Category: iran

  • Iran says it will block snap inspections by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) beginning next week if other parties to the 2015 nuclear deal do not uphold their obligations under the accord.

    Under legislation enacted last year, the Iranian government is obliged to limit IAEA inspections to declared nuclear sites starting next week if other parties do not fully comply with the deal.

    The move will end the agency’s sweeping inspection powers granted under the nuclear pact to have short-notice access to any location seen as relevant for information gathering.

    Iran’s envoy to the IAEA said on February 15 that Tehran has informed the IAEA about its plan.

    Kazem Gharibabadi, said on Twitter that the law “will be executed on time,” giving February 23 as the date.

    Foreign Ministry spokesman Saeed Khatibzadeh said, however, that the move does not mean all inspections by the UN nuclear watchdog will end.

    “All these steps are reversible if the other party changes its path and honors its obligations,” he said, alluding to the United States.

    Former U.S. President Donald Trump withdrew the United States from the agreement in 2018 and reimposed punishing sanctions against Iran.

    In response, Tehran has gradually breached parts of the pact, saying it is no longer bound by it. Last month, it resumed enriching uranium to 20 percent — a level it achieved before the accord.

    The Biden administration has expressed a willingness to return to the deal but has insisted that Iran move to full compliance with the deal first. Tehran has rejected any preconditions and called for the immediate lifting of sanctions.

    Qatari Foreign Minister Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al-Thani, who said last week that Doha was in consultations to help salvage the deal, met in Tehran with Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif on February 15.

    The minister also met with President Hassan Rohani and delivered a message from the emir of Qatar, Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al-Thani.

    “We welcome efforts by friendly countries like Qatar,” Khatibzadeh said, confirming that there have been consultations between Tehran and Doha at various levels.

    Under the deal — reached by Iran, the United States, China, Russia, Germany, France, and Britain — Iran agreed to curbs on its uranium enrichment program in return for the lifting of sanctions. Iran has always denied pursuing nuclear weapons, saying its nuclear program is strictly for civilian purposes.

    With reporting by AFP and Reuters

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Photo Credit:  CODEPINK

    As Congress still struggles to pass a COVID relief bill, the rest of the world is nervously reserving judgment on America’s new president and his foreign policy, after successive U.S. administrations have delivered unexpected and damaging shocks to the world and the international system.

    Cautious international optimism toward President Biden is very much based on his commitment to Obama’s signature diplomatic achievement, the JCPOA or nuclear agreement with Iran. Biden and the Democrats excoriated Trump for withdrawing from it and promised to promptly rejoin the deal if elected. But Biden now appears to be hedging his position in a way that risks turning what should be an easy win for the new administration into an avoidable and tragic diplomatic failure.

    While it was the United States under Trump that withdrew from the nuclear agreement, Biden is taking the position that the U.S. will not rejoin the agreement or drop its unilateral sanctions until Iran first comes back into compliance. After withdrawing from the agreement, the United States is in no position to make such demands, and Foreign Minister Zarif has clearly and eloquently rejected them, reiterating Iran’s firm commitment that it will return to full compliance as soon as the United States does so.

    Biden should have announced U.S. re-entry as one of his first executive orders. It did not require renegotiation or debate. On the campaign trail, Bernie Sanders, Biden’s main competitor for the Democratic nomination, simply promised, “I would re-enter the agreement on the first day of my presidency.”

    Then-candidate Senator Kirsten Gillibrand said during the Democratic primary, “We need to rejoin our allies in returning to the agreement, provided Iran agrees to comply with the agreement and take steps to reverse its breaches …” Gillibrand said that Iran must “agree” to take those steps, not that it must take them first, presciently anticipating and implicitly rejecting Biden’s self-defeating position that Iran must fully return to compliance with the JCPOA before the United States will rejoin.

    If Biden just rejoins the JCPOA, all of the provisions of the agreement will be back in force and work exactly as they did before Trump opted out. Iran will be subject to the same IAEA inspections and reports as before. Whether Iran is in compliance or not will be determined by the IAEA, not unilaterally by the United States. That is how the agreement works, as all the signatories agreed: China, France, Germany, Iran, Russia, the United Kingdom, the European Union – and the United States.

    So why is Biden not eagerly pocketing this easy first win for his stated commitment to diplomacy? A December 2020 letter supporting the JCPOA, signed by 150 House Democrats, should have reassured Biden that he has overwhelming support to stand up to hawks in both parties.

    But instead Biden seems to be listening to opponents of the JCPOA telling him that Trump’s withdrawal from the agreement has given him “leverage” to negotiate new concessions from Iran before rejoining. Rather than giving Biden leverage over Iran, which has no reason to make further concessions, this has given opponents of the JCPOA leverage over Biden, turning him into the football, instead of the quarterback, in this diplomatic Super Bowl

    American neocons and hawks, including those inside his own administration, appear to be flexing their muscles to kill Biden’s commitment to diplomacy at birth, and his own hawkish foreign policy views make him dangerously susceptible to their arguments. This is also a test of his previously subservient relationship with Israel, whose government vehemently opposes the JCPOA and whose officials have even threatened to launch a military attack on Iran if the U.S. rejoins it, a flagrantly illegal threat that Biden has yet to publicly condemn.

    In a more rational world, the call for nuclear disarmament in the Middle East would focus on Israel, not Iran. As Archbishop Desmond Tutu wrote in the Guardian on December 31, 2020, Israel’s own possession of dozens – or maybe hundreds – of nuclear weapons is the worst kept secret in the world. Tutu’s article was an open letter to Biden, asking him to publicly acknowledge what the whole world already knows and to respond as required under U.S. law to the actual proliferation of nuclear weapons in the Middle East.

    Instead of tackling the danger of Israel’s real nuclear weapons, successive U.S. administrations have chosen to cry “Wolf!” over non-existent nuclear weapons in Iraq and Iran to justify besieging their governments, imposing deadly sanctions on their people, invading Iraq and threatening Iran. A skeptical world is watching to see whether President Biden has the integrity and political will to break this insidious pattern.

    The CIA’s Weapons Intelligence, Nonproliferation and Arms Control Center (WINPAC), which stokes Americans’ fears of imaginary Iranian nuclear weapons and feeds endless allegations about them to the IAEA, is the same entity that produced the lies that drove America to war on Iraq in 2003. On that occasion, WINPAC’s director, Alan Foley, told his staff, “If the president wants to go to war, our job is to find the intelligence to allow him to do so” – even as he privately admitted to his retired CIA colleague Melvin Goodman that U.S. forces searching for WMDs in Iraq would find, “not much, if anything.”

    What makes Biden’s stalling to appease Netanyahu and the neocons diplomatically suicidal at this moment in time is that in November the Iranian parliament passed a law that forces its government to halt nuclear inspections and boost uranium enrichment if U.S. sanctions are not eased by February 21.

    To complicate matters further, Iran is holding its own presidential election on June 18, 2021, and election season — when this issue will be hotly debated — begins after the Iranian New Year on March 21. The winner is expected to be a hawkish hardliner. Trump’s failed policy, which Biden is now continuing by default, has discredited the diplomatic efforts of President Rouhani and Foreign Minister Zarif, confirming for many Iranians that negotiating with America is a fool’s errand.

    If Biden does not rejoin the JCPOA soon, time will be too short to restore full compliance by both Iran and the U.S.— including lifting relevant sanctions — before Iran’s election. Each day that goes by reduces the time available for Iranians to see benefits from the removal of sanctions, leaving little chance that they will vote for a new government that supports diplomacy with the United States.

    The timetable around the JCPOA was known and predictable, so this avoidable crisis seems to be the result of a deliberate decision by Biden to try to appease neocons and warmongers, domestic and foreign, by bullying Iran, a partner in an international agreement he claims to support, to make additional concessions that are not part of the agreement.

    During his election campaign, President Biden promised to “elevate diplomacy as the premier tool of our global engagement.” If Biden fails this first test of his promised diplomacy, people around the world will conclude that, despite his trademark smile and affable personality, Biden represents no more of a genuine recommitment to American partnership in a cooperative “rules-based world” than Trump or Obama did.

    That will confirm the steadily growing international perception that, behind the Republicans’ and Democrats’ good cop-bad cop routine, the overall direction of U.S. foreign policy remains fundamentally aggressive, coercive and destructive. People and governments around the world will continue to downgrade relations with the United States, as they did under Trump, and even traditional U.S. allies will chart an increasingly independent course in a multipolar world where the U.S. is no longer a reliable partner and certainly not a leader.

    So much is hanging in the balance, for the people of Iran suffering and dying under the impact of U.S. sanctions, for Americans yearning for more peaceful relations with our neighbors around the world, and for people everywhere who long for a more humane and equitable international order to confront the massive problems facing us all in this century. Can Biden’s America be part of the solution? After only three weeks in office, surely it can’t be too late. But the ball is in his court, and the whole world is watching.

    The post Is Biden Committing Diplomatic Suicide Over the Iran Nuclear Agreement? first appeared on Dissident Voice.

    This post was originally published on Dissident Voice.

