Category: Cricket

  • Read RFA coverage of this story in Tibetan.

    A 19-year-old has made history as the first Tibetan female cricketer to break into India’s highly competitive state-level cricket scene.

    Jetsun Narbu competes for the all-women’s Mumbai Cricket Association — the city’s top state-level team — and has her sights on the Indian national team.

    Narbu, who was born in Mumbai and has Indian citizenship, told Radio Free Asia that she hopes to use her platform to raise awareness about Tibetan identity and culture on the international stage.

    “I want to represent India and bring attention to my Tibetan heritage through cricket,” she said. “And If I could achieve that as a Tibetan cricketer, it would be a dream come true.”

    Narbu’s rise in cricket marks a significant milestone, both for her as an athlete and for the Tibetan community in India. 

    Indians are passionate about cricket. Played everywhere from crowded city streets to dirt lanes of rural villages, the sport unites people of all ages and backgrounds.

    Early seeds

    Narbu’s love for cricket developed during her childhood, when she first saw her father watching a match of female cricket players on TV. The image of women playing a traditionally male-dominated sport captivated her, fueling her ambition to become a cricketer. 

    Encouraged by her father, Narbu Chee, she started training to be a cricketer at the age of 13. 

    Jetsun Narbu at cricket practice in Mumbai, India, 2024. (Jetsun Narbu)
    Jetsun Narbu at cricket practice in Mumbai, India, 2024. (Jetsun Narbu)

    Narbu developed her athletics skills with help from Indian coaches and strong family support, and has played in multiple tournaments, including Under-19 and T20 competitions, representing various teams at a state and national levels. 

    In 2021, Narbu represented the northeastern state of Sikkim during the Women’s Senior One-Day Trophy and the T-20 Women’s Senior Tournament. In 2023, Narbu represented Mumbai in the national T20 and under-19 ODI tournaments. 

    As a university student, Narbu studies finance at Jai Hind College in Mumbai and hopes to land a job in investment banking with the specialization in mergers and acquisitions.

    Ethnic background

    Narbu said she has never experienced discrimination based on her ethnicity, though she has occasionally noticed curious glances from Indian onlookers because of her different facial features. 

    “In sports, skills and dedication should matter more than your background or ethnicity,” she said, underscoring her belief in merit over identity.

    Her ambition, however, does come with challenges. 

    Competing in a sport where few Tibetan women are visible, Narbu is paving her path with little precedent, which can be both daunting and empowering, she says. 

    “Whatever sport you choose, focus on your training and commitment,” she said. “Through sports, we can not only showcase our talents but also bring attention to Tibet’s culture and cause.”

    Additional reporting by Tenzin Dickyi for RFA Tibetan. Translated by Dawa Dolma. Edited by Roseanne Gerin and Malcolm Foster.


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by By Dechen Wangmo for RFA Tibetan.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • For readers who are unfamiliar, do you mind giving a quick rundown of what you’re working on right now, and some highlights from the world of Cricket?

    I’m a filmmaker and a writer, and I’m a performer in what used to be in the world of comedy, but I feel like I’m recovering from that. I started out as a weirdo artist in Baltimore, Maryland, just bopping around that scene. I thought I wanted to be a musician. And then, I did a lot of theater, and then I fell in with a group called Wham City, which was a collective there that started making a lot of film work together. That’s how I got sucked into film. My early artistic endeavors were infomercials for Adult Swim: the best known one was probably this thing called Unedited Footage of a Bear, which was a big viral hit when it came out.

    Can you tell me more about what you carry with you from the creative community you were part of in Baltimore, now that you live in LA?

    I will be forever grateful that I spent 10 years of my life in Baltimore. It’s where I learned to be an artist. I never went to art school. It was just this community of people who were like, “What can we do together? What can we do for this place, and for each other?” Because it was so small, there were no boundaries between disciplines. That really helped me as an artist. If you needed to do something, you needed to find people to do it. You weren’t like, “Oh well, she’s not a musician, so she can’t sing in this.” It was like, “Oh, you used to be in a choir? Please come sing with me.”

    What’s some of your work that you’re really excited about right now?

    I’m really excited and proud of these two short films that I wrote and directed and acted in, that have been bopping around the festivals. One of them is called Someday All This Will Be Yours, and I filmed it in my childhood home with a very small crew. I just self-funded it. It’s a house tour [by] a haunted, pregnant woman who’s talking about the legacy of the things and emotions we offer as inheritances to our children. It’s a very weird, decrepit 1970s house. I wanted to document the home that I grew up in, [and thought] that no one would ever see it. It’s the most personal thing I’ve ever made.

