radiofree.asia

Category: Features

  • Royal Commission reveals the unlawful and cruel nature of the Coalition’s Robodebt scheme

    Royal Commission reveals the unlawful and cruel nature of the Coalition’s Robodebt scheme

    In a significant development following last week’s release of the New South Wales ICAC report on serious corruption in public office, the Robodebt Royal Commission Report has now been made public. Similar to the ICAC findings, this report carries immense weight and significance. Spanning 990 pages, the report contains 57 recommendations and includes a ‘sealed section’ detailing referrals for civil and criminal prosecution, which will be directed towards the new National Anti-Corruption Commission. The identities of individuals mentioned in the sealed section will remain undisclosed until the NACC determines if charges should be filed.

    Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, commenting on the release of the Robodebt Royal Commission Report, acknowledged the courage displayed by vulnerable Australians in the face of injustice, hardship, and grief. He sharply contrasted their bravery with those who attempted to shift blame, suppress the truth, and perpetuate the shocking harm caused by the Robodebt scheme. Described as a gross betrayal and a human tragedy, the scheme targeted Australians who often did not owe any debts. It was an illegal and wrongful pursuit of debt recovery that should never have taken place.

    Under the previous Liberal–National Coalition government, the Robodebt scheme unlawfully raised a staggering $1.76 billion in debts from approximately 433,000 Australians. The consequences of this tragedy extended beyond financial hardship, causing stress, anxiety, and even financial destitution. Alarmingly, over 2,000 individuals lost their lives to suicide and stress, after receiving Robodebt notifications, underscoring the severity of the program’s impact. The report reveals that for over four years, Liberal ministers disregarded or dismissed repeated concerns raised by victims, public servants, community organizations, and legal experts.

    The Robodebt Royal Commission Report characterises the scheme as a “crude and cruel” mechanism that needlessly traumatised people under the mere and remote suspicion of owed money. It highlights the costly failure of public administration, both in human and economic terms. The report resonates with those affected by the Robodebt system, the families of the deceased, witnesses who testified during the Royal Commission, and advocates who tirelessly brought attention to the failures of the program over the past five years.

    The report’s release marks a turning point in the fight for justice and accountability. While much remains to be explored, the sealed section has become a subject of intense speculation. Although the names within it remain unknown, it is believed that at least three public servants and four ministers may be implicated. The potential laying of charges poses a delicate situation for the government, which must exercise caution, to avoid jeopardising any future legal actions against these people. However, the evidence presented thus far suggests criminal activities involving senior public servants or Ministers of the Crown, further intensifying the urgency for justice.

    Minister for Government Services Bill Shorten, outlining his response to the report, emphasises how the previous government and senior public servants betrayed the trust of the nation and its citizens. The report’s assessment of the Robodebt scandal as the worst chapter of public administration, underlines the extent of the breach of citizens’ trust.

    Shorten’s focus lies firmly on the victims, acknowledging the 433,000 vulnerable Australians identified by the Royal Commission and the countless others who were unjustly targeted. These individuals were subjected to a system of institutionalised abuse, wherein they received unfounded debt notices, often leading to court battles or demands from debt collection agencies. The reversal of the onus of proof and the treatment of citizens as guilty until proven innocent further compounded the harm they endured. Moreover, those who dared to raise concerns faced vile political attacks from the Coalition government.

    Commissioner Catherine Holmes, who oversaw the Royal Commission, delivered a scathing judgment on the Robodebt scheme, deeming it unfair and illegal and also expressed astonishment at the lack of interest displayed in ensuring the scheme’s legality. The report also criticises the Coalition government for incompetence and cowardice, and for former Prime Minister, Scott Morrison for deliberately allowing federal Cabinet to be misled.

    The Coalition parties faces criticism at their attempts to deflect blame

    Former government minister Senator Bridget McKenzie has attempted to shift blame onto the public service, while Liberal Party leader Peter Dutton has accused the government of strategically timing the report’s release to coincide with the Fadden byelection.

    McKenzie placed responsibility on public servants, stating that the assumption made by Cabinet is that proposed measures are legal under Australian law, and emphasised the need for “frank and fearless” advice from public servants to ensure informed decision-making on behalf of the Australian people, even though it was clear through her involvement with the infamous Sportsrorts affair, that McKenzie and the former Coalition government made a habit of avoiding advice provided to them by public servants. However, this attempt to absolve the government of responsibility has drawn criticism, given the report’s damning findings.

    Dutton’s response to the report was primarily based on accusing the government of political maneuvering by releasing it during the Fadden byelection, even though the dates for the release of the Royal Commission report had been set even before member for Fadden, Stuart Robert, had announced his resignation from Parliament. Dutton’s other diversionary tactics included raising a wide range of unrelated issues, such as nuclear energy, and defending a racist and controversial anti-Voice to Parliament cartoon which appeared in the Australian Financial Review: the intention was clear: to avoid discussing the illegal and borderline criminal behaviour associated with the Robodebt scheme that was implemented by the Liberal Party.

    The report’s findings pose a significant challenge to Dutton and the Liberal Party. His attempt to change the conversation reflects a desire to distance himself from the scandalous program that should never have been implemented by the party. The report’s revelations confirm that the advice provided at the time clearly indicated the illegality of the scheme, making the government’s actions inexcusable.

    This latest development should be seen as a final nail in the coffin for the far-right wing faction that has dominated the Liberal Party since 2005. Calls for resignations – and legal action – from within the party, particularly for those associated with the Robodebt scandal, have grown louder. The report’s findings have also prompted demands for an overhaul of the Liberal Party’s recruitment policies, ensuring that individuals lacking ethical integrity and competency are not given the opportunity to hold public office.

    The past decade has been marred by mediocrity and ethical shortcomings within the Liberal Party. Australia cannot afford a repetition of such a disgraceful period. It is essential for all political parties – including Liberal, Labor, National, and Greens – to reflect on their selection processes and ensure that individuals driven by self-interest and lacking moral standards are kept away from public office. While a diverse range of ideas in Parliament is essential, it is equally important to hold parties accountable and prevent the ascent of individuals who do not serve the best interests of the nation.

    As Australia grapples with the aftermath of the Robodebt Royal Commission Report, a collective effort is needed to restore faith in the political system. It is crucial to return to an era where public officials driven solely by personal gain are considered outliers, swiftly dismissed from ministries, and regarded as a source of amusement rather than a serious threat. Restoring this approach will pave the way for a more accountable and ethical political landscape.

    The post Royal Commission reveals the unlawful and cruel nature of the Coalition’s Robodebt scheme appeared first on New Politics.

    This post was originally published on New Politics.

  • ‘I lost seven people’: South Africans mourn latest mine tragedy

    South African authorities have promised to tackle illegal mining after gas kills 17 people, including three children. 

    This post was originally published on Al Jazeera – Breaking News, World News and Video from Al Jazeera.

  • ‘In Lebanon, I earn well, but not enough to keep my mum alive’

    Amid the economic crisis, a son struggles to find the $7,000 required every three weeks for his mother's cancer drugs.

    This post was originally published on Al Jazeera – Breaking News, World News and Video from Al Jazeera.

  • Serious corruption ICAC findings for Berejiklian and Maguire

    Serious corruption ICAC findings for Berejiklian and Maguire

    The NSW Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) has released its long-awaited findings into the actions of former New South Wales Premier Gladys Berejiklian and former Member for Wagga Wagga, Daryl Maguire, exposing their involvement in serious corruption.

    These findings come as a blow to the former premier, who had been portrayed by some as a victim of circumstance, entangled in a relationship with Maguire. The ICAC report shatters that narrative, revealing a level of corruption that goes beyond personal entanglements. It uncovers a culture of secrecy, cover-ups, and financial improprieties that undermines the integrity of New South Wales politics.

