Category: Europe

  • Western governments are cranking up repression of pro-Palestine activists in response to the outpouring of solidarity with Palestine by millions around the globe. In Europe, Germany has set a grim bar in brutalizing protestors and violating their civil liberties. The Real News reports from Berlin’s largely Arab and Muslim Sonnenallee neighborhood.

    Producers: Belal Awad, Leo Erhardt
    Videographers: Dan Avram, Arne Büttner
    Video Editors: Leo Erhardt


    Transcript

    (Narrator): As Israel continues to subject besieged Gaza to a brutal bombing campaign, variously described as war crimes, ethnic cleansing and genocide Western governments have lined up in support of Israel whilst attempting to dampen solidarity with Palestine. No country, though, seems to have aligned itself as unequivocally with Israel than Germany. 

    On the streets of Berlin, a city famous for its ‘anything goes’ attitude. This unwavering support of Israel has translated into harsh and unprecedented police repression. Sonnenallee, a street in the predominantly Arab and Turkish neighborhood of Neukölln is known by the Arab community as Share’ al-Arab or Arab street. 

    Zaid, Activist: Sonnenallee is the street with all the Arab shops and Arab people and migrants in general, they are very 

    I mean, this is also Hermannplatz. 

    (Narrator): Zaid Abdulnasser is the coordinator of the Germany chapter of Samidoun an international solidarity network for Palestinian prisoners. 

    He’s also a Palestinian refugee and resident in Germany since 2015. 

    Zaid, Activist: I would say in every demonstration and every event that happened for Palestine in Berlin ever since the seventh of October, in every event, there was an incident, at least one where the police attacked the demonstration and hit people and assaulted them and arrested at least a couple of people. 

    Some of the harshest repressions took place, last week happened here, and they closed that street and they blockaded it with tens of police vans, and, and police officers, like hundreds of police officers, were roaming the street here, and they built some sort of desk to process the people. 

    (Narrator): One of the people processed at these desks was sociologist and activist Mattanja, who says she was walking home when she was arrested. 

    Mattanja, activist: They just drove me two blocks and dropped me off over there in this street on Hermannplatz, where they created a pop-up police station.

    They really put down tables and everything because they were arresting so many people that day. And there was a line with people, maybe like 100 people, women, men, ten year old kids after me, a ten year old boy got arrested, worked to the floor, sat on his neck. He was standing behind me in line over there. 

    (Narrator): In a video that quickly went viral, Mattanja is seen being arrested by police. “I am arrested because I said ‘free, free Palestine’” 

    Mattanja, activist: On that day there were like two protests scheduled here in Neukölln that were banned immediately. Those protests were on two different squares here in the neighborhood. I was just there on the sideline like watching other people getting kettled and arrested. And then actually I was on my way home to where I live and passing over Sonnenallee there were like a lot of people and some people said: “Free, free Palestine.” I chanted “Free, free Palestine” twice while walking home on a street where there was no demonstration planned. And I sat down at a table and 2 seconds later, five police cops ran at me and said: “You’re arrested.” 

    (Narrator): Of course, the police are acting on orders from higher up. 

    Olaf Scholz, German Chancellor: It is very important to say this today here in Israel during these difficult times: Germany’s history and responsibility it had for the Holocaust requires us to help maintain the security and existence of Israel. 

    (Narrator): Activists claim that police repression, criminalization, and institutional silencing of Palestine solidarity goes way back to before October the 7th. With the recent events representing only an intensification. 

    Nevertheless the drive by many in Germany to express solidarity to mourn, to protest against occupation and genocide seems not only to persist but to grow. 

    Crowd chanting: “Free, free Palestine!” 

    “Stop the genocide!” 

    “Cease fire now!”

    (Narrator): Iris Hefets is an activist in Germany’s ‘Jewish Voice for Peace’. On October 14th, she was arrested and detained for holding a sign in public reading: 

    ‘As a Jew and Israeli stop the genocide in Gaza.’ 

    Civilian: Iris Hefets from the ‘Jewish Voice’ detained the Berlin police detained Iris Hefets on Hermannplatz. 

    Iris Hefets, Activist: Yeah, if someone is here offended by the fact that I’m criticizing Israel it can be considered to be anti-Semitic. This is the perversion of Germany, of anti-Semitism. And we see now, of course, that it’s a big problem, because if everything is anti-Semitism, then nothing is anti-Semitism. 

    Anna, Protester: Of course anti-Semitism exists, but Palestinians and Arabs still have the right to go on the street, show their support for the people mourn also and this has been completely, since one month, forbidden in the name of anti-Semitism, which is actually racism against Arabs and Muslims within Germany who is a huge part of the population also. 

    Lorin, Protester: By silencing a democratic protest you’re just gonna divide more people. They actually get to the opposite result that they say they want to achieve. 

    Samantha, Protester: Supporting this idea that to oppose the state of Israel is to oppose Jews this causes anti-Semitism this is an extremely dangerous mystification. People have the right to protest and suppressing the right to protest is only going to actually increase anti-Semitism. 

    (Narrator): As well as arresting people for expressing an opinion, since the 7th of October, videos have surfaced showing German police attacking protesters, stamping out candles at candle-lit vigils, ripping away Palestinian flags and simply stopping and searching people who are even suspected of being part of a demonstration. 

    Mohamed Al Hassan, is the manager of a law firm representing many of the protesters who have been arrested at the demonstrations since October 7th.

    Mohamed Al Hassan, manager of Advocardo: At the moment we have women, young women, girls, basically girls who are beaten up very badly up into hospital. So they have black eyes. They have broken bones, broken ribs. So people people were completely beaten up and we have to say that some people were even beaten up after they were taken into the police cars. So they were handcuffed already. And they totally got beaten up. And we are filing cases against the police as well. 

    Samantha, Protester: The police… I never feel safe when the police are nearby, and I don’t think they are here to protect us, they are here to enforce the German State’s perception of Palestine as an anti-Semitic cause and it’s outrageous and dangerous. 

    Crowd chanting: “Eyes open, eyes open!” 

    “Our children are being lost!” 

    Zaid, Activist: But what happens when you apply this amount of repression and pressure against Palestinians and Arabs and even internationals who support Palestine, where you ban them, from gathering legally and voicing their worries and voicing their feelings and voicing their political position. 

    What this resulted in is that the street at some point refused this repression, so like even in a sense of if I were the state and I was concerned about my inner security, it is very dangerous to alienate hundreds of thousands of people in this very brash and very repressive way and if anything, it does show that, fascism never left Germany. Fascism is still alive and well in Germany. 

    Iris Hefets, Activist: If Germany says that in order to do a ‘never again’, they are supporting genocide, that is really a perversion of the Jewish history, of the history of all humans. The Holocaust is not only Jewish history. 

    Therefore, I am here to say, of course not in my name. Of course, I condemn deeply what Germany is doing. 

    Mattanja, activist: I think it’s very important for people all around the world to become aware of how German propaganda the media outlets have no shame in twisting the most like basic basic observations.

    (Narrator): One of Germany’s largest media corporations, and one of the largest media publishers in Europe, Axel Springer, outlines its core “values” on its website. The first value mentions “democracy and a united Europe” while the second “the right of the existence of the State of Israel.” 

    Their flagship tabloid Bild is the highest-circulation newspaper in Europe with over 12 million daily readers. 

    Zaid, Activist: The German media specifically played a major role in everything that happened in the past two years. 

    (Narrator): BILD has not only targeted the Samidoun network but Zaid personally. 

    Zaid, Activist: A couple of weeks ago ‘Samidoun: Palestinian prisoners solidarity network’ was banned by Olaf Scholz. And suddenly Samidoun is this devil in Germany and my picture was put on The Bild as “Chef der Juden-Hass” like “the leader of Jew-hatred.” This is an invitation to harm. This is an invitation to attack me, like, physically hurt me. And for what? 

    What do we do in Germany? We go to the streets, we organize public events where we speak about Palestine and the prisoners. It is very normal political work. 

    (Narrator): Nevertheless, the German government continues to clamp down on Palestine solidarity, with some politicians now even openly calling for deportation on grounds of anti-Semitism. For Zaid these threats have become a reality, as he struggles to retain his refugee status, and fights possible deportation. Despite all of this, he remains committed. 

    Zaid, Activist: So regarding the future, I do feel, a sense of extreme optimism, what we’re seeing on the street where people are refusing the repression by the state. 

    They see that this German police is not too different than the police they see on TV, in occupied Palestine that is hitting and repressing people. 

    They have put themselves there. They have expressed this extreme hatred towards Palestinians and towards Palestine and towards Arabs and towards anything that does not support the occupation.

    You can do a thousand seminars about it, but it will never be as clear as when the person is being punched in the face by the police because they’re saying “Free Palestine from the river to the sea.”

    This post was originally published on The Real News Network.

  • Human rights activists say supreme court’s vague wording provides wide scope for persecution

    Russia’s supreme court has outlawed what it called an “international LGBT public movement” as extremist, in a landmark ruling that representatives of gay and transgender people warn will lead to arrests and prosecutions of the already repressed LGBTQ+ community.

    The ruling in effect outlaws LGBTQ+ activism in a country growing increasingly conservative since the start of the war in Ukraine. The “extremist” label could mean that gay, lesbian, transgender or queer people living in Russia could receive lengthy prison sentences if deemed by the authorities to be part of the so called “international LGBT public movement”.

    Continue reading…

    This post was originally published on Human rights | The Guardian.

  • The holocaust now visited on Palestine by US-Israel is unique in many ways. Rates of killing and maiming exceed those of previous Israeli assaults on Gaza, the perpetrators announce their genocidal intent with unusual frankness, and Western media and official apologists are especially shameless.

    But in a world under centuries of West European domination, this particular intentional genocide/mass-death event ought to seem familiar. These mass killings have always been necessary for the global system to function, providing land for settlement, cultivation and resource extraction, labor for hyper-exploitation, and geopolitical power.

    In the “long 16th century” (~1450 to ~1650) the capitalist world system emerged, marked by the guiding imperative of endless accumulation of wealth. [1]  This system rests on colonialism, neo-colonialism, settler-colonialism (subjugation, expulsion, and extermination of indigenous populations), chattel slavery, hyper-exploitation of labor, and now neoliberal globalization. It insures that wealth flows steadily from Global South to Global North.

    This system of plunder established chiefly by the Portuguese, Spanish, Dutch, French, British and Americans, would come to serve what is now loosely called the Global North, or “the triad,” of North America, Western Europe, and (last-added) Japan. Complex financial and production systems (“commodity chains”) now link labor and resources of the Global South to the triad and its smaller appendages (Australia, New Zealand, Israel). The system requires constant nurturing and prolific violence to suppress the costs of labor, resources, and non-monopoly-protected manufactures from the Global South. It is also imperative that the triad keep the vast majority of the world’s population from becoming affluent enough to compete for essential commodities. [2]

    Today the US is the prime enforcer of this system, with at least 800 military bases encircling the globe, under military commands covering every inch of the Earth. [3] This global occupation is a gun, figuratively and literally, held to the head of every government and person on the planet. The overweening power of this occupation expresses itself through most of the world’s governments, including in the long-standing practice of exterminating and expelling Palestinians pursuant to Israel’s settler-colonial effort.

