Online dissent is a serious crime in China. So why did a Weibo censor help me publish posts critical of the Communist party?
It is 2013. For four full months, Liu Lipeng engages in dereliction of duty. Every hour the system sends him a huge volume of posts, but he hardly ever deletes a single word. After three or four thousand posts accumulate, he lightly clicks his mouse and the whole lot is released. In the jargon of censors, this is a “total pass in one click” (一键全通), after which all the posts appear on China’s version of X, Sina Weibo, to be read by millions, then reposted and discussed.
He logs on to the Weibo management page, where many words are flagged. Orange designates sensitive words that require careful examination – words like freedom and democracy, and the three characters that make up Xi Jinping’s name. While such words regularly appear in newspapers or on TV, that does not mean ordinary citizens can use them at will.
A Liberal Democrat MP refused entry to Hong Kong to see her young grandson has said her experience should be “a wake-up call for any parliamentarian”, given that it seems to show China holds a secret list of banned politicians.
Wera Hobhouse, who was turned back by officials on Thursday, said she was given no explanation as to why this happened, and could only assume that it was because she had spoken out about rights abuses by China.
From meat-free dim sum to non-dairy pearl tea: a 2025 list of Hong Kong’s best vegan-friendly eats.
If you’re in Hong Kong and you happen to love food, you’re in for a good time.
The city’s historical cuisine is known for its Cantonese origins, with international culinary accents sprinkled all over.
It may be among the most prolific meat-eating regions globally, but as Asia’s World City, it’s also home to some of the best meat-free food on the planet. Hong Kong is a fast-moving, ever-evolving plant-based paradise, with meat-free eaters getting a taste of the island as much in fancy diners as they do at street food stalls.
Post-Covid, the vegan scene underwent some major changes, and many of the lists online are outdated. Since the first question people ask us when we say we work at Green Queen is “Where are the best vegan eats?”, we figured we owed it to our home city to create an updated list of the island’s best vegan-friendly restaurants.
About this list: This is by no means an exhaustive list; rather, it’s a curated, up-to-date snapshot of some of the city’s always-reliable, plant-based restaurants – all tried and tested by our team. The restaurants listed here are either vegetarian or vegan. We are not including some great non-veg spots to get plant-based food. Find some of those here. Hong Kong also has a great selection of Cantonese and Buddhist Chinese vegetarian cuisine (dozens, in fact), but that list would have been too long, and Happy Cow does a perfectly good job.
Vegan dim sum
Veggie Kingdom
Courtesy: Anay Mridul/Green Queen
For vegan dim sum (or yum cha as the locals call it), look no further than Veggie Kingdom. It’s a fully plant-based parlour that keeps to the tick-what-you-want tradition but modernises classic dim sum dishes to be animal-free. Try the shredded turnip puffs, the vegan shrimp dumplings, and the cucumber salad – but book in advance, because the restaurant is almost always full!
Veggie Kingdom has two locations: VIP Commercial Centre, 120 Canton Road, Tsim Sha Tsui, Kowloon, and 4th Floor, Kyoto Plaza, 491-499 Lockhart Rd, Causeway Bay.
LockCha
Courtesy: LockCha
Another great restaurant for local food is LockCha, a vegetarian tea house and dim sum restaurant with tons of options for vegans. It’s slightly pricier, but it’s worth it. Go for the bean curd rolls, stay for the siu mai and pan-fried rice roll with XO sauce (a Hong Kong original).
LockCha has two locations: G06-07, Block 01, Tai Kwun, 10 Hollywood Road, Central, and The KS Lo Gallery, Hong Kong Park, 10 Cotton Tree Drive, Admiralty.
Date night
Japanese Isoya
Courtesy: Anay Mridul/Green Queen
Just a short walk away from Wan Chai station, Isoya is a Japanese restaurant that puts the ‘fine’ in ‘fine dining’. A perfect date spot, the meat-free establishment has a tasting menu that can be made vegan upon request. While some dishes change seasonally, we loved the tofu tasting plate, the veggie sushi, and the life-altering tomato sashimi. Reservations recommended.
Isoya is located at 83 Wan Chai Rd, Wan Chai.
Cantonese-French at Emerald
Courtesy: Emerald
How about some modernist Cantonese-French cuisine? Emerald has you covered for date night, with some truly inventive plant-based dishes to keep you interested. Think iced king oyster mushrooms with yuzu-wasabi soy sauce, seafood fried rice with laksa and XO sauce, OmniPork dumplings in soup, and vegan foie gras balls with truffle sauce. And if that wasn’t enough, diners can also enjoy vegan tiramisu and golden crispy oat milk.
Emerald is located at 6/F, M88, Wellington Place, 2-8 Wellington Street, Central.
Pan-Asian at Root Vegan
Courtesy: Root Vegan
For a more casual vibe, Root Vegan is the place to be. The establishment offers a mix of Cantonese and pan-Asian dishes, with most dishes changing seasonally. We’re big fans of the khao soi with soy drumsticks, which is permanently on the menu, as well as their dairy-free, eggless cakes.
Root Vegan is located at Shop 102-103, 1/F Sunwise Building, 112-114 Wellington Street, Central.
Desserts and brunch
The Cakery and Maya Bakery
Courtesy: The Cakery
Owned by entrepreneur Shirley Kwok, The Cakery and its sister chain Maya Bakery are two of our favourite places to find vegan sweet treats. The former has a host of options for diet-inclusive cakes and desserts (from a Dubai chocolate cotton cake to a Biscoff cheesecake), while the latter specialises in baked goods, savoury brunch options, and coffee (we’re big fans of the vegan egg tarts, pineapple buns, and the fish-free tuna mayo croissant).
The Cakery has five locations across Hong Kong, including in Admiralty, Wong Chuk Hang, and Tsim Sha Tsui. Its sites in IFC Mall on Finance Street and PCCW Tower in Taikoo Place also feature Maya Bakery.
LN Fortunate Coffee
Courtesy: Anay Mridul/Green Queen
For a calming vegan brunch with the sweetest staff, you’d be hard-pressed to find something better than LN Fortunate Coffee. Yes, it does good coffee – but the real stars are the dishes. This 100% plant-based establishment is the only place we’ve found that offers a classic Hong Kong French Toast, sans animals – and it doesn’t disappoint. We also loved the bubble waffles and the hot dogs (with a jumbo tofu sausage).
LN Fortunate Coffee has two locations in Hong Kong: 30-34 Kwai Wing Road Shop 107, 1/F, Edge, Kwai Chung, and 118 Second Street, Sai Ying Pun.
18 Grams
Courtesy: 18 Grams
One of Hong Kong’s original specialty coffee roasters, 18 Grams serves only vegetarian fare, and has a host of options for plant-based visitors (plus free swaps for oat or almond milk). Try the oat milk piccolo, the tofu-avocado bagel, and the all-day breakfast – the menu does change seasonally, so you can always expect great vegan breakfast grub here.
18 Grams has three locations: City’super, B1/F, Times Square, 1 Matheson Street, Causeway Bay, Shop C, G/F, Hoi To Court, 15 Cannon Street, Causeway Bay, and City’super, Shop 204-214, 2/F, New Town Plaza, 18 Sha Tin Centre St, Sha Tin.
Vegan Bubble Pearl Tea
Mother Pearl
Courtesy: Mother Pearl
Yet another entirely vegan spot, Mother Pearl is truly the mother of all pearl teas, with the power to turn bubble tea haters into members with subscription cards. The Instagram-ready aesthetic is one thing, but the flavours and textures really take you on a journey – all with homemade plant milks. With every season, the chain brings out new must-try innovations, but menu stalwarts like Crush on Gold, Soul Full of Sunshine, and Glimpse of Sunburst will blow your mind.
Mother Pearl has three locations: 25 Lyndhurst Terrace, Central, Shop 3, On Hing Mansion, 2-4 Tai Wong Street East, Wan Chai, and Shop No M31, MOKO, 193 Prince Edward Rd W, Mong Kok, Kowloon.
Nuttea
Courtesy: Nuttea
While we’re on drinks, be sure to give Nuttea a try. There’s no boba here, but the star of the show is the five-nut cream. The beige, airy cream can top any of the extensive teas and chocolate drinks on the menu, lending a creamy, Nutella-like flavour (but somehow with no chocolate). It’s addictive, and you can also buy a whole cup of just nut cream (wink wink).
Nuttee has seven locations in Hong Kong, including in Kwai Fong, Tai Po, Shek Mun, Tsuen Wan, Tuen Mun, Tsim Sha Tsui, and Admiralty.
All-day eateries: vegan pasta, burgers and wraps
Treehouse – multiple locations
Courtesy: Treehouse
A fantastic vegetarian chain with build-your-own bowls and wraps, burgers, and desserts that make it the perfect eatery for lunch on a busy workday, or a quick dinner before your nightlife plans. The menu is heavily focused on whole-food plant-based eating, with our favourites including the Willow bowl, the Reef burger, and the double chocolate chip-macadamia cookie.
Treehouse has five locations, including in Central, Taikoo Place, Causeway Bay, Quarry Bay, and Tsim Sha Tsui.
Years Group – multiple locations
Courtesy: Anay Mridul/Green Queen
Rather than being a chain or singular eatery, Years is a restaurant group with several vegetarian establishments scattered across the city, each with its own theme and cuisine, spanning a mix of local and international. Try the double cilantro Impossible cheeseburger at its original namesake site, the chipotle-avocado sushi volcano at Wanaka, the Japanese yuzu tofu steak bento at Here, and the Sichuan mala cilantro spaghetti at Here.
Years has six restaurants across the city: Years (Sham Shui Po), The Park (Sham Shui Po), Friends (Tsuen Wan), Be (Hung Hom), Here (Taikoo Shing), and Wanaka (Wan Chai).
Veggie4love
Courtesy: Veggie4love
Bringing more international vibes is Veggie4love, which is designed as a San Francisco eatery from the 1950s. This is the place to get your burger and milkshake fix (we recommend the I Am Fabulous beetroot-cashew-lentil burger and the secret shake), but it’s also great if you’re craving dishes like a vegan bibimbap, a gado-gado salad, or plant-based chicken rice.
Veggie4love is located at 10/F, 11 Stanley Street, Central.
Thai Vegetarian Food
This unassuming eatery in Kowloon is all about no-frills dining. It has an extensive menu of Thai classics, all of which is completely vegetarian and of course, highly adaptable for vegans. Try the fried monkey head mushrooms, the pomelo salad, the tom yum, and the longan juice.
