Category: Democracy

  • Three people have jumped barriers in the house of lords to access the king’s throne and the chairs of state. They planned to announce the release of The People’s Charter – a new democratic mandate for the UK.

    Replace the lords

    Touring the house of lords chamber at 9:30am on 19 December, they climbed a barrier to take their place around the king’s throne. They unfurled a banner that read: ‘REPLACE THE LORDS’. Almost immediately they were intercepted by Metropolitan Police officers stationed in the room, and parliamentary security guards. They were removed, detained, and questioned on site before being released without arrest.

    The three took this action to signal the failure of UK democracy, while highlighting the most popular alternative to the house of lords: a permanent Citizen’s Assembly.

    Rayal, from London, is one of those who took action today. He said:

    After taking part in the creation of the People’s Charter, I am inspired to share the idea with the people! They hold the power, not the lords!

    The People’s Charter is the comprehensive outcome from the House of the People’s first sitting. The House of the People is a new grassroots institution which is modelling the proposed replacement to the house of lords. The first sitting was organised by Assemble, a grassroots democracy group. Another sitting will take place in 2026.

    The House of the People

    The House of the People sat for 3 days in July 2025, as a brand new institution for the UK. It invited the public to participate via in an open ‘lottery’, which welcomed people from all backgrounds and regions. Those selected carefully considered the evidence and reached decisions on the biggest issues of our time, including the UK’s approach to the climate crisis, genocide, and poverty.

    The People’s Charter from the House of the People is available to read for free, and a public Zoom call is happening on Monday 22 December to discuss it. [Register here to join]

    The top 5 outcomes in the People’s Charter are:

    1. Tax wealth not work

    Close loopholes for the ultra-rich: fix investment income, pensions perks and banking services to raise £40 billion a year and fund our future.

    2. Slash political corruption

    Ban lobbying, ban second jobs, ban political gifts – politics exists to serve people, not companies.

    3. Choose life over GDP

    Establish a Future Generations act – a law above all laws – to put people and nature above gross domestic product.

    4. End support for genocide

    Stop all arms, trade and state support to any country violating international law – starting with an immediate embargo on Israel.

    5. Reclaim our spaces

    Take homes out of the hands of those who buy them but never live in them – bring empty buildings into public use, cap rents and build green, affordable council housing.

    Fairer and more democratic

    A spokesperson for the group said this today:

    This is not a protest against the monarchy. The king has a symbolic role in government. But the lords have real power, and they’re corrupt as hell. It’s time to replace them with a fair and democratic Citizen’s Assembly.

    A public-led institution like a House of the People will produce fairer, more effective, and more democratic outcomes than the existing parliamentary system, which is not fit for purpose.

    The recent election saw the lowest turnout and vote count for two decades. But it produced a prime minister with the strongest majority.

    Polls show that most British people are in favour of replacing the house of lords. And a permanent rolling citizens’ assembly is the favourite alternative.

    Featured image via Assemble

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.


  • This content originally appeared on Democracy Now! and was authored by Democracy Now!.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on Democracy Now! and was authored by Democracy Now!.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on Democracy Now! and was authored by Democracy Now!.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • In December 2025, Judge Jennifer Bailey of the 8th Judicial Circuit Court in West Virginia ruled that the creation of the state’s charter schools are unconstitutional because they were authorized by the West Virginia Professional Charter School Board (PCSB) instead of being authorized by “the constitutionally mandated consent of a majority of affected county voters.” In addition, there is no right under the state constitution to attend a “school of choice” funded by public dollars.

    The PCSB, which is separate from the West Virginia Department of Education, is comprised of individuals appointed by the governor, which means that it is not a form of elected governance accountable to the public. Like many unelected bodies established in numerous other states to authorize charter schools, the PCSB is a mechanism for avoiding democratic processes and public input. Such unelected bodies typically establish deregulated and independent charter schools with greater speed and less accountability than publicly elected bodies.

    The question that naturally arises is this: what is the need for such unelected entities like the PCSB if the public is supposedly very eager to have lots of charter schools? If charter schools are unassailable, superior to traditional public schools, and readily sought after by parents, what need is there for the PCSB? Why not put the creation of a school to a normal democratic vote carried out with integrity and go from there? Are charter school proponents worried that the public might reject the creation of privately-operated contract schools that siphon funds from public schools?

    For now, Judge Bailey has “issued a permanent injunction that immediately prohibits the PCSB from authorizing any new charter schools unless local voters approve them via special election.” Additional court actions could even close all existing charter schools in the state.

