
This post was originally published on Michael West.
This post was originally published on Michael West.
This post was originally published on Michael West.
This post was originally published on Michael West.
This post was originally published on Michael West.
This post was originally published on Michael West.
The NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal (NCAT) chose to protect the legal fraternity over a NSW Health whistleblower left untrained and anxious at the tribunal bar table. Blowing the whistle cost her dearly.
This post was originally published on Michael West.
This post was originally published on Michael West.
China has passed a law allowing the authorities to seize and freeze the assets of foreign states, in a move analysts say will encourage tit-for-tat “hostage diplomacy.”
The country’s National People’s Congress Standing Committee passed the Foreign State Immunity law on Friday, in a move state media said would “safeguard China’s sovereignty, security and development interests.”
The law, which takes effect Jan. 1, 2024, allows Chinese, Hong Kong and Macau authorities to seize or freeze the assets of foreign states in situations where the government concerned has already taken similar action against Chinese assets on foreign soil, state news agency Xinhua reported.
“Once a foreign state abolishes, restricts or downgrades the immunity it has granted to China, China will have the right to take necessary countermeasures in accordance with the principle of reciprocity,” Xinhua said.
But the law doesn’t affect privileges and immunities enjoyed by foreign diplomatic missions, consular posts, special missions, missions to international organizations, delegations to international conferences, nor the privileges accorded to foreign heads of state, heads of government, foreign ministers, and other officials of comparable status.
Analysts said the law is part of a slew of recent legislation targeting foreign entities and individuals in China that includes recent amendments to the Counterespionage Law, and a Foreign Relations Law.
Elastic definition
Chinese authorities have typically employed a highly elastic definition of what constitutes a state secret, and national security charges are frequently leveled at journalists, rights lawyers and activists, often based on material they posted online.
“This kind of legislation means they have another tool they can use … to bring a lot of diplomatic pressure to bear to achieve their aims,” Hong Kong lawyer and current affairs commentator Sang Pu commented on the law. “They can claim that they are only acting in accordance with their laws.”
“This is an important part of China’s Wolf Warrior diplomacy, and another step forward in its diplomatic bullying of other countries,” Sang said. “It’s part of a comprehensive foreign policy intended to confront Western liberal democracies.”
Under the law, a foreign state will be deemed to have consented to the jurisdiction of Chinese courts if it files a lawsuit, or if it is named as a plaintiff or a defendant in a lawsuit accepted by a Chinese court.
Commercial activities by foreign states could spark legal action in China if the actions “have had a direct effect in Chinese territory even though they took place outside Chinese territory.”
That includes transactions of goods or services, investments, borrowing and lending, and other acts of a commercial nature that do not constitute an exercise of sovereign authority, according to the China Law Translate website.
Lunghwa University of Science and Technology assistant professor Lai Jung Wei said the ruling Chinese Communist Party appears to believe that foreign countries are busy infiltrating China, much as their agents and supporters are infiltrating other countries.
“A lot of their state-owned enterprises take the guise of private enterprises to infiltrate the rest of the world,” Lai said. “They do this because the party has to be in control of everything – it’s a party-state.”
“And they use the same logic to view the rest of the world, and they are worried that the rest of the world is going to start doing it to them,” he said.
‘Hostage diplomacy’
Lai said it’s another card Beijing – which has repeatedly hit out at sanctions against its officials over its human rights record – can play in future diplomatic wrangles.
“[They’re saying] if you refuse to back down, we can use this against you, or as a form of retaliation if you do similar things to us,” he said. “But the legislation is inseparable from party rule.”
“To put it bluntly, it’s a form of political security for the Xi Jinping dictatorship,” he said.
China was widely criticized for its “hostage diplomacy” when it arrested and jailed Canadian nationals following the arrest of a top Huawei executive Meng Wanzhou in Vancouver on Dec. 1, 2018 pending a U.S. extradition request.
Sang said it’s noteworthy that the law will be enacted in Hong Kong and Macau as well as in mainland China, suggesting that there is now scant difference between the three jurisdictions.
“Hong Kong is getting more and more similar to mainland China,” he said.
Reports emerged last year that China was trying to obtain floor plans for all properties used by foreign missions in Hong Kong, amid an ongoing crackdown on dissent under a draconian national security law imposed on the city by Beijing.