Thai Vegetarian Food is located at Cheong Wong Building, 28A South Wall Rd, Kowloon.
Christine Wong, author of plant-based cookbook The Vibrant Hong Kong Table, talks about our meat-eating culture, vegan alternatives, and marrying tradition with future-forward cooking.
With roots in one of the world’s most meat-eating cities and a home in one of the US’s most-eating cities, being a plant-based chef must be hard work.
Or so you’d think, but for Christine Wong, it comes easy. The chef’s new plant-based cookbook, The Vibrant Hong Kong Table, is an homage to the city she grew up in, written from her home in New York City.
Over 88 recipes – ranging from pineapple buns and curry puffs to milk tea and steamed eggs – Wong showcases how local classics from Hong Kong can be futureproofed with animal-free ingredients. The book, in her words, is a “love letter to the city’s culinary heritage”, and an “opportunity to create longevity for these nostalgic dishes”.
We spoke to Wong about the ideas behind her recipes, what vegan food means to a meat-loving culture, why meat alternatives took a backseat in her cookbook, and the things her pantry will never run out of.
This interview has been edited for clarity and concision.
Green Queen: Having lived in New York for the last two decades, what sparked the idea for the book, and how long did it take you to write it?
Courtesy: Chronicle Books
Christine Wong: Ever since I left Hong Kong, whenever I was homesick, I would head over to Pearl River Mart (where I now work part-time as their creative manager), an iconic Asian emporium in Manhattan that has been around for over 50 years.
I would eat dim sum or some of my favourite dishes, like bitter melon and rice, and go to the Asian markets to load up on Chinese groceries, observing the Chinatown aunties scrutinising produce before making their selections – from these daily life moments to festive Lunar New Year celebrations, Chinatown has become my home away from Hong Kong.
During the pandemic, not only was the Asian American community suffering from xenophobia and Asian hate, I watched from afar as Hong Kong was also changing… with unrest and strict lockdown, and iconic restaurants and landmarks disappearing. There was a point when I thought I might never be able to return home.
My book, The Vibrant Hong Kong Table, was inspired by my desire to encapsulate and honour the history and culture of the city that has been home to my family for four generations, and to celebrate all of our iconic foods. The dishes are nostalgic, yet future-forward with a sustainable plant-based twist.
Having embraced a plant-predominant diet since 2014, it’s hard to find vegan versions of these dishes, so it’s also for selfish reasons to have written this book. It took me two years to thoroughly research and create all the recipes.
GQ: What was the inspiration behind the recipes in your book?
CW: Hong Kong is known for so many incredible dishes, but I went back in time to focus mainly on the culmination of the city’s unique West-Meets-East cuisine, or Soy Sauce Western, that sprung out of bing sutts and cha chaan tengs, which met the demand for affordable Western-style dishes using inexpensive shelf-stable ingredients and Chinese techniques.
The recipes in The Vibrant Hong Kong Table use plant-based ingredients with traditional techniques, and are structured on a timeline of eating throughout the day in Hong Kong, from a dim sum or congee breakfast to siu yeh (late-night snacks).
GQ: In the book, you grapple with the idea of using meat alternatives – can you give us an insight into your thinking, and why you chose to spotlight vegetables for the most part?
Courtesy: Chronicle Books
CW: I prefer to use whole ingredients and vegetables as meat replacements, as mock meats tend to be overly processed. There’s so much that the plant world has to offer like cabbage, cauliflower, sweet potatoes, and young jackfruit. I made sure to include these, rather than only subbing meat with tofu and mushrooms.
GQ: Many local restaurants in Hong Kong tend to use traditional soy- or wheat-based meat analogues (which, to many, taste better than their western counterparts). What’s your view on them, and do you think there’s a place for these centuries-old alternatives in helping people cut back on meat?
CW: The key to cutting back on meat is to keep an open mind and not to scrutinise and compare plant-based dishes with the original. It will never quite be the same, though most modern meat replacements try to – some western plant-based meat brands even bleed!
Traditional soy- and wheat gluten-based alternatives are tasty, and less processed – however, even as a kid, seeing the Buddhist vegetarian foods my Maa Maa (paternal grandmother) would eat, I never understood why all the dishes were brown, and not colorufully vibrant. The focus should be on integrating more vegetables into your diet rather than only replacing the meat.
GQ: Do you think Hong Kongers – who love their meat – would be receptive to a vegan cookbook and its non-traditional recipes?
Courtesy: Chronicle Books
CW: Whenever I tell people about my book and mention that The Vibrant Hong Kong Table is plant-based, I can see/hear “approval” and know that I’ve captured interest in the book.
I think Hong Kongers are more open to vegan cookbooks these days, especially this one, since many of the recipes are iconic Hong Kongese dishes. People glancing through my book often don’t realise that the dishes are vegan.
GQ; What do you think people get most wrong about vegan cooking?
CW: Vegan food does not always equate to rabbit food and isn’t limited to salads and smoothies. It can be culturally nostalgic and satisfyingly flavourful, with the added benefit of being nutritiously good for you – and good for the planet.
When prepared with the same attention and care as other dishes, one would not even miss the meat. Protein can be found in plant foods with the benefit of a plethora of nutrients and fibre, which lends to being satiated.
GQ: What are some of your favourite recipes from the book?
CW: My Steamed ‘Egg’, Black-Pink Pepper Cabbage Steak, Jackfruit ‘Brisket’ Noodles and Grandma’s Hong Kong Curry bring me comfort, satisfying some of my most poignant food memories.
GQ: What was the most difficult dish to veganise in the book, and why?
Courtesy: Chronicle Books
CW: Fishballs! I really wanted to capture that distinct bouncy texture, and played around with countless variations of flours and combinations. It was the first and last recipe I tested, with multiple iterations in between.
GQ: What are three things that you recommend people always have in their pantry, and why?
CW: Rice is a pantry staple that complements any dish, especially saucy and soupy ones. Whether it’s freshly steamed, fried with chopped ingredients, boiled into a congee, or even soaked, blended and steamed to make cheung fun (rice noodle rolls), rice is a versatile grain – especially if you include glutinous rice too.
Dried mushrooms are full of umami and a perfect substitute for meat both in terms of flavour and texture. They are one of the most convenient pantry items, only requiring water to soak and rehydrate them.
Soybeans are not only a great source of protein – these dried legumes are so versatile that making soy milk and tofu is easy. And if you have the time and patience, tofu skin.
GQ: Your book is an ode to Hong Kong – what do you hope readers take away from your book?
Courtesy: Benjamin Von Wong
CW: I would like The Vibrant Hong Kong Table to preserve and celebrate Hong Kong’s culture and identity. It is a culinary exploration for the vegan community who want to “travel the world” through food while opening up the mindset of meat-eaters that vegan recipes can be culturally appropriate, satisfyingly delicious, and equally nostalgic.
The Vibrant Hong Kong Table by Christine Wong (Chronicle Books) is available online and at bookstores worldwide for $32.50.
UK chancellor becomes first holder of her office to make an official visit to China in a decade
Rachel Reeves has said the UK “must engage confidently with China”, as she arrived in Beijing amid market turbulence at home.
The Conservatives and Liberal Democrats had demanded the chancellor call off her China trip after the value of the pound plummeted to its lowest level in a year. But ministers argue that improved relations with the world’s second-largest economy will help boost growth, and that under the Conservatives the UK lagged behind the US and EU when it came to high-level engagement with Beijing.
The jailing of pro-democracy activists, omnipresent surveillance and a distrust of the police have driven people into a fearful silence
Growing up, I had always dreamed of becoming a police officer like my uncle. In my childhood in the 1980s and 90s, the police had a positive and brave image. I remember when I was in first or second grade, struggling with English, my uncle would tutor me. After our lessons, I would stay at his house to play. Next to his bed was a punching bag, and he would teach me how to throw punches and do one-handed push-ups.
My uncle would show off the muscles on his arms, telling me his dream was to become a police officer who fights crime and protects the innocent. He eventually did. And in his police uniform graduation photo, he stood tall and proud – a hero in my eyes.
Australian cultivated meat startup Vow has received regulatory approval in Hong Kong, where it will debut cultured foie gras at the Mandarin Oriental.
Six months after rolling out its cultured quail parfait in Singapore, Vow is expanding to Hong Kong with its latest product, Forged Gras.
It is the first cultivated meat company to earn regulatory clearance in Hong Kong, having satisfied the safety requirements set by its Centre for Food Safety (CFS), a feat confirmed by its approval from the Singapore Food Agency earlier this year.
The Sydney-based startup is also the first to sell multiple cultivated meat products in multiple markets, with its versions of quail parfait and foie gras both available at restaurants in Hong Kong.
Vow will debut the foie gras – sold under its Forged brand – at The Aubrey, an izakaya at the Mandarin Oriental, reveals co-founder and CEO George Peppou. “The Aubrey’s Japanese izakaya-style setting provides the perfect backdrop for showcasing our cultured Japanese quail products,” he tells Green Queen.
“Forged Parfait will feature in a dish exclusive to Hong Kong, served within smoke and topped with citric, yuzu and chives alongside brioche and pickles,” he says. The dish is priced at HK$388 ($49.85), with the option to add caviar for another HK$198 ($25.45).
For the launch month, a limited-edition cocktail will also be available to diners, costing HK$170 ($21.85). “Crafted by Devender Sehgal, the cocktail – titled ‘Senses’ – is a new take on an old fashioned, fat-washed with the Forged Gras to deliver a deep, rich flavour, complemented with herbal notes and a touch of nuttiness,” explains Peppou.
Courtesy: Vow
Vow’s cultured foie gras targets a new taste experience
Forged Gras comprises 51% of Vow’s cultured Japanese quail, which lends the product a “rich umami and subtle gamey flavour”, Peppou says: “To achieve its luxurious texture and melt-in-your-mouth experience, we blend this with a thoughtful selection of ingredients – vegetable and herb-infused coconut oil, sunflower oil, and fava bean protein.”
He adds: “These are then balanced with konjac, carrageenan, and yeast extract to perfect the structure and enhance flavour. Natural vegetable and fruit concentrates (beetroot, carrot, radish, and turmeric) are added for a subtle colour and depth.”
Like caviar and bluefin tuna, foie gras is one of the world’s most exclusive and lucrative foods, but it’s also highly problematic. Traditionally, the French delicacy entails force-feeding a duck or goose to fatten their liver, which is then sold whole or as part of a mousse, pâté, or other similar preparations.
