Category: iran

  • U.S. President Joe Biden’s nominee to run the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) has told lawmakers that the “biggest geopolitical test” the United States faces comes from China but said Russia remains a familiar threat.

    William Burns, a former ambassador to Russia and Jordan, spoke on February 24 during his confirmation hearing before the Senate Intelligence Committee.

    He called China “a formidable, authoritarian adversary” that is strengthening its ability to steal intellectual property, repress its people, expand its reach, and build influence within the United States.

    But he said there may be room for cooperation with Beijing in areas such as climate change and nuclear nonproliferation.

    He said Russia remained a disruptive and potent threat, although it is in many ways a declining world power.

    “As long as Vladimir Putin is the leader of Russia, we’re going to be operating within a pretty narrow band of possibilities, from the very sharply competitive to the very nastily adversarial,” he said.

    A recent hack of corporations and U.S. government departments believed to have been the work of Russians laid bare the perils of underestimating the Kremlin and served as a “very harsh wake-up” call about the vulnerabilities of supply chains and critical infrastructure, he said.

    Burns said the Biden administration would soon produce an assessment of Russian-related issues, including the hack. Russia has denied involvement.

    “I think it’s essential for the CIA in particular to work even harder to develop our capabilities to help detect these kind of attacks when they come from external players from foreign players,” he told the committee.

    Burns, who was a lead negotiator in the secret talks that paved the way to the 2015 Iran nuclear deal under former President Barack Obama, also commented on Iran, saying it can never be trusted with a nuclear weapon.

    Burns has said he would restore the nuclear deal with other major global powers that former President Donald Trump pulled the United States out of in 2018.

    Burns, 64, is expected to win confirmation and become the first career diplomat to lead the CIA. He has been confirmed by the Senate five times for his stints as ambassador to Jordan and Russia and three senior State Department positions.

    With reporting by Reuters and AP

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • A UN special rapporteur has accused Iran of misleading denials and inadequate investigations after the accidental downing of a Ukrainian passenger jet after takeoff from Tehran’s international airport in January 2020.

    Agnes Callamard, a special rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary, or arbitrary executions, said in a 45-page letter on the findings of a six-month inquiry on February 23 that “Iran committed multiple human rights violations in shooting down Ukraine International Airlines flight PS752 and in the aftermath of the deadly attack.”

    “The inconsistencies in the official explanations seem designed to create a maximum of confusion and a minimum of clarity,” Callamard said in the text, which was reportedly delivered to Iranian officials two months ago. “They seem contrived to mislead and bewilder.”

    After days of official denials following the crash, Iran admitted that its forces had inadvertently shot down the Kyiv-bound plane, killing all 176 people on board, after firing two missiles amid heightened tensions with the United States.

    But Iran’s civilian aviation authority in its final report from July 2020 cited “human error,” saying a broken radar system created communication problems with a military unit.

    “The Iranian government claims it has nothing to hide, yet it has failed to carry out a full and transparent investigation in line with its international obligations. As a result, many questions are left unresolved,” the UN rapporteur said.

    The majority of the victims were Iranians and Canadians, but Afghans, Britons, Swedes, and Ukrainians were also among the dead.

    Ukraine said last month in connection with the first anniversary of the tragedy that all five of those governments would “hold Iran to account to deliver justice and make sure Iran makes full reparations to the families of the victims and affected countries.”

    Iran announced in December 2020 that the government had allocated $150,000 for the families of each of the victims — an offer rejected by the Ukrainian and Canadian governments, as well as some of the families of the victims, who see it as an attempt to close the case and escape accountability.

    Human Rights Watch (HRW) marked the anniversary of the crash by accusing Iranian authorities of harassing and intimidating the victims’ families instead of conducting a “transparent and credible” investigation.

    Flight 752 was downed the same night that Iran launched a ballistic-missile attack that targeted U.S. soldiers in Iraq. Tehran’s air defenses were on high alert in case of retaliation.

    Iran’s missile attack was in response to a U.S. drone strike that killed the powerful commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps, Major General Qasem Soleimani, in Baghdad five days earlier.

    With reporting by dpa

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Britain, France, and Germany on February 23 criticized Iran’s decision to abandon a snap-inspections regime and reduce transparency as part of a mounting standoff over the fate of a 2015 nuclear agreement with world powers.

    Iran confirmed a day earlier that it had ended its implementation of the Additional Protocol allowing for surprise inspections of nuclear-related sites.

    That move signaled a further disintegration of the so-called Joint Comprehensive Plan Of Action (JCPOA) among Iran and world powers that the previous U.S. administration abandoned in 2018.

    “We…deeply regret that Iran has started, as of today, to suspend the Additional Protocol and the transparency measures under the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action,” the British, French, and German foreign ministers said in a joint statement.

    “We urge Iran to stop and reverse all measures that reduce transparency and to ensure full and timely cooperation with the IAEA,” they added.

    Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei also vowed “not to back down on the nuclear issue” and floated the possibility of dramatically escalating uranium enrichment.

    Washington and its Western partners have been scrambling to salvage the JCPOA since U.S. President Joe Biden took office in January vowing a return to the deal while preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapons capability.

    Meanwhile, the director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) on February 23 laid out details of a deal he worked out with Iranian officials last weekend to preserve some monitoring for up to three months beyond Tehran’s deadline for nixing the snap inspections.

    Rafael Grossi described a system whereby data and “key activities” would be monitored and stored but not made available until after the period in question.

    “In other words, we will know exactly what happened, exactly how many components were fabricated, exactly how much material was processed or treated or enriched and so on and so forth,” Grossi told an event hosted by the U.S. think tank called the Nuclear Threat Initiative.

    In a sign that the nuclear issue is further pitting hard-liners against President Hassan Rohani’s administration, lawmakers in Iran’s parliament on February 22 objected to the government’s decision to allow the continued IAEA monitoring.

    The state-run newspaper Iran countered on February 23 by suggesting that the parliamentarians’ tough line could leave Iran “alone as in the past” on the international stage.

    The White House has said that its European allies are awaiting a response from Iran on an offer to host an informal meeting of current members of the JCPOA.

    The United States and other governments have accused Iran of secretly trying to build a nuclear-weapons capability, a charge that Tehran has consistently rejected despite years of what the IAEA said was obfuscation and deception.

    Based on reporting by Reuters

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • A State Deparment spokesman said the United States will hold Iran “responsible” for a rocket barrage on February 22 that targeted the U.S. Embassy in the Iraqi capital.

    But it said it won’t “lash out” in response.

    Iraq’s army said earlier that there were no casualties when the embassy, within Baghdad’s heavily fortified Green Zone, was targeted by the rockets.

    It said there was only minor property damage, including a damaged vehicle.

    Iraqi security officials said three rockets were fired at the U.S. Embassy. They said one rocket fell within the perimeter of the vast embassy complex and another fell in the nearby residential neighborhood of Harthiya just outside of the Green Zone.

    Iraqi officials said the rockets had been launched from the Al-Salam neighborhood to the southwest of the Green Zone.

    There was no immediate claim of responsibility for the attack.

    Baghdad’s Green Zone houses foreign embassies as well as the seat of Iraq’s government.

    The rocket barrage was the third attack to target the U.S. presence in Iraq in a week.

    A contractor working for the U.S.-led coalition in Iraq was killed and several other civilians were wounded by a rocket attack outside Irbil International Airport in northern Iraq on February 16.

    A little-known Shi’ite militant group that calls itself the Guardians of Blood Brigade claimed responsibility for that attack.

    On October 20, rockets wounded employees of a U.S. defense company at Balad Air Base in Salahaddin Province about 70 kilometers north of Baghdad.

    The U.S. Embassy had been a frequent target of rocket attacks during the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump. The pace of attacks slowed during the weeks before President Joe Biden took office. But attacks recently have become more frequent.

    Based on reporting by AP and Reuters

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • A State Department spokesman has said the United States will hold Iran “responsible” for a rocket barrage on February 22 that targeted the U.S. Embassy in the Iraqi capital.

    But it said it won’t “lash out” in response.

    Iraq’s army said earlier that there were no casualties when the embassy, within Baghdad’s heavily fortified Green Zone, was targeted by the rockets.

    It said there was only minor property damage, including a damaged vehicle.