    The extensive report reveals that Berejiklian breached public trust by supporting a grant to the Australian Clay Target Association – $5.5 million – and the construction of a hall for the Riverina Conservatorium of Music – $25 million. Additionally, the ICAC recommends that the public prosecutor file charges against Maguire for advancing his own financial interests through land deals and a visa scheme, which could also have ramifications for some former federal Liberal Party ministers.

    After nearly two years of criticism and speculation, the release of the ICAC findings brings clarity and validates the suspicions many had about corruption within the New South Wales political landscape. The 600-page report – published in two volumes – delves into various instances of corruption, laying bare the extent of the wrongdoing.

    While the ICAC did not recommend charges against Berejiklian, the report strongly criticises her inaction despite being aware of the corruption taking place. Her infamous “I don’t need to know about that” recording, widely circulated, stands as a testament to her misconduct. The report uncovers a cover-up and highlights the urgent need for accountability.

    The most corrupt NSW Premier ever

    This marks the highest level of corruption among New South Wales premiers, with Berejiklian becoming the third Liberal Party premier found guilty of corruption by the ICAC. The previous instances involved Nick Greiner, whose charges were overturned on a technicality, and Barry O’Farrell, who resigned over a failure to disclose a wine donation; however, the audacity of the corruption in this case is deeply troubling.

    Berejiklian’s downfall is particularly tragic, considering her inspirational rise from a young child with limited English proficiency to becoming the state’s premier. However, her acceptance of corruption tarnishes her once-inspiring story, casting doubt on her future employment prospects in Australia. Potential diplomatic positions overseas may be the only viable option – and at some distant point in the future – although the public’s willingness to accept someone with a proven record of corruption as a representative remains uncertain.

    Critics from the Liberal Party have been quick to attack the ICAC and its findings, echoing their sentiments even before the report’s release. The reduction of ICAC funding by both Berejiklian and former Premier Mike Baird adds another layer of complexity to the issue. Former Prime Minister Scott Morrison, who previously criticised the ICAC as a “kangaroo court,” had even considered endorsing Berejiklian as a candidate in the 2022 federal election.

    The mainstream media’s portrayal of Berejiklian as a victim has also faced widespread criticism, a level of support which seemed to continue, even after ICAC found that she engaged in serious corruption, preferring to focus on her management of the COVID pandemic, even though there were serious outbreaks that occurred during her time in office, most notably, the Ruby Princess debacle in 2020, and a failure to lockdown early enough in June 2021.

    The ICAC report includes 18 recommendations, emphasising the need for changes in New South Wales political culture and mandatory corruption training for parliamentarians. The fact that such training is necessary raises questions about the suitability of these individuals for parliamentary roles if they require instruction on identifying corruption. Wouldn’t it be obvious to most people what corruption is in public office?

    The pervasiveness of corruption in New South Wales politics has led to a lack of understanding and acknowledgment of its existence. However, with the ICAC findings now exposed, it is crucial for the state to address this issue head-on and work towards restoring public trust and integrity in the political system.

    The corruption in NSW needs to end

    The revelations surrounding Gladys Berejiklian’s tenure mark a significant moment in New South Wales politics. It is a stark reminder that corruption is not confined to the shadows but can permeate the highest levels of power. The ICAC’s thorough investigation, despite attempts to discredit it, serves as a reminder of the importance of an independent body holding those in power accountable.

    The state’s political culture must undergo a comprehensive overhaul to prevent future instances of corruption and ensure that those who occupy positions of authority act in the best interests of the people they serve.

    The road to redemption for New South Wales politics is long, but the exposure of corruption and the ICAC’s in-depth report may serve as a catalyst for change. It is a pivotal moment for the state to re-evaluate its political landscape and strive for a more transparent, accountable, and ethical governance system.

    The post Serious corruption ICAC findings for Berejiklian and Maguire appeared first on New Politics.

    This post was originally published on New Politics.

  • Q&A: Afrobeats is ‘one of Africa’s biggest cultural exports’

    A leading music executive answers questions on the essence and evolution of the trendy music genre Afrobeats.

  • Activists seek to confront UK’s plan to ban boycotting Israel

    Pro-Palestinian campaigners are lobbying British MPs to vote down the bill in July that would outlaw sanctioning Israel.

    This post was originally published on Al Jazeera – Breaking News, World News and Video from Al Jazeera.

  • Can the Palestinian Authority protect Palestinians from settlers?

    Calls grow for the Palestinian Authority to protect Palestinians against increasing violent settler attacks.

    This post was originally published on Al Jazeera – Breaking News, World News and Video from Al Jazeera.

  • Dutton image makeover: He’s still a monster!

    Still a monster: Liberal Party leader Dutton’s image makeover

    In a bid to revamp his public image, the federal Liberal leader, Peter Dutton, has embarked on an extensive makeover campaign. Following in the footsteps of his predecessors – John Howard and Anthony Albanese all had political success after their respective image makeovers – Dutton aims to present a more appealing persona to the electorate.

    Dutton’s recent efforts have seen him don a new pair of glasses and release a seven-minute documentary-style video highlighting his positive attributes, with particular emphasis placed on testimonials from his wife, Kirilly Dutton.

    In the video, Kirilly praises Dutton’s commitment to family, his love for his children, and his support for her successful small business. The couple portrays a “normal” home life, engaging in simple, wholesome activities like attending their children’s sporting events and enjoying the outdoors.

    However, critics argue that these orchestrated attempts to present Dutton as a kind and empathetic individual clash with his actions throughout his political career. They point to instances such as his controversial walk-out during the Apology to the Stolen Generations in 2008, divisive comments regarding “African gangs” during the 2018 Victoria election, a history of hardline policies targeting refugees and asylum seekers, and his dismissive attitude towards the Voice to Parliament. These actions, combined with allegations of corruption, cast doubt on the authenticity of Dutton’s newfound empathy.

    The video release has sparked a broader discussion about the effectiveness of such image makeovers in politics. It is not uncommon for politicians to attempt to reshape public perception through similar means, as evidenced by previous campaigns led by figures like Howard and Albanese. However, the cynicism surrounding Dutton’s efforts stems from the stark contrast between the portrayed empathy and the lack thereof demonstrated in his political actions.

    Some observers argue that if a politician feels the need to produce a seven-minute video featuring people praising their character, it may indicate an underlying insecurity or lack of authenticity. Dutton’s video, labeled by some as a desperate attempt to improve his polling numbers, attempts to project him as a likable figure to counter the negative public sentiment.

    Nevertheless, critics contend that true empathy and kindness cannot be manufactured and must be demonstrated consistently through actions.

    Dutton’s ongoing struggle to resonate with the electorate is evident in his consistently low personal support ratings, hovering around 17 per cent, and the Liberal and National parties two-party preferred voting percentages ranging from 42 to 45 per cent. With the next federal election due in 2025 – two years away – the pressure to turn the tide is mounting. Speculation has emerged about potential leadership challenges within the Liberal Party, with some suggesting figures such as deputy leader Sussan Ley, may be positioning themselves as alternatives.

    While Dutton’s image makeover may signal a sense of panic and desperation, it remains uncertain whether it will be sufficient to reverse his low levels of support. Public perception of politicians is primarily shaped by their public actions, and no amount of spin or promotional videos can easily alter entrenched perceptions.

    Dutton and the religious problem in Victoria

    Victoria’s political landscape also presents a significant obstacle for Dutton and the Liberal Party, as the state’s performance often impacts federal voting intentions. Recent polling reveals a persistently low level of support for the Liberal Party in Victoria – in state and federal polling – with around 39 per cent support, compared to the Labor Party’s 61 per cent.

