Category: israel

  • This year, the Democratic National Convention held its first-ever panel on Palestinian human rights. The panel came after persistent grassroots organizing against U.S. support for Israel’s assault on Gaza. We play excerpts, including from the Arab American Institute’s James Zogby, a former executive member of the Democratic National Committee; Dr. Tanya Haj-Hassan, a pediatric intensive care…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • Hours before the Democratic National Convention officially began on Monday, Aug. 19, thousands of people gathered in Chicago’s Union Park for a rally and march organized by the Coalition to March on the DNC. “Democratic Party leadership switching out their presidential nominee does not wash the blood of over 50,000 Palestinians off their hands,” the coalition’s website states. “It is a matter of historical urgency that all organizations who fight for the rights of working and oppressed people in the US join us in this demonstration to stand in solidarity with Palestine.” The Real News reports from the streets of Chicago, speaking with march organizers and attendees.

    Interviewer: Mel Buer
    Videography: Camero Granadino, David Hebden, Kayla Rivara, Maximillian Alvarez
    Post-Production: Cameron Granadino
    Audio Mastering: David Hebden


    Transcript

    The following is a rushed transcript and may contain errors. A proofread version will be made available as soon as possible.

    Crowd:

    If we don’t get it, shut it down.

    If we don’t get it, shut it down.

    If we don’t get it.

    Shut it down.

    Maximillian Alvarez:

    We’re here on the ground in Chicago, just blocks away from the United Center, where tonight the Democratic National Convention is set to begin. But as you can see behind me, the March on the DNC has already begun with thousands of protesters filling the street. They began the march in Union Park down the road, and now they are currently making their way slowly but surely through the protest route. But as Mel and I reported for The Real News a couple of weeks ago, this March almost didn’t happen, right Mel?

    Mel Buer:

    Yeah. The organizations have been in the middle of a year-long battle to get permits for this march from the city. Finally, in the last two days, permits were granted for a rally space, for speakers, for a stage, and a protest route was part of the deal.

    Maximillian Alvarez:

    And so we expect more marches throughout the week. The Coalition to March on the DNC, representing over 200 organizations that helped organize this march are going to be back here on Thursday on the day that Kamala Harris speaks. The Real News will be there, and we’re going to take you on the ground right now inside the march itself.

    So Hatem, as we discussed prior weeks ago, this march almost didn’t happen. What do you think it says about the strength of the coalition that you are marching in the streets of Chicago right now within sight and sound of the DNC?

    Hatem Abudayyeh (Coalition to March on the DNC):

    Yeah, I mean, we had every expectation that this is what was going to happen. We’re professional organizers. We’ve been doing this stuff for a long time. We’ve organized every single RNC and DNC protest since 2008. So I was confident that this was going to happen. We ran into some challenges, of course, but we did what we do. We worked with the community, we worked with allies, we worked with people that were close to the administration and we put some pressure on them. And it worked.

    Maximillian Alvarez:

    And what can folks expect from the rest of the week from the coalition?

    Hatem Abudayyeh (Coalition to March on the DNC):

    Yeah, I mean, listen, I think we hit close to 15,000 today. And Wednesday, we’ll have a good crowd. Thursday, we’ll have a good crowd. We’re definitely going to get the tens of thousands that we said we were going to get this week. This is a really, really great start.

    I was a little bit worried. It was about 11:45 and there were only a couple thousand people there, and I got really, really nervous. But the community came through, my community came through, all the other communities came through. And people from the oppressed communities know that sometimes we start things a few minutes late. So folks got here a few minutes late, but we made up for it.

    Amanda (protest attendee):

    So I’ve come out basically to send a message that the Democrats need to earn our votes. They don’t just get to have them from us based off of our identity or theirs. And what I mean by earning our vote is materially making any progress at all actually, the bar is quite low, towards ending the genocide in Gaza and also to stop the racist policies that the Democratic Party has continued to perpetuate despite all of their marketing efforts to say otherwise.

    I’m really just disappointed in the weaponization of identity politics. And what I mean by that is putting this woman of color up there and being like, “Oh yeah, she’s like for Black and brown people.” And she’s not. She’s made her career off of incarcerating Black men in California. And it’s sad to see that some people are falling for that. And that real solidarity between different groups includes just eliminating carceral structures in the United States, or at the very least reducing the amount of funds towards them. And so just putting a Black or brown face in a high place is not going to help us, and we really need to fight for material change.

    Mel Buer:

    And you have hope for that, yeah?

    Amanda (protest attendee):

    I do have hope for that. Yeah, I absolutely do. I mean, I think now is the time to push the Democrats and to tell them if they don’t change their policies, we’re going to vote for someone else. And hopefully that’s enough for them because they’re supposed to care about democracy, so yeah.

    Hatem Abudayyeh (Coalition to March on the DNC):

    And this is what they’re afraid of. They’re afraid of all of us. They’re afraid of the unity between Black and Palestinian people in this country. They’re afraid of the unity between Palestinian people and undocumented immigrants in this country. They’re afraid of the unity of the working class and the rank-and-file workers and the Palestinian people in this country.

    So I want to thank every single one of you for being here. I want to thank you for what you do for us and for our families and for our people in Palestine.

    Rama Izar (Student for Justice in Palestine):

    And the blood of every single martyr in Gaza is on the hands of our politicians. Until we achieve an arms embargo and end to the unconditional aid to the Zionist entity, a permanent ceasefire and a liberated Palestine, we will remain in revolt both on our campuses and in the streets.

    Mona (Palestinian Feminist Collective):

    We have screamed in agony as we witnessed the brutal slaughter of Palestinian children, mothers, fathers, sisters, and brothers. We marched, we demanded, we wrote, and we prayed for our people in Palestine only to be met, only to be met with nothing but empty platitude and contempt from our elected officials. Enough.

    Nick Tilson (NDN Collective):

    We’re an international organization based out of Oceti Sakowin lands from my home lands in South Dakota. And we’re here showing solidarity, reminding America that this election’s happening on the stolen land of indigenous people. And here within the Land Back movement, we stand in deep solidarity with the Palestinian people. And we’re here to continue to call for a ceasefire and stop the funding of the military aid to Israel.

    We’re also here fighting and reminding folks to support the movement of the return of indigenous lands back into indigenous hands.

    And then the third campaign that we’re really focused on is we’re fighting for executive clemency for Leonard Peltier, who is the longest existing indigenous political prisoner in history. So we’re calling on President Biden for executive clemency for Leonard Peltier.

    Mel Buer:

    So we’re standing here. This crowd is just getting bigger and bigger. What is the thing that you’re most excited about being out here today and representing your organization?

    Nick Tilson (NDN Collective):

    I think the biggest thing is we’re out here showing the diversity that makes up this country. There’s been active efforts to erase indigenous people from the political process, from the narrative process. They tend to try to say that as we fight for liberation and freedom for all indigenous peoples, that they make efforts to try to erase us. And so our purposes here is to show that a multiracial democracy is possible, but we have to be fighting for real politics, like stopping the genocide, like fighting for indigenous land back, like freeing all of our political prisoners.

    Mel Buer:

    Is there anything else that you would like our audience to know about why you’re here, your organization, why you think it’s important to continue to come out and support this kind of event?

    Nick Tilson (NDN Collective):

    Well, NDN Collective is dedicated to building indigenous power. And we do that through multifaceted approach by investing into the self-determination of indigenous people. Because throughout settler colonialism, our lands, our decision-making process over our lives and our lands has been slowly taken from us. And the Land Back movement is about rebuilding those things.

    And so we’re over here reminding America that if it’s ever going to be able to look at itself in the mirror, it is going to have to return, begin to return indigenous lands back into indigenous hands. There’s no way that they can get rid of us. They’ve tried everything that they possibly could to get rid of indigenous peoples in the building of America. And now indigenous peoples are building an uprising, a movement for structural change for this country. And that’s what Land Back’s all about. Not just getting actual lands back, but also dismantling the systems that are responsible for the stealing of our lands and responsible to maintain the continued theft of our lands.

    And so as we come out here all throughout Indian country, we live in some of the poorest places in this country. This country prides itself on its human rights record, prides itself on its democracy, yet it never has even begun to get its relationship with indigenous people right.

    And so we’re here to remind this country and America that, and to stand in solidarity with our Palestinian brothers, to stand in solidarity with our Black brothers and sisters who are fighting for Black reparations ’cause the Land Back movement not only believes a future where indigenous lands get returned back into indigenous hands, but we believe in a future that includes Black reparations too.

    Christine Boardman (protest attendee):

    I’m mainly out here because I’m pissed off at the way the US has been supporting Israel and the destruction of Gaza. That’s the main reason I’m out here. But there’s a lot of good reasons to be out here because the Democratic Party is really just tailing after Israel. Not right.

    Mel Buer:

    How about you?

    Kate Thompson (protest attendee):

    And I would say something very similar. I can’t stand watching day after day the carnage in Gaza and on the West Bank, and I think our government has to cut aid to Israel. We are funding all that carnage.