    Iraqi security officials said three rockets were fired at the U.S. Embassy. They said one rocket fell within the perimeter of the vast embassy complex and another fell in the nearby residential neighborhood of Harthiya just outside of the Green Zone.

    Iraqi officials said the rockets had been launched from the Al-Salam neighborhood to the southwest of the Green Zone.

    There was no immediate claim of responsibility for the attack.

    Baghdad’s Green Zone houses foreign embassies as well as the seat of Iraq’s government.

    The rocket barrage was the third attack to target the U.S. presence in Iraq in a week.

    A contractor working for the U.S.-led coalition in Iraq was killed and several other civilians were wounded by a rocket attack outside Irbil International Airport in northern Iraq on February 16.

    A little-known Shi’ite militant group that calls itself the Guardians of Blood Brigade claimed responsibility for that attack.

    On October 20, rockets wounded employees of a U.S. defense company at Balad Air Base in Salahaddin Province about 70 kilometers north of Baghdad.

    The U.S. Embassy had been a frequent target of rocket attacks during the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump. The pace of attacks slowed during the weeks before President Joe Biden took office. But attacks recently have become more frequent.

    Based on reporting by AP and Reuters

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas has called on Iran to fully comply with the 2015 nuclear pact with world powers which he said was in Tehran’s interest.

    Addressing the UN-sponsored Conference on Disarmament in Geneva on February 22, Maas noted U.S. President Joe Biden’s administration’s stated readiness to rejoin the pact, adding: “It is in Iran’s best interest to change course now, before the agreement is damaged beyond repair.”

    Maas said that Germany expected “full compliance, full transparency, and full cooperation” from Iran with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), whose chief Rafael Grossi returned on February 21 from a trip to Tehran.

    Iran on February 22 hailed the outcome of Grossi’s visit and a temporary agreement the two sides reached on site inspections as a “significant achievement.”

    That deal effectively bought time as all sides try to salvage the agreement, which was pushed to the brink of collapse when former U.S. President Donald Trump withdrew from it in 2018.

    Tehran is demanding that Washington remove punishing sanctions Trump reimposed in 2018, while Washington has called on Iran to first return to all of its nuclear commitments.

    In the standoff, Iran’s conservative-dominated parliament has demanded that the country limit some inspections by the IAEA from February 23.

    Grossi hammered out a temporary technical deal with Tehran during his visit, whereby Iran will continue to allow access to UN inspectors to its nuclear sites — but will for three months bar inspections of other, non-nuclear sites.

    Grossi said afterwards that the “temporary solution” enables the IAEA to retain “a necessary degree of monitoring and verification work.”

    Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesman, Saeed Khatibzadeh, said on February 22 that the talks had “resulted in a very significant diplomatic achievement and a very significant technical achievement.”

    Khatibzadeh stressed that the outcome was “within the framework of parliament’s binding law.”

    Under the agreement reached over the weekend with the IAEA, Iran will temporarily suspend so-called “voluntary transparency measures” — notably inspections of non-nuclear sites, including military sites suspected of nuclear-related activity.

    Tehran will for “three months record and keep the information of some activities and monitoring equipment” at such sites, Iran’s Atomic Energy Organization said.

    This means that cameras will keep running at those sites, “but no footage will be given to the IAEA,” Khatibzadeh said.

    The footage will be deleted after three months if the U.S. sanctions are not lifted, Iran’s atomic body has said.

    With reporting by Reuters, AFP, and dpa

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Authorities in Iran said on February 21 that an imprisoned activist from the Sufi Gonabadi dervish religious minority died days after being hospitalized for what they say was poisoning caused by drug consumption.

    Behnam Mahjubi had been jailed after taking part in a demonstration along with other members of the Gonabadi order in 2018 and started serving a two-year prison sentence in June.

    Mahjubi was reportedly taken from the notorious Evin Prison and admitted to a local hospital on February 16.

    The Gonabadi order strongly opposes the use of drugs.

    Mahjubi’s wife, Saleh Hosseini, told RFE/RL’s Radio Farda last week after being allowed to see her husband in the intensive care unit of Loghman hospital in Tehran that he had been denied timely medical care and that contributed to his falling into a coma.

    Mahjubi’s mother said last week that her son was breathing with the aid of a ventilator while handcuffed to a hospital bed in the hospital’s intensive care unit.

    The Gonabadi dervishes have spent years clashing intermittently with Iranian authorities, with critics saying Iran’s leadership regards them as a threat to its monopoly on religion.

    Some conservative clerics have called the Sufis a danger to Islam.

    “Special medical care was administered after he was hospitalized, but despite the medical team’s efforts, the prisoner unfortunately passed away,” Iran’s judiciary said on an official website on February 21.

    Security troops have destroyed Gonabadi houses of worship and detained members en masse on a number of occasions.

    Amnesty International says the persecution of dervishes in Iran increased after an October 2010 speech by Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, who denounced “newly created circles of false mysticism.”

    Based on reporting by RFE/RL’s Radio Farda and AFP

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • President Joe Biden’s national-security adviser, Jake Sullivan, said on February 21 that the new administration has “begun to communicate with the Iranians” on the issue of detained Americans.

    Speaking on a weekend current-affairs program, Sullivan said Washington’s “strong message to the Iranians will be that…we will not accept a long-term proposition where they continue to hold Americans in an unjust and unlawful manner.”

    The United States has repeatedly called on Iran to help locate former FBI agent Robert Levinson, who disappeared when he traveled to the Iranian resort of Kish Island in 2007 and is presumed dead.

    At least four other American-Iranians are thought to still be in Iranian custody.

    “It will be a significant priority of this administration to get those Americans safely back home,” Sullivan said.

    The United States and other Western governments have long accused Tehran of detaining dual nationals who visit Iran and other foreign nationals — frequently on dubious espionage charges — in order to use them as bargaining chips for prisoner swaps.

    “We intend to very directly communicate with the Iranians about the complete and utter outrage, the humanitarian catastrophe that is the unjust, unlawful detention of American citizens in Iran,” Sullivan said on CBS’s Face The Nation program. “We have begun to communicate with the Iranians on this issue, yes. And we will continue to do so as we go forward.”

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • The head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Rafael Grossi, has met with Ali Akbar Salehi, the head of the civilian Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, ahead of Tehran’s February 23 deadline to reduce United Nations inspections of the country’s nuclear facilities if U.S. sanctions are not lifted, Iranian media reported on February 21.

    Iran has said that it would stop implementing “voluntary transparency measures” under the 2015 nuclear agreement with major powers, including the so-called Additional Protocol, which allows IAEA inspectors to visit undeclared sites in Iran at short notice. Tehran has said that the steps are reversible.

    The International Atomic Energy Agency said last week that Grossi’s visit to Tehran was aimed at finding “a mutually agreeable solution for the IAEA to continue essential verification activities in the country.”

    Iran has stressed it will not cease working with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) or expel its inspectors.

    Iran and six major powers struck a landmark nuclear deal in 2015 that called for curbs on Iran’s uranium-enrichment program in return for the lifting of international sanctions.

    But President Donald Trump in May 2018 pulled his country out of the accord and reimposed crippling sanctions on Iran, saying the terms were not strict enough.

    In response, Tehran has gradually breached the deal by building up its stockpile of low-enriched uranium, refining uranium to a higher level of purity, and using advanced centrifuges for enrichment.

    The administration of President Joe Biden is exploring ways to return to the deal.

    The White House said on February 19 that the European Union has floated the idea of a conversation among Iran and the six major powers that signed the deal.

    On the same day, Biden said that Washington is prepared to reengage with the international partners that signed the deal on Iran’s nuclear program.

    Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi said on February 20 that his country is considering the European Union’s offer to host a meeting between Iran and the other parties to the 2015 nuclear deal.

    “Now we are considering [the offer],and are engaged in consultations with our other friends and partners like China and Russia,” Araqchi was quoted as saying by Iranian media.

    “However, we believe a U.S return to the nuclear accord does not require a meeting and the only way for it is to lift the sanctions,” Araqchi said.

    With reporting by AFP, AP, PressTV, and IRNA

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • The United States plans no additional actions in response to pressure from Tehran ahead of proposed talks on a return to the 2015 Iran nuclear deal, the White House said on February 19.

