Category: israel

  • At the 2025 National Membership Meeting of Jewish Voice for Peace in Baltimore, thousands of anti-Zionist Jews gathered to reaffirm their opposition to Israel’s occupation of Palestine and ethnic cleansing of Palestinians—and to reject the antisemitic notion that the political ideology of Zionism represents all Jews. In this vital and wide-ranging discussion recorded during the JVP gathering in Baltimore, TRNN’s Marc Steiner sits down with self-identified Palestinian Jews Esther Farmer and Ariella Aïsha Azoulay to discuss the complexities of Jewish identity and belonging today, the historical origins of Israel, and “the way that Zionism destroyed both Palestine and the diverse modes of Jewish life” that predate and reject the Zionist project.

    Ariella Aïsha Azoulay is a Palestinian Jew of African origins, film essayist, curator, and professor of modern culture and comparative literature at Brown University. She is the author of numerous books, including: Potential History: Unlearning ImperialismThe Civil Contract of Photography; and From Palestine to Israel: A Photographic Record of Destruction and State Formation, 1947-1950Esther Farmer is a Palestinian Jew and native Brooklynite passionate about using theater as a tool for community development. She is former Ombudsman and Manager for the New York City Housing Authority, former United Nations representative for the International Association for Community Development and was an original founder of Teamsters for a Democratic Union. She is also a Jewish Voice for Peace NYC chapter leader and the director and playwright of “Wrestling with Zionism.”

    Studio Production: Cameron Granadino, David Hebden
    Audio Post-Production: Alina Nehlich


    Transcript

    The following is a rushed transcript and may contain errors. A proofread version will be made available as soon as possible.

    Marc Steiner:

    Welcome to the Marc Steiner Show here in The Real News. I’m Marc Steiner. It’s good to have you all with this. Jewish Voice for Peace is having their national convention right here in Baltimore, and the real news is there to bring you the story. Two of the leading participants in JVP are joining me in studio here at The Real News, Ariella Aïsha Azoulay is Professor of modern culture and media and comparative literature, and a film essayist and curator of archives and exhibitions. Her books include Potential History: Unlearning Imperialism; Civil Imagination: The Political Ontology of Photography; The Civil Contract of Photography; and From Palestine to Israel: A Photographic Record of Destruction and State Formation, 1947-1950. Among her films: Un-Documented: Unlearning Imperial Plunder, and Civil Alliance: Palestine 47-48. Among her exhibitions: “Errata” in Barcelona and HKW in Berlin; “Enough! The Natural Violence of the New World Order” that was done in Leipzig.

    And we’re also joined by Esther Farmer, who is a Palestinian Jew, a native Brooklynite whose passion is using theater as a tool for community development. She’s the director of “Wrestling with Zionism,” a reader’s theater project in New York City, as well as the author of several published articles on theater and community development. Esther is an active member and part of the leadership team of Jewish Voice for Peace in New York City. And they join us here in studio. So welcome both of you. It’s good to have you here. I’m really happy you could take the time from the conference to join us here for a little bit. One of the things that fascinated me about the two of you as I was going through all of your work, not all of it, but going through your work, is that you both identify as Palestinian Jews. Can we talk about what that means? That’s a word You never hear that maybe in certain circles you do, but in the rest of the world you don’t hear that notion idea of Palestinian Jew and what that means and why. That’s the way you identify.

    Esther Farmer:

    So my father was born in Hebron, Palestine. My grandfather was a Turkish Jew who went to Palestine pretty much to avoid the draft from World War I. He was a draft dodger,

    Marc Steiner:

    Didn’t want to fight for the Turkish army.

    Esther Farmer:

    He was a progressive Jew, didn’t believe in war. I found out much later that the penalty for avoiding the draft was to be hung. So several Jews actually left, but he did not realize that since Palestine was a Turkish protector, he was drafted anyway, and that’s why they came to the United States. They came to New York. So this was way before the Nakba and way before 1948, my family was, they lived on the Lower East Side. They were very poor and they were very anti-Zionist. So my family’s existence gives the lie to all Jews loved Israel, and certainly Ariella’s work really ties into that, that before the Holocaust, most Jews were not Zionists. So what does it mean to be a Palestinian Jew is that there was a country called Palestine, and it was Muslim, Christian, and Jewish. It was very diverse, and the vast majority at that time, 80% were not Jewish. They were Muslim. So Israel was a creation of people who did not live there for their own interest.

    Marc Steiner:

    I want to get to that point because that’s really a critical point. People don’t get about it, what Israel is and why it is. Ariella?

    Ariella Aïsha Azoulay:

    Yeah. So I think that first of all, we have to be reminded that the category of identity is a colonial category. And I was born into the Zionist colony in Palestine, and an identity was imposed on me at birth called Israeli identity. And this identity was fabricated in 14 years since, I mean 14 years before I was born, which means synthetic identity that was meant to cultivate or to create a factory of Israeli babies, that their identity is predicated on their opposition to other who lived in this country, who lived in this place, which were defined Palestinians. So when I’m speaking about these kind of human factories in the Zionist colony in Palestine, I’m speaking about the way that Zionism destroyed both Palestine and the diverse modes of Jewish life. Part of them took place in Palestine. My family moved to Palestine, my maternal from maternal side, they were expelled together with Muslims when the first white Christian state was created in Spain, when Jews and Muslims were expelled from Spain. So they moved from Spain to Portugal, France, Austria, Bulgaria, and then Palestine, way before the Zionist movement started to colonize or to aspire to colonize Palestine. So they were Palestinian Jews in the very factual way. They were part of Palestine. And this is not a colonial identity, this is a form of belonging. And when I’m saying that I’m a Palestinian Jew, it is a way of undoing, first of all, the identity that was imposed on me at birth, that I’m not recognizing myself in it, and all the other colonial identities that await for me like American or like French. So claiming that I am a Palestinian Jew is claiming a form of belonging. That was the form of belonging of my maternal ancestors. From my paternal side, we were Algerian Jews and both identities were destroyed. Both forms of belonging, sorry, not identities were destroyed through two colonial project, the French colonization of Algeria on the one hand and the Zionist colonization of Palestine. So being an Algerian Jew, a Palestinian Jew, a Muslim Jew is a mode of reclaiming my ancestral modes of belonging.

    Marc Steiner:

    I love that. Both of you really interesting stories, very powerful stories, and I want to dive back into that. But I was thinking as you were talking that, and I’ve wrestled this a lot and I’ve written about this, which is that if there had been no Holocaust there, there’d be no Israel. I mean, that’s the fundamental, most Jews were not interested in being Zionists. They were in this socialist movements here. They were doing whatever they were doing, whatever we were.

    Esther Farmer:

    I don’t know about that.

    Marc Steiner:

    Okay, please go ahead.

    Esther Farmer:

    I mean, I don’t know how we could know that, but there’s an assumption there that the imperialist powers at that time wouldn’t have. I mean, they certainly used the Holocaust and the sympathy of the world, or the Zionist claimed that they absolutely had to have Israel to, and it was seen as some kind of reparation or something. But as my father used to say, also, I love Avila’s work because it kind of puts a context to things that my family would say is that the Zionists love Israel and they hate Jews. And I think that says a lot. So I don’t know that the imperialists wouldn’t have created Israel one way or another. I don’t know. I just think it’s an assumption.

    Marc Steiner:

    Good.

    Esther Farmer:

    Yeah,

    Ariella Aïsha Azoulay:

    Maybe I can complete it from a different perspective. Yeah, please. I think that we cannot say that if there will not, Holocaust won’t be the state of Israel. We have to ask ourself what is the continuity between the Holocaust and the state of Israel in order to reply that we have to go back in time because the Holocaust didn’t arrive from nowhere.

    Okay, if it didn’t arrive from nowhere, we have to ask ourself what did Europe wanted from the Jews in order to have the Holocaust and then to force on the Jews all over the world to be represented by the Zionists that destroyed Palestine and created the state of Israel as the destiny of the Jewish people. For that, I invite in my book, the Jewelers of the Umai, have it here with me, a potential history of the Jewish Muslim world. What I invite people to look at is in the wake of the French Revolution, when the modern citizenship was invented, Jews who lived in France were not part of the citizenship they were given with this citizenship a few years after the French Revolution. But what interests me is not the fact that the Jews were naturalized in the wake of the French Revolution. What interests me is the price that they had to pay in order to become citizens.

    They had to forget that they were Jews and forgetting that they were Jews. This was a European project. So eliminating the Jews either by assimilating them into the Christian world or assimilating them into what the Euro-American powers invented in the wake of World War II as the Judeo-Christian tradition, or eliminating the Jews through extermination. All these are part of the same project, what to do with the Jews. Europe invented the Jews as a question, as a problem. And at the same time that Europe invented the Jews as a problem, they also invented the solution with quotation mark to make out of diverse Jewish communities, a Jewish people with a destiny. This brings us to the beginning of the 19th century, the beginning of the 19th century. They invent Palestine as a question, and they invent the Jews as a question, and they merge both questions. Napoleon, Napoleonic Wars already saw the possibility of transferring the Jews to Palestine.

    So this connection between Palestine and the Jews is something that Europe invented way before the Nakba. And the last point in time that I would like to bring to our conversation is in the wake of World War ii, after the Holocaust, Euro-American powers imposed what they called New World Order. They created the UN as the organ to facilitate their solutions to different people. The Jews were in displaced person camps in Europe from 45 to 48. The Zionist movement was a marginal movement in the life of Jews, worldwide marginalized movement. In the Jewish Muslim world, it has almost no presence. And Europe that was responsible for the extermination of the Jews add to innocent itself, making Europe innocent, making Europe, one of the liberating powers add to what was relied on the exceptional of the Nazi, which legitimized all the European colonies and the exceptional of the Jewish suffering, this double exceptional and the recognition of the Zionist as representative of the Jews, which means those who were mandated to destroy Jewish, a diverse Jewish life all over the world in Asia, in North Africa, in many other places. And the Zionists were mandated to destroy Palestine. This was part of Europe and your American powers part of their response, what to do with the Jews. So if we speak about the final solution by the Nazi as an extermination, the final, final solution or the post final solution was to impose on the Jews a state that will be for them at the price of Palestine, at the price of the destruction of diverse Jewish communities,

    Esther Farmer:

    Which is fascinating to me because it’s like it’s the way that Zionism is so deeply antisemitic. It is antisemitic, obviously by

    Marc Steiner:

    Homogenizing. Jump to that. Please go ahead.

    Esther Farmer:

    Well, just by homogenizing, and now it’s being used tangible form of Jewish life except the Zionist one, right? And it’s like this way of Jews being used. I mean, that was something that my family taught me very deeply in my DNA, that Jews are used by the imperialists for their own interests. And the creation of Israel was so much about that. And yet, we’re all supposed to say that as Jews, we all love Israel, which is the most antisemitic thing possible. And of course for me, as someone who comes from a very strong leftist Jewish background, what Israel is doing is a travesty. And back to that question of the Jews love the Zionists, love Israel and hate Jews. That incident that happened when it was a boatload of refugees and they were coming to the United States and they were turned away.