    I like the idea of a house as a form of self portrait.

    Right? Memories are stored in the physical environment. In LA, where I didn’t grow up, all of the memories here are the most recent version of me. And then, I go home to my childhood home, and every single doorknob is just laden with who I used to be. It’s such a rich space to draw on. I think everybody’s childhood home is haunted, so it’s kind of about that.

    And then, I have another short film right now called Chomp, that is more explicitly horror, about a news intern who starts biting everyone and stealing their teeth. It’s about making violent decisions in order to get ahead, and the things that I’ve done that I’m not proud of, and also, the self-violence that you have to inflict in order to fit into a system. There’s lots of biting, so I’m proud of that, too.

    If you could haunt anything or anyone, what would you haunt? Are you haunted by anything?

    If I could haunt anything, I think I would haunt the Maine seacoast. It just sounds so romantic. That’s the physical environment in which I think the act of haunting would really fit.

    You just like it aesthetically.

    I like it aesthetically, and I think, as an actor, the production design really helps me get into a character, so I think I would haunt the Maine sea coast.

    Okay, for example, you said that all childhood homes are haunted, but does your childhood home haunt you?

    It did until I made this film, and now it doesn’t, because I think the film was a spell that I did on my relationship with it. I don’t think I’m a particularly haunted person. I’m haunted by things I said to people that came out the wrong way.

    I’m haunted by that, and I’m haunted by a sense of the present being in the middle position of such a long line of people in both directions.

    So you’re haunted by time?

    Yes. Oh my god, yeah. I’m haunted by time.

    How do you see where you’re at in your career, or creative identity, right now? What are some of the things you appreciate about this page in your story?

    I think for a long time, because I was really scared to be an artist, I really didn’t understand that I had an identity as an individual artist. I did a lot of collaborative work, and I love that model. I think in these last few years, it’s maybe the first time that I’ve allowed myself to understand that I can make work on my own. I am lucky in that I had this soft, lovely launching pad of understanding how to make work with other people and friends. Now, I can take those lessons and trust myself enough to make what I want to make, and not feel like I have to create somebody else’s idea, or that I have to run my ideas by someone else. There’s a little more trust in myself now.

    It’s funny, because I’m turning 40 this year, and I don’t know—I think this is true of a lot of artists who I talk to—I’m like, “Am I early career? Is this just beginning? Have I had a career? Have I arrived in any way?”

    It’s always interesting talking to people who have five or 10 year plans. I have never had a brain that could hold space for things like that.

    I’ve done the Artist’s Way, and it was very helpful to me, and that’s controversial. There’s a part in that where you have to write out five year goals, and I was like, “Whoa.” It never occurred to me that I could be that methodical. During the pandemic, I lost a lot of the traditional career opportunities that had been building up. I had a pilot that was canceled. Any sense that I had of a linear artistic career trajectory went away, and it felt really bad for a little bit. That’s when I started being like, “I want to make this film. I can just shoot, nobody can tell me yes or no.” Now, I follow instinct, and I’m not sure where it will lead me. Maybe in five years I’ll want another five-year plan, but right now, I don’t.

    What advice would you share with someone who wants to make a film but isn’t sure how to get started?

    I would say, first of all, that’s amazing, and you should do it. The only way to make a film is to make a film. There’s so much gatekeeping. It seems so complicated, and it seems so unattainable to a lot of people that I think people stop before they start. What I would say is, figure out the emotional and energetic resources and talents of the people around you that you can put into a project, and then make something that you can do with that.

    I don’t want to be too dismissive of the fact that it takes resources to make something that looks like a Hollywood film, but I think the best film work comes out of limitations. Start with “What resources do I have to make this thing?” And then, cater your idea towards that, so you can work from a place of abundance as opposed to, “Well, I can’t make Goodfellas, so I’m not going to make anything at all.”

    But then how do you also make yourself open to opportunities if you do want to expand what you have?

    That’s a question that I’ve asked myself when I was in a place of artistic loneliness. That feeling of, “I want to make this, but I have no idea how to start,” is a thing I think that all artists, and all people face. I only know what I’ve done, which is to find people who are making things that you admire and just asking them if you can help. Helping other people on their projects is the best way to learn how to make your own.

