Category: Global

  • Israel is threatening to open new military fronts in the region, particularly against Iran and Lebanon, amid political and media escalation led by Benjamin Netanyahu’s government. However, Israeli estimates indicate that any major military move will be postponed until after Netanyahu’s upcoming meeting with US President Donald Trump in Florida at the end of December.

    Hebrew media outlets are dominated by reports and analyses discussing preparations for a possible attack on Iran, as well as the possibility of expanding military operations in Lebanon, at a time when pressure is mounting within the Israeli government to resume the war on the Gaza Strip, despite indications that the US administration wishes to move towards ending this issue.

    Since October 2023, Israel, with US support, has waged a widespread genocide on the Gaza Strip, resulting in tens of thousands of Palestinian deaths and injuries, before reaching a ceasefire agreement that came into effect last October. However, continued Israeli violations have led to hundreds of casualties since then.

    Winds of regional escalation thanks to Netanyahu

    Israeli military analysts have described the current phase as showing clear signs of imminent regional escalation, considering that statements by army leaders reflect a readiness for a long-term confrontation, led by the confrontation with Iran, which Tel Aviv considers to be the main axis of conflict.

    These assessments come amid escalating tensions between Israel and Iran, against a backdrop of mutual accusations and indirect operations, in addition to the limited war that broke out between the two sides in the middle of this year and lasted for about 12 days, before a US-brokered ceasefire was announced.

    Israeli reports indicate that the issues of Gaza, Lebanon, Syria and Iran will feature prominently on the agenda of the meeting between Netanyahu and Trump, amid differing views between the two sides, with Tel Aviv seeing the need to resume military pressure on various fronts, while Washington tends to contain the escalation, especially in the Gaza Strip.

    US and Israeli calculations

    According to Israeli estimates, Trump is focused on ending the Gaza issue and preventing the collapse of existing understandings, refusing to give far-right ministers in Netanyahu’s government leeway to disrupt this process. In return, Israel is looking to obtain US support or a green light for any potential military action against Iran.

    In Syria, Israel continues its military operations despite the absence of a direct threat from Damascus, taking advantage of the post-regime collapse phase, while indirect talks are underway to reach new security arrangements amid Israel’s continued occupation of additional Syrian territories.

    In Lebanon, Israeli estimates predict the continuation of limited military operations in the south, with the level of escalation kept under control, despite daily violations of the ceasefire agreement and the continued Israeli occupation of several locations within Lebanese territory.

    Iran at the forefront

    According to Israeli analysts, Iran remains the most sensitive issue, as Tel Aviv seeks to prevent Tehran from regaining its military capabilities, especially in the field of ballistic missiles and air defences. Estimates indicate that Israel has set what it describes as a ‘red line,’ but is waiting for explicit US approval before launching any new attack.

    Observers believe that any Israeli military action against Iran will be conditional on concessions or understandings on the issues of Gaza, Lebanon and Syria, as part of a comprehensive approach to redrawing the balance of power in the region.

    Given these circumstances, Israeli analysts are wondering not whether a new confrontation will take place, but when, amid a regional landscape open to the possibility of gradual escalation in the coming period.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Alaa Shamali

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • The Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Observatory has warned of serious humanitarian repercussions with the onset of winter in the Gaza Strip, asserting that Israel is turning harsh weather conditions into an additional tool for killing civilians by continuing to prevent the entry of temporary housing and basic shelter materials.

    Gaza in further crisis due to Israel

    The Observatory explained that Gaza is facing an imminent disaster that could include the collapse of hundreds of homes damaged by bombing on top of their inhabitants, in the absence of any safe or habitable housing alternatives, noting that the weather changes accompanying winter greatly increase the likelihood of structural collapse of cracked buildings.

    It pointed out that civilians in Gaza are being forced into harsh choices, either to remain in homes threatened with collapse or to resort to tents that lack the most basic protection from the cold and rain, considering that the Israeli blockade is being used as an executive tool in the ongoing crime of genocide, by creating deadly living conditions.

    The Observatory emphasised that Israel’s ‘denial of shelter’ policy pursued by Israel aims to destroy the residential environment in the Strip and deprive the population of their right to safe housing, stressing that this pattern of violations represents a strategic and systematic tactic to bring about long-term forced displacement by erasing the basic necessities of life and pushing the population to leave.

    The Observatory called on the international community to exert urgent and effective pressure on Israel to lift the ban on the entry of temporary housing into Gaza, stressing that under no pretext should basic humanitarian needs be subject to security requirements or political bargaining.

    The UN Special Rapporteur on adequate housing also called for an official and urgent appeal to the Israeli authorities to end this ban, warning that continuing to prevent the entry of temporary housing and shelter supplies in winter conditions could amount to the deliberate killing of civilians.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Alaa Shamali

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Earlier today, we reported that the US Justice Department appeared to have accidentally released a new set of Epstein Files before revoking access. The suspicion is these files were not meant to be released yet, as they lacked the extreme (and likely illegal) redactions of the earlier releases. As reviewers managed to download all the files before losing access, however, they’ve been able to trawl through what’s there. In the process, they’ve discovered in the Epstein files the following about Donald Trump:

    Unredacted on Epstein – Trump

    The file in question is available here. What you’re reading is an FBI report covering a tip from a limousine driver who reportedly heard Trump talking about a man named “Jeffrey” abusing “some girl”. The limousine driver said Trump was saying things which were so sickening he considered pulling over to beat him up.

    The report additionally details an accusation from a woman who claimed Trump and Epstein raped her. The woman said she wouldn’t call the police as “they will kill me”. The woman was later found with her head “blown off”. Reportedly, officers at the scene said ‘there was no way it was a suicide’, although a coroner would later deem it to be self-inflicted.

    This isn’t the only startling release either.

    Another document is a letter from Jeffrey Epstein to Larry Nassar. Nassar is the disgraced gymnastics doctor who was accused of abuse by 139 women. The letter is postmarked “just days after Epstein died”, according to Meidas Touch, and reads like a suicide note:

    Dear L. N.

    As you know by now, I have taken the “short route” home. Good luck! We shared one thing . . . our love & caring for young ladies at the hope they’d reach their full potential.

    Our president shares our love of young, nubile girls. When a young beauty walked by he loved to “grab snatch,” whereas we ended up snatching grub in the mess halls of the system.

    Life is unfair.

    Yours
    J. Epstein

    People have urged caution over the above letter – especially as it seemingly confirms the narrative that Epstein killed himself:

    Trump’s Department of Justice has made efforts to protect his reputation since the files came out:

    Featured image via US Justice Department

    By Willem Moore

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Last week, Nicki Minaj was a surprise guest at the Turning Point USA Conference:

    While people are of course free to associate with whatever political movement they like, Turning Point founder Charlie Kirk didn’t seem to agree that they should be:

    Turning Point for Nicki Minaj?

    The following is a video of Nicki Minaj with widow Erika Kirk:

    Here’s another video in which Minaj accidentally referred to JD Vance as an ‘assassin’:

    This was awkward because some people on the right think Erika Kirk was involved in her husband’s murder. While we’ve seen no evidence to support that, she’s certainly not very traditional when it comes to grieving:

    So, why has Minaj pivoted?

    The theory is she wants a pardon for her brother:

    And her husband:

    Potentially she plans on committing some crimes of her own too.

    There’s good reason to suspect Nicki Minaj is being cynical anyway. This is what she posted in July this year (emphasis added):

    Desirat were you out marching with your fellow Mexican immigrants????? Oh, right…you were pardoned by President Trump so you kinda can’t, right? I mean it kind of implies you guys are cool with him while yall seem to pretend to be against him.

    Or are yall not his friend either anymore just like Diddy? I mean if someone pardoned me we’d be friends for life.

    Clearly, this woman has got pardons on the mind.

    Kirkified

    Regardless of whether Nicki Minaj is genuine or not, we do know what the late Charlie Kirk would think:

    Is Charlie Kirk spinning in his grave right now?

    If he is, have his former colleagues hooked him up to a wind turbine to generate Patriot brand electricity?

    And would that be the most cynical thing they’ve done this week?

    Regardless of what Minaj is or isn’t up to, we know how her (former) fans are taking it:

    Featured image via DRM News

     

     

    By Willem Moore

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • As we reported, the US Justice Department has been releasing redacted Epstein Files in what seems to be a clear violation of the law.

    Now, it seems like they’ve accidentally released files early, and with redactions yet to be finalised:

    Accidental transparency?

    The recently passed Epstein Files Transparency Act demanded that the government release all available materials. While the law allowed for redactions to protect victims, it did not allow for redactions to help Epstein’s associates and co-conspirators avoid embarrassment.

    Despite this, emails like the following clearly black out the names of individuals that Epstein was seemingly conspiring with:

    As reported by the BBC, Jean-Luc Brunel was a:

    French modelling agent and close associate of the late US financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

    Like Epstein, he was hanged to death in a prison cell — supposedly by his own hand. Brunel was accused of raping and trafficking minors.

    Coffeezilla (Stephen Findeisen) also reported on the latest release here, noting that we don’t understand the full picture yet:

     

    In the video above, Findeisen says:

    The FBI just accidentally released 11,000 Jeffrey Epstein files that they hadn’t publicly put out yet, but we got access to them. And at the end of this video, I’m going to show you how to access them.

    As he goes on to say, you can view the files yourself here.

    The files make it clear that the FBI was investigating other billionaires linked to Epstein, even though there has been some effort to obscure this fact:

    There are also reports that it’s possible to un-redact certain documents, again suggesting the Trump administration has orchestrated the sloppiest cover-up of all time:

    Meanwhile, commentators have continued to note Epstein had significant links with high-up Israeli politicians:

    Featured image via US Justice Department

    By Willem Moore

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Earlier this year, Elon Musk joined the Trump administration as the leader of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Known as Elon Musk DOGE, the plan was to save the American public trillions by cutting unnecessary spending. While it was obviously an absolute mess from start to finish, the depths of Musk’s failures are becoming more obvious over time:

    DOGE

    As you can see above, the US’s national debt spiked this year — almost as if Musk achieved absolutely nothing.

    So why did DOGE fail? Many questioned if Elon Musk DOGE could succeed given the circumstances.

    Could it be because Musk spends all day every day tweeting, despite his claims to be a legendary grafter?

    Or was it because the right-wing ethos of endlessly cutting services is long past having any ability to produce results?

    Here’s what one of the young men Musk employed to do DOGE cuts said:

    I personally was pretty surprised, actually, at how efficient the government was. This isn’t to say that it can’t be made more efficient — elimination of paper, elimination of faxing — but these aren’t necessarily fraud, waste and abuse.

    DOGE fired the guy for making these comments. This was despite Musk’s promise to be “maximally transparent” about DOGE’s activities. Yet, the Elon Musk DOGE episode continues to spark discussions.

    Reform

    So DOGE was a failure, and everyone knows that.

    Or do they?

