Category: israel

  • Biden administration officials are sweeping aside hundreds of reports of Israeli forces using U.S.-provided weapons to slaughter civilians in Gaza, new reporting finds, flouting the administration’s own policies regarding weapons to give Israel a pass. According to a new report by The Washington Post published Wednesday, the State Department has received nearly 500 reports of U.S.

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • Comprehensive coverage of the day’s news with a focus on war and peace; social, environmental and economic justice.

    United Nations Building prayitnophotography flikr

    The post UN rapporteur recommends suspending Israel from General Assembly amid outrage over Knesset’s ban on UN aid agency for Palestinians – October 30, 2024 appeared first on KPFA.


    This content originally appeared on KPFA – The Pacifica Evening News, Weekdays and was authored by KPFA.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Impunity for the killers of journalists continues unabated at nearly 80% worldwide

    New York, October 30, 2024 — Two small nations with outsized levels of impunity—Haiti and Israel—are the world’s top offenders in allowing the murderers of journalists to go unpunished. Globally, impunity remains entrenched, as no one is held to account in almost 80% of the cases where journalists have been directly targeted in retaliation for their work, according to the Committee to Protect Journalists’ 2024 Global Impunity Index

    Haiti, which first appeared on the index in 2023, is challenged by criminal gangs that are overtaking the country and destabilizing already weak institutions, including the judiciary. Its rise to the top of CPJ’s index—which was launched in 2008—follows the unsolved murders of seven journalists within the 10-year period index period for 2024. Israel, ranked second, has landed on the index for the first time following a failure to hold anyone to account in the targeted killing of five journalists in Gaza and Lebanon in a year of relentless war. All of the murdered journalists were reporting on the war and three of the five were wearing press vests at the time they were killed. CPJ is investigating the possible targeted murders of at least 10 additional journalists. Given the challenges of documenting the war, the number may be far higher. Overall, Israel has killed a record number of Palestinian journalists since the war began on October 7, 2023. Deliberately targeting journalists, who are civilians in any conflict, is a war crime.

    “Murder is the ultimate weapon to silence journalists,” said CPJ CEO Jodie Ginsberg. “Once impunity takes hold, it sends a clear message: that killing a journalist is acceptable and that those who continue reporting may face a similar fate.”

    Somalia (third), Syria (fourth), and South Sudan (fifth), round out the top five worst offenders of 2024. All three countries have appeared on CPJ’s index for at least a decade. In total, 13 nations are on the index, including democracies and authoritarian regimes, most of them suffering from one or more of the corrosive factors that allow journalists’ killers to evade justice: wars, insurgencies, criminal gangs and local authorities that are unwilling or unable to act and deliver justice. 

    CPJ 2024 Global Impunity Index rankings

    Index
    rank
    CountryUnsolved
    murders
    Population
    (in millions)*
    Years
    on index
    1Haiti711.72
    2Israel and Occupied Palestinian Territory*814.91
    3Somalia918.117
    4Syria1123.211
    5South Sudan511.110
    6Afghanistan1842.216
    7Iraq1145.517
    8Mexico21128.517
    9Philippines18117.317
    10Myanmar854.63
    11Brazil10216.415
    12Pakistan8240.517
    13India191428.617
     Source: CPJ data and population data from the World Bank’s 2023 World Development Indicators, viewed in September 2024, was used in calculating each country’s rating. Regions within a nation that are partially controlled or occupied by that nation, such as the Kurdistan Region of Iraq, and Gaza and Israel, are included in that country’s population figures.

    *The total for Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territory includes the murder of Reuters journalist Issam Abdallah, who was killed in Lebanon by Israeli forces firing from inside Israel.

    Over the 10-year period covered in the index, CPJ identified 241 killings where there was clear evidence the murders were directly linked to a person’s work. Less than 4% of those murdered achieved full justice; 19% obtained partial justice, meaning some of their killers were held to account; and the remaining 77% received no justice. 

    Mexico recorded the highest overall number of unpunished murders of journalists – 21 – during the index period and ranks eighth on the index because of its sizable population. Long one of the world’s most dangerous countries for the media, Mexico reported a rise in deadly violence in 2024 after dropping from record levels in 2022. More than a decade since the establishment of a Federal Mechanism for the Protection of Human Rights Defenders and Journalists, the program is plagued by fundamental flaws and requires reform in order to provide the protection for which it was designed. 

    “Impunity in the murder of journalists does not exist in a vacuum, as the index shows. These countries represent places where acute violence against the press is normalized, with journalists perpetually under threat, working under impossible conditions that remain unabated for years,” said Ginsberg. “The lack of accountability creates news deserts that stifle the voices of local people, making it easy for officials to ignore them, and creating fertile ground for corruption and wrongdoing to flourish.” 

    Asia is the most represented region in the index with Afghanistan (ranked sixth), the Philippines (ninth), Myanmar (10th) and Pakistan (12th), with the Philippines and Pakistan appearing annually since 2008. 

    Iraq, which has appeared on the index every year since its inception, ended its six-year hiatus in work-related murders following the targeted killing of two women journalists in 2024. Islamic State (IS) militants and Turkish anti-Kurdish forces were behind most of the 11 murders in Iraq during the 2024 index period.

    Despite international frameworks intended to tackle impunity, the lack of meaningful improvement in accountability for journalist killings in the past decades indicates more needs to be done to hold perpetrators to account. Together with other organizations, CPJ is advocating for the establishment of an international investigative task force focused on crimes against journalists. A blueprint for a body, initially proposed in 2020 by a panel of legal experts, could deploy resources or advise in situations where local law enforcement may be lacking either capacity or political will to investigate crimes against journalists.

    ###

    Note to Editors:

    CPJ’s Global Impunity Index calculates the number of unsolved journalist murders as a percentage of each country’s population. For the 2024 index, CPJ examined journalist murders that occurred between September 1, 2014, and August 31, 2024, and remain unsolved. Only those nations with five or more unsolved cases are included on the index. CPJ defines murder as the targeted killing of a journalist, whether premeditated or spontaneous, in direct connection to the journalist’s work. The index only tallies murders that have been carried out with complete impunity. It does not include those for which partial justice has been achieved. Population data from the World Bank’s 2023 World Development Indicators, viewed in October 2024, were used in calculating each country’s rating. Regions within a nation that are partially controlled or occupied by that nation, such as the Kurdistan Region of Iraq, and Gaza and Israel, are included in that country’s population figures. The total for Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territory includes the murder of Reuters journalist Issam Abdallah, who was killed in Lebanon by Israeli forces firing from inside Israel. See full methodology here.

    Read CPJ’s 20232022, and 2021 impunity index reports.

    About the Committee to Protect Journalists

    The Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) is an independent, nonprofit organization that promotes press freedom worldwide. We defend the right of journalists to report the news safely and without fear of reprisal.


    This content originally appeared on Committee to Protect Journalists and was authored by CPJ Staff.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • A prominent journalists’ rights group is calling for international investigations into Israel’s pattern of killing journalists amid its assault of Lebanon, saying that the longtime impunity for Israel’s occupation and massacres will only allow it to kill more of the people exposing the military’s violence in the Middle East to the world. The Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) raised alarm…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • A far right commentator has been banned from appearing on CNN after he spewed a hateful, Islamophobic comment at journalist Mehdi Hasan on Monday night when Hasan expressed his support for Palestinian rights. During a roundtable segment on Donald Trump’s rally at Madison Square Garden that commentators have likened to an infamous 1939 Nazi rally at the same venue for its bigoted and inciting…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • On Tuesday, the Israeli Knesset passed legislation banning the main aid group for Palestinians from operating in the occupied Palestinian territories — a move that world leaders, humanitarian groups and the agency itself have warned will spell certain death for those starving amid Israel’s genocide and vastly erode Palestinians’ rights in the long term. The two bills passed with overwhelming…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • In parliament, former Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn demanded foreign secretary David Lammy end arms sales to Israel.

