Category: Health

  • Jackfruit is all the rage these days. Whether shredded as taco meat, used in chicken-free nuggets and burgers, or, if you’re lucky enough, ripe right off the tree, there’s no wrong way to enjoy jackfruit. Now, jackfruit enthusiasts have another application for the tropical fruit: jackfruit flour.

    Jackfruit flour, a gluten-free alternative derived from the unripe jackfruit, has gained significant attention in the health and wellness industry. Once an underutilized byproduct, this flour is now being hailed for its nutritional benefits, especially its potential to help manage type 2 diabetes. As demand for functional foods rises, jackfruit flour is emerging as a powerhouse ingredient rich in fiber, low in carbohydrates, and packed with essential vitamins and minerals.

    From fruit to flour

    The process of making jackfruit flour begins with the selection of mature yet unripe jackfruits, primarily grown in tropical regions such as India, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, and parts of Southeast Asia. These regions have the ideal climate for cultivating jackfruit trees, which are known for their large, spiky fruits that can weigh up to 80 pounds.

    jackfruit on treeGetty

    Once harvested, the jackfruits undergo a cleaning process to remove any excess latex, which is a naturally occurring sticky substance. The fruit is then peeled, and its fleshy interior is separated from the seeds. The raw jackfruit pieces are sliced into uniform portions and then subjected to dehydration through sun-drying, freeze-drying, or low-temperature oven drying. The chosen drying method plays a crucial role in preserving the nutritional content and preventing enzymatic browning.

    After dehydration, the dried jackfruit pieces are finely milled into a powder. This flour undergoes sieving to ensure a smooth, consistent texture, making it suitable for a variety of culinary applications. The final product is then packaged in airtight containers to maintain freshness and extend shelf life. Unlike many commercial wheat-based flours, jackfruit flour is free from preservatives and artificial additives, making it an appealing option for those seeking natural, whole-food alternatives.

    jackfruit flourJackfruit 365

    As interest in sustainable food sources continues to rise, jackfruit flour holds strong potential as a mainstream alternative to conventional flours. Jackfruit trees require minimal water and grow abundantly without the need for chemical fertilizers, making them an environmentally friendly alternative to grain-based crops like wheat or rice, which require intensive agricultural inputs.

    “It is easy to grow. It survives pests and diseases and high temperatures. It is drought-resistant,” Danielle Nierenberg, president of Food Tank told The Guardian. “It achieves what farmers need in food production when facing a lot of challenges under climate change.”

    Nutritional profile and health benefits

    Jackfruit flour boasts a robust nutritional profile, making it an attractive ingredient for health-conscious consumers. It is naturally rich in dietary fiber, providing digestive benefits while helping to regulate blood sugar levels. A single serving of jackfruit flour (approximately 30 grams) contains:

    • High-fiber content: Roughly six to eight grams per serving, aiding digestion and promoting gut health.

    • Low-glycemic index (GI): Unlike refined wheat flour, jackfruit flour has a much lower GI, meaning it causes a slower rise in blood sugar levels.

    • Essential vitamins and minerals: Including vitamin C, vitamin A, potassium, calcium, and iron, all of which support immune function, bone health, and cardiovascular well-being.

    • Antioxidant properties: Jackfruit contains phytonutrients that help combat oxidative stress and inflammation.

    One of the most notable benefits of jackfruit flour is its ability to aid in managing type 2 diabetes. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition found that participants who replaced a portion of their daily carbohydrate intake with jackfruit flour experienced a significant reduction in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels over a 12-week period.

    The study found patients who consumed the jackfruit flour had a significantly higher reduction in HbA1c, FPG, and PPG than the control group, demonstrating the efficacy of jackfruit flour in glycemic control as medical nutrition therapy replacing an equal volume of rice or wheat flour in daily meals.

    close up jackfruit

    “It’s a miracle. It can provide so many nutrients and calories – everything,” Shyamala Reddy, a biotechnology researcher at the University of Agriculture Sciences in Bangalore, India, told The Guardian. “If you just eat 10 or 12 bulbs of this fruit, you don’t need food for another half a day.”

    How to use jackfruit flour

    Jackfruit flour’s neutral taste and fine texture make it an incredibly versatile ingredient that can seamlessly integrate into various recipes.

    1Traditional sses in South Asian cuisine

    In South India, jackfruit flour has long been incorporated into everyday meals. It is often blended into dosa and idli batter to enhance fiber content and lower the glycemic index of these staple foods. Some households also mix a tablespoon of jackfruit flour into traditional porridge or kanji to boost satiety.

    2Gluten-free baking

    For those avoiding gluten, jackfruit flour serves as an excellent alternative to wheat flour in baked goods. It can be used in cakes, muffins, pancakes, and even bread. Since jackfruit flour lacks gluten, it is often combined with other gluten-free flours such as almond or coconut flour for better texture and binding.

    woman on phone while cooking pexelsPexels

    3Thickening agent for soups and sauces

    Due to its high fiber content, jackfruit flour acts as an effective thickening agent in soups, stews, and gravies. It can replace cornstarch or all-purpose flour in recipes requiring a thick, creamy consistency.

    4Smoothies and nutritional drinks

    For a nutrient-dense boost, adding a spoonful of jackfruit flour to smoothies or protein shakes is an easy way to incorporate fiber and essential minerals into one’s diet without altering the taste significantly.

    Where to find jackfruit flour

    With growing consumer interest in plant-based and functional foods, jackfruit flour is becoming more widely available in supermarkets, specialty health food stores, and online marketplaces. Leading brands such as Jackfruit365, Telugu Foods, and Beleon have launched commercial versions of jackfruit flour. Currently, the best option for sourcing jackfruit flour is via online retailers like Amazon.

    For those interested in making jackfruit flour at home, the process is simple but requires patience. Using a dehydrator or an oven at low temperatures, individuals can dry jackfruit slices over several hours before grinding them into a fine powder. This homemade alternative ensures a preservative-free product with maximum nutrient retention.

    This post was originally published on VegNews.com.

  • With the official advice from the NHS saying that Covid-19 is mainly spread by ‘droplet and touch’ but the World Health Organisation saying the primary spread is ‘airborne’, the message to staff and patients is confused, leading to a lack of protective measures, putting staff and patients at risk.

    The NHS: failing to protect people

    As pressures in the NHS continue, with increasing admissions for infectious viruses, there are calls to improve the infection, prevention and control (IPC) measures within the NHS and social care. 

    That’s because flu, Covid, RSV, and norovirus (droplets can be airborne when a patient vomits) can be deadly for patients who are immunosuppressed, and those with conditions like cancer who, due to treatment, are more prone to infection.

    But confusion has set in within the NHS IPC department saying that Covid is mainly spread by ‘droplet and touch,’ and others including the WHO saying it is primarily ‘airborne spread.’

    In practice this now means the onus is on vulnerable patients to ask staff to wear a mask, with some patients unaware or unable to make this request. To complicate this further, not all staff are complying with this request. Other staff agree, but their masks won’t give suitable protection.

    For Janice, this became a problem when her mum aged 86, who has a neuromuscular degenerative condition, injured her head in a fall. An ambulance was called and Janice said:

    My husband and I waited for them at the door, both of us in masks. But they turned-up mask free and refused to put one on. I couldn’t believe it! We had brand new unopened FFP3 masks in stock, but they refused to take them saying they hadn’t been fit tested and trained to wear them. They also said Covid was over!

    Eventually, Janice said they put on their own blue surgical masks, that were ‘baggy’ and offered little protection

    So, why do we have two different views on how Covid is spread? 

    Confused messaging and understanding

    Experts at the Covid-19 Inquiry have testified that the primary route of transmission for Covid is airborne. This is often called ‘aerosol spread’. 

    But the current Head of IPC for NHS England, Dr Lisa Ritchie in the current document ‘How to avoid catching COVID-19 infection gives the following advice:

    When someone with COVID-19 breathes, speaks, coughs or sneezes, they release small droplets containing the virus. You can catch it by breathing in these droplets, or by touching surfaces covered in them and then touching your eyes, nose or mouth.

    In his extensive written evidence, Professor Clive Beggs discussed the historical controversy surrounding airborne versus droplet-borne diseases:

    During the pandemic the World Health Organisation (WHO) and many other professional institutions relied on(these) flawed assumptions, despite some dissenting pre-pandemic evidence.

    Eventually the scientific evidence for airborne transmission of Covid-19 from studies using multiple types of methodology became overwhelming and the WHO acknowledged its significance with a change in official terminology adopted in 2024, reclassifying SARS-COV-2 as a pathogen that is ‘transmitted through the air.

    If the World Health Organisation has updated their official terminology to match the ‘overwhelming’ scientific evidence, why has the NHS IPC Department not followed suit?

    One answer might be because a primary mode of transmission that is airborne has major cost implications for the whole of the NHS and social care, with poorly ventilated, or crowded indoor spaces a particular risk regarding the spread of these pathogens

    But to protect those who use and work in the NHS and/or social care sectors the government needs to put in place these IPC measures. This would also help to protect against flu, RSV, tuberculosis, and measles which are also on the rise. 

    The measures that need to be implemented include improved ventilation to bring in fresh air. High Efficiency Particulate Air (HEPA) filters to ‘clean’ the air and remove any viruses. Plus, effective PPE for everyone, with FFP2 and FFP3 masks being more effective to prevent the spread of airborne viruses. The blue surgical masks worn reluctantly by the paramedics Janice encountered don’t offer the protection required. 

    The NHS must do better

    With no progress on protecting staff and patients, a petition has been set up by Janet Newsham the coordinator of Greater Manchester’s Hazards Centre and Chair of the UK Hazards Campaign, to address this. You can sign the petition here.

    Newsham said:

    There are many airborne risks especially in healthcare settings which are ongoing and should and can be prevented, reducing the risks for patients, visitors and staff.

    In terms of what the public could do to apply pressure on the government, Newsham said:

    The UK government and parliament petition calling for these measures is one way that the public can let the government know that they want to be protected from airborne infections while accessing healthcare.

    The All-Party Parliamentary Group for Long Covid has now been set up and separately to this group, a letter has been sent to the Chair of the Covid-19 Inquiry inviting her to make urgent interim recommendations to make healthcare settings safe. But a reply was received on 27 January 2025 in which the Right Honourable Baroness Hallett declined to make any recommendations in module three of the Inquiry. 

    As the Covid-19 Inquiry turns to reflect on matters such as the procurement and quality of PPE, it is frankly shocking that in 2025, the protection of staff and patients is still an issue causing concern.

    The confusing message from the NHS IPC department and continued lack of protective measures puts all those who use and work in the NHS and social care at risk, particularly those who are vulnerable due to weakened immune systems.   

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Ruth Hunt

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • The Assisted Dying Bill faces strong opposition from the palliative care community, with fears that inadequate services may push vulnerable patients towards premature death. Experts urge the need for improved palliative care over legalising assisted suicide, highlighting serious ethical implications and potential harms.

    Assisted suicide: pushback from palliative care professionals

    During recent discussions surrounding Kim Leadbeater’s Assisted Dying Bill, significant concern has emerged from the palliative care community about the potential negative impact on end-of-life care provisions in the UK.

    The oral evidence sessions held over three days have revealed a strong opposition among palliative care workers, raising alarms about the implications this Bill could have on the quality and accessibility of NHS palliative care.

    Glyn Berry, Co-Chair of the Association of Palliative Care Social Workers, highlighted some critical issues that undermine the argument for assisted suicide.

    While presenting evidence before the Committee, she pointed out that the inequitable provision of palliative care can lead to individuals feeling compelled to choose assisted suicide due to prevailing inadequacies.

    Berry’s insights laid bare the risks associated with the introduction of assisted suicide laws, correlating inadequate palliative care with a potential increase in requests for premature death. She stated that factors such as housing instability and financial insecurity contribute to the impression that assisted suicide is the only option available to some patients.

    Berry expressed further concern regarding the capacity of doctors to fully understand the complex social and familial dynamics of patients. She called for the inclusion of palliative care representatives in discussions related to assisted suicide decisions, underscoring the potential for coercion and misinformed consent in cases where patients might feel pressured by their circumstances.

    An inadequate system

    Supporting Berry’s stance, Professor Nicola Ranger, Chief Executive of the Royal College of Nursing, acknowledged to MP Danny Kruger that there is a possibility that requests for assisted suicide may stem from inadequate palliative care.

    Dr Rachel Clarke, a fellow palliative care doctor, reinforced this notion by asserting that the shortcomings of the current palliative care framework may lead patients to believe they possess no alternatives other than assisted suicide.

    Dr Sarah Cox, President of the Association for Palliative Medicine, further substantiated the opposition to assisted suicide within the medical community, reporting that around 80% of her members are against the Bill. She pointed out that regions which have refrained from adopting assisted suicide laws have experienced thrice the improvement in their palliative care services compared to those that have legalised it.

    Evidence was also presented indicating that the implementation of assisted suicide laws has impeded advancements in palliative care services in various jurisdictions.

    The discussion took a particularly stark turn when international comparisons were introduced.

    Alex Greenwich, the MP for Sydney, Australia, was provided with insights by Danny Kruger regarding the state of palliative care in his region. Contrary to Greenwich’s claims that legalising euthanasia led to improvements in service, data revealed that New South Wales faced significant budget cuts to palliative care shortly after the legalisation, diverting resources towards its assisted suicide programme.

    Assisted suicide is not the answer

    As the Parliamentary session progressed, concerns were raised about the trajectory of the Bill. Observers noted that attention to the testimony of palliative care experts was lacking, as evidenced by Kit Malthouse MP’s apparent disinterest while scrolling through his phone during discussions.

    Such conduct has been interpreted by critics as indicative of a broader trend among proponents of the Bill to disregard the voices advocating for substantial improvements in palliative care.

    A notable issue remains regarding the timing of the proposed legislation. The Palliative and End of Life Care Commission has yet to report its findings, with a crucial vote on the Bill looming.

    The decision to fast-track the Bill is seen by some as problematic, raising questions about the motivations behind the legislative process and the potential ramifications for the future of palliative care in the UK.

    Currently, it is estimated that approximately 100,000 out of the 550,000 individuals who pass away annually in Britain do so without receiving the sufficient palliative care they require.

    Critics argue that rather than veering towards a framework that prioritises assisted suicide, energy and resources should be directed towards enhancing the standards and availability of palliative care services.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • A new report has revealed that legalising and regulating cannabis in the UK could generate up to £1.5 billion annually in tax revenue and criminal justice savings, while creating thousands of jobs and reducing the financial burden of prohibition.

    The research called High Returns: the Economic Benefits of UK Cannabis Legalisation was conducted by the Transform Drug Policy Foundation. It makes a strong economic case for cannabis reform, arguing that the shift would not only benefit public health and social justice but also provide a much-needed boost to the UK economy.

    Legalising cannabis: an economic windfall and job creation

    According to the report, a legally regulated cannabis market could capture up to 80% of the current illicit trade within five years.

    The Hybrid Commercial Retail model—which includes regulated commercial retail alongside home growing and non-profit associations—is projected to generate £1.1 billion in tax revenue, create over 15,500 full-time jobs, and deliver £284 million in savings across the criminal justice system.

    Meanwhile, a state monopoly retail model, where the government oversees cannabis retail operations, could yield even higher financial returns of £1.23 billion.

    These figures suggest that the financial benefits of legalisation far outweigh the costs, especially when considering the significant criminal justice savings. By reducing enforcement, prosecution, and incarceration costs associated with cannabis-related offences, the government could save up to £284 million annually, with police savings alone amounting to £88 million.

    Stopping criminalisation and ending a criminal justice approach

    The current approach to cannabis prohibition places a heavy burden on law enforcement, with over 133,000 cannabis possession offences recorded in 2020/21. The report estimates that policing costs alone could be reduced by up to £88 million annually under legalisation, freeing up resources for more pressing public safety concerns. Court proceedings and prison costs associated with cannabis offences could also see savings of £187 million per year.

    Additionally, legalisation could help address the long-term economic harm caused by criminal records. The report highlights how removing criminal penalties for cannabis offences and expunging past convictions would improve life opportunities and economic prospects for thousands of individuals, particularly in communities disproportionately affected by prohibition.

    Beyond economic incentives, the report emphasises the public health benefits of legalisation.

    Under a regulated system, cannabis products would be subject to strict quality control, accurate labelling, and responsible dosage guidelines, reducing risks associated with contaminated or high-potency products. Consumers would have access to harm reduction information, much like current alcohol and tobacco regulations.

    Legalisation also presents a unique opportunity to reinvest in communities that have suffered disproportionately under punitive drug policies. The report calls for a portion of cannabis tax revenue to be allocated toward social equity programmes, helping to empower those affected by past enforcement measures.

    Countries such as Canada and certain US states have implemented similar initiatives, with cannabis tax revenue funding drug treatment, education, and community development projects.

    Global momentum and public support for legalising cannabis

    With cannabis legalisation gaining traction worldwide, the UK risks falling behind in harnessing the economic and social benefits of reform. The report points to Canada, where a regulated cannabis market has flourished, capturing over 73% of the illegal trade while generating billions in tax revenue.

    Across Europe, Germany, Luxembourg, and Malta have taken steps towards legal regulation, with more nations expected to follow.

    Public opinion in the UK is also shifting in favour of reform. Recent polling suggests that a majority of Britons support legalisation, particularly when considering the economic benefits and the potential to undercut organised crime.

    As the financial pressures on the UK government continue to mount, the report argues that cannabis legalisation presents a viable solution for generating revenue without resorting to unpopular tax increases or public service cuts.

    Report Co-Author Steve Rolles said:

    There are many powerful arguments for ending the generational failure and injustice of cannabis prohibition, but the economic arguments have particular salience in the current political debate. £1.5 billion in annual income could fund 18 million more GP appointments, free school meals for all the UK primary schools, or reverse the cut in winter fuel payments for pensioners. It’s long past time for the UK Government to grow up – deal with reality – and begin an adult debate on how legalisation and regulation of cannabis can deliver for the UK.

    Cannabis: a transformative opportunity

    The findings of the Transform Drug Policy Foundation report provide compelling evidence that cannabis legalisation could be a game-changer for the UK economy. With the potential to create thousands of jobs, generate significant tax revenue, and reduce the financial strain on law enforcement, legalisation represents a pragmatic policy shift that aligns with global trends.