Simon Cheng, a former employee of the British Consulate General in Hong Kong, told Radio Free Asia that Chinese state security police were insistent that he draw a floor plan of the consulate for them during his interrogations during a 15-day detention in August 2019.
Cheng warned in an October 2022 interview that Beijing will continue to tighten control on what it views as potentially hostile “foreign forces” that it blames for inciting the 2019 protest movement in Hong Kong.
Translated by Luisetta Mudie. Edited by Malcolm Foster.
This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by By Raymond Cheng for RFA Cantonese.
This post was originally published on Radio Free.
This post was originally published on Michael West.
You and I have the democratic right to place a Petition before Parliament asking them to consider and act upon any matter of public interest that concerns us. All that is required is that we go to the website of the Australian Parliament, click on PETITIONS, and follow the guidelines on how to submit a …
The post I INVITE YOU TO SIGN THIS PETITION TO PARLIAMENT ASKING THAT THEY RESEARCH THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL BENEFITS OF UNIVERSAL BASIC INCOME. appeared first on Everald Compton.
This post was originally published on My Articles – Everald Compton.
This post was originally published on Michael West.
This post was originally published on Michael West.
This post was originally published on Michael West.
Rex Patrick demolishes Defence Minister Richard Marles’ AUKUS statement to explain Labor’s incredible $368B of public spend on submarines. At $11.5B per paragraph, it’s a swindle.
The spiraling cost of our alliance with the United States goes way beyond the $368B AUKUS deal and joined intelligence and communications facilities. Australia is also paying the price of reduced independence.
This post was originally published on Michael West.
This post was originally published on Michael West.
Thursday, several colleagues and I, sent an open letter to all 535 members of Congress about reducing their five-week vacation and remaining in Congress to address crucial long-delayed tasks.
July 27, 2023
Open Letter to Members of Congress: Crises Demand More Work Time Shorter Vacation
The Congress is about to embark on the longest of its annual numerous “recesses” – some would call these five weeks until after Labor Day in September a vacation from your Washington, D.C. workplace. Does it seem reckless not to be in session, holding hearings, floor deliberations, personally communicating with one another, and legislating at a time of national and international convulsions?
Deadly climate eruptions – floods, droughts, uncontrollable wildfires, hurricanes (typhoons), and extreme heat are reaching record levels in recorded history. U.S. war policies and practices, constitutionally under congressional directive, are out of control by an escalating rampage of Executive power. You have a budget deadline by September 30 and numerous appropriation bills, including the audit-resistant (in violation of the 1990 federal law) runaway military budget, still on the table. Post-pandemic privations for tens of millions of Americans in poverty, including inexcusable plights of millions of children, no longer receiving the child’s tax credit, are mounting. And more.
Come to your institutional senses. Convene three out of the five weeks to work inside our legislature and focus our many unproductive committees and subcommittees on these calamities facing our country. That still leaves you with two weeks before Labor Day to rest, stretch and reflect on your full constitutional duties before the nation and the people who sent you there. The same people who want you to work full weeks to address their necessities which they have entrusted to your care – all 535 of you in the House of Representatives and the Senate.
We look forward to your individual and collective responses.
Sincerely,
Ralph Nader, Esq.
Bruce Fein, Esq.
Louis Fisher
Rocky Anderson, Esq.
Two-term elected Mayor pf Salt Lake City
Robert Weissman, Esq.
President of Public Citizen
CC: The American People
For members of Congress, today it’s “Whee, we’re outta here” till after Labor Day. The summer recess is the longest of their numerous recesses. Your Senators and Representatives spend about 35 weeks a year on Capitol Hill and on average they are only in session three days each week. Even then the lawmakers scurry out of their Congressional offices to nearby campaign offices to dial for campaign dollars. (See, Welcome to The Congress on Capitol Hill! An exclusive country club in Washington, DC by Steve Skrovan and James Wirt, July/August 2023 issue of the Capitol Hill Citizen).
What do they leave behind as they take their long summer break? Unpassed, much-delayed appropriations bill for government departments and agencies plus the overall budget bill due on September 30.
What else do they need to do? Here is a sample of some important matters that deserve public hearings:
During the first three weeks of August, those underworked Congressional Committees and Subcommittees you pay for could hold dramatic public hearings. There are many expert witnesses eager on short notice to disclose their findings and reforms.
