Category: facebook

  • On 23 April 2025 Front Line Defenders expressed its serious concern for Syrian woman human right defender Hiba Ezzideen Al-Hajji, as well as her family and the ‘Equity and Empowerment’ organisation, who are being targeted by a defamation campaign on Facebook which seeks to incite violence against them. The online campaign, initiated both by individuals known to support the new government and unknown users, has targeted Hiba Ezzideen Al-Hajii for a Facebook post she made on 20 April 2025, in which she advocated against forced marriages. This bombardment of defamatory messages has included calls for violence, including death threats, constituting a clear case of harassment.

    Hiba Ezzideen Al-Hajji is a Syrian feminist and woman human rights defender. She is the CEO of the Equity and Empowerment organisation and the Chairperson of the Board of Directors in Shan network for peace building. Equity and Empowerment is a women-led organisation which works on gender equality, focusing on digital security, economic and political empowerment. [see also: https://humanrightsdefenders.blog/2023/08/10/syrian-woman-human-rights-defender-hiba-ezzideen-al-hajji-threatened/]

    Since 20 April 2025, Hiba Ezzideen Al-Hajii’s Facebook account, through which she posted about women’s rights, has been used to start a defamation campaign and incite violence against her, as well as her family and the Equity and Empowerment organisation, both based in Idlib, Syria. The online campaign has led to Hiba Ezzideen Al-Hajii receiving numerous death threats on the social media platform, both through private messages and through a flood of posts on her own account, as well as on Equity and Empowerment’s page. The online mob, formed by unknown users, have urged followers to post defamatory content against her online and called for physical violence, inciting people to burn down the center of Equity and Empowerment in Idlib, with the objective of killing Hiba Ezzideen Al-Hajii and harming her family. They have distorted the meaning of an old video, in which she stated that it is unnecessary to use the veil in the centers of Equity and Empowerment where there are only women, to falsely accuse her of insulting the Hijab and Islam. The online mob have also attempted to distort her Facebook post in which she urged authorities to investigate cases of women’s abduction, in order to allow for accountability.

    Several public figures have taken advantage of this defamation campaign in order to falsely accuse the woman rights defender of being an agent to Assad security branches, despite her clear stands against the Assad regime and extensive record of human rights activism against it. Subsequently, on 22 April, the police in Idlib closed down the center of Equity and Empowerment. Furthermore, the governor of Idlib announced via Facebook that he has requested the public prosecutor to file a lawsuit against Hiba Ezzideen Al-Hajii for insulting the hijab. The woman human rights defender has expressed a profound concern for her personal safety and well-being. She has reported fearing for her life, as well as the lives of her family and team at Equity and Empowerment.

    Front Line Defenders condemns the defamation and online campaign seeking to incite violence, as well as subsequent acts of intimidation against woman human rights defender Hiba Ezzideen Al-Hajii, her family and her organisation Equity and Empowerment. Front Line Defenders believes that the defamation campaign and online harassment is directly related to Hiba Ezzideen Al-Hajji’s work in the defence of human rights, particularly her work towards the promotion of women’s rights in Syria.

    Front Line Defenders also expresses concern with the recurrent use of Facebook as a tool to incite violence against woman human rights defenders in Syria. The organisation urges Meta to immediately take down all Facebook posts against woman human rights defender Hiba Ezzideen Al-Hajii and her organisation Equity and Empowerment, suspend any groups, pages and profiles used to defame her or organise attacks and incite violence against her and her organisation, while also storing data that is relevant for future investigations and accountability. Meta must fulfill their responsibility to protect human rights, in accordance with international human rights standards. They must take the necessary steps to guarantee the safety of human rights defenders online, ensuring their platforms do not contribute to violent and dangerous campaigns, or allow users to incite targeted violence against defenders, particularly woman human rights defenders, which puts their lives at serious risk. Front Line Defenders stands ready to assist Meta with identifying the defamatory and violent content in question and the accounts on which they are hosted or shared.

    https://www.frontlinedefenders.org/en/statement-report/syria-defamation-campaign-against-woman-rights-defender-hiba-ezzideen-al-hajji

    This post was originally published on Hans Thoolen on Human Rights Defenders and their awards.

  • Facebook and Instagram owner criticised for leaving up posts inciting violence during UK riots

    Mark Zuckerberg’s Meta announced sweeping content moderation changes “hastily” and with no indication it had considered the human rights impact, according to the social media company’s oversight board.

    The assessment of the changes came as the Facebook and Instagram owner was criticised for leaving up three posts containing anti-Muslim and anti-migrant content during riots in the UK last summer.

    Continue reading…

    This post was originally published on Human rights | The Guardian.

  • Meta Platforms’ Oversight Board on Wednesday sharply rebuked the Facebook and Instagram owner over a policy overhaul in January that cut fact-checking and eased curbs on discussions of contentious topics such as immigration and gender identity. The board, which operates independently but is funded by Meta, urged the world’s biggest social media company to assess…

    The post Meta’s oversight board rebukes company over policy overhaul appeared first on InnovationAus.com.

    This post was originally published on InnovationAus.com.

  • In one of its first major actions under the Trump administration, the Federal Trade Commission is arguing Meta has an illegal monopoly in social media and should be forced to divest Instagram and WhatsApp. CEO Mark Zuckerberg took the stand Monday as the highly anticipated antitrust trial kicked off in Washington, D.C. If Meta loses the trial, it could be forced to sell off those platforms.

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.


  • This content originally appeared on Democracy Now! and was authored by Democracy Now!.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Mexico City, April 3, 2025—Mexican authorities should immediately take steps to protect 17 reporters named by a Facebook page allegedly run by a criminal gang in the state of Chiapas and hold those responsible to account, the Committee to Protect Journalists said Thursday.

    On Friday, March 28, the Facebook page “Noticias Chiapas al ROJO” published the names of 17 journalists active in Tapachula, near the border with Guatemala, and accused them, without evidence, of working for the alleged leader of a local gang.

    “It is deeply concerning that alleged criminals use social media to smear journalists, placing their lives at risk,” said Jan-Albert Hootsen, CPJ’s Mexico Representative. “Mexican authorities must provide protection to reporters implicated by this Facebook page and find those responsible and bring them to justice.”

    Two Tapachula journalists who spoke to CPJ by phone on condition of anonymity, fearing reprisal, believe Noticias Chiapas al ROJO was created by a criminal gang to spread disinformation against rivals, authorities and journalists.

    Social media profiles posing as legitimate news outlets to spread disinformation is common practice in Mexico, according to numerous journalists and government officials CPJ has spoken with over the past several years.

    This places journalists at an immediate risk of being targeted by gangs; in 2022, Tijuana photographer Margarito Martínez was killed after being targeted by similar social media pages.

    CPJ attempted to contact Facebook via email for comment but did not receive a reply. The offices of the Chiapas state prosecutor and Chiapas governor Eduardo Ramírez did not respond to calls by CPJ for comment. 