    The White House has “no plan to take additional steps” on Iran in advance of having a “diplomatic conversation” about a possible U.S. return to the deal, spokeswoman Jen Psaki said.

    Psaki noted the European Union has floated the idea of a conversation among Iran and the six major powers that struck the agreement: Britain, China, France, Germany, Russia, and the United States, known as the P5+1.

    “The Europeans have invited us and…it is simply an invitation to have a conversation, a diplomatic conversation,” she said, speaking to reporters on Air Force One as President Joe Biden flew to Michigan.

    The European Union is working on organizing an informal meeting with all participants, a senior EU official said on February 19.

    In an address the same day to the Munich Security Conference, Biden said that Washington is prepared to reengage with the international partners that signed the deal on Iran’s nuclear program.

    Biden also said his administration is going to work with Europe and “other partners” to address Iran’s “destabilizing activities across the Middle East.”

    In 2015, the P5+1 — the five permanent members of the UN Security Council, plus Germany — signed a landmark agreement with Tehran that called for curbs on Iran’s nuclear program in return for the lifting of international sanctions.

    But in 2018, U.S. President Donald Trump withdrew the United States from the accord and reimposed crippling sanctions on Iran. In response, Tehran has increasingly breached limits it had agreed to under the pact.

    The United States on February 19 also notified the UN Security Council that it had withdrawn Trump’s September 2020 invocation of the so-called “snap-back” mechanism under which it insisted that all UN sanctions against Iran were to be reimposed.

    The United States said earlier this week that it was ready to talk to Iran about both nations returning to the deal. But the countries have been at odds over which one should make the first step.

    Iran has said the United States must first lift sanctions, while Washington says Tehran must first return to compliance with the deal.

    Iran said on February 19 that it would “immediately reverse” actions that contradict a 2015 nuclear agreement once U.S. sanctions are lifted.

    When sanctions are lifted, “we will then immediately reverse all remedial measures. Simple,” Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif said on Twitter.

    With reporting by Reuters and AFP

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Whether you are working from your DC office or your home in LA or New York, here’s all you need to know to become an expert on Iran.

    1. Always refer to Iran as the “Islamic Republic” and its government as “the regime” or, better yet, “the Mullahs.”

    2. Never refer to Iran’s foreign policy. The correct terminology is its “behavior.” When U.S. officials say Iran “must change its behavior” and “behave like a normal country,” write those quotes down word for word. Everyone knows that Iran is a delinquent kid that always instigates trouble and must be disciplined.

    3. Omit that Iran has a population of 80 million with half a dozen ethnicities, languages, and religions. Why complicate when you can do simple?

    The post How To Write About Iran appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • The United States, in apparent moves to tamp down tensions with a bitter rival, says it is prepared to meet with Iran over its nuclear program and it eased “extremely restrictive” limits on movements of Iranian diplomats accredited at the New York-headquartered United Nations.

    The U.S. administration on February 18 also notified the UN Security Council that it had withdrawn then-President Donald Trump’s September 2020 invoking of the “snapback” mechanism under which it insisted that all UN sanctions against Iran were to be reimposed.

    Richard Mills, the acting U.S. ambassador to the UN, said in a letter that sanctions purported to be reinstated in August “remain terminated.”

    Former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo at the time insisted the United States was technically still a part in the 2015 accord and that it was triggering UN sanctions for Iranian violations.

    However, even U.S. allies dismissed Pompeo’s argument and the UN said no such sanctions would come into effect.

    The series of moves represents a change in tenor with regards to relations between Washington and Tehran.

    Trump had taken a hard line with Iran, accusing it of fomenting extremist violence in the Middle East and of attempting to develop nuclear weapons, allegations Tehran has denied.

    In May 2018, Trump pulled the United States out of the 2015 Iran nuclear deal and reimposed crippling sanctions on Tehran. In turn, Iran began breaching terms of the accord.

    President Joe Biden has expressed a willingness to reengage with Tehran, although he has insisted it must return to the terms of the 2015 deal before it would discuss the possibility of easing sanctions.

    The State Department said the United States would accept an invitation from the European Union to attend a meeting of the signees of the nuclear deal.

    Washington has not participated in such meetings since Trump withdrew from the deal.

    “The United States would accept an invitation from the European Union High Representative to attend a meeting of the P5+1 and Iran to discuss a diplomatic way forward on Iran’s nuclear program,” State Department spokesman Ned Price said.

    An invitation has not yet been issued, but one is expected shortly, following discussions on February 18 among top U.S., British, French, and German diplomats.

    Meanwhile, the U.S. mission to the UN said the United States was easing tough restrictions imposed by the Trump administration on movements of Iranian UN diplomats.

    “The idea here is to take steps to remove unnecessary obstacles to multilateral diplomacy by amending the restrictions on domestic travel. Those had been extremely restrictive,” a State Department official told reporters.

    Trump in 2019 barred Iranian diplomats from all but a few blocks around the UN headquarters and their mission.

    Iranian diplomats will still be subject to restrictions on diplomats linked to nations with poor relations with the United States, such as North Korea, the State Department said. Those require authorization to travel beyond a 40-kilometer radius from Manhattan.

    With on reporting by AP, AFP, and Reuters

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • The top diplomats from the United States, Germany, France, and Britain are holding talks on ways to revive the landmark 2015 nuclear deal with Iran, which Washington pulled out of in 2018.

    The deal signed by Tehran with the four Western powers, along with China and Russia, called for curbs on Iran’s uranium-enrichment program in return for the lifting of sanctions.

    President Donald Trump in May 2018 pulled his country out of the accord and reimposed crippling sanctions on Iran, saying the terms were not strict enough to prevent Tehran from developing nuclear weapons.

    Iran has maintained that its nuclear program is strictly for civilian purposes.

    The other signatories have been attempting to save the accord. But since the U.S. pullout, Tehran has increasingly breached limits it had agreed to under the deal.

    German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas and British Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab met France’s Jean-Yves Le Drian for talks in Paris on February 18. New U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken joined through a video link.

    “The recent steps of Iran are not helpful at all, they endanger the return of the Americans” to the deal, German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas told reporters in Paris.

    “Apparently Iran is not interested in easing the tensions, but in escalation. They are playing with fire,” he said.

    U.S. President Joe Biden has indicated more willingness to deal with Iran than his predecessor did, but he has publicly stated Tehran must adhere to its commitment under the 2015 deal before his administration will discuss the possibility of lifting sanctions.

    Blinken said last month he wants to coordinate with U.S. allies to get to a “longer and stronger agreement” with Iran.

    Based on reporting by AFP and Reuters

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • U.S. President Joe Biden and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu have spoken by phone amid reports of a strained relationship between the two countries following Netanyahu’s close ties to the Trump administration.

    A statement released on February 17 by the Israeli leader’s office said the two leaders discussed the “Iranian threat” as well as other issues, including the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Netanyahu was one of the last leaders of a U.S. ally to receive a call from Biden since the U.S. president’s January 20 inauguration.

    Netanyahu had close ties with Biden’s predecessor, Donald Trump, who pushed what was seen as a heavily pro-Israel agenda that angered many Arab nations, along with some U.S. allies in Europe and elsewhere.

    The prime minister is facing a tough fight in a legislative election scheduled for March 23. The relationship with Washington is of crucial importance to Israeli voters.

    Netanyahu’s office was the first to announce the conversation and released a photo of a smiling prime minister holding a phone to his ear. The one-hour conversation was “warm and friendly,” his office said.

    “The two leaders noted their long-standing personal connection and said that they would work together to continue strengthening the steadfast alliance between Israel and the U.S.,” the statement said.

    It added that topics included “the Iranian threat” of developing nuclear weapons, efforts to fight the coronavirus pandemic, and the desire to expand Israel’s new deals establishing relations with Arab nations.

    During his presidential campaign, Biden criticized Trump’s decision to pull out of the landmark 2015 nuclear accord that Iran signed with world powers. Netanyahu adamantly backed Trump’s move, which involved reinstating crushing sanctions on Iran, Israel’s main rival in the region.

    Biden has publicly stated that Iran must adhere to its commitment under the 2015 deal before his administration will discuss the possibility of lifting sanctions.