    I didn’t go to film school. I had never made [a film], and I produced Unedited Footage of a Bear, and I learned through doing it. And then I was like, “Okay. I’ll make fewer mistakes next time.” You’re also always going to learn more by finding your peers who are making things and reaching out to them. If you meet other working artists who are around your experience level, and help each other come up, those are things that are going to help you forever, and that’s going to be a better process emotionally.

    I’m curious for your thoughts on balancing relationships with friends who are also collaborators, especially when there’s money involved, or credit. What kind of pitfalls have you witnessed or experienced?

    No, nothing like that has ever happened to me. [laughs]

    That’s great. Good for you. [laughs]

    Credit is always going to be hard if the work is listed with authors, which the system really wants it to be, right? When you work on a film, there’s a list of positions, and you’re supposed to have all these delineated roles. You know how we think that we have discrete organs and muscles and stuff in our body, but actually, if you cut open a body, one thing oozes into another, and it’s all one thing? That’s what making a film is, I think that’s what collaboration is. It’s really tricky when someone’s like, “I’m the heart. I’m the brain,” and you’re like, “We all did this.”

    The only thing that I have learned is to be very, very clear upfront with people about what everyone’s expectations and goals are. I’ve worked on film projects where we had discussions about credits after the fact, and it feels bad. If you have somebody who you can talk about the squidgy parts of it with, that’s really huge. Direct communication ahead of time, and hopefully, working to build models that aren’t so delineated in terms of credit, that’s what I’d like to do.

    It is an organism, and film is so collaborative. You can make a beautiful film totally alone, but for the most part, they’re not being made alone. I hope to make work in a way that celebrates that, more than the individual credit.

    I love the body metaphor.

    When you look at a dissection, it’s like, “Yeah, we made this shit up.”

    I haven’t looked-

    But you could.

    But I could. Can you tell me a bit about how you navigate the work/life balance stuff?

    It’s hard. I think different models of grind, or different models of trying to get money out of creative pursuits work differently for different people. All I know is what works for me, which is trying to keep money separate from creativity. The most I’ve ever made from art in a year was $16,000, and that was the year I sold a TV pilot to a network, and [I was] like, “Whoa, amazing.” The creative skills that I have, I could use them maybe in the film industry, I could produce for money. But that is so draining to me.

    I’m also really lucky in that I have a part-time day job that supports me, that’s enough money to live on, and that’s not most people’s reality. It’s really easy to be like, “Oh, yeah, what you should do is go get a part-time job that gives you health insurance.” In America, that’s a unicorn. I used to grind more in terms of constantly thinking about what the next thing would be for my career, and now, I don’t do that anymore, and it’s going a lot better.

    Can you talk about the process of going from the nucleus of an idea to actually making it? What are the parts of the lifecycle that are most invigorating to you, and what are the parts that you hate the most?

    It’s such a yo-yo back and forth for me, of the joys and terrors of taking an idea from the initial inspiration into actually existing in the world. I always know when an idea has happened that I need to pay attention to. For Chomp, I remember lying in my bed five years ago, and I was like, “Somebody biting someone on the news,” and I just knew. I was like, “Okay, that has to be something.” I usually let it percolate for a little while, and then there’s a lot of really embarrassing stream of consciousness Google Docs that I would never let anyone see. I’m like, “Someone biting someone. Who’s the biter, and who’s the bitee?” That part feels really exciting to me because I have the certainty of knowing that an idea happened that I needed to pay attention to, but there’s no limitations yet, and I haven’t gotten to the next part, which is narrowing it down, feeling like it’s a terrible idea and I’m bad and I’ve never had a good idea, no one will ever understand me. That’s the part I don’t like.

    What’s your attitude towards self-judgment? How much do you reign in criticism of yourself versus pay attention to that voice?

    I have been working very hard to not pay attention to that voice, and the quieter that voice gets, I think the better that my work gets. Some people will come to yoga for flexibility because they’re so strong and they need to be flexible. Some people come and they’re so flexible and they need to get stronger. Maybe some people need to critique their own ideas more, and some people need to critique them less, I don’t know. Historically, I’m haunted by self-criticism, and I guess this is something that I took from the Artist’s Way, so forgive me.

    That’s okay.

    She talks about how the creator in us comes from a very tender and childlike place. Making something is play, and nobody likes to play when they’re being yelled at, and I do think that is true.

    Yeah. Well, you’re a human.

    Yes, so far. Until I’m a ghost on the Maine sea coast.