    They weren’t interested in going to Israel. They wanted to come to the United States. And the United States turned them away, and the Zionists were fine with that as long as the United States supported Israel. So it’s just a perfect example in your face of how Jews in Israel is not the same thing, but we have been inundated with propaganda to make our identities. And I mean, Ella’s work is so fascinating to me because they’ve literally erased our memories and have just changed the narrative and the dialogue to the point where it’s unrecognizable as to who people are. And now Christian nationalists are telling us what it is to be a Jew, which the IRA definition says that you’re only a Jew if you support Zionism. So they’re literally erasing our memories and history.

    Ariella Aïsha Azoulay:

    Yeah, no, this goes back to Napoleonic Wars Napoleon, who codified what is Judaism, who invented the Jewish consi story, who created Jewish life as a pyramidal modes of being who are entangled being Jew with the state in a way that the state, the states, different states can tell us today, what does it mean to be Jew? And there are bad Jews, and good Jews and the anti-Zionists are being considered the bad Jews. And those are Christians who never reckoned with their antisemitism or anti Judaism with their racism toward many groups that are telling us what does it mean to be Jew? And I would like just to add that Europe, in order to innocent itself from its crimes against the Jews, first of all, imposed the state of Israel or imposed the Zionist as representative of the Jews, but also exchanged with the enemy of the Jews and created Palestinians, Arab and Muslims as the enemies of the Jews.

    And these were never our enemies. If the Jews added systematic enemy, this was Europe. For centuries, Jews were expelled from one place to another in Europe. And it ended up with a project that is being called as a euphemistic term to describe. It was called the emancipation of the Jews in the 18th century, in the 19th century. What is this emancipation? This emancipation meant to kill the Jew within the Jew. I think that here in the us, we have to think about it as similar to the project of killing the indigenous within the indigenous, right? It’s like the boarding schools. So on a global scale, Europe killed the Jew within the Jew, and many of the members of what is being called here in a way that always surprise me, American Jewry, many of the members of this community don’t even remember that they belong to other communities that were destroyed by Europe, right? American Jewry is an invention, is an amalgamation, is another amalgamation that is built on the European amalgamation of the Jewish people in the 19th century. So we have to be reminded also that Zionism started as a Christian movement. The colonization of Palestine was a Christian ideology before it became a Zionist, a Jewish Zionist ideology.

    Esther Farmer:

    It’s interesting that I remember when Biden said, if we didn’t have Israel, we would have to invent

    Marc Steiner:

    It,

    Esther Farmer:

    Which is again, the most antisemitic thing in the world telling are you saying that Jews are not safe where they are? So we’re not safe here. So we have to create Israel. And you support that. I mean, you can’t get more antisemitic than that, but where are the Zionists? Where’s the outrage from the Zionist around that statement?

    Marc Steiner:

    You both have just said so much that we can stay here for hours, just pulling it all apart and really taking a deep dive here into all of it that you’ve said. I mean, what both of you have pointed out on one level, a number of levels you have on one level is how antisemitism drove Zionism in many ways to create Israel for the power of the West, as I put it once a long time ago, is to force refugees, to create refugees. And what you’ve all described, how do you take that and make it understood both politically and socially in this country? So some of the Zionist leaders will immediately call you and me self hating Jews. That’s the first thing they’ll say. But how do you take what you’ve just described and get people to really understand and put their hands around what it really means, how Israel, Israel created, what it stands for and what it’s done to us?

    Esther Farmer:

    Well, we are doing this conference now where we have 2000 anti-Zionist Jews in a womb 15 years ago. Be lucky if you got 15 anti-Zionist Jews in the room. So this is happening right now because the impact of what Zionism has done is war militarism and imperialism. And that’s being seen now throughout the whole world. So our job in JVP is to move Jews and everyone away from Zionism, and that’s happening. The issue is that the narrative, I mean, I’ve been doing this work for 50 years, and I have never seen the narrative the way it is right now. It has substantially changed, and that took a tremendous amount of work, and we’re proud of that work. So that’s happening. And yet the policies of the United States are still the same. So that says a lot about what so-called democracy is, when the majority of the country is with us pole after pole is saying they are not supporting what Israel is doing, but yet that’s still the policy. So I think these issues of identity and the relentless propaganda that has gone on since this Zionist, I dunno what you want to call it, experiment, has been both so destructive to Palestinians and to Jews, really, really destructive. And that’s why it’s so important for us to have this as Naomi Klein says it, Exodus away from Zionism.

    Marc Steiner:

    Yeah,

    Ariella Aïsha Azoulay:

    No, I think that just maybe we have to remind ourselves that there is genocide going on. It’s almost two years, and there are some common ways to understand what is genocide, which is related to what was done by Lemkin and the convention against genocide. But I think that we have to maybe ask other questions about genocide rather than defining what is genocide. Understanding that settler colonial regimes are genocidal regimes, and the state of Israel is a genocidal regime that serve the west, serve the West to solve with quotation mark the Jewish question another time in its history and serve the West to have its mercenaries in the form of Israelis. And I think that it became very clear that since October, 2023, without the arms and the money and the propaganda machine all over the world, in the western world in what you called policies in state apparatuses, the persecution of voices that are denouncing the genocide without all these western power,

    The genocide will not last more than 1, 2, 3 weeks. Israel does not have the power to have a genocide. Israel itself would not survive in 48 without the destruction of Jewish diverse communities without forcing the Jews in Europe, the survivors to go to Palestine rather than to rebuild their communities in Europe without inciting violence in the Jewish Muslim world and making the life of Jews in the Jewish Muslim world impossible in a way that they slowly, slowly, this world was dismantled and Jews had to leave. Most of them did not want to go to Palestine. The case of Algeria in 62, at the moment of the end of the War of Independence

    Marc Steiner:

    For Algeria

    Ariella Aïsha Azoulay:

    Only 20% in Algeria, only 20% of the Jews were forced to leave Algeria because two colonial projects forced them to leave Algeria, only 20% went to the Zionist colony in Palestine. The rest of them went to Canada and France. So they were not Zionists. So we have to understand that the state of Israel was sustained with Western power. It was not an expression of a Jewish liberation project. It was a European project, Euro-American project to reorganize the entire world to create what they called the Jewish Judo Christian tradition, which never existed to remove the Jews from the Jewish Muslim world,

    Marc Steiner:

    Which did exist

    Ariella Aïsha Azoulay:

    To create Palestine as allegedly a state for the Jews and to turn Palestinians into exterminate group. So when I relate to the term genocide, when I wrote several texts during the beginning of the genocide, I put aside the legal definition of genocide. And I am trying to reconstruct how the genocide against Palestinians started. And it started in the wake of World War ii when Western power through the mediation of the UN, decided that Palestinians are experiment for the sake of Zionist, for the sake of creating a Zionist state. So rather than speaking about genocide as an event, I speak about genocidal regime, I speak about genocidal technologies, and when you understand the genocidal regime, you understand that already the nakba was the beginning of the genocide because Palestinians were exter amenable. They had to pay the price, they could be exterminated because their presence, there was an obstacle for the imposition of the new world order with quota mark, which was a Euro-American project of enting Europe of its crimes against the Jews and of its crimes against other colonies. We have to be reminded that in 45 European powers, and we’re speaking about the British, the French, Spanish, they still had colonies in different places in the world. So by exceptionalizing, the Nazi, by exceptionalizing the suffering of the Jews, they actually continue to run the world and not to reckon with their crimes against the Jews and against other racialized communities.

    Esther Farmer:

    One of the things that gets me always is when people say, well, Israel has a right to exist as if the country was established by God. I mean countries are created by the that be for their own interests. When I was growing up, there was no Bosnia.

    This was created generally not created by the people that live in these places. It’s created as Ariela was saying, by the western world for their imperialist interest. So I don’t know why this country of Israel has any more right to exist than anybody else. And I think there’s a difference between these countries and the people that live in them, but this idea that countries, that Israel has a right to exist, it’s just so interesting. It’s an example of how the assumptions and how we’ve been trained to think in these ways around nation states and the creation of these things that just has nothing to do with our actual lived experience and history.

    Marc Steiner:

    So you both have said so much and given such deep analysis about where this is in some ways, I think that is not heard very often and really original. I mean, it’s not the way people describe what is being faced at this moment. And as you were speaking, 10 things were going through my head. One was, how do you take the analytical description that you both have given us and popularize that message so people understand it so people can grasp it? Because the way you describe, it’s very simple, very clear about what created this, I’m sorry, go ahead.

    Ariella Aïsha Azoulay:

    No, no. It just occurred to me to think about it not as we would do this work. JVP does an incredible work, but it is not only about people doing this work, the genocide made it clear to millions

    That this is a genocide and Israel is a genocidal regime. I can write this book and this book and you can do your work, et cetera. But people are not stupid. And there is a moment when people understand they cannot do an accelerated lessons that you take with someone who already did the work, but with the beginning of the genocide, millions went to the street, right, took it to the street to say, this is a genocide and they’re being persecuted constantly. All these draconian laws, all these draconian policies of the Trump administration is because there are millions who are saying that this is a genocidal regime. So the question is not how you bring these ideas. The question is maybe how we exit, as Nole said Zionism, but how we exit the structures that imperial powers created as benign structures. Museums, archives, nation, states, borders, naturalization, all these structures are against people.

    So the questions are much bigger than how you transmit the lies of Zionism to other people. For me, the main question is outcome. That all the crimes that were committed against the Jews as if they never existed because the Jews were received with quota state or the Jews received a citizenship. The question is how to bring the Jews to participate in the anti-colonial, general global anti-colonial struggle to decolonize this world. So it’s not only how you convince your parents or your siblings, it’s about how we exit from those institutions that were normalized as benign institutions, but actually they are reproducing the destruction of the world.

    Marc Steiner:

    So one of the things I think about as you all describe where we are and why we’re here, I think about historically here in this country that 70% of all the civil rights workers in the South when I was a civil rights worker in the South as a young man were Jews. 70% of all the whites civil rights workers, civil rights workers in the south were Jews. And that we were the heart of the labor movement. We were the heart of the revolutionary movements. In Europe, there’s a different spirit I think that has to be grasped and put out there a different heritage and tradition of who we are as opposed to having it being defined by this kind of Zionist domination that was pushed and created by the imperial powers as you were talking about. So they have a beachhead in the Middle East and they figured out what to do with the Jews.

    Ariella Aïsha Azoulay:

    But the example that you bring is very interesting because Jews participated in the civil rights movement. They were in solidarity with the black.