    These numbers highlight the pressing challenges faced by Dutton and his party. Adding to the woes is the struggle of the opposition leader in Victoria, John Pesutto, who is grappling with his own set of issues.

    There is a growing influence of religious groups within the Victorian branch of the Liberal Party, where Mormons, Pentecostals, and other conservative Christian factions have taken control of key party branches. This situation has raised concerns about the representation of the views of these groups in Parliament, especially when they do not necessarily align with the broader electorate’s sentiments.

    A significant development in this context is the upcoming state byelection in the seat of Warrandyte, where the Liberal Party has preselected Nicole Werner, a Pentecostal preacher and activist, as their candidate. While there is nothing inherently wrong with religious individuals participating in politics – not all people of faith are conservative and there are some very progressive religious voices out there – the concern arises when their views disproportionately influence policy decisions, outweighing their representation within the electorate.

    Werner’s previous electoral performance in the seat of Box Hill during the 2022 Victorian election is noteworthy: despite a 9 per cent swing against her on the primary vote in a seat the Liberal Party should have won, she has been given another preselection opportunity. This raises questions about the Liberal Party’s commitment to merit-based selection, which they often tout as a core principle.

    Critics argue that Werner’s second preselection highlights the significant influence religious groups hold within the Victorian branch, potentially stifling the representation of diverse viewpoints. It also suggests that the party may not be genuinely listening to the electorate but rather prioritising the preferences of select interest groups.

    The concerns surrounding the rise of religious groups within the Liberal Party extend beyond Werner’s candidacy. The overall composition of the Victorian branch has led to a disconnect between party members and the wider community and this divergence poses a significant challenge for the Liberal Party, as they risk alienating voters and failing to resonate with the electorate.

    Liberal Party needs a return to liberal progressivism

    In response to these issues, some observers have pointed out the need for the Liberal Party to evolve and become more progressive in the traditional sense of liberal progressivism. They argue that a party’s power lies in its ability to adapt and represent the changing views of society accurately. Ignoring this reality can result in the continued erosion of support and a lack of influence.

    While Werner’s preselection may have been based on the decisions of the local branch membership, it does raise concerns about the party’s commitment to reflecting the broader community’s sentiments. The selection of candidates who do not represent the diversity of viewpoints within their electorates can hinder the party’s credibility and disconnect them from the needs and aspirations of the people they aim to serve.

    As the Liberal Party navigates the intricate political landscape in Victoria, the challenges they face highlight the need for a more inclusive and representative approach. Overcoming these hurdles will require a thorough examination of candidate selection processes and a genuine commitment to understanding and addressing the concerns of the wider electorate. Failure to do so may impede the party’s ability to regain support and influence in the state and, ultimately, the federal arena.

    The post Dutton image makeover: He’s still a monster! appeared first on New Politics.

    This post was originally published on New Politics.

  • Greece boat wreck victims asked for prayers before leaving Libya

    Many now feared dead in the boat wreck off Greece were full of hope and asked loved ones to pray for them.

    This post was originally published on Al Jazeera – Breaking News, World News and Video from Al Jazeera.

  • Disbelief, anger: Russians struggle to process Wagner revolt

    A Rostov native recalls Saturday's spectacle as Moscow decides what to do with mercenary chief Yevgeny Prigozhin.

  • Voice to Parliament challenges ahead after strange alliances formed

    Voice To Parliament progress but referendum challenges ahead with Lidia Thorpe forming alliances with opponents.

    In a significant step towards achieving greater Indigenous representation, the legislation for a referendum on the establishment of an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice to Parliament has been approved.

    While no specific date has been set for the referendum yet, this development marks a pivotal moment in the ongoing efforts to address Indigenous rights and empower First Nations peoples. However, there remains a possibility of a temporary halt if Prime Minister and Opposition Leader Anthony Albanese believe the referendum‘s success is uncertain.

    The approval of the legislation in the Senate was met with enthusiasm and celebration – not by all – 52 in favour, and 19 against recognising the First Peoples of Australia through the establishment of an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice. This historic achievement paves the way for a crucial democratic process that will shape the nation’s future.

    Despite this progress, tensions emerged as Senator Lidia Thorpe announced her opposition to the Voice of Parliament and has aligned herself with the Liberal Party, the National Party, and One Nation to campaign against the ‘yes’ case. Senator Thorpe expressed disappointment in the government’s failure to act in good faith during negotiations, particularly in implementing the recommendations of the Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody and the Bringing Them Home report. These long-standing issues, dating back three decades, demand self-determining solutions from Indigenous communities themselves. Senator Thorpe’s decision to join forces with political opponents reflects her dedication to her principles, even if it means working alongside those with whom she often disagrees.

    Critics of the Voice to Parliament, including Senator Thorpe, argue that it falls short of addressing all the necessary issues faced by Indigenous communities. They contend that negotiations for a Treaty, reparations, and initiatives such as the ‘Pay The Rent’ campaign should be pursued alongside the establishment of the Voice. While acknowledging these concerns, proponents argue that progress must be made incrementally within the realm of politics, with the Voice to Parliament representing a significant milestone in the journey towards Indigenous empowerment.

    Senator Thorpe’s alignment with the Black Sovereignty Movement, which argues that the Voice to Parliament perpetuates white dominance over Indigenous affairs, has sparked further debate. While this view does not appear to represent the majority opinion among Indigenous communities and leaders, it highlights the complexity surrounding the issue.

    Political strategy for Voice to Parliament and the complex path to treaty negotiations

    These political dynamics also pose challenges for Senator Thorpe herself. Having been elected as a Senator through the Australian Green and subsequently leaving the party, she now faces the task of maintaining a prominent position in the Senate. The implications of her current alliances and potential consequences for her future endeavours, especially if a Treaty becomes the focus, remain uncertain.

    The world of politics often brings together individuals with contrasting views and values, particularly when it serves their respective agendas. However, collaborating with the Liberal Party, the National Party, and One Nation on the ‘no’ campaign, Senator Thorpe’s decision has left many wondering about the underlying motives and potential consequences.

    Critics argue that aligning with these political forces – known for their hostile opposition to initiatives such as a Treaty or the ‘Pay The Rent’ campaign – may undermine the interests of Indigenous Australia. Without clear indications of any hidden agreements or trade-offs, the motivations behind this alliance remain mysterious, raising concerns about the effectiveness of such a political strategy.

    In contrast, the delay of House Australia Future Fund by the Australian Greens appears to have a more obvious strategy: the Greens aim to enhance existing policies and capitalise on the associated issues for political gain within their movement. However, opposing the Voice of Parliament without any viable alternatives from the government appears questionable at this stage. The pressing need for a Treaty with First Nations people, which was promised by Bob Hawke in 1988 but subsequently neglected, has long been a central aspiration for Indigenous communities. Addressing the historical injustices of stolen land in 1788 through colonisation and again in 1901 through Federation, the call for a Treaty, ‘Pay The Rent’, reparations, or any other means of rectification resonates with many Indigenous voices.

    For those skeptics who doubt the potential impact of a Treaty, Victoria’s current Treaty process serves as a powerful example. Indigenous people in Victoria are in the process of electing representatives to participate in Treaty negotiations—a significant milestone. However, if the negotiations are not completed within the term of Premier Daniel Andrews or a subsequent Labor government in Victoria, the prospects of a Treaty may fade, or be removed by a change of government in future elections. Perhaps this context provides insight into Senator Thorpe’s strategy: dismantling the Voice of Parliament to pave the way for Treaty negotiations, although it should be noted that the Voice to Parliament and the Treaty are not mutually exclusive but could work in tandem to advance Indigenous rights and reconciliation.