The act of feeding these birds against their will and more than what they’d normally eat – frequently to 10 times their usual volume and in intensive farming settings – has spurred many cities and countries to ban foie gras production, including India, Argentina, Germany, Italy, and Turkey. In France, too, 15 cities have outlawed the food.
Courtesy: Vow
But Vow isn’t just targeting the cruelty aspect with its cultured foie gras. In a 1,000-person survey, it found that of the 92% of American meat-eaters who hadn’t tried the delicacy, only 5% cite ethical reasons for not doing so.
So the company is hoping to offer a new flavour experience with Forged Gras, one that provides the gamey notes of Japanese quail with the texture of fatty liver. Its scalable production process, meanwhile, will make the product “accessible beyond the limits of scarcity”.
“At Vow, we’re paving a new path for food by using innovative technology to address real challenges around foods that people want, but can’t access,” says Peppou. “The launch of Forged Gras continues our mission to bring scarce or never-before-seen foods to millions, but does so in a way that seeks to innovate, not imitate. By fostering culinary imagination, we aim to create something entirely new, unconstrained by the tradition of even the oldest delicacies.”
Singapore approval a benchmark for Hong Kong greenlight
Courtesy: Vow
In Hong Kong, food safety regulation is overseen by the CFS, which falls under the Food and Environmental Hygiene Department (FEHD). “The CFS has issued guidance outlining the safety assessments required for cultured meat to meet regulatory standards. Vow has met these requirements, with our approval from the Singapore Food Agency in March 2024 confirming that our products meet CFS safety standards,” Peppou tells Green Queen.
Singapore was the first country to greenlight the sale of cultivated meat, granting it to Eat Just’s Good Meat brand in 2020, and its regulatory framework is welcomed as a benchmark by several other countries. The UK has been working on such a model of international cooperation too, and Dutch cultivated pork startup Meatable plans to use this approach to gain clearance in several countries next year.
“We too are always looking at locations where our approval in one region would allow us to enter quickly,” confirms Peppou.
“We are confident that Hong Kong’s regulatory framework will continue to support the safe introduction of cultured meat, and will continue to actively engage with CFS and FEHD to ensure these standards are maintained and supported across the industry,” he adds.
Vow’s newest market has shown considerable interest in cultivated meat. In a 2021 poll, 96% of Hong Kong residents expressed interest in trying these proteins. A more recent survey suggests a much lower – but still sizeable – acceptance rate at 28%.
Courtesy: Vow
That said, Vow has its sights set globally. To celebrate the launch of Forged Gras, it approached Masa Takayama, the chef-owner of three-Michelin-starred sushi restaurant Masa in New York City, to design a new menu featuring Vow’s cultured quail.
“We work with visionary chefs around the world, creating entirely new meats that inspire them to reimagine what’s possible in the kitchen,” says Peppou. “Chef Masa Takayama is a true innovator who immediately saw the potential of Forged Gras, and used both to craft exceptional dishes, showcasing its versatility and flavour in ways only he could.”
He adds: “While we’re not approved for sale in the US, this exclusive preview was an opportunity to share Forged with top tastemakers and gather their feedback from those further away from Singapore and Hong Kong.”
Vow has made progress in its application with Food Standards Australia New Zealand, which has opened a second round of public consultations, running until Christmas Eve. “As we expected, FSANZ confirmed that no new evidence had arisen from the first public consultation, or in the public domain since the first round closed, that altered their assessment that our cell-cultured quail was safe for human consumption,” notes Peppou.
“Given the projected timelines shared with us by FSANZ, we anticipate an approval decision will be made in Q1 2025.”
Vow’s ‘unique’ approach key to its success
Courtesy: Vow
Peppou established Vow in 2019 with chief commercial officer Tim Noakesmith. The company calls its production system “the most efficient and extensive operation” in the industry, allowing it to achieve regulatory clearance faster than counterparts like Upside Foods (which took eight years) and Aleph Farms (six years). It has done so with $56M in investment, much lower than the $270M raised by Good Meat, or the $608M secured by Upside Foods.
“We attribute our success to a few key factors, all of which are unique to Vow. We deliberately started with an entirely new meat product, specifically the high-end market – a product that excited chefs and consumers because it offered something deliberately different to anything else, instead of just being an expensive replication of something they already know,” says Peppou. “That has allowed us to sell at higher margins from the outset, to a market that wants to experience new and different foods.”
Vow owns one of the world’s largest cultivated meat facilities, Factory 1, which can produce 30 tonnes of protein per year. A sister site, Factory 2, is in development, boasting a capacity 100 times higher. “We took a different path to the cultured meat industry, which has used existing pharmaceutical manufacturing platforms that are ridiculously expensive and over-engineered for food production,” the CEO explains.
“We have continuously vertically integrated wherever possible to reduce costs and iteration cycles, achieving now an end-to-end in-house scaled production system. We also borrowed talent from other cutting-edge industries (like engineers from SpaceX’s starship programme) to build our own equipment, including designing and commissioning the world’s largest operational food-grade cell-culture bioreactor built at less than 80% of the market estimate for its size.
“The combination of both is Vow selling products that our customers selfishly choose, and being able to scale production and meet demand far quicker and cheaper than the competition.”
Courtesy: Vow
Vow will soon announce other Hong Kong venues where the Forged products will be available. But it’s not the only company making cultivated foie gras, with France’s Gourmey pursuing approval in five markets (including the EU).
There may yet be more approvals for cultivated meat before the end of 2024, but either way, it has been a seminal year for the industry. Vow’s two greenlights join the successes of Aleph Farms (Israel) and pet-focused Meatly (UK) in the last 12 months, with several other startups poised to join the list next year.
Peppou’s plan for Vow is to bring cultured meat to more plates. “We’ll be bringing more products to market, and hopefully see other markets open up, but our real priority is working with chefs in Singapore and Hong Kong to deliver incredible dining experiences with Forged Parfait and Forged Gras,” he says.
Amid an uncertain future for food tech in the US, with the impending presidency of Donald Trump, more companies could be looking elsewhere to succeed. Vow’s foray into Hong Kong, in the wider context, could be a sign of the times.
New York, November 18, 2024—The Committee to Protect Journalists urges the Hong Kong government to drop its trumped-up charges against media publisher Jimmy Lai, who is set to take the stand for the first time on Wednesday in his trial on national security charges, which could see the 77-year-old jailed for life if convicted.
“This show trial must end before it is too late,” said CPJ CEO Jodie Ginsberg on Monday. “The case of Jimmy Lai is not an outlier, it’s a symptom of Hong Kong’s democratic decline. Hong Kong’s treatment of Jimmy Lai — and more broadly of independent media and journalists — shows that this administration is no longer interested in even a semblance of democratic norms.”
Lai, the founder of the now-shuttered pro-democracy newspaper Apple Daily, has spent nearly four years in a maximum-security prison and solitary confinement since December 2020. He has faced multiple postponements to his trial, in which he has been charged with sedition and conspiring to collude with foreign forces.
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer told parliament in October that the case of Lai, who is a British citizen, was a “priority” and called for his release. Similarly, United Nations experts in January urged Hong Kong authorities to drop all charges against the publisher and free him.
The U.N. Working Group on Arbitrary Detention found that Lai is unlawfully and arbitrarily detained in Hong Kong, expressed alarm over his prolonged solitary confinement, and called for immediate remedy. Lai suffers from a long-standing health issue of diabetes.
Responding to CPJ’s request for comment, a Hong Kong government spokesperson referred to a November 17 statement in which it said that Lai was “receiving appropriate treatment and care in prison” and that Hong Kong authorities “strongly deplore any form of interference.”
Foreign secretary discussed China’s treatment of Uyghurs and support of Russia as well as ‘areas of cooperation’
David Lammy pressed his Chinese counterpart on human rights concerns and China’s support for Russia’s invasion of Ukraine during talks in Beijing, the Foreign Office has said.
The foreign secretary had been under pressure to take a tough line on a range of human rights issues with the Chinese foreign minister, Wang Yi, when the pair met on Friday during Lammy’s first visit to China since taking office.
Hong Kong-based charity Redress has announced the results of the 2024 Redress Design Award, with the top prize winner getting a chance to work with Tommy Hilfiger.
Redress, the Asia-focused charity tackling the fashion industry’s environmental impact, has named Hong Kong designer Tiger Chung as the winner of the 2024 Redress Design Award’s top prize.
Described as the world’s leading sustainable fashion design competition, the Redress Design Award aims to empower designers about circular fashion to reduce the industry’s climate impact and waste crisis. The 14th edition was held at the ongoing Centrestage Hong Kong trade show last week.
As the winner of the top prize, Chung will now get to work with Tommy Hilfiger on a sustainable design project for retail, and spend time under the wing of the fashion giant’s sustainability team to deepen his skills and understanding of eco-friendly production and marketing. He will further receive mentorship sessions from Tommy Hilfiger, which sponsored the top prize this year.
Chung, whose collection The Wanderer exploited waste streams like car seat covers and discarded sofas, called it a “huge opportunity to showcase circular solutions on a global stage”.
“Fashion is rightly criticised for its negative environmental impact, which is a huge concern for designers like myself,” he said. “But we intend to change this – and make fashion better for the planet.”
Tommy Hilfiger champions circularity at Redress Design Award
Courtesy: Redress
The fashion industry is responsible for a tenth of global emissions – five times higher than the aviation sector. It is also set to take up a quarter of the world’s carbon budget by 2050. This makes it one of the most polluting industries, thanks in large part to the waste crisis it’s currently undergoing.
The equivalent of one rubbish truck of textiles is landfilled or burned every second. And this is showing no signs of stopping: between 2015 and 2030, textile waste has been estimated to rise by 60%. On a wider note, more than 80% of a product’s climate footprint comes during the design stage.
This is why Redress is pushing designers to champion the circular economy, which involves regenerating nature, reusing and upcycling materials, and taking into account a product’s full life cycle.
The 10 finalists of the 2024 Redress Design Award – which partners with 170+ academic institutions – were from all over the world, selected from applications across 55 global regions. Creations on its runway were made using circular design techniques and textile waste – from denim end-of-rolls to a shredded military parachute.
They participated in a host of circular educational challenges. In Vietnam, a low-waste design challenge at Tal Apparel’s factory explored commercial solutions for pre-consumer garment waste. Similarly, a Packaging with Purpose challenge in partnership with Delta Global looked at how eco packaging can connect more consumers to a brand’s value.
“Circular design is foundational to a sustainable future for fashion,” said Jessica Wei, senior sustainability director at Tommy Hilfiger Asia-Pacific, and a judge of the 2024 awards. By 2030, all of the fashion label’s products will contribute to the circular economy through design, use and end of life. That’s also why Tommy Hilfiger partnered with Redress to help educate designers about circular fashion design.