    Tehran, under the deal with the United States, China, Russia, Germany, France, and Britain, agreed to curbs on its uranium-enrichment program in return for the lifting of sanctions. Iran has always denied pursuing nuclear weapons, saying its nuclear program is strictly for civilian purposes.

    Since Trump abandoned the agreement and reimposed sanctions, Tehran has gradually breached the deal’s terms.

    With reporting by AP and AFP

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • An earthquake with a magnitude of 5.6 shook southwest Iran near the town of Sisakht late on February 17, with at least 10 people reported to be injured.

    Iranian state TV quoted an official in the region as saying, “People in Sisakht and the town of Yasuj left their homes in panic. Water and electricity have been cut off in Sisakht.”

    “Rescue teams and ambulances have been dispatched to the area. So far, 10 people have been injured,” the official added.

    Sisakht, a farming area with a population of around 6,000 people, is about 500 kilometers south of the capital, Tehran.

    State news agency IRNA said the temblor struck at a depth of 10 kilometers at around at 10 p.m.

    IRNA added that there were no immediate reports of fatalities, but the Fars news agency reported that at least two of the injured were in critical condition.

    Regional officials also reported heavy rain in the region and said many people were suffering in extreme cold weather.

    Iran sits on top of major tectonic plates and experiences frequent seismic activity.

    A 7.3-magnitude quake in the western province of Kermanshah killed 620 people in November 2017.

    In 2003, a 6.6-magnitude quake destroyed the ancient mud-brick city of Bam in Iran’s southeast, killing at least 31,000 people.

    Iran’s deadliest was a 7.4-magnitude quake in 1990 that killed 40,000 people, injured 300,000 others, and left half a million homeless in the country’s north.

    Based on reporting by RFE/RL’s Radio Farda, Reuters, IRNA, and AP

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • The top diplomats from the United States, Germany, France, and Britain will hold talks on February 18 to discuss the future of the landmark 2015 nuclear deal with Iran, which Washington pulled out of in 2018.

    The deal signed by Tehran with the four Western powers, along with China and Russia, called for curbs on Iran’s uranium-enrichment program in return for the lifting of sanctions.

    However, President Donald Trump in May 2018 pulled his country out of the accord and reimposed crippling sanctions on Iran, saying the terms were not strict enough to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons.

    Iran has always denied seeking to develop nuclear weapons, saying its nuclear program is strictly for civilian purposes.

    Trump also said Iran had violated the spirit of the accord by financing extremist activity in the region, an allegation Tehran has denied.

    The other signees have been attempting to save the accord. Since the U.S. pullout, Tehran has increasingly breached limits it had agreed to under the deal.

    German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas and British Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab are scheduled to meet France’s Jean-Yves Le Drian for talks in Paris. New U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken will take part through a video link.

    U.S. President Joe Biden has indicated more willingness to deal with Iran than his predecessor did, but he has publicly stated Iran must adhere to its commitment under the 2015 deal before his administration will discuss the possibility of lifting sanctions.

    Blinken said last month he wants to coordinate with U.S. allies to get to a “longer and stronger agreement” with Tehran.

    Based on reporting by dpa and Reuters

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • The top diplomats from the United States, Germany, France, and Britain will hold talks on February 18 to discuss the future of the landmark 2015 nuclear deal with Iran, which Washington pulled out of in 2018.

    The deal signed by Tehran with the four Western powers, along with China and Russia, called for curbs on Iran’s uranium-enrichment program in return for the lifting of sanctions.

    However, President Donald Trump in May 2018 pulled his country out of the accord and reimposed crippling sanctions on Iran, saying the terms were not strict enough to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons.

    Iran has always denied seeking to develop nuclear weapons, saying its nuclear program is strictly for civilian purposes.

    Trump also said Iran had violated the spirit of the accord by financing extremist activity in the region, an allegation Tehran has denied.

    The other signees have been attempting to save the accord. Since the U.S. pullout, Tehran has increasingly breached limits it had agreed to under the deal.

    German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas and British Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab are scheduled to meet France’s Jean-Yves Le Drian for talks in Paris. U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken will take part through a video link.

    U.S. President Joe Biden has indicated more willingness to deal with Iran than his predecessor did, but he has publicly stated that Iran must adhere to its commitment under the 2015 deal before his administration will discuss the possibility of lifting sanctions.

    Blinken said last month he wants to coordinate with U.S. allies to achieve a “longer and stronger agreement” with Tehran.

    Based on reporting by dpa and Reuters

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • As Congress still struggles to pass a COVID relief bill, the rest of the world is nervously reserving judgment on America’s new president and his foreign policy, after successive U.S. administrations have delivered unexpected and damaging shocks to the world and the international system. 
     
    Cautious international optimism toward President Biden is very much based on his commitment to Obama’s signature diplomatic achievement, the JCPOA or nuclear agreement with Iran. Biden and the Democrats excoriated Trump for withdrawing from it and promised to promptly rejoin the deal if elected. But Biden now appears to be hedging his position in a way that risks turning what should be an easy win for the new administration into an avoidable and tragic diplomatic failure.

    The post Is Biden Committing Diplomatic Suicide Over The Iran Nuclear Agreement? appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei says Iran wants to see “action not words” from the signatories of the 2015 nuclear deal, after the new U.S. administration said it could return to the pact that was abandoned by former President Donald Trump.

    “We have heard many nice words and promises which in practice have been broken and opposite actions have been taken. Words and promises are no good. This time [we want] only action from the other side and we will also act,” Khamenei said in a televised speech on February 17.

    U.S. President Joe Biden has said Washington will return to the nuclear pact abandoned by Trump in 2018 if Tehran first resumes full compliance. Tehran says Washington must act first.

    Under the deal with the United States, China, Russia, Germany, France, and Britain, Iran agreed to curbs on its uranium-enrichment program in return for the lifting of sanctions.

    Iran has always denied pursuing nuclear weapons, saying its nuclear program is strictly for civilian purposes.

    Since Trump abandoned the agreement and reimposed sanctions, Tehran has gradually breached the deal’s terms.

    On February 16, the International Atomic Energy Organization (IAEA) confirmed that Iran had informed it that it plans to reduce its cooperation with the UN atomic watchdog’s inspectors as of February 23.

    The Vienna-based agency said that Tehran had told it that it would stop implementing “voluntary transparency measures” including the so-called Additional Protocol, which allows IAEA inspectors to visit undeclared sites in Iran at short notice.

    Based on reporting by Reuters, AFP, and dpa

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Bulgarian authorities say they have confiscated more than 400 kilograms of heroin from a ship traveling from Dubai that was transporting construction materials from Iran.

    Prosecutor Vladimir Chavdarov said on February 16 that the drugs were divided into 487 packages and hidden among asphalt rollers, which the ship was carrying.

    Customs officials in the Black Sea port of Varna valued the seized heroin at about $22 million.

    Prosecutors said the owner of the importing company and a customs official had been detained and charged with drug trafficking.

    The two men could face up to 20 years in prison, if convicted of the charges.

    Bulgarian police believe the heroin was not intended for the domestic market but rather destined to be sold in Western Europe.

    Bulgaria is on the so-called Balkan drug-trafficking route, which is used to supply Western Europe with drugs from Asia and the Middle East.

    With reporting by AP, Reuters, and dpa

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Iran and Russia have embarked on a joint naval drill in the northern part of the Indian Ocean that they say has been designed to “enhance the security” of maritime trade in the region, Iranian state media reported.

    State television said on February 16 that the exercise dubbed Maritime Security Belt will cover an area of about 17,000 square kilometers and include units from the Iranian Navy, the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps’ (IRGC) Navy, and the Russian Navy.

    Iranian Rear Admiral Gholamreza Tahani said its purpose was to “enhance the security of international maritime trade, confront maritime piracy and terrorism, and exchange information.”

    The Indian Navy will also join the exercise, in a message of “peace and friendship for neighboring and regional countries,” Tahani said.

    Iran’s state-run IRNA news agency reported that the drill was scheduled to last three days.

    This is the second joint Russian-Iranian naval exercise since December 2019, when the two countries plus China held a drill in the Indian Ocean and Gulf of Oman.

    Iran and China also participated in military exercises held in Russia in September 2020.

