Category: Global

  • While football referees around the world prepare to participate in international tournaments and others train on the latest electronic refereeing systems, Gaza’s referees have had to fight a different kind of battle. Instead, they’ve been embroiled in a battle for survival under Israeli bombardment that did not distinguish between players on a football pitch, a house, or a child carrying a piece of bread.

    Over the past two years, during Israel’s devastating war on the Gaza Strip, the Palestinian sporting community has lost some of its elite referees. They have been martyred in the bombardment, while others have been injured and left with physical disabilities that forcibly ended their careers. Five referees lost their lives, and seven others suffered varying injuries. Some referees have had their legs amputated, while others were paralysed or suffered deep wounds. However, they all share one fate: they are denied the opportunity to return to the field.

    Football in Gaza a thing of the past

    Among the martyrs is international assistant referee Mohammed Khattab. He was considered one of the most prominent referees in Gaza. Months before his martyrdom, he refereed matches in the West Asian Youth Championship in Jordan and dreamed of reaching the Asian Cup for adults.

    But that dream was shattered in a single night when Israeli shelling targeted his apartment in Deir al-Balah, killing him and his entire family. His whistle, which used to set the pace of the matches, fell silent under the rubble, and the world did not hear that silence.

    His colleague Hani Masmouh, an international beach soccer referee, followed him a few days later. Hani suffered a serious abdominal injury, and with his death there went the legacy of one of the most prominent referees who raised the name of Palestine in football.

    As for the three referees, Rashid Hamdouna, Omar Al-Kilani, and Mohammed Darabi, all have refused to leave northern Gaza despite warnings, clinging to their homes and families. Their fate was also martyrdom, like many of the people of the Strip who found no safe place to take refuge.

    Injuries end the journey… and dreams remain unfulfilled

    The pain did not end with martyrdom. Referee Ramadan Sabra was seriously injured, resulting in the amputation of his left foot, after an Israeli air strike targeted the area where he lived.

    In a scene no less cruel, referee Mohammed Al-Najjar lies paralysed from the waist down, waiting for an opportunity to cross the Rafah crossing to receive treatment outside the Strip.

    Referee Islam al-Shukrit is receiving treatment in Egypt after suffering multiple fractures, while Mahmoud Abu Hasira is living with the consequences of serious injuries he sustained during a bombing that targeted his home, leading him to decide to retire from refereeing permanently after having been one of the most prominent up-and-coming referees in Gaza.

    Referee Khaled Bader lost his eldest son in a bombing that targeted the area where he was, and he himself suffered various injuries that made it difficult for him to return to the field. As for the young Hazem Al-Sufi, he was pulled from the rubble three days after losing consciousness, returning to life with a broken body and a soul still searching for its lost whistle.

    The game the world lost

    What happened is not just a local tragedy, but a global loss for a sport in which Palestinians had made a respectable showing despite the blockade and limited resources.

    Gaza used to produce talented referees who represented Palestine in Arab and Asian championships and trained new generations of young referees. But the war destroyed the sports infrastructure, halted training programmes, and turned Gaza’s stadiums into grey arenas where only the sirens of ambulances can be heard.

    Despite all this, there are still those who cling to hope. The referees who survived sometimes gather in destroyed stadiums, sharing stories of their martyred colleagues and dreaming of the day when the sound of the whistle will return to the stands of Gaza.

    One of them told them the Canary:

    We may have lost our stadiums, uniforms and international badges, but we have not lost the justice we dreamed of. We will teach our children how the whistle is a symbol of life, not silence.

    When justice is bombed

    In sport, the referee’s whistle represents a moment of justice on the pitch, but in Gaza, justice itself has been bombed.

    The targeting of referees was no accident, but part of a systematic attempt to kill everything that symbolises order, fairness, and the human dream.

    Nevertheless, the whistle of football in Gaza is not dead; its echoes still reverberate in every home that has lost a referee and in every stadium that awaits their return, telling the world that sport is not a luxury in Palestine, but a form of resistance.

    Featured image via Unsplash/Catia Climovich

    By Alaa Shamali

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Asia Pacific Media Network

    Pacific Media, a new regional research journal, made its debut today with a collection of papers on issues challenging the future, such as independent journalism amid “intensifying geostrategic competition”.

    The papers have been largely drawn from an inaugural Pacific International Media conference hosted by The University of the South Pacific in the Fiji capital Suva in July last year.

    “It was the first Pacific media conference of its kind in 20 years, convened to address the unprecedented shifts and challenges facing the region’s media systems,” said conference coordinator and edition editor Dr Shailendra Singh, associate professor in journalism at USP.

    The cover of the first edition of Pacific Media
    The cover of the first edition of Pacific Media. Image: PM

    “These include pressures arising from governance and political instability, intensifying geostrategic competition—particularly between China and the United States—climate change and environmental degradation, as well as the profound impacts of digital disruption and the COVID-19 pandemic.”

    Topics included in the volume include “how critical journalism can survive” in the Pacific; “reporting the nuclear Pacific”; “Behind the mic” with Talking Point podcaster Sashi Singh, the “coconut wireless” and community news in Hawai’i,; women’s political empowerment in the Asia Pacific; “weaponising the partisan WhatsApp group in Indonesia; and “mapping the past to navigate the future” in a major Pacific Islands News Association (PINA) publishing project.

    Other contributors include journalists and media academics from Australia and New Zealand featuring a “Blood on the tracks” case study in investigative journalism practice, and digital weather media coverage in the Pacific.

    This inaugural publication of Pacific Media has been produced jointly by The University of the South Pacific and the New Zealand-based Asia Pacific Media Network (APMN), with Dr Amit Sarwal, one of the conference organisers, joining Dr Singh as co-editor.

    APMN managing editor Dr David Robie welcomed the new publication, saying “this journal will carry on the fine and innovative research mahi (work) established by Pacific Journalism Review during a remarkable 30 years contributing to the region”.

    It ceased publication last year, but is still ranked as a Q2 journal by SCOPUS.

    Associate Professor Shailendra Singh (left) and Dr Amit Sarwal
    Associate Professor Shailendra Singh (left) and Dr Amit Sarwal. Image: PM

    The new journal will open up some new doors for community participation.

    Both the PJR and PM research archives are in the public domain at the Tuwhera digital collection at Auckland University of Technology.

    Khairaih A Rahman has been appointed by APMN as Pacific Media editor and her first edition with a collection of papers from the Asian Congress for Media and Communication (ACMC) conference in Vietnam last October will also be published shortly.

    Published with permission from Asia Pacific Media Network.

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • RNZ Pacific

    Pacific civil society groups say 2025 has been a big year for the ocean.

    Development Alternatives with Women for a New Era (DAWN) representative Maureen Penjueli said the Pacific Ocean was being hyper-militarised and there was a desire for seabed minerals to be used to build-up military capacity.

    “Critical minerals, whether from land or from the deep ocean itself, have a military end use, and that’s been made very clear in 2025,” Penjueli said during the Pacific Network on Globalisation (PANG) 2025 State of the Ocean webinar.

    “They’re deemed extremely vital for defence industrial base, enabling the production of military platforms such as fighter aircraft, tanks, missiles, submarines.

    “2025 is the year where we see the link between critical minerals on the sea floor and use [in the] military.”

    PANG’s Joey Tau said one of the developments had been the increase in countries calling for a moratorium or pause on deep sea mining, which was now up to 40.

    “Eight of which are from the Pacific and a sub-regional grouping the MSG (Melanesian Spearhead Group) still holds that political space or that movement around a moratorium.”

    Deep-sea mining rules
    Tau said it came as the UN-sanctioned International Seabed Authority tried to come to an agreement on deep-sea mining rules at the same time as the United States is considering its own legal pathway.

    “It is a bad precedent setting by the US, we hope that the ISA both assembly and the council would hold ground and warn the US.”

    He said unlike US, China spoke about the importance of multilateralism and it for global partners to maintain unity within the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) agreement which has not been ratified by the United States.

    Also in February was the deep sea minerals talanoa, where Pacific leaders met to discuss deep sea mining.

    “Some of our countries sit on different sides of the table on this issue. You have countries who are sponsoring and who are progressing the agenda of deep-sea mining, not only within their national jurisdiction, but also in the international arena,” Tau said.

    In May, UN human rights experts expressed concern about the release of treated nuclear wastewater.

    Japan’s government has consistently maintained the release meets international safety standards, and monitoring by the International Atomic Energy Agency shows there is no measurable impact beyond Japan’s coastal waters.

    Legal and moral problem
    However, Ocean Vision Legal’s Naima Taafaki-Fifita said as well as being an environmental issue, it was also a legal and moral problem.

    “By discharging these radioactive contaminants into the Pacific, Japan risks breaching its obligations under international law,” she said.

    “[The UN special rapporteurs] caution that this may pose grave risks to human rights, particularly the rights to life, health, food and culture, not only in Japan, but across the Pacific.”

    Taafaki-Fifita said it was a “deeply personal” issue for Pacific people who lived with the nuclear legacy of testing.

    In September, what is known as the “High Seas Treaty” received its 60th ratification which means it will now be legally effective in January 2026.

    The agreement allows international waters — which make up nearly two-thirds of the ocean — to be placed into marine protected areas.

    Taafaki-Fitita said it was important that Pacific priorities were visible and heard as the treaty became implemented.

    This article is republished under a community partnership agreement with RNZ.

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • Turkiye has issued Israel arrest warrants for 37 senior officials. They are all accused of genocide and crimes against humanity. This comes in response to the Israeli occupation’s military operation in Gaza.

    Senior Israeli occupation officials have no place to hide

    Only five of the officials have been named. They are war criminal Netanyahu, far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, Defence Minister Israel Katz, Israeli occupation forces (IOF) Border and Security Minister Eyal Zamir, and Naval Forces Commander David Salama.

    The charges stem from allegations that the IOF has waged “systematic violence against civilians in Gaza”. Infrastructure has been intentionally destroyed, and humanitarian aid has been blocked, while medical assistance has been denied.

    Turkish prosecutors cited specific targeted attacks in Gaza, between October 2023 and March 2025. These included the devastating attack on the Al-Ahli Arab Baptist Hospital on October 17, 2023, in which more than 470 people were massacred and 340 injured, from an explosion in the hospital car park. The Israeli regime blamed the incident on a failed rocket launch by Hamas, and continues to do so today. But according to analysis by Forensic Architecture there was a campaign of disinformation from the Israeli occupation forces about the incident.

    The prosecutors also refer to the “Turkish-Palestinian Friendship Hospital”. This was built by Turkiye, and was the only cancer hospital in Gaza. It was bombed in March of this year, after ‘Israel’ claimed again, without any evidence, that the hospital was being used by Hamas.

    They also referenced the killing of seven aid workers from the World Central Kitchen on April 1, 2024. All three vehicles were clearly marked with their logo, even on the roof, and their route had been agreed upon with the IOF beforehand. But they were targeted by Israeli precision drone strikes, and were killed.

    Israel arrest warrants — regime calls it a ‘PR stunt’

    The Foreign Minister for the Israeli regime, Gideon Saar has dismissed the announcement of the charges by calling them “the latest PR stunt by the tyrant Erdogan.” Even though Saar is deeply complicit in Gaza’s genocide, the UK government actively shielded him from arrest during a visit to Britain earlier this year.

    Hamas has welcomed the decision by Turkiye to issue the arrest warrants. In a statement, the resistance group said:

    We call on all countries worldwide, and their judicial bodies, to issue legal warrants to pursue the terrorist Zionist occupation leaders everywhere, and work to bring them to court, and hold them accountable for their crimes against humanity.

    Turkiye has been a vocal critic of the genocide in Gaza, and suspended diplomatic and trade relations with Israel over the conflict. But the country has a long history of diplomatic relations with the Israeli regime. It was the first Muslim majority country to officially recognize the Israeli regime in 1949. For decades, the two countries cooperated in areas such as trade, military, and intelligence. In the 1990s and early 2000s, security and economic ties deepened between the two and, in 2006, the Israeli occupation’s Foreign Ministry described its country’s relationship with Turkiye as “perfect”.

    In 2010 ‘Israel’ killed 10 Turkish activists

    Relations started to strain following Turkiye’s condemnation of Operation Cast Lead. Israeli occupation’s devastating 22 day military assault on Gaza in 2008, killed almost 1390 Palestinians, wounded 5000, and obliterated much of Gaza’s infrastructure. Relations deteriorated further after the 2010 Gaza Flotilla incident, where Israeli occupation forces raided the Turkish-owned aid ship Mavi Marmara in international waters, killing 10 Turkish activists. The boat was attempting to break the occupation’s blockade on Gaza. This led to a sharp diplomatic break and the suspension of military ties.

    Trump’s 20 Point Plan for Gaza states that an International Stabilisation Force (ISF) will soon be deployed to Gaza. Its task would be to oversee the ‘ceasefire’, and provide security in Gaza. It would oversee aid distribution, train a Palestinian police force and also ensure that Hamas hands over its weapons. The US wants Islamic and Arab states to contribute with funding and troops. Turkey says it will commit to the ISF, and Gaza’s reconstruction. But the Israeli regime insists that any foreign troops deployed in Gaza must have its approval, and says any Turkish military presence in Gaza is unacceptable.

    Israel arrest warrants — Countries have a legal obligation

    History shows us a pattern of cooperation and confrontation between Turkiye and ‘Israel’, but Turkiye is now  pursuing legal measures. The country wants to challenge Israeli’s impunity for war crimes. The decision also places renewed pressure on other governments. Those who have remained silent or complicit — failing their obligations under international law.

    As the warrants set a new precedent, Turkiye’s move challenges the longstanding impunity that Israeli occupation officials have enjoyed on the world stage. More countries must act. Rather than countries such as the UK shielding criminal Israeli occupation officials, arrest warrants must continue to be issued. All ties must also be cut with the regime. Foreign Minister Gideon Saar, has told us that ‘Israel’ will be destroyed if it suffers from an arms embargo. But we need to ensure diplomatic, economic, academic and cultural boycotts take place as well.

    Under international law, every country has a moral and legal obligation to prevent genocide, and stop it happening. It is time we fulfilled our obligations and held the Israeli occupation to account for its many crimes.

    By Charlie Jaay

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Asia Pacific Report

    In an open letter released at the Belém Climate Summit, special envoys for strategic regions have expressed their support for the COP30 presidency and for all leaders committed to advancing climate crisis action.

    Former New Zealand prime minister Dame Jacinda Ardern, the “voice” for Oceania, was among the seven climate envoys signing the letter.

    The document acknowledges the progress achieved through the Paris Agreement and the Dubai Consensus, while underscoring the need for further advances “in light of the Global Stocktake” and warning of the growing challenge posed by climate disinformation.

    COP30 BRAZIL 2025
    COP30 BRAZIL 2025

    The text calls for unity and concrete action to bridge the “triple gap” between climate finance, adaptation, and mitigation.

    These bottlenecks, it emphasised, could not be resolved solely through revisions to Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs), but required tangible policy measures.

    The Baku to Belém Roadmap is highlighted as a vehicle for developing innovative solutions to unlock large-scale investments while reducing financing costs.

    In addressing the spread of climate disinformation, the special envoys underlined the need for coordinated responses, collective strategies, and reinforced regulatory frameworks.

    The letter was signed by Special Envoys Adnan Z. Amin (Middle East), Arunabha Ghosh (South Asia), Carlos Lopes (Africa), Jacinda Ardern (Oceania), Jonathan Pershing (North America), Laurence Tubiana (Europe), and Patricia Espinosa (Latin America and the Caribbean).

    The open letter to leaders in Belém and to the COP30 presidency from the special envoys for strategic regions

    We, the Special Envoys for our respective regions, wish to express our strong support for the Brazilian Presidency and all leaders committed to climate action at Belém.

    COP30 presents both a significant opportunity and a profound challenge. To remain aligned with the ambition of the Paris Agreement amidst an increasingly complex geopolitical environment, we must demonstrate decisive progress. Multilateralism, grounded in international law and guided by the Paris Agreement, remains our most effective framework.