    Corbyn: Israel killing ‘the entire population of northern Gaza’

    Corbyn, now elected as an independent MP, said:

    Joyce Msuya, the humanitarian chief of the UN, who says and I quote ‘the entire population of northern Gaza is at risk of dying’, on top of the 1,000 who died last week, on top of all those living in the most desperate situation in southern Gaza, on top of the occupation of southern Lebanon, the bombing of southern Beirut and now the dangers of a hot war between Iran and Israel… isn’t it time… we suspend arms supplies in total to Israel in order to bring about a ceasefire and a cessation of this frankly murder of an innocent civilian population

    But in response Lammy simply treated the situation in Palestine as some kind of natural disaster, rather than what the International Court of Justice called a ‘plausible genocide’. He even referred to the “Disasters Emergency Committee” in his answer:


    Lammy also said “we have suspended arms that could be used in contravention of international humanitarian law”. But as Corbyn and the Independent Alliance of MPs have pointed out, through banning just 8.5% of export licenses to Israel the government has:

    finally admitted there is a clear risk of weapons being used to commit violations of international law

    They continued:

    It is beyond shameful that it took the lives of more than 40,000 Palestinians for this admission to be made public

    The Independent Alliance called for the limited arms suspension to be the:

    first step in ending all arms sales to Israel. That includes parts for F-35 fighter jets, used by the Israeli military to commit genocide in Gaza.

    Also in parliament, Labour MP Andy McDonald told Lammy:

    The foreign secretary will no doubt agree with me that third states such as the UK are obliged not to assist Israel in its annihilation of the Gazan people. Israel continues to target cynically named ‘safe zones’, schools, hospitals in its war of extermination.

    While the UK has suspended only 30… licenses for the export of arms to the Israeli military, our continued participation in the F-35 global supply chains means that devastating 2,000 pound bombs continue to destroy human beings

    As the Canary has reported, the Danish outlet Information and NGO Danwatch has documented the use of F-35 fighter jets in a specific Israeli bombing that killed around 90 Palestinians and injured over 300. 15% of F-35 fighter jets are produced in the UK. The bombardment was in an area – Al-Mawasi in southern Gaza – that Israel had previously designated as a ‘safe zone’.

    UK exports

    Campaign Against Arms Trade estimates that UK arms exports to Israel total at least £1bn since 2015 – double what the government says it is.

    The estimate comes because the government uses open licenses to mask the figures. This is where companies can export unlimited amounts of specific military equipment under one license.

    In June, the Department of Business and Trade revealed that Rishi Sunak’s government had approved 42 military export licenses to Israel from 7 October 2023 to 31 May 2024. Of these, five are open licenses.

    The government’s continued approval of export licenses to Israel is very much out of step with the British public. Back in April, YouGov polling found that 56% of people believe the government should end arms and spare part sales to Israel, compared to 17% who don’t.

    Featured image via Jeremy Corbyn – X

    By James Wright

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • This story originally appeared in Truthout on Oct. 28, 2024. It is shared here with permission.

    Israeli forces have arrested all but one of the medical staff at the only operational hospital left in north Gaza, the Gaza Health Ministry said on Monday, after a days-long siege left the facility in ruins.

    Only one pediatrician remains at the Kamal Adwan Hospital, which was treating hundreds of patients and serving as a shelter to more than 600 Palestinians, after Israeli forces “arrested and deported all the medical staff” there, the ministry said. The Ministry of Health called for those with surgical skills to go to the hospital in order to help the patients left there.

    Kamal Adwan Hospital was the last fully functional medical center in north Gaza before Israel’s siege, with the other two facilities in the region only partially operational.

    The fate of the medical workers is currently unknown. The Israeli military reportedly pulled out of the hospital on Saturday after having caused extensive damage to the facility. Earlier reports found that Israel had imprisoned the majority of the hospital’s 70 staff members and later released roughly a dozen of them, including the hospital’s director Hossam Abu Safiyeh. Israeli forces later claimed, without evidence, that they had arrested fighters at the hospital.

    “The smell of death has spread around the hospital,” Gaza Health Ministry’s director of field hospitals Marwan al-Hams told Al Jazeera. The UN has estimated that 440,000 Palestinians remain in north Gaza, with almost no option to obtain health care amid heavy Israeli shelling and attacks; the Gaza Civil Defense agency reported last week that it has had to suspend emergency services in northern Gaza due to Israel’s siege.

    World Health Organization (WHO) head Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said that the situation there is “catastrophic.”

    “Intensive military operations unfolding around and within healthcare facilities and a critical shortage of medical supplies, compounded by severely limited access, are depriving people of life saving care,” Tedros said.

    MedGlobal, a U.S.-based humanitarian group, said on Monday that five of its staff have been detained at Kamal Adwan Hospital.

    “With limited communication access to our team in northern Gaza, MedGlobal is gravely concerned for their safety and well-being amid increasingly perilous conditions.”

    On Friday, Israeli forces killed Safiyeh’s son after Safiyeh refused to evacuate the hospital. Safiyeh had been outspoken about Israel’s assault as Israeli forces closed in on the hospital in recent weeks.

    Israel’s siege on the hospital has had horrific consequences. At least two children died due to the Israeli military’s destruction of the oxygen station and generators on Friday. Israeli forces shelled the hospital’s courtyard and surrounded the hospital and began shooting, witnesses told Al Jazeera, while soldiers inside used the hospital speakers to call for Safiyeh. This is reportedly the 14th time Israeli forces have attacked the hospital.

    Israel’s siege on north Gaza has killed at least 1,000 Palestinians so far, with no end in sight to the slaughter.

    This post was originally published on The Real News Network.

  • In times of crisis, academics must be public intellectuals. Why invest our lives in becoming experts in history, society, policy, science, or any other field of study and then remain isolated in an academic cocoon for safety or career advancement? The consequences of silence for our profession and our society are too great. Recent events on college campuses have made it clear that academic…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • Israeli forces on Tuesday bombed a crowded residential building in the northern Gaza town of Beit Lahiya, killing around 93 people — including at least 20 children — in the latest atrocity in a region that has been under heavy military siege for weeks. Eyewitnesses described an appalling scene at the building decimated by the Israeli strike. One person who was helping to remove victims from…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • The movement in solidarity with Palestine has a sizable presence of progressive Jewish Americans. As an anti-Zionist rabbi, Brant Rosen has made it his life’s work to build religious and cultural community for other likeminded Jews whose solidarity with Palestine runs deep. The Marc Steiner Show returns with another edition of ‘Not in Our Name.’

    Studio Production: Cameron Granadino
    Audio Post-Production: Alina Nehlich


    Transcript

    The following is a rushed transcript and may contain errors. A proofread version will be made available as soon as possible.

    Marc Steiner:

    Welcome to the Marc Steiner Show here on The Real News. I’m Marc Steiner. It’s good to have you all with us as always. And this is another part of our episode of our series, Not in Our Name. We’re talking to the rabbi, Brant Rosen. He’s a rabbi at Tzedek Chicago, a consciously anti-Zionist congregation, founded in 2015. He’s a former president of the Reconstructionist Rabbinical Association, co-founder and co-chair of Jewish Voice for Peace Rabbinical Council. He’s written in many journals. His newest book is Wrestling in the Daylight, a Rabbi’s Path to Palestinian Solidarity, and we’ll be linking some of his articles in Tikkun and Truthout and the Jewish Forward that you’ll see on this site and can read for yourself. Brant, welcome. Good to have you with us.

