Category: Comcast

  •  

    Fox News: Biden FCC nominee's reputation as hard left partisan alarms Republicans

    Fox News (11/11/21) has repeatedly reported on the nomination of Gigi Sohn to the FCC board to depict her as a “deeply divisive pick with a track record of hard left advocacy.”

    President Joe Biden nominated consumer advocate Gigi Sohn to the Federal Communications Committee last October, yet the Senate has still failed to bring her nomination to a vote (FAIR.org, 4/19/22). Behind the scenes, corporate media, afraid of having a staunch defender of the public interest on the commission, are lobbying against her. One of those corporations, Comcast, owns a major cable news network that has been conspicuously silent about the stalled nomination.

    While Fox News has brought up Sohn’s nomination nine times since November (to call her “radical” and “scary”—e.g., Tucker Carlson Tonight, 11/30/21), Comcast-owned MSNBC hasn’t mentioned her on any of its programs. (There was a one-sentence reference to her in a Steve Benen post on MSNBC.com12/7/21—about Republican hypocrisy on “mean tweets.”)

    It’s not that MSNBC won’t touch any stories about obstruction of Biden nominees, which has reached an unprecedented level in the Senate. It’s reported on Sen. Ron Johnson (R.–Wisc.) attempting to block Biden’s nominee to be an envoy on antisemitism (Deadline: White House, 2/10/22); on Republicans holding up his nominees for US attorney in Washington, DC (Rachel Maddow Show, 10/20/21), and myriad ambassadorships (Andrea Mitchell Reports, 12/8/21); and on their blockades against nominees for the Federal Reserve board (Andrea Mitchell Reports, 2/17/22).

    The Rachel Maddow Show (4/18/22) reported on the American Accountability Foundation, a new right-wing dark money group launching smear campaigns against a whole slate of Biden nominees, uncovered by the New Yorker‘s Jane Mayer (4/16/22). Though Sohn is spotlighted on the group’s hit list, Maddow (and Mayer) didn’t mention her as a target.

    Ars Technica: Comcast trying to “torpedo” Biden FCC pick Gigi Sohn, advocacy group says

    Comcast just hired a lobbying firm to try to torpedo Gigi Sohn’s nomination to the FCC,” the group Free Press declared in January 2022 (Ars Technica, 1/13/22).

    Two differences between all of these obstructions covered by MSNBC and the one against Sohn: Democrats are among those stalling Sohn, and MSNBC owner Comcast is actively lobbying against her (Ars Technica, 1/13/22).

    If Sohn is confirmed and takes the fifth seat on the FCC, the currently deadlocked board could actually take action to restore net neutrality rules, implemented under Obama and repealed under Trump, that ensure smaller companies and organizations have equal access to fast broadband speeds. It could also ensure equal access to broadband for American households, regardless of race or income, and protect against further media mergers that reduce consumer choice.

    A functional FCC isn’t in the interests of Comcast and other big media corporations; it is, however, very much in the interests of MSNBC‘s viewers, as people who use the internet and watch TV, which is why the outlet’s silence is so noteworthy and troubling.


    ACTION: Tell MSNBC to cover the obstruction of consumer advocate Gigi Sohn’s nomination to the FCC.

    CONTACT: You can send a message to Rachel Maddow at Rachel@msnbc.com (or via Twitter:@Maddow). Andrea Mitchell is at Andrea.Mitchell@nbc.com (or on Twitter @MitchellReports). Chris Hayes and Lawrence O’Donnell can be reached via Twitter: @ChrisLHayes and @Lawrence, respectively. MSNBC‘s Twitter account is @MSNBC. Please remember that respectful communication is the most effective.

    See FAIR’s previous action alert, with a link to call your senator: “Big Media Want Gigi Sohn Kept Off FCC Board” (4/19/22).

     

    The post ACTION ALERT: Urge MSNBC to Cover Biden FCC Pick Blocked by Big Media appeared first on FAIR.

    This post was originally published on FAIR.

  • The entrance to an AT&T store in San Francisco, California, on August 12, 2018.

    Telecommunications and telephone utilities companies spent a combined $66 million in lobbying in the first half of 2021 ahead of the Senate passing a $1 trillion infrastructure deal that will allocate $65 billion to boost internet access across the country. The telecommunications and utilities industries spent around the same amount of money on lobbying in the first half of 2020.

    The $1 trillion infrastructure bill advanced in the House of Representatives last Tuesday when House Democrats also passed a $3.5 trillion budget resolution without Republican support. The infrastructure bill is on track to be passed by the House and will be voted on by Sept. 27.

    If the bipartisan infrastructure bill passes the House and is signed into law by President Joe Biden, the $65 billion allocation should allow the telecommunications industry to expand internet access to an estimated 30 million Americans who lack broadband infrastructure.

    Comcast Corp. spent the most on lobbying, with $6.7 million in the first half of the year. The second highest was spent by NCTA The Internet & Television Association, which spent $6.5 million in the first half of the year.

    AT&T, which has spent about $5.7 million on lobbying efforts through June, plans to kickstart their own fiber-optic network expansion in 90 metro areas across the country in 2021. The company has said its expansion plans will benefit from government subsidies in the infrastructure bill.