  • by Medea Benjamin and Nicolas J. S. Davies / February 15th, 2021

    Photo Credit:  CODEPINK

    As Congress still struggles to pass a COVID relief bill, the rest of the world is nervously reserving judgment on America’s new president and his foreign policy, after successive U.S. administrations have delivered unexpected and damaging shocks to the world and the international system.

    Cautious international optimism toward President Biden is very much based on his commitment to Obama’s signature diplomatic achievement, the JCPOA or nuclear agreement with Iran. Biden and the Democrats excoriated Trump for withdrawing from it and promised to promptly rejoin the deal if elected. But Biden now appears to be hedging his position in a way that risks turning what should be an easy win for the new administration into an avoidable and tragic diplomatic failure.

    While it was the United States under Trump that withdrew from the nuclear agreement, Biden is taking the position that the U.S. will not rejoin the agreement or drop its unilateral sanctions until Iran first comes back into compliance. After withdrawing from the agreement, the United States is in no position to make such demands, and Foreign Minister Zarif has clearly and eloquently rejected them, reiterating Iran’s firm commitment that it will return to full compliance as soon as the United States does so.

    Biden should have announced U.S. re-entry as one of his first executive orders. It did not require renegotiation or debate. On the campaign trail, Bernie Sanders, Biden’s main competitor for the Democratic nomination, simply promised, “I would re-enter the agreement on the first day of my presidency.”

    Then-candidate Senator Kirsten Gillibrand said during the Democratic primary, “We need to rejoin our allies in returning to the agreement, provided Iran agrees to comply with the agreement and take steps to reverse its breaches …” Gillibrand said that Iran must “agree” to take those steps, not that it must take them first, presciently anticipating and implicitly rejecting Biden’s self-defeating position that Iran must fully return to compliance with the JCPOA before the United States will rejoin.

    If Biden just rejoins the JCPOA, all of the provisions of the agreement will be back in force and work exactly as they did before Trump opted out. Iran will be subject to the same IAEA inspections and reports as before. Whether Iran is in compliance or not will be determined by the IAEA, not unilaterally by the United States. That is how the agreement works, as all the signatories agreed: China, France, Germany, Iran, Russia, the United Kingdom, the European Union – and the United States.

    So why is Biden not eagerly pocketing this easy first win for his stated commitment to diplomacy? A December 2020 letter supporting the JCPOA, signed by 150 House Democrats, should have reassured Biden that he has overwhelming support to stand up to hawks in both parties.

    But instead Biden seems to be listening to opponents of the JCPOA telling him that Trump’s withdrawal from the agreement has given him “leverage” to negotiate new concessions from Iran before rejoining. Rather than giving Biden leverage over Iran, which has no reason to make further concessions, this has given opponents of the JCPOA leverage over Biden, turning him into the football, instead of the quarterback, in this diplomatic Super Bowl

    American neocons and hawks, including those inside his own administration, appear to be flexing their muscles to kill Biden’s commitment to diplomacy at birth, and his own hawkish foreign policy views make him dangerously susceptible to their arguments. This is also a test of his previously subservient relationship with Israel, whose government vehemently opposes the JCPOA and whose officials have even threatened to launch a military attack on Iran if the U.S. rejoins it, a flagrantly illegal threat that Biden has yet to publicly condemn.

    In a more rational world, the call for nuclear disarmament in the Middle East would focus on Israel, not Iran. As Archbishop Desmond Tutu wrote in the Guardian on December 31, 2020, Israel’s own possession of dozens – or maybe hundreds – of nuclear weapons is the worst kept secret in the world. Tutu’s article was an open letter to Biden, asking him to publicly acknowledge what the whole world already knows and to respond as required under U.S. law to the actual proliferation of nuclear weapons in the Middle East.

    Instead of tackling the danger of Israel’s real nuclear weapons, successive U.S. administrations have chosen to cry “Wolf!” over non-existent nuclear weapons in Iraq and Iran to justify besieging their governments, imposing deadly sanctions on their people, invading Iraq and threatening Iran. A skeptical world is watching to see whether President Biden has the integrity and political will to break this insidious pattern.

    The CIA’s Weapons Intelligence, Nonproliferation and Arms Control Center (WINPAC), which stokes Americans’ fears of imaginary Iranian nuclear weapons and feeds endless allegations about them to the IAEA, is the same entity that produced the lies that drove America to war on Iraq in 2003. On that occasion, WINPAC’s director, Alan Foley, told his staff, “If the president wants to go to war, our job is to find the intelligence to allow him to do so” – even as he privately admitted to his retired CIA colleague Melvin Goodman that U.S. forces searching for WMDs in Iraq would find, “not much, if anything.”

    What makes Biden’s stalling to appease Netanyahu and the neocons diplomatically suicidal at this moment in time is that in November the Iranian parliament passed a law that forces its government to halt nuclear inspections and boost uranium enrichment if U.S. sanctions are not eased by February 21.

    To complicate matters further, Iran is holding its own presidential election on June 18, 2021, and election season — when this issue will be hotly debated — begins after the Iranian New Year on March 21. The winner is expected to be a hawkish hardliner. Trump’s failed policy, which Biden is now continuing by default, has discredited the diplomatic efforts of President Rouhani and Foreign Minister Zarif, confirming for many Iranians that negotiating with America is a fool’s errand.

    If Biden does not rejoin the JCPOA soon, time will be too short to restore full compliance by both Iran and the U.S.— including lifting relevant sanctions — before Iran’s election. Each day that goes by reduces the time available for Iranians to see benefits from the removal of sanctions, leaving little chance that they will vote for a new government that supports diplomacy with the United States.

    The timetable around the JCPOA was known and predictable, so this avoidable crisis seems to be the result of a deliberate decision by Biden to try to appease neocons and warmongers, domestic and foreign, by bullying Iran, a partner in an international agreement he claims to support, to make additional concessions that are not part of the agreement.

    During his election campaign, President Biden promised to “elevate diplomacy as the premier tool of our global engagement.” If Biden fails this first test of his promised diplomacy, people around the world will conclude that, despite his trademark smile and affable personality, Biden represents no more of a genuine recommitment to American partnership in a cooperative “rules-based world” than Trump or Obama did.

    That will confirm the steadily growing international perception that, behind the Republicans’ and Democrats’ good cop-bad cop routine, the overall direction of U.S. foreign policy remains fundamentally aggressive, coercive and destructive. People and governments around the world will continue to downgrade relations with the United States, as they did under Trump, and even traditional U.S. allies will chart an increasingly independent course in a multipolar world where the U.S. is no longer a reliable partner and certainly not a leader.

    So much is hanging in the balance, for the people of Iran suffering and dying under the impact of U.S. sanctions, for Americans yearning for more peaceful relations with our neighbors around the world, and for people everywhere who long for a more humane and equitable international order to confront the massive problems facing us all in this century. Can Biden’s America be part of the solution? After only three weeks in office, surely it can’t be too late. But the ball is in his court, and the whole world is watching.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Iran’s Foreign Ministry has denied Turkish media reports alleging that an Iranian citizen recently arrested in Turkey is a consulate employee linked to the 2019 murder of an Iranian dissident in Istanbul.

    “What has happened is the arrest of an Iranian national upon entry,” ministry spokesman Saeed Khatibzadeh told reporters on February 15, adding that Tehran was in contact with Turkish officials regarding the matter.

    Khatibzadeh did not provide more details.

    Last week, Turkey’s pro-government Sabah newspaper reported that a man identified as Mohammad Reza Naserzadeh was arrested on suspicion of planning the killing of Masud Molavi Vardanjani, a critic of Iran’s political and military leadership.

    Reuters confirmed that Naserzadeh had been held over Vardanjani’s killing, but the news agency said it could not confirm Sabah’s allegation that the suspect worked at the civic registry department of the Iranian Consulate in Istanbul.

    Vardanjani, a former Iranian intelligence operative who exposed corruption involving Iranian officials, was shot and killed in Istanbul on November 14, 2019 — a year after leaving Iran. He had been put under investigation by Iranian authorities.

    A Turkish police report published in March 2020 said Vardanjani had worked in cybersecurity at Iran’s Defense Ministry before becoming a vocal critic of the Iranian regime.

    Two senior Turkish officials told Reuters last year that Vardanjani’s killing was instigated by intelligence officials at the Iranian Consulate in Istanbul. One of the officials identified the two suspects by their initials, and one set of initials matched Naserzadeh’s.

    A senior U.S. administration official said in April 2020 that Washington had grounds to believe that Iran’s Ministry of Intelligence and Security was directly involved in Vardanjani’s killing.

    Iran has denied that any consulate staff had been involved in Vardanjani’s shooting death.

    Last week, a Belgian court sentenced an Iranian diplomat to 20 years in prison on charges of planning an attack on an exiled opposition group.

    It was the first trial of an Iranian official on terrorism charges in Europe since Iran’s 1979 revolution.

    With reporting by IRNA, AFP and Reuters

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • The Iranian health minister has warned about a fourth COVID-19 surge in Iran due to the spread of a mutated virus in his country.

    Meanwhile, Iranian President Hassan Rohani has told state television that “alarm bells were ringing for a fourth coronavirus wave” as at least nine cities and towns in southwestern Iran were declared high-risk “red” zones after a rise in cases on February 12.