    They didn’t fight their own struggle as part of it. And I think that what JVP maybe today offer is how to think about the liberation aspirations of the Jews together with the liberation aspirations of other groups. And I think that what happened with the us, what happened with this kind of erasure of what Europe did to us, what Euro-American did to us is the removal of the Jews from the history of colonization in a way that the Jews from a long time did not have a project of decolonization while they were still colonized. To act only as a blank American citizen in the movement for the civil rights movement means not understanding how much Jews were still colonized. So they could act as blank citizens, but not as Jews who are affirming this as their own struggle. They struggle for black Americans. And I think that here there is a very interesting things for Jews to do in the US is to reclaim their histories outcome that they became American Jews outcome, that their history is a very short history, the history of their life in America.

    Where is their history in Europe, what was taken from them? There are traditions, there are beliefs, there are many things were taken from them. There are possibility to live their life there. So I’m not speaking about in terms of returning to Europe, but I’m speaking about reclaiming their histories. If the Jews will reclaim their histories, they will not be blank citizens in empire only joining others struggles. And I think the JVPs that maybe the first time that there is a kind of broad Jewish movement in the US where Jews are speaking about what was taken from them and cementing Zionism as their identity is part of what was taken from them. But there is much more to that.

    Esther Farmer:

    I mean, I feel very personally angry at Zionism from my experience as a leftist Jew. My father was a union organizer, and I grew up with that history of, as you say, in the labor movement. And Jews and I have always felt, and I have seen this with my own eyes, how this Zionist project has moved Jews to the right in the way that you are describing has moved Jews in the direction where it’s unrecognizable. To me, that’s the other way in which I see Zionism as so antisemitic. The whole history of Jews being for justice, even in the biblical text and stuff, it’s just completely thrown away by only us only. My mother used to say, we are Jews for justice, not just us.

    Marc Steiner:

    And

    Esther Farmer:

    That was the history, what it meant to me to be a Jew. So I feel like Zionism was, and in Ella’s work, it’s like a deliberate attempt to erase an understanding of Jews as standing with the oppressed in the world. That’s interesting what you said about from my family, I did experience that connection between what happened to the Jews and other people, that solidarity. I did feel that, and I think that there were other people who did feel that, but I also think that there was a deliberate attempt to break that memory in some ways though I think that’s what’s so interesting about what we’re talking about.

    Marc Steiner:

    Yeah, I think the reason, I’m not usually at a loss for words how I make my living, but one of the things that really struck me about this conversation we’ve had so far is that it’s one that doesn’t take place in very many places where there’s an introspection about Jewish history and Jewish life and what it means in what we face today and how we’ve become sucked into this imperial world oppressing Palestinians. And when I was a kid, it was the fight against Jewish store owners in inner city neighborhoods that we used to boycott and go after because of what they were doing. But now that becomes, it becomes a prominent aspect of American jewelry at this moment. And I think the way you two describe this, the depth of which you describe, this is something I think that people need to wrestle with. Beyond JVP.

    Ariella Aïsha Azoulay:

    There are many initiatives. If we see millions in the street protesting against the genocide, many of them are organized in different collectives. Strike MoMA, making, munches, kohenet, so many collectives, smalls middle size that are reclaiming, they are Jewish heritage and reclaiming. They are Jewish heritage is saying, we are not white try to whiten us. This is what they’re saying. But Jews were never white. So while accepting as part of the Jewish identity in the us, it’s something that always strike me accepting this category that the Jews are white is accepting to erase their history. They were first racialized, their histories were destroyed in order to tell them, we give you the passage to passage white, but Jews are not white. So I think that we cannot see the millions in the street protesting against the genocide and believe that there is only JVP. JVP is very powerful, very broad because you have branches in different cities, but there are many, many initiatives all over to reclaim what was taken from the Jews and what was taken from the Jews.

    Part of it is major part of it today. There are history as victims of genocide, and now the Zionists are perpetrating genocide that implicate the entire Jewish community because of a long history of conflating between Zionists and Jews. Because when the West recognized the Zionist as representing the Jewish people with no reason to recognize them, but it served the interest of the West, it created a kind of conflation. And this conflation took from the Jews many things that people are struggling to today to introduce a distance from them and from this identification or this false mode of being represented by the state of Israel and the Zionist without announcing the responsibility to continue the struggle against the genocidal regime.

    Marc Steiner:

    So as we conclude here, I was thinking about this kind of neofascist regime that exists in Israel and this neofascist regime that’s taking over the country that we live in here, and all the experience the two of you have had and the creative work you’ve done and the political work you’ve done, and where you see the hope and where we’re going, where you see the struggle going and what we face right now. I mean, seeing JVP grow as it has is amazing, and other groups are there, but the right is really on the rise. And in many ways, as almost as you were alluding to the right, often uses Jews and people get sucked into the right. So where do you both think this takes us all, after all your years of struggle and being parts of movements in your work,

    Esther Farmer:

    I mean, hits the horror and the hope every second.

    Marc Steiner:

    Yeah,

    Esther Farmer:

    Right. I mean, across the street you’ve got 2000 anti-Zionist. That’s the hope. And we have this fascistic things. Is this really happening right now? Again, I think it’s a really interesting moment when the majority of the country is with us, and yet we still have these policies now that contradiction is only going to grow. I think there’s so much grassroots organizing going on, not just from JVP in so many areas, and it’s really important. I think this concept of intersectionality and solidarity is extremely important. And that’s the hope is the solidarity and the intersectionality of our movements. And as Ariella was saying, it’s a worldwide thing. It’s not only about Israel, it’s not only about Palestine. It’s this whole way of understanding even how nation states are organized. I struggle with that myself because I come from a time when national liberation struggles were a very progressive thing and people wanted independence. And then there are these states that exist and have they helped the world? Have they not helped the world? What does that mean to have the world organized by these nation states? Is there a difference between anti-colonial and decolonial? These are interesting questions that are coming up right now for me anyway. So yeah, I think there is hope. There is organizing going on. People are moving and both sides are moving very fast. They are,

    Ariella Aïsha Azoulay:

    Yeah. So if I may just pick on something that you said right now, I don’t think that these were a national liberation movement. These were anti-colonial movements that were intercepted by the colonizers to become national liberation movements. All the process of decolonization of Africa was intercepted by the West through the creation of the un. We have to be reminded that in 45 there were several 40, 45 states in the world. Today we have 200 states, which means that the decolonization of Africa, decolonization of Asia, rather than being decolonized from the imperial powers, the imperial powers created international organization that imposed that the only way to decolonize a place would be to create a nation state.

    Esther Farmer:

    That’s very interesting.

    Ariella Aïsha Azoulay:

    So I don’t think that these were national liberation struggles. These were anticolonial liberation struggle that were intercepted by the West in Algeria. It’s very typical. It was an anticolonial struggle and it ended up with an independent state from where the Jews, Algerian Jews had to live because this was the model that is built on the purification of the body politic from elements that do not fit there. So the Jews didn’t fit here, and the Jews didn’t fit there, and the Jews didn’t fit there and others didn’t fit there. And we got the new World order. One comment about what you said, I don’t think that in Israel it is a neo fascist regime. Israel is, as I said earlier, a genocidal regime to begin with. The fact that Netanya ran this genocide cannot make us forget that the genocide against Palestinians started in 48. The destruction of Palestine, the destruction of the Palestinian society didn’t start with Netanya.

    And this phase of the genocide is horrible and is the highest in terms of casualties, but it is not the highest in terms of the destruction of the Palestinian society. And when you ask about hope, if there is hope is in a global decolonial transformation of the world, because all these structures that enabled in 45 to impose another settler colonial state as a liberation project for the Jews, while it was a project of liberation of Europe from its crimes to appear in the world as the liberator. So I think that the fact that those organs continue to exist as benign organs, museums, for example, that looted so much of ancestral worlds of black, of Jews, of Muslims, and impose themselves as the guardians of this culture while they participated in the decimation of the material culture of so many people. So I think that there is a lot of work to be done in order to undo imperial planter, to undo the imperial organization of the world, and not only to speak about throwing away this or that government, it’s about stopping the genocidal regimes that are still being recognized as benign democratic regime with an accident with side project that should be reformed.

    Israel cannot be reformed. Israel is a genocidal regime and Israeli state apparatuses should be dismantled in order to allow the return of Palestine in which Jews will also be part of it as one of the minority groups and not as the governor, the masters of the land.

    Marc Steiner:

    I want to say that this has been one of the best conversations I’ve had in a long time, and mostly because I didn’t do much talking at all, but which is great. I think you both brought a very profound and different analysis to this conversation that’s not often heard, and I wish we could sit here for the next three hours, but we can’t. And I just want to say thank you to Ariel Zuli and to you both farmer for being here today and being part of this conversation.

    Ariella Aïsha Azoulay:

    Thank you for inviting us. It was a pleasure. Yes. Thank you so much for having us to share the flow with you.

    Marc Steiner:

    I deeply appreciate it. Really the joke from my friends that were listening, mark, you didn’t say anything. It’s okay. Because what came out of this, I think was something that people have to really wrestle with about where our future is going, not just as Jews, not just as Israel Palestine, but in terms of where the world is going and why this is so central to all of that.

    Esther Farmer:

    And there’s something very liberating about thinking about the world without nation states or thinking about the world without borders. Can we have those imaginations? Can we think beyond what they’ve given us, that we have to think that way? Can we think beyond that? And now maybe is a moment the horror and the hope where we can think in different ways.

    Marc Steiner:

    We have to thank you both so much for taking all this time.

    Esther Farmer:

    Thank you. Thank you.

    Marc Steiner:

    See you back at the JVP conference. Once again, thank you to Ariella, Aisha Azule and Esther Farmer for joining us today. And thanks to David Hebdon and Cameron Grino for running the program and audio editor, Alida Nek and producer for always working for Magic behind the scenes. And everyone here at The Real News for making this show possible. Please let me know what you thought about what you heard today and what you’d like us to cover. Just write to me at mss@therealnews.com and I’ll get right back to you. Once again, thank you to Ella Aisha Azule and Esther Farmer for being our guest today here on the Mark Steiner Show on the Real News. And remember, we can’t do this without you, so please share, join our community by clicking on the subscribe button right below here and support the Real News Network. Do it now. So for the crew here at The Real News, I’m Mark Steiner. Stay involved. Keep listening, and take care.

    This post was originally published on The Real News Network.

  • MPs from the Independent Alliance have challenged the media to push UK prime minister Keir Starmer harder on the British government’s involvement in Israel’s genocide in Gaza. They accuse Starmer of complicity in war crimes, evading legal obligations, engaging in secretive and potentially unlawful military support, denying genocide despite overwhelming evidence, and blocking efforts for democratic accountability. And they encourage journalists to take the risk of holding him to account for all this.

    Independent Alliance: “Journalism During a Genocide

    Highlighting Israel’s murder of many dozens of journalists who try to document what’s been happening in Gaza, they said:

    Exposing the truth comes at a cost

    In Gaza, journalists have paid with their lives.