    Report Co-Author Ester Kincova said:

    Making cannabis illegal has been a generational failure, it has undermined public health, criminalised millions of people, wasted taxpayer money, and is increasingly unpopular with the public. This Government needs to follow the sensible moves by countries across the world from Canada to Germany, and responsibly regulate and tax our cannabis market, rather than leave control, and profits, in the hands of organised crime groups.

    Moreover, the broader societal benefits—including improved public health outcomes, reduced criminalisation, and social equity initiatives—make the case for reform even stronger.

    As the UK government faces growing budgetary challenges, embracing cannabis regulation could prove to be a forward-thinking economic and social policy that delivers high returns for both the Treasury and the wider public.

    Featured image supplied

    By Steve Topple

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • novo nordisk ultra processed food
    7 Mins Read

    Over 90 nutrition scientists have hit back at a research project funded by Ozempic maker Novo Nordisk, which aims to develop a new classification for ultra-processed food.

    The ultra-processed food (UPF) wars are heating up, and this time, it’s a battle between nutritionists.

    More than 90 independent health and nutrition scientists have penned an open letter to voice their concerns about a research effort developing the “next generation” of the Nova classification, the tiered system that defines what foods through the amount of processing.

    The project is backed by Novo Nordisk Foundation, the controlling shareholder in the eponymous pharmaceutical giant, most famous for diabetes and obesity medications like Ozempic, Wegovy, and NovoRapid.

    The letter, whose signatories include experts like NYU Professor Emerita Marion Nestle and Ultra-Processed People author and infectious disease doctor Chris van Tulleken, raises concerns about a conflict of interest, given that Novo Nordisk “derives substantial profit from the treatment of diet-related diseases”.

    “It is deeply problematic that a corporation with vested financial interests in these conditions is now funding a project that seeks to redefine the very classification system used to successfully study the role of diet in diet-related diseases,” it reads.

    Phillip Baker, a research fellow at the University of Sydney and signatory of the letter, wrote: “This initiative involves, and is being promoted by, scientists who have been paid by food companies in the past, including Arla, McDonald’s, McCain Foods, Nestlé and others.”

    It comes just after Professor Carlos Monteiro, who led the University of São Paulo team that developed the Nova classification, called out pharma giant’s ‘Nova 2.0’ project.

    In a letter addressed to the initiative’s lead, University of Copenhagen’s Prof Susanne Bügel, Monteiro did not mince his words: “Do not use the term Nova in the title or objectives of your project. Do not refer to your project as an improvement or new version of the Nova classification. Do not suggest that your project has any connection with the Nova classification or its creators”.

    What are UPFs, and why are they criticised?

    nova classification
    Courtesy: Springer

    Monteiro and his team of researchers created the Nova system in 2009, grouping products into four subgroups. The first category comprises unprocessed or minimally processed foods (including whole foods), the second contains ‘processed culinary ingredients’ (like nut and seed oils, or salt), and the third category is made up of processed foods that have enhanced shelf lives (think tinned fish, salted nuts, pickles, breads and cheeses).

    UPFs make up the final category, which the Nova classification defines as foods produced via industrial formulations and techniques like extrusion or pre-frying, combined with cosmetic additives and substances of little culinary use. This involves products like ice creams, sugary cereals, fizzy drinks, packaged breads, sausages and reconstituted meats, and plant-based meat analogues.

    This last group has been under heavy scrutiny in the last year, due to the link between UPFs and ill health – several studies have concluded that UPFs are bad for human health, with one umbrella review last year outlining 32 harmful effects of these foods.

    The discourse has amplified since Robert F Kennedy Jr became the new US health secretary, on the back of promises to ban UPFs in schools and make the food system less processed. California is also cracking down on these products, while some of the country’s largest food companies are facing a lawsuit for deceptive marketing to children.

    In response, the Consumer Brands Association – which represents industry giants including Nestlé, Kraft Heinz, Coca-Cola, Danone, PepsiCo, Kellanova, and Mondelēz International – has created a Food Processing Facts website to combat “consumer confusion” around UPFs. And the Non-GMO Project has unveiled a new Non-UPF Verified label for food products.

    food processing facts
    Courtesy: Consumer Brands Association/Green Queen

    Novo Nordisk’s push to develop Nova 2.0

    The project by Novo Nordisk Foundation, meanwhile, was announced in October. Over two years, it aims to “develop a scientifically based understanding” of the importance of different food processing methods – in other words, the research will directly focus on the nutritional content of foods, rather than the production process.

    Bügel and her team will also look at incorporating the food matrix into the conversation around UPFs – this refers to the chemical and physical composition of foods, and how their molecules interact.

    “We are at risk of demonising healthy foods such as some types of cereals that you cannot make at home, but are packed with whole grains and fibres,” said Arne Astrup, managing director and senior VP for the obesity and nutrition division at Novo Nordisk Foundation.

    “We should not make the same mistake as when we shamed fat, because we ended up promoting a diet with a high starch content that in effect works like sugar in the body. This turned out to be a bad solution for many people. Instead, our science should be as nuanced, rich and rewarding as a good meal.”

    plant based meat ultra processed
    Courtesy: Metro/The Telegraph/Daily Mail/New York Post

    It’s a sentiment echoed by many nutritionists across the world, who have described the Nova classification as important, but often misunderstood in media coverage. Several studies have shown that not all UPFs are bad or unhealthy – whole-grain breads or plant-based milk (even those with additives) come to mind.

    Nutrition experts have highlighted that processing shouldn’t be linked to nutrition. Dr Martin Smollich, head of pharmaconutrition at Germany’s Institute of Nutritional Medicine, noted last year: “Ultra-processed foods are not all the same: there are UPFs with a very good and with a very poor nutritional profile – just as is the case with less processed foods.”

    Marlana Malerich, co-founder at the Rooted Research Collective and a food systems researcher with expertise in UPFs, told Green Queen: “The open letter raises the legitimate concern of potential conflict of interest that should not be dismissed, however, it is well-established that the Nova classification system – and categorising food by level of processing alone – can create confusion, even among health experts

    She adds that other systems, like ‘high fat, salt and sugar’ (HFSS) categorisation, are more comprehensive. “Many processed foods are HFSS, and fundamentally unhealthy, and can be quantified (via nutrient content) as such. However, this is due to the content of the products rather than the processing level.”

    Nutritionists hit back at ‘industry-serving’ effort to redefine UPFs

    nova classification
    Courtesy: Københavns Universitet

    Rather than alienating the inventors of the original Nova system, Bügel wants to work with them on the Novo Nordisk-based research. “An important aim of this project is to bring experts together and include both those who invented the original Nova classification and those who have been critical,” she said.

    That, however, has been met with strong resistance from Monteiro and other health experts. “Nova and its creators have never had, do not have, and will not have any association with the newly launched Novo Nordisk project to create ‘Nova 2.0’,” Monteiro tweeted last week.

    In the open letter, the nutritionists claim that the attempt to update Nova “undermines years of rigorous research” and “creates confusion among policymakers, scientists, and the public”, while benefitting the industries that profit from UPFs. They highlight how the UN Food and Agriculture Organization and World Health Organization have adopted the Nova score as one of their four diet quality indicators globally.

    “The language used in the project announcements, particularly the framing of Nova as ‘flawed’ or ‘requiring change’, appears as an effort to delegitimise independent research and promote an alternative classification system more favourable to industry,” the letter states, calling into question the “scientific legitimacy” of Novo Nordisk’s project.

    They object to the exclusion of Nova’s creators in the revision effort, though that is in direct contradiction to Bügel’s comments. In the open letter, they urge “all independent scientists to boycott” the initiative and a workshop it’s conducting in June, and ask the Novo Nordisk initiative’s researchers to refrain from using the defined term “ultra-processed foods”.

    “Do not use the term Nova in the title or objectives of your project, refer to your project as an improvement or new version of the Nova classification, [or] suggest or imply that your project has any connection with the Nova classification or its creators,” they add.

    The post ‘Deeply Problematic’: Nutritionists Slam Ozempic Maker’s Efforts to Revise Ultra-Processed Food Classification appeared first on Green Queen.

    This post was originally published on Green Queen.

  • vegan restaurants healthy
    4 Mins Read

    A large chunk of restaurants – particularly those that serve meat – don’t offer healthy plant-based meals, according to a new study.

    In places like the US, Europe and Australia, seeing a vegan-friendly dish on restaurant menus is increasingly common, as the foodservice industry works to adapt to widening dietary preferences.

    But many of these options may not be great for you, according to a new study by researchers at the University of Louisville and the University of Chicago.

    Over the course of three years, the authors visited over 560 restaurants with vegan offerings – a majority located in the US, followed by Australia, England, Germany, Italy and Spain – analysing plant-based entrées for healthfulness.

    They found that there are many unhealthy plant-based foods found on the menus of both omnivorous and meat-free restaurants. “There is minimal transparency in the disclosure of nutritional facts that would help health-conscious patrons distinguish between healthful and unhealthful plant-based items,” they wrote.

    Published in the Nutrients journal, the findings come at a time when health becomes the central focus for many plant-based brands, in response to consumer demand for products that better serve their wellbeing. For example, Beyond Meat revamped its plant-based beef recipe last year to cut saturated fat content by 60%, replacing coconut and canola oils with avocado oil.

    Meat-free restaurants tend to have healthier options for vegans

    vegan food unhealthy
    Courtesy: Nutrients

    The researchers analysed up to a maximum of 10 vegan mains on restaurant menus, with each scoring one point if they were free from what they classed as unhealthy ingredients.

    These included refined grains like white rice or refined flour, saturated fats such as palm oil or coconut cream, and deep-fried foods – each of which carried a negative point. Even products like meat analogues from Impossible Foods and Beyond Meat were classed as unhealthy, although the latter was no longer identified that way after its reformulation.

    “If an entrée with an unhealthy ingredient had a healthier option listed on the menu – e.g., brown rice instead of white rice, whole-grain bun vs white-flour bun, or steamed tofu vs fried tofu – the healthier option was credited to that entrée,” the study explained.

    There was an almost equal split of omnivore and meatless eateries, with the number of plant-based mains on offer similar in the US (6.6) and elsewhere (6.2). That said, the average number of healthful vegan entrées trended slightly higher stateside (3.4, versus 2.9 in other countries).

    Vegan or vegetarian restaurants had a slightly higher number of healthy plant-based dishes on offer, with 24% having a score of seven or above, versus just 13% for eateries that also serve meat.

    Meanwhile, 14% of meat-free establishments were found to have zero options without refined grains, saturated fat, or deep-fried components, rising to 26% of omnivore outlets.

    Refined grains represented the “largest source of unhealthfulness in entrées”, reducing the scores of dishes in 40% of omnivore eateries and 26% of meatless ones. Following that, meat-serving restaurants were more likely to be penalised for saturated fat (12%), and vegan/vegetarian establishments for deep-fried foods (28%).

    Restaurants have the responsibility to ‘promote health over profit’

    is vegan food healthy
    Courtesy: Nutrients

    “There is minimal transparency in the disclosure of nutritional facts that would help health-conscious patrons distinguish between healthful and unhealthful plant-based items. Since most restaurants do not provide detailed information on portion size, calories, sodium, total fat, saturated fat, total sugar, or added sugar content, even knowledgeable consumers may struggle to make informed choices,” the authors said.

    “Given the well-established relationship between unhealthful dietary patterns, chronic illness, and mortality – and the relative ease with which nutritional information could be provided – we propose that detailed nutrition facts be made publicly available for every restaurant.”

    The researchers advised restaurants to reevaluate the healthfulness of their entrées by using recipes and ingredients driven by dietary guidelines – more and more countries are recommending citizens eat plant-based whole foods and cut back on meat.

    “Restaurants have the power, if not the responsibility, to promote health and sustainability rather than profits at the high cost of chronic disease and premature mortality,” the study added.

    Consumers are increasingly looking for healthier food options as the battle against ultra-processed food rages on. In the US, nearly half of consumers are eating more plant-based foods because they feel they’re better for their health than meat and dairy.

    In Australia, too, two in five people are cutting back on meat, primarily out of health concerns. This is also the main driver for their consumption of plant-based alternatives, with 53% citing it.

    The post Most Restaurants Fail to Offer Diners Healthy Meat-Free Options, Finds Study appeared first on Green Queen.

    This post was originally published on Green Queen.

  • A recent study led by the Murdoch Children’s Research Institute (MCRI) and published in The Lancet projects a significant rise in global childhood and adolescent obesity by 2050. The research indicates that one in six individuals aged five to 24 will be obese within the next 25 years, totaling approximately 360 million young people.

    Additionally, about one-third of this age group, or 385 million, are expected to be overweight. These alarming projections underscore the urgent need for comprehensive public health interventions to address the escalating obesity crisis among youth.

    VegNews.KidsEatingSnacks.LeelooTheFirst.PexelsPexels

    The study highlights a dramatic increase in obesity rates over recent decades. From 1990 to 2021, the global obesity rate for individuals aged five to 24 tripled, rising by 244 percent to 174 million. This surge suggests that existing strategies to combat obesity have been insufficient, leaving a generation of young people vulnerable to associated health complications. As of 2021, 493 million children and adolescents were classified as overweight or obese.

    ‘A vulnerable population’

    Jessica Kerr, PhD, of MCRI emphasized the critical need for immediate action, stating, “Children and adolescents remain a vulnerable population within the obesity epidemic. Prevention is key as obesity rarely resolves after adolescence.”

    She further warned of the extensive burden this trend places on health systems and economies, noting the increased risks of diabetes, cancer, heart problems, respiratory issues, fertility challenges, and mental health disorders associated with high Body Mass Index (BMI).

    VegNews.kidseatvegetables.PexelsPexels

    Kerr also pointed out the potential for these health issues to affect future generations, stating, “This giant burden will not only cost the health system and the economy billions, but complications associated with a high BMI … will negatively impact our children and adolescents now and into the future, even holding the potential to impact our grandchildren’s risk of obesity and quality of life for decades to come.”

    The analysis, released on World Obesity Day, utilized data from the 2021 Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study, led by the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. The study assessed current overweight and obesity levels and provided forecasts across 204 countries and territories. Projections indicate that nations such as the United Arab Emirates, Cook Islands, Nauru, and Tonga will experience the highest prevalence of obesity. Meanwhile, countries including China, Egypt, India, and the US are expected to have the largest number of children and adolescents with obesity by 2050.

    VegNews.KidsVegetables.GettyGetty

    In Australia, the situation is particularly concerning. The country has witnessed one of the fastest transitions to obesity globally among its youth. Currently, Australian girls are more likely to be obese than merely overweight. Projections for 2050 suggest that among Australians aged five to 24, approximately 2.2 million will be obese, with an additional 1.6 million classified as overweight.

    Resources absent in at-risk regions

    Kerr highlighted regions at heightened risk, stating, “Without urgent policy reform, the transition to obesity will be particularly rapid in North Africa, the Middle East, Latin America, and in the Caribbean, where the rise is concurrent with high population numbers and limited resources.”

    kids eating orangesCanva

    She emphasized the necessity for national surveillance systems to monitor obesity trends, especially in areas historically focused on combating undernutrition and stunting. Kerr also stressed the importance of targeting older adolescent girls, aged 15 to 24, for interventions to prevent intergenerational transmission of obesity and related chronic conditions.

    Professor Susan Sawyer of MCRI called for governmental investment in multifaceted strategies to address the root causes of obesity. She stated, “While people and families can work to balance their physical activity, diet, and sleep, everything in our environments works to counteract these efforts.” Sawyer advocated for regulatory measures such as taxing sugar-sweetened beverages, banning junk food advertising aimed at young people, and funding healthy meals in schools. She also suggested broader policy initiatives, including urban planning reforms to promote active lifestyles.

    This post was originally published on VegNews.com.

  • whole moon coconut milk
    4 Mins Read

    An upstart brand on the alt-dairy block, New Moon has introduced what it says is the plant-based category’s first milk made from whole coconut meat.

    Positioning it as a category-first, New York-based brand Whole Moon has unveiled a clean-label coconut milk product that uses whole coconut meat.

    The consumer brand of WhiteMug, New Moon only entered the market in October and is banking on Americans’ thirst for more ‘natural’ food products short on ingredients and high on functional benefits.

    Whole Moon’s coconut milk joins its existing range of oat, almond and pistachio milks, all of which contain its proprietary Whole Protein formulation derived from soybeans. This ensures the products are a complete protein source, with all nine essential amino acids present.

    Playing into demand for clean-label options

    whole moon milk
    Courtesy: Whole Moon

    Founded by Jonghoon Lim in 2023, Whole Moon is one of the newest plant-based milk players in the US market and says it wants to take on established brands with its nutritional focus.

    While Americans drank 3% more whole milk last year, they cut back on plant-based alternatives by 6% – a third consecutive yearly decrease – according to Circana. And despite half (49%) of households buying non-dairy milk, a third of these consumers still haven’t found a product that meets all their needs.

    Coconut milk has been an outlier among the wider decline in the plant-based milk category. In the 12 months to July 2024, dollar sales of almond and oat milk were down by 9% and 1% respectively while coconut milk experienced a 13% hike.

    WhiteMug is hoping to build on this momentum with the Whole Moon coconut meat innovation, which it says gives the milk a smooth, subtly sweet flavour profile with a creamy, full-bodied texture, minus any oils or artificial flavours.

    This will appeal to the growing demand for clean-label products – more than a quarter of Americans who buy plant-based milk want simpler ingredients, or at least ones they can understand. The main reason these consumers choose dairy over vegan alternatives is because they view the former as more ‘natural’ and nutritious.

    “We’re thrilled to offer consumers the first coconut milk made from whole coconut meat – no creams, no oils, just pure, whole ingredients,” said Susan Knight, president and CEO of WhiteMug and Whole Moon. “This addition to our lineup stays true to our mission of delivering Whole Protein nutrition and a rich, satisfying taste in every sip. It’s exactly what consumers love and what we’re known for,” she added.

    It’s not the only brand targeting this demographic – Texas-based PKN last week launched Zero Pecan Milk, a stripped-back product with zero additives.

    pkn pecan milk
    Courtesy: PKN

    ‘Whole Protein’ process opens up a wide range of applications

    The Whole Moon coconut milk has 5g of protein per cup, far higher than existing options on the market. Plus, by utilising whole ingredients, the company’s products focus on dietary fibre too (containing 2g per serving).