    In a February 13 meeting with the heads of Iranian medical colleges broadcast live on state television, Health Minister Saeed Namaki said: “Hard days are beginning for us and you must prepare to fight the most uncontrollable mutated virus which is unfortunately infecting the country.”

    Namaki said Iran’s first three deaths this week from the virus variant that was first found in Britain — including the death of a 71-year-old woman with no history of travel — suggested that the mutant strain of the virus was spreading and soon “may be found in any city, village or family.”

    He urged Iranians to avoid gatherings in order “not to turn weddings into funerals” during what is traditionally one of the most popular wedding months in the country.

    Iran started a vaccination drive on February 9, two weeks after declaring there were no “red” cities left in the country.

    Iran has recorded more than 1.5 million cases and 58,883 deaths from COVID-19.

    Based on reporting by Reuters and IRNA

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • HERAT, Afghanistan — A fuel tanker exploded on the Afghan-Iranian border on February 13, causing a massive fire and a chain reaction that destroyed more than 500 trucks carrying natural gas and fuel.

    Afghan officials and Iranian state media said the blast occurred on the Afghan side of the border in the western Afghan province of Herat at the Islam Qala border crossing.

    Wahidullah Tawhidi, a spokesman for Afghanistan’s Ministry of Power Supply, said the blaze forced Afghanistan to shut down its electrical supply from Iran — leaving the provincial capital of Herat in darkness after nightfall.

    Initial reports said at least seven people were injured. But Wahid Qatali, Herat’s provincial governor, suggested the number of casualties could be much higher — saying:: ““For the time being, we can’t even talk about the casualties.”

    Qatali said it wasn’t immediately clear what caused the explosion. He said Afghan firefighters did not have the means to put out the enormous blaze and had requested support from Iran in the form of firefighting aircraft.

    Mohammad Rafiqu Shirzy, a spokesman for the regional hospital in the city of Herat, said the intensity of the flames meant ambulances were having trouble reaching the wounded or getting close to the site of the blast.

    But he confirmed that at least seven people injured by the fire had been admitted to the hospital in the city of Herat, about 120 kilometers east of the border.

    Iran’s semiofficial ISNA news agency quoted truck drivers who said that more than 500 trucks carrying natural gas and fuel were burned.

    The Associated Press reported that two explosions at the border crossing were powerful enough to be spotted from space by NASA satellites.

    The first was at about 1:10 p.m. local time and the next was about half an hour later.

    The fire was continuing to burn after nightfall.

    The road between the city of Herat and Islam Qala is a dangerous stretch of highway that Afghans rarely travel on during the night for fear of attacks by criminal gangs.

    Taliban militants also travel freely in the area. Afghan security services had set up checkpoints and were assisting ambulances and emergency vehicles traveling to and from the border crossing.

    Iran’s state-run IRNA news agency quoted Mohsen Nejat, director-general of crisis management in Iran’s Khorasan Razavi Province. as saying that Iranian “rescue forces and fire fighters were under way to extinguish the fire inside Afghanistan” at the request of Herat’s provincial governor.

    Iranian state television reported that fire also spread to the Dogharoon customs facilities on the Iranian side of the border.

    It reported that Iranian firefighters, troops from the Iranian Army, and Iranian border guards were all working to try to extinguish the blaze.

    Other trucks carrying natural gas and fuel were directed to leave the scene.

    The United States allows Afghanistan to import fuel and oil from Iran as part of a special concession that exempts Kabul from U.S. sanctions against Iran.

    Satellite photos taken on February 13 before the explosion showed dozens of tankers parked at the border crossing.

    With reporting by AP, Reuters, AFP, and Tolonews.com

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • American side hustle

    Need an idea for a side hustle? Put sanctions on a country, pirate its oil exports, then sell it! That’s what the US did with a million barrels of Iranian oil.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Need an idea for a side hustle? Put sanctions on a country, pirate its oil exports, then sell it! That’s what the US did with a million barrels of Iranian oil.

    The post US Sells Millions of Barrels of Seized Iranian Oil first appeared on Dissident Voice.

    This post was originally published on Dissident Voice.

  • Kameel Ahmady spent years in Iran compiling research into the treatment of some of the most vulnerable elements of society.

    His widely praised anthropological work shone a light on child marriage, sexual orientation, minorities and ethnicity, as well as official silence over the ongoing practice in Iran of female genital mutilation.

    More recently, with a long prison sentence pending as one of the Iranian regime’s latest dual-nationals convicted on dubious charges of spying for the West, Ahmady made headlines with a daring escape on foot across Iran’s mountainous northeastern border.

    But personal accounts by three Iranian women, whose identities are known to RFE/RL but who spoke on condition of anonymity out of fear for their safety, suggest that the Iranian-born and U.K.-educated Ahmady’s story may include a darker side — including sexual assault and other predatory behavior against women.

    Two of those women accuse him of sexual assaults that date back several years and, in one case, possibly with the use of illegal drugs. The other says he once emerged from a bathroom naked and wanted her to fondle him.

    When contacted by RFE/RL via e-mail, Ahmady demanded the names of the women who accused him in order to defend himself. He also agreed to be interviewed by Skype but later e-mailed to say he was seeking legal advice.

    Ahmady has rejected allegations of sexual abuse in the past on multiple occasions.

    In a February 12 statement to The Guardian, which published a story about sexual allegations against him the same day, he called the claims “deliberate slander and baseless, but also very well and deliberately organized, at both a state and personal level.”

    Ahmady added that some people “used their gender” to “weaken my scholarly research and personal position” and to “create obstacles in my life…in their desire to gain power.”

    Most of the public accusations that have previously emerged against Ahmady — and allegedly prompted his expulsion from a sociological association last year — have been anonymous.

    RFE/RL knows the identities of the accusers and has maintained their confidentiality because they could face punitive action by Iran’s strict Islamic authorities for engaging in even nonconsensual sex if their assault charges were not believed once they told their stories.

    The women also fear they could face shame and ostracism from families and friends over the episodes.

    Researching The Vulnerable

    As a researcher whose work has frequently focused on vulnerable members of society, Ahmady was in close contact with women who have suffered genital mutilation in their youth or are lesbian in a country that does not officially recognize homosexuality.

    The allegations against Ahmady were first published on social media in late August as a worldwide #MeToo movement first gathered momentum in Iran.

    It included an outpouring of reports of sexual abuse or rape from Iranian women who, in some cases, named their alleged abusers.

    Eight women posted their accounts of alleged abuse on a feminist Twitter account called Bidarzani against a man who was identified by the initials “KA” or, in one case, as “Mr. X.”

    RFE/RL learned through sources that Ahmady was the target of those accusations.

    He then issued a statement on September 2 on social media saying that he “apologized” for some mistakes” at work and for “hurting” some people due to what he said was “my relaxed attitude and different views toward relationships.”

    Detailed Accounts

    At the time of the accusations on social media, Ahmady was awaiting sentencing after being charged with espionage, an offense that the Iranian judiciary often brings against dual nationals who have been used as bargaining chips in negotiations with the West.

    In September, Ahmady was expelled from the Iranian Sociological Association, where he had been head of a group focusing on the sociology of childhood.

    The association said its board of directors had “meticulously investigated” allegations of the sexual abuse of female colleagues by Ahmady and cited “available evidence” to expel Ahmady for “misusing one’s position of power” and “misusing relationships that were built on trust.” It concluded that “the behavior resulted in the sexual abuse of some younger [female] colleagues in the project.”

    Since Almaty’s perilous escape to the West earlier this month, RFE/RL has spoken to three women who accused him of sexual misconduct after they met him through research projects on gender, child labor, or minority issues.

    Two of the women offered detailed accounts of the assaults allegedly committed by Ahmady.

    Another said he appeared naked in front of her after he invited her to his apartment and attempted to convince her to look at and touch his genitals. She said Ahmady attempted to manipulate and pressure her into having sex with him during the three years they worked together.

    All three of the women cited the sensitivity of such issues in Iranian society, where women are often blamed for being sexually harassed or even raped.

    Proving a crime like rape is extremely difficult and victims can face punishment based on laws that criminalize sexual relations outside of marriage.

    Similar Stories

    Marzieh Mohebi, a lawyer based in the northeastern city of Mashhad, told RFE/RL that she had been approached by four women who accused Ahmady of sexually assaulting them.

    She said she believed the women’s claims but that they had insufficient evidence after the years since the assaults took place to prove their cases in an Iranian court.

    “Those we talked to had his text messages, the text of their chats on Whatsapp and Telegram where he had invited them or threatened them, but it wasn’t solid enough for [an Iranian] court,” Mohebi said.

    Activists have long complained of the difficulty of proving rape allegations in Tehran’s judicial system, which routinely discounts women’s testimony without concurring testimony from a man.

    If unproven, such accusations can turn into prosecutions of female accusers of sexual wrongdoing under strict Islamic codes on marriage out of wedlock.

    Mohebi said that, while the women did not know each other, their accounts were all similar.

    “He would find his victims among girls and women active socially and would meet them for research purposes,” she said.