    David Michael Smith’s Endless Holocausts: Mass Death in the History of the United States Empire is an elegantly concise account of US responsibility, sole and shared, for mass deaths. [4]  He counts roughly 300 million deaths. This includes North American slavery and the Indigenous genocide, naturally. But it also includes US complicity in the two world wars, through its profiteering and support for fascist regimes, East and West, in the period before World War II, and its calculated delay in entering that war, after much of the killing and destruction wrought by the Axis powers had been accomplished, aided by the US. [5]  As many others have noted, both 20th century world wars and the ravages of fascism could have been avoided.

    After World War II, the US helped bring mass death to countries too numerous to list here. For example, Greece (about 165,000), Korea (about 5 million), Cambodia/Laos/Vietnam (about 8 million), Indonesia (over 1 million), El Salvador/Guatemala/Honduras/Nicaragua (100s of thousands), Iraq (1 to 2 million), Iran (over half a million) Afghanistan (100s of thousands), Libya (100s of thousands), Syria (100s of thousands), Palestine (10s of thousands), Rwanda (1 to 2 million), Democratic Republic of the Congo (Congo-Kinshasa) (over 6 million), Somalia (100s of thousands), Yemen (100s of thousands), Ukraine (about 14,000 before February 24, 2022 and 100s of thousands since).

    In the periods of 1945-1980, and 1980-2020, Smith counts 29 and 25 million deaths respectively [6], noting, “By 1980, the holocausts of Pax Americana resembled the global horrors that a reasonable observer might have expected from a fascist victory in the Second World War.” [7]

    But the US is also successor to the half-millenium project of the rich nations to own the world.  Indeed, the US empire is the culmination of that ambition. [8]  Accordingly, the US bears responsibility not just for its own mass-death events and those of proxies and collaborators, but also of previous empires to which the US is now the beneficiary. Thus to the deaths Smith attributes to the US, we should add pre-World War II mass death perpetrated on other continents by the British, French, Portuguese, Spanish, Dutch, Belgian, German, and Italian empires, whose plunder of the Global South is legendary. An accounting would surely more than double Smith’s tally of 300 million killed in US-authored mass-death events.

    Still, the very worst thing about these mass deaths is what they are for. They not only maintain Western imperial military and political prerogatives, but they enforce and entrench a global system in which the vast majority of humanity is confined to poorer countries with governments powerless to resist hyper-exploitation of their labor by the multinational corporations of the triad. The greater part of the value produced by their labor is then captured (not “earned”) by these corporations based in the triad. [9]  As Intan Suwandi notes in her Value Chains: The New Economic Imperialism, “So extreme is this overaccumulation that the twenty-six wealthiest individuals in the world, most of whom are Americans, now own as much wealth as the bottom half of the world’s population, 3.8 billion people.” [10]  This is not merely unjust, it condemns a great part of the world’s eight billion people to lives of poverty, insecurity, hunger, disease, and violence.

    It is hard to imagine an end to this macabre world regime, unless in nuclear omnicide. World-wide demonstrations, UN resolutions, labor action against weapons shipments, and wars have not stopped the century-long laceration of Palestine, let alone brought down the capitalist world system that produced it. But perhaps the movements, governments, and armed forces now rising in the South and East can, finally, transform the system which has tormented humanity for centuries.

    END NOTES

    [1] Wallerstein, Immanuel. The Modern World-System, vol. I: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century (New York/London: Academic Press, 1974); The Essential Wallerstein (New York: The New Press, 2000); World-Systems Analysis: An Introduction (Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press, 2004).

    [2] Patnaik, Prabhat. “Imperialism in the Era of Globalization,” Monthly Review, July-August 2015, Volume 67, Number 3.

    [3]The World With Commanders’ Areas of Responsibility,” Library of Congress. Vine, David “U.S. Military Bases Abroad, 2020.”

    [4] Smith, David Michael. Endless Holocausts: Mass Death in the History of the United States Empire. New York: Monthly Review Press, 2023, p. 15.

    [5] Smith, Endless Holocausts, p. 153-167.

    [6] Smith, Endless Holocausts, p. 209, 256.

    [7] Smith, Endless Holocausts, p. 170.

    [8] Perhaps it began formally with the Treaties of Tordesillas (1494) and Saragossa (1529), in which Spain and Portugal divided the world between them, like an apple.

    [9] Suwandi, Intan, Value Chains: The New Economic Imperialism. New York: Monthly Review Press, 2019.

    [10] Suwandi, Value Chains, p. 65.

    This post was originally published on Dissident Voice.

  • Want to understand why the media we consume is either owned by billionaires or under the thumb of government? The latest developments in the story about who was behind the explosions that destroyed the Nord Stream pipelines that brought Russian gas to Europe provide the answer.

    Although largely forgotten now, the blasts in the Baltic Sea in September 2022 had huge and lasting repercussions. The explosion was an act both of unprecedented industrial sabotage and of unparalleled environmental terrorism, releasing untold quantities of the most potent of the greenhouse gases, methane, into the atmosphere.

    The blowing up of the pipelines plunged Europe into a prolonged energy crisis, tipping its economies deeper into a recession from which they are yet to recover. Europe was forced to turn to the United States and buy much more expensive liquified gas. And one of the long-term effects will be to accelerate the de-industrialisation of Europe, especially Germany.

    There can be almost no one in Europe who did not suffer personal financial harm, in most cases significant harm, from the explosions.

    The question that needed urgently answering at the time of the blasts was one no media organisation was in a hurry to investigate: Who did it?

    In unison, the media simply recited the White House’s extraordinary claim that Russia had sabotaged its own pipelines.

    That required an unprecedented suspension of disbelief. It meant that Moscow had chosen to strip itself both of the lucrative income stream the gas pipelines generated, and of the political and diplomatic leverage it enjoyed over European states from its control of their energy supplies. This was at a time, remember, when the Kremlin, embattled in its war in Ukraine, needed all the diplomatic influence it could muster.

    The main culprit

    The need to breathe credibility into the laughably improbable “Russia did it” story was so urgent at the time because there was was only one other serious culprit in the frame. No media outlet, of course, mentioned it.

    US officials from Biden down had repeatedly threatened that Washington would intervene to make sure the Nord Stream pipelines could not operate. The administration was expressly against European energy dependency on Russia. Another gain from the pipelines’ destruction was that a more economically vulnerable Europe would be forced to lean even more heavily on the US as a guarantor of its security, a useful chokehold on Europe when Washington was preparing for prolonged confrontations with both Russia and China.

    As for the means, only a handful of states had the divers and technical resources enabling them to pull off the extremely difficult feat of successfully planting and detonating explosives on the sea floor undetected.

    Had we known then what is gradually becoming clear now, even from establishment media reporting – that the US was, at the very least, intimately involved – there would have been uproar.

    It would have been clear that the US was a rogue, terrorist state, that it was willing to burn its allies for geostrategic gain, and that there was no limit to the crimes it was prepared to commit.

    Every time Europeans had to pay substantially more for their heating bills, or filling up their car, or paying for the weekly shop, they would have known that the cause was gangster-like criminality by the Biden administration.

    Evidence ignored

    Which is precisely why the establishment media were so very careful after the explosions not to implicate the Biden administration in any way, even if it meant ignoring the mass of evidence staring them in the face.

    It is why they ignored the incendiary report by legendary investigative journalist Seymour Hersh – who has broken some of the most important stories of the last half century – detailing exactly how the US carried out the operation. When his account was occasionally referenced by the media, it was solely to ridicule it.

    It is why, when it became obvious that the “Russia did it” claim was unsupportable, the media literally jumped ship: credulously reporting that a small group of “maverick” Ukrainians – unknown to President Volodymyr Zelensky, of course – had rented a yacht and carried off one of the most daring and difficult deep-sea stunts ever recorded.

    It is why, later, the media treated it as entirely unremarkable – and certainly not worthy of comment – that new evidence suggested the Biden administration was warned of this maverick Ukrainian operation against the whole of Europe. It apparently knew what was about to happen but did precisely nothing to stop it.

    And it is why the latest reporting from the Washington Post changes the impossible-to-believe “maverick” Ukrainian operation into one that implicates the very top of the Ukrainian military. Still, once again, the paper and the rest of the media steadfastly refuse to join the dots and follow the implications contained in their own reporting.

    The central character in the new drama, Roman Chervinsky, belongs to Ukraine’s special operations forces. He supposedly oversaw the small, six-man team that rented a yacht and then carried out the James Bond-style attack.

    The ingenuous Post claims that his training and operational experience meant he was “well suited to help carry out a covert mission meant to obscure Ukraine’s responsibility”. It lists his resistance activities against Russia. None indicate that he had the slightest experience allowing him to mastermind a highly challenging, extremely dangerous, technically complex attack deep in the waters of the Baltic Sea.

    Prior knowledge

    If the Ukrainian military really was behind the explosions – rather than the US – all the indications are that the Biden administration and Pentagon must have been intimately involved in the planning and execution.

    Not least, it is extremely unlikely that the Ukrainian military had the technical capability to carry out by itself such an operation successfully and undiscovered.

    And given that, even before the war, the Ukrainian military had fallen almost completely under US military operational control, the idea that Ukraine’s senior command would have been able to, or dared, execute this complex and risky venture without involving the US beggars belief.

    Politically, it would have been quite extraordinary for Ukrainian leaders to imagine they could unilaterally decide to shut down energy supplies to Europe without consulting first with the US, especially when Ukraine’s entire war effort was being paid for and overseen by Washington and Europe.

    And, of course, Ukrainian leaders would have been only too aware that the US was bound to quickly work out who was behind the attack.

    It would be telling indeed that, in such circumstances, the Biden administration would apparently choose to reward Ukraine with more money and arms for its act of industrial sabotage against Europe rather than punish it in any way.

    It would be equally astonishing that the three states supposedly investigating the attack – Germany, Sweden and Denmark – would not also soon figure out for themselves that Ukraine was culpable. Why would they decide to cover up Ukraine’s attack on Europe’s economy rather than expose it – unless they were worried about upsetting the US?

    And, of course, there is the elephant in the room: the Washington Post’s earlier reporting indicated the US had prior knowledge that Ukraine was planning the attack. That is even more likely if the pipeline blast was signed off by Ukrainian military commanders rather than a group of Ukrainian “mavericks”.

    The Washington Post’s new story repeats the line that the Biden administration was forewarned of the attack. Now, however, the Post casually reports that, after expressing opposition, “US officials believed the attack had been called off. But it turned out only to have been postponed to three months later, using a different point of departure than originally planned”.

    The Post simply accepts the word of US officials that the most powerful country on the planet fell asleep at the wheel. The CIA and the Biden administration apparently knew the Ukrainian military was keen to blow up the Nord Stream pipelines and plunge Europe into an energy crisis and economic recession. But US officials were blindsided when the same small Ukrainian operational team changed locations and timings.

    On this account, US intelligence fell for the simplest of bait and switches when the stakes were about as high as could be imagined. And the Washington Post and other media outlets report all of this with a faux-seriousness.