    It’s a macronutrient that has become prominent in people’s nutrition goals – 95% of Americans don’t consume enough fibre, despite its benefits for the gut. Polling shows that protein and fibre are the two nutrients these consumers are most interested in, a box Whole Moon is ticking.

    The Non-GMO Project Verified lineup is currently available at retailers like Fairway, Central Markets, QFC, Haggen, and Key Foods, and will be stocked at Sprouts Farmers Market from next month. The coconut-meat milk can be drunk on its own or blended into beverages and foods, and is priced at $5.79 for a 42oz bottle.

    WhiteMug’s Whole Protein technology roasts soybeans whole to enhance the taste, eliminate the beany notes and add a hint of nuttiness. These are then precision-milled to lock the flavour in and retain the natural fat, without the need for additives. The firm doesn’t separate the okara (soy pulp) or fibre, saving food waste in the process.

    While Whole Moon is WhiteMug’s way into the market, the resulting Whole Protein ingredient can be used for a variety of applications beyond milk alternatives, from baked goods, nutrition bars, and gluten-free products to protein powders, yoghurts, and plant-based meat.

    The post Whole Moon: Can Meat & Protein Usher In A New Era for Coconut Milk? appeared first on Green Queen.

    This post was originally published on Green Queen.

  • foodtech world cup
    5 Mins Read

    Food tech community FoodHack is back with the second edition of the FoodTech World Cup, launched in collaboration with Nestlé and Givaudan, with a special focus on nutrition.

    Whether it’s brands targeting gut health amid the GLP-1 wave, apps like Zoe supporting glucose management, or Bryan Johnson’s quest for longevity, nutrition and wellness have never felt more critical to consumers’ food choices.

    In the US, for example, the most common New Year’s resolution for 2025 was to eat healthier, a five-point increase from last year. This is also top of mind for Europeans, over half of whom want their diets to be more health-forward. And in Asia-Pacific, 45% of consumers want to improve their sleep this year, and the main way they plan to do that is through dietary change.

    To supercharge nutrition-minded startups in the food tech economy, the world’s largest food company, Nestlé, and one of the largest ingredient and flavour houses, Ingredion, have teamed up with food tech community FoodHack for the FoodTech World Cup 2025.

    The second edition of the tournament convenes 20 jurists, who will work with FoodHack and the two industry giants to uncover startups disrupting the future nutrition space with innovative and impactful technologies.

    While Givaudan is a returning partner, Nestlé is joining the accelerator for the first time. “We are eager to create synergies with startups that are developing innovative compounds, technologies, or combinations beyond consumer-facing solutions,” Eugenia Barcos, startup programme lead at the Swiss company, tells Green Queen.

    “Our goal is to accelerate the creation of differentiating nutritious solutions that have a positive impact on consumers, the planet, and society.”

    Gut health, weight-loss focus chimes with Nestlé’s GLP-1 push

    nestle r&d
    Eugenia Barcos – Courtesy: Nestlé

    The tournament’s organisers are looking for startups developing deep tech solutions over six categories. The longevity vertical focuses on healthier ageing and wellbeing through nutrition, while immunity involves boosting the body’s natural defences, and energy centres around sustaining both physical and mental energy.

    There’s also a focus on glucose management (with solutions supporting stable and balanced blood sugar levels), weight (to help people achieve healthy weight goals), and gut wellness (targeting the connection between the gut microbiome and overall health).

    “We all recognise the significant role nutrition plays in weight management, and providing effective solutions – particularly in response to the GLP-1 trend – is a crucial focus for us,” says Barcos.

    Drugs like Ozempic and Mounjaro have taken over our food and health conversations, with one in eight Americans having tried these weight-loss medications, and the number of regular users could reach anywhere between 10 to 70 million by 2028.

    Nestlé itself responded to the shift with a new Vital Pursuit brand targeting GLP-1 users with affordable frozen foods and a GLP-1Nutrition website under its Health Science unit to provide nutritional support for people on weight-loss programmes.

    “The R&D Accelerator at Nestlé Research in Lausanne is dedicated to translating our advanced science and technology into valuable business propositions across all our sectors,” says Barcos. “In the case of the GLP-1 platform, we are actively collaborating with our scientists to develop scientifically robust and differentiated solutions that can support individuals on their weight management journey.”

    nestle glp 1
    Courtesy: Nestlé

    Internal innovation and external collaboration equally important

    A total of 40 startups will be chosen from across the world to present to a panel of investors and corporate leaders over six virtual demo days. These judges include figures from VC firms Mudcake, Big Idea Ventures, Better Bite Ventures, and Catalyst Fund, among others*.

    They’ll be looking to answer three main questions: how big and impactful the idea can be at its largest scale, why it’s the right team to take the idea to its largest form, and how well the tech can be scaled up. There will also be a focus on the uniqueness of the solutions, early traction and path to scale, and the founders’ understanding of the market opportunity.

    The two most promising startups from each region (totalling 10) will be selected to pitch live at the finals, an official side event of the HackSummit – FoodHack’s partner climate conference in Lausanne, Switzerland – on May 15.

    “We highly value working with startups because they have the ability to accelerate the development of unique solutions in strategic areas for us, such as longevity or regenerative agriculture, which can have a positive impact on consumers, society and the planet,” says Barcos.

    For Nestlé, both internal innovation and external collaborations are vital for success. “Internal innovation allows us to leverage our extensive resources and expertise, while external innovation, particularly from startups, brings cutting-edge technologies that complement our own efforts,” she explains. “By combining the strengths of internal and external innovation, we adopt a dynamic and effective approach to address the challenges and opportunities in our industry.”

    hacksummit
    Courtesy: HackSummit

    The winner of last year’s inaugural FoodTech World Cup was Italian cocoa-free chocolate maker Foreverland. “Partnerships with companies like Givaudan are essential for an early-stage startup like us as they can provide unique insights on the food industry and support our growth,” its co-founder and CTO, Riccardo Bottiroli, outlines.

    “By teaming up with startups, we can spark new, creative approaches, and create faster, more agile, innovation pathways,” says Alexandre Bastos, head of front-end innovation at Givaudan. “We look forward to supporting more startups on their scale-up journey and to collaborating with them for a healthier, more sustainable future for all.”

    Disclaimer: Green Queen founding editor Sonalie Figueiras is a jurist at the 2025 FoodTech World Cup.

    The post FoodTech World Cup 2025: Nestlé & Givaudan Back Global Accelerator for Future Nutrition Startups appeared first on Green Queen.

    This post was originally published on Green Queen.

  • Think about the spiciest dish you’ve ever put in your mouth—maybe you’ve had some enchiladas or fajitas that packed some heat, or perhaps you’ve indulged in phaal curry (otherwise known as the spiciest meal on Earth). Now, think about the taste. Hard to describe, right? But even if you like spice, you probably thought it was uncomfortable. And that’s because when we eat ultra-spicy foods, it actually causes a painful sensation in the mouth. It’s not sweet, salty, bitter, sour, or umami (the five main tastes our tongues can detect), but pain.

    JUMP TO THE HOT SAUCES

    We hear you. Pain does not sound like something we should be inflicting on ourselves. But actually, in the case of spicy food, a little bit of pain might be kind good. In fact, it may induce endorphins for some people, but not necessarily everyone, which explains why many do not enjoy eating spicy foods but plenty of others do. Spicy food also may come with some health benefits, which makes that weirdly pleasurable yet painful sensation even more worth it. Spice lovers, here’s what you need to know. Plus, hot sauce and pepper recommendations. Let’s turn up the heat.

    Is spicy food good for you?

    Spicy food is associated with some health benefits, and that might be down to a chemical called capsaicin. This is basically the active component of chili peppers responsible for bringing the heat. When our mouths detect capsaicin, it kickstarts the fight or flight process, and the body releases stress hormones like adrenaline. As your body responds to the sensation of heat, you start to sweat, you turn red, your heart rate increases, and your nose runs, you know the drill.

    And, for some people, the body also releases endorphins, just like when you exercise, which produces a natural high. Humans probably like this because of the thrill, notes a report by BBC—it’s kind of like why we rush towards rollercoasters.

    VegNews.BellPeppers.GettyGetty

    But adrenaline aside, capsaicin is also associated with some significant health benefits. In 2020, one study from the American Heart Association linked consumption of chili peppers with a potentially lower risk of death from heart disease and cancer. 

    “We were surprised to find that in these previously published studies, regular consumption of chili pepper was associated with an overall risk-reduction of all-cause, CVD, and cancer mortality. It highlights that dietary factors may play an important role in overall health,” senior author Bo Xu, MD, cardiologist at the Cleveland Clinic’s Heart, Vascular & Thoracic Institute in Cleveland, OH, said in a statement. He added, however, that further research is still needed.

    “The exact reasons and mechanisms that might explain our findings, though, are currently unknown,” Xu noted. “Therefore, it is impossible to conclusively say that eating more chili peppers can prolong life and reduce deaths, especially from cardiovascular factors or cancer. More research, especially evidence from randomized controlled studies, is needed to confirm these preliminary findings.”

    But capsaicin is just one component of chilies. They also contain nutrients, like vitamin C, vitamin B, copper, potassium, and vitamin A, for example.

    The spiciest hot sauces and peppers to try

    If you like to bring the heat when you cook, or you’re intrigued about experimenting with spice, here are some of the best hot sauces and peppers to try next. Pro tip: if you’re not used to the heat, keep a glass of cold oat milk on hand to cool down your mouth while you’re eating (not water, as this will only make the spicy effect worse!). After you’ve read this list, find all of our best spicy vegan recipes here!

    VegNews.spicyfoodgoodforyou.tabascoTabasco

    1 Tabasco

    One of Louisiana’s most iconic inventions, Tabasco sauce is full of spice and iconic pungent flavor. It scores around 3,500 on the Scoville Scale (a measurement tool for spicy peppers that goes up to around 2,200,000), which means it has a kick, but it’s still at the milder end when compared with other spices.
    find it here

    VegNews.spicyfoodgoodforyou.

    2 Louisiana Hot Sauce

    Made with aged peppers, distilled vinegar, and salt, this Louisiana Hot Sauce is a great way to add just a little dash of heat to your favorite meal. The simple tried and tested recipe has been around since the 1920s, and remains a staple in kitchens all over the US. It’s pretty mild, coming in at just 450 on the Scoville Scale.
    find it here

    VegNews.spicyfoodgoodforyou.cholula

    3 Cholula

    Formulated in Mexico, the home of many spicy dishes, Cholula hot sauce is allegedly based on a century-old family recipe. It features both arbol and piquin peppers, both of which originated in Mexico, alongside an “array of regional spices,” notes the brand. At 3,600 Scoville units, Cholula certainly has quite the kick compared to Louisiana Hot Sauce, for example, but it’s not going to blow your head off in terms of heat.
    find it here

    VegNews.spicyfoodgoodforyou

    4 Frank’s RedHot

    The recipe for Frank’s RedHot sauce was perfected way back in 1918, but it wasn’t until the 1960s that it was paired with buffalo wings for the first time. Now, you’d be hard-pressed to find a better combination (obviously the wings have to be vegan though). If you like things mild, the Original Frank’s RedHot scores only 450 Scoville units. But don’t worry if you like things a bit spicier, because its Xtra Hot variety comes in at around 2,000.
    find it here

    VegNews.spicyfoodgoodforyou.wickedreaper

    5 Carolina Reaper chili pepper powder

    Are you feeling brave? The Carolina Reaper is the hottest chili pepper in the world. It’s sweet, fruity, and, at 2.2 million Scoville (that’s not a joke), it is seriously intense. Only try some of this powder if you’re really into spice, and use it sparingly, because it’s going to knock your socks off. Proceed with caution.
    find it here

    VegNews.spicyfoodgoodforyou.straightfromfrance

    6 Espelette pepper powder

    At around 4,000 on the Scoville scale, the espelette pepper, which is cultivated in Espelette in France (and only this region—nowhere else), has nothing on the Carolina Reaper in terms of spice factor, but it’s nice and sweet, and still gives off a pleasantly mild kick.
    find it here

    dried chile de arbolGetty

    7 Dried chile de árbol

    This small, potent red Mexican chili, which is always sold dried, can be added to many different dishes to add flavor and a good level of spice. On the Scoville Scale, they measure between 15,000 and 30,000, so expect some pretty serious heat when you’re cooking.
    find it here

    VegNews.spicyfoodgoodforyoujalapenos

    8 Sliced jalapeño peppers

    Jalapeño is one of the most popular peppers in the US, and it’s arguably one of the best pizza toppings around, especially when it’s combined with vegan pepperoni. It’s pretty spicy, and depending on the variety you get, these common peppers can reach 8,000 on the Scoville Scale (at their lowest, they usually sit at around 2,000).
    find it here

    Untitled design (9)

    9 Ghost chili pepper powder

    Adding some of this ghost chili pepper powder to your curry or sauce is going to seriously turn up the heat, so use sparingly and with caution. Known as Bhut Jolokia, this is another of the world’s hottest peppers (seriously, it’s around 170 times hotter than Tabasco and sits at around 1 million Scoville Units). This is a popular choice with spice lovers, though, so don’t shy away if you love dishes with a big kick.
    find it here

    This post was originally published on VegNews.com.

  • Two white men in their 60s live hundreds of miles away from each other, one in Arizona and the other in Washington state. They are the same age and have identical socioeconomic backgrounds. They also have similar habits and are in roughly the same physical shape. But the man in Arizona is aging more quickly than the man in Washington — 14 months faster, to be exact. Neither man smokes or drinks. Both exercise regularly. So why is the subject living in the desert Southwest more than a year older at the cellular level than his counterpart in the Pacific Northwest?

    A study published this week in the journal Science Advances makes the case that extreme heat is aging millions of Americans more quickly than their counterparts in cooler climates. The impact of chronic exposure to high temperatures, researchers found, is equivalent to the effect of habitual smoking on cellular aging. 

    As global average temperatures continue to rise due to the greenhouse gas effect caused by burning fossil fuels, wider swaths of the global population are being exposed to extreme heat, which has killed more than 21,000 Americans since 1999. In 2023, Phoenix, Arizona, where some of the people analyzed in the study live, saw 31 days straight of temperatures above 110 degrees Fahrenheit. That year was the warmest year on record globally — a record that was quickly surpassed by 2024

    A billboard displays a temperature of 118 degrees F during a record heat wave in Phoenix, Arizona, in July 2023. Patrick T. Fallon / AFP via Getty Imagees

    Exposure to above-average heat has serious short-and long-term health repercussions. People may experience heat-related illness, such as dehydration and fainting, or sustain heat stroke — the most serious form of heat-related illness that can lead to death. Older adults and young children are particularly vulnerable to these impacts because they have trouble thermoregulating, or maintaining a steady internal body temperature. Over months and years, heat exposure can exacerbate existing chronic conditions like kidney and cardiovascular disease, and raise a person’s risk of mental health issues and dementia

    Eun Young Choi, a postdoctoral gerontological researcher at the University of Southern California’s Leonard Davis School of Gerontology and the lead author of the study, wanted to find out what might be driving the long-term health consequences of exposure to extreme heat on a cellular level, particularly in people approaching their 60s. She was particularly interested in “non-clinical manifestations” of heat exposure, meaning she hoped to capture how heat was affecting people who weren’t showing up in emergency rooms with heat-related illness or heat stroke. Her hypothesis was that heat was chipping away at overall health, whether or not someone could feel it acutely. 

    In order to test that theory, Choi analyzed blood samples from more than 3,600 people over the age of 56 who had participated in a large national health and retirement study. Those participants had taken a blood test in 2016 or 2017. Choi and her coauthor, Jennifer Ailshire, then used weather and climate data to estimate how many “heat days,” as defined by the National Weather Service, each participant had been exposed to in the years, months, and days leading up to the date of the blood test. They sorted the participants into demographic groups based on race, socioeconomic status, exercise habits, and other factors, and then compared the people in those groups to each other using a series of biological tests that determine how quickly a person’s cells are aging. 

    “With longer-term heat exposure — one year and six years — we see a consistent association between heat and [cellular] age” across different biological tests, Choi said. People living in places where temperatures are at or above 90 degrees F for half of the year have experienced up to 14 months more biological aging compared to people living in areas with fewer than 10 days of temperatures at or above 90 degrees. 

    “This study is one of the first empirical assessments suggesting that longer-term exposure to heat is directly associated with an acceleration of the aging process,” said Vivek Shandas, a professor at Portland State University who studies the effects of climate change on cities and was not involved in the study.  It “adds to the existing work by suggesting that near-term mortality may be the result of older adults having longer-term and periodic exposures to heat.”

    Two previous studies found that people exposed to heat age more quickly, and studies in mice consistently show that heat ages cells, but Choi’s study is the first nationally representative research to draw the connection. The size and diversity of her pool of subjects helped drown out many of the factors that usually sully this type of data. Choi didn’t find any major differences between demographics — an indication that heat damages cells across the board in older individuals. 

    What Choi didn’t account for, however, are all the ways people adapt to protect themselves from heat. Some people, particularly wealthier Americans, might stay inside with the air conditioning blasting all day and night. 

    A person with a white beard and wearing a blue helmet and a neon vest drinks from a plastic water bottle
    A construction worker takes a water break during a heat wave in Irvine, California, in 2024. Allen J. Schaben / Los Angeles Times via Getty Images

    Previous research has shown that above-average temperatures don’t affect all populations equally. Extreme heat is particularly dangerous for people who live in urban areas with patchy tree cover and lots of concrete. These zones, in places like New York City and Chicago, are called urban heat islands, and they can get up to 7 degrees F hotter than surrounding rural areas. Urban heat islands tend to coincide with neighborhoods where non-white communities were historically confined by racist zoning practices, which is one reason that the average person of color is exposed to more severe heat in urban areas than the average non-Hispanic white person. These populations are also less likely to be able to afford air conditioning

    “We know that some demographics, such as those working outside, unhoused populations, people living in urban heat islands, incarcerated populations, and lower-income residents generally have longer periods of exposure to extreme heat (over decades),” Shandas said. “Accordingly, we might draw on these findings to suggest that some certain populations will need greater attention and care as we see forecasts for heat waves.”

