Tanya Haj-Hassan is a pediatric intensive care physician who has volunteered in Gaza multiple times over the past 10 months. She joins us to recount what she witnessed there and to explain why she is calling for an end to U.S. support for the Israeli military and the resumption of comprehensive humanitarian aid to the Gaza Strip. Over the course of Israel’s assault, Haj-Hassan has treated victims…
Israel’s forced evacuations in Gaza are now so widespread that Palestinians are not only being almost completely separated from crucial resources like water, they are also being squeezed into a “safe zone” that has shrunk to a point where they are never more than a few blocks away from the frontline of Israel’s ground assault, humanitarian groups warn. According to the UN Relief and Works…
The mood inside the Democratic National Convention is triumphant, but not everyone is content to toe the party line. On the first day of the convention, three uncommitted delegates dropped a banner calling for a stop to US arms to Israel. In what has now become a viral internet moment, the delegates around them responded by hitting the banner-drop activists with their DNC signs. Liano Sharon, one of the DNC delegates who dropped the banner, speaks to The Real News in an exclusive interview.
Video: Kayla Rivara Post-Production: David Hebden
Transcript
The following is a rushed transcript and may contain errors. A proofread version will be made available as soon as possible.
Liano Sharon:
Hi, my name is Liano Sharon. I’m a Democratic National Committee member elected from Michigan, and I emphasize elected because 55% of the Democratic National Committee are not elected to be members of the Democratic National Committee.
Speaker 2:
Liano, thank you so much for talking to us. I know you’ve had a busy week, and we’re only halfway through this thing, and you were part of an action that started on first night of the DNC last night. I was wondering if you could tell our viewers and listeners a little bit about what happened, and how the reaction has been since then.
Liano Sharon:
Sure. So myself, and Nadia Ahmad, and Esam Boraey, the three of us raised a banner during Biden’s speech, and in the highest part of the Florida delegation area that said, “Stop arming Israel.”
And we did that because first of all, for myself as a Jew, I was always raised to believe that never again means never again for anyone, anywhere, ever, period. And that’s not what we’re doing. What we’re doing is we’re continuing to support a genocide and the mass murder of children, and that has to stop. But another very important reason that I did it, and that we did it together, is that it’s good electoral politics.
A poll came out a few days ago, for example, that said that 60% of undecided voters under 30, across three of the big swing states, Arizona, Georgia, and Pennsylvania, 60% of them will be more likely to vote for Harris if she supported an arms embargo, which is to say that if she chose to enforce the Leahy laws, which already exist on the books, which already make it illegal for us to be sending over the weaponry that we’re sending over there.
And there are statistics like that out of the individual states, Georgia and Arizona, etc., and it’s similar numbers. For example, it’s 60% in favor, 7% against or 39% in favor, 5% against. It’s that kind of big difference that’s in favor of significant electoral gains from making this move. And at the same time, she’s running on the idea that she’s the prosecutor, she’s the law enforcement official, she’s going to enforce the law. Well, if she’s going to enforce the law, then she needs to enforce the Leahy laws, which would require imposing an arms embargo.
So it’s good electoral politics, it’s good law, and more than that, we have to understand it’s good politics in general, because Netanyahu is an ally of Donald Trump. He is going to do everything he possibly can to incite things in the Middle East, not have a ceasefire, and do everything he can to tank her campaign in order to remain in power because if he gets out of power, which would happen if he agreed to a ceasefire, that would stop the war, which would mean that he’d have to run for re-election, 72% of Israelis don’t want him, and he’s under investigation for corruption from before October 7th.
So if he accepts a ceasefire, he’s probably losing power, and he may more than likely going to jail, from what I understand of the court case against him. So he has every incentive not to accept ceasefire, as demonstrated by the fact that a few weeks ago he murdered the person on the other side of the table doing the negotiations in Tehran.
So if you have a situation where a guy is your political opponent, and he has every incentive not to accept any kind of a ceasefire, if he has every incentive to try to drag this out and try to make Trump win so that Trump will give him carte blanche, then if you’re calling for a ceasefire but you’re not calling to enforce the Leahy laws, you’re not calling for any kind of an arms embargo, then how do we take you seriously?
If you’re not going to use leverage against a guy who has demonstrated that he doesn’t want a ceasefire, if you’re not going to use leverage to get a ceasefire, you’re not making a credible argument that you actually want to ceasefire. And given all of those facts, then the question arises, are you really serious about defeating Donald Trump? Okay, here is an ally of Donald Trump who’s literally going to do everything he can to ensure that you lose, and you have leverage available to you over him that are actually just enforcing the laws, okay, but you’re not going to do that? Why should anybody take you seriously that you really want a ceasefire?
Speaker 2:
Oh, please.
Liano Sharon:
No, no. Those are the key things.
Speaker 2:
Well, and as you said, you’re an elected delegate from the great state of Michigan, where I myself lived for many years, but where a lot of this political struggle has been coming to a head. The uncommitted campaign in Michigan made a really big statement earlier this year. Of course, Dearborn has a massive Arab population, a long history of activism in the state. But also this is where Kamala Harris was speaking recently, and when protesters were making the case that you’re making now, she infamously responded with, “If you want Donald Trump to win, just say that. Otherwise, I’m speaking.” I guess, what is your message as a rep elected delegate from Michigan who, as you said, you don’t want Trump to win. What is your response to that way of framing from Kamala Harris and the Democratic Party?
Liano Sharon:
Well, let’s just be clear. That way of framing things is really actually a fascist kind of way of framing things. I get to say what I want, but the rest of the coalition, the supposed big tent party, they have to be quiet. Okay? That’s not an acceptable way to deal with. And I commend her for subsequently changing her framing of that, and addressing the issue with more compassion.
And that actually gives me a bit of hope in the sense that she’s clearly responding to the pressure that she’s being put under. And she’s clearly, it seems to me what she’s been doing so far is running a very data-driven campaign. I think that’s a good part of the reason why she picked Tim Walz, which I think is a great pick. Because I think that she’s got a team that’s looking at the data, and if you look at the data, it clearly mitigates towards, it clearly drives towards having actual leverage and actually using that leverage over Netanyahu.
And literally all it takes is enforcing our own laws. So on the one hand, the way that she responded to it is the way that the Democratic Party has generally responded to these kinds of things, and I’m encouraged by the fact that she changed. But then again, that’s her and she’s trying to win an election, whereas like last night, the people that ripped the banner out of my hand and hit my colleague Nadia Ahmed over the head with their signs, here’s a hijab-wearing woman, and they’re beating her over the head with their signs.
That is the more common way that we have seen the Democratic Party behave in general. And that’s just brown shirt behavior. I mean, it is political violence designed to silence people. We were not practicing violence. All we did is we held up a banner that said, “Stop arming Israel.” We weren’t chanting, we weren’t disrupting, we held up a sign. Lots of other people were holding up different signs. That’s fine, that’s political expression. We’re supposed to be a big tent party. But the problem is what the party tries to do is it tries to enforce unity, and enforced unity is just a kind of authoritarianism.
What we need in the Democratic Party in order to be democratic is solidarity, that way in a situation we have a lot of different factions, they have differences, but we do have commonalities. And when different factions feel that they need to express themselves, we encourage that expression. We don’t try to shut it down.
Speaker 2:
And you’ve been so gracious with your time, I really appreciate it, I just got one more question for you. What’s your message for folks out there who are heartsick about the ongoing genocide and Gaza, they want it to stop, that is their primary concern. They also don’t want Donald Trump to win. So now they’re caught between this rock and a hard place heading into the general election in November. Where does this movement go, and what room is there to push Kamala Harris in the Democrats in the next few months? What would you say to folks out there who are in that position now?
Liano Sharon:
I would say get out there and demonstrate, show what you want. Because this similar situation that happened under FDR. Where he was talking with the socialists, and the communists, and the labor unions who want the New Deal, and what he said to them is, “Make me. Make it politically impossible for us to do anything else here in Washington.” That’s what we need to do. We need to have people out there protesting every time there’s an opportunity to get in front of her with a sign that says, “Stop arming Israel, enforce the Leahy laws.” If she’s not going to do that, it undercuts her entire argument that she’s the law enforcement officer, that she’s the great prosecutor, if she’s not going to enforce the laws. So I really think that that is a key part of what we need to do.
There are a lot of people out there, and I support them 100% because that’s democracy, that will not vote for Kamala Harris if there is not something like that going on that really demonstrates that she’s serious about shutting down this genocide. There’s an awful lot of people who will not vote for her. I’m not one of them. I don’t want Donald Trump, and I’m perfectly willing to say that I’m going to vote against Donald Trump.
My only option to vote against Donald Trump in this election is Harris. Same thing happened last time with Biden, and 68% of actual Biden voters in 2020 told exit pollsters that they didn’t vote for Biden, they voted against Trump. So for myself I’m in the same situation as I was back then, though I will also say that I want to vote for her. I want the opportunity to vote for her. I want the opportunity to vote for somebody who does not support genocide.
But we have to understand it’s not only about the genocide that’s going on in Israel. We have to recognize that there’s genocide of a kind going on right here in the United States when we have a privatized health insurance system that literally murders 68,000 specifically poor people, disproportionately women and minorities every single year like clockwork. And the only thing that I know of that murders tens of thousands of people every single year like clockwork, is a Nazi death camp. That’s the kind of health insurance system or health care, “health care system” that we’re running in this country and that she’s supported.
So there’s a lot of different issues that we need to look at, and we need to understand how these things are connected, because right now, given the electoral math, given the logic of her campaign about enforcing laws, given all that stuff, the only forces pushing against this kind of an arms embargo enforcing the Leahy laws is number one, APAC. And number two, the military industrial complex who want to keep up their contracts and get lots of money. So literally, in both cases, in the insurance industry case and in the Gaza case, we’re murdering people for money.
And that’s got to stop. And I think that right now, the logic of stopping the murders in Gaza demonstrates that the way to make her do it is to make her do it. To demonstrate that it is not politically viable to not do it. And I think that’s the same thing that we have to do with the mass murder that we’re experiencing every year in healthcare as well.
