Category: israel

  • Over the last two years, Israel has run simultaneous military operations across an expanding array of fronts. Its armed forces have carried out a genocide in the Gaza Strip and expanded military operations across major West Bank urban centers. Cities including Jenin, Tulkarm, Nablus, Hebron, and areas near Jericho have experienced night raids, blockades, killings, demolitions…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • Free speech advocates are raising concerns that a new bipartisan bill would force social media companies to censor criticism of Israel on their platforms. Reps. Josh Gottheimer (D-N.J.) and Don Bacon (R-Neb.) rolled out the bill, called the Stopping Terrorists Online Presence and Holding Accountable Tech Entities (STOP HATE) Act, at a press conference Wednesday, alongside Jonathan Greenblatt…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • I first learned about malnutrition from textbooks and documentaries in my medical school. I followed the scenes of hunger emerging from Somalia and South Sudan. I wholeheartedly felt them — with every sip of potable water I drank while theirs was polluted, with each bite of food I ate while they were reduced to skin and bones. Yet I never imagined that one day, I would be in their place…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.


  • This content originally appeared on Democracy Now! and was authored by Democracy Now!.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Israel’s “precisely designed mass starvation” campaign in Gaza has caused at least 83 children to die of hunger, health officials say, with many deaths occurring just in the last week as human rights experts warn that humanitarian conditions have surpassed a “tipping point” and will soon result in mass death if not stopped. The Gaza Government Media Office reported on Friday that health…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • A second group of international activists with the Freedom Flotilla Coalition are en route to Gaza to challenge Israel’s blockade. Their ship, named the Handala, launched from Italy five days ago carrying humanitarian aid desperately needed by Gaza’s starving population. The Freedom Flotilla’s most recent attempt to deliver aid was prevented by the Israeli military when their ship was raided and…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • On Wednesday, Israel’s legislature overwhelmingly passed a non-binding measure calling for Israel to annex the occupied West Bank, projecting Israel’s intent to pursue the illegal plan that is in many ways already in motion. The motion, to declare the Palestinian territory as “an inseparable part of the Land of Israel” and proclaiming “Israeli sovereignty” in the region, passed 71 to 13.

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • CPJ joined 35 members of the International News Safety Institute in a July 25 letter calling for Israel to respect the freedom of movement of journalists. 

    The joint letter called for Israeli authorities to allow Gazan journalists and their families – many of whom, like the rest of the population, are starving and facing extraordinary challenges to their health and ability to report – to leave Gaza, and allow other journalists to enter Gaza to continue their work. Nearly two years into the war, no international journalists have independently been able to access Gaza.

    “Protecting those who report from conflict is a duty shared by all,” the letter said. “Our local journalists have done their jobs with unimaginable resilience and bravery. Letting them leave Gaza if they wish to do so and allowing others in to offer respite and continue their work is a humanitarian obligation we cannot ignore.”

    Read the full letter here.


    This content originally appeared on Committee to Protect Journalists and was authored by CPJ Staff.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Spanish airline Vueling have explained that a group of French-Israeli teenagers were removed from a plane for safety reasons. However, right-wing media, including a number of Israeli outlets, have reported that the passengers were ejected for being Jewish.

    In a statement, Vueling said:

    During flight VY8166, a group of teenagers engaged in disruptive behaviour and adopted a confrontational attitude in breach of Article 41 of Air Safety Law.

    The company went on to detail how the teenagers tampered with passenger safety equipment, disrupted the safety demonstration, and “repeatedly disobeyed crew instructions.” Cabin crew gave “increasingly serious warnings” before resorting to assistance from the flight deck. There, due to safety reasons, the decision was undertaken to request support from the police.

    However, despite the clear unacceptable behaviour of the students, The Telegraph still ran the story with the headline:

    Jewish schoolchildren kicked off plane after ‘singing Hebrew songs.’

    French-Israeli Teenagers kicked off plane

    The Telegraph repeated allegations that the French-Israeli teenagers were removed from the plane for “singing Hebrew songs.” However, the Spanish police, the Guardia Civil, said:

    We deny that the incident was related to the singing of songs. The minors repeatedly tampered with emergency equipment and interrupted the crew’s safety demonstration, ignoring the crew. The pilot, believing they were endangering the flight, ordered their removal.

    Israeli minister, Amichai Chikli, made the remarkable claim that:

    The @vueling airline crew said that Israel is a terrorist state and forced the children off the aircraft; they are now in Valencia, waiting to return to France.

    He then concluded that:

    In line with Hamas’s campaign of lies echoed by Al Jazeera, Haaretz, and others, we are seeing numerous severe antisemitic incidents recently; this is one of the most serious.

    It remains unclear why Hamas or Al Jazeera would target Vueling of all people, but far be it from us to question Hamas’ strategic intelligence.

    Rumours abound

    Rumours have circulated on social media that the “Hebrew songs” were in actual fact the chant “death to Arabs.” These rumours have not been confirmed by the airline or the police, as yet. However, Euro-Med chairman Ramy Abdul shared:

    Quds News Network alleged that one of the students spat at a passenger:

    And, journalist Craig Murray pointed out the misinformation:

    Right-wing propaganda

    It is remarkable that right-wing media have chosen to portray this story as one about students being persecuted for being Jewish. Regardless of any rumours on social media, the verifiable fact is that these students behaved in a dangerous and unacceptable manner. Any airline would have had them removed from the plane, particularly given their repeated contempt for cabin crew.

    However, the real kicker is how the likes of The Telegraph have jumped to claim antisemitism. As ever, such journalism is harmful to genuine examples of antisemitism. Their propaganda has even less credence as soon as they echoed the remarks of an Israeli minister without question. The Zionist regime and the MSM have once again attempted to spin the appalling behaviour of Israelis as other people’s antisemitism.

    Featured image via Unsplash/Pourya Gohari

    By Maryam Jameela

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Israel continues to starve Palestinians in its manufactured famine. The United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA) reported that malnutrition amongst children under 5 in Palestine has more than doubled from March to June. Israeli authorities haven’t allowed UNRWA to bring in any humanitarian aid whatsoever for 4.5 months. And, as the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) have said:

    the Israeli military continues to kill and gravely injure hundreds of Palestinians as they desperately seek the little shelter and food available, raising further concerns that Israel is inflicting on Palestinians conditions of life increasingly incompatible with their continued existence in Gaza.

    As the Canary’s Palestinian correspondent Alaa Shamali has been reporting for months, more then 93% of people in Gaza are facing severe levels of food insecurity. Famine is not something that can immediately escalate. It requires repeated and consistent efforts. Israel has made those efforts through blocking aid, destroying infrastructure vital to life, and killing people as they line up for what little aid there is. The World Food Programme warned as far back as May 2024. Politicians have had every opportunity to stop this from happening. They have chosen to allow Palestinians to suffer untold horrors.

    Israel starves Palestine as world watches

    However, certain politicians have chosen this particular moment to release vague, watered down statements about Palestine.

    Rabid warmonger Hillary Clinton said:

    It has been widely documented that aid seekers have been brutally murdered while waiting for food and water. Flour has been laced with highly addictive oxycodone. Israel have blockaded Gaza for decades for almost 20 years and all Killary can muster is:

    The full flow of humanitarian assistance must be restored immediately.

    It’s remarkable the tone of voice that can be crafted – who is restricting the flow of aid? Are they restricting it politely? Can you ‘restore’ something to a terrorised population?