    Here in Britain, journalists may damage personal relationships or hamper their professional ambitions. In an ongoing genocide, these risks are surely worth taking.

    The British establishment media, however, has overwhelmingly failed. As the MPs added:

    For too long, this government has avoided real scrutiny over the full scale of its complicity in crimes against humanity. The media has a responsibility to hold the government to account and expose the truth.

    In particular, they stressed that the “numerous press conferences” Starmer has held since becoming prime minister give journalists the opportunity to hold him to account.

    The charges against Starmer

    Because “transparency and accountability are cornerstones of democracy”, the MPs asserted, “the public deserves to know the full scale of the UK’s complicity in crimes against humanity”, particularly via “the sale of weapons, the supply of intelligence and the use of Royal Air Force (RAF) bases in Cyprus”. Indeed, one report called RAF Akrotiri “a foundational asset for genocide”, saying Britain is “engaged in military actions without being subject to parliamentary scrutiny”.

    The MPs also accused the government of “knowingly and openly making an exception to its legal obligations” regarding the sale of arms. This comes a week after a new report showed Israel recording the entry of 8,630 items of death and destruction from the UK in recent months despite despite Starmer’s team supposedly banning items the occupying power could use for its war crimes in Gaza.

    The Independent Alliance added that:

    both the Prime Minister and the Foreign Secretary have… have made statements denying the existence of genocide in Gaza, contradicting the claim that it is for the courts, not governments, to make that determination

    And they stressed that “the government is yet to respond” to a March call for “a full, public, independent inquiry into the UK’s involvement” in Gaza.

    There are also accusations of the government ignoring a request for the arrest of Israeli foreign minister Gideon Sa’ar on a recent visit, and of hypocrisy for sanctioning Russia widely “for breaches of international law” but not doing so with Israel.

    Journalists: ask these questions

    The MPs suggested that journalists ask, among others, the following questions:

    • Is it the government’s position that it cannot – or will not – bring the F-35 programme in line with the UK’s legal obligations?
    • Is RAF Akrotiri being used as a route for weapons to be deployed in Gaza?
    • Has the government sought legal advice over the continued use of RAF Akrotiri to support Israeli military operations?
    • Have Israeli F-35 jets been stored and/or repaired at RAF bases?
    • Have you received any advice on the definition of genocide and its applicability to the situation in Gaza? If so, are their comments in line with your advice?
    • When will any advice be made public? If you have not offered any such advice, why not?
    • Why have you ignored the demand for an independent inquiry?

    We strongly urge mainstream journalists with a conscience, and access to press conferences, to push Starmer and his government to answer these questions. They can access the full document here. It includes links, further details, and more questions.

    Featured image supplied

    By Ed Sykes

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Israel’s blockade on humanitarian aid has entered its third month, pushed Gaza to the grip of starvation. Food supplies are dwindling rapidly, shops are stripped bare — even of the most basic essentials – and bakeries have shut down. Finding anything to quiet our growling stomachs has become a daily struggle, especially as the prices of basic food supplies continue to soar. Flour, one of the most…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • Israel has murdered journalist Hassan Eslaih in an airstrike on the Nasser Medical Complex in Gaza. But as is the norm with war crimes against Palestinians, Israeli media is essentially suggesting it was acceptable.

    Israel is concealing and silencing the truth, with Western support

    Israel has been committing genocide in Gaza since at least October 2023. For many years before that, the apartheid state had been isolating the occupied Palestinian territory’s highly concentrated population with a brutal blockade that turned it into “the world’s largest open-air prison”. And because Israel wanted to minimise international outrage, it stopped journalists from outside Gaza going in to document its crimes. Meanwhile, the occupation forces have murdered between 160 and 232 local journalists and tried to smear them as ‘terrorists’ to pre-emptively justify their assassination.

    Western media outlets, meanwhile, have participated in the whitewashing of Israeli attacks on hospitals and health workers in Gaza. They’ve also allowed genocide apologists to silence Palestinian voices in Gaza simply by uttering the name ‘Hamas’. But unlike Israel, Hamas has not advanced an illegal occupation and settler-colonial practices for decades. Palestinian people have the right to resist occupation, but Israel does not have the right to decimate occupied territory. Hamas is neither a progressive champion nor the picture of evil that Israel paints. And it has committed just a tiny fraction of Israel’s international crimes.

    The further deteriorating of an apparently hopeless situation for Palestinians in the 21st century and the lack of a meaningful peace process very much led to 7 October 2023. On that day, crimes undoubtedly took place, but Hamas attacked an Israeli military base with the aim of taking hostages in order to negotiate “the release of thousands of Palestinians in Israeli prisons”. Israel responded by killing its own citizens and launching a genocidal assault on Gaza, in which it has killed at least one Palestinian child every hour, murdering around 17,492 children (including about 825 babies, 895 one-year-olds, 3,266 preschoolers, and 4,032 six-to-10-year-olds).

    ‘Is it ok to kill a journalist?’

    Upon the murder of journalist Hassan Eslaih, Israeli propagandists sought to downplay the crime of attacking an unarmed person in a hospital. They did this by mentioning Eslaih’s reporting on the events of 7 October and his supposed civilian connection to Hamas.

    Eslaih was in hospital. He was unarmed. And Israel murdered him. That’s the story. The rest is an insight into Israel’s barbaric, noxious logic.

    Let’s apply the ‘eye for an eye’ principle to what Israel is saying with its assassination of Eslaih and those like him. Because it’s basically asserting that anyone in the apartheid state who has ever had a connection to its war criminal government, military, or illegal occupation is a legitimate target for people resisting the occupation. Israeli politicians, however, know they have the backing of the US and other Western governments. So they know there’s absolutely no way Palestinians would ever be able to do to people in Israel what the occupation forces have done to people in Gaza.

    The question isn’t what connection Eslaih or anyone else in Gaza had with Hamas as a political organisation. It’s whether we accept that people who are not currently fighting in or directing an armed conflict are legitimate targets for assassination. And if we want a world of peace and reason, we absolutely mustn’t accept that.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Ed Sykes

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Today, 13 May, a court case against the British government’s complicity in Israel’s genocide in Gaza has begun. The Global Legal Action Network (GLAN) and Palestinian human rights group Al-Haq are holding Keir Starmer’s regime to account for continuing to supply parts for F-35 fighter jets despite its international obligations to prevent war crimes. However, as the Guardian reported the Labour-led government will be defending itself by essentially claiming F-35 sales are more important than war crimes. 

    This comes as UN agencies and humanitarian organisations have confirmed a “famine is imminent in Gaza”, with 477,000 people at risk of “catastrophic” hunger in the coming months. A UN official, meanwhile, has insisted that Israel is using starvation as a weapon of war.

    The lucrative business of F-35 fighter jets, which has caused so much death and destruction in Gaza, marked a highly controversial exemption from Labour’s licence suspensions in 2024. And last week, a new report showed Israel has received numerous shipments of aircraft parts in recent months. Former Foreign Office adviser Mark Smith had previously revealed efforts under Tory and Labour governments “to suppress inconvenient truths” about UK allies. He spoke about official use of bullying, manipulation, and stonewalling to prolong “complicity with war crimes“.

    The High Court will now “review the decision-making process of the UK government, and rule whether they have acted unlawfully by continuing to export some arms to Israel”. The judgement will probably take a few months to arrive.

    “The UK is complicit in the killing of children”. Stop arms sales to Israel now.

    Activists have taken to London to call for an end to arms sales to Israel:

    Independent MPs have been on the streets too:

    Charities, meanwhile, have supported this call:

    Save the Children, for example, stressed that:

    The UK is complicit in the killing of children in Gaza

    It added:

    The UK has enabled attacks on civilians by continuing to approve the supply of British-made parts for F-35 fighter jets – despite acknowledging last year the clear risk that they are being used to commit violations of international law.

    While the Government defends their continued supply of lethal arms to Israel in court, children are being killed by bombs and bullets at an unprecedented rate…

    Keir Starmer, David Lammy: history is watching you. Is this what you want your legacy to be? …

    The UK Government must not be an ally to Israel’s atrocities.

    Israel committing genocide, and using famine as a weapon

    Philippe Lazzarini is commissioner-general of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East. And speaking to the BBC, he left it in no doubt that Israel is weaponising the starvation of Palestinians in Gaza, which is a war crime:

    The British government, meanwhile, has consistently offered Israel the political and material support it has needed to commit genocide since at least October 2023:

    This court case will hopefully serve to hold the state to account for its complicity with Israel’s crimes.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Ed Sykes

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • This spring, with hands overflowing with tenderness, Lolo Mando Al-Qishawi — a Palestinian mother living on Yaffa Street in the Al-Tuffah neighborhood in the eastern part of Gaza City — lovingly adorned her daughter in her Eid dress, her eyes reflecting the girl’s pure, uncontainable joy. But soon, those same hands, trembling with heartbreak, had to strip away the colors of celebration, wrapping her child instead in the cold, final cloth of farewell.

    Eid Al-Fitr was meant to be a day of blessings, but instead it turned into a haunting sorrow as a mother’s heart was shattered. How had happiness vanished so swiftly? What cruel twist of fate had stolen away her sweet, innocent girl, who had wished for nothing more than a simple, joyful Eid?

    The post How Much Longer Must Mothers In Gaza Fear Losing Their Children? appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • The US government has dropped its demand for Hamas to disarm as a precondition for a ceasefire in Gaza, Egyptian sources revealed to Al-Araby Al-Jadeed.

    “US negotiators conveyed to Egyptian intermediaries that the issue of Hamas’s disarmament could be addressed at a later stage, rather than being an immediate requirement for a ceasefire agreement,” the Qatari-owned news outlet reports.

    The unnamed source added that US President Donald Trump’s “inner circle” is convinced of the “futility” of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s strategy to free the captives via military pressure, believing that no military option will help save the Israeli captives in Gaza.

    The post US Abandons ‘Hamas Disarmament’ Demands In Gaza Truce Talks appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • Last week, Jordanian authorities arrested Hamza Khader, the coordinator of the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement in Jordan, and took him to an undisclosed location for investigation. According to BDS, Khader was arrested on Tuesday, May 6, over social media posts.

    BDS Jordan issued a statement on Wednesday, May 7, denouncing the arrest of Khader, saying that “it constitutes a clear violation of the fundamental rights of Jordanians to freedom of opinion, freedom of speech and peaceful assembly, which are guaranteed by the Jordanian constitution and the international conventions.”

    The movement criticized the Jordanian authorities’ use of broadly-worded provisions of the Cybercrime Laws to crackdown on individuals, who express their solidarity with the Palestinian cause, which “represents the conscience of the vast majority of Jordanian nationals.”

    The post Jordan Arrests BDS Movement Coordinator Hamza Khader appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • After a year and a half of genocidal atrocities, the editorial boards of numerous British press outlets have suddenly come out hard against Israel’s onslaught in Gaza.