    Ukrainian fall guy

    Either way, the US is deeply implicated in the attack on Europe’s energy infrastructure and the undermining of its economy.

    Even if the establishment media reporting is right and Ukraine blew up Nord Stream, the Biden administration must have given the green light, overseen the operational planning and assisted in the implementation and subsequent cover-up.

    Then again, if as seems far more likely, Hersh is right, then there was no middle man – the US carried out the attack on its own. It needed a fall guy. When Russia no longer fitted the bill, Ukraine became the sacrificial offering.

    A year on, these muffled implications from the media’s own reporting barely raise an eyebrow.

    The establishment media has played precisely the role expected of it: neutering public outrage. Its regimented acceptance of the initial, preposterous claim of Russian responsibility. Its drip-feed, uncritical reporting of other, equally improbable possibilities. Its studious refusal to join the all-too-visible dots. Its continuing incuriousness about its own story and what Ukraine’s involvement would entail.

    The media has failed by every yardstick of what journalism is supposed to be there for, what it is supposed to do. And that is because the establishment media is not there to dig out the truth, it is not there to hold power to account. Ultimately, when the stakes are high – and they get no higher than the Nord Stream attack – it is there to spin narratives convenient to those in power, because the media itself is embedded in those same networks of power.

    Why do billionaires rush to own media corporations, even when the outlets are loss-making? Why are governments so keen to let billionaires take charge of the chief means by which we gain information and communicate between ourselves. Because the power to tell stories, the power over our minds is the greatest power there is.

    This post was originally published on Dissident Voice.

  • ISLAMABAD: The Joint Arab Islamic Extraordinary Summit which was held in Riyadh has called upon the United Nations Security Council to adopt a resolution to condemn the destruction, displacement, and prevention of basic services and needs in Gaza and to ensure immediate cessation of Israeli military escalation, according to Associated Press of Pakistan (APP.

    APP while quoting a press statement said that the summit further demanded lifting of the Israeli illegal siege, ensure delivery of humanitarian aid to the Gaza Strip and compel the colonial occupation to abide by the international laws, ).

    The joint extraordinary Arab and Islamic Summit held in Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, on 11 November had concluded its work in the presence of Heads of State and Government of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation and the League of Arab States, a press statement said.

    The two organizations in the resolution adopted by the joint summit underscored the centrality of the Palestinian cause and their support with all their capabilities for the legitimate struggle of the Palestinian people to liberate all their occupied territories and the need to end the Israeli aggression against the Palestinian people and to separate Gaza from the West Bank, including Al Quds Al Sharif.

    “The resolution affirmed that Israel and all the states in the region will never enjoy security and peace unless Palestinians enjoy them and reclaim all their usurped rights,”.

    The resolution mandated the foreign ministers of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia as Chair of the Arab Summit (32), and the Islamic Summit and of Jordan, Egypt, Qatar, Turkiye, Indonesia, Nigeria, Palestine, and any other interested country and the secretary generals of the two organizations to start immediate international action on behalf of all member states of the Organization and the League to initiate an international action to stop the war on Gaza.
    The resolutions also demanded that all countries stop exporting weapons and ammunitions to the occupation authorities that are used by their army and terrorist settlers to kill the Palestinian people and destroy their homes, hospitals, schools, mosques, churches, and all their properties.

    The resolution mandated the two General Secretariats of the OIC and the League of Arab States to establish two specialized legal monitoring units to document all the crimes of the occupation authorities in the Gaza Strip since 7 October 2023 and to prepare evidence on the Israeli violations.

    It affirmed its support for the legal and political initiatives of the State of Palestine at the International Court of Justice (ICJ), the International Criminal Court (ICC), and the Human Rights Council (HRC).
    It also requested the prosecutor of the ICC to continue its investigation into the war crimes and crimes against humanity perpetrated by Israel against the Palestinian people.

    The resolution called for convening an international peace conference, as soon as possible, noting that a just, durable, and comprehensive peace was the only way to achieve that on the basis of international legitimacy resolutions and the Arab Peace Initiative as basic terms of reference and renewed adherence to all its provisions and priorities.

    The resolution contained political, legal, and humanitarian steps, including breaking the siege on Gaza, ensuring the entry of Arab, Islamic, and international humanitarian aid convoys, and supporting Egypt’s efforts to deliver aid to the Strip in an immediate, sustainable, and sufficient manner.
    It also called on the international organizations to participate in this process.

    It described the ongoing Israeli aggression as a retaliatory war crime that could not be justified under any guise.
    “The resolution also included the activation of the Arab and Islamic Financial Safety Net to provide assistance and financial, economic, and humanitarian support to the Government of the State of Palestine and to UNRWA, and emphasized the need to mobilize international partners to reconstruct Gaza and mitigate the effects of the massive destruction caused by the Israeli aggression as soon as it stops,” the statement said.

    The resolution also condemned the military aggression against the Gaza Strip and the war crimes and barbaric, brutal, and inhuman massacres committed by the colonial occupation government and the military operations against Palestinian cities and camps, the settlers’ terrorism, and Israeli attacks on Islamic and Christian holy places in Al-Quds and the illegal Israeli measures that violated freedom of worship.

    The post Joint Arab Islamic Summit’s resolution calls upon UNSC to condemn destruction in Gaza, ensure immediate cessation of Israeli escalation first appeared on VOSA.

    This post was originally published on VOSA.

  • UNITED NATIONS: Although current agri-food systems provide nourishment and sustain economies, they also impose huge hidden costs on health and the environment – the equivalent of at least $10 trillion annually – a new report by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), a Rome-based UN agency, has revealed.

    APP reported that the figure represents nearly 10 percent of global Gross Domestic Product (GDP), according to the 2023 edition of The State of Food and Agriculture (SOFA) – the agency’s flagship report – which covers 154 countries.

    It introduces the concept of the hidden costs and benefits of agrifood systems, offering a framework through which they can be assessed.

    The aim is to help decision makers steer global agrifood systems – the whole industry encompassing food and non-food agricultural production – towards greater sustainability.

    “In the face of escalating global challenges: food availability, food accessibility and food affordability; climate crisis; biodiversity loss; economic slowdowns and downturns; worsening poverty; and other overlapping crises, the future of our agrifood systems hinges on our willingness to appreciate all food producers, big or small, to acknowledge these true costs, and understand how we all contribute to them, and what actions we need to take,” FAO Director-General Dongyu Qu said in a statement.

    The report found that the biggest hidden costs, more than 70 percent, are driven by unhealthy diets that are high in ultra-processed foods, fats and sugars, leading to obesity and non-communicable diseases, and causing labour productivity losses. This is particularly the case in richer countries.

    One fifth of the total costs are environment-related, from greenhouse gas and nitrogen emissions, land-use change and water use, with all countries affected.

    Meanwhile, low-income countries are proportionately the hardest hit by hidden costs of agrifood systems, which represent more than a quarter of their GDP, compared to less than 12 percent in middle-income countries and less than eight percent in high-income countries.

    Hidden costs associated with poverty and undernourishment are also the most significant in these nations.

    The report calls for more regular and detailed analysis by governments and the private sector of the hidden or “true” costs of agrifood systems through true cost accounting, followed by action.

    Although there have been previous attempts at measurement, the FAO report is the first to disaggregate these costs down to the national level and ensure they are comparable across cost categories and between countries.

    The UN agency said it will dedicate two consecutive editions of the SOFA report to the same theme, marking a first. The current report presents initial estimates, while the 2024 edition will focus on in-depth targeted assessments to identify the best ways to mitigate them such as through taxation, subsidies, and legislation.

    FAO has urged governments to use “true cost” accounting to transform agrifood systems to address the climate crisis, poverty, inequality and food security, which will require investment and innovations in areas such as research, data collection and capacity building.

    “I hope that this report will serve as a call to action for all partners – from policymakers and private-sector actors to researchers and consumers – and inspire a collective commitment to transform our agrifood systems for the betterment of all,” Qu said.

    The post Hidden costs of global agrifood systems worth at least $10 trillion: UN agency first appeared on VOSA.

  • UNITED NATIONS: Opium poppy production in Afghanistan has plummeted since the Taliban imposed a drug ban last year, according to a new survey by the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, UNODC, as reported by the Associated Press of Pakistan (APP).

    According to the Afghanistan Opium Survey 2023, released by the Vienna-based agency on Sunday, the supply of opium declined by an estimated 95 per cent, falling from 6,200 tons in 2022 to 333 tons in 2023, corresponding to a fall in the area under cultivation, from 233,000 hectares to just 10,800 hectares over the same period.

    The near-total contraction of the opiate economy is expected to have far-reaching consequences, UNODC said, highlighting the urgent need for alternative development support for rural communities to build an opium-free future for the Afghan people.

    “This presents a real opportunity to build towards long-term results against the illicit opium market and the damage it causes both locally and globally,” said Ghada Waly, UNODC Executive Director.

    “At the same time, there are important consequences and risks that need to be addressed for an outcome that is ultimately positive and sustainable, especially for the people of Afghanistan,” she added.

    The survey noted the sharp reduction has had immediate humanitarian consequences for many vulnerable rural communities that relied on income from cultivating opium.

    Farmers’ income from selling the opium harvested in 2023 to traders fell by more than 92 per cent from an estimated $1,360 million for the 2022 harvest to $110 million in 2023, the survey added.

    “Today, Afghanistan’s people need urgent humanitarian assistance to meet their most immediate needs, to absorb the shock of lost income and to save lives,” Ms. Waly said, noting that over the coming months, the country will require strong investment in sustainable livelihoods, to provide farmers with opportunities away from opium.

    UNODC also emphasized that though there are high levels of opiate use within Afghanistan, evidence-based treatment options remain limited.

    It called for evidence-based treatment to be integrated in public health measures and assistance, including to prevent people with opiate use disorders from turning to potentially even more harmful substances.

    Beyond Afghanistan, less heroin may lead to reduced trafficking and use, or it could spur the emergence of harmful alternatives, such as fentanyl and other synthetic opioids, UNODC warned.

    Data on seizures indicate that traders are selling off their opium inventories from past record harvests to weather the shortfall in 2023, while heroin processing has decreased.

    However, trafficking in other drugs, namely methamphetamine, has surged in the region.

    The post Opium cultivation in Afghanistan plunges by 95% under Taliban: UN first appeared on VOSA.

  • Suella Braverman signs ‘migration and security agreement’ with Austrian counterpart in move to work more closely together

    Austria is seeking to adopt a Rwanda-style deal to deport asylum seekers to a third country, having agreed a deal to work with the UK on migration.

    Suella Braverman signed a “migration and security agreement” with her Austrian counterpart, Gerhard Karner, in which the two countries agreed to work more closely together.

    Continue reading…

  • Opposition leader Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya condemns the sentencing of Tor Band’s three members

    Musicians from a group that became a symbol of protest in Belarus have been sentenced to prison terms of up to nine years in the country’s relentless crackdown on dissent.

    Tor Band became widely known in Belarus during a wave of protests that arose in August 2020 after a disputed presidential election in which Alexander Lukashenko was declared the winner, giving him a sixth term in office.

    Continue reading…

    This post was originally published on Human rights | The Guardian.