    Brant Rosen:

    Thank you so much. Thanks for having me.

    Marc Steiner:

    When I read the pieces you’ve written, one of the things that really came out to me is the pain of what you write about. It’s not like, oh me, oh woe is me. The kind of pain I’m talking about is the pain of watching Israel do what it’s doing at this moment in terms of the occupation of the war and the slaughter of Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank. I think that that’s something that many people don’t really get when it comes to especially Jews who say, no, not in our name.

    Brant Rosen:

    Yeah, I would say that the pain, there’s primary pain and secondary pain I suppose. I think the primary pain is the pain that I feel for the Palestinian people and what they’re going through and what is being inflicted on them with and has been for decades, but I think in the past year plus now, just to unbearable, genocidal levels. I follow the news very, very carefully and I read every day about mass murder that’s going on in Gaza, in the West Bank, now in Lebanon, and that is a deep source of pain just as a human being, as a human being of conscience. I’m sure there are many who feel the same way, probably not enough, but there is a growth of solidarity of Palestinians around the world.

    I think secondarily as a Jew, not just as a human being, but as a Jew, I feel pain because a spiritual tradition that I cherish very deeply is being used as the pretense for this genocide and for this oppression and has been for many, many decades. And I mourn what is being done in my name as you put it, and also what is being done to a centuries-old, very venerable spiritual tradition that stands for ethical behavior and for promoting justice.

    Marc Steiner:

    I was going to wait until later to ask this, but since you said what you said, I’m going to talk about this now. A long time ago, in 1971, I wrote a poem called Growing Up Jewish. And in that poem there was a line that I wrote that said, how does the oppressed become the oppressor? And it’s something I’ve been wrestling with a long time, given kind of the very nationalistic and racist attitudes within my own family, other people I know, Israelis, other people in the Holy Land itself. And I’m just curious reflecting on that because it goes beyond just being Jews. It can be for any culture and how the oppressed end up being an oppressor as we have become in the Holy Land.

    Brant Rosen:

    Yeah, I mean, I think there are many ways to understand this. I think we know that on an individual level, people who suffer abuse will often become abusers themselves. That’s certainly true on the interpersonal level. And I think on some level, I think it works in the collective as well, a community that has gone through the trauma of oppression, especially the Jewish community that has lived through centuries of anti-Semitic oppression and violence, primarily in Europe at the hands of Christendom, and then later culminating in the Nazi’s genocide against them during World War II. I think you can understand that one mindset that can emerge from this experience is a never again to us, that we must do whatever we can to survive because we were almost wiped out, and that is a recipe for oppression.

    This attitude I think stems from trauma and is handed down generationally, generational trauma is something that’s very real, can turn people who have a legacy, a historical experience of oppression into oppressors themselves, especially when state violence becomes part of the mix. Right? Jews were a stateless people for most of our history, and once we had a nation and an army and the support of the international community behind us, much of that trauma, unfortunately tragically can be kind of metabolized into the kinds of things that were done to us we now do to others, namely the Palestinian people.

    Marc Steiner:

    I didn’t ask that question obviously, and you didn’t respond to the question that way either as an excuse or as a justification.

    Brant Rosen:

    No, it’s an explanation.

    Marc Steiner:

    Yes, an explanation of what we’re facing and why. And so I wonder, as a leader of part of the Jewish community, what you think we can do? How do you change hearts and minds, not just in Israel, but in the Jewish community about this war? I mean, on Yom Kippur, I spoke at a synagogue about what we’re talking about now. Response was mixed to say the least. But when you see the masses of younger Jews saying, no, this is not right. This is not who we are, not in our name. We can’t tolerate this. How does that organize and take place inside the Jewish community, and how is it approached to begin to change hearts and minds and the understanding in our own country?

    Brant Rosen:

    I’m not in the changing hearts and minds business. I’m not interested, I mean, I know that sounds harsh, I’m not interested in changing hearts and minds. I think it’s fruitless in my experience, and I’ve been doing this a long time on this particular issue, especially in the Jewish community. If we’re talking about changing individual hearts and minds, people are not ready to change until they’re ready to change, and nothing, I can continue to do what I do and others like the young people who you were referring to who are mobilizing in increasing numbers and massive numbers as part of the Palestine Solidarity movement. I think all of us are exemplars. We’re not doing this to change hearts and minds in the Jewish community, but we’re well aware that the Jewish community is watching us, and often they’re watching us in fury. They’re sickened by us. But I think in other cases it’s planting a little bit of a seed.

    They know we exist. They know what our message is. Maybe they might pay attention to parts of that message and park it away for the time being. But actively trying to change people’s minds who aren’t prepared to be changed I think is fruitless and a waste of energy and a waste of time and a waste of resources. I think we need to build a movement. We need to participate in the up building of the Palestine Solidarity movement and be a real Jewish presence in that movement, which we are doing. And that’s really the first order of business. If and when others in the Jewish community are ready to join us, hem muzmanim le’ashot et ze, as my grandfather used to say, they’re welcome to do it. But in the meantime, I’m not going to spend my time trying to convince parts and minds to think a way that they’re not prepared to think. They have to do it in their own time if they’re going to do it at all. But in the meantime, we can provide role models for them for a different Jewish way.

    Marc Steiner:

    So one more question in that realm. As somebody who’s spent a lot of time in his life as an organizer, community, union organizing, issue organizing over the years, does that have a role in organizing something within to say no about what’s going on in Palestine Israel?

    Brant Rosen:

    I think it’s a little different than union organizing. I think when we talk about building movements for, mass movements for communal justice, I mean I would compare it more to the Civil Rights movement perhaps, or the anti-Apartheid movement. In those cases, they weren’t going individual by individual as you would if you’re doing union organizing where you’re really building individual relationships through one-on-one. Let’s look at Martin Luther King and the Civil Rights movement. If you read Letter From a Birmingham Jail, he was responding to liberal clergy in the South who were doing that kind of engagement. Those liberal clergy were trying to change hearts and minds in the South. These were white liberal clergy, and they had written a public letter and said, we are trying to address this through relationship building and engagement with these white supremacists, and please don’t come to Birmingham. We don’t need any outside agitators. We’ve got this. That’s who he was addressing in his letter.

    King had a different approach to organizing, and I think rightly so. He was saying that when it comes to transformative change, societal change, it’s not about trying to change individual hearts and minds. It’s about creating tension. It’s about going in the streets and saying, no, this is wrong. And that power, as Douglas said, power concedes nothing without a demand, and King said something similar in the letter. I think the kind of organizing we’re talking about, about building mass movement for transformative change in a real way is just a different model of organizing. I just don’t think it’s going to happen if we try to convince one person at a time.

    Marc Steiner:

    As somebody who is in the middle of all that, and demonstrations are taking place by Jews and others in this country against what’s happening at this moment to stop the slaughter, in terms of the work you’re doing in similar work, how do you see it taking effect in whole? How do you see it grabbing not just hearts and minds, but also for serious political change that turns this around, that stops the ability of the United States from continuing to arm Israel and allow them to destroy the Palestinian people? How do you think that happens?

    Brant Rosen:

    Well, historically it’s happened. It’s not happening the way we would hope it would happen right now after over a year of protest. But historically, I’m going to use another example, use the anti-Apartheid movement against the South African apartheid. That was a similar kind of popular grassroots movement that was very much a coalition of forces, and there was a palpable Jewish presence in that coalition. It was just the constant application of pressure and to build popular support until politically, the political elites could not ignore it, and it became a liability to continue that political support until that tipping point is reached, and that tipping point was reached. I remember it well, I’m sure you do too, that the United States was a strong ally of apartheid South Africa, and then the Black Congressional Caucus under the Reagan Administration introduced an anti-apartheid bill and Reagan vetoed it, and they overrode the veto, and then dominoes began to fall.