    The first drop of rain came last week from The Financial Times in a piece by the editorial board titled “The west’s shameful silence on Gaza,” which denounces the US and Europe for having “issued barely a word of condemnation” of their ally’s criminality, saying they “should be ashamed of their silence, and stop enabling Netanyahu to act with impunity.”

    Then came The Economist with a piece titled “The war in Gaza must end,” which argues that Trump should pressure the Netanyahu regime for a ceasefire, saying that “The only people who benefit from continuing the war are Mr Netanyahu, who keeps his coalition intact, and his far-right allies, who dream of emptying Gaza and rebuilding Jewish settlements there.”

    The post Multiple Western Press Outlets Have Suddenly Pivoted Hard Against Israel appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • President Joe Biden’s military pier installed for a short time off the coast of Gaza last year lacked basic planning and was far more dangerous to U.S. soldiers than previously known, a new report finds. The Department of Defense Inspector General has found in an investigation that 62 of the 1,000 U.S. military members carrying out the ill-fated operation were injured, with one person…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • President Joe Biden’s military pier installed for a short time off the coast of Gaza last year lacked basic planning and was far more dangerous to U.S. soldiers than previously known, a new report finds. The Department of Defense Inspector General has found in an investigation that 62 of the 1,000 U.S. military members carrying out the ill-fated operation were injured, with one person…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • Hamas released an Israeli American soldier from captivity in Gaza on Monday, seeking to reopen ceasefire negotiations as a gesture of goodwill to President Donald Trump as he visits the Middle East this week. The 21-year-old Israeli military soldier, Edan Alexander, was first released to officials from the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), who handed him over to the Israeli…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • This content originally appeared on The Real News Network and was authored by The Real News Network.

  • Recent words from Israeli ex-soldiers show that even they understand that ending Israel’s brutal occupation of Palestine is the only path to peace for all people in the region.

    Israeli “occupation is not the solution — it’s the problem”

    Breaking the Silence is an Israeli organisation of former soldiers which “aims to bring an end to the occupation” by exposing “the reality of everyday life in the Occupied Territories”. Their testimonies give important context about how Israeli control in Palestine creates an endless cycle of violence. And in response to Israel’s plan to enter and control Gaza Strip, likely forcing local people to move, the group has stressed:

    It’s not about hostages or security, it’s about land

    It added:

    Military occupation is not the solution — it’s the problem. Security can never be gained through oppression and control.

    And it emphasised that this is the same tactic Israeli occupation forces have employed in Palestine “for decades“:

    As former soldiers who served in the occupied territories, we’ve seen firsthand what military control over a civilian population looks like. This isn’t a new strategy — it’s the same playbook Israel has used in the West Bank for decades. We already know it’s not about security.

    This is nothing to do with Hamas or 7 October 2023. It’s about giving Palestinian people a stark choice:

    Occupation isn’t a tactical decision — it’s a political choice meant to violently suppress any path to Palestinian self-determination: forcing millions of Gazans to choose either permanent displacement, life under a foreign military dictatorship, or death. It’s deeply immoral.

    “I realised it was an 11-year-old kid”

    Nadav Weiman is currently the executive director of Breaking the Silence. And he has previously spoken about serving “between 2005 to 2008 in a special forces unit”, describing the “straw widow” strategy of “taking a private Palestinian family’s house and turning it into a military post”.

    In one video discussing this tactic, he explains that he participated in a raid on a house in the Jenin refugee camp in the occupied West Bank in 2006. And after ‘grabbing someone from their bed’, he realised “it was an 11-year-old kid”:

    @sahatenglish“Straw Widow” — a sniper’s confession. Former Israeli sniper Nadav Weiman reveals the brutal reality behind a military tactic used to occupy Palestinian homes in the West Bank. “I dragged families from their beds, including children. I stormed hundreds of homes… and told myself this was for security.” Weiman reveals how Israeli soldiers routinely seize Palestinian homes, turning them into sniper bases — terrorizing families under the pretext of ‘security’.♬ original sound – Sahat English

    From these experiences that he had, he realised:

    The occupation is not for security. It’s for control, right? We want to control Palestinians because we want to build settlements, because we want to take their land.

    He told Democracy Now! about the warped logic he had while he was in the occupation army:

    And I told myself, “Ah, yeah, they hate me because I’m Jewish,” right? And then, when I finished my army service and started thinking as a civilian, I understand that they hated me because I was an occupying soldier.

    Weiman is not a radical. He simply sees that there can be no peace for people in Palestine or Israel as long as this continues. As he asserted:

    I believe that pro-Palestine or pro-Israel is the same thing, because, for me, pro-Israel is anti-occupation and pro-peace.

    Featured image via screengrab

    By Ed Sykes

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • The Gaza Strip is at a “critical risk” of famine, with the entire population projected to face crisis levels of hunger as a result of Israel’s total humanitarian aid blockade, UN-backed food researchers have found in their latest assessment. As of mid-May, the entire population of Gaza is facing a hunger crisis, researchers with the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC)…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • This visual exposes Britain’s extensive collaboration with Israel’s genocide in Gaza. British military forces, arms manufacturers, and industries provide supply lines and military parts that Israel depends on to continue its aggression against Palestinians. While Israeli jets reduce Gaza to rubble, Britain’s politicians bypass their own laws regulating weapons sales to keep these planes flying.

    The post Cruel Britannia: British Complicity in Genocide first appeared on Dissident Voice.

  • Even as tensions eased slightly on May 12 after military strikes between India and Pakistan over the previous couple of days, unverified images and videos claiming to be related to the conflict continued to flood social media. Among them is a video of hovering lights and bright flashes in the night sky that is being shared as Indian S-400 surface to air missiles intercepting Pakistani JF-17 and J-10C fighter aircraft over Amritsar.

    A fortnight after a terrorist attack in Pahalgam had killed 26 people, Indian armed forces in the early hours of May 7 launched Operation Sindoor, hitting nine sites in Pakistan and PoK from where attacks against India had been planned and directed. The Union ministry of defence described the action as “focused, measured and non-escalatory in nature”, with no Pakistani military facilities having been targeted. Late on May 7, reports came in of heavy mortar shelling by Pakistan on forward villages along the Line of Control in Poonch and Rajouri areas of Jammu and Kashmir killing at least 16 civilians. They also attempted to engage a number of military targets in northern and western India including in Awantipura, Srinagar, Jammu, Pathankot and Amritsar, among other places, using drones and missiles. These were neutralized by India’s integrated counter UAS grid and air defence systems. Subsequently, the conflict escalated rapidly on May 9 and 10, with Indian armed forces targeting air defence radars and systems at a number of locations in Pakistan in a proportionate response, and neutralizing the air defence system in Lahore.

    Sharing the video in question, X user Tathvam-asi (@ssaratht) wrote on May 8, “India’s S-400 taking good care of Amritsar 😍🔥At least two JF-17 and one J-10C went last night. #OperationSindoor #Sialkot #IndiaPakistanWar”. (Archive)

    Several other X users amplified the claim. (Archives- 1, 2)

    Click to view slideshow.

    Fact Check

    Upon a reverse image search of keyframes from the viral video, we found that the official X handle of the state government of Israel had tweeted the video on August 4, 2024. According to the caption, the visuals show a barrage of Hezbollah rockets fired at Israeli communities.

    Several other pro-Israel accounts had also shared the video at the same time. One can see them here and here.

    Click to view slideshow.

    As it stands, a 2024 video of Hezbollah rockets being fired at Israeli communities has been circulated by social media users with the misleading Indian missiles shooting down Pakistani aircraft near Amritsar.

    The post Viral video of ‘Pakistani aircraft shot down in Amritsar’ actually shows Hezbollah rockets targeting Israel appeared first on Alt News.


    This content originally appeared on Alt News and was authored by Shinjinee Majumder.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • A group of independent human rights experts from the UN have released their blistering assessment of Israel’s genocide in Palestine. In a call for immediate global intervention, they said:

    While States debate terminology – is it or is it not genocide? – Israel continues its relentless destruction of life in Gaza, through attacks by land, air and sea, displacing and massacring the surviving population with impunity.

    They pointed out how Israel has, horrifically, escalated their actions after the so-called ceasefire:

    Since breaking the ceasefire, Israel has killed hundreds of Palestinians, many daily – peaking on 18 March 2025 with 600 casualties in 24 hours, 400 of whom were children.

    Israel and impunity

    Israel have continued to destroy infrastructure vital to the continuation of human life. Doctors Without Borders (MSF) found that Gaza no longer has any kind of health system:

     due to the bombardment of health facilities by Israeli forces, dire shortages of vital supplies, and evacuation orders forcing patients and staff into life-threatening situations.

    Healthcare professionals themselves have been attacked in addition to healthcare facilities. The Hind Rajab Foundation has shared the extent of the damage to civilian infrastructure:

    Yet, since October 7th, 2023, up to 80% of Gaza’s civilian infrastructure has been damaged or destroyed by the Israeli Army…With up to four-fifths of Gaza’s civilian infrastructure damaged or destroyed—including water and sanitation systems, which the UN Environment Programme (UNEP) describes as ‘almost entirely defunct’–one must ask: if this does not constitute an act of genocide, what does?

    Israel has also gone to great lengths to stop any aid, specifically food, from reaching Palestinians. Human Rights Watch has reported:

    Israel did not make any meaningful efforts to ensure that the humanitarian needs of displaced people were met. Instead, Israel has taken steps to ensure that displaced civilians cannot avail themselves of such protections through its attacking of civilian infrastructure and restrictions on water, electricity, and aid leading to starvation and threatening famine.

    What cannot be lost in this discussion is that Israel is not only bombing Palestinians, but doing all it can to destroy any chance of survival. As the UN experts argued:

    Not only is delivering humanitarian aid one of Israel’s most critical obligations as the occupying power, but its deliberate depletion of essential necessities, destroying of natural resources and calculated push to drive Gaza to the brink of collapse further corroborates its criminal responsibility.

    ‘Genocidal conduct’

    Remarkably, Israel’s genocidal conduct is still being reported in Western mainstream media as legitimate. Despite various organisations who have been in Gaza, including Amnesty International, designating Israel’s actions as genocidal they are not being treated as such by media and politicians. The experts continue:

    These acts, beyond constituting grave international crimes, follow alarming, documented patterns of genocidal conduct.

    None of the declarations of the UN experts are being explained for the first time. In fact, this has been the most well-documented genocide in history. As such, the experts write:

    The world is watching. Will Member States live up to their obligations and intervene to stop the slaughter, hunger, and disease, and other war crimes and crimes against humanity that are perpetrated daily in complete impunity?