    Because Reform UK are still flogging this dead horse:

    This gives us an idea for a slogan they can use:

    Reform UK: Delivering Yesterday’s Failures Tomorrow

    We’ve covered Reform’s dodgy DOGEing before, with Joe Glenton reporting the following in December:

    Bullshitters-in-chief Reform UK claim to have made £1.7 million in savings for Lancashire County Council. The problem is the savings are for the year before their Benny Hill Brigade councilors actually took over. Incredible work once again, lads.

    We’ve also reported on the fact that far from saving money, many of these new Reform politicians are actually asking for higher reimbursements:

    On 19 September, we covered the Reform mayor who wanted an ‘eye-watering’ budget bump to tackle ‘non-mayoral concerns’. The latest instance of reverse-cuts is the leader of Durham County Council arguing that councillors should be paid more.

    While we agreed that councillors should be paid more, it’s frankly astonishing that Reform think they’re in a position to make this argument given their electoral position of cutting services to the bone.

    Reform councils have also *DRUM ROLL* raised taxes:

    You’ll note Reform are pursuing the worst of all worlds here, with higher taxes and diminished services. It’s a uniquely ridiculous strategy, and one which is fully deserving of the ‘DOGE’ moniker. Interestingly, the saga of Elon Musk DOGE is often referenced in these discussions.

    Featured image via Independent

    By Willem Moore

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Since his public loss to Chase DeMoor, Andrew Tate has been tweeting non-stop to convince people that losing is cool, actually.

    Now, in a post-fight analysis, Andrew Tate’s explained what happened:

    In other words, he was physically weaker than his opponent, and that led to Andrew Tate’s crushing defeat.

    Was anyone actually confused about this?

    Corn cobbing

    In the video above, Tate explains that it’s getting back up again that makes him the ‘Top G’. Previously, Andrew Tate said this:

    Okay, loser.

    He said this too:

    Clearly didn’t want it enough.

    And this:

    We get it, pal…by your own metrics, you’re not a winner.

    Since coming out as a loser, Tate has been tweeting NON-STOP in an effort to convince the world that middle-aged men who publicly get the shit kicked out of them are the real winners:

    Andrew Tate’s also been retweeting flowery stuff like this from his fellow fantasists:

    He did lose something, though — he lost the fight.

    The term for what Tate is doing is ‘corn cobbing’, in reference to the following meme:

    The Loser club

    Many of Tate’s dick riders have been asking the following:

    There’s a very simple answer to this, and it’s that Andrew Tate isn’t famous for being a professional boxer; he’s famous for being an alleged rapist / human trafficker who mouths off about how he’s the pinnacle of human perfection.

    Oh, and lest we forget, for saying things like:

    What do you call someone who loses?

    A loser.

    Featured image via X

    By Willem Moore

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • On 22 December, we reported that the head of CBS news, Bari Weiss, chose not to release a documentary critical of Donald Trump and his administration. Now, that same documentary has been leaked:

    Trump TV

    First, we should explain who owns CBS, and why everyone thinks they’re motivated to protect Trump.

    The guy at the top is Larry Ellison, who rose to fame and wealth as the head of Oracle. Oracle recently made a major push into AI, and is currently experiencing the bubble-like effects that all the other AI companies are:

     

    If you’re reading in the UK, you may be aware that Ellison is a big backer of Tony Blair and Digital ID:

    Ellison is also one of the people taking over TikTok in the US:

    It’s additionally involved in the day-to-day running of government when it comes to data:

    As if Ellison and his family didn’t have enough companies and influence, they also own Paramount, which itself owns CBS:

    The person they chose to head CBS is Bari Weiss — a Zionist opinion writer known for having universally bad opinions:

    When Weiss wrote the above, her point was that she isn’t a right-wing authoritarian, actually — the issue is people online say everyone is ‘fascist’. As the tweet above notes, how’s that looking now?

    You can quibble over whether Trump’s administration is technically ‘fascist’ or not, but it’s certainly operating outside the law with the backing of wealthy interests — interests who seemingly employed Weiss to do their bidding.

    Oh, and there’s worse too:

    Leaked

    As we covered yesterday, those involved in the documentary were immediately critical of Weiss’s decision to spike it:

    While the documentary has now leaked, the Ellisons seems to be leveraging their influence to block it:

    You can make up your own mind on whether it should have been spiked by watching it here:

    Featured image via CBS

    By Willem Moore

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Photograph Source: Blaise-Pascal MUHEKA – CC0

    In recent years, more people around the world have begun to encounter images of Congo’s suffering on their phones: a child emerging from a cobalt mine, a collapsed tunnel, families fleeing violence. Viral clips of displaced communities and reports of mass killings circulate across our screens. Yet even as this visibility grows, what remains almost entirely invisible is the full scale of the crisis and the direct connection between that violence and the very devices through which we witness it.

    Congo’s devastation is not a local failure, but the logical outcome of a global economic system that profits from extraction, militarization, and silence. The world may be watching Congo more than before, but it still refuses to see itself in the story.

    The Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), located at the heart of Africa, is the continent’s second-largest country and among the richest in natural resources. Yet for decades its people have endured relentless violence, mass displacement, poverty, and environmental devastation. Since colonial rule, Congo’s mineral wealth has been systematically exploited by foreign powers and corporate interests, with independence reshaping—but never dismantling—these extractive structures. Today’s crisis is therefore the continuation of a long history of plunder. Resource extraction for global markets remains a central driver of instability, drawing local, regional, and international actors into competition over control. More than 100 armed groups now operate in eastern Congo, many financed through illegal mineral trade, turning the country’s immense wealth into a weapon against its own people.

    The current crisis

    The contradiction between technological progress and human devastation is not incidental. It defines the present crisis in the DRC. Currently, the DRC provides the world with many natural resources, such as copper, cobalt, coltan, lithium, gold, and diamonds, many of which are used in electronics, electric vehicles, batteries, and green-energy technologies. AI data centers are increasing demand for cobalt and other minerals even more. Controlling these resources is therefore crucial: the DRC holds 70% of the world’s coltan reserves and over 50% of cobalt, meaning whoever dominates Congo dominates the future of technology.

    Rather than delivering prosperity, Congo’s extraordinary mineral wealth has produced a “resource curse.” Competition for coltan, cobalt, gold, and diamonds drives violent conflict, forcing miners, often children, into brutal, unsafe conditions while forests are cleared and rivers contaminated in the scramble for profit. In November 2025, dozens were killed when a bridge at a mine collapsed, a tragedy that illustrates how extraction proceeds with total disregard for human life. Because the richest deposits lie in the eastern provinces, these territories have become the epicentre of militarization, where armed groups, militias, and even state forces battle for control while communities are displaced and terrorized.

    The environmental destruction deepens the crisis: forests are cleared to reach mineral deposits, mining releases vast amounts of carbon and nitrogen dioxide, and toxic mining waste poisons rivers and lakes, wiping out agriculture and fishing, the very means by which people survive.

    The humanitarian consequences are catastrophic. By 2025, there are over 6.9 million people internally displaced, the highest number in Africa, 1.2 million refugees in neighbouring countries, and 28 million people suffering from malnutrition. Furthermore, more than 3 million people in eastern Congo are in the emergency phase of hunger. Children as young as five work in dangerous artisanal mines, digging by hand, inhaling toxic dust and risking suffocation or burial in tunnel collapses. Conflict-related sexual violence affects thousands, with almost 40% of sexual violence survivors being children. Armed groups are committing gang rapes, abductions, attacks on hospitals, and unlawful detentions, abuses that may constitute war crimes. This is not simply a story of conflict happening near minerals; it is a system in which minerals fund the conflict, and conflict makes the minerals easier to steal.

    Global Complicity

    To understand why this violence persists, it is necessary to look beyond Congo’s borders. What unfolds in the DRC is not merely a local or regional conflict, but a transnational project sustained by states, corporations, and markets far beyond its borders.

    Regional Involvement: Neighbouring countries remain central players in the ongoing conflict in eastern DRC, driving both strategic military interventions and illegal resource extraction. According to a 2025 report from UN experts, Rwanda exerts “de facto direction and effective control” over the armed group M23. The recruits are trained under Rwandan supervision and supported by high-tech Rwandan weaponry, rendering the Rwandan state liable for the group’s actions, including territorial seizure and mineral looting. Interestingly, Rwanda is often presented as the supplier of minerals while having very few reserves of its own. Many reports show that minerals, especially coltan and other critical resources, are frequently smuggled into Rwanda, laundered into upstream supply chains, and re-exported as “Rwandan” origin.

    Moreover, Uganda has leveraged cross-border smuggling networks to profit from gold and other minerals, often entwined with militia trafficking routes. UN experts state Uganda has also supplied weapons, hosted rebel leaders and allowed cross-border movements of M23 fighters. Moreover, the Ugandan-led Allied Democratic Forces, killed at least 40 people, most of them hacked to death, at a funeral ceremony in September. This is just a small sample of what has recently been documented.

    Burundi is involved in a similar way. A UN report demonstrates that gold was also being smuggled from the DRC to Burundi. Moreover, the Burundi National Defense Force was also deployed into the DRC even though it was denied by the DRC military headquarters. A different UN report also warned that Burundi’s military was involved with the Congolese army fighting against the M23 and Rwandan soldiers, exacerbating regional tensions.

    Rwanda, Uganda, and Burundi have all turned Congo’s minerals into cash, and in doing so, turned its borders into corridors of violence.

    Israel and the diamond industry: external actors beyond Africa also profit from Congolese exploitation. Israel has one of the largest diamond industries in the world, despite having no domestic reserves. Its polishing sector relies heavily on rough diamonds from African countries like the DRC. The profits of the extraction of these diamonds directly enable the occupation and genocide in Palestine since they finance for example drones, bomb and spyware used on Palestinians. In this sense, the profits from Congolese resources become entangled in wider structures of occupation and repression.

    Israeli-linked businessmen have played a significant role in this sector, most notably Dan Gertler, who secured extensive mining and diamond concessions in the DRC through what U.S. sanctions describe as “hundreds of millions of dollars” in corruption and political bribery, depriving the Congolese state of over $1.36 billion in public revenue. Israel’s longstanding reliance on African rough diamonds and its economic partnerships, especially through the UAE which is now the world’s largest rough-diamond trading hub, create financial links between the exploitation of the Congo and the occupation of Palestine. Moreover, what appear to be Israeli-made arms have been found among multiple armed groups in the DRC.

    Western complicity: Western governments and international financial institutions like the IMF and World Bank also sustain structures that enable resource exploitation. Through trade deals, investment guarantees, security cooperation, and aid packages, they stabilize extractive regimes. Trade deals and arms sales concentrate wealth in the Global North while distributing death in the Global South. Policies framed as “good governance” often become neoliberal reforms, dismantling public services and opening local markets to foreign extraction.

    Moreover, the EU has a mineral deal with Rwanda, and are therefore knowingly allowing Rwanda and the M23 to benefit from illegally exploiting minerals in the DRC. The EU and its member states also sell arms to Rwanda, which may end up aiding Rwanda’s military operations in the Congo making the EU complicit.

