Category: israel

  • The Hind Rajab Foundation’s (HRF) complaint against the European Investment Bank (EIB) for alleged complicity in Israeli war crimes has advanced to a formal assessment phase within the bank’s Complaints Mechanism (EIB-CM), Anadolu Agency reported on 4 November.

    HRF said the step is not merely procedural but represents “a political and legal milestone” and “a turning point,” forcing a European institution to reckon with its role in grave breaches of international law. 

    The group described it as one of the first legal actions within the European Union that directly challenges the financial complicity of an EU institution in Israeli war crimes.

    The post Hind Rajab Foundation Takes Aim At European Investment Bank appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • A complaint by human rights group CAGE International has led to the Charity Commission issuing a ‘remedial action plan’ to the so-called Campaign Against Antisemitism (CAA), one of Israel’s most influential lobby groups in the UK, in an attempt to bring its activities into line with UK charity law.

    The Campaign Against Antisemitism and UK Lawyers for Israel

    CAGE International raised concerns that CAA and another notoriously aggressive ‘charity’, UK Lawyers for Israel (UKLFI), misuse their charitable status to defend Israel’s apartheid policies and genocide, and to suppress pro-Palestinian advocacy, through vexatious complaints – a breach of charity law. The Charity Commission has also placed UKLFI under investigation where it may face the same enforcement action.

    According to CAGE’s press release:

    [The sanction] follows a formal complaint submitted by CAGE International earlier this year against both the CAA and UK Lawyers for Israel (UKLFI), which detailed how both charities defend and advocate for the State of Israel’s apartheid and genocidal policies in a manner that contravenes their charitable purposes, while also engaging in vexatious and malicious complaints against pro-Palestinian individuals, universities, employers, and regulatory bodies – a tactic for which both organisations are notorious. This is done as a means of intimidating and silencing Pro-Palestinian activism.

    The Commission’s intervention marks the second regulatory consequence resulting from CAGE’s complaint. In September, Middle East Eye revealed that the Commission had opened an active investigation into the UKLFI Charitable Trust, the fundraising arm of UK Lawyers for Israel, over concerns that “some of its activities may fall outside the scope of its charitable objectives.”

    A spokesperson for the Charity Commission confirmed that, following the concerns raised by CAGE International, the Campaign Against Antisemitism has been issued a remedial Action Plan under section 15(2) of the Charities Act 2011. The plan requires the charity’s trustees to take specific steps to improve the administration, management, and governance of the organisation in light of the concerns raised. The Commission will follow up with the trustees to ensure that the charity implements the advice given.

    The Commission’s regulatory engagement with both UKLFI and CAA comes amid mounting public scrutiny over the political use of charitable structures to defend Israel’s apartheid regime and suppress pro-Palestinian advocacy.

    CAGE’s formal submission to the Charity Commission detailed how both groups:

    • support and legitimise Israel’s apartheid and genocide, contrary to their stated charitable purposes and charity law against political activity;
    • misuse their charitable platforms to promote a political agenda shielding Israel from accountability;
    • engage in vexatious and malicious complaints against universities, employers, and professionals who express solidarity with Palestine – causing reputational, professional, and emotional harm to individuals.

    CAA was one of the main groups at the forefront of the antisemitism scam attacking the British left and particularly then-Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn; the group was also one of the chief agitators behind the now-discredited Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) investigation into Corbyn’s Labour, which did not find evidence of the alleged systemic antisemitism but has been widely misquoted as a weapon ever since, despite the EHRC having to settle an expensive lawsuit brought by two left-wing figures it smeared.

    CAGE’s complaint followed its May report, Britain’s Apartheid Apologists, which outlined how UKLFI and CAA “operate as the leading advocacy infrastructure sustaining Israel’s apartheid system under the guise of charity” and documented how these groups have weaponised regulatory bodies, media platforms, and legal mechanisms to silence pro-Palestinian voices and legitimise systemic violence against the Palestinian people.

    Anas Mustapha, Head of Public Advocacy at CAGE International, said:

    The CAA has long acted as a leading enabler of state-led repression against Britons who oppose genocide. It operates as an extension of the State of Israel, undermining fundamental freedoms by intimidating, accusing, and silencing those who challenge the apartheid settler-colonial regime. The Charity Commission must act decisively to prevent both the CAA and UKLFI from masquerading as charities before further damage is done to its own credibility and reputation.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Skwawkbox

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Money has always distorted U.S. politics, but the current Trump regime has entered new territory with an unabashed pay-to-play setup that’s stuffing the president’s political coffers while enriching him and his family. Donald Trump’s coldly transactional dealings have been on full display as he’s tapped billionaire allies and major corporations to shower his administration with donations to…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • Life on college campuses has changed dramatically in the last 10 months. While institutions of higher education continue to reel from the Trump administration’s top-down attacks and scramble to adjust, workers on campus say that their universities are simultaneously expanding their own internal repression and surveillance apparatuses to squash dissent. In this episode, we speak with a panel of graduate student workers and union members from Columbia University and the University of Michigan about the chilling new reality on their campuses and what it’s like to live, learn, and work there today.

    Panelists include; Vayne, a PhD candidate in history at Columbia University and a member of the bargaining committee for Student Workers of Columbia; Conlan Olson, a PhD student in computer science at Columbia University and a member of the bargaining committee for Student Workers of Columbia; Jared Eno, a grad worker in sociology and public policy at the University of Michigan and a rank-and-file member of the Graduate Employees Organization.

    Additional links/info:

    Featured Music:

    • Jules Taylor, Working People Theme Song

    Credits:

    • Audio Post-Production: Jules Taylor
    Transcript

    The following is a rushed transcript and may contain errors. A proofread version will be made available as soon as possible.

    Maximillian Alvarez:

    I got work. All right. Welcome everyone to Working People, a podcast about the lives, jobs, dreams, and struggles of the working class today. Working People is a proud member of the Labor Radio Podcast network and is brought to you in partnership within these Times Magazine and the Real News Network. This show is produced by Jules Taylor and made possible by the support of listeners like you. My name is Maximillian Alvarez and we’ve got a really important episode for y’all today, which is the latest installment of our ongoing coverage here on working people and all across the Real News Network on the Trump Administration’s all-Out assault on our institutions of higher education and the people who live, learn and work there. And today’s conversation is going to be a critical follow-up to an episode that we published back in late April where I spoke to a panel of graduate student workers with the graduate employee organization or GEO at the University of Michigan and student workers of Columbia University United Auto Workers, and that was a really intense and frankly surreal episode.

    We were talking about some really intense and surreal stuff that was unfolding before our eyes in that moment on Columbia and Michigan’s campuses at the time. If you guys remember just three months into the new Trump administration, we were talking about federal abductions of pro-Palestine student protestors like Mahmood, Khalil Trump’s gangster style shakedown of Columbia involving massive funding cuts and withholding of federal grants, billions of dollars of worth. We were talking about Columbia firing and expelling grant, minor president of Student Workers of Columbia just before bargaining sessions with the union and the administration were set to begin and we were also talking about the breaking story that on the morning of April 23rd at the direction of Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel, law enforcement officers including FBI agents, raided the homes of multiple student organizers connected to Palestine solidarity protests at the University of Michigan. As I’ve told you guys many times and will continue to disclose is my alma mater and GEO is my former union and now here in October, 2025, we’ve got headlines like this in the Michigan Daily three pro-Palestine activists arrested for protesting speech given by former Israeli soldiers and I’ve got press releases from student workers of Columbia in my inbox saying Columbia surveilled and threatened student workers of Columbia Union members engaging in protected concerted activity flouting the NLRA and explicitly extending its suppression of free speech to labor action.

    Now, as I said in that last episode that we did in April, and as we keep saying in our coverage of this, the battle on and over our institutions of higher education have been and are going to continue to be a critical front where the future of democracy and the Trump administration’s entire agenda are going to be decided. And it’s going to be decided not just by what Trump does and how university administrations and boards of regents respond, but by how faculty respond students, grad students respond, how staff and campus communities and the public writ large respond. And today we are very grateful to be joined by a panel of graduate student workers and union members at the University of Michigan and Columbia University who are on the front lines of that fight. We are joined once again by Conlin, who is a PhD student in computer science at Columbia University and is on the bargaining committee for student Workers of Columbia, also calling in from Columbia.

    We are joined by Vayne. Vayne is a PhD candidate in history at Columbia University and is also on the bargaining committee for Student Workers of Columbia and we are also joined by Jared Eno. Jared is a grad worker in sociology and public policy at the University of Michigan and as a rank and file member of GEO, well, Conlan vain. Jared, thank you all so much for joining us here on Working People. I really, really appreciate it and I wanted to ask if we could just go around the table and have y’all introduce yourselves a little more to our listeners and let’s start walking them through what’s been happening in your lives and on your campuses since our audience last heard from you or your fellow union members back in April.

    Vayne:

    Awesome. Thanks Max. Thanks for having us on. My name is Vayne, as you mentioned. I’m a fourth year PhD at Columbia and this is going to be my third straight year in the trenches and organizing with Columbia around this campus and yeah, it’s hard to try to recount everything that’s happened since April. Really, I was just, when I was looking at some of the, as the last episode, Jesse, who is also on this podcast actually got suspended for two years for a Palestine related activity. There was an action at Butler, a teach in and she wrote an incredible EO essay about this actually, which I think really highlights the state of things since then. She was, I guess readers can check this out with themselves, but she had participated in an eight day occupation of building at Columbia as an undergrad when she was at Barnard many years ago, and I think the discipline was a letter, an apology letter, and over the summer, Jesse and a bunch of others have received various levels of suspensions.

    Yeah, I think since April we’ve really seen Columbia has unfortunately gained a lot of experience in repressing student action and activism and our labor movement as well. I think at this point I just saw over 200 students have been suspended or expelled for Palestine related actions at Columbia since as of October, 2025. And yeah, the most recent event that you mentioned was this disciplinary warning for members who were picketing, we’re in the middle of a bargaining for our new contract and this has never happened, ever. I’ve participated in pickets, I led pickets without masks on, with masks on. I think there have been more attempts to get our IDs on campus, but this is really a really large escalation really. There was always this understanding even though most of Columbia’s responses to protestors have been completely unjustified, but there’s always this understanding that labor that they were going to respect labor law and it just seems that they’ve been really empowered by the federal administration to take this next step and they issued warnings and not charges, which I think speaks a little bit to the strength, the power of still being part of a union at this point, but it really is a significant departure.

    They changed a bunch of disciplinary policies over the summer, but still created some carve outs actually for members of the community university community who were participating in concerted activity protected on their NLRA. But this is very much a departure from that, but it’s just the latest in a pattern of cuts to student worker positions, suspensions, expulsions, and there’s stuff that’s reported and then stuff that isn’t much so, but it’s just really been a lot’s happened since April. I think. I’d say just we’re really seeing the way that repression boomerangs. I think that things that are happening at Columbia are also things that the US government has roughly been doing for a long time and in New York City as well, but also things that happen at Columbia on higher ed institutions, on campuses are really also affecting broad ranges of American societies. So yeah, that’s my summary.

    Conlan Olson:

    Hi, I am Conlan, as Maximillian mentioned, I’m a PhD student in computer science at Columbia and yeah, I think echoing what vain had said, we’ve really seen an escalation in repression both from the federal government, also from Columbia itself. I think increasingly we’ve seen that Columbia is unconcern with this public image, unconcerned with the law in particular unconcerned with violating the NLRA. And so a lot of the traditional more legal tools that we have to fight repression or the idea that we can appeal to public opinion to fight repression, I think are being undermined and I think we’re learning this hard lesson that what we really still have is our labor power and there’s not that much else that we have these days. Columbia has gone pretty mask off in terms of repressing labor activity and other protests to be on campus. The federal government is certainly not going to step into pushback against Columbia’s moves there.

    And so I think that we’ve sort of realized that what we have left is our ability to withhold our labor. We know that grad students run the university and if we can successfully withhold our labor, we will shut the university down and we are fully intending to use that kind of power to fight for a university that actually works for all the people in it, a university that actually contributes positively to society at large. And at the same time, it’s a hard task because the repression is intense and it is scary, and I think that the major problem right now is making sure that we’re moving together as a university community and as student workers at Columbia to keep each other safe and to take this sort of militant labor action together in a way that keeps everyone taking it safe. I think this lesson is also echoed in larger activist movements across the us for example, I think we’ve learned that there’s really no legal guardrails or safeguards against ICE taking arbitrary actions against non-citizens and citizens alike.

    And I think that communities and activists have realized that what we still have left is our ability to be there on the ground and fight back against repression. And I think, yeah, so this lesson of the safeguards that we thought we had about people in power sticking to moral standards or the laws being there to protect us have sort of eroded and we’re seeing that now and what we still have is our ability to take militant action together, but mobilizing that is hard, and so I think that’s a lot of the work that we have going forward.

    Jared Eno:

    Yeah. Hi all. I’m Jared Eno. I’m a grad worker at the University of Michigan and a member of the Grad Worker Union, GEO Graduate Employees Organization, really honored to be here. I appreciate the podcast and I really appreciate y’all and at Columbia Solidarity really on the front lines and we learned so much from you and it’s great to be in conversation with y’all. Yeah, similarly here in Michigan, the battle continues in terms of the repression and trying to fight for worker rights from here to Palestine. I think what’s happened since the last podcast is hard to summarize as others have said, but one thing that’s notable is back then, earlier this year, an Attorney General Dana Nessel had been recruited by the University of Michigan regents to bring felony charges and other charges against folks for the encampment and other actions in solidarity with Palestine and an orientation event called Festival.