    Racist gangster Keir Starmer released the following guff:

    After years of Israel’s genocide, it takes some fucking nerve to say that:

    While the situation has been grave for some time. It has reached new depths and continues to worsen.

    This, coming from the same man who uses loopholes to continue to provide arms to Israel. Who has received intelligence from UK spy planes flying over Palestine. Who has refused to call the genocide a genocide. Starmer is a hypocritical disgrace. He could have picked any one of thousands of moments where Palestinians have suffered atrocity after atrocity that he could have stopped.

    We are far past the point where any action from Starmer could feasibly be described as “urgent.” How can he call for “all sides to engage in good faith” when Israel have violated international law time and time again? All possible agencies who have the expertise to designate war crimes and crimes against humanity have done so. There couldn’t be more evidence and, yet, spineless cretin Starmer wants to pretend he gives a fuck.

    Complicity

    Unlike Starmer and Clinton, the rest of the world will not forget their abject complicity. The backlash on social media has been, rightly, swift and furious:

    Far too little, far too late:

    Starmer is the same man overseeing the arrest of pensioners trying to stop Israel’s genocide:

    And, that’s to say nothing of the vile aiding and abetting of Israel’s genocide that Starmer’s been engaged in:

    Meanwhile, Clinton got a similar response for her craven posturing:

    No offence to Satan:

    Clinton has put in the hours to demonise and denigrate pro-Palestine protesters at every opportunity:

    Curious, how adept Clinton is at ensuring even when supposedly calling for Palestinians to be saved, she can still make it seem as though some unknown entity is starving them:

    Ultimately, Starmer, Clinton, and other politicians lining up their empty statements are guilty of the following:

    Fuck your aid

    Starmer and Clinton’s words are even more insulting considering the hell Israel have unleashed on Palestine. Palestinians have risked everything possible to recount themselves and their people in the worst possible moments of their lives, in hopes that someone might do something. Meanwhile, Western politicians have sat on their hands in defiance of not only international law, but basic moral values.

    Just days ago, Palestinian journalist Motasem Dalloul outlined the death traps of supposed ‘food aid’ set up by the American-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF). Dalloul said that GHF:

    regularly posts the aid distribution schedule on Facebook. Each time, around 60,000 to 70,000 Palestinians converge at the designated site. Loudspeakers announce that when the green light turns on, people have just 10 minutes to grab between 300 to 400 aid packages—though much of the critical supplies, like flour, sugar, and salt, are snatched up first by gangs and collaborators.

    Then:

    After the 10-minute window, the light turns yellow, signaling that only 5 minutes remain to flee before automatic machine guns open fire indiscriminately on anyone still in the area.

    Why didn’t these politicians speak up then? Why not one of the other innumerable atrocities? How could anyone defend Palestinians having their lives played with like this?

    Journalist Mosab Abu Toha shared footage of ten Palestinian children between the ages of 15 and 17 who were abducted near a GHF site by Israeli military:

    One child yells out:

    Fuck your aid!

    What else is there to say when the so-called aid comes with torture, abductions, murder, and is laced with drugs anyway? Starmer and Clinton may have one eye on the Hague coming knocking, but the hell they’ve sanctioned for Palestinians will not be forgotten.

    Threatening journalists

    However, Israel is, incredibly, still threatening Palestinian journalists. Al Jazeera’s Anas Al-Sharif has been a vital reporter whose recent video documents his own starvation as he trembled with hunger. The Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) released the following statement:

    The Committee to Protect Journalists is gravely worried about the safety of Al Jazeera Arabic’s Gaza correspondent Anas Al-Sharif, who is being targeted by an Israeli military smear campaign, which he believes is a precursor to his assassination.

    In the early days of the genocide, there was disbelief in some quarters over Israel’s threats to journalists and their families; over their brazen bombing of hospitals and refugee shelters; over their targeting of children and schools. How are we to describe that disbelief now, twisted and contorted as it is by the continuous barbarous actions of the Israelis over a year later?

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Maryam Jameela

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Volker Türk says the Home Office proscription restricts right to freedom of expression and peaceful assembly

    The UK government’s ban on Palestine Action limits the rights and freedoms of people in the UK and is at odds with international law, the UN human rights chief has said.

    Volker Türk, the UN human rights commissioner, said ministers’ decision to designate the group a terrorist organisation was “disproportionate and unnecessary” and called on them to rescind it.

    Continue reading…

    This post was originally published on Human rights | The Guardian.

  • This Saturday 26 July, Aberystwyth will become the stage for one of Wales’ most powerful visual protests for Palestine. Hundreds of people from across the country will gather to hold a 500-metre ‘Red Line’ – a striking symbol of defiance against Israel’s genocide in Gaza and its decades-long occupation of Palestine.

    The Red Line: an international emblem against Israel’s genocide in Aberystwyth

    The ‘Red Line’ is no ordinary banner. It’s an international emblem of protest, previously unfurled outside the White House, Westminster, and the Senedd. Now, it’s coming to Aberystwyth – to turn the town into a beacon of solidarity, resistance, moral clarity and a ‘Red Line’ against the genocide. The Palestine Solidarity Movement (PSM) from Bournemouth is providing the banner.

    As governments and politicians continue to turn ignore reality – even in the face of rulings from the International Court of Justice and arrest warrants sought by the International Criminal Court – this grassroots action sends a clear message: we will not stay silent.

    Wales ‘united in defiance – and in hope’

    Over 60 Welsh organisations, including trade unions, faith-based, peace, environmental networks and Palestine solidarity groups, have united behind the call. From every corner of Wales, people are travelling to Aberystwyth to make history and demand justice.

    Hannah Mann of Aberystwyth Palestine Solidarity Campaign said:

    Every hand that holds the Red Line is united in defiance – and in hope.

    Israel has crossed every red line imaginable – bombing civilians, razing hospitals, starving children. Yet our leaders remain silent. If our governments won’t draw the line, we will become it.

    The Red Line symbolises the breaking point – not only for international law, but for our collective conscience. Wales’ First Minister and MSs now face a moral choice: If this is not the red line, what is?

    This Saturday, Aberystwyth and Wales will stand with Gaza – loud, united, and uncompromising. Together, they will be the ‘Red Line’ against Israel’s genocide.

    Featured image supplied

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • This Saturday 26 July, a group of Totnes residents – including award-winning author and journalist George Monbiot and 80-year-old retired nurse Mary Light – will join a nationwide wave of protest as part of the Defend Our Juries’ campaign, ‘Lift The Ban’. They will turn out to oppose the home secretary’s classification of the direct action group Palestine Action as a ‘terrorist’ organisation.

    Some of them will be peacefully holding signs stating: “I Oppose Genocide. I Support Palestine Action”.  The same wording has led to police arresting more than 200 people under the Terrorism Act since the proscription order came into force on 5 July.

    The group will notify the police of the action in advance and understand the risk of being arrested.

    George Monbiot to join Palestine Action protests

    George Monbiot said:

    The proscription of Palestine Action is the most illiberal thing any home secretary has done for at least 30 years. The result is an Orwellian situation, in which people gently calling for peace are arrested under the Terrorism Act, while the government actively assists Israeli state terror, as it perpetrates genocide in Gaza. This is an assault on free speech, on logic and on human decency.

    On Monday, the government admitted in court that Palestine Action does not advocate for violence against people, but only for damage to property used to support the Israeli government’s assault on Gaza.

    Since October 2023, Israel has massacred at least 58,000 Palestinians. Nearly 2.1 million people – about 88% of Gaza’s population – have been displaced into just 12% of its territory.

