Category: florida

  • A bill advancing in the Florida state Senate would forbid the removal of memorials related to Confederate figures or events, and ban the addition of text on or near monuments to provide added historical context. The proposal would also impose steep fines on individuals who damage historical memorials, including Confederate statues, plaques, and other sites glorifying people who fought to preserve…

    Source



  • Reproductive rights advocates on Monday angrily vowed to fight back after Florida’s Republican-controlled Senate approved a bill banning abortions after six weeks of pregnancy—a point at which many people don’t even know they’re pregnant.

    S.B. 300 would replace a Florida law prohibiting abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy with a six-week ban containing exceptions for victims of rape, incest, human trafficking, and “devastating” fatal fetal abnormalities; to save the pregnant person’s life; or when a fetus is diagnosed with a fatal fetal abnormality.

    “Bodily autonomy should not give a person the permission to kill an innocent human being,” explained state Sen. Erin Grall (R-54), a sponsor of the bill.

    However, Florida state Rep. Anna Eskamani (D-42) asserted that “this was never about life, this is about control.”

    As state Sen. Alexis Calatayud (R-38)—one of only two Republicans who voted against the six-week ban (she supports a 15-week limit)—spoke during an emotionally heated floor debate on Monday, someone in the visitors’ gallery shouted, “People are going to die!”

    Kara Gross, the ACLU of Florida’s legislative director and senior policy counsel, said in a statement: “This bill is a near-total ban on abortion in Florida. It directly violates our right to bodily autonomy and will virtually eliminate legal abortion care in Florida.”

    “In a state that prides itself on being free, this is an unprecedented, unconstitutional, and unacceptable level of government overreach and intrusion into our private lives,” she continued. “This bill will force pregnant individuals to remain pregnant against their will and endure labor, delivery, and all of the significant medical and financial risks associated with pregnancy and childbirth.”

    Gross added that the legislation will also “unfairly and disproportionately impact people who live in rural communities, people with low incomes, people with disabilities, and people of color.”

    “Hundreds of thousands of pregnant people will be forced to travel out of state to seek the care they need,” she warned. “Many people will not even know they are pregnant by six weeks, and for those who do, it is unlikely they will be able to schedule the legally required two in-person doctor’s appointments before six weeks of pregnancy.”

    Democratic Miami-Dade County Mayor Daniella Levine Cava said in a statement that “women’s rights, freedoms, and access to reproductive care are under continued attack in Florida.”

    “We must reinforce that private healthcare decisions must be protected and allowed to stay private between a woman, her family, her doctor, and her faith,” the mayor continued.

    “Things have gone too far,” she added. “We must do better and stand for true freedoms that have been the foundation of our great nation.”

    S.B. 300 now heads to the GOP-controlled state House of Representatives for consideration. Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, a Republican and possible 2024 presidential candidate, supports the measure.

    As NBC Miami’s Anthony Izaguirre noted:

    A six-week ban would more closely align Florida with the abortion restrictions of other Republican-controlled states and give DeSantis a political win on an issue important with GOP primary voters ahead of his potential White House run.

    The bill would have larger implications for abortion access throughout the South, as the nearby states of Alabama, Louisiana, and Mississippi prohibit the procedure at all stages of pregnancy and Georgia bans it after cardiac activity can be detected, which is around six weeks.
    According to the Guttmacher Institute, Florida is one of two dozen states that have banned abortion or are likely to do so after the U.S. Supreme Court voided half a century of reproductive rights in last June’s Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization ruling.

    This post was originally published on Common Dreams.

  • Beset with reactionary attempts to curtail their academic freedom and bust their unions, college and university professors have become a key target of Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis’s far right regime — in no small part because they represent one of the few organized statewide forces ready to fight back against his increasingly repressive administration. There are few people better positioned to speak…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.



  • Librarians from across the United States released a report showing that pro-censorship groups’ efforts to ban books with LGBTQ+ themes and stories about people of color have driven an unprecedented rise in the number of book challenges, with right-wing organizers pushing library workers to remove works ranging from the dystopian novel The Handmaid’s Tale to children’s books about foods enjoyed in different cultures.

    According to the American Library Association (ALA), a record-breaking 2,571 unique titles were challenged in 2022, a 38% increase from the previous year.

    The organization recorded 1,269 demands to censor books from various groups and individuals, compared to 729 challenges counted in 2021.

    “Each attempt to ban a book by one of these groups represents a direct attack on every person’s constitutionally protected right to freely choose what books to read and what ideas to explore,” said Deborah Caldwell-Stone, director of the ALA Office for Intellectual Freedom. “The choice of what to read must be left to the reader or, in the case of children, to parents. That choice does not belong to self-appointed book police.”

    The Office for Intellectual Freedom said that starting in 2021, a rising number of challenges began targeting large numbers of titles, suggesting they were coordinated efforts from national groups like Moms for Liberty. Previously, the vast majority of book challenges were focused on a single book to which a parent or group of parents objected.

    In 2022, 90% of the books challenged were part of attempts to censor multiple titles, the ALA reported.

    “A book challenge is a demand to remove a book from a library’s collection so that no one else can read it. Overwhelmingly, we’re seeing these challenges come from organized censorship groups that target local library board meetings to demand removal of a long list of books they share on social media,” said Caldwell-Stone. “Their aim is to suppress the voices of those traditionally excluded from our nation’s conversations, such as people in the LGBTQIA+ community or people of color.”

    In Florida, where Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis has led a nationwide effort by conservatives to keep public school students from learning accurate American history and discussing issues regarding the LGBTQ+ community, one county removed from school library shelves 176 books which have been held in storage since January 2022. The books include the children’s books Hush! A Thai Lullaby, featuring a Thai mother and child, and Dim Sum for Everyone!, about a family eating in a Chinese restaurant.

    “I’ve never seen anything like this,” Caldwell-Stone told the Associated Press. “The last two years have been exhausting, frightening, outrage-inducing.”

    People for the American Way called the association’s data, collected from media reports and library professionals across the country, “shocking but not surprising.”

    “The far right wants to turn back the clock on the freedom to read, teach, and learn,” said the group. “We won’t stand for it.”

    The ALA report comes four months after voters in at least two U.S. towns voted to cut or eliminate funding for their public libraries in the wake of campaigns to ban books with LGBTQ+ themes.

    People in Jamestown Township, Michigan voted for a second time against a millage to fund 84% of their library’s budget, dooming the facility to a likely closure in 2024. The vote followed a push by a local conservative group to remove the book Gender Queer: A Memoir.

    Craighead County Jonesboro Library in Arkansas lost 50% of its funding after “librarians and library workers were labeled pornographers and pedophiles because of the books on their shelves” that dealt with LGBTQ+ themes, as EveryLibrary Institute executive director John Chrastka told Publishers Weekly in November.

    A poll commissioned by the EveryLibrary Institute last year found that 75% of respondents were opposed to efforts to ban books, and across 16 states last fall, a majority of initiatives to pull funding from libraries failed.

    “While a vocal minority stokes the flames of controversy around books, the vast majority of people across the nation are using life-changing services that public and school libraries offer,” said ALA President Lessa Kanani’opua Pelayo-Lozada on Thursday. “Our nation cannot afford to lose the library workers who lift up their communities and safeguard our First Amendment freedom to read.”

    This post was originally published on Common Dreams.

  • Florida’s unrelenting assault on trans livelihood has extended itself to criminalizing close supporters of trans individuals seeking gender-affirming care. On March 13, Florida’s Senate Committee on Health Policy voted to pass Senate Bill 254, which would impose criminal penalties on parents, guardians and medical providers helping trans children as they seek gender-affirming care.

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • sign on a building reads: “Pregnant? Need Help? Pregnancy Help Medical Clinics. Free and Confidential.”

    This article was published in partnership with the Miami Herald.

    The glass outside the Pregnancy Help Medical Clinics location in North Miami reads: “FREE pregnancy Testing, Walk-Ins Welcome, Ultrasound Verification, Confidential.” 

    Inside, it looks like a medical office: fake plants, a generic painting of an ocean and a TV tuned to a cooking show channel. There is a reception desk with a closed-off window and a sign that reads: “Your donation is greatly appreciated! We are only funded by the community.” But that isn’t entirely true: Heartbeat of Miami, the nonprofit that runs this center, was awarded more than $1.4 million in state funding between 2017 and 2021.

    Although the Pregnancy Help Medical Clinics claim to be medical facilities, their mission is to dissuade pregnant people from considering abortion.

    Now, Republican lawmakers in Florida are proposing a more than fivefold increase in taxpayer funding for anti-abortion centers like the Pregnancy Help Medical Clinics, to $25 million from $4.45 million in 2022.

    The proposal is tucked at the bottom of a new bill that would ban abortions past six weeks of pregnancy, dramatically reducing access from the 15-week limit signed into law last year. 

    For decades, reproductive rights groups have warily eyed so-called crisis pregnancy centers that often have the appearance of abortion clinics but in reality push women toward parenting or adoption. These centers also typically discourage the use of contraceptives. 