    And Dana Nessel had just sent in the FBI to raid folks’ homes around that time. Shortly after that, Nestle was forced to drop all the criminal charges against the people who she had targeted, and this was a result of long and intense drop the charges campaign that was waged by workers, students, community members alike, including of course our National Lawyer Guild, wonderful lawyers in the courtroom. But there was like a lot of outrage as others have said, people seeing what was happening and how clear it was that the regents who of course continue to choose to politically and financially support the horrific and utterly depraved Israeli genocide of Palestinians to this day were in cahoots with the State Attorney General who was attempting to attack the Palestine solidarity movement. That generated a lot of outrage and eventually the pressure was enough that Nestle completely dropped all those charges, which was a huge victory I think for us and obviously for the folks who were targeted, especially who held strong through the entire time.

    Partly as a result of that, the university has turned toward its own internal disciplinary mechanisms to try and hurt people retaliate against people for standing against genocide. So Nestle drops all of those charges on May 20th and about a week later, our campus police sent over their police reports to the Office of Student Conflict Resolution here, which has supposedly a restorative justice office, but has now been transformed into an office for political repression. As others have said, as has happened at Columbia, the Regents have unilaterally changed the rules of the student conduct process and how that happens to make it easier for them to hurt people who oppose their fascist agenda. So there’s now been three rounds of Oscar charges, as we call them, people being Oscar, I’m one of them, and I was Oscar in the first wave, which was about an occupation of the Ruth and administration building back on November 17th, 2023 where the campus police led a cop riot in response to that and brutalized many people and then subsequently tried to get a bunch of people criminally charged, managed to convince the local prosecutor, Ellie Savitt, who is now running for State Attorney General to charge four of them with felonies, which he later allowed them to plead down because of the public pressure campaign back then.

    But now they’ve also brought second and third wave of disciplinary charges and like I said, made it easier for themselves to achieve their goal of convicting these folks through completely processes without any shred of due process. There’s a hundred percent conviction rate. Every person who’s found not responsible for the things they’re being charged with then gets that overturned and is found responsible. So we see the university now beefing up its own internal mechanisms for punishing people because of the public pressure that has been successful against the criminal charges. I’ll say a little bit more about that in that, as others have said, this comes amidst the intensification of the fascist crackdown, which the regents of the University of Michigan have very clearly decided to place themselves as part of that. And obviously that has been first and foremost the attacks on the Palestine solidarity movement, but the regions had already, I think ended the university’s DEI programs as of the last podcast, but they also subsequently decided to end gender affirming care for minors at University of Michigan’s Hospitals, which is a major provider for not just the state, but the region.

    They did that without fighting the federal government’s intimidation tactics. So again, we just see them rolling over, over and over and not actually being complicit and actively pushing this agenda forward through every means that they have. There’s the criminal charges, there’s disciplinary charges, they’ve banned people from campus, they’ve had people fired, they’ve brought people into disciplinary hearings from employment, just like every tool that they have, they’ve been trying to go after us, and as others have said, there’s now, yeah, a lot of conversations among workers, continued conversations about how we can fight back and how workers, as others have said, need to look to each other as a way out of this and really figure out what is the world that we can build together and how do we build the collective power to move toward it.

    Maximillian Alvarez:

    Yeah, I think that’s all beautifully, powerfully and harrowingly put, and I really appreciate y’all laying that out for us in our audience. And I kind of want to stick with those themes and maybe sort of go a little bit deeper because last time, as we said, and as y’all have been reaffirming, we were focusing a bit more on the top down assaults on your universities and your unions from these big scary federal government forces, whether they be Trump or ICE or what have you, but now we’re seeing much more of the universities in response, ramping up their own internal repression machines, which as y’all have mentioned, they’ve been developing and refining and expanding. I can think over just the course of doing this show and doing interviews with union members during strikes at Columbia or GEO or then the repressive efforts on campus after October, 2023 to then, as we’re talking the early months of this year in the second Trump administration, I feel like people can go back and listen to those episodes and hear about how the repression machine that is being ramped up now was being built up over that time.

    I wanted to kind of take that and ask if we could give listeners more of a worker’s eye view, a graduate student’s eye view of what it’s like to live and work in those environments right now, November of 2025, because what’s also changed in the country is now we got federal troops marching into cities. We’ve got more ice raids and brutalization of our communities and our neighbors. We maybe war with Venezuela in a week. Like shit continues to roll downhill while the repression continues to ramp up and the ivory tower. And so can you guys give our listeners a sense of what it’s like on campus right now? I want to ask if you could also talk about the surveillance side of it from the university. All of these issues seem to also revolve around that, like the university threatening to identify people who are wearing masks or log and register people for their political activities. The University of Michigan’s contracted private investigators to follow around their own students. Can you talk about, give people a sense of what it’s actually like on your campuses right now?

    Vayne:

    As for life on campus at Columbia right now, I am thinking about the two weeks after actually the Hins Hall raid at Columbia in spring 2024 where they banned everyone from campus except for I think the freshmen who literally lived on that block of campus that people normally think of when they think of Columbia. No professors, no students, and there’s just these images of cops guarding this empty campus, and I think right now we’re just living in that reality. People are kind of walking back, they’re back in classrooms, we’re walking around, but I think we’re very much still living in that reality, and I think that’s really the university that we’re almost barreling toward, if not for the struggles of a lot of people who are living and working there on a day-to-day basis. I think the university is in a kind of protracted struggle with community members actually who rely on this thoroughfare in the middle of campus called College Walk.

    It’s completely blocked off. It’s been blocked off for years now and it sucks. It is just not pleasant being on campus at all. This is the first year I’m on research fellowship this year actually, so this is the first year in a while where I haven’t needed to go to campus to teach multiple times, and it is quite remarkable how much of an impact on my mental health that has been frankly, not having to be there. It’s hard to really describe what it’s like as soon as you get to campus, you’re being eyed at by campus security, you come out of the subway, there’s the gates, there’s a row of public safety, they’re already and public safety now, that’s also another big change that we didn’t mention before. They have arrest powers on campus. There’s a trained group of some 30 something officers, I forgot what they’re called, but that’s another one of these heinous changes.

    And you get to the gates, you tap in, oftentimes they’re in line for a while, they added another box. It’s this terrible gray box in the middle of in front of the gates, and sometimes you have to tap again or they’re just watching you and you keep going and just random parts of this, otherwise I think quite beautiful campus are just fenced off in terrible ways. People, I mean, I was at Columbia in fall 2022 and it’s just so hard. It is just unrecognizable from them. People would sit on the steps during lunch and you’d see people playing Frisbee in front of the library, and to an extent you still see this, but then you are also so jarred by seeing these kids playing Frisbee with security, watching them, some mix of public safety officers and private contractors, and it makes the campus environment just so hostile to what I thought, frankly, what I thought I was coming here to do to learn and teach and research. It’s just way harder to literally bring people to campus to do research. I know people who’ve gotten their guest requests denied by the university.

    I know someone who is studying something related to cops and surveillance and was going to bring someone else for a research meeting onto campus, and that request got denied by Columbia Public Safety. It’s like the irony is just so jarring and frustrating and it is a serious impact on just our ability to do the work that we came here to do to begin with. I mean, you’re still always hearing about professors and adjunct instructors and TAs who are still just having to change their syllabi, having to make changes on their and how they teach to because the university is doing so little, in fact, nothing at all to protect the mission that we’re supposed to be doing here, which is why I’m just really fixated on this thinking a lot about this image of this empty university and a bunch of cops. As for surveillance too, I think that kind of stuff just does affect the ways that we approach our current contracts campaign.

    Our contracts expired in June and we have yet to sit down with the university, though we finally will be on Friday. The university is just able to kind of play dumb this entire year about not wanting to come to the table. They’ve just outright refused to bargain. They made it about Zoom and then it was about the size of the room, and it’s just really truly nonsensical reasoning that they were using to avoid coming to the table. Things that might have, I mean, people know Columbia is just really terrible, terrible employer full of actual evil, but it’s just kind of shocking still sometimes the things that they feel empowered to get away with now. And I think as others have been talking about, it’s really just this veneer of being passively complicit in evil. Columbia’s just, and a lot of other higher ed institutions, it’s outright cooperation, oftentimes mirroring the same things that the Trump administration is doing, consolidating power kind of doing. It’s really jarring hearing very similar things happening at Michigan, at Columbia, also with our disciplinary offices and the ways that our, it’s now called the Office of Institutional Equity. It is the office that’s supposed to be dealing with discrimination and harassment that’s also consolidated around university administrators. We’re also definitely seeing that affecting our living and working conditions.

    Conlan Olson:

    As vain said, things feel really bad at Columbia. And at the same time, I think Maximi what you said at the beginning, which is that back in April when I last talked to you, it did feel scarier actually because there were federal agents on campus and like, well, now they’re maybe just undercover. I dunno. And I think that’s actually a real strategy on the part of Columbia, which is that they’ve put, the window has been pushed so far towards fascism towards the right that now when Columbia does anything, they are trying to trick us into being grateful for it. And so I’m really thinking about that a lot in our contract campaign that I think it’s very clear that Columbia’s going to try to offer us a tiny raise, which will of course still be well below cost of living and say, Hey, we’re being really generous.

    We’re offering you a raise. We care about you. I’m really worried that I think we need to be really disciplined and understand things have not gotten better. It’s just that the window has been pushed so far towards us accepting such intense repression and such intense fascist tendencies that even a moderate acts of supposed goodwill feel like wins. And so I think it’s really important that we stay very disciplined, very strong and continue to take militant action. I think that this is important first just to effectively get a good contract and effectively operate as a worker union. I think this is also important because we’ve all been referencing the higher ed labor union fight is just one of many, many fights going on, even just in the US and let alone the many, many more vitally important fights around the world. And so I think that something that a lot of people at student workers of Columbia feel really deeply is the importance of keeping solidarity demands front and center.

    And so I think even as Columbia will try to get us to stand down by buying us out with a small compensation increase, we have to remember that we are a union that’s committed to things like protecting non-citizens to things like making Columbia align its investments with its supposed moral values and drop its support of the genocidal Israeli apartheid regime as someone watching how things have unfolded and remembering what things felt like in April. I think it’s really important to understand that yes, things felt scarier back then, but it’s not as if things have gotten better or less urgent. One thing that I think about a lot with this idea of discipline and militancy is being a worker and a researcher in computer science. Well, to no one’s surprise, there’s a lot of evil going on in computer science. If I’m looking at my coworkers, if we fight as a union, get them a raise, I’ll be happy.

    But then if they, after graduation, go off and work at Palantir and develop surveillance tech that’s going to be used to target civilians and military conflicts or deport people, that is a loss. That is a loss for the left. That is a loss for the labor movement that is a loss for the fight for oppressed people everywhere. And so I think at places like Columbia, which claim to be and are in some senses, in many senses, elite institutions, they explicitly say that they’re trying to train the ruling class. I think it’s important to stick to our solidarity demands and to fight for something much, much more than just our employer pretending to be a little bit nicer to us.

    Jared Eno:

    Well, plus one to so much of that, I mean, yeah, university of Michigan is also at this point kind of a surveillance state. There’s just so many cops. There’s so many cops everywhere. If it’s not cops, there’s rent to cops. If it’s not rent to cops, it’s cameras. And obviously this is millions and millions of dollars that the university is pouring into building this repressive apparatus. And as comrades have said, it sounds like, yeah, in Columbia, that just resonates. There’s so much precarity everywhere, whether it’s in the classroom, people just being scared to even teach the content that they research or having their funding cut on that research. Yeah, precarity is runs through everything. And part of that, there’s just a lot of fear, particularly among international workers obviously. And I think it’s important to name the police department here. It’s like UMPD as part of the DPSS Department of Public Safety and Security, I think it’s called ridiculously.

    It is really a key driver of all of this. And I should have mentioned earlier when I was talking about what has happened, I mean just a couple of weeks ago as an example that kind of ties some of this together, A pro-Israel student group brought some IOF soldiers to campus brazenly. This is part of a national tour that I think is called Triggered. I think purposefully playing on the outrage that they know it’s going to cause to bring gens airs to campuses where people do not accept genocide. And of course, people turned out to protect their community against the IOF. And of course UMPD protected the gens airs instead of protecting the community and violently assaulted and arrested three people. And it’s just indicative of the normalization of violence, of police repression, other kinds of oppression that comrades from Columbia are describing that’s freely concerning.

    And I’ll just plug quickly, I think we have a zap that I’d like to share with folks if you’d like to support. This is just one way to do it because right now, of course, university police are now trying to get anti genocide protestors once again prosecuted, criminally prosecuted for this. And another thing that I think is super important to note is that this group, like so many others, was not just students. It’s not just students, it was students, workers, community members, which again, I think is one of the powerful aspects of the organizing that’s come out throughout this time that the university desperately wants to break. So if folks want to participate in the Zap, you can go to Bitly bi ly slash email zap T two two, I CT 22 to tell prosecutors not to enable what the university is doing. But again, this is just one particularly pressing instance of a general trend. And as I said, there’s a lot of people who are coming together here and Columbia and everywhere who do not want this.