    Choi hopes future studies will continue to tease out these differences, particularly because by 2040, 1 in 5 Americans will be 65 or older — up from 1 in 8 in the year 2000. The results of Choi’s study also have implications for all age groups, not just people in their 50s and older. “I don’t think the underlying biology is significantly different,” she said. “We would expect to see some significant effects of heat in younger adults. And we really need to track people from their birth to older ages to see whether any of these effects can be reversible.” 

    This story was originally published by Grist with the headline Extreme heat can age you as fast as a smoking habit on Feb 27, 2025.

    This post was originally published on Grist.

  • Conservative Party MP Kieran Mullan – a doctor by background no less – has publicly attacked the work of NHS anti-privatisation campaign group EveryDoctor.

    However, the group wasn’t about to let the Tory politician get away with misrepresenting its vital work. So now, it has made a formal complaint to the party.

    EveryDoctor’s work maligned by a Tory MP

    In the Autumn of 2024, EveryDoctor built a doctors’ manifesto to fix the NHS. With the input of hundreds of doctors, this blueprint spells out a series of urgent actions the Labour Party government must now make to mend the UK’s ailing health services and end dangerous NHS privatisation. Between October and December, it hosted a series of briefings for MPs, and in January 2025, it followed these up with another emergency briefing.

    The group and its volunteers brought the manifesto’s ideas to 117 MPs and their teams. And a key part of its success was down to the public’s help. Throughout, the group asked the public to contact their MPs, and encourage them to engage with EveryDoctor’s work.

    Many MPs responded positively and did engage with EveryDoctor’s work. For instance, as many as 104 MP offices supported its latest briefing in January.

    However, this was a far-cry from the response that Mullan made to constituents concerned about the state of the NHS. By contrast, he wrote to them that:

    I don’t attend briefings or work with EveryDoctor. I find that their social media is more concerned with building their social media following and raising money to further that than genuine efforts to engage sensibly and constructively with the challenges facing the NHS.

    Hostile behaviour unacceptable in public office

    Of course, constituents are no strangers to stock responses and dismissive answers from MPs. As EveryDoctor noted on the mixed MP reception to constituent outreach:

    Many MPs shared our concerns about the current situation in the NHS, others replied with the ‘official party line’, some didn’t reply to their constituents at all and others have approached us for helping in formulating parliamentary questions and motions.

    However, EveryDoctor feels that Mullan’s response crossed a line. So, it isn’t letting his disparaging and misrepresentative words stand. Notably, the group has now issued a formal complaint to the Conservative Party HQ’s Complaints Panel. In it, the group wrote that his comments are:

    a grossly inaccurate description of our work, it also impugns our integrity as a campaigning organisation.

    What’s more, Mullan’s remarks come at a time of winter crisis for the NHS. It’s therefore alarmed that an elected representative would respond to the genuine concern of a constituent in such a hostile manner.

    Moreover, the group pointed out that this “hostile behaviour”:

    from politicians, and others in positions of power, has led to the incitement of harassment and bullying online that is so prevalent today. Behaviour from elected officials has real-world consequences

    The EveryDoctor team – and in particular, group founder and Canary journalist Dr Julia Grace Patterson – have often been at the sharp end of this.

    It’s on the basis of all this that EveryDoctor believes Mullan has broken the Conservative Party Code of Conduct. So on 25 February, the group made this known by reporting his behaviour to the Conservative Party’s formal complaints body.

    Breaching the Conservative Code of Conduct?

    In its letter, it has underscored a number of standards it believes Mullan’s comments are in breach of per the Lord Nolan and the Committee on Standards in Public Life. These are as follows:

    • “3. Objectivity – Holders of public office must act and take decisions impartially, fairly and on merit, using the best evidence and without discrimination or bias.”
    • “6. Honesty – Holders of public office should be truthful.”
    • “7. Leadership – Holders of public office should exhibit these principles in their own behaviour. They should actively promote and robustly support the principles and be willing to challenge poor behaviour wherever it occurs;
      – Lead by example to encourage and foster respect and tolerance;
      – Treat others with civility, courtesy and respect;
      – Act with honesty and probity and in a manner which upholds the reputation and values of the Conservative Party. Such duty is fundamental. Conduct which the public may reasonably perceive as undermining a representative’s honesty and probity is likely to diminish trust and confidence placed in them, and the Party, by the public;
      – Not use their position to bully, abuse, victimise, harass or unlawfully discriminate against others.”
    • Annex – “Harassment is any unwanted physical, verbal or non-verbal conduct that has the purpose or effect of violating a person’s dignity or creating an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive situation or environment for them. A single incident can amount to harassment.”
      >And: “Bullying is offensive, intimidating, malicious or insulting behaviour involving the misuse of power that can make a person feel vulnerable, upset, humiliated, undermined or threatened.”

    As a result, the group now hopes the party will take its complaint seriously and find him in breach of all this. If the Conservative’s complaints panel do so, they suggest that it require him to make public apologies both to his constituents, and EveryDoctor.

    The Canary contacted Kieran Mullan for comment. His office told us:

    We would observe that a group that seems more concerned with building and maintaining a social media following than credibly engaging with the challenges facing the NHS, responded to an MP concerned about this on TikTok.

    EveryDoctor shows up Mullan in one fell swoop

    What’s more, amidst the allegations, EveryDoctor well and truly rebuffed Mullan’s comments to boot. It listed off a series of its work and and achievements, writing:

    Over the past 6 years, EveryDoctor has held over 30 MP briefings, published ground-breaking research projects about the extent of NHS privatisation and conducted a national campaign during the COVID-19 pandemic to fight for protections for frontline workers.

    By comparison, Mullan has hardly been a champion of “genuine efforts to engage sensibly and constructively with the challenges facing the NHS”.

    In 2021, he was among 291 MPs that voted through the Conservative’s Health and Care Bill. Campaigners had branded it a “Corporate Takeover Bill”, and for good reason. At the time, EveryDoctor was on the scene fighting against it. Patterson explained to the Canary how the restructuring of the NHS opened the door to ever greater privatisation. This was through the establishment of Integrated Care Systems (ICS) which enabled private companies to sit on local health boards.

    Of course, the bill became law – and has facilitated the speed up of NHS privatisation ever since. Judging by his voting record then, it’s little wonder Mullan isn’t a fan of EveryDoctor’s work. His response to a constituent showed a barely concealed hostility and contempt for the organisation.

    At the very least though, EveryDoctor has proven his comments to be spurious nonsense. And they could very well constitute a breach of the Conservative’s Code of Conduct. Whether the party’s panel will genuinely acknowledge this however, yet remains to be seen.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • uk climate change committee meat
    8 Mins Read

    Brits need to drastically reduce their meat and dairy consumption to help the country meet its climate goals, and experts say plant-based and alternative proteins are the key to this shift.

    Sunday roasts will need a major makeover if the UK is to make good on its environmental promises, according to its Climate Change Committee (CCC).

    As part of a Balanced Pathway in its seventh carbon budget, climate experts have urged the UK government to introduce measures that encourage Brits to cut back on meat and dairy, and pointed to plant-based alternatives as a critical lever for this shift.

    The emissions reduction roadmap, which would begin this year and bring the UK in line with its net-zero target for 2050, suggests that meat intake in the UK needs to fall by 35% by mid-century, with a steeper 40% decline in red meat consumption “to reflect the higher carbon intensity of ruminant livestock”, from a 2019 baseline.

    Average dairy consumption, meanwhile, must come down by 20% in the next 10 years, a level that would need to be maintained through to 2050.

    The CCC’s pathway sees meat products mainly being replaced by existing alternative proteins, some plant-based whole foods, and in time, novel foods made via precision fermentation or cell cultivation.

    “We are absolutely not saying everyone needs to be vegan,” Emily Nurse, head of net zero at the Climate Change Committee, told the Guardian. “But we do expect to see a shift in dietary habits.”

    At a time when alternative proteins are seeing sales and investment drop amid a backlash against ultra-processed foods, the latest climate advice to the UK government is a ringing endorsement of these foods and their potential to safeguard the planet’s future.

    Why is the Climate Change Committee calling for meat reduction?

    is kier starmer vegetarian
    UK Prime Minister Kier Starmer, a pescetarian, and his vegetarian wife Victoria | Courtesy: Number 10/Flickr/CC

    Animal agriculture is a highly resource-intensive industry, taking up a lot more land and water than plant-based foods, and generating far higher emissions.

    A landmark UK study in 2023 found that plant-based diets can reduce land use, water pollution, and greenhouse gas emissions by 75% compared to diets rich in meat.

    Ruminant livestock particularly emits high amounts of methane, a gas 28 times more potent than carbon dioxide over a 100-year period. The CCC’s pathway would see the UK achieve net-zero methane emissions by 2045, falling steeply in the late 2020s and early 2030s mainly due to on-farm measures and shifts away from red meat and dairy.

    Around half of the country’s methane emissions come from agriculture, but reductions from other sectors would occur more quickly, underscoring the need for a rapid shift away from meat and dairy.

    The health implications of meat and alternative proteins

    this isn't chicken
    Courtesy: THIS

    This goes beyond just climate impacts. The CCC notes that many of its measures can deliver health benefits while improving the climate resilience of agriculture. The pathway’s suggested substitution relies more heavily on alternative proteins than legumes or pulses, but these can reduce the risk of death from colon and rectum cancer, ischaemic heart disease, and type 2 diabetes.

    The recommended alternative proteins can have estimated health impacts with a net benefit of £900M in 2040. While the biggest benefits come from swapping meat for plant-based whole foods, this will “only happen some of the time”.

    Replacing processed meats with processed plant-based alternatives still delivers health and nutritional gains. And while the effect of precision-fermented or cultivated proteins will “depend on their overall ingredients and processing methods”, the CCC says they’re associated with “potential positive nutrition and health impacts”.

    Importantly, it states that reducing meat consumption will only make your health worse if your diet is unbalanced, or if it isn’t substituted with alternatives at all, allaying concerns that cutting back on animal protein can be detrimental.

    It’s also a vote of confidence for plant-based meat products, which have been criticised for being ultra-processed, despite the term being unrelated to the nutritional value of a product.

    “Changes to diets are expected to have minimal impacts on household food costs in the short term and lead to slight reductions in food costs in the longer term as alternative proteins develop that are cheaper to buy than meat and dairy,” the report notes.

    What do British citizens think?

    uk lab grown meat
    Courtesy: Ivy Farm Technologies

    The CCC convened a citizens’ panel to explore what an accessible and affordable vision of net zero would look like for households.

    Overall, Brits accepted the need for dietary change, though what was considered possible or acceptable varied from person to person. They were surprised about the emissions impact of certain foods, and conceded that government-backed awareness schemes would be key to supporting a shift to plant proteins.

    There was a clear preference for a shift towards healthier, home-cooked options, with greater education around plant-based meal preparation as another measure to help the transition.

    Some of the members tried plant-based meat for the very first time as a result of the panel, and there was a consensus that there needs to be a variety of meat and dairy alternatives available. Some were uneasy about precision-fermented proteins and cultivated meat, but thought the government could still support these to ensure a larger range of products.

    One of their biggest concerns was about a potentially negative impact on farmers. But they were surprised to learn about the share of subsidies directed to livestock farmers, and wanted to see public spending going to plant-based producers too, which would lower end costs. Separate research has found British farmers to be receptive to cultivated meat.

    “Livestock farmers face some reduced demand for their products, while some farmers have new opportunities in land stewardship,” the report says, but adds that the replacement of meat and dairy with alternative proteins, fruits and vegetables “could support new jobs and industrial opportunities”.

    Brits were also open to replacing a small amount of meat in pre-prepared meals with other ingredients, like plant-based whole foods or alternative proteins, but expressed concerns about the impact on taste and the wallet.

    UK government must make alternative proteins more affordable

    lab grown meat pet food
    Courtesy: Meatly

    The climate change experts emphasised the need for lowering the cost of animal-free proteins, which would encourage more consumers to buy them, and help the country slash its emissions.

    “Reducing the costs of plant-based alternatives to meat that are comparable in taste, texture, and preparation method could enable more people to choose these options for some of their meals,” the CCC says. “There is potential for innovation to make some low-carbon alternatives (for example, alternative proteins) more substitutable for high-carbon choices and to bring down prices.”

    Other promising policy levers include increasing the choice and availability of low-carbon foods in public procurement settings, restaurants, and supermarkets, and supporting innovations in novel foods to improve taste and texture.

    The UK government has invested £75M towards the development of sustainable proteins, and has been overhauling its regulatory framework to allow novel food companies to get to market faster. And earlier this month, it became the first European country where people could buy cultivated meat on supermarket shelves, with Meatly and The Pack co-launching cell-cultured dog treats at Pets At Home.

    Sales of meat fell by 10% between 2020 and 2022 in the UK, representing a faster rate of decline than even what’s outlined in the CCC’s Balanced Pathway. “It is too early to tell whether this steeper-than-projected trend will continue in the long term or is a temporary response to the cost-of-living crisis, which saw an 11% decrease in overall food purchases by weight between 2020 and 2022,” the report reads.

    Carbon budget advisors hail CCC’s recommendations

    uk alternative protein
    Courtesy: Hoxton Farms

    Experts from the Food and Trade Advisory Group (FTAG), an independent advisor for the seventh carbon budget, echoed the CCC’s calls for alternative-protein-led dietary transition.

    They called on the government to invest in technical innovation and scale up the supply of alternative proteins, which could disrupt the food system in two ways. “Plant and precision-fermentation derived products that displace dairy and processed meat, and cellular meat that displaces complex cuts. The former is much more likely to be cheap and displace the volume end of the market,” they wrote.

    The food advisory group further urged policymakers to raise the prices of meat and dairy while simultaneously lowering the costs of plant-based alternatives. This can be done through carbon taxes – as Denmark has shown – which can regulate higher agriculture standards to achieve climate goals.

    “For this not to adversely affect farmer livelihoods, it implies a more regulated import policy… or an overtly protectionist trade policy. In the absence of the trade barriers and acceptance of higher costs, raising domestic standards may simply mean citizens switch to cheaper imported goods, farmer livelihoods are affected, with the political costs associated,” the FTAG added.

    The Vegan Society welcomed the CCC’s report. “The more meat and dairy we cut, the greater the benefits are, and these recommendations can and should go further,” a spokesperson for the charity said. “Dietary change is a win-win solution that improves people’s health and offers the opportunity for billions of pounds of savings to the NHS, as well as cutting emissions and protecting nature.”

    They added: “As it prepares to develop a new food strategy, this government has the opportunity to implement practical policies which encourage dietary change.”

    The FTAG acknowledged that food is highly political – and for every potential intervention, there will be winners and losers: “Ultimately, though, without tackling climate change, everyone becomes a loser.”

    The post Explainer: Why Climate Change Experts Are Asking the UK Govt to Replace Meat with Plant-Based Alternatives appeared first on Green Queen.

    This post was originally published on Green Queen.

  • IV vitamin therapy has surged in popularity, promoted by wellness clinics and concierge services offering everything from energy-boosting drips to hangover cures. The concept is simple: by bypassing the digestive system, these intravenous infusions are said to deliver essential nutrients directly into the bloodstream for faster, more efficient absorption. Celebrities including Rihanna and Adele have both embraced IV vitamin therapy to support their demanding careers, fueling the idea that this method offers superior benefits compared to oral supplements. 

    vitamin IV therapyGetty

    The rise of IV vitamin therapy has been fueled in part by social media, with influencers and wellness brands positioning it as an essential part of a high-performance lifestyle. Mobile IV services have made the treatment even more accessible, offering in-home visits for busy professionals, frequent travelers, and event-goers looking for a rapid energy boost. However, while proponents argue that these treatments provide an instant wellness boost, experts remain skeptical about whether IV therapy delivers meaningful long-term benefits for healthy individuals.

    What is IV vitamin therapy?

    IV vitamin therapy involves administering a blend of vitamins, minerals, and hydration fluids directly into the bloodstream through an intravenous drip. Unlike oral supplements, which must pass through the digestive system before absorption, IV infusions are designed to deliver nutrients immediately into circulation, theoretically allowing for higher levels of bioavailability.

    Initially developed for medical use, IV therapy has long been used in hospitals for patients with severe dehydration, nutrient deficiencies, or conditions that impair absorption, such as Crohn’s disease and celiac disease. In recent years, the wellness industry has adopted the practice, marketing it as a quick fix for fatigue, weakened immunity, and even beauty concerns like dull skin and premature aging. Mobile IV services now offer treatments on demand, bringing the service directly to homes, offices, and hotel rooms.

    man getting vitamin IVGetty

    While IV therapy was once reserved for medical necessity, today’s consumers seek infusions to combat everything from jet lag to post-workout muscle fatigue. Rihanna has been photographed receiving IV drips, leading to speculation that she relies on them to maintain energy during world tours. Similarly, Adele has reportedly turned to vitamin infusions to sustain vocal health and endurance during high-pressure performances. With high-profile endorsements like these, the treatment has evolved from a medical tool into a luxury wellness trend.

    For individuals with confirmed nutrient deficiencies or conditions that affect absorption, IV therapy can be a valuable tool. However, for the average healthy person, most medical professionals agree that a well-balanced diet, adequate hydration, and oral supplementation when needed are sufficient for maintaining optimal health. The Mayo Clinic states that “most people can get the vitamins and minerals they need from their diet and oral supplements without the need for IV infusions.”

    What’s in IV vitamin infusions?

    Most IV vitamin drips contain a combination of vitamins, minerals, electrolytes, and amino acids designed to address specific health concerns. The widely used Myers’ Cocktail, named after the late Dr. John Myers, is a blend of magnesium, calcium, B-complex vitamins, and vitamin C. It is often marketed as a treatment for fatigue, immune support, and chronic conditions like fibromyalgia and migraines.

    woman getting vitamin IVGetty

    Other common ingredients in IV drips include vitamin C, zinc, and glutathione, an antioxidant often associated with detoxification and skin brightening. Some infusions focus on hydration, replenishing fluids and electrolytes lost through excessive sweating, illness, or alcohol consumption. Athletes frequently turn to IV therapy for post-workout recovery, seeking formulations that include amino acids, electrolytes, and antioxidants to reduce muscle soreness and inflammation.