Speaker 2:
Thank you so much for watching The Real News Network, where we lift up the voices, stories and struggles that you care about most. And we need your help to keep doing this work so please, tap your screen now, subscribe and donate to The Real News Network. Solidarity Forever.
Climate activists disrupted a DNC-adjacent event sponsored by ExxonMobil on Wednesday, the same day that Minnesota Governor Tim Walz formally accepted his nomination as vice-presidential candidate for the Democratic Party. Walz has faced harsh criticism from Indigenous and environmental rights groups in Minnesota for his authorization of the Line 3 oil pipeline through Native treaty lands in the state. We host a roundtable discussion on the climate crisis and the Democratic Party’s response with Ojibwe lawyer and founder of the Giniw Collective Tara Houska; climate organizer Collin Rees, who was part of the ExxonMobil action at the DNC; and climate scientist Michael Mann.
This content originally appeared on Democracy Now! and was authored by Democracy Now!.
Israeli forces regularly use children as human shields in Gaza, a rights group finds in a new report shining a light on horrific stories of abuse faced by children detained by Israeli forces. As part of its genocide in Gaza, the military registered by the UN as a violator of children’s human rights is “systematically” detaining and torturing children, according to Defense for Children…
The Israeli military has ordered new forced evacuations in parts of central Gaza, signaling the expansion of ground operations and the latest displacement of Palestinians, many of whom have already been displaced multiple times over the course of Israel’s war on the territory. At least 50 Palestinians have been killed in the last 24 hours, according to the Health Ministry in Gaza…
Over the past months, Israeli forces have been clearing space for and building a road in northern Gaza that may indicate that Israel is intending to maintain a permanent military presence in the region that was home to the largest and most bustling city in the Gaza Strip, a new analysis finds. According to analysis group Forensic Architecture, satellite imagery shows that Israeli forces have…
DNC delegates unfurl banner during Biden’s speech at the DNC. Photo credit: Esam Boraey
An Orwellian disconnect haunts the 2024 Democratic National Convention. In the isolation of the convention hall, shielded from the outside world behind thousands of armed police, few of the delegates seem to realize that their country is on the brink of direct involvement in major wars with Russia and Iran, either of which could escalate into World War III.
Inside the hall, the mass slaughter in the Middle East and Ukraine are treated only as troublesome “issues,” which “the greatest military in the history of the world” can surely deal with. Delegates who unfurled a banner that read “Stop Arming Israel” during Biden’s speech on Monday night were quickly accosted by DNC officials, who instructed other delegates to use “We Joe” signs to hide the banner from view.
In the real world, the most explosive flashpoint right now is the Middle East, where U.S. weapons and Israeli troops are slaughtering tens of thousands of Palestinians, mostly children and families, at the bidding of Israel’s Benjamin Netanyahu. And yet, in July, Democrats and Republicans leapt to their feet in 23 standing ovations to applaud Netanyahu’s warmongering speech to a joint session of Congress.
In the week before the DNC started, the Biden administration announced its approval for the sale of $20 billion in weapons to Israel, which would lock the US into a relationship with the Israeli military for years to come.
Netanyahu’s determination to keep killing without restraint in Gaza, and Biden and Congress’s willingness to keep supplying him with weapons to do so, always risked exploding into a wider war, but the crisis has reached a new climax. Since Israel has failed to kill or expel the Palestinians from Gaza, it is now trying to draw the United States into a war with Iran, a war to degrade Israel’s enemies and restore the illusion of military superiority that it has squandered in Gaza.
To achieve its goal of triggering a wider war, Israel assassinated Fuad Shukr, a Hezbollah commander, in Beirut, and Hamas’s political leader and chief ceasefire negotiator, Ismail Haniyeh, in Tehran. Iran has vowed to respond militarily to the assassinations, but Iran’s leaders are in a difficult position. They do not want a war with Israel and the United States, and they have acted with restraint throughout the massacre in Gaza. But failing to respond strongly to these assassinations would encourage Israel to conduct further attacks on Iran and its allies.
‘
The assassinations in Beirut and Tehran were clearly designed to elicit a response from Iran and Hezbollah that would draw the U.S. into the war. Could Iran find a way to strike Israel that would not provoke a U.S. response? Or, if Iran’s leaders believe that is impossible, will they decide that this is the moment to actually fight a seemingly unavoidable war with the U.S. and Israel?
This is an incredibly dangerous moment, but a ceasefire in Gaza would resolve the crisis. The U.S. has dispatched CIA Director William Burns, the only professional diplomat in Biden’s cabinet, to the Middle East for renewed ceasefire talks, and Iran is waiting to see the result of the talks before responding to the assassinations.
Burns is working with Qatari and Egyptian officials to come up with a revised ceasefire proposal that Israel and Hamas can both agree to. But Israel has always rejected any proposal for more than a temporary pause in its assault on Gaza, while Hamas will only agree to a real, permanent ceasefire. Could Biden have sent Burns just to stall, so that a new war wouldn’t spoil the Dems’ party in Chicago?
The United States has always had the option of halting weapons shipments to Israel to force it to agree to a permanent ceasefire. But it has refused to use that leverage, except for the suspension of a single shipment of 2,000 lb bombs in May, after it had already sent Israel 14,000 of those horrific weapons, which it uses to systematically smash living children and families into unidentifiable pieces of flesh and bone.
Meanwhile the war with Russia has also taken a new and dangerous turn, with Ukraine invading Russia’s Kursk region. Some analysts believe this is only a diversion before an even riskier Ukrainian assault on the Russian-held Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant. Ukraine’s leaders see the writing on the wall, and are increasingly ready to take any risk to improve their negotiating position before they are forced to sue for peace.
But Ukraine’s recent incursion into Russia, while applauded by much of the west, has actually made negotiations less likely. In fact, talks between Russia and Ukraine on energy issues were supposed to start in the coming weeks. The idea was that each side would agree not to target the other’s energy infrastructure, with the hope that this could lead to more comprehensive talks. But after Ukraine’s invasion toward Kursk, the Russians pulled out of what would have been the first direct talks since the early weeks of the Russian invasion.
President Zelenskyy remains in power three months after his term of office expired, and he is a great admirer of Israel. Will he take a page from Netanyahu’s playbook and do something so provocative that it will draw U.S. and NATO forces into the potentially nuclear war with Russia that Biden has promised to avoid?
A 2023 U.S. Army War College study found that even a non-nuclear war with Russia could result in as many U.S. casualties every two weeks as the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq did in two decades, and it concluded that such a war would require a return to conscription in the United States.
While Gaza and Eastern Ukraine burn in firestorms of American and Russian bombs and missiles, and the war in Sudan rages on unchecked, the whole planet is rocketing toward catastrophic temperature increases, ecosystem breakdown and mass extinctions. But the delegates in Chicago are in la-la land about U.S. responsibility for that crisis too.
Under the slick climate plan Obama sold to the world in Copenhagen and Paris, Americans’ per capita CO2 emissions are still double those of our Chinese, British and European neighbors, while U.S. oil and gas production have soared to all-time record highs.
The combined dangers of nuclear war and climate catastrophe have pushed the hands of the Doomsday Clock all the way to 90 seconds to midnight. But the leaders of the Republican and Democratic parties are in the pockets of the fossil fuel industry and the military-industrial complex. Behind the election-year focus on what the two parties disagree about, the corrupt policies they both agree on are the most dangerous of all.
President Biden recently claimed that he is “running the world.” No oligarchic American politician will confess to “running the world” to the brink of nuclear war and mass extinction, but tens of thousands of Americans marching in the streets of Chicago and millions more Americans who support them understand that that is what Biden, Trump and their cronies are doing.
The people inside the convention hall should shake themselves out of their complacency and start listening to the people in the streets. Therein lies the real hope, maybe the only hope, for America’s future.
The Democratic National Convention is taking place this week in Chicago, and efforts to smear, co-opt and deflate the planned massive protests — and the Uncommitted movement within the convention itself — are already underway. Since securing the Democratic Party’s presidential nomination, Vice President Kamala Harris has not only refused to signal any real break from President Joe Biden’s Gaza…
A number of countries and companies sending oil to Israel, which it is using to advance its mass slaughter and ethnic cleansing in Gaza may be legally complicit in genocide, new analysis finds. Countries like the U.S. and companies like Chevron and BP have been providing Israel with crude oil and other fuels amid the genocide, according to new findings by Oil Change International.
Former President Donald Trump is sometimes depicted as having a less interventionist foreign policy than his Democratic rivals, but this is a myth, argues foreign policy scholar Stephen Zunes. The former president had an extreme militaristic agenda, which he disingenuously pitched as an alternative to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s during the 2016 presidential campaign — an initial…
This story originally appeared in Truthout on Aug. 20, 2024. It is shared here with permission.
In a speech at the Democratic National Convention (DNC) on Monday night, President Joe Biden said that “both sides” in Israel’s genocide of Gaza are experiencing civilian death — a blatant lie that ignores any semblance of reality on the ground in Gaza, where the Palestinian civilian death toll rises each day.
“Those protesters out in the street, they have a point,” Biden said, referring to the droves of pro-Palestine protesters demonstrating outside of the convention. “A lot of innocent people are being killed on both sides.” He once again touted the U.S.’s ceasefire negotiations that have done nothing but prolong Israel’s genocide so far.
It is patently untrue that there are people dying on “both sides” in Gaza and Israel. Since October 7, when Hamas forces killed 1,139 Israelis and foreigners, including roughly 700 Israeli civilians, almost zero Israeli civilians have been killed by Palestinian forces. Since then, a few dozen Israeli hostages have been killed — though it’s unclear how many are dead, and of those, how many were killed by the Israeli military.
The true death toll is likely far, far higher, experts have said. But, even at the highly conservative estimate of 38,000 Palestinians killed by Israel, the ratio between Palestinian and Israeli civilian deaths since October 7 is 45 to 1.