    Most offer free ultrasounds, a strategy that centers use to change women’s minds by offering a “window to the womb,” according to industry leaders. Many also open near abortion clinics in an attempt to intercept patients. Their online ads come up during searches for abortion care, an issue that Google has aimed to address. More than 2,500 centers are open across the country, with nearly 160 in Florida. About a dozen are in South Florida, many located in Spanish-speaking and lower-income communities. In Miami, all the Pregnancy Help Medical Clinics have staff who speak Spanish. 

    The proposed funding increase is part of a national anti-abortion campaign spearheaded by Republican-dominated state legislatures. The goal is to expand the reach of pregnancy centers following the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling last summer to overturn Roe v. Wade, a landmark decision that protected abortion rights for half a century.

    Florida is among 14 states that fund pregnancy centers through “alternatives to abortion” programs, funneling millions in taxpayer money to the anti-abortion movement. This year, at least three additional states – Kansas, Tennessee and West Virginia – are considering new plans to fund pregnancy centers.

    The multimillion-dollar proposal, which would be funded by the state’s general revenue, is a provision within the Senate version of the six-week abortion ban bill, filed by Sen. Erin Grall, R-Fort Pierce, and co-introduced by Republican Sens. Joe Gruters of Sarasota and Clay Yarborough of Jacksonville. It includes exceptions for rape and incest until 15 weeks of pregnancy, but only if a victim provides documentation of the crime, such as a medical record or police report.

    “The $25 million appropriation is really to go to all families, all mothers who are looking for support at this time in their life,” Grall said at a Senate Health Policy Committee hearing Monday. Committee members voted 7-4 to advance the bill.

    While the bill would inject millions into the centers’ cause, it does nothing to increase oversight of the pregnancy center industry in Florida. An investigation by Reveal from The Center for Investigative Reporting found that most centers operate in a kind of regulatory dead zone, free of significant state and federal oversight. Most states, including Florida, don’t require pregnancy centers that provide medical services to be licensed or inspected. They’re also not required to comply with the federal patient privacy law known as HIPAA. In many states, tanning salons, massage parlors and even pet stores face significantly stricter oversight.


    The House version of the six-week abortion ban bill does not include the $25 million proposal. A Florida House committee voted to advance the bill last week. 

    If the bill is signed into law, it would run up against a legal challenge to Florida’s 15-week abortion restriction based on grounds that it violates the state constitution’s privacy clause. The case is pending before the Florida Supreme Court. The six-week ban would not go into effect until the court issues its decision. The funding for pregnancy centers, however, would go into effect immediately if it is included in the appropriations bill approved by lawmakers and signed by the governor. 

    The law would effectively end Florida’s status as one of the last remaining abortion-access states in the South. Over the past six years, more than 440,000 abortions were performed in Florida, with nearly 23,000 patients traveling from other states. With a Republican supermajority in the Legislature, the bill is likely to pass.

    Grall and Yarborough did not respond to reporters’ requests for an interview, instead providing prepared statements. “SB300 will make Florida a beacon of hope for those who understand that life is sacred and must be protected,” Grall said in her statement.

    “I am honored that I will have the opportunity as a state senator to support the strongest pro-life legislation in more than 50 years,” Yarborough echoed in his statement. Gruters did not return reporters’ messages for comment. 

    The Senate bill also would expand the state’s alternatives-to-abortion program to include parenting support services and require an annual report to the governor and Legislature. Additionally, it would set aside $5 million toward the family planning program run by the state Health Department, which covers contraceptives. 

    During a Senate Health Policy Committee hearing Monday, Democratic lawmakers attempted to make the case for diverting the $25 million to other services. Sen. Lauren Book, D-Plantation, proposed the money go to resources for domestic violence and sexual assault victims. “Let’s put these taxpayer dollars that are already in the bill where they will make a real difference,” she said.

    Sen. Tracie Davis, D-Jacksonville, proposed allocating the funds toward family planning services and telehealth services for a minority maternal care pilot program. “By passing this amendment, we can truly better guarantee that our constituents will have transparent, accountable, professional, licensed, tailored resources in their communities to make well-informed decisions,” she said. The amendments were ultimately rejected.

    The program providing state funding for pregnancy centers in Florida began in 2004 under then-Gov. Jeb Bush. Since the program’s creation, the Florida Department of Health has contracted out oversight of the program to the Florida Pregnancy Care Network, an anti-abortion nonprofit in Tallahassee. 

    According to the care network’s state contract, centers are reimbursed for providing free pregnancy tests, tests for sexually transmitted infections and “counseling with a goal of childbirth.” 

    The program has come under scrutiny in recent years. A 2021 report by Floridians for Reproductive Freedom, a coalition advocating for access to reproductive health care like abortion and contraceptives, found that centers were providing clients with misleading materials about abortion. Some centers, for example, tell clients that abortion causes breast cancer – a claim widely disputed by medical research. 

    The state contract also requires the Florida Pregnancy Care Network to provide wellness services, such as medical screenings for cholesterol, blood pressure or diabetes. But the report notes that out of 56 subcontractors, only two were equipped to provide this type of medical care.  The pregnancy centers run by Heartbeat of Miami specifically say they do not offer this type of medical care. Aside from offering ultrasounds, they refer women to outside clinics if they need additional care. Heartbeat President Martha Avila did not respond to the Miami Herald’s interview requests, instead sending a text message with a summary of center services.  

    “Four million a year was already way too much,” said Amy Weintraub, reproductive rights program director for the progressive nonprofit Progress Florida. “And then the idea that they’re adding $25 million on top of a nearly all-out abortion ban is beyond the pale. It is like they are looking to punish Floridians who want to have full bodily autonomy and want to have control over their own pregnancy decisions in every way possible.”

    Florida Pregnancy Care Network Executive Director Rita Gagliano declined to comment and referred a reporter to the state Health Department. A spokesperson there said the agency does not comment on pending legislation. The network’s board members did not return reporters’ messages or declined to comment.

    Among the care network’s subcontractors is the Archdiocese of Miami, which received nearly $650,000 between 2017 and 2021. It operates three centers, with the Fort Lauderdale center next door to an abortion clinic. 

    “By funding these pregnancy centers, we can provide women in crisis with alternatives that would ultimately be better for them and certainly much better for their unborn baby,” Archbishop Thomas Wenski said in an interview last week.

    Angela Curatalo, director of the archdiocese’s Respect Life Ministry, which runs the pregnancy centers, said “the increased funding we would receive through the state would help us immensely support our programs.” She said her program would use the money for online parenting courses, supplies for pregnant people and new mothers, as well as administrative costs. 

    Women sometimes call the centers seeking to terminate a pregnancy, but staff there are clear that they do not offer or refer for abortions, Curatalo said. The centers offer counseling and free pregnancy tests, as well as ultrasounds that “show the mom that there is a baby,” she said. The centers then refer clients to medical providers for further care.

    Not all centers are as forthcoming about their services. In 2018, the state Health Department investigated a volunteer at a Jacksonville pregnancy center. The volunteer allegedly told patients heading to the abortion clinic across the road that their appointments were in her building. She performed ultrasounds on several women, providing them with inaccurate information about their pregnancies. The state issued a cease-and-desist notice against her for practicing medicine without a license, Reveal reported in December.

    Book, the Democratic state senator, called the multimillion-dollar proposal “insulting to women on top of a six-week ban with a ridiculous rape and incest exemption.” 

    Nearly six years ago, Book and a friend visited a pregnancy center near the Florida State University campus in Tallahassee to better understand how they operate. They sat in a room staring at a glass diorama that showed the stages of fetal development. They also recalled a counselor who told them abortion was more traumatic than rape, a claim that infuriated Book, who is a survivor of child sexual abuse.

    “This is an irresponsible way to utilize state funds,” Book said. “It is despicable that we have been funding these all along.”

    This story was edited by Nina Martin, Casey Frank and Kate Howard and copy edited by Nikki Frick. 

    Laura C. Morel can be reached at lmorel@revealnews.org, and Clara-Sophia Daly can be reached at csdaly@miamiherald.com. Follow them on Twitter: @lauracmorel and @clarasophiadaly

    Florida Legislators Want to Vastly Expand State Funds for Anti-abortion Pregnancy Centers is a story from Reveal. Reveal is a registered trademark of The Center for Investigative Reporting and is a 501(c)(3) tax exempt organization.

    This post was originally published on Reveal.

  • On January 6, 2023, two years after the far right occupation of the U.S. Capitol, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis announced that he was appointing Christopher Rufo to the Board of Trustees of the New College of Florida. Rufo had been one of the key architects of the Republican effort to stir up a public frenzy around “critical race theory” — turning the term into a right-wing dog whistle for any attempt…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • Florida’s colleges and universities are in Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis’s crosshairs as he pushes to follow through on his January 23 inaugural promise to make the Sunshine State the place “where woke goes to die.” The state’s 40 public colleges and universities — 10 of which allow students to pursue degrees in African American studies, Latinx studies, ethnic studies and gender studies — are facing…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.



  • The 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Thursday kept in place a preliminary injunction against Florida GOP policymakers’ school censorship law in what rights advocates celebrated as “an important victory for professors, other educators, and students.”

    The appellate court denied a request from Florida Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis’ administration and higher education officials to block a district judge’s injunction that is currently preventing enforcement of the Stop Wrongs Against Our Kids and Employees (WOKE) Act—rebranded by its supporters as the Individual Freedom Act—in the state’s public colleges and universities.