Apart from its support, Chung will also benefit from an HK$50,000 ($6,400) development fund, a lockstitch machine and overlock sewing machine from Japanese company Juki, and a one-year subscription to Bloomsbury Fashion Central. He also won the Hong Kong Best Prize, which recognised the highest-scoring designer from the city, which carried an HK15,000 ($1,900) prize money.
Tian Ruyin, a designer from China, was the runner-up, earning a mentorship with sustainable fashion designer Orsola de Castro, an HK15,000 ($1,900) grant, and a lockstitch machine. And British designer Silvia Acien Parrilla won the People’s Choice award, receiving a Juki sewing machine after impressing global voters with her designs.
All the finalists join the Redress Alumni Network, a community of over 300 previous finalists and semi-finalists from more than 50 regions (over half of them are based in Asia). These designers have made strides globally, dressing celebrities like Taylor Swift and Heidi Klum, appearing at the Olympics, and visiting the Pacific to tackle microplastic pollution with Uniqlo.
“This competition win is a broader victory for the industry, which needs urgent injections of creativity from designers, and more engagement from consumers if we’re to tackle the growing waste crisis raging globally and particularly in Asia,” said Redress founder Christina Dean. “Urgent change and collaboration at the design stage is needed.”
Dean founded Redress in 2007 to inspire positive environmental change and promote sustainability in fashion by reducing textile waste, pollution, and water and energy consumption. A decade later, she established an offshoot fashion brand called The R Collective, which rescues textile waste from luxury brands, mills and manufacturers and upcycles these materials into elegant clothing pieces.
Courtesy: Redress
Redress will again collaborate with Tommy Hilfiger to present a celebratory runway of the awards’ emerging Chinese designers at Shanghai Fashion Week (October 10-18).
Speaking to Green Queen in February, Dean recalled her biggest learnings since starting Redress 17 years ago. “I’ve come to respect the fashion industry, its suppliers, its spinners, weavers, farmers, etc., very deeply, and I see such wonderful and enormous talent, generosity, determination, and humanity and love throughout the business,” she said.
“I’ve met the most incredible activists working in the fastest and cheapest of the big fast-fashion brands; I’ve met recyclers with bigger brains than their machines; and I’ve met CEOs with more conviction for change than prolific activists,” Dean added.
“So I’ve come to realise that the humans behind the machines, spreadsheets, steering wheels, and boardrooms of fashion are pretty amazing people, who bring optimism to the challenges at hand. We are all only human, against some inhumanly complex issues.”
Taipei, September 2, 2024—Hong Kong authorities are criminalizing normal journalistic work with the “openly political” conviction of two editors from the shuttered news portal Stand News for subversion, the Committee to Protect Journalists and four other rights groups said.
By weaponizing the legal system against journalists, China has ruthlessly reneged on guarantees given to Hong Kong, which should enjoy a high degree of autonomy after the former British colony was handed back to Beijing in 1997, the groups said in a joint statement.
Former Stand News editors Patrick Lam and Chung Pui-kuen are due to be sentenced on September 26 and could be jailed for two years.
“We now await with trepidation the outcome of trials targeting senior staff from the defunct Apple Daily newspaper, especially its founder Jimmy Lai who faces the prospect of spending the rest of his life behind bars,” they added.
British judge David Neuberger, who was part of a Hong Kong court panel that denied an appeal from media publisher Jimmy Lai and six pro-democracy campaigners, should “do the right thing and reconsider” his position in the Chinese-ruled city, the Committee to Protect Journalists and 44 groups said in a Monday letter.
The letter said Neuberger’s role in the Hong Kong ruling, as a non-permanent overseas judge on Hong Kong’s top court, contradicts his previous efforts in advocating free speech and press freedom. Neuberger’s continued involvement would be, in effect, “sponsoring a systematic repression of human rights against peaceful activists and journalists in the city.”
Neuberger, a former head of Britain’s Supreme Court, resigned as chair of an advisory panel to the Media Freedom Coalition on August 14, two days after the conviction of Lai and six pro-democracy campaigners was upheld. Lai has been behind bars since December 2020.
The MFC is a group of 50 countries that pledge to promote press freedom at home and abroad. CPJ is a longstanding member of the MFC’s consultative network of nongovernmental organizations.
The Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) condemns the decision by Hong Kong’s top court to uphold the conviction of publisher Jimmy Lai and six pro-democracy campaigners on charges of participating in an unauthorized assembly in 2019. CPJ is also dismayed by the participation of David Neuberger, a former head of Britain’s Supreme Court who also chairs an advisory panel to the Media Freedom Coalition (MFC), as part of a panel of five Court of Final Appeal judges that delivered the ruling.
Former UK Supreme Court head David Neuberger was part of a panel of five Court of Final Appeal judges that delivered the ruling dismissing Jimmy Lai’s appeal on August 12, 2024. (Photo: Wikimedia Commons)
“It is impossible to reconcile Lord Neuberger’s judicial authority as part of a system that is politicized and repressive with his role overseeing a panel that advises governments to defend and promote media freedom. The Media Freedom Coalition should immediately review his role as chair of the High Level Panel of Legal Experts on Media Freedom,” said CPJ Advocacy and Communications Director Gypsy Guillen Kaiser.
Lai, the 76-year-old founder of the now-shuttered pro-democracy newspaper Apple Daily, has been behind bars since 2020. On August 12, Hong Kong’s top court rejected his appeal against a conviction for taking part in unauthorized anti-government protests. Lai, whose trial on national security charges was adjourned again last month to late November, faces possible life imprisonment if convicted. He was honored by CPJ and the organization continues to advocate for his immediate, unconditional release.
The MFC is a group of 50 countries that pledge to promote press freedom at home and abroad. CPJ is a longstanding member of the MFC’s consultative network of nongovernmental organizations.
CPJ believes the International Bar Association’s Human Rights Institute, which serves as the secretariat for the MFC’s panel of media freedom experts, should also review Neuberger’s role.
Human rights advocates have called on Anthony Albanese to place China’s human rights record ahead of economic and trade discussions in his meeting with China’s second most powerful leader on Monday.
They said it was time for Australia’s Labor government to demand concrete action from China in addressing human rights complaints against it as “statements of concern” were not achieving results.
The conviction of peaceful pro-democracy activists is another shameful moment in the ongoing crackdown
Seven years ago, Lord Neuberger, a judge of the Hong Kong court of final appeal – and formerly president of the UK’s supreme court – described the Chinese region’s foreign judges as “canaries in the mine”. Their willingness to serve was a sign that judicial independence remained healthy, “but if they start to leave in droves, that would represent a serious alarm call”.
That was before the extraordinary uprising in 2019 to defend Hong Kong’s autonomy, and the crackdown that followed. The draconian national security law of 2020 prompted the resignation of an Australian judge, and two British judges quit in 2022. Last week, two more birds flew: Lord Sumption and Lord Collins of Mapesbury. Lord Sumption (with other judges) had said that continued participation was in the interests of the people of Hong Kong. Now he says that those hopes of sustaining the rule of law are “no longer realistic” and that “a [once] vibrant and politically diverse community is slowly becoming a totalitarian state”. He cited illiberal legislation, Beijing’s ability to reverse decisions by Hong Kong courts and an oppressive political environment where judges are urged to demonstrate “patriotism”.
Researchers in Hong Kong have developed a fungi-derived fat alternative that can decrease the fat content of a product and improve gut health and metabolic benefits.
The alt-fat world has been blossoming lately. Microbes, microalgae, carbon, you name it – startups all over the world are using techniques like fermentation to come up with fats that are better for you, and better for the Earth.
These also hold a key to the progress of an Ozempic-hit food industry, which has contributed to and coincided with a rising awareness of gut health and metabolism.
Joining this list of innovations is AkkMore, a fungi-derived fat designed to replace animal fats while preventing obesity and metabolic diseases, enhancing gut health and immunity, and relieving anxiety. That is the promise of its creators from Hong Kong Polytechnic University’s (PolyU) Research Institute for Future Food (RiFood) and Department of Food Science and Nutrition (FSN).
“Our research team has completed three rounds of animal trials on AkkMore. The results show that the formula can effectively improve metabolism and aid in weight management,” said project co-lead Gail Jinhui Chang, a research assistant professor at FSN. “Moving forward, we are focusing on exploring applications of AkkMore in the development of healthy food.”
Hitting health and sustainability touchpoints
The PolyU researchers have been working on AkkMore since 2022, finding a way to extract the functional component from natural fungal sources. While conducting animal trials puts a question mark over the welfare aspects of the product, mice that had been administered the AkkMore formula were found to have a healthier gut microbiota, indicating better weight management, gut health, immune and metabolic system, and anxiety management.
The research won a Silver Medal at the 2022 International Exhibition of Inventions in Geneva, and its applications for health benefits are being evaluated for patent filings.
“This collaboration is testament to the successful translation of a research outcome,” said Chang. “Moving forward, we will further explore the application of AkkMore formula in innovative health foods and put greater efforts into identification of mushroom strains with better functions and standardisation of the cultivation process.”
In addition to lowering the calorific content of food, AkkMore is also said to extend the shelf life of cream products, and have thickening, emulsifying and stabilising properties. Leveraging these attributes, the PolyU team developed Cream Mate, an alternative cream that can be used in conjunction with conventional cream to reduce the latter’s content in desserts.
This, the researchers argue, could help cut dairy consumption and food waste in the long run, contributing to lower greenhouse gas emissions and higher manufacturing productivity.
AkkMore’s potential for the foodservice industry
Courtesy: Hotel Icon
To demonstrate AkkMore’s viability for restaurants and the foodservice industry, RiFood and FSN have teamed up with Hotel Icon, which is owned by PolyU, whose fine-dining eatery Green has been using Cream Mate to develop reduced-fat soft serve and desserts.
Hotel Icon commissioned a lab test to assess the nutritional components of the soft serve, which revealed that the fat content of the ice cream using Cream Mate was under 3%, and reduced by over 80% when compared to regular soft serve. Meanwhile, the total calories were also cut by more than half.
Since May 1, the Green restaurant has been running a forest-themed afternoon tea offering with Japanese fruits and AkkMore. The tasting menu includes two Cream Mate soft serves in Japanese hōjicha and Hokkaido milk flavours. Guests can also opt for an Akkmore ‘special drink’ instead of tea or coffee for an additional price.