    Given all the charter school disinformation routinely promoted by charter school proponents in the U.S., it is important to take stock of Part One (July 2025) and Part Two (December 2025) of a Three-Part report, Charter School Reckoning: Decline, Disillusionment, and Cost on the trajectory of charter schools over the past 30+ years. Part One focuses on decline in the charter school movement while Part Two focuses on disillusionment in the charter school sector. Part Three will be released by the National Center for Charter School Accountability in the near future. Like many other reports produced by a range of organizations over the years, these reports expose endless problems plaguing the charter school sector and how charter schools harm education and society. Despite being promoted under the veneer of high ideals, there is still much that is kept from the public about charter schools decades after they first appeared in the country.

    Currently, about 4,200 students are enrolled in West Virginia’s seven brick-and-mortar and virtual charter schools. Together the privately-operated schools employ roughly 100 teachers. The West Virginia State Constitution can be viewed here.

    The post West Virginia Judge Says Charter Schools Violate State Constitution first appeared on Dissident Voice.

    This post was originally published on Dissident Voice.


  • This content originally appeared on Democracy Now! and was authored by Democracy Now!.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on Democracy Now! and was authored by Democracy Now!.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on Democracy Now! and was authored by Democracy Now!.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on Democracy Now! and was authored by Democracy Now!.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Seg sudn child

    The paramilitary Rapid Support Forces in Sudan, backed by the United Arab Emirates, is accused of attempting to cover up its mass killings of civilians by burning and burying bodies, according to a new report by Yale’s Humanitarian Research Lab. This comes as drone strikes have plunged several cities into darkness, including Khartoum and the coastal city of Port Sudan. “We have the expansion of the war through Darfur, El Fasher, now Western Kordofan, which is an extremely important region economically. … And now we have this potential of the expansion of this war to South Sudan,” says Sudanese scholar Khalid Mustafa Medani. “We have a humanitarian crisis that has expanded, but we also have a military stalemate.”


    This content originally appeared on Democracy Now! and was authored by Democracy Now!.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Guest tania

    Former immigration judge Tania Nemer, who was fired in February, is now suing the Trump administration, alleging that she was discriminated against despite strong performance reviews. Nemer is one of about 100 immigration judges who have been fired or reassigned since Trump took office. The system is notoriously backlogged, with more than 3 million cases pending. “I was pulled away in the middle of the hearing,” she says.

    Nemer filed a discrimination complaint with the Department of Justice, which officials dismissed, citing Article II of the Constitution on presidential powers. “I’ve been practicing employment law and representing federal employees for almost 30 years, and I have never seen a federal agency dismiss a complaint for this reason,” says Nemer’s attorney, James Eisenmann.


    This content originally appeared on Democracy Now! and was authored by Democracy Now!.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Seg trump

    President Trump praised the state of the U.S. economy in a primetime address Wednesday evening, even though new government statistics show the nation’s unemployment rate is at a new four-year high of 4.6%. Dean Baker, senior economist at the Center for Economic and Policy Research, says Trump’s aides should be “wondering about the man’s sanity” after Wednesday’s speech. “This is utterly divorced from reality.” Though Trump blames former President Biden for the poor economy, Baker notes that Trump had inherited an “incredibly strong economy by almost every measure imaginable.”


    This content originally appeared on Democracy Now! and was authored by Democracy Now!.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Democracy Now! Thursday, December 18, 2025


    This content originally appeared on Democracy Now! Audio and was authored by Democracy Now!.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on Democracy Now! and was authored by Democracy Now!.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Thursday Democracy Now! show for rebroadcast – HD


    This content originally appeared on Democracy Now! for Broadcasters – HD MP4 and was authored by Democracy Now! for Broadcasters – HD MP4.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on Democracy Now! and was authored by Democracy Now!.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Pro-Israel commentators across the world have wasted no time in trying to blame anti-Zionist protestors for the terrifying antisemitic terror attack at Australia’s Bondi beach. In particular, many have described the massacre as a manifestation of a globalised Intifada.

    Wasting no time in finding another opportunity to smear pro-Palestinian protesters, Starmer announced during Prime Minister’s Questions (PMQs) on 17 December that he intended to further repress Palestinian activism in response to the Bondi attack.

    Likewise, British police forces have announced that they will now consider use of the phrase ‘globalise the intifada’ an arrestable offence.

    Intifada being Arabic for “uprising.”

    ‘Actions that match the words’

    Today’s PMQs were understandably dominated by expressions of shock and solidarity with the victims of the Bondi attack. In particular, Lib Dem leader Ed Davie asked what the UK government would do to fight back against antisemitism within the country.

    Starmer replied:

    It’s really important that we have actions that match the words we have expressed in response to these horrific attacks.