    This far into the genocide, the most powerful nations in the world have shown the problem is not that they are powerless to stop Israel. Instead, they simply do not wish to. The UN experts are forthright in explaining the consequences of inaction:

    International norms were established precisely to prevent such horrors. Yet, as millions protest globally for justice and humanity, their cries are muted. This situation conveys a deadly message: Palestinian lives are dispensable, and international law, if unenforced, is meaningless.

    Impunity to complicity with Israel

    In continuing to not intervene, states are showing that international law can become meaningless if the political will is not there. Instead, the experts warn that if states continue to do nothing and allow genocide to happen they will complicit in war crimes:

    Continuing to support Israel materially or politically, especially via arms transfers, and the provision of private military and security services risks complicity in genocide and other serious international crimes.

    By allowing Israel’s impunity and enabling their war crimes, states are proving themselves to be complicit in war crimes. States may find it profitable or politically expedient to support genocide for the moment – but that won’t remain the situation forever. Just as they have in every single day since October 2023, states can choose the side of impunity, or the side of complicity alongside Israel.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Maryam Jameela

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • At a time when global concern is mounting over the crimes committed against civilians in Gaza, and calls are increasing to halt the genocide being carried out by Israel, recent news reveals a more dangerous role played by giant tech companies in fueling the Israeli war machine. In July 2024, Alphabet, the parent company of Google, announced the completion of its acquisition of the Israeli company Wiz for an unprecedented amount — $32 billion in cash. The move was described as the largest acquisition in Google’s history.

    But this deal goes beyond being merely a business investment; it reveals the depth of moral and technical involvement Silicon Valley companies have in supporting the economy of the Israeli occupation, and even in financing its military and intelligence arms.

    The post Google’s Acquisition Of An Israeli Software Company: Big Tech’s Complicity In Genocide appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • Maybe you remember an incident like this from your schooldays. Someone in your class has done something wrong, like pass around a caricature of the principal, and the teacher decides to punish the whole class by taking away your recess. Maybe this is done to force the culprit to confess, or to pressure you and your classmates to point the finger. It’s a clever method of drafting students to help police the classroom.

    Such tactics of collective punishment have fallen out of favor for obvious reasons. They’re unfair. They don’t change behavior. They teach all the wrong lessons and make kids hate school.

    The post The Obscenity Of Collective Punishment In Gaza appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • This spring, with hands overflowing with tenderness, Lolo Mando Al-Qishawi — a Palestinian mother living on Yaffa Street in the Al-Tuffah neighborhood in the eastern part of Gaza City — lovingly adorned her daughter in her Eid dress, her eyes reflecting the girl’s pure, uncontainable joy. But soon, those same hands, trembling with heartbreak, had to strip away the colors of celebration…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • The International Centre of Justice for Palestinians (ICJP) has welcomed the findings of a ground-breaking report published on 7 May: Exposing UK arms exports to Israel. The report, written by Progressive International, Palestine Youth Movement (PYM), and Workers for a Free Palestine, uses data from the Israel Tax Authority to reveal the scale of UK arms exports to Israel.

    This data shows shipments of military goods, munitions of war, arms and arms parts. Notably, this included the export of over 8,000 separate munitions since the government’s partial suspension of export licences in September 2024 up until March 2025.

    UK arms exports to Israel: has Lammy misled parliament?

    Whilst the government suspended direct exports of F-35 components to Israel in September, they created a loophole that allows spare parts to still reach Israel if they go via another country such as the US, in order to not:

    undermine the global F-35 supply chain that is vital for the security of the UK, our allies and NATO.

    However, evidence from this report now shows that the UK are likely to have continued to supply F-35 jet components to Israel. This contradicts statements senior government ministers in the Department for Business and Trade and Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office made in the House of Commons.

    The report concludes that the Foreign Secretary appears to have misled parliament and the public regarding arms sales to Israel. Specifically, this is in relation to his statement that:

    much of what we send [to Israel] is defensive in nature. It is not what we describe routinely as arms.

    UK trade data more opaque than genocidal Israel’s

    Opaque trade data in the UK and broad customs codes (encompassing both military and non-military items) makes it difficult to draw definitive conclusions. Therefore, the UK government must release transparent and complete licensing and export data. This would be in order to clarify the nature of these good and to allow a full investigation of these shipments.

    Indeed, the organisations who authored the report criticised the opacity of the UK arms export regime. Jeanine Hourani of PYM went so far as to say:

    We actually could glean more about what the UK is sending to Israel from Israeli data than from UK data. This is really shocking.

    The report is published less than a week before the High Court hearings for a legal challenge to the UK government’s continued arms sales to Israel, filed by Palestinian human rights group Al-Haq and the UK-based Global Legal Action Network (GLAN), with support from the International Centre of Justice for Palestinians.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By The Canary

  • On May 5th, seven students from California State University, Long Beach, launched a hunger strike as part of an organized protest across four CSU campuses: San Francisco, Sacramento, and San Jose State. In total, twenty-five students are striking for Gaza. They join a wave of nationwide protests demanding an immediate end to the United States’ arming and facilitating a genocide in Gaza by Israel.

    The seven strikers announced on the campus their commitment to refuse food until their institution divests from companies that supply weapons, military equipment, and surveillance technology, among other demands, to Israel’s military.

    The post California Students Go On Hunger Strike For Gaza appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • The Norwegian Confederation of Trade Unions (LO), the country’s largest labor federation, has voted in favor of a comprehensive boycott of Israel, including a ban on trade and investment with Israeli companies.

    The decision was passed with an overwhelming 88 percent majority during LO’s national congress, held in the Norwegian capital, Oslo, from May 8 to 9, the official Palestinian news agency WAFA reported. The Palestine Committee of Norway also announced the move on its Instagram page, saying the LO “will introduce an economic boycott of Israel, with 240 votes for economic boycott, and 69 votes against.”

    It said the resolution “means that LO now requires that the State Pension Fund abroad, Norwegian companies and financial institutions withdraw from companies that contribute to the Israeli occupation.”

    “The resolution shows strong support among LO’s one million members to introduce boycott, divestment and sanctions,” it added.

    The post Norway’s Largest Trade Union Votes For Boycott Of Israel appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • It has been a year since Israel first invaded Rafah and crossed Biden’s illusory “red line.” The Israeli army destroyed the Rafah crossing, isolating Gaza from Egypt and completely cutting it off from the outside world. Israel was free to conduct the mass displacement of Palestinians away from the Egyptian border, but it never admitted to that goal. But now, Rafah is no more…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • In 1948, the newly proclaimed Israeli government seized 78% of Palestinian land and expelled more than half of the population (750,00 people) from their villages and towns. This act disregarded United Nations General Assembly Resolution 181 (1947), which called for the termination of the colonial British Mandate and the partition of Palestine into a Palestinian and a Jewish state. This process came to be known as the Nakba (Catastrophe).

    The Palestinians gathered in Gaza, the West Bank, East Jerusalem, and the neighbouring Arab states in the hope that they would soon be able to return to their homes.

    The post Crimes In The West Bank appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • Today Brooklyn College showed the strength of student-worker unity.

    And today Brooklyn College showed the brutality of university administrators and the NYPD.

    On May 8 CUNY-PSC — the union representing 30,000 faculty and staff at the City University of New York — organized an action to support adjunct faculty, the most precarious and lowest-paid faculty who struggle to make ends meet each month.

    At the same time, students organized an action in solidarity with Palestine to denounce the ongoing genocide, the bombardments, and the forced starvation of Palestinians by the brutal Zionist state of Israel, as well as CUNY’s continued investments in Israel.

    The post Students And Faculty Denounce Genocide And Resist Repression appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • The leader of the Ansarallah resistance movement, Abdul Malik al-Houthi, stated during a televised speech on 8 May that Yemen will continue supporting Palestine against Israel’s ethnic cleansing campaign.

    “Our country has resumed its full stance – militarily, officially, and popularly – to support the Palestinian people since the resumption of the genocide,” Houthi said, emphasizing that the Yemeni position is “firm and comprehensive regarding support, whether through bombing deep inside occupied Palestine or the ban on Israeli ships.”

    The post Ansarallah Leader Says US War Failed To Stop Yemen appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • Antisemitism is a real, violent, and pervasive scourge that spans the globe, but as anti-Zionist Jews like Molly Kraft argue, conflating opposition to Israel with antisemitism will make Jewish people less safe, not more. “Any systematic review of antisemitism must separate antisemitism from the Israeli state’s claims to represent all Jewish people, or more precisely, all Jewish safety,” Kraft writes in The Grind. “This is both because no colonial state can provide safety as it destroys and expels Indigenous populations, but also because Jewish safety will only come through the destruction of all oppressive systems.” In the latest installment of “Not in Our Name,” a Marc Steiner Show series bringing together voices across the Jewish world speaking out against Israel’s Occupation and destruction of Palestine, Marc Steiner speaks with Kraft about the need to accurately identify and fight antisemitism while forcefully rejecting Zionists’ attempts to weaponize antisemitism to perpetuate genocidal violence and justify repressive censorship.

    Molly Kraft is a Canadian labor and community organizer, writer, a founding member of the Jews Say No to Genocide Coalition, and co-founder of Standing Up for Racial Justice (SURJ) – Toronto.

    Producer: Rosette Sewali
    Studio Production: Cameron Granadino
    Audio Post-Production: Alina Nehlich


    Transcript

    The following is a rushed transcript and may contain errors. A proofread version will be made available as soon as possible.

    Marc Steiner:

    Welcome to the Marc Steiner Show, here at the Real News. I’m Marc Steiner. It’s great to have you all with us. And this is another edition of Not in Our name, and today we’re talking to Molly Kraft, who’s in Canada. She’s a union and grassroots organizer over 20 years experience organizing and she is motivated to support movements to win by building collective power to tear down all kinds of oppressive systems of showing up for racial justice. Toronto Jews say No to genocide, their national coalition in Canada of anti-Zionist groups. She’s been works at this intensely. She lives in Toronto, as I said with her partner. They have two children. She fights for justice, that’s her life’s work and also organizes with the nurses union. So she’s a busy woman and takes time out for us today. Welcome. Good to see you, Molly. Good to have you here.

    Molly Kraft:

    Thanks, Marc. You

    Marc Steiner:

    Wrote this article that I thought was really, really well done and powerful and it’s called, and we’re going to link to this here so you all can read it yourselves. It’s in a magazine called The Grind To Fight Antisemitism, we need to accurately identify it. Too often we’re failing. So one of the things that really struck me about the piece that you wrote is this, the difficulty of really getting to the heart of both antisemitism, the death of its history for thousands of years, people trying to wipe us off the face of the earth, but then in comes the state of Israel, which intensifies antisemitism while it oppresses Palestinians and forgets our own struggles for survival and fighting for justice. So talk about how you put that together and your theory of all that.