    Christine Boardman (protest attendee):

    Actually Kate made a really good point. Think about how many people are still just buried in those buildings that they’ve never been able to get out. So when they say that 38,000 civilians have died, I don’t even think that that’s half of it because there used to be more than a million people living there.

    Kate Thompson (protest attendee):

    Yeah. I’ve heard people say, I think up to 150,000 if you include everybody under the rubble and all the people who are going to die from disease and from starvation.

    Mel Buer:

    How do you feel about being out here amongst crowds of, it looks like a thousand, couple thousand. How does it feel to be out here supporting?

    Christine Boardman (protest attendee):

    Well, it feels great. I just wish there were more people out here because that’s what they need to do if we don’t protest. But I think people are disgusted with the way that we can’t get next to the United Center where all of them are going to be voting on an agenda, which is still going to support Israel.

    Mel Buer:

    How do you feel?

    Kate Thompson (protest attendee):

    It feels great. I go every Saturday. There are Palestinian demonstrations downtown, and I go to all of them. And those feel good too, but they’re smaller, so it’s nice to see a bigger crowd and I hope there will be even a bigger crowd. I think people are still arriving, so hopefully there will be even more.

    Mel Buer:

    Yeah, there’s definitely still people coming into the park. It’s really cool to be out here and to see what’s going on and to talk to folks like you. Is there anything that we haven’t discussed already that you would like our listeners to know?

    Christine Boardman (protest attendee):

    I guess about voting that I think I’m still not decided. I think I most likely will vote for Kamala just because I’m afraid of Trump, but I’m not sure yet. I want to find out. I want to see how much we can push her to change her policy before I make up my mind, and …

    Kate Thompson (protest attendee):

    I am voting for her, but that’s just because the alternative is Trump. And if you want to see fascism arrive, that’s going to be the step.

    Montana Hirsch (MIRAC):

    Yeah. We’re here with the Minnesota Immigrant Rights Action Committee. We’re also here with a larger national network called Legalization for All Network. And we’re here because we are marching for legalization for all. We stand in solidarity with Palestine and Palestinian Liberation as well. But yeah, we’re an immigrant rights group local to Minnesota, and we kind of fight for equality in all areas of life for all immigrants.

    Mel Buer:

    What is one message that you would like to send off to the DNC as you’re standing out here today?

    Montana Hirsch (MIRAC):

    I think we just want them to know that we want legalization for everyone. And even if the Democrats say that they’re going do better for immigrants in the country, we want to uphold them to that. And I know that there’s been some stuff about being strong on the border just like Trump is, and we want them to know that we’re not cool with that. And immigrants are people too, and they deserve to have their rights respected and upheld.

    Mel Buer:

    What is one thing that you really want folks to know as you’re talking to the individuals that come up to ask about your organization?

    Esper Garcia (MIRAC):

    Yeah, I mean, I guess that we marched on the RNC in Milwaukee last month as well. We are here to hold whoever’s in power accountable, and we haven’t seen the Democrats do much better. I was on a delegation to the US-Mexico border last spring, and the border wall was still being built under the Biden administration. So we just kind of know that we have to be out here in the streets fighting every step of the way for immigrant rights in order for them to take us seriously.

    This post was originally published on The Real News Network.


  • This content originally appeared on Democracy Now! and was authored by Democracy Now!.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on Democracy Now! and was authored by Democracy Now!.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • It’s a presidential election year, and a deeply divisive imperialist war has split the public. As the Democratic National Convention gathers in Chicago, anti-war organizers vow to be in the streets to protest US responsibility for a genocide overseas. No, this isn’t 2024. It’s 1968. And the police riot that follows in the city of Chicago has effects on US politics that will reverberate for decades to come. Former member of the Weather Underground Bill Ayers joins The Marc Steiner Show for a timely look back on the events of the 1968 Chicago DNC, and its resonance with the current Chicago DNC happening amid the genocide in Gaza funded and perpetuated by the Biden-Harris administration.

    Studio Production: Cameron Granadino
    Post-Production: Alina Nehlich


    Transcript

    The following is a rushed transcript and may contain errors. A proofread version will be made available as soon as possible.

    Marc Steiner:

    Welcome to the Marc Steiner Show here on The Real News. I’m Marc Steiner. It’s great to have you all with us now as we approach this election in a deeply divided nation, our nation’s futures at stake. I think about another democratic convention that took place when I was much younger and a year that saw so much upheaval and revolutionary activity. It took place in the same city, Chicago, where the Democrats will be gathering again. The year was 1968, the year when the war in Vietnam was raging, when Martin Luther King and Robert Kennedy were assassinated. When the wake of King’s murder rebellions broke out across United States and Black communities in over a hundred cities, thousands of us camped out in Washington DC in Resurrection City as part of the Poor People’s Campaign. And the national mobilization to end the war in Vietnam, as thousands were dying in Vietnam and tens of thousands of Vietnamese were being killed, the organized protest outside the Democratic Convention, thousands came there. And what happened was a police riot and sued.

    My guest today was there in ’68, was the leader of SDS. His name is Bill Ayers, and I’ve known him for a long time. He’s a distinguished professor or was retired now distinguished professor of education and senior university scholar at the University of in Illinois, Chicago, written extensively about social justice, democracy, education, teaching. He was a teacher for years and a leader of the Students for Democratic Society and the Weather Underground, which took on the US government during the war and has written numerous books. Let me give you a couple of them, A Kind and Just Parent, Teaching Toward Freedom, Fugitive Days, Public Enemy, On the Side of the Child, To Teach: The Journey, in comics. And Bill, good to see you, brother. Good to have you here.

    Bill Ayers:

    Great to see you. Great to see you, Marc. And it’s always a pleasure to be in conversation.

    Marc Steiner:

    Let’s go back to that moment. It was really very different than what we’re facing today. In some ways we’ll get to later. It is kind of the seeds of what we’re facing today. But take us back to that moment, and you being one of the organizers of the massive protest outside the convention. What led to that?

    Bill Ayers:

    Well, what led to it was years of opposition to the war. And as you know, the American War in Vietnam began in 1965. My first arrest opposing the war was inside a draft board in Ann Arbor. There were 39 of us arrested, which was a huge civil disobedience at the time. We were copying tactics and strategy from the Civil Rights Movement, but we were determined to bring a screaming, screaming response to the American invasion and occupation of Vietnam. So I was arrested in 1965 when something like 20% of Americans supported the war. Three years later, 1968, close to 55% opposed the war and the Democratic Party was in crisis, and democracy is in crisis because the war had defined the war, along with the Black Freedom Movement, the uprisings had defined the moral territory of the country. And so there’d been demonstration.

    I’ve been arrested dozens of times. In those three years, there had been mobilizations on campuses, mobilizations in DC all over the country. And yet the war ground on. I think three things happened really in those three years that I think are worth noting. One is that people like me became full-time activists and organizers. I’d never been an organizer before, but I began not only demonstrating acting, fighting the police in the streets, but also knocking on doors which proved to be a very difficult undertaking. I got used to being beat up, but it’s hard to talk to strangers, and yet it’s the essence of democracy. So I spent an entire summer in Detroit going door to door to door seven days a week trying to convince people that the war was immoral, illegal, unnecessary, wrong, wrongheaded and so on. That was important, but it wasn’t as important as the Black freedom struggle coming out against the war in those three years. So Muhammad Ali, you remember.

    Marc Steiner:

    Yep.

    Bill Ayers:

    Said, “I won’t fight in the White man’s army. No Vietnamese ever called me the N word.” And he refused service and that shook the country up. The Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee issued a statement saying, “No Black man should go 10,000 miles away to fight for a so-called freedom he doesn’t enjoy in Mississippi.” That shook the country up. But most important perhaps was Martin Luther King’s famous Beyond Vietnam speech, which he gave at Riverside Church April 4th, 1967, exactly a year before his assassination. And King said, “We’re on the wrong side of world history. We are the most violent nation on earth. We must get on the right side of history and morality.” And he said, “People who criticize me and say, stay in your lane, don’t understand me and don’t understand what my lane is. My lane is humanity. My lane is justice, my lane is peace.”And he took a courageous stand and alienated a lot of his liberal followers. That was hugely important.

    But the third thing I would point to in those three years was young men coming home from Vietnam and telling the truth about what they were asked to do there, what they saw there, what they suffered there. And they threw their medals, they organized their own groups, they added energy to the antiwar movement, and they threw their medals at the Congress that had sent them there and the country was shaken. So here you are in the spring of ’68, Gene McCarthy, a senator from Wisconsin, announces that he’s going to challenge a sitting president for the nomination. Wow. And he was going to challenge him on the Vietnam War. That was incredible. In late March 1968, last day of March 1968, Lyndon Johnson, the President, goes on television and says, “I will not run for reelection. I will work to try to end the war.” We were ecstatic, those of us who had been working against the war all over the country.