    I think it’s very important given the normalization of this level of oppression for us to build capacity to talk to each other about what’s going on and to remind each other. We do not want this. The majority of people do not want this. The majority of people do not want genocide. And yes, this is scary, but at a bare minimum, we do not have to go through it alone. That’s just a huge thing. And one thing that’s been so inspiring and so life-giving for me personally, is seeing the activity of people just talking to each other, whether it’s door knocking, phone banking, getting together to discuss how to push back against these disciplinary charges is something that I’ve personally been involved in. These are radical opportunities to build the capacity for democratic deliberation, which is of course what the labor movement, what unionism is really about.

    And think about what the world we want as workers and who we are. To Lin’s point, we are not just grad workers at the University of Michigan. We are also staff, we are also custodial staff, we also RAs. And one really inspiring part of this is the unionization efforts that resident assistants are pushing University Staff United as a new staff union. So there’s that. But even beyond that, there’s the communities that of course we are embedded in. And part of one of the major organizing points right now is that the University of Michigan is attempting to build a 1.2 billion data center in Ypsilanti, Michigan, which is just next door to Ann Arbor. And which will of course have severe negative impacts on the ecosystems there, on the power grid there, on the quality of life there. And will also, this thing is a collaboration with Los Alamos National Labs.

    It is designed to support the US nuclear stockpile. So this is horrible. And community members as well as folks who are within the university formally have come together to push back on this, which has been really inspiring. I’ll also say that within GEO, we are also within a contract campaign. So we’re very much talking about how we fit into this broader picture. And one very important part of that is research. G SRAs research assistance at the University of Michigan have not had a formal union protection. So there’s some really exciting conversations happening to make sure that we are all standing together against this fascism and thinking, as I said, really radically about what’s possible if we are not isolated, if we build capacity for collective action.

    Maximillian Alvarez:

    And I think that that is one of the many reasons why folks listening to this, even if they currently have no connection to or affiliation with higher education, should care about this fight. And they should care about what happens on campuses and around campuses, and not just for the nut job, Fox News reasons for why they think they should care about what’s going on on campus, but this speaks so much to what I myself have known and experienced living, working, and organizing on a college campus, the very one that Jared is at right now. And during the first Trump administration, I remember these coalitions that we were a part of everyone on campus, like so many different groups including the little one that I co-founded, the campus anti-fascist network. We worked in sort of collaboration with the unions, the unions, not graduate union, the lecturers union, the student democrats, the young socialists, the anarchists in Ypsilanti.

    It was a really interesting and beautiful coalition of people that came together out of this urgently felt need to defend our campus communities from open fascist and Nazis who wanted to come to those campuses and spread their hate and misinformation and bring their hateful, violent followers with ’em. Anyway, long story short, I saw over my time there as a graduate student and organizer or what it looked like after those fights and those coalitions started learning how to build and work together. There’s something you learn together when you are working together in those moments. And if you stay together after those initial fights, then you see things like I saw where the student, the undergraduates were going to the lecturers bargaining sessions and cheering them on, and you just had these beautiful sprouts of solidarity growing into something more and something beautiful out of those struggles that brought us together in the first place and out of the struggle itself.

    And that is why I think people need to look at universities and campus communities as microcosms of the sort of solidarity that working people are going to need, whether they’re in unions, whether they’re not, whether they just live in the area, whether they have family members attending these institutions or they’re struggles like in sacrifice zones that we’ve been covering on the show where you get Republican voters, democratic voters, non voters, neighbors who were brought together and forced to talk to each other and struggled together because a catastrophe has kind of befall their communities. So in all these different contexts, you have coalitions that need to emerge to fight back, and that’s happening on campus communities as well. With all that said, I wanted to sort of turn things back over to y’all and end on that note. If we could have y’all talk more about what folks in your communities, in your unions are doing right now to fight back and to defend your rights and to defend our right to academic freedom and free speech. And what can people listening do to help and be part of that if they are listening to this and want to get involved?

    Vayne:

    Yeah, I think top of mind right now, I’m actually thinking a lot about my coworkers who are actually eligible for SNAP benefits and are facing food insecurities. I think we were just talking about these broader ways that all these struggles are interlinked, the attacks on welfare, on working class people, these are all felt, so some of our coworkers are feeling these directly. We have a independent group called Student Workers Aid Collective swac, that is Mutual Aid group that folks who are listening can contribute to. It’s a mutual aid organization, provides emergency relief for student workers. And any amounts that aren’t used are, I think, contributed to local mutual aid organizations or Palestinian mutual aid organizations. As for fighting back as a union too, I think that we can’t afford to give up on little fights. You want to be able to pick your battles, but these days, every little one really does matter for rank and file democracy for the strengths of our union, we really have to always be putting our best foot forward.

    And we’ve just seen in the past year, we’ve been, even as we’ve been going through all of these really surreal attacks on our rights and our livelihoods, one of our biggest fights as a union has been around our bargaining conditions, which felt so kind of untethered to things that were also happening, but it was a terrain. It was just we couldn’t give up on every inch of power that we can have. We have to fight for it. It was about fighting for as many of our workers as possible, everyone who wants to come to participate directly in our union. And that’s the way that we’ve been structured for a long time. Now we have this commitment to rank and file led democracy, and that requires direct participation. And Columbia knows that that’s a impediment on their ability to organize. But that’s not to say we weren’t also organizing on all these other fronts.

    We were building these strong mutual aid and safety networks that I think maybe Colin can also speak to as well. But I am just thinking a lot about how we really had to fight for every inch of our power to keep it on our side. Just knowing that Columbia, like many other employees right now, is going to take any opportunity they can to try to weaken us. And a lot of the protections that we had before, we can’t take for granted, especially legal protections. And as Colin was saying earlier as well, that we really have each other. That’s what we’re doing to fight back, is just continuing to stay united. And it’s hard. It is really hard. I think it’s just required a lot of personal interpersonal growth and pushing each other really hard in ways that I didn’t expect to experience. But I think, yeah, it’s just also being disciplined about what that struggle requires.

    Conlan Olson:

    Yeah, I think seconding what vain was saying, I think, yeah, the mutual aid fund I think is a good example of a place where, I mean fundamentally the sort of forces at play here are we can withhold labor and then we can take care of each other. And I think taking care of each other in the form of mutual aid is really important as sort of just a foundational value of taking action together. Yeah, I mean we have our fund, we support funds around campus and our community and then also support funds in places that any of our members care about often on the ground aid in Gaza, but also other solidarity campaigns throughout the world. And then I think way back on the contract campaign side, I also want to highlight something that I think we’ve mentioned a few times but not talked about in depth, which is our fight about academic freedom.

    And I think we’re fighting for contract articles that solidify our right to teach and learn about topics that we choose in the contract because we’ve seen that Columbia has no qualms about squashing our academic freedom, about disciplining people who even mentioned Palestine in the classroom. I know professors who have been forced to change class descriptions or even whole class topics. And I think that accepting little for, I mean these are not particularly little, but even accepting forms of censorship like this one at a time is how we sort of backslide step-by-step into full scale fascist control over not only knowledge production, but also our actions and the technology that’s developing. This is again, speaking from a person in engineering, which is the technology that our universities develop fundamentally shapes the landscape of the places where we live. And people and computer science are building the technology that’s used to repress activism and also just control populations around the world right now.

    And so I think the fight over academic freedom is a specific thing, but I think serves as a really important step to resist this piecemeal erosion of our ability to think and do things that we want to do. And I think this is sort of something that’s important to fight tooth and nail every step of the way. This is similar to what Vain was saying about maybe a different topic, but the same principle that yeah, we can’t just accept little things because they don’t seem like the worst possible thing. We have to really push back against this. So I think our academic freedom fight is something that I think I would like more people to know about, not just at Columbia, but across higher ed institutions and across the world in general. And I think, yeah, I also want people to know how aggressively Columbia is cracking down on academic freedom, however this fight feels to us.

    Jared Eno:

    Yeah, it’s kind of nice going through it, I guess because I get to just plus one what other folks have said. I feel that so much, and I’m also just going to hit on the point that we got to do this for ourselves. We cannot rely on these universities or any other corporation. And let’s be clear, these universities are just corporations. They’re really just hedge funds, capital pools that have universities and hospitals attached maybe. And that weaponize the idea that they’re interested at all in knowledge and humanity. We can see that they’re not, but they are full of human beings like you and me, and that’s where the potential is. So I think last time geo comrades, Lavinia and Ember talked about the ice hotline that grad workers had set up when the service cancellations were happening. That was a wonderful example of workers just getting together and being like, how do we solve the problem given that the university is not taking action here right now?

    Another similar thing that’s happening is the federal government is trying to change the rules around I 20 duration of status for international students, putting some very restrictive rules in place that will, for instance, limit people’s authorized stay here. International students authorized stay here to four years and then they’ll have to renew, whereas before they could expect it to be here for the duration of their program. And that’s going to be now approved by DHS itself rather than being delegated to the universities. So this is a huge change really, that I think has massive implications for international students and workers and the University of Michigan is not doing a whole lot to get the word out to let people know about this. So again, grad workers are doing it and talking to each other one-on-one in department meetings. We’re having a town hall coming up in a week or so.

    So again, it’s an example of how we can turn to each other and show each other what’s possible, which I think really connects to what vain is saying about this is not a time to be letting fights go because our power is in our unity. And it is of course about winning very important concrete things. And it is simultaneously about building the power to win those things, building the unity among ourselves. And as others have said, this is not easy. This takes serious labor. I think the kind of reproductive labor of organizing is so crucial because again, we’re doing world building, which is major labor. It’s not something you just do on the side, right? This is our lives. And to that point, I think I want to note one thing I’ve been thinking about lately that Laura Shihi, who’s a Ian Psycho psychoanalyst, has been offering this concepts that are useful for this about psychic militancy.

    She was recently on millennials or killing capitalism if you want to go take a look. But I think part of that is the power of just naming things, naming the tactics that are being used against us to disempower us. And so much of what this repression has done, I’ll speak personally as somebody who’s been targeted through this student disciplinary process. So much of it is just gaslighting taken to the organizational level and to undo that, we need to be able to talk to each other, as I keep saying, and as others keep saying, we can think about the practices that enable us to maintain our psychic militancy through that. For instance, naming what this is really about, when people are repressed, it is not about individuals, it’s about the institution trying to destroy movements. Just being very clear about that.

    Another part of that is being real about what we are doing is serious knowledge production. I think in higher ed in particular, but I think this is true of just any worker, any organizer, any person who’s standing up for their community is producing cutting edge technology like political technology and very important knowledge that I think we should take seriously and talk with each other. I love this conversation. I’m learning so much from you all because that’s always what happens when people talk to together about resistance, resisting the suppression, and that can be so transformational and change our consciousness in ways that are very dangerous to those in power. And I think that’s why they understand that. That’s why they are repressing us so hard, particularly in the type of consciousness that sees that our power comes from our unity. That is not only unity between people on campus and off campus, unity between people here on occupied Turtle Island and an occupied Palestine. This is a transformational process that we are doing the labor of. And I think when I struggle, when I feel despair and fear, which I think are totally valid and make sense in these contexts, what it always turns it around for me is talking to comrades to understand what’s going on and to think about how we might resist. So yeah, I appreciate you y’all.

    Maximillian Alvarez:

    All right, gang. That’s going to wrap things up for us this week. I want to thank our guests, vain and Conlin to graduate student workers at Columbia University and Union Bargaining unit, members of student workers of Columbia, and Jared Eno, a graduate student worker at the University of Michigan, and a rank and file member of the Graduate Employees organization. And of course, I want to thank you all for listening and I want to thank you for caring. We’ll see y’all back here next week for another episode of Working People and if you can’t wait that long, then go explore all the great work that we’re doing at the Real News Network where we do grassroots journalism that lifts up the voices and stories from the front lines of struggle. Sign up for the Real News newsletter so you never miss a story and help us do more work like this by going to the real news.com/donate and becoming a supporter today. I promise you guys, it really makes a difference. I’m Maximilian Alvarez, take care of yourselves. Take care of each other, solidarity forever.

    This post was originally published on The Real News Network.

  • Israel is threatening major violence against Lebanon again. It began its latest campaign with psychological warfare, with its military’s Arabic-language mouthpiece trailing this afternoon on X that an “Urgent Alert to Residents of Southern Lebanon” is “#BREAKING!! #SOON”, without providing more clarity:

    The ‘warning of a warning’ comes after nightly Israeli bombing – without warning – of civilians in southern Lebanon, including this attack on a civilian vehicle that murdered four people:

    Adraee then elaborated on the threat, telling Lebanese citizens that Israel was ‘only’ warning residents of a large area of southern Lebanon that they were about to attack:

    Supposedly, the attack will be on ‘Hezbollah infrastructure’ because while Israel rested, re-armed and re-deployed its forces during the latest not-really-pause in Lebanon, it considers itself entitled to attack anyone else doing so – and its idea of ‘military infrastructure’ is well known to include homes, schools, hospitals and civilians just walking down the street.