    An official with the Federal Mechanism for the Protection of Human Rights Defenders and Journalists, which coordinates protection of reporters at risk, told CPJ on Friday, March 28, that his agency was in the process of evaluating the risk facing reporters named by the Facebook page. He asked not to be identified by name, as he is not authorized to speak publicly on the issue.


    This content originally appeared on Committee to Protect Journalists and was authored by CPJ Staff.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • A US Senate investigative subcommittee opened a review on Tuesday into efforts by Facebook parent Meta Platforms to gain access to the Chinese market and is seeking documents from the company. Senator Ron Johnson, who chairs the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, joined by Senator Richard Blumenthal, the top Democrat, and Senator Josh Hawley, asked Meta…

    The post US Senate investigates Meta’s market access efforts for China appeared first on InnovationAus.com.

    This post was originally published on InnovationAus.com.

  • By Scott Waide, RNZ Pacific PNG correspondent

    The Papua New Guinea government has admitted to using a technology that it says was “successfully tested” to block social media platforms, particularly Facebook, for much of the day yesterday.

    Police Minister Peter Tsiamalili Jr said the “test” was done under the framework of the Anti-Terrorism Act 2024, and sought to address the growing concerns over hate speech, misinformation, and other harmful content online.

    Tsiamalili did not specify what kind of tech was used, but said it was carried out in collaboration with the Royal Papua New Guinea Constabulary (RPNGC), the National Information and Communications Technology Authority (NICTA), and various internet service providers.

    “We are not attempting to suppress free speech or restrict our citizens from expressing their viewpoints,” Tsiamalili said.

    “However, the unchecked proliferation of fake news, hate speech, pornography, child exploitation, and incitement to violence on platforms such as Facebook is unacceptable.

    “These challenges increasingly threaten the safety, dignity, and well-being of our populace.”

    However, government agencies responsible for communications and ICT, including NICTA, said they were not aware.

    ‘Confidence relies on transparency’
    “Public confidence in our digital governance relies on transparency and consistency in how we approach online regulation,” NICTA chief executive Kilakupa Gulo-Vui said.

    “It is essential that all key stakeholders, including NICTA, law enforcement, telecommunications providers, and government agencies, collaborate closely to ensure that any actions taken are well-understood and properly executed.”

    He said that while maintaining national security was a priority, the balance between safety and digital freedom must be carefully managed.

    Gulo-Vui said NICTA would be addressing this matter with the Minister for ICT to ensure NICTA’s role continued to align with the government’s broader policy objectives, while fostering a cohesive and united approach to digital regulation.

    The Department of Information Communication and Technology (DICT) Secretary, Steven Matainaho, also stated his department was not aware of the test but added that the police have powers under the new domestic terrorism laws.

    Papua New Guinea’s recently introduced anti-terror laws are aimed at curbing both internal and external security threats.

    Critics warn of dictatorial control
    However, critics of the move say the test borders on dictatorial control.

    An observer of Monday’s events, Lucas Kiap, said the goal of combating hate speech and exploitation was commendable, but the approach risks paving way for authoritarian overreach.

    “Where is PNG headed? If the government continues down this path, it risks trading democracy for control,” he said.

    Many social media users, however, appeared to outdo the government, with many downloading and sharing Virtual Area Network (VPN) apps and continuing to post on Facebook.

    “Hello from Poland,” one user said.

    East Sepik Governor Allan Bird said today that the country’s anti-terrorism law could target anyone because “the definition of a terrorist is left to the Police Minister to decide”.

    ‘Designed to take away our freedoms’
    “During the debate on the anti-terrorism bill in Parliament, I pointed out that the law was too broad and it could be used against innocent people,” he wrote on Facebook.

    He said government MPs laughed at him and used their numbers to pass the bill.

    “Yesterday, the Police Minister used the Anti-terrorism Act to shut down Facebook. That was just a test, that was step one,” Governor Bird said.

    “There is no limit to the powers the Minister of Police can exercise under this new law. It is draconian law designed to take away our freedoms.

    “We are now heading into dangerous territory and everyone is powerless to stop this tyranny,” he added.

    This article is republished under a community partnership agreement with RNZ.

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • Asia Pacific Report

    A joint operation between the Fiji Police Force, Republic of Fiji Military Force (RFMF), Territorial Force Brigade, Fiji Navy and National Fire Authority was staged this week to “modernise” responses to emergencies.

    Called “Exercise Genesis”, the joint operation is believed to be the first of its kind in Fiji to “test combat readiness” and preparedness for facing civil unrest, counterinsurgency and humanitarian assistance scenarios.

    It took place over three days and was modelled on challenges faced by a “fictitious island grappling with rising unemployment, poverty and crime”.

    The exercise was described as based on three models, operated on successive days.

    The block 1 scenario tackled internal security, addressing civil unrest, law enforcement challenges and crowd control operations.

    Block 2 involved humanitarian assistance and disaster relief, and coordinating emergency response efforts with government agencies.

    Block 3 on the last day dealt with a “mid-level counterinsurgency”, engaging in stabilising the crisis, and “neutralising” a threat.

    Flash flood scenario
    On the second day, a “composite” company with the assistance of the Fiji Navy successfully evacuated victims from a scenario-based flash flood at Doroko village (Waila) to Nausori Town.

    “The flood victims were given first aid at the village before being evacuated to an evacuation centre in Syria Park,” said the Territorial Brigade’s Facebook page.

    “The flood victims were further examined by the medical team at Syria Park.”

    Fiji police confront protesters during the Operation Genesis exercise in Fiji
    Fiji police confront protesters during the Operation Genesis exercise in Fiji this week. Image: RFMF screenshot APR

    On the final day, Thursday, Exercise Genesis culminated in a pre-dawn attack by the troops on a “rebel hideout”.

    According to the Facebook page, the “hideout” had been discovered following the deployment of a joint tracker team and the K9 unit from the Fiji Corrections Service.

    “Through rigorous training and realistic scenarios, the [RFMF Territorial Brigade] continues to refine its combat proficiency, adaptability, and mission effectiveness,” said a brigade statement.

    Mock protesters in the Operation Genesis security services exercise in Fiji
    Mock protesters in the Operation Genesis security services exercise in Fiji this week. Image: RFMF screenshot APR

    It said that the exercise was “ensuring that [the brigade] remains a versatile and responsive force, capable of safeguarding national security and contributing to regional stability.”

    However, a critic said: “Anyone who is serious about reducing crime would offer a real alternative to austerity, poverty and alienation. Invest in young people and communities.”

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • Maria Ressa says rules-based order ‘can perhaps still exist’ but social media is being used to undermine democracy around the world

    The arrest of Rodrigo Duterte is a welcome sign that the rules-based order continues to hold, the Nobel laureate Maria Ressa has said, even as the global order has been marred by the US “descending into hell” at the hands of the same forces that consumed the Philippines.