    Tehran has been seeking to step up military cooperation with Beijing and Moscow amid tensions with the United States.

    Iran has also increased its military drills in recent weeks as tensions built during the final days of the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump.

    Tehran is now trying to pressure U.S. President Joe Biden’s new administration to reenter a 2015 nuclear deal between Iran and world powers.

    Last week, the IRGC conducted a ground forces drill in the southwest of Iran near the Iraqi border.

    Trump withdrew the United States from the nuclear pact in 2018 and reimposed crushing sanctions on Iran.

    In response to the U.S. moves, which were accompanied by increased tensions between Iran, the United States, and its allies, Tehran has gradually breached parts of the pact saying it is no longer bound by it.

    The Biden administration has expressed willingness to return to compliance with the accord if Iran does, and then work with U.S. allies and partners on a “longer and stronger” agreement, including other issues such as Iran’s missile program and its support for regional proxy forces.

    Iranian officials insist that the United States should make the first move by returning to the agreement, which eased international sanctions in exchange for curbs on Tehran’s disputed nuclear program.

    They also say that the country’s missile program and regional policies are off the table.

    With reporting by AFP, AP, and Reuters

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Iran says it will block snap inspections by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) beginning next week if other parties to the 2015 nuclear deal do not uphold their obligations under the accord.

    Under legislation enacted last year, the Iranian government is obliged to limit IAEA inspections to declared nuclear sites starting next week if other parties do not fully comply with the deal.

    The move will end the agency’s sweeping inspection powers granted under the nuclear pact to have short-notice access to any location seen as relevant for information gathering.

    Iran’s envoy to the IAEA said on February 15 that Tehran has informed the IAEA about its plan.

    Kazem Gharibabadi, said on Twitter that the law “will be executed on time,” giving February 23 as the date.

    Foreign Ministry spokesman Saeed Khatibzadeh said, however, that the move does not mean all inspections by the UN nuclear watchdog will end.

    “All these steps are reversible if the other party changes its path and honors its obligations,” he said, alluding to the United States.

    Former U.S. President Donald Trump withdrew the United States from the agreement in 2018 and reimposed punishing sanctions against Iran.

    In response, Tehran has gradually breached parts of the pact, saying it is no longer bound by it. Last month, it resumed enriching uranium to 20 percent — a level it achieved before the accord.

    The Biden administration has expressed a willingness to return to the deal but has insisted that Iran move to full compliance with the deal first. Tehran has rejected any preconditions and called for the immediate lifting of sanctions.

    Qatari Foreign Minister Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al-Thani, who said last week that Doha was in consultations to help salvage the deal, met in Tehran with Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif on February 15.

    The minister also met with President Hassan Rohani and delivered a message from the emir of Qatar, Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al-Thani.

    “We welcome efforts by friendly countries like Qatar,” Khatibzadeh said, confirming that there have been consultations between Tehran and Doha at various levels.

    Under the deal — reached by Iran, the United States, China, Russia, Germany, France, and Britain — Iran agreed to curbs on its uranium enrichment program in return for the lifting of sanctions. Iran has always denied pursuing nuclear weapons, saying its nuclear program is strictly for civilian purposes.

    With reporting by AFP and Reuters

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Photo Credit:  CODEPINK

    As Congress still struggles to pass a COVID relief bill, the rest of the world is nervously reserving judgment on America’s new president and his foreign policy, after successive U.S. administrations have delivered unexpected and damaging shocks to the world and the international system.

    Cautious international optimism toward President Biden is very much based on his commitment to Obama’s signature diplomatic achievement, the JCPOA or nuclear agreement with Iran. Biden and the Democrats excoriated Trump for withdrawing from it and promised to promptly rejoin the deal if elected. But Biden now appears to be hedging his position in a way that risks turning what should be an easy win for the new administration into an avoidable and tragic diplomatic failure.

    While it was the United States under Trump that withdrew from the nuclear agreement, Biden is taking the position that the U.S. will not rejoin the agreement or drop its unilateral sanctions until Iran first comes back into compliance. After withdrawing from the agreement, the United States is in no position to make such demands, and Foreign Minister Zarif has clearly and eloquently rejected them, reiterating Iran’s firm commitment that it will return to full compliance as soon as the United States does so.

    Biden should have announced U.S. re-entry as one of his first executive orders. It did not require renegotiation or debate. On the campaign trail, Bernie Sanders, Biden’s main competitor for the Democratic nomination, simply promised, “I would re-enter the agreement on the first day of my presidency.”

    Then-candidate Senator Kirsten Gillibrand said during the Democratic primary, “We need to rejoin our allies in returning to the agreement, provided Iran agrees to comply with the agreement and take steps to reverse its breaches …” Gillibrand said that Iran must “agree” to take those steps, not that it must take them first, presciently anticipating and implicitly rejecting Biden’s self-defeating position that Iran must fully return to compliance with the JCPOA before the United States will rejoin.

    If Biden just rejoins the JCPOA, all of the provisions of the agreement will be back in force and work exactly as they did before Trump opted out. Iran will be subject to the same IAEA inspections and reports as before. Whether Iran is in compliance or not will be determined by the IAEA, not unilaterally by the United States. That is how the agreement works, as all the signatories agreed: China, France, Germany, Iran, Russia, the United Kingdom, the European Union – and the United States.

    So why is Biden not eagerly pocketing this easy first win for his stated commitment to diplomacy? A December 2020 letter supporting the JCPOA, signed by 150 House Democrats, should have reassured Biden that he has overwhelming support to stand up to hawks in both parties.

    But instead Biden seems to be listening to opponents of the JCPOA telling him that Trump’s withdrawal from the agreement has given him “leverage” to negotiate new concessions from Iran before rejoining. Rather than giving Biden leverage over Iran, which has no reason to make further concessions, this has given opponents of the JCPOA leverage over Biden, turning him into the football, instead of the quarterback, in this diplomatic Super Bowl

    American neocons and hawks, including those inside his own administration, appear to be flexing their muscles to kill Biden’s commitment to diplomacy at birth, and his own hawkish foreign policy views make him dangerously susceptible to their arguments. This is also a test of his previously subservient relationship with Israel, whose government vehemently opposes the JCPOA and whose officials have even threatened to launch a military attack on Iran if the U.S. rejoins it, a flagrantly illegal threat that Biden has yet to publicly condemn.

    In a more rational world, the call for nuclear disarmament in the Middle East would focus on Israel, not Iran. As Archbishop Desmond Tutu wrote in the Guardian on December 31, 2020, Israel’s own possession of dozens – or maybe hundreds – of nuclear weapons is the worst kept secret in the world. Tutu’s article was an open letter to Biden, asking him to publicly acknowledge what the whole world already knows and to respond as required under U.S. law to the actual proliferation of nuclear weapons in the Middle East.

    Instead of tackling the danger of Israel’s real nuclear weapons, successive U.S. administrations have chosen to cry “Wolf!” over non-existent nuclear weapons in Iraq and Iran to justify besieging their governments, imposing deadly sanctions on their people, invading Iraq and threatening Iran. A skeptical world is watching to see whether President Biden has the integrity and political will to break this insidious pattern.

    The CIA’s Weapons Intelligence, Nonproliferation and Arms Control Center (WINPAC), which stokes Americans’ fears of imaginary Iranian nuclear weapons and feeds endless allegations about them to the IAEA, is the same entity that produced the lies that drove America to war on Iraq in 2003. On that occasion, WINPAC’s director, Alan Foley, told his staff, “If the president wants to go to war, our job is to find the intelligence to allow him to do so” – even as he privately admitted to his retired CIA colleague Melvin Goodman that U.S. forces searching for WMDs in Iraq would find, “not much, if anything.”

    What makes Biden’s stalling to appease Netanyahu and the neocons diplomatically suicidal at this moment in time is that in November the Iranian parliament passed a law that forces its government to halt nuclear inspections and boost uranium enrichment if U.S. sanctions are not eased by February 21.

    To complicate matters further, Iran is holding its own presidential election on June 18, 2021, and election season — when this issue will be hotly debated — begins after the Iranian New Year on March 21. The winner is expected to be a hawkish hardliner. Trump’s failed policy, which Biden is now continuing by default, has discredited the diplomatic efforts of President Rouhani and Foreign Minister Zarif, confirming for many Iranians that negotiating with America is a fool’s errand.