    I’ve ordered a review of protest and hate crime laws to stop protests breeding hatred. We’re looking at new police powers to deal with repeat and targeted protests, and we’ve launched a review and training to tackle antisemitism in the NHS.

    ‘Actions that match the words’ indeed. The Labour leader moved to conflate antisemitism and anti-Zionist protest so fast it could make your head spin.

    Just so that it’s said: clamping down on protest will do nothing to stop antisemitic violence because Palestine protests are not antisemitic violence.

    Changing laws around protests will do nothing but create yet another wave of non-violent protesters being charged with hate or terror offences for holding placards. It represents yet another ramp-up of the draconian anti-protest laws in the UK.

    And, likewise, the mention of the NHS training is as disgusting as it is telling. Clamping down against NHS staff wearing fucking watermelon pins does nothing to prevent antisemitic violence because NHS workers are not goddamn antisemitic terrorists.
    Time and again, Labour and NHS England have insisted that this was a campaign against antisemitism and racism. NHS campaigners have highlighted the hierarchy of racism within the training, with antisemitism being treated as worse than other racism. And today, at PMQs, Starmer just happened to forget about the racism part.

    Police crackdown on protest

    At almost the exact same time that Starmer was answering PMQs, the Metropolitan Police and Greater Manchester Police chiefs put out a joint statement. It announced that, after the Bondi attack, the use of the phrase ‘Globalise the Intifada’ was now considered cause for arrest.

    The statement read:

    We begin by acknowledging the horrific terrorist attack in Australia, where Jews were deliberately targeted whilst enjoying the Hanukkah celebrations. Our thoughts are with those who lost their lives, their families and those injured. Coming so soon after the Heaton Park Synagogue attack in Manchester and amid rising antisemitism globally, this is deeply alarming. Jewish communities across London, Greater Manchester, and the rest of the United Kingdom are already worried and scared – and this only adds to it.

    Antisemitic hate crime has surged, protests have intensified, and online abuse has grown since 2023. These trends create real fear and disrupt daily life – and have an impact on how safe the Jewish community feels when attending synagogues and other communal spaces.

    The fact that antisemitic hate crime is on the rise is a cause for alarm and resistance. But note how quickly the statement moves to conflate hate crime with the act of protest.

    ‘Globalise the Intifada’

    The protests are against Israel, and its genocide of the Palestinian people. To automatically associate Jewish UK citizens with Israel and Zionism is antisemitic in itself. Worse still, it paints a target on the backs of the Jewish population by conflating them with Israel’s repressive regime.

    Not that any of that would stop the racists in the Met police, mind you. The statement goes on to say:

    We know communities are concerned about placards and chants such as “globalise the intifada” and those using it at future protest or in a targeted way should expect the Met and GMP to take action. Violent acts have taken place, the context has changed – words have meaning and consequence. We will act decisively and make arrests.

    Police are already wasting their time arresting protesters for supporting Palestine Action. This has done nothing to prevent terrorism or stop antisemitism. Rather, it has clogged our courts with peaceful pensioners who held up placards.

    The announcement also states that:

    These measures are practical and immediate – designed to keep communities safe, deter intimidation, and enforce the law. Our intent is clear: create a hostile environment for offenders and a safer environment for Jewish communities, while protecting lawful protest. All members of society have a responsibility to consider their impact on others – it is possible to protest in support of Palestinian people without intimidating Jewish communities or breaking the law.

    How on earth does this move do anything to ‘protect lawful protest‘? It is clearly yet another crackdown on anti-Zionism in the UK. It’s yet another restriction on the right to protest in this country — already gutted by the PCSC Act, the Public Order Act, and the designation of direct action in support of Palestine as terrorism.

    Together, the government and the police have used a vicious act of antisemitic hatred in Australia as an excuse to repress anti-Zionism in the UK. This is a shocking betrayal of the memories of the 15 people killed at Bondi. It is an insult to peaceful pro-Palestine demonstrators across the world.

    If Starmer, Labour or the police had any shame at all, this outrage would overwhelm them.

    Featured image via Barold

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.


  • This content originally appeared on Democracy Now! and was authored by Democracy Now!.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on Democracy Now! and was authored by Democracy Now!.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on Democracy Now! and was authored by Democracy Now!.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on Democracy Now! and was authored by Democracy Now!.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on Democracy Now! and was authored by Democracy Now!.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on Democracy Now! and was authored by Democracy Now!.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Seg epstein

    As the Trump administration is expected to release investigative files related to Jeffrey Epstein later this week, a recent New York Times investigation delves into one of the biggest mysteries about the deceased sexual predator: how the college dropout with no financial training rose through the world of finance and amassed his wealth, which enabled his abuse and insulated him from scrutiny for decades.

