop. It’s no way to live.

    Max: So, the thing I want to emphasize again is that, Mountain Valley Pipeline is trying to say that the pipeline is almost completely done in hopes that people will have given up hope and assume it’s a lost cause. However, a large section barge. Sections of the pipeline have not been completed yet. And after a year, over a year of not working, they are about to start working again. Specifically we know of in Giles and Craig counties and. Now’s the time to be fighting them when they’re about to start working a one way in which to get involved in fighting the pipeline is to contact Appalachians Against Pipelines either through the Facebook page or the email that is AppalachiansAgainstPipelines@protonmail.com.

    And you also can, I would really like to encourage people to take on Todd in this action, especially if you’re someone who lives close by to the pipeline, you can talk to your friends and neighbors, see what strategies might work for you and make sure that yeah. And it’s going to be a step towards making your community healthier and safer.

    Another thing that I would really like to plug is another pipeline fight that is going on up in Minnesota. There are people who have been taking some really inspiring actions against the line three pipeline. One way to learn more about the line three fight up in Minnesota is to check out the Facebook page, Giniw Collective. That is G I N I W. And. Yeah, check them out and maybe consider donating because a lot of people have been walking down a bear and they’re going to meet somebody off money.

    ML: If you’ve enjoyed this podcast and would like to help Truthout publish more news and insight on the climate crisis, please take a moment to like and share this episode on social media or rate our show on your podcast platform. You can also support us by going to truthout.org/donate. Thanks for listening to Climate Front Lines. Until next time, stay safe out there. And remember, where there is a movement, there is hope.

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • 4 Mins Read While organic agriculture has long been hailed as key to building a sustainable food system, a new study pinpoints the critical role that it could play in combating climate change. In a meta-analysis of over 4,000 studies, researchers found that best management organic farming practices could lead to a significant double-digit increase in the amount […]

    The post Organic Farming Practices Could Boost Carbon Sequestration By Double-Digits, New Study Finds appeared first on Green Queen.

    This post was originally published on Green Queen.

  • Wanjiku Gatheru, who goes by the name ‘Wawa’, is an environmental justice trailblazer. After founding the grassroots platform Black Girl Environmentalist, an intergenerational community of Black girls, women and non-binary environmentalists, she aims to use climate activism to help pave the way for Black, Indigenous and People of Colour (BIPOC) communities in the environmental movement.

    Gatheru is making space for underrepresented voices in climate conversations but also campaigns for BIPOC to be included in the environmental decision-making process.

    Growing up in the US, she took environmental studies at the University of Connecticut before becoming a prestigious Rhodes Scholar, and student at Oxford University, UK.

    Now Gatheru’s started a new initiative called Reclaiming Our Time to “promote and solidify visibility for Black climate activists”. In collaboration with Pass the Mic Climate and Generation Green, the campaign matches 30+ activists worldwide with organisations like Greenpeace UK, Sierra Club, and Earthrise. In a series of Instagram live takeovers, activists educate followers about the intersections between social justice, environmentalism, and groundwork. Mark Ruffalo and Anne Hathaway are among those involved.

    Running throughout February and March, founders hope to continue the discussions in the lead up to International Mother Earth Day on 22 April.

    Gatheru spoke to The Canary’s Aaliyah Harris about all things climate, race and politics.

    Why climate activism?

    A lot of my interest has come from understanding my family’s history, as well as the experiences of Black communities in the US. My parents are both immigrants from Kenya which is a frontline country experiencing climate change. The environmental movement is overwhelmingly white-led and as an organiser at university, I have been the only person of colour, not just the only Black person, in most environmental spaces.

    You tweeted about Black youth being erased/ignored/side-lined in the climate and environmental movement. How is the environmental movement’s history racist?

    It’s an issue with the environmental movement at large and the media. The environmental movement has been historically white-led and has a very troubled racist history, which led to the intentional exclusion of poor people and people of colour. Especially people who live at the intersection of both of those demographics. A lot of the founding fathers of the environmental movement were racist. They conceptualised definitions to accommodate racialised environments that essentially crafted environments worth protecting, and those that weren’t. Those racialised conceptions of nature and wilderness were used to accommodate the white elite, at the very intentional exclusion of poor people and people of colour. This past year, with the world’s reckoning with anti-black racism, [we’ve seen] the environmental movement at large, non-profits, the private sector and academia begin to reckon with this racist history. But [they’re doing it] without exploring the way that history continues to inform the present: from who’s represented in the green workforce to which voices are understood and articulated as those capable of being leaders, particularly when it comes to youth climate activism.