    Currently, starvation is acute because Israel continues to deny aid access to the Strip. Israel killed at least 67 Palestinians collecting aid on 20 July. These sit amid the more than 1,000 Palestinians attempting to get aid it has slaughtered since the end of May.

    The World Health Organization and UN agencies are warning of imminent famine and breakdown of water and medical services.

    Ordinary people who cannot stand idly by

    Mary Light said:

    I am a retired nurse. I am horrified to see the utter cruelty unleashed by the Israeli government and army. Parents are having to watch their children die from starvation, children seeing a dearly loved parent lying dead, waiting to be buried in a mass grave. As a nurse, I’m also appalled by the targeted destruction of hospitals and the torture, imprisonment and killing of medical staff. Over 1,400 healthcare workers have died – this is a war on Gaza’s healthcare.

    Artist and grandmother Ruth Ben-Tovim said:

    Resistance is lawful, resisting genocide is not wrong—it is a moral and legal obligation. Palestine Action have been labelled ‘terrorists’ for protest actions including spray‑painting military aircraft to highlight UK arms complicity with Israel’s genocide. Once ‘terrorism’ means “economic damage” or “embarrassment, freedom of expression ceases to exist.

    The protest with George Monbiot will bring together ordinary people, who can’t be bystanders and ignore what is happening. They will demand that:

    1. The UK government must lift the ban on – meaning to de-proscribe – direct action group Palestine Action.
    2. An end to the role of arms and oil industry lobbyists in proposing laws that criminalise those who expose the violence and lies of those industries.
    3. An end to the sale of arms to a state committing genocide, as international law demands.
    4. The legal right of everyone who has taken reasonable and proportionate measures to prevent mass loss of life to present that as a defence to criminal charges.
    5. An end to the jailing of people for taking peaceful action to protect life in accordance with international law.

    Standing up to the brutal implications of this law, and opposing genocide

    The group of protesters, including George Monbiot, plan to notify their local Totnes police station about the action. Police responses have varied across the country – some respect the Human Rights Act, others enforce the Terrorism Act.

    They said:

    We await the police’s response in Totnes.

    This is just a small aspect of a much bigger story, of international complicity in Gaza’s genocide.

    We stand to show solidarity, to make visible the brutal implications of this law, and to oppose our government’s role in genocide.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Israel is accelerating its efforts to cement its permanent control over the West Bank through a number of sweeping legal and institutional changes, according to a new report from Adalah, The Legal Center for Arab Minority Rights in Israel.

    The 87-page report, Legal Structures of Distinction, Separation, and Territorial Domination, describes the ways in which the Netanyahu government is rapidly building on a long-standing legal matrix that further threatens Palestinians’ right to self-determination.

    “These developments are not something new to us,” Dr. Suhad Bishara, Legal Director of Adalah and lead author of the report, told Mondoweiss.

    The post Israel Is Changing The Legal System Governing The West Bank appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • Dell Technologies enjoys deeper ties with the Israeli military than previously known, including enabling Israeli soldiers to target and kill Palestinian civilians using Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies, the Electronic Intifada reported on 24 July.

    In January 2023, the US-based multinational won a $150 million tender from Israel’s Defense Ministry to supply servers and IT infrastructure to the Israeli army, other security bodies, and the ministry itself.

    The deal included services provided by Dell subsidiaries VMware and EMC Israel Advanced Information Technologies, which offered both technology and training to Israeli military units.

    The post Dell Supplied Tech Used In Israeli Kill-List Programs appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • Columbia University just suspended nearly 80 students for participating in a teach-in honoring Palestinian writer and revolutionary Basel al-Araj — marking the largest student suspension in the university’s modern history.

    The escalation comes amid growing repression against the pro-Palestine movement nationally, and just days before Columbia is expected to finalize an agreement with the Trump administration and the Anti-Defamation League (ADL). The deal would restore $400 million in canceled federal funding in exchange for adopting policies that criminalize criticism of Israel.

    The post Stop The Nationwide Repression Of The Pro-Palestine Movement appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • Over two dozen Senate Democrats are demanding that the Trump administration lead an independent investigation into the killing of Palestinian American Sayfollah Musallet by Israeli settlers earlier this month, calling out the U.S. government’s historic failure to act on other Israeli killings of Americans like Shireen Abu Akleh and Ayșenur Ezgi Eygi. In a letter sent to Secretary of State…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • Humanitarian groups have accumulated tens of thousands of trucks’ worth of aid that are in “limbo,” sitting in warehouses awaiting approval for entry into Gaza that may never come, Oxfam said on Thursday — as Israel runs a propaganda campaign attempting to blame its starvation plan on the very aid groups to whom it’s denying access. According to Oxfam, international humanitarian agencies have…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • Israel is majorly restricting visas for UN humanitarian affairs workers seeking entry into Gaza, seemingly in attempts to deepen the humanitarian catastrophe there, after effectively barring the top humanitarian official for the region from entering this weekend. On Sunday, Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar said that they will not renew the visa of Jonathan Whittall, the head of the UN’s…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • This story originally appeared in Mondoweiss on July 24, 2025. It is shared here with permission.

    Israel is accelerating its efforts to cement its permanent control over the West Bank through a number of sweeping legal and institutional changes, according to a new report from Adalah, The Legal Center for Arab Minority Rights in Israel.

    The 87-page report, Legal Structures of Distinction, Separation, and Territorial Domination, describes the ways in which the Netanyahu government is rapidly building on a long-standing legal matrix that further threatens Palestinians’ right to self-determination. 

    “These developments are not something new to us,” Dr. Suhad Bishara, Legal Director of Adalah and lead author of the report, told Mondoweiss. “All eyes are on Gaza, justifiably so,” she said. “However… it is important to highlight the intensity of the structural changes that have taken place since the current government took over in December 2022.”

    “What is happening in the West Bank is dangerously fast-forwarding annexation policies in a blatant violation of international law,” Bishara said. “Israel is intensifying measures to change the status of the West Bank, the status of many Palestinians living in Area C who are subject to intensified displacement induced by settler violence and Israeli policies.” She said, “This is in addition to settler expansion and further restrictions on Palestinian development in the area.”

    Thoroughly researched and footnoted, the report documents how the current extremist government has built on what Adalah describes as “foundational mechanisms through which Israel has entrenched a land regime that facilitates territorial domination and racial segregation.” 

    Area C comprises over 60 percent of the West Bank, and is under full Israeli military control. 

    Here are the mechanisms of territorial domination Adalah examines in these areas.

    Civilian governance for Israeli settlers; military rule over Palestinians

    Beginning in the late 1970s, Israel abandoned its security-based justifications for approving settlements and adopted a policy based on civil, not military grounds. The report describes how, soon after, the Civil Administration — the Israeli body governing the West Bank — was established to formalize the division between military and civilian affairs.

    As a result, “Israel has steadily transferred governance over Israeli settlers in the West Bank from military to civilian control, entrenching permanent territorial dominance and greatly expanding the settlement enterprise,” according to the report.

    Most recently, structural reforms — such as the appointment of Bezalel Smotrich to serve as both Finance Minister and a Minister in the Defense Ministry — have resulted in increasing legal authority for the pro-settler civil servants working with Smotrich in the West Bank. These reforms have cemented the two distinct legal structures that govern life in Palestinian villages and Israeli settlements: the former, in which the military rules, and the latter, administered according to Israeli law. 