    It wasn’t only United States. United States was a prominent ally, but political support began to fall all around the world as a result of the boycotts, the protests, the economic pressure, the popular pressure. And that is, I think, the same playbook that we are hoping for this time around. I think it’s just a much, it’s been a much harder prospect. We have the popular support. I mean, if you look around the world, popular support for the Palestinian people is rising rapidly, and it’s happening in the international community too. Countries like Ireland and other European countries, certainly countries that you expect to support Israel, but now some of the Western countries as well. But the popular support is not really translating into that political tipping point. The United States support for Israel is still rock solid. Republican, Democrat, it doesn’t seem to matter. I think a lot of this has to do with commercial interests. I think the weapons industries are supporting the Democratic Party as much as the Republican Party.

    Lockheed, Northrop Grumman, Boeing, they’re basically funding this genocide, but profiting from it, I should say rather. United States is funding it. So it’s a daunting, daunting foe to be going up against and after over a year of doing this, we’re no closer to a ceasefire. In fact, we seem to be more closer to a larger regional war. So it’s been, I think it’s, within the movement, it’s raised lots of questions about tactics and about strategy and about why isn’t what we’ve been doing working and how do we need to shift. But in terms of raising awareness and popular support, I think Israel is about as isolated in the world as it’s ever been.

    Marc Steiner:

    You spent time going back and forth to Israel, and there’s always been, and it was different 20 years ago, 30 years ago, but there’s always been a movement within Israel against the occupation and the persecution and oppression of Palestinians. It’s always been there. Where do you see the state of that now? When you look at, I remember in some of the articles I’ve been reading that you wrote and also articles you refer to that I read, Israel has gone so far right. The kind of neo-fascist parties in Israel have gained so much strength, and what is it, almost 2 million Israelis, many of whom were on the left, have left Israel. They’re gone. So you’re left with this vacuum and this power of the right. So I’m curious, from your journeys inside, how do you think a movement develops that changes that from the inside?

    Brant Rosen:

    I don’t think the movement can change itself from the inside. I think it can only change because of external pressure applied from the outside. Israel is not going to save itself. I think right now, the left in Israel is a shambles.

    Marc Steiner:

    Yeah.

    Brant Rosen:

    What left there is is basically protesting for the return of the hostages, but not really actively protesting the genocide that Israel is committing. I think these are still Zionists. In other words, they consider themselves left liberal, but they’re still promoting a Jewish apartheid regime, a democracy for Jews, but not for non-Jews. The number of Israelis who are genuinely standing in solidarity with Palestinians is very, very minuscule. I know many of them well, in fact, and they are, what they’re up against is just hard to even fathom. Many of them are just indefatigable. They’re constantly going out to the West Bank to do productive presence in villages when settlers are attacking. They’re forming deep important relationships with Palestinians and Palestinian movements. But their numbers are just so minuscule and they’re up against it in a major way.

    As you say, many of them are leaving the country, and that’s increasing the rightward, the far rightward trend. But there are others who aren’t. I have a good friend, a very dear friend who is an Israeli member of the Palestine Solidarity movement, and she says, I don’t have a second passport. I can’t go anywhere. This is my home. And what they’re stuck with is really, is very, very hard. It doesn’t look good. Their crackdown on them is fierce.

    Marc Steiner:

    What do you mean? Talk a bit about that crackdown when you say it’s fierce.

    Brant Rosen:

    Well when they protest, the police come down hard on them violently. Many of them are jailed. I mean, look, I need to put it in perspective. It’s nothing compared to what Israel is doing to Palestinians, and it’s also nothing compared to what Israel is doing to Palestinian citizens of Israel either. There are examples that have been documented of Palestinian citizens of Israel just being jailed indefinitely for posting a Facebook post. So I want to keep perspective here that Israelis, while they are being violently treated by the authorities, whether it’s by the police or the border police or the Secret Service of Israel, it’s nothing like what they’re doing to Palestinians. But it means taking their physical safety in their own hands whenever they go out to protest or when they go out to work in protected presence in the West Bank. I know many of them who have broken bones and they’ve been knocked out and shot at. It’s not easy to be a Palestine Solidarity activist within Israel these days if it ever was.

    Marc Steiner:

    As the leader of an anti-Zionist synagogue, as someone who’s deeply involved in the movement, a huge part of your existence is inside that movement. So I’m curious where you think this movement goes in this country? Where does it go and what strategically can be done and are people doing to end the support of this kind of apartheid regime in Israel and its oppression of Palestinians, and where do you see it going?

    Brant Rosen:

    So are you referring to the Jewish movement specifically or the movement writ large?

    Marc Steiner:

    Well, the entire movement, yeah. Yeah.

    Brant Rosen:

    I hesitate to speak too much for the movement itself because I think Palestinians really need to speak for themselves, the ones who are leading the movement. I think there’s a sizable Jewish part of this coalition, Jewish Voice for Peace, of which I’m a member and very active as a part of that, but it’s ultimately not up to me to dictate or to prognosticate what the tactics and the strategies should be for the movement going forward. That’s really for the Palestinian leaders themselves. As I said before, I think there is probably some reassessment going on given that so much effort has been put into protests, both the outside game and the inside game, I should say. I think what happened to the DNC and the inside game and the undecided movement being shut out of the DNC, I think was a huge wake-up call that many people who were working the inside game just had doors slammed in their face in a way that was something of a rude awakening.

    I don’t think we should stop trying to change things politically within the Democratic Party, but I think there may be some strategizing about how to work politically to recruit new candidates in different kinds of ways. I am not the best person to ask. There are other people like Beth Miller, who’s the political director of Jewish Voice for Peace, who might have more to say on that particular subject. But something needs to shift and something needs to change, and I think much of it will be continuing to hammer our message home that we can’t stop and we can’t let up if for any other reason, but for the moral importance of it, that we’re living in a time of genocide. In a time of genocide you don’t stay silent. If there’s anything that we know as Jews and as people of conscience is that you don’t stay silent. When history judges us, we don’t want to be judged as ones who didn’t speak out when this happened.

    Marc Steiner:

    I agree completely. I mean, that is an important statement to make towards the end of the conversation together, at least this one today, because we do have to stand up. I’ve been inside the anti-occupation movement since 1968 and after trying to enlist in the Israeli army, and I didn’t get in there, thank God. Then you meet Palestinians and left-wing Israelis and the world shifted. But it seems in many ways that we are at a critical juncture more than I’ve ever seen before, just in terms of this war. The outright oppression of Palestinians on the West Bank being shot and put in prison. The 50,000 plus people who have been killed, maybe more, because of the ones who are stuck under the rubble, who aren’t being counted, and this very right-wing, Israeli government that’s also deeply imbued with the fundamentalist leadership, religiously fundamentalist leadership.

    It’s as if Jerry Falwell took over the United States of America. We are at a very critical place, and as someone who is really helping lead some of this, running a congregation in the middle of this movement, it seems to me, when I said organizing earlier, I was talking about how you take it beyond Palestinian Americans or Jewish Americans and get a larger population to understand what is being faced, what it’s doing to the Holy Land, what it’s doing to us. This has to be a much kind of larger movement to say, no, this has to stop.