    Australia needs a Treaty with First Nations people

    While Australia stands out as a nation without a treaty with its Indigenous populations, it is crucial to acknowledge that treaty-making processes vary across the globe. These treaties are ongoing negotiations, often revisited every few years to assess their effectiveness and adapt to changing circumstances. The Voice to Parliament, though not deemed ideal by some, can serve as a catalyst for initiating the Treaty process.

    Representatives within the Voice to Parliament could advocate for a Treaty using compelling moral arguments: the promises made in 1988, the Apology to Parliament, and the urgent need to address the alarmingly low living standards faced by Indigenous communities. The concept of ‘paying the rent’ – although ironic amid a domestic rental crisis – invites Australia to reflect on its responsibilities and priorities.

    As the discussion surrounding Indigenous rights continues, unconventional alliances and differing strategies emerge within the political landscape. While the motivations behind certain political manoeuvres remain open to interpretation, the ultimate goal of achieving Indigenous empowerment, justice, and reconciliation must remain at the forefront. The journey towards true equality and understanding demands unwavering commitment, informed dialogue, and a willingness to challenge existing norms and perceptions. Only then can Australia move closer to a future that respects the rights and aspirations of its First Nations peoples.

    The post Voice to Parliament challenges ahead after strange alliances formed appeared first on New Politics.

    This post was originally published on New Politics.

  • Crucial legislation delayed by Greens, sparking debate during a housing crisis

    Crucial legislation delayed by Greens, Adam Bandt, Max Chandler-Mather

    This week, the Senate voted to delay the implementation of the $10 billion housing Australia future fund for social housing until 16 October, despite the ongoing national housing crisis. The delay has sparked debates, criticism, and frustration among various political parties, housing advocates and the public.

    The Labor government had hoped to secure the support of the Australian Greens and two other Senators – David Pocock and Jacqui Lambie – to pass the legislation. However, the Greens and the Liberal and National parties voted to postpone the progress of the Bill. This decision has raised questions about the justification for delaying a program aimed primarily at addressing the pressing housing crisis.

    The essence of Parliament is to tackle critical issues and ensure the prompt delivery of essential services but the decision to delay the housing Australia future fund legislation appears difficult to justify, especially considering the urgency of the housing crisis. Supporters argue that it is crucial to initiate the program as soon as possible to begin providing much-needed housing to those in need.

    Critics of the legislation’s funding structure point out that relying on future investment results poses significant risks: investments can be unpredictable, and the government should not solely depend on making money through investments when alternative and more stable income streams are available. Many people in the community believe that housing is a fundamental right that warrants a more robust funding approach.

    Legislation delayed by Greens: how will this assist those who need housing now?

    The Greens find themselves in a challenging position, aligned with the Coalition, who are unlikely to support any government propositions, irrespective of the quality of these propositions. However, they may have been outmaneuvered by more cynical and experienced politicians, which has now led to a delay of five months in critical housing legislation. This delay could also potentially provide an opportunity for the Labor Party to lay blame on the Greens for impeding progress, which is now becoming a narrative that is more prevalent in the mainstream media.

    While the housing Australia future funding program has faced criticism for its apparent inadequacy, starting the program and gradually expanding it over time can still lead to incremental progress. Although the initial target of building 2,000 to 5,000 dwellings per year falls short of the current demand of 640,000 dwellings, it is start that added to be by state and territory governments, and is a step in the right direction. Additionally, other housing policy measures and increased pressure on the government can be explored to address the pressing housing crisis comprehensively.

    The Greens’ stance on the legislation has resulted in frustration among segments of the public. Some accuse them of obstructing government efforts to provide public housing and question their commitment to the cause. However, the Greens argue that they are seeking better alternatives and comprehensive solutions, which is a reasonable standpoint. Nevertheless, their failure to propose a viable solution or provide suitable alternative plans may have consequences, both politically and in terms of public perception.

    Media narratives have also begun to shape public opinion against the Australian Greens – conveniently overlooking the fact that the Coalition also played a role in blocking the legislation – several news stories have emerged, criticising the Greens for allegedly denying new housing to the homeless and painting them as “heartless”. Such narratives further complicate the political landscape surrounding this issue.

    Will the housing bill delay result in a double-dissolution election?

    Speculation about a double-dissolution election has also arisen, but this speculation is premature. According to parliamentary procedures, a Bill must be rejected twice by the Senate to trigger such an election, whereas the housing Australia future fund legislation has only been delayed, not rejected, leaving a considerable distance to cover before any double-dissolution election comes into play.

    While the Greens’ decision to block a crucial government program has drawn attention, it carries the risk of damaging their own reputation, although it could be argued that the government’s reluctance to increase funding for the program and ensure its adequacy may also harm its standing among the public.

    The situation has fostered a hostile debate between the government and the Greens, characterised by name-calling and verbal attacks, with accusations from the Labor government that the Greens had a priority for social media engagement through TikTok, rather that really addressing the needs of renters and housing stock. The Treasurer, Jim Chalmers, also argued that the Green’s decision to side with the “Coalition of cookers” instead of cooperating with Labor on building more social and affordable homes suggests misguided priorities and a poor alignment of their political ambitions and philosophies.

    A predictable refusal to comprise?

    Suggestions have been made that the Greens’ resistance to compromise on social housing stems from previous disappointments with compromised legislation. Some point to the compromise on the 43 per cent emissions reduction target by 2030 – the Greens wanted a 75 per cent target but settled for less – only to witness the Labor government approving more coal mines.

    This history may have influenced their current stance on the housing program. However, when considering all the factors and political dynamics at play, the decision to delay the program by at least five months still appears questionable.

    The delay of the housing Australia future fund legislation has ignited debates, frustration, and political backlash amid the ongoing national housing crisis. While the government’s plan may have limitations, initiating the program first and then seeking opportunities for improvement should be the priority. Both the Labor government and the Greens need to find common ground and work towards comprehensive solutions that address the pressing housing needs of the Australian population. The urgency of the situation demands swift action and collaboration, with a focus on the wellbeing of those in need, and avoid further polarisation within the political landscape.

    The post Crucial legislation delayed by Greens, sparking debate during a housing crisis appeared first on New Politics.

    This post was originally published on New Politics.

  • ‘Not afraid’: The Texas pilot flying patients to abortions

    As abortion becomes less accessible in the US, one pilot is determined to help vulnerable patients despite the risks.

    This post was originally published on Al Jazeera – Breaking News, World News and Video from Al Jazeera.

  • The Australian housing affordability crisis continues

    The continuing housing affordability crisis

    Housing affordability remains a pressing issue throughout Australia, prompting the Labor government to introduce amendments to its Housing Australia Future Fund legislation in a bid to garner support from the Senate, approve the legislation, and commence the social housing building program that Prime Minister Anthony Albanese promised in the lead-up to the 2022 federal election.

    The proposed changes aim to secure the backing of the Australian Greens and several other Senators, signaling a concerted effort to address the country’s housing challenges. However, critics argue that the suggested amendments still fall short of the drastic measures required to combat the crisis.

    One of the key amendments put forward is the removal of the fund’s proposed cap, accompanied by a pledge to allocate a minimum of $500 million annually towards social housing initiatives. While this commitment is an improvement, experts argue that it is woefully insufficient. Depending on the type of housing, this would create between 2,000 to 5,000 dwellings per year, whereas based on the current demand across Australia, an estimated 640,000 dwellings are needed immediately. It is clear that a more comprehensive approach is urgently required.