    Cricket Arrison Recommends:

    Looking up X-rays of what our skulls look like when we still have both sets of our teeth.

    The film She Is Conann by Bertrand Mandico.

    Jetz-Scrubz sponges – I swear to god they don’t ever get that weird sponge smell.

    The Wind River Mountain Range in Wyoming – no crowds and so beautiful.

    The Anatomy of a Story by John Truby – much better than Save the Cat and as I’ve learned even the strangest ideas can benefit from structure.


    This content originally appeared on The Creative Independent and was authored by Rene Kladzyk.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • The Men’s Cricket World Cup – one of the world’s most popular sporting events – has touched down in Dharamsala.

    On Tuesday, the New Zealand cricket team and their families visited the Dalai Lama at his residence in the city at the edge of the Himalayas that serves as the seat of the Tibetan government in exile.

    The visit comes ahead of Saturday’s match between New Zealand and Australia. The winner should have the inside track on making it to the final next month in Ahmedabad.

    The game will be held at Himachal Pradesh Cricket Association Stadium in Dharamsala, one of the most picturesque cricket stadiums in the country. 

    Located at an altitude of 1,450 meters (4,760 feet), it features a stunning view of the snow-capped Dhauladhar range. 

    ENG_TIB_Cricket_10242023.2.jpg
    Members of the New Zealand cricket team have their photo taken with the Dalai Lama at his residence in Dharamsala, India, on Oct. 24, 2023. Credit: Office of His Holiness the Dalai Lama

    Thousands of pilgrims come to visit the head of Tibetan Buddhism at his residence every year. On Tuesday, smiling team members filed past a seated Dalai Lama, said hello and shook his hand one-by-one.

    New Zealand’s team captain noted that it was a quick interaction, but he nonetheless felt “fortunate to meet him and be in his presence.”

    Casually dressed and enjoying the mild weather, the players later posed for a group photo.

    “It was pretty cool to be around His Holiness as you hear a lot of stories about him,” said Rachin Ravindra, one of the youngest members of New Zealand’s squad.

    Edited by Matt Reed.


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by By RFA Tibetan.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • This week, the International Cricket Council’s One Day International tournament will commence in India. The man who will take centre stage during the occasion will be Indian Prime Minister, Narendra Modi, whose earthly attributes are fast becoming, at least in a political sense, celestial in dimension.

    Commentators are already noting that the tournament will usher in a pre-election campaign extravaganza for Modi and his Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), one lasting six weeks. Modi has positioned himself as all and everything, supreme self-referencing god head in a political strategy that eclipses rivals and dooms them to irrelevance. Like other authoritarians, he is keen to find solid footing in established popular rites and customs, appropriating the features he likes (Hinduism, good), and abandoning those he dislikes (Sikhism, Islam, Christianity, bad).

    India’s national sport has not been spared the Modi touch. Nothing about the man speaks about the dash and panache of the Indian cricket team, but that hardly matters. Modi has previously run the Gujarat Cricket Association with his current Home Affairs minister Amit Shah. While India’s Board of Control for Cricket has a nominal presidential head in the form of the ineffectual Roger Binny, true power over the organisation lies with Shah’s son Jay, the body’s honorary secretary. With Ashish Shela as treasurer, the BJP stranglehold seems total.

    The national team has become, in effect, an extension of the prime minister’s ambitions. All have come together, fused and meshed, none better illustrated than through the renaming of an enormous stadium – one of the world’s largest, in fact – after the PM himself. With a seating capacity over 130,000, the Narendra Modi stadium, based in the PM’s home state of Gujarat, will host the key events and matches of the World Cup.

    Hard to miss in this dance is also the power of global cricket’s locus. Long straddling the England-Australia nexus, cricket’s hegemonic centre has moved with spectacular effect. The BCCI (Board of Control for Cricket in India) is unchallenged in its supremacy over purse strings and glitzy promotion, with the Indian Premier League being the game’s crowning, commercial glory. In its 2023 season, the IPL drew in over 500 million viewers, registering a growth rate of 32% from the previous season, while total revenues for the BCCI in 2021-22 came in at $771 million. As the Financial Times noted in July this year, the BCCI “dominates global decision making and takes a larger share of global revenues than England and Australia combined.”

    Despite this, the governing body remains blighted. Overseas, it is accused of buying preferential treatment for the IPL over other cricketing schedules, seducing, if not strong-arming smaller nations into accepting its agenda.