    The latest threat ends the pretence of a ‘ceasefire’ – breached every day by Israel just like its ‘ceasefire’ in Gaza – reached after Israel’s terrorist pager-bomb attacks and mass bombings that killed and maimed thousands just over a year ago yet escaped censure from the Starmer regime and other Western governments.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Skwawkbox

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Israel continues to use the so-called ‘ceasefire’ – still breached massively every day – to murder Palestinians and steal territory in the West Bank.

    After attacking Palestinian farmers to prevent the olive harvest, abducting dozens, burning farms and destroying water resources, the colonisers have killed an older woman and a child overnight in separate attacks in the West Bank areas of Ramallah and Jenin.

    Occupation soldiers stormed Haniya Hannoun’s home in the early hours of this morning in the al-Mazra’a al-Gharbiya village north of Ramallah. Local journalists report that she was beaten to death as Israeli troops abducted her grandson Mohammad Abbas Hannoun and ransacked the home.

    During the night, occupation forces also shot 15-year-old Murad Fawzi Abu Saifein – then blocked Palestinian medics from reaching him until he died and took Murad’s body so the family cannot even bury him.

    Israeli impunity

    Israel has now murdered at least fifty-six people in Jenin Governorate since it began its assault on the city and refugee camp located there. Countless others have also been wounded. And, Israel have completely demolished a third of the camp – 600 homes – displacing around twenty-two thousand residents in the area.

    Zionist forces have also continually intensified their daily incursions and attacks on civilians in the area since the beginning of the so-called ceasefire in Gaza. The strategy mirrors the occupation’s actions in January when Netanyahu offered an escalation in the West Bank to bribe fascist settler ministers into remaining in the government after the first Gaza ‘ceasefire’ of 2025, even while breaching it daily.

    Israel has continued to bomb and shoot civilians in Gaza, initially using the current supposed ceasefire to retrench and re-fit, but has already returned to intense bombing of civilian areas little reported by the UK ‘mainstream’ media, which whitewashes the crimes even when they are reported by repeating Israel’s lies it uses to excuse them.

    The occupation regime has openly said it will resume its full attack on Gaza as soon as it suits its purposes – again, unreported by the corporate media.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Skwawkbox

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Among the thousands of bombs that rained down on the Gaza Strip during Israel’s war of annihilation, one single bomb was enough to extinguish thousands of dreams at once. In December 2023, the Al-Basma Fertility Clinic in Gaza City—the only medical centre in the Strip for embryo preservation and infertility treatment—was reduced to rubble and smoke after being directly targeted by Israeli warplanes. In an instant, four thousand tiny lives, preserved in nitrogen tubes, awaiting their birth, were destroyed.

    Israel has committed another act of genocide

    The bombing was not random. The building was separate from the main hospital, yet the planes precisely targeted the metal storage tanks that held Palestinian embryos on their way to life. In a few minutes, those tubes turned to ash, and with them, the dreams of thousands of couples who had spent years on the journey of treatment and the hope of motherhood vanished.

    Former chair of the UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry on Palestine Navi Pillay stated that the targeting of the fertility clinic was not an isolated incident, but rather part of a recurring pattern of systematic destruction of Palestinian healthcare infrastructure. She has asserted that the strike was “deliberate and planned to prevent births among Palestinians,” describing it as a full-fledged act of genocide targeting the very existence of humanity in Gaza.

    In the place that once held the pulse of life, only the smell of burnt metal and shattered glass, tainted with the remnants of hope, remained. Inside the clinic, charred equipment and twisted pipes lay piled high, while a cloud of white vapour rose above the spilt nitrogen, like tiny souls bidding farewell to the world before they could be born.

    The tragedy was not merely a medical loss, but a symbolic collapse of the last thread of human hope in Gaza. Women awaiting their next implantation appointments found themselves facing a cruel void: no clinic, no embryos, no new opportunity for motherhood. The bombing was enough to erase the very idea of ​​a future from their memories, leaving them in perpetual mourning for children who were never born.

    Long-lasting impacts

    In the displacement camps in the southern Gaza Strip, many women sit clutching medical scans instead of children, talking about unborn babies whose faces they never saw. Some weep not only for the loss of hope of having children, but also for the extinguishing of the dream that gave them the strength to endure and survive amidst the daily death.

    Israel’s shells shattered the dreams of thousands of mothers, declaring that the war no longer only kills the living, but also seeks to kill those yet unborn. Even the Palestinian womb, under this prolonged siege, has not been spared from the bombing, and life in its simplest forms has not been exempted from targeting.

    Today, the tragedy of the “smile” stands as one of the most horrific images of the war on Gaza, where the hope of motherhood has turned to cold ash in nitrogen tanks, and the laboratories that once created life have become witnesses to a crime targeting the future itself.

    In Gaza, mothers no longer grieve only for their martyred sons, but also for unborn children who never had the chance to cry their first tears.

    In a war that obliterates homes and memories, a single shell has come to confirm that this war is not content with destroying bodies, but seeks to erase life itself.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Alaa Shamali

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • On Sunday, hundreds of thousands of runners and spectators from around the world gathered in New York City to celebrate endurance, achievement, and community. Yet, this bright imagery masks the grim reality of the marathon’s title sponsor, Tata Consultancy Services (TCS), a company complicit in the genocide of the Palestinian people.

    In the weeks leading up to the largest marathon in the world, the “TCS” logo has become ubiquitous across the five boroughs. From special-edition New Balance “TCS Marathon” shoes that light up Times Square, to TCS-branded half-zips donned by every other runner in Prospect Park, reminders of the upcoming race are everywhere. 

    The post Exposing The Tata Group: Major Sponsor Of New York Marathon appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • YouTube, owned by Google LLC, has deleted more than 700 videos documenting Israeli human rights violations, citing compliance with US sanctions imposed on Palestinian human rights groups cooperating with the International Criminal Court (ICC), according to an investigation by The Intercept published on 5 November.

    The investigation revealed that the videos were removed after US President Donald Trump’s administration sanctioned three Palestinian organizations over their work with the ICC on war crimes cases against Israeli leaders.

    The post YouTube Deletes Hundreds Of Videos Documenting Israeli War Crimes appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • The leaked Israeli memo’s contents.

    A leaked Israeli military order has confirmed that the Palestinian man raped by Israeli occupation soldiers at the Sde Teiman torture camp was a civilian, not the “Khamas fighter” that the Israeli regime and its supporters had falsely claimed – as if it would justify such a horrific crime even if it was true.

    Footage of the rape was leaked by a senior Israeli military lawyer. She has been arrested for the leak, while the rapists appeared, masked, on Israeli TV to demand ‘justice’ — by which they meant for no action to be taken against them.

    The leaked document confirms that the victim was never charged with any crime and was among 1,700 Gaza detainees held without charge who were then freed in the prisoner exchange of 13 October 2025.

    The United Nations has repeatedly condemned Israel’s use of sexual violence against Palestinian detainees, while human rights and legal groups have exposed incidents of such torture – even to death, like Palestinian doctor Adnan Bursh and the clients of Palestinian lawyer Khaled Mahagna:

     

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Skwawkbox

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • In one of the displacement camps in Khan Younis, amidst rows of tents where dust mingles with the smell of gunpowder, ten-year-old Jamila Basla sits silently, her hand hidden behind her back, watching Gaza children from afar. She once ran among them with lightness and joy, before play turned to crime, and a packet of Indomie noodles became a deadly trap.

    Days earlier, an official source in the Palestinian Ministry of Health revealed that the occupation forces had left behind booby-trapped toys and other explosive materials among the rubble of homes and in displacement areas of the southern Gaza Strip, in what the ministry described as “a continuation of the policy of extermination and targeting of children even after talk of a ceasefire.”

    Gaza children negotiating death traps

    Jamila was one of the victims of these traps. While searching for something to bring her a taste of life amidst the oppression and hunger, she spotted a packet of Indomie noodles lying on the ground. She picked it up with childlike joy, and moments later a small explosion shook the tent and blood splattered on the ground.

    Her mother, fighting back tears, says:

    I ran to her and found her hand bleeding, her fingers torn off, her face twisted in pain… From that day on, she wasn’t the same as before.

    Today, the child suffers from fainting spells, learning difficulties, and psychological distress. Doctors confirm that her condition is complex, involving both neurological and orthopaedic injuries, leaving her trapped between physical pain and recurring nightmares.

    Despite her mother’s attempts to encourage her to play again, Jamila prefers to sit silently near her tent, hiding her severed hand behind her back. Whenever someone approaches, she whispers a single word: “I want a finger.”

    A Childhood Trapped by Death

    Jamila’s story is not unique. According to reports from the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), more than 50,000 children have been killed or injured in Gaza since October 2023. Save the Children reports that at least 15 children a day suffer permanent disabilities due to bombings or unexploded ordnance.

    Reuters and international demining agencies warn that Gaza has become an “open killing field,” with the removal of explosives estimated to take more than 30 years. The Associated Press (AP) confirmed that many child injuries were caused by small bombs mistaken for toys or shiny objects, which exploded in their hands.

    Incomplete Memories and Severed Dreams

    In the displacement camp, Jamila gazes silently at the sky, remembering the day of the explosion. She tries to laugh, but hides her severed hand. When the mothers in the camp see her, they whisper bitterly:

    She was playing… as if playing has become a crime.

    This is how Jamila encapsulates the story of an entire generation, a generation snatched from the pages of books and the games of the neighbourhood, finding itself growing up amidst destruction. A child who dreamed of a small meal lost both her finger and her childhood, in a land where food, dreams, and play have become different faces of death.

    Featured image via Times of Gaza

    By Alaa Shamali

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Italian journalist Gabriele Nunziata has been sacked by his employer, Agenzia Nova, for daring to ask the European Commission (EC) last month why Israel shouldn’t pay to rebuild Gaza like the EC is demanding that Russia pay to rebuild the parts of Ukraine destroyed in its war with that country.

    Nunziata has posted today on Instagram to confirm that “Yes, I lost my job because of a question I asked about Israel”. He then explained what he experienced – and his continued defiance:

    Last week I received a letter from Agenzia Nova informing me that our working relationship had been terminated. The decision came after I asked the European Commission the following question on October 13: “You have repeatedly said that Russia should pay for the reconstruction of Ukraine. Do you believe that Israel should also pay for the reconstruction of Gaza, given that it destroyed much of the Strip and its civilian infrastructure?”. I learned through phone calls that my question had not been appreciated by my agency. Then on October 27, I received a letter informing me that the working relationship would end on December 1.

    In the note sent by Agenzia Nova to [Italian outlet] Fanpage, the decision to terminate our collaboration was justified on the grounds that the question was “technically incorrect” and based on inadequate assumptions that would call into question the objectivity of my work as a journalist.

    My question can only be considered biased if one needs to deny reality. It is a fact that Israel has almost completely razed Gaza to the ground; this is not an opinion. It is a fact that the International Criminal Court has issued an arrest warrant for war crimes and crimes against humanity against Benjamin Netanyahu and some of his ministers. These, and many others, are facts. On the contrary, it would be biased to deny them and not question them.

    I fully stand by the legitimacy of my question. The right choices sometimes come at a cost, and I do not regret having paid it.

    Gabriele Nunziata becomes the latest in a string of journalists sacked by ‘mainstream’ media after challenging Israeli actions and narratives, like former LBC presenter Sangita Myska, Sky’s Belle Donati, and six BBC Arabic presenters, along with three Muslim journalists at US broadcaster MSNBC — and Match of the Day presenter Gary Lineker. The ‘mainstream’ sackings have been inflicted alongside Keir Starmer’s ‘lawfare’ war on independent journalists who dare to expose Israel’s crimes in Gaza and elsewhere.

    Featured image via L’Espresso

    By Skwawkbox

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Beginning January 1, 2026, teachers in California classrooms will be looking over their shoulders to avoid running afoul of a frightening new “antisemitism” law. On October 7, despite widespread opposition from civil rights groups, teachers’ unions, and education advocates, Gov. Gavin Newsom signed AB 715, which amends the California Education Code to police what teachers can teach and what…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • The genocide economy is set to get a big boost, with British-based energy firm Energean preparing to construct a pipeline that would see gas pumped to Cyprus from an offshore rig in stolen maritime territory in Palestine.

    The planned project just needs approval from both governments to go ahead. The land thieves in West Jerusalem are keen to sign off on the move to plunder more resources, having already taken over 78% of historic Palestine, and occupied the rest. Cypriot energy group Cyfield have given the deal their go-ahead, so now all that remains is the signature of the Cypriot government. Cyprus will be the first European nation to import natural gas from the apartheid settler-colony, a disgraceful breach of the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) campaign and international law, as it funds a genocide.

    Britain and Cyprus jointly assist genocide in Palestine

    This wouldn’t be the first case of joint British-Cypriot complicity in Zionist crimes. Throughout the genocidal onslaught against Gaza, Britain has used land it still occupies in the Mediterranean nation to launch spy flights that have assisted the Zionist entity in gathering intelligence over Gaza. Using RAF Akrotiri as the launching point, at times during the last two years Britain has been operating the plurality of such operations over the besieged strip, more than so-called ‘Israel’ itself. This is a level of involvement that goes beyond complicity in a holocaust, and instead amounts to active participation. DropSite News also reports “senior sources” from the British military divulging the capacity for Zionist F-35s to “render technical assistance at the RAF Akrotiri base in Cyprus”.