Granted, such hearings are much more likely to be held in the Democratically-controlled Senate. (The current GOP crop in the House is crazed.). But it is not widely known that the minority Democratic Party – in the House – can hold unofficial hearings on their own using the otherwise empty Committee rooms.
Congressional hearings generate press and inform the people and the legislators, to whom they have delegated their sovereign power, about serious matters including public necessities. Hearings set the stage for legislation to abolish dire poverty, protect our children, wage peace, address environmental disasters and achieve a just legal system holding corporate power to account.
If you bump into your Senators and Representatives on their handshaking tours and fund-raisers in August, ask them why they don’t work full-time in Congress in the interest of the people. Better yet, invite them to your own town meetings. (See, Members of Congress are home for August by Ralph Nader, July/August 2023 issue of the Capitol Hill Citizen).
This post was originally published on Dissident Voice.
This post was originally published on Michael West.
This post was originally published on Michael West.
This post was originally published on Michael West.
Myanmar’s shadow National Unity Government said Thursday that it is ready to launch an online bank that uses cryptocurrency in an effort to disrupt the flow of foreign currency to banks run by the ruling military junta, including the country’s central bank.
The Spring Development Bank will be the Southeast Asian nation’s first financial institution to operate solely with crypto and blockchain technology. It will have a trial run with 1,000 users and 100 supervisors on July 22.
“Spring Revolution” refers to popular protests that began in February 2021 following the military’s coup d’etat.
The NUG – made up of members of Myanmar’s former democratically elected government and other opponents of the junta – set up the bank to ensure the financial security of the people, said Tin Tun Naing, the shadow minister of planning, finance, and investment and governor of the NUG’s interim central bank.
Banks controlled by the junta have blocked the accounts of users, seized their deposits, and provided their personal account data to the authorities by violating the bank regulations, he said.
“There are many incidents where the terrorist military council has threatened people’s deposits in the banks which the people have deposited with trust,” he said at a press conference on Thursday. “We are responsible for protecting people’s financial security — the safety of the people’s funds and their personal data.”
Myanmar’s banking industry nearly collapsed following the military coup, as many bankers and other employees at financial institutions walked off the job to join the nationwide civil disobedience movement in opposition to the junta. The system received a further blow from restrictions on transactions implemented by the junta-controlled central bank.
The NUG issued an ordinance on June 1 to establish an interim central bank to regulate and rectify the banking sector and to safeguard foreign exchange reserves from misuse by the junta.
The Spring Development Bank, expected to be fully operational by the end of August, will serve as the NUG’s representative bank to help with funding, tax collection and fundraising for the Spring Revolution, Tin Tun Naing said.
Currencies supported
Initially, the bank will support transactions in Myanmar kyat, U.S. dollars, Malaysian ringgit and Singaporean dollars, said officials at the press conference.
Later, the bank will handle transactions in British pounds, euros, South Korean won, Japanese yen and other currencies.
The NUG is planning for the bank to support payments for trade and links with international banks, provide loans, and offer currency swaps, fixed deposits and prize-linked savings account services such as depositing gold and using credit cards, NUG officials said.
It also will issue revolutionary bonds and auction property owned by the State Administration Council, as the junta regime is known.
The bank expects to have 100,000 users in its first six months of regular operations, and 500,000 users in the following six months, officials said.
RFA could not reach the junta’s central bank for comment.
A financial expert said the development was positive but that SDB would have to take precautions to avoid fraudulent digital currency transactions.
“I see it as a positive since it is using transparent technology for transactions, but we have to be cautious about technical fraud — scams,” he said.
Easier for transferring money
Min Zayar Oo, the NUG’s deputy minister of planning, finance and investment, said the crypto banking system will be safe to use.
“Similarly, the SDB has also implemented a security system [in case] users leak the data,” he said.
Pro-military junta Telegram channels frequently reported arrests of supporters of the revolution and users of the NUG’s mobile money service, NUG Pay.
Myo Myint Aung, who is helping anti-dictatorship activists on the Thai-Myanmar border, said the crypto banking system will be easier for transferring money and supporting resistance fighters.
“For us, this means that when we send money to the youths [revolutionaries], we can send it safely,” he said. “In the same way, we deposit money in the bank safely. We don’t have to worry about our accounts being blocked.”
Translated by Htin Aung Kyaw for RFA Burmese. Edited by Roseanne Gerin and Malcolm Foster.
