
This post was originally published on Michael West Media.
This post was originally published on Michael West Media.
New York, November 9, 2021 – Kyrgyz authorities should retract a recently devised bill increasing state control over the country’s public broadcaster and instead enact changes to safeguard the corporation’s editorial independence, the Committee to Protect Journalists said today.
On October 29, 15 prominent media representatives and advocacy groups issued a statement calling on Kyrgyzstan’s Cabinet of Ministers and Ministry of Culture to withdraw a draft law on OTRK, the state-funded broadcaster, according to the group’s statement and news reports.
The bill, “On the Kyrgyz Broadcasting Corporation,” has not been made publicly available but CPJ has reviewed a copy. The draft proposes altering the corporation’s official status from a “public television channel” to a “national state agency.”
As part of the changes, the broadcaster’s supervisory council, partially nominated by non-governmental organizations drawn from civil society, would be abolished, meaning the corporation’s general director will be appointed by the Kyrgyzstan president instead of the council.
The media representatives and organizations argue that these measures will remove public control over the broadcaster’s operations and legitimize “unlimited political interference” in its editorial policy.
“Proposals to grant the president the right to appoint the head of Kyrgyzstan’s state-funded broadcaster are deeply concerning and should be discarded at once,” said Gulnoza Said, CPJ’s Europe and Central Asia program coordinator. “While recognizing OTRK’s current shortcomings, the bill’s solutions run in entirely the wrong direction, and threaten to undermine journalistic freedom and ensure that the corporation will be nothing but a mouthpiece for state propaganda.”
Kyrgyzstan’s public broadcaster OTRK is the country’s largest and most watched television network, broadcasting on six television channels covering news, culture, sport and children’s TV, and five radio channels, according to news reports.
The corporation’s status was first altered from a “state” to a “public” broadcaster following Kyrgyzstan’s April Revolution in 2010, when the new authorities wanted to create a more politically impartial state-funded TV. Its 15-member supervisory council was given wide oversight powers over editorial policy and budgetary matters. Under current law, five council members are nominated by the Kyrgyzstan president, five by parliament, and five by civil society groups. The members serve for five years and elect the general director every four years.
Despite the initial success of the reforms, OTRK is frequently criticized inside Kyrgyzstan for alleged unobjective coverage and spreading state propaganda, according to news reports.
Under the new bill, the general director will be appointed by the Kyrgyzstan president at the nomination of the Ministry of Culture, although the law does not specify a set process. The statement from the 15 media representatives and organizations argues this will replace the transparency and competitiveness of the current appointment procedure with one closed to public scrutiny.
Media representatives fear the changes will grant the president increased power to interfere in broadcast content. Altynai Isaeva, a lawyer at the local independent media advocacy organization Media Policy Institute, told U.S. Congress-funded Current Time TV that under the proposed reform, the broadcaster’s editorial policy will be “totally dependent on [President Sadyr Japarov].”
Kyrgyz officials have given various explanations for the proposed changes. At a press conference on October 23, Japarov stated that reform was necessary because OTRK currently works in the interests of the supervisory council rather than the state and that the corporation ought to broadcast “national ideology.”
In their statement, the media representatives write that, although OTRK today has not become a de facto “public” broadcaster, “this says more about a lack of political will among the country’s leadership, which continues to interfere in the television station’s editorial policy,” and that the answer should instead be to provide reforms that bolster the corporation’s independence from the state.
Proposed changes to OTRK’s status are part of a wider process of legal reform that began with Japarov’s decree in February this year to review over 350 laws, reports stated. Authorities announced plans to revise three other key media laws, including the laws “On Mass Media” and “On Protecting the Professional Activity of the Journalist,” but the Justice Ministry promised to avoid making major changes to these laws for the time being following an appeal by media groups, Nurbek Sydykov, a lawyer with Media Policy Institute, told CPJ by messaging app.
The present drafts of these laws propose only insignificant alterations, Sydykov said.
CPJ emailed the Cabinet of Ministers and the office of the presidency of Kyrgyzstan and called the Ministry of Culture for comment but did not receive any replies.
This content originally appeared on Committee to Protect Journalists and was authored by Committee to Protect Journalists.
This post was originally published on Radio Free.
This post was originally published on Michael West Media.
This post was originally published on Michael West Media.
This post was originally published on Michael West Media.
This post was originally published on Michael West Media.
After over seven years of court hearings, arrests and strong resistance from the Mi’kmaw community, the controversial Alton Gas project has been cancelled!
This project would have used water from the Shubenacadie River in Nova Scotia to create large, underground storage caverns for natural gas. Members of the Sipekne’katik First Nation raised concerns that the project would damage and pollute the 73-kilometre tidal river with toxic brine making it dangerously saline, especially to native fish like the three-spined stickleback.
Dorene Bernard, a Mi’kmaq Grassroots Grandmother and Water Protector of the Sipekne’katik Band, described the river as “a major artery for our people” and that the river “has a very significant historical, spiritual and cultural relevance to who we are.”
Our heartfelt congratulations and gratitude go out to all of the water and land protectors, and the people of Nova Scotia, that made this happen.
This approach to fighting project by project from large companies trying to pollute our environment, especially where Indigenous, racialized and low income Canadians live, isn’t working. That’s why we need a national strategy to advance environmental justice. Earlier this month, we joined the Canadian Coalition for Environmental and Climate Justice (CCECJ) to call on the government to re-introduce Bill C-230. If re-introduced and passed, this Bill would examine the link between race, socio-economic status, and exposure to environmental risk. This is a critical first step toward acknowledging the legacy of environmental racism in Canada and ensuring that all people in Canada benefit from environmental protection policies.