    Why is youth climate activism significant for environmental change?

    Youth climate activism hit the mainstream around 2019 with Greta Thunberg gaining international attention. However, something we’ve seen since and before, is that many youths of colour who also participated in doing great organising work in their communities don’t get the same airtime or credibility. We often aren’t distinguished as being leaders within the environmental movement and sometimes in response it’s, ‘Oh, well, that’s all ego why should you get recognition?’. But it’s much bigger than that because particularly for youth of colour, black youth and indigenous youth, our communities are already experiencing climate change first and worse. A huge concern is, if the media and environmental movement are ignoring our voices now on how climate change is impacting our lives, then what does that mean when it gets worse? Our narratives need to be incorporated within climate policies.

    What environmental issues must be addressed?

    Understanding the intersectionality of environmentalism, and the social dimensions that take a central role in the way that people experience environmental harm and climate change. This will allow us as a global community to be better equipped to deal with the climate crisis and environmental degradation. COP 2021 (the United Nations Climate Change Conference) need to integrate youth voices at the decision-making table, have more women, indigenous and Black participation. COP set a huge precedent for how the folks that do gather engage with environmental decision-making in countries. If a top environmental body doesn’t articulate indigenous or Black women’s voices to be important, what’s there to say about the rest of the world does.

    Any upcoming plans to tackle the climate crisis?

    Black Girl Environmentalists has exciting mentorship opportunities, book clubs and video calls to discuss environmental hazards that exist such as those in skin lightening creams. Studies show that lighter skin tones are considered to be more desirable which has led to disproportionate exposure to environmental hazards through skin lightening creams detrimental to overall health. Yet, online there aren’t many resources for information, nor has the environmental movement ever really centred on those things which are part of the lived experiences for many people of colour. Particularly in Nigeria, India and China. We deliberately create space to discuss hazards and we’ll be providing educational resources filling the gaps in the mainstream environmental movement.

    Check out Black Girl Environmentalists next live panel and IG takeover here.

    Featured image via Wikimedia and Kevin Gill

    By Aaliyah Harris

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • 4 Mins Read SaladStop, the Singapore-headquartered healthy salad chain with locations across Asia, has carbon labelled its entire menu, making it the first restaurant in the region to do so. Describing the move as a “simple and convenient way for customers to make planet-friendly food choices”, the chain’s commitment comes as more F&B businesses begin to take up […]

    The post SaladStop Becomes First Restaurant Chain In Asia To Carbon Label Entire Menu appeared first on Green Queen.

    This post was originally published on Green Queen.

  • 3 Mins Read Anglo-Dutch global oil and gas giant Shell funded an industry group lobbying to block efforts by U.S. banks to tackle climate change, an investigation has found. Even as the corporation made new sustainability pledges and made net-zero its goal publicly, documents reviewed by nonprofit journalism platform SourceMaterial and HuffPost showed that Shell backed the lobbyists […]

    The post Shell Funded Lobbying For Trump’s Pro-Fossil Fuel Financing Looking To Block Banks’ Climate Action appeared first on Green Queen.

    This post was originally published on Green Queen.

  • 4 Mins Read Consumers are searching for tech-forward innovations and environmental footprint labels on products to help them adapt to a sustainable lifestyle, a recent survey shows. Among some of the digital solutions cited as helpful include apps that help shoppers make greener purchasing decisions and platforms measuring personal carbon footprints, while government legislation to push businesses to […]

    The post Consumers Want Climate Apps & Footprint Labels To Help Them Live Sustainably, Survey Finds appeared first on Green Queen.

    This post was originally published on Green Queen.

  • 4 Mins Read 22-year-old climate activist Disha Ravi has recently become the face of India’s ongoing farmer protests. She had been for over three years a prominent environmental campaigner, but she’s now been arrested at her home in Bengaluru and charged with sedition and criminal conspiracy by Delhi authorities. In a defiant message, Ravi made clear that there […]

    The post India Climate Activist Disha Ravi Arrested: ‘I Supported The Farmers Because They Are Our Future’ appeared first on Green Queen.

    This post was originally published on Green Queen.