    A clear signal from COP30 that the international community stands united in its determination to confront climate change will resonate globally. Our shared commitment to fully implement the Paris Agreement is the strongest collective response to a crisis that is disproportionately affecting vulnerable households and countries, devastating lives, livelihoods, and the ecosystems upon which we all depend.

    We should also recognise the progress achieved since the Paris Agreement in 2015. The rapid growth of clean solutions is bending the trajectory of global emissions; where we had been on track to exceed a devastating temperature increase of more than 4°C, we are now able to project a level of less than 2.5°C.

    But we need greater progress. We are not on track to achieve the goals of the Paris Agreement, and in particular, we are taking insufficient action to keep 1.5°C within reach, or even enough to keep warming well below 2°C. And every tenth of a degree of additional warming will mean harsh consequences for the world.

    COP30 must acknowledge and address the “triple gap” in mitigation, adaptation and finance. Doing so requires an accelerated effort across the next decade, mobilising the full range of tools, resources, and partnerships available to us. This is at the heart of the goal of COP30: to advance the full implementation of both the Paris Agreement and the UAE Consensus, informed by the Global Stocktake presented at COP28 in Dubai.

    To accelerate progress, we must maintain a laser focus on concrete, coordinated action.

    The Action Agenda is a powerful reservoir of those actions, which must be structured, monitored, and supported for effective delivery. Addressing the gap should not be understood solely as revising Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs), but rather as translating ambition into policies that enable each country to overperform on its existing commitments. And the policies we take, as has been amply demonstrated in our successes to date, can marry not only climate benefits, but also contribute to growing our economies, promote our national security, improve the welfare of our citizens, and promote a healthy environment.

    Tripling global renewable energy capacity is a goal within reach. Collectively, we have the
    technology and resources: what is required now is scaled investment in all regions. The Baku to Belém roadmap to mobilise US$1.3 trillion annually for developing countries outlines both established and innovative solutions to deliver investment at scale at reduced costs of finance. To operationalise it, clear milestones, mandates, and responsibilities are needed.

    Ministers of finance should take the lead in defining the priorities. Creating fiscal space, minimizing debt burdens, effectively mobilising domestic and international finance, and
    ensuring enabling policy environments, alongside increased investment in the Global South,
    are all essential to making this roadmap credible and implementable.

    Strengthening resilience and adaptation are equally critical. Climate impacts are increasingly a major barrier to sustainable economic and social development. We must work together to define the indicators that do not impose resource-intensive reporting burdens but instead help our economies and societies adapt to their local circumstances and become resilient.

    We must engage the insurance sector, central banks, and private investors to close the
    protection gap that threatens long-term developmental gains.

    Countries pursuing the transition away from fossil fuels should define roadmaps, in line with their national circumstances, while fostering dialogue between producers and buyers of fossil fuels. Roadmaps to end deforestation and restore ecosystems are equally necessary. Taken together, these pathways can allow countries to implement the long-term strategies submitted in previous years.

    For the first time, COP30 will also confront the challenge of climate disinformation: a growing threat that undermines public trust and policy implementation. Combatting this challenge requires coordinated approaches, shared strategies, and strengthened regulatory
    cooperation. We must shine the spotlight on our collective progress, in general, but also cases in particular where countries have met their climate targets ahead of schedule,
    demonstrating a positive bias for action.

    Lastly, we need an evolution of the climate regime that makes implementation more effective and inclusive. Progress depends on joining forces with the local authorities, economic sectors, governments, and civil society. Subnational leaders, from governors, to regional authorities, mayors, and community representatives, must be empowered to reinforce and complement NDCs and National Adaptation Plans (NAPs). COP30 is the moment to have them at the table and to craft a new approach that brings all relevant actors together in a global effort to safeguard our common future.

    It is the moment to remind ourselves of the need for solidarity, and to recognise our agency — we have it within our power to change the future for the better.

    Signed:

    Adnan Z. Amin (Special Envoy for Middle East), chair, World Energy Council; CEO of COP28; former director-general, International Renewable Energy Agency

    Arunabha Ghosh (Special Envoy for South Asia), founder-CEO, Council on Energy, Environment and Water

    Carlos Lopes (Special Envoy for Africa), chair, Africa Climate Foundation; former executive
    secretary, UN Economic Commission for Africa

    Jacinda Ardern (Special Envoy for Oceania), former Prime Minister of New Zealand

    Jonathan Pershing (Special Envoy for North America); former US Special Envoy for Climate Change

    Laurence Tubiana (Special Envoy for Europe), dean, Paris Climate School; CEO, European
    Climate Foundation; former French Special Envoy for Climate Change

    Patricia Espinosa (Special Envoy for Latin America and the Caribbean), former executive
    secretary, UN Framework Convention on Climate Change

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • Ms Rachel is a children’s entertainer who has drawn significant criticism for speaking out on behalf of Palestinian children. While the pressure she’s faced has been immense, she’s remained steadfast, and now she’s joined the boycott of the New York Times (NYT):

     

    View this post on Instagram

     

    A post shared by Ms Rachel (@msrachelforlittles)


    Ms Rachel — Integrity

    Writing for the Canary, Maryam Jameela reported the following on Ms Rachel earlier this year:

    Ms Rachel, an American children’s entertainer, is facing attacks from pro-Israel groups. Otherwise known as Rachel Accurso, the performer has used her massive following to call for the famine and murder of Palestinian children to be stopped. Incredibly, this has led a number of Zionist lobbyists and mainstream media outlets to question if Ms Rachel is funded by Hamas.

    At the time, Ms Rachel said:

    When it’s controversial to advocate for children that have been killed in the thousands, are blocked from food and medical care, and have become the largest cohort of amputees in modern history, we have lost our way.

    It’s my unwavering belief that children aren’t less valuable or less equal because of where they were born, the color of their skin, or the religion they practice.

    In a follow-up message to her NYT boycott post, Ms Rachel highlighted why people are taking action:

     

    View this post on Instagram

     

    A post shared by Ms Rachel (@msrachelforlittles)

    In October, Middle East Eye reported that 150 NYT contributors had pledged not to write for the outlet until it ends its bias against Palestinians. Their letter stated:

    Until The New York Times takes accountability for its biased coverage and commits to truthfully and ethically reporting on the US-Israeli war on Gaza, any putative ‘challenge’ to the newsroom or the editorial board in the form of a first-person essay is, in effect, permission to continue this malpractice

    Only by withholding our labor can we mount an effective challenge to the hegemonic authority that the Times has long used to launder the US and Israel’s lies

    As of this week, Mondoweiss say the number of signatories is more like 500.

    The letter detailed the many examples of shoddy journalism perpetrated by the NYT, including:

    The writers also called on The New York Times to retract a December 2023 article titled “Screams Without Words,” which alleged that Palestinians who took part in the Hamas-led 7 October 2023 attack committed sexual assault against Israeli women.

    That article relied largely on the testimony of an unnamed Israeli special forces paramedic. A spokesperson for the kibbutz where the article claimed the assaults took place later denied the allegations made by The New York Times.

    Anat Schwartz, one of the report’s authors, was later investigated by the paper after it emerged that she had liked a social media post calling for Gaza to be turned into a “slaughterhouse”.

    Prior to the article, family members of the girls killed during the attack, who were the alleged victims of the sexual assault, gave several interviews that appeared to contradict the claims made in the story. However, none of these interviews were used in the New York Times piece.

    History repeats itself

    Like much of the British media, the NYT helped sell the lies which led to the Iraq War. They apologised for that, but clearly they haven’t learned.

    Solidarity with the Palestinians and with all those who are boycotting the NYT.

    Featured image via USA Today

     

    By Willem Moore

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • On November 7, the US became only the second country in history – after ‘Israel’ in 2013 – to skip its scheduled Universal Periodic Review (UPR) at the United Nations.

    The Universal Periodic Review

    The Universal Periodic Review is designed to promote and protect human rights in every UN member country.

    The UPR was established in 2006, and occurs every four to five years. Its aim is to review each of the 193 UN member states’ human rights record. The most recent review session took place on Friday, at the Human Rights Council in Geneva. There was no US representative present.

    This has shocked the international human rights community and also sparked widespread criticism and concern. The move ends nearly two decades of unbroken US participation, and comes at a time when there has been growing concerns over America’s human rights record. The US absence raises serious questions not only about accountability, but also the undermining of global efforts on human rights.

    US Human Rights absence

    Amnesty International called the US boycott of its UPR “shocking,” and accused Washington of “walking away from even the impression of caring about the safety and security of people in the US and around the world.”

    Human Rights Watch said although the US may avoid this formal scrutiny for a time,

    it will only generate international criticism and further erode its place on the world stage.

    Larry Krasner, District Attorney of Philadelphia, claimed Trump did not want a report card on “his unceasing violations of human rights”. He said the President “wants to be Adolf Hitler,” and it was unsurprising the “criminal” Trump administration “wants to escape accountability”.

    To support the US review, hundreds of organisations had submitted reports on a wide range of human rights violations taking place in the country. These included  arbitrary detention, and regression in sexual, reproductive and LGBTQ+ rights. Raids by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), systemic racial discrimination and the abusive treatment of  immigrants were also on the agenda for discussion. So were the excessive use of force during demonstrations, attacks on free speech, and the death penalty.

    US has refused to attend its UPR

    The US decision to disengage from this review is linked directly to Trump’s administration. It ordered the move following the February 4 executive order to withdraw from several UN agencies. These were the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC), along with the UN Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), and also the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA). In a statement, the White House claimed these UN bodies have “drifted from their mission” and instead:

    act contrary to the interests of the United States while attacking our allies and propagating anti-Semitism.

    The US Department of State issued another statement on Friday. It framed its withdrawal from the UPR as a rejection of what it sees as the Human Rights Council’s failures to condemn severe human rights violations from UNHRC members such as Venezuela, China, and Sudan. It also stated that the US would not accept lectures about its human rights record from these countries.

    Significant and multiple human rights abuses

    Recent reports show disturbing human rights abuses in the United States, particularly related to law enforcement practices. As of October 2025, over 1,000 people have been killed by police officers, marking the twelfth consecutive year of exceeding this grim milestone. These killings often involve excessive use of force. They frequently affect unarmed individuals including those who are mentally ill or just in need of help. This persistent pattern highlights systemic issues within US law enforcement agencies.​

    Racial minorities in the US face a higher likelihood of being targeted with lethal force. Although Black Americans make up around 12 percent of the US population, they account for an estimated 20% of those fatally shot by police in 2025. The same applies to the Hispanic population in the US. Police misconduct, disproportionate arrests and use of force against minorities are also common US human rights abuses.

    Systemic injustice also extends into the US criminal justice system. Around two million people are imprisoned in the country, and there is an overrepresentation of racial minorities. ICE are conducting violent raids against immigrants, who are then systematically detained for prolonged period, seriously abused, and deported.

    America ‘claims’ to uphold human rights

    The continuation of the death penalty is also a stain on the US’s human rights record. Several states maintain use of the death penalty, sometimes employing methods such as nitrogen hypoxia criticized internationally as cruel and inhumane. In addition, places such as Guantanamo Bay continue to indefinitely detain individuals, without trial, violating international law. Environmental justice, violence against Indigenous peoples, and the LGBTQ community should also have been brought up in the UPR, if the US had attended, to push for necessary reforms.

    The UN Universal Periodic Review is designed to hold all UN member states accountable, regardless of their global power. The US decision not to participate signals its clear refusal to accept external scrutiny. It raises serious questions about its commitment to human rights.

    By withdrawing from the UPR, the US also gives other countries with human rights abuses an excuse to follow suit.

    The UN Human Rights Council has postponed the US review until November 2026. The Council warned it may take further action if the US continues to refuse cooperation.​

    Featured image by ISHR

    By Charlie Jaay

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • The European sporting arena has recently witnessed remarkable shifts in attitudes towards Israel, with increasing calls to freeze its participation in continental football tournaments, against the backdrop of crimes committed in the Gaza Strip.

    These moves, which began with clubs and fans and then reached national federations such as the Irish Football Association, reflect a gradual moral shift within Europe that raises a fundamental question: Can sport remain silent in the face of genocide?

    From Aston Villa… signs of European awakening

    The British authorities’ decision to ban fans of Israeli club Maccabi Tel Aviv from attending their team’s match against Aston Villa in the Europa League competition sparked widespread reaction in both sporting and political circles.

    Despite the ban being justified on security grounds, many in Europe – including pro-Palestinian activists – saw the move as an implicit rejection of normalising sport with an entity that commits war crimes against civilians in Gaza.

    The scene was not limited to England, as the Irish Football Association announced its intention to vote on a formal proposal calling on the Union of European Football Associations (UEFA) to suspend the Israeli association’s membership and ban it from its competitions, based on violations related to the practices of Israeli clubs in the occupied Palestinian territories and their failure to implement anti-racism standards.

    Growing popular sentiment in Europe

    There has been a growing awareness among the European public of what is happening in Palestine, especially with the continuing massacres in the Gaza Strip and the tens of thousands of victims. This awareness has translated into clear sporting action:

    Demonstrations in front of stadiums in London, Amsterdam and other European cities chanting ‘No football for genocide’.

    Fans of major clubs — such as Celtic in Scotland and Ajax in the Netherlands — raised Palestinian flags during matches, defying warnings from local federations.

    In response, popular demands have grown for UEFA and FIFA to be held accountable for their double standards, after they rushed to punish Russia for its invasion of Ukraine while remaining silent on Israel’s aggression, which has been ongoing for more than a year.

    This shift in European public sentiment represents a turning point in Western public opinion, with the Palestinian cause now present in the consciousness of broad sections of young people, athletes and fans, who see sport as a space for defending justice rather than merely commercial competition.

    Increasing influence on official sports institutions

    At the institutional level, this wave has begun to pressure European national federations to reconsider their position on Israel.

    The Irish Football Association, with the support of Bohemian FC, broke the official silence and opened the door to the first vote of its kind in Europe to call for a ban on Israel.

    According to media sources, officials within some federations are discussing the possibility of adopting similar positions, based on Israel’s violation of the conditions for joining UEFA, particularly with regard to discrimination and racism.

    Even within UEFA itself, a legal debate has begun on how to apply the regulations to the case of the Israeli occupation, amid increasing pressure from human rights and media groups.

    For Palestinians, these developments are a historic precedent in official European awareness, as they shift the position from the realm of ‘humanitarian sympathy’ to that of institutional action capable of bringing about real change.

    Sport is not immune to justice

    From a Palestinian perspective, these steps represent a true translation of the principle that sport cannot be neutral in the face of injustice.

    The Israeli occupation uses sporting participation as a front to improve its image abroad, while continuing to kill civilians and besiege Gaza.

    Therefore, every European step – however symbolic – towards holding it accountable or restricting its sporting presence is a moral victory for the Palestinian people and a message that justice can begin in any field, even on the playing field.

    A moral European sporting front

    What is happening on European pitches today is not just a sporting dispute, but a moral and popular shift in attitudes towards the genocide in Palestine.

    The voices of fans and clubs such as Aston Villa and Bohemian are paving the way for Europe to correct its position, not only with statements, but with institutional action.

    While some federations hesitate to take a clear decision, there is a growing conviction that history will record who stood up for justice and who remained silent.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Alaa Shamali

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • The Phoenix & Friends Podcast is seeking to connect people and inspire them with positivity. And the Canary spoke to Phoenix to find out more.

    In a wide-ranging conversation, Phoenix stressed the importance of nurturing curiosity – of breaking away from the short-form doom-scroll overload of social media today and delving into issues more deeply and meaningfully instead. He also described his personal connection to Africa and interest in boosting the past and present stories of the continent in a Western corporate media environment that too often ignores them. And he noted that, while protests have their benefits, campaigners today need to develop new tactics to really foster and bring about change.

    With his podcast, he hopes to help motivate people with constructive conversations that can have a positive impact on them and the communities around them.