Stay tuned on our progress to fight for better protections for people most vulnerable to harm from toxics and those living in communities where exposure is high; recognizing the right to a healthy environment for the first time in federal law; and the clean-up of contaminated sites.
The post Alton Gas project cancelled after years of strong Mi’kmaw opposition appeared first on Environmental Defence.
This post was originally published on Environmental Defence.
This post was originally published on Michael West Media.
This post was originally published on Michael West Media.
This post was originally published on Michael West Media.
This post was originally published on Michael West Media.
This post was originally published on Michael West Media.
This post was originally published on Michael West Media.
This post was originally published on Michael West Media.
This post was originally published on Michael West Media.
This post was originally published on Michael West Media.
This post was originally published on Michael West Media.
This post was originally published on Michael West Media.
This post was originally published on Michael West Media.
This post was originally published on Michael West Media.
This post was originally published on Michael West Media.
This post was originally published on Michael West Media.
This post was originally published on Michael West Media.
This post was originally published on Michael West Media.
This post was originally published on Michael West Media.
Australian governments are forecast to spend more than $6.4 billion dollars next year on IT services like consultants, managed services and cloud infrastructure, as part of a near double-digit rise in the growth of overall IT expenditure.
Advisory firm Gartner on Wednesday released its 2022 government IT spend forecast, predicting Commonwealth, state, territory, and local governments in Australia will spend $15.5 billion on IT in 2022, an 8.8 per cent or $1.2 billion leap on this year.
This includes $6.4 billion on IT services and a further $4.7 billion on software, the two largest and fastest growing areas of IT expenditure by Australian governments, which together will account for 72 per cent of IT spending in 2022.
The jump is being driven by a slew of digital projects, including the federal government’s $1.2 billion Digital Economy package, as Australian governments try to catch up to global counterparts by modernising systems and forming a clearer view of citizens across different services, according to Gartner vice president, executive programs, Brian Ferreira.
“Government has to modernise their landscape. That’s the biggest issue,” Mr Ferreira told InnovationAus.
“They’ve been underspending in technology, and suddenly now that COVID has created chaos in our lives they want all of these technology capabilities. Now they are finding themselves behind the curve.”
The modernisation acceleration is driving the forecasted jump in software and IT services spend, Mr Ferreira said, but governments are also looking at ways to get a more holistic view of citizens to deliver linked up services through a “case management” approach rather than as individual agencies or services.
“If you look at how things are handled at border control and trying to see if people are vaccinated, how do they cross the borders – case management has become one of the biggest gaps in government end to end,” Mr Ferreira said.
The federal government has spent years and $460 million on a controversial digital identity scheme designed to address the service fragmentation issue, including handing a single consultancy firm more than $54 million dollars to work on the program which will be widened to the states and private sector next year.
Mr Ferreira, who advises large public sector clients including federal agencies, said a digital identity system is fundamental to the case management approach to service delivery.
“If you don’t have some of the end-to-end case management use cases out and digital identity, you can modernise until you’re blue in the face [but] you’re not going to get it right.”
Cyber security is also driving the growing IT spend, Mr Ferreira said, particularly with new powers allowing governments agencies and law enforcement to monitor and alter citizens’ communications, and the threat of foreign interference.
“With that legislation now being available, I think we’re going to see probably a lot of spend going into the cyber space. I think the government is worried about that,” Mr Ferreira said.
The trend by Australian governments to outsource technology work will continue because of talent gaps and staffing caps, which Mr Ferreira said often leave agencies with little choice but to outsource.
“Government still has old models of how many [full-time employees] an agency can have… the headcount model in government hasn’t adjusted yet for digital,” Mr Ferreira said.
“And for some of the more advanced things they just don’t have the skills, and they can’t attract the skills locally.”
The growing importance of technology to deliver digital services means governments’ IT expenditure will continue to grow, he said.
“You can’t cut IT spend if you want to go digital, it’s going to cost you more [eventually]. You’ve got to find the business case in the citizen value, or efficiencies or operating expenses. You just can’t cut IT further if you want to go into digital.”
In 2019, a review of the Australian Public Service recommended an “urgent” audit of IT spending after discovering a lack of oversight. The audit was accepted by the government but only began this year.
The post Billion-dollar boom forecasted for govt IT spend appeared first on InnovationAus.
This post was originally published on InnovationAus.
This post was originally published on Michael West Media.
Environmental Defence expert spokespeople are available to comment on climate change and other environmental issues including plastic pollution and toxic chemicals in our air and water
Toronto, Ont. – With climate change and the environment top of mind for many Canadian voters, it is important that Canadians have information about the threats to our country’s environment. Environmental Defence expert spokespeople are available to comment and clarify information on climate change and its solutions, along with other environmental issues, including plastic pollution, toxic chemicals in our air, water and the products people use, and the need to end subsidies to the fossil fuel industry.
WHO: Environmental Defence expert spokespeople available to comment on climate change, plastic pollution, toxic pollution, ending fossil fuel subsidies, and Great Lakes water quality.
WHERE: Toronto and Ottawa, available remotely
A briefing about key environmental issues facing Canadians this election is available here: https://environmentaldefence.ca/report/election-2021-backgrounder/
About ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENCE (environmentaldefence.ca): Environmental Defence is a leading Canadian environmental advocacy organization that works with government, industry and individuals to defend clean water, a safe climate and healthy communities.
-30-
To arrange an interview with an Environmental Defence expert spokesperson, please contact:
media@environmentaldefence.ca, 647-280-9521
The post ADVISORY: Spokespeople are available to comment on climate change, environmental issues during election appeared first on Environmental Defence.
This post was originally published on Environmental Defence.
This post was originally published on Michael West Media.
This post was originally published on Michael West Media.