While this is a limited-edition run, it’s part of a growing roster of alt-fat ingredients targeting sustainability and health in the food sector. In the US, GLP-1 agonist drugs like Ozempic and Wegovy are already making people eat fewer calories and fats as they look to manage their weight. Meanwhile, Roughly 30% of Hong Kong’s residents live with obesity, while another 20% are overweight. Meanwhile, 8.5-10% of people in the city live with type 2 diabetes.
PolyU’s development aims to address these issues, while also lowering the foodservice industry’s climate footprint. The shelf life aspect will also help Hong Kong’s food sector reduce waste – 30-40% of Hong Kong’s municipal waste is made up of food waste, only 4% of which is recycled.
Six people including barrister held for social media posts before Tiananmen Square anniversary
Hong Kong police have arrested six people, marking the first time that the city’s new national security law, known as Article 23, has been used against suspects since it was implemented in March.
The six people, aged between 37 and 65, are accused of publishing messages with seditious intent ahead of an “upcoming sensitive date”, according to a police statement.
Two food waste warriors let us in on their efforts to turn surplus food into a sustainable dining experience in a city that throws out over a million tonnes of food each year.
Hong Kong may be known as Asia’s World City, a melting pot of cultures with great food and a penchant for elevated dining experiences, but the city – like most others in the world – has a major food waste problem.
Every day, 3,600 tonnes of food and 13 million rice bowls end up in the city’s landfills – estimates suggest that 30-40% of Hong Kong’s municipal waste comprises food waste. But only 4% of all this waste is recycled, which doesn’t bode well for the city’s climate action plan, which aims to reduce emissions by 26-30% by the end of the decade.
It also doesn’t bode well for Hong Kong’s food insecurity problem, which affects a third of all its citizens. Over 7.3 million people live in the city, and eat an average of 2.85kg of food each day. Roughly calculated, the amount of food that goes to waste could feed nearly 1.3 million of its residents – that’s almost equivalent to all Hong Kongers living under the poverty line.
Tackling food waste has multipronged benefits for the city, and that’s exactly what The Rescued Feast, a sustainable dining experience that made use of surplus food destined for waste, sought to highlight on April 25.
Courtesy: CHOMPED/TMS
Organised by food-saving app CHOMP, media company TMS and charity More Good, the event rescued food from CHOMP’s F&B vendors, which were transformed into light bites led by More Good head chef Mike Silva. It showcased how food scraps can be turned into nutritious meals, raising awareness about Hong Kong’s food waste problem.
With nearly 200 attendees, The Rescued Feast managed to save 230kg of food, equating to about 460k for CO2e. The success means it is now the first of a series. After the event, Green Queen founding editor Sonalie Figueiras – who attended the dinner – spoke to CHOMP founder and CEO Carla Martinesi and TMS founder Krystal Lai about the initiative, their goals, and the importance of fighting food waste in Hong Kong.
This interview has been lightly edited for clarity and concision.
Sonalie Figueiras: How did you both come together to create this event?
Krystal Lai: It’s been a long time in the making. About a year ago, Carla approached me with the idea of hosting an event using food waste and scraps. We were both super excited by the potential to transform these into a high-end event that could shift perceptions about food waste. Having volunteered with More Good several times, I was familiar with their mission, space, and team, which led us to the natural conclusion: why not host the event right here?
When we first reached out to the founders of More Good, their excitement matched ours. Carla and I feel incredibly fortunate that the event was such a success, and we’re excited to turn it into a series.
Courtesy: CHOMPED/TMS
SF: Where did the rescued food come from? Why was it going to be wasted?
Carla Martinese: The food scraps were collected from various CHOMP Partners & Friends (such as LSG Sky Chefs, Airside, Bon-Eat-O, Bones & Blades, PermaClub, Slowood and Agrician). Like many F&B businesses, there are all sorts of reasons for food to be wasted, and [it’s] never intentional. Reasons include: bad weather (thus fewer customers), weather-damaged produce, miscalculations, inability to sell before the expiration date, and some of it was the scrapped ends of fruits and vegetables like pineapple peels.
SF: Can you share more about More Food, the location of the event?
CM: More Good is an F&B charity based in Hong Kong that serves hundreds of freshly cooked meals to the elderly, homeless and refugee communities across Hong Kong. Its beneficiaries include Impact HK and Refugee Union. Their location in Chai Wan hosts events to raise money for charities and also doubles as a soup kitchen space where people can volunteer their time to make food for the needy.
Courtesy: CHOMPED/TMS
SF: Who were some of your favourite partners for this event? Why did you choose to work with them?
CM: With so many sponsors involved, it’s hard to choose. A big shout-out has to go to our food scrap vendors who graciously donated their clean scraps for us to reuse into another meal. We’d have to say our favourite partner had to be More Good.
SF: What worked and what didn’t?
CM: I think everything worked the way we hoped it would, we ran this as a pilot to test if the concept could even work, and it did! In terms of what didn’t work (or what we can improve) is coordinating with restaurants to collect food scraps for the event. Every good dish should involve some sort of protein element and it was really difficult to source that as a scrap. Luckily, on the last day, we had Bon-Eat-O come through with their seafood protein. That’s something we’d have to focus more on next time.
SF: How can you ensure The Rescued Feast’s guests will continue to stay motivated to fight food waste beyond the dinner?
CM: We hope this dinner served as a reminder to guests that food can be given a second life, that sometimes it’s not just a scrap bit of food that can be thrown away. If you’re choosing to eat out, consider ordering less or taking food home to cook into another dish the next day. Research, learn about your food and get creative. Or even easier, use the CHOMP app to save food from restaurants from going to waste instead.
Courtesy: CHOMPED/TMS
SF: In a perfect world, what’s your goal with this event? Do you want to do more?
CM: Our goal was to bring more awareness to Hong Kong’s massive food waste problem. With the MSW law [which will charge sectors based on the amount of municipal waste they create] getting postponed to August, garbage has been a spotlighted story across the city. Unfortunately, a lot of the focus has been on plastic with the new ban, but the reality is food waste makes up 40% of the landfill, which is more than any other item – and not much has been done to combat this.
Our aim is to make this event a series and spotlight local vendors, and the food-saving mission.
SF: How aware are people in Hong Kong about food waste?
CM: Unfortunately, not as much as we’d like them to be. With no consequence to waste food, it’s not in a lot of people’s minds. It’s been a struggle to educate on the environmental consequences of food waste on the planet. We’ve seen a shift in mentality over the years through CHOMP, especially in schools and individuals but there’s still a long way to go.
Courtesy: CHOMPED/TMS
SF: Why should people care about food waste in Hong Kong?
KL: I think it’s important on numerous fronts. Environmentally, food waste contributes further to greenhouse gas emissions, specifically methane and our environmental footprint. It’s also economic and social, though. Hong Kong spends a lot of money on food that goes to waste, which just means that resources and capital are being tied up on redundant processes and products that aren’t used or consumed. Think about the produce, the delivery, and the processing of the waste.
This is why I think the MSW law is a big step in the right direction. As waste is – for most – such an “out of sight, out of mind” problem, this will really force businesses and individuals to think twice about consumption, including food consumption.
Lastly – and this is something that I feel quite passionate about – it’s also about social equity. In a city like Hong Kong where rent is sky-high and poverty and food insecurity exist, it feels paradoxical to have significantly high levels of food waste when you have people a lot closer than you probably realise who need help.
SF: What does the Hong Kong government need to do to help fight food waste better?
CM: I think improving the public education on the state of the planet and how individuals can affect change too. Support local businesses who are pushing to do good for the city like CHOMP and More Good. Work with local stakeholders such as farmers, food producers and retailers to develop solutions to reduce food waste on every level.
On World Press Freedom Day, May 3, the Freedom Cartoonists Foundation recognized the talent and courage of cartoonists working under difficult circumstances. The Kofi Annan Courage in Cartooning Award 2024 was presented by Nobel Peace Prize laureate Dr. Shirin Ebadi of Iran, during a public ceremony at the Geneva Graduate Institute, in presence of CNN’s international chief anchor Christiane Amanpour. For more on this award see: https://www.trueheroesfilms.org/thedigest/awards/f60cb3d4-c79a-43aa-9b5c-351c56c02ae1. This award is presented every two years in alternance with a prize presented by the allied organization Cartoonists Rights in the United States. The accompanying international exhibition Cartooning for Freedom, visible on the shores of Lake Geneva until June 2, 2024, features nearly 60 press cartoons selected by Freedom Cartoonists, in partnership with Cartooning for Peace in Paris. Chaired by Kenneth Roth, former Executive Director of Human Rights Watch, the international jury shares the 2024 Prize between two winners: Rachita Taneja (India) and Zunzi (Hong Kong).
For Chappatte, president of the Foundation, “Both brilliantly embody the fundamental values of editorial cartooning: talent, freedom of spirit, and courage. With a bit of mischief.”
Authoritarian governments are extending their pursuit of critics far beyond their borders
Forty-five years ago, the Bulgarian dissident Georgi Markov was killed in London with a poison-tipped umbrella as he made his way home from work. The horrifying case transfixed the British public.
So transnational repression is not new, including on British shores. But unless its target is unusually high-profile, or it uses startling tactics such as those employed by Markov’s killers – or in the attempt to assassinate Sergei Skripal – much of it passes with minimal attention.
Chinese President Xi Jinping meets with U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing, capital of China, April 26, 2024. Photo: Xinhua
A foreboding article was published on April 24. It was pointed out that China had provided a berth to a Russian ship Angara that is purportedly “tied to North Korea-Russia arms transfers.”
Reuters cited Royal United Services Institute (RUSI) – that boasts of itself to be “the world’s oldest and the UK’s leading defence and security think tank” – which claims Angara, since August 2023, has transported “thousands of containers believed to contain North Korean munitions,” [italics added] to Russian ports.
Container ships transport containers, and along the way they dock in certain harbors. Until satellite photos have X-ray capability any speculation about what is inside a container will be just that: speculation. Discerning readers will readily pick up on this.
Despite China repeatedly coming out in favor of peace, Reuters, nonetheless, plays up US concerns over perceived support by Beijing for “Moscow’s war” (what Moscow calls a “special military operation”) in Ukraine.
And right on cue, US secretary-of-state Antony Blinken shows up in Beijing echoing a list of US concerns vis-à-vis China.
Blinken had public words for China: “In my meetings with NATO Allies earlier this month and with our G7 partners just last week, I heard that same message: fueling Russia’s defense industrial base not only threatens Ukrainian security; it threatens European security. Beijing cannot achieve better relations with Europe while supporting the greatest threat to European security since the end of the Cold War. As we’ve told China for some time, ensuring transatlantic security is a core US interest. In our discussions today, I made clear that if China does not address this problem, we will.”