    Brant Rosen:

    Yeah, I think that’s another piece of it too, I agree with this, what you’re saying, and I think another piece of it too is that the way people get their news, and thus the way they construct their narratives is very limited, especially around Israel. If you look at the mainstream media narrative on Israel, it’s just unbelievable to me that when I read the New York Times and the Washington Post and Watch, which I try not to do that often, but enough just to know what’s being said and the major networks, it’s the Israeli narrative right down the line. Just every single day there has been an article on the front page of the New York Times about the assassination of Sinwar from Hamas, but nothing about the fact that Israel has been massacring Palestinians in North Gaza and literally starving them to death according to a plan that was made public by the Israeli press.

    The killing of this one Palestinian person, but nothing about the mass murder that Israel is carrying out every single day. We need to lift that narrative up. We need to do a better job of letting people know what is going on because that media does exist. It exists on social media. All you have to do is listen to Democracy Now every morning. It will ruin your day. But I think we need to help people shift the narrative, or at least round out the very, very tiny, narrow narrative, corporate narrative that they’re being given through the mainstream media and that’s up to us.

    Marc Steiner:

    That is up to us. And I think in many ways, it’s up to people in the Jewish community like you, like me, like others, to lead that, to be at the forefront saying no, and putting it out there in the media, putting it out there in massive forums so people, because it could also be very easy for this movement to fall into anti-Semitism, which is always lurking below the surface of humanity. It doesn’t take much for it to bubble up. And that’s why even though we could be attacked as Judean Rats or whatever other people want to call us, that it’s time for us to be able to build something that really stands in the way.

    Brant Rosen:

    Yeah, and I think anti-Semitism is already starting to bubble up, but it’s not the anti-Semitism that Israel advocates and the state of Israel would have us believe. It’s not people standing in solidarity with the Palestinians. It’s MAGA anti-Semitism, it’s fascist anti-Semitism, it’s white supremacist anti-Semitism, and we’re seeing evidence of it all over the place. I mean, it’s coming right out of Trump’s mouth directly. That should also be a impetus for us to start to create real coalitions because there are lots of people who are being targeted by fascism in this MAGA moment, and we need to stand with one another. We need one another more than ever, and by being able to identify who is the common enemy and who is not is going to be really, really critical.

    Marc Steiner:

    No, we have to wind down. But that’s the point where I think that when we spoke earlier about organizing, that kind of organizing has to take place internally in the United States to pull that together, to pull people at that together, to show that there’s this movement that says, we’re not naive. We know what’s happening, and it has to stop.

    Brant Rosen:

    Yeah, absolutely.

    Marc Steiner:

    Well, I tell you, I do really look forward to staying in touch and putting together many more programs with you and really getting this to the fore because it has to come out there. We have to really, this is, as I said, after all these 50 plus years of fighting against the occupation, this is the direst moment I’ve ever seen.

    Brant Rosen:

    Yeah, I would agree. I would agree. What we’re reading about is just utterly horrific. I will tell you, it’s resembling the Holocaust more and more, and I don’t say that lightly, but what’s going on in North Gaza right now is we need to shine the brightest light possible on what Israel is doing.

    Marc Steiner:

    It does. I’ll just say that when we say, when we make the Holocaust comparison, I always add, I’m not talking about the camps. I’m talking about 1933, 1935, this is how it begins.

    Brant Rosen:

    Right, and also to remind people that when we talk about genocide, the Holocaust is not the only model for genocide. There are many different forms of genocide. If you look at international law, it happens in many different ways through many different categories. And so just because something does not identically resemble the Holocaust does not mean it’s not a genocide, and it doesn’t mean it doesn’t share certain aspects with the Holocaust, mainly the dehumanization of another people and the attempt to rid one society of them because they’re seen as less than human.

    Marc Steiner:

    Well, let me say, I really appreciate you taking the time, and I do look forward to staying in touch. Thank you for taking the time with us today, Rabbi Brant Rosen. This has really been important, and I look forward to other conversations and building this conversation out and bringing more people in to see where we can take it across the country and across the globe. So thank you so much for the work you do. I appreciate it.

    Brant Rosen:

    Thank you, Marc. No, it’s my pleasure and my honor.

    Marc Steiner:

    Once again, thank you to Rabbi Brant Rosen for joining us today. Thanks to Cameron Grandino for running the program and our audio editor, Alina Nelich and producer Rosette Suwali for making it all work behind the scenes and everyone here at The Real News for making this show possible. Please let me know what you thought about what you heard today, what you’d like us to cover. Ideas, we’d love to hear them. Just write to me at mss@therealnews.com, and I’ll get right back to you. Once again, thank you to Rabbi Brant Rosen for joining us today and for the work that he does. And we’ll be bringing you more people like Brant Rosen and others together on this program to talk about what we can do collectively to stop the slaughter in Gaza. So for the crew here at The Real News, I’m Marc Steiner. Stay involved, keep listening, and take care.

    This post was originally published on The Real News Network.

  • The recent escalation of Israel’s war in Lebanon has imperiled the press as they face Israeli strikes that have destroyed news outlet offices and killed at least three journalists, in addition to being assaulted, obstructed, threatened, and detained while reporting.  

    At about 3 a.m. on October 25, an Israeli airstrike hit a compound housing 18 journalists from multiple media outlets in Hasbaya, a town in southern Lebanon. The strike killed pro-Hezbollah Al-Mayadeen TV’s camera operator Ghassan Najjar, broadcast engineer Mohammed Reda, and Hezbollah-owned Al-Manar TV’s camera operator Wissam Kassem.

    According to the BBC, the IDF said it struck a Hezbollah military structure in Hasbaya where “terrorists were operating.” The IDF said it received reports “several hours after the strike” that journalists had been hit, adding that “the incident is under review.” 

    Lebanon filed a complaint with the U.N. Security Council on Monday, October 28, over the strike. 

    Israeli strikes have killed at least three additional journalists while on assignment and injured at least 11 in Lebanon since the Israel Defense Forces and Lebanon’s militant group Hezbollah began exchanging fire in October 2023. Israel escalated tensions on October 1, 2024, when they launched a ground invasion into Lebanon. 

    CPJ is investigating another five killings of journalists and media workers in Lebanon by Israel since September 23 to determine if they were killed in relation to their work. 

    “Journalists are civilians, and the international community has an obligation to protect them by making it clear to Israel that their long-standing record of aggression and impunity in journalist killings will not be tolerated,” said CPJ Program Director Carlos Martinez de la Serna. “International bodies must be given access to conduct independent investigations into these killings. Deadly attacks on journalists, who are protected under international humanitarian law, and obstructions to reporting must immediately stop.”

    CPJ has documented the following obstructions to journalism in Lebanon since the September escalation: 

    Israeli strikes on media facilities 

    • Israeli forces bombed and destroyed the outlet offices of the Hezbollah-affiliated religious TV channel Al-Sirat in the southern district of the capital, Beirut, on September 30. No casualties were reported. 
    • Israeli forces bombed a building in the southern city of Tyre on October 20, which housed the Hezbollah-linked financial institution Al-Qard Al-Hasan and local radio station Sawt Al Farah. Workers evacuated the building, and no casualties were reported in the destruction of the 34-year-old station — one of the oldest in south Lebanon. Reports said the station’s broadcast was stopped by the bombing. Sawt Al Farah’s website continues to operate. 
    • Israeli forces bombed and destroyed the Beirut office of the Hezbollah-affiliated broadcaster Al-Mayadeen in the Jnah neighborhood of Beirut on October 23. The two missile strikes killed one person and injured five others, none of whom have been identified. The channel said it had previously evacuated its offices and “holds Israel responsible for the attack.”

    The IDF responded to CPJ in New York’s email inquiring about these strikes on October 28; the IDF said its operations in Lebanon since October 8 have been “in accordance with its obligations under international law,” and the IDF “directs its strikes towards military targets and military operatives only, and does not target civilian objects and civilians.”