This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by By RFA Burmese.
This post was originally published on Radio Free.
Rebecca Levingston is a good friend. She hosts the morning program on 612 ABC Brisbane from 8.30 until 11 Monday to Friday and from time to time I have enjoyed being her guest. At 10 on Fridays, she devotes 30 minutes to reviewing the major news events of the week and has invited me to …
Continue reading I AM CHATTING WITH REBECCA ON ABC EVERY FRIDAY MORNING AT 10.
The post I AM CHATTING WITH REBECCA ON ABC EVERY FRIDAY MORNING AT 10. appeared first on Everald Compton.
This post was originally published on My Articles – Everald Compton.
This post was originally published on Michael West.
Prime Minister Hun Sen’s government has ordered internet service providers in Cambodia to block the websites of Radio Free Asia and other news outlets ahead of this Sunday’s parliamentary election.
The outlets were accused of misrepresenting the government’s reputation and prestige and of failing to meet the Ministry of Information’s conditions for doing business, according to a July 12 letter signed by Srun Kimsan of Telecommunication Regulator of Cambodia.
The blocked sites include RFA’s Khmer and English websites and RFA’s Khmer language Twitter page.
The regulator also ordered the blocking of the Kamnotra website, produced by the Cambodian Center for Independent Media, or CCIM. The website posts information, data or documents that people can use.
RFA condemned the order, calling it a “clear violation of Cambodian law and an attempt to censor the free flow of information ahead of the July 23 election,” according to RFA spokesman Rohit Mahajan.
“Access to timely, accurate news and information, which RFA’s programming and content provides to the Cambodian people on a daily basis, is essential in any democracy where the rule of law supports free speech and a free press,” he said.
“Despite these unfortunate efforts, RFA will keep striving to inform its audience in Cambodia with up-to-the-minute journalism during this critical time and beyond,” Mahajan said.
‘Undermines their rights’
As of Monday afternoon Washington DC time, access to some of RFA’s websites were blocked within Cambodia, sources there said.
Some RFA monitors inside the country said they were still able to access RFA broadcasts on Facebook, YouTube, Telegram and Twitter.
However, Kamnotra has already been blocked by major internet service providers like Cellcard and Ezecom, CCIM director Ith Sothoeut said.
“When sources of information are blocked, it undermines the right to information of the general population, which is guaranteed by law, especially before the election,” he said.
“It undermines their rights as voters, who need to be fully informed to make it easier for them to make informed decisions,” he said.
Cambodia’s 1993 constitution guarantees press freedom.
But in February, the government closed independent news outfit Voice of Democracy after it reported that the prime minister’s son had approved a government donation to support Turkey’s earthquake recovery efforts.
Previous crackdowns
Several other independent media outlets were forced to shut down prior to the last general election in 2018.
And a government crackdown in 2017 led to the closure of 32 FM radio frequencies, including those that broadcast RFA Khmer Service content, the arrest of two former RFA journalists and the closure of The Cambodia Daily newspaper.
The July 12 letter from the Telecommunication Regulator of Cambodia also ordered the blocking of a Khmer language website that has continued to publish stories under The Cambodia Daily name.
RFA has not been able to contact Telecommunication Regulator of Cambodia spokesmen Seang Sethy and Im Vutha for comment. Ministry of Posts and Telecommunications spokesman Sovisothy and Ministry of Information spokesman Meas Sophorn also weren’t immediately available on Monday.
However, Ministry of Information spokesman Meas Sophorn confirmed to CamboJA News on Monday that the ministry had ordered the closure of the websites.
Cambodia’s Information Ministry issues licenses to broadcasters and other media outlets. The Telecommunication Regulator of Cambodia is an autonomous unit within the Ministry of Posts and Telecommunications.
Translated by Sok Ry Sum and Keo Sovannarith. Edited by Matt Reed and Malcolm Foster.
This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by By RFA Khmer.
This post was originally published on Radio Free.
This post was originally published on Michael West.
Listen to a reading of this article (reading by Tim Foley):
I saw a video clip of Julian Assange speaking in London in 2010 where he made an important observation while explaining the philosophy behind his work with WikiLeaks. He said that all our political theories are to some extent “bankrupt” in our current situation, because our institutions are so shrouded in secrecy that we can’t even know what’s really going on in the world.