    The U.S.-brokered “peace deal” in June 2025 between DRC and Rwanda is a mineral deal first, and a possible opportunity for peace second. Again, prioritizing profit over the lives of millions of Congolese.

    Multinational corporations: local and regional armed groups would not operate in the DRC without access to international markets. Multinational corporations and global markets supply goods and services, provide market outlets, pay taxes, licensing fees, and “protection” payments providing rebels and warlords with the money to sustain the violence. Corporations have treated militia-held territories as de facto sovereign states, using local commanders as conduits for illicit trade, undermining Congolese sovereignty while strengthening the rebels’ grip on territory.

    Global Witness reports that European commodities trader Traxys purchased hundreds of tonnes of coltan in 2024 traced to conflict-controlled mines in eastern Congo, funneled through Rwanda’s smuggling networks. These corporate arrangements, contracts, deals, logistical support, and export channels, serve to finance and entrench the very actors driving violence. Because so many companies operate in the DRC, embedded in vast and deliberately opaque global supply chains, it is nearly impossible to map every link in the chain. Yet the effect is unmistakable: corporations make war profitable while hiding behind opacity, providing the capital, markets, and infrastructure that allow armed groups to continue extracting, killing, and ruling.

    End consumers: at the final end of this global chain sit millions of consumers whose everyday purchases link them, however inadvertently, to Congolese suffering. Smartphones, laptops, electric vehicles, solar panels, and aerospace technologies all rely on cobalt, coltan, tin, and gold, minerals extracted in eastern Congo under conditions of extreme violence. These consumers, often unaware of the origins of raw materials, become participants in a system where human rights abuses, environmental degradation, forced labour, and mass violence are embedded in globalized supply chains.

    When society celebrates the latest tech innovations or clean-energy breakthroughs, it often overlooks the grim reality behind the materials that make them possible. Unless there is serious demand for transparency, ethical sourcing, and supply-chain accountability, consumption in the Global North will continue to perpetuate and profit from the suffering of communities in the Global South.

    Beyond Congo: A Global Pattern

    The Congo is not an isolated case. Every nation suffering extreme conflict or genocide possesses resources coveted by the Global North: Congo has cobalt and coltan, Gaza has offshore gas reserves, Sudan has gold and oil, West Papua has copper and crude oil. These conflicts are not isolated “ethnic” struggles, despite how Western media often likes to portray them. They are direct expressions structural violence of global capitalism, which constantly needs to expand, exploit, and destroy to maintain profit.

    The crises in the DRC, Sudan, and Palestine are therefore part of a shared global system, not separate tragedies. In all cases, the lives of people in the Global South are subordinated to the profitability of capital in the Global North. Borders, weapons, and sanctions function as tools that protect wealth while distributing death. Although the European Union and the United States present themselves as defenders of democracy and human rights, they remain deeply complicit in ongoing genocides and mass atrocities: financing authoritarian regimes, selling weapons, signing extractive contracts, and enforcing migration policies that punish the very victims of the violence they help produce. New regional powers, including Gulf states, operate as emerging imperialist powers, buying governments and militias to secure access to resources, while institutions like the IMF and World Bank impose neoliberal reforms and reinforce poverty and inequality. Together, these forces form a global machinery of domination that transforms the suffering of millions of people into the engine of capitalist accumulation.

    From Congo to Gaza, Sudan to West Papua, the same logic of resource-driven exploitation and violence prevails — a world order in which entire peoples are sacrificed so corporations and states can gorge on what lies beneath their land.

    The DRC’s crisis is thus not a distant tragedy but a central pillar of the modern global economy. The minerals extracted through violence, child labour, and ecological destruction power the technologies and green-energy transitions celebrated as progress in the Global North. This system did not end with colonialism; it evolved into a global network of states, corporations, and markets that continue to treat Congolese lives as expendable.

    And the cruellest irony is this: many of us will finish reading about Congo’s horrors on the very devices built from the minerals that sustain those horrors. We watch the suffering of Congolese people through screens powered by their exploitation.

    Until this contradiction is confronted, until people are placed before profit, nothing will change. Congo will remain the hidden foundation of a global system that calls itself progress, while millions continue to pay for that progress with their lives.

    The post Global Complicity: Who Kills in the Congo? appeared first on CounterPunch.org.


    This content originally appeared on CounterPunch.org and was authored by Laura Wittebroek.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Earlier this year, professional Israel supporter Bari Weiss became the head of CBS News. We know this wasn’t because of her journalistic talent or experience, which means it must have been her willingness to grovel before power. Now, everyone’s suspicions have been confirmed:

    Bari Weiss

    Weiss used to be a columnist at the New York Times, where she was known for being annoying and bad. It’s widely theorised she spent several months trying to get fired, but the New York Times had no bottom. The theory goes that Weiss wanted to use the sacking as a jumping off point to launch a career as a maligned free-thinker, and when she didn’t get that, she simply quit and acted like she’d been hounded out.

    This is from her resignation letter, which actually has its own menu option at the top of her site:

    My own forays into Wrongthink have made me the subject of constant bullying by colleagues who disagree with my views. They have called me a Nazi and a racist; I have learned to brush off comments about how I’m “writing about the Jews again.” Several colleagues perceived to be friendly with me were badgered by coworkers. My work and my character are openly demeaned on company-wide Slack channels where masthead editors regularly weigh in. There, some coworkers insist I need to be rooted out if this company is to be a truly “inclusive” one, while others post ax emojis next to my name. Still other New York Times employees publicly smear me as a liar and a bigot on Twitter with no fear that harassing me will be met with appropriate action. They never are.

    While it’s true colleagues shouldn’t mock one another’s opinions in most jobs, that obviously isn’t the case when you’re job is OPINIONIST. It’s especially not the case when you’re opinions are terrible:

    Weiss is the person who coined the term ‘Intellectual Dark Web’ by the way – a group which was inexplicably named after the part of the internet where all the child porn is:

    The Intellectual Dark Web incorporated some of the most laughable figures of the modern day, including Jordan Peterson, Joe Rogan, Ben Shapiro, Bret Weinstein, and Majid Nawaz.

    Summarising who Weiss is, Defector wrote:

    Weiss, an empty-suit nullity whose very raison d’être is to speak comfort to power, feels that her news organization cannot proceed with the story without the willing participation of its villains, even when those villains have ignored appeals for their perspective. As has been pointed out by Alfonsi—who was already reporting for CBS News when Weiss was an undergraduate, and who has been doing stories for 60 Minutes for a decade—this absurd position allows the most brazenly dishonest and media-hostile administration in living memory to dictate the boundaries of CBS News’s reporting.

    Spiked

    The documentary in question covers the plight of Venezuelan men that Trump deported to a maximum security prison in El Salvador. Correspondent Sharyn Alfonsi went straight for Weiss’s throat, as Yashar Ali reported:

    In the email — which was first reported on by the Wall Street Journal — Alfonsi compares the decision to spike the story to the Jeffrey Wigand scandal.

    Jeffrey Wigand was a tobacco industry whistleblower whose interview was initially withheld by CBS in the 1990s over legal concerns, a decision that severely damaged the network’s credibility and became one of the most infamous episodes in broadcast journalism.

    Alfonsi writes that Weiss declined to speak with her about the decision.

    She also says the move was political rather than editorial.

    “Our story was screened five times and cleared by both CBS attorneys and Standards and Practices,” Alfonsi wrote. “It is factually correct.”

    Bari Weiss attempted to justify her decision as follows:

    My job is to make sure that all stories we publish are the best they can be. Holding stories that aren’t ready for whatever reason — that they lack sufficient context, say, or that they are missing critical voices — happens every day in every newsroom. I look forward to airing this important piece when it’s ready.

    Since then, Weiss – a career reject who was parachuted into her position by wealthy interests – has chided those who spoke out, accusing them of not being proper journalists:

    I want to say something about trust: our trust for each other and our trust with the public.

    The only newsroom I’m interested in running is one in which we are able to have contentious disagreements about the thorniest editorial matters with respect, and, crucially, where we assume the best intent of our colleagues. Anything else is absolutely unacceptable.

    Weiss is confused because she thinks it’s the journalist’s job to launder the dirty secrets of their bosses, not to – you know – do journalism.

    In the same call, Weiss said:

    I held a 60 Minutes story because it was not ready. While the story presented powerful testimony of torture at CECOT, it did not advance the ball—the Times and other outlets have previously done similar work. The public knows that Venezuelans have been subjected to horrific treatment at this prison. To run a story on this subject two months later, we need to do more. And this is 60 Minutes.

    We need to be able to get the principals on the record and on camera. Our viewers come first. Not the listing schedule or anything else. That’s my north star and I hope it’s yours, too.

    So far, it seems like no one is buying that she pulled it for reasons of professionalism:

    In another email, Weiss stated that the documentary doesn’t sufficiently both-sides the story. You know – the story of Trump deporting Venezuelans to what you could arguably describe as an ‘El Salvadorian torture fortress’:

     

    The Epstein Continuum

    At the same time that Bari Weiss has been spiking credible journalism, she’s also been organising town hall debates featuring prominent associates of the dead paedophile Jeffrey Epstein. First up was Alan Dershowitz:

    If you don’t know who Alan Dershowitz is, that must be nice!

    Now This summed him up in the following video, but the TLDR is that he’s a lawyer who enthusiastically specialises in defending rapists:

    The next Epstein associate up to bat is Steven Pinker:

    Here’s a video of Pinker which came out in the latest release of the Epstein Files:

     

    Unwise Bari Weiss

    It’s hard to work out precisely what Bari Weiss thinks she’s doing, but it’s an absolute mess, we can tell you that much.

    While rich people can parachute stooges like Weiss in, the companies still have to make money. Nobody is tuning in to watch the ‘Epstein Pals Tedium Hour’, and instigating weekly mutinies is going to turn away watchers in droves.

    Given that Weiss keeps failing upwards, we’ve no doubt this catastrophe will only lead to greater positions of influence in the long run. In the meantime, sitback and enjoy her latest and greatest downfall.

    Featured image via Guardian

    By Willem Moore

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • A clip of FBI director Kash Patel has gone viral, and it’s easy to see why:

    Is this a genuine clip, though? And if it is, what’s the context?

    Israel first

    If you didn’t know, the American right has split into two camps over the past few months:

    • Make America Great Again (MAGA): The side which backs Trump no matter what (including his unlimited support of Israel).
    • America First: The side which wants to stop prioritising Israel over America’s own interests (as they perceive it).

    When you see comments like Kash’s above, it’s easy to see why the latter side is growing. America is supposed to be the most powerful country in the world, and the right are all about wielding that power for their own benefit. Of course they’d eventually become sick of politicians who talk like this:

    This was how Donald Trump spoke about his billionaire donor Miriam Adelson earlier this year when he visited the Israeli parliament:

    Back to Patel, the clip at the top is reportedly from October 2024:

    Here’s a transcript of what Patel said in the runup to the 2024 election which saw Trump restored to power (emphasis added):

    Donald Trump rescued 50 hostages and detainees. That’s more than every president performed combined. And I hope he wins on November 5th. And Aaron’s right.