It would seem clear that the Taiwan Straits is a core China interest, no? Or is it only US core interests that matter?
Blinken: “I also expressed our concern about the PRC’s unfair trade practices and the potential consequences of industrial overcapacity to global and US markets, especially in a number of key industries that will drive the 21st century economy, like solar panels, electric vehicles, and the batteries that power them. China alone is producing more than 100 percent of global demand for these products, flooding markets, undermining competition, putting at risk livelihoods and businesses around the world.”
It sounds like sour grapes from the US that China’s R&D and manufacturing is out-competing the US. Take, for example, that the US sanctions Huawei while China allows Apple to sell its products unhindered in China. China has hit back at the rhetoric of “overcapacity.”
Blinken complained of “PRC’s dangerous actions in the South China Sea, including against routine Philippine maintenance operations and maritime operations near the Second Thomas Shoal. Freedom of navigation and commerce in these waterways is not only critical to the Philippines, but to the US and to every other nation in the Indo-Pacific and indeed around the world.”
Mentioning freedom of navigation implies that China is preventing such. Why is freedom of navigation in the South China Sea critical to the US? Second Thomas Shoal is a colonial designation otherwise known as Renai Jiao in China. The “routine Philippine maintenance operations and maritime operations” that Blinken speaks of are for a navy landing craft that was intentionally grounded by the Philippines in 1999. Since then, the Philippines has been intermittently resupplying its soldiers stationed there.
Blinken: “I reaffirmed the US’s ‘one China’ policy and stressed the critical importance of maintaining peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait.”
How does the US stationing US soldiers on the Chinese territory of Taiwan without approval from Beijing reaffirm the US’s commitment to a one-China policy? The Shanghai Communiqué of 1972 states “the United States acknowledges that Chinese on either side of the Taiwan Strait maintain there is but one China and that Taiwan is a part of China. The United States does not challenge that position.”
Blinken: “I also raised concerns about the erosion of Hong Kong’s autonomy and democratic institutions as well as transnational repression, ongoing human rights abuses in Xinjiang and Tibet, and a number of individual human rights cases.”
Evidence of human rights abuses in Xinjiang? This is a definitive downplay from the previous allegations of a genocide against Uyghurs. It would be embarrassing to continue to accuse China of a genocide in Xinjiang due to a paucity of bodies which is a sine qua non for such a serious allegation as a genocide; meanwhile the US-armed Israel is blowing up hospitals and schools with ten-of-thousands of confirmed Palestinian civilian bodies. Even if there are human rights abuses in Xinjiang (which should be deplored were there condemnatory evidence), the US would still be morally assailable for its selective outrage.
Blinken: “I encouraged China to use its influence to discourage Iran and its proxies from expanding the conflict in the Middle East, and to press Pyongyang to end its dangerous behavior and engage in dialogue.”
Is the US militarily backing a genocide of Palestinians a “conflict.” Are US military maneuvers in the waters near North Korea “safe behavior”?
Blinken responded to a question: “But now it is absolutely critical that the support that [China’s] providing – not in terms of weapons but components for the defense industrial base – again, things like machine tools, microelectronics, where it is overwhelmingly the number-one supplier to Russia. That’s having a material effect in Ukraine and against Ukraine, but it’s also having a material effect in creating a growing [sic] that Russia poses to countries in Europe and something that has captured their attention in a very intense way.”
Are the ATACMS, Javelins, HIMARS, Leopard tanks, drones, artillery, Patriot missile defense, etc supposed to be absolutely uncritical and have no material effect on the fighting in Ukraine? And who is posing a threat to who? European countries are funding and arming Ukraine and sanctioning Russia not vice versa? It sounds perversely Orwellian.
*****
From Biden to Harris to Yellen to Raimondo to Sullivan to Blinken, US officials again and again try to browbeat and put down their Chinese colleagues.
At the opening meeting on 18 March 2021 of the US-China talks in Anchorage, Alaska, the arrogance of Blinken and the US was put on notice by the rebuke of Chinese foreign affairs official Yang Jiechi: “[T]he US does not have the qualification to say it wants to speak to China from a position of strength.” It doesn’t seem to have sunk in for the American side.
The Russia-China relationship is solid. China’s economy is growing strongly. Scores of countries are clamoring to join BRICS+ and dedollarization is well underway. Yet, the US continues to try to bully the world’s largest – and still rapidly growing – economy. This strategy appears to affirm the commonly referred to aphorism about the definition of insanity: trying the same thing over and over and expecting a different result.
Brussels, April 25, 2024—The Committee to Protect Journalists welcomed Thursday’s call by the European Parliament for the repeal of two Hong Kong security laws that it said undermine press freedom and for the release of Jimmy Lai, founder of the now-shuttered pro-democracy newspaper Apple Daily.
The parliamentary resolution condemned Hong Kong’s adoption last month of a new security law, which includes offenses for treason, sabotage, sedition, theft of state secrets, and espionage. The latest legislation expands on a Beijing-imposed 2020 national security law, under which more than 200 people — including Lai — have been arrested, according to the European Parliament.
“The European Parliament’s resolution sends a clear signal to Hong Kong authorities — we are standing shoulder to shoulder with Apple Daily’s Jimmy Lai and pro-democracy activists who have been jailed for speaking out against repression,” said Tom Gibson CPJ’s EU representative. “Hong Kong and Chinese authorities should repeal the Hong Kong security laws and stop harassing and prosecuting journalists.”
In 2023, the European Parliament urged Hong Kong to immediately and unconditionally release Lai, saying that he had been detained on “trumped-up charges.”
Lai faces life imprisonment if convicted of conspiring to collude with foreign forces under the 2020 security law.
A former British colony, Hong Kong was returned to China in 1997 with the guarantee of a high degree of autonomy, including freedom of speech, under a “one country, two system” formula.
Law, which has in effect silenced opposition, comes into force with penalties of up to life in prison for treason and insurrection
Hong Kong’s new national security law came into force on Saturday, putting into immediate effect tough penalties of up to life imprisonment for crimes including treason and insurrection.
The law – commonly referred to as article 23 – targets five categories of national security crimes, and was swiftly passed by Hong Kong’s opposition-free legislature on Tuesday.
New York, March 22, 2024—As a new national security law goes into effect in Hong Kong on Saturday, CPJ was among 145 groups across the globe that denounced the legislation, which could deepen a crackdown on human rights and further suppress media freedom in the city.
Enacted under Article 23 of Hong Kong’s mini-constitution, the law punishes offenses ranging from theft of state secrets to sedition. The statement said this could make journalism “even riskier” and intensify censorship in the Asian financial hub.
Once a beacon of press freedom in Asia, Hong Kong has seen a dramatic decline with journalists arrested, jailed, and threatened since Beijing implemented a national security law in the city in 2020. Among those jailed includes Jimmy Lai, founder of the now-shuttered pro-democracy newspaper Apple Daily.
The new security law, passed by Hong Kong’s legislature on Tuesday, expands on the 2020 Beijing-imposed legislation.
Debate has begun on Article 23 – legislation designed to bring laws closer to those of mainland China
Hong Kong’s government has released the draft text of a new national security law that would further tighten control on the city and bring its laws closer in line with mainland China.
The law, known as Article 23, is a domestic piece of legislation defining and penalising crimes related to national security.
The Cakery founder Shirley Kwok speaks to Green Queen about her new businesses shaking up Hong Kong’s plant-based scene: vegan cheese brand Cultured and plant-forward bakery Maya.
Shirley Kwok is one busy lady. Under her entrepreneur belt so far: a cakery, a bakery, and an artisanal cheese brand, and it’s not even been a decade!
And oh, her products range from better-for-you, allergen-friendly, vegan-friendly and diet-inclusive to a combination of all the above. The best part, though? The flavour is – some would say – bomb.
What started as a pop-up cake shop at Hong Kong’s famous commercial complex Landmark in 2016 has now evolved into five locations that offer cakes in all shapes and sizes, for all occasions and diets. But about a year and a half ago, The Cakery was no longer enough for Kwok, a mother of two.
You see, there was this local vegan cheese she loved, but the brand was sadly closing down – a fate that many of the city’s plant-forward businesses have suffered post-pandemic. Kwok was going to buy out that business, but that didn’t pan out. So instead, she created her own artisanal vegan cheese brand.
Courtesy: Cultured
“I was doing a lot of tests at home,” she tells me. After testing a few different versions, she brought the cheese to work. “Everybody tried and they’re like: ‘Oh, it’s really nice. And I can’t stop eating,’” recalls Kwok. That’s when the thought occurred – maybe there was a real business in all this.
It came to fruition at the end of last year in the form of Cultured, a CPG brand offering kitchen staples like spreadable cheese blocks, cream cheeses, superfood crackers and curried hummus – all vegan.
Inspired by nations, powered by fermentation
As the name suggests, Cultured is rooted in fermentation, blending a base of cashews with probiotics and ageing them to unlock depth, complexity and umami notes. Plus, there’s the good-for-you bacteria and enzymes to support digestion and a strong immune system. “Everyone’s talking about gut health,” notes Kwok.
“The reason why I use the word ‘Cultured’ is because I wanted to bring in all sorts of cultures into this new thing. I want the brand to be inclusive, so it’s for everyone to try,” she tells me. The idea was to blend global cultures with fermentation cultures, with product flavours linked to different parts of the world (truffles are a nod to Italy, jalapeños to Mexico, and so on).
Her decision to make blocks of spreadable cheese over grated/gratable versions was part of a conscious move away from ingredients like agar or cornstarch, keeping her products as clean-label as possible. ethos intact. That is evident when you take a peek at the label: the sundried tomato and roasted garlic cheese, for example, has cashews, water, lemon juice, nutritional yeast, sundried tomatoes, garlic, salt and probiotics.
Courtesy: Cultured
The process of making the cheese starts with a 48-hour ferment at room temperature, followed by another two to three days in the fridge, which will make it good to last for at least two weeks. Kwok has tried plenty of nuts, but cashews just work well with the flavour and texture of her current portfolio. “I’m going to start using other nuts,” she adds. Almonds, macadamias, and the like.
But with nut-based cheeses, cost is always an issue. Cultured’s cashew cheeses range from HK$120-135 ($15-17) for less than 200g, which is quite steep. Having said that, it is artisanal cheese, and the prices aren’t much different from high-end conventional counterparts.