    Molly Kraft:

    Yeah, absolutely. Well, I think it’s important to position myself so that people understand why I would make this claim. So I’m the granddaughter of Holocaust survivors and they fled and lost their whole families and ended up in displaced persons camps and are highly traumatized from the Holocaust. And even my aunt, so I’m not even really technically a full third generation. My mom’s sister died in a concentration camp. So my mom was lucky enough to be born in the United States. My mom met my dad in Canada, and I grew up with a very clear understanding that it was only because of people who fought for justice, that my grandparents were saved and brought over to the United States by being sponsored by friends of friends coming to Peoria, Illinois and being able to start their life. So my understanding of why oppression is able to lead to the mass murder of people is through the funding by state apparatus that allow those things to happen.

    And so when I look at the history and the trajectory of antisemitism, which allowed the killing of my family, I see exactly to your point, the creation of Israel and the massive amount of funding backed by both Britain and then the US and now really global superpowers everywhere. To say that this is a state that is to do absolutely anything that it wants in the name of Jewish safety or fighting antisemitism, that actually that just replicates the kind of violence that we all fled from. And so the connection that I see is that Ashkenazi Jews, specifically in the West we’re able to come into whiteness, be welcomed into whiteness, be closer to power, to get to what they thought was safety, what we thought was safety, right? We’re going to become more like white people. We’re going to become more normal. We’re going to assimilated into American society, and that’s going to be our ticket away from these violent histories.

    And Israel is going to be the primary place that makes this happen. We’re going to get away from the vision of that really weak Yiddish Jew, and we’re going to become this masculinized Israeli white like big buff, modern man Jew, and no one’s ever going to do that to us again. And that cozying up to whiteness, that closeness to whiteness, that closeness to empire, to imperial power then allows a state funding of a kind of impunity that we’ve really rarely seen before. And I think it’s important that we actually debunk it, pull it apart, say that this doesn’t actually, most of this doesn’t have to do with antisemitism anymore. It’s an imperial project. And that Jews have to identify the difference between real antisemitism, like you said, that has historical and painful roots, deeply connected to white supremacy and then criticism of the state of Israel and their absolute death cults, destruction of Palestine and the Palestinian people. And so it felt very important to me personally to say I have a stake in that as well because my own history is tied up in that narrative.

    Marc Steiner:

    Lemme tell you something, Lord, I have mercy. You laid out so much here. I got to figure out how to parse this out.

    Molly Kraft:

    Yeah, sorry. We’ll just slow

    Marc Steiner:

    Down. No, no, it’s great. It’s wonderful. It’s great because you gave us a kind of analytical history of why we’re here and who we are.

    Molly Kraft:

    I

    Marc Steiner:

    Think it’s really important. Lemme ask you a quick personal question.

    Molly Kraft:

    Yeah, absolutely.

    Marc Steiner:

    And then jump into this. So did you know your grandparents with numbers on their arms?

    Molly Kraft:

    No. So my grandparents were both very lucky. They survived through not being in camps. So they were actually communists and they were imprisoned because they were communist and because they were Polish, Russian polish, as soon as they got out of jail, their communist friends said, you’ve got to get out of here because you’re communist. They’re coming for you. So they left their daughter and one of them went and fought on the eastern front, and he actually survived the war through fighting the Nazis on the other side. So he was a survivor through never being in a camp. My bubba hid and snuck around and made it all the way again to a displaced person’s camp in Stuttgart, Germany. And they were reunited in that displaced person’s camp. So they are lucky enough to have never been in a concentration camp, but they did live for three years in a displaced person’s camp. And that’s where they had my second aunt. But the family members that I grew up with had numbers on their arms. So when I would go to Peac or any other family holiday in Fort Lauderdale, which is where they all ended up after living in New York,

    Marc Steiner:

    Where else would they go?

    Molly Kraft:

    Where would they go after living in New York City for many years. So at payback, people would show us these were the numbers on their arms, and it was very strict in our family. There was not going to be any tattoos on any part of our arms. We have tattoos elsewhere. But as Jews who were supposed to be respecting these elders, we were not supposed to do that. And we grew up with stories of this is part of you, it’s part of our blood, it’s part of our very much present in everything we do. It’s a joke, but it isn’t, I’m sure people have said this to you, but which Christian friends going to hide you? What will you do when the day comes that this inevitably returns? What will you do to survive? And that was very much a part of our identity growing up.

    Marc Steiner:

    That’s a very interesting story in itself. I mean, just growing up in a left Jewish family that survived the war, that could be a movie on its own.

    Molly Kraft:

    Yes, exactly.

    Marc Steiner:

    It could. So I really want to explore your thoughts on antisemitism and how that plays into what’s happening now in Israel Palestine, and also how this struggle against Palestinian oppression can also bubble up the antisemitism because of what Israel is doing. Not blaming Jews for antisemitism, but just saying because it’s there. So talk a bit about your analysis that you wrote about that incredible

    Molly Kraft:

    Article. Yeah, so that’s such a brilliant question, and if we can’t actually have this conversation, I don’t believe that we will ever be able to come to justice because I think that if the left does not have a sharp analysis of antisemitism, we will never be able to bring Jews over from Zionism. And I think what I mean by that is that antisemitism is so prevalent within our societies because we live in Christian dominant societies. Antisemitism is part of Christian dominant societies, just the same way patriarchy is. It’s the soil, it’s the air. So to imagine ourselves on the left as somehow outside of that is an error because it leaves Jews saying, wait a minute, I don’t want to be in this group because they don’t acknowledge it. I actually believe that the primary backlash to DEI comes from, at least in Canada, there’s a huge movement of white Jews who said, wait a minute.

    I was forced to go into the white group with all the Christians to caucus and talk about whiteness, but nobody’s talking about antisemitism. And to give them credit where credit is due until the left is able to say antisemitism is a unique and specific form of discrimination that changes. And it is about the being cast out and being brought back in. And so what do we mean by that? Ashkenazi Jews have been sent out othered, and then in times when it’s convenient brought back in, when do we see that close? Clearly Donald Trump, anti-Semitic, literal Nazis in his circles would’ve cast out Jews when it was convenient. And now the bringing back in unquote of Jews, even though actually the neo-Nazis all are still in his inner circles, but using Jews very much as a scapegoat to do his own fascist state repression of free speech on campuses and education policies and funding of universities.

    This is how antisemitism operates. That’s different than, for example, anti-black racism. Anti-black racism is a permanent pushing down, a permanent casting out. You are different because of blackness. You are far from whiteness. So we have to have an analysis on the left. That’s the first thing to understand how to have multiracial movements. Because if we don’t know what antisemitism is, we actually can’t include left Jews in these movements. So when we look at things like how we talk about Israel Palestine, what we so often miss is an analysis that says Israel by cozying up to imperial powers, by becoming best friends with the United States, this is not a coincidence. The money to mass murder children in Gaza, the money to occupy the West Bank, the direct movement of Michael from Brooklyn into a house, someone’s Palestinian’s house in the West Bank, these are not accidents. The United States imperial project of overtaking land in a very, very special place in this earth is intended to maintain white colonial power. And the Jews, I actually believe are a bit of a scapegoat in this. Unfortunately, this is a historical and biblical connection for Jews. We can debate how much or how little, that’s a whole other podcast,

    But it’s not an accident that the United States is this invested in this genocide or in the displacement of Palestinians in the West Bank. And what happens is we don’t have an analysis of the fact that Christian Zionism, so there are more Christian Zionists in the world than there are Jews there absolutely believe more Christian Zionists even in the United States than there are Jews in the

    Marc Steiner:

    United States. Correct.

    Molly Kraft:

    So what we have to be able to say is that confluence of things, it doesn’t make antisemitism go away. It also doesn’t make it the biggest oppression of all time. There are bigger oppressions, especially because most Jews, it’s hard to say exactly how many, but most Jews globally are probably more like Ashkenazi, probably present more like white in societies where whiteness is the norm, that means that they are closer to power, which means that, for example, I do have the ability to not face discrimination all the time because most people probably don’t know that I’m Jewish. Again,

    Marc Steiner:

    To

    Molly Kraft:

    Distinguish from anti-black racism, it’s not the same form of discrimination. White Jews coming to America, I’m bouncing around here, but white Jews coming to America and cosing up to whiteness to try to escape those lineages of violence and try to get to safety have traded in saying that we have to fight all oppressions at the same time. And if we believed that we had to fight all oppressions at the same time, then we would’ve never displaced anyone from the West Bank. We would’ve never stolen occupied lands in Israel. Whatever land had been given, we would’ve co occupied because if we believed that all oppressions were interlinked, if we believed that our survival was bound up in the success of the Palestinians that already existed on that land, then we would be fighting that as co-conspirators. And so for me, it’s very obvious that Israel is a settler colonial project with an imperial power backing it.

    And what I believe is so important for the left to be able to name is that that settler power backing it is the United States. It is Christian hegemony, it is imperial power that cares about gas and oil. These things matter because otherwise we get into, oh, the Jews in Israel have so much power. Oh, the reason the world is letting this happen is because it’s the Jews. And then you get into global conspiracy theories which are antisemitic in nature. And so as long as we can say Israel doesn’t have more power because of being Jewish, Israel has more power because Christian Zionism is invested in Israeli Jewish Zionism to flourish. That is an important piece of this story,

    Marc Steiner:

    Right? It is. And preach this to preach.

    Molly Kraft:

    Yeah, exactly. Yeah. Yeah.

    Marc Steiner:

    Right. So two quick questions in the time we have here.

    Molly Kraft:

    Yeah.

    Marc Steiner:

    So given the analysis you just laid out in the table for everybody to ponder, how does that affect the ability to organize in the Jewish world? Let’s start there in the Jewish world to move people over. I mean, you can see generationally now that more and more younger Jews, your generation and younger are moving over saying something’s wrong. What Israel is doing is not right. This is not who we are. We can’t be the oppressor. So talk about your experience in that kind of organizing and where you think that’s going.

    Molly Kraft:

    Yeah, I think it’s such a good point. And even just your own framing of that reminds us why it’s like if you tap into the humanity of most Jewish folks’ story, if you can get a little bit of distance from that trauma. That’s why I believe it is generational. I believe that my mom’s generation, the older generations are a little bit too close and there is a genuine traumatic response that does not tell people to say, I’m looking at other human beings. There is a full transference. I mean, Naomi Klein talks way better about this than I can, but a full transference of Nazis to Palestinians like the Palestinians have become the people that they did nothing to us, but instead we will avenge all of our trauma on them. So that space into this next generation. Exactly. To your point, I think that if you can tap into the humanity of what is happening to say there is absolutely no justification for the mass slaughter of innocent children, men, women, elders, hospitals, community clinics, places where people eat playgrounds.