    But I was in Ann Arbor. We swarmed out of the dormitories, out of our apartments, we swirled around the city and we ended up on the lawn of the President of the University of Michigan. He had a bullhorn because he was the president. And I had a bullhorn because I was the president of SDS. We had dueling bullhorns. I said something idiotic that night, I don’t remember. But what he said that night was, he said, “Congratulations to you young people. You’ve won a great victory now you should be satisfied and you should go home and count yourselves lucky and the nation thanks you.” I thought he was right. I thought we had won a million people were needlessly dead, but it was over.

    Four days later, King was murdered. Two months later, Kennedy was murdered. And a few months after that, Kissinger emerged with a plan to expand the war all over Indochina. And this is what we were facing, Marc. All this energy, where was it going to go? We were standing up against genocide, where should we take that energy? And every week that the war went on, 6,000 people were murdered every week. So it wasn’t like we saw the end in sight. All we could see was an endless carnage in our name. And so we felt a sense of urgency and where would all that energy from the year, two years before [inaudible 00:07:31] it went to Chicago. And we went to be heard and seen, not just by the Democratic Party, but by the world. And that’s why our slogan was, “The whole world is watching.” And the whole world was watching.

    Marc Steiner:

    The whole world was watching. And I remember I was not in Chicago, Resurrection City was destroyed. They threw us out in Poor People’s Campaign, and I decided to go back to college. So it was up in New Hampshire. But I remember watching it and just even watching it, it was a horrific moment watching the violence that took place, the police attacking, people being bludgeoned, and you were in the middle of it.

    Bill Ayers:

    I was. I would say, one other thing, and then I’ll talk a minute about that moment, but our goal was to bring a million people to Chicago. And in that goal, we failed miserably for a lot of reasons, including the fact that Mayor Daley made it abundantly clear from his prior actions and from his threats that if you came to Chicago, you were going to be arrested and you were going to be hurt. That certainly suppressed the numbers.

    Marc Steiner:

    Yeah.

    Bill Ayers:

    It was a frightening, dangerous time. And we knew that we were risking a lot by going there. But our second goal was to show the world first, that there were a group of Americans who were committed to an international stand and we were not on the side of our government, we were against the government policies, and we could be counted on for being militantly opposed to this war making machine. But the other thing that we wanted to show the world was that the people in power were not able to meet except through police violence. And you called it a police riot. That was the official designation by the official commission set up to investigate the demonstrations. It wasn’t our riot, it was the police rioting. The police riot created so many ripples. For example, they not only attack the demonstrators, they attack the kids who were there supporting Gene McCarthy. The piece Clean for Gene.

    Marc Steiner:

    Clean for Gene.

    Bill Ayers:

    Not only did they attack them, they attacked the press. And not only outside the convention, but inside the convention itself. So you have people like Dan Rather who was kind of one of the very serious CBS commentators getting roughed up on the floor of the convention. This was unprecedented. And the police who were under the direct control of the mayor were determined to shut us down. And in trying to shut us down, they blew themselves up. And I think there’s a cautionary tale there, which is, I felt at the time the wise thing to do would’ve been to say, “This is democracy at work. Let’s let the demonstrators have the area outside the convention. They can shout all they want, and we can be in dialogue.” They should have let the demonstrators camp at Soldier Field instead of harassing them and chasing them out of Lincoln Park. And I feel the same way today.

    In fact, I’m not the least bit nostalgic for a ship that already left the shore, but I did have a deja vu moment, which is when the police were called out this spring and attacked every Gaza encampment, every encampment for peace at campus after campus, starting with the horrendous actions at Columbia University. All I could think of was opportunity lost. A wise administration would’ve said, “This is what the university’s for debating important issues, let’s do it.” And then they could have said, “Let’s open it up instead of shut it down.” The same thing is true today around Chicago. All that energy is coming to Chicago. What they ought to do is say, “Not only do we want the conversation, but we’re going to allow a speaker on the platform from the uncommitted group in Michigan. 30 delegates inside the convention are going to be people who were elected from the uncommitted block.” What a great idea. Let them speak, have the discussion, don’t be so afraid of the people.

    Marc Steiner:

    One of the things I was thinking about in terms of convention in ’68 and what happened in that period, and Nixon winning that election, it launched the building of a reactionary movement in the wake of the anti-war movement. All the other work people were doing organizing in poor communities. And to me, it was kind of the beginning of a political tsunami from the right to really begin attack. And then many of you, many of us, you included, went underground to fight and to make a statement. And it just seems to me, but that was kind of the root of the beginning of what we’re facing now in Trump and the power of the right.

    Bill Ayers:

    Yes and no. I mean, I think there’s some differences. And I also think…

    Marc Steiner:

    But let me just say I’m not blaming them.

    Bill Ayers:

    [inaudible 00:12:37].

    Marc Steiner:

    I’m just saying, “Yeah, yeah, yeah.”

    Bill Ayers:

    Well, let me give you my analysis of what happened. Hubert Humphrey, the liberal happy warrior from Minnesota, very reminiscent of Tim Walz, right? I mean, he was a ultra liberal from Minnesota, and yet he had tied himself tightly to the Vietnam War. When he tried to pivot away from it was too late.

    Marc Steiner:

    Right.

    Bill Ayers:

    So my view is Humphrey lost the election. The left didn’t lose the election for him.

    Marc Steiner:

    Oh, right, right.

    Bill Ayers:

    Every time the right wing surges, the talking heads, the [inaudible 00:13:12] establishment, commentators all say, “Well, the left did it.” So it was the green party that got Bush elected in Florida. No, it was Gore’s failure, not somebody else’s victory. This is true today. If I were giving the Democrats advice, and I’m not, they’re not asking for it. But if I were, I would say, “Go with your strengths. Don’t try to be a little bit like Trump.” In terms of when did the right wing reaction begin, I’m not sure I would date it from when you date it. I could date it to McCarthyism. I could date it to the success of trade unions. Certainly, we could date it to the Civil Rights Movement or reaction to the Civil Rights Movement. Mass incarceration in many ways was a reaction to the Civil Rights Movement. So we always do have this push and pull.

    But what I’m reluctant to get involved in is saying, “Here we have an election coming up, would all the people please be quiet? And would the women not demand anything right now? And would Black people chill for a minute? Then we’ll get elected and do all the right things.” I don’t think it works that way. I think the right has been on the rise. I think we have in this country a material base for White supremacy that existed from the beginning and it stirred up and mobilized. I’ve never seen it as mobilized as it is today, but I don’t think it began with ’68. And I think you could say the Reagan revolution was the beginning and so on. But I think that the White supremacist base is as well organized and as forceful as I’ve ever seen it. And what that tells me is that not only should we continue to build an independent, irresistible social movement for racial justice and for peace, but we should also unite to defeat fascism. We really have to because the territory I want to live on and organize on is served better if we don’t have a fascist government.

    Marc Steiner:

    So here we are in the midst of this Democratic Convention 2024, and some things went through, I was thinking about as you were responding. One is what is 1968 say to activists today, young activists as they confront what’s happening in Chicago again at the Democratic National Convention. Let me just stop there. And I have another piece I want to say, let me just stop at that moment.

    Bill Ayers:

    Well, I think first of all, as I said, I’m not nostalgic, but I also believe that the young have everything to teach us. And that when we were young, we were looking to older people to learn. Now that I’m quite old, I’m looking to the young to learn. And so I’m not sure that I can draw lessons. I would say this though, my analysis of what’s going on is that contradictions like the contradiction of war, the contradiction of White supremacy, these things were not resolved in ’68 or ’70 or ’72, they go on and they endure. People mythologize the sixties, I mean I’ve told you this before, but I didn’t know single person who looked at their wristwatch on December 31st, 1968 and said, “Oh shit, it’s almost over.” In ’69, nobody did that.

    Marc Steiner:

    Right, right.

    Bill Ayers:

    There’s no such thing as the ’60s. But I understand what people are pointing to. And I would say that it’s important to remember that we had two relatively modest goals. They got more ambitious as they went along. One goal was to end a war, the war in Vietnam. And then as we got deeper and become more radicalized, we wanted to end the cause of war. We failed to end the war in Vietnam. It went on for eight years, seven years after a majority opposed it. And we couldn’t figure out how to stop it. And as I say, 6,000 people a week were being murdered. So it’s important to remember, as glorious as some of us thought the ’60s were, it didn’t do the minor thing we wanted to do, which is end the war. We wanted to end segregation, Jim Crow. We wanted to end White supremacy. And again, here we are, the same contradictions, the same themes, the same issues. Not because history’s repeating itself, but because we’ve never resolved those fundamental contradictions.

    Marc Steiner:

    So in ’68, unlike now, there was a war that was killing tens of thousands of Americans and hundreds of thousands of Vietnamese people. Legal segregation was just ending. There was a sense of revolutionary fervor in the air, especially among young people, people organized and that was happening. We’re in a very different time at this moment in that way. None of that’s going on at the moment. Maybe some of the revolutionary fervors there, but in all my talking to people, I don’t get the sense it’s not the same firmament. I wonder from your perspective, where we are now as we’re in the midst of this Democratic National Convention. Where are we at this moment? How do you push that now?