    For some, the appeal lies in the belief that IV therapy can provide higher doses of vitamins than what is possible through diet alone. Clinics promote high-dose vitamin C infusions for immune function, while anti-aging formulations often contain glutathione, which some claim can reduce oxidative stress. Other blends are targeted at mental clarity, with ingredients like magnesium and B vitamins that are linked to cognitive function.

    Does IV vitamin therapy work?

    The effectiveness of IV vitamin therapy is one of the most debated topics in wellness. While proponents claim it offers near-instant results, scientific evidence supporting the benefits of IV infusions for healthy individuals is limited. The body tightly regulates nutrient absorption, meaning that excess water-soluble vitamins, such as B and C, are typically excreted rather than stored.

    “For the most part, people report feeling better after these treatments because it’s a rapid way to receive hydration,” says Sam Torbati, MD, co-chair of emergency medicine at Cedars-Sinai. “If you’ve been sick or out drinking, you’re dehydrated—so hydrating will make you feel better.”

    Studies indicate that the benefits of IV therapy for hydration are well established. Hospitals use intravenous fluids for patients with severe dehydration, and rehydration through IV drips can be beneficial for those recovering from illness or intense physical exertion. However, the advantage of receiving additional vitamins beyond hydration remains unproven for most healthy individuals.

    The use of IV vitamin therapy in medical settings is well documented. Patients with conditions like Crohn’s disease, celiac disease, or short-bowel syndrome may struggle to absorb nutrients efficiently and can benefit from intravenous supplementation. Cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy sometimes receive high-dose vitamin C infusions as part of their treatment plan, though research on its effectiveness remains inconclusive. A study published in the Canadian Medical Association Journal found that while intravenous vitamin C has been proposed as an adjunct therapy for cancer, evidence supporting its efficacy is lacking.

    nurse IV dripCanva

    Some clinics offer IV drips for hangover recovery, claiming that their blends of electrolytes, B vitamins, and anti-nausea medications can alleviate symptoms within an hour. While hydration and electrolyte replacement can help, many medical professionals argue that these effects are primarily due to fluid replenishment rather than the added vitamins. Since the body naturally metabolizes alcohol at a fixed rate, no amount of IV therapy can accelerate that process.

    Downsides of IV vitamin therapy

    Despite its popularity, IV vitamin therapy is not without risks. While generally considered safe when administered by a trained professional, complications can arise. The most common risks include infection at the injection site, allergic reactions, and imbalances caused by excessive nutrient intake. 

    One major concern is vitamin toxicity, particularly with fat-soluble vitamins like A, D, E, and K, which accumulate in the body rather than being excreted. High doses of minerals such as magnesium or calcium can also cause adverse effects, especially for individuals with kidney disease. The Cleveland Clinic advises that patients should be cautious about IV vitamin therapy, as unnecessary or excessive treatments could lead to potential health risks.

    Another issue is the lack of regulatory oversight. Unlike prescription medications, most IV vitamin infusions are not subject to FDA approval. While some clinics are run by licensed medical professionals, others operate without strict medical supervision, leading to inconsistencies in dosing and sterility. Consumers considering IV therapy should verify that the provider follows medical safety standards and uses high-quality ingredients.

    “When you put something straight into the bloodstream, you bypass all of your body’s built-in safeguards and filters,” Torbati says. “You want to make sure you know exactly what’s in it.”

    The cost of IV vitamin therapy is another factor to consider. Prices vary widely depending on the provider and formulation, with a basic hydration drip typically costing between $100 and $150. Custom treatments with added nutrients can range from $250 to $500 per session, with some clinics recommending regular treatments that can add up to thousands of dollars annually. Since IV therapy is considered an elective wellness treatment, insurance rarely covers the cost unless it is medically necessary. 

    This post was originally published on VegNews.com.


  • This content originally appeared on ProPublica and was authored by ProPublica.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • The debate over high-protein versus low-protein diets has intensified as wellness trends push protein consumption to new heights. From gym-goers chugging protein shakes to the rise of meat-heavy ketogenic diets, the emphasis on protein as a pillar of health is stronger than ever. Yet, regions known as Blue Zones—areas where people consistently live past 100 years—tell a different story. These long-lived populations consume significantly less protein, primarily from plant-based sources, than the Western average. So, is a low-protein diet the key to longevity?

    The Blue Zones diets

    Blue Zones, identified by National Geographic researcher Dan Buettner, include regions such as Okinawa, Japan; Sardinia, Italy; Ikaria, Greece; Nicoya, Costa Rica; and Loma Linda, CA in the US. Across these areas, a common dietary pattern emerges: high consumption of legumes, whole grains, and vegetables, with minimal animal protein.

    Women eating in OkinawaBlue Zones

    Okinawans, for example, derive only about nine percent of their calories from protein, primarily from soy-based foods such as tofu and miso. The Nicoyan diet follows a similar pattern, relying on beans, squash, and corn tortillas for sustenance. Even in Sardinia and Ikaria, where dairy plays a larger role, protein intake remains modest compared to the high-protein norms of Western diets where protein, much of it from animal sources, makes up about 16 percent of calories.

    What the science says

    Recent research supports the Blue Zones approach. A study published in Cell Metabolism found that middle-aged adults who consumed high amounts of animal protein were four times more likely to die from cancer and had a 75 percent increased risk of overall mortality compared to those on low-protein diets. However, this risk was not observed in individuals over 65, suggesting that protein needs may increase with age.

    Valter Longo, a leading researcher on aging and the author of The Longevity Diet, has advocated for moderate protein intake, particularly from plant-based sources. Longo says protein restriction can activate pro-longevity pathways, explaining it’s not about eliminating protein but about the source and the timing.

    VegNews.LegumesBeansLentils

    Animal protein, particularly red and processed meat, has been linked to an increased risk of chronic diseases. The World Health Organization classifies processed meats such as bacon and sausage as Group 1 carcinogens, meaning they have a definitive link to cancer. Additionally, diets high in animal protein have been associated with an increased risk of heart disease due to their saturated fat and cholesterol content.

    Conversely, plant-based proteins—such as beans, lentils, and nuts—offer fiber, antioxidants, and polyphenols that help reduce inflammation and support gut health. A study published in JAMA Internal Medicine found that replacing just three percent of animal protein with plant protein reduced the risk of premature death by 10 percent.

    A low-protein diet has also been linked to reduced risk of type 2 diabetes and kidney disease. High-protein diets, particularly those rich in animal protein, place additional strain on the kidneys and may accelerate the progression of kidney disease. The National Kidney Foundation recommends plant-based protein sources for individuals at risk, noting that they produce fewer waste products that tax the kidneys.

    VegNews.Tofu.GettyGetty

    Additionally, research from Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health found that high consumption of red meat, particularly processed varieties, increased the risk of type 2 diabetes by 20 percent. Meanwhile, plant-based proteins, such as nuts and legumes, were associated with improved insulin sensitivity and lower blood sugar levels.

    Muscle maintenance without meat?

    One of the biggest concerns surrounding a low-protein diet is muscle loss. However, research suggests that adequate plant protein combined with resistance training is sufficient to maintain muscle mass. In a study published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, researchers found no significant difference in muscle-building between individuals consuming animal protein versus plant protein, provided that total protein intake was adequate.

    VegNews.OlderAdults.SamWilliams.UnsplashSam Williams | Unsplash

    This aligns with the Blue Zones, where elders maintain high levels of physical activity despite lower protein intake. Sardinians, for instance, engage in daily walking and manual labor well into old age, while Okinawans practice tai chi and gardening—both of which contribute to muscle retention and overall vitality.

    What this means for the average diet

    “Protein contains the same 20 amino acids, regardless of where it comes from,” says nutrition expert Christopher Gardner. “It isn’t the amount of protein consumed as much as the proportions of amino acids, which make up proteins, that matter most.”

    While Blue Zones residents naturally follow low-protein, plant-forward diets, shifting away from the Western emphasis on high protein may require a mindset change. Many nutrition experts now advocate for a “protein redistribution” approach, where total protein remains moderate but leans heavily toward plant-based sources.

    VegNews.VeganProtein.Arx0nt3   Arx0nt3

    “A lot of people think that plants don’t have enough total protein to meet human requirements,” Gardner says. “But the truth is vegetarians and vegans usually meet and exceed their protein requirement as long as they’re eating a reasonable variety of foods.”

    And, he says, there are things to consider: “Animal foods don’t have fiber, and plant foods generally don’t have saturated fat. In this sense, it’s actually more beneficial to choose plant foods over animal foods.”

    This post was originally published on VegNews.com.

  • The modern world is facing a sleep crisis, with millions of people struggling to get the rest they need. Sleep deprivation is linked to a range of mental health issues, including increased stress, anxiety, and depression. Despite this, the importance of sleep is often overshadowed by a culture that prioritises productivity over rest.

    One of the most overlooked factors in sleep quality is the sleep environment itself – particularly bed size (such as a king size). A cramped sleeping space can lead to frequent disturbances, discomfort, and poor sleep hygiene, all of which contribute to mental and physical exhaustion. By prioritising a spacious and comfortable sleep setup, individuals may see significant improvements in their overall well-being.

    The Modern Sleep Crisis

    Sleep deprivation is a growing issue in the UK and around the world. Studies show that nearly three quarters (71 percent) of UK adults do not get the recommended seven to nine hours of sleep per night, with similar trends seen globally. The consequences of chronic sleep deprivation extend beyond fatigue, contributing to cognitive impairment, weakened immune function, and serious mental health issues.

    One of the key drivers of this crisis is the pervasive hustle culture, which glorifies long work hours and productivity at the expense of rest. Many people sacrifice sleep to meet demanding schedules, leading to burnout and stress. Additionally, the rise of digital technology has disrupted natural sleep patterns. The blue light emitted by screens suppresses melatonin production, making it harder to fall asleep and stay asleep.

    As a result, poor sleep has become a significant factor in rising levels of anxiety, depression, and other mental health conditions. Without adequate rest, emotional regulation and resilience decline, making it harder to cope with daily stressors. Addressing the sleep crisis requires a cultural shift towards valuing rest as an essential pillar of health and well-being.

    The Science Behind Sleep and Mental Health

    Sleep is a fundamental component of overall well-being, directly influencing both physical and mental health. When individuals do not get enough quality sleep, it can lead to severe physiological and psychological consequences. Chronic sleep deprivation weakens the immune system, increases inflammation, and contributes to the development of chronic conditions such as heart disease and diabetes. From a mental health perspective, lack of sleep exacerbates symptoms of anxiety and depression, making emotional regulation increasingly difficult.

    Furthermore, sleep plays a crucial role in cognitive function, including memory retention, problem-solving abilities, and decision-making skills. Without sufficient rest, the brain struggles to process and store information efficiently, leading to diminished productivity and focus. The ability to manage stress is also directly linked to sleep quality, as rest allows the body to recover from daily stressors and regulate hormone levels such as cortisol.

    Creating a sleep-friendly environment is essential for maintaining good mental health. Factors such as bed size, mattress quality, room temperature, and lighting can significantly influence sleep hygiene. By prioritising an optimal sleep environment, individuals can enhance their sleep quality, ultimately improving emotional stability, cognitive performance, and overall well-being.

    Why Bed Size Matters

    The size of a bed plays a crucial role in sleep quality. A larger bed provides more room to move freely, reducing the likelihood of discomfort and interruptions during the night. Cramped sleeping conditions can lead to frequent awakenings, as partners may accidentally disturb each other, affecting the depth and continuity of sleep.

    Research has shown that individuals who sleep in larger beds experience fewer disturbances and enjoy better overall sleep quality. When there is ample space to stretch out and find a comfortable position, the body can fully relax, promoting deeper and more restorative sleep. Additionally, for couples, a larger bed minimizes movement disruptions, ensuring that one person’s tossing and turning does not negatively impact the other’s rest.

    Beyond just physical space, the perception of having a spacious sleep environment can also have psychological benefits. Knowing there is enough room to move can reduce feelings of restlessness and enhance relaxation, making it easier to fall and stay asleep. Investing in a larger bed can be a simple yet effective way to improve overall sleep hygiene and mental well-being.

    The Psychological Benefits of a Better Sleep Environment

    A well-designed sleep environment has profound effects on mental well-being. Spacious sleeping arrangements can help to reduce stress and promote relaxation by providing an unconfined, restful space where the body can fully unwind. People sleeping in larger beds often report feeling more at ease, which leads to deeper, more restorative sleep.

    An optimal sleep setup can also contribute to creating a sanctuary that fosters emotional stability. Elements such as a comfortable mattress, soft bedding, and a clutter-free bedroom environment can significantly enhance feelings of safety and comfort. When individuals feel secure in their sleep environment, they are more likely to experience uninterrupted rest, which is vital for emotional regulation and overall mental health.

    Experts in sleep science and psychology consistently highlight the importance of a supportive sleep setting. Testimonials from individuals who have upgraded their sleeping arrangements often reflect noticeable improvements in mood, stress levels, and cognitive function. Investing in a well-structured sleep space is a simple yet effective way to support mental and emotional well-being.

    Practical Steps to Improve Sleep Through Bed Choice

    When to Consider Upgrading to a Bigger Bed

    If you frequently wake up feeling cramped or find yourself disturbed by a partner’s movements, it may be time to invest in a larger bed. A good rule of thumb is to assess whether you can lie comfortably with your arms outstretched without feeling confined. A bigger bed allows for better movement, reduces partner disturbances, and creates a more relaxing sleep environment.

    Other Factors to Consider: Mattress Type, Bedding, and Room Setup

    Beyond bed size, the choice of mattress is crucial. Memory foam, hybrid, or pocket-sprung mattresses cater to different sleep preferences and can greatly impact comfort. Opt for breathable, high-quality bedding to regulate temperature and improve sleep quality. Additionally, arranging your room to minimize clutter, control light exposure, and maintain a cool temperature can enhance overall restfulness.

    Additional Sleep Tips to Complement a Better Sleep Environment

    • Establish a consistent bedtime routine to regulate your sleep cycle.
    • Reduce screen time at least an hour before bed to minimise blue light exposure.
    • Use blackout curtains to create a dark, restful atmosphere.
    • Consider using white noise or calming sounds to improve relaxation.
    • Invest in ergonomic pillows that support your neck and spine alignment.

    By making these simple yet effective adjustments, you can create an optimal sleep environment that supports both physical and mental well-being.

    Final Thoughts

    Sleep is an essential component of mental and physical health, yet it is often neglected in modern lifestyles. The evidence is clear: poor sleep quality contributes to heightened stress levels, emotional instability, and cognitive decline. Addressing the sleep crisis requires a conscious effort to prioritise rest and optimise sleeping conditions.

    One simple yet impactful change is ensuring adequate sleeping space. A larger bed can significantly enhance comfort, reduce sleep disturbances, and foster deeper, more restorative rest. Investing in a better sleep setup is an investment in overall well-being.

    By making small but meaningful adjustments—such as upgrading to a more spacious bed, selecting the right mattress, and refining sleep hygiene practices—individuals can drastically improve their quality of sleep and, in turn, their mental and emotional health. It’s time to recognise sleep as a pillar of well-being and take the necessary steps to nurture it.

    By Nathan Spears

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • While they might seem like a simple enough snack, cashews have quite the history. Native to Brazil, cashew trees were discovered by Portuguese colonizers in the 1500s, and their fruit, which produces nuts, was quickly traded around the world. Today, you can still find cashew trees in South America’s rainforests. But, according to Statista, today’s leading exporter of cashew nuts is actually nearly 6,000 miles away in Tanzania. 

    Jump to the products

    Today, all over the world, cashews are loved for their versatility (particularly when it comes to making dairy-free milk, cheese, yogurt, and cream), but also for their nutritional benefits. Here, we dive into all of the benefits of cashews, some of the best products on the market, as well as some tasty recipes to make with cashews as the star ingredient. 

    Jump to the recipes

    What are cashews?

    The scientific name for the cashew tree is Anacardium occidentale. This produces a pepper-shaped drupe known as the cashew apple, or if you’re in Central America, a marañón. Underneath this grows a small tree fruit which is shaped like a kidney, and inside that is what is commonly referred to as the cashew “nut” (despite the fact that it is technically a seed).

    VegNews.CashewTree.QuangNguyenVinh.PexelsQuang Nguyen Vinh/Pexels

    While they grow in a way that is very similar to legumes, cashews are not classified as such because they grow inside a hard drupe shell, not a pod (like peas, for example).

    Are cashews healthy?

    It’s worth noting that in their raw-shelled form, cashews are poisonous to humans. This is because the shells contain urushiol, a mixture of organic and toxic, compounds. When human skin comes into contact with urushiol, it can cause an itchy, red, and painful allergic reaction—imagine if you brushed up against some poison ivy, for example, which also contains urushiol.

    VegNews.CashewFruitBowl.JonathanBorba.PexelsJonathan Borba/Pexels

    But most of the cashews you can buy in the store have been cooked and processed, so they’re perfectly safe to eat. And they’re nutritious, too, as they’re a good source of protein, fiber, iron, and unsaturated fats, as well as copper, zinc, and magnesium. To benefit from this nutrition, experts recommend you consume around 15 cashew nuts per day.

    Benefits of cashews

    Nutrition aside, cashews have other benefits, too. Because of their creamy texture, they’re an effective dairy alternative, and are used to make milk, cheeses, yogurts, and cream that taste like dairy, but are totally plant-based.

    This is, of course, better for the animals. According to Compassion in World Farming, globally, around 270 million cows are forced to produce milk every year, and most of them live in cramped, dirty factory farming conditions. (According to one 2019 study, more than 99 percent of US farm animals are factory farmed.)

    VegNews.Cashews.JennKosar.UnsplashJenn Kosar | Unsplash

    Cashew dairy alternatives are also better for the environment than dairy, which is incredibly resource-intensive. Plus, the entire livestock industry produces 14.5 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions. 

    According to the BBC climate change food calculator, which is based on Oxford University research, consuming one glass of dairy milk three to five times a week contributes 131 kilograms to a person’s annual greenhouse gas emissions. It adds that consuming a handful of nuts for the same amount of time contributes two kilograms of emissions.

    Cashew uses and products

    The versatility of cashews means they have been used in many different ways by recipe creators and brands alike. Of course, they’re easy to snack on as they come, but if you want to try something more innovative, here are a few examples of some of the recipes and products out there.