“We can all write about our political issues, we can all push for particular things we believe in, we can all have particular brands of politics, but I say actually it’s all bankrupt,” Assange said. “And the reason it’s all bankrupt, and all current political theories are bankrupt and particular lines of political thought, is because actually we don’t know what the hell is going on. And until we know the basic structures of our institutions — how they operate in practice, these titanic organizations, how they behave inside, not just through stories but through vast amounts of internal documentations — until we know that, how can we possibly make a diagnosis? How can we set the direction to go until we know where we are? We don’t even have a map of where we are. So our first task is to build up a sort of intellectual heritage that describes where we are. And once we know where we are, then we have a hope of setting course for a different direction. Until then, I think all political theories — to greater and lesser extents of course — are bankrupt.”
It’s an extremely important point if you think about it: how can we form theories about how our governments should be operating when we have no idea how they are currently operating? How can a doctor prescribe the correct treatment when he hasn’t yet made a diagnosis?
Political theories are in this sense “bankrupt”, because they are formed in the dark, without our being able to see precisely what’s happening and what’s going wrong.
The nature of our institutions is hidden from us, and that includes not only our government institutions but the political, media, corporate and financial institutions which control so much of our society. Their nature is hidden not only by a complete lack of transparency but by things like propaganda, internet censorship, Silicon Valley algorithm manipulation, and the fact that all the most loudly amplified voices in our society are those who more or less support status quo politics.
The fact that all the most important aspects of our civilization’s operation are hidden, manipulated and obfuscated by the powerful makes a joke of the very idea of democracy, because how can people know what government policies to vote for if they can’t even clearly see those policies? How can people know what to vote for when everything about their understanding of the world is being actively distorted for the benefit of the powerful?
Democracy is impossible when the public is flying blind, and so is any other means by which the public might impose their will on existing power structures. You will never see a collective uprising of the masses against their rulers when the dominant message being inserted into everyone’s mind is that everything is basically fine and if you don’t like the way things are you can change it by voting. If the veil of secrecy was ever ripped away from the US empire’s inner workings and everyone could see the full scale of its criminality in the plain light of day you’d probably have immediate open revolution in Washington. Which is precisely why that veil exists.
We can’t form solid political theories while everything’s hidden from us, and even if we could we’re unable to organize any means to put those theories into action for the same reason. The fact that the nature of our world is being so aggressively obfuscated from our view keeps us from knowing exactly what needs to change, and keeps us from effecting change.
For this reason I often argue that our most urgent priority as a civilization is rolling back all the secrecy and obfuscation, because until that happens we’ll never get change, and we’ll never know what should be changed. I have my ideological preferences of course, but I’m just one person taking their best guess at what needs to happen in a world where so many of the lights are switched off. Not until our society can actually see the world as it really is will we have the ability to begin, as Assange says, “setting course for a different direction.”
And those who benefit from our current course are lucidly aware of this. That’s why we’re not allowed to see what they’re up to behind the veils of secrecy, that’s why our entire civilization is saturated in nonstop propaganda, that’s why the internet is being increasingly censored and manipulated, and that’s why Julian Assange is in prison.
We can only begin fighting this from where we’re at. None of us individually have the power to rip the veil of secrecy away from the empire, but we do each individually have the ability to call out its lies where they can be seen and help wake people up to the fact that we’re being deceived and manipulated. Every pair of eyelids you help open is one more pair of eyes looking around helping to get an accurate picture of what’s going on, and one more pair of eyes helping to open the eyes of others.
Once we have enough open eyes, we will have the potential for a real course of action.
___________________
All my work is free to bootleg and use in any way, shape or form; republish it, translate it, use it on merchandise; whatever you want. My work is entirely reader-supported, so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around, throwing some money into my tip jar on Patreon, Paypal, or Substack, buying an issue of my monthly zine, and following me on Facebook, Twitter, Soundcloud or YouTube. If you want to read more you can buy my books. The best way to make sure you see the stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list on Substack, which will get you an email notification for everything I publish. For more info on who I am, where I stand, and what I’m trying to do with this platform, click here. All works co-authored with my husband Tim Foley.
Bitcoin donations: 1Ac7PCQXoQoLA9Sh8fhAgiU3PHA2EX5Zm
This post was originally published on Caitlin Johnstone.