    Bill Ayers:

    Well, I think you’re asking the most important question, and that is we should ask each other and we should ask everybody, what is this political moment? And when I name the political moment we’re living in, I think it’s the worst of times in some ways. There’s a proxy war in Europe, a Cold War growing in Asia, a genocide of war in the Middle East.

    Marc Steiner:

    Right.

    Bill Ayers:

    The police murder a Black citizens continues a pace. Women are being asked to get back in the medieval definition of who they are. Queer people are under attack. And then we could go on and on. The kind of racist approach to immigration is just staggering. So it’s the worst of times. And then I can turn my head the other way and say, it’s the best of times that is I’ve never seen a larger outpouring against racial apartheid than I saw just three years ago and you saw it too. It was extraordinary, what a wonderful outpouring. And yes, we haven’t stopped police killings and we haven’t abolished the police or the prisons, but we have really gained huge consciousness and understanding. Women are not going back into the closet. They are not going back to the Middle Ages. Queer people are not disappearing. And most importantly, perhaps environmental activism. While the planet is under tremendous stress and destruction, the environmental movement is growing. It’s growing in sophistication, in militancy. So I say it’s the best of times. So I think Charles Dickens would understand this political moment perfectly. The best of times is the worst of times. And I think that is the universal condition of humanity, contradiction. The question is how do we dive into and live within that contradiction? The Democratic Convention is just one site where that contradiction will be fully available and fully illuminated.

    Marc Steiner:

    So as someone who was there in ’68 outside the convention, arrested twice, spent your life since coming back from the underground, above ground as a teacher. And you’re sitting in a room now with a lot of young activists, young revolutionaries, young radicals.

    Bill Ayers:

    And very honored to be there.

    Marc Steiner:

    Yeah, absolutely. Absolutely, absolutely, always. So I’m just curious, when people do ask questions about what happened in ’68 and what we’re looking at in ’24 and what’s the connection, what are the differences, what do you say to people as they approach fighting, what they see at this moment?

    Bill Ayers:

    Well, as I say, I don’t have a lot of advice for people. I really have learned a ton from the Black Lives Matter people in the last 10 years, I’ve learned a ton from the incarcerated people I work with. I teach at Stateville Prison.

    Marc Steiner:

    Oh, you’re still doing that? Good.

    Bill Ayers:

    I’m still doing it and I’m learning all the time from my students and from young people. But I will say that, I said a minute ago, and I’ll repeat that, the themes that animated our movement are the same themes animating the movement today. That is racial justice and peace in the world. That is women’s freedom. These were our issues. This is what we cared about. And I remember when I was a community organizer, we had two slogans. One was, “Let the people decide.” We were for participatory democracy. And two was, “Build an interracial movement of the poor.” I still think those things are relevant.

    Marc Steiner:

    Me too.

    Bill Ayers:

    So I don’t think they’ve gone away. But if I had any advice for people at all, my advice has pretty consistently for the last several decades been don’t be self-righteous. You may be right on the issues, but when you feel yourself being certain that you’re right and the other guys are dead wrong, you’re in danger and you’re in danger of dogma, you’re in danger of orthodoxy and you’re in danger of stopping thinking. So I’m all for continuing to experiment with life, continuing to experiment with politics. I’m for trying everything and rejecting so much of the old, but I think we should be very careful about being certain that we and only we have the truth. We have to talk to people, we have to be in dialogue. We have to speak with the possibility of being heard. We have to listen with the possibility of being changed. I mean, this is fundamental pedagogy and it’s where I live.

    Marc Steiner:

    It’s also fundamental organizing.

    Bill Ayers:

    That’s right. And to me, teachers and organizers have pretty much the same job. I mean, when you go into a classroom or you knock on a door, you assume an intelligence there. And it’s your job to uncover it, to mobilize it, to unlock it. Your job isn’t to spread wisdom all over the tops of people’s heads. No, your job is to listen. Your job is to mobilize. Your job is to learn. And the greatest teachers I’ve ever known are always learning as they’re teaching. That’s true of organizers as well.

    Marc Steiner:

    Bill, it is really good to have this conversation with you. And Bill Ayers, it’s been a while since we’ve seen each other, it’s good to see you. Give my best to Bernadine and I’ll…

    Bill Ayers:

    I will. And I hope I see you in Baltimore.

    Marc Steiner:

    You will.

    Bill Ayers:

    I have that new book. I have a new book coming out called When Freedom is The Question, Abolition is the Answer. And I’ll be at the Baltimore Book Festival and I hope we can get together.

    Marc Steiner:

    What’s that date? Do you remember?

    Bill Ayers:

    I don’t remember. Sometime in late September.

    Marc Steiner:

    We’ll figure it out. But we will be there. That’s great. Well, thank you so much for joining us today. I appreciate it.

    Bill Ayers:

    Thank you, brother. It’s always a great honor. Take care.

    Marc Steiner:

    Once again, let me thank my old comrade and friend Bill Ayers for joining us today. Its perspectives are always enlightening. And thanks to Cameron Granadino for running the program and audio editor Alina Nehlich for all of her work, who was at [inaudible 00:24:10] for producing the Marc Steiner show and the tireless Kayla Rivera for making it all work behind the scenes. And everyone here at The Real News for making the show possible. Please let me know what you thought about what you heard today, what you like us to cover. Just write to me at mss@therealnews.com and I’ll get right back to you. Once again, thank you to Bill Ayers for being our guest today. And please keep listening to all the reporting stories my colleagues are producing now at the Democratic National Convention. So for the crew here at The Real News, I’m Marc Steiner. Stay involved, keep listening, and take care.

    This post was originally published on The Real News Network.

  • On Tuesday 20 August at Glasgow Sheriff Court, five young people from Palestine Action Scotland were jailed.

    Israel, the climate crisis, and the UK’s political prisoners

    It was after they occupied Thales’s weapons factory in Govan, Glasgow, on 1 June 2022. The five occupied the roof of the arms maker and dropped banners to disrupt production. Two of them also damaged weaponry inside the building. In total, they cost Thales’ over £1m in losses.

    Three who were convicted of ‘Breach of the peace’ were given 12 month custodial sentences. Whereas two of the five who were convicted of ‘breach of the peace’ and ‘malicious mischief’ were given 14 months and 16 months custodial sentences. They will be expected to serve half of their sentences in prison.

    The Judge stated the aim of the harsh sentences was to deter further activism against weapons companies in Scotland.

    There has now been more than 40 political prisoners jailed in Britain since July for taking action to stop crimes against humanity.

    16 of these are linked to the group Palestine Action, which takes direct action to stop Britain facilitating violations of international humanitarian law by Israel against the civilian population of Gaza.

    26 are linked to Just Stop Oil, which takes direct action in support of science-based demands to prevent catastrophic and irreversible harm to humanity and life on earth.

    Enabling Israel’s genocide

    Thales is one of the world’s largest arms companies – producing armoured vehicles, missile systems and military UAVs (drones). Thales works in partnership with Elbit Systems, Israel’s largest weapons company, to produce military drones in their joint owned factory in Leicester called UAV Tactical Systems. They both work on the ‘Watchkeeper’ drone project which was modelled on Elbit’s Hermes 450 and “battle-tested” on the Palestinian people.

    A Palestine Action spokesperson said:

    Imprisoning activists for taking action against Scotland’s arms trade with Israel only serves to protect companies enabling genocide. Such sentences will urge more people to acknowledge Scottish complicity with the ongoing Gaza genocide and motivate them to take action against it. It is those who arm the massacres of the Palestinian people who are guilty, not those who take action to stop them.

    On Friday, the senior British diplomat, Mark Smith, resigned from the FCDO over arms sales to Israel:

    It is with sadness that I resign after a long career in the diplomatic service, however, I can no longer carry out my duties in the knowledge that this Department may be complicit in war crimes.

    Defend Palestine Action

    A spokesperson for Defend Our Juries said:

    It was just over 10 years ago in September 2013, that Russia jailed 30 Greenpeace activists for a daring direct action against the Prirazlomnaya oil drilling platform. The action was widely perceived as symptomatic of Russia’s descent into authoritarianism under Putin. After concerted diplomatic pressure, the 30 were released in December 2013 after 3 months imprisonment.

    But now Britain has decided to follow in Putin’s footsteps by filling its own broken prison system with political prisoners – people of conscience who have taken direct action to stop crimes against humanity.

    Meanwhile, last year it was revealed by the Guardian that the Israeli government had sought a political intervention in criminal trials concerning Palestine Action:

    Israeli embassy officials in London attempted to get the attorney general’s office to intervene in UK court cases relating to the prosecution of protesters, documents seen by the Guardian suggest.

    Featured image via Palestine Action/Guy Smallman

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Seg banner guests

    During President Biden’s speech on the first night of the DNC, protesters briefly unfurled a banner that read “Stop Arming Israel,” before it was wrested away by convention staff. We speak to three members of the group Delegates Against Genocide who organized and carried out the action: Esam Boraey, a human rights activist and delegate from Connecticut; Florida DNC member Nadia Ahmad; and progressive Jewish activist Liano Sharon, an elected delegate from Michigan. “We were there specifically to confront President Joe Biden,” says Ahmad, explaining why the protesters chose to disrupt Biden’s speech. “He’s the one who can stop this genocide by picking up the phone and making a phone call, and he has chosen not to do that.”