    We need America to wake up and prioritize Israel.

    And that is not what Kamala Harris is about. We need to bring home Americans and end this war, bring home Israelis, and make sure we stand by our number one ally in Israel.

    And people need to wake up when it comes to November 5th.

    Donald Trump’s the only choice.

    While there’s more context, this would still rile up the ‘America First’ people. They’re serious when they say ‘America First’, and it’s going to be difficult for any politician to hold the American right together now there’s one side which defines itself by supporting Israel and another which defines itself by not supporting them:

    Kash Patel’s bad week

    Somewhat-misleading clips aside, it’s been a very bad week Patel in general, as the released Epstein Files seem to have proven he lied under oath:

    Not one to wallow in accountability, Patel did find time for himself:

    Here’s the podcast in question:

    We’ve not watched it, but we suspect he balances his work/life dynamic by not working very hard. While Patel is out there vibing, however, the FBI agents under him are working over time shepherding tipsy women:

    While we don’t particularly care for either side of the American right, it’s not hard to see why MAGA are losing. Donald Trump and his cronies are completely failing to make any impact at home, so of course their supporters would begin to question the endless support for Israel.

    Maybe it’s time that Kash Patel wakes up and prioritises his actual job.

    Featured image via APNews

    By Willem Moore

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • The latest AI trend had middle-aged men taking endless selfies with celebrities. But this trend might be dead now — as a result of this absolute atrocity of a video in which Jeffrey Epstein meets a series of perverts, freaks, and sex criminals:

    Slop

    The account el.cine is the primary perpetrator of this trend:

    The following video shows famous actors playing DragonBall characters in a live-action adaptation:

    el.cine also published the following video which they claim is an example of hose ‘useful’ AI is:

    Others have got in on the act too:

    In the video at the top, Jeffrey Epstein takes selfies with:

    • The cast of Stanley Kubrick’s Eyes Wide Shut (a film about sex cults).
    • Nikelodeon’s Dan Schneider (a producer who was accused by child actors of unsettling and potentially criminal behaviour).
    • The cast of The Wizard of Oz (presumably a reference to the mistreatment suffered by child actor Judy Garland).
    • Arthur Freed (a film producer accused of exposing himself to a child).
    • Bill Cosby (convicted of sex crimes which were later overturned, although there are other allegations outstanding).
    • Charlie Chaplin (married a teenager as a 54-year-old).
    • P Diddy (currently serving time for sexually related crimes).

    The video ends with Henry Kissinger and Benjamin Netanyahu holding Bill Gates on a dog lead.

    So yeah, either this video is going to kill the trend, or it’s a sign of much weirder content to come.

    While we don’t care at all that Epstein’s image is being abused, imagine if some goon created a video like this featuring one of your dead relatives.

    This technology is truly demonic…and I say that as a somewhat committed atheist.

    The problem with AI

    Slop like the above is created through generative AI tools which were trained on actual artists’ work — often without their consent. As if that wasn’t bad enough, it seems like this stuff is so expensive to run that no one is actually making any money off it:

    While companies profiting from art theft wouldn’t be good, it would at least be understandable.

    What’s happening instead is that hundreds of billions of dollars are being pumped into the bullshit machine to artificially inflate the stock market. AI technology is energy and water intensive too, at a time when we should be doing everything in our power to clean up the planet.

    And all to generate videos of Jeffrey Epstein smoking weed with Spongebob Squarepants in hell.

    Featured image via icantevenproduction

    By Willem Moore

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Erika Kirk is the widow of Charlie Kirk, the right-wing activist who was murdered in September this year. Having taken over his position as the head of Turning Point USA, she spoke at their conference this week.

    Founded by Charlie Kirk in 2012, Turning Point USA is a non-profit organisation which seeks to – in its own words – “identify, educate, train and organize students“. Others consider it to be an astroturfed pipeline to the right which is financed by wealthy donors and run by conniving con men. That’s why the following Freudian slip from Erika Kirk was so interesting:

    Here’s what she said (emphasis added):

    Despite the devastating loss of Charlie Kirk, my incredible husband at UVU, Caleb has persisted with the same grift, excuse me, gift, grit. It has been a long day. Trust me, you’re not a grifter, honey. It’s all good.

    The only word that appears to have come easily was ‘grift’, which we think speaks volumes, especially given her panic to try and repair her ‘error’.

    Erika Kirk: keeping it in the family

    Speaking to the idea that the late Charlie Kirk was a grifter, the Medium essayist Fazer Domino wrote:

    They sold you a legend: the unshakeable mind, the campus conqueror, the “titan of debate.”

    But legends are for bedtime. In daylight, the truth is simpler:

    Charlie Kirk wasn’t a titan. He was a grifter.

    Here’s the hustle: stage a confrontation, force a false binary, drown the room in buzzwords, clip 60 seconds, upload “DESTROYED” in all caps, and sell the feeling of victory to people who don’t care if it was real.

    That’s not debate. That’s content manufacturing.

    No one “wins” these spectacles. One side posts WE CRUSHED THEM, the other posts NO, WE DID. The scoreboard isn’t logic. It’s views.

    Increasingly, people think Charlie wasn’t the only grifter in the family:

     

    The below is a paraphrase rather than a direct quote, but it does summarise how people think Erika Kirk is using her ‘grief’ to launder the reputation of her political allies:

    At the Turning Point conference, Erika Kirk also announced her support for JD Vance becoming president in 2028:

    This was her with Vance a mere month after an assassin gunned down her husband:

    Oh, and there was another Freudian slip at the event by the way – this one involving Nicki Minaj and JD Vance:

    Some conspiracists literally think that Erika Kirk was involved in her husband’s murder by the way, so yucking it up like this isn’t going to help dismiss that. Most of these conspiracists are on the right, by the way, although less extreme right-wingers like Tim Dillon are also taking issue with her performance:

    We will say this about Erika Kirk; she’s been a real ‘gift’ to people who want to criticise Turning Point USA.

    Featured image via Sky

    By Maddison Wheeldon

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Ihab Abu Jazar was not just the coach who led the Palestinian national team in the Arab Cup, he was the story of Gaza walking on the front line, its voice reaching from the tents to the brightly lit stadiums in Qatar.

    Ihab Abu Jazar: Gaza’s son

    A son of Gaza who lived its daily reality, leaving behind family who remain there amid a war that has lasted two years and endless suffering, he carried the banner of Palestine and Gaza together before the eyes of the world.

    Ihab did not come out of nowhere. He is a son of the place, knows its pain well, and remembers the names of its streets and the faces of its people. Therefore, his mission was not only coaching, but also humanitarian and national. He entered the tournament knowing that every match was a message, and every minute of play was a space of hope for a people exhausted by war and deprivation.

    During all the national team’s training sessions and matches, Abu Jazar motivated his players with words that came from the heart: ‘You are not playing only for yourselves. There are people waiting for us in Gaza, in tents, under bombardment and in the cold.’ He linked the sweat on the pitch with the pain in the besieged streets to create a different, sincere motivation that cannot be taught in training manuals.

    The scene that summed up the story and brought millions to tears was the image of his mother watching him from inside a tent in Gaza. A mother watching her son lead his country’s national team, while living the harshest of lives. An image that bridged the distance between Gaza and Qatar and made the world see football through different eyes: a game that gives life, even if only for a few moments.

    Rising above suffering

    In Gaza, despite the pain, people rose above their suffering. They gathered around screens, followed their team’s matches, cheered for the players, and found rare moments of joy in every victory or honourable performance. The Palestinian national team, led by Ihab Abu Jazar, not only achieved sporting results, but also gave its people doses of happiness and restored their sense of presence, visibility and audibility.

    This is how Ihab Abu Jazar became an icon. Not only because he is a successful coach, but because he carried Gaza in his voice, in his gaze, and in every step he took on the bench. He raised its flag high and made the Arab Cup a platform to remind us that behind the numbers and results, there are people, stories, and a coach named Ihab Abu Jazar who left Gaza but left his heart there.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Alaa Shamali

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • This Hanukkah, colonial Zionist settlers from the Nachala movement broke through the Gaza border, and raised the ‘Israeli’ occupation flags. They said the move was a symbolic first step towards establishing a settlement in Gaza.

    Nachala movement settlers calling for reestablishment of Jewish settlements in Gaza

    The two groups of illegal settlers who broke through the barrier into Gaza, were from the Nachala settler movement. They raised Israeli flags near two former illegal Jewish settlements, and called for the reestablishment of Jewish communities in the enclave.

    In 2005, all 21 settlements in Gaza were dismantled and, within a week, the Israeli occupation forces and roughly 8000 illegal settlers were removed from the Strip. This ended a 38 year continuous military presence in the enclave. The ‘Israeli’ government offered compensation to settlers once they left Gaza. Once the settlements were evacuated, they were demolished, and all military installations were removed.

    The Israeli occupation’s unilateral Disengagement Plan, was mainly due to security challenges, economic costs, and international pressure. It involved no peace negotiations with the Palestinians, and was instead intended to “freeze the peace process” indefinitely. It also allowed Israel to consolidate its hold on larger, strategically important settlement blocs in the West Bank.

    Aim is to settle two million Jews in occupied Palestine

    The Nachala movement’s objective is to prevent the establishment of a Palestinian state, by building new Jewish settlements in both Gaza and the West Bank. It says it aims to encourage and help the Israeli occupation government with its pledge to settle two million Jews in the occupied territory.

    Far-right Daniela Weiss, who is sanctioned by the UK, is co-founder and chairwoman of the Nachala organisation. At a rally on the Gaza border, Weiss told supporters the flag-raising would mark the “beginning of a new era-  an era in which we return to Gaza.”

    She said “Not Indonesians, not Turks, not Egyptians, not any country – only the people of Israel will rule in Gaza”.

    At the same time, Bezalel Smotrich, colonial terrorist and finance minister, has approved a plan for a huge new settlement. He posted on X ‘Israel’ will establish a new colonial city of “tens of thousands of housing units”, in occupied East Jerusalem.

    Smotrich claimed:

    This is another step in promoting de facto sovereignty in the area, and stopping the idea of establishing an Arab state (in the West Bank).

    Resettlement of Gaza and settlement building in occupied West Bank and East Jerusalem illegal under international law

    This plan is a dangerous escalation in the settlement and annexation project, and will continue the Judaisation of Jerusalem. This means establishing Jerusalem as a predominantly Jewish capital, at the expense of Palestinian identity.

    Calls to resettle Gaza and built yet more settlements, are not only about stealing Palestinian land. They are also about ethnically cleansing the Palestinian population. They stand in direct violation of international law and highlight the urgent need to hold the occupation to account. 

    Featured image and additional images via the Canary

    By Charlie Jaay

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Five weeks after being interviewed by the BBC, Israeli anti-Zionist lawyer Ben Marmarelli says he has been told the “public service broadcaster” will not be using any part of the interview.

    BBC claim Marmarelli’s interview not used due to “reasons of duration”. The real reason is censorship.