    Phoenix & Friends Podcast: about the power of human passion and potential

    Phoenix has interviewed a diverse group of people so far since starting his podcast earlier this year. These include an Olympian, community-project organisers, a mayor, and “creatives from different fields”. What they aren’t, he asserted, is “some unattainable celebrity that was born into status and wealth”. The main message that comes across is one of:

    Persistence and patience with yourself, and faith in yourself, and finding something that you want to do, regardless of what that is, and just starting and keeping going and seeing that, when you really follow that passion, that is such an important thing

    He wants the podcast to help people see that:

    there is something that you can do that you’re passionate about that can make a positive change in the world, and pay your bills and put food on the table, and you can find a way to do that

    As he insisted:

    human potential is amazing

    We need a different approach

    Growing up and participating in protests, the tactics of the state’s apparatus convinced Phoenix that the protests of the past aren’t going to cut it anymore. One barrier to their success, he said, is the bias of the mainstream media. Because today’s media landscape:

    allows states to… shape the picture of what’s happening at protests, and allows them to tell the story how they want it to be told, and more often than not puts the protesters in places of aggression.

    In one protest he attended, for example:

    we got run down by a bunch of horses, and I went back home, and I watched the BBC footage, and they played everything backwards… [and] out of order to make it look as if the crowd were the aggressors in the situation.

    Insisting he’s “tired of just chanting the same things over and over”, he argued that:

    We’ve got to actually speak beyond just chants and slogans, because… that doesn’t say much or do much for anyone.

    This realisation informed his decision to:

    transition into doing something more with media and with arts, and finding a way… [to] get into the homes of people who we can’t reach by being out on the streets.

    He added that “states and police forces overall are too well-practised and rehearsed now” to allow protests to be really effective. While such events are good for venting frustration and recharging hope via the energy of many like-minded people, he said, “we have to kind of come up with new methods to create that change” we want to see. “It needs to evolve.”

    “Connecting with people in person”

    Having travelled around the country with a group of musicians in support of Black Lives Matter, Phoenix said people came up to them – having been drawn in by a song, dance, or poem – to find out more. Creating opportunities to talk and connect with other people, he insisted, is so important. And it “definitely means being there in person, as opposed to being behind a keyboard or reading a comment” because:

    Communication is 2% the words we use, which is basically online communication, and 98% is our tone of voice, our body language, everything else, and that is all taken out when we’re speaking online, unless we’re watching a video, and even then… our attention spans are so short. There’s so many people talking at us. It’s just not comparable with connecting with people in person.

    Online engagement does matter, though. Because it creates connections with people who “don’t necessarily go out, don’t take part in community”, or are suffering from the “massive loneliness crisis”. And on that topic, he pointed out the dangers of short posts on social media (see Watching short form content damages the brain five times worse than alcohol). He suggested that it’s normal for kids to have short attention spans because “everything is still new and interesting and fascinating”, but that when adulthood starts to hit there’s more space to encourage deep-dives into specific topics. At the same time, he noted that schools in Britain seem to have dulled the spark of curiosity for too many kids.

    “The education system has really gone down the drain,” he said, adding:

    I grew up between here and Africa, and one of the… I left just after I did my GCSEs and spent a year in Africa. And even then, in 2005-6, it struck me, because I came from an environment where everyone was like, ugh, school, I don’t want to go, I don’t want to do this, I’m not interested in learning, to a place where everyone’s like: ‘all I want to do is go to school. I wish I could go to school and learn.’ … We’ve made… expanding our minds, for so many people, an unattractive thing.

    He wants us to nurture that natural human interest in learning – not just about the world, but about each other:

    I will listen to anyone, even the people that I disagree with, … to understand where you’re coming from, at least.

    And he stressed that we can almost always find some common ground, even if “sometimes it takes time to discover that”. So much polarisation, he asserted, comes from the fact that many people have never had meaningful interactions with people who have different experiences, backgrounds, or opinions. On top of that, the:

    atmosphere of fear that the media has created, and of alienation, leads people to jump to these wild assumptions, and not have the curiosity to look into it

    He hopes to challenge that with his podcast.

    Phoenix & Friends Podcast: take the time to listen

    Phoenix argued that:

    In so many ways, I think things like long-form YouTube videos or podcasts have replaced the radio for a generation

    When he’s cleaning or doing other tasks around the house, he said:

    I will actively look for a video that’s as long as possible

    So he’s been creating something that can be positive for others with similar habits.

    Despite delving into some “really massive, huge, difficult topics… from genocide and ecocide to mental health difficulties”, he always seeks to leave “something that people can take away that is also positive or constructive”. With that in mind, he specifically asks podcast guests to only discuss challenges they’ve faced if they also have a:

    form of solution or thing that people have used to overcome that, or deal with that along the way if they can’t overcome it

    One problem we discussed was rising fascism. And as Phoenix stressed, fascists are using the longstanding “fear playbook of ‘identify something different that isn’t present, but you can make it a looming threat, and then scare everyone about it”. But he strongly believes “the only way to resolve that is through conversation”.

    We could hardly agree more with Phoenix. Because we absolutely need to be doom-scrolling less and interacting with others more. And when we can’t do that, we can allow inspiring and positive podcasts like Phoenix & Friends to nurture our mind and soul.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Ed Sykes

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • I’m running out of time.

    That’s how James Richard Klingsborg – known as Rich – begins his harrowing plea for help. He is living through what he calls “a perfect storm of progressive, permanent brain damage.” Three rare and interacting conditions — a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, infratentorial superficial siderosis, and triple-positive antiphospholipid syndrome — are destroying his health, while Swedish healthcare has left him to deteriorate.

    Rich: his brain is being damaged as we speak

    This was Rich before these conditions took hold in February of this year. Even though he was also living with myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME) he still had some quality of life:

    Rich explains that now:

    My life is falling apart around me as I struggle within a healthcare system that has proved both indifferent to and incapable of diagnosing or treating this complex and rapidly worsening health crisis.

    For six months he has been “repeatedly sent home from the emergency room,” despite visible neurological decline – and even psychosis. The leaking CSF causes brain sagging, vein rupture, bleeding, and iron toxicity. The latter is killing off nerves in his brain, leading to permanent damage – and it is this which is causing rich to experience psychosis.

    Freiburg University Hospital in Germany, a world leader in CSF-leak treatment, has given him hope. They’ve confirmed his diagnosis and have a plan for targeted repair — “treatment ready and waiting,” as he writes — but cost is the only obstacle.

    Rich describes his daily life as one of isolation and despair. He says:

    It’s an absurd situation — to not receive the care you need in your own country — and profoundly uncomfortable to so publicly and literally have to beg for your life.

    A creative soul who once loved sound and light, he now lives in near-darkness, unable to bear loud noise or movement:

    The emotional toll is palpable. “No more listening to or making music… the things you take for granted suddenly become unbearably painful,” he writes. Each day without treatment risks further nerve death, deeper disability, and the permanent loss of independence.

    Systemic failures

    Sweden’s failure is not an individual oversight; it’s a systemic collapse around the world. A supposedly advanced healthcare system has let bureaucracy and ignorance consign a man to worsening neurological damage. Supposed rare-disease patients like Rich fall through cracks too wide to close — cracks widened by medical arrogance and ignorance. They’re also widened by the notion that diseases are rare – when in fact, they all-too-often not.

    But crucially, it’s the notion – pushed by psychiatrists and adopted by mainstream medicine – that physical illness can somehow be psychomatic which is most damaging. As Rich describes in the below video, doctors think his and so many other people’s illnesses are somehow ‘all in their heads’ – when they are demonstrably not:

    Rich writes,:

    After six months of being repeatedly sent home… I’ve reached a terrifying crossroads: I’m now far too sick to keep fighting this uphill battle.

    His words cut to the core of a state that prides itself on universal care yet forces its citizens to crowdfund survival.

    He needs your support

    Germany, by contrast, offers a clear route: advanced imaging, dynamic myelography and surgical sealing of the leak. It’s sophisticated, evidence-based medicine — but it costs money Rich doesn’t have. The fundraiser seeks 150,000 SEK to cover diagnostics and treatment.

    Rich promises transparency:

    Every donation, no matter how small, could be what saves my life… Any reimbursement will be refunded to donors.

    What stands out most is his courage to write with such honesty. He jokes darkly about the surreal task of fundraising for your own life — “being told it has to be catchy and filled with cheerful photos of you so people will want to help.” Yet behind the gallows humour lies desperation:

    Desperation and death anxiety are very strong motivators.

    The Swedish health authorities should hang their heads in shame. A man shouldn’t have to explain his suffering to strangers because alleged medical professionals refuse to listen. Their delays have made his disease worse — his brain damage, pain, his tinnitus, his dizziness, psychosis, and paralysis, all avoidable with earlier intervention.

    Rich’s case exposes a more profound truth: when systems stop seeing patients as people, they condemn them quietly. Bureaucracy becomes triage; neglect becomes policy. Sweden’s international image as a compassionate healthcare model means nothing to those it abandons.

    Help Rich if you can

    For Rich, however, there is still a window of hope. The specialists in Freiburg can act — but only if they reach them in time. “The care I urgently need is available and waiting in Germany, while I lie here rapidly deteriorating,” he pleads.

    His situation shouldn’t exist. And yet, as he writes from his darkened room:

    Time is running out.

    Your donation could buy more than medical intervention — it could bring him back the sounds, lights, and sensations of a life worth living.

    Please, if you can, give what you’re able. Share his story. Be part of the humanity that Sweden’s healthcare system has forgotten.

    Donate to Rich’s fundraiser here.

    Watch more of Rich’s story below:

    Featured image and additional images supplied

    By Steve Topple

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Asia Pacific Report

    A Pacific people’s mission to Kanaky New Caledonia was repeatedly confronted with a “profound sense of distrust” in the French state’s role in the decolonisation process, a new report released this week has revealed.

    “This scepticism, articulated by Kanak representatives, is rooted in the belief that France is not a neutral arbiter but a key actor in perpetuating the conflict,” said the mission, which concluded that the French management of the territory continued to undermine the Kanak right to self-determination and breached international commitments on decolonisation.

    As one speaker cited in the report explained:”France is acting like a referee, but instead they are the main perpetrator.”

    The mission — led by the Pacific Network on Globalisation (PANG), the Pacific Conference of Churches (PCC) and the Protestant Church of Kanaky New Caledonia (Église protestante de Kanaky Nouvelle-Calédonie, EPKNC) — was conducted on April 10-19 this year following invitations from customary and church leaders.

    Its findings, released last Wednesday by PANG, reveal persistent inequality, systemic discrimination, and political interference under the French administration. The report said that France’s role in Kanaky’s long-delayed decolonisation process had deepened mistrust and weakened the foundations of self-rule.

    “The Pacific Mission in Kanaky New Caledonia is a reminder of our Pasifika connection with our families across the sea,” said Pastor Billy Wetewea of the EPKNC.

    “It shows that we never exist alone but because of others, and that we are all linked to a common destiny. The journey of the Kanak people toward self-determination is a journey shared by every people in our region still striving to define their own future.”

    The delegation included Anna Naupa (Vanuatu — the mission head), Lopeti Senituli (Tonga), Dr David Small (Aotearoa New Zealand), Emele Duituturaga-Jale (Fiji), with secretariat support by PANG and Kanak partners.

    The team met community leaders, churches, women’s groups and youth networks across several provinces to document how the effects of French rule continue to shape Kanaky’s political, economic and social life.

    Key findings
    The Pacific Peoples’ Mission Report identifies four main areas of concern:

    • France is not a neutral actor in the transition to independence. The state continues to breach commitments made under the Accords through election delays, political interference and the transfer of Kanak leaders to prisons in mainland France.
    • Widening socio-economic inequality. Land ownership, employment, and access to public resources remain heavily imbalanced. The 2024 unrest destroyed more than 800 businesses and left 20,000 people unemployed.
    • A health system in decline. About 20 percent of medical professionals left after the 2024 crisis, leaving rural hospitals and clinics under-resourced and understaffed.
    • Systemic bias in the justice system. Kanak youth now make up more than 80 percent of the prison population, a reflection of structural discrimination and the criminalisation of dissent.
    The full Kanaky People's Mission report
    The full Pacific People’s Mission to Kanaky report.

    Kanak writer and activist Roselyne Makalu said the report documented the lived experiences of her people.

    “This support is fundamental because, as the Pacific family, we form one single entity united by a common destiny,” she said.

    “The publication of this report, which constitutes factual evidence of human-rights violations and the denial of the Kanak people’s right to decide their future, comes at the very moment the French National Assembly has voted, against popular opinion, to postpone the provincial elections.

    “This Parisian decision is nothing short of a blatant new attack on the voice of the Caledonian people, intensifying the political deadlock.”

    Tongan law practitioner and former president of the Tonga Law Society, Lopeti Senituli, who was a member of the mission, said the findings confirmed a deliberate system of control, adding that “the deep inequalities faced by Kanak people — from land loss and economic marginalisation to mass incarceration — are not accidents of history”.

    “They are the direct outcomes of a system designed to keep Kanaky dependent,” he added.

    ‘Politics of revenge’
    Head of mission Anna Naupa said France could not act as both referee and participant in the decolonisation process.

    “Its repeated breaches, political interference and disregard for Kanak rights expose a system built to protect colonial interests, not people,” she said.

    “The mission called for immediate action — the release of political prisoners, fair provincial elections, and a Pacific-led mediation process to restore trust and place Kanaky firmly on the path to self-determination and justice.”

    The mission also confirmed that the May 2024 crisis was an uprising by those most affected by France’s flawed governance and economic model.

    It described France’s post-crisis policies — including scholarship withdrawals, fare increases, and relocation of public services — as “politics of revenge” that had further harmed Kanak and Oceanian communities.

    Recommendations
    The mission calls for:
    • Free and fair provincial elections under neutral international observation;
    • A new round of negotiations to be held to find a new political agreement post Nouméa Accord; and
    • Pacific-led mediation through the Melanesian Spearhead Group (MSG) and the Pacific Islands Forum (PIF).

    The report further urges Pacific governments to ensure Kanaky remains on the United Nations list of Non-Self-Governing Territories and to revitalise regional solidarity mechanisms supporting self-determination and justice.

    “The world is already in the fourth international decade of decolonisation,” the report concludes.

    “Self-determination is an inalienable right of colonised peoples. Decolonisation is a universal issue — not a French internal matter.”

    • The full report, Pacific Peoples’ Mission to Kanaky New Caledonia, is available here through the Pacific Network on Globalisation.
    Supporters of Kanak self-determination hold aloft the flags of Fiji and Kanaky
    Supporters of Kanak self-determination hold aloft the flags of Fiji and Kanak independence in Suva. Image: PANG

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • Asia Pacific Report

    A Pacific people’s mission to Kanaky New Caledonia was repeatedly confronted with a “profound sense of distrust” in the French state’s role in the decolonisation process, a new report released this week has revealed.

    “This scepticism, articulated by Kanak representatives, is rooted in the belief that France is not a neutral arbiter but a key actor in perpetuating the conflict,” said the mission, which concluded that the French management of the territory continued to undermine the Kanak right to self-determination and breached international commitments on decolonisation.

    As one speaker cited in the report explained:”France is acting like a referee, but instead they are the main perpetrator.”

    The mission — led by the Pacific Network on Globalisation (PANG), the Pacific Conference of Churches (PCC) and the Protestant Church of Kanaky New Caledonia (Église protestante de Kanaky Nouvelle-Calédonie, EPKNC) — was conducted on April 10-19 this year following invitations from customary and church leaders.

    Its findings, released last Wednesday by PANG, reveal persistent inequality, systemic discrimination, and political interference under the French administration. The report said that France’s role in Kanaky’s long-delayed decolonisation process had deepened mistrust and weakened the foundations of self-rule.

    “The Pacific Mission in Kanaky New Caledonia is a reminder of our Pasifika connection with our families across the sea,” said Pastor Billy Wetewea of the EPKNC.

    “It shows that we never exist alone but because of others, and that we are all linked to a common destiny. The journey of the Kanak people toward self-determination is a journey shared by every people in our region still striving to define their own future.”