    This content originally appeared on Democracy Now! and was authored by Democracy Now!.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Comedian Reginald D Hunter has been the victim of a Zionist smear operation – but not even a very good one, at that. Because the central actors at the heart of the story have a long history of agitating for the Israeli state; just ask Jeremy Corbyn. So, it wasn’t hard to expose who they really were when they tried to remain anonymous.

    Reginald D Hunter: Fluffy Fluffy Beavers

    Social media has been in a frenzy over the story of two people who were hounded out of Reginald D Hunter’s gig at the Edinburgh Fringe – supposedly because they were from Israel. The Telegraph planted the seeds of the frenzy via Dominic Cavendish’s review of his gig. He asserted that:

    Hunter… said a Channel 5 documentary containing a scene about an abusive wife herself accusing her husband of abuse made him think, “My God, it’s like being married to Israel.” There was audience laughter in response, but not from the couple on the front row, who shouted “not funny”.

    The pair, who said they were from Israel, then endured their fellow audience members shouting expletives (“f— off” among them), and telling them to go – with slow-hand claps, boos and cries of “genocidal maniac”, “you’re not welcome” and “free Palestine” part of the toxic mix…

    Instead of tolerating the couple’s joint heckle, he doubled down with a sinister air of beaming bellicosity: “I’ve been waiting for you all summer, where the f— you been?” He continued: “You can say it’s not funny to you, but if you say it to a room full of people who laughed, you look foolish.”

    “Look at you making everyone love Israel even more,” he jeered, after the woman remonstrated with the audience.

    The Telegraph then ran a separate story on the alleged incident – which noted that cops said there was no crime involved but regardless Hunter had already been cancelled by another venue. So, cue the Daily Mail ‘tracking down’ the Israeli couple – while misrepresenting the jokes entirely.

    Enter the Daily Mail

    Sabrina Miller wrote for the right-wing tabloid that the couple – who wished to remain anonymous (shocker) – said that the audience had “hate in their eyes”, were afraid they would be ‘attacked and beaten’, and that Jewish people ‘were not safe in the UK’:

    They concluded by saying, as the Daily Mail wrote, that:

    they now want to use their platform to tackle the rising wave of anti-Semitism and anti-Israel racism in Britain.

    The wife added: ‘I do have an important message to get across and that is that people must stand up and not let hate win.

    ‘I’ve always spoken out, whether it’s about something Jewish or not’.

    Aside from the fact that Reginald D Hunter’s joke wasn’t about Jewish people – it was about the genocidal Israeli state – this ‘anonymous’ couple have already used their ‘platform’ to speak out about what they view as antisemitism in the UK. This is because we now know who the couple are:

    It’s Mark and Mandy

    Yes, that’s right. It’s Mark Lewis and Mandy Blumenthal – the couple who infamously went on the BBC claiming they were leaving the UK because of Jeremy Corbyn. So, it seems there are quite a lot of questions they, and the Daily Mail’s Miller, have to answer over the Reginald D Hunter story:

    Unfortunately, Mark and Mandy seemed to forget what century we were in (as did Sabrina Miller) – because video footage has already come out:

    Plus, journalist Sangita Myska was actually there:

    Photos emerged:

    Yet still – STILL – Sabrina Miller doubled-down on the story:

    Let’s be clear – Mark and Mandy are NOT a “brave” couple:

    Nor are they just a ‘random’ couple. Lewis is a lawyer (involved in notorious Zionist outfit Campaign Against Antisemitism) who just happened to defend Rachel Riley in court and called for “unapologetic Zionism” in the UK.

    Targeting Reginald D Hunter

    So, it seems that the whole thing was a set-up. Reginald D Hunter’s joke about the STATE of Israel was NOT about Jewish people, nor did it mention Jewish people. Might we remind you that it is antisemitic to blame Jewish people for Israel’s actions? Yet here we are, with it being presented as if it was.

    However, there is a big BUT with this whole story. Why would the Zionist lobby target Reginald D Hunter specifically? Maybe Mark and Mandy were genuinely at his show – and saw an opportunity for a quick newspaper headline and some faux outrage. Either way, this whole concocted story is just that; another example of why the phrase ‘it was a scam’ still rings true.

    Featured image via X – screengrab

    By Steve Topple

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • While the CGT proudly participated in the ‘Games of Shame,’ a personal triumph for Macron and his repressive, regressive policies, with the participation of the Israeli delegation and even the Israeli President, who was honored amid the ongoing genocide in Gaza, this letter from Jean-Pierre Page, former head of the CGT’s International Department, condemns the betrayals of France’s leading trade union.

    Jean-Pierre Page sent this message (see original in French here) to an elected CGT representative who, on January 29, wrote against an open letter calling for genuine support for the Palestinian cause. He claimed the signatories were merely opponents of the current CGT leadership seeking reasons to criticize them, arguing that the CGT’s international meetings had never focused more on the Palestinian issue and that the union had been active in mobilizations. He dismissed the open letter as lacking concrete proposals and accused its authors of internal manoeuvring rather than genuine advocacy.

    Both Jean-Pierre Page, a prominent signatory of the open letter, and I, the initiative’s originator, reacted the same day with the messages below, both of which went unanswered. Subsequently, I faced defamation, threats, and exclusion from the CGT local Teacher’s Union of Puy-de-Dôme (central France) on April 12th, with national CGT authorities confirming this exclusion on June 25th. These repressive measures also aimed to discredit and intimidate all signatories challenging the CGT’s stance on Palestine (see this petition detailing the facts and demanding my reinstatement).

    For more on the CGT’s involvement in the Olympic Games, see the revealing interview with Bernard Thibault, the CGT’s celebrated Olympic torchbearer. Thibault downplays labor code violations, claims that there have been “no fatal accidents” on the Olympic construction sites (despite seven deaths), and explains social cleansing with misleading justifications. Also, see “The CGT Union Bears the Olympic Flame and Validates Macron’s Social Truce” and “Olympic Games: Mass Surveillance and Political Discrimination”.

    Message from Jean-Pierre Page

    [Notes in square brackets by Alain Marshal]

    Dear Comrade,

    I have read your comments on the Appeal and your refusal to support it. I concur with Alain/Salah’s response and arguments [see below], so I won’t reiterate them. I have frequently expressed my views on the situation in Gaza, the West Bank, and Jerusalem, and on the broader geopolitical stakes. More generally, I have written about the historical dispossession of Palestine, which has been colonized and dissected for a century, and whose people have endured martyrdom. The Palestinian people is currently subjected to a policy of extermination and genocide by Israel, a criminal state whose impunity is guaranteed by Western governments.

    Do you share this view? If not, I find it damning for a CGT activist, considering that this is the only union in France whose proclaimed internationalist commitment is part of its foundations and values. Certainly, not just any kind of internationalism! Not the rhetoric from Congresses that the CGT leadership feeds us, but a consistent class-based internationalism, one that is anti-imperialist and anti-capitalist. Not just in words, but in deeds.

    I was a member of the Confederal Executive Commission for 20 years and head of the CGT’s International Department for 10 years. This doesn’t give me more authority than others, but since the refocusing of our Confederation, I have observed that the CGT leadership has not only abandoned our internationalist principles but, worse, has aligned itself with the official narrative shared uncritically with the ETUC [European Trade Union Confederation] and the ITUC [International Trade Union Confederation, formerly the ICFTU, which broke with the WFTU — World Federation of Trade Unions dominated by Communists] whose complicities and compromises are well-documented. Let’s be clear: the CGT now follows a different international ‘policy’, aligned not with today’s world but with yesterday’s. Internationally, the CGT is on the wrong side of the barricade. Since the 53rd Congress [in 2023], the situation hasn’t improved but deteriorated.

    This is particularly the case with positions in line with current trends and declarations condemning the October 7 action, which aim to stigmatize the armed and political struggle of an entire nation through the Palestinian resistance organizations that the people have established for themselves, without exception. I regard October 7 as a historic act, for which the Palestinians are paying a high price with extraordinary courage. This was also true in other anti-colonial struggles, such as in Algeria, Vietnam, China, and Africa. What’s different now? In practice, solidarity is no longer the position of the CGT’s International Department. I regret this deeply.

    In my open letter to Sophie Binet [CGT Secretary General], I outlined several arguments about the historical causes of this liberation struggle, which can only be resolved through the self-determination of the Palestinian people. I made similar points in the Appeal I initiated, which gathered 300 French and international figures in support of the “Palestinian people on their feet, who do not want to live on their knees”. Yet, for obvious reasons, the CGT has chosen not to clarify “how it came to this”. In the latest issue of Ensemble — La Vie Ouvrière [the CGT’s monthly magazine], I encountered astonishing comments legitimizing Israel’s actions. This is not merely due to the weaknesses and gross ignorance of the CGT’s International Department but is a deliberate choice, reflecting a broader orientation. It stands in stark contradiction to the CGT’s historical international commitments, such as those made by the CGTU with Abdel Krim during the Rif War in 1925.