    1. Administration by local authorities

    Adalah’s report dives into the weeds as it describes one of the more concerning mechanisms that reveals Israel’s intent to annex the whole of the West Bank. Having transitioned the settlements from military administration to civilian rule — and having handed over significant legal and administrative decision-making to pro-settler civil servants — Israel can argue that the settlements operate now under Israeli sovereignty. But applying Israeli law in occupied territory, Adalah maintains, is a violation of international human rights law and constitutes “a measure of de facto annexation.” 

    2. Financial incentives for settlements 

    Readers of the report won’t be surprised to learn that, as Adalah writes, “Israeli settlements receive extensive financial benefits through direct government subsidies, preferential policies, and financial incentives… [covering] multiple sectors, including land allocation, housing, infrastructure, and agriculture.” 

    Still, it is remarkable—as documented in the Adalah report—how in contravention of international law, Israel continues each year to pour billions of shekels into the development of settlements in the West Bank. Readers of the report will learn of “the legal mechanisms behind these incentives and how Israeli law facilitates their distribution.” 

    3. Declaring State land 

    According to Adalah, Israel’s designation of State Land in the West Bank is “the primary legal mechanism through which Israeli authorities have taken possession of Palestinian land since the late 1970s.” Those already familiar with Israel’s use of this means of de facto annexation will be surprised by the extraordinary amount of Palestinian land so designated. The report includes information obtained by Peace Now through a Freedom of Information Act request that shows a shocking fact: in under a one-year period, Israel has designated more Palestinian land as State Land than it had in an 18-year period.

    From 1998 to 2016, just over 21,000 dunams were declared as State Land. But in just over nine months (from the end of February 2024 through early December 2024), over 24,200 dunams were declared as State Land. This acceleration is historically unprecedented.

    The planning system in Area C

    Adalah includes an entire section on the legal and structural framework in place in Area C to further expand Israel’s settlement project, fulfilling one of the Netanyahu government’s guiding principles shared the day before his swearing-in as Prime Minister in December 2022: “The Jewish people have an exclusive and inalienable right to all parts of the Land of Israel,” promising to expand settlements throughout “Judea and Samaria,” the Israeli term for the occupied West Bank. 

    Paralleling the judgments of the ICJ, UN experts, and international, Palestinian, and Israeli human rights groups, the report ends by listing the five international crimes that Adalah finds Israel guilt of: violations of International Humanitarian Law; the deepening of the illegal mechanism of de facto annexation; the denial of Palestinian people’s right to self-determination; the deepening of the apartheid system in the occupied Palestinian territory; and the commission of war crimes and crimes of aggression on the part of Israel.

    The most recent newsletter from Ir Amim, an Israeli NGO, describes Israel’s expanding control over illegally annexed East Jerusalem. Asked to comment, Tess Miller, Public Outreach staff at Ir Amim (“City of Nations” or “City of Peoples” in Hebrew) told Mondoweiss that “the mechanisms of displacement that we monitor and advocate against within Jerusalem are not separate from the mechanisms seen today in Gaza and the West Bank.”

    “What we are witnessing,” Miller said, “time after time, place after place, is violent control granted to those willing to advance the state’s agenda of expanding Jewish presence and diminishing Palestinian presence.” Ir Amim’s newsletter documents home demolitions, evictions, and starkly discriminatory housing and land confiscation policies.

    “Together,” Miller said, “they all contribute to the accelerating erasure of the Palestinian people from their own cities, neighborhoods, and lands — enabled by the complicity of an increasingly radicalized Israeli public and the international community’s persistent refusal to take meaningful action.”

    According to Adalah’s Dr. Bishara, it is hoped that the Adalah report, read by advocates for Palestinian rights, stakeholders, and states alike, “will generate international pressure against these long-term changes in the West Bank that violate international law and threaten the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination.”

    This post was originally published on The Real News Network.

  • Approximately 100 incarcerated Iranian trans people are missing, presumed dead, after an Israeli strike on the infamous Evin Prison. Authorities inside Iran, and political prisoners from inside the prison, are saying these missing individuals were killed in the bombardment. Israeli officials and media have framed the attack on Evin as “symbolic”: Israel wanted to show Iranians that it…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • After a man assaulted a woman marching for Palestine on a recent fundraising walk, Hastings Friends of Al-Mawasi have announced another in defiance at the blatant act of intimidation.

    Thug assaults woman on a fundraising walk in Hastings for Palestine

    At the previous walk, the woman, who was planning to greet the walkers as they arrived in Bexhill, was waiting at the De La Warr Pavilion wearing a traditional Palestinian keffiyeh. This was when a man approached her without warning to grab the keffiyeh from her neck and called her a ‘terrorist’. A violent assault ensued and police have launched an investigation.

    A Sussex Police statement on the attack said:

    Police received a report of an assault on a woman by a man in Bexhill at about 1.30pm on Sunday, 20 July. It happened on the beach side at the front of the De La Warr Pavilion. Officers are investigating, and witnesses or anyone with information can report it to Sussex Police online, quoting serial 414 of 20/07.

    In a separate incident, another man carrying an Israeli flag followed walkers along the route shouting threats and abuse.

    The group plans to hold another fundraising walk from Hastings to Bexhill on Sunday 10 August.

    Far-right emboldened by the proscription of Palestine Action

    Richard Wistreich who is a member of Hastings Jews for Justice and was wearing a HJJ t-shirt on the day said:

    Because I was the only walker visibly identifiable as Jewish, I was singled out for a rabid verbal attack. He not only screamed in my face that I am not a Jew, repeatedly calling me a Nazi (in fact, my father narrowly escaped being annihilated in the Holocaust, as many in my family were), but threatened to hit me (I’m twice his age). Such deeply antisemitic abuse reveals his profound ignorance.

    The walk, which was attended by dozens of local people, including young children, raised over £4,300 for people in Al-Mawasi. The town in Gaza has longstanding links to Hastings. Hastings Borough Council recently voted to formally support and promote the friendship link between Hastings and Al-Mawasi. Councillor Becca Horn, Hastings’ Mayor, said she was shocked by the attack and hoped to attend the next fundraising walk.

    It appears there has been a marked escalation of threatening and abusive behaviour in the past few weeks, aimed at people in the town who show sympathy or support for the people of Palestine.

    Local businesses in Hastings displaying support for Palestine under attack

    Steph Warren is the owner of the Stella Dore Gallery in Hastings. It is one of a number of local businesses that have been targeted with stickers about ‘Hamas’ and ‘antisemitism’. She said:

    I have proudly displayed posters in my window advertising community events like the recent ‘Oh Big Blue’ poetry exhibition by children in Gaza, and there is no way I am going to be intimidated by these pro-genocide hate-mongers. I hope many more people will join me on the fundraising walk on the 10th, and show that these cowardly bullies are the minority who will never silence the vast majority of our town who stand for peace and justice.

    Stooge Cafe were also undeterred by the actions of what they called “a tiny, sad minority” and said:

    We know our customers appreciate our display of solidarity… just last week we had two Palestinian families drop in for drinks after seeing our sign. They said it gave them some comfort knowing that there is community support for them, that folks like us are disgusted by our government.