  • BEIJING: Pakistan National Pavilion at the Sichuan Agriculture Expo in Chengdu has introduced the famous touristic sites in Pakistan and displayed a number of the agricultural goods produced by the country, according to APP

    More than a dozen Pakistani companies displayed their agricultural products here. The Pavilion attracted great interest from the participants attending the Expo.

    Pakistan’s Ambassador to China, Moin ul Haque, inaugurated the Pavilion.

    He was joined by the Vice governor of Sichuan Province Hu Yun, Secretary Trade Development Authority of Pakistan (TDAP), Dr Farheed Iqbal and Pakistan’s Acting Consul General in Chengdu Agha Hunain Abbas Khan, CEN reported.

    Meanwhile, the Ambassador participated in the Opening Ceremony of the 9th Sichuan Agriculture Expo, where Pakistan is the Country of Honor. In his address during the opening ceremony, the Ambassador highlighted the strong bilateral relations between Pakistan and China, that are based on political trust, strategic communication, and practical cooperation.

    He also highlighted the close cooperation between Pakistan and Sichuan, including through sister province and city collaborations.

    Pakistan’s participation in the Expo will inject impetus into the ongoing cooperation between Pakistan and China in the agriculture sector. Recently five important agriculture SPS protocols have been finalized between the two sides, giving Pakistan access to a market of US$30 billion in cooked beef, dairy, chillies, cherries and other livestock products.

    This endeavor will contribute to Pakistan’s efforts to increase its exports to China.

    Sichuan Agriculture Expo is the largest agriculture expo in western China and caters to over 400 million people. More than 2000 exhibitors are attending the Expo and more than 200,000 people are expected to visit it.

    The post Pakistan Pavilion in Chengdu introduces famous touristic sites first appeared on VOSA.

    This post was originally published on VOSA.

  • Top MEP says Iranian woman’s death in police custody last year ‘triggered a movement that is making history’

    Mahsa Amini, the 22-year-old Kurdish Iranian woman who died in police custody in Iran last year, sparking worldwide protests against the country’s conservative Islamic theocracy, has been awarded the EU’s top human rights prize.

    The award, named for the Soviet dissident Andrei Sakharov, was created in 1988 to honour individuals or groups who defend human rights and fundamental freedoms. Sakharov, a Nobel peace prize laureate, died in 1989.

    Continue reading…

    This post was originally published on Human rights | The Guardian.

  • Top MEP says Iranian woman’s death in police custody last year ‘triggered a movement that is making history’

    Mahsa Amini, the 22-year-old Kurdish Iranian woman who died in police custody in Iran last year, sparking worldwide protests against the country’s conservative Islamic theocracy, has been awarded the EU’s top human rights prize.

    The award, named for the Soviet dissident Andrei Sakharov, was created in 1988 to honour individuals or groups who defend human rights and fundamental freedoms. Sakharov, a Nobel peace prize laureate, died in 1989.

    Continue reading…

    This post was originally published on Human rights | The Guardian.

  • When a passenger plane was forced to land in Minsk in 2021, one man screamed: ‘They’ll kill me’. Many of his countrymen and women now realise they are also not safe, even in exile

    For a few days in May 2021, the perilous reality of being a dissenting voice in Belarus was laid bare when pilots on board Ryanair flight FR4978 bound for Vilnius in Lithuania were forced to make an emergency landing in Minsk after entering Belarusian airspace.

    The pilots had been told by Belarusian air traffic control that the plane had a bomb on board. When one of them announced to passengers that the plane was being diverted to Minsk, a young male passenger leapt to his feet. He shouted that if the plane landed he would be seized by the authorities. “I am wanted there, they’ll kill me,” he screamed.

    Continue reading…

    This post was originally published on Human rights | The Guardian.

  • New York: As Hamas-Israel fresh conflict continues for a week now, Jews in New York demonstrated in favor of Gaza, and condemned the Israeli bombing on Gaza and the use of phosphorus.

    Demonstrations expressed their solidarity with Palestinians, and condemned Israel’s aggressive attacks on Gaza.

    To express solidarity with the Palestinian people, various Muslim and human rights organizations in the Manhattan area of New York participated in a demonstration.

    Thousands of people, including a large number of children and women also participated.

    Thousands of students from college were also a part of this rally.

    Demonstrators said that attacks on civilians in Gaza are against the teachings of the Torah, that attacks on civilians in Gaza are genocide.

    Demonstrators carried placards with anti-Israel slogans while participants held up photographs of children martyred in Gaza.

    The post Israel’s attacks on civilians in Gaza against the teachings of the Torah: Jews hold protest in NYC first appeared on VOSA.

    This post was originally published on VOSA.

  • UK has led the way, with countries across the continent making mass arrests, passing draconian new laws and labelling activists as eco-terrorists

    Human rights experts and campaigners have warned against an intensifying crackdown on climate protests across Europe, as Guardian research found countries across the continent using repressive measures to silence activists.

    In Germany, France, Italy, Sweden, the Netherlands and the UK, authorities have responded to climate protests with mass arrests, the passing of draconian new laws, the imposing of severe sentences for non-violent protests and the labelling of activists as hooligans, saboteurs or eco-terrorists.

    Continue reading…

    This post was originally published on Human rights | The Guardian.

  • Luisa Neubauer, of Fridays for Future, cites language used by the chancellor amid protest crackdown

    Severe policing and “scary” political rhetoric is fuelling abuse against climate activists, Germany’s best-known environmentalist has said.

    “It’s not a shift any more, it’s a slide,” said Luisa Neubauer, from the German branch of Fridays for Future, the protest movement that grew out of Greta Thunberg’s school strikes. “There’s an increase in hate language, there’s an increase in threats, and the threats are getting more concrete. So they’re not saying any more ‘I hate you’ but they’re saying ‘We should come to your place, we should go get you.’”

    Continue reading…

    This post was originally published on Human rights | The Guardian.

  • Logo of the NDP Windsor-Tecumseh riding association. Image credit: Windsor—Tecumseh NDP/Facebook

    Chinese (Simplified)EnglishFrenchGermanItalianPortugueseRussianSpanish

    Written by: Jack Dempster

    The New Democratic Party, at all levels of Canadian politics, has a long and sordid history of supporting imperialism and the bandit policies of Bay Street capitalism. In a recent example of the NDP’s brazen support to reactionary politics, an Ontario NDP riding association has signalled support to Azerbaijan’s ethnic cleansing against the Armenians of Nagorno-Karabakh.

    Recently, the Windsor-Tecumseh NDP riding association put forth a convention resolution openly supporting Azerbaijan’s drive to conquer Nagorno-Karabakh, an ethnically Armenian enclave surrounded by Azerbaijani territory.  

    “Azerbaijan’s sovereignty is being violated by Armenia factions in Nagorno-Karabakh,” reads the motion. It continues on to say the NDP must “support and affirm Azerbaijan’s territorial claims to Nagorno-Karabakh,” citing international laws and United Nations resolutions which supposedly uphold “the inviolability of international borders and the inadmissibility of the use of force for the acquisition of territory.”

    It is notable that this NDP riding put the motion forward. Support for, say, NATO’s proxy war using Ukraine against Russia (which even a Canadian MP admits to) is solid across all levels of the NDP. But the issues around Azerbaijan and Armenia have produced a perceived split in opinion within the party.

    At the Federal Level, NDP MPs Heather McPherson and Alexandre Boulerice, alongside the Bloc Québécois, have called for sanctions against Azerbaijan. Foreign Affairs Minister Mélanie Joly has reciprocated, stating that “everything is on the table.” The Canadians obviously have some interest in puffing up their “humanitarian” credentials on the world stage. 

    Yet regardless of one’s opposition to a foreign government, unilateral sanctions represent only an act of imperialist aggression against foreign nations and states, which immiserate the working class and result in widespread economic devastation. They are based on liberal illusions that imperialism can be a force for moral good on the world stage.

    The New Democrats totally partake in such illusions, but they sometimes disagree over when and where to employ them. Thus, we find this stark difference in opinion between the leading Federal NDP MP’s pushing for sanctions against Azerbaijan, and the local riding who filed the pro-Azerbaijan motion.

    In comment to The Canada Files, the Armenian National Committee of Canada (ANCC) said: “It is unconscionable to think that the NDP convention would even consider such a resolution at a time when the authoritarian regime in Azerbaijan is actively committing a state-sponsored ethnic cleansing campaign against the Armenian people after subjecting them to ten months of blockade and genocidal aggression.”

    The ANCC does favour sanctions, continuing to say that: “The NDP leadership has taken a principled stance on this issue, calling on Canada to sanction Azerbaijan and hold them accountable for their crimes, and the NDP convention should do the same by rejecting this motion, which clearly aims to promote the toxic propaganda of a foreign regime in Canada.

    The NDP riding association for Windsor-Tecumseh did not respond to The Canada Files’ request for comment. NDP MP’s Heather McPherson and Alexandre Boulerice did not respond to TCF’s questions.

     

    Azerbaijan’s actions and Armenian suffering

    On September 19, Azerbaijan’s military launched a lightning blitz against Nagorno-Karabakh, territory which has been fought over since the downfall of the USSR. Azerbaijan used drones to attack soldiers and also hit social infrastructure, killing a number of civilians. The aim of Azerbaijan was to finalize the conquest of Nagorno-Karabakh, which was left uncompleted from a 2020 offensive.

    On September 20, a ceasefire agreement mediated by Russia, was signed. This agreement called for the disbandment of the Artsakh Defence Army and all other Armenian-backed forces. By the end of the month, Armenian defenders agreed to dissolve their government, with Nagorno-Karabakh to become Azeri territory. Leading Karabakh politicians such as Ruben Vardanyan and Arayik Harutyunyan, have been detained. This represents the downfall of the Armenian Republic of Artsakh.

    Over 100 000 ethnic Armenians have fled Nagorno-Karabakh, nearly emptying the territory. This forced displacement comes on the heels of a months-long Azeri starvation blockade of the Lachin Corridor connecting Artsakh with Armenia proper. Displaced Armenians are now living in poverty and despair in Armenia’s capital Yerevan and elsewhere in the region.


    Armenia and Azerbaijan’s fight for Nagorno-Karabakh

    Starting in the early 1920’s, Armenia and Azerbaijan entered a period of Sovietisation. At the time the vast majority of Nagorno-Karabakh was ethnically Armenian. The Bolsheviks, however, decided to merge Nagorno-Karabakh with Azerbaijan for pragmatic reasons. Namely, they wanted to link the heavily rural area of Nagorno-Karabakh with industrialized Baku in order to speed up economic development and the growth of a proletariat in the area. Nationalistic contradictions were expected to slowly dissipate through the process of modernization and cohabitation. For decades, Armenia and Azerbaijan would live in peace.  

    However, with the breakup of the Soviet Union, nationalist tensions exploded. War between Armenia and Azerbaijan broke out in the late 1980s. Armenians fled in huge numbers from Azerbaijan and there were pogroms against them in Baku and Sumgait. Azerbaijanis also left Armenia in large numbers. Sharp national divisions were drawn between the two peoples. Meanwhile, Azerbaijan repressed Armenians in Karabakh, who were demanding unification with the Armenian Soviet Socialist Republic.