Unlike the Israeli civilian death toll, the Palestinian civilian death toll rises each day due to Israel’s extermination campaign in Gaza — and rising violence in the occupied West Bank. Just on the day after Biden’s speech, Israel bombed a school in Gaza City, killing at least 12 people in the building that was housing at least 700 forcibly displaced families.
To say that there are two sides to Israel’s genocide of Gaza is, in itself, a farce. Israelis today are living in relative freedom, some of them terrorizing Palestinians directly, many living in homes stolen directly from Palestinians.
As Israeli citizens dine out or go shopping, Palestinians are living under full Israeli military control — with Gaza an open-air prison guarded by Israeli forces. Each day, Palestinians live in fear of being killed by an Israeli bomb or sniper; they scrounge for food amid a famine manufactured by Israel; they have little to no access to clean water, electricity, health care, or things like clean toilets; and they may even face being kidnapped by Israeli forces and being taken to a torture camp.
Though Biden feigns concern about Palestinian civilian lives and securing a ceasefire, he refuses to use any of the U.S.’s leverage to stop the genocide — including the tens of billions of dollars in military assistance that the U.S. has pledged to Israel that experts say fly in the face of international and domestic law.
To the frustration of advocates for Palestinian rights, Biden’s comment was one of the only mentions of Gaza from a speaker on the main stage at the convention, despite it being one of the most major issues in this election and of our time. Other mentions of the genocide at the DNC appeared to be aimed at praising Democrats for their policy of giving Israel carte blanche to kill and maim Palestinians as they wish.
In her speech, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-New York) carried water for the Biden administration. As DNC attendees tried to drown out and abuse pro-Palestine protesters in the arena, Ocasio-Cortez claimed that Vice President Kamala Harris is “working tirelessly” for a ceasefire in Gaza. And yet, Harris has said nothing about the one thing that advocates say could secure a ceasefire: an arms embargo to Israel.
A group of American doctors who treated patients in Gaza held a press conference in Chicago on Tuesday to describe the suffering they saw among Palestinians injured and killed in Israel’s war on the territory. The press conference, taking place during the Democratic National Convention, was organized by the Uncommitted National Movement, which is pressuring Democrats for an end to blanket U.S. support for Israel. Among those who spoke was Dr. Ahmed Yousaf, who returned from Gaza just weeks earlier. “When we got to the hospital, everything I saw on TikTok and Instagram and all the television, all the stuff that we had in alternative media … it was 100 times worse than I could have ever imagined,” he said.
This content originally appeared on Democracy Now! and was authored by Democracy Now!.
Many users of X, formerly Twitter, seem deeply misguided. They imagine that Elon Musk is the saviour of free speech. He’s not. He is simply the latest pioneer in monetising speech. Which isn’t the same thing at all.
All the blue ticks on X – mine included – are buying access to an audience. Which is why Musk has made it so easy to get a blue tick – and why there are now so many of them on the platform. If you don’t pay Musk, the algorithms make sure you get minimal reach. You are denied your five seconds of fame.
That has particularly infuriated corporate journalists. On what used to be called Twitter, they got access to large audiences as a natural right, along with politicians and celebrities. They never paid a penny. They felt entitled to those big audiences because they already enjoyed similarly big audiences in the so-called “legacy media”. They did not see why they start competing with the rest of us to be heard.
The new media system was rigged, as the old media system has been for centuries, to ensure that it was their voices that counted. Or rather it was the voices of the ultra-wealthy paying their salaries who counted.
Independent journalists, including myself, have been some of the chief beneficiaries of Musk’s X. But I don’t for a minute make the mistake of thinking Musk is really in favour of my free speech – or anyone else’s – compared to his own.
A reminder that free speech in America is special and we need to do everything possible to preserve it https://t.co/yAvX1TpuRp
Being able to buy yourself an audience isn’t what most people understand as free speech.
Musk’s X is simply the latest innovation on the traditional “free speech” model from the bad old days. Then, only a handful of very rich men could afford to buy themselves lots of hired hands, known as journalists; own a printing press; and be in a position to attract advertisers.
Billionaires paid a small fortune to buy the privilege of “free speech”. As a result, they managed to secure for themselves a very big voice in a highly exclusive market. You and I can now pay a hundred bucks a year and buy ourselves a very, very small voice in a massively overcrowded, cacophonous marketplace of voices.
The point is this: Speech on X is still a privilege – it’s just one that you can now pay for. And like all privileges, it is on licence from the owner. Musk can withdraw that privilege – and withdraw it selectively – whenever he thinks someone or something is harming his interests, whether directly or indirectly.
Musk is already disappearing opinions, either ones he doesn’t like or ones he cannot afford to be seen supporting – most visibly, anything too critical of Israel.
As I said earlier this week, “decolonization”, “from the river to the sea” and similar euphemisms necessarily imply genocide.
Clear calls for extreme violence are against our terms of service and will result in suspension. https://t.co/1fCFo5Lezb
He has threatened users with suspension for repeating slogans such as “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free” – in other words, for calling for an end to what the judges of the World Court recently decreed to be Israel’s apartheid rule over Palestinians. He is also against hosting on X the term “decolonisation” in reference to Israel, claiming perversely that “it implies a Jewish genocide” – itself an implicit admission that Israelis (not Jews) have long been colonising Palestine and ethnically cleansing Palestinians.
The Israel lobby is also pushing hard for a ban on the words “Zionism” and “Zionist”. It won’t be long before X, like Meta, cracks down on these terms too.
Note that banning these words makes it all but impossible to discuss the specific historical forces that led to Israel’s creation at the expense of the Palestinian people, or analyse the ideology that today underpins Israel’s efforts to disappear the Palestinian people, or explain how the West has been complicit in Israel’s illegal occupation of the Palestinian territories for decades and is currently aiding the genocide of Palestinians in Gaza.
The loss of “Zionist” and “Zionism” from our lexicon would be a serious handicap for anyone trying to explain some of the major events unfolding in the Middle East at the moment. Which is precisely why the establishment, and Musk, are so keen to see such words discredited.
The Egyptian comedian Bassem Yousef, one of the most acute and acid critics of Israel, has suddenly disappeared from X. Many assume he has been banned. The Jerusalem Posthighlights that, shortly before he vanished from X, he had written: “Are you still scared to be called an antisemite by those Zionists?”
Whatever the case, you will see Musk’s X getting a lot more censorious over the next months and years, especially against what he is terming the “faaaaaar left” – that is, disparate groups of people he has lumped together who hold opinions either he doesn’t like personally or that can damage his business interests.
From the standpoint of the faaaaaar left, this platform is far right, but it’s actually just centrist https://t.co/PUNAvdTKQS
Billionaires aren’t there to protect free speech. They got to be billionaires by being very good at making money – by seizing markets, by inflating our appetite for consumption, and by buying politicians to rig the system to protect their empires from competitors.
Musk understands that the only people against a world based on rapacious profit and material greed are the “faaaaaar left”. Which is why the “faaaaaar left” are in the crosshairs of anyone with power in our rigged system, from the centrists to the right wing, from “liberals” to conservatives, from Blue to Red, from Democrats to Republicans.
The right and the centrists disagree only on how best to maintain that rapacious, consumption-driven, environmentally destructive status quo, and on how to normalise it to different segments of the public. They are competing wings of a system designed by a single ruling cabal.
Musk used to see himself as a liberal and now leans towards the Trumpian right. Trump used to see himself as a Clintonian Democrat but now sees himself as… well, fill in the blank, according to taste.
The point is that centrists and the right are, in essence, interchangeable – as should be only too clear from the rapid shift of free-speech liberals towards authoritarian censorship, and the rapid (pretend) reinvention of conservatives from moralising guardians of family values to the embattled defenders of free speech.
Neither’s posturing should be taken at face value. Both are equally authoritarian, when their interests are threatened by “an excess of democracy”. Their apparent differences are simply the competition for dominance within a system that’s been gerrymandered to their mutual benefit. We are their dupes, buying into their games.
JUST IN: ?? ?? Emmanuel Macron's Liberal MEP threatens to shut down X in Europe .
"If Elon Musk does not comply with the European rules on digital services, the EU Commission will ask the continental operators to block X or, in the most extreme case, force them to completely… pic.twitter.com/8rbt4pjSPp
The two tribes are there to offer the pretence of a battle of ideas, of competition, of choice at election time, of freedom. They look hostile to each other, but when push comes to shove they are united in their support for oligarchy, and opposition to genuine free speech, to real democracy, to meaningful pluralism, to an open society.
The “faaaaaar left” are the true enemy of both the centrists and the right. Why? Because they are the only group struggling for a society in which money doesn’t buy privilege, where speech isn’t something someone can own.
That’s why, when Musk intensifies his crackdown, it will be the “faaaaar left” that’s erased so completely you won’t notice it’s gone. You won’t remember it was ever there.
Israeli forces killed at least 12 Palestinians, including two children, in the bombing of a school-turned-shelter in Gaza City on Tuesday, according to Gaza’s civil defense agency. An Israeli plane dropped a bomb on the Mustafa Hafiz School, which housed hundreds or thousands of displaced people, without warning, leaving Palestinian rescue workers to sift through the rubble of the collapsed…
On Monday, Secretary of State Antony Blinken blamed Hamas negotiators for causing the impasse in the latest ceasefire negotiations — but Hamas said that this is another of the Biden administration’s “misleading claims” aimed at “buying time” for Israel to continue its genocide in Gaza. In a press conference after a meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu…
In a speech at the Democratic National Convention (DNC) on Monday night, President Joe Biden said that “both sides” in Israel’s genocide of Gaza are experiencing civilian death — a blatant lie that ignores any semblance of reality on the ground in Gaza, where the Palestinian civilian death toll rises each day. “Those protesters out in the street, they have a point,” Biden said…
This year, the Democratic National Convention held its first-ever panel on Palestinian human rights. The panel came after persistent grassroots organizing against U.S. support for Israel’s assault on Gaza. We play excerpts, including from the Arab American Institute’s James Zogby, a former executive member of the Democratic National Committee; Dr. Tanya Haj-Hassan, a pediatric intensive care…
Hours before the Democratic National Convention officially began on Monday, Aug. 19, thousands of people gathered in Chicago’s Union Park for a rally and march organized by the Coalition to March on the DNC. “Democratic Party leadership switching out their presidential nominee does not wash the blood of over 50,000 Palestinians off their hands,” the coalition’s website states. “It is a matter of historical urgency that all organizations who fight for the rights of working and oppressed people in the US join us in this demonstration to stand in solidarity with Palestine.” The Real News reports from the streets of Chicago, speaking with march organizers and attendees.