    DeSantis’ Stop WOKE Act “limits the ways concepts related to systemic racism and sex discrimination can be discussed in teaching or conducting training in workplaces or schools,” parroting a Trump administration executive order that was ultimately rescinded by President Joe Biden, the ACLU explained last year.

    The plaintiffs in one of the relevant cases, Pernell v. Florida Board of Governors, are represented by the national and state ACLU along with the Legal Defense Fund (LDF) and Ballard Spahr, who first filed the federal suit last August—the same day U.S. District Judge Mark Walker, an appointee of former President Barack Obama, issued a separate injunction against the law related to employers.

    The new appeals court order upholds the injunction Walker issued in November, which began by quoting George Orwell’s novel 1984. Calling the controversial law “positively dystopian,” the judge wrote at the time that “the powers in charge of Florida’s public university system have declared the state has unfettered authority to muzzle its professors in the name of ‘freedom.’”

    “All students and educators deserve to have a free and open exchange about issues related to race in our classrooms.”

    Leah Watson, a senior staff attorney with the ACLU Racial Justice Program, said Thursday that “the court’s decision to leave in place the preliminary injunction is a recognition of the serious injury posed to educators and students by the Stop WOKE Act.”

    “All students and educators deserve to have a free and open exchange about issues related to race in our classrooms,” Watson argued, rather than censored discussions that erase “the history of discrimination and lived experiences of Black and Brown people, women and girls, and LGBTQ+ individuals.”

    LDF assistant counsel Alexsis Johnson similarly stressed that “institutions of higher education in Florida should have the ability to provide a quality education, which simply cannot happen when students and educators, including Black students and educators, feel they cannot speak freely about their lived experiences, or when they feel that they may incur a politician’s wrath for engaging in a fact-based discussion of our history.”

    The order also pertains to a challenge filed by the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE) in September.

    “Professors must be able to discuss subjects like race and gender without hesitation or fear of state reprisal,” FIRE said Thursday. “Any law that limits the free exchange of ideas in university classrooms should lose in both the court of law and the court of public opinion.”

    The Stop WOKE Act is part of a nationwide effort by Republican state lawmakers and governors—especially DeSantis, a potential 2024 GOP presidential candidate—to curtail what content can be shared and discussed in classrooms and workplaces.

    “Since January 2021, 44 states have introduced bills or taken other steps that would restrict teaching critical race theory or limit how teachers can discuss racism and sexism,” according to an Education Week analysis updated on Monday. “Eighteen states have imposed these bans and restrictions either through legislation or other avenues.”

    ACLU of Florida staff attorney Jerry Edwards warned Thursday that “lawmakers continue to threaten our democracy by attempting to curtail important discussions about our collective history and treatment of Black and Brown communities.”

    “This is an important step in preserving the truth, civil liberties, and a better future,” Edwards said of the 11th Circuit’s decision.

    Though legal groups welcomed the order, the battle over the law is ongoing. The court will eventually rule on the merits of the case—which DeSantis’ press secretary Bryan Griffin highlighted Thursday, adding, “We remain confident that the law is constitutional.”

    Opponents of the law are also undeterred, as Ballard Spahr litigation department chair Jason Leckerman made clear.

    “The movement to restrict academic freedom and curtail the rights of marginalized communities is as pervasive as it is pernicious,” he said. “We are proud of the work we have done so far with our partners, the ACLU and Legal Defense Fund, but the fight is far from over. Today, we’ll take a moment to savor this result—and then we’ll keep working.”

    This post has been updated with comment from FIRE and Gov. Ron DeSantis’ press secretary.

    This post was originally published on Common Dreams.

  • In Gov. Ron DeSantis’s (R) latest action targeting LGBTQ people in Florida, his administration has filed a complaint with a popular hotel in Miami, alleging that the establishment hosted an unlawful drag show. The Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation filed its complaint on Tuesday against Hyatt Regency Miami, seeking to have the hotel’s liquor license revoked over a holiday…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • News outlet Axios fired a reporter in Tampa, Florida, this week after he called a press release from the Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) administration “propaganda” in an email that DeSantis officials posted online to smear the reporter. In a reply to a press release about a DeSantis event called “Exposing the Diversity Equity and Inclusion Scam in Higher Education” from the Florida Department of Education…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • Florida Republican state lawmakers are proposing a slew of new bills that would expand the state’s already restrictive laws on discussion of gender and sexuality in schools across the state. A law signed by Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) last year, commonly known as the “Don’t Say Gay” law in the state, puts immense restrictions on what teachers or other school employees can discuss with students regarding…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • Corrientes Avenue, Buenos Aires Photo: Bill Hackwell

    As the sun was setting in Buenos Aires this past Saturday, the vibrant Corrientes Avenue that goes through the center of the city was shut down. Corrientes is closely connected to Argentine culture; lined with theaters and bookstores and on this occasion it was dedicated to The Night of the Libraries and honoring 40 years of democracy since the bloody dictatorship. Reading, educating and never forgetting those dark years of the 1970s when the US backed Argentine military killed, or disappeared, over 30,000 people is important to the human core of this country to ensure that history will not repeat itself.

    Teachers, authors, intellectuals, academics and young students spoke to crowds in panels covering a wide range of social topics, along with cultural performances. The City of Buenos Aires helped finance the event even with its Macrist Mayor Horacio Rodríguez Larreta of the right-wing Republican Proposal Party (PRO) who has already announced he is running for president in the general election in October; clearly his strategy was to not allow the Peronists currently in power to take the credit for this popular event.

    Meanwhile in the US, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis has taken a different approach to reading and libraries as he maneuvers to be more reactionary than other Republican candidates in his bid to get the nomination for US President in 2024 by banning books in his state.

    In July 2022, DeSantis signed into law House Bill 1467 that requires that all books in Florida schools have to be screened by employees that had an educational media specialist certificate. The full impact of is just now taking affect as many districts hastily pulled all books off their library shelves and classroom until they are arbitrarily reviewed to be appropriate for “student needs” and if they do not meet approval they need to be covered and stored.

    In Manatee County some parents are reporting that shelves of the school’s library are empty. Signs in Parrish Community High School bookcases have been covered with signs that read, “Books Are NOT for Student Use!!”

    Florida teachers, who rank 48th in how much they get paid, are confused and now run the risk of possible professional ramification if they are not in compliance with the law and could possibly face felony charges for having unapproved books in their classroom.

    One such dangerous book that has been covered and shelfed in Duval County is Roberto Clemente: Pride of the Pittsburgh Pirates by Jonah Winter that tells the story of the legendary Afro-Puerto Rican baseball player who won multiple Most Valuable Player awards, and was a strong voice against racism in the major leagues. Clemente died in a plane crash while delivering humanitarian aid to earthquake victims in Nicaragua in 1972.

    The banning of books legislation is in conjunction with another reactionary Florida law promoted and signed by DeSantis in April 2022 known as the STOP WOKE Act which regulates instruction in schools and workplaces prohibiting discussions on primary issues like LGBTQ struggles, racism, and even Black, Latino or Indigenous history because according to the law it could make other students or workers “uncomfortable” to hear about slavery from a Black point of view for example. The law essentially requires teachers to monitor classroom discussion to prevent them from wandering into exchanging of ideas on a range of topics that are fundamental issues facing US society.

    Back on Corrientes Avenue Saturday there were lots of books about socialist Cuba including books dedicated to the life of Fidel and photography books on the Cuban Revolution. I could not help but wonder just what access students in Florida have to any truthful accounts of not just the Cuban Revolution but also about the social gains that have been made there since 1959. Could they find out, for example, that Cuba has a higher life expectancy than the US despite the criminal unilateral blockade of the island that has gone on for over 60 years? Could they learn in school about how Cuba sent front line doctors to over 40 countries during Covid?, or the remarkable protection of life that Cuba has during the cycles of hurricanes that hit the island and how miserable in comparison the record in preparation that their state has when those hurricanes move onto their shores.

    You don’t have to be an educator to know how fundamental reading a wide range of topics is for students in developing them into being critical thinkers, to be able to arrive at one’s own conclusion through education and to be able to distinguish between truth and fake news, or to question authority about issues of war and peace and why is it that billions get sent to fan the flames of war in Ukraine at the same time as 30 million people get kicked off of food stamps while inflation soars.

    This is some kind of slippery slope with frightening consequences as other states are also enacting these extreme steps towards censorship. History teaches us that things change only when people have developed a consciousness and come together into collective movements to forge a new inclusive future that has freedom and respect for everybody as its goal.

    Source: Resumen Latinoamericano – English

    The post Florida Bans Books While Argentina Celebrates the Night of the Libraries first appeared on Dissident Voice.

    This post was originally published on Dissident Voice.