    In 1991, both Armenia and Azerbaijan declared independence, and the Soviets withdrew. That same year, the peoples of Nagorno-Karabakh voted overwhelmingly to govern themselves. In 1994, Armenia launched a bid to seize Karabakh. By 1994, they had succeeded in taking both Karabakh and several adjoining Azeri areas and would control the region for another two decades.  

    In 2020, Azerbaijan launched a war to retake Nagorno-Karabakh. Using Israeli and Turkish drones, the Azeri military was able to seize portions of Karabakh. Turkish-backed Syrian jihadists backed up Azerbaijan’s war drive. At that time, Russia intervened to negotiate a ceasefire. Azerbaijan gained back its territory around Karabakh, but not the enclave itself. Russian troops were deployed along the Lachin Corridor. Intermittent fighting continued between the two sides, until December of last year, when the blockade began, leading to the current crisis.

    On the face of things, one might lament that the Azerbaijani-Armenian dispute over Nagorno-Karabakh is simply a tragedy rooted in the unravelling of the internationalist USSR and its replacement by various nationalist capitalist states. That is true in the general sense, but to end with such a lament would be to betray the cause of the Armenians who are currently caught in the hell of forced displacement and ethnic cleansing.

    Azerbaijan is a Turkic nation, and fights on the basis of Great Turkish chauvinism. Turkey, a member of the NATO imperialist alliance, is backing Azerbaijan in its irredentist drive. So too is the Zionist regime, which has armed Azerbaijan, selling it billions of dollars worth of weapons.

    The Turkish ruling class were responsible for the Armenian genocide during the late Ottoman epoch, and to this day the Turkish government refuses to take responsibility for the genocide. Today’s ethnic cleansing of Armenians by Azerbaijan thus produces grim historical echoes. Meanwhile, the Israelis are responsible for one of the most violent examples of ethnic cleansing in world history, namely the dispossession of Palestine and the 1948 Nakba.

    When a NATO member along with Israel supports forced population transfers and irredentist warfare, neutrality is failure.

    We do not know the motivations of the particular NDP riding association members who called to “support and affirm Azerbaijan’s territorial claims” on Nagorno-Karabakh. In any case, those who put forward the motion must do nothing else than hang their heads in shame over their support for NATO-backed ethnic cleansing. 


    Editor’s note: Introducing Operation 135, The Canada Files’ campaign to go from 65 to 200 consistent financial supporters. The Canada Files is the country’s only news outlet focused on Canadian foreign policy. We’ve provided critical investigations & hard-hitting analysis on Canadian foreign policy since 2019, and need your support.
     
    Please consider joining 65 consistent financial supporters, in setting up a monthly or annual donation through Donorbox.


    Jack Dempster is a socialist trade unionist and writer based in Toronto, Ontario.


    More Articles

    This post was originally published on Articles – The Canada Files.

  • Practice ruled to be discriminatory, but Conseil d’État says it does not have power to force change in policy

    France’s highest administrative court has recognised discriminatory police identity checks based on racial profiling exist in France and are not isolated cases, but said it could not change political policy on the issue.

    In a class action against the French state, six French and international organisations including Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch and the Open Society Justice Initiative had asked for French authorities to be found at fault for failing to prevent the widespread use of racial profiling.

    Continue reading…

    This post was originally published on Human rights | The Guardian.

  • Foreign workers at the Middle East locations of US and UK brands allege low pay, harsh conditions and a legal limbo with few protections

    Today the Guardian has published an investigation into labor conditions at the Persian Gulf locations of major US and UK brands, including Amazon, McDonald’s and the InterContinental Hotels Group.

    Almost 100 current and former migrant laborers spoke to reporters, and many claimed they were misled into taking poorly paid jobs, subject to extortionate and arbitrary fees, or had their passports confiscated. These practices are broadly considered to be indicators of labor trafficking.

    Continue reading…

    This post was originally published on Human rights | The Guardian.

  • Workers contracted to work for western brands in Saudi Arabia have described conditions as ‘like jail’

    Over the years the world’s most powerful fast-food chain, McDonald’s, has twice honored a Saudi prince’s business empire with its highest accolade for its franchisees: the Golden Arch award.

    Prince Mishaal bin Khalid al-Saud – who controls more than 200 McDonald’s outlets across Saudi Arabia – told CEO Magazine in 2018 that one of the secrets of his enterprise’s success is “ensuring a positive and favorable environment for our employees”.

    Continue reading…

    This post was originally published on Human rights | The Guardian.

  • On February 12, 2002 at a Pentagon news conference, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld was asked by Jim Miklaszewski, the NBC Pentagon correspondent, if he had any evidence that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction and was supplying them to terrorists.  Rumsfeld delivered a famous non-answer answer and said:

    Reports that say that something hasn’t happened are always interesting to me, because as we know, there are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns — the ones we don’t know we don’t know.

    When he was pressed by Jamie McIntyre, CNN’s Pentagon correspondent, to answer the question about evidence, he continued to talk gobbledygook, saying, “I could have said that the absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, or vice versa.”

    He never said he had evidence, because he didn’t.

    Rumsfeld, who enjoyed his verbal games, was the quintessential bullshitter and liar for the warfare state.  This encounter took place when Rumsfeld and his coconspirators were promoting lie after lie about the attacks of September 11, 2001 and conflating false stories about an alliance between Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden in order to build a case to wage another war against Iraq, in order to supplement the one in Afghanistan and the war on “terror” that they launched post September 11 and the subsequently linked anthrax attacks.

    A year later on February 5, 2003, U. S. Secretary of State Colin Powell went before the U. N. Security Council and in a command performance assured the world that the U.S. had solid evidence that Iraq had “weapons of mass destruction,” repeating that phrase seventeen times as he held up a stage prop vial of anthrax to make his point.  He said, “My colleagues, every statement I make today is backed up by sources — solid sources. These are not assertions. What we’re giving you are facts and conclusions based on solid intelligence.”  He was lying, but to this very day his defenders falsely claim he was the victim of an “intelligence failure,” a typical deceitful excuse along with “it was a mistake.”  Of course, Iraq did not have “weapons of mass destruction” and the savage war waged on Iraq was not a mistake.

    Scott Ritter, the former Marine U.N. weapons inspector,  made it very clear back then that there was no evidence that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction, but his expertise was dismissed, just as his current analysis of the war in Ukraine is.  See his recent tweet about Senator Diane Feinstein in this regard:

    Thirteen months after Rumsfeld’s exchange in the news conference, the United States invaded Iraq on March 19, 2003, knowing it had no justification.  It was a war of aggression.  Millions died as a result.  And none of the killers have been prosecuted for their massive war crimes.  The war was not launched on mistaken evidence; it was premeditated and based on lies easy to see.  Very, very easy to see.

    On January 28, 2003, eleven days before Powell performance, I, an independent writer, wrote a newspaper Op Ed, “The War Hoax,” saying:

    The Bush administration has a problem: How to start a war without having a justifiable reason for one.  No doubt they are working hard to solve this urgent problem.  If they can’t find a justification, they may have to create one.  Or perhaps they will find what they have already created. . . . Yet once again, the American people are being played for fools, by the government and the media.  The open secret, the insider’s fact, is that the United States plans to attack Iraq in the near future.  The administration knows this, the media knows it, but the Bush scenario, written many months ago, is to act as if it weren’t so, to act as if a peaceful solution were being seriously considered. . . . Don’t buy it.

    Only one very small regional Massachusetts newspaper, the North Adams Transcript, was willing to publish the piece.

    I mention this because I think it has been very obvious for a very long time that the evidence for United States’ crimes of all sorts has been available to anyone who wished to face the truth.  It does not take great expertise, just an eye for the obvious and the willingness to do a little homework.  Despite this, I have noticed that journalists and writers on the left have continued to admit that they were beguiled by people such as Bill and Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, and Joseph Biden, con men all.  I do not mean writers for the mainstream press, but those considered oppositional.  Many have, for reasons only they can answer, put hope in these obvious charlatans, and some prominent ones have refused to analyze such matters as the JFK assassination, September 11th, or Covid-19, to name a few issues.  Was it because they considered these politicians and matters known unknowns, even when the writing was on the wall?

    Those on the right have rolled with Reagan, the Bushes, and Trump in a similar manner, albeit for different reasons.  It causes me to shake my head in amazement.  When will people learn?  How long does it take to realize that all these people are part of a vast criminal enterprise that has been continuously waging wars and lying while raking in vast spoils for the military-industrial complex.  There is one party in the U.S. – the War Party.

    If you have lived long enough, as have I, you reach a point when you have, through study and the accumulation of evidence, arrived at a long list of known knowns.  So with a backhand slap to Donald Rumsfeld, that long serving servant of the U.S. war machine, I will list a very partial number of my known knowns in chronological order.  Each could be greatly expanded. There is an abundance of easily available evidence for all of them – nothing secret – but one needs to have the will for truth and do one’s homework.  All of these known knowns are the result of U.S. deep state conspiracies and lies, aided and abetted by the lies of mass corporate media.

    My Known Knowns:

    • The U.S. national security state led by the CIA assassinated President John F. Kennedy on November 22, 1963. This is The foundational event for everything that has followed.  It set the tone and sent the message that deep state forces will do anything to wage their wars at home and abroad.  They killed JFK because he was ending the war against Vietnam, the Cold War, and the nuclear arms race.
    • Those same forces assassinated Malcolm X fourteen months later on February 21, 1965 because he too had become a champion of peace, human rights, and racial justice with his budding alliance with Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. Such an alliance of these two black leaders posed too great a threat to the racist warfare state.  This conspiracy was carried out by the Nation of Islam, the New York Police Department, and U.S. intelligence agencies.
    • The Indonesian government’s slaughter of more than one million mainly poor rice farmers in 1965-6 was the result of a scheme planned by ex-CIA Director Allen Dulles, whom JFK had fired. It was connected to Dulles’s role in the assassination of JFK, the CIA-engineered coup against Indonesian President Sukarno, his replacement by the dictator Suharto, and his mass slaughter ten years later, starting in December 1975.  The American-installed Indonesian dictator Suharto, after meeting with Henry Kissinger and President Ford and receiving their approval, would slaughter hundreds of thousands East-Timorese with American-supplied weapons in a repeat of the slaughter of more than a million Indonesians in 1965.
    • In June of 1967, Israel, a purported ally of the U.S., attacked and destroyed the Egyptian and Syrian armies, claiming falsely that Egypt was about to attack Israel. This was a lie that was later admitted by former Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin in a speech he gave in 1982 in Washington, D.C.  Israel annexed the West Bank and Gaza and still occupies the Golan Heights as well.  In June 1967, Israel also attacked and tried to sink the U.S. intelligence gathering ship the U.S. Liberty, killing 34 U.S. sailors and wounding 170 others.  Washington covered up these intentional murders to protect Israel.
    • On April 4, 1968, these same intelligence forces led by the FBI, assassinated Martin Luther King, Jr. in Memphis, Tennessee. He was not shot by James Earl Ray, the officially alleged assassin, but by a hit man who was part of another intricate government conspiracy.  King was killed because of his work for racial and human rights and justice, his opposition to the Vietnam War, and his push for economic justice with the Poor People’s Campaign.
    • Two months later, Senator Robert F. Kennedy, on his way to the presidency, was also assassinated by deep state intelligence forces in another vastly intricate conspiracy. He was not killed by Sirhan Sirhan, who was a hypnotized patsy standing in front of RFK. He was assassinated by a CIA hit man who was standing behind him and shot him from close range.  RFK, also, was assassinated because he was intent on ending the war against Vietnam, bringing racial and economic justice to the country, and pursuing the assassins of his brother John.
    • The escalation of the war against Vietnam by Pres. Lyndon Johnson was based on the Tonkin Gulf lies. Its savage waging by Richard Nixon for eight years was based on endless lies.  These men were war criminals of the highest order.  Nixon’s 1968 election was facilitated by the “October Surprise” when South Vietnam withdrew from peace negotiations to end the war.  This was secretly arranged by Nixon and his intermediaries.
    • The well-known Watergate scandal story, as told by Woodward and Bernstein of The Washington Post, that led to Richard Nixon’s resignation in August 1974, is an entertaining fiction concealing intelligence operations.
    • Another October Surprise was arranged for the 1980 presidential election. It was linked to the subsequent Iran-Contra scandal during the Reagan administration, led by future CIA Director under Reagan, William Casey, and former CIA Director and Vice-President under Reagan, George H. W. Bush.  As in 1968, a secret deal was made to secure the Republican’s election by making a deal with Iran to withhold releasing the American hostages they held until after the election.  They were released minutes after Reagan was sworn in on January 20, 1981.  American presidential elections have been fraught with scandals, as in 2000 when George W. Bush and team stole the election from Democrat Al Gore, and Russia-gate was conjured up by the Democrats in 2016 to try to prevent Trump’s election.
    • The Reagan administration, together with the CIA, armed the so-called “Contras” to wage war against the Sandinista government of Nicaragua that had overthrown the vicious U.S. supported dictator Anastasio Somoza. The Contras were Somoza supporters and part of a long line of terrorists that the U.S. had used throughout Latin America where they supported dictators and death squads to squelch democratic movements. Such state terrorism was of a piece with the September 11, 1973 U.S. engineered coup against the democratic government of President Salvatore Allende in Chile and his replacement with the dictator Augusto Pinochet.
    • The Persian Gulf War waged by George H.W. Bush in 1991 – the first made for TV war – was based on lie upon lie promoted by the administration and their public relations firm. It was a war of aggression celebrated by CNN and other media as a joyous July 4th fireworks display.
    • Then the neoliberal phony William Clinton spent eight years bombing Iraq, dismantling the social safety net, deregulating the banks, attacking and dismantling Yugoslavia, savagely bombing Serbia, etc. In a span of four months in 1999 he bombed four countries: Afghanistan, Sudan, Iraq, and Yugoslavia.  He maintained the U.S. sanctions placed on Iraq following the Gulf War that resulted in the death of 500,00 Iraqi children.  When his Secretary of State Madeleine Albright was asked by Lesley Stahl of 60 Minutes if the price was worth it, Albright said, “We think the price is worth it.”
    • The attacks of September 11, 2001, referred to as 9/11 in an act of linguistic mind control in order to create an ongoing sense of national emergency, and the anthrax attacks that followed, were a joint inside operation – a false flag – carried out by elements within the U.S. deep state.  Together with the CIA assassination of JFK, these acts of state terrorism mark a second fundamental turning point in efforts to extinguish any sense of democratic control in the United States.  Thus The Patriot Act, government spying, censorship, and ongoing attacks on individual rights.
    • The George W. Bush-led U.S. invasion of Afghanistan, Iraq, etc. and its “war on terror” were efforts to terrorize and control the Middle East, Southwest Asia, as well as the people of the U.S. The aforementioned Mr. Rumsfeld, along with his partner in crime Dick Cheney, carried out Bush’s known known war crimes justified by the crimes of Sept 11 as they simultaneously created a vast Homeland Security spying network while eliminating Americans basic freedoms.
    • Barack Obama was one of the most effective imperialist presidents in U.S. history. Although this is factually true, he was able to provide a smiling veneer to his work at institutionalizing the permanent warfare state.  When first entering office, he finished George W. Bush’s unfinished task of bailing out the finance capitalist class of Wall St.  Having hoodwinked liberals of his bona fides, he then spent eight years presiding over extrajudicial murders, drone attacks, the destruction of Libya, a coup in Ukraine bringing neo-Nazis to power, etc.  In 2016 alone he bombed seven countries Pakistan, Libya, Yemen, Afghanistan, Syria, Somalia, and Iraq.  He expanded U.S. military bases throughout the world and sent special forces throughout Africa and Latin America.  He supported the new Cold War with sanctions on Russia.  He was a fitting successor to Bush junior.
    • Donald Trump, a New York City reality TV star and real estate tycoon, the surprise winner of the 2016 U.S. presidential election despite the Democratic Party’s false Russia-gate propaganda, attacked Syria from sea and air in the first two years of his presidency, claiming falsely that these strikes were for Syria’s use of chemical weapons at Douma and for producing chemical weapons. In doing so, he warned Russia not to be associated with Syrian President Assad, a “mass murderer of men, women, and children.”  He did not criticize Israel that to the present day continues to bomb Syria, but he recognized Jerusalem as the capital of Israel. He ordered the assassination by drone of Iranian General Qasem Soleimani near Baghdad International Airport while on a visit to meet with Iraq’s prime minister.  As an insider contrary to all portrayals, he presided over Operation Warp Speed Covid vaccination development and deployment, which was a military-pharmaceutical-CIA program, whose key player was Robert Kadlec (former colleague of Donal Rumsfeld with deep ties to spy agencies), Trump’s Assistant Secretary of Health and Human Services for Preparedness and Response and an ally of Dr. Anthony Fauci and Bill Gates.  On December 8, 2020 Trump joyously declared: “Before Operation Warp Speed, the typical time-frame for development and approval [for vaccines], as you know, could be infinity. And we were very, very happy that we were able to get things done at a level that nobody has ever seen before. The gold standard vaccine has been done in less than nine months.”  And he announced they he will quickly distribute such a “verifiably safe and effective vaccine” as soon as the FDA approved it because “We are the most exceptional nation in the history of the world. Today, we’re on the verge of another American medical miracle.”  The Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine was approves three days later. Moderna’s Covid-19 vaccine received FDA emergency use authorization a week later.
    • This Covid-19 medical miracle was a con-job from the start. The official Covid operation launched in March 11, 2020 with worldwide lockdowns that destroyed economies while enriching the super-rich and devastating regular people, was a propaganda achievement carried out by intelligence and military apparatuses in conjunction with Big Pharma, the WHO, the World Economic Forum, etc. and promulgated by a vast around-the-clock corporate media disinformation campaign.  It was the third fundamental turning point – following the JFK assassination and the attacks of September 11, 2001 and anthrax – in destabilizing the economic, social and political life of all nations while undermining their sovereignty.  It was based on false science in the interests of further establishing a biosecurity state.  The intelligence agency planners who had conducted many germ war game simulations leading up to Covid -19 referred to a future arising out of such “attacks,” as the “New Normal.”  A close study of these  precedents, game-planning, and players makes this evident.  The aim was to militarize medicine and produce a centralized authoritarian state.  Its use of the PCR “test” to detect the virus was a lie from the start.  The Nobel Award winning scientist who developed the test, Kary Mullis, made it clear that “the PCR is a process. It does not tell you that you are sick.”  It is a processto make a whole lot of something out of nothing,” but it can not detect a specific virus.  That it was used to detect all these Covid “cases” is all one needs to know about the fraud.
    • Joseph Biden, who was Obama’s point man for Ukraine while vice-president and the U.S. engineered the 2014 coup d’état in Ukraine, came into office intent on promoting the New Cold War with Russia and refused all Russian efforts to peacefully settle the Ukrainian crisis. He pushed NATO to further provoke Russia by moving farther to the east, surrounding Russia’s borders.  He supported the neo-Nazi Ukrainian elements and its government’s continuous attacks on the Russian speaking Donbass region in eastern Ukraine.  In doing so, he clearly provoked Russian into sending troops into Ukraine on 24 February 2022.  He has fueled this war relentlessly and has pushed the world to the brink of nuclear annihilation.  He supported the invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq.  He currently presides over an aggressive provocation of China.  And like his predecessor Trump, he promotes the Covid disinformation campaign and the use of “vaccines,” urging people to get their jabs.
    • Throughout all these decades and the matters touched upon here – some of my known knowns – there is another dominant theme that recurs again and again.  It is the support for Israel and its evil apartheid regime’s repeated slaughters and persecution of the Palestinian people after having dispossessed them of their ancestral land. This has been a constant fact throughout all U.S. administrations since the JFK assassination and Israel’s subsequent acquisition of nuclear weapons that Kennedy opposed.  It is been aided and abetted by the rise of the neocon elements within the U.S. government and the 1997 formation of The Project for the New American Century, founded by William Kristol and Donald Kagan, whose signees included Donald Rumsfeld, Dick Cheney, Paul Wolfowitz, et al., and their claim for the need “for a new Pearl Harbor.”  Many of these people, who held dual U.S. and Israeli citizenship, became members of the Bush administration.  Once the attacks of September 11th occurred and a summer of moviegoers watching the new film Pearl Harbor had passed, George W. Bush and the corporate media immediately and repeatedly proclaimed the attacks a new Pearl Harbor.  Once again, the Palestinian’s and Hamas’s Oct. 7, 2023 attack on Israel that is widely and falsely reported as unprovoked, as is Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, has been referred to as “a Pearl Harbor Moment.”  By today, Monday 9 Oct. 2023, President Biden has already given full U.S. support to Israel as it savagely attacks Gaza and has said that additional assistance for the Israeli Defense Forces is now on its way to Israel with more to follow over the coming days. Rather than acting as an instrument for peace, the U.S. government continues its  support for Israel’s crimes as if it were the same country. The Israel Lobby and the government of Israel has for decades exerted a powerful control over U.S. Middle East policies and much more as well.  The Mossad has often worked closely under the aegis of the CIA together with Britain’s M16 to assassinate opponents and provoke war after war.

    Donald Rumsfeld, as a key long time insider to U.S. deep state operations, was surely aware of my list of known knowns.  He was just one of many such slick talkers involved in demonic U.S. operations that have always been justified, denied, or kept secret by him and his ilk.

    One does not have to be a criminologist to realize these things.  It is easy to imagine that Rumsfeld’s forlorn ghost is wandering since he went to his grave with his false “unknown unknowns” tucked away.

    When he said, “I could have said that the absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, or vice-versa,” he did say it, of course.  Despite double-talkers like him, evidence of decades of U.S. propaganda is easy to see through if one is compelled by the will-to-truth.

    “Ancestral voices prophesying war; ancestral spirits in the danse macabre or war dance; Valhalla, ghostly warriors who kill each other and are reborn to fight again.  All warfare is ghostly, every army an exercitus feralis (army of ghosts), every soldier a living corpse.”  – Norman O. Brown

    Note:  If you think I too have no evidence, look at this for many of them.