    Marmarelli is an outspoken critic of the Israeli occupation’s rape and torture of Palestinian political prisoners. The BBC were running a story about Palestinian prisoner abuse, and although they had testimonies from two Palestinian former prisoners they also wanted to speak with Marmarelli, so filmed an interview with him.

    The BBC have now told Marmarelli they did not have enough time to use any of his interview, without forfeiting some of the testimony from the Palestinians. This is obviously not true. The BBC would not waste time with interviews if they did not intend to use them. They would also take timing into account while filming, and would be unlikely to make errors in this area:

    I can’t believe it. But my main concern was that they would present a false image of what I said. I don’t trust the BBC, and I know they will edit any voice that’s for Palestine. That’s why I secretly recorded our interview.

    The Canary is publishing the interview in full:

    Marmarelli: “Western media is very much afraid of the Zionists”

    In a recent interview with the Canary, Marmarelli described the systematic abuse of Palestinian political prisoners by the Israeli regime, and the threats faced by himself for speaking out. After posting a viral video on social media describing this abuse, in November, he had a string of interviews with public broadcasters and leading newspapers in France, the Netherlands, Italy, and the UK. More than a month later they are telling him they are still working on the interview, still editing.

    Marmarelli says:

    And the British cut my interview off completely! We can see how the Western media is very much afraid of the Zionists, and scared of publishing anything that wont be seen favourably by them. The Zionists have teams of lawyers, and lobby groups everywhere around the world, including the UK. They will attack the BBC on every story that is remotely not in favour of Israel, and will say the BBC is antisemitic.

    In contrast to Western  media, Turkey’s Anadolu Ajansı, and Doha’s Al Jazeera, published their interview with Marmarelli almost immediately, so he knows this is a deliberate act of political censorship. Western media function as an extension of state power, protecting Israel from accountability while silencing those who expose its crimes. In his view, the refusal to publish his testimony reflects the deep entanglement of media institutions with the same governments, military interests, and economic systems that enable Israel’s abuses.

    Western media’s complicity in ‘Israel’s’ crimes

    He says:

    Israel, along with the UK, Italy, France, the Netherlands- the EU- are all part of this global capitalist system of Western colonialism, imperialism and domination. This system is of course led by the US. All these countries buy weapons and have military connections with Israel. Israel’s crimes are British crimes as well, and Western media are accomplices in these Western crimes.

    ‘Israel’ consistently ranks within the top 10 largest arms exporters globally. In 2024, the Israeli occupation’s Defense Ministry made a record $15 bn on weapons exports. This figure is up 13% from the previous year. European countries were the largest purchasers. They accounting for almost 55% of sales in 2024 – up nearly 20% from 2023.

    Marmarelli makes clear he told the BBC his thoughts about them, but they were still keen for an interview:

     I told them in advance I don’t like the BBC, because it is pro-genocide and pro-apartheid, and I don’t think they are a professional news organisation.

    He argues the broadcaster is deliberately avoiding calling what is happening in Gaza a genocide. This goes against the consensus of all leading human rights organisations, and an independent UN Commission of Inquiry.

    BBC’s pro-Israel bias

    Everyone knows what Israel’s been doing for the past 26 months, it’s no secret. It’s a genocide, it’s apartheid, it’s colonialism. But the BBC are deliberately not calling it a genocide. They are biased in favour of Israel, even though Israel is the criminal, the one committing the genocide, and operating an apartheid regime.

    An anonymous journalist from the BBC confirmed to Declassified UK that the use of the word genocide is effectively banned. They said “any contributor who uses this word is immediately shut down.”

    Accusations of pro-Israel bias, anti-Palestinian racism, and censorship at the BBC are not new. But they have increased dramatically since October 7, 2023.

    In 2025 120 journalists from the BBC, and more than 300 media industry figures anonymously signed a letter to the BBC’s director general. They accused the broadcaster of acting as a “mouthpiece for Israel” and whitewashing Israeli war crimes. The letter claims the editorial approach consistently favours Israeli occupation narratives. And content creators face censorship in the name of impartiality- even whilst a genocide is being committed.

    Claims the BBC is systematically biased against Palestinians, is backed up a study from the Centre for Media Monitoring (CfMM). Their report, titled BBC on Gaza- Israel: One story double standards, analysed over 35,000 pieces of BBC content between October 7, 2023 and October 6, 2024.

    BBC believes Israeli deaths worth 33 times more than those of Palestinians

    Israeli deaths received 33 times more coverage per fatality in BBC online articles. This is despite a casualty ratio of around 34 Palestinian deaths to every 1 Israeli death during the study period.

    CfMM also found emotive terms such as “massacre,” “murder,” and “atrocities” were used much more often for Israeli victims. For example, “murder” was used 220 times for Israeli deaths, compared to once for Palestinian deaths.

    The report claimed the BBC interviewed more than double the number of Israelis on TV and radio, compared to Palestinians. Israeli perspectives were also shared 11 times more frequently by presenters than Palestinian ones.

    There is also a lack of historical and legal context in BBC reporting on Israel- Palestine. CfMM found that only 0.5% of articles referenced Israel’s almost 60 year occupation, or its blockade, when reporting on the October 7 attacks, which were referenced in 40% of online coverage.

    The BBC’s decision to drop Marmarelli’s interview without a credible explanation underscores the censorship he describes. At a time when evidence of abuse is widely documented, excluding an expert critical voice is less an issue of timing and more an act of editorial avoidance. Although Marmarelli’s testimony will circulate anyway, what lingers is further damage to the BBC’s credibility.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Charlie Jaay

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Content warning: this article contains discussion of rape and sexual violence that some readers may find upsetting

    Documented Palestinian testimonies reveal the use of sexual violence, including rape, as a systematic means of torture inside Israeli prisons, in one of the most serious violations suffered by Palestinian prisoners since the start of Israel’s war on Gaza, amid widespread international silence and accusations of political collusion that provides cover for the continuation of these crimes.

    In exclusive testimonies published by Middle East Eye, two former Palestinian prisoners gave shocking accounts of sexual assault and physical and psychological torture inside Israeli detention centres. The prisoners emphasised that what they experienced cannot be classified as isolated incidents, but rather part of a systematic policy practised against prisoners, especially during the initial phase of detention, known among detainees as the ‘welcome party’.

    Palestinian journalist: they raped me after a medical examination

    Palestinian journalist Sami al-Sayegh, 44, from Tulkarm, said he was physically abused in the Israeli Megiddo prison after his arrest in February 2024, during a campaign of raids carried out by the occupation army in the West Bank following the war on Gaza. Al-Sayegh explained that he was held in administrative detention for 16 months without charge or trial.

    He noted that a few days after his arrest, he was transferred to a clinic inside the prison, where he could hear the screams of prisoners being tortured in neighbouring rooms. According to his testimony, the prison doctor gave him a quick examination before the guards were asked to take him away. He was then blindfolded, handcuffed and taken to a closed room where, according to his account, he was beaten, insulted, threatened and sexually assaulted while a number of guards watched and laughed.

    Al-Sayegh added that one of the guards threatened to attack members of his family, saying that what was happening ‘would affect all journalists.’ He said he felt his life was at stake, suggesting that the incident had been documented after he heard one guard ask another to stop filming.

    ‘Welcome party’: systematic torture upon entering prison

    According to Al-Sayegh, prisoners call the pattern of violent torture that many detainees are subjected to upon their arrival in Israeli prisons a ‘welcome party,’ which includes severe beatings, humiliation, and sexual assault. He said that what he experienced was only a small part of what he heard from prisoners from the Gaza Strip, emphasising that the level of violence had reached unprecedented levels. He also stressed that most of these violations are committed by prison guards, and not only during interrogation.

    In another testimony, a former Palestinian prisoner from the West Bank, who preferred to remain anonymous, said that occupation soldiers sexually assaulted him using a dog inside a prison. He explained that the guards broke into his cell at dawn, tied him up along with a number of other prisoners, and then took him to a place away from the surveillance cameras, where he was beaten and stripped of his clothes before the assault was carried out.

    He added that the soldiers assaulted him again when he screamed, before leaving him for hours in the prison yard in harsh conditions. He said that the moment was indescribable, emphasising that the sexual assault was part of a wider system of torture.

    The prisoner noted that violations inside prisons also include deliberate starvation, deprivation of water, medical neglect, severe overcrowding, and the spread of untreated diseases. He noted that prisoners received very limited amounts of food, not exceeding about 700 grams per day, without basic nutrients, which led to a deterioration in their health.

    Direct accusations and political cover for Israeli prisons

    Al-Asir pointed out that violations inside prisons also include deliberate starvation, deprivation of water, medical negligence, severe overcrowding, and the spread of untreated diseases. He noted that prisoners were given very limited amounts of food, not exceeding about 700 grams per day, without basic nutritional elements, which led to a serious deterioration in their health.

    The prisoner confirmed that Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir visited Ofer Prison in July 2024, coinciding with the storming of prisoners’ cells by guards who assaulted them with batons. He said he saw Ben-Gvir directing the guards and laughing, describing the scene as akin to direct supervision of torture.

    These testimonies are consistent with UN investigations and reports accusing Israel of using sexual violence as a ‘weapon of war’ aimed at subjugating Palestinians and destroying their social fabric. The Israeli organisation B’Tselem has also described prisons as a ‘network of torture camps,’ documenting cases of rape and sexual assault committed by soldiers and guards against Palestinian prisoners, in the absence of accountability and the continuation of violations.

    By Alaa Shamali

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • The Commissioner-General of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA), Phillipe Lazzarini, warned that the humanitarian situation in the Gaza Strip remains extremely serious thanks to Israel’s genocide.

    Gaza: the situation is still extremely serious says UNRWA

    He stressed that some 1.6 million Palestinians continue to suffer from acute and dangerous levels of food insecurity, despite the fact that several months have passed since the ceasefire came into effect. He explained that the cessation of military operations has not yet had a sufficient impact on the lives of the population, given the continuing restrictions on the entry of basic humanitarian aid.

    In a press statement, UNRWA’s Lazzarini said that the latest Integrated Food Security Phase Classification reports reveal that the limited improvement recorded since the ceasefire began last October remains extremely fragile and could collapse at any moment. He added that these indicators confirm that the population of the Strip remains on the brink of a humanitarian catastrophe, with severe shortages of food, water and basic services.

    The UNRWA Commissioner-General stressed that ending this crisis requires urgent action, namely the immediate and unrestricted entry of humanitarian supplies and the ability of relief workers to operate freely and safely within the Strip. He stressed that any delay in this regard would exacerbate the suffering of civilians, especially children, women, and older people.

    Lazzarini pointed out that UNRWA currently has a large stockpile of aid, including food parcels sufficient to feed around 1.1 million people for an appropriate period of time, as well as quantities of flour sufficient to cover the needs of the entire population of the Gaza Strip. However, according to him, this aid remains stuck outside the Strip, awaiting the necessary approvals for its entry.