North Korean authorities are cracking down on women for smoking in public, saying they are promoting capitalist culture and extinguishing socialist morals, residents in the country told Radio Free Asia.
But the same thinking does not seem to apply to men. The country’s supreme leader, Kim Jong Un, for example, is a chain smoker often seen in state media holding a lit cigarette.
In North Korea, it is natural for men to smoke, but frowned on for women to do the same, sources told RFA.
Statistics as recent as 2020 seem to confirm this trend, with 46.1 percent of North Korean men self-reporting that they have used tobacco –compared to zero women– according to a report by 38 North, a publication of the Washington-based Stimson Center think tank.
But these days, more women are lighting up in front of other people, and authorities are enforcing anti-public-smoking laws on women but not on men.
“Even if the authorities try to [enforce a ban], it doesn’t stop men from smoking, but recently they are catching women smoking too,” a source in the northwestern province of North Pyongan told RFA on condition of anonymity for security reasons.
“The authorities have been cracking down since early this month as more and more women smoke [in public], mainly in the city,” she said.
Anti-smoking laws
In 2005, North Korea passed the Tobacco Control Law, which made it illegal to smoke in hospitals and medical clinics, and on public transportation. This did little to prevent public smoking in other areas.
In a move that was publicized as beneficial for public health and the environment, the country introduced the Tobacco Prohibition Law in 2020, which regulated production and sales of cigarettes, designated more public spaces where smoking is banned, and laid out detailed punishments for smoking in public.
Manufacturers and male smokers were largely allowed to ignore the law, as the firms were responsible for generating revenue for the state, which is only possible if smokers can light up.
Plus, RFA reported in 2020 that North Koreans privately called the anti-smoking laws hypocritical because Kim Jong Un is often pictured in state media puffing away on cigarettes, including in front of children at an orphanage he was visiting around the time the law was passed.
But a recent rise in public smoking by women is the cause for the recent crackdown, which has police monitoring places like restaurants and marketplaces, the North Pyongan resident said.
“This is the first crackdown like this,” she said, and described a June 10 incident where two women in their 40s were fined 30,000 won (US$3.60) for smoking after eating a meal at a restaurant in the city of Sinuiju, which lies on the border with China.
“The police warned them that if they are caught smoking again they will be fined 100,000 won ($12) and if they are caught a third time they could be imprisoned at a disciplinary labor center for a month,” the resident said.
Targeting the wealthy
In the city of Anju, in South Pyongan province, police are even going undercover to try to catch women smoking, a resident there told RFA on condition of anonymity to speak freely.
“Since the beginning of this month, social security agents in civilian clothes have been visiting every restaurant near the provincial arts theater in Anju,” she said. “Many artists and rich people [go there] and many of the women smoke cigarettes.”
The South Pyongan resident said that until recently women who smoke did so secretly, but now they are smoking in front of others. She attributed the rise in female smoking to the greater stresses they face earning money to feed their families.
In the past, North Korean men could expect to support a family with the income from their government assigned jobs, but this became impossible after the economic collapse that led to the 1994-1998 North Korean famine.
Rapid inflation since then rendered the men’s salaries nearly irrelevant, so it has fallen on the women to make money by operating their own businesses, and a nascent market economy has since emerged.
Modern women
So now, women who smoke are seen as more modern than their counterparts of yesteryear, the South Pyongan source said.
Smoking among women is also a sign that women are rebelling against an oppressive society pressure that has consistently suppressed their desires, Yoon Bo Young, a researcher who focuses on North Korean women and society at South Korea’s Dongguk University, told RFA.
“As women’s rights are expanded and women’s abilities are demonstrated, women act to break taboos,” said Yoon. “From that point of view, a woman who smokes should be recognized as a modern woman in North Korea. This is a society where hair must be neatly tied and women must wear appropriate clothes.”
Despite the obvious harmful health impact of smoking, doing so in public can be seen as a way for women to assert their independence.
Yoon noted that in Korean culture, smoking has traditionally been considered a male pastime, but now fewer female smokers are hiding their habit in South Korea as well.
She predicted that women feeling comfortable enough to smoke in public will cause more cracks in North Korean social norms.
Translated by Claire Shinyoung Oh Lee. Written in English by Eugene Whong. Edited by Malcolm Foster.
This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by By Son Hyemin for RFA Korean.
This post was originally published on Radio Free.