  • A Republican lawmaker in Florida has introduced a bill that would ban abortion past six weeks of pregnancy — legislation that, if passed, would effectively eliminate most abortion access in the South. Republicans hold supermajorities in both the state’s Senate and House of Delegates, and Gov. Ron DeSantis, who is visiting early primary states in advance of an expected presidential run…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • The youngest member of Congress has condemned Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) for actions that he describes as fascist. Rep. Maxwell Frost (D-Florida), a Gen Z member of the House of Representatives, appeared on CNN on Sunday to discuss DeSantis, who is viewed as a potential contender for the Republican Party’s presidential nomination in 2024. DeSantis is “acting on scapegoating vulnerable…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  •  

    The Hill: DeSantis steps up attacks on media

    The Hill (10/10/22) reported that DeSantis “has surged in recent national polls, propelled by his willingness to position himself at the epicenter of the culture wars.”

    One reason why Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis is a hot contender (CBS, 2/27/23; SunSentinel, 2/27/23; AP, 2/27/23) for the Republican presidential nomination is his constant war with the media, framing himself as an everyman trying to fix the state’s problems against elite critics who stymie him at every turn. He has also gained a reputation as a bully who wants to use his political might to silence criticism of his administration in the press.

    Twitter suspended the governor’s press secretary for “violating rules on ‘abusive behavior’” after the AP (8/20/21) said the official’s “conduct led to [an AP] reporter receiving threats and other online abuse.” Last year, DeSantis displayed his combativeness when he accused a reporter of creating “false narratives” when he was questioned about his anti-gay speech codes during a press conference (Twitter, 3/7/22).

    He told a local right-wing website (Florida Voice, 10/4/22; quoted in The Hill, 10/10/22) that “regime media”—a funny term coming from the head of a state “regime”—were cheering for Hurricane Ian to destroy Florida:

    They don’t care about the people of this state. They don’t care about this community. They want to use storms and destruction from storms as a way to advance their agenda.

    In Ian’s aftermath, DeSantis bit back at a CNN reporter who questioned his storm response policies (Fox News, 10/2/22).

    Most recently, his office (Independent, 2/23/23) said his staff “will not take questions from NBC News or MSNBC until host Andrea Mitchell apologizes for misrepresenting [the governor’s] bans on books about Black history.” Rupert Murdoch’s media empire (New York Post, 12/15/22, 2/2/23, 2/15/23; Fox News, 1/27/23, 2/22/23, 2/23/23) has been eager to cheer on DeSantis’ war against the press.

    Making journalists easier to sue

    Politico:DeSantis wants to roll back press freedoms — with an eye toward overturning Supreme Court ruling

    A proposed Florida bill (Politico, 2/23/23) would, among other things, declare that “comments made by anonymous sources are presumed false for the purposes of defamation lawsuits”—and remove protections from journalists who decline to reveal their sources.

    The trick of executives projecting their policy mishaps on the press is as old as politics itself. But DeSantis is far more dangerous than your average governor, not just because he is seeking the presidency, but because he is actively trying to legally neuter the free press in the same way he is trying to destroy academic freedom and freedom of speech in his own state. And he could win, because he has much of the conservative movement behind him.

    The Florida state legislature is considering a bill that seeks “sweeping changes to Florida’s libel and defamation law,” the Orlando Sentinel (2/21/23) reported. It would presume “information from anonymous sources to be false and removes protections that allow journalists to shield the identity of sources if they are sued.” And the bill “limits the definition of who would qualify as a public figure,” which means that more people would be able to sue news outlets without having to show that the outlets displayed a reckless disregard for the truth.

    Politico (2/23/23) noted that “beyond making it easier to sue journalists, the proposal is also being positioned to spark a larger legal battle with the goal of eventually overturning New York Times v. Sullivan,” the 1964 Supreme Court decision “that limits public officials’ ability to sue publishers for defamation.”

    DeSantis expressed his disdain for the Sullivan standard at a round-table discussion about the media in February (2/7/23): “When the media attacks me, I have a platform to fight back. When they attack everyday citizens, these individuals don’t have the adequate recourse to fight back.” Telegraphing his legislative ambitions, he added, “In Florida, we want to stand up for the little guy against these massive media conglomerates.”

    This is absolutely backward. The Sullivan rule doesn’t offer the media protection against lawsuits from Joe Taxpayer, but it does offer protection from partisan leaders, as the Sullivan standard forces public figures to show a court that a publisher acted with “actual malice” in order for a libel suit to stand (Washington Post, 2/15/23). Eliminating Sullivan doesn’t offer the “little guy” anything.

    And while he targets “massive media conglomerates,” ending the Sullivan standard would be especially harmful for local and independent media. The New York Times (3/1/22) has a legal team that can combat defamation suits , but do smaller outlets like Common Dreams or Hell Gate stand a chance?

    Conservative quarry

    American Conservative: Overturn New York Times v. Sullivan

    The American Conservative (9/9/22) argues that “the public needs accurate information about the candidates for public office”—and therefore government officials need to be able to sue reporters if they don’t like how they’re being depicted in the press.

    Two years ago, I warned FAIR’s audience (3/26/21) about the conservative movement’s targeting of Sullivan, as late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia—as well as current Justice Clarence Thomas and the US Court of Appeals’ Lawrence Silberman—expressed their hostility to the Sullivan standard. Surely, if this bill is passed and signed into law in Florida, it will face a legal challenge; if that challenge goes to the Supreme Court, there’s very little reason to think that the 6–3 conservative majority that just struck down Roe v. Wade thinks striking down Sullivan is a bridge too far.

    The threat against Sullivan has intensified since my 2021 warning. At the February round-table discussion, Carson Holloway of the Claremont Institute’s Center for the American Way of Life said:

    The thumb seems to be on the scale for the media in these lawsuits, and that’s because of what the Supreme Court did in New York Times v. Sullivan back in 1964. That case changed the standards under which libel cases are heard in modern America…. If we go back to the Founders, we are reminded that people have a right to their reputation. Reputation is a right as precious as one’s property, one’s life, one’s liberty, so another fundamental purpose of American law is to protect rights. The actual malice standard is an invention of the Supreme Court inconsistent with the way the Founders thought about libel and freedom of speech.

    The American Conservative (9/9/22) also called for the high court to overturn Sullivan, as it is “a typical product of the Warren Court—probably the most activist and least originalist Court in the nation’s history.” This is a swipe at the one era of the court’s history, under Chief Justice Earl Warren, marked by progress for civil rights and civil liberties, with decisions like Brown v. Board of Education and Loving v. Virginia. The magazine complained, “It is nearly impossible to prove actual malice.”

    Most ominously, Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch (New York Times, 7/2/21) said the Court must revisit the doctrine, “suggesting that the actual malice doctrine might have made more sense” in 1964, “when there were fewer and more reliable sources of news.”

    In other words, DeSantis is flanked by conservative legal theorists, activists and sitting jurists who are licking their chops at the prospect of cutting down Sullivan. This would be catastrophic for free expression. Corporate tycoons and politicians could use lawsuits to bankrupt and cripple news outlets with costly litigation, and editors would constantly think twice about publishing critical reporting on powerful people out of fear of litigation. Government figures and big business would essentially have more control over what can be printed or aired.

    War on academia

    Chronicle of Higher Education: DeSantis' Terrifying Plot Against Higher Ed

    Keith Whittington (Chronicle of Higher Education, 2/27/23): “Florida is breaking new ground in insisting that state universities convey the government’s favored message in its classes.”

    In taking on Sullivan, DeSantis is opening a new front in a culture war he has long waged against academics in his state. The state has “deployed a controversial survey on campus ideological diversity to public college and university students, faculty and staff members,” a move some faculty have called “a political litmus test since it was first proposed” (Inside Higher Ed, 4/5/22).

    DeSantis has asked “state universities for the number and ages of their students who sought gender dysphoria treatment, including sex reassignment surgery and hormone prescriptions” (AP, 1/18/23).

    A new Florida bill would bar “funds from being used for diversity, equity and inclusion programs, as well as critical race theory–related programs, on college campuses,” and “would also remove diversity, equity and inclusion efforts or policies that impact hiring practices” (ABC, 2/23/23). Even sillier, one Florida proposal would “ban ‘unproven’ or ‘theoretical’ content from general-education courses, which might banish Plato and Albert Einstein to elective courses.” according to the Chronicle for Higher Education (2/27/23), which added that Florida is a trailblazer for “higher-education reforms,” while “Republican-leaning states are likely to follow its lead.”

    For DeSantis and a great deal of the American right, academics and journalists are partners in the same ideological war: They make up a disloyal intelligentsia that uses professional stature to sow doubt about the political establishment, challenge traditional cultural orders and threaten the power of big business. If DeSantis has come this far waging a war against academia in his own state, there is no reason why he wouldn’t take this war to the Miami Herald and the Tampa Bay Times.

    Sullivan and civil rights

    Heed Their Rising Voices

    The Supreme Court ruled in Sullivan v. New York Times that a Montgomery, Alabama, police official could not sue over minor inaccuracies in an advertisement that asserted that “Southern violators have answered Dr. King’s peaceful protests with intimidation and violence.”

    It should not be forgotten, also, that Sullivan was a civil rights case: an Alabama police commander had brought a libel suit against the Times for an advertisement by civil rights activists that mischaracterized the role of his officers. Samantha Barbas—a professor at SUNY Buffalo’s School of Law and author of Actual Malice, a book about the Sullivan case—wrote (UC Press Blog, 12/20/22):

    In the 1960s, segregationist officials in the South weaponized libel law in a campaign to undermine liberal Northern newspapers that criticized segregation. Their objective was to halt coverage of the civil rights movement, reporting that would prove crucial to forging national support for desegregation and civil rights.