    The delegation included Anna Naupa (Vanuatu — the mission head), Lopeti Senituli (Tonga), Dr David Small (Aotearoa New Zealand), Emele Duituturaga-Jale (Fiji), with secretariat support by PANG and Kanak partners.

    The team met community leaders, churches, women’s groups and youth networks across several provinces to document how the effects of French rule continue to shape Kanaky’s political, economic and social life.

    Key findings
    The Pacific Peoples’ Mission Report identifies four main areas of concern:

    • France is not a neutral actor in the transition to independence. The state continues to breach commitments made under the Accords through election delays, political interference and the transfer of Kanak leaders to prisons in mainland France.
    • Widening socio-economic inequality. Land ownership, employment, and access to public resources remain heavily imbalanced. The 2024 unrest destroyed more than 800 businesses and left 20,000 people unemployed.
    • A health system in decline. About 20 percent of medical professionals left after the 2024 crisis, leaving rural hospitals and clinics under-resourced and understaffed.
    • Systemic bias in the justice system. Kanak youth now make up more than 80 percent of the prison population, a reflection of structural discrimination and the criminalisation of dissent.
    The full Kanaky People's Mission report
    The full Pacific People’s Mission to Kanaky report.

    Kanak writer and activist Roselyne Makalu said the report documented the lived experiences of her people.

    “This support is fundamental because, as the Pacific family, we form one single entity united by a common destiny,” she said.

    “The publication of this report, which constitutes factual evidence of human-rights violations and the denial of the Kanak people’s right to decide their future, comes at the very moment the French National Assembly has voted, against popular opinion, to postpone the provincial elections.

    “This Parisian decision is nothing short of a blatant new attack on the voice of the Caledonian people, intensifying the political deadlock.”

    Tongan law practitioner and former president of the Tonga Law Society, Lopeti Senituli, who was a member of the mission, said the findings confirmed a deliberate system of control, adding that “the deep inequalities faced by Kanak people — from land loss and economic marginalisation to mass incarceration — are not accidents of history”.

    “They are the direct outcomes of a system designed to keep Kanaky dependent,” he added.

    ‘Politics of revenge’
    Head of mission Anna Naupa said France could not act as both referee and participant in the decolonisation process.

    “Its repeated breaches, political interference and disregard for Kanak rights expose a system built to protect colonial interests, not people,” she said.

    “The mission called for immediate action — the release of political prisoners, fair provincial elections, and a Pacific-led mediation process to restore trust and place Kanaky firmly on the path to self-determination and justice.”

    The mission also confirmed that the May 2024 crisis was an uprising by those most affected by France’s flawed governance and economic model.

    It described France’s post-crisis policies — including scholarship withdrawals, fare increases, and relocation of public services — as “politics of revenge” that had further harmed Kanak and Oceanian communities.

    Recommendations
    The mission calls for:
    • Free and fair provincial elections under neutral international observation;
    • A new round of negotiations to be held to find a new political agreement post Nouméa Accord; and
    • Pacific-led mediation through the Melanesian Spearhead Group (MSG) and the Pacific Islands Forum (PIF).

    The report further urges Pacific governments to ensure Kanaky remains on the United Nations list of Non-Self-Governing Territories and to revitalise regional solidarity mechanisms supporting self-determination and justice.

    “The world is already in the fourth international decade of decolonisation,” the report concludes.

    “Self-determination is an inalienable right of colonised peoples. Decolonisation is a universal issue — not a French internal matter.”

    • The full report, Pacific Peoples’ Mission to Kanaky New Caledonia, is available here through the Pacific Network on Globalisation.
    Supporters of Kanak self-determination hold aloft the flags of Fiji and Kanaky
    Supporters of Kanak self-determination hold aloft the flags of Fiji and Kanak independence in Suva. Image: PANG

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • On Saturday 8 November, Ireland’s Football Association approved a decision calling on the Union of European Football Associations (UEFA) to suspend Israel’s participation in European football competitions.

    Ireland says ban Israel from UEFA

    The resolution states that the Israeli association has violated two fundamental provisions of UEFA’s statutes. The first relates to the organisation of clubs in the occupied Palestinian territories without the consent of the Palestinian association, which is a direct violation of European football laws.

    The second clause relates to the Israeli association’s failure to implement an effective anti-racism policy, which is a prerequisite for membership of any association within the UEFA system.

    The resolution also called for clear and transparent criteria for suspending or excluding member associations that violate fundamental laws, thereby ensuring the protection of sporting values and fairness within the European Football Association.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Alaa Shamali

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • As the homes of Gaza’s families lie in ruins, its farmlands and water supply now also pose lethal risks in  environmental and health catastrophe.

    SPECIAL REPORT: By Elis Gjevori

    Israel’s war on Gaza has not only razed entire neighbourhoods to the ground, displaced families multiple times and decimated medical facilities, but also poisoned the very ground and water on which Palestinians depend.

    Four weeks into a fragile ceasefire, which Israel has violated daily, the scale of the environmental devastation is becoming painfully clear.

    In Gaza City’s Sheikh Radwan neighbourhood, what was once a lively community has become a wasteland. Homes lie in ruins, and an essential water source, once a rainwater pond, now festers with sewage and debris.

    COP30 BRAZIL 2025
    COP30 BRAZIL 2025

    For many displaced families, it is both home and hazard.

    Umm Hisham, pregnant and displaced, trudges through the foul water with her children. They have nowhere else to go.

    “We took refuge here, around the Sheikh Radwan pond, with all the sufferings you could imagine, from mosquitoes to sewage with rising levels, let alone the destruction all around. All this poses a danger to our lives and the lives of our children,” she said, speaking to Al Jazeera’s Ibrahim Alkhalili.

    The pond, designed to collect rainwater and channel it to the sea, now holds raw sewage after Israeli air attacks destroyed the pumps. With electricity and sanitation systems crippled, contaminated water continues to rise, threatening to engulf nearby homes and tents.

    Grave impacts
    “There is no doubt there are grave impacts on all citizens: Foul odours, insects, mosquitoes. Also, foul water levels have exceeded 6 metres high without any protection; the fence is completely destroyed, with high possibility for any child, woman, old man, or even a car to fall into this pond,” said Maher Salem, a Gaza City municipal officer speaking to Al Jazeera.

    Local officials warn that stagnant water could cause disease outbreaks, especially among children. Yet for many in Gaza, there are no alternatives.


    Gaza contaminated water risk            Video: Al Jazeera

    “Families know that the water they get from the wells and from the containers or from the water trucks is polluted and contaminated … but they don’t have any other choice,” said Al Jazeera journalist Hani Mahmoud, reporting from Gaza City.

    Palestinian Ambassador to Brazil Ibrahim al-Zeben at COP30 . . . “the deliberate destruction of sewage and water networks has led to the contamination of groundwater and coastal waters.” Image: SBS TikTok screenshot APR

    Destroyed water infrastructure
    At the COP30 Climate Summit in Brazil,  described the crisis as an environmental catastrophe intertwined with Israel’s genocide.

    “There’s no secret that Gaza is suffering because of the genocide that Israel continues to wage, a war that has created nearly a quarter of a million victims and produced more than 61 million tonnes of rubble, some of which is contaminated with hazardous materials,” he said.

    “In addition, the deliberate destruction of sewage and water networks has led to the contamination of groundwater and coastal waters. Gaza now faces severe risks to public health, and environmental risks are increasing,” al-Zeben added.

    Agricultural land ‘destroyed’
    Israel’s attacks have also “destroyed” much of the enclave’s agricultural land, leaving it “in a state of severe food insecurity and famine with food being used as a weapon,” he said.

    In September, a UN report warned freshwater supplies in Gaza are “severely limited and much of what remains is polluted”.

    Piles of Gaza garbage have bred many pests and spread diseases
    Piles of Gaza garbage have bred many pests and spread diseases. Image: AJ screenshot APR

    “The collapse of sewage treatment infrastructure, the destruction of piped systems and the use of cesspits for sanitation have likely increased contamination of the aquifer that supplies much of Gaza with water,” the report by the United Nations Environment Programme noted.

    Back in Sheikh Radwan, the air hangs thick with rot and despair. “When every day is a fight to find water, food, and bread,” journalist Mahmoud said, “safety becomes secondary.”

    A New Zealand pro-Palestine protester with a watermelon "Free Palestine" placard at traffic lights in a West Auckland rally
    A New Zealand pro-Palestine protester with a watermelon “Free Palestine” placard at traffic lights in a West Auckland rally yesterday. Image: Asia Pacific Report

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • The Gaza government’s emergency operations unit has issued an urgent appeal to the United Nations, its agencies, and international humanitarian organisations. It’s calling for immediate action to protect thousands of displaced families facing the threat of flooding as winter approaches.

    Displaced families face imminent threat of flooding and need to be relocated

    Dr. Samah Hammad, head of the operations unit, described the situation as “extremely dire.” She said families living in coastal and low-lying areas face an immediate threat from flooding, rainwater, and storm surges. Hammad urged the relocation of families to safe shelters and called for urgent delivery of aid.

    The ongoing genocide has destroyed infrastructure across Gaza — including drainage systems and roads. Gaza Municipality reports that most wastewater plants, pumping stations, and sewage networks are in ruins. This extensive destruction has led to a build-up of contaminated water, environmental toxicity, and serious public-health risks.

    Collapsed water and sanitation systems make neighbourhoods more prone to flooding and prevent communities from coping with heavy rains. Living conditions are worsening fast — many displaced people have no protection from the cold and no heating at all.

    Items needed for winter survival are prevented from entering Gaza by the Israeli occupation

    Gaza’s humanitarian crisis has deepened under years of blockade and repeated Israeli assaults. Even before October 2023, 80% the population relied on aid to survive. Israel continues to ban construction materials, blocking any real reconstruction effort. Now the siege is stopping tents, building materials, and winter supplies from entering — even as storms approach.

    Hammad said international organisations already have shelter supplies ready, but Israel has refused to grant border access. Aid entry remains severely restricted — in clear breach of the ceasefire agreement promising 600 trucks per day.

    According to Gaza’s Government Media Office, between 10 October and 31 October 2025 only 3,203 aid trucks entered Gaza — an average of just 145 a day. That’s nowhere near enough to meet urgent needs.

    Humanitarian aid needs to be immediate and unrestricted

    The Ministry of Public Works and Housing has identified almost 300 temporary shelter sites equipped with basic water and sanitation facilities near displaced communities. But these safe zones can only function if international and local authorities coordinate — and if Israel stops blocking access.

    Humanitarian groups like the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) and the UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR) are mobilising to help but need unrestricted entry to do their work.

    Hammad urged the international community to demand the immediate, unhindered delivery of tents, shelter materials, and prefabricated housing units. Without this, hundreds of thousands of people face another winter without safety or dignity.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Charlie Jaay

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • In a city where the echoes of bombardment mingle with the groans of the wounded, the health system in Gaza is collapsing under the weight of the siege and denial of medical supplies. The scene is no longer limited to the wounded waiting for a bed, but also includes doctors searching for a single dose of painkillers in nearly empty warehouses.

    The Director General of the Ministry of Health in Gaza, Dr. Munir al-Barsh, painted a grim picture of the situation, telling journalists that the amount of medicine that has entered since the ceasefire on October 10th does not exceed 10% of the Strip’s needs.

    “Medicine has become part of the battlefield, not a means of healing,” said Al-Barsh, referring to what he described as a “deliberate medical siege.”

    Gaza medicine — An open-ended crisis

    Since the ceasefire was declared, only 60 truckloads of medical supplies have been allowed in, a meagre number compared to the needs of two million people living amidst destruction and disease.

    According to the Ministry of Health, the shortage of medicines has reached 65%, while the shortage of medical supplies has reached 70%, unprecedented levels even during the most brutal phases of the war. As Al-Barsh puts it:

    Some essential medicines are completely out of stock. We are treating the wounded with what remains of expired packages or alternative medications that are insufficient

    Medicine in the Market: Between Scarcity and Greed

    In the few markets that are still operating, pharmacies have become like museums of rare medicines, where medication is sometimes available, but at exorbitant prices.

    Al-Barsh confirmed that some medicines reach the private sector in “very small” quantities, which explains the sharp rise in prices, especially for painkillers and antibiotics.

    Targeting the Pharmaceutical Infrastructure

    The occupation did not stop at blocking the entry of trucks. It also destroyed what remained of the health facilities. According to the Ministry of Health, approximately 860 private pharmacies were destroyed during the two years of the war, in what Al-Barsh described as “a direct attack on people’s right to treatment and life.”

    When the hospital is destroyed and the pharmacy closes, all that remains is the tent and waiting… waiting for death or a miracle

    Medical Care Amidst the Rubble

    In hospital corridors, doctors work with whatever supplies and bandages are left. Operating rooms are sometimes lit by emergency lights, and the wounded are given insufficient anaesthesia.

    A nurse at Al-Shifa Hospital told the Canary,

    Sometimes we perform surgeries without anaesthesia. Pain has become part of the treatment.

    Thus, in Gaza, wounds have become a daily reality, and medicine a wish suspended at a military checkpoint.

    Open the crossings

    Al-Barsh concluded his remarks with an urgent appeal to international organizations and humanitarian agencies to take immediate action, emphasising that the continued siege “means the slow death of thousands of patients and the wounded.”

    The occupation is not only bombing, but also preventing treatment. The medical blockade is a crime committed in broad daylight, and the world watches.

    Gaza medicine — a Political Issue

    The health crisis in Gaza is no longer a matter of relief, but a political issue used by Israel for control and subjugation. Every delayed shipment of medicine and every denied permit means more suffering in hospital wards and more postponed funerals.

    Despite all this, doctors continue to work, patients persevere, and the people of Gaza cling to life with their last lifeline.

    Featured image via UNRWA

    By Alaa Shamali

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Asia Pacific Report

    New Zealand Pro-Palestine protesters gathered at West Auckland’s Te Pai Park today, celebrating successes of the BDS movement against apartheid Israel while condemning the failure of the country’s coalition government to impose sanctions against the pariah state.

    “They’ve done nothing,” said Neil Scott, secretary of the Palestine Solidarity Network Aotearoa (PSNA), noting that some 35 protests were taking place across the motu this weekend and some 4000 rallies had been held since Israel began its war on Gaza in October 2023.

    He outlined successes of the global BDS Movement and explained now New Zealanders could keep up the pressure on the NZ government and on the Zionist state that had been “systematically” breaching the US-brokered “ceasefire” in Gaza.

    The criticisms followed the condemnation of New Zealand’s stance last week by the secretary-general of the global human rights group Amnesty International, Agnès Callamard, who said the government had a “Trumpian accent” and had remained silent on Gaza.

    “Internationally, we don’t hear New Zealand. We haven’t heard New Zealand on some of the fundamental challenges that we are confronting, including Israel’s genocide, Palestine or climate,” she said in a RNZ radio interview.

    Te Atatu MP Phil Twyford also spoke at the Te Pai Park rally, saying that the government was “going backwards” from the country’s traditional independent foreign policy and that it was “riddled with Zionists”.

    After the rally, protesters marched on the local McDonalds franchise. McDonalds Israel is accused of supporting the IDF (Israeli Defence Forces) genocidal crimes in Gaza by supplying free meals to the military, prompting a global BDS boycott.

    Türkiye arrest warrants for Israelis
    Meanwhile, Türkiye has issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and 36 other suspects over Gaza genocide charges

    Israel, under Netanyahu, has killed close to 69,000 people, mostly women and children, and wounded more than 170,600 others in the genocide in Gaza since October 2023.

    PSNA secretary Neil Scott speaking at today's Te Pai Park rally
    PSNA secretary Neil Scott speaking at today’s Te Pai Park rally in West Auckland. Image: Asia Pacific Report

    TRT World News reports that the Istanbul Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office said yesterday it had issued arrest warrants for 37 suspects, including Netanyahu, on charges of “genocide” in Gaza.

    In a statement, the Prosecutor’s Office said the warrants were issued after an extensive investigation into Israel’s “systematic” attacks on civilians in Gaza, which it described as acts of genocide and crimes against humanity.