    Ressa’s remarks came after Duterte, the former president of the Philippines, made his first appearance before the international criminal court (ICC) in The Hague, accused of committing crimes against humanity during his brutal “war on drugs”.

    Continue reading…

    This post was originally published on Human rights | The Guardian.

  • When Mark Zuckerberg terminated Meta’s diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs for hiring and training employees and procuring suppliers in January 2025, he forged “inroads with the incoming Trump administration,” abandoned Meta’s founding ethos of open innovation, and dramatically realigned how the tech giant will now do business, as critics like Bärí A. Williams, former lead counsel for…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • The Hong Kong Journalists’ Association is appealing to journalists to preserve Facebook live video footage of 2019 protests after Meta said it will start deleting archived videos from its servers.

    There are concerns that much of the online footage of those protests, most of which is banned in the city amid an ongoing crackdown on dissent, will no longer be available to the general public.

    That will make it easier for the authorities to impose their own narrative on events in the city’s recent history.

    Facebook notified users last month that it will be deleting archived live video streams from June 5, while newly streamed live video will be deleted after 30 days from Feb. 19, 2025.

    “Since the Hong Kong news media have relied heavily on Facebook Live for reporting in the past, the Journalists Association now calls on the heads of mainstream, independent and citizen media and online editors to back up their videos as soon as possible,” the Hong Kong Journalists Association said.

    “If necessary, you can follow the platform’s instructions to apply for an extension to up to six months before deletion,” it said.

    Capturing history

    In one livestream still available on YouTube from Oct. 1, 2019, an out-of-breath protester collates video feeds from several sources on the ground, commenting on what is unfolding while sounding out of breath from “running” at a protest a minute earlier.

    Meta's webpage outlining their process to update Facebook Live videos.
    Meta’s webpage outlining their process to update Facebook Live videos.
    (Meta)

    In a Facebook Live video from the same day, a professional reporter from government broadcaster RTHK, which has since been forced to toe the ruling Chinese Communist Party line in its reporting, follows protests in Wong Tai Sin, explaining what is going on to live viewers.

    While one feed is run by protesters and the other by a professional journalist, both offer a sense of boots-on-the-ground immediacy that would be crucial for anyone seeking to learn what the protests were about many years later.

    RELATED STORIES

    Hong Kong social worker convicted of rioting for her role in 2019 protests

    Protesters Dispersed With Tear Gas After Storming Hong Kong Legislature

    Hong Kong rejects amnesty for thousands arrested for 2019 protests

    EXPLAINED: What is the Article 23 security law in Hong Kong?

    A reporter for an online media outlet who gave only the pseudonym Ken for fear of reprisals said a very large proportion of the public record of the 2019 protests was streamed live on Facebook, with more than 100 videos stored there.

    While current media organizations have made backups, the footage will no longer be there for anyone to browse, making the record of that year less publicly available, Ken said.

    “It’s like we’ve lost an online library,” he said. “Unless someone is willing to back it up and put it all online, there’ll be no way of finding that history any more, should you want to.”

    Ken and his colleagues are concerned that online records of the 2019 could disappear entirely in a few years’ time, especially as republishing them from Hong Kong could render the user vulnerable to accusations of “glorifying” the protests, and prosecution under two national security laws.

    Photographers document pro-democracy activist Joshua Wong, left, as he speaks at the police headquarters in Hong Kong, June 21, 2019.
    Photographers document pro-democracy activist Joshua Wong, left, as he speaks at the police headquarters in Hong Kong, June 21, 2019.
    (VIncent Yu/AP)

    “This is a very serious problem, because certain events or people may be completely forgotten about in a few years, maybe 10 years,” Ken said.

    But there are risks attached to republishing video content — especially for residents of Hong Kong.

    “You don’t know whether you will be accused of incitement if you post it again,” Ken said. “You never know what your live broadcast captured and whether there was issue … under the two national security laws.”

    Permanent loss of historical material

    A fellow journalist who gave only the pseudonym Mr. G for fear of reprisals said his media organization still has access to its own live streamed footage of the 2019 protests from both Facebook and YouTube.

    But he said the planned deletions could lead to “the permanent loss of some historical material.”

    Facebook said that the owners of the videos will receive an email or notification in advance “and can choose to download the videos, transfer them to the cloud, or convert them into reels short videos within 90 days.”

    “If users need more time to process old videos, they can apply to postpone the deadline by 6 months,” it said, adding that most live video is viewed in the first few weeks after being uploaded.

    Veteran media commentator To Yiu-ming said social media platforms aren’t suited for use as a historical archive.

    “There’s no point criticizing them,” To said. “Users may well encounter similar practices even … if they move to another social media platform.”

    “If you want to preserve the historical record, you have to use less convenient methods, and spend a bit of time and money,” he said.

    The concerns over the deletion of live video come after a report claimed that Meta was willing to go to “extreme lengths” to censor content and shut down political dissent in a failed attempt to win the approval of the Chinese Communist Party and bring Facebook to millions of internet users in China.

    Citing a whistleblower complaint by Sarah Wynn-Williams from the company’s China policy team, the Washington Post reported that Meta “so desperately wanted to enter the lucrative China market that it was willing to allow the ruling party to oversee all social media content appearing in the country and quash dissenting opinions.”

    The notice in Chinese from Facebook warning users that archived live video will be deleted, Feb. 19, 2025.
    The notice in Chinese from Facebook warning users that archived live video will be deleted, Feb. 19, 2025.
    (Meta)

    So it developed a censorship system for China in 2015 and planned to install a “chief editor” who would decide what content to remove and could shut down the entire site during times of “social unrest,” according to a copy of the 78-page complaint exclusively seen by The Washington Post.

    Meta executives also “stonewalled and provided nonresponsive or misleading information” to investors and American regulators, the complaint said.

    Meta spokesman Andy Stone told the paper that it was “no secret” the company was interested in operating in China.

    “This was widely reported beginning a decade ago,” Stone was quoted as saying. “We ultimately opted not to go through with the ideas we’d explored, which Mark Zuckerberg announced in 2019.”

    Translated by Luisetta Mudie. Edited by Malcolm Foster.


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Alice Yam for RFA Cantonese.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • In July last year, Australia’s eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant directed tech companies to develop codes of practice to keep children safe from online porn and harmful content. Now, after seven months, the industry has submitted draft codes to eSafety for approval. eSafety is currently assessing the draft codes. Assuming Ms Inman Grant approves the…

    The post Tech companies’ proposed new safety codes won’t protect all kids online appeared first on InnovationAus.com.

    This post was originally published on InnovationAus.com.

  • Read more on this topic in Vietnamese

    Students in Vietnam have been coming under pressure to share and “like” a Facebook post promoting the political theories of Communist Party General Secretary To Lam.