    Meanwhile, the Cypriot government has allowed Israelis to essentially establish colonies across the island in recent years, with the Cradle reporting the acquisition of over 4,000 properties since 2021, which have been in many cases turned into “nearly inaccessible ‘gated communities’”.

    Stefanos Stefanou, a spokesperson for the Progressive Party of Working People (AKEL) referred to Israeli newspapers which:

    …speak of a targeted policy of expansion of Israel in Cyprus.

    He continued:

    These are not just holiday homes. These are settlements in all but name.

    Given the scale of Israeli crimes, there’s a very real possibility these areas may now harbour Israeli Genocide Forces (IGF) war criminals. The Cradle also quote Israeli newspaper Haaretz, reporting that:

    Israel’s Mossad intelligence agency was active in Cyprus and was using it for “safehouse operations.

    Zionists have always had an eye on Cyprus

    Middle East Eye has reported how the Zionist project since its inception has had its eyes on Cyprus, with an article on the topic describing how:

    The Zionists have always referred to the ancient Hebrew colonies in Cyprus, whose ancient Hebrew name (which is still used in modern Hebrew) is “Kafrisim”, including Paphos and Salamis, as a precedent for future colonisation.

    Davis Trietsch was a frequent correspondent with Zionism founder Theodore Herzl, and spoke of his:

    …natural and beautiful idea [that] a return to the Old Land could very well be combined with a colonisation in Cyprus.

    Various colonies were established around the turn of the 19th century, including by the unambiguously titled Jewish Colonisation Association, who set one up for Jewish people from Russia in 1897. Over time Cyprus moved to a position that was largely in solidarity with Palestinians, before a recent warming of relations with the Zionist entity over the last 15 years.

    The pipeline will extend from the Karish gas field, which had been the centre of a maritime border dispute between the illegitimate Zionist state and Lebanon, until it was resolved under US mediation in 2022. Interestingly, Hezbollah did not ultimately oppose the deal, having previously described it as a “red line”. It seems the dire state of the Lebanese economy was sufficient to push even the Iran-backed group to back down and accept a deal that Marc Ayoub, an associate fellow at the American University in Beirut, described as one that “gives more advantages to Israel…than Lebanon.”

    Energy deals bolster Zionist regional position

    Various deals with potential regional adversaries have been a means of the Zionist entity shoring up both revenues and bolstering its strategic position. An agreement is at an advanced stage for supply of gas to Egypt, under a:

    …15-year transmission agreement for Israel’s planned Nitzana pipeline…

    Similar to Lebanon, the Egyptian economy is in a sorry state, and has been suffering an energy crisis in recent years. From this weak position, it seems they too will place themselves partly at the mercy of the criminal regime to their east. We have seen the devastating effects suffered by Gaza through having its fuel supplies cut off by the settler-colony which blockades them, and now Egypt and Cyprus may find themselves in a similar position, though to a less extreme extent.

    Setting up these relationships also creates a deterrent for any future Iranian missile campaign. Tehran already seemed reluctant to extensively target Zionist energy infrastructure, and that position may deepen if it realises it will generate additional ire in those countries supplied by West Jerusalem. Karish was one of the oil fields ‘Israel’ turned off as a precaution while under Iranian bombardment.

    An insight into the strategic thinking can be seen in comments made by Israeli Energy and Infrastructure Minister Eli Cohen, when he said of the Cypriot deal:

    Selling gas to Cyprus will strengthen Israel’s diplomatic standing in the region and among European countries, contribute to greater stability and prosperity in our area, and generate billions of shekels in revenue for the state. I intend to continue advancing the expansion of Israeli gas export targets.

    Britain must take action against corporations for their role in economy of genocide

    Britain’s role must be to hold to account the company it hosts both physically and on its stock exchange. Energean is a long-time partner of the Zionist pseudo-state, having begun its relationship there in 2012 through work related to the Tanin Field. From there it has continued on pipe laying and the Karish facility. CEO Mathias Rigas enthused about the potential Cyprus deal:

    Our proposal offers a practical and efficient solution to reduce Cyprus’s energy isolation by providing direct access to natural gas from a neighbouring source, thereby enhancing regional energy cooperation and supporting the transition to cleaner, more sustainable energy.

    Cleaner than oil perhaps, but new climate wrecking fossil fuel developments simply amount to another arm to ‘Israeli’ destructiveness. It begs the question why such energy ‘solutions’ are being undertaken rather than the likes of solar or offshore wind in a region bathed in sunlight and with a vast coast.

    Energean’s role in the Zionist market makes it a key player in what Francesca Albanese termed the “economy of genocide“. She spoke of corporations’ key role in “colonial racial capitalism” and insisted on:

    …accountability for corporate entities and their executives at both domestic and international levels: commercial endeavours enabling and profiting from the obliteration of innocent people’s lives must cease.

    Fuel plundering has its own section in the report, with BP singled out for criticism:

    At a time of increasing brutality, British BP p.l.c. is expanding involvement in the Israeli economy, with exploration licences confirmed in March 2025, which allow BP to explore Palestinian maritime expanses illegally exploited by Israel.

    A British government up to its neck in Palestinian blood can add gas to a list of holocaust participation that now includes – at minimum – arms exports, spy flights, diplomatic cover, reputation whitewashing, war criminal harbouring and IGF training. With a list like that there’s slim hope of a sudden shift, but eager eyes in the Palestine solidarity movement can add Energean and BP executives to the list of those who must face justice when the reckoning eventually comes.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Robert Freeman

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • YouTube has deleted hundreds of videos which evidence Israeli war crimes against Palestinians since October 2025. The NGOs affected warn that this is part of an assault on truth. They also highlighted how Donald Trump has taken an increasingly aggressive stance against accountability for Israel.

    Three Palestinian human rights groups had their accounts terminated in October. Between them Al-Haq, Al Mezan Center for Human Rights, and the Palestinian Centre for Human Rights had posted over 700 videos.

    The videos included investigations into killings and torture by Israel and a documentary about children murdered in an airstrike on a Gaza beach.

    A YouTube spokesman gave an obtuse response, claiming that:

    Google is committed to compliance with applicable sanctions and trade compliance laws.

    The Palestinian groups, and others, say the tech firm is destroying the truth. The Trump regime sanctioned the groups in September due to their work with the International Criminal Court (ICC).

    The ICC is investigating Israel for genocide.

    YouTube is destroying the truth

    Gazan group Al Mezan had their account deleted on 7 October. A spokesperson said:

    Terminating the channel deprives us from reaching what we aspire to convey our message to, and fulfill our mission and prevents us from achieving our goals and limits our ability to reach the audience we aspire to share our message with.

    Al-Haq are based in the West Bank. A spokesperson said:

    The U.S. Sanctions are being used to cripple accountability work on Palestine and silence Palestinian voices and victims, and this has a ripple effect on such platforms also acting under such measures to further silence Palestinian voices.

    The Palestinian Centre for Human Rights (PCHR) said:

    YouTube said that we were not following their policy on Community Guidelines, when all our work was basically presenting factual and evidence-based reporting on the crimes committed against the Palestinian people especially since the start of the ongoing genocide on 7 October.

    By doing this, YouTube is being complicit in silencing the voices of Palestinian victims.

    Trump’s war on justice

    Trump has made it his business to attack the ICC in behalf of Israel. But it didn’t start with him. In 2002, George W. Bush created a law by which the US could use military force to rescue war criminals in ICC custody.

    As the Intercept reported in 2024:

    While no president has yet made good on this military threat, it serves as shorthand for the U.S. relationship to the international institution of justice.

    That law was made in the context of the War on Terror but US leaders always had one eye on their apartheid colony, Israel:

    The law was meant to fend off the specter of American troops standing trial for atrocities committed during the fledgling “war on terror,” but the U.S. horror of The Hague has its roots in the longstanding policy of unconditional support for Israel.

    Digital evidence is very fragile

    The Accountability Archive describes itself as a “crowdsourced record of journalists, politicians, and public figures endorsing or encouraging the ethnic cleansing of Gaza and/or defaming pro-Palestinian activists”.

    Alex Foley, co-founder, told the Canary digital evidence was very fragile:

    The Internet is not durable for storing evidence. In reality, digital evidence is incredibly fragile, more so than real evidence. We don’t have bundles of letters laying around… like when you finish a job and your email date gets wiped.

    In the space of war crimes evidence, the ICC, and the being videos erased, what we see is that terms of use and service for big social media companies… we think they’re there to promote connection. In reality, these firms aren’t pro freedom. If something falls afoul of their terms of service it gets black-boxed, unless law enforcement requires it.

    Foley gave the example of evidence of Libyan war crimes from 2017 which had been posted online:

    The Libyan evidence got scrubbed because it was considered too violent. It took an extremely lengthy legal process to recover it. It was very contentious.

    On Trump’s assault on the ICC, Foley added:

    This move highlights the ‘why’ around the [ICC] sanctions, this is the intended effect, this is what was meant to happen… a broader chilling effect. It says “you might be next” to organisations. This is intended.

    The Intercept reported that some of the videos are still available where they’ve been reproduced. Trump and the Israeli war criminal’s can run from justice and hide from accountability, but the dawn is coming.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Joe Glenton

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • YouTube has deleted hundreds of videos which evidence Israeli war crimes against Palestinians since October 2025. The NGOs affected warn that this is part of an assault on truth. They also highlighted how Donald Trump has taken an increasingly aggressive stance against accountability for Israel.

    Three Palestinian human rights groups had their accounts terminated in October. Between them Al-Haq, Al Mezan Center for Human Rights, and the Palestinian Centre for Human Rights had posted over 700 videos.

    The videos included investigations into killings and torture by Israel and a documentary about children murdered in an airstrike on a Gaza beach.

    A YouTube spokesman gave an obtuse response, claiming that:

    Google is committed to compliance with applicable sanctions and trade compliance laws.

    The Palestinian groups, and others, say the tech firm is destroying the truth. The Trump regime sanctioned the groups in September due to their work with the International Criminal Court (ICC).

    The ICC is investigating Israel for genocide.

    YouTube is destroying the truth

    Gazan group Al Mezan had their account deleted on 7 October. A spokesperson said:

    Terminating the channel deprives us from reaching what we aspire to convey our message to, and fulfill our mission and prevents us from achieving our goals and limits our ability to reach the audience we aspire to share our message with.

    Al-Haq are based in the West Bank. A spokesperson said:

    The U.S. Sanctions are being used to cripple accountability work on Palestine and silence Palestinian voices and victims, and this has a ripple effect on such platforms also acting under such measures to further silence Palestinian voices.

    The Palestinian Centre for Human Rights (PCHR) said:

    YouTube said that we were not following their policy on Community Guidelines, when all our work was basically presenting factual and evidence-based reporting on the crimes committed against the Palestinian people especially since the start of the ongoing genocide on 7 October.

    By doing this, YouTube is being complicit in silencing the voices of Palestinian victims.

    Trump’s war on justice

    Trump has made it his business to attack the ICC in behalf of Israel. But it didn’t start with him. In 2002, George W. Bush created a law by which the US could use military force to rescue war criminals in ICC custody.

    As the Intercept reported in 2024:

    While no president has yet made good on this military threat, it serves as shorthand for the U.S. relationship to the international institution of justice.

    That law was made in the context of the War on Terror but US leaders always had one eye on their apartheid colony, Israel:

    The law was meant to fend off the specter of American troops standing trial for atrocities committed during the fledgling “war on terror,” but the U.S. horror of The Hague has its roots in the longstanding policy of unconditional support for Israel.

    Digital evidence is very fragile

    The Accountability Archive describes itself as a “crowdsourced record of journalists, politicians, and public figures endorsing or encouraging the ethnic cleansing of Gaza and/or defaming pro-Palestinian activists”.

    Alex Foley, co-founder, told the Canary digital evidence was very fragile:

    The Internet is not durable for storing evidence. In reality, digital evidence is incredibly fragile, more so than real evidence. We don’t have bundles of letters laying around… like when you finish a job and your email date gets wiped.

    In the space of war crimes evidence, the ICC, and the being videos erased, what we see is that terms of use and service for big social media companies… we think they’re there to promote connection. In reality, these firms aren’t pro freedom. If something falls afoul of their terms of service it gets black-boxed, unless law enforcement requires it.

    Foley gave the example of evidence of Libyan war crimes from 2017 which had been posted online:

    The Libyan evidence got scrubbed because it was considered too violent. It took an extremely lengthy legal process to recover it. It was very contentious.

    On Trump’s assault on the ICC, Foley added:

    This move highlights the ‘why’ around the [ICC] sanctions, this is the intended effect, this is what was meant to happen… a broader chilling effect. It says “you might be next” to organisations. This is intended.

    The Intercept reported that some of the videos are still available where they’ve been reproduced. Trump and the Israeli war criminal’s can run from justice and hide from accountability, but the dawn is coming.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Joe Glenton

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Rachel Griffin Accurso – known to millions of children as popular children’s entertainer and educator ‘Ms Rachel’ – is officially one of the world’s most influential entertainers. She is also now officially Glamour Magazine’s Woman of the Year – and she accepted her award last night in a dress featuring art by children in Gaza, with a powerful, moving speech that was all about the children whose drawings it featured:

    Ms Rachel: standing firm

    Ms Rachel has been the target of hate and threats from the US Israel lobby for months for her outspoken empathy with the children of Gaza being maimed and slaughtered by the occupation during Israel’s genocide. She was also refused by three venues in New York City when she tried to arrange a birthday party for Rahaf, a three-year-old Palestinian girl she has befriended and supported and who lost both legs in an Israeli bomb.