Interviewer: Mel Buer Videography: Camero Granadino, David Hebden, Kayla Rivara, Maximillian Alvarez Post-Production: Cameron Granadino Audio Mastering: David Hebden
Transcript
The following is a rushed transcript and may contain errors. A proofread version will be made available as soon as possible.
Crowd:
If we don’t get it, shut it down.
If we don’t get it, shut it down.
If we don’t get it.
Shut it down.
Maximillian Alvarez:
We’re here on the ground in Chicago, just blocks away from the United Center, where tonight the Democratic National Convention is set to begin. But as you can see behind me, the March on the DNC has already begun with thousands of protesters filling the street. They began the march in Union Park down the road, and now they are currently making their way slowly but surely through the protest route. But as Mel and I reported for The Real News a couple of weeks ago, this March almost didn’t happen, right Mel?
Mel Buer:
Yeah. The organizations have been in the middle of a year-long battle to get permits for this march from the city. Finally, in the last two days, permits were granted for a rally space, for speakers, for a stage, and a protest route was part of the deal.
Maximillian Alvarez:
And so we expect more marches throughout the week. The Coalition to March on the DNC, representing over 200 organizations that helped organize this march are going to be back here on Thursday on the day that Kamala Harris speaks. The Real News will be there, and we’re going to take you on the ground right now inside the march itself.
So Hatem, as we discussed prior weeks ago, this march almost didn’t happen. What do you think it says about the strength of the coalition that you are marching in the streets of Chicago right now within sight and sound of the DNC?
Hatem Abudayyeh (Coalition to March on the DNC):
Yeah, I mean, we had every expectation that this is what was going to happen. We’re professional organizers. We’ve been doing this stuff for a long time. We’ve organized every single RNC and DNC protest since 2008. So I was confident that this was going to happen. We ran into some challenges, of course, but we did what we do. We worked with the community, we worked with allies, we worked with people that were close to the administration and we put some pressure on them. And it worked.
Maximillian Alvarez:
And what can folks expect from the rest of the week from the coalition?
Hatem Abudayyeh (Coalition to March on the DNC):
Yeah, I mean, listen, I think we hit close to 15,000 today. And Wednesday, we’ll have a good crowd. Thursday, we’ll have a good crowd. We’re definitely going to get the tens of thousands that we said we were going to get this week. This is a really, really great start.
I was a little bit worried. It was about 11:45 and there were only a couple thousand people there, and I got really, really nervous. But the community came through, my community came through, all the other communities came through. And people from the oppressed communities know that sometimes we start things a few minutes late. So folks got here a few minutes late, but we made up for it.
Amanda (protest attendee):
So I’ve come out basically to send a message that the Democrats need to earn our votes. They don’t just get to have them from us based off of our identity or theirs. And what I mean by earning our vote is materially making any progress at all actually, the bar is quite low, towards ending the genocide in Gaza and also to stop the racist policies that the Democratic Party has continued to perpetuate despite all of their marketing efforts to say otherwise.
I’m really just disappointed in the weaponization of identity politics. And what I mean by that is putting this woman of color up there and being like, “Oh yeah, she’s like for Black and brown people.” And she’s not. She’s made her career off of incarcerating Black men in California. And it’s sad to see that some people are falling for that. And that real solidarity between different groups includes just eliminating carceral structures in the United States, or at the very least reducing the amount of funds towards them. And so just putting a Black or brown face in a high place is not going to help us, and we really need to fight for material change.
Mel Buer:
And you have hope for that, yeah?
Amanda (protest attendee):
I do have hope for that. Yeah, I absolutely do. I mean, I think now is the time to push the Democrats and to tell them if they don’t change their policies, we’re going to vote for someone else. And hopefully that’s enough for them because they’re supposed to care about democracy, so yeah.
Hatem Abudayyeh (Coalition to March on the DNC):
And this is what they’re afraid of. They’re afraid of all of us. They’re afraid of the unity between Black and Palestinian people in this country. They’re afraid of the unity between Palestinian people and undocumented immigrants in this country. They’re afraid of the unity of the working class and the rank-and-file workers and the Palestinian people in this country.
So I want to thank every single one of you for being here. I want to thank you for what you do for us and for our families and for our people in Palestine.
Rama Izar (Student for Justice in Palestine):
And the blood of every single martyr in Gaza is on the hands of our politicians. Until we achieve an arms embargo and end to the unconditional aid to the Zionist entity, a permanent ceasefire and a liberated Palestine, we will remain in revolt both on our campuses and in the streets.
Mona (Palestinian Feminist Collective):
We have screamed in agony as we witnessed the brutal slaughter of Palestinian children, mothers, fathers, sisters, and brothers. We marched, we demanded, we wrote, and we prayed for our people in Palestine only to be met, only to be met with nothing but empty platitude and contempt from our elected officials. Enough.
Nick Tilson (NDN Collective):
We’re an international organization based out of Oceti Sakowin lands from my home lands in South Dakota. And we’re here showing solidarity, reminding America that this election’s happening on the stolen land of indigenous people. And here within the Land Back movement, we stand in deep solidarity with the Palestinian people. And we’re here to continue to call for a ceasefire and stop the funding of the military aid to Israel.
We’re also here fighting and reminding folks to support the movement of the return of indigenous lands back into indigenous hands.
And then the third campaign that we’re really focused on is we’re fighting for executive clemency for Leonard Peltier, who is the longest existing indigenous political prisoner in history. So we’re calling on President Biden for executive clemency for Leonard Peltier.
Mel Buer:
So we’re standing here. This crowd is just getting bigger and bigger. What is the thing that you’re most excited about being out here today and representing your organization?
Nick Tilson (NDN Collective):
I think the biggest thing is we’re out here showing the diversity that makes up this country. There’s been active efforts to erase indigenous people from the political process, from the narrative process. They tend to try to say that as we fight for liberation and freedom for all indigenous peoples, that they make efforts to try to erase us. And so our purposes here is to show that a multiracial democracy is possible, but we have to be fighting for real politics, like stopping the genocide, like fighting for indigenous land back, like freeing all of our political prisoners.
Mel Buer:
Is there anything else that you would like our audience to know about why you’re here, your organization, why you think it’s important to continue to come out and support this kind of event?
Nick Tilson (NDN Collective):
Well, NDN Collective is dedicated to building indigenous power. And we do that through multifaceted approach by investing into the self-determination of indigenous people. Because throughout settler colonialism, our lands, our decision-making process over our lives and our lands has been slowly taken from us. And the Land Back movement is about rebuilding those things.
And so we’re over here reminding America that if it’s ever going to be able to look at itself in the mirror, it is going to have to return, begin to return indigenous lands back into indigenous hands. There’s no way that they can get rid of us. They’ve tried everything that they possibly could to get rid of indigenous peoples in the building of America. And now indigenous peoples are building an uprising, a movement for structural change for this country. And that’s what Land Back’s all about. Not just getting actual lands back, but also dismantling the systems that are responsible for the stealing of our lands and responsible to maintain the continued theft of our lands.
And so as we come out here all throughout Indian country, we live in some of the poorest places in this country. This country prides itself on its human rights record, prides itself on its democracy, yet it never has even begun to get its relationship with indigenous people right.
And so we’re here to remind this country and America that, and to stand in solidarity with our Palestinian brothers, to stand in solidarity with our Black brothers and sisters who are fighting for Black reparations ’cause the Land Back movement not only believes a future where indigenous lands get returned back into indigenous hands, but we believe in a future that includes Black reparations too.
Christine Boardman (protest attendee):
I’m mainly out here because I’m pissed off at the way the US has been supporting Israel and the destruction of Gaza. That’s the main reason I’m out here. But there’s a lot of good reasons to be out here because the Democratic Party is really just tailing after Israel. Not right.
Mel Buer:
How about you?
Kate Thompson (protest attendee):
And I would say something very similar. I can’t stand watching day after day the carnage in Gaza and on the West Bank, and I think our government has to cut aid to Israel. We are funding all that carnage.
Christine Boardman (protest attendee):
Actually Kate made a really good point. Think about how many people are still just buried in those buildings that they’ve never been able to get out. So when they say that 38,000 civilians have died, I don’t even think that that’s half of it because there used to be more than a million people living there.
Kate Thompson (protest attendee):
Yeah. I’ve heard people say, I think up to 150,000 if you include everybody under the rubble and all the people who are going to die from disease and from starvation.
Mel Buer:
How do you feel about being out here amongst crowds of, it looks like a thousand, couple thousand. How does it feel to be out here supporting?
Christine Boardman (protest attendee):
Well, it feels great. I just wish there were more people out here because that’s what they need to do if we don’t protest. But I think people are disgusted with the way that we can’t get next to the United Center where all of them are going to be voting on an agenda, which is still going to support Israel.
Mel Buer:
How do you feel?
Kate Thompson (protest attendee):
It feels great. I go every Saturday. There are Palestinian demonstrations downtown, and I go to all of them. And those feel good too, but they’re smaller, so it’s nice to see a bigger crowd and I hope there will be even a bigger crowd. I think people are still arriving, so hopefully there will be even more.
Mel Buer:
Yeah, there’s definitely still people coming into the park. It’s really cool to be out here and to see what’s going on and to talk to folks like you. Is there anything that we haven’t discussed already that you would like our listeners to know?