    The probe was launched following complaints filed by victims and representatives of the Global Sumud Flotilla, a civilian humanitarian mission, that was recently intercepted by Israeli naval forces while attempting to deliver aid to Gaza.

    A "Free Gaza now" placard at today's Te Pai Park rally
    A “Free Gaza now” placard at today’s Te Pai Park rally in West Auckland. Image: Asia Pacific Report

    The statement said evidence gathered from victims, eyewitnesses, and international law provisions indicated that Israeli military and political leaders were directly responsible for ordering and carrying out attacks on hospitals, aid convoys, and civilian infrastructure.

    Citing specific incidents, the Prosecutor’s Office referred to the killing of six-year-old Hind Rajab by Israeli soldiers, the bombing of al-Ahli Arab Hospital that killed more than 500 people, and the strike on the Turkish-Palestinian Friendship Hospital, among other atrocities.

    Additional war crimes
    The office said that the investigation determined Israel’s blockade of Gaza had “deliberately prevented humanitarian assistance from reaching civilians,” constituting an additional war crime under international law.

    The suspects, including Netanyahu, Defence Minister Israel Katz, National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, Chief of General Staff Herzi Halevi, and Navy Commander David Saar Salama, were accused of “genocide” and “crimes against humanity.”

    As the individuals are not currently in Türkiye, the Prosecutor’s Office requested the court to issue international arrest warrants (red notices) for their detention and extradition.

    The investigation is being carried out with the cooperation of the Istanbul Police Department and the National Intelligence Organization (MIT), and it remains ongoing.

    The statement concluded that Türkiye’s legal actions are based on its obligations under international humanitarian law and the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, affirming the country’s commitment to accountability for war crimes and justice for the victims in Gaza.

    Last November, the International Criminal Court (ICC) issued arrest warrants for Netanyahu and his former Defence Minister, Yoav Gallant, for war crimes and crimes against humanity in Gaza.

    Israel also faces a genocide case at the International Court of Justice for its war on the enclave and Türkiye has joined South Africa and other countries in bringing the allegations.

    In Tel Aviv, Foreign Minister Gideon Saar said Israel “firmly rejects, with contempt” the charges, calling them “the latest PR stunt by the tyrant [Turkish President Recep Tayyip] Erdogan”.

    A fragile ceasefire has been in force in the devastated Palestinian territory since October 10 as part of US President Donald Trump’s regional peace plan.

    The Islamist militant group Hamas welcomed Türkiye’s announcement, calling it a “commendable measure [confirming] the sincere positions of the Turkish people and their leaders, who are committed to the values of justice, humanity and fraternity that bind them to our oppressed Palestinian people”.

    The Te Pai Park pro-Palestinian rally in West Auckland today
    The Te Pai Park pro-Palestinian rally in West Auckland today. Image: Asia Pacific Report

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • Asia Pacific Report

    New Zealand Pro-Palestine protesters gathered at West Auckland’s Te Pai Park today, celebrating successes of the BDS movement against apartheid Israel while condemning the failure of the country’s coalition government to impose sanctions against the pariah state.

    “They’ve done nothing,” said Neil Scott, secretary of the Palestine Solidarity Network Aotearoa (PSNA), noting that some 35 protests were taking place across the motu this weekend and some 4000 rallies had been held since Israel began its war on Gaza in October 2023.

    He outlined successes of the global BDS Movement and explained now New Zealanders could keep up the pressure on the NZ government and on the Zionist state that had been “systematically” breaching the US-brokered “ceasefire” in Gaza.

    The criticisms followed the condemnation of New Zealand’s stance last week by the secretary-general of the global human rights group Amnesty International, Agnès Callamard, who said the government had a “Trumpian accent” and had remained silent on Gaza.

    “Internationally, we don’t hear New Zealand. We haven’t heard New Zealand on some of the fundamental challenges that we are confronting, including Israel’s genocide, Palestine or climate,” she said in a RNZ radio interview.

    Te Atatu MP Phil Twyford also spoke at the Te Pai Park rally, saying that the government was “going backwards” from the country’s traditional independent foreign policy and that it was “riddled with Zionists”.

    After the rally, protesters marched on the local McDonalds franchise. McDonalds Israel is accused of supporting the IDF (Israeli Defence Forces) genocidal crimes in Gaza by supplying free meals to the military, prompting a global BDS boycott.

    Türkiye arrest warrants for Israelis
    Meanwhile, Türkiye has issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and 36 other suspects over Gaza genocide charges

    Israel, under Netanyahu, has killed close to 69,000 people, mostly women and children, and wounded more than 170,600 others in the genocide in Gaza since October 2023.

    PSNA secretary Neil Scott speaking at today's Te Pai Park rally
    PSNA secretary Neil Scott speaking at today’s Te Pai Park rally in West Auckland. Image: Asia Pacific Report

    TRT World News reports that the Istanbul Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office said yesterday it had issued arrest warrants for 37 suspects, including Netanyahu, on charges of “genocide” in Gaza.

    In a statement, the Prosecutor’s Office said the warrants were issued after an extensive investigation into Israel’s “systematic” attacks on civilians in Gaza, which it described as acts of genocide and crimes against humanity.

    The probe was launched following complaints filed by victims and representatives of the Global Sumud Flotilla, a civilian humanitarian mission, that was recently intercepted by Israeli naval forces while attempting to deliver aid to Gaza.

    A "Free Gaza now" placard at today's Te Pai Park rally
    A “Free Gaza now” placard at today’s Te Pai Park rally in West Auckland. Image: Asia Pacific Report

    The statement said evidence gathered from victims, eyewitnesses, and international law provisions indicated that Israeli military and political leaders were directly responsible for ordering and carrying out attacks on hospitals, aid convoys, and civilian infrastructure.

    Citing specific incidents, the Prosecutor’s Office referred to the killing of six-year-old Hind Rajab by Israeli soldiers, the bombing of al-Ahli Arab Hospital that killed more than 500 people, and the strike on the Turkish-Palestinian Friendship Hospital, among other atrocities.

    Additional war crimes
    The office said that the investigation determined Israel’s blockade of Gaza had “deliberately prevented humanitarian assistance from reaching civilians,” constituting an additional war crime under international law.

    The suspects, including Netanyahu, Defence Minister Israel Katz, National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, Chief of General Staff Herzi Halevi, and Navy Commander David Saar Salama, were accused of “genocide” and “crimes against humanity.”

    As the individuals are not currently in Türkiye, the Prosecutor’s Office requested the court to issue international arrest warrants (red notices) for their detention and extradition.

    The investigation is being carried out with the cooperation of the Istanbul Police Department and the National Intelligence Organization (MIT), and it remains ongoing.

    The statement concluded that Türkiye’s legal actions are based on its obligations under international humanitarian law and the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, affirming the country’s commitment to accountability for war crimes and justice for the victims in Gaza.

    Last November, the International Criminal Court (ICC) issued arrest warrants for Netanyahu and his former Defence Minister, Yoav Gallant, for war crimes and crimes against humanity in Gaza.

    Israel also faces a genocide case at the International Court of Justice for its war on the enclave and Türkiye has joined South Africa and other countries in bringing the allegations.

    In Tel Aviv, Foreign Minister Gideon Saar said Israel “firmly rejects, with contempt” the charges, calling them “the latest PR stunt by the tyrant [Turkish President Recep Tayyip] Erdogan”.

    A fragile ceasefire has been in force in the devastated Palestinian territory since October 10 as part of US President Donald Trump’s regional peace plan.

    The Islamist militant group Hamas welcomed Türkiye’s announcement, calling it a “commendable measure [confirming] the sincere positions of the Turkish people and their leaders, who are committed to the values of justice, humanity and fraternity that bind them to our oppressed Palestinian people”.

    The Te Pai Park pro-Palestinian rally in West Auckland today
    The Te Pai Park pro-Palestinian rally in West Auckland today. Image: Asia Pacific Report

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • 33-year-old Palestinian journalist Mustafa Ayyash, founder of Gaza Now, was arrested at Schiphol Airport in the Netherlands on 19 September at Austria’s request.

    He is now detained in a Dutch prison — without trial — accused of no violent crime. Ayyash is fighting extradition to Austria.

    Mustafa Ayyash’s Gaza Now — accused by Israel of “Hamas ties” for telling the truth

    Gaza Now, founded in 2009, is one of Gaza’s most-watched media outlets. It provides 24-hour coverage and reaches millions worldwide. The platform exposes Israeli war crimes and human rights abuses — making it an obvious target for the occupation.

    A source close to Ayyash, who requested anonymity, shared new details with the Canary about his case.

    In November 2023, Israel bombed his family home in Al-Nuseirat refugee camp. The six-storey house was flattened by three missiles — without warning.

    The bombing completely flattened the house and resulted in the deaths of all Ayyash’s family members who were inside at the time- his mother, father, three brothers, three sisters, and seven nephews and nieces. 40 people in total.

    Israeli regime threatens and kills Palestinian journalists on a daily basis.

    According to the Canary’s source, Mustapha Ayyash had received direct threats from Israeli occupation forces. Targeting journalists is routine practice for Israel, which kills them — and their families — to silence Gaza’s truth-tellers. It is very likely that Israel deliberately target Ayyash’s house.

    Israel initially believed it had killed him. Even the UN reported his “death.” Fearing for his life, Ayyash fled and was granted asylum in Austria.

    UK and US sanctions made Ayyash fear for his life

    In March 2024, the UK and US sanctioned Ayyash, claiming he funds Gaza Now which, in turn, ‘promotes Hamas and the Islamic Jihad’.

    They accused his fundraising for civilians in Gaza of “benefitting Hamas.” Ayyash denies all charges and calls them deliberate misinformation.

    A source told The Canary these sanctions froze his assets, restricted travel, and made him “constantly fearful he’d be killed.”

    Ayyash’s lawyer, Frederieke Dölle, said:

    “There is a pattern, unfortunately, where Palestinian journalists face fake allegations of Hamas links. It’s something to be very worried about, and it’s important they are protected.”

    Soon after the sanctions, Austrian police raided Mustapha Ayyash’s home. They seized devices, deleted Gaza Now’s WhatsApp (300,000 followers) and Facebook pages (8 million).

    Ayyash was not charged or arrested.

    Austrian police caused permanent injury to Ayyash’s eight months pregnant wife. After the raid on his home, Mustafa and his family left Austria, because they did not feel safe any more in the country.

    Dölle said police treated Ayyash and his eight-months-pregnant wife “very harshly.” His wife later partially lost her sight due to the violent search.

    Ayyash travelled to the Netherlands to file a complaint at the International Criminal Court (ICC) over Austria’s conduct against him and his family. But as he passed through Schiphol Airport, he was arrested. Austria had submitted a European Arrest Warrant.

    Mustapha Ayyash’s lawyer: Arrest warrant “very vague”

    Dölle explained that Ayyash’s extradition hearing on 11 November is “a special case.”

    “He’s accused of asking for donations for Gaza that allegedly reached Hamas — but there’s no detail: no when, how, or where. Even with a European arrest warrant, you must be specific.”

    She warned many journalists are branded Hamas supporters “without any evidence” — and suspects Israeli involvement behind the request.

    Ayyash may be made to go to Austria- which must be within 10 days of the judgement. But Dutch judges could also deny his extradition, or say they need more time and more information from the Austrian authorities.

    If extradited, Ayyash could be sent to Austria within 10 days of the ruling. Dutch judges could also delay or deny the request, demanding more details from Austria.

    Although Dölle  hopes the Dutch authorities do not comply, and the Dutch judge denies the extradition request, she knows this will be extremely difficult, because Austria is a European Union country.

    There’s no Israeli extradition request yet. But Austria is bound by the European Convention on Human Rights — meaning it shouldn’t transfer him to Israel. Still, Dölle warns the risk cannot be ruled out.

    If this happens, Ayyash’s life would be in extreme danger, as the Israeli regime specifically targets journalists. 

    Since October 2023, Israel has killed more journalists in Gaza than were killed in World War I, World War II, Korea, Vietnam, Yugoslavia, and Afghanistan combined.

    His physical and mental health very fragile

    Dölle told the Canary that Ayyash is severely traumatised. He lost his family to an airstrike — and now sits in a cell for a crime he didn’t commit. Mustapha is extremely frightened, and doesn’t know when he will be released. He has self-harmed and attempted suicide.

    Mustapha is denied family visits, even from his brother in the Netherlands.

    A source told The Canary he’s been beaten and tortured, and “suffered greatly.” Ayyash ended a 15-day hunger strike, but his physical and mental health continues to deteriorate. He doesn’t have access to regular medical checkups and even his lawyer visits are sparse and restricted.

    Our government’s collusion with a regime that kills journalists and commits crimes against humanity must stop now

    Ayyash’s case shatters the myth that Western democracies care about press freedom or human rights.

    Israel — whose leaders are wanted by the International Criminal Court — continues to evade accountability, silence dissent, and imprison and kill journalists with impunity. Its track record shows a clear disregard for the rule of law and truth.

    By enabling Israel’s persecution, our governments betray the values they preach.

    We must demand an end to this collusion that suppresses critical journalism and stops justice. Ayyash’s ordeal is not only a personal tragedy but shows us how truth is under attack. Defending him means protecting the freedom to expose the truth and hold the powerful and corrupt accountable, even when they want their crimes to remain hidden.

    We must demand an end to this collusion that punishes truth-telling. That suppresses critical journalism and stops justice. Mustafa Ayyash’s ordeal is a warning — when journalists are criminalised, democracy dies with them. Defending him means defending the right to expose power, even when the powerful want their crimes buried.

    So what are these so called Western democratic nations doing, that speak of freedoms of press and speech, colluding with a pariah state committing war crimes and crimes against humanity? Ones whose leaders are wanted by the International Criminal Court?

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Charlie Jaay

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • A Gaza resident tells his story of the struggle to survive in Israel’s Gaza genocide today, “ceasefire” or not.

    SPECIAL REPORT: By Qasem Waleed El-Farra

    On October 19, Israel launched a barrage of airstrikes across the Gaza Strip, killing dozens of people in a blatant violation of US President Donald Trump’s ceasefire plan, which had come into effect just over a week earlier.

    And a day after world leaders had gathered in Egypt to discuss implementation, I went back to my neighborhood in eastern Khan Younis on October 14 to gather anything that could protect me and my family against the approaching winter — clothes, sheets, wood, books even, for those cold nights where there will be little else to do but read.

    I had not long been searching through the rubble of my home — which has been completely destroyed — when I heard shooting and saw people running.

    I had been in enough of such situations to know not to ask questions. I left everything I had pulled from under the rubble and fled back toward downtown Khan Younis.

    While we were — yet again — fleeing our area, I learned that an Israeli quadcopter had attacked a group of civilians in the area. One of them, I was told, was shot right in the heart.

    I’ve faced death many times throughout the genocide. But this time was different. This was just one day after Trump, backed by a number of world leaders, announced a plan to bring peace to Gaza and the Middle East.

    That day, Israel had also announced that Zikim beach, which is located in the Gaza Strip envelope, to enable the Israeli settlers there to “breathe again.”

    When I arrived in my tent in the al-Mawasi area of Khan Younis, I pondered just one question: Is this the ceasefire they want to bring us? Or do they just want to announce a cessation of violence, but have no interest in enforcing it?

    Targeting global solidarity
    As a person in Gaza who has been living through a genocide for two years and five major Israeli attacks on Gaza before that, the term “ceasefire” is selective and always shadowed with deadly threats.

    As far as I have experienced, the word simply means that Israel is able to do whatever it wants. We aren’t.

    More broadly, for Israel, ”peace” in Palestine equals a Palestine with no Palestinians, as Israel’s prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu and other senior government ministers have made very clear.

    Over the years, Palestinians have learned the hard way that when the colonial plans and their various institutional manifestations — from the Peel Commission in 1936 to Trump’s “Board of Peace” — are formed, allegedly to bring peace, the oppressed people’s rights are lost.

    The reason is that behind the proposal, there is always a gun pointed at us.