    David Enrich, deputy investigations editor at The New York Times and lead author of the report, headlined “Scams, Schemes, Ruthless Cons: The Untold Story of How Jeffrey Epstein Got Rich,” says Epstein’s early success in business was due to a series of lucky breaks, lies and scams that nevertheless convinced sophisticated investors and business titans to give him their money.


    This content originally appeared on Democracy Now! and was authored by Democracy Now!.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Seg epstein

    As the Trump administration is expected to release investigative files related to Jeffrey Epstein later this week, a recent New York Times investigation delves into one of the biggest mysteries about the deceased sexual predator: how the college dropout with no financial training rose through the world of finance and amassed his wealth, which enabled his abuse and insulated him from scrutiny for decades.

    David Enrich, deputy investigations editor at The New York Times and lead author of the report, headlined “Scams, Schemes, Ruthless Cons: The Untold Story of How Jeffrey Epstein Got Rich,” says Epstein’s early success in business was due to a series of lucky breaks, lies and scams that nevertheless convinced sophisticated investors and business titans to give him their money.


    This content originally appeared on Democracy Now! and was authored by Democracy Now!.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Seg chile

    José Antonio Kast has won Chile’s presidential election, with the far-right leader getting about 58% of the vote in Sunday’s runoff against Jeannette Jara, a member of the Communist Party who served as labor minister under outgoing President Gabriel Boric. Kast has openly praised former U.S.-backed dictator Augusto Pinochet and is the son of a Nazi who fled Germany after World War II. Kast campaigned on fighting crime and carrying out mass deportations of immigrants.

    “It is a political and ethical earthquake,” says acclaimed Chilean American writer Ariel Dorfman, who served as a cultural adviser to socialist President Salvador Allende from 1970 to 1973. He pins much of the blame for Kast’s rise on an “uninspired left” that has lost its way since the end of dictatorship and “turned its back on the troubles of the people.”


    This content originally appeared on Democracy Now! and was authored by Democracy Now!.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Seg chile

    José Antonio Kast has won Chile’s presidential election, with the far-right leader getting about 58% of the vote in Sunday’s runoff against Jeannette Jara, a member of the Communist Party who served as labor minister under outgoing President Gabriel Boric. Kast has openly praised former U.S.-backed dictator Augusto Pinochet and is the son of a Nazi who fled Germany after World War II. Kast campaigned on fighting crime and carrying out mass deportations of immigrants.

    “It is a political and ethical earthquake,” says acclaimed Chilean American writer Ariel Dorfman, who served as a cultural adviser to socialist President Salvador Allende from 1970 to 1973. He pins much of the blame for Kast’s rise on an “uninspired left” that has lost its way since the end of dictatorship and “turned its back on the troubles of the people.”


    This content originally appeared on Democracy Now! and was authored by Democracy Now!.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Seg trump maduro

    President Trump has ordered what he called a “total and complete blockade” of sanctioned oil tankers entering and leaving Venezuela, as the United States escalates pressure on the government of President Nicolás Maduro. The move comes amid a major U.S. military buildup in the region and days after U.S. forces seized an oil tanker carrying Venezuelan oil. Since September, the U.S. military has carried out at least 25 airstrikes on alleged drug-smuggling boats in the Caribbean and eastern Pacific near Venezuela, killing at least 95 people.

    The administration’s actions against Venezuela signal “the total renunciation of liberal internationalism” and further abandonment of “a world governed by common laws,” says Pulitzer Prize-winning historian and Yale University professor Greg Grandin. This comes as Latin America is on a “knife’s edge between the left and the right,” with the Trump administration eager to boost its authoritarian allies across the region, says Grandin.


    This content originally appeared on Democracy Now! and was authored by Democracy Now!.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Democracy Now! 2025-12-17 Wednesday

    • Headlines for December 17, 2025
    • A Path to WWIII? Greg Grandin on Venezuela, Trump's "Madman Doctrine" & More
    • Chile's Trump? Ariel Dorfman on the Election of Pinochet Admirer José Antonio Kast
    • How Did Epstein Get Rich? The New York Times Investigates His "Scams, Schemes, Ruthless Cons"

    Download this show


    This content originally appeared on Democracy Now! Audio and was authored by Democracy Now!.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • The longtime peace activist Cora Weiss died December 8 at the age of 91, after decades of advocacy demanding civil rights, nuclear disarmament, gender equality and the abolition of war.


    This content originally appeared on Democracy Now! Audio and was authored by Democracy Now!.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.