    This post was originally published on Dissident Voice.

  • Chinese (Simplified)EnglishFrenchGermanItalianPortugueseRussianSpanish

    Written by: Aidan Jonah 

    Conservative MP Tom Kmiec let the rabbit out of the hat when speaking to the Toronto Star, openly admitting that NATO is using Ukraine in a proxy war against Russia.

    Kmiec, a member the Canadian NATO Parliamentary Association, said that in trying to justify financial and military support given to Ukraine by Canada, he tries to “make the case that”:

    “They’re [Ukraine] basically fighting it [‘a battle the West has been preparing for since the Cold War’] on our behalf.”… “And they’re not asking us to send troops”.

    Kmiec also acknowledges that this is a battle the West has been “preparing for since the Cold War”, first with the USSR and then with Russia. The admissions were prompted by Conservative MPs hearing from constituents who oppose further aid to Ukraine.

    Ivan Katchanovski, a Political Science professor at the University of Ottawa, said “Such statements by a growing number of Western politicians represent an admission that the Ukraine war is a proxy war between the West and Russia”. Katchanovski says he sees Russia as having “illegally invaded Ukraine in 2022”.

    Kmiec’s moment of truth comes amidst growing concerns of Canadian Prime Minister Trudeau and his Liberals about signs of a breakdown in the cross-partisan Canadian consensus for support to Ukraine.

    Glenn Michalchuk, President of the Association of United Ukrainian Canadians, isn’t surprised by MP Kmiec’s remarks. Michalchuk said:

    “Before the war broke out in February 2022, the Canadian Parliament was stumping for war with Russia. Parliament was motivated by Cold War animosities and ideology. In this it was fueled by the ideology of a section of the Ukrainian diaspora that longed for war with Russia.

    All of this led Canada to take the path of escalation in that critical period when diplomacy could have averted war and saved Ukraine.”

    A small number of Canadians have consistently argued that this is a NATO proxy war, while also opposing the waste of taxpayer dollars.  The Canadian government seeks to refute this by claiming “Russian disinformation” campaigns surrounding criticism of the proxy war. It’s doubtful that they can “Russian disinformation” their way out of Kmiec’s admissions, if these become known by more Canadians.

    Kmiec’s office did not respond to The Canada Files’ request for comment.

    NATO politicians admit Ukraine is fighting on the West’s behalf 

    The loss of life in Ukraine, over the process of Russia’s SMO, has been horrific. Nearly 500 000 Ukrainian soldiers are dead, millions of civilians have had to flee their homes, and Ukraine has seen a 300 000 person increase in Ukrainians with disabilities. The deaths inflicted on the people of the Donbass by the Ukrainian army from 2014 to 2022, after declaring themselves independent states, should be acknowledged as well.

    The Press Office of Russia’s embassy in Canada says “Canada’s current cabinet, as part of the collective West, at the U.S. behest, is waging a hybrid proxy war against Russia – at the expense of Ukrainian citizens,” with the objective “to inflict on Russia a geostrategic defeat and to take on the rest of the world to ensure the preservation of an American-centered order.”

    The utilization of Ukraine as a NATO proxy against Russia, as evidenced by the stats, have been utterly devastating for the Ukrainian people. The Ukrainian people have been led to the slaughterhouse.

    Katchanovski said “The Western governments use Ukraine as a proxy to weaken and contain Russia. Since chances of Ukraine defeating Russia are close to zero, Ukrainians are paying very high price in terms of lives, devastation, and their future.”

    Yet, Canadian MP Kmiec’s admission of NATO’s proxy war using Ukraine, is far from the first by a Western lawmaker.  

    This year, US Senator Lindsey Graham said “The Russians are dying”, and slightly later, that Ukraine aid was the best money ever spent by the US. US Senator Mitt Romney said that the spend of “less five per cent of the military budget” while “we’re [the USA] losing no lives in Ukraine”, praising the US’ ramping up to Ukraine post-SMO’s beginning. Romney was clearly focused on tackling the long-term ‘China threat’ by ‘defeating’ Russia.

    Former US Vice President Mike Pence said the importance of the US military support to Ukraine, was in seeking to avoid a US war with Russia. Why a Russian military victory would make the US go to war wasn’t explained. But Pence very clearly explained the US government doctrine for a proxy war, saying:

    “he was a supporter of Ronald Reagan’s doctrine that “if you’re willing to fight the enemies of the United States on your soil, we’ll give you the means to fight them there so our men and women in uniform don’t have to fight them.”

    Michalchuk said:

    “As President of the AUUC I have repeatedly condemned the actions of the Canadian government in its support for NATOs war against Russia using Ukraine and its people as the battleground. MP Tom Kmiec’s remarks are not surprising and reflect the general attitude in the House of Commons and across party lines.”

    Meanwhile, the Ukrainian counteroffensive has completely failed, and they are being pushed back slowly but surely.

    Ukraine is led to the slaughter in an attempt to ‘send a message’ to China and weaken Russia, so fanatical US politicians don’t feel the need to launch a war on Russia, should it defeat Ukraine.

    The Russian embassy in Canada’s press office says that “The complete demilitarization and denazification of Ukraine is the only way to stop this conflict. The regime in Kiev must surrender and let the peoples of Ukraine decide their fate.”

    “After the war broke out, Canada eschewed the need for descalation, ceasefire and negotiations and poured weapons and money into the war. It has done so to this day resulting in the destruction of Ukraine,” said Michalchuk.

    The Ukrainian people are suffering deeply, while members of their government and military apparatus pocket part of Western aid, while Zelensky and his entourage personally have stolen more than $400 million alone. The US/NATO doesn’t care about this, as long as they can use Ukraine as a proxy against Russia.

    To see the Ukrainian people’s true enemy, don’t look northward, look to the West.

    Full comments of those quoted

    “Such statements by a growing number of Western politicians represent an admission that the Ukraine war is a proxy war between the West and Russia, in addition to an interstate war between Russia, which illegally invaded Ukraine in 2022, and Ukraine and continuation of the civil war with pro-Russian separatists in Donbas. The Western governments use Ukraine as a proxy to weaken and contain Russia. Since chances of Ukraine defeating Russia are close to zero, Ukrainians are paying very high price in terms of lives, devastation, and their future.”

    • Ivan Katchanovski, Political Science professor at the University of Ottawa

    “Such statements by Canadian MPs are not new to Russia or the rest of the world. Canada’s current cabinet, as part of the collective West, at the U.S. behest, is waging a hybrid proxy war against Russia – at the expense of Ukrainian citizens. The objective is to inflict on Russia a geostrategic defeat and to take on the rest of the world to ensure the preservation of an American-centered order. The U.S. and its allies’ neo-colonial ambitions have resulted in the deaths of the hundreds of thousands. The complete demilitarization and denazification of Ukraine is the only way to stop this conflict. The regime in Kiev must surrender and let the peoples of Ukraine decide their fate.”

    • Press Office of the Embassy of the Russian Federation in Canada

     

    “As President of the AUUC I have repeatedly condemned the actions of the Canadian government in its support for NATOs war against Russia using Ukraine and its people as the battleground. MP Tom Kmiec’s remarks are not surprising and reflect the general attitude in the House of Commons and across party lines.

    Before the war broke out in February 2022, the Canadian Parliament was stumping for war with Russia. Parliament was motivated by Cold War animosities and ideology. In this it was fueled by the ideology of a section of the Ukrainian diaspora that longed for war with Russia.

    All of this led Canada to take the path of escalation in that critical period when diplomacy could have averted war and saved Ukraine.

    After the war broke out, Canada eschewed the need for descalation, ceasefire and negotiations and poured weapons and money into the war. It has done so to this day resulting in the destruction of Ukraine.

    The NDP and Green Party leaders have failed to be the voice of reason and sanity, and have bought fully into the war narrative engineered by Zelensky, the U.S. and NATO.

    No doubt there are MPs of good conscience on all sides of the House but until now they have been silenced by the McCarthyite atmosphere that prevails around this war ie) “if you call for peace you are a tool of Russia”.

    The debacle of Parliament’s honouring a Nazi shows how MPs have been turned into automatons by this new Cold War McCarthyism – they simply had to hear that he fought against Russia and that was good enough for them.

    Now is the time for all people of good conscience to speak the truth and end this war. Whether any MP has the courage to do so remains to be seen.”

    • Glenn Michalchuk, President of the Association of United Ukrainian Canadians


    Editor’s note: Introducing Operation 135, The Canada Files’ campaign to go from 65 to 200 consistent financial supporters. The Canada Files is the country’s only news outlet focused on Canadian foreign policy. We’ve provided critical investigations & hard-hitting analysis on Canadian foreign policy since 2019, and need your support.
     
    Please consider joining our 68 consistent financial supporters, in setting up a monthly or annual donation through Donorbox.


    Aidan Jonah is the Editor-in-Chief of The Canada Files, a socialist, anti-imperialist news outlet founded in 2019. Jonah has broken numerous stories, including how the Canadian Armed Forces trained neo-Nazi “journalist” Roman Protasevich while he was with the Azov Battalion, and how a CIA front group (the NED) funded the group (URAP) which drove the “Uyghur genocide” vote in parliament to pass in February 2021. Jonah recently wrote a report for the 48th session of the UN Human Rights Council, held in September 2021.


    More Articles

    This post was originally published on Articles – The Canada Files.

  • Hopes fade of deal being struck, with one sticking point being right to occasionally breach detention centre standards

    European Union member states have failed to reach an agreement on changes to the bloc’s migration laws after Germany and Italy clashed over key proposals relating to human rights guarantees in detention centres and the role of NGOs in facilitating migrant arrivals.

    But, as hopes faded on Thursday of a deal being struck, ministers said they expected “fine tuning” in coming days to lead to a pact that would apply in the event of a sudden refugee crisis such as that of 2015 when more than 1 million people arrived from Syria and beyond.

    Continue reading…

    This post was originally published on Human rights | The Guardian.

  • The India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC) is a massive public diplomacy op launched at the recent G20 summit in New Delhi, complete with a memorandum of understanding signed on 9 September.

    Players include the US, India, UAE, Saudi Arabia, and the EU, with a special role for the latter’s top three powers Germany, France, and Italy. It’s a multimodal railway project, coupled with trans-shipments and with ancillary digital and electricity roads extending to Jordan and Israel.

    If this walks and talks like the collective west’s very late response to China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), launched 10 years ago and celebrating a Belt and Road Forum in Beijing next month, that’s because it is. And yes, it is, above all, yet another American project to bypass China, to be claimed for crude electoral purposes as a meager foreign policy “success.”

    No one among the Global Majority remembers that the Americans came up with their own Silk Road plan way back in 2010. The concept came from the State Department’s Kurt Campbell and was sold by then-Secretary Hillary Clinton as her idea. History is implacable, it came down to nought.

    And no one among the Global Majority remembers the New Silk Road plan peddled by Poland, Ukraine, Azerbaijan, and Georgia in the early 2010s, complete with four troublesome trans-shipments in the Black Sea and the Caspian. History is implacable, this too came down to nought.

    In fact, very few among the Global Majority remember the $40 trillion US-sponsored Build Back Better World (BBBW, or B3W) global plan rolled out with great fanfare just two summers ago, focusing on “climate, health and health security, digital technology, and gender equity and equality.”