    It’s no coincidence peaceful protesters are labelled ‘terrorists’

    Grace Lally, one of the organisers of Hastings Friends of Al-Mawasi, said:

    It’s no coincidence that in the weeks since the Government labelled Palestine Action as terrorists, and the police started arresting peaceful anti-genocide protestors, we have seen an increase in threatening and violent behaviour by people who support Israel’s genocidal actions. The local Labour MP, Helena Dollimore, recently accused Palestine campaigners of endangering her, when they called on her personally to condemn Israel. But it is clear that by falsely labelling anti-genocide campaigners as some kind of threat, our MP and our government are emboldening violent thugs who now feel empowered to treat even young children on a fundraising walk as if they are ‘terrorists’ who deserve to be hounded and abused.

    For the woman who was attacked in Bexhill (who doesn’t wish to be named) the parallels with the violence being meted out to people in Palestine are clear. She wrote:

    What happened to me, a single act of violence, echoes the deeper, ongoing violence that Palestinians endure every day. It was a glimpse into the hatred they face simply for existing. And yet, they continue to resist, to survive, to hold onto their humanity in the face of unimaginable cruelty. My bruises will heal. But Gaza continues to bleed. We are failing to see that if genocide is allowed and international law is being broken with impunity, then in times of conflict, we are all at risk of the same fate. In this sense, we are all Palestinian. We must not look away and we can not allow this hatred and violence to stain our own communities.

    Pattern of aggressive men targeting women expressing support for Palestine

    Hastings residents have reported further incidents to the police in recent weeks. This includes a woman who far-right and Zionists thugs targeted for abuse leaving her home. This appeared to be owing to a Palestine poster in her window. She subsequently received an intimidating message directly to her phone.

    The pattern of aggressive men targeting women seems to be another feature of these incidents. Given this, a local women’s group issued a statement saying:

    Hastings Women’s Voice is horrified to hear that a woman supporting Hastings Friends of Al-Mawasi was physically attacked on Sunday on the seafront. Sending our solidarity and sending our best wishes. Women’s Voice deplores all violence, but particularly violence against women, and stands shoulder to shoulder with those campaigning against the genocide in Gaza.

    Hastings Mosque also issued a statement extending their solidarity and calling for a community response:

    To our dear sister, we extend our heartfelt duas and unwavering support. You are not alone. You belong. You are cared for…Let this terrible act not sow fear, but awaken our collective conscience. Let it deepen our solidarity and strengthen our resolve to build a community where everyone, regardless of faith, ethnicity, or cause they stand for, can walk with dignity and without fear.

    The fundraising walk will leave the Stade at 11am on Sunday 10th of August aiming to arrive in Bexhill De la Warr Pavilion at around 1pm. For sponsorship forms or more information contact hastingsalmawasi@gmail.com

    Featured image supplied

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • International condemnation for Israel’s actions in Gaza is growing, with horrific and heartbreaking photographs of babies and children it is deliberately starving even making it as far as the front page of the Daily Express. However, instead of taking meaningful action, foreign secretary David Lammy has instead lied to numerous media outlets about the UK’s role in arming Israel.

    Even former Conservative home secretary Kit Malthouse condemned Lammy’s stance, asking if he can:

    see the personal risk to him, given our international obligations, that he may end up at The Hague because of his inaction?

    Lammy’s barefaced lies over arms to Israel

    Lammy claimed that the UK is not sending any military equipment to Israel that the genocidal state is using in Gaza. He also denied that the UK is providing Israel with spare parts for the F-35 fighter jets.

    The UK makes 15% of every F-35 combat aircraft that Israel is using to drop 2000lb bombs on children in Gaza. While his government did suspend a small number of arms sales to Israel, it made an exemption – known as the F-35 carve out – for F-35 parts going into the global stockpile that Israel can and is accessing.

    In the recent GLAN/Al-Haq court case over their continued supply, his government admitted there is a clear risk that Israel is using F-35s to commit war crimes and that Israel is not committed to complying with international humanitarian law. Its own Export Control Joint Unit (ECJU) found that:

    it is uncontentious that conduct which could, in principle, satisfy the physical component of genocide continues to take place in Gaza.

    Throughout the entire court case there was no suggestion that the UK is not supplying spare parts to Israel via the global stockpile. Instead, the argument was simply that it was in the interests of national security to allow this flow of spare parts to continue. Furthermore there is no evidence that his government has made any attempt to work with F-35 partner nations to stop Israel receiving these parts.

    However, F-35 spare parts are not the only concerning part of the UK’s arms trade with Israel. Export licensing figures show that the government licensed £142m worth of military equipment to Israel in 2024.

    Israeli arms companies gearing up for the UK’s biggest arms fair under Labour’s watch

    Lammy, and others in his government, have tried to justify this massive increase in exports. Notably, they have done so on the basis that the majority were connected to an arms project for export to another country. However, as a letter dated 15 July, cosigned by 56 MPs and peers, asks:

    Why is the UK continuing such co-production with a state that the government has acknowledged is not committed to International Humanitarian Law?

    Such close collaboration with the Israeli arms industry still supports the Israeli war machine responsible for its genocide in Gaza.

    Meanwhile, the UK’s largest arms fair, DSEI, is set to welcome Israeli delegates and arms companies in September. The government is yet to confirm whether it will invite an official Israeli delegation as it has in previous years.

    However, Israeli arms companies are already gearing up for the event. For example, Israeli Aerospace Industries is already advertising its presence at the event with a brochure of military equipment Israel uses to commit genocide.

    Lammy and this Labour government complicit in the ‘worst war crimes imaginable’ and history will condemn them

    Campaign Against Arms Trade’s media coordinator Emily Apple said:

    We are not equivocating – the evidence is clear – David Lammy is lying about the UK’s arms trade with Israel. The world is finally seeing the unspeakable horrors that Israel is inflicting on children in Gaza, yet Lammy is continuing to defend the indefensible. He is complicit in the worst war crimes imaginable, and he will face the consequences of his actions.

    Lammy claims our arms export license system is the most robust in the world. The questions asked by over 50 parliamentarians show this isn’t the case. Far from cutting off arms sales to Israel, not only has this government increased them, it is getting ready to roll out the red carpet for Israeli arms companies and delegates at the London arms fair. Moreover his government has deliberately chosen to set aside this so-called ‘robust’ regime to protect the F-35 components – the UK’s single biggest contribution to Israel’s genocide in Gaza.

    This government’s position is unconscionable. Instead of imposing a full two-way arms embargo, it has prioritised the profits of arms dealers over Palestinian lives, and criminalised protesters doing what they think is necessary to stop a genocide as terrorists.

    History will condemn Lammy and his government. But Palestinian people can’t wait for history. These atrocities are happening now, and it is down to every one of us to sound the alarm and do everything we can to stop them.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • No-one will have missed the recent media hype surrounding the opposite candidacies of US President Trump and UN rapporteur Francesca Albanese for this year’s Nobel Peace Prize. This blog with its focus on human rights defenders and their awards would be amiss in not taking note, even if the Nobel Prize is foremost a peace prize not necessarly a human rights award. [see also my piece of 2012 https://global.comminit.com/content/nobel-prize-peace-not-necessarily-human-rights]

    So, it is not excluded that the ‘making peace at any cost’ considerations will prevail, but my bet is that the Peace Prize Committee will be careful in ignoring the massive support from the world’s human rights community who have massively come out against the Trump administration’s sanctions against Albanese. Human rights should trump ‘peace’ on this occasion.