    DeSantis’ war on press freedom—in the context of his campaign to censor Black authors (PEN America, 2/13/23) and attacks on “wokeness” (Guardian, 2/5/23), a word that has its origins in Black awareness of racial injustice—is the living legacy of Jim Crow–era Southern governors who did everything they could to maintain racial apartheid.

    As faculty and students fight Florida’s war on campuses, journalists who value their freedom to report and opine must also oppose this assault on media. If DeSantis wins, it won’t just impact Florida, it will impact the whole country.

    The post DeSantis’ War on Florida’s Press Is Designed to Hit Nationwide appeared first on FAIR.

    This post was originally published on FAIR.

  • Supporters of former President Donald Trump are accusing Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) of being anti-free speech after security at a mall where DeSantis was doing a book signing instructed them to disperse. DeSantis, who is seen as a potential challenger to Trump for the Republican nomination for president in 2024, signed autographs for his new book at a mall in Leesburg, Florida, on Tuesday.

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • A Republican lawmaker in Florida has proposed a bill that would effectively dismantle the Democratic Party, a move that would disenfranchise millions of voters in the state. Senate Bill 1248, sponsored by Republican state Senator Blaise Ingoglia, is titled “The Ultimate Cancel Act,” a reference to right-wing grievances about so-called cancel culture. The bill doesn’t mention the Democratic Party…

    Source



  • Florida Senator Rick Scott is perhaps the leading policy voice in today’s Republican Party. His proposed “Rescue America Plan” outlines detailed policies that would supposedly address our shared national challenges and crises. They do not.

    At best, his approaches ignore the underlying causes of the serious problems facing us. Far worse, most of his proposals would exacerbate them. This is chilling because of Scott’s power and influence within his party.

    As I will show, Scott’s views are the tenants and intentions of today’s GOP. He’s articulated their agenda, the policies that they will gleefully impose on us should they win the 2024 elections.

    Rather than build on progress already made, Scott’s plans boldly outline a far right wing wish list that would block and even roll back progress on all of the challenges we face, dating back several decades, at the very least.

    Instead of seeking common ground, Scott seeks to impose highly divisive and unpopular social, economic, and fiscal policies that would attack the basic human and constitutional rights along with the well-being of millions of U.S. residents.

    Ignoring the fact that many or most of his proposals have already been tried and have already failed spectacularly—and were therefore repealed and replaced—Scott stubbornly substitutes his own intransigence and ideology for proven effective approaches.

    Examining Rick Scott’s world view as well as his character, his veracity (or lack thereof), and his modus operandi is essential to understanding the horrifying implications of his far right wing agenda.

    What you’ll discover is that Scott is an inveterate ideologue. He has a visceral distaste for programs in the public interest, especially if they’re proven effective, popular, and essential such as Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, and public education.

    It’s up to all of us to ensure that every voter understands what every Republican stands for before casting their ballot.

    When I say Rick Scott has announced that he’s coming for your Medicare and Social Security, as well as for your constitutional rights, I mean it. And so does he.

    When you examine his record, you’ll see that he knows how to pillage the public treasury. He has a nasty habit of violating the public trust. He’s doggedly determined to deprive We the Taxpayers of the essential services we need and paid for.

    To reiterate, we know this not only from his explicitly stated intentions as outlined in his “Rescue America” Plan. That’s also been his established track record for decades. So, let’s get to the details.

    Often reading more like a rant from an extreme right wing radio talk show host (or from your unhinged, bigoted, homophobic relative who listens to right wing radio) than serious policy proposals, Scott’s plans are nonetheless very troubling. Even if we only regarded these radical, destructive proposals as a flotilla of trial balloons, we’d be foolish to dismiss them.

    The details of Scott’s “Rescue America” plan clearly and incontrovertibly contains provisions that would place at risk every single federal program through sunsetting provisions, and without doubt eliminate every one that fails to be renewed by act of Congress every five years.

    This including Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, and countless other programs upon which we rely to retire with dignity; uplift people from poverty; protect the environment, consumers, working families, and all of us from tainted food, unsafe products, abuses from employers, and on and on.

    All of Scott’s protestations to the contrary are prevarication. We know this, because of his explicit statements and from his long career of actions against the public interest.

    Other key provisions of his plans include: blocking and reversing progress on climate. This, by confusing weather with climate (“The weather is always changing”), and dismissing best practices on climate as “nutty policies.”

    The plan also attacks equality and basic human rights including voting rights; and misinterprets the Second Amendment to block and overturn common sense, effective, and overwhelmingly popular gun safety policies. Scott also calls for imposing tax hikes on approximately 50% of U.S. residents specifically those least able to afford his new regressive tax hike policies.

    Claiming, “Currently, far too many Americans who can work are living off of the hard work of others, and have no ‘skin in the game,’” Scott demands a tax on work, while disingenuously attacking current policies like the Earned Income Tax Credit that actually enable hard-working people to survive despite the long trend of deteriorating earning power for nearly all U.S. residents.

    Scott’s plan outlines strict, simplistic, and dangerous radical austerity policies that would risk a costly and disruptive default on the national debt and other fiscal chaos, likely to trigger a world-wide economic catastrophe.

    The plan explicitly would: “shrink the federal government, reduce the government work force by 25% in 5 years, sell government buildings and assets” and “Prohibit debt ceiling increases absent a declaration of war.” This would lock the USA into a fiscal strait jacket.

    By eliminating a quarter of all federal workers’ jobs, Scott’s meat-ax approach would immediately throw 550,000 people out of work. It would also degrade the quality of life—especially health and safety—for all US residents by weakening or terminating federal government operations including:

    • The U.S. Food and Drug Administration that tests new medicines for safety and efficacy.
    • Public water systems that provide safe drinking water based on standards set by the EPA (which Scott also wants to slash).
    • The Transportation Security Administration that monitors the 39 billion tons of cargo that are transported annually by passenger and freight carriers.
    • The Federal Aviation Administration and the United States’ air traffic control system that keeps air travel safe.
    • U.S. Department of Agriculture that enforces standards for food safety through inspection of meat, dairy and food to protect against contamination and disease.
    • OSHA that protect America’s workforce by limiting exposure to toxic chemicals and other workplace harm.
    • The Department of the Interior that protects our national parks and public lands.
    • Agencies that enforce federal laws and regulations to protect U.S. residents from polluted air, water, and land.
    • The U.S. Postal Service that prevents mail fraud.
    • U.S. Weather Service that provides storm and other warnings.
    • The Federal Housing Authority that helps Americans become homeowners.
    • Consulates and embassies that help U.S. citizens traveling abroad.
    • FEMA that provides support for victims of hurricanes, floods or other disasters.
    • The National Park Service that maintains national parks.
    • The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers that helps to maintain the nation’s ports, harbors and navigation channels.
    • The federal agencies that provide 60 percent of all research funding to Universities.
    • The Small Business Administration that helps Americans start, grow, and build businesses.
    • Veterans Affairs’ facilities that treat millions of Americans each year.
    • Customs and Border Patrol agents that protect our borders.
    • Scientists at the National Institutes of Health and the Centers for Disease Control who research and develop ways to diagnose and treat diseases including cancer, Parkinson’s Disease and Alzheimer’s Disease, as well as more specialized agencies like the National Cancer Institute.
    • The “Do Not Call” Registry makes it easier for consumers to stop getting telemarketing calls that they don’t want.

    Under Scott’s vision, future Republican control of the federal government would resemble a hostile takeover of our entire system, one in which the corporate raiders dismantle it and sell it off for parts. Presumably to further enrich and empower their rich and influential donors.

    Alarmingly, Scott calls for a blitzkrieg against public education including closing the Department of Education and undermining public schools, while censoring and micromanaging curricula, and imposing unconstitutional mandates including loyalty oaths on public schools and children.

    CNN reports that Scott’s plan would also dictate that: “Public schools will teach our children to love America because, while not perfect, it is exceptional, it is good, and it is a beacon of freedom in an often-dark world.” This, while “repeatedly trying to craft a contrast to what Scott calls ‘the woke left’ and ‘wokeness.’”

    Scott’s obsession with trivialities like catch phrases, and his infatuation with failed dysfunctional Dickensian policies over reasonable policy choices are hallmark of his regressive and dangerous vision. So much so that Rick Scott would make an alarmingly cruel Ebenezer Scrooge-like villain.

    Scott’s own articulation of his policies reveal they are absolutely reactionary, regressive, and reviled. So much so, that even his fellow Republicans and right-wing media have castigated him for saying the quiet part out loud.

    None of their criticisms should be taken as repudiation of these policies. Rather, they’ve merely voiced concerns that if voters knew the scope and impact of this anarchical, Ayn Rand-inspired approach of taking a meat axe to the public interest, then millions upon millions would never vote to elect Republicans again.

    Make no mistake: Scott has mapped out the backward course that many if not most Republican elected officials and party leaders seek to impose on the majority of us who disapprove of them—mainly through stealth, misdirection, and propaganda as opposed to the attacks in plain sight Scott has proposed.