    But last night she put the Israel lobby to shame – and not just in the US. Her dress is reminiscent of a display of plates featuring Palestinian children’s art that Zionist lobby group ‘UK Lawyers for Israel’ pressured Guy’s hospital in London into removing by falsely claiming that Jewish patients had felt threatened by it. There had been no complaints at all from Jewish patients.

    UKLFI, which has hounded those who speak out against Israel’s genocide, particularly in the NHS and the entertainment industry, is now under investigation by the Solicitors Regulation Authority for alleged “vexatious and baseless” legal threats to silence support for Palestine. The group also has US links – Natasha Hausdorff, one of its main spokespeople, reportedly screamed at far-right US podcaster Charlie Kirk at an ‘intervention’ about his plan to abandon his support for Israel and for ‘platforming’ right-wing critics of Israel.

    UKLFI will probably be horrified this morning at Ms Rachel’s dress and even more so by her speech, which made clear why the Israel lobby so fears Palestinian children. Hopefully, in New York she is out of their reach if not that of their fellow advocates for the genocidal colony.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Skwawkbox

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Rachel Griffin Accurso – known to millions of children as popular children’s entertainer and educator ‘Ms Rachel’ – is officially one of the world’s most influential entertainers. She is also now officially Glamour Magazine’s Woman of the Year – and she accepted her award last night in a dress featuring art by children in Gaza, with a powerful, moving speech that was all about the children whose drawings it featured:

    Ms Rachel: standing firm

    Ms Rachel has been the target of hate and threats from the US Israel lobby for months for her outspoken empathy with the children of Gaza being maimed and slaughtered by the occupation during Israel’s genocide. She was also refused by three venues in New York City when she tried to arrange a birthday party for Rahaf, a three-year-old Palestinian girl she has befriended and supported and who lost both legs in an Israeli bomb.

    But last night she put the Israel lobby to shame – and not just in the US. Her dress is reminiscent of a display of plates featuring Palestinian children’s art that Zionist lobby group ‘UK Lawyers for Israel’ pressured Guy’s hospital in London into removing by falsely claiming that Jewish patients had felt threatened by it. There had been no complaints at all from Jewish patients.

    UKLFI, which has hounded those who speak out against Israel’s genocide, particularly in the NHS and the entertainment industry, is now under investigation by the Solicitors Regulation Authority for alleged “vexatious and baseless” legal threats to silence support for Palestine. The group also has US links – Natasha Hausdorff, one of its main spokespeople, reportedly screamed at far-right US podcaster Charlie Kirk at an ‘intervention’ about his plan to abandon his support for Israel and for ‘platforming’ right-wing critics of Israel.

    UKLFI will probably be horrified this morning at Ms Rachel’s dress and even more so by her speech, which made clear why the Israel lobby so fears Palestinian children. Hopefully, in New York she is out of their reach if not that of their fellow advocates for the genocidal colony.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Skwawkbox

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • The PR company CMS Strategic that reportedly planted a false story in the Times about Palestine Action has a series of intimate connections to the shadowy pro-Israel lobby group We Believe in Israel (WBII). This is of course the same WBII that boasted its role in machinating the proscription of the group.

    What’s more, vis-a-vis these WBII ties, the firm appears to have a wealth of links to the Labour Party and key figures in government.

    Palestine Action Iran funding smear: PR firm exposed

    As the Canary’s Alex/Rose Cocker detailed, the article in question had claimed – completely without basis – that the Home Office was investigating Palestine Action receiving funding from Iran.

    However, repeated Home Office denials over the allegations had suggested for a while that something else was afoot.

    Private Eye had previously approached the Home Office over the Times article. However, according to the magazine, this was only for it to come back and say that it did not recognise the claim.

    The Canary had also submitted a Freedom of Information (FOI) request to the Home Office. But once again, the Home Office confirmed that it had not supplied any information directly to the Times for the story.

    At the time, there was a mainstream media frenzy from the usual suspects. GB News, the Daily Mail, the BBC, the Telegraph, and the Spectator all ran a series of stories trumpeting the potential Iran link. Declassified UK traced them all back to the dubious claims in the Times article.

    Now, Private Eye has revealed how:

    CMS Strategic has acted as Elbit’s UK PR firm for some years. A witness known by the Eye heard Georgia Pickering, CMS’s managing director and owner, claiming credit for getting a story into newspapers about Palestine Action, the “direct action” group that damaged Elbit factories and other premises the group says are linked to the war in Gaza.

    Source of the Times claims – long unclear

    Since the Times published the article, multiple outlets have speculated over the source of the claims.

    The Guardian had highlighted how We Believe in Israel had tweeted just two days before the Times article calling Palestine Action a “shell front” and stating:

    Behind Palestine Action’s theatre of resistance stands a darker puppeteer: the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.

    It’s well documented that the Zionist lobby group was chief among those lobbying for Palestine Action’s proscription. In June, just weeks ahead of Palestine Action’s ban, it published a report titled Palestine Action: A Case for Proscription under the Terrorism Act 2000. And notably, the Guardian pointed out how home secretary Yvette Cooper’s statement on the decision to proscribe Palestine Action was “similar” to the wording from this report. WBII even boasted it was thanks to its briefing that the government decided to proscribe Palestine Action.

    What’s more, the Canary has identified how WBII’s current director, Catherine Perez-Shakdam, had in the year leading up to Palestine Action’s proscription, penned op-eds not only calling for the ban, but also insinuating a link to Iran. Notably, in November 2024, she wrote an article calling Palestine Action activists “Tehran’s ideological sentries” and arguing that:

    To look at Palestine Action is to see not an “activist” group, but an ideological proxy for the Iranian regime, operating as Tehran’s enforcers in a country they otherwise could never reach.

    The piece goes to great lengths to paint Palestine Action as “proxies of a foreign power”, describing them as:

    foot soldiers whose purpose is to inject Tehran’s twisted worldview into the heart of Britain’s public discourse.

    At points, the article implies Palestine Action tactics are “inspired” by the Iranian regime. In others, she goes further to almost imply they are active foreign agents, making baseless claims like:

    Tehran, unable to influence Britain directly, deploys groups like Palestine Action to project its authoritarian ethos across borders.

    Of course, opinion article that it is, for the Zionist Times of Israel no less, Perez-Shakdam was compelled to provide no evidence for her conspiracist diatribe.

    We Believe in Israel: cropping up again, naturally

    To date, the Canary has been unable to source evidence of Perez-Shakdam and the numerous organisations she heads lobbying the Home Office. However, the Home Office has obviously categorically denied any role in seeding the story anyway – at least directly.

    Now, these facts take on new significance in light of Private Eye’s revelations.

    This is because, if CMS Strategic really did plant the story in the Times, its worth emphasising some particular links to WBII – and their timing.

    To start with, there’s the company’s senior account executive Kira Lewis. Lewis joined CMS Strategic in March 2025 from the infamous Israel lobby group British Israel Communications and Research Centre (BICOM).

    Of course, this was just months before the Labour government announced the proscription of Palestine Action. As the Canary’s Ed Sykes previously highlighted, We Believe in Israel is:

    “a side-project” of BICOM – “Britain’s most active pro-Israeli lobbying organisation”. And its longstanding director was awful Labour right-winger and self-proclaimed “Zionist shitlord” Luke Akehurst (who isn’t Jewish, by the way).

    And Lewis evidently has clear connections to the group, not least through her role with BICOM.

    In July 2022, they penned an op-ed for Jewish News about their trip to Israel with:

    the Labour Friends of Israel and the We Believe In Israel campaign group.

    Then, in June 2024, they were out on the campaign trail for Akehurst. Akehurst only stepped down from his near 13-year stint as We Believe in Israel director that very same June.

    What’s more, it appears CMS Strategic has made use of Lewis’s links with the parachute North Durham MP. In May, Labour First (where incidentally, Lewis also previously worked), hosted an event with chancellor Rachel Reeves.

    In a LinkedIn post, Pickering posted chummy photos with the chancellor and thanked Akehurst for arranging for the company to support the event.

    Labour links in abundance

    What’s also apparent is that CMS Strategic has tangible inroads with this current Labour government as well.

    Pickering is a Bracknell Labour Party councillor. Alongside this, she is also co-chair of Labour in Communications’ (LIC) defence and aerospace policy network group. The organisation describes its remit as:

    Labour’s fastest-growing professional network of supporters working in the communications, media and public affairs industry.

    In a LinkedIn post, Pickering put out a call to recruit new Labour Party members from the PR and defence sectors to the group. A group gathering together Labour members with defence lobbyist experience – nothing to see there of course.

    Lewis, a Young Labour member, is also a Labour Party councillor, for Higham Hill. In 2023, they resigned their role as junior whip on the Waltham Forest council after posting a tweet stating that:

    What Israel is doing is bad – killing thousands of innocent people, including children. But not evil. Hamas is evil.

    Additionally, Lewis’s LinkedIn details a number of short-term gigs as an organiser for the party.

    However, perhaps most significantly, as mentioned above, Lewis previously worked for Labour First. Journalist and author Paul Holden has described the group in his explosive new book as the “base camp for the Labour right’s overt fightback” against Corbyn and the party’s left-wing. By this, he was referring to the organisation’s very public efforts to oust Corbyn and his allies, namely by spearheading repeated coup attempts during his leadership.

    And low and behold, Akehurst had his fingers in this pie too. He co-founded Labour First alongside former LFI vice-chair and MP John Spellar and Labour councillor Keith Dibble. Naturally, Akehurst is still a director.

    CMS staff were also at the Labour Party’s 2025 conference arranging “1-1 discussions” for ministers, MPs, and “industry voices”.

    CMS Strategic shilling for DSEI

    Moreover, CMS is no stranger to publicly gloating about helping defence companies get coverage in the corporate media either:

    So despite the company denying the claims from the Eye, it would be quite on-brand for Pickering to have boasted this – and for the company to be the actor behind the scenes.

    As the Eye underscored, CMS has shilled for notorious Israel-linked arms corporation Elbit Systems. Of course, Palestine Action has long made the number one Israel arms manufacturer the main target of its direct action. The magazine also highlighted that in 2024 Palestine Action targeted CMS over its lobbying for the company.

    Indeed, the PR firm is one of just two companies the arms producers has employed in recent years to lobby the UK government. CMS isn’t currently listed as its lobbyist.

    However, CMS itself has maintained a murky menagerie of arms manufacturers amid its clientele. It was none other than CMS running media and comms for the UK’s largest arms fair Defence and Security Equipment International (DSEI). In fact, Pickering was bragging about CMS delivering this for DSEI for the 10th time:

    https://www.linkedin.com/posts/georgia-pickering-60331b24_dsei-defence-activity-7372595480180080640-m9DL?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAAF2OYo0BSE0SivVWCPD3hjkt_6nXLu6_qeA

    This was the same DSEI that exhibited arms giants that have armed and sustained Israel’s genocide. It included drone and F35 manufacturers Elbit, Rafael, Lockhead Martin, and BAE.

    Times peddling propaganda for CMS Strategic? What’s new

    The Canary approached CMS Strategic and the Times for comment. We asked the Times whether it had verified that the Home Office were purportedly “understood” to be investigating Palestine Action’s funding and links to Iran. In addition, we queried if CMS/Georgia Pickering were the source for its article. The outlet did not respond by the time of publication.

    Meanwhile, CMS Strategic came back with an identical comment to what it told the Eye:

    Any suggestion that CMS was involved with The Times article dated 23 June 2025 or discussed being involved with it are categorically untrue.

    Ultimately, the Times in its top-quality due diligence journalism, published what appear to be outrageously fabricated claims. Those claims may have originated from a long-term lobbyist and PR outfit for major arms companies abetting Israel’s genocide.

    There’s no definitive proof – at present – that WBII had a hand in this. However, these connections to CMS Strategic do raise significant questions nonetheless. As its swagger around Palestine Action’s proscription underscores – pumping out propaganda sure wouldn’t be out of character.

    By Hannah Sharland

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • A vote has been passed at Belfast City Hall to fly the Palestine flag on Saturday 29 November following a council vote passed by a margin of 41 to 15. Sinn Féin Councillor Ryan Murphy proposed the motion at the council’s monthly full meeting. Referencing the ongoing ceasefire violations of so-called ‘Israel’, he said:

    I’ve had people contact me in regards to what they can to try and highlight those ongoing human rights abuses and to try and support the people of Palestine in any way they can.

    He put forward the display of the flag as another means to show support for those still enduring Zionist genocide, apartheid and ethnic cleansing. November 29 is International Day for Solidarity with the People of Palestine, and the flying of their colours will seemingly be the first occasion on which a non-Union Flag has been flown at a government building in the North of Ireland, other than those displayed in specific exempted circumstances. The European flag is put up on Europe Day, and those for the visiting heads of state of other nations can also be flown.