    The cricket body has repeatedly stifled such anti-corruption efforts as those mounted by the former Delhi commissioner of police, Neeraj Kumar. When Kumar’s A Cop in Cricket was published, it told an all too familiar story on spoliation wrought by wealth, fed by the lucre of the IPL, money laundering and rampant bookmakers. He also found that the enormous outlay of funds otherwise “meant for the promotion of cricket at the grassroots level is diverted and misappropriated by state association officials, who adopt every conceivable modus operandi of malfeasance to do so.” Little wonder that much of Modi’s own relations with the powerful agents of Indian public life reflect a broader, dark model of the Hindutva crony state, where funds are diverted in the name of special interests.

    The sheer scope, exposure, and significance of cricket, and its dramatic modernisation by Indian sporting practice, has made it pure political capital. Salil Tripathi, author and board member of PEN International, explains the point. “The men’s cricket World Cup, to be staged in India from October 5, will put India, and Modi’s premiership, back on the global stage.”

    Peter Oborne is none too happy with this. Having written extensively about cricket on the subcontinent, a keen student and admirer of its magical play and often tortuous politics, Oborne can only look at the Modi appropriation experiment with alarm. During Modi’s tenure, dissidents, Muslims and Christians have been targeted. In an article co-authored with Imran Mulla, some symptoms of this rule are mentioned. “Since May, Hindu nationalist militants have killed over 100 Christians in northeastern Manipur, destroying churches and displaying 50,000 people in a brutal campaign of terror.”

    Oborne and his co-author do not shy away from warning that the Modi-Hindutva state is showing genocidal urges. “This is a moral emergency and thus far nobody seems to have noticed. US President Joe Biden, supposedly the leader of the free world, recently gave Modi a hero’s welcome in Washington.” Modi’s renaming of the stadium sent an ominous “message that the Indian cricket team represents his own political party – the Bharatiya Jana Party (BJP) – and not the nation as a whole.”

    The authors pertinently contrast the tepid coverage leading up to the Cricket World Cup with the near surfeit of moral indignation expressed prior to the FIFA Men’s World Cup held in Qatar – albeit one eventually extinguished in the glow of the tournament. “The BBC decided not to broadcast the opening ceremony live, with its star presenter Gary Lineker lecturing TV viewers on Qatar’s human rights record and Labour leader Keir Starmer boycotting the event.”

    Expect, on this occasion, no videos and clips of protest by any of the competing teams complaining about human rights violations, religious intolerance, barbaric practices or appalling working conditions. Ditto that of ingratiating British and Australian politicians. Modi’s Hindutva train of religious and ideological purity has gone unnoticed in most of the cricket world. The only question that will be asked of him at the tournament’s opening is simple: Will he be able to land the ball on the square?

    This post was originally published on Dissident Voice.

  • Rishabh Pant is currently undergoing treatment at a private hospital in Dehradun following a car accident on December 30

    This post was originally published on The Asian Age | Home.

  • Pant met with a serious accident while returning from Delhi to Roorkee as his car collided with the divider on the Narsan border of Roorkee

    This post was originally published on The Asian Age | Home.

  • Both Pakistan and India have fielded three seamers and two spinners in their respective playing XIs

    This post was originally published on The Asian Age | Home.

  • Thakur is expecting that Pakistan team will come to India to compete in the 50-over World Cup next year, saying ‘all are welcome’

    This post was originally published on The Asian Age | Home.

  • The petition seeking extension of tenure was filed nearly two years back and on the last occasion on December 9, 2020

    This post was originally published on The Asian Age | Home.

  • For a country experiencing its worst economic crisis since gaining independence in 1948, the picture of a touring team pampered and fussed over might cause consternation.  But the Australian cricket tour to Sri Lanka has only been met by praise from the country’s cricket officials, where logic is inverted, and the gaze of responsibility averted.  Not even a shortage of foreign currency, precipitating a dramatic fall in medicines and fuel, along with demonstrations that have left nine dead and 300 injured, prompted second thoughts.

    A good deal of this crisis was helped by the coming to power of former defence minister Gotabaya Rajapaksa who, in turn, named his older brother, Mahinda, also a former president, prime minister.  Their 2020 election victory was thumping, decisive, and corrupting.  Graft and nepotism set in.  Quixotic decisions to cut taxes eroded state revenue.  COVID-19 began its seemingly inexorable march of infection.