    One of the women RFE/RL interviewed, a well-known researcher, said she was sexually assaulted by Ahmady during a field trip to an Iranian province about 10 years ago.

    Another, an LGBT activist, said she was sexually assaulted by Ahmady in 2016.

    All three women who spoke to RFE/RL were in their 20s when the alleged attacks took place.

    They offered similar accounts of Ahmady inviting them to an apartment where he was staying in Tehran or other cities. They said he offered them alcohol and, in one case, a woman accused Ahmady of putting hashish in a water pipe without her knowledge. She said she became dizzy and felt she was losing consciousness before going to lie down. She said Ahmady entered the room and sexually assaulted her despite her protests.

    A few days later and amid mounting anger, she told RFE/RL that she confronted him.

    The other woman alleged that when Ahmady assaulted her she didn’t fight him as she was afraid he would harm her.

    “I didn’t physically resist,” she said. “He looked very drunk and I was thinking that if he injures me, how am I going to explain it to my parents?”

    #MeToo Arrives In Iran

    She became the first woman to post an account of alleged sexual assault by Ahmady on Bidarzani amid last year’s social media campaign among Iranians highlighting sexual abuse.

    She told RFE/RL that Ahmady later contacted her, asking her to remove the post and threatening to report her LGBT activism to Iranian authorities if she did not.

    Meanwhile, her account of the alleged assault seems to have prompted several other Ahmady accusers to come forward.

    A former colleague of Ahmady’s who now lives in Europe told RFE/RL that she had witnessed what she described as inappropriate and “unprofessional” behavior and language by Ahmady over the years. She said she had not witnessed any assaults.

    The ex-colleague, who also did not want to be named, said Ahmady often talked about sex with women who seemingly trusted him due to their work relationship.

    “He would pose as a hero who has come to save [Iranian] women from sexual deprivation,” she said. “I witnessed it many times.”

    All of the women interviewed by RFE/RL, including the alleged victims, said they had been frustrated by the recent media reports depicting Ahmady as heroic because of his escape from Iran.

    Ahmady authored a widely cited study on female genital mutilation five years ago that aimed to shatter official silence over the fact that the practice was being carried out on a large scale in some Iranian provinces.

    Ahmady reportedly grew up in a largely ethnic Kurdish and Turkish town near the northwestern border where Turkey, Iraq, and Azerbaijan converge.

    He emigrated in his late teens to the United Kingdom, where he studied anthropology at the University of Kent before returning to Iran in 2010, reportedly to look after his aging father.

    State Harassment

    Ahmady’s projects since then have focused on some of Iran’s most acute social and cultural fractures, including child marriage (which can be as young as 9 for girls, with court and parental permission), sexual orientation, ethnicity, and a groundbreaking study exposing officials’ failure to halt genital mutilation in women.

    Iran’s hard-line clerical leadership frequently dismisses international pressure for tolerance on those issues and other matters — including the discriminatory treatment of women and a liberal application of the death penalty — as Western meddling.

    Ahmady had previously complained of alleged harassment by Iran’s powerful Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps that he said targeted him over his research and its dissemination among other academics and lawmakers.

    Born into Iran’s minority Kurdish community, Ahmady was sentenced in December to at least eight years in prison for allegedly collaborating with a hostile government — a charge he denies — and ordered to pay a fine equivalent to some $720,000.

    He spent time in solitary confinement in Tehran’s notorious Evin prison and was released on bail before his recent escape in which he made his way through Iraq and Turkey to get to Europe.

    “The sentence issued against him in Iran is unfair,” said the activist who claims Ahmady sexually assaulted her. “But at the same time the public should know who he is. I saw young students around him — these girls have a right to know.”

    “The most important thing is for men like him who do these things to understand that they can’t get away with it,” another alleged victim told RFE/RL.

    U.K.-based activist and doctoral student Zeinab Peyghambarzadeh said she had learned of accusations of sexual assault against Ahmady in 2017. Offenders, she said, should be held accountable in such cases.

    “One shouldn’t face prosecution for doing research,” said Peyghambarzadeh, who last year signed a petition calling for Ahmady’s release from prison. “But a person who is facing [sexual assault] accusations should be investigated.”

    Prominent Iranian-born women’s rights advocate Sussan Tahmasebi said Ahmady should be held accountable for any “unforgivable breach of trust with these most vulnerable communities and the harm that he has [allegedly] caused to social research in Iran.”

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • An Iranian official suspected of instigating the killing of an Iranian dissident in 2019 has been arrested in Turkey, Reuters has reported.

    Quoting unnamed sources, Reuters said it had confirmed a report by Turkey’s Sabah newspaper that Mohammad Reza Naserzadeh was detained earlier this week on suspicion of planning the shooting of Masud Molavi Vardanjani, a critic of Iran’s political and military leadership.

    Sabah reported that Naserzadeh worked at the civic registry department of the Iranian Consulate in Istanbul. Reuters said it could not independently confirm that information.

    The incident could strain ties between regional powers Turkey and Iran. Iran’s Foreign Ministry called the newspaper report “baseless.”

    Vardanjani, a former Iranian intelligence operative who exposed corruption involving Iranian officials, was shot and killed in Istanbul on November 14, 2019 — a year after leaving the Islamic republic. He had been put under investigation by Iranian authorities.

    A Turkish police report published in March 2020 said Vardanjani had an “unusual profile.” It said he had worked in cybersecurity at Iran’s Defense Ministry before becoming a vocal critic of the Iranian regime.

    Two senior Turkish officials told Reuters in 2020 that Vardanjani’s killing was instigated by intelligence officials at the Iranian Consulate in Istanbul.

    At the time, one of the Turkish officials identified the two suspects by their initials. One set of initials matched Naserzadeh’s.

    A senior U.S. administration official said in April 2020 that Washington had grounds to believe that Iran’s Intelligence and Security Ministry was directly involved in the killing of Vardanjani.

    Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesman Saeed Khatibzadeh denied that any consulate staff had been involved in Vardanjani’s shooting death.

    The Foreign Ministry’s website said Iran was in talks with Turkish officials to shed light on the issue.

    Last week, a Belgian court sentenced an Iranian diplomat to 20 years in prison on charges of planning an attack on an exiled opposition group.

    It was the first trial of an Iranian official on terrorism charges in Europe since Iran’s 1979 revolution.

    With reporting by Reuters

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) has launched ground forces drills in the southwest of the country near the Iraqi border.

    IRGC Ground Force Commander Brigadier General Mohammad Pakpour said on February 11 that drones, helicopters, and artillery are to be used in the drills, dubbed Great Prophet 16, according to Press TV.

    It was not clear how long the drills would last.

    Iran has increased its military drills in recent weeks as tensions built during the final days of the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump.

    Tehran is also trying to pressure U.S. President Joe Biden’s new administration to reenter a 2015 nuclear deal between Iran and world powers.

    In January, the IRGC conducted exercises in which ballistic missiles targeted simulated targets in the country’s central desert and the Indian Ocean, state media reported.

    The previous week, the Iranian conducted short-range missile exercises in the Gulf of Oman following an IRGC naval parade in the Persian Gulf.

    Trump withdrew the United States from the nuclear pact in 2018 and reimposed crushing sanctions on Tehran.

    In response to the U.S. moves, which were accompanied by increased tensions between Iran, the United States, and its allies, Tehran has gradually breached parts of the pact saying it is no longer bound by it.

    The Biden administration has expressed willingness to return to compliance with the accord if Iran does, and then work with U.S. allies and partners on a “longer and stronger” agreement, including other issues such as Iran’s missile program.

    Iranian officials insist that the United States should make the first move by returning to the agreement, which eased international sanctions in exchange for curbs on Tehran’s disputed nuclear program.

    They also say that the country’s missile program is off the table.

    With reporting by AP and Press TV

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Iran has begun producing small amounts of uranium metal, the UN atomic watchdog said on February 10, in the latest breach of Tehran’s 2015 deal with world powers as it seeks to ramp up pressure on U.S. President Joe Biden’s new administration.

    International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) head Rafael Grossi told member nations that inspectors had confirmed on February 8 that 3.6 grams of uranium metal had been produced at a nuclear facility in Isfahan.

    Although the amount is small and not enriched, uranium metal could be used to form the core of a nuclear weapon.

    The nuclear agreement — reached by Iran, the United States, China, Russia, Germany, France and Britain — put a 15-year ban on Iran “producing or acquiring plutonium or uranium metals or their alloys.”

    Former President Donald Trump withdrew the United States from the nuclear pact in 2018 and reimposed crushing sanctions on Tehran.

    In response to the U.S. withdrawal, Tehran has gradually breached the deal by building up its stockpile of low-enriched uranium, refining uranium to a higher level of purity, and using advanced centrifuges for enrichment.

    Iran announced in January it intended to research uranium metal production, saying the advanced fuel was needed for a research reactor in Tehran. The measure was part of a law passed by parliament in December following the assassination of a top nuclear scientist, which Tehran blames on Israel.

    When Iran announced its plans to produce uranium metal, Germany, France, and Britain stated they were “deeply concerned.”