    The Australian Greens – a key political player in the Senate if the Labor government wishes to have its legislation enacted – have decided to postpone their vote on this legislation until October and are expected to push for more substantial changes, emphasising that addressing housing affordability extends beyond social housing alone and that the magnitude of the crisis necessitates action across multiple facets of the housing sector.

    Insufficient infrastructure provided by governments to support new housing developments further compounds the challenges faced by communities. An example is found in south-western Sydney suburb of Canterbury, where 3,000 apartments were constructed without adequate accompanying social services.

    Developers were mandated to include social amenities but provided a supermarket and several cafes, instead of crucial facilities such as additional hospitals, police stations, medical services, and schools. This oversight has resulted in considerable difficulties for both existing and new residents of Canterbury, who have struggled with the ramifications of rapid expansion. Similar issues have arisen in other parts of the country, demanding a comprehensive re-evaluation of housing policies.

    To tackle these complex issues, governments must convene a summit that goes beyond the developers’ perspective, a summit which should include town planners, environmental thinkers, anthropologists, and sociologists to collectively determine the best strategies for managing cities and achieving affordable accommodation.

    This approach should aim to alleviate problems such as overcrowding, inadequate public transportation, and limited access to essential social services such as hospitals and police stations. Currently, too many individuals are grappling with the scarcity of suitable housing, particularly in major cities where their skills and contributions are highly sought after.

    Balancing the interests of small investors and preserving the value of existing properties while simultaneously enabling affordable homeownership poses a considerable challenge for the government. It is crucial to strike a delicate balance to ensure the financial stability of homeowners without further exacerbating the housing crisis.

    As the housing affordability crisis continues to escalate, the Labor government’s proposed amendments to the Housing Australia Future Fund represent a step in the right direction. However, greater efforts and a multifaceted approach are essential to alleviate the burden on individuals seeking affordable housing. The path forward requires proactive collaboration and innovative strategies to ensure that housing affordability becomes a reality for all Australians.

    Urgent action is needed to address the housing affordability crisis

    Advocate groups such as Shelter NSW have been at the forefront of this battle for housing affordability for some time, tirelessly lobbying for improved housing conditions for lower-income communities. According to Cathy Callaghan, senior policy adviser with Shelter NSW, the dire situation facing many Australians today is a culmination of government actions and inactions over the past few decades.

    “Government policy over the last 20 years has been dominated by a philosophy that the private housing market will take care of housing, and governments have stepped away from its traditional role to provide housing through public social housing,” says Callaghan. “We’ve seen policies that have really, in some cases, made the problem worse.”

    Recent years have also witnessed an alarming rise in homelessness, even among traditionally middle-class individuals. Stories of women in their 50s and 60s, who once led regular lives, finding themselves suddenly homeless have become distressingly common. Additionally, the sight of hundreds of people queuing for rental properties highlights the intensity of the housing shortage.

    To tackle these pressing issues, Callaghan believes it is crucial to determine which level of government should take responsibility for finding solutions. “There needs to be a national strategy and plan, where we have national political and civic leadership that repositions housing as an essential service and not as a financial product. But probably the biggest thing that that governments could do right now, particularly in New South Wales, is step back into the game of being responsible for building and growing the stock of social housing.”

    Callaghan also feels that addressing the housing crisis requires a multifaceted approach that considers various factors contributing to the problem. “There’s some underlying structural issues in the Australian taxation system, for example, that disproportionately ramps up investment in housing as a speculative product.

    “The changes that were made under the Howard government around the capital gains discount, that’s widely credited as being something that made housing much more speculative, brought investors in and saw people wanting to buy homes, competing with other investors. And even just the way the retirement income system is structured, everything assumes you own your own home. There’s been very little recognition that we have a large and growing population that rents and will rent probably for their lives.”

    Other piecemeal solutions, such as first homeowner grants and government subsidies for buyers, have proven ineffective and often worsen the problem, whereas co-ordinated, big-picture initiatives are necessary to effect real change. The federal Labor government has shown promising signs of prioritising housing and homelessness, emphasising the need for a co-ordinated and strategic approach across the country.

    How will we know if the housing affordability crisis is easing?

    While implementing solutions will undoubtedly take time, Callaghan points to certain factors that can signal progress and show whether any significant improvements are being met. “The Census, for example, counts every five years the rate of homelessness in the country – in the last Census in New South Wales, are over 122,000 people identified, self-identified as homeless. If we had a better system of housing in this state, we will see that figure go down.

    “We also have some clear ways of tracking the degree of housing stress – if households are paying more than 30 per cent of their gross household income, whether it’s mortgage or rent, then they define as being in a state of housing stress. And we know that households that are in housing stress, are forced to compromise on other critical spending, like their health, like food. If we will see rates of housing stress come down, we would see people not forced to make those unreasonable choices between paying rent and eating food or playing a power bill.

    “And one key indicator would be the safety net of social housing restored and become –and it is in other countries – a substantial player in the rental market. This would mark a vital step toward resolving the crisis.”

    As governments deliberate on housing decisions, they must consider the broader implications and long-term consequences. With projected population growth, careful planning and integration of social and affordable housing into new developments will be critical to avoid compounding the existing housing issues.

    It is crucial to act swiftly and decisively to combat the housing crisis in Australia. Only through a co-ordinated, comprehensive approach, backed by strong leadership and genuine political will, can the country hope to provide secure and affordable housing for all its citizens.

    The post The Australian housing affordability crisis continues appeared first on New Politics.

    This post was originally published on New Politics.

  • The Liberal Party blame game backfires

    The Liberal Party blame game backfires David Van Peter Dutton

    In a typical Liberal Party blame game act, the week in Canberra saw a political firestorm, as allegations and accusations were on the centre stage, engulfing Australian politics in controversy. The spotlight was firmly focused upon Senator Katy Gallagher, who was facing allegations from the Liberal Party and the mainstream media of misleading parliament during a Senate hearings exchange that occurred back in June 2021. But the blame game has backfired.

    This contentious exchange, which unfolded in the wake of the Brittany Higgins sexual assault allegations, sparked outrage in the media and ignited a fierce debate within the Australian political landscape. But by week’s end, the tables had turned, and all the focus was back onto the Liberal Party, over sexual assault allegations from one of their own Senators.

    The core of the initial controversy revolves around a series of exchanges between Senator Gallagher and Senator Linda Reynolds during a Senate hearing. The focus has zeroed in on Gallagher’s statement of “no one had any knowledge,” which has triggered a vehement response from the Liberal Party, the mainstream media, and even calls for resignations.

    The allegations stem from the question of who had prior knowledge of Brittany Higgins’ assault allegations before they became public in 2021. What initially appeared to be an innocuous exchange during the Senate hearing snowballed into a national calamity, with critics accusing the Liberal Party of exploiting the incident to create a major scandal and deflect attention from their own shortcomings.

    The Liberal Party has a track record of magnifying minor incidents into major scandals and skillfully deflecting blame onto others, a tactic which has yielded considerable success for them in the past. However, this time, their strategy has backfired, and the fallout from the controversy could have unforeseen consequences.

    The media blames women, as it always does

    Beyond the political storm, what has been forgotten is the person the heart of this issue—Brittany Higgins, a woman who endured a terrible sexual assault and was let down by those entrusted with her protection. It also questions the priorities of those involved in the blame game—the Liberal Party and the right-wing mainstream media—when the focus should have been on justice for the victim and accountability for the perpetrator, instead of base political point-scoring.

    The mainstream media should be criticised for perpetuating the narrative manufactured by the Liberal Party and failing to provide unbiased coverage and fair reporting. The lack of proper investigative journalism on this issue and the absence of larger media outlets fulfilling their role in holding politicians accountable is lamentable.