    The article, titled “Firmly and Adamantly Rejecting Distorted Rhetoric About the Nation’s New Era,” discussed the phrases “the new era” and “the era of national rise,” with which To Lam has peppered his speeches since becoming Communist Party General Secretary last year.

    A student at a high school in Dak Lak province told Radio Free Asia that on Feb. 18, he received a text message from his class’s Youth Union secretary, instructing him to like, react with a heart emoji, and share the article posted on the Facebook page Hung thieng Tay Nguyen (Holy and Heroic Central Highlands) which describes itself as a “news and media site” although it is unclear who runs it.

    The Youth Union is Vietnam’s largest youth organization and operates under the leadership of the Communist Party.

    The 200-word Facebook post – since restricted from general users – is an excerpt from an article on the Communist Party’s online portal. It defends the argument that, “the new era – the era of national rise – is a well-founded concept, not vague as hostile forces have distorted it to seem.”

    Vietnam is entering a period of growth and prosperity under the party’s leadership, the article argues. It also discusses efforts to reform leadership methods, streamline government operations, promote a digital transformation, combat corruption and waste, and develop a comprehensive economic and social strategy, all key Lam policies. The article calls on citizens to counter “hostile narratives about the nation’s rise” and asks everyone from the party to the people to familiarize themselves with the goals and tasks of the new era.

    The student told RFA Vietnamese he was told to like and share the post the same day

    “We were told to take a screenshot and send it to student leaders before 9 p.m. the same night,” said the student, who didn’t want to be identified for fear of reprisals.

    However, he said he ignored the order because he thought the article was boring.

    Another student, who also declined to be named, said he shared the post despite feeling “annoyed” about the request, adding that he only skimmed the article. He said all of his classmates were told to share the post but some told him they hadn’t bothered.

    RFA called the phone number listed on the Facebook page of Huynh Thuc Khang High School’s Youth Union. A man who identified himself as the school principal but who didn’t give his name said the school had nothing to do with the request for students to like and share the post. He also declined to provide contact information for the school’s Youth Union secretary.

    RFA emailed the school’s Youth Union and sent text messages to Buon Ho town’s Ho Chi Minh Communist Youth Union to verify the information about the Facebook campaign but no one replied.

    Widespread request

    RFA checked the post before it was restricted and saw that pupils from other schools in Dak Lak had also shared, “liked” and put heart emojis on it.

    A screenshot of a phone message from a student leader shared by a student, but not verified by RFA, explained how to share a short link to the post using the site 263.org.vn which is used by Youth Union officers.

    The instructions were to: “click the ‘like’ or ‘heart’ button or leave a positive emoji; share the post en masse on all [Facebook] pages and groups of agencies, units, and personal Facebook accounts of party members, cadres, youth union members, young people, and children; and comment with positive content/feedback or expressions of approval to react to the post,” from 7:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. on Feb. 18.

    It included a link to a page, since deleted, featuring 36 suggested comments praising the “new era,” a phrase introduced by Lam last August.

    The Facebook post, which was put up at 3:40 p.m. on Feb.18, generated approximately 1,500 likes, 1,500 comments and 1,900 shares as of 6:00 p.m. on Feb. 19 before being blocked from general view.

    It generated comments from various Dak Lak student unions and hundreds from personal accounts, most of which had few posts or locked profiles.

    RELATED STORIES

    Vietnam’s To Lam consolidates power through personnel changes at 10th Plenum

    To Lam shakes up Vietnam with a government restructuring plan

    Some content on RFA Vietnamese’s Facebook page suddenly disappears

    Communist Youth Union branches in other parts of Vietnam made similar requests of students. None of them responded to RFA’s emails.

    “Many agencies and organizations have monthly quotas for the number of likes and comments they want to see. Those who fail to fulfill the quota may be ‘evaluated’ in terms of moral conduct,” said Ho Chi Minh city-based journalist Nam Viet.

    “Thousands of comments and likes with heart emojis have been made to comply with the above requirements. However, in many cases, participants couldn’t even understand the content of the posts.”

    Translated by Ann Vu. Edited by Mike Firn.


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by RFA Vietnamese.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Dakar, February 20, 2025—The Committee to Protect Journalists calls on Malagasy authorities to immediately release investigative journalist Fernand Cello, who has been in detention since his January 29 arrest over a Facebook post about President Andry Rajoelina.

    On January 30, a judge charged Cello with spreading false news and undermining national security and placed him in pretrial detention in Madagascar’s capital Antananarivo’s Antanimora prison, one of Cello’s relatives told CPJ, on condition of anonymity, citing fear of reprisals.

    “Fernand Cello should never have been arrested based on a warrant issued in October 2023 for a social media post that he apologized for soon after publication,” said Moussa Ngom, CPJ’s Francophone Africa representative. “Rather than criminalizing journalists, Malagasy authorities should free Fernand Cello and drop all charges against him.”

    Cello’s September 15, 2023, Facebook post inaccurately said that Rajoelina had left the country on a flight that included the High Constitutional Court president Florent Rakotoarisoa.

    Days earlier, the court had dismissed opposition appeals to void Rajoelina’s candidacy on the grounds of his dual French-Malagasy nationality. Rajoelina won a third term in November 2023.

    On September 16, 2023, Cello published a video “explaining and apologizing” for his mistake. In March 2024, he published another video apology and asked Rakotoarisoa to “end his persecution.”

    Cello, who was arrested at home, had been in hiding since the warrant, the family member told CPJ. The journalist continued to work for the privately owned newspaper Basy Vava, a second relative said. He also posted daily news and comments on Facebook.

    In 2017, Cello was detained for four months, before receiving a two-year suspended sentence for cheque theft, in a case that he said was in retribution for his work at the local station Radio Jupiter, which broadcast allegations of an electricity firm’s financial irregularities and illegal sapphire mining. He was acquitted on appeal in 2019.

    CPJ’s calls to the communication and justice ministries to request comment were not answered.


    This content originally appeared on Committee to Protect Journalists and was authored by Committee to Protect Journalists.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Instagram and Facebook have recently taken steps to blur, block, or remove posts from abortion pill providers, according to The New York Times. Abortion providers say that censorship on the platforms has intensified over the past two weeks, particularly in the days following Donald Trump’s inauguration. Instagram has also suspended several accounts linked to these providers…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • Donald Trump has returned for his second term as US president.

    He invited some of the world’s most powerful billionaire oligarchs to his inauguration in Washington.

    Sitting next to Trump’s cabinet nominees, at the center of his inauguration, were the three richest people on Earth: Elon Musk, the CEO of Tesla; Jeff Bezos, the founder and executive chairman of Amazon; and Mark Zuckerberg, the CEO of Meta, which is the parent company of Facebook and Instagram.

    Together, these three men have nearly $900 billion in wealth.

    They could be seen on video chatting alongside Sundar Pichai, who is the billionaire CEO of Google and its parent company Alphabet.