    If Biden does not rejoin the JCPOA soon, time will be too short to restore full compliance by both Iran and the U.S.— including lifting relevant sanctions — before Iran’s election. Each day that goes by reduces the time available for Iranians to see benefits from the removal of sanctions, leaving little chance that they will vote for a new government that supports diplomacy with the United States.

    The timetable around the JCPOA was known and predictable, so this avoidable crisis seems to be the result of a deliberate decision by Biden to try to appease neocons and warmongers, domestic and foreign, by bullying Iran, a partner in an international agreement he claims to support, to make additional concessions that are not part of the agreement.

    During his election campaign, President Biden promised to “elevate diplomacy as the premier tool of our global engagement.” If Biden fails this first test of his promised diplomacy, people around the world will conclude that, despite his trademark smile and affable personality, Biden represents no more of a genuine recommitment to American partnership in a cooperative “rules-based world” than Trump or Obama did.

    That will confirm the steadily growing international perception that, behind the Republicans’ and Democrats’ good cop-bad cop routine, the overall direction of U.S. foreign policy remains fundamentally aggressive, coercive and destructive. People and governments around the world will continue to downgrade relations with the United States, as they did under Trump, and even traditional U.S. allies will chart an increasingly independent course in a multipolar world where the U.S. is no longer a reliable partner and certainly not a leader.

    So much is hanging in the balance, for the people of Iran suffering and dying under the impact of U.S. sanctions, for Americans yearning for more peaceful relations with our neighbors around the world, and for people everywhere who long for a more humane and equitable international order to confront the massive problems facing us all in this century. Can Biden’s America be part of the solution? After only three weeks in office, surely it can’t be too late. But the ball is in his court, and the whole world is watching.

    The post Is Biden Committing Diplomatic Suicide Over the Iran Nuclear Agreement? first appeared on Dissident Voice.

    This post was originally published on Dissident Voice.

  • by Medea Benjamin and Nicolas J. S. Davies / February 15th, 2021

    Photo Credit:  CODEPINK

    As Congress still struggles to pass a COVID relief bill, the rest of the world is nervously reserving judgment on America’s new president and his foreign policy, after successive U.S. administrations have delivered unexpected and damaging shocks to the world and the international system.

    Cautious international optimism toward President Biden is very much based on his commitment to Obama’s signature diplomatic achievement, the JCPOA or nuclear agreement with Iran. Biden and the Democrats excoriated Trump for withdrawing from it and promised to promptly rejoin the deal if elected. But Biden now appears to be hedging his position in a way that risks turning what should be an easy win for the new administration into an avoidable and tragic diplomatic failure.

    While it was the United States under Trump that withdrew from the nuclear agreement, Biden is taking the position that the U.S. will not rejoin the agreement or drop its unilateral sanctions until Iran first comes back into compliance. After withdrawing from the agreement, the United States is in no position to make such demands, and Foreign Minister Zarif has clearly and eloquently rejected them, reiterating Iran’s firm commitment that it will return to full compliance as soon as the United States does so.

    Biden should have announced U.S. re-entry as one of his first executive orders. It did not require renegotiation or debate. On the campaign trail, Bernie Sanders, Biden’s main competitor for the Democratic nomination, simply promised, “I would re-enter the agreement on the first day of my presidency.”

    Then-candidate Senator Kirsten Gillibrand said during the Democratic primary, “We need to rejoin our allies in returning to the agreement, provided Iran agrees to comply with the agreement and take steps to reverse its breaches …” Gillibrand said that Iran must “agree” to take those steps, not that it must take them first, presciently anticipating and implicitly rejecting Biden’s self-defeating position that Iran must fully return to compliance with the JCPOA before the United States will rejoin.

    If Biden just rejoins the JCPOA, all of the provisions of the agreement will be back in force and work exactly as they did before Trump opted out. Iran will be subject to the same IAEA inspections and reports as before. Whether Iran is in compliance or not will be determined by the IAEA, not unilaterally by the United States. That is how the agreement works, as all the signatories agreed: China, France, Germany, Iran, Russia, the United Kingdom, the European Union – and the United States.

    So why is Biden not eagerly pocketing this easy first win for his stated commitment to diplomacy? A December 2020 letter supporting the JCPOA, signed by 150 House Democrats, should have reassured Biden that he has overwhelming support to stand up to hawks in both parties.

    But instead Biden seems to be listening to opponents of the JCPOA telling him that Trump’s withdrawal from the agreement has given him “leverage” to negotiate new concessions from Iran before rejoining. Rather than giving Biden leverage over Iran, which has no reason to make further concessions, this has given opponents of the JCPOA leverage over Biden, turning him into the football, instead of the quarterback, in this diplomatic Super Bowl

    American neocons and hawks, including those inside his own administration, appear to be flexing their muscles to kill Biden’s commitment to diplomacy at birth, and his own hawkish foreign policy views make him dangerously susceptible to their arguments. This is also a test of his previously subservient relationship with Israel, whose government vehemently opposes the JCPOA and whose officials have even threatened to launch a military attack on Iran if the U.S. rejoins it, a flagrantly illegal threat that Biden has yet to publicly condemn.

    In a more rational world, the call for nuclear disarmament in the Middle East would focus on Israel, not Iran. As Archbishop Desmond Tutu wrote in the Guardian on December 31, 2020, Israel’s own possession of dozens – or maybe hundreds – of nuclear weapons is the worst kept secret in the world. Tutu’s article was an open letter to Biden, asking him to publicly acknowledge what the whole world already knows and to respond as required under U.S. law to the actual proliferation of nuclear weapons in the Middle East.

    Instead of tackling the danger of Israel’s real nuclear weapons, successive U.S. administrations have chosen to cry “Wolf!” over non-existent nuclear weapons in Iraq and Iran to justify besieging their governments, imposing deadly sanctions on their people, invading Iraq and threatening Iran. A skeptical world is watching to see whether President Biden has the integrity and political will to break this insidious pattern.

    The CIA’s Weapons Intelligence, Nonproliferation and Arms Control Center (WINPAC), which stokes Americans’ fears of imaginary Iranian nuclear weapons and feeds endless allegations about them to the IAEA, is the same entity that produced the lies that drove America to war on Iraq in 2003. On that occasion, WINPAC’s director, Alan Foley, told his staff, “If the president wants to go to war, our job is to find the intelligence to allow him to do so” – even as he privately admitted to his retired CIA colleague Melvin Goodman that U.S. forces searching for WMDs in Iraq would find, “not much, if anything.”

    What makes Biden’s stalling to appease Netanyahu and the neocons diplomatically suicidal at this moment in time is that in November the Iranian parliament passed a law that forces its government to halt nuclear inspections and boost uranium enrichment if U.S. sanctions are not eased by February 21.

    To complicate matters further, Iran is holding its own presidential election on June 18, 2021, and election season — when this issue will be hotly debated — begins after the Iranian New Year on March 21. The winner is expected to be a hawkish hardliner. Trump’s failed policy, which Biden is now continuing by default, has discredited the diplomatic efforts of President Rouhani and Foreign Minister Zarif, confirming for many Iranians that negotiating with America is a fool’s errand.

    If Biden does not rejoin the JCPOA soon, time will be too short to restore full compliance by both Iran and the U.S.— including lifting relevant sanctions — before Iran’s election. Each day that goes by reduces the time available for Iranians to see benefits from the removal of sanctions, leaving little chance that they will vote for a new government that supports diplomacy with the United States.

    The timetable around the JCPOA was known and predictable, so this avoidable crisis seems to be the result of a deliberate decision by Biden to try to appease neocons and warmongers, domestic and foreign, by bullying Iran, a partner in an international agreement he claims to support, to make additional concessions that are not part of the agreement.

    During his election campaign, President Biden promised to “elevate diplomacy as the premier tool of our global engagement.” If Biden fails this first test of his promised diplomacy, people around the world will conclude that, despite his trademark smile and affable personality, Biden represents no more of a genuine recommitment to American partnership in a cooperative “rules-based world” than Trump or Obama did.