    Showing a developed streak of obliviousness to the developing storm around them, the Rajapaksas even went so far as to ban chemical fertilizers as part of a drive to make farmers embrace organic agriculture.  To do so during this crisis battered and bruised the country’s agrarian sector.

    And what of the cricket bureaucrats?  “These are tough times for our people,” a regretful Sri Lanka Cricket Secretary Mohan De Silva told reporters in Colombo.  “We are indeed grateful to Cricket Australia and the Australian government for supporting this series despite the hardships we as a nation are facing.”

    Sri Lanka Cricket, in pushing the positive message, has intimated that all income from tickets for the three Twenty20s, five one-day internationals and two Test matches will be donated to initiatives for the public welfare.  De Silva is confident that $2.5 million (AU$3.5 million) will be generated by the tour, along with incidental earnings.  “From three-wheel drivers to suppliers of food, all these stakeholders down the line will have an opportunity to earn something for one and a half months.  So, economically this will have a significant effect on this country.”

    This would seem to be getting things the wrong way around.  On some level, this confusion is forgivable, given the poor returns from a game that was played to generally empty stadiums during the ravages of the COVID-19 pandemic.  Last December, a 50 percent capacity crowd was permitted to see the touring West Indians.

    Assessments from the SLC should, however, be taken at face value.  In 2018, the International Cricket Council identified Sri Lanka as having one of the most corrupt cricketing cultures in the sporting world.  Over recent years, the board has been at war with itself, and with players whom they have, at various times, censured, punished and suspended.  Money has been appropriated; matches and pitches fixed.

    Sri Lanka’s own 1996 World Cup winning captain, Arjuna Ranatunga, gives us a sense about an organisation that has governed the game with indulgent haphazardness and raging incompetence.  Last month, he was unrestrained in claiming that the cricket board, habitually filled with “thieves”, was “the most corrupt institution in the country.”

    Australian cricketers, never the sharpest students of culture and their surrounds, have preferred to avoid any detailed examination of cricket officialdom in Sri Lanka.  But they have voiced some concern about the visit.  “It’s fair to say,” states chief executive officer of Cricket Australia, Todd Greenberg, “there is a level of discomfort around touring in conditions that contrast with those faced by the people of Sri Lanka, such as rising food prices, power cuts and fuel rationing.”

    He was confident, however, that the players would not pipe up too much.  “Ultimately our players want to continue to play cricket and will take direction, guidance and advice from CA about tour arrangements and planning.”

    Cricket Australia, in turn, had satisfied itself that touring the country would be safe.  “There is no change in the status of the tour,” CA stated in early May.  “Our head of security confirms that there are no concerns about the tour proceeding as scheduled from either side.”

    That is all good for De Silva, who sees the Australians as standard bearers for peaceful reassurance and cash.  Having them tour Sri Lanka will send “a strong message to the world that Sri Lanka is safe.  Millions of people will be watching the telecast during the matches.”

    The optimism is pure veneer.  While Sri Lanka Cricket markets itself as donor and provider, so far donating $2 million to the health sector to purchase vital medicines, initiatives such as the tour are glaringly sapping. The T20 matches, for instance, are billed as thrilling under-the-light affairs.  But to supply them with electricity during a time when Sri Lankans face rolling power cuts lasting for periods up to 15 hours a day, speaks of authoritative condescension.

    A former manager of the Sri Lanka national team, Charith Senanayake, is not one to be too bothered by such problems.  “We have our own generators and we don’t depend on the government’s power,” he boasted last month.  “The political situation has no bearing on the game and the SLC is always apolitical.”

    The cricket schedule of the Australians has, given the fuel shortages, already presented a problem.  SLC hoped that the longer matches, which will take place during the day and not require night lighting, will be played in the first part of the tour.  “Because of the fuel problem,” De Silva stated, “we had a discussion with Cricket Australia and were trying to persuade them to start with the two Tests because the two Test matches don’t need any [lights].”  Unfortunately, Australia, in fielding three touring teams, would have been unduly disrupted.  “We didn’t want to push too much because of the fact that the Australians have been very generous in their thinking.”

    The thinking here is less generous than loose.  While the Australians will delight the crowds and offer succour for distraction, they will do little to shake the impression that both the government of the day and Sri Lanka Cricket share an awful lot in common, little of which is good.

    The post Dear Times and Costly Cricket: Australia’s Sri Lankan Tour first appeared on Dissident Voice.