    In the 1970s, I lived and worked in this region, alongside the Palestinian and Lebanese resistance. The CGT once enjoyed great prestige there, as I can personally attest. Today, that prestige has been lost. How did this happen? In 1996, I accompanied Louis Viannet [former CGT Secretary General] to Beirut, where we met with all progressive organizations, including Hezbollah, and to Gaza, where we had an extensive discussion with Yasser Arafat. I recall his warm praise for the CGT’s efforts and its capacity to maintain fraternal relationships with all the trade unions and political organizations of the Palestinian resistance. This is no longer the case, and the reason is quite clear. Contrary to the decisions of the Confederal Congress, the CGT leadership has chosen to make selective alliances. For instance, it ostracizes the oldest Palestinian trade union confederation [the Palestinian General Federation of Trade Unions], due to its affiliation with the WFTU. Do you support this stance? Conversely, the CGT refuses to sever ties with the Histadrut, a historic pillar of Israeli Zionism known for its corruption and unwavering support for Netanyahu. Do you agree with this? Additionally, the CGT no longer has relations with Syria, Iraq, or Jordan, and its ties with FENASOL in Lebanon, also affiliated with the WFTU, have become merely formal. Do you consider this acceptable?

    These are just a few examples to help you reconsider and refine your arguments, which frankly fall short of what should be expected from a CGT militant who claims to be in solidarity. In reality, solidarity with what and how? Do you or do you not support the right to armed struggle, a legitimate right recognized by the United Nations Charter?

    Shouldn’t we address this question and have the courage to answer it clearly? Why do we support armed struggle in Ukraine but not in Palestine?

    You see, to me this choice belongs to the Palestinian people, and it is certainly not up to their class adversary — imperialism — to decide for them, especially in this area. This is why our internationalism must be substantive. Clarity is essential — indeed, indispensable. That’s why I signed this Appeal, as it contributes to this. All that’s left for you to do is sign it!

    Fraternally yours,

    Jean-Pierre Page

    Message from Alain Marshal

    Dear Comrades,

    I’d like to take the liberty of responding to the comrade’s comment. I don’t see this as a ‘personal opinion on the document,’ as our 5 pages of detailed and referenced arguments are entirely ignored, with no mention of potential flaws. What stands out instead is a sweeping ad hominem attack on dozens of signatories from diverse backgrounds, accusing them, without a shred of evidence, of insidious motives. This baseless accusation, claiming comrades are exploiting the genocide in Gaza to settle personal scores, is unworthy. Misrepresenting the substance of a comment to launch personal attacks is usually a tactic when there are no compelling counterarguments or may even tacitly admit that the CGT’s problematic statements we are highlighting are indeed indefensible. Pitting quantity against quality is unacceptable; calling for a ceasefire while endorsing key (and widely discredited) elements of Israeli propaganda is neither healthy nor constructive.

    If you want to argue against signing a document, it would be more appropriate to justify your opposition based on the document’s content or a principled disagreement with the open letter’s approach, rather than casually dismissing the majority of its signatories. Several comrades have declined to sign the letter for valid reasons — whether because a particular point in the petition concerned them, or because they preferred to maintain a different relationship with the CGT Confederation — without resorting to denigrating its initiators and supporters.

    The appeal’s fundamental proposals are clear and concrete: we urge the Confederation to stop using pro-Israeli rhetoric and base its declarations on international law, justice, and morality, rather than succumbing to emotional, political and media pressures from our capitals subservient to Washington and its unconditional support for Israel. We could have made even more proposals had the Conf’ not responded so disappointingly — and even contemptuously — to our request, or had it been willing to engage in a genuine internal debate on this issue.

    When the dust settles, the propaganda fades, and the truth about the events of October 7 and their aftermath becomes clear, the CGT will be credited for having leaders, members, and sympathizers who recognized what was happening and did their utmost to urge the Confederation to reconsider its stance. At a time when efforts to annihilate the Palestinian cause are in full force — including the egregious act of cutting off funding to UNRWA, the UN agency for Palestinian refugees, effectively condemning millions to starvation — it is our moral duty to distance ourselves from anything that could be seen as endorsing what is happening in Gaza. Many revelations since October 7 should have prompted the Conf’ to correct its position, yet it persists in its unacceptable statements. The dire situation in Gaza, the existential stakes for over 2 million Palestinians, the very future of Palestine, and the defense of the CGT’s values and history, which demand a firm stance against colonial oppression and the rejection of war propaganda, compel us to take this stand.

    Fraternally yours,

    Salah L. (Alain Marshal is a pseudonym used on this blog to uphold my ‘duty of neutrality’ as a public servant)

    The post Jean-Pierre Page: in Gaza, France’s CGT Union Turned Its Back on Internationalism first appeared on Dissident Voice.

    This post was originally published on Dissident Voice.

  • Israel has majorly escalated its campaign of shooting and killing children in the occupied West Bank since October, a UN report says, as Israel carries out its deadliest campaign in the West Bank on record amid its genocide of Gaza. In the 10 months since last October, Israeli forces tripled the number of Palestinian children they shot and killed in the West Bank than they did in the previous…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • A U.K. official resigned from his position in the Foreign Office on Friday over the government’s weapons transfers to Israel as it carries out its genocide in Gaza. The former counterterrorism official, Mark Smith, worked on arms export licensing for the Middle East within the British Embassy in Dublin. In his resignation letter, which was first reported by journalist Hind Hassan…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • Protests against the Democratic National Convention DNC) kicked off on Sunday night with hundreds of people marching for Palestinian liberation and reproductive justice under a notably heavy police presence in downtown Chicago. The Bodies Outside of Unjust Laws march showcased the palpable anger greeting Democrats in the streets as they arrive in Chicago for three days of celebrations ahead…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • Secretary of State Antony Blinken warned on Monday that it may be the last chance for negotiators to achieve a ceasefire deal as Israeli leaders continued to reject a ceasefire and demanded that any deal allow them to exercise military control in Gaza. In remarks amid his visit to Tel Aviv, Blinken said that this round of negotiations is “the best, maybe the last, opportunity to get the…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • It is farcical to suggest a distinction between settler and state violence: They are part of the same settler-colonial structure, and not only complement each other but depend on one another.
    — Fathi Nimer, The West Bank: Settler Colonial Spillover of the Gaza Genocide

    While Israel continues its brutal genocide of Palestinians in Gaza, armed Israeli settlers, backed by the Israeli government, continue to expand illegal settlements in the West Bank. Our new visual captures how the Israeli government has transferred hundreds of thousands of guns and other weapons to Israeli settlers since October 7, as settler violence against Palestinian communities skyrockets with impunity.

    The post 150,000+ Guns and Weapons to Israeli Settlers Since October 7 first appeared on Dissident Voice.

    This post was originally published on Dissident Voice.

  • This story was published by in In These Times on Aug. 19, 2024. It is shared here with permission.

    Chicago, we all know why we are here.

    We are drowning, and our hearts are broken.

    We are drowning in debt. In medical bills. In rising rents. In inflation.

    We are under attack in this country. The Right has declared war on people of color, on trans people, on women. They are trying to dismantle our systems of education, trying to criminalize teaching Black history and the realities of racism, oppression and exploitation in this country. 

    They openly call for mass deportations and want to strip Black people of voter rights.

    Demonstrators on the eve of the Democratic National Convention in Chicago. Photo by Steel Brooks

    Every year, the climate crisis kills more people of heat, of floods, of fires. Every year, the number of climate refugees at home and abroad climbs and climbs.

    “They have provided an infinite supply of bombs to destroy Gaza’s homes, its schools, its hospitals, its playgrounds, its mosques, its churches, its croplands, its infrastructure.”

    And in this moment of absolute disaster, of absolute crisis.

    The American ruling class —the people descending on this city for the Democratic National Convention — have seen fit to spend our money on killing children in Gaza. 

    They have provided an infinite supply of bombs to destroy Gaza’s homes, its schools, its hospitals, its playgrounds, its mosques, its churches, its croplands, its infrastructure. 

    As the most powerful country on earth, they have bullied the rest of the world in the name of protecting a far-right government openly committing a genocide.

    And now …

    Now they want our votes.

    They say they have earned them by showing a little more empathy towards those poor Palestinians they happened to kill.

    Vice President Harris, we hear your shift in tone.

    But …

    Your tone will not resurrect the dead.

    “Your tone will not pull bombs out of the sky. Your tone is not enough.”

    Your tone will not shelter the living.

    Your tone will not pull bombs out of the sky.

    Your tone is not enough.

    Genocide Joe would still be on the ticket if it were not for this movement, for all of us. Our movement is one of the main reasons that you are now the Democratic candidate for President in the most powerful country on the planet.

    You, Vice President Harris, get to run for office because we ousted your predecessor right here in these streets. But it was never just about him. It was about the 40,000 Palestinians he helped kill.

    The Bodies Against Unjust Laws march on August 18 in Chicago included calls to link the struggles for abortion access, queer liberation and an end to the genocide in Gaza. Photo by Steel Brooks

    And now we are telling you that ​“Not the other guy” is not a platform.