    Amidst this political firestorm, voices of support for Senator Gallagher have emerged, including independent MP Zali Steggall, who questioned the motivations behind the attack on Gallagher and highlighted the poor behaviour of Peter Dutton and the mistreatment of Brittany Higgins.

    There needs to be a comprehensive examination of this issue, free from partisan biases. No one should be above the law or immune from proper parliamentary procedure, but it’s impossible to achieve true accountability in the absence of a responsible and ethical mainstream media.

    The Liberal Party blame game scores an own goal

    As if one controversy wasn’t enough, the Australian political landscape was rocked by new allegations, this time involving Liberal Party Senator David Van. Concerns about inappropriate behaviour within Parliament rose, as Senator Lidia Thorpe made allegations of a sexual assault by Senator Van, sparking calls for a thorough investigation into the matter.

    Senator Van, known for his history of controversial behaviour, including making growling and dog noises directed at Senators Hanson-Young and Jacqui Lambie, now faces serious accusations that demand thorough scrutiny and investigation.

    Former Liberal Party Senator Amanda Stoker has also come forward with allegations of inappropriate touching by Senator Van, incidents that reportedly occurred in 2020. These accounts shed light on a pattern of concerning behaviour exhibited by Senator Van, leading to his expulsion from the Liberal Party room, and subsequent resignation from the party.

    Aside from the racial undertones of these events—Senator Thorpe, an Indigenous woman, was ridiculed and pilloried by the media for making “unfounded allegations”, but it was only after Stoker made her own allegations against Van that Thorpe was believed—the gravity of these allegations necessitates a comprehensive investigation to uncover the truth and ensure that appropriate consequences are imposed if Senator Van is found guilty.

    The incidents serve as a stark reminder that harassment and mistreatment of women have no place in society or within the halls of power. Female politicians, irrespective of which side of politics they arrive from—Lidia Thorpe, Pauline Hanson, Katy Gallagher, Michaelia Cash, Sussan Ley, and all others—deserve to fulfill their duties without fear of sexual harassment or discrimination. Their ideas and contributions should be evaluated on their merit—or lack of merit—rather than overshadowed by sexist behaviour.

    The public deserves better

    The revelations surrounding Senator Van’s conduct and the subsequent calls for investigation underscore the urgent need for cultural and systemic changes within Australian politics. These changes should guarantee the safety, respect, and fair treatment of all individuals within the political sphere, regardless of gender.

    It is crucial to create an environment where inappropriate behaviour and actions are not tolerated and where politicians can focus on serving the interests of the public rather than dealing with internal misconduct.

    The impact of these allegations on Senator Van’s political career remains to be seen, and he is set to take leave from Parliament for an undisclosed period of time. However, the continued exposure of such incidents serves as a reminder that the issue of harassment and misconduct within Parliament requires a comprehensive and lasting solution.

    The Australian public expects its elected representatives to uphold the highest standards of behaviour and accountability, making it crucial to take steps to restore trust and ensure a more respectful and inclusive political landscape.

    The post The Liberal Party blame game backfires appeared first on New Politics.

    This post was originally published on New Politics.

  • Fears of ethnic cleansing mount in Sudan’s West Darfur

    Multiple ceasefires and international mediation efforts have failed to stop the conflict from escalating.

    This post was originally published on Al Jazeera – Breaking News, World News and Video from Al Jazeera.

  • After fleeing FGM, refugees struggle to make ends meet in Ireland

    A mother escapes Sierra Leone with her twin daughters to protect them from FGM, only to find financial hardship abroad.

    This post was originally published on Al Jazeera – Breaking News, World News and Video from Al Jazeera.

  • Fate of jailed fighters still unknown months after Ethiopia truce

    The whereabouts of hundreds of fighters on both sides of the Ethiopian war are still not known, despite truce.

    This post was originally published on Al Jazeera – Breaking News, World News and Video from Al Jazeera.

  • Murdoch Royal Commission needed right now

    Calls for inquiry into the Murdoch media empire in Australia

    The calls for a Royal Commission into the Murdoch media empire in Australia continue to gain traction, with advocates highlighting the need to address media diversity and outdated regulations.

    While there may not be strong public support for an inquiry at this stage, proponents argue that it is long overdue and necessary for the benefit of the public. Among those pushing for the inquiry is Australian Greens Senator Sarah Hanson-Young, who recently introduced a Bill in the Senate to establish the investigation.

    In a recent interview on New Politics, Senator Hanson-Young emphasised the pressing need for an inquiry into the role of News Corporation in Australia’s media landscape.

    She pointed out the concentration of media ownership in the country and the inadequacy of current regulations, which fail to address the rapidly changing media environment and the growing distrust of news among the public. The Senator highlighted the influence of the Murdoch press as a ‘negative influence’ on both the media and political landscapes in Australia, stressing the urgency of reducing or eliminating this influence.

    The difficulty of reforming the media

    The push for an inquiry gained significant attention in 2020 when former Prime Minister Kevin Rudd initiated a petition calling for a Royal Commission into the Murdoch media. The petition garnered a record-breaking 500,000 signatures, reflecting widespread concerns about media concentration and ownership.

    While Rudd has since been appointed as ambassador to the United States, former Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull has taken up the cause, joining the ranks of vocal critics against the Murdoch empire. However, critics point out the irony of these former politicians’ current stance, considering their lack of action on media reform while in office. The relationship between political leaders and media magnate Rupert Murdoch continues to be a subject of scrutiny, with potential Prime Ministers usually seeking his approval in New York, prior to each federal election.

    Addressing the apparent difficulty in achieving media reform, Senator Hanson-Young acknowledged the reluctance of governments to challenge the unparalleled power of Murdoch and his media empire. She cited the lack of action by members of parliament when they possess the power to enact change, contrasting it with their vocal criticism once they are no longer in office.

    To overcome this challenge, she believes a Royal Commission would be an effective pathway to shed light on the negative impact of the Murdoch press and the need for substantial reform. Drawing attention to the Murdoch media’s role in perpetuating conspiracy theories, influencing elections, and impeding climate action globally, Senator Hanson-Young also stressed the importance of exposing these issues and building public expectations for change.

    Public interest journalism

    Senator Hanson-Young commended the recent reporting by Nine Media in their coverage of the activities of the Special Air Service (SAS) in Afghanistan, which exemplified the essence of public interest journalism. However, to restore trust in the media, she emphasised the need for stronger regulations that hold powerful media interests accountable.

    The existing regulatory bodies, such as the Press Council and the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA), are ineffective in addressing complaints and lacking the necessary authority. Defamation laws were also seen as a tool that can be misused to suppress public interest reporting. Senator Hanson-Young called for comprehensive reforms in these areas to ensure a fair and effective system of media accountability.

    There is also the strained relationship between the Australian Broadcasting Corporation and News Corporation, where a deliberate campaign by News Corp to diminish the ABC’s credibility and influence has been a longstanding concern. Senator Hanson-Young called on the ABC to stand up against the attacks and not allow itself to be undermined by the Murdoch empire.

    Media reform can be achieved

    Senator Hanson-Young stressed the importance of balancing freedom of the press with tighter controls on media behaviour, but addressing media ownership concentration, the need for a growth in independent journalism, and better and more effective regulation. There are successful broadcasting and media models in Nordic countries, which combine strong public broadcasters, private sector media, and support for smaller and independent media, underpinned by a unified regulatory framework that upholds quality journalism and the public interest. Solutions in other countries exist and currently operating successfully: why can’t Australia implement similar reforms?

    The Murdoch media empire and its influence on the Australian media landscape are under scrutiny. The outcome of these current discussions and investigations will shape the future of media regulation in the country, with the aim of fostering a diverse, accountable, and trustworthy media environment that serves the public interest.