Christine Boardman (protest attendee):
I guess about voting that I think I’m still not decided. I think I most likely will vote for Kamala just because I’m afraid of Trump, but I’m not sure yet. I want to find out. I want to see how much we can push her to change her policy before I make up my mind, and …
Kate Thompson (protest attendee):
I am voting for her, but that’s just because the alternative is Trump. And if you want to see fascism arrive, that’s going to be the step.
Montana Hirsch (MIRAC):
Yeah. We’re here with the Minnesota Immigrant Rights Action Committee. We’re also here with a larger national network called Legalization for All Network. And we’re here because we are marching for legalization for all. We stand in solidarity with Palestine and Palestinian Liberation as well. But yeah, we’re an immigrant rights group local to Minnesota, and we kind of fight for equality in all areas of life for all immigrants.
Mel Buer:
What is one message that you would like to send off to the DNC as you’re standing out here today?
Montana Hirsch (MIRAC):
I think we just want them to know that we want legalization for everyone. And even if the Democrats say that they’re going do better for immigrants in the country, we want to uphold them to that. And I know that there’s been some stuff about being strong on the border just like Trump is, and we want them to know that we’re not cool with that. And immigrants are people too, and they deserve to have their rights respected and upheld.
Mel Buer:
What is one thing that you really want folks to know as you’re talking to the individuals that come up to ask about your organization?
Esper Garcia (MIRAC):
Yeah, I mean, I guess that we marched on the RNC in Milwaukee last month as well. We are here to hold whoever’s in power accountable, and we haven’t seen the Democrats do much better. I was on a delegation to the US-Mexico border last spring, and the border wall was still being built under the Biden administration. So we just kind of know that we have to be out here in the streets fighting every step of the way for immigrant rights in order for them to take us seriously.
It’s a presidential election year, and a deeply divisive imperialist war has split the public. As the Democratic National Convention gathers in Chicago, anti-war organizers vow to be in the streets to protest US responsibility for a genocide overseas. No, this isn’t 2024. It’s 1968. And the police riot that follows in the city of Chicago has effects on US politics that will reverberate for decades to come. Former member of the Weather Underground Bill Ayers joins The Marc Steiner Show for a timely look back on the events of the 1968 Chicago DNC, and its resonance with the current Chicago DNC happening amid the genocide in Gaza funded and perpetuated by the Biden-Harris administration.
Studio Production: Cameron Granadino Post-Production: Alina Nehlich
Transcript
The following is a rushed transcript and may contain errors. A proofread version will be made available as soon as possible.
Marc Steiner:
Welcome to the Marc Steiner Show here on The Real News. I’m Marc Steiner. It’s great to have you all with us now as we approach this election in a deeply divided nation, our nation’s futures at stake. I think about another democratic convention that took place when I was much younger and a year that saw so much upheaval and revolutionary activity. It took place in the same city, Chicago, where the Democrats will be gathering again. The year was 1968, the year when the war in Vietnam was raging, when Martin Luther King and Robert Kennedy were assassinated. When the wake of King’s murder rebellions broke out across United States and Black communities in over a hundred cities, thousands of us camped out in Washington DC in Resurrection City as part of the Poor People’s Campaign. And the national mobilization to end the war in Vietnam, as thousands were dying in Vietnam and tens of thousands of Vietnamese were being killed, the organized protest outside the Democratic Convention, thousands came there. And what happened was a police riot and sued.
My guest today was there in ’68, was the leader of SDS. His name is Bill Ayers, and I’ve known him for a long time. He’s a distinguished professor or was retired now distinguished professor of education and senior university scholar at the University of in Illinois, Chicago, written extensively about social justice, democracy, education, teaching. He was a teacher for years and a leader of the Students for Democratic Society and the Weather Underground, which took on the US government during the war and has written numerous books. Let me give you a couple of them, A Kind and Just Parent, Teaching Toward Freedom, Fugitive Days, Public Enemy, On the Side of the Child, To Teach: The Journey, in comics. And Bill, good to see you, brother. Good to have you here.
Bill Ayers:
Great to see you. Great to see you, Marc. And it’s always a pleasure to be in conversation.
Marc Steiner:
Let’s go back to that moment. It was really very different than what we’re facing today. In some ways we’ll get to later. It is kind of the seeds of what we’re facing today. But take us back to that moment, and you being one of the organizers of the massive protest outside the convention. What led to that?
Bill Ayers:
Well, what led to it was years of opposition to the war. And as you know, the American War in Vietnam began in 1965. My first arrest opposing the war was inside a draft board in Ann Arbor. There were 39 of us arrested, which was a huge civil disobedience at the time. We were copying tactics and strategy from the Civil Rights Movement, but we were determined to bring a screaming, screaming response to the American invasion and occupation of Vietnam. So I was arrested in 1965 when something like 20% of Americans supported the war. Three years later, 1968, close to 55% opposed the war and the Democratic Party was in crisis, and democracy is in crisis because the war had defined the war, along with the Black Freedom Movement, the uprisings had defined the moral territory of the country. And so there’d been demonstration.
I’ve been arrested dozens of times. In those three years, there had been mobilizations on campuses, mobilizations in DC all over the country. And yet the war ground on. I think three things happened really in those three years that I think are worth noting. One is that people like me became full-time activists and organizers. I’d never been an organizer before, but I began not only demonstrating acting, fighting the police in the streets, but also knocking on doors which proved to be a very difficult undertaking. I got used to being beat up, but it’s hard to talk to strangers, and yet it’s the essence of democracy. So I spent an entire summer in Detroit going door to door to door seven days a week trying to convince people that the war was immoral, illegal, unnecessary, wrong, wrongheaded and so on. That was important, but it wasn’t as important as the Black freedom struggle coming out against the war in those three years. So Muhammad Ali, you remember.
Marc Steiner:
Yep.
Bill Ayers:
Said, “I won’t fight in the White man’s army. No Vietnamese ever called me the N word.” And he refused service and that shook the country up. The Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee issued a statement saying, “No Black man should go 10,000 miles away to fight for a so-called freedom he doesn’t enjoy in Mississippi.” That shook the country up. But most important perhaps was Martin Luther King’s famous Beyond Vietnam speech, which he gave at Riverside Church April 4th, 1967, exactly a year before his assassination. And King said, “We’re on the wrong side of world history. We are the most violent nation on earth. We must get on the right side of history and morality.” And he said, “People who criticize me and say, stay in your lane, don’t understand me and don’t understand what my lane is. My lane is humanity. My lane is justice, my lane is peace.”And he took a courageous stand and alienated a lot of his liberal followers. That was hugely important.
But the third thing I would point to in those three years was young men coming home from Vietnam and telling the truth about what they were asked to do there, what they saw there, what they suffered there. And they threw their medals, they organized their own groups, they added energy to the antiwar movement, and they threw their medals at the Congress that had sent them there and the country was shaken. So here you are in the spring of ’68, Gene McCarthy, a senator from Wisconsin, announces that he’s going to challenge a sitting president for the nomination. Wow. And he was going to challenge him on the Vietnam War. That was incredible. In late March 1968, last day of March 1968, Lyndon Johnson, the President, goes on television and says, “I will not run for reelection. I will work to try to end the war.” We were ecstatic, those of us who had been working against the war all over the country.
But I was in Ann Arbor. We swarmed out of the dormitories, out of our apartments, we swirled around the city and we ended up on the lawn of the President of the University of Michigan. He had a bullhorn because he was the president. And I had a bullhorn because I was the president of SDS. We had dueling bullhorns. I said something idiotic that night, I don’t remember. But what he said that night was, he said, “Congratulations to you young people. You’ve won a great victory now you should be satisfied and you should go home and count yourselves lucky and the nation thanks you.” I thought he was right. I thought we had won a million people were needlessly dead, but it was over.
Four days later, King was murdered. Two months later, Kennedy was murdered. And a few months after that, Kissinger emerged with a plan to expand the war all over Indochina. And this is what we were facing, Marc. All this energy, where was it going to go? We were standing up against genocide, where should we take that energy? And every week that the war went on, 6,000 people were murdered every week. So it wasn’t like we saw the end in sight. All we could see was an endless carnage in our name. And so we felt a sense of urgency and where would all that energy from the year, two years before [inaudible 00:07:31] it went to Chicago. And we went to be heard and seen, not just by the Democratic Party, but by the world. And that’s why our slogan was, “The whole world is watching.” And the whole world was watching.
Marc Steiner:
The whole world was watching. And I remember I was not in Chicago, Resurrection City was destroyed. They threw us out in Poor People’s Campaign, and I decided to go back to college. So it was up in New Hampshire. But I remember watching it and just even watching it, it was a horrific moment watching the violence that took place, the police attacking, people being bludgeoned, and you were in the middle of it.
Bill Ayers:
I was. I would say, one other thing, and then I’ll talk a minute about that moment, but our goal was to bring a million people to Chicago. And in that goal, we failed miserably for a lot of reasons, including the fact that Mayor Daley made it abundantly clear from his prior actions and from his threats that if you came to Chicago, you were going to be arrested and you were going to be hurt. That certainly suppressed the numbers.
Marc Steiner:
Yeah.
Bill Ayers:
It was a frightening, dangerous time. And we knew that we were risking a lot by going there. But our second goal was to show the world first, that there were a group of Americans who were committed to an international stand and we were not on the side of our government, we were against the government policies, and we could be counted on for being militantly opposed to this war making machine. But the other thing that we wanted to show the world was that the people in power were not able to meet except through police violence. And you called it a police riot. That was the official designation by the official commission set up to investigate the demonstrations. It wasn’t our riot, it was the police rioting. The police riot created so many ripples. For example, they not only attack the demonstrators, they attack the kids who were there supporting Gene McCarthy. The piece Clean for Gene.
Marc Steiner:
Clean for Gene.