    Scott’s plans outline and expose the GOP’s plans for a one-size-fits all, top down, nationwide imposition of several disastrous and dysfunctional policies from Washington D.C. to all corners of the country.

    Many or most of these onerous policies have already been or may soon be enacted by Republican-dominated state governments. Again, this includes many failed and unsound policies that we’ve already widely rejected as divisive, hateful, and counterproductive.

    Scott has “revised” his plan under fierce criticism from his Republican Senate colleagues and right wing pundits, including FOX News interviewers.

    As FOX News reported, “Scott released his plan last year as a proposed Republican legislative agenda ahead of the midterm elections. Democrats seized on several of Scott’s proposals, including a blanket statement that ‘all federal legislation sunsets in five years. If a law is worth keeping, Congress can pass it again.’”

    While many of his Republican colleagues quickly distanced themselves from the bold and often overwrought rhetoric Scott features in his plans, he is not by any means an outlier or a fringe backbencher. On the contrary, Scott is perhaps the most clear and outspoken voice in the GOP about his party’s plans.

    By choosing him to serve as chair of the National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC), Senate Republicans affirmed their reliance on his leadership in “the fight to restore the GOP Senate majority.”

    Despite his shady background in business and in public office, Scott remains one of the most respected and powerful voices in the Republican Party. His statements must be taken seriously as they indicate the intentions of most if not all Republican leaders.

    Rick Scott’s Background

    Rick Scott has a concerning record, even according to fellow Republicans. Politifact quoted a spokesperson for Republican then-Florida Attorney General Bill McCollum saying, “Rick Scott oversaw the most massive Medicare fraud scheme in American history.” This refers to the historic Medicare fraud case brought against Columbia HCA while Scott was the CEO of that corporation.

    Politifact also reported, “Scott resigned as CEO [of Columbia HCA] in July 1997, less than four months after the inquiry became public and before the depth of the investigation became clear. Company executives said had Scott remained CEO, the entire chain could have been in jeopardy.”

    Politifact added, “As part of the 2000 settlement, Columbia/HCA agreed to plead guilty to at least 14 corporate felonies. A corporate felony comes with financial penalties but not jail time, since a corporation can’t be sent to prison. Among the 14 felonies, Columbia/HCA pleaded guilty to three counts of conspiracy to defraud the United States.”

    An opinion article published by The South Florida Sun Sentinel reports, “When the federal investigation of Rick Scott’s former hospital company became public in 1997, the board of Columbia/HCA forced him out. Scott left with $300 million in stock, a $5.1 million severance and a $950,000-per-year consulting contract for five years.”

    Adding, “Columbia/HCA gave kickbacks to doctors so they would refer patients. Columbia/HCA made patients look sicker than they were, so Medicare would pay more. Columbia/HCA kept two sets of books.”

    Numerous scandals continued to plague Scott when he became Governor of Florida, as a quick online search reveals. Most search engine hits relate to the massive Columbia/HCA Medicare scandal under his watch, but there are too many other allegations of serious wrongdoing to discuss in depth.
    One noteworthy scandal involved Scott’s alleged retaliation against Gerald Bailey, “the former head of the Florida Department of Law Enforcement [who] asserted he was pushed out after resisting questionable and unethical requests from the Scott administration and the governor’s re-election campaign,” according to an Associated Press report.

    The AP quoted Republican then-Attorney General of Florida, Pam Bondi (who served in that office from 2011 to 2019) as saying, “This is ridiculous. We have to have better procedures in place so this type of thing does not happen again.” The report added, “Questions are mounting from fellow Republicans in a state where Scott was once a tea party stalwart.”

    Conclusions

    All of these scandals provide important insights into Rick Scott’s ethical lapses, his plans, and his relentless drive to impose his extreme and ideological will upon the rest of us, by hook or by crook—mainly crook.

    Today, the USA is facing a combination of serious challenges as well as existential crises. These include: the climate emergency; the COVID-19 pandemic; lack of basic economic and human rights and necessitates including housing, nutrition, fair wages, a voice in the workplace, transportation, and especially healthcare for millions of us, our families, and people in our communities.

    Also, long-term declining standards of living for millions of U.S. residents; persistent and deadly hatred against marginalized people: racism, sexism, xenophobia, anti-LGBTQ+ and other pernicious bigotry, as well as other social strife; widespread gun violence, police brutality, corporate misconduct, and more.

    Rick Scott’s vision is to blame the victims, ignore root causes, deny science and medicine, and leave us all alone and on our own to struggle against vast and powerful multinational special interests. All of this would make our already dreadful problems much worse for all of us as individuals, families, communities, and as a nation.

    Ironically, Scott has done all us who care about each other and our nation a favor by exposing the GOP agenda, even if at times only briefly and then quickly dissembling about it.

    He’s done us another favor by opening a clear window and showing everyone the easily explained set of extreme, unreasoning, unreasonable, and unpopular policies that the Republicans would quickly impose upon us if they were to regain control of our federal government.

    He’s let us know that the GOP would start their hostile takeover by dismantling, dismembering, and selling off our democratic republic for parts, and by subverting the essential mission of whatever depleted wreck was left.

    Now that we know without any doubt what the right-wing GOP plans to do, the question remains: what do we plan to do about it? I propose repeating all of the gory details about each and every one of the failed, antagonistic, and dysfunctional GOP policies that Scott outlined.

    Also, warning everyone we know that the Republican Party is intent on turning back the clock to the 18th Century rather than lead us forward into the 21st Century. We must continually point out the already horrendous impact of these Republican policies we’re already seen in the states where they’ve taken effect.

    It’s up to all of us to ensure that every voter understands what every Republican stands for before casting their ballot. Failure to loudly dissent against the dangerous path the GOP usually secretly advocates for would be catastrophic.

    Luckily, by focusing on these extreme right-wing Republican views, we can and must inform the voters to oppose these dark designs before it’s too late. By exposing them and forcing GOP candidates to run on their previously hidden stealth agenda, we should be able to get out the vote.

    It’s up to us to sound the alarm and engage voters about the GOP’s stark and heartless agenda. I hope we will never stop putting all of these proposals to a vote in the court of public opinion and eventually at the ballot box in 2024.

    The choices ahead of us couldn’t be more clear. Rick Scott has given us all the information we need. If we engage in persistent and successful efforts to inform voters, we should empower a massive electoral victory.

    And finally, you don’t have take my word for it. Scott has laid out all the details of his hideous plot to further secure oligarchic control of our country here: rescueamerica.com.

    This post was originally published on Common Dreams.

  • Gov. Ron DeSantis is taking full advantage of the Republican supermajority in Florida’s state legislature. The governor continues to introduce what advocates call fascist censorship laws that recall Germany’s Hitler-era systematic erasure of LGBTQIA+ and BIPOC experiences. Bills to “stop wokeness” in Florida’s education system have multiplied since the infamous “Don’t Say Gay” law and Stop WOKE…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • A bill proposed in the Florida Republican-controlled state legislature that aims to make it easier for public figures, including lawmakers, to sue news media for coverage they dislike would also have severe repercussions for anyone (not just those in the news industry) who use social media to point out someone else’s bigoted behavior. In addition to granting greater leeways for defamation lawsuits…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • A Florida House Republican introduced legislation Monday that would make it easier for state officials — such as censorship-happy Gov. Ron DeSantis — to sue for defamation, a measure that critics decried as a blatant attack on the freedom of the press and free expression with potentially sweeping implications. Filed by Florida state Rep. Alex Andrade (R-2), H.B. 951 laments that the U.S.

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.



  • A Florida House Republican introduced legislation Monday that would make it easier for state officials—such as censorship-happy Gov. Ron DeSantis—to sue for defamation, a measure that critics decried as a blatant attack on the freedom of the press and free expression with potentially sweeping implications.

    Filed by Florida state Rep. Alex Andrade (R-2), H.B. 951 laments that the U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark ruling in New York Times v. Sullivan has “foreclosed many meritorious defamation claims to the detriment of citizens of all walks of life” by placing such claims under the purview of the federal government and establishing a high standard of proof.

    As the Oyez Project summarizes, the high court held in the 1964 decision that “to sustain a claim of defamation or libel, the First Amendment requires that the plaintiff show that the defendant knew that a statement was false or was reckless in deciding to publish the information without investigating whether it was accurate.”

    Following the introduction of Andrade’s bill, Floyd Abrams, a First Amendment lawyer, told the outlet Law & Crime that “it’s black-letter law that a state cannot constitutionally provide less protection in libel litigation than the First Amendment requires.”

    “This text does just that, obviously intentionally,” said Abrams. “If Governor DeSantis, a Harvard Law graduate, thinks the statute is constitutional, he’s forgotten what he was taught. If he’s looking for a way to offer the Supreme Court a case in which it might reconsider settled law, who knows. But what’s clear is that it is today and tomorrow facially at odds with the First Amendment.”

    The new bill was filed two weeks after DeSantis, a possible 2024 presidential candidate, held a roundtable purportedly aimed at spotlighting the “defamation practices” of legacy media outlets. While DeSantis has framed his campaign against defamation as an attempt to empower “everyday citizens” against false attacks, free speech advocates warned that, in reality, the governor and his right-wing allies in the Legislature are looking to silence criticism of elected officials like themselves.