    We are telling you that you actually have to earn our votes.

    And we are telling you exactly how to earn them.

    We are telling you we want a weapons embargo.

    We are telling you we want a permanent ceasefire.

    And we are telling you that we want them NOW.

    “But the majority of Americans, in poll after poll, say they disapprove of Israel’s actions in Gaza.”

    You keep telling us that democracy itself is on the line.

    You keep telling us that fascism is knocking at the door.

    You keep telling us that Trump would be worse.

    But the majority of Americans, in poll after poll, say they disapprove of Israel’s actions in Gaza. Study after study shows that a weapons embargo would earn you more votes, would secure you this election.

    Vice President Harris, why are you risking the end of democracy, the rise of fascism, the return of Trump to protect Netenyahu’s war on children?

    You are not the protector of democracy.

    We are the protectors of democracy.

    If you want to see democracy, look to Chicago’s streets this week. We are democracy speaking back to power, saying we will not be ignored.

    Eman Abdelhadi at the march on August 18 in Chicago. Photo by Steel Brooks

    We want to house our unhoused.

    We want to feed our hungry.

    We want to heal our sick.

    We want to guard our planet.

    We want to build our future, not rob Gaza’s children of theirs.

    You may think that the people who make it into the United Center today are the ones who get to shape the future of this country.

    That’s not true.

    “We want to build our future, not rob Gaza’s children of theirs. You may think that the people who make it into the United Center today are the ones who get to shape the future of this country. That’s not true.”

    We make the future of this country. We make it where we’ve always made it, right here on the streets.

    Vice President Harris, you have a choice. You could join a movement for justice. You could make a place for yourself in history. You could be a leader who chose to listen to her people rather than the interests of the war manufacturers. Or you could aid and abet a war criminal.

    Vice President Harris, if you want Donald Trump to win, then say that. Otherwise, WE ARE SPEAKING.

    Hear us. We will not be placated by tone. 

    We need you to act — and we will not leave the streets until you do.

    This post was originally published on The Real News Network.

  • The opening day of the Democratic National Convention on Monday will feature its first-ever panel on Palestinian rights, a result of persistent grassroots organizing against U.S. support for Israel’s assault on the Gaza Strip — a war that a majority of Democratic voters believe is genocidal. The co-founders of the Uncommitted National Movement — which urged voters to mark “uncommitted” on…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • For all the media pomp over US secretary of state Antony Blinken visiting Israel to bring about a peace deal, the proposition doesn’t even include a permanent ceasefire.

    The so-called ‘peace deal’

    In fact, Israel’s government demands that:

    • It can continue the genocide after a pause
    • It maintains control of key areas of Gaza, including borders
    • It maintains Israel’s newly established Netzarim Corridor, which splits Gaza in to Northern and Southern halves

    The increased securitisation of Gaza and the isolation of its North from its Southern part could pave the way for an Israeli attempt at colonisation of part of the strip. Prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu has himself stated that Israel is “working on” the “migration” of people in Gaza. And Israel’s national security minister Itamar Ben Gvir has called for “encouraging the migration of the residents of Gaza”.

    Israel had settlements and military posts in Gaza until 2005. But the state still maintained its occupation of Gaza, ongoing since 1967, according to an International Court of Justice finding. This is through Israel’s “degree of effective control” in a land, air and sea blockade, along with restrictions on Palestinians in Gaza’s movement, import and export taxes, construction, resources, water, electricity and documents.

    In his weekly cabinet meeting, Netanyahu spoke of the ceasefire proposal:

    I would like to emphasise we are conducting negotiations and not a scenario in which we just give and give. There are things we can be flexible on and there are things that we cannot be flexible on, which we will insist on.

    Therefore, alongside the major efforts we are making to return our hostages, we stand on the principles that we have determined, which are vital for the security of Israel.

    Hamas has rejected the new proposal, but pointed to a previous one that included Israel’s complete withdrawal from the Gaza strip as one it accepted.

    Israel appears dedicated to expanding, rather than cooperating with Middle East

    Israel’s colonial expansionism makes a long-term ceasefire and peace deal difficult. In the occupied West Bank, there are 700,000 illegal Israeli settlers living on seized Palestinian land. This territory is supposed to be part of Palestine under the ‘two state solution’. Under the 1995 Oslo accords, Israel split the West Bank into Areas A, B and C. Area C constitutes 60% of the West Bank and remained – and still does – under full Israeli control.

    The majority of Israeli settlers live in Area C, but there are also many in East Jerusalem. The splitting up of the West Bank in order to further colonise part of it is similar to the division of Gaza that Israel is attempting to uphold in the ceasefire deal today.

    And in the Golan Heights, which Israel took from Syria in 1967, the state plans to double its settler population there by 2027. That followed the US officially proclaiming that the Golan Heights is part of Israel under Donald Trump in 2019. Still, the majority of the international community considers the annexation illegal.

    Featured image via PBS NewsHour – YouTube

    By James Wright

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • On Sunday, Aug. 18, one day before the beginning of the Democratic National Convention, protestors rallied in downtown Chicago at a march organized by Bodies Outside of Unjust Laws: Coalition for Reproductive Justice & LGBTQ+ Liberation. As the coalition states on their website, “We demand national legislation to expand access to abortion, support families, and defend the rights of trans and queer people. We demand an end to US funds going to the genocide in Palestine.” TRNN reports on the ground from Sunday’s march as part of our ongoing coverage of the 2024 DNC.

    Studio Production / Post Production: Cameron Granadino


    Transcript

    The following is a rushed transcript and may contain errors. A proofread version will be made available as soon as possible.

    MUSIC:

    My body, my choice. My choice, my body.

    It’s not yours, it’s my body, my choice. My choice, my body.

    It’s not yours, it’s my body, my choice. My choice, my body.

    Maximillian Alvarez:

    So we’re here on the ground in downtown Chicago in the shadow of Trump Tower. It’s Sunday, August 18th. The Democratic National Convention officially begins tomorrow, but the people’s assembly in Chicago has already begun. We’re here in front of the Bodies Outside of Unjust Laws March that is currently making its way down Michigan Avenue. People from all over the country have assembled to unite around a message to the Democrats that they will not support the Democrats, Kamala Harris, or Joe Biden if they continue to support Israel’s genocidal war on Gaza, if they continue to not do what protesters are saying needs to be done to protect bodily autonomy, abortion rights, to stand up against attacks on trans and LGBTQ folks.

    This is an expression of grassroots anger that we are seeing manifest right here on the streets of Chicago, but this is going to be happening throughout the week. The real news is going to be on the ground covering the protests and covering the events inside the convention.

    Speaker 3:

    Everyone that will march on the DNC on Monday, on Wednesday, on Thursday… the power of each and every one of us is so much stronger because of this injustice, because of this moment of unforgiving genocide that we’re witnessing right now. Over the past 10 months, over the past decades, people like me, Jews constantly being told that if we are standing here and screaming, “Free Palestine,” we’re bad Jews.

    Progressive people are being told that if we are speaking up against genocide, if we are asking the Democratic Party where there were for 50 years since Roe without taking any action on abortion and access to reproductive rights, we’re getting in the way. We’re bad. There’s enough for us to scream that every single person deserves to be home, not just if you call them a hostage. Even if they’re unjustly detained by the Israeli government, they’re just as well-kept hostage.

    Maximillian Alvarez:

    As their website says, the coalition’s demands are, “We demand federal action to expand access to abortion and reproductive health care, support families, and defend the rights of trans and queer people. We demand an end to reproductive genocide, an end to US arms exports to Israel, and an immediate and lasting ceasefire in Palestine so all Palestinians can live in freedom and dignity with bodily autonomy and reproductive justice.”

    Cara, Could you say a little bit about where we are right now and the folks that you’re with and what the message is right now?

    Cara Mclane:

    Yeah, so Abortion Access Front, we are here at the DNC. We’re a nationwide organization, so we have about eight states represented in our group. We came to the DNC to specifically make sure that abortion isn’t a forgotten issue. We know that everyone usually is like, “Abortion is a state’s issue,” but in this election it could be a federal issue. So we came to, one, talk about misinformation out there, about medication abortion, and also to bring joy and humor to our activism.

    Maximillian Alvarez:

    Could you say a little more about what the Democrats and Kamala Harris could do to really secure abortion rights federally rather than just signal that, “We’re going to reinstate the protections of Roe?”

    Cara Mclane:

    So what I can say is anybody who’s running on a platform of codifying Roe, Roe has always been the floor. That is the least we can do for people who are capable of having pregnancies. We need someone who is going to take abortion, create it, protect it as a right for anybody who needs it or wants it without having to explain.

    Maximillian Alvarez:

    And could you just say a little bit for folks watching about the real state of abortion access in this country, what people are going through in the post-Roe world right now?