    This post was originally published on Dissident Voice.

  • The Sri Lankan government is hoping the Australian cricket tour will distract from the economic and political crisis engulfing the country, writes Binoy Kampmark.

    This post was originally published on Green Left.

  • The 46-year-old, who played 26 Tests and 198 one-day internationals for Australia from 1998 to 2009, was involved in a single-car accident

    This post was originally published on The Asian Age | Home.

  • For more terrestrially grounded people, writing about cricket can be seen as an exercise in distant planetary speculation.  The Nobel laureate Harold Pinter did not think so, calling this old English game “the greatest thing that God ever created on earth.”  Others might disagree with mild disgust, finding it archaic, jargon heavy and slow.

    In the early 1990s, one figure broke through the stuffiness of willow bats, pads, leather balls and white flannel.  When life left the overly worked body of Australia’s Shane Warne, who expired in Thailand at 52, the reaction was global.  In India and Pakistan, hundreds of millions mourned.  This most celebrated of error-prone buffoons was, as the emperor Vespasian might have said, becoming a god.

    The Melbourne Cricket Ground, on March 30, became the venue for one such occasion: a state memorial service held in honour of the cricketer.  For a brief spell, a sporting stadium had become a cathedral, the occasion heavy with solemnity.  In it, Warne’s followers and admirers communed.

    When Sir Elton John appears to commemorate you, the celebrity value is bound to inflate and discombobulate.  There were others from the Hollywood set with recorded speeches (fittingly, Warne, with his peroxide hair, ear adornments and lifestyle had been given the name of “Hollywood”).  The more cynical observer might wonder whether these people would necessarily know what a cricket pitch looked like, let alone what Warne’s expertise entailed.  But sport in this era can enable a figure to move beyond fringes, catapulted to permanent, social media dissemination. Even prior to the advent of the tech giant platform, Warney had already broken the mould.

    Nothing can be taken away from his expertise, in so far as it was practised on the cricket ground.  The smell of leather whirring and whizzing upon flattened grass.  Deception and guile, packed into the movement of the delivery.  A mastery of tactics, field placements, with a sublime ability that enabled him to execute the “ball of the century” in 1993 against England’s bemused Mike Gatting.

    Memorials, however, always risk going too far, slipping into soppy hagiography.  Malcolm Knox tearily glistens by claiming that the cricketer was “a force of nature and an everyman”.  Writing like a starstruck admirer, Knox is dewey.  “If you ever walked behind Shane Warne through a crowded place, you might get an idea of what it was like.  Some deferred by looking away again.  Others grappled with their phones to take a quick shot.”

    Another admirer of Warne’s, sports commentator Sam Newman, was aghast about Warne’s other, lesser-known activities.  It came out during the memorial service itself.  Warne, Andrea Egan of the UN Development Programme revealed, had joined its wildlife fund, Lion’s Share, in 2021.  Her address seemed to transform the late sports figure into a modern incarnation of St. Francis of Assisi.  She explained how his legacy lived on “in the people of Sri Lanka promoting sea turtle conservation, in an all-female anti-poaching unit in South Africa and the team of the Byron Bay hospital, who were supported in the wake of the bushfires.”

    Egan’s appearance stunned Newman. “They had a representative from the United Nations!  I tell you what, if that man has not taken all before him, I’d like to see someone who can top that.”  It’s not often you hear a good word about the UN in these circles – Newman is as parochially soaked as they come – but he had to concede that Warne’s involvement, and the acknowledgment, “nearly blew me out of the water”.

    Memorial services also serve to iron out wrinkles and add cosmetic touch-ups.  Brilliance, or genius, can be mistaken as being broad rather than confined, somehow seeping into other areas of life.  Unless you have a particular affection for laddish and occasionally loutish behaviour, for acts of spectacular stupidity in public life, cricket remains the throne upon which Warne sat most comfortably.  But when he got off it and wandered around without orb and sceptre, the messiness began.

    Warne made no secret of this tendency, though he proved unapologetic about it.  In one of his three ghost written autobiographies, No Spin, he conceded to having “made a number of mistakes in my life and I will continue to make them. This is what it means to be human.”

    With that standard in mind, Warne proved particularly human in accepting $5,000 in 1994 during a one-day tournament in Sri Lanka from a shady Indian bookmaker by the name of “John”.  This was a stroke of good luck – Warne had frittered away about that same amount at the hotel’s casino in Colombo.  This “gift” with “no strings attached” transpired because Warne’s own Australian teammate, Mark Waugh, had received $4000 from “John” for supplying weather and pitch reports.