    “Iran has no credible civilian use for uranium metal,” they said in a joint statement. “The production of uranium metal has potentially grave military implications.”

    Iran maintains its nuclear program is for civilian purposes and it has no intention of building a weapon.

    Iran’s latest breach complicates a standoff between Washington and Tehran over the future of the nuclear accord.

    The Biden administration is seeking to revive diplomacy but is demanding Iran first return to compliance with the accord, which required Tehran to put limits on its nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief.

    Iranian officials insist that the United States should first return to the deal by lifting sanctions.

    Based on reporting by AFP, AP, and Reuters

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • This announcement does not augur peace in Yemen any time soon. Rather it looks a bit like political mystification that some have chosen to celebrate now, regardless of what it actually means, apparently in hope of making it a meaningful, self-fulfilling prophecy some time in the future. This does not seem likely, given what Biden actually said, but we shall see.

    For the foreseeable future, Yemen, the poorest country in the Middle East, will remain the victim of a Saudi war of aggression and Saudi war crimes. Since March 2015, with the full support of the Obama administration, Saudi Arabia and its allies have turned Yemen into the world’s worst humanitarian disaster, as assessed by the United Nations.

    The post How Rational Can The US Be In Dealing With Yemen And Iran? appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • The US has decided to deploy the Israeli Iron Dome Missile Interceptor Systems, purchased in 2019, in Eastern European countries and also in the Gulf countries where the US Central Command (CENTCOM) operates and has established operational military bases. This step coincides with the US decision that Israeljoin CENTCOM (with Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Bahrein, Jordan, Iraq, Egypt, Sudan, Afghanistan, Kuwait, Qatar, Oman, Pakistan and more) following the normalisation of trade and diplomatic relations  between several Arab and Islamic countries and Tel Aviv. 

    The post Defensive Moves Or Preparation For War With Iran? appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • Iran’s foreign minister urged Washington to act fast to return to the 2015 nuclear deal in an interview published February 6 in an Iranian newspaper.

    “Time is running out for the Americans, both because of the parliament bill and the election atmosphere that will follow the Iranian New Year,” Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif said in the interview in Hamshahri.

    Iran’s new year begins on March 21, and elections are in June.

    Legislation passed by parliament in December forces the government to harden its nuclear stance if U.S. sanctions are not eased by February 21.

    “The more America procrastinates, the more it will lose,” Zarif said in the interview. “We don’t need to return to the negotiating table. It’s America that has to find the ticket to come to the table.”

    President Donald Trump pulled the United States out of the landmark nuclear deal between Iran and world powers in 2018 and began restoring sanctions against Iran.

    In response, Tehran has gradually breached parts of the pact, saying it is no longer bound by it. Last month, it resumed enriching uranium to 20 percent — a level it achieved before the accord.

    President Joe Biden’s administration is exploring ways to return to the deal. Biden has said that if Tehran returned to strict compliance with the pact, Washington would follow suit, but Tehran has said Washington must ease sanctions first and has ruled out negotiations on wider security issues that would restrict Iran’s missile development, a suggestion raised by Washington.

    In the latest steps by Iran to develop its missile program, the Iranian military on February 6 opened a plant to produce hybrid solid fuel for missiles and a factory to build shoulder-fired rockets, state television reported.

    The European foreign ministers of Germany, France, and Britain and U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken discussed the landmark nuclear deal in their first call on February 5.

    British Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab said the foreign ministers discussed how a united approach could address their shared concerns towards Iran, which has always denied pursuing nuclear weapons, saying its nuclear program was strictly for civilian purposes.

    Separately, Iran’s Foreign Ministry commented on Washington’s decision to end its support for the Saudi-led coalition’s “offensive operations” in Yemen, saying it could be a helpful step.

    “Stopping support…for the Saudi coalition, if not a political maneuver, could be a step toward correcting past mistakes,” state media quoted ministry spokesman Saeed Khatibzadeh as saying.

    But he added that the move alone won’t solve Yemen’s problems and called for an air, sea, and land blockade to be lifted and an end to military attacks by Saudi Arabia.

    Biden said on February 4 the more than six-year war, widely seen as a proxy conflict between Saudi Arabia and Iran, “has to end.” He also named veteran U.S. diplomat Timothy Lenderking as the U.S. special envoy for Yemen in a bid to step up American diplomacy to try to end the war.

    With reporting by Reuters and Hamshahri

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • French President Emmanuel Macron has renewed his call for dialogue with Russia despite what he called its “huge mistake” in jailing opposition politician Aleksei Navalny, and offered to be an “honest broker” in talks between the United States and Iran.

    Amid lasting tensions between the West and Russia, Macron has long pushed for a working relationship with Moscow under President Vladimir Putin and renewed his commitment to the strategy during a question and answer session with the Atlantic Council think tank on February 4.

    His latest comments come as Moscow continues to ignore international calls to release Navalny, who on February 2 was sentenced to jail for almost three years for violating the terms of parole while recovering in Germany from a nerve-agent poisoning in August 2020. The Kremlin critic accuses Putin of ordering his poisoning — a charge rejected by Russian officials.

    “I think this is a huge mistake, even for Russian stability today,” Macron said of the Moscow court’s ruling, which critics say aims to silence Navalny.

    But the French president also said that he favored dialogue with Moscow because Russia is “part of Europe.”

    It was “impossible” to have peace and stability in Europe without being able to negotiate with Russia, he said.

    The West’s relationship with Russia has been severely strained over a variety of issues including Moscow’s seizure of Ukraine’s Crimean Peninsula, its support for separatists in the conflict in eastern Ukraine, election interference, and hacks that the European Union, the United States, and other countries have pinned on the Kremlin.

    ‘Honest Broker’

    On Iran, Macron offered himself as a “honest broker” in talks between Tehran and Washington in order to revive a landmark nuclear deal between Iran and world powers.

    “I will do whatever I can to support any initiative from the U.S. side to reengage in a demanding dialogue, and I will…try to be an honest broker and a committed broker in this dialogue,” he said.

    In 2018, former President Donald Trump pulled the United States out of a landmark 2015 nuclear deal between Tehran and world powers, and started imposing crippling sanctions on Iran as part of a “maximum pressure” campaign aimed at forcing the country to negotiate a new agreement that would also address the country’s missile programs and its support for regional proxies.

    In response to the U.S. moves, which were accompanied by increased tensions between Iran, the United States, and its allies, Tehran has gradually breached parts of the pact saying it is no longer bound by it.

    U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken on February 1 said that the new administration of President Joe Biden is willing to return to compliance with the 2015 accord if Iran does, and then work with U.S. allies and partners on a “longer and stronger” agreement including other issues.

    The next day, State Department spokesman Ned Price told reporters that the U.S. administration would be “consulting with our allies, consulting with our partners, consulting with Congress before we’re reaching the point where we’re going to engage directly with the Iranians and [be] willing to entertain any sort of proposal.”

    Price was responding to comments made by Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif suggesting that the United States and Iran take synchronized steps to return to the nuclear accord.

    Iranian officials have insisted that the United States should make the first move by returning to the agreement, which eased international sanctions in exchange for curbs on Iran’s disputed nuclear program.

    They have also said that the country’s missile program and regional policies are off the table.

    Macron argued in favor of new negotiations with Iran that would also place limits on Iran’s ballistic missile program and include Israel and Saudi Arabia.

    The two Iran foes were fiercely opposed to the 2015 deal and supported Trump’s decision to pull the United States out.

    “We have to find a way to involve in these discussions Saudi Arabia and Israel because they are some of the key partners of the region directly interested by the outcomes with our other friends of the region,” Macron said.

    With reporting by AFP and Reuters

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Amnesty International is urging the international community to “urgently intervene” to save the lives of four ethnic Baluch and four ethnic Arab men who are on death row following what the human rights watchdog called “flagrantly unfair trials.”

    “The recent escalation in executions of Baluchis and Ahwazi Arabs raises serious concerns that the authorities are using the death penalty to sow fear among disadvantaged ethnic minorities, as well as the wider population,” Diana Eltahawy, deputy director for the Middle East and North Africa at the London-based group, said in a statement on February 4.

    “The disproportionate use of the death penalty against Iran’s ethnic minorities epitomizes the entrenched discrimination and repression they have faced for decades,” Eltahawy added.

    The statement called for “concerted action” by the international community, including United Nations human rights bodies and the European Union, to “stop the Iranian authorities from carrying out executions after flagrantly unfair trials marred by torture-tainted ‘confessions’.”

    It cited figures obtained from the Washington-based Abdorrahman Boroumand Center, which promotes human rights in Iran, according to which the country has executed at least 49 people since December 1, 2020. More than a third of them were Baluchis.

    The Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) has denounced what it called a crackdown on ethnic and religious minority groups in Iran since mid-December 2020, in particular Kurdish, ethnic Arab, and Baluch communities.

    Amnesty International said the four Baluch prisoners on death row in Zahedan prison in Sistan-Baluchestan Province and in Dastgerd prison in Esfahan Province “have all been subjected to a catalogue of human rights violations, including enforced disappearance and torture.”