“I feel like people who really understand my product should be able to appreciate that,” she says. “Even for my cakes, some people say: ‘Oh, yeah, your cakes are really expensive. But I can tell you use really good ingredients.’”
From The Cakery to a plant-forward bakery
This brings us neatly to the setting of our chat – we’re sat at the site of Maya in the commercial hub that is Taikoo Place. Borrowing similar principles from The Cakery, Maya is Kwok’s newest brand, a bakery with an almost fully plant-based menu. There are vegan versions of local favourites in egg tarts and pineapple buns, international treasures in pistachio croissants and blueberry muffins, and indulgent treats in peanut-butter-filled chocolate cookies.
My favourite part (aside from the flavour, of course) is the price. The vegan egg tart costs HK$18 ($2.30), the pistachio croissant HK$26 ($3.30), and the pandan-fulled pineapple bun HK$22 ($2.80). For high-quality plant-based products, that is excellent pricing. How did Kwok manage to keep prices so low for Maya, especially when Cultured’s rates are relatively high?
Processed with VSCO with al3 preset
“It’s a new concept, and we’re having the shop in a commercial area,” she explains. She was expecting to get some pushback. “I wanted people to give it a try first, and not have a barrier. So then they like it and come back again. But if the price point is too high, they’ll be like: ‘Why would I want to pay so much for something that I’m not even sure whether I would like?’”
It’s a pertinent point for a region where 20% of the population lives in poverty, and inflation has mirrored increases globally, with things costing 2.4% more in December 2023 than the month before. But despite a spate of post-pandemic closures and collapses for plant-based businesses, the demand for vegan food remains, with a June 2023 survey finding that 86% of locals want to see more plant-based options in public places, while 70% don’t think restaurants offer enough meat-free options.
Speaking of which, you may have noticed I described Maya as a bakery with an almost 100% vegan menu. That’s because the menu has one meat-based option: a turmeric chicken sourdough sandwich. “I was debating whether to use ‘fake’ meat,” says Kwok. “But it’s processed, and we really don’t want to use that.” She acknowledges that the menu does have a sandwich with vegan tuna, which she says is “the most processed food in this café”.
Courtesy: Green Queen Media
“I was also worried that we’re in a commercial area, where probably most of the people are not vegan – I still want to try to accommodate people who are not vegan, you know?” she adds. Explaining her rationale, she says meat-eaters might come to the store and select the chicken sandwich the first time, but they might like it so much that they’d try something else – maybe one of the vegan sandwiches (which incorporate Cultured’s products), quiches or soups – next time. It’s a working example of how flexitarians hold the key to protein diversification.
Kwok isn’t vegan herself but says she really appreciates good plant-based food. “But it’s quite hard to find in Hong Kong,” she tells me. “Even though they say they’re vegan, they’re heavily processed, and I don’t feel healthy after eating it.” It’s a view held by many around the world, with the heightened discourse about ultra-processed foods (UPFs) associating certain vegan foods with ill health – though not all UPFs or plant-based meats are unhealthy. “I try to eat very clean. I prefer wholesome food, rather than really processed food.”
It’s all about the aesthetics – and family
The other reason why Maya isn’t fully vegan is because the espresso bar serves cow’s milk. Don’t worry though, there’s oat and soy too – and the coffee, sourced from a local roaster, is truly great. There are two options: “nutty” and “fruity” (which I assume are layperson’s terms for washed and natural processed coffee, respectively).
Aesthetics are important to Kwok. There’s an underlying pastel theme running through Maya’s exteriors, serveware and the food itself. The hot drinks come in gorgeous stone mugs with golden spoons, with takeaway packaging sourced from local supplier Sustainabl. For iced beverages, there are plastic-free, starch-based straws.
Courtesy: Maya
As for the food, take that pistachio croissant, for instance. The top is meticulously half-covered in a pistachio-white chocolate glaze, lined with pistachio pieces. I ask her why she chose to go with an exterior glaze instead of a filling. “I really appreciate things that look nice,” she responds. “So if I put it on top, it can be very catchy.” Traditional croissants can be “shiny and nice”, but it’s hard to replicate that with a margarine-based vegan croissant. So she wanted something that would grab the attention of people standing afar.
But Maya isn’t just a bakery: it moonlights as a bar, with cocktails like Honeybee Gin Tea, Coriander Blast and a classic negroni, alongside craft beers and organic wines. You can grab a vegan cheese platter too, if you’re into that. It’s a whole package, and it makes sense when you consider how personal the brand is to Kwok.
Maya is the name of her 11-year-old daughter, who helped conceptualise the business’s mascot and logo, a bird also called Maya. The new business is a tribute to both her kids, and signals that she’s in it for the long haul. She’s already deep in R&D for future releases (a not-so-subtle hint: if you’re into kimchi and hot sauces, you may be in for a treat).
Courtesy: Maya
While Kwok does want to expand eventually, she’s wary that vegan cheese brands in Hong Kong have come and gone, so education for her is key. In the long term, she hopes people recognise she’s trying to help her own community and normalise veganism. “Right now, people are still asking us: ‘Do you have normal cakes?’ Hopefully, in five years, I won’t get those kinds of customers,” she says.
In the end, for Kwok, it’s about convincing people that it’s okay to eat vegan food: “Just give it a try.”
Christina Dean, founder and CEO of Redress and The R Collective, speaks to Green Queen about the evolution of sustainable fashion, what she’s learnt in her 17 years as an activist, and the impact of online shopping and e-commerce.
A decade ago, we spoke to sustainable fashion icon Christina Dean, founder of the Hong Kong-based charity The R Collective, who said she felt a personal responsibility towards a green, low-impact lifestyle. “I do what I can throughout my life streams, from the values I teach my children about not wasting resources and about caring about what happens to our future world to the consumption choices I make on a daily basis,” she said.
Then, five years on, we caught up with Dean again, who had begun The R Collective, an offshoot fashion brand from Redress. She reflected upon the future of sustainability, female leadership, and zero-waste supply chains. “We all have a slightly different relationship with fashion, and it is okay. Wherever you are within the fashion industry, make your bit more sustainable,” she suggested.
Courtesy: The R Collective
The Redress charity was founded in 2007 and works on inspiring positive environmental change and promoting sustainability in the fashion industry by reducing textile waste, pollution, water and energy consumption. The R Collective, meanwhile, was launched in 2017 as a circular fashion brand that uses rescued textile waste, sourced from luxury brands, mills and manufacturers and upcycling these materials into elegant clothing pieces. A quarter of its profits go back to Redress. “We all need to satisfy our desire for creativity, but it should not come at the cost of the planet,” Dean explained in 2019.
Now, we touched bases with the activist and entrepreneur again, exploring the changes she’s seen in the fashion industry, her growth as a leader, and the evolution of Redress, 17 years from launch.
This interview has been edited for clarity and concision.
Green Queen: We interviewed you 10 years ago (and five years ago too). A lot of the data shows waste is getting worse. How much has changed when it comes to fashion, waste and the Redress mission?
Christina Dean: Redress is 17 years old, and it was fashion’s horrific waste rates that led me to start an NGO focused on reducing textile waste. I stumbled upon fashion’s waste and pollution problems purely by chance as a journalist writing on environmental pollution. At that time (2005/06), fashion’s waste was a ‘hush-hush’ issue, basically swept under the carpet.
Seventeen years on, the cat’s out of the bag on fashion’s highly wasteful and polluting ways. We have data that makes everyone – from the C-suite to everyday citizens – sit up and take notice. One headline estimates that the equivalent of one dumper truck of textiles is either landfilled or incinerated every second around the world. As if that wasn’t a smack in the face, it’s estimated that textile waste is set to increase by about 60% between 2015 and 2030. Left unchanged, the fashion industry is projected to use 26% of the world’s carbon budget by 2050. So, this spells very bad news for the planet.
So with a worsening situation, you might wonder what on earth have we been doing for 17 years if all that we’re seeing is a worsening textile waste landscape! Yes, the reality can be quite dispiriting because, on a bad day, we might feel like we’re on a sinking ship. But on all good days, which are most of them, we continue to strongly believe that the fashion industry is a highly impactful industry to influence positively, so we forge on.
In terms of our mission, over the last 17 years, we have adapted our first founding mission three times to reflect the changes in the problems and solutions that we seek to influence. We’ve gone from “promote sustainable fashion” to “reduce waste in fashion” to now “accelerate the transition towards a circular fashion system by educating designers and consumers to reduce fashion’s negative environmental impacts”. Despite these apparent changes, the essence of our spirit and resolve is unchanged, and that is, basically, to shift fashion from being a polluter to a pioneer.
GQ: How much have you changed as a leader and activist in that time?
Courtesy: Redress
Christina Dean: I’ve grown up so much in 17 years, in so many aspects of my life and work. Looking at the fashion industry, I’ve gone from the early days of pointing angry fingers at various parts of the fashion industry to now wholeheartedly understanding that we must embrace the industry and work within the reality of business and its various parameters. I am very pro-industry as a sustainable way to drive long-term change.
I have also put my pointy fingers away when it comes to consumers. I used to be relatively frustrated and judgmental about what could be considered rather negligent consumers who shop until they drop, so to speak. I am now humbler and more understanding about why consumers love to shop, the deeper psychological desires underpinning this, and I also accept why many are not really that interested in sustainable fashion issues, with so many other competing worries, like how to pay their bills being one obvious example.
I guess 17 years of life – that saw us found Redress and The R Collective and have four kids and get divorced – has given me a better understanding of life and self. So I’m more accepting of the disorder around me, whether that’s in the office, in the supply chain, in an ESG report, or in my own head! Despite this acceptance, I’ve not mellowed at all. I see the urgency to act as being greater than ever before, and so my focus and resolve are as they ever were. I just realise that change happens slowly and that our work is just a few little sprinkles of goodness at this point in time.
GQ: What’s your biggest learning, 17 years later?
Christina Dean: I’ve come to respect the fashion industry, its suppliers, its spinners, weavers, farmers, etc., very deeply, and I see such wonderful and enormous talent, generosity, determination, and humanity and love throughout the business. I’ve met the most incredible activists working in the fastest and cheapest of the big fast-fashion brands; I’ve met recyclers with bigger brains than their machines; and I’ve met CEOs with more conviction for change than prolific activists.
So I’ve come to realise that the humans behind the machines, spreadsheets, steering wheels, and boardrooms of fashion are pretty amazing people, who bring optimism to the challenges at hand. We are all only human, against some inhumanly complex issues, so I’m lucky to work with incredible people.