    He concluded by emphasising that the international community must shoulder its moral and humanitarian responsibilities and work seriously to ensure that aid reaches those who deserve it and prevent the situation from deteriorating to even more dangerous levels.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Alaa Shamali

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • In an interview for his new Avatar sequel, James Cameron showed his understanding of why people in Palestine, Ukraine, and Sudan are standing up to their oppressors like Israel:

    Given that the Avatar films are explicitly anti-imperialist, it’s not surprising Cameron would think like this.

    James Cameron: “it’s existential”

    In the video above, the host asks:

    You capture all-out war in this movie. Good guys are killing bad guys. They’re each killing each other. They’re each killing each other’s animals and creatures. And yet I feel like when we see the sort of suffering, we only see the pain, mostly see the pain inflicted on the good guys. As if you’re trying to make sure we don’t empathize with the bad guys. Can you talk about how fighting for what’s right, and walking that line, requires that sort of portrayal?

    Cameron responds:

    It’s a fine line, right? Because we go down, we go into Tulkun culture and they say, you know, killing only leads to more killing, an endless expanding spiral, right? And that’s the world we live in right now. That’s what we’ve seen. We’ve seen it in Gaza. We’ve seen it in Sudan. We’ve seen it in Ukraine.

    And you know, you’re doing an action movie. People are going to fight, right? But are you fighting for a just cause? Are you fighting for what you believe in? Are you fighting from a place of hatred or revenge?

    There are some fights that are righteous. And total annihilation is a reason to fight. It’s existential.

    Cameron and his friends George Lucas have made similar comments in the past:

    Featured image via Raw Pixel 

    By Willem Moore

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • The Gaelic Athletic Association (GAA) has chosen to maintain its insurance and sponsorship agreement with Allianz, despite the company being part of so-called Israel’s economy of genocide, outlined in a landmark UN report. The GAA is the main administrator of traditional Irish sports such as Gaelic football and hurling, with over 2,200 clubs registered as members.

    Gaelic Athletic Association

    The sporting body had assigned a review of the deal with the German financial services monstrosity to its Ethics and Integrity Commission (EIC). The Gaelic Athletic Association set up the EIC in the wake of pressure from members demanding that the association drop Allianz, citing its appearance in a report by the brilliant UN Special Rapporteur Francesca Albanese. In that report, entitled From economy of occupation to economy of genocide, Albanese outlined how Allianz have been ploughing money into the illegitimate Zionist pseudo-state, saying:

    Global insurance companies, including Allianz and AXA, also invest large sums in shares and bonds implicated in the occupation and genocide, partly as capital reserves for policyholder claims but primarily to generate returns. Allianz holds at least $7.3 billion and AXA, despite some divestment decisions, still invests at least $4.09 billion in tracked companies named in this report.

    She went on to detail how they fund the high-risk work of companies that operate as part of ‘Israel’s’ ongoing land theft project, enabling them to continue their criminality knowing they have an insurance behemoth at their back:

    Their insurance policies also underwrite the risks other companies necessarily take when operating in Israel and the occupied Palestinian territory, thus enabling the commission of human rights abuses and “de-risking” their operational environment.

    GAA’s ‘Ethics and Integrity’ Commission doesn’t understand its own name

    Nonetheless, the authors of the Ethics and Integrity Commission report determined that the genocide funding company should be kept. A Gaelic Athletic Association statement gives the reasons, including:

    • If the GAA was to terminate its contracts with Allianz it would be impossible to secure an alternative insurer that would not have similar links.
    • The unilateral termination of the contract with Allianz plc by the GAA could expose the Association to legal consequences apart from loss of sponsorship.
    • The GAA is ethically and legally bound to honour its contracts and a failure to do so has the potential to damage its reputation and undermine its ability to do business with commercial entities.
    • Allianz plc has no involvement with the IDF or corporate entities involved in the war in Gaza. Any such relationship is with a ‘sibling or cousin company’.

    Now, this might be linguistic pedantry, but one might think an ‘Ethics and Integrity’ Commission might want to focus on – just as a starting point – ethics and integrity. Instead, the reasons cited focus on the practicalities of securing alternative insurance, legal consequences and potential reputation damage. The moments where they get close to honouring their own name still manage to find a means of falling short.

    In terms of alternate insurance providers, the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement do not have a policy of finding a perfect, spotless option when dealing with complicity companies. An emphasis is placed on avoiding the primary targets of the movement, and other companies that egregiously fail, as Albanese’s report proves Allianz do.

    That Allianz supposedly have “no involvement with the IDF” is a red herring; again the UN findings are clear on Allianz’s criminality. The fact that the GAA report refers to “the war in Gaza” rather than the Zionist holocaust in Gaza, tells the reader all they need to know about the useless commission’s starting point for examining these issues.

    Decision condemned by activist groups

    Activist group Gaels Against Genocide have condemned the Gaelic Athletic Association decision, saying:

    It was important to give the GAA an opportunity to show us where they stand. The content, tone and utter lack of human empathy in the press release is telling. The GAA executive has adopted a ‘business as usual’ approach in a time of genocide.

    The ethics that the Executive concerned itself with was not the genocide rather, the ethics of ending a commercial contract. It is now up to the grassroots of the GAA to make their position known at Congress.

    They concluded by saying:

    Given the history and values of the GAA, it should adopt a human rights based approach in its commercial dealings. This requires contracts to be screened for human rights violations in times of conflict.

    System change is vital and we remain dedicated to our aim. We have faith in the great goodness and decency of the people of our Association.

    The Gaelic Athletic Association has historically characterised itself as not being politically neutral. It has claimed to act as a vessel for the preservation of Irish culture, and as a vehicle for anti-imperialism.

    This pretence now appears to have evaporated. Business concerns now appear to trump doing the bare minimum during a modern-day holocaust. As musician Nodlaig Ní Bhrollaigh put it:

    For the GAA, it’s ‘business as usual’ – the banality of evil.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Robert Freeman

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • A group of around 30 protesters gathered outside the Presbyterian Church in Ireland’s (PCI) Assembly Buildings Conference Centre, calling for the church to take action against so-called Israel’s ongoing genocide in Gaza. The demonstration was staged to coincide with a Special General Assembly at the opulent Belfast premises on Thursday December 18, held to discuss a separate but arguably related matter – the fallout from “failures in safeguarding“.

    This is essentially a nice way of saying the PCI did virtually nothing to protect those in its care from predatory paedos.

    Those demonstrating highlighted the church’s failure to protect the children in Gaza, where the Zionist regime has killed at least 20,000 innocent young people – probably far more. The PCI has been essentially silent on this modern-day holocaust.

    A scan of their X feed shows two mentions of Gaza in the last two years, and none of Palestine. Even these references to the mass slaughter frame the matter in misleading “both sides” terms, describing the “suffering in Gaza and Israel“. They compound this by mischaracterising the Zionist mass murder campaign as “war in the Gaza Strip“, as they “hope” for an end to the violence.

    Presbyterian Church failing to be the good Samaritan

    Among the groups present were Christians for Palestine, who said:

    The church was holding an all-Ireland assembly to discuss their child protection failings. We reminded them of their failure to stand up for the children of Gaza. In the parable of the good Samaritan it was the Priest and the Levite who walked by on the other side. In our present day it’s ministers and elders.

    We implore Presbyterian Church of Ireland- and indeed all Christians – to stand for humanity and justice, as Jesus asks us. What good is your faith for if you say nothing while entire families scream under the rubble?

    Protester chants included:

    We are thousands, we are millions – where are all the Presbyterians?

    and

    PCI PCI – how many kids will you let die?

    BDS Belfast were also present, and a video posted to their Instagram page shows demonstrators imploring those in attendance to do more. One woman says:

    Act likes Christians today! Don’t just worship, don’t just speak the word!

    Another said:

    They [‘Israelis’] are abusing children and killing them. They have many 1000s of Palestinians locked up being tortured every single day. Why do our lives matter more? Why do we get to live? Where is the justice for the people of Palestine?

    There was limited engagement from PCI members entering the building. One man said he had helped Palestinian families around Belfast. Others gave thumbs up, though more common were glares or an attempt to ignore the protest entirely.

    Protesters made it clear the issue wasn’t with individuals, but with PCI as a “corporate body”. They stressed that some individual Presbyterian churches had done good work for Palestine.

    PCI failed to safeguard children in its care, and ignores the murder of those in Gaza

    At the General Assembly meeting, head of the PCI Rev Dr Richard Murray issued an apology for the victims of those harmed as a result of the church’s failure to protect them. He said:

    It’s necessary that we gather together in this special General Assembly to grieve and lament for those who have been hurt and harmed – and for their families who have to pick up the pieces.

    There will be things these good people have to live with for the rest of their lives. And to them we say sorry, that you have been hurt or harmed, or both, by our failings.

    The meeting heard various proposals to prevent people once again being subjected to sexual abuse. These included the setting up of a new safeguarding department and what the BBC describes as an “independent, external review of safeguarding.”

    The Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) is currently carrying out a criminal investigation as a result of the PCI’s disclosure in November that it had failed on safeguarding. The probe will:

    …seek to establish victims of offending and their perpetrators, and if criminal offences have been committed by those responsible for safeguarding.

    It took the criminal conviction of a volunteer youth worker to prompt the PCI into investigating its failure to protect local children. He admitted to:

    …three charges of inciting two different children under the age of 13 into sexual activity.

    As horrifying as that is, the Zionist pseudo-state has subjected the children of Gaza to even worse. All churches must do more to speak out on their behalf, or continue to prove protesters right when they say:

    Christian response to genocide – walking by on the other side!

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Robert Freeman

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • In the early 2020s, the planet found itself in the grip of a virus which spread like wildfire. That virus was the misogynistic gospel of Andrew Tate, and the people who found themselves infected were young boys the world over.

    Having felt his fame and popularity slip somewhat, Tate decided to do something drastic to prove he’s still the pinnacle of toxic masculinity.

    There’s just one problem with that:

    Andrew Tate: man down

    Before he was an international man of misogyny, Andrew Tate was a kick boxer and an arsehole. He was famous on British Twitter long before the rest of the world knew him, and by that we mean ‘famously repellant’ – i.e. he tweeted stuff like this:

    Next point, if you put yourself in a position to be raped, you must bare some responsibility. I’m not saying it’s OK you got raped.

    He was banned from Twitter, but Elon Musk reinstated his account after purchasing the platform. This is why we get to see him tweeting out excuses today:

    You’re supposed to be the ‘Top G’ – not the ‘Runner Up G’.

    Do you really think your supporters are interested in watching a middle-aged man get the shit kicked out of him?

    We’re getting ahead of ourselves, however; we haven’t even shown you what the beating looked like yet:

    The guy that Tate fought was Chase DeMoor, who’s best known for appearing on reality dating shows:

    While DeMoor has fought before, he’s not particularly well regarded, as this video demonstrates:

    No offence to DeMoor, of course; dating shows are perfectly watchable, and we have nothing but respect for the way he handled Tate. The point is everyone thinks Andrew Tate picked DeMoor because he wasn’t a serious opponent:

    There were other great shots of Tate’s clownfall too:

     

    Lover boy bye bye

    While it’s good to ridicule Andrew Tate, it’s important to remember he’s not just someone who the internet loves to hate. Tate allegedly committed a string of violent crimes against women; crimes which he’s literally described in his own words:

    Andrew Tate and his brother were on trial in Romania for human trafficking, and texts from the Top G suggest it was Donald Trump who helped him wriggle out of accountability:

    Where are the anti-rape gang people like Tommy Robinson when you need them?