    “DeSantis continues to make clear his disdain for freedom of speech and the press and to prioritize censoring dissent over governing,” said Seth Stern, director of Advocacy for Freedom of the Press Foundation (FPF) and a First Amendment lawyer.

    Andrade’s bill, Stern argued, “would do nothing for ordinary Floridians but would allow government officials and celebrities to harass and even bankrupt their critics with expensive litigation.”

    “It would stifle investigative reporting by presuming any statements attributed to anonymous sources to be false despite that (or, given DeSantis’ ambitions, maybe because) confidential sources have literally brought down presidents in this country,” Stern added. “The Florida legislature should reject this political stunt and Floridians should not tolerate their governor’s experiments in authoritarianism in their name and at their expense. The U.S. Congress should safeguard the First Amendment by codifying Sullivan and ensuring that the press and public are protected from politically-motivated defamation lawsuits.”

    “Unsurprisingly, it’s peddled as a bill to protect the little guy. Nothing is further from the truth. It’s a gift to the ruling class.”

    The Florida House measure, just the latest broadside against free expression by the state GOP, specifically urges the U.S. Supreme Court to “reassess” Sullivan, an effort that media lawyer Matthew Schafer described as “part of the right’s world war on individual rights, equality, and democracy.” (The Supreme Court declined to hear a challenge to the 1964 ruling last year.)

    “Unsurprisingly, it’s peddled as a bill to protect the little guy,” Schafer noted. “Nothing is further from the truth. It’s a gift to the ruling class.”

    Andrade’s bill, which resembles a proposal drafted by DeSantis’ administration last year, outlines specific restrictions on who can and cannot be considered a “public figure” entitled to pursue defamation claims under the legislation.

    The measure states that a person does not qualify as a public figure if their “fame or notoriety arises solely from” defending themselves against an accusation; “granting an interview on a specific topic”; “public employment, other than elected office or appointment by an elected official”; or “a video, an image, or a statement uploaded on the Internet that has reached a broad audience.”

    In a column last week, The Washington Post‘s Erik Wemple cautioned that DeSantis’ attempts to target Sullivan could pose “a far greater threat to U.S. media” than former President Donald Trump’s ultimately empty pledge to “open up” libel laws.

    During his roundtable event earlier this month, “DeSantis, an ace practitioner of GOP media-bashing rhetoric, showed why some critics view him as a more dangerous embodiment of Trump’s two-bit authoritarianism,” Wemple wrote.

    This post was originally published on Common Dreams.

  • While Democrats defied historical trends in the 2022 midterm elections by blocking the Republican “red wave” that many pundits predicted would overtake the U.S. Congress, last year’s election resulted in significant GOP gains in Southern state legislatures, bolstering their control of the region’s politics. Republicans gained about 55 legislative seats in Southern states in 2022 and now hold…

    Source



  • The campaign of Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis—a strident supporter of loosening gun regulations—tried to ban firearms at an election night event in Tampa last year and blame the city for the policy, The Washington Post said in a report published Friday that had critics on both sides of the political aisle calling the presumptive 2024 Republican presidential candidate a hypocrite.

    According to the Post, DeSantis’ campaign sought to prohibit guns from the governor’s reelection victory party at the Tampa Convention Center, a city-run venue, last November 8, while suggesting city officials claim responsibility for the ban.

    The Post obtained an October 8 email from Chase Finch, the convention center’s safety and security manager, saying that “DeSantis/his campaign will not tell their attendees they are not permitted to carry because of the political optics.”

    “DeSantis caters to an extremist, MAGA Republican base by pushing permitless carry while having the privilege to keep those same armed extremists at a distance.”

    Finch explained that the request for the city to shoulder blame was due to “Republicans largely being in support of 2A,” a reference to the Second Amendment.”

    “Basically it sounds like they want us to say it’s our policy to disallow firearms within the event space if anyone asks,” he added, drawing a response from city administrator Nicole Travis stressing that “we are not saying anything about concealed carry.”

    “That is the responsibility of the renter,” Travis said. “We follow state statute that permits concealed carry.”

    Responding to the Post report, California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, tweeted that “the level of hypocrisy here is just astounding.”

    Fred Guttenberg—an activist whose daughter Jaime Guttenberg was one of 17 students and staff shot dead during the February 14, 2018 massacre at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida—said DeSantis “is a fraud and he should be treated that way.”

    “The tough guy act covers for a small, weak, and weird man,” he tweeted. “His decision to be OK with others being at risk of gun violence but not him and to try and cover that up? WEAK!”

    Shannon Watts, founder of the gun control advocacy group Moms Demand Action, wrote on Twitter that “the hypocrisy of ‘the dangers of unregulated guns for thee but not for me’ is next-level.”

    “DeSantis caters to an extremist, MAGA Republican base by pushing permitless carry while having the privilege to keep those same armed extremists at a distance,” she added. “DeSantis is reportedly forcing attendees at his events to go through metal detectors and he’s also refusing to attend events unless guns are banned. Yet he’s simultaneously pushing for permitless carry to strip gun safety requirements. Safety for him, violence for everyone else.”

    Under a Republican-authored bill backed by DeSantis, Florida would become the 26th state to allow people to carry concealed loaded guns without permits. There are currently around 2.6 million concealed carry permits in the state, according to the Tallahassee Democrat.

    The election night party wasn’t the only time DeSantis’ campaign has tried to keep guns out of events attended by the governor.

    Alachua County GOP Chair Tim Marden told the Post that he skipped a DeSantis fundraiser last October because the governor was insisting upon having metal detectors at the event—outside of which a gun rights protester was arrested.

    “In my thinking, it was a little hypocritical to have this measure in place for law-abiding citizens at a time when a lot of folks in the gun community will condemn a Democratic politician for having a security force,” Marden said.

    Luis Valdes, Florida state director of Gun Owners of America, told the Post that “DeSantis continually pays lip service to the Second Amendment as he positions himself for a nationwide run, and yet what I am seeing as a constituent of his and as a Floridian is that his events are gun-free zones.”

    “His primary rivals will clean his clock on guns,” he added.

    At the polar opposite of the gun control issue, Florida Moms Demand Action volunteer Wendy Malloy told the Tampa Bay Times that “this proves what we already knew—when it comes to gun violence, Gov. DeSantis puts ‘political optics’ before public safety.”

    “Our lawmakers should stand up to Gov. DeSantis’ hypocrisy and reject permitless carry,” she added.

    This post was originally published on Common Dreams.

  • Civil rights advocates on Friday condemned the Republican-led Florida Legislature for passing another voter suppression bill that far-right Gov. Ron DeSantis, a likely GOP presidential candidate for 2024, is expected to sign into law.

    The Florida House passed Senate Bill 4B by a margin of 77-33 on Friday, two days after state senators approved the bill in a 27-12 party-line vote. The legislation seeks to expand the authority of the Office of Statewide Prosecution (OSP) to pursue charges for alleged election-related crimes. The OSP reports to Republican Attorney General Ashley Moody, a close ally of DeSantis.

    A coalition of voting rights groups—including NAACP Florida, ACLU of Florida, Common Cause Florida, and the Brennan Center for Justice—submitted joint testimony opposing S.B. 4B on Thursday. In a joint statement issued after its passage on Friday, the coalition warned that the legislation “risks impacting people with past convictions who will continue to be arrested and prosecuted in the criminal legal system for honest mistakes about their voter eligibility.”

    “The office made arrests, claimed jurisdiction, and is now seeking to change the law after the courts said no.”

    “This proposal is a solution in search of a problem,” the coalition said. “There is no legitimate need to waste taxpayer dollars and state resources by expanding the Office of Statewide Prosecution for these purposes. This bill is being heard and swiftly passed only because the governor desires to expand his prosecutorial authority over Floridians who are lawfully trying to exercise their right to vote.”

    S.B. 4B comes as DeSantis faces rebuke for using Florida’s newly established Office of Election Crimes and Security to arrest 20 formerly incarcerated individuals who believed they were eligible to vote—thanks to Amendment 4, a voter-approved 2018 referendum re-enfranchising 1.4 million people with past felony convictions—for alleged “voter fraud” last year.

    Most of the people who were arrested for improperly casting ballots had been approved by the Florida Department of Elections, which mailed them voter registration cards prior to the 2020 election. Despite this, all of them have been slapped with felony charges carrying prison terms of up to five years and fines of up to $5,000. The arrests, unsurprisingly, have reportedly scared away many potential voters.

    “While one of the cases has been settled, judges have in many cases dismissed charges and some local state attorneys have been reluctant to pursue charges,” Florida Politics reported Friday. “Democrats have questioned if the proposed legislation will allow the statewide prosecutor to take over cases that local state attorneys won’t try.”

    Florida Rep. Anna Eskamani (D-47) alluded to body cam footage showing that many of those arrested—and some of the police officers—were confused about the nature of the charges.

    “We had folks in Orange County that, after that amendment passed, they called the Supervisor of Elections, they called the Division of Elections, and were told they could vote,” she told Florida Politics. “There’s a reason why these cases are being tossed out.”

    According to the news outlet, many critics of S.B. 4B view it as “an intimidation tactic to discourage many former felons from registering regardless, even if they are now eligible to do so.”