    Nuts-for-CheeseNuts for Cheese

    1 Cashew cheese

    When blended and combined with ingredients like nutritional yeast, cashews have a very similar taste and texture to cheese. This is why Canadian brand Nuts for Cheese chose to use fermented cashews as a base for products like its Un-Brie-Liavable brie alternative, its Super Blue, and its Chipotle Cheddar Style Wedge.

    Popular US brand Miyoko’s Creamery also relies on cashew milk to make its range of vegan mozzarellas and cream cheeses.

    But if you’d like to get creative in the kitchen and have a go at making cashew cheese on your own, this recipe from vegan chef Chad Sarno will walk you through the process from start to finish.

    Forager-ProjectForager Project

    2 Cashew yogurt

    The vegan yogurt category is growing. In 2021, it was valued at more than $2 billion, and it’s expected to reach nearly $10 billion by 2029. A number of nuts and grains can be used to make yogurt, and cashews are no exception. 

    Take Forager Project, for example, which makes a whole range of yogurts using cashew milk as a base. Even Trader Joe’s has its own cashew yogurt options, including a seasonal pumpkin spice flavor.

    Again, if you want to make your own, you’re not short of options. Try this Instant Pot recipe for example.

    ElmhurstElmhurst

    3 Cashew milk

    There are so many vegan milk products on the market. But while almond and oat are two of the most popular, it’s important not to forget about the humble cashew. 

    Plenish, Forager Project, MALK, and Elmhurst are just a few examples of some of the brands offering vegan cashew milk today. And, of course, you can make your own if the mood takes you.

    EcomilEcomil

    4 Cashew cream

    If it’s possible to make cashew milk and yogurt, it stands to reason that cashew cream exists too. Although, it’s not as common as some of the other products on the list. That said, you can buy it from Spanish brand Ecomil, which sells a sugar-free organic cooking cream, made with cashews, or, you can make it from home! 

    This recipe, for example, takes just 30 minutes to throw together, and all you need is some raw cashews and one cup of water.

    Maisie-JanesMaisie Janes

    5 Cashew butter 

    Move over, peanut butter, you’ve got competition. Just like its rival, cashew butter is creamy, crunchy, and a great source of protein. Plus, it’s easy to get hold of, too. Even Whole Foods offers a cashew butter in its 365 range. 

    Other brands with cashew butter products include Maisie Janes and NutRaw, which makes a pistachio and cashew butter. Artisana Organics also sells raw cashew butter.

    There are also many easy recipes for cashew butter available. 

    Cashew recipes 

    These tasty vegan recipes all call for cashews. 

    VegNews.lobstermacandcheeseAlex Shytsman

    1Cashew Mac and Cheese With Lobster Mushrooms

    Is there anything more comforting than a warm bowl of creamy macaroni and cheese? We’ll answer for you: no. This recipe combines a cashew-based sauce with ingredients like nutritional yeast and umami-rich miso. It’s super quick to make, too, and honestly, once you’ve tried it, you’ll want to make it every single weeknight for the rest of time.
    Get the recipe

    lasagnaHollan Hawaii

    2 Lasagna With Cashew Béchamel Sauce

    The secret to a delicious lasagna is perfecting the béchamel. And this recipe produces a velvety, creamy version of the classic French white sauce using, you guessed it, cashews. Simply layer it up with the filling of your choice. Will you go with vegan meat or vegetables? 
    Get the recipe

    VegNews.CashewHorchataFeatureVegan Heritage Press

    3 Horchata With Cinnamon Cashew Milk

    A tasty, comforting favorite, Horchata is a popular drink choice everywhere across Mexico. While traditional recipes often call for cow’s milk, it’s not a necessity, as this recipe proves. Simply mix cashews with dates, water, and cinnamon! Nope, there’s nothing else to it, it’s as easy as that. 
    Get the recipe

    VegNews.FennelSaladAlejandra Schrader

    4 Cashew Dill Yogurt Salad Dressing

    Nothing jazzes up a salad like the right dressing. This recipe will show you how to upgrade your lunchtime go-to by making a cashew dill topping. It’s a little more complicated than some of the other options on this list, but your tastebuds will be grateful you’ve put in the time. 
    Get the recipe

    VegNews.BlueberryCheesecake.LaurenToyotaLauren Toyota

    5 Creamy Cashew Cheesecake

    A creamy, indulgent, decadent cheesecake dessert does not require dairy. Instead, swap out dairy cream for a cashew cream base. You’ll barely notice the difference, and neither will your loved ones. You’ll be fighting them for the last piece!
    Get the recipe  

    VegNews.SaltedVanillaCashewButterFudgeChristina Leopold

    6Cashew Butter Fudge

    Fudge is the ultimate sweet treat. And you’ll be pleased to know it’s super easy to make vegan. To make this tasty recipe, all you need is some cashew butter, maple syrup, coconut oil, vanilla paste, and salt. Even better, it’s no bake! (Although you will need to set aside three hours for freezing time.)
    Get the recipe

    This post was originally published on VegNews.com.

  • Surgeons who worked in Gaza fear disease, malnutrition and eradication of healthcare will reverberate for decades

    British doctors who worked in Gaza during the war have issued dire predictions over the long-term health of Palestinian civillians, warning that large numbers will continue to die.

    The prevalence of infectious disease and multiple health problems linked to malnutrition, alongside the destruction of hospitals and killing of medical experts, meant mortality rates among Palestinians in Gaza would remain high after the cessation of Israeli shelling.

    Continue reading…

    This post was originally published on Human rights | The Guardian.

  • Cancer Research UK has published a new cancer study, specifically on death rates across the UK. Crucially, it identified enormous health disparities for people living in the most deprived areas of the country. Too any paying attention, this pointed to the deadly impacts of more than a decade of callous neoliberal capitalist policies.

    However, the findings have triggered a wave of hand-wringing over people’s so-called lifestyle choices. This was with the obvious implication that poor people are to blame for their own worse off health. Of course, in reality, this couldn’t be further from the case – and it was shameful that anyone implied otherwise.

    Cancer study: deaths higher for deprived communities

    As the Guardian reported:

    Cancer death rates are 60% higher for people living in the most deprived areas of the UK compared with those in more affluent areas, according to new analysis.

    There are 28,400 extra cancer deaths across the UK each year due to deprivation, the equivalent of 78 additional deaths every day, Cancer Research UK found.

    For all cancers combined in the UK, mortality rates are almost 1.6x higher in people living in the most deprived areas compared with the least (337 deaths per 100,000 against 217 deaths).

    Crucially, it highlighted that:

    Almost half (47%) of these were caused by lung cancer, where the death rate was almost three times higher in the most deprived areas.

    Predictably, politicians, NHS officials, and medical scientists honed in on this. They were quick to point the finger at long waiting times for diagnosis treatment:

    Meanwhile, the Independent quoted Health Secretary Wes Streeting saying:

    Our new targets for cancer diagnosis and treatment will mean around an extra 100,000 patients are seen on time next year, and we have also started using the latest digital AI technologies to help catch the disease earlier

    Symptoms of an underlying systemic problem

    However, let’s be clear. While long waitlists for diagnosis, lack of GP appointments, and access to treatment in deprived areas is undoubtedly contributing to this, these are all simply symptoms of a more obvious underlying cause.

    It was the mainstream liberal media outlet’s image choice that really underscored the problem with this. Crucially, it drove home a huge issue in the way the press and political establishment were interpreting the research.

    In a cropped photo, it pictures a person lighting a cigarette into cupped hands. This sat above a caption that read:

    Lung cancer death rates are almost three times higher in the most deprived areas of the UK

    Straight away, that’s a choice to focus on smoking in its feature image. Yes, the report did find lung cancer caused the most mortalities. But a few things here. One: smoking is not the only driver of this. Poor air quality from industrial and commercial pollution is undoubtedly a factor. Two: the report explored multiple forms of cancer, not only lung cancer anyway.

    What it immediately implies is that it’s people choosing to smoke that’s driving its headline “death rates 60% higher in deprived areas”. If a picture says a thousand words, this one is an essay on poor people making bad life choices, and causing themselves a premature death.

    Moreover, the Guardian wasn’t the only one making this out – in not so many words. The article cited Cancer Research UK’s inequalities programme lead Karis Betts arguing that:

    Sustainably funding support to help people stop smoking will avoid so many cancer cases in deprived areas. But we also need new and better ways to diagnose cancer at an early stage, like targeted lung screening, which is proven to help save lives in at-risk communities.

    That little head nod to “funding support to help people stop smoking” again subtly suggested the same idea. That is, that it’s poor people’s smoking habits that’s at fault.

    The lifestyle choice mantra is back with a vengeance again

    Invariably, all were some version of putting the onus on poor communities to make better life choices. Some might have cursorily acknowledged that there’s an element of lack of healthcare, so didn’t fully foist the onus on people’s life choices – at least not so directly. But each time, it still came back to that same wearying, disgusting argument.

    On Wednesday, the Canary reported that life expectancy improvements across Europe had slumped. England had the sharpest decline for the period between 2011 and 2019. However, instead of joining the dots between more than a decade of callous austerity-addled policies, it laid the blame squarely at the feet of the country’s population.

    In effect, it singled out England’s populace as somehow more inept at all things diet and exercise, than every other civilian citizenry in Europe.

    The bigger picture for this cancer study too could almost be a rinse and repeat of what we underscored in that one. Notably, we emphasised that:

    An aggressive and deadly combination of callous policies punching down on the poorest and most marginalised communities were the recipe for this classist, ableist act of eugenics.

    In short, the doctrine of neoliberal capitalism was fomenting this stall life expectancy growth. And of course, its the Whitehall political establishment that’s responsible. Yes, this means the Tories of fourteen years past. So too, it includes the Labour Party government now – and not forgetting new Labour in the early millennium either. We wrote as well that the study’s researchers should:

    Try living in poverty, overworked with piss-take pay, without access to healthy food, time to exercise or cook

    All this is relevant again for this research. This is because, once more, the egregiously dangerous lifestyle choices mantra is rearing it head.

    There was nothing said about the Tories gutting public services either. If we’re going to take the idea of a lack of support, at a bare minimum, it needed to acknowledge that. After all, these spiralling waitlists for diagnosis and treatment are a product of fourteen years of neoliberal wreck and ruin.

    What’s more, poor people have less access to healthy food that manufacturers haven’t pumped full of harmful oils, and chemical additives. That’s sure to have an impact on their health – and likely their chances of developing various cancers too.

    And lest we forget, landlords lumping poor residents with toxic mold-riddled, damp properties aren’t exactly helping lungs and health either:

    Policies pushing poverty are killing people, as cancer study shows

    When this research references ‘deprived areas’, it’s worth remembering that the government uses what’s known as the Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD).

    As the name suggests, this takes into account different forms of deprivation. It assesses 39 separate indicators across seven “domains of deprivation”. These are: income, employment, education, skills and training, health and disability, crime, barriers to housing and services, and living environment.

    All these deprivations compound on people’s health. Yet, takes on the findings seem to ignore all these factors. It’s little wonder then that politicians and healthcare experts have ignored the political ideology underpinning them too.

    The Office for National Statistics (ONS) has previously shown that mortality rates are literally higher for people in the most deprived areas. For instance, in 2020, those living in the most deprived areas were more than double as likely to die avoidable deaths than people in the least deprived areas.

    After decades of politicians peddling policies that have entrenched more and more people into ever deeper poverty, this is the result. Worse life expectancies, higher cancer rates, higher mortality all round.

    Ultimately, this was another rerun of the neoliberal capitalist penchant for gaslighting marginalised communities for the problems it has fomented. Plenty of people on X recognised the symptoms from the societal illness:

    The festering rot at the heart of these harrowing figures? Class war – and when all is said and done, that’s the real crux of this.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Hannah Sharland

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • TAIPEI, TAIWAN – North Korea is expected to send a large number of healthcare workers to Russia for training, a South Korean government-backed think tank said, as it tries to address a lack of in-house capabilities to achieve a goal of modernizing rural health services.

    North Korean leader Kim Jong Un pledged in early February to make the modernization of regional health services a “top priority,” highlighting the “wide gap” between urban and rural areas.

    He also said building public health facilities and multifunctional bases for cultural life was an urgent task that would accelerate “the simultaneous and balanced development of all fields and regions,” unveiling a plan to build 20 hospitals across cities and counties each year, from 2026.

    But Jeong Eun-mi, a researcher at the Korean Institute for National Unification, believes the North will have no choice but to rely on Russia as it lacks the capability to achieve those aims on its own.

    “Given the fact that the Pyongyang General Hospital, which began construction in March 2020, has still not opened, and that this year’s healthcare budget has only increased by 5.6% compared to last year, it is difficult for North Korea to achieve this on its own, making external help inevitable,” said Jeong.

    North Korean leader Kim Jong Un takes part in the groundbreaking ceremony for the Kangdong County Hospital and General Service Center in Kangdong County, North Korea, February 6, 2025, in this photo released by North Korea's official Korean Central News Agency.
    North Korean leader Kim Jong Un takes part in the groundbreaking ceremony for the Kangdong County Hospital and General Service Center in Kangdong County, North Korea, February 6, 2025, in this photo released by North Korea’s official Korean Central News Agency.
    (KCNA/Reuters)

    North Korea has a long-standing practice of concentrating resources and prioritizing development in Pyongyang, as it serves as the showcase city for the regime. Major infrastructure projects, healthcare facilities, and economic investments are typically funneled into the capital to maintain its image of stability and progress.

    Given this centralized allocation of resources, if even the capital struggles to complete a flagship project like the Pyongyang General Hospital, it is virtually impossible for rural areas to receive similar investments.

    “Kim Jong Un, in his speech, strongly urged medical professionals to improve not only their medical skills and qualifications in line with the advancements of modern medicine but also their foreign language proficiency,” said Jeong.

    “It is expected that a significant number of North Korean medical personnel will be dispatched to Russia in the near future,” she added, citing a comprehensive strategic partnership treaty Russia and North Korea signed in June last year.

    The neighbors signed the treaty during a visit to Pyongyang by President Vladimir Putin. The treaty covers various areas of cooperation, including healthcare, medical education and science.

    As part of the agreement, Russia pledged to assist North Korea in constructing a new hospital, aiming to enhance its healthcare infrastructure.

    “Most North Korean healthcare workers lack experience in operating modern medical facilities and have limited academic qualifications and medical skills,” Jeong explained.

    RELATED STORIES

    ‘I want to defect to South’: North Korean soldier captured in Kursk breaks silence

    Russia supports US-North Korea dialogue, envoy says

    North Korean casualty rate in Kursk may be as high as 50%: US expert

    ‘Not what I expected’

    A Russian soldier who was treated recently at a medical facility in North Korea told media that he did not receive the sort of medical treatment he was expecting.

    “It wasn’t what I expected, but I thought I should try it out,” the soldier, who identified himself as Aleksei, told the Guardian newspaper, without elaborating.

    Aleksei was one of the hundreds of Russian soldiers covertly sent to North Korea for medical rehabilitation and rest.

    Russia’s ambassador to North Korea said in early February that “hundreds of Russian soldiers” who fought in Ukraine were “undergoing rehabilitation in North Korean sanatorium and medical facilities.”

    About 4,000 of the up to 12,000 North Korean troops dispatched to Russia’s Kursk region late last year to help it in its war against Ukraine have been killed or wounded, according to Ukraine. Neither North Korea nor Russia has acknowledged their presence.

    Aleksei added he shared a facility in Wonsan, where one of North Korea’s main tourist beach resorts is located, with about two dozen other Russian soldiers.

    He spent days playing table tennis and cards with fellow servicemen, while enjoying access to a pool and a sauna.

    Aleksei and the other soldiers were forbidden from going outside in the evenings or making contact with residents of the area, and alcohol was also hard to come by, he told the British newspaper.

    Edited by Mike Firn.


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Taejun Kang for RFA.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • DHAKA/COX’S BAZAR, Bangladesh – At a Rohingya refugee camp in southeastern Bangladesh, Mohammed Hasan cast doubt over whether he’d ever walk again.

    The 40-year-old had a leg amputated after a Burmese soldier shot him during the Myanmar military’s deadly crackdown against the stateless Rohingya Muslim minority in 2017. Hasan’s other leg was paralyzed after the shooting.

    Like hundreds of thousands of his fellow Rohingya, he fled that year from his home in Rakhine state to neighboring Bangladesh. There, a nongovernmental organization helped him with medical treatment, including physiotherapy.

    But all that is gone now.

    “Physiotherapy and other treatments at Handicap International revived my hope for being able to stand up again. But Handicap International ceased their operations, blowing my hopes,” Hasan told BenarNews this month.

    More than a dozen healthcare facilities that help Rohingya refugees have suspended operations in the past few weeks, leaving thousands without essential health services and exacerbating already dire conditions at sprawling camps in Cox’s Bazar district near the Myanmar border.

    Some Bangladeshi officials have attributed the closures to a decision last month by the new U.S. administration to freeze foreign aid for 90 days, pending a review of foreign assistance programs.

    Bangladeshi officials say the decision by the United States – the world’s largest single aid donor, according to the United Nations – has affected various services helping the Rohingya refugees in Bangladesh, including health, water and sanitation, education, and livelihood.

    In a filing with the U.S. District Court in the District of Columbia on Feb. 18, the Trump administration said it would not release its foreign aid funds despite a federal judge’s order last week to lift its freeze, according to a copy of the court document seen by BenarNews.

    Three facilities run by the global nonprofit International Rescue Committee (IRC) have completely shut down while two others could stop operations by the end of March, an official of a Bangladeshi government agency overseeing the needs of refugees told BenarNews last week.

    “Apart from that, around 14 [Centre for Disability in Development, or CDD facilities] across the camps ceased their operations following the U.S. fund freeze that also laid off many healthcare staff,” Refugee, Relief and Repatriation (RRR) Commissioner Mohammed Mizanur Rahman said.

    BenarNews visited five CDD facilities in Cox’s Bazar and found they had stopped their operations at present.

    Rohingya refugee Gulfaraz Begum with her son, Mohammed Hasan, who lost a leg in Myanmar military’s crackdown in 2017, at a refugee camp in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh, Feb. 10, 2025.
    Rohingya refugee Gulfaraz Begum with her son, Mohammed Hasan, who lost a leg in Myanmar military’s crackdown in 2017, at a refugee camp in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh, Feb. 10, 2025.
    (Abdur Rahman/BenarNews)

    A medical officer working at a government hospital also told BenarNews that the health aid group Handicap International – which used to provide medical care for refugees such as Mohammed Hasan – had stopped its operations.