    Or, like how Francesca Albanese, the UN’s special rapporteur on human rights in the occupied Palestinian territories, put it: “Ceasefire according to Israel = ‘you cease, I fire.’”

    When I read through the Trump-Netanyahu 20-point ceasefire plan for Gaza, all I could think of is that we have gone back a century in time: It is another colonial promise of peace that includes everyone but Palestinians, the land’s native population.

    Of course, in Gaza, we all want this ceasefire to hold, to save what remains of our home. Still, it does not take a genius to see that the ceasefire plan is nothing but a grotesque charade directed by Trump and Netanyahu — a desperate move to save Israel from being internationally isolated, especially after the unprecedented pro-Palestine demonstrations across the globe.

    Thus, the plan deprives Gaza of the increasing momentum of world support, while also resulting in the continued loss of people and land in Gaza. It is either Netanyahu’s rock or Trump’s hard place.

    On-off genocide
    The ceasefire plan depends fundamentally on a phased Israeli withdrawal “based on standards, milestones, and timeframes linked to demilitarisation that will be agreed upon between the IDF [Israel Defense Forces], ISF [International Stabilisation Force], the guarantors, and the United States.”

    In more precise terms, there is no specified timeline.

    This means that with Israeli troops withdrawal to the yellow line on the plan’s map, it is still in control of 58 percent of Gaza, and while some people might be able to return to their areas of residence, I cannot.

    The plan has allowed Israel to do what it does best — stall, manipulate and deceive. By October 28, according to Gaza’s authorities, Israel had breached the ceasefire 125 times.

    The killings continue, aid is still being hindered and the Rafah crossing remains closed, denying people travel to receive urgent medical treatment.

    A significant reason for the continued killing in Gaza is that the Israeli withdrawal lines are tricky and ambiguous, even unknown to locals, especially those who live in the eastern part of Gaza.

    On October 17, for instance, Israel killed 11 members of the Abu Shaaban family: seven children, three women and the father, as they returned to check on their house in the al-Zaytoun neighborhood of eastern Gaza City.

    In my neighborhood, Sheikh Nasser, in eastern Khan Younis, neighbors marked a destroyed house with a big red sheet to warn others not to cross further.

    We have witnessed two prior ceasefire agreements in the past two years of genocide. Both times I hoped they would bring an end to our misery. Many of us in Gaza remain very sceptical about this ceasefire, and we can’t afford to let hope in our hearts again.

    Israel loves to fish in muddy water, or, like we in Gaza like to put it, ala nakshah, meaning that Israel is merely awaiting any slight excuse to resume the killing.

    Netanyahu has repeatedly made it obvious that it’s either his political future or our future. For as long as he is in power, Israel will keep coming for us in an on-off genocide in order to make our misery constant.

    This is the “peace” we are offered after two years of suffering the crime of crimes.

    Qasem Waleed El-Farra is a physicist based in Gaza. His article was first published by The Electronic Intifada on 6 November 2025.

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • RNZ News

    The current New Zealand government has a “Trumpian accent” that should be a red flag for the people, one of the world’s leading human rights voices says.

    Amnesty International secretary-general Agnès Callamard spoke this week on 30 with Guyon Espiner during her first official visit to New Zealand.

    Once a country that was seen internationally as “punching above its weight” in terms of human rights, Callamard said it was not currently seen as having a strong voice.

    “New Zealand has always been a country that, what is the expression, punched above its weight. In human rights terms, in solidarity terms, you know, by holding the line on a number of very fundamental questions.

    “Right now, this is not what is happening.”

    This led to the government having a “certain Trumpian accent”, she said.


    Amnesty’s top official says New Zealand is losing its reputation as a human rights leader Video: RNZ News

    “These are red flags, I think, for the New Zealand people, because, you know, the shift can happen very quickly.

    “At Amnesty International, we are worried about this evolution. Internationally, we don’t hear New Zealand. We haven’t heard New Zealand on some of the fundamental challenges that we are confronting, including Israel’s genocide, Palestine or climate.”

    Critical of Trump
    Callamard was critical of United States President Donald Trump — saying she would not give him any credit for his actions regarding the Gaza ceasefire.

    “For the last 10 months of power, he has shielded Israel,” Callamard said.

    “Everyone agrees that this ceasefire, this deal, could have been made in March. This deal could have been made in June.

    “Okay, it’s being made now. But why did we have to wait so long? Israel would never have been able to do what they’ve done without the support of the US.”

    She said she was “super happy” the bombing had stopped but she would not thank the US for waiting “24 months” to act.

    New Zealand’s silence on issues, including the war in Gaza, was being noticed internationally, she said, with “dwindling voices coming from the Western world”.

    ‘Speak loud. We need you’
    It was something she had raised with the government itself, although not resonating in a positive way.

    “They don’t see it that way. I see it that way. We just have to leave it at that.

    “We have different views on how New Zealand stands right now, and it is a critical juncture for the world and any voice that we don’t hear any more for the protection of the rules-based order is dramatic.

    “I want to invite the New Zealand people and New Zealand leaders to really please speak up. Speak loud. We need you.”

    The Prime Minister’s Office has been contacted for comment.

    This article is republished under a community partnership agreement with RNZ.

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • RNZ News

    The current New Zealand government has a “Trumpian accent” that should be a red flag for the people, one of the world’s leading human rights voices says.

    Amnesty International secretary-general Agnès Callamard spoke this week on 30 with Guyon Espiner during her first official visit to New Zealand.

    Once a country that was seen internationally as “punching above its weight” in terms of human rights, Callamard said it was not currently seen as having a strong voice.

    “New Zealand has always been a country that, what is the expression, punched above its weight. In human rights terms, in solidarity terms, you know, by holding the line on a number of very fundamental questions.

    “Right now, this is not what is happening.”

    This led to the government having a “certain Trumpian accent”, she said.


    Amnesty’s top official says New Zealand is losing its reputation as a human rights leader Video: RNZ News

    “These are red flags, I think, for the New Zealand people, because, you know, the shift can happen very quickly.

    “At Amnesty International, we are worried about this evolution. Internationally, we don’t hear New Zealand. We haven’t heard New Zealand on some of the fundamental challenges that we are confronting, including Israel’s genocide, Palestine or climate.”

    Critical of Trump
    Callamard was critical of United States President Donald Trump — saying she would not give him any credit for his actions regarding the Gaza ceasefire.

    “For the last 10 months of power, he has shielded Israel,” Callamard said.

    “Everyone agrees that this ceasefire, this deal, could have been made in March. This deal could have been made in June.

    “Okay, it’s being made now. But why did we have to wait so long? Israel would never have been able to do what they’ve done without the support of the US.”

    She said she was “super happy” the bombing had stopped but she would not thank the US for waiting “24 months” to act.

    New Zealand’s silence on issues, including the war in Gaza, was being noticed internationally, she said, with “dwindling voices coming from the Western world”.

    ‘Speak loud. We need you’
    It was something she had raised with the government itself, although not resonating in a positive way.

    “They don’t see it that way. I see it that way. We just have to leave it at that.

    “We have different views on how New Zealand stands right now, and it is a critical juncture for the world and any voice that we don’t hear any more for the protection of the rules-based order is dramatic.

    “I want to invite the New Zealand people and New Zealand leaders to really please speak up. Speak loud. We need you.”

    The Prime Minister’s Office has been contacted for comment.

    This article is republished under a community partnership agreement with RNZ.

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • When Tom Hanks appeared on The Late Show with Stephen Colbert on November 3, the host asked why he still wears a mask:

    I’m doing a play right now so I cannot get sick… I’ve had COVID enough in my life, I don’t need to do that again. So I’m wearing this for health reasons.

    That comment came in the context of his starring and co-writing role in This World of Tomorrow, an Off-Broadway production at The Shed. Hanks had recently been photographed riding the New York City subway while wearing a face mask, first a surgical mask, later a high-filtration KN95.

    Stephen Colbert and the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic

    Stephen Colbert’s late-night career has also intersected deeply with the ongoing pandemic, recording a monologue from his bathtub when studios first shut in March 2020 and then running extended stretches of the program from outside the Ed Sullivan Theater, including remote a setup at the family home in South Carolina.

    By late 2023, The Late Show had weathered multiple COVID-related interruptions, first in April, then in October. A few weeks later, in November 2023, the situation escalated when Colbert underwent emergency surgery for a ruptured appendix, lost 14 pounds, and described how he “was not aware of the amount of trouble I was in.”

    When he returned in December 2023, according to his own account, Colbert had taped two episodes while in severe pain, rehearsed his monologue with a “barf bucket” beside his desk, and only later learned that his appendix had burst and caused blood poisoning. Colbert’s health scare, and its proximity to the show‘s COVID cancellations, raises an important question: could his acute appendicitis and subsequent complications relate in part to the infection a few weeks before?

    While no individual case allows for definitive causal attribution, a growing body of clinical research suggests that infection with SARS‑CoV‑2 (the virus that causes COVID) is associated with health complications beyond the airways, including increased risk of acute or complicated appendicitis.

    Biological association between COVID and organ damage

    Early in the pandemic, an increase in acute appendicitis cases was often attributed to delayed care during lockdowns, but newer understandings of COVID’s effects on the body add weight to a direct biological association.

    Many people continue to think of COVID‑19 as an upper respiratory infection, like a cold or flu, but it has become increasingly clear that the illness is a multisystem, neurovascular disease. SARS-CoV-2 is not limited to the airways because it targets the endothelium, the thin layer of cells that lines every blood vessel in the body. Reviews in Nature outline how SARS-CoV-2 can damage the lining of blood vessels (the endothelium), set off tiny clots (micro-thrombi), and drive “immunothrombosis,” a feedback loop between inflammation and coagulation that can impair blood flow in multiple organs, including the brain and gut.

    A spreading disaster

    Once the virus, or the inflammation it triggers, damages that lining, the effect can spread through the entire vascular network, essentially the body’s distribution system for oxygen, nutrients, and immune signals. When those blood vessels become inflamed or clogged with tiny clots, all of the body’s systems can be affected. This is why complications range from neurological symptoms to gastrointestinal inflammation and organ injury.

    The gut is an essential part of that overall clinical picture. Direct intestinal involvement, persistent immune activation, and signs of a weakened barrier in the GI tract persist after infection, changes that make local tissues more vulnerable.

    Those same mechanisms help explain why there has been an increase in complicated cases of appendicitis since the beginning of the pandemic. Lymphoid tissue in the appendix swells after viral infection (a common trigger for blockage), while vascular and immune effects can speed progression from early irritation to perforation or abscess. All of these point to a biologic pathway of injury (rather than simply delays in care) in patients who go on to present with appendicitis that is unusually severe or complicated.

    This overall biological picture of COVID as a multi-system disease with downstream effects on the appendix been borne out in the clinical research.

    COVID and complicated appendicitis: did this affect Stephen Colbert?

    Across a growing number of studies since the beginning of the pandemic, SARS-CoV-2 infection has been associated with a higher risk that appendicitis will present as, or progress to, a complicated course, even after accounting for delays to presentation or surgery.

    A 2025 study found that, the rate of complicated appendicitis rose significantly, even after adjusting for treatment-delay factors. A 2024 multicenter retrospective study of adult patients found that SARS-CoV-2 infection raised the odds of complicated appendicitis by more than 3 times while a nationwide study in Japan describe faster progression and a larger share of perforations and abscesses.

    While one cannot definitively say that Stephen Colbert’s hospitalization for acute appendicitis was caused by prior COVID infections, the broader literature suggests the infection may have been an additive risk factor, either by promoting inflammation or weakening immune-tissue resilience. COVID may or may not have directly “caused” the crisis, but it plausibly made it more likely, more severe, and harder to recover from.

    Cognitive impacts

    While appendicitis illustrates how COVID-19’s systemic effects can manifest suddenly in an acute medical emergency, much of its longer-term impact is less visible, but still serious. Because COVID is a multi-system, neurovascular disease, affecting organs including the blood vessels and the brain, many of its consequences unfold gradually.

    Among the most widely documented are the virus’s cognitive effects, sometimes described as “brain fog” or post-COVID cognitive impairment, conditions that can persist for months, years or indefinitely after infection.

    Tom Hanks’s on-air admission that he has “had COVID enough in my life” and his remark that, as a co-writer of his play, he “disappeared the other night” by forgetting his own lines, intersects with this emerging evidence of COVID’s cognitive effects. SARS-CoV-2 infection leaves measurable marks on the brain and cognition.

    Some areas, especially those involved in memory and decision-making, can become slightly thinner or show signs of disrupted connections after infection. This happens because the virus and the body’s immune response can inflame or damage the tiny blood vessels that feed brain tissue, or, in some cases, may directly affect brain cells themselves.

    Loss of grey-matter thickness

    The UK Biobank imaging study in Nature detected loss of grey-matter thickness and tissue changes in regions tied to memory and smell among people scanned before and after infection, while matched controls without COVID did not show the same pattern.

    Complementing the imaging data, a large observational study in The New England Journal of Medicine reported persistent, objectively measurable deficits in attention, memory, and executive function after COVID-19 that, in some individuals, were comparable to the decline seen over years of aging.

    For a nightly performer like Stephen Colbert, whose craft relies on sustained presence, even modest cognitive deficits may translate into changes in delivery.

    Indeed, some long-time viewers have anecdotally remarked that Colbert’s pacing and energy feel subtly different since late 2023, though such observations remain speculative and could reflect many variables. What cannot be dismissed is the convergence of a serious health event and a virus known to affect cognition.

    Personality changes with neurological causes

    The lasting effects of COVID infections may extend beyond memory and cognition into changes in personality, including reduced empathy, increased irritability and diminished self-awareness.

    Neuroimaging and neuro-inflammation studies offer potential mechanism. For example, a PET-scan study found increased glial activation (gliosis) in the prefrontal cortex, hippocampus and dorsal striatum of persons with post-COVID depressive/cognitive symptoms, linking persistent immune-mediated inflammation to regional brain injury.

    A December 2024 BMC Infectious Diseases survey of 114 long-COVID diagnosed participants found that 94.7% reported cognitive changes and a high proportion reported sleep disturbances, depressive symptoms and perceived personality shifts. Higher “neuroticism” and lower “conscientiousness” scores correlated with worse outcomes.

    Together these findings mean that, beyond what people call “brain fog,” the virus may disrupt the very neural circuits that regulate emotion. When those systems are impaired, changes in personality make sense as clinical sequelae of a multi-system disease.

    Disease insight: neurological over logical reasoning

    One of the stranger and more sobering aspects of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic is the cultural narrative: even as the scientific evidence of SARS-CoV-2’s continuing dangers has become stronger, public awareness is not keeping pace.

    A partial explanation is external. Misinformation and disinformation about the virus’s ongoing risks continues to circulate through platforms and search engines, and long debunked conspiracy theories like “immunity debt” still are widely held. This may explain why Tom Hanks’s saying on national television that he wears a mask because he has “had COVID enough” can feel startling for some.

    Yet there may be a more unsettling layer to this public health communication gap.

    Disease insight (or anosognosia in the neurological literature) describes a patient’s ability to recognize that they are ill. In many neurological conditions, including certain forms of dementia and brain injury, this capacity is diminished or absent. It isn’t denial in the psychological sense, but a structural change in brain function.

    It occurs in some frontotemporal dementias, in stroke survivors, and in people with medication-related brain injury, including from benzodiazepines (e.g. Valium/Diazepan, Klonopin/Clonazepan, Xanax, etc.), drugs that ironically are now often prescribed for common COVID sequelae, including anxiety, insomnia, and inflammation control.

    Huge complications

    In practice, this means that even when patients are told they have a condition, or even when its symptoms are visible to others, they may not believe it. Even when presented with accurate data or clear medical explanations, their brains may reject that information not logically, but neurologically.

    This idea that neurology can override psychology may be uncomfortable—and taking it seriously calls for an expansion of what “misinformation” might mean. It suggests that the struggle to maintain public understanding of COVID’s ongoing impact may not only be about bad faith actors, but also about subtle biological effects that interfere with comprehension itself. This calls for approaches to public health communication that combine rigorous citations with factually-grounded pathos.