    The IDF told CPJ it was unaware of a strike on October 20 in Tyre, Lebanon, and that they could better answer CPJ’s questions with specific coordinates and times of the attacks, information that CPJ has no access to provide.

    Displacement and lack of PPE

    • Journalists who resided in southern Lebanon, including Beqaa valley and Beirut’s southern suburb, told CPJ they face displacement because of Israeli strikes in this area. At least 15 journalists were displaced and received housing aid from local press freedom groups Skeyes and the Alternative Press Syndicate.
    • Lack of personal protective equipment (PPE) has been an issue for many in the country, journalists told CPJ, adding that many press members do not own any and are working as freelancers, without an outlet’s direct support. Skeyes and Alternative Press Syndicate have loaned PPE to at least 100 journalists in the last month, with many more still on the waiting list.  
    This picture shows a car marked “Press” at the site of an Israeli airstrike that targeted an area where 18 journalists were located in the southern Lebanese village of Hasbaya on October 25, 2024, amid the ongoing war between Israel and Hezbollah. (Photo: AFP/Ali Hankir)

    Attacked while reporting

    • A group of around 20 men, some of whom were armed, beat two Belgian journalists with broadcaster VTM News while they reported on an Israeli airstrike that hit the Islamic Health Organization building in the Bashoura neighborhood of Beirut on October 3. Journalist Robin Ramaekers told CPJ he was treated at a hospital for facial fractures, and camera operator Stijn De Smet was treated for gunshot wounds to his leg. 
    • A man chased and attacked two Italian journalists, reporter Lucia Goracci and camera operator Marco Nicois, with broadcaster RAI TG3 and tried to steal and break their cameras on October 8 in Jiyeh, a town south of Beirut. Their driver, Ahmad Akil Hamzeh, was trying to de-escalate the situation when he collapsed and later died of a heart attack. 
    • A group of men attacked and insulted Mahmoud Shokor, a reporter with the Saudi-owned Al-Arabiya, while he was reporting live on October 15 in Beqaa, a valley near the central town of Chtoura.

    Several local and international journalists spoke to CPJ about being beaten or witnessing other journalists being attacked on the condition of anonymity, citing fear of retaliation as they continue to report on the war. CPJ is investigating at least six additional incidents of journalists being attacked while reporting in various areas in Beirut between October 10 and October 22. 

    A journalist detained

    • Police detained Alia Mansour, a Lebanese Syrian journalist and deputy editor-in-chief of privately owned Now Lebanon, for several hours on October 19 after a social media account impersonating the journalist appeared to be in communication with Israeli social media accounts. 
    A journalist documents damaged buildings after an Israeli airstrike in the village of Temnin in eastern Lebanon on October 5, 2024. (Photo: AP/Hassan Ammar)

    Restricted access

    Multiple journalists who spoke to CPJ on the condition of anonymity, citing fear of reprisal, said that journalists working in Lebanon must now get accreditation from multiple parties before filming in any area, given the high risks of attacks. This includes the Lebanese Ministry of Information, political parties, and other groups influential in certain parts of the country. 

    Multiple reporters told CPJ that authorities have also regularly restricted journalists’ access to bombed areas.  

    On several occasions since September 2024, unidentified individuals have asked reporters from local and regional TV stations to leave or stop filming during live feeds of the bombings in Lebanon, according to reporters who spoke to CPJ and CPJ’s review of the news feeds. CPJ was unable to confirm the individuals’ affiliations.

    Mohammed Afif (shown), Hezbollah’s media relations official, said in an October 22 press conference that “freedom of the press does not give you immunity from incitement or complicity in murder.” (Screenshot: YouTube/Al Araby TV News)

    Anti-media rhetoric

    In October, Hezbollah’s media division accused several local and international media outlets, especially those that embedded reporters with the Israel Defense Forces in southern Lebanon, of “aiding Israel,” inciting violence, and “justification of Israeli crimes.” 

    Mohammed Afif, Hezbollah’s media relations official, repeated these accusations in an October 22 press conference, adding that “freedom of the press does not give you immunity from incitement or complicity in murder.”

    CPJ reviewed dozens of social media posts by unknown individuals in the last month containing calls to ban outlets, burn studios, or obstruct journalists working with the local privately owned Lebanese broadcaster MTV, the Saudi broadcasters Al-Hadath and Al-Arabiya, and the UAE-owned TV broadcaster Sky News Arabia

    Outlets threatened

    • NBN, a TV channel affiliated with the Shia political party Amal, part of Lebanon’s ruling coalition, evacuated its studios and paused broadcasting on October 22 after a staffer received a phoned threat that authorities later determined to be fake. 

    CPJ’s texts to Hezbollah media spokesperson Rana Sahili and Lebanese Minister of Information Ziad Makari requesting comment on obstructions and attacks on the press and any official steps to protect them did not receive a response. A Lebanese Ministry of Interior media spokesperson told CPJ that the ministry declined to comment. 

    The IDF’s North America Desk responded to CPJ in New York’s email requesting comment on the rest of these incidents on October 24; the IDF asked for an unspecified extension and coordinates of the attacks, information that CPJ, in response, said it has no access to provide.


    This content originally appeared on Committee to Protect Journalists and was authored by CPJ Staff.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • As Barclays announced its profits soaring to over £2bn, activists posted up outside its headquarters to call out its complicity in Israel’s ongoing genocide in Gaza.

    Barclays’ profits: protesters hold vigil for Gaza outside HQ

    Fossil Free London staged a silent protest outside Barclays HQ in Canary Wharf. They were there to call out the banking giant’s continuing complicity in Israel’s genocide in Gaza. Protesters coincided it with the morning of Barclays’ quarter three profits announcement:

    People laid down children’s toys and flowers in front of the headquarters entrance. They held a silent vigil to commemorate the children Israel has killed in Gaza:

    Protester holding a placard that reads "Was it worth it?" kneels behind soft toys and other placards, and a banner that reads: "Barclays funds bombs and big oil".

    Standing together, protesters held up placards and banners exposing the banking giant’s violent investments in arms and big oil:

    Protesters stand in a line behind a collection of soft toys and flowers laid out on the ground. They hold a banner that reads: "Barclays funds bombs and big oil" and placards that say: "How was this quarter?" and "Was it worth it?"

    Barclays bankrolling bombs and big oil

    On Thursday 24 October, Barclays published its third quarter profits. The multinational banking giant raked in pre-tax profits of £2.2bn, up 18% on last year.

    Yet Barclays’ eye-watering increase in profits came after over a year of Israel’s genocide in Gaza – in which arms companies the bank holds shares has played a central role.

    By February 2024, Barclays had £2bn in shares in eight of the nine companies providing military equipment to Israel.

    This included £2.7m in Elbit Systems. Elbit provides 85% of Israel’s military drone fleet and land-based equipment. Alongside this, it supplies bombs, missiles, and other weaponry. It markets these as “battle-tested” after bombardments in occupied Palestine.

    Barclays has provided over £6.1bn in loans and underwriting to the arms and military technology companies Israel has violently deployed against Palestinians. These include arms firms like BAE Systems, Boeing, and Raytheon.

    Meanwhile, Barclays is also making a killing bankrolling the climate crisis. Between 2016 and the end of 2023, Barclays has poured US $235.2bn into fossil fuels. This is according to the latest ‘Banking on Climate Chaos’ report, which placed Barclays among its ‘Dirty Dozen’ – the top twelve worst banks for financing the polluting sector.

    Moreover, it has invested over US $190bn in fossil fuels since the Paris Agreement. Whilst Barclays committed to stop financing new oil & gas expansion ‘projects’ in a renewed energy policy in February, this restricts just 10% of their fossil fuel funding.