    In reflecting upon this incident, Warne gave one of his famously baffling reasons.  He did not wish to insult John, who was offering the money to a figure he described as “a great player”.  He would recall that this was “the sort of conversation I might have had with my dad and brother.”  This dubious family analogy did not extend to the Pakistani cricketer Saleem Malik, who, fortunately for the slow bowler, failed in an attempt to make Warne throw a match for $200,000.

    Family, however, makes an appearance again in 2003.  The occasion was the injudicious taking of tablets, which pushed Warne, and Australia, into the less than flattering light of sports doping.  That year, Warne was found to have taken a banned diuretic.  Like many an idiot son in the lurch, he blamed his unwitting mother, who wished him to look “nice” when facing the media.

    At the time, Dick Pound, former vice-president of the International Olympic Committee, found that explanation incorrigible, “laughable” and on par with the excuse, “I got it from the toilet seat”.  In February 2003, the Australian Cricket Board drugs panel imposed a twelve-month ban.

    An unrelenting Pound would continue to find Warne’s account dubious.  In his 2006 book Inside Dope, the former sporting administrator is withering to the cricketer.  Pointing the finger at his mother for wishing to see a more streamlined version of her son before the cameras concealed the fact that Warne was nursing a shoulder injury.  “The diuretic was a masking agent that could have hidden the possible use of steroids that would help the injury cure faster.  He had returned to play almost twice as quickly as the experts had predicted.”

    With Warne’s entry into the pantheon of cricket’s immortals, ethicists and philosophers will have no reason to lose sleep.  Dick Pound will remain unconvinced.  The most profitable exercise will be to regard the player’s talent on the field with admiration, and his ability to command loyalty as remarkable.  Keep him on cricket’s throne.  He looks best there.

    The post Give Me that Flipper Shane first appeared on Dissident Voice.

    This post was originally published on Dissident Voice.

  • While experts say ‘Team comes first’, netizens feel he should have allowed Jadeja to complete his double century

    This post was originally published on The Asian Age | Home.

  • The league stage of the IPL will be conducted in Mumbai and Pune

    This post was originally published on The Asian Age | Home.

  • The Men in Blue also sported black armbands in memory of the legendary singer

    This post was originally published on The Asian Age | Home.

  • Play was not stopped as Bennett played a defensive shot to mid-off, and then hit the next ball to the boundary

    This post was originally published on The Asian Age | Home.

  • The selection committee is set to meet on Wednesday afternoon to deliberate on the squad for the series against West Indies

    This post was originally published on The Asian Age | Home.

  • This was the first time that Vamika’s photos were seen anywhere

    This post was originally published on The Asian Age | Home.

  • Kohli’s decision to leave Test captaincy comes a day after India lost the three-match Test series against South Africa on Friday

    This post was originally published on The Asian Age | Home.

  • Vivo took a break from the sponsorship rights for a year after the 2020 Galwan Valley military face-off between India and China

    This post was originally published on The Asian Age | Home.

  • Ganguly was rushed to Woodlands Multispeciality hospital on Monday night after he tested positive

    This post was originally published on The Asian Age | Home.

  • The former Indian skipper remains afebrile days after testing positive for coronavirus

    This post was originally published on The Asian Age | Home.

  • Ganguly is double vaccinated and has been travelling extensively, taking part in all professional activities

    This post was originally published on The Asian Age | Home.

  • Kohli’s comments had exposed the simmering tension between him and the BCCI officials after he was removed as ODI skipper earlier this month

    This post was originally published on The Asian Age | Home.

  • Kohli clarified that he was given an hour-and-a half’s notice before being sacked

    This post was originally published on The Asian Age | Home.

  • Mohammad Azharuddin on Tuesday had tweeted about the alleged rift between the players

    This post was originally published on The Asian Age | Home.

  • Resuming the day at 140 for five, New Zealand folded up for 167 in the second innings

    This post was originally published on The Asian Age | Home.

  • Jim Laker was the first cricketer to scalp 10 wickets in a Test innings in 1956, followed by Anil Kumble in 1999 against Pakistan

    This post was originally published on The Asian Age | Home.

  • The tour comprises three Tests, three ODIs and four T20 Internationals and is scheduled to start on December 17 at the Johannesburg

    This post was originally published on The Asian Age | Home.