    Nominations for a Nobel Peace Prize for Francesca Albanese are gathering steam. See the links below:

    https://www.frontlinedefenders.org/en/statement-report/united-states-america-sanctions-united-nations-special-rapporteur-assault-human

    https://www.scmp.com/news/us/diplomacy/article/3318822/trump-says-he-deserves-nobel-peace-prize-not-everyone-agrees

    https://english.pnn.ps/news/47558

    https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/latest-news/un-experts-condemn-us-sanctions-on-special-rapporteur-francesca-albanese-amid-report-on-corporate-complicity-in-israels-occupation-genocide/

    https://www.thearabweekly.com/eu-gingerly-criticises-washingtons-unprecedented-sanctions-un-rapporteur

    https://www.ynetnews.com/article/bku2skjbgl

    https://www.hrw.org/news/2025/07/10/us-imposes-sanctions-on-un-special-rapporteur

    This post was originally published on Hans Thoolen on Human Rights Defenders and their awards.

  • The messy scrap between the Trump administration and Harvard University was always more than a touch bizarre. On June 4, President Donald Trump issued a proclamation claiming that the university was “no longer a trustworthy steward of international student and exchange visitor programs.” It had not pursued the Student Exchange Visa Program (SEVP) in good faith and with transparency, nor adhered “to the relevant regulatory frameworks.” The university had failed to furnish the government with sufficient information “to identify and address misconduct”, thereby presenting “an unacceptable risk to our Nation’s security”.

    The nature of that misconduct lay in foreign students supposedly engaged in any number of scurrilous acts vaguely described as “known illegal activity”, “known dangerous and violent activity”, “known threats to other students or university personnel”, “known deprivation of rights of other classmates or university personnel”, and whether those activities “occurred on campus”. Harvard had failed to provide any useful data on the “disciplinary records” of such students. (The information on the three miscreants supplied in the lists was not just inadequate but useless.) Just to make Trump foam further, Harvard had “also developed extensive entanglements with foreign countries, including our adversaries” and flouted “the civil rights of students and faculty, triggering multiple Federal investigations.” While the proclamation avoids explicitly mentioning it, the throbbing subtext here is the caricatured concern that the university has not adequately addressed antisemitism.

    In various splenetic statements, the President has made no secret of his views on the university. On Truth Social, we find him berating the institution for “hiring almost all woke, Radical left, idiots and ‘birdbrains’”. The university was also hectored through April by the multi-agency Task Force to Combat Anti-Semitism to alter its governance processes, admissions and hiring policies, and academic programs. The administration demanded via an April 11 letter to Harvard’s president that a third party be hired to “audit” the views of students, faculty, and staff to satisfy government notions of “viewpoint diversity” that would also include the expulsion of specific students and the review of “faculty hires”.  Extraordinarily, the administration demanded that the audit “proceed on a department-by-department, field-by-field, or teaching-unit-by-teaching-unit basis as appropriate.” Harvard’s refusal to accede to such demands led to a freezing of over $2.2 billion in federal funding.

    On May 22, the Department of Homeland Security cancelled Harvard’s means of enrolling students through the SEVP program or employing J-1 non-immigrants under the Exchange Visitor Program (EVP). In its May 23 filing in the US District Court for Massachusetts, the university contended that such actions violated the First Amendment, the Due Process Clause, and the Administrative Procedure Act.  They were “in clear retaliation for Harvard exercising its First Amendment rights to reject the government’s demands to control Harvard’s governance, curriculum, and the ‘ideology’ of its faculty and students.”

    The June 4 proclamation proved to be another sledgehammer wielded by the executive, barring non-immigrants from pursuing “a course of study at Harvard University [under the SEVP program] or to participate in an exchange visitor program hosted by Harvard University”.  The university successfully secured a temporary restraining order on June 5, preventing the revocation from taking effect. On June 23, US District Judge Allison D. Burroughs granted the university’s request for a preliminary injunction, extending the temporary order. “The case,” wrote Burroughs, “is about core constitutional rights that must be safeguarded: freedom of thought, freedom of expression, and freedom of speech, each of which is a pillar of a functioning democracy and an essential hedge against authoritarianism.” The “misplaced efforts” by the government “to control a reputable academic institution and squelch diverse viewpoints seemingly because they are, in some instances, opposed to this Administration’s own views, threaten these rights.”

    On July 21, the parties again clashed, this time over the issue of restoring the funds frozen in federal research grants. Burroughs made no immediate decision on the matter but barely hid her scepticism about the government’s actions and inclinations. “If you can make decisions for reasons oriented around free speech,” she put to Justice Department senior attorney Michael Velchik, “the consequences are staggering to me.”

    Harvard’s attorney Steve Lehotsky also argued that the demands of the government impaired the university’s autonomy, going beyond even that of dealing with antisemitism. These included audits of viewpoint diversity among faculty and students, as well as changes to the admissions and hiring processes. The demands constituted “a blatant, unrepentant violation of the First Amendment.” The issue of withdrawing funding was also argued to be a violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which requires an investigation, the holding of a hearing, and the release of findings before such a decision is made.

    Velchik, very much in the mood for sophistry, made less of the antisemitism issue than that of contractual interpretation. Under government contracts with institutions, language always existed that permitted the withdrawal of funding at any time.

    If Trump were serious about the MAGA brand, then attacking universities, notably those like Harvard, must count as an act of monumental self-harm. Such institutions are joined hip and all to the military-industrial-education complex, keeping America gorged with its complement of engineers, scientists, and imperial propagandists.

    Harvard has also shown itself willing to march to the music of the Israel lobby, which happily provides funds for the institution. The extent of that influence was made clear by a decision by the university’s own Kennedy School to deny a fellowship to Kenneth Roth, the former head of Human Rights Watch, in early 2023. While the decision by the morally flabby dean, Douglas Elmendorf, was reversed following much outrage, the School had displayed its gaudy colours. Little wonder, given the presence of the Wexner Foundation, which is responsible for sponsoring the attendance of top-ranked Israeli generals and national security experts in a Master’s Degree program in public administration at the university.

    Trump is partially right to claim that universities and their governance structures are in need of a severe dusting down. But he has shown no interest in identifying the actual problem. How wonderful, yet unlikely, it would be to see actual reforms in university policies that demilitarize funding in favor of an enlightened curriculum that abhors war.

    The post How Not to Reform a University: Trump’s Harvard Obsession first appeared on Dissident Voice.

    This post was originally published on Dissident Voice.

  • James O’Brien seems to have fallen foul of the Zionist lobby after reading out a listener’s letter on his LBC show. Listener, Chris, had written to the presenter who read out:

    I do think it’s worth saying that these warped views are not just an Israeli problem. My wife was brought up Jewish, and at Shabbat school in a leafy Hertfordshire town, she was taught that one Jewish life is worth 1000s of Arab lives, and that Arabs are cockroaches to be crushed, whilst young children are being taught such hatred and dehumanisation, undoubtedly on both sides, then they will always be able to justify death and cruelty, and it does indeed start young.

    O’Brien explained that he was reading the letter out because of his interest in “objectivity.”

    Complaints have since flooded in from right-wing media outlets, and the Board of Deputies of British Jews have demanded O’Brien is taken off air. For their part, LBC have removed the online clip of the offending section, and the presenter has apologised:

    As with all the texts and messages that I read out on the programme, I did so in good faith, but the message has understandably upset a lot of people, and I regret taking those unsubstantiated claims at face value and am genuinely sorry for that, and it is very important that I get that out there.