Bill Ayers:
Not only did they attack them, they attacked the press. And not only outside the convention, but inside the convention itself. So you have people like Dan Rather who was kind of one of the very serious CBS commentators getting roughed up on the floor of the convention. This was unprecedented. And the police who were under the direct control of the mayor were determined to shut us down. And in trying to shut us down, they blew themselves up. And I think there’s a cautionary tale there, which is, I felt at the time the wise thing to do would’ve been to say, “This is democracy at work. Let’s let the demonstrators have the area outside the convention. They can shout all they want, and we can be in dialogue.” They should have let the demonstrators camp at Soldier Field instead of harassing them and chasing them out of Lincoln Park. And I feel the same way today.
In fact, I’m not the least bit nostalgic for a ship that already left the shore, but I did have a deja vu moment, which is when the police were called out this spring and attacked every Gaza encampment, every encampment for peace at campus after campus, starting with the horrendous actions at Columbia University. All I could think of was opportunity lost. A wise administration would’ve said, “This is what the university’s for debating important issues, let’s do it.” And then they could have said, “Let’s open it up instead of shut it down.” The same thing is true today around Chicago. All that energy is coming to Chicago. What they ought to do is say, “Not only do we want the conversation, but we’re going to allow a speaker on the platform from the uncommitted group in Michigan. 30 delegates inside the convention are going to be people who were elected from the uncommitted block.” What a great idea. Let them speak, have the discussion, don’t be so afraid of the people.
Marc Steiner:
One of the things I was thinking about in terms of convention in ’68 and what happened in that period, and Nixon winning that election, it launched the building of a reactionary movement in the wake of the anti-war movement. All the other work people were doing organizing in poor communities. And to me, it was kind of the beginning of a political tsunami from the right to really begin attack. And then many of you, many of us, you included, went underground to fight and to make a statement. And it just seems to me, but that was kind of the root of the beginning of what we’re facing now in Trump and the power of the right.
Bill Ayers:
Yes and no. I mean, I think there’s some differences. And I also think…
Marc Steiner:
But let me just say I’m not blaming them.
Bill Ayers:
[inaudible 00:12:37].
Marc Steiner:
I’m just saying, “Yeah, yeah, yeah.”
Bill Ayers:
Well, let me give you my analysis of what happened. Hubert Humphrey, the liberal happy warrior from Minnesota, very reminiscent of Tim Walz, right? I mean, he was a ultra liberal from Minnesota, and yet he had tied himself tightly to the Vietnam War. When he tried to pivot away from it was too late.
Marc Steiner:
Right.
Bill Ayers:
So my view is Humphrey lost the election. The left didn’t lose the election for him.
Marc Steiner:
Oh, right, right.
Bill Ayers:
Every time the right wing surges, the talking heads, the [inaudible 00:13:12] establishment, commentators all say, “Well, the left did it.” So it was the green party that got Bush elected in Florida. No, it was Gore’s failure, not somebody else’s victory. This is true today. If I were giving the Democrats advice, and I’m not, they’re not asking for it. But if I were, I would say, “Go with your strengths. Don’t try to be a little bit like Trump.” In terms of when did the right wing reaction begin, I’m not sure I would date it from when you date it. I could date it to McCarthyism. I could date it to the success of trade unions. Certainly, we could date it to the Civil Rights Movement or reaction to the Civil Rights Movement. Mass incarceration in many ways was a reaction to the Civil Rights Movement. So we always do have this push and pull.
But what I’m reluctant to get involved in is saying, “Here we have an election coming up, would all the people please be quiet? And would the women not demand anything right now? And would Black people chill for a minute? Then we’ll get elected and do all the right things.” I don’t think it works that way. I think the right has been on the rise. I think we have in this country a material base for White supremacy that existed from the beginning and it stirred up and mobilized. I’ve never seen it as mobilized as it is today, but I don’t think it began with ’68. And I think you could say the Reagan revolution was the beginning and so on. But I think that the White supremacist base is as well organized and as forceful as I’ve ever seen it. And what that tells me is that not only should we continue to build an independent, irresistible social movement for racial justice and for peace, but we should also unite to defeat fascism. We really have to because the territory I want to live on and organize on is served better if we don’t have a fascist government.
Marc Steiner:
So here we are in the midst of this Democratic Convention 2024, and some things went through, I was thinking about as you were responding. One is what is 1968 say to activists today, young activists as they confront what’s happening in Chicago again at the Democratic National Convention. Let me just stop there. And I have another piece I want to say, let me just stop at that moment.
Bill Ayers:
Well, I think first of all, as I said, I’m not nostalgic, but I also believe that the young have everything to teach us. And that when we were young, we were looking to older people to learn. Now that I’m quite old, I’m looking to the young to learn. And so I’m not sure that I can draw lessons. I would say this though, my analysis of what’s going on is that contradictions like the contradiction of war, the contradiction of White supremacy, these things were not resolved in ’68 or ’70 or ’72, they go on and they endure. People mythologize the sixties, I mean I’ve told you this before, but I didn’t know single person who looked at their wristwatch on December 31st, 1968 and said, “Oh shit, it’s almost over.” In ’69, nobody did that.
Marc Steiner:
Right, right.
Bill Ayers:
There’s no such thing as the ’60s. But I understand what people are pointing to. And I would say that it’s important to remember that we had two relatively modest goals. They got more ambitious as they went along. One goal was to end a war, the war in Vietnam. And then as we got deeper and become more radicalized, we wanted to end the cause of war. We failed to end the war in Vietnam. It went on for eight years, seven years after a majority opposed it. And we couldn’t figure out how to stop it. And as I say, 6,000 people a week were being murdered. So it’s important to remember, as glorious as some of us thought the ’60s were, it didn’t do the minor thing we wanted to do, which is end the war. We wanted to end segregation, Jim Crow. We wanted to end White supremacy. And again, here we are, the same contradictions, the same themes, the same issues. Not because history’s repeating itself, but because we’ve never resolved those fundamental contradictions.
Marc Steiner:
So in ’68, unlike now, there was a war that was killing tens of thousands of Americans and hundreds of thousands of Vietnamese people. Legal segregation was just ending. There was a sense of revolutionary fervor in the air, especially among young people, people organized and that was happening. We’re in a very different time at this moment in that way. None of that’s going on at the moment. Maybe some of the revolutionary fervors there, but in all my talking to people, I don’t get the sense it’s not the same firmament. I wonder from your perspective, where we are now as we’re in the midst of this Democratic National Convention. Where are we at this moment? How do you push that now?
Bill Ayers:
Well, I think you’re asking the most important question, and that is we should ask each other and we should ask everybody, what is this political moment? And when I name the political moment we’re living in, I think it’s the worst of times in some ways. There’s a proxy war in Europe, a Cold War growing in Asia, a genocide of war in the Middle East.
Marc Steiner:
Right.
Bill Ayers:
The police murder a Black citizens continues a pace. Women are being asked to get back in the medieval definition of who they are. Queer people are under attack. And then we could go on and on. The kind of racist approach to immigration is just staggering. So it’s the worst of times. And then I can turn my head the other way and say, it’s the best of times that is I’ve never seen a larger outpouring against racial apartheid than I saw just three years ago and you saw it too. It was extraordinary, what a wonderful outpouring. And yes, we haven’t stopped police killings and we haven’t abolished the police or the prisons, but we have really gained huge consciousness and understanding. Women are not going back into the closet. They are not going back to the Middle Ages. Queer people are not disappearing. And most importantly, perhaps environmental activism. While the planet is under tremendous stress and destruction, the environmental movement is growing. It’s growing in sophistication, in militancy. So I say it’s the best of times. So I think Charles Dickens would understand this political moment perfectly. The best of times is the worst of times. And I think that is the universal condition of humanity, contradiction. The question is how do we dive into and live within that contradiction? The Democratic Convention is just one site where that contradiction will be fully available and fully illuminated.
Marc Steiner:
So as someone who was there in ’68 outside the convention, arrested twice, spent your life since coming back from the underground, above ground as a teacher. And you’re sitting in a room now with a lot of young activists, young revolutionaries, young radicals.
Bill Ayers:
And very honored to be there.
Marc Steiner:
Yeah, absolutely. Absolutely, absolutely, always. So I’m just curious, when people do ask questions about what happened in ’68 and what we’re looking at in ’24 and what’s the connection, what are the differences, what do you say to people as they approach fighting, what they see at this moment?
Bill Ayers:
Well, as I say, I don’t have a lot of advice for people. I really have learned a ton from the Black Lives Matter people in the last 10 years, I’ve learned a ton from the incarcerated people I work with. I teach at Stateville Prison.
Marc Steiner:
Oh, you’re still doing that? Good.
Bill Ayers:
I’m still doing it and I’m learning all the time from my students and from young people. But I will say that, I said a minute ago, and I’ll repeat that, the themes that animated our movement are the same themes animating the movement today. That is racial justice and peace in the world. That is women’s freedom. These were our issues. This is what we cared about. And I remember when I was a community organizer, we had two slogans. One was, “Let the people decide.” We were for participatory democracy. And two was, “Build an interracial movement of the poor.” I still think those things are relevant.
Marc Steiner:
Me too.
Bill Ayers:
So I don’t think they’ve gone away. But if I had any advice for people at all, my advice has pretty consistently for the last several decades been don’t be self-righteous. You may be right on the issues, but when you feel yourself being certain that you’re right and the other guys are dead wrong, you’re in danger and you’re in danger of dogma, you’re in danger of orthodoxy and you’re in danger of stopping thinking. So I’m all for continuing to experiment with life, continuing to experiment with politics. I’m for trying everything and rejecting so much of the old, but I think we should be very careful about being certain that we and only we have the truth. We have to talk to people, we have to be in dialogue. We have to speak with the possibility of being heard. We have to listen with the possibility of being changed. I mean, this is fundamental pedagogy and it’s where I live.
Marc Steiner:
It’s also fundamental organizing.
Bill Ayers:
That’s right. And to me, teachers and organizers have pretty much the same job. I mean, when you go into a classroom or you knock on a door, you assume an intelligence there. And it’s your job to uncover it, to mobilize it, to unlock it. Your job isn’t to spread wisdom all over the tops of people’s heads. No, your job is to listen. Your job is to mobilize. Your job is to learn. And the greatest teachers I’ve ever known are always learning as they’re teaching. That’s true of organizers as well.