    Oh yeah, that’s right, Robinson has actually defended this guy, as we reported:

    All that aside, it’s heartwarming to see people like Andrew Tate and Jake Paul getting what they deserve this Christmas – i.e. knocked the fuck out.

    Featured image via YouTube

    By Willem Moore

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • On 19 December, Donald Trump’s Justice Department finally released the Epstein Files.

    Which is to say they released about 10% of them.

    90% of which they redacted.

    Donald Trump – or 468 of him – in the Epstein files

    Still, though, we did get to see some new photos like File 468, which demonstrated Jeffrey Epstein had a drawer full of pictures of Donald Trump for some reason:

    So, the fact that they released this image proves that they are somewhat serious about…

    …and the file is no longer there:

    This stinks

    Earlier this year, the US congress passed the Epstein Files Transparency Act which required the Justice Department to publish all of the documents relevant to Epstein. While it was permissible to redact information and images relevant to victims, it was not permissible to redact information to protect individuals’ reputations and/or feelings.

    It certainly wasn’t permissible to delete files after the fact when they clearly did not contain redactable material, and yet here we are:

    As one user highlighted, the image is not available in the Justice Department’s list of files, and yet it can still be found in the searchable ‘Epstein Files Browser’ that a user uploaded to GitHub:

    It’s unclear precisely what Trump and his lackeys are up to, but if they’re trying to cover up the image, it’s clearly going to result in the Streisand effect:

    Oh, and reportedly they’re also ‘doctoring’ files too:

    This is already looking like the clumsiest cover up in history, and yet somehow things will no doubt get worse from here.

    Featured image via The Epstein Files

    By Willem Moore

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Jake Paul is an influencer-turned boxer who’s famous for fighting retirees. He also came out to support Donald Trump in 2024 alongside the violent rapist Conor McGregor:

    Now, Paul has finally done something which people can rally behind, and that’s getting his jaw broken in two places:

    A Paul-ing

    As the New York Times reported, Jake Paul has fought 13 matches since becoming what they describe as a “professional” boxer. The reason we’re not so sure that wording is appropriate is because only five of those 13 bouts were against boxers (including a 58-year-old Mike Tyson). Paul has also boxed against two retired MMA fighters, cementing the impression that he’s the least professional boxer in the profession:

    The fight between Paul and Anthony Joshua lasted for six rounds, and it ended when Paul found himself unable to get back up in time following repeated knockdowns. People took great joy in sharing images and videos from the knockdowns:

    It later came out that Joshua broke Paul’s jaw, with Paul himself sharing an X-ray:

    People also suggested Joshua went easy on Paul:

    They further drew attention Paul’s interesting fighting style (or ‘avoiding fighting’ style, you might say):

    Jake Paul: Trump love in

    As noted, Jake Paul threw his weight behind Donald Trump in the 2024 election:

    In the text for the above video, Paul noted:

    I was very hesitant to make this video, but I felt like I had no choice. This is the most important election in U.S history. If you are a U.S citizen, please exercise your right to vote, and let’s come together to save America. This is who I am supporting in the 2024 Presidential Election… and why you should too.

    He added:

    make the right choice, and exercise your right to vote… America depends on it

    On the same day that Paul was getting his clock rung, Trump was breaking the law by not releasing the so-called Epstein Files (files which many believe will incriminate him personally). Meanwhile, the American economy is showing significant signs of trouble, and millions of people are facing the loss of their healthcare.

    So yeah, it’s not for nothing that people wanted to see this guy get knocked out.

    Featured image via PBS

    By Willem Moore

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • A new video shows Tommy Robinson being “bullied” at a boxing event in Dubai:

    Little Tommy

    Ty Mitchell is a British Muslim from Derby; he’s also a professional boxer:

     

    View this post on Instagram

     

    A post shared by Ty Mitchell 🐏 (@tymitchellofficial)

     

    View this post on Instagram

     

    A post shared by Ty Mitchell 🐏 (@tymitchellofficial)

    Seeing Tommy Robinson being interviewed, Mitchell charged over and gave Robinson a piece of his mind:

    Mitchell shouted that Tommy Robinson is a racist “prick” / “rat” and asked why they’re giving him airtime. Robinson was bouncing around with the energy of a child and/or cokehead through part of the exchange; at other times he was tetchily repeating himself; at other times again he was nervously glancing around.

    After the initial shouting, something like a conversation happened with Robinson arguing he doesn’t hate Muslims; he just opposes ‘terrorists’ and ‘sex criminals’. Mitchell said Robinson only seems to care about crimes when there are Muslim men involved. This is something we’ve covered before, with Robinson having defended colleagues who were accused of sex crimes. Robinson also worked with the alleged human trafficker Andrew Tate, who fittingly was fighting at the same event.

    Here’s a video of Tate explaining how he used the ‘lover boy’ method to traffic women:

    Here’s some more evidence against him:

    When right-wing commentator Lauren Southern accused Tate of date raping her, Tommy Robinson leapt to Tate’s defence. This is what people mean when they say Robinson only cares about sex crimes in so far as he can use them to attack Muslims. And as Mitchell himself said, this isn’t to defend Muslims who commit crimes; it’s to note you can find criminals in any sub-sect of people – the issue is using the minority to tarnish the majority.

    Tommy Robinson: cry harder

    People enjoyed seeing Tommy Robinson get called out anyway – especially Mukhtar:

     

    People also highlighted the 24-7 grift that the guy is on:

    Featured image via Mukhtar

    By Willem Moore

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • On 19 December, Donald Trump’s Justice Department finally released the so-called ‘Epstein Files’. There was a problem, however, in that they didn’t release all of the files. Making matters worse, they heavily redacted the files they did release. As a result, president Donald Trump and his team have made themselves look more suspicious than ever:

    The Trump Epstein coverup

    Until this year, the government was unable to release certain files relating to Epstein and his alleged accomplices because of the trial / appeal of his right hand woman Ghislaine Maxwell. This changed when Congress passed the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which made it both legal and mandatory for the Justice Department to publish all of the Epstein documents. Despite this, the released files are incomplete and heavily redacted:

    As a result of the redactions, Democrat and Republican politicians have accused the Justice Department of breaking the law:

    Trump eventually supported the Epstein Files Transparency Act after initially opposing it. At the same time, he also ordered a new investigation which many suspected was instigated solely to provide cover for future redactions:

    One person who commented on the state of the release was journalist Julie K Brown. Brown was pivotal in bringing the Epstein case to national attention, leading to the arrests of Epstein and Maxwell. Speaking to the BBC, Brown said:

    I’m still going through it, of course, but it’s just a lot of material that is either dated, that we already knew about it, or heavily redacted.

    So it doesn’t make sense. A lot of these redactions just frankly don’t even make sense

    At the same time, she praised the victims who have fought to get this far:

    I think the fact that we’ve even gotten this far is worthwhile and certainly the victims should be credited. They’re the heroes here who have fought really hard for transparency and for accountability and to hold some of these men accountable.

    What’s there

    Despite the redactions, there is new material in the latest release, including this harrowing image of the dead paedophile with a child in his lap:

    The released files may also prove that the attorney general Pam Bondi previously lied (depending on how she was defining ‘associates’):

    Bondi herself said the following post-release:

    There’s also this:

    People have additionally highlighted this exchange between Trump, Epstein and a 14-year-old girl:

     

    While this exchange was already exposed back in 2020, it’s avoided widespread public attention before now.

    End game

    On the same day that his justice department released the Epstein Files, Trump gave a rally. People noted that Trump’s age was showing at the event:

    Trump has also been avoiding questions around the release:

    Between his political failures, suspected criminality, and advanced age, it’s no wonder Trump’s polling is in the toilet:

    While he may be losing the support of anti-paedophile Americans, however, Trump does seemingly still enjoy the backing of Reform UK and GB News:

    Featured image via Justice Department

    By Willem Moore

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • On 18 December, Labour MP for Brent West Barry Gardiner pressed the solicitor general to release the Filton 24 hunger striker prisoners:

    Justice delayed for hunger strike prisoners

    Gardiner started by echoing his opponent’s own words:

    The solicitor general is absolutely right to say that justice delayed is justice denied.

    Hey, remember when justice secretary David Lammy was banging on about the tragedy of delaying justice just a few weeks back? Of course, he wanted to use it as an excuse to roll back the right to trial by jury. But clearly this is an issue that’s near and dear to ministers’ hearts.

    Gardiner went on:

    My constituent, Qesser Zuhrah, has been on remand in prison now for over a year. Two of my other constituents, Heba Muraisi and Lewie Chiaramello, have also been on remand awaiting coming to trial. They have been accused of offences, none of which are violence against the person. But all three are now on hunger strike.

    As a reminder, the statutory limit for holding a prisoner on remand – that is, awaiting trial – is six months. The fact that the Filton 24 have already been held for a year for what amounts to property damage is a clear miscarriage of justice.

    Or at least, it would be in a functioning justice system – as Gardiner pointed out:

    Would it not be much more sense, much more efficient for the criminal justice system, and quite honestly, a humanitarian gesture to allow these three to be released, with tagging and appropriate monitoring, to face trial in due course?

    The speaker stopped the solicitor general from replying, stating that:

    The point’s been made, I think it’s on the record.

    Parliament has more important things to consider, clearly. Lammy, Starmer and the rest of anti-Palestine Labour have certainly been trying their damn hardest to ignore the issue of the hunger strikes.

    ‘Political imprisonment and repression at home’

    Fortunately, whilst our own MPs – less 51 – are doing their best to bury the issue, the hunger strike is only gaining attention elsewhere. In fact, on Monday 15 December, supporters of the strike staged a picket outside of the UK Consulate in New York.

    Activist groups Within Our Lifetime and Writers Against the War on Gaza organised the protest. Within Our Lifetime explained that: 

    Right now 8 political prisoners for Palestine in the UK are on hunger strike, risking their lives to resist the ongoing genocide in Palestine and political imprisonment and repression at home.

    Pro-Palestine groups helped publicise the call to action on social media:

    The Palestine Info Center echoed that:

    The hunger strikers, known as the Filton 24, have been imprisoned without trial for over a year for resisting the UK’s role in supplying Israeli weapons, particularly through Elbit Systems, which have been used in repeated attacks on Palestinian civilians in Gaza.

    Quds News Network also included:

    The rally seeks to demand the release of the Filton 24, all Palestinian prisoners, an end to political repression, the shutdown of Elbit Systems, and the de-proscription of Palestine Action.