    That will confirm the steadily growing international perception that, behind the Republicans’ and Democrats’ good cop-bad cop routine, the overall direction of U.S. foreign policy remains fundamentally aggressive, coercive and destructive. People and governments around the world will continue to downgrade relations with the United States, as they did under Trump, and even traditional U.S. allies will chart an increasingly independent course in a multipolar world where the U.S. is no longer a reliable partner and certainly not a leader.

    So much is hanging in the balance, for the people of Iran suffering and dying under the impact of U.S. sanctions, for Americans yearning for more peaceful relations with our neighbors around the world, and for people everywhere who long for a more humane and equitable international order to confront the massive problems facing us all in this century. Can Biden’s America be part of the solution? After only three weeks in office, surely it can’t be too late. But the ball is in his court, and the whole world is watching.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Iran’s Foreign Ministry has denied Turkish media reports alleging that an Iranian citizen recently arrested in Turkey is a consulate employee linked to the 2019 murder of an Iranian dissident in Istanbul.

    “What has happened is the arrest of an Iranian national upon entry,” ministry spokesman Saeed Khatibzadeh told reporters on February 15, adding that Tehran was in contact with Turkish officials regarding the matter.

    Khatibzadeh did not provide more details.

    Last week, Turkey’s pro-government Sabah newspaper reported that a man identified as Mohammad Reza Naserzadeh was arrested on suspicion of planning the killing of Masud Molavi Vardanjani, a critic of Iran’s political and military leadership.

    Reuters confirmed that Naserzadeh had been held over Vardanjani’s killing, but the news agency said it could not confirm Sabah’s allegation that the suspect worked at the civic registry department of the Iranian Consulate in Istanbul.

    Vardanjani, a former Iranian intelligence operative who exposed corruption involving Iranian officials, was shot and killed in Istanbul on November 14, 2019 — a year after leaving Iran. He had been put under investigation by Iranian authorities.

    A Turkish police report published in March 2020 said Vardanjani had worked in cybersecurity at Iran’s Defense Ministry before becoming a vocal critic of the Iranian regime.

    Two senior Turkish officials told Reuters last year that Vardanjani’s killing was instigated by intelligence officials at the Iranian Consulate in Istanbul. One of the officials identified the two suspects by their initials, and one set of initials matched Naserzadeh’s.

    A senior U.S. administration official said in April 2020 that Washington had grounds to believe that Iran’s Ministry of Intelligence and Security was directly involved in Vardanjani’s killing.

    Iran has denied that any consulate staff had been involved in Vardanjani’s shooting death.

    Last week, a Belgian court sentenced an Iranian diplomat to 20 years in prison on charges of planning an attack on an exiled opposition group.

    It was the first trial of an Iranian official on terrorism charges in Europe since Iran’s 1979 revolution.

    With reporting by IRNA, AFP and Reuters

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • The Iranian health minister has warned about a fourth COVID-19 surge in Iran due to the spread of a mutated virus in his country.

    Meanwhile, Iranian President Hassan Rohani has told state television that “alarm bells were ringing for a fourth coronavirus wave” as at least nine cities and towns in southwestern Iran were declared high-risk “red” zones after a rise in cases on February 12.

    In a February 13 meeting with the heads of Iranian medical colleges broadcast live on state television, Health Minister Saeed Namaki said: “Hard days are beginning for us and you must prepare to fight the most uncontrollable mutated virus which is unfortunately infecting the country.”

    Namaki said Iran’s first three deaths this week from the virus variant that was first found in Britain — including the death of a 71-year-old woman with no history of travel — suggested that the mutant strain of the virus was spreading and soon “may be found in any city, village or family.”

    He urged Iranians to avoid gatherings in order “not to turn weddings into funerals” during what is traditionally one of the most popular wedding months in the country.

    Iran started a vaccination drive on February 9, two weeks after declaring there were no “red” cities left in the country.

    Iran has recorded more than 1.5 million cases and 58,883 deaths from COVID-19.

    Based on reporting by Reuters and IRNA

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • HERAT, Afghanistan — A fuel tanker exploded on the Afghan-Iranian border on February 13, causing a massive fire and a chain reaction that destroyed more than 500 trucks carrying natural gas and fuel.

    Afghan officials and Iranian state media said the blast occurred on the Afghan side of the border in the western Afghan province of Herat at the Islam Qala border crossing.

    Wahidullah Tawhidi, a spokesman for Afghanistan’s Ministry of Power Supply, said the blaze forced Afghanistan to shut down its electrical supply from Iran — leaving the provincial capital of Herat in darkness after nightfall.

    Initial reports said at least seven people were injured. But Wahid Qatali, Herat’s provincial governor, suggested the number of casualties could be much higher — saying:: ““For the time being, we can’t even talk about the casualties.”

    Qatali said it wasn’t immediately clear what caused the explosion. He said Afghan firefighters did not have the means to put out the enormous blaze and had requested support from Iran in the form of firefighting aircraft.

    Mohammad Rafiqu Shirzy, a spokesman for the regional hospital in the city of Herat, said the intensity of the flames meant ambulances were having trouble reaching the wounded or getting close to the site of the blast.

    But he confirmed that at least seven people injured by the fire had been admitted to the hospital in the city of Herat, about 120 kilometers east of the border.

    Iran’s semiofficial ISNA news agency quoted truck drivers who said that more than 500 trucks carrying natural gas and fuel were burned.

    The Associated Press reported that two explosions at the border crossing were powerful enough to be spotted from space by NASA satellites.

    The first was at about 1:10 p.m. local time and the next was about half an hour later.

    The fire was continuing to burn after nightfall.

    The road between the city of Herat and Islam Qala is a dangerous stretch of highway that Afghans rarely travel on during the night for fear of attacks by criminal gangs.

    Taliban militants also travel freely in the area. Afghan security services had set up checkpoints and were assisting ambulances and emergency vehicles traveling to and from the border crossing.

    Iran’s state-run IRNA news agency quoted Mohsen Nejat, director-general of crisis management in Iran’s Khorasan Razavi Province. as saying that Iranian “rescue forces and fire fighters were under way to extinguish the fire inside Afghanistan” at the request of Herat’s provincial governor.

    Iranian state television reported that fire also spread to the Dogharoon customs facilities on the Iranian side of the border.

    It reported that Iranian firefighters, troops from the Iranian Army, and Iranian border guards were all working to try to extinguish the blaze.

    Other trucks carrying natural gas and fuel were directed to leave the scene.

    The United States allows Afghanistan to import fuel and oil from Iran as part of a special concession that exempts Kabul from U.S. sanctions against Iran.

    Satellite photos taken on February 13 before the explosion showed dozens of tankers parked at the border crossing.

    With reporting by AP, Reuters, AFP, and Tolonews.com

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • American side hustle

    Need an idea for a side hustle? Put sanctions on a country, pirate its oil exports, then sell it! That’s what the US did with a million barrels of Iranian oil.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Need an idea for a side hustle? Put sanctions on a country, pirate its oil exports, then sell it! That’s what the US did with a million barrels of Iranian oil.

    The post US Sells Millions of Barrels of Seized Iranian Oil first appeared on Dissident Voice.

    This post was originally published on Dissident Voice.

  • Kameel Ahmady spent years in Iran compiling research into the treatment of some of the most vulnerable elements of society.

    His widely praised anthropological work shone a light on child marriage, sexual orientation, minorities and ethnicity, as well as official silence over the ongoing practice in Iran of female genital mutilation.

    More recently, with a long prison sentence pending as one of the Iranian regime’s latest dual-nationals convicted on dubious charges of spying for the West, Ahmady made headlines with a daring escape on foot across Iran’s mountainous northeastern border.

    But personal accounts by three Iranian women, whose identities are known to RFE/RL but who spoke on condition of anonymity out of fear for their safety, suggest that the Iranian-born and U.K.-educated Ahmady’s story may include a darker side — including sexual assault and other predatory behavior against women.

    Two of those women accuse him of sexual assaults that date back several years and, in one case, possibly with the use of illegal drugs. The other says he once emerged from a bathroom naked and wanted her to fondle him.

    When contacted by RFE/RL via e-mail, Ahmady demanded the names of the women who accused him in order to defend himself. He also agreed to be interviewed by Skype but later e-mailed to say he was seeking legal advice.