    Three ethnic Arabs on death row have sewn their lips together and have been on hunger strike since January 23 in Sheiban prison in Ahvaz, Khuzestan Province, “in protest at their prison conditions, denial of family visits, and the ongoing threat of execution,” the watchdog said.

    The fourth ethnic Arab inmate “has been forcibly disappeared since April 2020, putting him at risk of torture and secret execution.”

    Amnesty International’s plea comes a day after 36 civil society and human rights organizations denounced “an ongoing wave of arbitrary arrests, incommunicado detention, and enforced disappearances by the Iranian authorities” targeting Iran’s “disadvantaged” Kurdish minority.

    The groups said in a statement that at least 96 members of the community had been arrested in five provinces since January 6.

    They included “civil society activists, labor rights activists, environmentalists, writers, university students, and formerly imprisoned political activists as well as individuals with no known history of activism,” they said.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Russia and Iran are among the top authoritarian states extending their tentacles of repression abroad to target exiles, a new report by Freedom House says.

    The report, published on February 4, says the Russian government “conducts highly aggressive” transnational repression activities abroad, relying “heavily” on assassination as a tool to target former insiders and other individuals perceived as threats by the Kremlin.

    The Russian campaign accounts for seven of 26 assassinations or assassination attempts identified globally by the U.S.-based nongovernmental organization between 2014 and 2020.

    The group says the Iranian regime has been linked to five assassinations or assassination attempts in three countries, and plots were thwarted in at least two others. The campaign targeted dissidents and journalists the authorities often labelled “terrorists.”

    Pakistan, Azerbaijan, and all five Central Asian republics — Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan — are also among countries that target their nationals abroad, using tactics such as assaults, detentions, and unlawful deportations.

    According to the report, titled Out Of Sight, Not Out Of Reach, human rights activists, dissidents, as well as their families “face a worldwide pattern of violence and intimidation perpetrated by the authoritarian regimes they hoped to avoid by fleeing abroad.”

    Freedom House says there have been at least 608 cases of direct, physical transnational repression since 2014 against victims in 79 host countries.

    China “conducts the most sophisticated, global, and comprehensive campaign of transnational repression in the world,” the report says. Rwanda, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey are also identified as leading states targeting their nationals abroad.

    “The scale and violence of these attacks underscore the danger that people face even after they flee repression,” Freedom House President Michael Abramowitz said in a statement, adding that putting an end to the practices is “vital to protecting democracy and rolling back authoritarian influence.”

    The report says the Kremlin commonly uses assassination in its transnational repression efforts. It cites the case of former intelligence officer Alexander Litvinenko, who died following radiation poisoning in London in 2006, while a nerve agent was used in the attempted assassination of former intelligence officer Sergei Skripal and his daughter in England in 2018.

    “At a minimum, in Ukraine, Bulgaria, Germany, and the United Kingdom, the Kremlin has shown a willingness to kill perceived enemies abroad,” it says, adding that these attacks “also come against the backdrop of numerous unexplained deaths of high-profile Russians in exile, their business partners, and other potential targets of the Russian state.”

    The Russian government is also responsible for “assaults, detentions, unlawful deportations, and renditions in eight countries, mostly in Europe.”

    Russia is responsible for 38 percent of all public Red Notices in the world, making it the “most prolific abuser” of the Interpol notice system that Freedom House says the Kremlin uses to harass and detain exiles.

    Russians abroad who are engaged in political opposition also face “surveillance and sophisticated hacking campaigns,” which are paired with control over key cultural institutions operating abroad, including the Russian Orthodox Church, in an effort to exert influence over the Russian diaspora.

    Meanwhile, Ramzan Kadyrov, the Kremlin-backed leader of Russia’s North Caucasus region of Chechnya, employs “a brutal direct campaign to control the Chechen diaspora” in what Freedom House describes as “a unique example of a subnational regime operating its own transnational repression campaign.”

    Of the 32 documented physical cases of Russian transnational repression, “a remarkable 20 have a Chechen nexus,” according to the report, which notes that three Chechen exiles have been murdered in Europe over the last two years.

    Freedom House says Tehran has resumed assassinations of exiles in Europe and Turkey in recent years following a lull in the 2000s.

    It cited the case of former Iranian intelligence officer Masud Molavi, who was gunned down in Istanbul in November 2019, a killing ascribed by Turkish and U.S. officials to the Iranian government.

    In Belgium, an Iranian diplomat charged with plotting to bomb an exiled opposition group’s gathering is currently standing trial.

    Meanwhile, Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) has led “operations to kidnap exiles from other countries and forcibly repatriate them,” with Freedom House citing the “particularly outrageous” case of opposition journalist Ruhollah Zam, who was executed in Iran in December 2020 after being “abducted” from Iraq.

    Tehran has used in some cases “a combination of bilateral pressure and co-optation of other countries’ institutions to achieve detentions and deportations,” it says, adding that Iranian authorities also used Interpol to harass exiles “even though the clear lack of judicial independence in the country should limit the credibility of its notices.”

    The Iranian state uses other tactics to pressure those involved in opposition politics or independent journalism, including smear campaigns such as the creation of fake news websites that mirror real ones and falsification of statements by journalists in order to discredit them.

    In January 2020, Reporters without Borders (RSF) counted 200 Iranian journalists living overseas who had been threatened, including 50 who had received death threats.

    These threats are frequently paired with coercion by proxy in which family members within Iran are threatened or detained in order to silence exiles.

    Iranian authorities also run highly “sophisticated” spyware campaigns, with Iranians abroad receiving “complex spear-phishing attempts.”

    In Central Asia, Freedom House says Tajik exiles have “faced the largest wave of transnational repression” in the former Soviet Union during the period under study spanning between January 2014 through November 2020, as the government of President Emomali Rahmon “consolidated power at home and targeted the opposition that fled abroad.”

    “Thirty-eight of 129 coded incidents from the region originated from Tajikistan, showing extensive detentions as well as unlawful deportations, renditions, an assault, an unexplained disappearance, and one assassination,” it says.

    Azerbaijani authorities also “aggressively target” opposition figures and journalists abroad, having conducted five renditions — from Ukraine, Georgia, and Turkey — since 2014. In four of those cases, the victim was a journalist or a journalist’s spouse.

    Kazakhstan’s transnational repression has focused on political opposition figures and former insiders, especially Mukhtar Ablyazov, a fugitive former banking official and outspoken critic of the government, his family, and associates.

    Freedom House counted five cases of transnational repression by Kyrgyz authorities, including four involving the targeting of ethnic Uzbeks who fled Kyrgyzstan following clashes in southern Kyrgyzstan in 2010. The four were detained at Bishkek’s requests in Russia but eventually released following legal challenges.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • A British-Iranian anthropologist who faced years in prison in Iran says he escaped the country on foot across a mountain border and made his way back to the United Kingdom.

    Kameel Ahmady told British media on February 3 that he had escaped while on bail pending an appeal against his prison sentence.

    “I just simply left. I packed my bag with a shaving kit, a few books of mine, and a laptop,” Ahmady told the BBC, adding: “And warm clothes, because I knew I had to smuggle myself out of that train in the mountains. It was very cold, very long, very dark, and very scary.”

    He told The Guardian he took paths used by smugglers from Iraq and Turkey, wading through deep snow 1.5 meters deep and fog while evading Iranian border patrols.

    Ahmady was sentenced in December 2020 to more than nine years in prison for allegedly collaborating with a hostile government — a charge he denies – and ordered to pay a fine equivalent to $722,000.

    The academic was arrested at his home in Tehran in August 2019 and spent three months in Tehran’s Evin prison, where he said he was subjected to “so-called white torture, a psychological pressure they put on you.”

    The academic was then released on bail before his sentencing by a Revolutionary Court.

    Ahmady is an ethnic Kurd whose research touched on sensitive issues such as child marriage, female genital mutilation, minorities, gender, and temporary marriages practiced in Shi’ite Islam.

    His parents sent him to Britain when he was 18. He studied at the University of Kent and the London School of Economics, and applied for British citizenship before returning to Iran.

    Ahmady told the BBC that he had been targeted not just because he was a dual national, but also because Iran wanted to retaliate after Britain in 2019 seized an Iranian oil tanker off Gibraltar that was suspected of breaking EU sanctions.

    “I always knew that I am an attractive and potential asset,” he said. “But that doesn’t mean that I have done anything wrong.”

    Iran has repeatedly detained foreigners and dual nationals in recent years on charges human rights activists and governments say are unfounded.

    With reporting by the BBC and The Guardian

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Red Lines host Anya Parampil speaks with investigative journalist Gareth Porter about his recent piece in The Grayzone which explores the role CENTCOM Chief General Kenneth McKenzie played in escalating tensions with Iran in the final days of the Trump Administration. Porter also discusses the role General McKenzie will have in the Biden Administration as well as the new president’s Iran strategy.

    The post US General Manipulates Media To Push For War With Iran appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • Iran’s parliament has rejected a draft state budget proposed by President Hassan Rohani’s government, amid a political struggle between moderates and conservative hard-liners ahead of the presidential election in June.