    ‘They’re putting themselves on the line’

    Middle East Eye covered the protest over the hunger strike itself:

    The protesters sang familiar chants of:

    You can’t, you can’t hide – you’re committing genocide

    The MEE reporting highlighted the fact that the Filton hunger strike is the largest such action since the IRA hunger strike led by Bobby Sands in the ’80s.

    It is a damning indictment of the justice system in the UK that the Filton 24 had to take action in the first place. Elbit – the factory targeted by the 24’s action – is directly arming Israel’s genocide of the Palestinian people. In a society with any sense of decency, Elbit would not have factories on our shores.

    It’s a further shame that the Filton 24 are being held past the 6-month limit, nevermind the fact they’re being held at all. There is no justice in that, delayed or otherwise.

    And, last but not least, it is a black mark on our parliament that even New Yorkers 3,000 miles away have recognised this injustice, when our own parliament refuses to even acknowledge that anything is amiss.

    Free the Filton 24.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Alex/Rose Cocker

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Journalist Mohammad Faraj has gone missing after arriving at Queen Alia International Airport in Jordan.

    Faraj, a journalist and a close friend of the Canary, was reportedly escorted away by officers of the Jordanian General Intelligence Department shortly after landing. That was over a week ago — on Friday 12 December 2025.

    Since then, he has effectively vanished.

    Repeated attempts by his family, friends, colleagues, and comrades to locate or visit him have gone unanswered. No official confirmation has been given. Charges have not been announced. No information has been provided about his health, his whereabouts, or even the legal basis for his detention.

    Mohammad Faraj — disappeared after arriving to Jordan

    Mohammad Faraj’s family does not know if he is safe.

    Numerous attempts have been made by his family, friends, colleagues and comrades to visit him, but all the requests remain unanswered. His family hasn’t received any updates or information about his health, whereabouts or even reasons for his arrest.

    That a journalist can simply disappear in this manner is chilling — especially in a country that routinely claims to respect freedom of expression and the protection of journalists.

    Mohammad Faraj’s wife, fellow journalist Rana Abi Jomaa, has expressed deep and mounting concern. On an interview with Al Mayadeen she said:

    All we want right now is just to know Mohammad is okay. We also would like to know why he’s been arrested?

    Rana continued:

    We were on a family visit during the holidays before coming back to Lebanon for the new year. I don’t want to analyse too much or read too much into this right now. Some people are saying this is a crackdown on free speech. Others say that this is a targeted intimidation of journalists.

    I don’t want to get into that right now. All I want is to know if he’s okay. Any news about Mohammad would be great.

    Rana’s restraint is understandable. Her priority is her husband’s safety.

    But allow us, then, Rana to do the analysis you have chosen not to.

    Jordan’s intimidation of journalists

    Mohammad Faraj’s disappearing cannot be viewed as anything other than intimidation. It is bullying by the Jordanian authorities, aimed solely at silencing voices that speak out against Jordan’s role in shielding Israel from accountability.

    Jordan’s record in recent months speaks for itself. As Israel’s genocide in Gaza intensified, Jordan became a key logistical supply artery — providing vital supply routes through the so-called “land bridge” improvised after Yemen enforced a blockade on the genocidal state. Jordan has also intercepted Iranian drones bound for Israel, not only defending Israel’s airspace but doing so at the expense of its own population. Drone debris and shrapnel have fallen onto residential areas, injuring Jordanians in their own homes.

    And now, faced with mounting domestic anger and regional outrage, Jordan appears to be naively attempting damage control. Not by changing policy, but by making an example of journalists who speak truth to power. Detaining Mohammad Faraj in silence, without explanation, is not law enforcement. It is a warning. Jordan is trying to make an example here.

    But it will not work.

    If the Jordanian authorities believe that disappearing journalists will help them regain control of a collapsing narrative — or whitewash their complicity over the past two years — they are deeply mistaken. We at the Canary will use every privilege and every protection afforded to us as a media organisation based in Britain to ensure this attempt at intimidation fails.

    The Canary stands in full and unequivocal solidarity with Mohammad Faraj.

    We demand immediate clarity on his whereabouts, his condition, and the legal grounds — if any exist — for his detention. And we call for his release without delay.

    Our thoughts are with Rana, with Mohammad Faraj’s family, and with all journalists across the region who continue to speak truth to power despite the risks.

    #Free_Mohammad_Faraj

    Featured image via the Canary

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Netanyahu has approved ‘Israel’s’ largest energy deal ever — a $35 billion gas export deal with Egypt. He said the deal “greatly strengthens Israel’s position as a regional energy superpower and contributes to regional stability”. But it raises serious questions about Egyptian complicity, responsibility, and the prioritisation of profit over Palestinian life. This is a long-term economic partnership with a government accused of war crimes and crimes against humanity, at a time when legal obligations should take precedence over commercial interests.

    Egypt’s 15-year energy deal with the occupation

    Under the agreement, gas from Israel’s offshore Leviathan field will be exported to Egypt over roughly 15-years, with Egypt acting as a regional processing and export hub. While the gas is extracted from waters internationally recognised as under ‘Israeli’ control, the deal is inseparable from the broader reality of ‘Israel’s’ occupation of Palestinian territory and its systematic abuse of Palestinian rights, including the deliberate strangulation of Gaza’s economy and infrastructure.

    ‘Israel’s’ energy boom has unfolded alongside a crippling blockade of Gaza, repeated military assaults, and policies that have left Palestinians without reliable access to electricity, fuel, or economic self-sufficiency. Gaza’s power shortages are the result of deliberate political decisions, and are a tool of control and colonisation. While hospitals, water desalination plants, and sewage systems have repeatedly been pushed to the brink of collapse, the occupation is able to expand its role as a regional energy exporter.

    Egypt — Deal ‘purely commercial’

    Although Egypt insists the gas deal is ‘purely commercial‘, this claim cannot be justified when viewed against international legal obligations. Under the 1948 UN Genocide Convention, states must not only stop genocide when it is being committed, but also take all reasonable steps to prevent it. Entering into long-term economic agreements that strengthen the economy of the genocidal state of Israel is clearly at odds with this responsibility.

    By locking itself into decades of gas purchases, Egypt is not just buying energy. It is also helping to normalise relations with a criminal state. It is also stabilising and legitimising an economy that underwrites military capacity, settlement expansion, and an occupation widely recognised by human rights organisations as apartheid. Economic cooperation with ‘Israel’ sends a message that genocide is no barrier to business as usual.

    Multinational energy companies operating in Israel’s gas sector are also deeply complicit. U.S.-based Chevron runs the Leviathan and Tamar offshore fields. British BP holds exploration licences in Israel’s Exclusive Economic Zone alongside Azerbaijan’s SOCAR. And Israeli occupation firms such as NewMed Energy also profit from extraction, transport, and export infrastructure that underpins ‘Israel’s’ economy.

    Gas from these fields is used for ‘Israel’s’ domestic supply. But it is also exported abroad, in deals such as this $35 billion deal supplying Egypt. These lock in decades of revenue, strengthening the economy of the apartheid Israeli state, and its military capacity and occupation. These companies continue to benefit financially but remain insulated from the consequences of Israel’s policies on the ground. This raises serious questions of complicity and corporate responsibility.

    ‘Energy security’

    Western governments have provided the diplomatic and political cover that allows these deals to proceed. Europe and the United States repeatedly invoke “energy security” to justify deepening ties with ‘Israel’s’ gas sector, even as they pretend to acknowledge the humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza. This selective application of international law undermines the legitimacy of the global legal framework these states claim to uphold. Energy dependence is treated as an overriding concern, while Palestinian lives are thought of as expendable.

    The Egypt gas deal is part of a broader pattern in which ‘Israel’ is economically rewarded even as it maintains its system of occupation, blockade, and collective punishment. Gas revenues strengthen the zionist entity’s standing with the rest of the world, and increases its bargaining power. This is happening whilst Palestinians are denied control over their borders, resources, and basic economic development.

    The Israeli regime’s gas strategy

    In October 2023, the Israeli occupation granted offshore gas exploration licences off Gaza’s coast, to six Israeli and international companies. This was in violation of international law. Al-Haq, Al Mezan and the Palestinian Centre for Human Rights warned these energy companies that involvement in these licences could amount to war crimes.

    So, ‘Israel’s’ gas strategy is not limited to commercially uncontested waters. It is expanding in ways that further entrench Palestinian dispossession. And is increasingly becoming another arena in which occupation is normalised and monetised.

    The Israel–Egypt gas deal is a political choice that prioritises stability and profit over international law and human rights. Egypt, Western governments, and multinational corporations all bear responsibility for the consequences of this choice.

    It rewards occupation, entrenches inequality, and financially supports a state accused of the worst crimes under international law. Participation in ‘Israeli’ gas exports strengthens a system that denies Palestinians control over their lives, their economy, and their future. Egypt’s claim that this is just a commercial deal is untrue. Economic ties and energy infrastructure are propping up ‘Israel’s’ regime of ethnic cleansing and control, and governments and corporations are choosing profit and gas over international law, humanity, and Palestinian life.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Charlie Jaay

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • A Rapid Support Force (RSF) drone attack knocked out power in major Sudanese cities.The UAE-backed Arab supremacist militia struck a key power station in Atbara, River Nile state. Electricity went out in government-controlled Khartoum and Port Sudan.

    The RSF and Sudanese military have been fighting over territory and resources for over two years. 150,000 people have been killed and up to millions displaced. RSF is backed by the UAE. The Sudanese government is supported by Saudi Arabia and Egypt.

    Al Jazeera reported:

    Two civil defence members were killed, power plant officials said, while trying to extinguish the fire that erupted after the first strike, adding that rescue workers were injured when a second drone hit as they battled the flames.

    Footage of the strike shows roaring flames engulfing parts of the facility:

    Al Jazeera reported Mohamed Vall told the channel:

    We have seen this many times during the during this current year and the last year. The RSF drones are going thousands of kilometres across Sudan because they think it is a way to weaken the government and to prove to the population they can’t be protected by this military government.

    Democracy Now interviewed Canada-based Sudanese scholar Khalid Mustafi Medani:

    Madani’s interview accompanied an analysis published on Zenodo.

    He said the war was partly driven by “a power struggle”:

    between groups representing traditional and modern segments of Sudanese civil society.

    But Sudan’s issues are also a result of the failure “of previous regimes”:

    to resolve the ethnic divisions dating back to the colonial era.

    Regional and global players have interest in Sudan — including a former coloniser: Britain.

    UAE, Saudi and others, all seek influence. Some of these also seek access to gold, oil and other resources from Sudan:

    Over the last two decades, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and to a lesser Qatar and Turkey, all have increased
    their engagement in the Red Sea.

    The Gulf states and, importantly, Israel are all backed the US, the UK and other European states to some extent. The UK, for example, is major supplier of arms to the UAE and Saudi Arabia.

    The Sudanese people are caught between these regional forces and their imperial backers. Unless a Sudanese-led solution can be found, the slaughter will likely continue unabated.

    Featured image via Sudan Tribune

    By Joe Glenton

    This post was originally published on Canary.