    #auspol #MurdochRoyalCommission

    The post Murdoch Royal Commission needed right now appeared first on New Politics.

    This post was originally published on New Politics.

  • ‘Foreign-backed drive to remove Khan’: UK Pakistanis protest

    Former Prime Minister Imran Khan's party organises a protest in London to show force ahead of Pakistan's October vote.

    This post was originally published on Al Jazeera – Breaking News, World News and Video from Al Jazeera.

  • ‘Layers of vulnerability’: The children growing up in urban war

    Much more needs to be done for the estimated one in six children worldwide who have to navigate war, Red Cross says.

    This post was originally published on Al Jazeera – Breaking News, World News and Video from Al Jazeera.

  • Reserve Bank inflation strategy questioned

    Philip Lowe Reserve Bank strategy questioned after interest rates rise

    The Reserve Bank inflation strategy has been questioned after Australia experienced yet another official interest rate rise, pushing it to 4.1 per cent – a level not seen since 2012. As the nation grapples with the economic implications of this increase, the customary blame game has ensued, with fingers pointing in various directions. While the Labor government is being singled out by some for its policies and budget, business leaders are also attributing the rate hike to the Australian Council of Trade Union push for higher wages, even though they never consider how high corporate profits are contributing to this crisis. However, amidst the accusations and complex economic dynamics, there is a growing sentiment that the Reserve Bank’s strategy is unclear and potentially ineffective.

    The more sensible economists argue that the blame cannot be placed solely on one party or entity. Economic problems are multifaceted, making it difficult to pinpoint a single cause but, ultimately, the responsibility falls on the government of the day to find solutions. There is mounting dissatisfaction with the Reserve Bank’s handling of the situation, as it appears to be struggling to alleviate the growing stress caused by rising rents and stagnant wages.

    Reserve Bank Governor, Philip Lowe, attracted criticism with his simple suggestion that individuals could mitigate the impact of these economic challenges by cutting back on spending or finding additional work hours to improve their cash flow. Of course, this is easier said than done and Lowe should have chosen his words more carefully. Critics argue that raising interest rates, while a traditional tool to influence the economy, may not be the most effective solution to address underlying economic issues and the blunt nature of this approach raises doubts about its ability to alleviate the community’s financial strain.

    The leftover strategy of neoliberalism thinking

    Lowe’s economic perspectives – and that of the Reserve Bank board – reflects outdated thinking, as the world has changed significantly since the 1980s – the onset of neoliberalism – and the economic model of that era is no longer applicable. Critics find it concerning that a policy based on such antiquated thinking could have far-reaching negative consequences for the economy.

    The issue of rising rents exacerbating the financial burdens faced by renters has also come under scrutiny. It is commonly observed that when interest rates increase, landlords often raise rents to cover their mortgage repayments. While this practice may not be morally justifiable or desirable, it is a prevailing reality.

    There is skepticism about Lowe’s long-term tenure as the Reserve Bank Governor. Some speculate that the government will remove him before September, when a new board structure is set to be implemented. The planned restructure of the Reserve Bank board, where one part focuses on interest rates and the other handles other aspects of monetary policy, might signal a change in leadership. Critics also argue that Lowe’s public statements and his performances demonstrate a lack of connection with the concerns and issues that affect mainstream Australia, potentially undermining his credibility.

    While the Reserve Bank’s role primarily revolves around targeting inflation, it has also acknowledged the adverse effects of rising rents and low wages on community stress levels. However, the complexity of the economy necessitates more comprehensive solutions than merely adjusting interest rates to control inflation.

    A better Reserve Bank suited for the times

    Acknowledging the need for change, the federal government has initiated a reform of the Reserve Bank’s board. This move, coupled with concerns over Lowe’s competence and diminished public confidence, raises doubts about his chances of being reappointed in September.

    In contrast, past Reserve Bank governors such as Glenn Stevens, Ian Macfarlane, and Bernie Fraser commanded respect and instilled confidence through their thoughtful decision-making processes. Even when faced with difficult choices, they approached their responsibilities with a stronger desire to improve the economy: Lowe’s performance falls short of this standard, as evidenced by his comment that interest rates would not rise until 2024, only for them to be raised on 14 occasions over the past 12 months.

    As Australia grapples with economic uncertainty and rising interest rates, questions surrounding the Reserve Bank’s strategy and Lowe’s leadership continue to intensify. The blame game and finger-pointing persist, but the underlying economic challenges are complex and require comprehensive solutions. As the government prepares to reform the Reserve Bank’s board, the nation awaits potential changes in leadership that could shape its economic trajectory.

    The post Reserve Bank inflation strategy questioned appeared first on New Politics.

    This post was originally published on New Politics.

  • Former Morrison government misused $2 billion fund

    Morrison government misused $2 billion health fund

    In a shocking turn of events, the former Morrison government has come under intense scrutiny for its mishandling of $2 billion in health funding programs during its final four years in office. The revelation, centred around the Community Health and Hospitals program, adds to a growing list of questionable practices exhibited by the former government. The pervasive pattern of poor guidelines, politically motivated grants, and a complete disregard for genuine need has left Australians questioning the ethical standards of some of their elected officials.

    The Morrison government’s legacy has increasingly become synonymous with scandal, presenting a never-ending source of ammunition for the Labor government. Every few months, new revelations of unethical and potentially illegal behaviour emerge, suggesting a systemic issue within the Morrison administration. Such developments undoubtedly provide substantial material for the National Anti-Corruption Commission, which is poised to tackle these matters head-on.

    The disconcerting aspect of this situation lies not only in the scale of misspent funds but also in the government’s evident lack of concern for the wellbeing and health of the Australian population. It was apparent that as long as the money flowed to their intended recipients – political donors and business supporters of the Coalition – the government showed little regard for the broader consequences. The implications of these revelations for the public service are equally worrisome, as senior officials who should have ensured better practices now face scrutiny.

    A continuing tale of funding corruption

    For years, critics have branded the Liberal–National Coalition government between 2013 and 2022 as corrupt, incompetent, and unethical. The recent revelations about the misspent health funding only serve to reinforce these claims. The Australian National Audit Office, responsible for uncovering this damning information, previously investigated the ‘sports rorts’ affair in 2019 and the Leppington Triangle scandal, where exorbitant amounts were paid to a Liberal Party donor for land undervalued by millions.

    It is hard to ignore the political dimensions surrounding these revelations. The timing of the release aligns neatly with the upcoming launch of the National Anti-Corruption Commission on 1 July 2023, and the impending byelection in the seat of Fadden on 15 July, caused by the resignation of former Liberal–National Party Minister Stuart Robert, who is likely to appear before the anti-corruption commission in relation to some of these matters. The Labor government will undoubtedly seize the opportunity to extract maximum damage from these revelations, potentially swaying public sentiment against the Coalition.

    One particularly alarming aspect of the released information pertains to a $4 million grant awarded to the Esther Foundation. This Christian rehabilitation centre has faced numerous complaints, including allegations of sexual abuse, denial of food, restrictions on communication with friends and family, and LGBTQI suppression techniques. Indigenous residents were also subjected to demeaning beliefs that their skin colour and cultural heritage were possessed by the devil. Despite these serious concerns, the Morrison government saw fit to grant the organisation a substantial sum of taxpayer money, exposing their incompetence and misplaced priorities.

    Former Prime Minister Scott Morrison’s assertion in 2019 that he “doesn’t invest in things that don’t work” stands in stark contradiction to the reality of his government’s actions. The allocation of $4 million to a controversial religious group exemplifies the inadequacy, incompetence, and corruption that plagued the Morrison government.