    The deleted clip can still be seen here:

    James O’Brien in for criticism

    However, it could well be the case that James O’Brien’s apology is not enough. As mentioned, the Board of Deputies of British Jews (BoD) were forceful in their criticism:

    The BoD are a notoriously Zionist organisation. In 2020, president Marie van der Zyl said:

    he Board of Deputies of British Jews represents the views and interests of the UK Jewish community. In the main, this is a Zionist community and Israel is of central importance to the identity of many of us.

    The group have since submitted evidence to the government putting forward their argument that anti-Zionism is anti-Semitism. And, just last month five elected representatives of the BoD were suspended after criticising Israel’s genocide in Palestine. The Spectator published a strong criticism of O’Brien reading out Chris’ letter, and even said that his apology wasn’t good enough. Jewish News called the choice to read out the letter “antisemitic blood libel.”

    I never thought leopards would eat MY face

    The furious response of right-wing Zionists is unsurprising. But, after James O’Brien’s attitude towards his former colleague, Sangita Myska, there’s not much sympathy circulating for him. As the Canary reported in 2024, speculation was rife that Myska was fired from LBC over her critiques of Israel’s genocide.

    The following clip is thought to have been the offending interview which led to Myska’s departure:

    Myska tells Avi Hyman, an Israeli government spokesperson, that:

    What the Iranians, of course, have said is that this is a retaliatory strike after Israel struck its consulate in Syria. Now we all know that the way diplomacy works is consulates and embassies are considered sovereign territory of the government that is concerned. What Israel did by taking that action against Iran was taken was escalate to what is already an incredibly fragile situation.

    Hyman calls her expression of verifiable fact:

    an outrageous framing of the reality.

    Myska’s remarks are provable: Israel did strike an Iranian consulate, which under international law should have diplomatic immunity from such attacks.

    Regardless, she departed from LBC. However, O’Brien insisted that Myska was not fired because of her stance on Israel but implied that it was due to a low level of listeners:

    Karma for James O’Brien?

    Now that James O’Brien is facing the Zionist lobby calling for his head, he’s receiving much less sympathy:

    Dr. Shola Mos-Shogbamimu was even more direct:

    Evidently, the apology isn’t going to cut it:

    The comparisons to Corbyn also rolled in:

    So much so:

    And, editor of Tribune Magazine Karl Hansen summed up exactly what it means for the BoD to come for O’Brien:

    Is he wrong?

    As delicious as it is to see James O’Brien get a taste of his own medicine, it doesn’t change that he didn’t do anything wrong in reading that letter. As is often the case with Zionists, they may well dispute the content and facts behind the letter. But, the point here is that Zionists are indeed radicalised and indoctrinated with hatred of Arabs.

    It takes barely any research at all to find footage of Israeli settlers chanting “death to Arabs.” Israeli Defence Minister Yoav Gallant has referred to Palestinians as “human animals.” Israeli settlers attack Palestinian homes and families with vicious brutality – and the IDF allows it to happen. Netanyahu is not a rogue actor; the state of Israel is fully behind the Zionist ideology that fuels the genocide in Palestine.

    These atrocities do not happen in isolation, nor do they happen without a pathway. The letter O’Brien read out pointed to a dehumanisation of Arabs that is vital to the process of Zionist attitudes to Palestine. That dehumanisation is the foundation of Israel’s genocide. No wonder the objections to O’Brien are so vociferous.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Maryam Jameela

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • A damning new Declassified UK report shows the Labour government’s own advisers told it Palestine Action didn’t pose a clear violent threat. Yet amid pressure from pro-Israel lobbyists, who have significant influence on Keir Starmer’s Labour Party, the state opted to ban the group anyway. This unprecedented crackdown came amid ongoing UK support for the Israeli state’s genocide in Gaza.

    Declassified‘s John McEvoy notes that “officials struggled to produce evidence the group posed a national security threat”. In particular, MI5’s Joint Terrorism Analysis Centre (JTAC) told the government “the majority of direct action by Palestine Action would not be classified as terrorism”. It also admitted that “PA branded media will highly unlikely explicitly advocate for violence against persons”.

    The Proscription Review Group (PRG), meanwhile, admitted that it knew of no precedent for banning a non-violent direct action group on terror grounds. And both JTAC and the PRG told the government in March that only 3 out of 385 actions could possibly cross the threshold for banning Palestine Action.

    Lobby pressure and establishment media complicity over Palestine Action

    McEvoy adds that the government was aware that:

    a ban on Palestine Action might give credence to claims that the pro-Israel lobby exerts influence over decision-making.

    A Community Impact Assessment for the government – from “the Ministry of Housing, RICU (Research, Information and Communications Unit), and NPCC (National Police Chiefs’ Council)” – detailed previous reports of pro-Israel groups and individuals putting pressure on the government. Those wanting harsher consequences for direct action against companies complicit in Israel’s war crimes against Palestinians included, unsurprisingly:

    The Community Impact Assessment also noted the dangers for free speech and democracy of banning Palestine Action, including that such a decision:

    could energise further calls from pro-Israel advocates to ban more moderate pro-Palestinian groups, emboldened by the precedent set.

    It also seems likely, McEvoy suggests, that US president Donald Trump “may have weighed in on the issue”. And he points out that British establishment propaganda outlets played their part too by spreading misinformation relating to Iran. But as he insists:

    The JTAC assessment of Palestine Action’s sources of funding makes no mention of Iran whatsoever, and nor does the Intelligence and Security Committee’s recent report on Iranian state threats to Britain.

    The fact that government officials nonetheless sought to plant the idea of Iranian links, McEvoy says:

    raises the prospect that a state-linked disinformation campaign was waged against Palestine Action in order to manufacture public consent for proscription.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Ed Sykes

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Q: How long did you teach mathematics at Cal State University, Northridge?

    David Klein:  I was there for a little more than three decades. Before that, I taught at UCLA and USC, and before that at Louisiana State University in Baton Rouge. There, I got into some trouble. I was arrested for taking over a U.S. Senator’s office along with half a dozen Quakers in protest of weapons to the Nicaraguan Contras. I also had a little run-in with the Ku Klux Klan and was sued by right-wing Central American students for bringing in speakers they didn’t like. They sued me for “mental anguish”. Of course, the suit was thrown out of court, but it was a distraction. So, when I got the position at CSUN, I was very happy to get a permanent position there.

    Q:  So “mental anguish” …. that’s a recurring theme of the critics.

    DK:  Yes, it’s one of their tools. Claiming to feel bad about what we talk about.

    Q:  How did you become interested in Israel-Palestine?

    DK:  Well, it was kind of gradual. When I was a kid, I was very pro-Israel. And then in college, I started to have doubts and talked to more people. And the more I learned, the more obvious it was that this was a settler colonial state that was engaged in pretty much what the United States did to the Native Americans. And then there was a real spike in my understanding and activity with the 2009  “Cast Lead” assault on Gaza by Israel. That really increased my activism. It was just a new level of outrage that I and many people felt.

    Q:  I understand you didn’t talk about politics in your mathematics classes, but that you were otherwise active. What did you do, and what attacks or censorship did you experience?

    DK: That’s right. I was careful not to bring it up in my classes since it didn’t really have direct relevance. But I was the faculty advisor for Students for Justice in Palestine and for the Student Green Party and a few other student groups. So, I created a webpage, a BDS resource webpage on the university server from my faculty webpage. Then, I wrote an open letter that was signed by many CSU faculty, administrators, and students to the chancellor of the entire CSU system, demanding that CSU end the study abroad program in Israel for a variety of reasons.

    That got some news coverage and brought a lot of attention to my website. So, that was the start of a lot of attacks.