    Drop Barclays over its complicity

    Spokeswoman for Fossil Free London Joanna Warrington said:

    There are no words to describe our heartbreak of watching clip after clip of misery and atrocities unfolding in Gaza, and knowing that those bleeding children and weeping parents are in that nightmare due to the complicity of banks like Barclays, here in our own city.

    Across civil society, from bands playing at festivals to charities with bank accounts, Barclays is being dropped.

    We were outside their HQ to silently demonstrate the truth to employees: Barclays funds bombs and big oil, and thousands to millions are suffering globally as a result.

    Featured image and additional images via Fossil Free London

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Over 1,000 authors and literary industry workers have signed a letter vowing to boycott any Israeli literary institutions that are complicit in Israel’s genocide in Gaza and occupation of Palestine, in an effort that organizers say is the largest cultural boycott of Israel in history. In the open letter, signatories say they “cannot in good conscience” work with Israeli institutions that have…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • Israel’s parliament just passed a bill that would ban the United Nations agency for Palestinian refugees (UNRWA) from working in Israel and occupied east Jerusalem, despite objections from the US. However, Israel banning UNRWA will aid in its ethnic cleansing of the Palestinian people. This is because the UN agency holds nearly all records for Palestinian refugees – dating back to before 1948.

    Israel banning UNRWA: the threats became reality

    Lawmakers began voting on the bill on Monday night after years of harsh Israeli criticism of UNRWA, which has only increased since the start of the war in Gaza following Hamas’s deadly 7 October attacks last year.

    Israel’s ban on UNRWA – which has provided essential aid and assistance across Palestinian territories and to Palestinian refugees elsewhere for more than seven decades – would be a blow to humanitarian work in Gaza.

    The US said on Monday it was “deeply concerned” about the bill, reiterating the “critical” role the agency plays in distributing humanitarian aid in the Gaza Strip.

    Britain’s foreign secretary David Lammy expressed “profound regret” that Israel was “shutting down UNRWA’s operations”. Of course, neither country has fully withdrawn weapons’ supplies from Israel during its year-long genocide in Gaza.

    UNRWA itself said in a statement that:

    It’s outrageous that a member state of the United Nations is working to dismantle a UN agency which also happens to be the largest responder in the humanitarian operation in Gaza.

    If it’s implemented it’s a disaster including due to the impact this is likely to have on the humanitarian operation in Gaza and in several parts of the West Bank.

    Israeli lies about the agency

    In January, Israel accused a dozen of UNRWA’s Gaza employees of involvement in the 7 October attack by Hamas, which sparked the deadliest war in the territory.

    A series of probes found some “neutrality related issues” at UNRWA, and determined that nine employees “may have been involved” in the October 7 attack, but found no evidence for Israel’s chief allegations.

    Yuli Edelstein, a far-right Likud party lawmaker and one of the sponsors of the bill, said in parliament as he presented the proposal:

    There is a deep connection between the terrorist organization (Hamas) and UNRWA and Israel cannot put up with it. There is no place for enemies in the heart of the capital of the Jewish people.

    Israel claims the whole of Jerusalem, including the annexed east, as its indivisible capital.

    The ban, a combination of two different private members bills presented to the Knesset by lawmakers from both the government and opposition, will effectively prevent UNRWA from operating in Israel.

    The legislation also target the agency’s operations in east Jerusalem, where it currently provides some essential services such as cleaning, education, and healthcare in certain neighbourhoods.

    Ethnic cleansing by proxy

    But it’s UNRWA’s refugee records which fascist Israel is also interested in. As the agency says on its website:

    We maintain, update and preserve Palestine refugees’ records.

    More than 17 million documents, including birth certificates, property deeds and registration documents, some of them dating back to pre-1948 Palestine, have been scanned and preserved. A new, Agency-wide Refugee Registration Information System helps determine Palestine refugees’ eligibility for UNRWA services and allows them to submit important amendments and changes to their records.

    So, get rid on UNRWA, and get rid of all historical records that allow Palestinians to understand and utilise their history. This in turn would make illegal settlements easier for Israel, and prevent any potential law suits.

    But it’s also symbolic. Israel banning UNRWA, and therefore Palestinian’s own family records, means the genocidal state is telling them they effectively don’t exist.

    This is part of Israel’s ethnic cleansing agenda. Nothing more, nothing less.

    Featured image via the Canary

    Additional reporting via Agence France-Presse

     

    By Steve Topple

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Israeli forces have arrested all but one of the medical staff at the only operational hospital left in north Gaza, the Gaza Health Ministry said on Monday, after a days-long siege left the facility in ruins. Only one pediatrician remains at the Kamal Adwan Hospital, which was treating hundreds of patients and serving as a shelter to more than 600 Palestinians, after Israeli forces “arrested…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • Prominent Palestinian detainee, a former high-ranking member of Fatah party, attacked in his cell, say rights groups

    Palestinian prisoner rights organisations have accused Israeli prison authorities of “brutally assaulting” Marwan Barghouti, the most prominent Palestinian detainee in Israeli custody.

    Prison staff assaulted Barghouti in his solitary confinement cell at Megiddo prison in northern Israel on 9 September, the Palestinian Commission of Detainees’ Affairs, the Palestinian Prisoners’ Club and a support group for Barghouti said in statements.

    Continue reading…

    This post was originally published on Human rights | The Guardian.

  • We speak with Iranian American policy analyst Trita Parsi about Israel’s latest attack on Iran on Saturday, when it bombed military facilities and air defense systems in the country. Iran said four soldiers were killed in the attack. Israel also struck air defense batteries and radars in Syria and Iraq. Israel’s assault this weekend came about four weeks after Iran launched a missile attack on…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.


  • This content originally appeared on Democracy Now! and was authored by Democracy Now!.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on Democracy Now! and was authored by Democracy Now!.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Seg2 neve letter split

    More than 3,000 Israelis have signed an open letter urging “global pressure on Israel to force an immediate ceasefire.” The signatories say they are motivated by patriotic duty to stop the country’s war crimes in Gaza and beyond, but say the lack of sanctions from other countries has allowed Israel to continue to pursue war, abandon the hostages still held in Gaza, ignore domestic opposition and persecute Palestinian citizens of Israel without real cost. “Unfortunately, the majority of Israelis support the continuation of the war and massacres, and a change from within is not currently feasible. The state of Israel is on a suicidal path and sows destruction and devastation that increase day by day,” reads the letter. For more, we speak with Neve Gordon, professor of international law and human rights at Queen Mary University of London, one of the signatories of the open letter, who says international powers including allies like the United States need to “put their leg down and say enough is enough.” We also speak with him about Israel’s well-documented history of using Palestinians as human shields, including in its current war on Gaza.


    This content originally appeared on Democracy Now! and was authored by Democracy Now!.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Seg1 gaza 5

    Israel’s three-week siege of northern Gaza has killed at least 1,000 Palestinians. Most of the dead are women and children. On Saturday, Israeli forces withdrew from Kamal Adwan Hospital just one day after storming it, with health officials saying that soldiers detained dozens of male medical staffers and some of the patients. This comes as the Israeli government has banned six medical NGOs from entering Gaza despite the dire humanitarian crisis stemming from repeated displacements of the population, widespread disease, injuries from Israeli attacks, hunger and more. Some 43,000 Palestinians have been killed since Israel launched its war on Gaza last October, according to local officials, although the true toll is likely far higher. “The healthcare infrastructure is destroyed. Many of the local doctors have been either killed or kidnapped. The patients are left stranded; no one is providing any help to them,” says Mosab Nasser, CEO of FAJR Scientific, one of the six medical aid groups banned by Israel.