    Ahmady has rejected allegations of sexual abuse in the past on multiple occasions.

    In a February 12 statement to The Guardian, which published a story about sexual allegations against him the same day, he called the claims “deliberate slander and baseless, but also very well and deliberately organized, at both a state and personal level.”

    Ahmady added that some people “used their gender” to “weaken my scholarly research and personal position” and to “create obstacles in my life…in their desire to gain power.”

    Most of the public accusations that have previously emerged against Ahmady — and allegedly prompted his expulsion from a sociological association last year — have been anonymous.

    RFE/RL knows the identities of the accusers and has maintained their confidentiality because they could face punitive action by Iran’s strict Islamic authorities for engaging in even nonconsensual sex if their assault charges were not believed once they told their stories.

    The women also fear they could face shame and ostracism from families and friends over the episodes.

    Researching The Vulnerable

    As a researcher whose work has frequently focused on vulnerable members of society, Ahmady was in close contact with women who have suffered genital mutilation in their youth or are lesbian in a country that does not officially recognize homosexuality.

    The allegations against Ahmady were first published on social media in late August as a worldwide #MeToo movement first gathered momentum in Iran.

    It included an outpouring of reports of sexual abuse or rape from Iranian women who, in some cases, named their alleged abusers.

    Eight women posted their accounts of alleged abuse on a feminist Twitter account called Bidarzani against a man who was identified by the initials “KA” or, in one case, as “Mr. X.”

    RFE/RL learned through sources that Ahmady was the target of those accusations.

    He then issued a statement on September 2 on social media saying that he “apologized” for some mistakes” at work and for “hurting” some people due to what he said was “my relaxed attitude and different views toward relationships.”

    Detailed Accounts

    At the time of the accusations on social media, Ahmady was awaiting sentencing after being charged with espionage, an offense that the Iranian judiciary often brings against dual nationals who have been used as bargaining chips in negotiations with the West.

    In September, Ahmady was expelled from the Iranian Sociological Association, where he had been head of a group focusing on the sociology of childhood.

    The association said its board of directors had “meticulously investigated” allegations of the sexual abuse of female colleagues by Ahmady and cited “available evidence” to expel Ahmady for “misusing one’s position of power” and “misusing relationships that were built on trust.” It concluded that “the behavior resulted in the sexual abuse of some younger [female] colleagues in the project.”

    Since Almaty’s perilous escape to the West earlier this month, RFE/RL has spoken to three women who accused him of sexual misconduct after they met him through research projects on gender, child labor, or minority issues.

    Two of the women offered detailed accounts of the assaults allegedly committed by Ahmady.

    Another said he appeared naked in front of her after he invited her to his apartment and attempted to convince her to look at and touch his genitals. She said Ahmady attempted to manipulate and pressure her into having sex with him during the three years they worked together.

    All three of the women cited the sensitivity of such issues in Iranian society, where women are often blamed for being sexually harassed or even raped.

    Proving a crime like rape is extremely difficult and victims can face punishment based on laws that criminalize sexual relations outside of marriage.

    Similar Stories

    Marzieh Mohebi, a lawyer based in the northeastern city of Mashhad, told RFE/RL that she had been approached by four women who accused Ahmady of sexually assaulting them.

    She said she believed the women’s claims but that they had insufficient evidence after the years since the assaults took place to prove their cases in an Iranian court.

    “Those we talked to had his text messages, the text of their chats on Whatsapp and Telegram where he had invited them or threatened them, but it wasn’t solid enough for [an Iranian] court,” Mohebi said.

    Activists have long complained of the difficulty of proving rape allegations in Tehran’s judicial system, which routinely discounts women’s testimony without concurring testimony from a man.

    If unproven, such accusations can turn into prosecutions of female accusers of sexual wrongdoing under strict Islamic codes on marriage out of wedlock.

    Mohebi said that, while the women did not know each other, their accounts were all similar.

    “He would find his victims among girls and women active socially and would meet them for research purposes,” she said.

    One of the women RFE/RL interviewed, a well-known researcher, said she was sexually assaulted by Ahmady during a field trip to an Iranian province about 10 years ago.

    Another, an LGBT activist, said she was sexually assaulted by Ahmady in 2016.

    All three women who spoke to RFE/RL were in their 20s when the alleged attacks took place.

    They offered similar accounts of Ahmady inviting them to an apartment where he was staying in Tehran or other cities. They said he offered them alcohol and, in one case, a woman accused Ahmady of putting hashish in a water pipe without her knowledge. She said she became dizzy and felt she was losing consciousness before going to lie down. She said Ahmady entered the room and sexually assaulted her despite her protests.

    A few days later and amid mounting anger, she told RFE/RL that she confronted him.

    The other woman alleged that when Ahmady assaulted her she didn’t fight him as she was afraid he would harm her.

    “I didn’t physically resist,” she said. “He looked very drunk and I was thinking that if he injures me, how am I going to explain it to my parents?”

    #MeToo Arrives In Iran

    She became the first woman to post an account of alleged sexual assault by Ahmady on Bidarzani amid last year’s social media campaign among Iranians highlighting sexual abuse.

    She told RFE/RL that Ahmady later contacted her, asking her to remove the post and threatening to report her LGBT activism to Iranian authorities if she did not.

    Meanwhile, her account of the alleged assault seems to have prompted several other Ahmady accusers to come forward.

    A former colleague of Ahmady’s who now lives in Europe told RFE/RL that she had witnessed what she described as inappropriate and “unprofessional” behavior and language by Ahmady over the years. She said she had not witnessed any assaults.

    The ex-colleague, who also did not want to be named, said Ahmady often talked about sex with women who seemingly trusted him due to their work relationship.

    “He would pose as a hero who has come to save [Iranian] women from sexual deprivation,” she said. “I witnessed it many times.”

    All of the women interviewed by RFE/RL, including the alleged victims, said they had been frustrated by the recent media reports depicting Ahmady as heroic because of his escape from Iran.

    Ahmady authored a widely cited study on female genital mutilation five years ago that aimed to shatter official silence over the fact that the practice was being carried out on a large scale in some Iranian provinces.

    Ahmady reportedly grew up in a largely ethnic Kurdish and Turkish town near the northwestern border where Turkey, Iraq, and Azerbaijan converge.

    He emigrated in his late teens to the United Kingdom, where he studied anthropology at the University of Kent before returning to Iran in 2010, reportedly to look after his aging father.

    State Harassment

    Ahmady’s projects since then have focused on some of Iran’s most acute social and cultural fractures, including child marriage (which can be as young as 9 for girls, with court and parental permission), sexual orientation, ethnicity, and a groundbreaking study exposing officials’ failure to halt genital mutilation in women.

    Iran’s hard-line clerical leadership frequently dismisses international pressure for tolerance on those issues and other matters — including the discriminatory treatment of women and a liberal application of the death penalty — as Western meddling.

    Ahmady had previously complained of alleged harassment by Iran’s powerful Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps that he said targeted him over his research and its dissemination among other academics and lawmakers.

    Born into Iran’s minority Kurdish community, Ahmady was sentenced in December to at least eight years in prison for allegedly collaborating with a hostile government — a charge he denies — and ordered to pay a fine equivalent to some $720,000.

    He spent time in solitary confinement in Tehran’s notorious Evin prison and was released on bail before his recent escape in which he made his way through Iraq and Turkey to get to Europe.

    “The sentence issued against him in Iran is unfair,” said the activist who claims Ahmady sexually assaulted her. “But at the same time the public should know who he is. I saw young students around him — these girls have a right to know.”

    “The most important thing is for men like him who do these things to understand that they can’t get away with it,” another alleged victim told RFE/RL.

    U.K.-based activist and doctoral student Zeinab Peyghambarzadeh said she had learned of accusations of sexual assault against Ahmady in 2017. Offenders, she said, should be held accountable in such cases.

    “One shouldn’t face prosecution for doing research,” said Peyghambarzadeh, who last year signed a petition calling for Ahmady’s release from prison. “But a person who is facing [sexual assault] accusations should be investigated.”

    Prominent Iranian-born women’s rights advocate Sussan Tahmasebi said Ahmady should be held accountable for any “unforgivable breach of trust with these most vulnerable communities and the harm that he has [allegedly] caused to social research in Iran.”

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.