    An estimated $42 billion of spending in the infrastructure plan will go to expand broadband to areas with little to no internet access, and another $14 billion will funnel money into monthly subsidies for low-income households to pay their internet bills.

    The $14 billion in subsidies would make the Emergency Broadband Benefit program, established during the COVID-19 pandemic, permanent. The program was originally started to help low-income households pay their monthly internet bills if they were unemployed or furloughed. However, the new permanent program would only supply families with $30 a month — the current plan sends families $50 a month. According to CQ RollCall, an American household typically pays $60 a month for internet access.

    Another $2.75 billion in the infrastructure plan will boost digital equity through two grants, the State Digital Equity Capacity Grant Program ($1.5 billion), and the Digital Equity Competitive Grant Program ($1.25 billion). The bill also grants $2 billion to the Tribal Broadband Connectivity Program, which will help expand broadband access to Native American communities.

    Companies that receive funding from the government to expand broadband access will be required to offer lower-cost options for families who struggle to afford internet services. Currently, AT&T, Comcast and Verizon provide low-cost plans for certain families, and the bill will allow smaller and newer internet companies to establish low-cost plans to increase access for individuals with no internet.

    Some telecommunication companies may have an issue with one of the bill’s provisions that will enable the Federal Communications Commission to retain funding from providers that have long network outages or longer periods where service is down due to power outages or scheduled maintenance. Companies may also have an issue with a provision mandating disclosure of prices and service levels.

    Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) said in a floor speech before the bill’s passage that the provisions will be sure to close the gaps in those who have access to the internet to those who do not.

    “It is time for us to bridge America’s digital divide and build a 21st-century broadband infrastructure that will meet our country’s needs not only today, but for years to come to be future-proof,” Collins said.

    The $65 billion falls short of Biden’s original proposal of a $100 billion investment, but he boasted the investment will still “deliver affordable, high-speed Internet to every American,” and maintained that internet access is “a necessity for the 21st century.”

    The bill could also potentially make it harder for new competitors to enter the market if the new companies have to compete with those receiving government funds. Specifically, it could stifle efforts by SpaceX’s Starlink satellites in earth’s lower orbit attempting to offer high-speed internet.

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • People hold placards with an image of the late Rep. John Lewis during a rally in support of voting rights, at Black Lives Matter Plaza in Washington, D.C., on July 17, 2021.

    Big brand name companies usually try to create an impression that they stand for something besides simply making money. They often want to be perceived as having a social conscience and sharing the same values as their customers. But when it comes to standing up for their customers’ abilities to participate in the democratic process by easily voting, many companies have failed in recent months to take any action or even speak out.

    As states have begun passing bills that will make it more difficult for people to vote, companies have been under pressure to stake out a position. More than a hundred businesses signed onto a letter endorsing the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act, which would restore parts of the Voting Rights Act that were struck down by the Supreme Court, and others signed a pledge in support of the For the People Act, which would enhance voting access, prevent partisan gerrymandering, and more.

    More than a dozen major brands have not done anything to stand up for voting rights, while in many cases directing PAC money to the state politicians behind the anti-voting bills, according to an analysis and scorecard from Greenpeace.

    Companies that scored ‘Fs’ on the voting rights scorecard include:

    • American Electric Power
    • Altria
    • Anthem Blue Cross
    • AT&T
    • Chevron
    • Coca-Cola
    • Comcast
    • ConocoPhillips
    • Delta
    • Dominion Energy
    • FedEx
    • Home Depot
    • Kaiser Permanente
    • Koch Industries
    • Marathon Petroleum
    • Reynolds American
    • UnitedHealth Group
    • UPS
    • Verizon

    Scoring an ‘F’ on the analysis means the company has not signed statements in support of legislation to protect voting access, opposed the U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s position against the For the People Act, responded to Greenpeace’s letter of recommendations on how to protect voting rights, or taken any other pro-voting rights action.

    Several of the failing companies have also been top PAC donors to the sponsors of the state anti-voting bills, Greenpeace found by analyzing contributions data from 2019 to the present for state house members and senators elected in 2020 and from 2017 to the present for those elected in 2018. Tobacco company Altria tops the list, having given more than $110,000 to the sponsors via its PAC, while companies in the top 10 include Anthem Blue Cross, Comcast, AT&T, Verizon, Dominion Energy, UnitedHealth Group, American Electric Power, and Reynolds.

    According to the Brennan Center for Justice, 17 states have enacted 28 new laws that restrict voting access as of June 21, and more anti-voting bills are likely to be enacted this year. Most of the bills could make voting by mail more difficult by shortening the timeframe for voters to request mail ballots, limiting how mail ballots can be delivered, or imposing new ID requirements for mail ballots. Other laws could make in-person voting more difficult by requiring IDs, reducing early voting hours, and limiting the number of polling places.

    The restrictive voting laws are generally believed to provide electoral benefits to Republican politicians, who typically benefit from low voter turnouts. Republicans tend to favor business-friendly policies on taxes and regulatory matters that may help the failing companies collect more profit in the coming years.

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.