    State TV reported on February 2 that of the 261 lawmakers present in the 290-seat parliament, which is dominated by hard-liners, 148 voted against the bill while 99 backed it. The rest abstained.

    Opponents of the proposed budget for the year beginning on March 21 argued that its heavy deficit and unrealistic oil-income forecast would worsen inflation and burden an economy already hit hard by U.S. sanctions imposed on Iran under former President Donald Trump.

    The rejection of the draft budget came after much discussion in various parliamentary committees since Rohani’s government, seen as moderate, presented the bill in December 2020.

    The administration now has two weeks to submit a new draft budget, and if the impasse is not resolved a temporary budget would have to be passed for one to three months, Iranian news agencies quoted lawmakers as saying.

    Government spokesman Ali Rabiei said it is willing to modify the bill, but without “changing the overall structure and projecting unrealistic earnings.”

    In 2018, Trump pulled the United States out of the landmark 2015 nuclear deal between Tehran and world powers, and started imposing crippling sanctions on Iran as part a “maximum pressure” campaign aimed at forcing the country to negotiate a new agreement that would also address the country’s missile programs and its support for regional proxies.

    In response, Iran has gradually breached parts of the pact saying it is no longer bound by it, despite international calls for Tehran to return to full compliance.

    Kazem Gharibabadi, Iran’s envoy to the International Atomic Energy Agency, said on February 2 that Iran was enriching uranium with a larger number of advanced centrifuge machines, deepening a key breach of the nuclear accord.

    “Thanks to our diligent nuclear scientists, two cascades of 348 IR2m centrifuges with almost 4 times the capacity of IR1 are now running with UF6 successfully in Natanz. Installation of 2 cascades of IR6 centrifuges has also been started in Fordow,” Gharibabadi tweeted.

    U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken on February 1 said that Washington is willing to return to compliance with the 2015 accord if Iran does, and then work with U.S. allies and partners on a “longer and stronger” agreement including other issues.

    Iranian officials insist that the United States should make the first move by returning to the nuclear agreement, which eased international sanctions in exchange for curbs on Iran’s disputed nuclear program.

    They also say the country’s missile program and regional policies are off the table.

    With reporting by Reuters, AFP, and AP

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Iran has agreed to allow the crew members of a South Korean vessel it seized for allegedly polluting the environment to leave the country,

    Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Saeed Khatibzadeh was quoted by state media on February 2 as saying Tehran was releasing the crew of 20 as a “humanitarian move.”

    “Following a request by the South Korean government…the crew of the Korean ship, which was detained on charges of causing environmental pollution in the Persian Gulf, have received permission to leave the country in a humanitarian move by Iran,” Khatibzadeh said.

    The Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) seized the South Korean-flagged MT Hankuk Chemi on January 4 and detained its crew near the strategic Strait of Hormuz over pollution violations — an allegation rejected by the ship’s operator.

    The move came amid tensions over Iranian funds frozen in Seoul because of U.S. sanctions.

    The frozen assets stem from oil sales earned before Washington tightened sanctions on Iran following the U.S. withdrawal from a landmark nuclear deal between Tehran and world powers.

    The Iranian government has rejected allegations that the seizure of the tanker amounted to hostage taking.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Iran’s ambassador to London has condemned a film produced by a U.K.-based company, claiming that the film undermines the teachings of the Prophet Muhammad.

    The film, titled The Lady Of Heaven, revolves around the story of an Iraqi child who learns the importance of patience by discovering the story of Fatima Zahra, the daughter of Muhammad.

    “In a letter to the Shi’ite and Sunni Islamic centers in the U.K., I categorically condemned the film…as a divisive action, and expressed concern over attempts to create division and hatred among Muslims at this sensitive time,” Ambassador Hamid Baeidinejad tweeted on February 1.

    Baeidinejad urged the both Shi’a and Sunnis to “be vigilant and act in unity to condemn this film and resort to legal steps to ban the film in the U.K.”

    Several senior Iranians clerics have reportedly condemned the movie, saying it promotes discord between Shi’a and Sunnis.

    It has been also condemned in Pakistan, where the telecommunications authority last month ordered social-media platforms to block all content related to the “sacrilegious” movie.

    With reporting by Mehr and Express Tribune

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken has said the Biden administration is considering possible action against Russia, a day after police used batons and tasers against protesters demanding the release of jailed opposition politician Aleksei Navalny.

    In a TV interview aired on February 1, Blinken said he was “deeply disturbed by the violent crackdown.”

    He also said in the wide-ranging interview that China acted “egregiously” to undermine Hong Kong and warned Iran was months away from the ability to produce the fissile material needed for a nuclear weapon.

    Russia’s Foreign Ministry claimed that Washington was behind the protests, alleging a “gross intervention in Russia’s affairs.”

    “The Russian government makes a big mistake if it believes that this is about us,” he said in the interview with NBC News. “It’s about them. It’s about the government. It’s about the frustration that the Russian people have with corruption, with autocracy, and I think they need to look inward, not outward.”

    In the interview, taped on January 31, Blinken did not commit to specific sanctions against Moscow. He said he was reviewing a response to the actions against Navalny, as well as Russian election interference in 2020, the Solar Wind hack, and alleged bounties for U.S. soldiers in Afghanistan.

    “The president could not have been clearer in his conversation with President [Vladimir] Putin,” Blinken said of Joe Biden’s telephone call last week with the Russian leader.

    On Iran, Blinken warned that Tehran was months away from being able to produce enough fissile material for a nuclear weapon, saying it could be only “a matter of weeks” if Iran continued to lift restraints in the nuclear deal.

    He said the United States was willing to return to compliance with the 2015 nuclear deal if Iran does and then work with U.S. allies and partners on a “longer and stronger” agreement including other issues. Pressed about whether the release of detained Americans, which was not part of previous negotiations, would be an absolute condition for an expanded nuclear treaty, he did not commit.

    “Irrespective of…any deal, those Americans need to be released. Period,” he said. “We’re going to focus on making sure that they come home one way or another.”

    Regarding China, Blinken said that despite World Health Organization inspectors on the ground in Wuhan, Beijing is “falling far short of the mark” when it comes to allowing experts access to the sites where the coronavirus was discovered.

    He called China’s lack of transparency a “profound problem” that must be addressed.

    Blinken said the Biden administration would be looking to see whether the U.S. tariffs imposed on Chinese imports by the previous Trump administration were doing more harm to the United States than to their target.

    He also criticized Chinese actions in Hong Kong, where he said China had acted “egregiously” to undermine its commitments to the semiautonomous island.

    Under a sweeping national security law criminalizing secession and subversion, pro-democracy demonstrators have been swept up in waves of arrests.

    With reporting by Reuters

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • President Biden has inherited a terribly flawed US foreign policy. For the past few decades, the pro-corporate US foreign policy has been a catastrophic failure, especially in the Middle East. Our criminal military interventions there have resulted in the devastation of much of that area, impoverished millions, created millions of refugees, and injured or killed millions more. Moreover, this criminal policy has wasted trillions of US taxpayer dollars, injured or killed thousands of US forces, and has badly damaged US strategic interests.

    The illegal US use of aggressive sanctions against nations that don’t follow its dictates has also harmed tens of millions of people worldwide. In addition, US pro-corporate trade policies as well as the US-influenced International Monetary Fund and World Bank have impoverished tens of millions in the Third World. Perhaps of even greater importance, the US-led opposition to enforceable policies that ameliorate the effects of climate chaos threatens billions of people.

    Clearly these ruinous policies need to be changed. The Biden administration must seize this opportunity and implement a sane foreign policy. Below are some excellent principles that provide a guideline for such a foreign policy. These principles were laid out in the “ Cross of Iron” speech delivered by President Dwight Eisenhower on April 16, 1953. Two lengthy excerpts from this speech are shown next.

    He said:

    The way chosen by the United States was plainly marked by a few clear precepts, which govern its conduct in world affairs.
    First: No people on earth can be held, as a people, to be enemy, for all humanity shares the common hunger for peace and fellowship and justice.
    Second: No nation’s security and well-being can be lastingly achieved in isolation but only in effective cooperation with fellow-nations.
    Third: Any nation’s right to form of government and an economic system of its own choosing is inalienable.
    Fourth: Any nation’s attempt to dictate to other nations their form of government is indefensible.
    And fifth: A nation’s hope of lasting peace cannot be firmly based upon any race in armaments but rather upon just relations and honest understanding with all other nations.

    Later in this speech, Eisenhower added:

    This Government is ready to ask its people to join with all nations in devoting a substantial percentage of the savings achieved by disarmament to a fund for world aid and reconstruction. The purposes of this great work would be to help other peoples to develop the underdeveloped areas of the world, to stimulate profitability and fair world trade, to assist all peoples to know the blessings of productive freedom.  The monuments to this new kind of war would be these: roads and schools, hospitals and homes, food and health. We are ready, in short, to dedicate our strength to serving the needs, rather than the fears, of the world.  We are ready, by these and all such actions, to make of the United Nations an institution that can effectively g uard the peace and security of all peoples.

    Eisenhower also pointed out the implications of spending huge amounts on military weapons in terms of homes, schools, hospitals, etc. that weren’t built.