Marc Steiner:
Bill, it is really good to have this conversation with you. And Bill Ayers, it’s been a while since we’ve seen each other, it’s good to see you. Give my best to Bernadine and I’ll…
Bill Ayers:
I will. And I hope I see you in Baltimore.
Marc Steiner:
You will.
Bill Ayers:
I have that new book. I have a new book coming out called When Freedom is The Question, Abolition is the Answer. And I’ll be at the Baltimore Book Festival and I hope we can get together.
Marc Steiner:
What’s that date? Do you remember?
Bill Ayers:
I don’t remember. Sometime in late September.
Marc Steiner:
We’ll figure it out. But we will be there. That’s great. Well, thank you so much for joining us today. I appreciate it.
Bill Ayers:
Thank you, brother. It’s always a great honor. Take care.
Marc Steiner:
Once again, let me thank my old comrade and friend Bill Ayers for joining us today. Its perspectives are always enlightening. And thanks to Cameron Granadino for running the program and audio editor Alina Nehlich for all of her work, who was at [inaudible 00:24:10] for producing the Marc Steiner show and the tireless Kayla Rivera for making it all work behind the scenes. And everyone here at The Real News for making the show possible. Please let me know what you thought about what you heard today, what you like us to cover. Just write to me at mss@therealnews.com and I’ll get right back to you. Once again, thank you to Bill Ayers for being our guest today. And please keep listening to all the reporting stories my colleagues are producing now at the Democratic National Convention. So for the crew here at The Real News, I’m Marc Steiner. Stay involved, keep listening, and take care.
On Tuesday 20 August at Glasgow Sheriff Court, five young people from Palestine Action Scotland were jailed.
Israel, the climate crisis, and the UK’s political prisoners
It was after they occupied Thales’s weapons factory in Govan, Glasgow, on 1 June 2022. The five occupied the roof of the arms maker and dropped banners to disrupt production. Two of them also damaged weaponry inside the building. In total, they cost Thales’ over £1m in losses.
Three who were convicted of ‘Breach of the peace’ were given 12 month custodial sentences. Whereas two of the five who were convicted of ‘breach of the peace’ and ‘malicious mischief’ were given 14 months and 16 months custodial sentences. They will be expected to serve half of their sentences in prison.
The Judge stated the aim of the harsh sentences was to deter further activism against weapons companies in Scotland.
There has now been more than 40 political prisoners jailed in Britain since July for taking action to stop crimes against humanity.
16 of these are linked to the group Palestine Action, which takes direct action to stop Britain facilitating violations of international humanitarian law by Israel against the civilian population of Gaza.
26 are linked to Just Stop Oil, which takes direct action in support of science-based demands to prevent catastrophic and irreversible harm to humanity and life on earth.
Enabling Israel’s genocide
Thales is one of the world’s largest arms companies – producing armoured vehicles, missile systems and military UAVs (drones). Thales works in partnership with Elbit Systems, Israel’s largest weapons company, to produce military drones in their joint owned factory in Leicester called UAV Tactical Systems. They both work on the ‘Watchkeeper’ drone project which was modelled on Elbit’s Hermes 450 and “battle-tested” on the Palestinian people.
A Palestine Action spokesperson said:
Imprisoning activists for taking action against Scotland’s arms trade with Israel only serves to protect companies enabling genocide. Such sentences will urge more people to acknowledge Scottish complicity with the ongoing Gaza genocide and motivate them to take action against it. It is those who arm the massacres of the Palestinian people who are guilty, not those who take action to stop them.
On Friday, the senior British diplomat, Mark Smith, resigned from the FCDO over arms sales to Israel:
It is with sadness that I resign after a long career in the diplomatic service, however, I can no longer carry out my duties in the knowledge that this Department may be complicit in war crimes.
Defend Palestine Action
A spokesperson for Defend Our Juries said:
It was just over 10 years ago in September 2013, that Russia jailed 30 Greenpeace activists for a daring direct action against the Prirazlomnaya oil drilling platform. The action was widely perceived as symptomatic of Russia’s descent into authoritarianism under Putin. After concerted diplomatic pressure, the 30 were released in December 2013 after 3 months imprisonment.
But now Britain has decided to follow in Putin’s footsteps by filling its own broken prison system with political prisoners – people of conscience who have taken direct action to stop crimes against humanity.
Israeli embassy officials in London attempted to get the attorney general’s office to intervene in UK court cases relating to the prosecution of protesters, documents seen by the Guardian suggest.
During President Biden’s speech on the first night of the DNC, protesters briefly unfurled a banner that read “Stop Arming Israel,” before it was wrested away by convention staff. We speak to three members of the group Delegates Against Genocide who organized and carried out the action: Esam Boraey, a human rights activist and delegate from Connecticut; Florida DNC member Nadia Ahmad; and progressive Jewish activist Liano Sharon, an elected delegate from Michigan. “We were there specifically to confront President Joe Biden,” says Ahmad, explaining why the protesters chose to disrupt Biden’s speech. “He’s the one who can stop this genocide by picking up the phone and making a phone call, and he has chosen not to do that.”
This content originally appeared on Democracy Now! and was authored by Democracy Now!.
Comedian Reginald D Hunter has been the victim of a Zionist smear operation – but not even a very good one, at that. Because the central actors at the heart of the story have a long history of agitating for the Israeli state; just ask Jeremy Corbyn. So, it wasn’t hard to expose who they really were when they tried to remain anonymous.
Reginald D Hunter: Fluffy Fluffy Beavers
Social media has been in a frenzy over the story of two people who were hounded out of Reginald D Hunter’s gig at the Edinburgh Fringe – supposedly because they were from Israel. The Telegraph planted the seeds of the frenzy via Dominic Cavendish’s review of his gig. He asserted that:
Hunter… said a Channel 5 documentary containing a scene about an abusive wife herself accusing her husband of abuse made him think, “My God, it’s like being married to Israel.” There was audience laughter in response, but not from the couple on the front row, who shouted “not funny”.
The pair, who said they were from Israel, then endured their fellow audience members shouting expletives (“f— off” among them), and telling them to go – with slow-hand claps, boos and cries of “genocidal maniac”, “you’re not welcome” and “free Palestine” part of the toxic mix…
Instead of tolerating the couple’s joint heckle, he doubled down with a sinister air of beaming bellicosity: “I’ve been waiting for you all summer, where the f— you been?” He continued: “You can say it’s not funny to you, but if you say it to a room full of people who laughed, you look foolish.”
“Look at you making everyone love Israel even more,” he jeered, after the woman remonstrated with the audience.
The Telegraph then ran a separate story on the alleged incident – which noted that cops said there was no crime involved but regardless Hunter had already been cancelled by another venue. So, cue the Daily Mail ‘tracking down’ the Israeli couple – while misrepresenting the jokes entirely.
Enter the Daily Mail
Sabrina Miller wrote for the right-wing tabloid that the couple – who wished to remain anonymous (shocker) – said that the audience had “hate in their eyes”, were afraid they would be ‘attacked and beaten’, and that Jewish people ‘were not safe in the UK’:
I tracked down and exclusively spoke to *that* Jewish Israeli couple who were hounded out of Reginald Hunter’s Fringe show.
‘The looks on people’s faces in the audience – it was like they wanted to attack us and beat us’ the couple tell me.
They concluded by saying, as the Daily Mail wrote, that:
they now want to use their platform to tackle the rising wave of anti-Semitism and anti-Israel racism in Britain.
The wife added: ‘I do have an important message to get across and that is that people must stand up and not let hate win.
‘I’ve always spoken out, whether it’s about something Jewish or not’.
Aside from the fact that Reginald D Hunter’s joke wasn’t about Jewish people – it was about the genocidal Israeli state – this ‘anonymous’ couple have already used their ‘platform’ to speak out about what they view as antisemitism in the UK. This is because we now know who the couple are:
He did however remember this woman and her partner, because these were the very people who disrupted his humorous stories. He ALWAYS remembers people who disrupt his humourous stories. He loves telling humourous stories. pic.twitter.com/DptzEKs1xN
Yes, that’s right. It’s Mark Lewis and Mandy Blumenthal – the couple who infamously went on the BBC claiming they were leaving the UK because of Jeremy Corbyn. So, it seems there are quite a lot of questions they, and the Daily Mail’s Miller, have to answer over the Reginald D Hunter story:
Will Mark Lewis, Mandy Blumenthal and journalist Sabrina Miller tell us the truth about what happened at the Reginald D Hunter gig?
Because “Shimon and Talia” don’t exist, there was no “romantic holiday” and they weren’t “tracked down” for their story. Mark and Mandy are in… pic.twitter.com/jvSwuC0ioZ
Unfortunately, Mark and Mandy seemed to forget what century we were in (as did Sabrina Miller) – because video footage has already come out:
Video footage of ‘Israeli couple’ at the Reginal D Hunter gig in Edinburgh, who turned out to be professional UK Zionist victims Mark Lewis and Mandy Blumenthal, famous for Corbyn-bashing, representing Rachel Riley in legal actions and various publicity stunts.@reginalddhunterpic.twitter.com/XPpeZK7A9g
Plus, journalist Sangita Myska was actually there:
I hoped to stay out of this (due to stress since April) but it’s unethical to let it pass: I was, coincidentally, at this show. The events are not being reported accurately by some press. Yes, it was upsetting but the couple were not ‘hounded out’ by a ‘baying’ antisemitic crowd https://t.co/ig8rGGsBU1
Yet still – STILL – Sabrina Miller doubled-down on the story:
All day people have tried to discredit, gaslight and intimidate the brave Jewish, Israeli couple who spoke up about their experiences at Reginald Hunter’s show.
Let’s be clear – Mark and Mandy are NOT a “brave” couple:
This is Mark Lewis and Mandy Blumenthal with fellow pro-Israel activists Jonathan Hoffman and Sharon Klaff – whose links to the extreme right we exposed in ep 2 of The Labour Files.