    The appeal to a core self is a concept that exceeds virology, but Stephen Colbert might recognize as adjacent to metaphysics, maybe what Thomas Aquinas might call “essence“ or fundamental nature. Something that is inviolable, even by a pathogen as comprehensively destructive to the biological self as SARS-CoV-2.

    An urgent question for soteriology (the theological inquiry into salvation), as well as neurology, could be posed like this: is there a self who can comprehend the ongoing dangers of the pandemic when the physiological capacity may have vanished?

    COVID as accelerant and additive risk

    While the question—did COVID almost kill Stephen Colbert in 2023?—cannot be answered definitively, the weight of medical and epidemiological evidence suggests that COVID-19 likely played an indirect but meaningful role in shaping the conditions that made his late-2023 health crisis more dangerous. It was probably not the sole cause, but one probable accelerant.

    From the start of the pandemic, public understanding of risk has often stopped at the acute phase of infection and that vaccination has neutralized potential damage. Vaccination remains vital because it sharply reduces the odds of hospitalization and death during the acute phase, but it does not prevent infection or the cumulative multi-system damage that can follow.

    This is why an infection can lead to secondary events that appear, on the surface, to be unrelated.

    A viral assault

    A viral assault on blood vessels and immune system can tip a minor intestinal irritation into a case of appendicitis that progresses faster or heals more slowly. The same systemic injury can also chip away at health more quietly, producing changes that are not immediately life-threatening but still profound, including cognitive decline and, in some cases, measurable changes in personality.

    Because COVID affects cognition and insight, a society with widespread infection may also find it harder to recognize or act on that fact. This article has aimed to stay cautious and evidence-based, grounding its claims in rigorous science rather than speculation.

    But if we take seriously what those data suggest, that repeated infections can erode our collective ability to remember, empathize, and reason, then responding to COVID’s long shadow requires emotional honesty about what we are losing if we don’t act, and how we might regain some ground of human dignity, even if we’re neurologically compromised.

    For that reason, the final “Word” goes to someone who once helped the United States make sense of crisis through embodying our shadow.

    The final ‘Word’ from Stephen Colbert

    “Stephen Colbert”: Nation, tonight’s Word is—

    [On-screen graphic: “COVID”]

    They say COVID can cause memory loss. Which is great news for anyone who still remembers the past decade.

    [Measured in milligrams of Effexor]

    But the brain is a muscle. You rest it, it comes back stronger.

    [Definitely not a muscle]

    Wait… what was I… ?

    [On-screen flickers]

    Anyway, some people worry COVID changes your personality. To which I say: nonsense! I’m the same brilliant, humble, God-fearing patriot I’ve always been.

    [Foolish consistency]

    Sure, sometimes I flub a guest’s credits, or which version of me is hosting tonight… but that’s just because I’m evolving.

    [Like a virus]

    Science calls it “cognitive decline.” I call it “staying on brand.”

    [Truthiness forgets selectively]

    See, truth is like the sense of smell. You don’t need it to breathe, but you sure miss it when it’s gone.

    [Would I smell the house burning down at 3 a.m.?]

    Now, some folks say repeated infections might make us less empathetic, more self-centered. To which I say: Finally, some good news!

    [America but EXTRA]

    Because empathy is a gateway drug to compromise, and I can’t have that clouding my brand. I built this persona one unexamined certainty at a time.

    And no microbe is taking that away from me.

    [How would you know if it already had?]

    People call that ego. I call it gravity. Stars have it.

    [And then they collapse]

    But maybe—stay with me—maybe there’s a… thinner place now between the person and the performance.

    [Somewhere in the pre-frontal cortex]

    Maybe the part that believes I was born to hold the center—

    [Congenital megalomania]

    —is getting louder to cover for the part that can’t remember why.

    [And maybe the tinnitus]

    Sometimes I feel… like I’m doing an impression of myself doing an impression of me.

    [Wear a face mask or your face as a mask. You choose.]

    So promise me something. If, one night, the laugh arrives and I don’t…

    Don’t clap.

    [Hold]

    Call me by my name.

    [“Stephen Colbert” or Stephen Colbert?]

    And if I don’t answer right away—

    [We’ll wait, but the epidemiological clock is ticking]

    …keep the cameras rolling. I’ll find my way back.

    [Through the fog]

    It’s fine. It’s nothing. It’s… what were we—

    [COVID]

    Right. COVID. The word we keep shrinking to fit into headlines.

    [Can the soul shrink…?]

    Anyway, the important thing is: I’m fine. I’m fine. We’re ALL FINE. And if we’re not, I hereby declare a new normal.

    [Mission Accomplished (…again)]

    Because in the end, America, COVID doesn’t change who we are—

    it just helps us forget who that was.

    [“The Word” logo, static-glitch fade-out]

    Featured image via the Canary

    By HEPA (Holy Erotic Propaganda Arson)

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • The so-called ‘manosphere’ has existed for several years now, and in that time the personality types we’re subjected to have diversified. Dale Partridge is known for being a misogynist of the Christian persuasion, and he’s specifically famous for shaming women. The shoe is now on the other foot, however, as Derek Guy the menswear expert has given Partridge a taste of his own medicine:

    Well, well, well – it looks like the slut shamer has become the slut shamee.

    Swanning around in his underwear

    Dale is know for posts like the following in which you can practically hear the sound of him panting:

    Today, my family went on a family trip to Flagstaff. We walked into a quaint sandwich shop, and a young woman approached to take our order.

    She was wearing a sports bra and crack-sucking leggings.

    It was the kind of outfit our grandmothers would see as lingerie.

    Had I not been with my family, I would have said something like, “Ma’am, do you not know how inappropriate your outfit is? Are you not ashamed to be wearing that in public?”

    So, when I got home, I wrote the owner.

    This won’t change until we make it change. Make sin shameful again. Remember, shame pushes people to see their need for forgiveness—in Christ.

    People responded to all that as you might expect:

    Partridge spends a lot of time demanding that the state oppress women, which is exactly what I’d do if I was terrified of them:


    In the following video, he says “nearly every legalised moral atrocity of the last 100 years was made possible by the female vote”:

    So being overly dramatic is a traditionally masculine personality trait, is it?

    It’s hard to imagine who’d take religious advice off this guy given his soulless stare. At the same time, it’s very easy to understand why an emotionally brittle man would find comfort in his stern petulance.

    Unfortunately for Partidge, he didn’t count on the menswear expert exposing him for the slut that he is:


    Others joined in too:


    Manhood

    If you’re an insecure man with money to burn, we’ve got good news for you;  Partridge can help you out with that:


    That’s ‘help you with the money to burn’ part, obviously; he’s not going to make you any less insecure.

    Featured image via Relearn

    By Willem Moore

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Preparations are underway for the establishment of a new US air base in Damascus, Syria, anonymised security sources told Reuters. A demilitarised zone in southern Syria will house the outpost. This includes logistical planning, namely reconnaissance and flight path testing.

    The bid, previously unheard of, signals an unyielding push by Washington to normalise Israeli-Syrian relations. Of course, genocidal Israel are desperate to make inroads with any possible diplomatic connections which will retrospectively whitewash their war crimes. The development comes at a critical juncture for Syria’s new government.

    Their survival will ultimately rest on political endorsement from the US, and, not least, Israel.

    US airbase: securing peace through strength

    As close allies the US and Israel can arguably be seen to share the same objectives in terms of geopolitical power. Iran’s opposition to both the US and Isreal has presented a significant challenge for American influence in the region. As such, Syria holds a precarious position in this grapple for power. The broader and no-longer-secret objective of Israel is stifling opposition from Arab states to Israel’s military belligerence and interventionism.

    The US official discourse implies a US air base will expedite a Trump-brokered security pact between Syria and Israel, which, according to pundits, is reachable by the end of 2025. Of course, peace through force will be anything but long lasting in light of Israel’s nauseating catalogue of war crimes perpetrated in Gaza and the lessons of the region’s not-so-historical past; namely the Anglo-US war on Iraq. 

    The base will reinforce Trump’s commitment to an ‘Israel first’ policy, and does seemingly less to fulfil his ‘make Syria great‘ pledge. In February 2025, Syria’s interim President Ahmed al-Sharaa ruled that any future US troop deployment will require government approval. Their foremost priority, for now, remains economic recovery and the cessation of sanctions, a pledge Trump has honoured. 

    The strategic prize of southern Syria

    In terms of geography, the Syrian Golan Heights, located in southern Syria, is the strategic prize that will allow Israel to intercept attacks targeting it northern territories.

    Before al-Sharaa seized power, the south was awash with Russian forces and Iran-backed militia. In August, Russian outlet, Kommersant, citing anonymised sources, reported that al-Sharaa’s administration favoured the presence of Russian forces as a bulwark against Israeli advances. Russian troops, as of yet, have been given precedence. 

    The Syrian administration’s strategy for now is concerned with economic growth and integration into the global market, twin objectives which require US endorsement. Trump and al-Sharaa are scheduled to meet at the White House on Monday — the first visit of its kind since the ouster of Bashar al-Assad regime last year — and enhanced security cooperation will undoubtedly top the agenda.

    Israel’s Mediterranean ambitions

    As the US visibly embeds itself in Syria, Israel, as Robert Freedman reported for the Canary, is unabashedly extending its economic and military reach in Cyprus – notably backed by Britain. Alongside, Greece, Cyprus is part of an energy alliance whose success would lay the groundwork for future normalisation between Israel and Turkey. Nevertheless, Cyprus has been critical to Israel’s encroachment into the eastern Mediterranean. Speaking on this, Freedman wrote: 

    The genocide economy is set to get a big boost, with British-based energy firm Energean preparing to construct a pipeline that would see gas pumped to Cyprus from an offshore rig in stolen maritime territory in Palestine.

    Israel’s attempts to normalise relations along the east Mediterranean are an alarming breach beyond its efforts with Arab states. The timing for Israel is critical as it sets out to capitalise on political turmoil in the region, a weakened Hezbollah, Hamas, and a defeated government in Iran with no appetite for sabre-rattling with Israel following  their ‘12 day war’ with Israel and October 7. The codependency between Israel and US, as the Canary’s Ed Sykes reports, is built on:

    the separation of Arab territories … to ensure that a chunk of the region’s precious natural resources remained in friendly hands, and those that didn’t could become the target of covert or overt hostility. 

    Strike while the iron is hot

    As the threat of war looms, particularly after Israel’s continued aerial strikes on Lebanon, the amplification of the Zionist military presence in Syria sets the tone for the future direction of US foreign policy in the Middle East.

    The push for normalisation with Israel is evidently part of a broader regional trend.  Historically normalisation was limited to countries that form the Gulf Coordination Council (GCC). Now, however, the strategy has extended to post-conflict states caught between a rock and a hard place.

    Stiff resistance remains. This is best demonstrated by the legislation passed by the Iraqi parliament in mid-2022, criminalising the normalisation of ties with Israel.

    Although the war against the Islamic State provided legal cover for the presence of US soldiers in northeastern Syria since 2014. The latest advance, though still underway, disguises war posturing as peacekeeping.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Nazli Tarzi

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • By Margot Staunton, RNZ Pacific senior journalist

    The parents of conjoined twins in Papua New Guinea have made a desperate global appeal to try to get their sons surgically separated.

    Tom and Sawong were born on October 9 and are joined at the abdomen. They are being looked after in Port Moresby General Hospital’s neonatal unit.

    The hospital made a u-turn on Tuesday and advised the family to remain in PNG or face one or both of them dying.

    Doctors initially explored the possibility transferring them to Australia for specialist care, but the plan fell through. They have now said surgery is too dangerous and the twins should not travel overseas.

    However, sponsors are hoping to fly the twins to Germany, where a major university hospital in Freiburg is assessing their case.

    Mayday call
    On Thursday, the parents initiated a world-wide mayday via text, which said:

    “While communications with a hospital in Germany are progressing well, we are running out of time. Would anyone know anyone globally who can take on the twins swiftly?

    “We continue to reach out to hospitals and specialists in Asia, Europe, America and beyond. If the reader of this mayday can assist or connect us to those who can help, please act now.

    “This is not just a plea, but a call for support, compassion and action. Lets unite to give the twins the chance they deserve. Please contact us if you want to help them through this journey on (675) 72242188 or jruh@mamamedevac.org.”

    Port Moresby General Hospital’s medical director Dr Kone Sobi said multiple discussions led to their final decision.

    “The underlying thing is that both twins present with significant congenital anomalies and we feel that even with care and treatment in a highly specialised unit, the chances of survival are very very slim,” Dr Sobi said.

    “In fact, the prognosis is extremely bad.”

    Tom and Sawong are joined at the abdomen and are being treated in Port Moresby General Hospital's neonatal unit.
    Tom and Sawong are joined at the abdomen and are being treated in Port Moresby General Hospital’s neonatal unit. Image: Port Moresby General Hospital/RNZ Pacific

    Surgery dangerous
    The twins have spina bifida — a neural tube defect that affects the development of newborn’s spine and spinal cord – and share a liver, bladder and portions of their gastrointestinal tract.

    Sobi said the medical complications made surgery dangerous.

    “One of the twins has a congenital heart defect, the same twin also has only one kidney and we believe malformed lungs,” he said.

    “So one of the twins is doing a lot of the work in terms of supplying oxygen for the heart for the other one.”

    The twins’ future was unpredictable, he said.

    “It’s a precarious condition for both, they both depend on each other really, where they go from here is anyone’s guess.

    “In our view, as long as we provide support to them in terms of feeding them, that one of our priorities, and guarding against infection, because they are in a very difficult situation at this point in time,” he said.

    Parents desperate
    Jurgen Ruh, the helicopter pilot and sponsor who initially flew the newborns to Port Moresby, said the parents were getting desperate.

    “They’re just trusting that something will happen for the children, they’re looking forward to care in a better facility.”

    “They are aware that one or both could be lost during the operation, but they just feel at least they will have tried,” Ruh said.

    He said the twins have so far battled the odds.

    “The children are doing well, they’ve got minimal support, like supplementary oxygen, and they’re being fed.

    “Considering that they’re not on life support and they’ve lived for one month, they have a will to live and they’ll continue living,” he said.

    Air Niugini has offered to fly them as far as Singapore, but another airline willing to take them to Germany still has to be found.

    This article is republished under a community partnership agreement with RNZ.

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • In a striking revelation, The Intercept has uncovered that YouTube deleted the channels of three leading Palestinian human rights organisations last October: Al-Haq Foundation, Al-Mezan Centre for Human Rights, and the Palestinian Centre for Human Rights (PCHR). Hundreds of field and documentary videos documenting alleged Israeli crimes in Gaza and the West Bank disappeared overnight.

    Sudden Deletion and Accusations of Political Censorship

    The three organisations said their channels were removed without notice, erasing more than 700 videos showing killings of civilians, home demolitions, and torture testimonies. YouTube, owned by Google, claimed the deletions were due to US sanctions imposed on the organisations last September. The company said it must “comply with US sanctions and trade laws,” as hosting sanctioned entities counts as a “commercial service.” Human rights groups say this is a legal pretext to justify political censorship.

    A Direct Impact on Palestinian Memory

    Human rights advocates warn that deleting this material silences Palestinian voices and destroys crucial legal evidence. The loss may harm international court cases, including those before the International Criminal Court. Researchers fear that the absence of an archive will disrupt documentation and accountability efforts.

    Basel Sourani, legal adviser at the Palestinian Centre for Human Rights, said:

    By doing this, YouTube is silencing victims and protecting perpetrators from accountability.

    Al-Haq Foundation called it “a worrying setback for freedom of expression and human rights.”

    Political Pressure and Double Standards

    The Intercept’s investigation revealed that the deletions coincided with the Trump administration’s second round of sanctions against the International Criminal Court. These targeted anyone cooperating in probes of Israeli officials. Observers say US tech companies, including YouTube, face political pressure to restrict Palestinian content under the guise of sanctions compliance.