    President Eisenhower plainly recognized that our security and well-being, as well as that of all people on the planet, come from cooperation, not competition. Once we understand this point, the necessary policies become clear. In summary, President Eisenhower, a military icon who knew well the horrors of war, specifically stressed respect for the sovereignty of nations, the need to make the U.N. stronger, spoke against forced changes in regimes or economic systems, called for military disarmament and supported world aid and reconstruction. Even though he wasn’t correct in describing what the US was willing to do or its path, imagine the difference had Eisenhower or any of his successors followed through on his words.

    President Biden now has the opportunity to follow Eisenhower’s counsel in a world where US actions have destroyed the myth of its moral authority or of being the exceptional nation. The US must work to rejoin the community of nations by complying with international law instead of running roughshod over it. This means among other things that the US must stop threatening other nations as well as ending its illegal sanctions.

    In particular, possible steps the Biden administration could take in collaboration with the international community are:

    • share covid-19 vaccines with all nations at an affordable cost; may require the temporary suspension of patents;
    • create enforceable steps for dealing with climate chaos including a large and increasing carbon tax; and fulfill funding climate change commitments to Third World nations;
    • drastically reduce weapons spending, disband NATO and rely on the UN and diplomacy for settling conflicts; may require the ability to override a veto in the Security Council;
    • strongly support international law and human rights for Palestinians; also support enforcement of the Right of Return for Palestinians;
    • rejoin weapons treaties including the JCPOA (aka, the Iran Nuclear Deal) and ratify the Ban Nuclear Weapons Treaty;
    • pay reparations for their rebuilding to nations the US has devastated;
    • close overseas military bases;
    • end unilateral sanctions, especially those against Venezuela, Cuba, Iran and North Korea; and,
    • strongly support the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

    Disappointingly, it appears as if President Biden will continue to pursue the disastrous US foreign policy. It is up to us, we the people, to convince President Biden and Congress to put the public interest over corporate profits.

    The post A New U.S. Foreign Policy first appeared on Dissident Voice.

    This post was originally published on Dissident Voice.

  • COVID-19 vaccination programs in Ukraine, Georgia, and Iran were given a boost over the weekend as health officials announced progress in getting their populations inoculated.

    Ukraine’s deputy health minister, Viktor Lyashko, said on January 30 that his country will receive 117,000 doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine in February through COVAX.

    The vaccine will be immediately distributed to inoculate employees of hospitals who provide care to patients with COVID-19, Lyashko said on Facebook.

    Ukraine will also receive between 2.2 and 3.7 million doses of the AstraZeneca vaccine in the first half of 2021.

    Georgia, meanwhile, will receive the first doses of the Pfizer vaccine at the end of February, Prime Minister Giorgi Gakharia said on Facebook on January 30..

    Gakharia did not specify how many doses would arrive, but he said the vaccination of medical personnel would begin immediately after the first doses arrive.

    Gakharia’s announcement came on the same day that several dozen restaurateurs, owners of hospitality businesses, and fitness centers demonstrated in Tbilisi to demand the lifting of COVID-19 measures, RFE/RL’s Georgian Service reported.

    The Georgian government has said the regulations will stay in place until the situation improves.

    Elsewhere, Iran expects to receive the first batch of Russia’s Sputnik-V coronavirus vaccine by February 4, the IRNA state news agency reported.

    “A contract for the purchase and joint production was signed yesterday between Iran and Russia,” said Tehran’s ambassador to Moscow, Kazem Jalali, according to IRNA on January 30.

    Two more batches are to be delivered later in February, he added.

    Despite criticism of the way trials of the vaccine were conducted, Sputnik-V has also been registered in Russia, Belarus, Argentina, Bolivia, Serbia, Palestine, Venezuela, Paraguay, Turkmenistan, the U.A.E., and the Republic of Guinea.

    It has also been cleared for emergency use in European Union member Hungary even though it has yet to be greenlighted by the European Medicines Agency (EMA), the EU’s drug regulator.

    The latest vaccine announcements come as governments in Europe and elsewhere move to curb international travel amid already tight restrictions as virus mutations show signs of spreading to dozens of countries around the globe.

    Health officials have expressed concerns over whether vaccines will provide sufficient protection, particularly against virus mutations originally detected in South Africa and Brazil.

    With reporting by Reuters, AFP, dpa, and AP

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • The United Nations has urged Iran to halt the “imminent” execution of a member of the Baluch ethnic minority as it rebuked Tehran for a number of recent hangings, including members of the country’s ethnic minorities.

    “We urge the authorities to halt the execution of Javid Dehghan, to review his and other death penalty cases in line with human rights law,” the Geneva-based Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) said on Twitter on January 29.

    “We strongly condemn the series of executions — at least 28 — since mid-December, including of people from minority groups,” the UN added.

    The UN said Dehghan had been sentenced to death in 2017 for “taking up arms to take lives or property and to create fear.”

    Amnesty International said on January 28 that Dehghan, 31, is scheduled to be executed on January 31.

    The London-based rights group said Dehghan was sentenced to death in connection with his alleged membership in the extremist group Jaish Al-Adl (Army of Justice) and his alleged role in an ambush that killed two members of Iran’ Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps.

    Jaish Al-Adl has reportedly carried out several high-profile bombings and abductions in Iran in recent years.

    Amnesty said his trial was “grossly unfair” with the court relying on “torture-tainted confessions” and ignoring abuses committed during the investigation.

    “Amnesty International urges the Iranian authorities not to compound the shocking catalogue of human rights violations already committed against Javid Dehghan by carrying out his execution,” the rights group said.

    Activists outside Iran have in past weeks expressed concern over the numbers of ethnic Baluch being executed or facing capital punishment in Iran.

    Abdollah Aref, the director of the Europe-based Campaign of Baluch Activists, told the BBC earlier this week that in the past two months his group has documented the execution of 16 members of the Baluch minority.

    The UN said Iran has launched a crackdown on minorities since mid-December.

    “This has included a series of executions of members of ethnic and religious minority groups — in particular Kurdish, Ahwazi Arab, and Baluch communities,” OHCHR spokesperson Ravina Shamdasani said.

    Iran is one of the world’s leading executioners.

    With reporting by AFP

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • A Taliban delegation has held talks with high-ranking Iranian officials in Tehran amid ongoing peace talks between the Afghan government and the militant group.

    Taliban spokesman Mohammad Naeem tweeted that the delegation led by deputy leader Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar met with Ali Shamkhani, the secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, and other officials on January 27.

    Naeem said the two sides discussed the Afghan peace process, border issues, and Afghan refugees.

    Shamkhani was quoted by Iranian state media as saying that Tehran would “never recognize a group that wants to come to power through war,” and urged the Taliban to reach a peace settlement with the internationally recognized government in Kabul.

    Baradar was quoted as saying that the militant group does not “trust the United States and we will fight any group that is a mercenary for the United States,” in reference to the Afghan government.

    The relationship between Shi’ite-majority Iran and the Taliban, a fundamentalist Sunni group, is complex. Iran officially opposes the Taliban, but a number of experts claim that Tehran provides some military support to the Taliban.

    The Taliban’s visit to Afghanistan’s western neighbor comes as peace talks in the Gulf state of Qatar remain deadlocked.

    U.S. President Joe Biden’s new administration has said it is reviewing an agreement reached with the Taliban last year to determine if the militant group is meeting its commitments, including reaching a cease-fire and engaging in meaningful negotiations with the Afghan government.

    Under a U.S.-Taliban deal reached last February, all foreign forces are to leave Afghanistan by May 2021 in exchange for security guarantees from the militant group, including severing ties with the Al-Qaeda terrorist group.

    The Afghan government said it welcomed the Biden administration’s review of the U.S.-Taliban agreement.

    With reporting by Tolo News, Pajhwok, and The National

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Iranian President Hassan Rohani has criticized Iran’s judiciary over the prosecution of the country’s telecommunications minister after he allegedly refused to block Instagram and impose restrictions on other foreign social media and messaging platforms.

    Mohammad Javad Azari Jahromi was summoned for prosecution last week but Rohani, seen as a moderate, challenged the Islamic nation’s judiciary during a cabinet meeting on January 27, saying that while a lack of control on content is wrong, the “closure” of social media is also misguided.

    “If you want to try someone, try me,” he said, noting that improving Internet bandwidth in Iran was done on his orders.

    “These days, the Internet is like oxygen for people…to want to restrict it would be absolutely wrong…. How else can we expect people to do everything from home and teach their children online during the pandemic?” he asked.

    Jahromi has been released on bail. His prosecution is seen as part of a political struggle between moderates and conservative hard-liners ahead of the presidential election in June.

    Hard-liners in the Iranian parliament, judiciary, and other powerful bodies have long viewed social-messaging services as part of a “soft war” waged by the West against the clerical establishment that is responsible for “social immorality” in the country.

    Many websites and social-media platforms are blocked in Iran, including YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, and Telegram, but the restrictions are ignored by many Iranians who access them via proxy VPN services.

    With reporting by AP, dpa, and ISNA

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Reports from Iran say a wrestler has been executed on charges of homicide.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.