So, it seems that the whole thing was a set-up. Reginald D Hunter’s joke about the STATE of Israel was NOT about Jewish people, nor did it mention Jewish people. Might we remind you that it is antisemitic to blame Jewish people for Israel’s actions? Yet here we are, with it being presented as if it was.
However, there is a big BUT with this whole story. Why would the Zionist lobby target Reginald D Hunter specifically? Maybe Mark and Mandy were genuinely at his show – and saw an opportunity for a quick newspaper headline and some faux outrage. Either way, this whole concocted story is just that; another example of why the phrase ‘it was a scam’ still rings true.
While the CGT proudly participated in the ‘Games of Shame,’ a personal triumph for Macron and his repressive, regressive policies, with the participation of the Israeli delegation and even the Israeli President, who was honored amid the ongoing genocide in Gaza, this letter from Jean-Pierre Page, former head of the CGT’s International Department, condemns the betrayals of France’s leading trade union.
Jean-Pierre Page sent this message (see original in French here) to an elected CGT representative who, on January 29, wrote against an open letter calling for genuine support for the Palestinian cause. He claimed the signatories were merely opponents of the current CGT leadership seeking reasons to criticize them, arguing that the CGT’s international meetings had never focused more on the Palestinian issue and that the union had been active in mobilizations. He dismissed the open letter as lacking concrete proposals and accused its authors of internal manoeuvring rather than genuine advocacy.
Both Jean-Pierre Page, a prominent signatory of the open letter, and I, the initiative’s originator, reacted the same day with the messages below, both of which went unanswered. Subsequently, I faced defamation, threats, and exclusion from the CGT local Teacher’s Union of Puy-de-Dôme (central France) on April 12th, with national CGT authorities confirming this exclusion on June 25th. These repressive measures also aimed to discredit and intimidate all signatories challenging the CGT’s stance on Palestine (see this petition detailing the facts and demanding my reinstatement).
I have read your comments on the Appeal and your refusal to support it. I concur with Alain/Salah’s response and arguments [see below], so I won’t reiterate them. I have frequently expressed my views on the situation in Gaza, the West Bank, and Jerusalem, and on the broader geopolitical stakes. More generally, I have written about the historical dispossession of Palestine, which has been colonized and dissected for a century, and whose people have endured martyrdom. The Palestinian people is currently subjected to a policy of extermination and genocide by Israel, a criminal state whose impunity is guaranteed by Western governments.
Do you share this view? If not, I find it damning for a CGT activist, considering that this is the only union in France whose proclaimed internationalist commitment is part of its foundations and values. Certainly, not just any kind of internationalism! Not the rhetoric from Congresses that the CGT leadership feeds us, but a consistent class-based internationalism, one that is anti-imperialist and anti-capitalist. Not just in words, but in deeds.
I was a member of the Confederal Executive Commission for 20 years and head of the CGT’s International Department for 10 years. This doesn’t give me more authority than others, but since the refocusing of our Confederation, I have observed that the CGT leadership has not only abandoned our internationalist principles but, worse, has aligned itself with the official narrative shared uncritically with the ETUC [European Trade Union Confederation] and the ITUC [International Trade Union Confederation, formerly the ICFTU, which broke with the WFTU — World Federation of Trade Unions dominated by Communists] whose complicities and compromises are well-documented. Let’s be clear: the CGT now follows a different international ‘policy’, aligned not with today’s world but with yesterday’s. Internationally, the CGT is on the wrong side of the barricade. Since the 53rd Congress [in 2023], the situation hasn’t improved but deteriorated.
This is particularly the case with positions in line with current trends and declarations condemning the October 7 action, which aim to stigmatize the armed and political struggle of an entire nation through the Palestinian resistance organizations that the people have established for themselves, without exception. I regard October 7 as a historic act, for which the Palestinians are paying a high price with extraordinary courage. This was also true in other anti-colonial struggles, such as in Algeria, Vietnam, China, and Africa. What’s different now? In practice, solidarity is no longer the position of the CGT’s International Department. I regret this deeply.
In my open letter to Sophie Binet [CGT Secretary General], I outlined several arguments about the historical causes of this liberation struggle, which can only be resolved through the self-determination of the Palestinian people. I made similar points in the Appeal I initiated, which gathered 300 French and international figures in support of the “Palestinian people on their feet, who do not want to live on their knees”. Yet, for obvious reasons, the CGT has chosen not to clarify “how it came to this”. In the latest issue of Ensemble — La Vie Ouvrière [the CGT’s monthly magazine], I encountered astonishing comments legitimizing Israel’s actions. This is not merely due to the weaknesses and gross ignorance of the CGT’s International Department but is a deliberate choice, reflecting a broader orientation. It stands in stark contradiction to the CGT’s historical international commitments, such as those made by the CGTU with Abdel Krim during the Rif War in 1925.
In the 1970s, I lived and worked in this region, alongside the Palestinian and Lebanese resistance. The CGT once enjoyed great prestige there, as I can personally attest. Today, that prestige has been lost. How did this happen? In 1996, I accompanied Louis Viannet [former CGT Secretary General] to Beirut, where we met with all progressive organizations, including Hezbollah, and to Gaza, where we had an extensive discussion with Yasser Arafat. I recall his warm praise for the CGT’s efforts and its capacity to maintain fraternal relationships with all the trade unions and political organizations of the Palestinian resistance. This is no longer the case, and the reason is quite clear. Contrary to the decisions of the Confederal Congress, the CGT leadership has chosen to make selective alliances. For instance, it ostracizes the oldest Palestinian trade union confederation [the Palestinian General Federation of Trade Unions], due to its affiliation with the WFTU. Do you support this stance? Conversely, the CGT refuses to sever ties with the Histadrut, a historic pillar of Israeli Zionism known for its corruption and unwavering support for Netanyahu. Do you agree with this? Additionally, the CGT no longer has relations with Syria, Iraq, or Jordan, and its ties with FENASOL in Lebanon, also affiliated with the WFTU, have become merely formal. Do you consider this acceptable?
These are just a few examples to help you reconsider and refine your arguments, which frankly fall short of what should be expected from a CGT militant who claims to be in solidarity. In reality, solidarity with what and how? Do you or do you not support the right to armed struggle, a legitimate right recognized by the United Nations Charter?
Shouldn’t we address this question and have the courage to answer it clearly? Why do we support armed struggle in Ukraine but not in Palestine?
You see, to me this choice belongs to the Palestinian people, and it is certainly not up to their class adversary — imperialism — to decide for them, especially in this area. This is why our internationalism must be substantive. Clarity is essential — indeed, indispensable. That’s why I signed this Appeal, as it contributes to this. All that’s left for you to do is sign it!
Fraternally yours,
Jean-Pierre Page
Message from Alain Marshal
Dear Comrades,
I’d like to take the liberty of responding to the comrade’s comment. I don’t see this as a ‘personal opinion on the document,’ as our 5 pages of detailed and referenced arguments are entirely ignored, with no mention of potential flaws. What stands out instead is a sweeping ad hominem attack on dozens of signatories from diverse backgrounds, accusing them, without a shred of evidence, of insidious motives. This baseless accusation, claiming comrades are exploiting the genocide in Gaza to settle personal scores, is unworthy. Misrepresenting the substance of a comment to launch personal attacks is usually a tactic when there are no compelling counterarguments or may even tacitly admit that the CGT’s problematic statements we are highlighting are indeed indefensible. Pitting quantity against quality is unacceptable; calling for a ceasefire while endorsing key (and widely discredited) elements of Israeli propaganda is neither healthy nor constructive.
If you want to argue against signing a document, it would be more appropriate to justify your opposition based on the document’s content or a principled disagreement with the open letter’s approach, rather than casually dismissing the majority of its signatories. Several comrades have declined to sign the letter for valid reasons — whether because a particular point in the petition concerned them, or because they preferred to maintain a different relationship with the CGT Confederation — without resorting to denigrating its initiators and supporters.
The appeal’s fundamental proposals are clear and concrete: we urge the Confederation to stop using pro-Israeli rhetoric and base its declarations on international law, justice, and morality, rather than succumbing to emotional, political and media pressures from our capitals subservient to Washington and its unconditional support for Israel. We could have made even more proposals had the Conf’ not responded so disappointingly — and even contemptuously — to our request, or had it been willing to engage in a genuine internal debate on this issue.
When the dust settles, the propaganda fades, and the truth about the events of October 7 and their aftermath becomes clear, the CGT will be credited for having leaders, members, and sympathizers who recognized what was happening and did their utmost to urge the Confederation to reconsider its stance. At a time when efforts to annihilate the Palestinian cause are in full force — including the egregious act of cutting off funding to UNRWA, the UN agency for Palestinian refugees, effectively condemning millions to starvation — it is our moral duty to distance ourselves from anything that could be seen as endorsing what is happening in Gaza. Many revelations since October 7 should have prompted the Conf’ to correct its position, yet it persists in its unacceptable statements. The dire situation in Gaza, the existential stakes for over 2 million Palestinians, the very future of Palestine, and the defense of the CGT’s values and history, which demand a firm stance against colonial oppression and the rejection of war propaganda, compel us to take this stand.
Fraternally yours,
Salah L. (Alain Marshal is a pseudonym used on this blog to uphold my ‘duty of neutrality’ as a public servant)
Israel has majorly escalated its campaign of shooting and killing children in the occupied West Bank since October, a UN report says, as Israel carries out its deadliest campaign in the West Bank on record amid its genocide of Gaza. In the 10 months since last October, Israeli forces tripled the number of Palestinian children they shot and killed in the West Bank than they did in the previous…
A U.K. official resigned from his position in the Foreign Office on Friday over the government’s weapons transfers to Israel as it carries out its genocide in Gaza. The former counterterrorism official, Mark Smith, worked on arms export licensing for the Middle East within the British Embassy in Dublin. In his resignation letter, which was first reported by journalist Hind Hassan…