    A year later, at a G7 meeting, B3W had already shrunk to a $600 billion infrastructure-and-investment project. Of course, nothing was built. History really is implacable, it came down to nought.

    The same fate awaits IMEC, for a number of very specific reasons.

    Map of The India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC)

    Pivoting to a black void 

    The whole IMEC rationale rests on what writer and former Ambassador M.K. Bhadrakumar deliciously described as “conjuring up the Abraham Accords by the incantation of a Saudi-Israeli tango.”

    This tango is Dead On Arrival; even the ghost of Piazzolla can’t revive it. For starters, one of the principals – Saudi Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman – has made it clear that Riyadh’s priorities are a new, energized Chinese-brokered relationship with Iran, with Turkiye, and with Syria after its return to the Arab League.

    Moreover, both Riyadh and its Emirati IMEC partner share immense trade, commerce, and energy interests with China, so they’re not going to do anything to upset Beijing.

    At face value, IMEC proposes a joint drive by G7 and BRICS 11 nations. That’s the western method of seducing eternally-hedging India under Modi and US-allied Saudi Arabia and the UAE to its agenda.

    Its real intention, however, is not only to undermine BRI, but also the International North-South Transportation Corridor (INTSC), in which India is a major player alongside Russia and Iran.

    The game is quite crude and really quite obvious: a transportation corridor conceived to bypass the top three vectors of real Eurasia integration – and BRICS members China, Russia, and Iran – by dangling an enticing Divide and Rule carrot that promises Things That Cannot Be Delivered.

    The American neoliberal obsession at this stage of the New Great Game is, as always, all about Israel. Their goal is to make Haifa port viable and turn it into a key transportation hub between West Asia and Europe. Everything else is subordinated to this Israeli imperative.

    IMEC, in principle, will transit across West Asia to link India to Eastern and Western Europe – selling the fiction that India is a Global Pivot state and a Convergence of Civilizations.

    Nonsense. While India’s great dream is to become a pivot state, its best shot would be via the already up-and-running INTSC, which could open markets to New Delhi from Central Asia to the Caucasus. Otherwise, as a Global Pivot state, Russia is way ahead of India diplomatically, and China is way ahead in trade and connectivity.

    Comparisons between IMEC and the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) are futile. IMEC is a joke compared to this BRI flagship project: the $57.7 billion plan to build a railway over 3,000 km long linking Kashgar in Xinjiang to Gwadar in the Arabian Sea, which will connect to other overland BRI corridors heading toward Iran and Turkiye.

    This is a matter of national security for China. So bets can be made that the leadership in Beijing will have some discreet and serious conversations with the current fifth-columnists in power in Islamabad, before or during the Belt and Road Forum, to remind them of the relevant geostrategic, geoeconomic, and investment Facts.

    So, what’s left for Indian trade in all of this? Not much. They already use the Suez Canal, a direct, tested route. There’s no incentive to even start contemplating being stuck in black voids across the vast desert expanses surrounding the Persian Gulf.

    One glaring problem, for example, is that almost 1,100 km of tracks are “missing” from the railway from Fujairah in the UAE to Haifa, 745 km “missing” from Jebel Ali in Dubai to Haifa, and 630 km “missing” from the railway from Abu Dhabi to Haifa.

    When all the missing links are added up, there’s over 3,000 km of railway still to be built. The Chinese, of course, can do this for breakfast and on a dime, but they are not part of this game. And there’s no evidence the IMEC gang plans to invite them.

    All eyes on Syunik 

    In the War of Transportation Corridors charted in detail for The Cradle in June 2022, it becomes clear that intentions rarely meet reality. These grand projects are all about logistics, logistics, logistics – of course, intertwined with the three other key pillars: energy and energy resources, labor and manufacturing, and market/trade rules.

    Let’s examine a Central Asian example. Russia and three Central Asian “stans” – Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan – are launching a multimodal Southern Transportation Corridor which will bypass Kazakhstan.

    Why? After all, Kazakhstan, alongside Russia, is a key member of both the Eurasia Economic Union (EAEU) and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO).

    The reason is because this new corridor solves two key problems for Russia that arose with the west’s sanctions hysteria. It bypasses the Kazakh border, where everything going to Russia is scrutinized in excruciating detail. And a significant part of the cargo may now be transferred to the Russian port of Astrakhan in the Caspian.

    So Astana, which under western pressure has played a risky hedging game on Russia, may end up losing the status of a full-fledged transport hub in Central Asia and the Caspian Sea region. Kazakhstan is also part of BRI; the Chinese are already very much interested in the potential of this new corridor.

    In the Caucasus, the story is even more complex, and once again, it’s all about Divide and Rule.

    Two months ago, Russia, Iran, and Azerbaijan committed to building a single railway from Iran and its ports in the Persian Gulf through Azerbaijan, to be linked to the Russian-Eastern Europe railway system.

    This is a railway project on the scale of the Trans-Siberian – to connect Eastern Europe with Eastern Africa and South Asia, bypassing the Suez Canal and European ports. The INSTC on steroids, in fact.

    Guess what happened next? A provocation in Nagorno-Karabakh, with the deadly potential of involving not only Armenia and Azerbaijan but also Iran and Turkiye.

    Tehran has been crystal clear on its red lines: it will never allow a defeat of Armenia, with direct participation from Turkiye, which fully supports Azerbaijan.

    Add to the incendiary mix are joint military exercises with the US in Armenia – which happens to be a member of the Russian-led CSTO – cast, for public consumption, as one of those seemingly innocent “partnership” NATO programs.

    This all spells out an IMEC subplot bound to undermine INTSC. Both Russia and Iran are fully aware of the former’s endemic weaknesses: political trouble between several participants, those “missing links” of track, and all important infrastructure still to be built.

    Turkish Sultan Recep Tayyip Erdogan, for his part, will never give up the Zangezur corridor across Syunik, the south Armenian province, which was envisaged by the 2020 armistice, linking Azerbaijan to Turkiye via the Azeri enclave of Nakhitchevan – that will run through Armenian territory.

    Baku did threaten to attack southern Armenia if the Zangezur corridor was not facilitated by Yerevan. So Syunik is the next big unresolved deal in this riddle. Tehran, it must be noted, will go no holds barred to prevent a Turkish-Israeli-NATO corridor cutting Iran off from Armenia, Georgia, the Black Sea, and Russia. That would be the reality if this NATO-tinted coalition grabs Syunik.

    Today, Erdogan and Azerbaijan’s President Ilham Aliyev meet in the Nakhchivan enclave between Turkiye, Armenia, and Iran to start a gas pipeline and open a military production complex.

    The Sultan knows that Zangezur may finally allow Turkiye to be linked to China via a corridor that will transit the Turkic world, in Azerbaijan and the Caspian. This would also allow the collective west to go even bolder on Divide and Rule against Russia and Iran.

    Is the IMEC another far-fetched western fantasy? The place to watch is Syunik.

  • Originally published at The Cradle.
  • This post was originally published on Dissident Voice.

  • Claimants say European countries are breaching their human rights by failing to take adequate action to tackle global heating

    An 11-year-old girl from Portugal sat inside the grand chamber of the European court of human rights on Wednesday to face 86 lawyers from 32 nations in the world’s largest climate legal action.

    Mariana Agostinho was alongside her brother and sister, and her cousins, two rows back from 17 human rights judges.

    Continue reading…

    This post was originally published on Human rights | The Guardian.

  • People injured in crashes involving Hungarian police are being pushed back to Serbia from hospital, say human rights groups

    When he woke up in the hospital, Karim* had no idea what had happened to him. All he remembered was that he had fallen asleep next to his friend, Yousef*, in the back of the car. Days before, in the summer of 2022, they had climbed the border fence between Serbia and Hungary and were heading towards Austria.

    Karim, 22, had left his home in northern Syria at the end of 2021. After making his way from Turkey through Bulgaria, he reached Serbia. From there he still had to cross Hungary and then on to Austria. “My dream was to reach Germany,” he says.

    Continue reading…

    This post was originally published on Human rights | The Guardian.

  • Six Portuguese young people claim inadequate policies to tackle global heating breach their human rights

    A key plank of the UK government’s defence against the biggest climate legal action in the world next week has fallen away as a result of the U-turn by the prime minister, Rishi Sunak, on green policies.

    The UK is one of 32 countries being taken to the European court of human rights on Wednesday by a group of Portuguese young people. They will argue in the grand chamber of the Strasbourg court that the nations’ policies to tackle global heating are inadequate and in breach of their human rights obligations.

    Continue reading…

  • Eddy Wax in Politico of 14 September 2023 reported that the far-right political group in the European Parliament nominated tech billionaire Elon Musk for the EU’s top human rights award. The Identity and Democracy (ID) grouping, which includes members of European Parliament tied to France’s Marine Le Pen and Italy’s Matteo Salvini, put Musk’s name forward, according to a document sent to MEPs on September 14 and seen by POLITICO. An ID official confirmed to POLITICO its decision to nominate Musk.

    ID cited Musk’s decision to release the so-called Twitter Files, which consisted of selected internal documents over how the social media platform handled requests to remove political posts. This amounts to a defense of the principle of freedom of expression, ID argued.

    Musk is highly unlikely to receive the accolade as the President of the Parliament Roberta Metsola and the leaders of all political groups will select the winner together later this year.

    The three largest groups — the center-right EPP, center-left S&D and liberal Renew — have all agreed to propose Mahsa Amini, a young Iranian woman whose death at the hands of police sparked a movement for women’s rights across Iran. [see also: https://humanrightsdefenders.blog/2023/05/11/now-it-is-the-turn-of-the-iranian-journalists-who-reported-on-mahsa-amini/]

    The Greens have nominated Ugandan climate activist Vanessa Nakate, while the right-wing ECR group put forward Nino Lomjaria, a public defender in Georgia who stood up to Russian interference. The Left proposed three women’s rights activists.

    https://www.politico.eu/article/identity-and-democracy-nominate-elon-musk-eu-human-rights-award-sakharov-prize/

    https://pen.org/x-must-ensure-safety-of-users/

    see also: https://www.fidh.org/en/region/americas/nicaragua/nicaragua-vilma-nunez-and-bishop-alvarez-nominated-for-european

  • Claimants to argue lack of adequate action is breach of human rights, in largest climate legal action to date

    Six young people are preparing to appear at the European court of human rights to try to compel 32 nations to rapidly escalate their emissions reductions in the world’s largest climate legal action to date.

    Aged from 11 to 24, the six Portuguese claimants, say they were driven to act by their experiences in the wildfires that ripped through the Leiria region in 2017, killing 66 people and destroying 20,000 hectares of forest.

    Continue reading…

  • Egypt, Vietnam and Indonesia among countries sending delegations to four-day DSEI at ExCeL

    Europe’s biggest ever arms fair got under way in London on Tuesday with record numbers expected to attend, boosted by interest from countries with controversial human rights records.

    Authoritarian Egypt and Vietnam are among those sending delegations, defence sources said, as well as Indonesia and India – all countries whose arms-buying strategies have been affected by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

    Continue reading…