    RELATED STORIES

    Trump aid freeze is opportunity to revamp US programs in Bangladesh

    Rubio allows humanitarian aid as Dhaka claims Rohingya funding will continue

    Q&A: Researcher finds hunger, desperation among newest Rohingya refugees

    More than a million refugees

    Another health research group, the International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (ICDDR, B), had also suspended its operations to help the refugees, said Enamul Haque, a medical officer at the government-owned Teknaf Upzila Health Complex.

    “With these two centers shut down, patients are facing extreme difficulties. There is no other hospital except for the government hospital,” Enamul told BenarNews on Feb. 11.

    “In reality, there is nowhere for these patients to go … [P]oor patients are suffering the most,” he said.

    BenarNews tried to contact five organizations that had allegedly suspended their operations following the freeze on foreign aid implemented by the Trump administration, which took office on Jan. 20.

    Among the groups, IRC and ICDDR, B did not respond to multiple requests from BenarNews. Local officials with Handicap International, CDD, and the U.N. refugee agency UNHCR declined comment.

    The locked gate of a facility of the Center for Disability in Development in Ukhia, Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh, Feb. 10, 2025.
    The locked gate of a facility of the Center for Disability in Development in Ukhia, Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh, Feb. 10, 2025.
    (Abdur Rahman/BenarNews)

    More than 1 million Rohingya refugees are staying in camps in and around Cox’s Bazar – some of the largest and most densely populated refugee shelters in the world.

    There are 120 healthcare centers across 34 camps that often provide medical care for at least 70,000 Rohingya refugees, Mizanur, the RRR commissioner, said.

    “As the U.S. is the biggest funder [of foreign aid in Bangladesh], the fallout of the aid freeze could impact other medical facilities too in the [camps],” he said.

    An official involved with healthcare services in the camps said on Feb. 11 that the existing healthcare facilities for the refugees had scaled down their services by as much as 25% since the U.S. funding was paused.

    “We have observed service disruptions in the Rohingya refugee camps as well as in the host communities, including in life-saving interventions,” Syed Md Tafhim, a communications officer at the Inter Sector Coordination Group (ISCG), said in a statement.

    The ISCG serves as the international central coordination body for humanitarian agencies that serve Rohingya refugees in Cox’s Bazar.

    A Rohingya refugee with a disability, who used to receive medical treatment from an aid group, in a camp in Ukhia, Cox’s Bazar, Feb. 10, 2025.
    A Rohingya refugee with a disability, who used to receive medical treatment from an aid group, in a camp in Ukhia, Cox’s Bazar, Feb. 10, 2025.
    (Abdur Rahman/BenarNews)

    Affected services range across different sectors, such as health (including treatment for persons with disabilities), water and sanitation, education, and livelihood, the group said.

    “As a result of this global pause, preliminary information suggests that several important projects benefitting Rohingya refugees and Bangladeshi host communities have had to be suspended, interrupting some essential and life-saving services,” the ISCG said.

    “While some exceptions and waivers are gradually being communicated by the U.S. Government, we do not yet have a detailed understanding of how this may affect specific programmes in the Rohingya response in the short and medium term,” it also said.

    According to the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), the pause in funding would “invariably affect” its Rohingya refugee response.

    “The United States has been among our steady partners to the Rohingya response, and we remain both grateful and hopeful that funding support will soon resume to ensure refugee women and girls and those from the host community continue to receive critical assistance to uphold their health, safety, and dignity in Bangladesh,” UNFPA Bangladesh Representative Masaki Watabe said in a statement.

    Anxious parent

    Back in the refugee camps, a Rohingya father waits.

    In their small hut made of bamboo and tarpaulin at Camp 16, Kabir Hossen lives with his son, Md Hasan, who has a paralyzed leg and struggles with a form of palsy.

    Rohingya refugee Kabir Hossen is seen with his son, Md Hasan, who has a paralyzed leg and struggles with a form of palsy, at a refugee camp in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh, Feb. 10, 2025.
    Rohingya refugee Kabir Hossen is seen with his son, Md Hasan, who has a paralyzed leg and struggles with a form of palsy, at a refugee camp in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh, Feb. 10, 2025.
    (Abdur Rahman/BenarNews)

    Every 10 days, they used to visit a CDD facility for his treatment and medicine. But on Feb. 1, the center’s staff turned them away, saying they already stopped providing services.

    “I don’t know where to avail the treatment for my son,” Hossen, 47, told BenarNews.

    “Uncertainty is gripping me.”

    BenarNews is an RFA-affiliated news organization.


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Mostafa Yousuf and Abdur Rahman for BenarNews.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Meat sticks have become an undeniable force in the snack industry, with consumer demand skyrocketing. The category is no longer just gas station Slim Jims; sales of dried meat sticks hit more than $3 billion last year, according to Marketplace. These include sugar-free, low-sodium, and even grass-fed options. 

    Convenience, high-protein claims, and aggressive marketing strategies have propelled the category to new heights, making it the fastest growing snack category, Jennifer Williams of The Wall Street Journal told Kai Ryssdal of Marketplace.

    eating Slim Jim meat stickSlim Jim

    The surge in popularity of meat sticks is part of a broader shift toward protein-forward snacks. Brands like Jack Link’s, Old Trapper, and Chomps have capitalized on this trend, positioning their products as convenient, on-the-go sources of protein.

    “People love their meat sticks. Some love the protein. Some like the convenience of that versus reaching into a bag for, say, jerky. And some just really think [meat sticks are] healthier than, say, a bag of potato chips,” said Williams.

    Is the convenience worth the cost?

    Despite their popularity, meat sticks raise significant health concerns. Many products in this category are heavily processed and high in sodium, saturated fat, and preservatives like nitrates and nitrites, which have been linked to increased cancer risk. According to the World Health Organization, processed meats fall into Group 1 carcinogens—the same category as tobacco and asbestos.

    A 2023 study published in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition found that frequent consumption of processed meats was associated with a 20 percent higher risk of cardiovascular disease. Additionally, the Dietary Guidelines as set by the US Department of Agriculture recommend limiting saturated fat intake to less than ten percent of daily calories, yet many meat sticks contain over five grams of saturated fat per serving.

    man holding Chomps meat stickChomps

    Recent research has also linked processed meat to an increased risk of dementia. “The main takeaway from our study is that higher intake of red meat, particularly processed red meat, was associated with a higher risk of developing dementia and worse cognition,” Yuhan Li, MS, research assistant at Channing Division of Network Medicine in the Department of Medicine at Brigham and Women’s Hospital and the first author of the study, told Medical News Today. “Replacing processed red meat with healthier options of protein sources could help to reduce this risk.”

    According to Frank Hu, MD, PhD, MPH, Fredrick J. Stare Professor of Nutrition and Epidemiology and chair of the Department of Nutrition at Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, current evidence suggests the higher [the] intake of processed meat, “the higher the risk of chronic diseases and mortality.” 

    VegNews.DoctorPatient.CottonbroStudio.PexelsCottonbro Studio | Pexels

    Previous studies have linked the inflammatory nature of ultra-processed foods to chronic inflammation and certain types of cancer, likely a result of the higher intake of sugars, salt, saturated fats, and trans fatty acids. But plant-forward diets, like the US News & World Report’s top-ranking Mediterranean diet, are routinely linked to reduced risks of health issues common in diets high in processed foods, including processed meat.

    “It is important for researchers to continue exploring how what we eat impacts brain health because diet is a modifiable risk factor that offers significant potential for dementia prevention and cognitive health improvement,” Li said.

    The environmental toll of processed meat snacks

    Beyond health implications, the environmental impact of meat stick production is also significant. Beef production, which supplies the majority of these snacks, is one of the leading drivers of deforestation, water consumption, and greenhouse gas emissions. According to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, livestock accounts for 14.5 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions, with beef contributing nearly two-thirds of that total.

    VegNew.Deforestation.MeatIndustry.UnsplashUnsplash

    A report from the Environmental Working Group found that beef production emits over 27 kilograms of carbon dioxide per kilogram of meat produced—far higher than plant-based alternatives. Additionally, meat production consumes vast amounts of water. The Water Footprint Network estimates that it takes 1,800 gallons of water to produce just one pound of beef.

    “Consumers are increasingly aware of the impacts their food choices have on both their health and the environment. However, the gap between awareness and action remains significant,” Lauren Hoffman, MBA, RD, Vice President of Healthy, Sustainable Food Systems at FoodMinds, said in a statement last year. According to the World Health Organization, at least 65 percent of consumers want to make spending choices that support both a healthier and more sustainable life.

    Alternative snacking: where do we go from here?

    As the conversation around meat sticks continues, health-conscious and environmentally-aware consumers are exploring better options. The plant-based snack sector is expanding, with brands introducing high-protein alternatives that offer convenience without the health and environmental drawbacks.

    According to sales data released last year, plant-based snack sales increased by 20 percent year-over-year, driven by innovations in legume-based, nut-based, and fermented protein snacks. Products like roasted chickpeas, lentil crisps, and seaweed-based protein bars provide comparable protein levels to meat sticks while avoiding some of the processed additives.

    Chickpea snacksBiena Snacks

    The shift toward better-for-you snacking is evident in changing consumer behavior. Data published last year found that more than 45 percent of consumers now check ingredient labels and 59 percent are more concerned about what’s in their food, signaling a growing preference for whole-food-based snacks over highly processed options.

    According to Nandini Roy Choudhury, Client Partner at Future Market Insights, consumers today are not just looking for food products that are labeled as healthy, “they want scientifically backed, functional nutrition that supports overall well-being.” 

    This post was originally published on VegNews.com.

  • Patients Lives Matter, a patient advocacy group, has announced the dates for the coroner’s inquest into the death of Balram Patel. The inquest will take place on 2-3 June 2025, at Southwark Coroner’s Court, London. A preliminary hearing is scheduled for 24 March at the same location.

    Balram Patel: ‘forced assisted dying’

    Jay Patel, founder of Patients Lives Matter and father of Balram Patel, alleges that his son’s death was a case of “forced assisted dying” due to medical negligence.

    This announcement comes in the wake of a recent £1.67m fine imposed on an NHS Trust in a criminal prosecution, following a three-year battle by parents whose newborn died due to NHS errors.

    “What happened to my son Balram was not just negligence, it was forced assisted dying,” said Jay Patel:

    The hospital decided it was time for him to go, despite our desperate pleas for proper treatment.

    Balram Patel, who was developmentally delayed, passed away on 9 August 2023 at the age of 30. He had been suffering from six life-threatening conditions, including acute pulmonary edema. Mr. Patel claims that the hospital’s refusal to administer intravenous (IV) diuretics in a timely manner directly led to his son’s death.

    According to the consultant’s witness statement, IV diuretics were more effective at treating the life-threatening acute pulmonary edema that Balram developed. The consultant acknowledged that Balram would have lived longer with IV diuretic treatment for the pulmonary edema.

    “I begged the hospital to start the IV infusion diuretics, telling them ‘My son is dying,’ which they acknowledged,” Mr. Patel recounted. “But the consultant refused, insisting on continuing with oral diuretics.”

    The IV pump infusion was finally started 40 hours after Mr. Patel’s initial plea. Tragically, Balram died just three hours later from acute pulmonary edema.

    Forced assisted dying?

    “This is a clear case of assisted dying forced upon Balram by the hospital,” Mr. Patel asserted. “They decided it was time for him to go, even though he couldn’t make that critical choice on his own due to his developmental delays.”

    The upcoming inquest will examine the circumstances surrounding Balram Patel’s death, including the decision-making process of the medical staff and the timeline of treatments administered. Patients Lives Matter hopes that this inquest will shed light on the systemic issues within the NHS healthcare system that can lead to such tragic outcomes.

    “We are fighting not just for Balram, but for all patients who are vulnerable and unable to advocate for themselves,” Mr. Patel stated:

    No family should have to endure what we’ve been through.

    Patients Lives Matter is calling for increased accountability in the healthcare system, including the right to second opinions and an independent review board for NHS complaints. The organization aims to prevent similar tragedies and ensure that patient rights are protected.

    “The question that must be answered is why was assisted death forced upon my son Balram?” Mr. Patel emphasised:

    We hope this inquest will provide answers and lead to meaningful changes in how hospitals treat their most vulnerable patients.

    Featured image supplied

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Long after the peak of the pandemic, COVID-19 continues to leave its mark, particularly for those suffering from long COVID-19. Characterized by lingering symptoms such as fatigue, brain fog, and cardiovascular complications, long COVID remains a major public health concern. However, new research suggests that dietary interventions—specifically, the Mediterranean diet—could play a key role in alleviating its effects.

    A February 2025 study published in the journal Nutrients analyzed 305 individuals diagnosed with long COVID and found that those who followed a Mediterranean-style diet exhibited lower uric acid levels, reduced body mass index (BMI), fewer metabolic syndrome components, and higher levels of beneficial HDL cholesterol. These improvements are significant, as they correlate with a lower risk of cardiovascular disease, one of the primary concerns for those suffering from lingering post-viral effects.

    VegNews.MediterraneanDiet.GettyGetty

    The Mediterranean diet, long recognized for its heart-healthy benefits, is known for its anti-inflammatory and antioxidant-rich properties. The study’s findings add to growing evidence that nutrition could influence how the body recovers from prolonged viral infections, particularly for individuals who already suffer from metabolic disorders, high blood pressure, or obesity—factors that may increase long COVID risk.

    With heart health and COVID-related metabolic concerns at the forefront, the Mayo Clinic has responded with its new Superfoods Meal Plan, which builds upon the Mediterranean diet while incorporating additional cardio-protective ingredients that support overall wellness.

    Mayo Clinic’s Superfoods Meal Plan

    The Mayo Clinic’s newly launched Superfoods Meal Plan provides a structured, nutrition-based approach to supporting cardiovascular health. The 12-week plan expands on the principles of the Mediterranean diet by incorporating scientifically-backed superfoods that help combat inflammation, stabilize blood sugar, and reduce the risk of chronic disease.

    Francisco Lopez-Jimenez, MD, MSc, Chair of Preventive Cardiology at Mayo Clinic, underscores why dietary interventions like this are crucial: “Heart disease remains the leading cause of death in the US, and obesity is often the ‘on-ramp’ to heart disease. A heart-healthy diet is one of the most effective ways to address these challenges,” he said in a statement.

    woman-and-kid-cookingGetty

    The Superfoods Meal Plan, which follows the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet, integrates a diverse range of heart-healthy ingredients, many of which overlap with the Mediterranean diet but take it a step further with specific additions clinically proven to improve cardiovascular markers. The plan emphasizes cardio-protective superfoods including cocoa, chili, oats, leafy greens, and legumes—all known for their heart-boosting properties. The meal plan features more than 90 recipes designed to reduce inflammation and provide an enjoyable approach to healthy eating.

    Kyla Lara-Breitinger, MD, a Mayo Clinic cardiologist, explains how this plan goes beyond the standard Mediterranean diet by incorporating additional scientifically validated heart-protective foods: “While the Mediterranean Diet is popular, our Superfoods Meal Plan takes it a step further by including ingredients clinically proven to enhance heart health. This plan offers a practical and enjoyable way for Americans to prioritize their heart health and manage their weight.”

    Why this matters for long COVID patients

    The connections between metabolic health and long COVID are becoming increasingly clear. Studies indicate that individuals with preexisting conditions such as diabetes, hypertension, or obesity are more likely to experience severe COVID-19 and long-term complications. Conversely, the impact of long COVID itself may exacerbate metabolic issues, further increasing the risk of cardiovascular disease.

    Eating saladGetty

    The Nutrients study on the Mediterranean diet and long COVID patients highlighted three key findings:

    1. Individuals with long COVID who adhered more closely to the Mediterranean diet exhibited fewer risk factors for metabolic syndrome.
    2. Higher Mediterranean diet scores were linked to lower BMI, reduced uric acid levels, and better cholesterol profiles—all markers associated with improved cardiovascular health.
    3. These benefits suggest that following a Mediterranean-style eating pattern could help mitigate some of the long-term impacts of COVID-19 on the body.

    Mayo Clinic’s Superfoods Meal Plan aligns directly with these findings by offering a structured dietary approach that mirrors the Mediterranean diet while incorporating additional superfoods for cardiovascular protection. For individuals struggling with post-COVID symptoms, particularly those with metabolic concerns, targeted nutritional strategies like this could offer a valuable tool in long-term recovery.

    The implications of these findings extend beyond long COVID patients. Heart disease remains the leading cause of death in the US, and obesity rates continue to rise, fueling the need for sustainable, evidence-backed nutritional solutions. Both the Mediterranean diet and the Mayo Clinic Superfoods Meal Plan provide a research-driven pathway toward better metabolic and cardiovascular health.

    This post was originally published on VegNews.com.

  • plant based survey
    5 Mins Read

    Interest in eating more plant-based food is growing across the Global South, with high prices the biggest obstacle to increased consumption, according to a new study.

    More than two-thirds (68%) of consumers across the world want to eat more plant-based food, with folks from countries in the Global South the most keen, according to a 31-nation study.

    The sentiment is strongest in Vietnam, where over 90% of people express a growing appetite for plants, and which is followed by 11 other nations in the Global South. Conversely, the seven countries least interested in plant-based foods are all in the Global North, with Australia (40%) at the bottom.

    plant based food consumption
    Courtesy: EAT/GlobeScan

    This is despite price being the top barrier to plant-based consumption in all regions, with 42% of global consumers finding these foods too expensive. It likely affected the three-point drop in frequent plant-based intake between 2023 and 2024, although these levels have remained largely stable over the last few years.

    The Grains of Truth 2024 report was conducted by GlobeScan and the non-profit EAT, collecting representative online samples of over 30,000 consumers across the 31 countries.

    Inflation cuts deep

    plant based price parity
    Courtesy: GFI

    In the US, animal meat is 77% cheaper than plant-based alternatives on average; this gap expands to 104% when it comes to plant-based milk and 317% for eggs.

    Experts have long argued that price parity is crucial for these products to compete in the market, but recent analysis shows that for true impact, they must undercut the cost of animal proteins.