    No fleg, no peace: Palestine flag set to fly in Belfast

    Fleg‘ flying remains a hugely contentious issue, with a Belfast City Council vote to restrict flying of the Union Flag to 18 days per year triggering months of rioting and protests in 2012-2013 from irate loyalists. They claimed the disappearance of the flag for much of the year was an attempt to erode ‘Britishness’ from the Six Counties. Previously the banner – often referred to by Catholic, Nationalist and Republican (CNR) community as The Butcher’s Apron for its association with imperial brutality – had flown every day of the year since 1906.

    There are already attempts to stage fresh street opposition to the Palestine colours loathed by the genocide-backing wing of Belfast politics. The Official Protestant Coalition’s (OPC) Facebook page is urging protest on 29 November. In a deeply confused statement, they say:

    On November 29th, you have two options – two ways – to resist the Islamic Republican movement.

    This is part of a recurring attempt to dishonestly tie the Palestine movement to republicanism and Islam, trigger words for a significant number of loyalists opposed to a united Ireland and all non-Christian religion (other than Judaism to the extent they unfairly link that faith to ‘Israel’). In text adjoining an image featuring People Before Profit (PBP) MLA Gerry Carroll and Alliance party leader Naomi Long, the OPC go on to say:

    We need to make a stand. This cannot be the same one-hour protest that we all forget about. This has to make headline news. Here we stand – we can do no more. No organisation, no leaders: just people power.

    Flag in support of human rights also set to fly

    Carroll has prominently led the campaign for the resignation of Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) Education Minister Paul Givan following his propaganda junket to stolen Palestinian land. The DUP have accused the Alliance party of meekly following along – i.e. being insufficiently pro-genocide for a party associated with neutrality. It is likely a large contingent of Palestine supporters will also be present on November 29 at the City Hall, perhaps the city’s most prominent building.

    An additional proposal to fly the Human Rights Day flag alongside the United Nations flag for Human Rights Day on December 10 was also passed. Following the successful proposal for the Palestinian flag, Councillor Murphy said in a statement on the Sinn Féin website:

    In light of the continued genocide against the people of Gaza, it is right that we show solidarity and support to them as they face a continuing barbaric onslaught from the Israeli military,

    The council meeting featured additional controversy, as a number of councillors walked out of the meeting following a decision by DUP Lord Mayor Tracy Kelly to shut down discussion of Givan’s trip to the Zionist entity. Sinn Féin Councillor Caoimhín McCann had attempted to raise Givan’s transgressions before being cut off by Kelly on the basis that his points were not relevant to council business. McCann said he had a relevant proposal to submit, but was cut short from doing so by Kelly, who sat stony-faced through the later vote to hoist the Palestine flag.

    Council meeting descends into farce as mayor blocks genocide discussion

    Deputy Lord Mayor Paul Doherty of the Social Democratic and Labour Party (SDLP) spoke afterwards about how he and colleagues “sought clarity on process” (i.e. whether it was legal for the mayor to take action in this way) following Kelly’s intervention, but said “that was shut down as well”. A walkout of councillors followed, leaving a half-empty chamber. He said:

    If the mayor’s going to shut down the conversation around genocide and the crisis in Palestine, we’re shutting down the meeting.

    Traditional Unionist Voice deputy leader Ron McDowell, who joined Givan’s Zionist-bought holiday in the settler-colony, said:

    [The] attempt to twist routine minutes into an opportunistic political attack was irresponsible, transparent, and fundamentally disrespectful to the institution.

    Political attacks in a political setting, who’d have thought it? He went on to say:

    The people of Belfast expect their Council to deal with the business before it – not to become a stage for last-minute political ambushes and point-scoring.

    The people of Belfast, including his own constituents, also want their elected representatives to serve their constituents rather than acting as the bought-off stooges of Zionist terrorists. Compounding that, McDowell and his cohorts are likely to remain more exercised by a piece of cotton on a flagpole than the mass murder of Palestinian children or the material needs of those they are meant to serve.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Robert Freeman

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales is at the centre of a “huge scandal” after intervening in the online encyclopaedia’s page on Israel’s genocide in Gaza to soften its assertion that Israel is, indeed, committing genocide – a conclusion that aligns with the findings of the United Nations, World Court, human rights groups and genocide experts.

    Wikipedia: sorry – but kind of not

    And it seems that the site’s parent foundation is attempting to distance itself from his position in response to what may be an exodus of donors disgusted at Wales’s continued siding with the genocidal, apartheid colony.

    In an email seen by Skwawkbox, a ‘Senior Donor Relations Specialist’ – presumably following an approved script – responded to a now-ex donor who ended his financial support for the platform “in disgust” at Wales’s pro-Israel stance by emphasising Wales’s lack of official role in the organisation (emphases added):

    Thank you for your email and per your request, I’ve unsubscribed you from our fundraising mailings.

    I truly apologize to hear you have found a comment or statement of Jimmy Wales’ objectionable. While Jimmy is the founder of Wikipedia, he is neither a paid employee nor an executive of the Wikimedia Foundation, and his opinions do not necessarily reflect those of the Wikimedia Foundation.

    Even as the founder of Wikipedia, Jimmy is one of hundreds of thousands of editors, all striving to present information, including on contentious topics, in line with Wikipedia’s policies.

    Wikipedia is an encyclopedia written by hundreds of thousands of volunteer editors who share information from reliable sources. No single person can determine what appears on Wikipedia. By design, its content is shaped through diversity of viewpoints and a process of open, collaborative discussion, debate, and consensus by its community of volunteer editors. Every edit, comment, and citation is recorded transparently for anyone to see. Articles on Wikipedia are updated as new information emerges and must follow three core policies, which require all content to be fact-based, neutral, and attributed to reliable sources. The aim is always to provide a well-rounded view on a range of topics for readers. Wikipedia is unique because it is a perpetual work in progress as a living encyclopedia: this means that content can evolve based on dialogue, feedback, and discussion in line with Wikipedia’s policies. This sometimes messy, very human process makes the quality of the encyclopedia stronger.

    Anyone who thinks articles can be improved is encouraged to participate in improving them; please see the tutorial to learn how you can contribute to Wikipedia directly. If you would prefer to just voice your concerns for the community to review, this input from readers is welcomed by the volunteers, too. Each article has a discussion page that can be edited with notes about the article. Please see the “Talk page” section of the Tutorial above.

    If you would like to call Jimmy’s attention to your concerns, you can even raise the issue on his own user talk page where he frequently responds to questions and concerns from Wikipedia readers.

    Thank you again for your generosity and your investment in the Wikimedia Foundation’s integrity. We hope you continue to stay involved in these conversations on Wikipedia, and that you will find the plurality of viewpoints expressed by volunteers — even that of the founder himself — ultimately contributes to the creation of a balanced encyclopedia, one respectful to all viewpoints and never reflective of those of a single individual.

    For more information about how Wikipedia works, you can visit our website and new blog series.

    A logical fallacy

    The email, however, echoes the same logical fallacy as Wales’ original intervention by referencing Wikipedia’s ‘core policy’ of being ‘neutral’, as if a neutral person cannot conclude based on overwhelming evidence that Israel is (of course) committing genocide against the Palestinian people in Gaza. The fallacy is reminiscent of the BBC’s insistence that it is ‘balanced’ – which it appears to apply as meaning it has to treat the view of someone who denies it’s raining as equal in value and significance even though it’s clearly raining in torrents outside.

    More interesting is the inference that Wikipedia may be haemorrhaging donations, given that it is responding to an individual, and presumably relatively minor, donor with a personal message trying to change his/her mind.

    By Skwawkbox

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • The Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) has released its annual report highlighting global food crises. However, it particularly shows the deteriorating humanitarian and agricultural situation in the Gaza Strip.

    UN issues severe warning over Gaza

    The report indicated that agricultural infrastructure in the Strip is in severe decline, with less than 5% of arable land remaining. Israeli military operations have damaged more than 80% of cultivated areas, and 77.8% are now inaccessible to farmers.

    It explained that more than 70% of agricultural greenhouses in Gaza have been destroyed, and most irrigation wells have been damaged, leading to a severe shortage of agricultural water.

    The FAO emphasised that what is happening in Gaza represents a “near-total collapse of the agricultural and production system,” warning that if the current situation continues, the Strip’s residents will become almost entirely dependent on humanitarian aid for their food.

    This warning comes as the organisation continues to call for facilitating the entry of agricultural and food aid into Gaza and rehabilitating damaged land and infrastructure to ensure a minimum level of food security.

    The FAO has classified the Gaza Strip as one of the worst food crisis areas in the world for 2024-2025, alongside Sudan, Yemen, and Afghanistan.

    Desperate shortages

    Regarding the fishing sector, the report indicated significant damage, with severe restrictions imposed on fishermen’s access to the sea, exacerbating the shortage of animal protein in the population’s diet.

    The organization also explained that more than 90% of Gaza’s population is unable to access sufficient food, and that local production of vegetables and grains has fallen to less than half of its level two years ago.

    The FAO recommended the urgent provision of agricultural support, including seeds, animal feed, and well repairs, to prevent further collapse in local production. It also emphasized that the continued restrictions on the entry of supplies and fuel through the crossings are exacerbating the crisis.

    The organization concluded its report by emphasizing that approximately 2.2 million people in Gaza are in dire need of urgent food and humanitarian assistance, warning that continued conflict and supply disruptions could lead to “widespread famine in the coming months” unless aid is allowed in immediately.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Alaa Shamali

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • The Financial Times revealed that Israel is deliberately obstructing the entry of humanitarian aid into the Gaza Strip by imposing a new registration system for international non-governmental organisations (NGOs), resulting in the freezing of tens of millions of dollars in vital relief supplies outside the besieged territory.

    Israel: deliberately obstructing aid into Gaza

    The newspaper reported that more than 40 humanitarian organisations – including Doctors Without Borders, Oxfam, and the Norwegian Refugee Council – confirmed that Israeli authorities rejected 99 requests to bring in aid during the first 12 days of the ceasefire. It added that almost all of the Norwegian Refugee Council’s requests were denied because these organisations were “not authorised to provide aid.”

    This comes as Israel has imposed new rules since last March, forcing organisations operating in the Palestinian territories to re-register with Israeli authorities before the end of the year, under penalty of losing their licenses. The director of the Norwegian Refugee Council said his organisation is “stuck in a dead end,” as it is being told its registration is “under review,” preventing it from bringing in any relief supplies.

    Meanwhile, UNRWA confirmed that winter shelter supplies intended for more than one million people are stockpiled in warehouses and are being prevented from entering by an Israeli decision, despite the bitter cold faced by hundreds of thousands of displaced people in the Gaza Strip.

    Hundreds of thousands of Gaza residents are still living in “catastrophic” displacement camps, where 93% of the tents are worn out, and more than 900,000 people, including tens of thousands displaced from Rafah, are living in inhumane conditions.

    The displacement camps lack water, sanitation, and basic supplies, and are in urgent need of new tents, especially before winter arrives.

    An ongoing genocide

    Despite the ceasefire agreement between Hamas and Israel on 10 October – which was supposed to pave the way for the flow of aid – Israel is only allowing the entry of symbolic amounts that cover a tiny fraction of the Gaza Strip’s needs. The United Nations estimates that approximately 600 truckloads of aid are needed daily, but the Israeli occupation has only permitted 25% of that to enter.

    This comes in the wake of Israel’s devastating genocide in Gaza, and which, according to Palestinian figures, left more than 68,000 dead and 170,000 wounded, most of them women and children. The United Nations estimates the cost of rebuilding the Gaza Strip at approximately $70 billion.

    Under the guise of “administrative procedures,” Israel is tightening its grip on Gaza once again. Humanitarian observers believe the new registration system is nothing more than another bureaucratic tool to perpetuate the siege and starve the civilian population.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Alaa Shamali

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • More To The Story: Jason Stanley isn’t afraid to use the F-word when talking about President Donald Trump. The author of How Fascism Works and Erasing History: How Fascists Rewrite the Past to Control the Future is clear: He believes the United States is currently under an authoritarian regime led by a fascist leader. At a time when the Trump administration is putting increasing pressure on private and public universities to conform or lose funding, Stanley recently left his position at Yale University and moved his family to Canada, where he’s now the Bissell-Heyd chair in American studies at the Munk School of Global Affairs & Public Policy at the University of Toronto. The move, he says, has allowed him to talk about the US in a way that wouldn’t have been possible if he remained in the country. On this week’s More To The Story, Stanley traces the recent rise of fascist regimes around the globe, and explains why he describes what’s happening in the US today as a “coup” and why he thinks the speed and scope of the Trump administration’s hardline policies could ultimately lead to significant pushback from those opposed to the president.

    Producer: Josh Sanburn | Editor: Kara McGuirk-Allison | Theme music: Fernando Arruda and Jim Briggs | Copy editor: Nikki Frick |  Digital producer: Artis Curiskis | Deputy executive producer: Taki Telonidis | Executive producer: Brett Myers | Executive editor: James West | Host: Al Letson

    Read: He Studies Fascism: Is He Now Living Through It? (Mother Jones)

    Listen:Trump’s New World (Dis)Order (Reveal)

    Watch: We Study Fascism, and We’re Leaving the US (The New York Times)

    Read: How Fascism Works: The Politics of Us and Them (Random House)


    Note: If you buy a book using our Bookshop link, a small share of the proceeds supports our journalism.

    Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices

    This post was originally published on Reveal.

  • More details have broken about the Maccabi Tel Aviv ‘fans’ – violent, racist thugs – whose ban by West Midlands Police (WMP) from a match this week in Birmingham Keir Starmer tried to overturn with the help of an organised campaign by the UK Israel lobby.

    Maccabi Tel Aviv – yes, they are the IDF

    Middle East Eye has revealed this evening that police in the Netherlands told WMP that more than two hundred ‘fans’ were not just a racist mob that had run riot in Amsterdam last November, attacking Muslims and other locals, but were “linked to the Israel Defence Forces” (IDF) – with “hundreds more” also “highly organised” “experienced fighters” who were determined to cause “serious violence” in Birmingham.⁠

    Starmer and his front-benchers tried to insist that WMP imposed the ban because it couldn’t guarantee the safety of ‘Jewish’ fans – a lie that was quickly and embarrassingly exposed – while Israel lobbyists claimed to be members of an invented ‘Jewish Villans’ supporters club. The new information about the WMP assessment further exposes the Starmer regime’s collaboration with Israel and its lobby groups⁠.

    Dutch intelligence services have classified Israel as a security threat to the Netherlands, in part based on the Maccabi violence and racist incitement a year ago.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Skwawkbox

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • In the hills of Masafer Yatta in the occupied West Bank, a small Bedouin community in the village of Umm al-Khair has fought for decades to remain on their land, a rocky landscape dotted with olive trees, where they farm and raise livestock. As a community with a steadfast commitment to nonviolent struggle, they document and fight back against increasing settler violence and land annexation for…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • At a time when digital infrastructure plays a pivotal role in the global economy, Palestinians in the Gaza Strip find themselves isolated from the world, amid the near-total collapse of communications and internet networks as a result of Israel’s widespread military targeting of digital infrastructure. This collapse is not limited to service disruptions but extends to an emerging economy that was relied upon to mitigate the effects of years of blockade by the Zionist occupation.

    Digital paralysis and disconnection from the world

    Economic researcher Ahmed Abu Qamar told the Canary that Israel has destroyed about 74% of communication towers and 50% of the public network, turning wires, towers and exchanges into ‘battlefields’ and causing losses estimated at more than $2.6 billion to the Palestinian digital economy.

    According to Abu Qamar, the Gaza Strip is experiencing near-total paralysis of telecommunications and internet services, leading to a breakdown in communication between residents and their families, disrupted humanitarian coordination efforts, and preventing direct media coverage in many areas during periods of fighting.

    Fifteen cases of complete or partial communication blackouts have been documented since the start of the war, which Abu Qamar described as ‘a strategic blow [by Israel] to the emerging Palestinian economy,’ confirming that thousands of workers in the fields of digital services, remote work, and e-commerce have lost their jobs and sources of income.

    Israel’s systematic targeting – and a technological gap

    According to the data provided, more than 580 cell towers and fibre optic networks were targeted by Israel, in strikes that affected vital components that were supposed to be a civilian safety net and a conduit for information and emergencies.

    Abu Qamar emphasised to the Canary that this targeting ‘cannot be considered collateral damage,’ but rather points to a systematic Zionist policy of digitally isolating the sector and restricting the flow of information.

    Despite the world’s reliance on high-speed data transfer and fifth-generation technologies, Gaza continues to operate on second-generation networks only as a result of Israeli restrictions imposed for years on the introduction of modern communications technologies.

    Experts believe that this policy deepens the technological divide, hinders investment in technology projects, and limits young people’s ability to integrate into the global economy.

    A stalled economy and an uncertain future

    Abu Qamar told the Canary that the damage was not only material, but also affected the future of the Palestinian economy, particularly the start-up and technology sector, which was experiencing growth before the war. Thousands of small and medium-sized enterprises that relied on the internet as an alternative economic outlet were also disrupted.

    He points out that rebuilding this sector requires major international investment and political will to ensure that civilian infrastructure is not targeted again, as this is a prerequisite for any future economic recovery.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Alaa Shamali

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Documentarian Louis Theroux recently interviewed punk singer Bob Vylan, touching on topics that included his controversial ‘Death to the IDF’ chant. In response, the Zionist pressure group the Board of Deputies of British Jews sought to hold the BBC responsible for Theroux and his interview.

    The problem?

    The interview had absolutely nothing to do with the BBC:


    With all this being the case, why did the Board announce this?

    Accountability

    For clarity’s sake, when we reference ‘Zionism‘, we’re talking about the colonial project of creating a Jewish ethno-state in the Middle East. This project led to the creation of Israel; if left unchecked, it will expand in to ‘Greater Israel’:


    Remember when Hitler attempted to create a greater Germany? Essentially it’s like that, only this time the Allied Forces are aligned with the Axis Powers.

    When Vylan chanted ‘Death to the IDF’, he was referring to the Israeli Defense Forces. The IDF is the military force of Israel, and for the past two years they’ve subjected the Palestinian people to genocide. People have described the chant as antisemitic, although many of these same people insisted that Labour adopt the IIHRA definition of antisemitism, which clearly states that antisemitism involves:

    Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel.

    Wishing bad things upon the IDF is only antisemitism if you believe that the IDF represents all Jewish people, and that in turn all Jewish people hold some responsibility for the actions of the IDF.


    When Vylan chanted what he chanted, the Board of Deputies wrote to the BBC, who broadcast the performance:


    You’ll notice they were vague about who Vylan was chanting about. You’ll also notice they didn’t reference the ongoing genocide.

    And now this

    People have criticised the Board’s latest intervention:


    Journalist Barry Malone said the following:


    Theroux’s last documentary with the BBC was The Settlers in April this year. Israel’s advocates didn’t like that one either:

    Shelf life

    Increasingly, more and more people are asking why British institutions are attacking British citizens to protect the feelings of a genocidal foreign regime. The answer, of course, is because America see Israel as a key asset, and Britain is subservient to the US.

    Quite how long this continues we can’t say; Israel and its defenders have clearly overstepped the mark, and now even the American right are turning against them:


    Featured image via Zscout370 (Wikimedia)

    By Willem Moore

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales has been accused of ‘caving’ to the Israel lobby after he intervened on the online encyclopedia’s entry on Israel’s genocide in Gaza.

    Wales jumped in on the edit discussion page to describe the article as “particularly egregious” for concluding that Israel is committing genocide against the Palestinians and stating “in Wikipedia’s voice” that:

    The Gaza genocide is the ongoing, intentional, and systematic destruction of the Palestinian people in the Gaza Strip carried out by Israel during the Gaza war.

    How could anyone with a smartphone or computer sensibly argue against that conclusion? Well, Wales did, saying on the discussion page that he had been:

    asked point-blank in a high profile media interview about this article, and I answered with transparency and honesty: this article fails to meet our high standards and needs immediate attention.

    Wikipedia founder

    Wales went on:

    As many of you will know, I have been leading an NPOV [Wikipedia Neutral Point of View] working group and studying the issue of neutrality in Wikipedia across many articles and topic areas including “Zionism”. While this article is a particularly egregious example, there is much more work to do.

    He maintained that:

    I assume good faith of everyone who has worked on this Gaza “genocide” article. At present, the lede and the overall presentation state, in Wikipedia’s voice, that Israel is committing genocide, although that claim is highly contested. This is a violation of WP:NPOV [Wikipedia Neutral Point of View] and WP:ATTRIBUTEPOV [Wikipedia Attribute Point of View] that requires immediate correction.

    And, he insisted that:

    This policy is non-negotiable, and the principles upon which it is based cannot be superseded by other policies or guidelines, nor by editor consensus.

    Instead, he demanded that the following approach be taken:

    A neutral approach would begin with a formulation such as: “Multiple governments, NGOs, and legal bodies have described or rejected the characterization of Israel’s actions in Gaza as genocide.

    Of course, as Al Jazeera explained:

    Several major international bodies, including the United Nations, have asserted that Israel’s assault on Gaza is a genocide. This view has been backed by human rights organisations and scholars.

    Turmoil within Wikipedia

    The intervention has caused what US journalist Ryan Grim called “a huge scandal… inside Wikipedia”, with other platform editors condemning the interference and insisting that Wales’s opinion should have no more weight than anyone else’s and needs to be proposed, argued and either accepted or rejected by the editing community like any other:

    An example of the outraged reactions of some participants in the Wikipedia discussion.

    Grim assessed that:

    top dog Jim Wales swoop[ed] in to edit the Gaza genocide article and some others, buckling to pressure from the ADL and Israel.

    The main article page has now been locked to prevent editing until at least tonight.

    Online backlash

    On social media, others considered that Wales had humiliated himself by wanting to give the opinions  of the Israel lobby equal weight to those of United Nations experts, human rights groups and genocide scholars, and by ‘caving’ to the Israel lobby:

    The insistence that everyone editing the article has to be treated as a good-faith actor is also humiliating, given that the Israeli regime has long admitted deploying armies of supporters to edit Wikipedia articles (and flood social media) to make them positive about Israel. Several posted this clip of former Israeli PM Naftali Bennett saying the same:

    History of Zionism

    Even more embarrassing is the fact that Wikipedia has a page listing “political editing incidents” that includes a examples of editing wars funded by Israel or its proxies including, alongside Bennett’s admission, those of:

    • Israeli firm Percepto (formerly Veribo), which was exposed by Wikipedia’s own internal newspaper for using sockpuppets (fake online identities) to edit articles for paying clients, a breach of Wikipedia rules

    • right-wing Israeli think tank Kohelet Policy Forum allegedly using sockpuppet accounts – after openly using paid editors in the past

    • Wikipedia administrators being forced to ban pro-Israel activists pushing a 2008 campaign organised by the ironically-named Israel propaganda group Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America (CAMERA)

    Wales’s own personal history of Zionism is no less troubling. He has said of himself that:

    I’m a strong supporter of Israel, so I don’t listen to those critics [of Israeli apartheid].

    Wales also joined in the UK antisemitism scam, accusing then-Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn of being antisemitic and ‘supporting Hamas’ – a position that saw him accused of being a supporter of apartheid by an Israeli citizen:

    Last month, Wales was accused by X owner Elon Musk for not being right-wing enough. Musk then set up Grokipedia, an alternative pushing “far-right talking points”. Musk’s own Grok AI has repeatedly admitted its programmed pro-Israel biases and Islamophobia.

    Featured image via YouTube screenshot/Channel 4 News

    By Skwawkbox

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Activists have taken on a genocide and climate change-linked arms and fossil fuel firm on London. Adani Group, who are based in India, have perversely been allowed to sponsor the ‘green gallery’ at the Science Museum. Hundreds of teachers have threatened a boycott.

    Opponents of the green-washing project projected the words ‘Drop Adani’ onto the museums and demonstrated outside. They also put up posters which read “Our energy revolution fuels genocide” and “Our energy revolution runs on firepower”.

    The campaign describes Adani as “the world’s second largest developer of coal power”.

    Adani directly fuelling genocide

    The educational and cultural boycott has been taken up by Parents for Palestine, Education Climate Coalition, Culture Unstained and others.

    In a press release, a spokesperson for Parents for Palestine explained:

    There’s no question that Adani is directly fuelling – and profiting from – repression, violence and genocide. The posters were quickly removed, making it only too clear that the museum doesn’t want people to know the truth about Adani.

    Just last month, the museum agreed to host a private cocktail reception for Adani and its corporate clients in the ‘Energy Revolution’ gallery it sponsors, when instead, it should be holding them accountable for their crimes by denouncing and disengaging from Adani.

    Blood money and arms firm

    Adani has a deep relationship with Israeli arms firm Elbit Systems. This has been been criticised by human rights organisations:

    Adani-Elbit Advanced Systems India Ltd, located in Hyderabad is a joint venture between Adani Defence and Aerospace and Elbit Systems, Israel to manufacture advanced drone systems

    And, Adani has maintained its support throughout Israel’s genocide:

    Even as Israel’s genocide of Palestinians in Gaza continues, Adani Elbit has recently supplied 20 Hermes 900 drones to the Israel military. While several countries have withdrawn support to Israel in the face of its inhuman carnage of Palestinians, Adani continues to profit from it, lining its pocket with blood money.

    The campaign aims to put pressure on the museum to divest from unethical firms. Energy Embargo for Palestine previously carried out an action at the so-called ‘pink ball’ for corporate donors:

    Their spokesperson said:

    The Science Museum must immediately drop Adani as a sponsor. At Energy Embargo for Palestine, we have a campaign against the British Museum for its £50m sponsorship deal with BP.

    These companies are complicit in the genocide of Palestinians, and in climate collapse, and they rely on these partnerships to whitewash their image. We will continue opposing these deals until they are permanently dropped.

    And a spokesperson for Climate Resistance said

    Gautam Adani is a billionaire coal baron who has made his obscene fortune supplying arms for genocide and fueling climate collapse. That the Science Museum is taking this filthy cash is beyond shameful.

    We have to end his climate wrecking empire, tax him and his billionaire mates out of existence, and use their obscene wealth to fund climate action.

    Adani also operate Haifa port, where a lot of Israeli weaponry arrives. Needless to say that equipment gets used against Palestinians.

    Featured image via Parents for Palestine

    By Joe Glenton

    This post was originally published on Canary.