    The post World’s Richest Billionaires At Center Of Trump’s Inauguration appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • The shutdown only lasted a few hours, but it generated no shortage of content. “Fascist countries ban apps. Fascist countries ban websites,” one TikTok user said in a video with more than 12 million views. “TikTok was never just an app. It was a battleground and a sanctuary,” another creator wrote in a viral Instagram post. Similar sentiments proliferated across social media in the days…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • COMMENTARY: By Lagipoiva Cherelle Jackson and Junior S. Ami

    With just over a year left in her tenure as Prime Minister of Samoa, Fiame Naomi Mata’afa faces a political upheaval threatening a peaceful end to her term.

    Ironically, the rule of law — the very principle that elevated her to power — has now become the source of significant challenges within her party.

    Fiame left the Human Rights Protection Party (HRPP) in 2020, opposing constitutional amendments she believed undermined judicial independence. Her decision reflected a commitment to democratic principles and a rejection of increasing authoritarianism within the HRPP.

    She joined the newly formed Fa’atuatua i le Atua Samoa ua Tasi (FAST) party, created by former HRPP members seeking an alternative to decades of one-party dominance.

    As FAST’s leader, Fiame led the party to a historic victory in the 2021 election, becoming Samoa’s first female Prime Minister and ending the HRPP’s nearly 40-year rule.

    Her leadership is now under threat from within her own party.

    FAST Founder, chairman and former Minister of Agriculture and Fisheries La’auli Leuatea Polataivao Schmidt, faces criminal charges, including conspiracy and harassment. These developments have escalated into calls for Fiame’s removal from her party.

    Deputy charged with offences
    On 3 January 2025, La’auli publicly revealed he had been charged with offences including conspiracy to obstruct justice, fabricating evidence, and harassment. These charges prompted widespread speculation, fueled by misinformation spread primarily via Facebook, that the charges were related to allegations of his involvement in an ongoing investigation into the death of a 19-year-old victim of a hit-and-run.

    Following La’auli’s refusal to resign from his role as Minister of Agriculture and Fisheries, Fiame removed his portfolio on January 10, citing the need to uphold the integrity of her Cabinet.

    “As Prime Minister, I had hoped that the former minister would choose to resign. This is a common stance often considered by esteemed public office custodians if allegations or charges are laid against them,” she explained.

    In response to his dismissal, La’auli stated publicly: “I accept the decision with a humble heart.” He maintained his innocence, saying, “I am clean from all of this,” and expressed confidence that the truth will prevail.

    La’auli urged his supporters to remain calm and emphasised his commitment to clearing his name while continuing to serve as a Member of Parliament for Gagaifomauga 3.

    Following his removal, the Samoan media reported that members of the FAST party wrote a letter to Fiame requesting her removal as Prime Minister.

    Three ministers dismissed
    In response, Fiame dismissed three Cabinet Ministers, Mulipola Anarosa Ale-Molio’o (Women, Community, and Social Development), Toelupe Poumulinuku Onesemo (Communication and Information Technology), and Leota Laki Sio (Commerce, Industry, and Labor) — allegedly involved in the effort to unseat her.

    Fiame emphasised the need for a cohesive and trustworthy Cabinet, stating the importance of maintaining confidence in her leadership.

    Amid rumors of calls for her removal within the FAST party, Fiame acknowledged the party’s authority to replace her as its leader but clarified that only Parliament could determine her status as Prime Minister.

    She expressed her determination to fulfill her duties despite internal challenges, though she did not specify the level of support she retains within the party.

    Samoa’s Parliament is set to convene next Tuesday, where these tensions may reach a critical point. La’auli, facing multiple criminal charges, remains a focal point of the ongoing political turmoil.

    A day after the announcement, on January 15, four new Ministers were sworn into office by Head of State Tuimaleali’ifano Va’aleto’a Sualauvi II at a ceremony attended by family, friends, and some FAST members.

    The new Ministers are Faleomavaega Titimaea Tafua (Commerce, Industry, and Labour), Laga’aia Ti’aitu’au Tufuga (Women, Community, and Social Development), Mau’u Siaosi Pu’epu’emai (Communications and Information Technology), and Niu’ava Eti Malolo (Agriculture and Fisheries).

    FAST caucus voted against Fiame
    Later that evening, FAST chairman La’auli announced that 20 members of the FAST caucus had decided to remove Fiame from the leadership of FAST and expel her from the party along with five other Cabinet Ministers — Tuala Tevaga Ponifasio (Deputy Prime Minister), Leatinuu Wayne Fong, Olo Fiti Vaai, Faualo Harry Schuster, and Toesulusulu Cedric Schuster.

    In Samoa, if an MP ceases to maintain affiliation with the political party under which they were elected — whether through resignation or expulsion, their seat is declared vacant if they choose to move to another party or form a new party.

    These provisions aim to preserve political stability, prevent party-hopping, and maintain the integrity of parliamentary representation, with byelections held as needed to fill vacancies.

    Under Section 142 of Samoa’s Electoral Act 2019, if the Speaker believes an MP’s seat has become vacant as per Section 141, they are required to formally charge the MP with that vacation.

    If the Legislative Assembly is in session, this charge must be made orally during the Assembly. Fiame and the four FAST members can choose to maintain their seats in Parliament as Independents.

    Former Prime Minister and now opposition leader Tuilaepa Sa’ilele Malielegaoi remarked that what should have been internal FAST issues had spilled into the public sphere.

    “We have been watching and we continue to watch what they do and how they deal with their problems,” he stated.

    Freedom of expression
    When asked whether he would consider a coalition or support one side of FAST, Tuilaepa declined to reveal the opposition’s strategy, citing potential reactions from the other side. He emphasised the importance of adhering to democratic processes and protecting constitutional rights, including freedom of expression.

    As Parliament prepares to reconvene on January 21, Facebook has become a battlefield for misinformation and defamatory discourse, particularly among FAST supporters in diaspora communities in the US, Australia, and New Zealand.

    Divisions have emerged between supporters of Fiame and La’auli, leading to vitriol directed at politicians and journalists covering the crisis. La’auli, leveraging his social media following, has conducted Facebook Live sessions to assert his innocence and rally support.

    Currently, FAST holds 35 seats in Parliament, while the opposition HRPP controls 18. If the removal of five MPs is factored in, FAST would retain 30 MPs, though La’auli claims that 20 members support Fiame’s removal. This leaves 10 MPs who may either support Fiame or remain neutral.

    If FAST fails to expel Fiame, La’auli’s faction may push for a motion of no confidence against her.

    Such a motion requires 27 votes to pass, potentially making the opposition pivotal in determining the outcome. This could lead to either Fiame’s removal or the dissolution of Parliament for a snap election.

    As Samoa faces this political crisis, its democratic institutions undergo a significant test.

    Fiame remains committed to the rule of law, while La’auli advocates for her removal.