    Like most young Jewish people, if they are not being fed absolute propaganda and lies about their own safety, I think can see that if the reverse, if this was our story and we were talking about fighting Nazis that no one would, there would be no question. And so I think that you go into the place of what safety will come from this, where will you get, we do not end up in a safer place if every single one of these people is slaughtered. We end up in a place where there will be many more people who hate Jews. I personally believe that the rise of actual antisemitism is far worse because of the situation that we find ourselves in. And I believe that the Trump administration is key in this because of scapegoating. Now, Jews, and I’ve been listening to American news in the last couple of days, and I think Jewish Americans are starting to say the repression of Palestinian pro-Palestinian protestors in the states will only lead to more antisemitism because it looks like a Jewish conspiracy. It looks like the Jews in power are saying you don’t talk like that. You don’t get to say that you don’t get funding like global Jewish conspiracy much. It’s very playing into classic antisemitic tropes,

    Marc Steiner:

    Right?

    Molly Kraft:

    So I think when we speak to Jews in North America, white Jews about organizing, it has to be collective humanity, our own histories. How is our own liberation tied up in this? And where will you actually find safety in this? You will never, ever get safe through mass murdering children. It’s just not possible. And I think young people know that.

    Marc Steiner:

    Again, you’ve said so much here, and I think that there is this generational trauma. I mean, I spent a long time in the Zionist movement as a young person, Haman and the Marxist Zionist after, because we all grew up with those stories. I mean, in my family, my bubby, my grandmother who’s also Ashkenazi, and folks who are listening, Ashkenazi means Eastern European Jews. If you don’t know that, we grew up with those stories because there were people in our living room with numbers in their arms growing up. And my grandmother, my bubby, her story was chilling. When the cossacks attacked her, she told the Jewish ghetto she ran from them holding her little sister’s hand, and the cossack rode up next to them and lopped off her little sister’s head while she was holding her hand. So we grew up with these stories, and I think that in some ways what you’re saying is that we have to make other Jews understand other people as well. But other Jews understand that what is being done in our name in Palestine and Israel against Palestinians is no different than what happened to my bubby.

    Molly Kraft:

    Exactly, exactly.

    Marc Steiner:

    To bring people over emotionally to see this is not us. This is not who we should be.

    Molly Kraft:

    Exactly.

    Marc Steiner:

    And I think that your work and your words are just really profound. I want to tell you that I think they are, because analytically and dialectically kind of put these ideas together both in your article and the way you describe it. So I’m curious where you think as we conclude, we can stay for the next two hours. I know we can’t. Where do you think the struggle goes from here, given everything that’s going on right now with Gaza in Israel, with this rightwing government in the United States with right wing growing across the globe as well? Tell me your own analysis, where you think it goes and where historical goes now, especially when it comes to Israel Palestine.

    Molly Kraft:

    Well also thank you for sharing that story because I think it’s so telling of why you have the politics that you do, which is that if you really embody what that means to a human being’s life, you carry that. And it means that you look at every Palestinian child and you think of your bubby sister and you know that you are responsible. We always say there’s that amazing quote of, I want you to look at every child like they’re your child.

    Marc Steiner:

    Yes, my bubby used to wear her little sister’s necklace around her neck until the day she died.

    Molly Kraft:

    That’s so beautiful. And you carry the hope of fighting for that whoever that new little sister is each day. And we’ve heard too many countless stories of those little sisters in Gaza, and we are not doing enough to save them. So I believe the way we make those connections is through saying that the actual root of all of this is white supremacist colonial violence, and if we cannot tie all of our struggles together, then we’ll get nowhere. So for example, the reason the Democratic party has crashed and burned so hard is because those struggles have been separated. And the working classes of America are saying, actually, you don’t represent me anymore because you’re so fixated on only fighting for the elite, right? We have to say as white Jews that we are invested in fighting anti-black racism, anti Palestinian racism, fighting for indigenous sovereignty. And the reason that must be part of our struggle is because if we don’t make those connections, governments will take over and manipulate our, that is what is happening.

    They will manipulate our struggles. So right now, antisemitism is being used to enact some of the most violent state sanctioned policies of fascist repression that we’ve probably seen since the McCarthy era, both in Canada and the United States. If you so much as say that you support Palestine, you have a chance of being deported, losing your job, we’re doxed a lot up here. I’m sure you guys are as well, where our public information is shared online, we’re threatened, our children are threatened, our jobs are threatened. That is happening because actually the people who are in power are white supremacists, neo-Nazis. They’re not invested in my safety. And it’s my job to say I know that because I understand. I have a clear seeing of the whole operation of power. I know that you don’t actually care about the safety of my neighbors, of my black neighbors, of my undocumented neighbors, of my native neighbors, of my disabled neighbors.

    We must make cross intersectional analysis for our fights for justice in order to tie our struggles to others. I think that the question for Jews right now is very complicated, and I think it still remains to be seen where we are best positioned at the beginning of all of this. At the beginning of the genocide, it was so powerful to hear us say, not in our name, this will not happen. And now we’re being manipulated in that. And so I think we will have to continue to put our heads together to say, how can we support our Palestinian families across both North America and in Palestine by dismantling empire? And that is a bigger question because I actually think we’ll need our Christians in that, right? This isn’t going to go anywhere until we have mass public pressure saying that your tax dollars, my tax dollars are not going to pay for weapons. I read that ridiculous statistic at the beginning of the genocide, that it was only three days that if America cut off the supply of weapons, there was only a three day weapons supply because that’s how many weapons are using. So

    If all taxpayers were invested in saying that needs to end now, maybe that’s our way through. I’m not so sure where Jews fit into that, but I do know that it comes from building coalition. We must build coalition, and we must be clear that these values are not Jewish. These values are not in leftist. They’re not in any tradition of a radical anti-oppressive fighting to say that we allow this kind of behavior and anyone who tells us that is manipulating us and is using Jews, I believe as scapegoat in order to do their bidding.

    Marc Steiner:

    Monica, I want to thank you so much for being here today. I mean, I just think that your analysis is really sharp and intense with its depth, and I really appreciate you taking the time here for the Marc Steiner show and not in our name. And we’re going to link to your article. People need to read it so well written. You’ll just sit and go through it. And I look forward to other conversations and staying in touch. Thank you so much for your work and putting everything on the line, and I appreciate you joining us today.

    Molly Kraft:

    Thank you so much, Marc, for having me. It was a real pleasure.

    Marc Steiner:

    Once again, let me thank Molly Kraft for joining us today with her brilliant and coaching analysis and ideas, and we’ll link to her work and her article from The Grind. It’s called To Fight Antisemitism. We need to accurately identify it. Too often we are failing. It’s brilliantly written, so I encourage you all to go there and read it. And thanks to Cameron Grino for running the program today and audio editor Alina Nek, who working her magic Roset Ali for producing the Marc Steiner show and the titleless Kayla Rivara for making it all work behind the scenes. And everyone here at The Real News for making the show possible. Please let me know what you thought about, what you heard today, what you’d like us to cover. Just write to me at mss@therealnews.com and I’ll get right back to you. Once again, thank you Molly Craft for joining us today. It was a great conversation. So for the crew here at The Real News, I’m Mark Steiner. Stay involved. Keep listening, and take care.

    This post was originally published on The Real News Network.

  • Palestine campaigners are challenging Hastings Council leader Julia Hilton over the local authority’s complicity in Israel’s ongoing genocide in Gaza. Notably, the Hastings Palestine Solidarity Campaign (HDPSC) is demanding Hilton release legal advice which she claims makes her powerless to stop arms company General Dynamics from carrying out illegal activities on Hastings Council property.

    General ‘Genocide’ Dynamics: manufacturing components for Israel in Hastings

    The UN Human Rights Council has ordered General Dynamics – which pro-Palestine campaigners refer to as ‘Genocide’ Dynamics – to end all sales to Israel. In particular, this is in the context of Israel’s ongoing attacks on civilians in Gaza which:

    may constitute serious violations of human rights and international humanitarian laws.

    General Dynamics has refused to abide by this UN ruling. Therefore, campaigners argue that it is carrying out illegal activities by assisting Israel to perpetrate a genocide.

    The arms company currently leases the factory building on Castleham Road from Hastings Borough Council. Its website states that it makes parts for avionic and tactical communications systems for ground vehicles. But under terms of the lease, Hastings Council can revoke it if they are involved in “illegal or immoral” activities.

    In January, HDPSC raised the issue with the council leader. This was when it first came to its attention that General Dynamics was operating on council land. In response to HDPSC, councillor Hilton claimed that the terms of the lease are subject to “commercial confidentiality”. She detailed that she had received legal advice that there was no grounds to take action because General Dynamics is manufacturing components which is “a permitted use within the law”.

    However, HDPSC has rejected this. In his reply to councillor Hilton, HDPSC secretary Laurie Holden wrote:

    If the components being manufactured by GD in Hastings are playing a key role in the commission of an ongoing genocide, then their manufacture and export would appear to violate section 52 (1) of the International Criminal Court Act 2001 which makes it ‘an offence against the law of England and Wales for a person to engage in conduct ancillary’ to ‘genocide, a crime against humanity or a war crime’, where such ancillary acts include ‘aiding’ the commission of these. For example, it might ordinarily be legal to manufacture and export machetes, but not to Rwanda during its genocide.

    Councillor Hilton responded in an email that the council had plans to introduce an ethical lettings policy in the future.

    Manufacturing bombs for Israel’s massacres

    Campaigners insist, however, that the lack of a current policy would not absolve the council from its responsibility to act in an ethical way now. Moreover, nor would it excuse councillors of the crime of aiding a genocide if they refused to take action once they are aware that this was happening on their land.

    Al Jazeera verified that it was bombs General Dynamics manufactured, Israel dropped on the then ‘safe zone’ of Al Mawasi in Gaza last year.

    Hastings has long-standing links to a community in al Mawasi and councillor Hilton herself denounced these massacres as “inhumane” last September.

    An organiser of Hastings Friends of Al Mawasi Grace Lally said:

    The council leader joined with us in condemning the attacks on our friends in Al-Mawasi last year.

    But condemnation is really a meaningless gesture if we don’t do everything we can, and use any powers we have, to stop companies like General Dynamics enabling this genocide.

    Mr Holden, who the police arrested, and courts tried and found not guilty of aggravated trespass after taking part in a peaceful protest against General Dynamics in February last year, urged the council to immediately question General Dynamics about whether their factory in Hastings is supplying components to Israel. He called on councillor Hilton to act now:

    to ensure that HBC is not directly or indirectly implicated in the most heinous crime that any human beings can perpetrate – genocide, the deliberate attempt to exterminate an entire people.

    HDPSC has led 16 demonstrations at the two General Dynamics sites in Hastings over the past 19 months. It has disrupted and shut down operations in protest at the arms company profiting from the genocide in Gaza.

    The group has recently launched a new campaign: Schools Out for Genocide Dynamics. This gives parents, carers, and students the tools to challenge their academic institutions over the presence of General Dynamics in schools and at careers fairs.

    The campaign has already claimed a victory with the Big Futures career fair in Eastbourne. It dropped the arms company from its list of exhibitors. The campaign has also prompted a flood of letters to the heads of local schools.

    Featured image supplied

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.