    There were hundreds of calls to my university president that I be fired. There were some threats, some kind of death threats. There were some threats to the administration to withhold financial contributions. There was just lots of slander. Some of it came from the campus itself, but it was mostly outside from the Zionist Organization of America, a group called AMCHA, and other groups. And then there were some politicians who joined in the attacks. The local congressman, Brad Sherman, and a California assembly member, Bob Blumenfield, who later became a city council member.

    An Israeli-supported law firm pressured then Attorney General Kamala Harris to prosecute me. And they separately asked the Los Angeles City attorney to do that. But those requests came to nothing. Still, I was required to produce massive amounts of emails, anything regarding Israel-Palestine, and regarding logistical planning to bring in guest speakers Ilan Pappe and Norman Finkelstein. These threats and demands went on and on for a long time. And on my website, I  posted a page of the threats, the nasty comments, and the calls for my removal. They were signed by doctors and other professionals, but used really low-level language.  The ugliness that it brought out was amazing.

    Q: So you were part of organizing and hosting famous academics such as Norman Finkelstein and Ilan Pappe. How did those visits go, and what were the results?

    DK: The Norman Finkelstein visit lasted a week. He gave three lectures, and there was a group of us who wanted to hire him at CSUN after he lost tenure at DePaul University. And so that included 30 faculty members from various departments, including the science departments and social studies, social science departments, and a wide range. And it was going well. We got the approval of a department that wanted to hire him, the journalism department, and it went up to the top, and we were all set to go. And then, at the last minute, it was vetoed by the campus president. Norman asked me to write an article about the whole thing, which I did.

    The visit of Ilan Pappe came later in 2012.  We had to have campus police escorts because of the threats. But he was very persuasive and compelling. Both of these guests were. The students were very engaged and it went well.

    Q:  I know that there was a big campaign to prevent the tour by Ilan Pappe, but ultimately, the presidents of several CSU universities defended his right to speak. Is that correct?

    DK: Three of the campus presidents wrote a letter defending academic freedom. It was an open letter, but it went to the chancellor of the entire CSU system. The visits went smoothly logistically because of that. And it was pretty rare that campus presidents would stand up for academic freedom and freedom of speech for speakers like Ilan Pappe, who very strongly promotes Palestinian human rights.

    Q: You’ve been an active supporter of the cultural and academic boycott of Israel. Why do you think this is important?

    DK: It’s an important part of the general Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions movement. Academics and culture are very important within Israel. And so this particular aspect of BDS lends what we think is special leverage to isolate the Zionist state because of its actions. Israeli universities are deeply complicit in the persecution and genocide of Palestinians. Maya Wind’s new book, “Towers of Ivory and Steel”, documents that very clearly. Focusing on academics is very pertinent to what’s going on. And the cultural boycott has a very large impact. Everybody recognizes when a famous artist, a singer, or a musician refuses to go to Israel and states the reasons.

    Q: But critics of Israel and supporters of BDS are under attack. Do you think the censorship and attacks are the same as in the past? Or is it getting worse?

    DK:  It’s getting much worse. The accusation of anti-semitism has been weaponized. Students, teachers, and professors are facing frivolous lawsuits. Students are facing expulsions. Faculty are facing job loss. Both are facing arrests and deportations for opposing genocide because it might hurt the feelings of the killers. Zionist students and outside advocates of genocide claim to feel unsafe because of demonstrations against Israel’s genocide. And they call human rights activists “anti-semitic”.  Even the Jewish activists. And so it’s much more intense now than in the past. They were just sort of getting warmed up on people like me, and now they’ve really sharpened their knives.

    Q:  Do you have any strategy suggestions for campus activists who oppose the genocide happening in Gaza?

    DK: Yes. I think we would do well to be less defensive and go on the offense. Pleading academic freedom and denying that we’re anti-semites is not really going very far. I think we need to move in the direction of accusing the accusers. Israeli soldiers are intentionally killing babies and children, shooting boys in their testicles, torturing doctors to death, and more broadly, carrying out the extermination of the entire Palestinian people. These are the worst of the worst. And we need to point to them, not just defend ourselves from their empty accusations.

    By defining opposition to genocide as antisemitic, they’ve turned antisemitism into a virtue. Hitler could have only dreamed of this kind of linguistic transformation. And in this sense, the Zionists are the biggest antisemites on the planet. They’re the worst of humanity. So I think that the least vulnerable among us should take the lead, especially US-born tenured professors.

    And we should focus on where the real power is.  For K-12 schools, it is the school boards. But for almost all colleges and universities in the United States, whether they’re public or private, the board of trustees is the institution’s highest decision-making or governance body.

    Members of the board are typically very rich. They have a lot of political power within the country, not just in universities. To give one example, Miriam Adelson is on the USC Board of Trustees. Miriam Adelson was married to the late Sheldon Adelson. He was a very rich billionaire. Both of them are rich billionaires. And Miriam Adelson’s Foundation contributes $200 million each year to Israel. And she was one of the biggest Trump donors as well. So, there are a lot of university trustees like that. They come from weapons manufacturers, the oil and gas industry, and other major corporations. And they’re overwhelmingly Zionist.

    University presidents, who appear to be in charge of their campuses, serve at the pleasure of the boards and can be hired and fired at the whim of these boards of trustees. So the boards of trustees are the real power at universities. They are behind the persecution of opponents of genocide. The college presidents who do cave in to the Zionist censors should face no-confidence votes from their faculty senate on campus. But, there really hasn’t been enough focus on the boards of trustees. And I think that’s the next step. There are a number of people who are coming to the same conclusion on campuses and universities.

    A lot of research would be involved to find out who these people are, what their background is, expose them to the public, and show what they’re doing, and try to get them kicked out. Replace them with decent human beings. It’s like you’re either for genocide or against it. If you don’t care, that doesn’t say much good about you. So being anti genocide is the minimal criterion for human decency. After all, if they’re going after and attacking people who are trying to stop a genocide, that makes them horrible human beings, and they shouldn’t be in charge of anything.

    Q: Do you have any final comments?

    DK: I think the importance of the Palestinians’ fight for survival can hardly be overstated. Their struggle is not only for themselves, but it’s at the forefront of a worldwide struggle against global fascism. And that includes the climate catastrophe, because global fascism can only accelerate planetary suicide.

    David Klein is Professor Emeritus of Mathematics at California State University, Northridge (CSUN). 

    The post Palestinians Fight for Survival is at the Forefront of a Worldwide Struggle against Global Fascism first appeared on Dissident Voice.

    This post was originally published on Dissident Voice.

  • In what could become a landmark ruling, a Belgian judge recently ordered the Flemish government to halt the transit of goods that could be used to continue or expand the genocide in Gaza. The decision follows a joint campaign by four organizations – Intal, Vredesactie (Peace Action), 11.11.11, and the Human Rights League – which was triggered by the discovery of containers in the port of Antwerp addressed to Israeli company Ashot Ashkelon Industries. The containers included materials used for the assembly of Merkava tanks, the same model implicated in the attack that killed six-year-old Hind Rajab.

    The post Belgian Court Bans Military Shipments To Israel In Activist Victory appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • One of the most inflammatory Republican representatives in the House was appointed to the high-powered House Foreign Affairs Committee on Tuesday — the same day he called for Israel to “starve” Palestinian civilians in Gaza. On social media Tuesday morning, Rep. Randy Fine (R-Florida) cheered a report saying that 15 Palestinians in Gaza, including four children, had died from famine in a…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.