    According to a study published in December, if plant-based alternatives are more expensive than meat, their preference falls below 20%, and if they’re priced equally, this increases to 21%.

    “Although barriers to plant-based food consumption differ around the world, price is the top barrier everywhere,” the authors of the Grains of Trust report write. This is an especially large concern in Europe and North America, where “even consumers who care about environmental sustainability often cannot afford plant-based foods regularly”.

    Meanwhile, economic instability in regions like Latin America and Africa makes it harder for people to prioritise dietary changes amidst broader food security concerns.

    Meat alternatives fail to impress

    plant based barriers
    Courtesy: EAT/GlobeScan

    Aside from the cost, taste is the second largest hurdle to plant-based consumption, most important in North America (chosen by 45% of respondents). In Latin America, convenience trumps flavour, while health concerns aren’t a major concern – highlighting that most consumers recognise the nutritional benefits of plant-based food.

    Likewise, health is still the top reason driving people to reduce meat, but this has weakened from 47% in 2020 to 41% in 2024. Financial considerations, meanwhile, have become more pertinent (from 12% to 17%).

    And while a third (34%) of consumers would prefer plant-based alternatives over conventional meat – if they match the taste, nutrition and price – this has dropped from 42% in 2020. Latin Americans are the most open to meat analogues, but people in Australia, North America, and Europe show a strong preference for animal protein.

    Broadly, too, frequent consumption of vegan or vegetarian food has decreased by at least five percentage points in the three largest markets: North America (now at 13%), Europe (18%), and Asia-Pacific (14%). Africa and the Middle East (38%) lead the way here.

    plant based meat consumption
    Courtesy: EAT/GlobeScan

    Gen Z and millennials lead the protein transition

    Nearly three-quarters (72%) of millennials – many of whom have young families now – want to eat more plant-based food, as do 69% of both Gen Z and Gen X consumers.

    While the interest from young groups wouldn’t usually be surprising, it comes at a time when they’re returning to animal-based foods. Among 18- to 24-year-olds in the UK, for example, 19% are increasing their meat intake, while only 16% are cutting back, according to a separate poll.

    gen z plant based food
    Courtesy: EAT/GlobeScan

    In this report too, frequent consumption of meat-free food dipped by more than five points among millennials in 2024. “Despite these generational differences, the data reveal a clear appetite for change – if the obstacles can be addressed,” the report notes.

    “The plant-based food sector has made strides in developing new products, but more needs to be done to tackle the persistent concerns about flavour and texture, a prominent barrier to adopting more plant-based diets, especially for older people.”

    Polluting food should be taxed, but meat reduction not a universal choice

    vegan consumer trends
    Courtesy: EAT/GlobeScan

    Meanwhile, 86% of consumers across the world agree that carbon-heavy food should be taxed higher than low-impact options – while this would seem like an endorsement of meat taxes, only 69% of them believe it would be better if the world ate less meat. In fact, 11% completely disagreed with the idea that reducing meat consumption would be beneficial.

    “Clear, transparent labelling and third-party certifications could help build confidence in the sustainability claims of plant-based products,” the authors state. “Investment in research and development coupled with a focus on cultural food preferences will be key to creating products that meet consumers’ tastes and expectations.”

    They add: “By creating a clear link between plant-based eating and positive environmental and human health outcomes, brands and policymakers can encourage more consumers to make the switch.”

    The post Most Consumers Hungry for Plant-Based Food, But High Prices Keep Them Away appeared first on Green Queen.

    This post was originally published on Green Queen.

  • Last year, 74,000 people did not receive NHS cancer treatment within the target of 62 days after an urgent referral, according to new analysis. This is particularly concerning when speed is of the essence when it comes to cancer treatment. With increased underfunding and privatisation, there has been a huge rise in people not receiving cancer treatment on time over the last decade. In 2014, 83.9% of cancer patients received treatment within this time frame. But in 2024, that figure stood at just 62.2%.

    NHS cancer treatment: “thousands of lives are at stake”

    Professor Pat Price, a leading oncologist and the chair of Radiotherapy UK, assured the Guardian of the seriousness of delayed treatment:

    Thousands of lives are at stake because of the normalisation of cancer patients not getting treatment on time… Every four weeks of delay in treatment can increase the risk of death by 10% for some cancers

    A coalition of more than 50 charities, One Cancer Voice, is urging the Labour government to act. Michelle Mitchell, chief executive of Cancer Research UK, said:

    Seventy-four thousand cancer patients waited longer than they should to start their treatment last year. Behind every one of these numbers is a family member, friend or loved one facing unbelievable stress and anxiety, where every day can feel like forever

    According to the British Medical Association (BMA), there has been a real terms cumulative underspend of £425bn in public health spending since 2009/10.

    The Conservatives (initially propped up by the Lib Dems) and now Labour have starved the NHS of funding to manufacture the argument for private provision of NHS services, with the profits further depleting healthcare budgets. Privatised NHS services now treat around 10% of patients, compared to 3% in 2011.

    On 6 January, Keir Starmer announced “a new agreement that will expand the relationship between the NHS and the private healthcare sector”. Privatised services will provide an additional million appointments, scans, and operations a year – at a 20% increase.

    The lack of funding comes at a time when the population is aging and healthcare needs are increasing. Cancer is one example of this, where there will be 20% more cases over this parliament than the last one.

    “Incredibly distressing”

    The analysis also shows that there has been a sharp rise in the people waiting more than 104 days for cancer treatment. That’s almost twice as long as the target of 62 days after an urgent referral. More than one in ten people (11.3%) waited longer than 104 days last year. That’s an increase from 6,000 people in 2016 to 22,000 people in 2024.

    The Labour Party government launched a request for evidence for its National Cancer Plan in February. But given the NHS was treating substantially more people on time a decade ago, the lack of funding is clearly a key issue. In January, Starmer said “we need an NHS hungry for innovation”. While healthcare improvements are welcome, the NHS has gone backwards on previous achievements because of austerity.

    Mitchell said:

    The National Cancer Plan can be a turning point for cancer patients across England, but the UK Government must invest in staff and equipment, alongside reforms, if it’s to hit all cancer waiting time targets by the end of this parliament. It’s the least that cancer patients deserve

    Laura Lee, chief executive of fellow cancer support charity Maggie’s, said:

    Waiting to begin cancer treatment can be an incredibly distressing and anxious time. Every single one of those 74,000 people have had their lives changed forever by their diagnosis, and coping with that news can be so much harder when you also have to wait too long to start treatment.

    Public services should be improving, not declining. But it seems the ideology of neoliberal politicians is preventing this.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By James Wright

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • oobli
    5 Mins Read

    US food tech firm Oobli has raised $18M and partnered with global ingredients supplier Ingredion to co-develop better-for-you sugar alternatives with sweet proteins.

    As Americans turn their backs on sugar in the Ozempic era, one startup is leading the alt-sweetener charge with sweet proteins that don’t impact the glycemic index.

    Based in California, Oobli has secured $18M in Series B1 funding from investors including Ingredion Ventures, Lever VC, and Sucden Ventures, which have joined existing backers like Khosla Ventures, Piva Capital, and B37 Ventures.

    The financing round takes Oobli’s total raised to almost $50M and is complemented by a new partnership with global ingredients giant Ingredion. This will involve the development of new sweetener solutions – using ingredients like stevia and sweet proteins – for food and beverage companies.

    Large food companies are increasingly turning to synbio startups for supply chain solutions like Oobli’s sugar alternative.

    “We’ve long been at the forefront of innovation in sugar reduction solutions, and our work with sweet proteins is an exciting new chapter in that journey,” said Nate Yates, VP and general manager of sugar reduction and fibre fortification at Ingredion, and CEO of its PureCircle stevia division.

    How Oobli makes its sweet proteins

    oobli fruit
    Courtesy: Oobli

    Oobli takes its name from the Oubli fruit, which is native to West Africa and contains brazzein, a natural sweet protein that’s up to 2,000 times sweeter than sucrose.

    But harvesting enough of the fruit for large-scale production of brazzein isn’t possible. Instead, Oobli makes use of precision fermentation, which combines traditional fermentation with the latest biotech advances to efficiently produce a compound of interest – a sweet protein, in this case.

    The startup isolates the genes responsible for sweet proteins and inserts them into yeast, which is added to a fermentation tank filled with a nutrient-rich broth. The microbes feed on the sugars in the broth to produce the proteins, which are filtered out and purified.

    In March 2024, Oobli received a ‘no questions’ letter from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), allowing it to sell brazzein to manufacturers and as part of CPG products. While the brand used to sell juices and iced teas too, it currently sells chocolate bars made with its sweet protein (combined with coconut sugar).

    Brazzein isn’t the only sweet protein it has commercialised, though. In December, it obtained the FDA’s greenlight for monellin, which is found in the serendipity berry and is even sweeter than brazzein.

    But how do they work? According to the company, the sweet proteins bind to and activate the same taste receptors on your tongue that sugar does, enabling us to “taste sugar without ingesting sugar”, and digest and metabolise sweet proteins just like any other protein.

    The portion sizes of sweet proteins are too small to have an impact on your daily macros; the real impact is on glucose. These ingredients can replace over 70% of sugar in products like sodas, baked goods, and yoghurts, and are said to have no impact on blood sugar, insulin or the gut microbiome, according to the company. They can also complement other natural sweeteners to help companies achieve ideal sweetness levels, meet nutrition goals, and manage costs.

    Sweet proteins are ‘long overdue’

    oobli chocolate
    Courtesy: Oobli

    Oobli is already working with a number of food companies globally, including Group Bimbo, with several product launches expected in 2025. The latest capital injection will allow the startup to expand the reach of its proteins both as a standalone solution and in combination with other sweeteners like stevia (developed with Ingredion).

    “Sweet proteins are a long-overdue addition to the toolkit of better-for-you sweeteners,” said Ooblu CEO Ali Wing. “Working with Ingredion’s best-in-class teams to pair natural sweeteners with our novel sweet proteins will deliver game-changing solutions in this important, growing and timely category.”

    Yates added: “Whether we’re enhancing existing sweetener systems with sweet proteins or using our established sweeteners to unlock new possibilities, we see incredible synergies across these platforms.”

    The two companies have tested several co-developed products to expand the opportunities for sweet proteins and stevia, and positive consumer feedback led to their collaboration. They are showcasing some of these sweet treats at San Franciso’s Future Food Tech event in March.

    Ingredion and its VC arm are also working with Better Juice, an Israeli sugar reduction startup that has developed a platform to convert fruit sugars into dietary fibre and non-digestible sugars, allowing manufacturers to cut sugar content by up to 80%. The solution has obtained self-determined GRAS status in the US.

    Ozempic boom lays open potential for sugar reduction startups

    oobli ingredion
    Courtesy: Oobli

    There is a lot of potential to change how we use sugar for the benefit of human health, the planet, and the global economy.

    In the US, people eat 17 teaspoons of sugar every day, much higher than the recommended amount. This has risen over the last century, with 2021 estimates suggesting sugar and artificial sweetener intake was up by 53% from 1909. Meanwhile, spending on sugar grew by 4% from pre-pandemic levels through to December 2022.

    The calorie-rich ingredient has been a major contributor to America’s obesity epidemic, which plagues 42% of its citizens. Meanwhile, over 11% of US consumers have type 2 diabetes.

    It’s why 76% of Americans are trying to limit or avoid their sugar intake, and among them, 60% are targeting added sugar in packaged foods to do so. Losing weight and managing diabetes are among the top reasons behind this anti-sugar drive, which are pertinent in the era of GLP-1 drugs like Ozempic and Moujaro.

    ozempic weight loss
    Courtesy: The New Consumer/Coefficient Capital

    Polling shows that sugar is the dietary element most GLP-1 users are turning away from (with 45% consuming it less since starting the medication), and that has directly impacted the sales of several companies. Hershey’s, one of the world’s largest chocolate companies, acknowledged that these weight-loss drugs have had a “mild year-on-year impact” on its business.

    With nearly three-quarters of Americans aged 20 and above overweight and obese, and almost four in 10 children and teenagers prediabetic, the appeal of the $7B sugar alternatives industry is only going to widen, sweetening the market for Oobli and competitor brands, such as Amai Proteins, Naturannova, MycoTechnology, and Sweegen.

    The post GLP-1 Boom Fuels Sugar Shift As Oobli Lands $18M For Sweet Proteins appeared first on Green Queen.

    This post was originally published on Green Queen.

  • oobli
    5 Mins Read

    US food tech firm Oobli has raised $18M and partnered with global ingredients supplier Ingredion to co-develop better-for-you sugar alternatives with sweet proteins.

    As Americans turn their backs on sugar in the Ozempic era, one startup is leading the alt-sweetener charge with sweet proteins that don’t impact the glycemic index.

    Based in California, Oobli has secured $18M in Series B1 funding from investors including Ingredion Ventures, Lever VC, and Sucden Ventures, which have joined existing backers like Khosla Ventures, Piva Capital, and B37 Ventures.

    The financing round takes Oobli’s total raised to almost $50M and is complemented by a new partnership with global ingredients giant Ingredion. This will involve the development of new sweetener solutions – using ingredients like stevia and sweet proteins – for food and beverage companies.

    Large food companies are increasingly turning to synbio startups for supply chain solutions like Oobli’s sugar alternative.

    “We’ve long been at the forefront of innovation in sugar reduction solutions, and our work with sweet proteins is an exciting new chapter in that journey,” said Nate Yates, VP and general manager of sugar reduction and fibre fortification at Ingredion, and CEO of its PureCircle stevia division.

    How Oobli makes its sweet proteins

    oobli fruit
    Courtesy: Oobli

    Oobli takes its name from the Oubli fruit, which is native to West Africa and contains brazzein, a natural sweet protein that’s up to 2,000 times sweeter than sucrose.

    But harvesting enough of the fruit for large-scale production of brazzein isn’t possible. Instead, Oobli makes use of precision fermentation, which combines traditional fermentation with the latest biotech advances to efficiently produce a compound of interest – a sweet protein, in this case.

    The startup isolates the genes responsible for sweet proteins and inserts them into yeast, which is added to a fermentation tank filled with a nutrient-rich broth. The microbes feed on the sugars in the broth to produce the proteins, which are filtered out and purified.

    In March 2024, Oobli received a ‘no questions’ letter from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), allowing it to sell brazzein to manufacturers and as part of CPG products. While the brand used to sell juices and iced teas too, it currently sells chocolate bars made with its sweet protein (combined with coconut sugar).

    Brazzein isn’t the only sweet protein it has commercialised, though. In December, it obtained the FDA’s greenlight for monellin, which is found in the serendipity berry and is even sweeter than brazzein.

    But how do they work? According to the company, the sweet proteins bind to and activate the same taste receptors on your tongue that sugar does, enabling us to “taste sugar without ingesting sugar”, and digest and metabolise sweet proteins just like any other protein.

    The portion sizes of sweet proteins are too small to have an impact on your daily macros; the real impact is on glucose. These ingredients can replace over 70% of sugar in products like sodas, baked goods, and yoghurts, and are said to have no impact on blood sugar, insulin or the gut microbiome, according to the company. They can also complement other natural sweeteners to help companies achieve ideal sweetness levels, meet nutrition goals, and manage costs.

    Sweet proteins are ‘long overdue’

    oobli chocolate
    Courtesy: Oobli

    Oobli is already working with a number of food companies globally, including Group Bimbo, with several product launches expected in 2025. The latest capital injection will allow the startup to expand the reach of its proteins both as a standalone solution and in combination with other sweeteners like stevia (developed with Ingredion).

    “Sweet proteins are a long-overdue addition to the toolkit of better-for-you sweeteners,” said Ooblu CEO Ali Wing. “Working with Ingredion’s best-in-class teams to pair natural sweeteners with our novel sweet proteins will deliver game-changing solutions in this important, growing and timely category.”

    Yates added: “Whether we’re enhancing existing sweetener systems with sweet proteins or using our established sweeteners to unlock new possibilities, we see incredible synergies across these platforms.”

    The two companies have tested several co-developed products to expand the opportunities for sweet proteins and stevia, and positive consumer feedback led to their collaboration. They are showcasing some of these sweet treats at San Franciso’s Future Food Tech event in March.

    Ingredion and its VC arm are also working with Better Juice, an Israeli sugar reduction startup that has developed a platform to convert fruit sugars into dietary fibre and non-digestible sugars, allowing manufacturers to cut sugar content by up to 80%. The solution has obtained self-determined GRAS status in the US.

    Ozempic boom lays open potential for sugar reduction startups

    oobli ingredion
    Courtesy: Oobli

    There is a lot of potential to change how we use sugar for the benefit of human health, the planet, and the global economy.

    In the US, people eat 17 teaspoons of sugar every day, much higher than the recommended amount. This has risen over the last century, with 2021 estimates suggesting sugar and artificial sweetener intake was up by 53% from 1909. Meanwhile, spending on sugar grew by 4% from pre-pandemic levels through to December 2022.

    The calorie-rich ingredient has been a major contributor to America’s obesity epidemic, which plagues 42% of its citizens. Meanwhile, over 11% of US consumers have type 2 diabetes.

    It’s why 76% of Americans are trying to limit or avoid their sugar intake, and among them, 60% are targeting added sugar in packaged foods to do so. Losing weight and managing diabetes are among the top reasons behind this anti-sugar drive, which are pertinent in the era of GLP-1 drugs like Ozempic and Moujaro.

    ozempic weight loss
    Courtesy: The New Consumer/Coefficient Capital

    Polling shows that sugar is the dietary element most GLP-1 users are turning away from (with 45% consuming it less since starting the medication), and that has directly impacted the sales of several companies. Hershey’s, one of the world’s largest chocolate companies, acknowledged that these weight-loss drugs have had a “mild year-on-year impact” on its business.

    With nearly three-quarters of Americans aged 20 and above overweight and obese, and almost four in 10 children and teenagers prediabetic, the appeal of the $7B sugar alternatives industry is only going to widen, sweetening the market for Oobli and competitor brands, such as Amai Proteins, Naturannova, MycoTechnology, and Sweegen.

    The post GLP-1 Boom Fuels Sugar Shift As Oobli Lands $18M For Sweet Proteins appeared first on Green Queen.

    This post was originally published on Green Queen.