    This content originally appeared on Democracy Now! and was authored by Democracy Now!.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • ANALYSIS: By Binoy Kampmark

    It prompted an outbreak of grim cheer in Israel. In Washington, there were similar pulsations of congratulation.

    Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar was dead, killed in Rafah after being spotted by an Israeli patrol and located by yet another one of those drones ubiquitous over the skies of Gaza.

    Sinwar was considered the central figure behind the October 7 attacks on Israel, which left, in its wake, more than 1200 dead and 250 hostages of diminishing number.

    His death earlier this month prompted Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to declare this to be “the beginning of the end”.

    Notwithstanding this cherished scalp, Netanyahu also made it clear that the war would continue.

    “It is harsh and it takes a heavy price from us.” Out of force of habit, a sinister quotation followed, this time from King David: “I will pursue my enemies and destroy them. And I will not turn back until they are wiped out.”

    In priestly fashion, he promised the Palestinians that Hamas would never rule in Gaza, a sure sign that terms will be dictated, not from any equal level, but the summit of victory.

    Same tone struck
    The same tone was struck for those “people of the region”: “In Gaza, in Beirut, in the streets of the entire area, the darkness is withdrawing and the light is rising.” The deciders are in charge.

    US President Joe Biden mirrored the approach. He focused on the bloody imprint of Sinwar’s legacy (“responsible for the deaths of thousands of Israelis, Palestinians, Americans and citizens from over 30 countries”).

    Israel had been right to “eliminate the leadership and military structure of Hamas.”

    Like Netanyahu, Biden made his own paternal assessment about the fate of the Palestinian people, one perennially subject to others. A rotten egg had been removed. Rejoice, for others will be laid under over guidance.

    “This is now the opportunity for a ‘day after’ in Gaza without Hamas in power, and for a political settlement that provides a better future for Israelis and Palestinians alike.”

    The killing also prompted other assessments that say nothing about Palestinians, but everything about that all subsuming word of “terrorism”.

    Israeli power had proved its point, suggesting the premise for resisting it had abated. It led to such remarks as those of Canada’s Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to call it an end to “a reign of terror”, a point conveniently ignoring Israel’s own policy of ill-nourishment towards Palestinians since the establishment of the Jewish state in 1948.

    Little context, history ‘irrelevant’
    Germany’s Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock, boxing Sinwar as “a brutal murderer and terrorist who wanted to annihilate Israel and its people” told Hamas to “lay down its weapons”, suggesting that the suffering of those in Gaza had been exclusive and unilateral to the organisation.

    Context, in short, was inconsequential, history an irrelevant past.

    As these statements were being made, the Israeli strikes on Gaza have continued with unabated ferocity — and Lebanon, as well as now Iran.

    Civilians continue perishing by the families, as do the habitual displacements. In Netanyahu’s cabinet, the pro-settler faction remains ever present.

    National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir nurses fantasies of ethnically displacing Palestinians from the Gaza Strip — something he euphemises as “voluntary departure”. He explicitly said as much at a rally in May. “This is moral, rational and humanitarian.”

    That Sinwar would perish in conflict was not unexpected. The extraordinary violence of October 7 was always going to trigger an extraordinarily violent response, and was intended to do so from the outset.

    Israel’s method of retaliation, rather than understanding the historical, exploitative savagery of Hamas, was to stubbornly cling to previous patterns: the use of superior military technology, vaunted intelligence, the decapitation of organisations, picking off central figures in adversarial entities, wish lists that rank well in the making of war and delight intelligence chiefs.

    Brokering of durable peace ignored
    The method says little in the brokering of durable peace, the notion of strategy, the skills of diplomacy. It ignores the terrible truth that harvests in such matters are almost always bitter.

    “A number of Israeli moderates have considered this a chance to retreat from a military solution and seek a grand bargain that would conclude conflicts against Hamas, Hezbollah and ease conflict with Iran. It would also involve the return of the surviving hostages.”

    Sinwar’s killing is mistakenly positioned as a chance to end the sequence of wars that have become an annexure of Israel’s existence.

    In Biden’s words, he “was an insurmountable obstacle to achieving all of those goals [about achieving peace]. That obstacle no longer exists.” Such statements are made even as others are already readying to occupy leadership roles for the next war.

    The same could be said about the recent killing of Hezbollah’s Hasan Nasrallah. In 1992, Abbas al-Musawi, then Hezbollah’s secretary-general, was slain along with his wife and son.

    His replacement: the resourceful, charismatic Nasrallah. It was he who pushed on the endeavours of the late Fuad Shukr, an architect in acquiring the militant group’s vast stockpile of missiles. Like a savage pruning, such killings inspire fresh offshoots.

    Ibrahim Al-Marashi of California State University, San Marcos, puts it better than most. “History shows every single Israeli assassination of a high-profile political or military operator, even after being initially hailed as a game-changing victory, eventually led to the killed leader being replaced by someone more determined, adept and hawkish.”

    Seeking a grand bargain
    With this in mind, a number of Israeli moderates have considered this a chance to retreat from a military solution and seek a grand bargain that would conclude conflicts against Hamas, Hezbollah and ease conflict with Iran.

    It would also involve the return of the surviving hostages. Hardly the sort of thing that thrills the likes of Ben-Gvir and his belligerent comrade in arms, Finance Minister, Bezalel Smotrich. The customary language of “degrade”, “annihilate” and “destroy” feature with dull regularity.

    This is the State of Judah doing battle against the forces of night. It is, however, a night that risks blackening all, a harvest that promises another Sinwar and another Nasrallah. Guns, drones, and bombs only go so far.

    Dr Binoy Kampmark was a Commonwealth Scholar at Selwyn College, Cambridge. He currently lectures in international politics at RMIT University in Melbourne, Australia. This article was first published by Eureka Street and is republished with the author’s permission.

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • Israel could kill everyone left in Northern Gaza if its assault on the enclave continues, a United Nations relief official warned on Saturday. U.N. Acting Under-Secretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs and Emergency Relief Coordinator Joyce Msuya also called for an end to the Israeli attack. “What Israeli forces are doing in besieged North Gaza cannot be allowed to continue…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.


  • This content originally appeared on The Grayzone and was authored by The Grayzone.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on The Grayzone and was authored by The Grayzone.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • The Israeli attack is over, but the outcome remains unclear. Tehran is downplaying it — even mocking it — which may be more reflective of their desire to de-escalate than a true assessment of the damage Israel inflicted on Iran. Just as Israel kept the damage of Iran’s Oct. 1 strikes secret, Iran will likely not disclose the full picture of Israel’s strike, although Tehran has reported that…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.


  • This content originally appeared on Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty and was authored by Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • The UN’s human rights chief has warned that Israel’s siege of north Gaza is the “darkest moment” of Israel’s year of genocide and suggested that Israeli forces may be violating the UN’s Genocide Convention as reports emerge of Israel seizing a hospital in the region. In one of the UN’s strongest statements on the assault so far, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk said that…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • Thirty-eight killed in Khan Younis including 13 children from same family, as survivors sift through rubble

    Middle East crisis – live updates

    At least 72 people have been killed in Israeli operations across Gaza in the past day, hospital officials in the besieged territory have said, although communication difficulties in the north of the strip mean the final toll could be much higher.

    In the central town of Khan Younis, 38 people, including at least 13 children from the same family, were killed in airstrikes early on Friday, hospital records showed. Relatives cradled their bruised and broken bodies in the morgue of the nearby European hospital before they were buried, in some cases several children to a shroud.

    Continue reading…

    This post was originally published on Human rights | The Guardian.