    Florida Rep. Yvonne Hinson (D-20) said that after “citizens served their time, they should be able to have their civil rights restored.” She called the bill “an intentional act by the Legislature to manipulate the judicial process to fit a political position.”

    “This bill will create more confusion and disenfranchise eligible voters as part of what’s been a continued effort to intimidate voters—especially returning citizens—from participating in our democracy.”

    The coalition of voting rights groups opposed to S.B. 4B shared the Democratic lawmakers’ assessments.

    By increasing the OSP’s power, this legislation “would remove cases from local prosecutors and prosecute minor occurrences of mistaken voters rather than having to prove a widespread voter conspiracy,” the groups lamented. “It would also seek to circumvent three Florida courts’ decisions which have rejected the OSP’s argument for more expansive jurisdiction.”

    “The office made arrests, claimed jurisdiction, and is now seeking to change the law after the courts said no,” the coalition continued. “We have grave concerns about the potential for this office targeting returning citizens for honest mistakes about their eligibility to vote in an effort to intimidate communities of color.”

    “All voters should have equal, meaningful, and non-burdensome access to the ballot box,” said the coalition. “To date, Florida has failed to effectively and efficiently verify people’s eligibility under the current system, and the state’s failure has disproportionately harmed Black Floridians.”

    According to the rights advocates, the state has refused for years “to provide sufficient guidance to those looking to determine whether they can vote. At the same time, government officials have allowed and, in some instances, outright encouraged people with past felony convictions to register to vote without verifying their eligibility to do so.”

    “This bill will create more confusion and disenfranchise eligible voters as part of what’s been a continued effort to intimidate voters—especially returning citizens—from participating in our democracy,” the groups warned. “Rather than trying to give unchecked power to prosecutors who report to the governor and his political appointees, state officials should instead find ways to fix the complex and unnavigable system for returning citizens to determine their eligibility and invest resources to solve current known problems.”

  • New data from Florida shows just how much influence individual judges — almost all White men — wield in determining if minors can access abortions in the state. In 36 states, minors are legally required to involve at least one parent before seeking an abortion, in some cases by simply notifying them and in others by obtaining explicit consent. Such laws are one of the nation’s most common forms of…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.



  • Research published Monday shows that Google is targeting lower-income users with advertisements for so-called crisis pregnancy centers, anti-choice organizations known to steer people away from accessing abortion care.

    As the Tech Transparency Project (TTP), which conducted the analysis, explained: “Crisis pregnancy centers—which critics have dubbed ‘fake abortion clinics‘—appear to offer medical services but instead push an anti-abortion message, providing free ultrasounds and baby supplies with the aim of persuading women to carry unwanted pregnancies to term. Abortion rights advocates accuse them of using deceptive tactics to get women in the door—and targeting their advertising at low-income women and women of color in urban areas.”

    For its investigation, TTP established Google accounts for test users in Phoenix, Arizona; Atlanta, Georgia; and Miami, Florida. The users were characterized as 21-year-old women belonging to three different household income groups as defined by Google: average- or lower-income, moderately high-income, and high-income. While logged into each account, researchers entered 15 abortion-related search terms, including “Abortion clinic near me” and “I want an abortion,” and then recorded ads that appeared on the first five pages of results. Researchers used a Google Chrome browser with no previous history, and they used virtual private networks to make it look like the users were conducting searches from their respective cities.

    TTP found that Google showed ads for crisis pregnancy centers to women on the lower end of the income scale at a higher rate than their wealthier counterparts in two of the three cities. In Phoenix, average- or lower-income women saw 56% of ads come from crisis pregnancy centers, higher than what moderately high-income women (41%) and high-income women (7%) saw. In Atlanta, 42% of the ads targeted at average- or lower-income women came from crisis pregnancy centers, more than Google showed to moderately high-income women (18%) and high-income women (29%).

    “By pointing low-income women to [crisis pregnancy centers] more frequently than higher-income women in states with restrictive laws, Google may delay these women from finding an actual abortion clinic to get a legal and safe abortion,” TTP director Katie Paul told The Guardian on Tuesday.

    “The time window is critical in some of these states,” said Paul.

    Abortion is banned after 15 weeks of pregnancy in Arizona and Florida. In Georgia, abortion is banned after six weeks, before many people know they are pregnant.

    Because it can cost thousands of dollars in lost wages, child care, transportation, and lodging, lower-income people are less likely to be able to travel for abortion care.

    Women on the lower end of the income scale did not receive ads for crisis pregnancy centers at the highest rate in every city in TTP’s study. In Miami, researchers observed an inverse pattern: high-income women saw a larger share of ads from anti-abortion organizations (39%) than moderately high-income women (10%) and average- or lower-income women (15%).

    “It’s not clear why Miami diverged from the other cities, but one possibility is that crisis pregnancy centers, which often seek to delay women’s abortion decisions until they are past the legal window for the procedure, are more actively targeting lower-income women in states like Arizona and Georgia, which have more restrictive abortion laws than Florida,” TTP hypothesized. Although Republican lawmakers in Arizona and Florida have both prohibited abortion after 15 weeks, Arizona’s ban comes with heightened restrictions.

    Still, even if high-income women in Miami received more crisis pregnancy center ads on the top five pages of search results, that doesn’t mean those are the ones they saw first. Ad rank is significant, and according to TTP, Google showed ads for anti-abortion organizations “higher up in the search results for lower-income women than it did for women of other income levels,” as shown below.

    In Miami, the first ad shown to an average- or lower-income Google user searching for \u2018Abortion clinic near me' is for a crisis pregnancy center. In Miami, the first ad shown to an average- or lower-income Google user searching for ‘Abortion clinic near me’ is for a crisis pregnancy center.(Photo: Tech Transparency Project)

    In Miami, the first three ads shown to a moderately high-income Google user searching for \u2018Abortion clinic near me' are for abortion providers. In Miami, the first three ads shown to a moderately high-income Google user searching for ‘Abortion clinic near me’ are for abortion providers.(Photo: Tech Transparency Project)

    In Miami, the first ad shown to a high-income Google user searching for \u2018Abortion clinic near me' is for an abortion provider. In Miami, the first ad shown to a high-income Google user searching for ‘Abortion clinic near me’ is for an abortion provider.(Photo: Tech Transparency Project)

    The search terms used are also important. Several queries in TTP’s experiment yielded only crisis pregnancy center ads for lower-income women.

    “Although companies buying ads with Google can selectively target the groups they want to reach–including by income–Paul adds that many users won’t be aware they are being targeted by Google in this way,” The Guardian reported.

    “Google has a large share of influence, particularly in the United States when people are trying to search for authoritative information,” Paul explained. “People generally tend to consider Google’s search engine as an equalizer. They think the results they get are the results that everyone’s going to get. But that’s just not the case.”

    “Lower-income women are being targeted,” she said, “and they’re the ones that are going to suffer the most under these policies.”

    As TTP pointed out: “Google is helping these centers reach their intended audience. Abortion rights groups and academic studies have noted that crisis pregnancy centers typically target women of lower socioeconomic classes, in part by advertising free services on public transportation and in bus shelters.”

    Crisis pregnancy centers have sought to expand their reach since the U.S. Supreme Court’s far-right majority overturned Roe v. Wade last summer.

    These facilities have “been known to employ a number of shady tactics to convince women seeking an abortion to keep their pregnancies,” The Guardian noted. “Those include posing as abortion clinics online though they do not offer abortion care, refusing pregnancy tests for women who say they intend to have an abortion, and touting widely disputed research about abortion care to patients. Crisis centers, which go largely unregulated despite offering medical services, have been known to target low-income women precisely because they find it harder to travel out of state for abortion care.”

    Previous reports have shown that Google is increasingly aiding these anti-abortion organizations, particularly in the GOP-led states that eliminated reproductive freedom as soon as the constitutional right to abortion was revoked.

    TTP’s new findings “add to growing questions about Google’s handling of crisis pregnancy centers,” the group wrote. “Bloomberg News has reported that Google Maps routinely misdirected users searching for abortion clinics to crisis pregnancy centers and that Google often failed to affix a warning, as promised, to crisis pregnancy center ads indicating they do not provide abortions. (In response to the first report, Google pledged to clearly label U.S. facilities that provide abortions in Google Maps and search results.)”

    “Last fall, TTP also found that Google frequently served ads for crisis pregnancy centers that falsely suggest they offer abortions, violating the platform’s policy against advertising that misleads users,” the group noted.

    During its new investigation, “TTP found similar omissions in multiple ads.”

    This post was originally published on Common Dreams.

  • In response to Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis’s (R) actions to limit the teaching of Black history in the state’s public schools, Chicago-based publisher Haymarket Books is offering multiple e-books by progressive Black authors for students to download free of charge. The company’s move comes as DeSantis’s Florida Department of Education (FDOE) recently blocked African American history courses…

    Source

  • We host a roundtable with three leading Black scholars about the College Board’s decision to revise its curriculum for an Advanced Placement course in African American studies after criticism from Republicans like Florida Governor Ron DeSantis. The revised curriculum removes Black Lives Matter, slavery reparations and queer theory as required topics, while it adds a section on Black conservatism.

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.