    Sarah Leah Whitson, executive director of Democracy for the Arab World Now (DAWN), said:

    It’s hard to believe that sharing Palestinian human rights material could violate sanctions. YouTube is showing astonishing weakness in the face of political dictates.

    This is not the first time. The platform has repeatedly been accused of double standards—deleting Palestinian content while leaving pro-Israel propaganda untouched. Previous reports by Wired and Access Now confirmed this pattern during the last Gaza war.

    Removing the channels also erased essential metadata such as upload dates, view counts, and comments—details vital for legal evidence. Digital documentation experts say this loss breaks the “chain of evidence” needed for material to be admissible in court. They warn that the lack of safeguards for human rights content poses a serious threat to collective memory. One administrative decision can wipe away years of documentation.

    Seeking Alternatives Outside US Control

    Following the deletions, Palestinian organisations began searching for alternative platforms outside US control to store their archives. Digital archivists now plan to work with international bodies to build secure, independent systems that protect human rights footage from deletion or manipulation.

    Freedom-of-expression groups warn that if this continues, global memory will be whitewashed and the Palestinian story erased from public view.

    The Intercept’s investigation highlights the growing overlap between political power, economic sanctions, and digital censorship. As human rights organisations try to document war crimes, tech giants are erasing their evidence. This sets a precedent that endangers every human rights group working in conflict zones. Palestinian visual memory—footage, testimonies, and fragments of lives—is now threatened by opaque decisions made in Silicon Valley. Without safeguards, evidence of crimes may vanish from the internet long before it ever reaches the courts.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Alaa Shamali

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • In Gaza, the pain does not end with death. Even the dead are not spared the brutality of occupation.

    There, where the story should end with condolences, new chapters of oppression begin: bodies held captive, mutilated remains, and mothers waiting for farewells that never come.

    With the implementation of the prisoner-exchange deal between Palestine and the occupation, heart-wrenching scenes unfolded.

    Gaza organ theft

    On Wednesday, the tenth batch of martyrs’ bodies held by the occupation arrived at Nasser Medical Complex in southern Gaza.This batch included 15 bodies. But those shrouds carried more than human remains — they held silent evidence of an unspeakable violation.

    A doctor at Nasser Medical Complex said:

    The bodies arrived stuffed with cotton, with gaps suggesting organs were removed. What we saw is indescribable.

    It’s a violation of the sanctity of the dead and human dignity.

    Recognisable bodies and accusations of organ theft

    Palestinian and international human rights organisations — including the Palestinian Centre for Human Rights and the Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor — have confirmed serious suspicions of organ theft from martyrs’ bodies held by Israel.

    Local medical reports have shown surgical incisions in the head, chest, and abdomen, suggesting removal of organs such as corneas, kidneys, and hearts.

    Despite repeated demands for independent examinations, Israel continues to refuse them, concealing the truth and deepening suspicion of this crime.

    ‘Numbered graves’ — where identity is buried

    For decades, Israel has held more than 450 bodies in “numbered graves,” plus about 150 more in its morgues.

    These bodies lie in unmarked graves, each identified only by a metal plate.

    This practice flagrantly violates the Fourth Geneva Convention, which guarantees families the right to a dignified burial.

    Human rights activists call this policy a form of collective punishment. They say Israel uses the bodies as political tools and bargaining chips. The occupation claims these acts are a “deterrent.” International organisations instead classify them as war crimes under Article 8 of the Rome Statute.

    Lost dignity — and a crime that never dies

    In Gaza, the struggle is no longer just for survival on the ground. It is now also a fight for dignity, even after death. The occupation, which kills in war, continues its aggression in silence. The body remains captive, the truth buried, and the family denied a final farewell.

    Despite UN condemnations, international silence still hangs like a shroud over this ongoing crime. Thousands of Palestinian families remain trapped between hope and despair.

    What is happening is not only a violation of the dead — it is an assassination of human dignity. As if the occupation is saying to Palestinians: we will not leave you in life, and we will not let you rest in death.

    Featured image via EuoromedMonitor

    By Alaa Shamali

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Keeping a line of sight to the challenges of both COP30 in Brazil next week and also the subsequent Pacific’s COP31. A Pacific perspective.

    COMMENTARY: By Dr Satyendra Prasad

    As Pacific’s leaders and civil society prepare for the United Nations Climate Conference in Brazil (COP30) next week, they also need to keep a line of sight to the subsequent Pacific’s COP31.

    As they engage at COP30, they will have in their thoughts the painful and lonely journey ahead in Jamaica and across the Caribbean as they rebuild from Hurricane Melissa.

    The Blue Pacific needs to build a well-lit pathway to land Pacific’s priorities at COP30 and COP31. The cross winds are heavy and the landing zone could not be hazier.

    COP30 BRAZIL 2025
    COP30 BRAZIL 2025

    At the recent Pacific Islands Forum Meeting in Honiara, Pacific leaders called for accelerating implementation of programmes to respond to climate change. They said that finance and knowhow remained the binding constraints to this.

    The Pacific’s leaders were unanimous that the world was failing the Pacific.

    Climate-stressed infrastructure
    Pacific leaders spoke about their infrastructure deficit. The region today needs well in excess of $500 million annually to maintain infrastructure in the face of rising seas and fiercer storms.

    There are more than 1000 primary and secondary schools, dozens of health centres across coastal areas in Solomon Islands, PNG, Vanuatu and Fiji that need to be repaired rehabilitated or relocated.

    The region needs an additional $300-500 million annually over a decade to build and climate proof critical infrastructure — airports, wharves, jetties, water and electricity and telecommunications.

    The Blue Pacific’s infrastructure distress is a cocktail that poisons its human development progress. This has lethal consequences for our elderly, for children and the most vulnerable.

    As a region has fallen short in convincing the international community that the region’s infrastructure distress is quintessentially a climate distress. This must change.

    Fiji’s former ambassador to the UN Dr Satyendra Prasad
    Fiji’s former ambassador to the UN Dr Satyendra Prasad . . . “the ball may be in the Pacific’s court on how successfully we can harness this rare opening.” Image: Wansolwara News

    The constant cycle of catastrophe, recovery and debt are on autoplay repeat across the world’s most climate vulnerable region. The heart-braking images coming out of Jamaica and the Caribbean in the wake of Hurricane Melissa makes this same point.

    The Blue Pacific as a region attracts a woefully insufficient share of existing climate finance. Less than 1.5 percent of the total climate finances reaches the world’s most climate vulnerable region today. This is unacceptable of course.

    Is our planet headed for a 3.0C world?
    At COP30, the world will see what the new climate commitments (NDCs) add up to. Our best estimates today suggest that the planet is headed for a 3.0C plus temperature rise. Anything above 1.5C will be catastrophic for the Blue Pacific.

    Life across our coral reef systems will simply roast at 3.0C temperature increase. The regions food security will be harmed irreparably. This will have massive consequences for tourism dependent economies. Bleached reefs bleach tourism incomes.

    The health consequences arising from climate change are set to worsen rapidly. As will the toll on children who will fall further behind in their learning as schools remain inaccessible for longer periods; or children spend long hours in hotter classrooms.

    For Pacific’s women, the toll of runaway temperature increase will be heavy — on their health, on their livelihoods and on their security. It will be too heavy.

    A deal for the Pacific at COP30
    The world of climate change is becoming transactional. Short termism and deal making have become its norm.

    As Pacific leaders, its civil society, its science community and its young engage at COP30 in Brazil, they are reminded that the Blue Pacific needs more than anything else, a settled outlook climate finance that will be available to the region. Finance must be foremostly predictable.

    The region should not feel like it is playing a lottery — as is the case today. Tonga must know broadly how much climate finance will be available to it over the next five years and so must Papua New Guinea.

    At Bele’m, the world will need to agree to a road map for how the climate financing short fall will be met. This is a must to restore trust in the global process.

    The weight on the shoulders of host Brazil is extraordinarily heavy. Brazil is the home of the famous Rio Conference in 1992 where the small island states first succeeded in placing climate change, biodiversity loss on the global agenda.

    The Small Islands States grouping is chaired by Palau. President Whipps Jnr will lead the islands to Brazil. He will no doubt remind the host that the world has failed the small states persistently since that moment of great hope at the Rio Conference in 1992.

    Belém hosts the Climate Summit
    Belém hosts the UN Climate Summit, an international meeting that will bring together heads of state and government, ministers, and leaders of international organisations on 10-21 November 2025. Image: Sergio Moraes/COP30/Wansolwara News

    Pace of climate finance
    There are three principal reasons why climate finance must flow to the Pacific at speed.

    First, is that most countries in our region have less than a decade to adapt. Farms and family gardens, small businesses, tourist resorts, villages and livelihoods need to adapt now to meet a climate changed world.

    Second, if adaptation is pushed into the future because of woefully insufficient finances — the window to adapt will close.

    As more sectors of our economy fall beyond rehabilitation, the costs of loss and damage will rise. Time is of the essence. And on top of that loss and damage remain poorly funded. This too must change.

    The Pacific needs to do many things concurrently to build its resilience. Everything for the Blue Pacific rests on a decent outcome on financing.

    The region needs to make its clearest argument that its share of climate finance must be ring-fenced. That its share of climate finance will remain available to the region even if demand is slow to take shape.

    The Pacific’s rightful share of climate finance over the next decade is between 3-5 per cent of the total across all financing windows. This is fundamentally because based the adaptation window is so short in such a uniquely specific way.

    This should mean that the Blue Pacific has access to a floor of US$1.5 billion annually through to 2035. This is very doable even if global currents are choppy.

    TFFF and Brazil’s leadership
    Brazil has already demonstrated that it can forge large financing arrangements through its leadership and creativity. It will launch the Tropical Forest Forever Facility (TFFF) at COP. PNG’s Prime Minister has played an important role on this. We hope that forested Pacific states will be able to access this new facility to expand their conservation efforts with much higher returns to landowners.

    Beyond Bele’m
    COP30 in Brazil is an opportunity for the Pacific to begin to frame a larger consensus — well in time for COP31. It is my hope that Australia and Pacific’s leaders will have done enough to secure the hosting rights for COP31.

    A ‘circuit-breaker’ COP31
    Fiji’s former Deputy Prime Minister Biman Prasad and Australia’s Climate Minister Chris Bowen recently said that COP31 must be “a circuit breaker moment” for the Blue Pacific.

    The reversals in our development story arising from the climate chaos have become too burdensome. Repeated recoveries means that every next recovery becomes that much harder.

    Ask anyone in Jamaica and Caribbean today and you will hear this same message. Their finance ministers know too well that in no time they will be back at the mercy of international financial institutions to rebuild roads and bridges that have been washed away and water systems that have been destroyed by Hurricane Melissa.

    Climate finance by its very nature therefore must involve deep changes to the architecture of international development and finance. The rich world is not yet ready to let go of privilege and power that it wields through an archaic financial international system.

    But fundamental reform is a must. Fundamental reform is necessary if small states are to reclaim agency and begin to drive own destinies.

    Future proofing our societies
    The risks arising from climate change are so multi-faceted that economic, social and political stability cannot no longer be taken for granted.

    Conflicts over land lost to rising seas, the strain on education, health and water infrastructure, deepening debt stress take their toll on institutions through which stability is maintained in our societies.

    The Blue Pacific needs to work with this elevated risk of fragility and state failure. This reality must shape the Blue Pacific expectations from a Pacific COP.

    Building on the excellent work underway in climate ministries in Fiji, Vanuatu, Samoa, PNG and across the region through the SPC, SPREP, OPOC, I have outlined what the Pacific’s expectations could be from a Pacific COP31.

    COP31 must be about transformation and impact. The Blue Pacific’s leaders should seek a consensus that includes both the rich industrial World and large developing countries such as China and India in support of a Pacific Package at COP31.

    A Pacific COP 31 package
    The core elements of a Pacific package at COP31 are:

    1. Ensuring that the Loss and Damage Fund has become fully operational with a pipeline of investment ready projects from across the Blue Pacific.
    2. Securing the Pacific Regional Infrastructure Facility (PRIF) as a fully funded and disbursement ready financing facility with a pipeline of investment ready projects.
    3. Securing ring-fenced climate finance allocations for the Blue Pacific at the Green Climate Fund (GCF) and across international financial institutions.
    4. Securing support for Blue Pacific’s “lighthouse” multi-country (region wide) transformative programs to advance marine and terrestrial biodiversity protection and promote sustainability across the Blue Pacific Ocean.
    5. A COP decision that is unambiguous on quality and speed of climate and ocean finance that will be available to small states for the remainder of the decade.
    6. Securing sufficient resources that can flow directly to communities and families to rapidly rebuild their resilience following disasters and catastrophes including through insurance and social protection vehicles.
    7. Ensuring that knowhow, resources and mechanisms for disaster risk reduction are in place, are fully operational and are sustainable.

    An Ocean of Peace for a climate changed world
    Fiji’s Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka has championed the Blue Pacific as an Ocean of Peace. Its acceptance by Pacific leaders opens up opportunities for the region’s climate diplomacy.

    The Pacific’s leaders accept that the Ocean of Peace anchors its stewardship of our marine environment to the highest principles of protection and conservation. An Ocean of Peace super-charges the Pacific’s efforts to take forward transboundary marine research and conservation, end plastic and harmful waste disposal, end harmful fisheries subsidies and decarbonise shipping.

    It boosts the Pacific’s efforts to main-frame the ocean-climate nexus into the international climate change frameworks by the time a Pacific COP31 is convened.

    A window of hope
    Between COP30 and COP31 lies a rare window of hope. The Blue Pacific must leverage this.

    Both a Brazilian and an Australian Presidency offer supportive back-to-back opportunities and spaces to take forward the regions desire to project a solid foundation of programs that are necessary to secure its future.

    Uniquely the ball may be in the Pacific’s court on how successfully we can harness this rare opening in the international environment.

    Dr Satyendra Prasad is a Non-Resident Senior Fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and Fiji’s former ambassador to the UN. He is the Climate Lead for About Global. This article was first published by Wansolwara Online and is republished by Asia Pacific Report in partnership with USP Journalism.

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • South Africa‘s G20 presidency comes to an end this month, with a devastating takedown of global inequality — neoliberalism. This hard-capitalist ideology is the ruling class’ move towards unbridled wealth extraction.

    Global inequality — false scarcity

    The presidency, which alternates between countries, commissioned a study led by American inequality economist Joseph Stiglitz. The report notes that the competition-at-all-costs approach of capitalism creates a false scarcity of knowledge and information. One striking example the report gives is that of healthcare in the Global South, which the authors say is “deprived” of the education it needs.

    For the economists, this is one aspect of what drives inequality:

    Distribution of asset ownership, not just financial assets but skills and social networks (social capital) that are critical in boosting workers’ wages.

    That’s in contrast to the publicly owned NHS, which shares internal information on the best practices for healthcare. If healthcare were fragmented, a misguided focus on competition would restrict information sharing.

    Rent over work

    The report states another driver of inequality is:

    Distribution of income among labour, capital, and rents (including market power and the laws and regulations that affect corporate power, the ability of firms to exploit workers, and corporate managers to extract rents from corporations).

    These rules and regulations that affect how market incomes are distributed are in turn affected by an interplay of political and economic power.

    The pursuit of unearned wealth through capital income, like rent, takes money away from people who work for a living by depleting their share of total global income. From 2000-2016, the share of global GDP that was extracted by capital income leapt from 20% to 32%, according to the London School of Economics (LSE).

    The non-work-based profiteering is taken to new heights by the few who are rolling in it to the point where they can pay experts to invest their money. Indeed, the global increase in rent-based income corresponds with a G20 report finding. Throughout the world, from 2000-2024, the richest 1% took 41% of new wealth, while 50% gained just 1% of it.

    When it comes to neoliberal capitalism, we’re being fed a vision that’s well past its sell-by date. Like a decaying potato in the kitchen cupboard, we should preserve any positive parts and bin the rest ASAP.

    Featured image via Climate and Capitalism

    By James Wright

    This post was originally published on Canary.