    Reflecting on the stakes, Fiame warned: “Disregarding the rule of law will undoubtedly have far-reaching negative impacts, including undermining our judiciary system and the abilities of our law enforcement agencies to fulfill their duties.”

    For now, Samoa watches and waits as its political future hangs in the balance.

    Lagipoiva Cherelle Jackson is a Samoan journalist with over 20 years of experience reporting on the Pacific Islands. She is founding editor-in-chief of The New Atoll, a digital commentary magazine focusing on Pacific island geopolitics. Junior S. Ami is a photojournalist based in Samoa. He has covered national events for the Samoa Observer newspaper and runs a private photography business. Republished from the Devpolicy Blog with permission.

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • As numerous U.S. corporations bend to the right with the political winds swirling around Republican President-elect Donald Trump’s imminent return to power, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg is following up on his company’s termination of its fact-checking program by ending its diversity, equity, and inclusion programs and praising “masculine energy” in corporate America. “I think a lot of the…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • The latest “free speech” proclamation from a Big Tech billionaire has caused both alarm and a collective eyeroll. Digital rights activists say the debate over freedom of speech and content moderation has devolved into a partisan food fight without challenging the virtual monopolies that a few wealthy companies hold over our data and online experience. Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s announced on…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • A court in Vietnam sentenced on Friday a prominent lawyer to three years in prison for Facebook posts criticizing a former chief justice that the supreme court said contained fabricated content, state media reported.

    Tran Dinh Trien was found guilty of “abusing democratic freedoms to infringe upon the interests of the State and the legitimate rights and interests of organizations and individuals” under Article 331 of the criminal code according to the Tuoi Tre news site.

    The charges carried a maximum sentence of seven years in prison.

    The 65-year-old former deputy head of the Hanoi Bar Association was arrested on June 1, 2024, for three posts on Facebook that prosecutors said criticized the actions of then-Chief Justice Nguyen Hoa Binh.

    Trien and his team of 12 lawyers argued that he was exercising his right to freedom of speech and had not broken the law.

    In one of the posts he was prosecuted for, Trien criticized Binh for upholding a death sentence for Ho Duy Hai at his final appeal in May 2020. Hai had consistently proclaimed his innocence after being found guilty of murder and robbery in 2009.

    RELATED STORIES

    Vietnam tightens controls on social media users

    US-based lawyer calls for people’s court to try corrupt Vietnam officials

    City bar association cancels membership of Vietnamese activist lawyers

    The trial panel in a Hanoi court said that when exercising free speech individuals must obey the law and not infringe on the interests of the nation, the people and the state, Tuoi Tre reported.

    It said the prosecution’s indictment stated that Trien “had personal grievances, believing that the judiciary and the leadership of the Supreme People’s Court had unreasonable issues.”

    Vietnam’s top court, the Supreme People’s Court, said three of Trien’s Facebook posts contained “fabricated and untrue” content “seriously insulting the dignity, honor, and reputation” of its chief justice.

    The Ministry of Information and Communications said the articles “negatively affected security, order, and social safety.”

    Ahead of the sentencing, groups including U.S.-based Human Rights Watch had called for Trien’s immediate release saying lawyers must have the freedom to exercise their opinions as much as anyone else.

    Edited by Mike Firn.


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by RFA Staff, RFA Staff.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • An open letter to Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg in response to the social media giant’s decision to abandon its fact-checking regime protection in the US against hoaxes and conspiracy theories. No New Zealand fact-checkers are on the list of signatories.

    Dear Mr Zuckerberg,

    Nine years ago, we wrote to you about the real-world harms caused by false information on Facebook. In response, Meta created a fact-checking programme that helped protect millions of users from hoaxes and conspiracy theories. This week, you announced you’re ending that programme in the United States because of concerns about “too much censorship” — a decision that threatens to undo nearly a decade of progress in promoting accurate information online.

    The programme that launched in 2016 was a strong step forward in encouraging factual accuracy online. It helped people have a positive experience on Facebook, Instagram and Threads by reducing the spread of false and misleading information in their feeds.

    We believe — and data shows — most people on social media are looking for reliable information to make decisions about their lives and to have good interactions with friends and family. Informing users about false information in order to slow its spread, without censoring, was the goal.

    Fact-checkers strongly support freedom of expression, and we’ve said that repeatedly and formally in last year’s Sarajevo statement. The freedom to say why something is not true is also free speech.

    But you say the programme has become “a tool to censor,” and that “fact-checkers have just been too politically biased and have destroyed more trust than they’ve created, especially in the US.” This is false, and we want to set the record straight, both for today’s context and for the historical record.

    Meta required all fact-checking partners to meet strict nonpartisanship standards through verification by the International Fact-Checking Network. This meant no affiliations with political parties or candidates, no policy advocacy, and an unwavering commitment to objectivity and transparency.

    Each news organisation undergoes rigorous annual verification, including independent assessment and peer review. Far from questioning these standards, Meta has consistently praised their rigour and effectiveness. Just a year ago, Meta extended the programme to Threads.

    Fact-checkers blamed and harassed
    Your comments suggest fact-checkers were responsible for censorship, even though Meta never gave fact-checkers the ability or the authority to remove content or accounts. People online have often blamed and harassed fact-checkers for Meta’s actions. Your recent comments will no doubt fuel those perceptions.

    But the reality is that Meta staff decided on how content found to be false by fact-checkers should be downranked or labeled. Several fact-checkers over the years have suggested to Meta how it could improve this labeling to be less intrusive and avoid even the appearance of censorship, but Meta never acted on those suggestions.

    Additionally, Meta exempted politicians and political candidates from fact-checking as a precautionary measure, even when they spread known falsehoods. Fact-checkers, meanwhile, said that politicians should be fact-checked like anyone else.

    Over the years, Meta provided only limited information on the programme’s results, even though fact-checkers and independent researchers asked again and again for more data. But from what we could tell, the programme was effective. Research indicated fact-check labels reduced belief in and sharing of false information.  And in your own testimony to Congress, you boasted about Meta’s “industry-leading fact-checking programme.”

    You said that you plan to start a Community Notes programme similar to that of X. We do not believe that this type of programme will result in a positive user experience, as X has demonstrated.

    Research shows that many Community Notes never get displayed, because they depend on widespread political consensus rather than on standards and evidence for accuracy. Even so, there is no reason Community Notes couldn’t co-exist with the third-party fact-checking programme; they are not mutually exclusive.

    A Community Notes model that works in collaboration with professional fact-checking would have strong potential as a new model for promoting accurate information. The need for this is great: If people believe social media platforms are full of scams and hoaxes, they won’t want to spend time there or do business on them.

    Political context in US
    That brings us to the political context in the United States. Your announcement’s timing came after President-elect Donald Trump’s election certification and as part of a broader response from the tech industry to the incoming administration. Mr Trump himself said your announcement was “probably” in response to threats he’s made against you.