GQ: Did you plan for Redress to become this big? Was this always your plan or did it get bigger than your original ideas?
Christina Dean at the Redress Design Award 2024 | Courtesy: Redress
Christina Dean: Redress becoming what it is today is a bit of an accident really. When I founded it, I never thought for a moment that 17 years on, I would still be as passionate and excited about the mission as the day I decided to start it. I’m lucky that I am a curious and collaborative person and that this, coupled with a good sense of humour and a glass-half-full nature – which is important when certain things hit the fan! – have enabled Redress to rise from a toddler, tween to teen.
It’s my dream that Redress survives without me – I’m always watching out for that bus; you just never know! We are well on our way now, with a strong board, great executive director and senior management team, and with a longer-term strategy and fundraising approach.
We have a saying at Redress: “I’d rather be a pirate than join the navy.” And this sums up our spirit, so each day remains a hustle in the office as we’re always on our toes for the next rollercoaster ride.
GQ: Did you foresee the negative effects of e-commerce and online shopping?
Christina Dean: Not really. I would not call myself highly astute at consumer trends and habits. That said, it’s obvious that when something becomes cheap and convenient, it takes off. This is as true for takeaways as it is for buying clothes online. So it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to know that the proliferation of e-commerce, especially during COVID, has changed the way we buy clothes – i.e., more, more, more – as indeed e-commerce has changed how some clothes are produced – i.e., more poorer quality fabrics can get away with it online.
I remain shocked by e-commerce’s high return rates, which are around 30% of all purchases globally. I’m personally not a very ‘typical’ fashion consumer, in that I don’t sit around online surfing for clothes that I don’t really want/need, so I find it surprising that people would overconsume styles and sizes and then post clothes back. I’ve seen firsthand the waste this creates because many businesses are unable, for various reasons, to get their customers’ returns back.
The Year of the Rat is quickly approaching, which means it’s time to take out your Chinese candy boxes out from your cupboards and fill them up with delicious goodies. While we are big fans of the tradition, many of the sweet treats that you’ll find aren’t exactly vegan-friendly. So if you’re wondering what to put in your “tray of togetherness” this year, we’re here to help with these 5 Chinese snacks that are totally plant-based!
1. Melon Seeds (Gua zi)
Source: CNY
Melon seeds are traditionally enjoyed during the Lunar New Year because they symbolise abundance and wealth! Not only do they supposedly bring in prosperity, these perfectly snackable (and addictive) black and red seeds are super healthy too – they are super rich in iron, magnesium and folate.
2. Pistachios (Hoi sum guo)
Source: Pinterest
Pistachios are another completely healthy vegan whole food snack that Chinese families dig into during the Spring Festival. As some of you may know, these delicious nuts are called hoi sum guo in Chinese, which literally translates to “happy nuts.” So make sure to fill your boxes up with some pistachios to spread the joy.
3. Candied Ginger (Geung tong)
Source: Foodal
Crystallised ginger or candied ginger is a much-loved traditional Chinese snack. Though enjoyed year-round, these feature in many candy trays because ginger is considered a very healthy food that will bring about longevity in Chinese culture. You can either make your own version at home or find them in most market stalls and Chinese supermarkets.
4. Mandarins (Gam)
Source: Pinterest
Of course, mandarins are an iconic fruit that appears every year during the Spring festivities. This is mainly because the Chinese word for mandarins – gam or gum – sounds just like gold, so this mini auspicious fruit is thought to represent good wealth and fortune. Plus, these are so delicious and so healthy!
We know that most modern Chinese candy boxes are now filled with chocolate coins and gummy candies, so complete your box with some vegan-friendly sweet alternatives. We propose vegan dark chocolate buttons to replace the chocolate coins, and gelatin-free gummies – both of which can be found in the city’s zero-waste bulk food stores. Plus, they come packaging-free so you don’t have to worry about the pesky pile of disposable waste that conventional versions come with.
Taipei, February 1, 2024— A Hong Kong court found journalists Wong Ka-ho and Ma Kai-chung guilty of unlawfully entering the legislative council on July 1, 2019, during a protest where demonstrators stormed the parliament in opposition to an extradition bill that would have allowed authorities to send Hong Kong citizens to mainland China for trial, according to newsreports.
Hong Kong authorities should drop the charges, the Committee to Protect Journalists said Thursday, and allow journalists to report freely without fear.
At the time of the incident, Wong was reporting for a student publication at the City University of Hong Kong, while Ma worked as a reporter for the newspaper and online news website Passion Times.
The two were charged with rioting and unlawfully entering the legislative council along with 11 other co-defendants. Both Wong and Ma pleaded not guilty to the charges, according to Passion Times and a copy of the verdict reviewed by CPJ.
Authorities released the journalists on bail Thursday pending sentencing, according to those reports. They face a potential fine of 2,000 Hong Kong dollars (USD $255) and up to 3 months imprisonment, according to the city’s Legislative Council Ordinance.
“The verdict today contradicts the freedom of the press that Hong Kong authorities have repeatedly assured, and unfortunately, it could serve as a bellwether for future cases involving journalists covering significant events,” said Iris Hsu, CPJ’s China representative. “Journalists must be free to report on civil unrest without fear of being prosecuted.”
Hong Kong Journalists Association released a statement calling the verdict “unreasonable,” saying that it disregards the freedom of the press that is guaranteed by law.
CPJ was unable to confirm whether the journalists plan to appeal.
The Hong Kong Police Force did not immediately respond to CPJ’s email requesting comment.
China is the world’s worst jailer of journalists, according to CPJ’s annual prison census, with at least 44 journalists in prison for their work as of December 1, 2023.
Meet Joey Siu, a Human Rights Foundation (HRF) Freedom Fellow and Hong Kong activist based in Washington, D.C. Siu played a vital role in Hong Kong’s 2019 pro-democracy protests, co-founding a student advocacy coalition and organizing city-wide demonstrations. After fleeing Hong Kong in 2020, Siu served as an advisor to the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China and a policy advisor to Hong Kong Watch. Siu is currently an Asia Pacific coordinator for the World Liberty Congress, an advisor to the Athenai Institute, and oversees the Hong Kong program at the National Democratic Institute.
In exile, Siu remains a dedicated advocate for Hong Kongers, Tibetans, Uyghurs, and other communities oppressed by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Learn more about her activism in the exclusive interview below.
Q: Tell us a little bit about yourself and your current projects.
A: I am a human rights activist from Hong Kong (HK). Back in 2019, when the pro-democracy movement in Hong Kong first started, I was one of the student leaders who led many of the on-campus activities and city-wide protests and demonstrations. In 2019, I also co-founded a student coalition with other student activists in HK to solidify international advocacy efforts for HK. I was forced to flee HK in late 2020 and settled in Washington, D.C. Since then, my efforts have been focused on international advocacy for HK’s democratic freedoms overseas.
I am establishing a regional activist network for women advocates to connect, amplify, and empower one another and to elevate women leaders in this space. Beyond that, I am very active in the HK diaspora community and working to foster cross-movement solidarity with other communities under the repression of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
Q: How do you feel about the bounty HK authorities placed on your head?
A: On Dec. 13, I woke up to the news that HK authorities issued an arrest warrant and a $1 million HK bounty on me. Ever since I fled, I knew this could happen given the Chinese and HK authorities’ efforts to silence dissent, not just from those in HK but from those in exile. But this bounty is like a death certification — I can really never go back. I was overwhelmed by the news and the actions I’ve had to take to step up my personal security.
I — and the 12 others with bounties on their heads — saw this coming. They issued the bounty to threaten us, to deter us from continuing our advocacy, to scare us, and to really intimidate us. But that will not work on me. I will not stop; I will continue my advocacy until I can return to HK.
Q: What tactics does the Chinese regime employ to suppress activists like yourself?
A: The overseas communities have lobbied for international attention on China and HK and all of the human rights atrocities committed by the CCP. That is why the CCP is trying so hard to silence us.
Over the past few years, the CCP and the HK authorities have stepped up their transnational repression. We’ve witnessed a wide variety of tactics employed by the CCP, from holding our loved ones back home as hostages to infiltrating our communities, setting up secret police stations all across the world, including in the United States, to coercing different stakeholders and industries to spy on their behalf.
These tactics have not been used just against Chinese and Hong Kongers but also against Uyghurs and Tibetans. And we’ve seen other authoritarian regimes copying the CCP’s tactics, including Russia, Iran, and Belarus. In fact, these regimes are working hand-in-hand to silence dissent overseas.
Q: Should democracies be paying more attention?
A: I want to stress that the impact of transnational repression extends beyond the activists. Beyond spying on dissidents overseas, tactics include economic coercion, brainwashing, and education through Confucius institutes in American universities and colleges. Those tactics impact every individual living in a democracy.
Democracies all across the world should pay attention to this and take concrete steps to combat transnational repression on their soil and in other democracies. Securing the safety and security of dissidents like me is an essential step to allowing us to have the freedom to continue speaking up and to continue confronting authoritarianism.
Q: How has the Freedom Fellowship supported you in your work?
A: The Fellowship allowed me to meet activists from communities I otherwise would not have been in touch with as actively or frequently. In my cohort, I met activists from Bolivia, Cuba, Myanmar, Morocco, Egypt, and more. I got to talk with them and learn the tactics they’ve used to overcome challenges and unite their communities. Fostering relationships and strategizing on campaigns together was the most valuable experience for me.
Building that cross-community solidarity is essential. We see dictators working together and it is of the utmost importance that we, human rights activists, are working together. Democratic backsliding is not an issue faced by one community alone; it is an issue faced by all communities under oppression.
Q: What have you recently been doing? What do you hope to achieve in 2024?
A: After the news about the HK bounty broke, I had several meetings with US congressional offices. I met with the House Foreign Affairs Committee, Chairman Mike Gallagher of the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party, and Sen. Jennifer Sullivan. Hopefully, these meetings will lead to legislation to combat transnational repression, but we require a coordinated and bipartisan effort in Congress. I hope to see something like the Transnational Repression Policy Act advanced and adopted in this Congress.
With the ongoing reports of the bounty on me and other activists, Jimmy Lai’s case, and the upcoming sentencing of the 47 activists in HK, we can hopefully take advantage of the momentum. We can push the US government and other democracies to take action.
Additionally, during the 2023 Freedom Fellowship retreat, I came up with the idea of the regional women’s network. In the upcoming months, I want to turn this idea into something concrete—start inviting people to be founding members and board members, start the registration process, and establish a financial foundation and fundraising plan.