North Korean authorities are cracking down on women for smoking in public, saying they are promoting capitalist culture and extinguishing socialist morals, residents in the country told Radio Free Asia.
But the same thinking does not seem to apply to men. The country’s supreme leader, Kim Jong Un, for example, is a chain smoker often seen in state media holding a lit cigarette.
In North Korea, it is natural for men to smoke, but frowned on for women to do the same, sources told RFA.
Statistics as recent as 2020 seem to confirm this trend, with 46.1 percent of North Korean men self-reporting that they have used tobacco –compared to zero women– according to a report by 38 North, a publication of the Washington-based Stimson Center think tank.
But these days, more women are lighting up in front of other people, and authorities are enforcing anti-public-smoking laws on women but not on men.
“Even if the authorities try to [enforce a ban], it doesn’t stop men from smoking, but recently they are catching women smoking too,” a source in the northwestern province of North Pyongan told RFA on condition of anonymity for security reasons.
“The authorities have been cracking down since early this month as more and more women smoke [in public], mainly in the city,” she said.
Anti-smoking laws
In 2005, North Korea passed the Tobacco Control Law, which made it illegal to smoke in hospitals and medical clinics, and on public transportation. This did little to prevent public smoking in other areas.
In a move that was publicized as beneficial for public health and the environment, the country introduced the Tobacco Prohibition Law in 2020, which regulated production and sales of cigarettes, designated more public spaces where smoking is banned, and laid out detailed punishments for smoking in public.
Manufacturers and male smokers were largely allowed to ignore the law, as the firms were responsible for generating revenue for the state, which is only possible if smokers can light up.
Plus, RFA reported in 2020 that North Koreans privately called the anti-smoking laws hypocritical because Kim Jong Un is often pictured in state media puffing away on cigarettes, including in front of children at an orphanage he was visiting around the time the law was passed.
But a recent rise in public smoking by women is the cause for the recent crackdown, which has police monitoring places like restaurants and marketplaces, the North Pyongan resident said.
“This is the first crackdown like this,” she said, and described a June 10 incident where two women in their 40s were fined 30,000 won (US$3.60) for smoking after eating a meal at a restaurant in the city of Sinuiju, which lies on the border with China.
“The police warned them that if they are caught smoking again they will be fined 100,000 won ($12) and if they are caught a third time they could be imprisoned at a disciplinary labor center for a month,” the resident said.
Targeting the wealthy
In the city of Anju, in South Pyongan province, police are even going undercover to try to catch women smoking, a resident there told RFA on condition of anonymity to speak freely.
“Since the beginning of this month, social security agents in civilian clothes have been visiting every restaurant near the provincial arts theater in Anju,” she said. “Many artists and rich people [go there] and many of the women smoke cigarettes.”
The South Pyongan resident said that until recently women who smoke did so secretly, but now they are smoking in front of others. She attributed the rise in female smoking to the greater stresses they face earning money to feed their families.
In the past, North Korean men could expect to support a family with the income from their government assigned jobs, but this became impossible after the economic collapse that led to the 1994-1998 North Korean famine.
Rapid inflation since then rendered the men’s salaries nearly irrelevant, so it has fallen on the women to make money by operating their own businesses, and a nascent market economy has since emerged.
Modern women
So now, women who smoke are seen as more modern than their counterparts of yesteryear, the South Pyongan source said.
Smoking among women is also a sign that women are rebelling against an oppressive society pressure that has consistently suppressed their desires, Yoon Bo Young, a researcher who focuses on North Korean women and society at South Korea’s Dongguk University, told RFA.
“As women’s rights are expanded and women’s abilities are demonstrated, women act to break taboos,” said Yoon. “From that point of view, a woman who smokes should be recognized as a modern woman in North Korea. This is a society where hair must be neatly tied and women must wear appropriate clothes.”
Despite the obvious harmful health impact of smoking, doing so in public can be seen as a way for women to assert their independence.
Yoon noted that in Korean culture, smoking has traditionally been considered a male pastime, but now fewer female smokers are hiding their habit in South Korea as well.
She predicted that women feeling comfortable enough to smoke in public will cause more cracks in North Korean social norms.
Translated by Claire Shinyoung Oh Lee. Written in English by Eugene Whong. Edited by Malcolm Foster.
This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by By Son Hyemin for RFA Korean.
This post was originally published on Radio Free.