    Some of the journalists that are part of our fact-checking community have experienced similar threats from governments in the countries where they work, so we understand how hard it is to resist this pressure.

    The plan to end the fact-checking programme in 2025 applies only to the United States, for now. But Meta has similar programmes in more than 100 countries that are all highly diverse, at different stages of democracy and development. Some of these countries are highly vulnerable to misinformation that spurs political instability, election interference, mob violence and even genocide. If Meta decides to stop the programme worldwide, it is almost certain to result in real-world harm in many places.

    This moment underlines the need for more funding for public service journalism. Fact-checking is essential to maintaining shared realities and evidence-based discussion, both in the United States and globally. The philanthropic sector has an opportunity to increase its investment in journalism at a critical time.

    Most importantly, we believe the decision to end Meta’s third-party fact-checking programme is a step backward for those who want to see an internet that prioritises accurate and trustworthy information. We hope that somehow we can make up this ground in the years to come.

    We remain ready to work again with Meta, or any other technology platform that is interested in engaging fact-checking as a tool to give people the information they need to make informed decisions about their daily lives.

    Access to truth fuels freedom of speech, empowering communities to align their choices with their values. As journalists, we remain steadfast in our commitment to the freedom of the press, ensuring that the pursuit of truth endures as a cornerstone of democracy.

    Respectfully,

    15min – Lithuania

    AAP FactCheck – Australia

    AFP – France

    AkhbarMeter Media Observatory – Egypt

    Animal Político-El Sabueso – México

    Annie Lab – Hong Kong SAR

    Aos Fatos – Brazil

    Beam Reports – Sudan

    Check Your Fact – United States of America

    Chequeado – Argentina

    Civilnet.am – Armenia

    Colombiacheck – Colombia

    Congo Check : Congo, Congo DR, Central African Rep

    Doğruluk Payı – Türkiye

    Dubawa – Nigeria

    Ecuador Chequea – Ecuador

    Ellinika Hoaxes – Greece

    Estadão Verifica – Brazil

    Fact-Check Cyprus – Cyprus

    FactCheck.org – United States of America

    FactCheckNI – Northern Ireland

    Factcheck.Vlaanderen – Belgium

    Factchequeado – United States of America

    FactReview – Greece

    Factnameh – Iran

    Faktisk.no – Norway

    Faktograf – Croatia

    Fatabyyano – Jordan

    Full Fact – United Kingdom

    Greece Fact Check – Greece

    Gwara Media – Ukraine

    Internews Kosova KALLXO – Kosovo

    Istinomer – Serbia

    Källkritikbyrån – Sweden

    La Silla Vacía – Colombia

    Lead Stories – United States of America

    Les Surligneurs – France

    Lupa – Brazil

    Mafindo – Indonesia

    Mala Espina – Chile

    MediaWise – United States of America

    Myth Detector – Georgia

    Newtral – Spain

    Observador – Portugal

    Open – Italy

    Pagella Politica / Facta news – Italy

    Polígrafo – Portugal

    PolitiFact – United States

    Pravda – Poland

    PressOne.PH – Philippines

    RMIT Lookout – Australia

    Snopes – United States of America

    Taiwan FactCheck Center – Taiwan

    Tech4Peace – Iraq

    The Journal FactCheck – Ireland

    The Logical Indian – India

    VERA Files – Philippines

    Verify – Syria

    Editor: Fact-checking organisations continue to sign this letter, and the list is being updated as they do. No New Zealand fact-checking service has been added to the list so far. Republished from the at the Poynter Institute.

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • Meta’s surprise move to end fact checking shows Australia can’t rely on the US for effective tech regulation, according to experts who are now urging policymakers to step up local protections. The social media giant’s changes will start in the US, where fact checkers are being shelved and content rules loosened, sparking concern about the…

    The post Meta’s ‘catastrophic’ move leaves Australians exposed appeared first on InnovationAus.com.

    This post was originally published on InnovationAus.com.

  • The vast censorship and suppression campaign launched by American tech companies since October 7, 2023 has been both systemic and deliberate. Instagram, Facebook, X as well as other tech platforms and companies like Google, Microsoft and Apple have actively worked to stifle information regarding the genocide in Gaza. Dissent against policies or individuals who enable these decisions is often met with swift reprimand in the form of job loss.

    Joining host Chris Hedges on this episode of The Chris Hedges Report are three courageous individuals who chose to put their careers on the line to fight against Big Tech suppression of voices fighting for Palestinian lives.

    The post Exposing Big Tech’s Complicity In Genocide appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • Read a version of this story in Vietnamese

    Meta, the company that owns Facebook, blocked more than 3,200 pieces of content from being viewed in Vietnam in the first half of 2024, it said Tuesday, including a report on Vietnamese officials being accused of sexual assault during a trip to New Zealand.

    In a report posted to its “Transparency Center,” Meta said it had restricted access to the content — which included 3,160 posts and 119 comments — after receiving requests from Vietnam’s Ministry of Information and Communications’ Authority of Broadcasting and Electronic Information and Ministry of Public Security.

    “We restricted access in Vietnam to over 3,200 items … for allegedly violating local laws on providing information which distorts, slanders, or insults the reputation of an organization or the honor and dignity of an individual” under Decree No. 72, Meta said.

    The report marked the fifth consecutive increase in amount of content Meta blocked in Vietnam, beginning in the first half of 2022, when it restricted 982 posts and two pages and groups.

    Meta provided no details on the specific content it had restricted or how it made the decision to do so, following the requests from the two ministries.

    Attempts to contact Meta for additional information went unanswered Tuesday.

    Report on assault blocked

    RFA Vietnamese spoke with Hoang Hung, a Vietnamese man living in the Czech Republic, who said content he shared — a Dec. 12 post entitled ‘Did Vietnamese officials commit sexual harassment/assaults in New Zealand?’ — was blocked in Vietnam.

    Hung told RFA that a day after sharing the content, he received a notification from Meta informing him that it was unavailable in Vietnam because “we received a request from Vietnam’s Ministry of Public Security asking us to restrict access to your post.”

    “These restrictions affect people within the country,” he said. “Any information that the authorities consider unfavorable or detrimental to them is blocked.”

    RELATED STORIES

    Vietnamese officials accused of sexual assault during March visit to New Zealand

    Social media platforms censor 15,000 pieces of ‘anti-state’ content in Vietnam

    Vietnam intensifies crackdown on critics before general secretary’s funeral

    Hung’s post had referred to a report last week which said that two Vietnamese security officials who visited New Zealand in March were accused of sexually assaulting two waitresses at a restaurant in the capital, Wellington, days before Prime Minister Pham Minh Chinh’s trip to the country.

    According to the report, police in Wellington said they had “no doubt these two women were indecently assaulted by two men while working,” and established that the suspects “were Vietnamese officials, visiting on official business.”