    Morrison scandals still reverberate a year later

    The sheer volume of scandals associated with the previous administration is overwhelming. It is no wonder that people have grown weary of these never-ending controversies. The repercussions of the Coalition’s misconduct in government continue to reverberate through Australian society, a year after their departure from office. With the establishment of the National Anti-Corruption Commission, it is anticipated that the exposure of such malpractice will persist for some time into the future.

    It is vital to remember how egregiously the Morrison government treated the Australian public during its tenure. Elected officials took the citizens for granted, exploiting their trust for personal gain and, as the saying goes, ‘they took us for mugs’. The intertwining of religion with government affairs, especially when it produces dodgy and harmful practices, warrants rigorous examination, deconstruction, and eradication from public life. Those involved must be held accountable, and the affected individuals should be rehabilitated, ensuring a more functional and responsible government for the future.

    While personal faith and beliefs should be respected, when they begin to encroach upon the broader society, it becomes imperative to subject them to criticism, investigation, and scrutiny when necessary.

    As Australians brace themselves for further revelations and investigations, they demand a government that prioritises their wellbeing, upholds ethical standards, and restores faith in the political system. The Morrison government’s legacy of mismanagement, corruption, and incompetence should serve as a stark reminder of the importance of transparency, accountability, and integrity in public office.

    The post Former Morrison government misused $2 billion fund appeared first on New Politics.

    This post was originally published on New Politics.

  • ‘Enough is enough’: A UK union rep fighting from the picket line

    For Mark Dollar, strike action against UK National Highways is not about the last 12 months, but the last 12 years.

    This post was originally published on Al Jazeera – Breaking News, World News and Video from Al Jazeera.

  • Explosive findings in Roberts-Smith defamation case

    Shocking explosive war crimes findings in Roberts-Smith defamation case rock Australia in high-profile trial.

    In a high-profile defamation case that captivated the nation, the release of findings in the Ben Roberts-Smith trial has sent explosive shockwaves through Australia. The evidence presented during the trial, which involved major media outlets, war crimes, domestic violence accusations, and the intervention of influential figures, has exposed a dark underbelly of the Australian military’s actions in Afghanistan and tarnished the reputation of a once-revered war hero.

    The trial centred around the publications by Nine Media in The Age, Sydney Morning Herald, and the Canberra Times, which alleged that Roberts-Smith had committed heinous acts during his service in Afghanistan. The court’s findings, based on the balance of probabilities, validated the veracity of these claims, including the disturbing revelation of four murders of civilians, the coercion of fellow soldiers to execute a prisoner, and the appalling act of kicking an unarmed handcuffed Afghan villager off a cliff.

    Moreover, the court also found that Roberts-Smith had lied about his threatening behaviours towards a woman with whom he was having an affair, implicating him in domestic violence accusations.

    An expensive defamation case

    This trial encompassed a wide range of contentious issues, including war crimes, the conduct of the Special Air Service (SAS) overseas, and the involvement of a Victoria Cross recipient who holds a significant presence at the Australian War Memorial in Canberra. The case also took on the dimensions of a battle between media owners, with Kerry Stokes, owner of Seven West Media, financing the substantial $25 million legal cost of the defamation case, in support of Roberts-Smith.

    The trial’s outcome dealt a severe blow to Roberts-Smith’s reputation, leaving it irreparably damaged. Moreover, it has opened the floodgates for the potential revelation of further war crimes committed in Afghanistan, amplifying concerns over the actions of the Australian military during its deployment.

    Some have argued that if Roberts-Smith had remained silent about the damning evidence published by Nine Media, the public might have eventually forgotten about these allegations, and his reputation would have remained intact. However, the crucial point is not about reputation management but rather the pursuit of justice. Regardless of the misguided nature of the defamation case, it successfully brought the truth to light, unmasking a deeply flawed and morally questionable individual.

    Public interest journalism through defamation

    Credit must be given to the journalists involved in uncovering and reporting on this story. Nick McKenzie and Chris Masters, through their relentless investigative journalism, showcased exemplary work under immense pressure. While mainstream media often draws criticism for its shortcomings, the quality of their reporting in this case deserves recognition. It demonstrated the importance of holding powerful individuals accountable and exposing the truth, even in the face of resistance.

    Critics of Roberts-Smith have contended that the evidence against him should not be dismissed simply because outsiders were not present on the battlefield. The evidence provided in court did not stem from inexperienced journalists making assumptions but rather from combatants who were present during the incidents and were able to compare behaviours in harrowing circumstances. Their testimonies overwhelmingly pointed to wrongdoing, lending credibility to the court’s findings.

    Notably, the trial also witnessed the involvement of other media outlets, such as News Corporation, which offered support to Roberts-Smith while denigrating the soldiers who testified against him. They propagated the notion that only those who had experienced combat could judge Roberts-Smith’s actions.

    However, it is important to acknowledge that criticisms can be made by individuals who have not been in combat. The military operates under a rules-based order, and certain actions, such as killing civilians and non-combatants, constitute war crimes. While such crimes often go unpunished, this case serves as a reminder that accountability should prevail when evidence is presented.

    The trial also exposed the flaws in the defamation laws of Australia, which have traditionally protected powerful individuals. In this instance, the legal process allowed crucial information about potential war crimes to enter the public domain. Though unintentional, Roberts-Smith inadvertently played a role in bringing these allegations to light.

    A reassessment of Australia’s Roberts-Smith hero worshipping

    The trial shed light on the dynamics within the regiment and how Roberts-Smith’s perception of support from his colleagues proved unfounded. Given his familial ties to another high-ranking Australian soldier – his father – Roberts-Smith was seen by some as highly privileged, potentially granted access and privileges not extended to others. While this perception may be subjective, it highlights broader issues within Australia, including the acceptability of certain behaviours and the need for a reassessment of how military veterans are cared for and revered. It challenges the notion of hero worship and reminds us that even those hailed as battle heroes can possess significant flaws.

    Ultimately, the trial’s outcome reinforces the importance of listening to those with firsthand knowledge and experience. When individuals who were present on the ground and witnessed Roberts-Smith’s actions attest to their inappropriateness, their voices must be heard. This trial has not only brought justice to those who acted with integrity but also exposed a disturbing chapter in Australia’s military history that demands reflection and change.

    The post Explosive findings in Roberts-Smith defamation case appeared first on New Politics.

    This post was originally published on New Politics.

  • Party with controversy: Spain’s festival of Moors and Christians

    Some see the annual festival marking the reconquest of Iberia from Arab rulers as racist and disrespectful.

    This post was originally published on Al Jazeera – Breaking News, World News and Video from Al Jazeera.

  • ‘Poor people don’t have friends’: A Pakistani widow’s life

    Zubeida lives in a village, works for families who live abroad and cleans their vacant homes, where birds come to nest.

    This post was originally published on Al Jazeera – Breaking News, World News and Video from Al Jazeera.

  • Battling bulldozers: Cairo’s historic necropolises under threat

    Ancient mausoleums, the homes of some of Cairo’s poor, are threatened by development projects in the City of the Dead.

    This post was originally published on Al Jazeera – Breaking News, World News and Video from Al Jazeera.

  • Iran has a hypersonic missile. What does that mean?

    Iran has dismissed scepticism over its development of hypersonic missiles, which could reach Israel in seven minutes.

    This post was originally published on Al Jazeera – Breaking News, World News and Video from Al Jazeera.

  • Greeks welcome continuity in Erdogan’s re-election in Turkey

    Erdogan's rhetoric may be unfriendly towards Greece, but his predecessors were outright dangerous, many Greeks say.

    This post was originally published on Al Jazeera – Breaking News, World News and Video from Al Jazeera.