    However, because New Zealand has no extradition treaty with Vietnam, police were unable to begin extradition proceedings, which was why the suspects hadn’t been charged.

    Violating freedom of speech

    Human rights lawyer Dang Dinh Manh, whose own posts have been deleted by Meta for reasons he considers unjustified, said that by blocking content, the company was “arbitrarily violating the freedom of speech of American users.”

    “In my opinion, the U.S. government, including both the executive and legislative branches, should be made aware of this issue and take timely measures to protect the freedoms being obviously infringed upon,” he said.

    RFA contacted the Vietnamese Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Ministry of Information and Communication, and two Meta companies via email seeking comment on the allegations of violating freedom of expression and access to information by blocking and deleting posts, but no response had been received by press time.

    In April 2020, Reuters news agency reported that Meta’s local servers in Vietnam were taken offline earlier in the year until the company gave in to the demands of the government to remove posts — a period of about seven weeks when the website was often not usable by Meta’s 65 million users in Vietnam.

    A Facebook user logs in on his mobile at a cafe in Hanoi, Vietnam Nov. 19, 2020.
    A Facebook user logs in on his mobile at a cafe in Hanoi, Vietnam Nov. 19, 2020.
    (Kham/Reuters)

    International rights groups slammed Meta for caving to Vietnam, demanding that it should publicly explain how it came to the decision to comply with the government requests, and saying the U.S. and other countries should have put diplomatic pressure on Vietnam to help Meta stand up to the pressure from Hanoi.

    Responding to the criticism at the time, the Vietnamese government said Meta had a responsibility to abide by local laws if it wants to do business in Vietnam.

    A Meta spokesperson told RFA in 2020 that while the company doesn’t agree with the laws, “if we continued to push back on lawful government requests to block access to content in Vietnam, it is highly likely our platforms would be blocked in their entirety.”

    Restrictions by other companies

    According to statistics from the Vietnamese government, global social media platforms Facebook, Google, and TikTok censored more than 15,000 pieces of content deemed to be “anti-Party and anti-state,” over the past year in Vietnam.

    The statistics showed that Facebook censored 8,981 posts, Google censored 6,043 pieces of content, and TikTok applied censorship measures to 971 videos considered to be in violation of local laws, and that the three companies had complied with more than 90% of Hanoi’s requests.

    Between 2011 and mid-2024, the Vietnamese government made a total of 2,776 requests to remove 83,129 videos and posts from Google platforms, including YouTube, Google Maps, Google Play Apps, and Blogger.

    Translated by Anna Vu. Edited by Joshua Lipes and Malcolm Foster.


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by RFA Vietnamese.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Meta will pay up to $50 million to users in Australia as part of its settlement with the privacy regulator over the tech giant’s Cambridge Analytica data harvesting scandal, which impacted more than 300,000 Australians a decade ago. The payment is the largest ever for a privacy settlement in Australia and was announced Wednesday by…

    The post Meta to pay $50m over Cambridge Analytica data harvesting appeared first on InnovationAus.com.

    This post was originally published on InnovationAus.com.

  • Just days out from the United States presidential election last month, X (formerly Twitter) suddenly crippled the ability of many major media and political organisations to reach audiences on the social media platform. Without warning, the platform, under tech billionaire Elon Musk’s stewardship, announced major changes to the main pathway these organisations use to disseminate…

    The post Social media platforms are throttling access to news appeared first on InnovationAus.com.

    This post was originally published on InnovationAus.com.

  • A government critic and agricultural expert who was beaten up on the streets of Phnom Penh last year was convicted of defamation on Thursday for comments posted online about the government.

    The Phnom Penh Municipal Court sentenced Ny Nak to two years in prison and fined him 200 million riel (US$50,000). He was arrested on Jan. 5 on charges of incitement and defamation.

    Minister of Labor Heng Sour filed a complaint against Ny Nak the week before the arrest after he posted a Facebook comment that mocked a Ministry of Commerce statement that said the government was aiming to register 10,000 new companies in the new year.

    Dressed in an orange jumpsuit, Ny Nak expressed his displeasure after the verdict was announced and asked his lawyer to meet with him at Tbong Khmum Provincial Correctional Center to discuss filing an appeal.

    The lawyer, Chuong Chou Ngy, told reporters in front of the court that his client was only exercising his right to freedom of expression in expressing his concern about national issues.

    Ny Nak was treated at a private clinic in 2023 after he was beaten by people wielding metal batons. (Facebook/Ny Nak)
    Ny Nak was treated at a private clinic in 2023 after he was beaten by people wielding metal batons. (Facebook/Ny Nak)

    Ny Nak’s wife, Sok Synet, told reporters that the court’s sentence was excessive and inappropriate. She added that Ny Nak is suffering from hepatitis B and has lost an excessive amount of weight due to malnutrition and sleeplessness.

    “It is unfair and the Court of Appeal should release my husband and drop all charges against him without paying any party,” she said. “The accusation is because he expressed his opinion on social media – and this is his personal opinion, his perception as a citizen.

    “He has no evil intention to overthrow the government or incite anyone to incite or hate someone,” she said.

    Minister’s complaint

    Ny Nak was previously convicted and sentenced to 18 months in prison after he criticized Cambodia’s COVID-19 policy as being too restrictive. He later apologized to then-Prime Minister Hun Sen.

    After his release in early 2023, Ny Nak began posting comments critical of the government on Facebook under the pseudonym IMAN-KH.

    In September 2023, he criticized Agriculture Minister Dith Tina over his handling of a report on rice prices.

    Hours later, he was beaten unconscious by several helmet-wearing, baton-wielding motorbike drivers.

    He was hospitalized for a week. No one was ever arrested in the attack.

    RELATED STORIES

    Critic faces charges after mocking government on Facebook

    Wife says detained critic willing to apologize for online comments

    Masked men savagely beat activist who called out Cambodian minister

    Ny Nak also posted critical comments about a government decision to cede about 100 hectares of land to a man named Heng Sour. His comment didn’t mention the man’s title, and it was unclear if he was referring to the minister of labor.

    Heng Sour and Prime Minister Hun Manet have denied that the government has given land to the minister.

    Sok Synet told Radio Free Asia earlier this year that Heng Sour may have filed the January criminal complaint over the Ministry of Commerce comment in retaliation for the previous land comment.

    RFA was unable to reach Phnom Penh Municipal Court spokesman Y Rin for comment on Thursday.

    Translated by Yun Samean. Edited Matt Reed and Malcolm Foster.


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by RFA Khmer.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • A trial of age verification technology will not deliver its findings to the federal government until six months after proposed legislation banning social media for under-16s is introduced to Parliament. The Communications department revealed the expected wait for the results while announcing a consortium of “industry experts” led by Age Check Certification Scheme (ACCS) as…

    The post Age verification tech trial results still six months away appeared first on InnovationAus.com.

    This post was originally published on InnovationAus.com.