    Cara Mclane:

    Yeah, so one thing is, depending on your zip code, is whether or not you have access to abortion in a clinic or if you can buy abortion pills outright. You can get abortion pills anywhere in the country. They can be mailed to your home, but it is very hard for people to find that information, so you have people being turned away at hospitals in states where abortion’s been banned. You also have people who don’t know where to go. The information is not readily available until you need it, and that’s what we do. We say, “You may not need this now, but we’re going to tell you where you can get abortion pills and how to do it.”

    Maximillian Alvarez:

    And what can folks out there watching do to get involved in this fight and advance that cause?

    Cara Mclane:

    The number one thing that takes no money, takes no time, is saying the word abortion in the context that it’s a normal medical procedure. Say the word abortion. Really, if everyone did that, this work would be so much easier.

    Speaker 5:

    We are over 300 days into a US-backed genocide led by Israel. Palestine is a reproductive justice issue. As much as Western feminists try to wipe their hands of American-led violence happening globally, we know that full reproductive justice will never be achieved until we see a fully-liberated Palestine where fathers and mothers don’t have to hold their children’s dead bodies in plastic bags, where the rate of miscarriage hasn’t skyrocketed to over 300%, and where Palestinian families can exist and raise children without the constant threat of Israeli violence.

    Speaker 6:

    What you’re seeing around here, first of all, is just an incredible act of solidarity with people from every background, every political persuasion, everything you could imagine united around a pretty self-explanatory cause if you just look at what’s going on, which is that this is just a vicious, explicit, even proud genocide by the people who are doing it. And for some reason, America is both funding it and running cover for it, pretending like there’s some cute face to something purely evil.

    I, as a Sikh… we have an obligation to humanity that we’re supposed to feed people universally. Our temples have communal kitchens where anybody of any religion, any background can come to be fed. And even in times of war where we’ve had to fight wars for justice, we even feed the enemy outside of the battlefield. So there’s absolutely no circumstance in which we would ever be able to accept that starvation is used as a method of war. There’s many methods of war that I’m against going on right now, but the starvation was something that was announced I think on October 9th very explicitly. And somehow, when I came out and said that I cannot support this as a Sikh, people told me I must be an antisemite.

    Maximillian Alvarez:

    This is a very diverse coalition of folks out here. What do you think that says about this cause and the people who are rallying to it?

    Speaker 6:

    It means you just have to be a human to support it. In fact, the people that I’m seeing here the most are Jewish people that I grew up with growing up in this area. Rabbi of an anti-Zionist congregation, other Jews who have just been outspoken for human rights in all ways, even going to the West Bank to defend Palestinians against settler violence. These are things that anybody could do if you have basic humanity. Doesn’t matter what your identity is. This idea that we have to be a certain fascist way because of however we’re bor is just completely false.

    Maximillian Alvarez:

    And if you could speak directly to the folks inside the DNC right now, what would you want them to know?

    Speaker 6:

    We see the way that you make everything about yourselves, and it comes across as sadistic. This whole, “I’m speaking,” line from Kamala, for example… I’ve never seen such a display of egotism that’s so blatant and yet somehow, doesn’t register in their minds. So I want them to understand these are real humans, and just because their jobs might not seem very real sometimes because it’s a bunch of bullshit, doesn’t mean that it’s a bunch of BS for us. These are real lives that are being messed with.

    Maximillian Alvarez:

    What’s going on and what brought you out here today?

    Speaker 7:

    So we’re here on Michigan Avenue marching for abortion rights, marching for Palestine. And specifically what brought me out here is I’m with If Not Now, which is a national movement of American Jews seeking to end the genocide and apartheid in Gaza.

    Maximillian Alvarez:

    And what does it say that we have such a diverse range of causes and organizations represented in this one march? It’s been a source of criticism for some saying that, “Well, what’s the message?” But do you think that that diversity represents a strength here?

    Speaker 7:

    I think that diversity does represent the strength here. What we’re seeing here is that our main banner is freeing Palestine. We need to get an arms embargo. We need to get a permanent ceasefire. We need to push Kamala Harris to move towards a permanent ceasefire. That’s part of why we’re here. There’s a Not Another Bomb campaign by the Uncommitted movement we’re in coalition with, working to get an arms embargo for freeing Palestine and ending the genocide, being able to exchange hostages and ending the violence.

    One of the things that is really interesting as to why we’re a diverse collective here is that it shows that the base is about ending the genocide in Palestine, about an arms embargo. In fact, if you look at our polling numbers in key states like Pennsylvania, Arizona, if we have an arms embargo from the Biden-Harris administration, it actually pushes Kamala’s ticket up in those crucial swing states.

    Maximillian Alvarez:

    What’s the latest on the Uncommitted campaign and the strategy moving forward?

    Speaker 7:

    So the strategy moving forward is the Not Another Bomb campaign. It’s asking for Biden and Harris, but also Harris, to make an arms embargo a priority and a policy. Rather than just giving us rhetoric, she needs to put policy into action, a policy that is popular among American Jews, among Americans, among Democrats. It shows that across the country. If she agrees to an arms embargo, her numbers go up.

    Speaker 5:

    And in this moment of absolute disaster, of crisis, the American ruling class, the people descending on this city for the Democratic National Convention tomorrow, have seen fit to spend our money, my money, your money, on killing children in Gaza. They’ve provided an infinite supply of bombs to destroy Gaza’s homes, its schools, its hospitals, its playgrounds, its mosques, its churches, its croplands, and its infrastructure. At the head of the most powerful country on earth, they have bullied the rest of the world in the name of protecting a far-right government openly committing a genocide.

    And now, they want our votes. They say they’ve earned them by showing a little more empathy towards poor Palestinians they happen to kill. Vice President Harris, we hear your shift in tone, but I’m here to tell you your tone will not resurrect the dead. Your tone will not shelter the living. Your tone will not pull bombs out of the sky. Your tone is not enough. And now, you’re telling us that, “Not the other guy,” is a platform. We are telling you that you have to actually earn our votes, and we are telling you exactly how to earn them. We are telling we want a weapons embargo.

    We are telling you we want a permanent ceasefire. And we’re telling you that we want them now. When do we want them?

    Speaker 7:

    Now.

    Speaker 5:

    When do we want them?

    Speaker 7:

    Now.

    Speaker 5:

    Chicago, when do we want them?

    Speaker 7:

    Now.

    Speaker 5:

    You keep telling us that democracy itself is on the line. You keep telling us that fascism is knocking at the door. You keep telling us that Trump would be worse. But the majority of Americans, in poll after poll, say they disapprove of Israel’s actions in Gaza. Study after study shows that a weapons embargo would earn you more votes, would secure you this election. So Vice President, why are risking the end of democracy, the rise of fascism, the return of Trump to protect Netanyahu’s war on children? You are not the protector of democracy. We are the protectors of democracy.

    If you want to see Democracy, look to Chicago’s streets this week. We are democracy speaking back to power, say we will not be ignored. We want to house our unhoused. We want to feed our hungry. We want to heal our sick. We want to guard our planet. We want to build our future, not rob Gaza’s children of theirs. You might think that the people at the United Center today are the ones who get to shape the future of this country. That is not true. We make the future of this country.

    We make it like we’ve always made it. We make it right here in the streets. Vice President, you have a choice. You could join a movement for justice. You could make a place for yourself in history. You could be a leader who chose to listen to her people rather than the interest of the war manufacturers. Or you could become a war criminal. Ms. Harris, if you want Donald Trump to win, then say that. Otherwise, we are speaking. Hear us. We will not be placated by your tone. We need you to act and we will not leave the streets until you do.

    This post was originally published on The Real News Network.

  • Multiple corporate media outlets – including the Independent and GB News – smeared members of a Palestine Support community as antisemitic for supposedly staging a protest outside a performance of Fiddler on the Roof. In reality however, they hosted no such protest.

    What’s more, it was in fact Zionists attending the theatre show who threatened and hurled racist abuse at the group as they queued for ice-cream and coffee. Despite this, the corporate press spun the story to vilify them, and paint them as the agitators.

    The Canary spoke to the group about the hate incident, and the impact of the spurious reporting which followed.

    Another corporate media antisemitism smear

    On Tuesday 6 August, numerous corporate media outlets falsely accused a group of people of antisemitism. Specifically, the mainstream press suggested that the group – carrying Palestine flags – had turned out to protest a performance of Fiddler on the Roof in Regent’s Park.

    The Independent ran the headline:

    Pro-Palestine demonstrators accused of antisemitism after protesting outside Fiddler on the Roof”

    Meanwhile, GB News plastered its video coverage with the specious title:

    ‘Jew haters’ – Pro-Palestine demonstrators accused of anti-Semitism after Fiddler on the Roof march

    The Jewish Chronicle carried the most in-depth report and was the first to publish on the incident. Notably, it included a series of comments from a party of theatre-goers claiming victimhood of the supposed antisemitic protest.

    The outlets presented a series of videos from X posts portending to back this up. Of course, these invariably cherry-picked select clips from the footage, without portraying the full picture. Predictably also, none of the outlets contacted the supposed pro-Palestine protest group, or the venue to verify this. Unsurprisingly then, the reporting was a serious misrepresentation of events.

    Crucially, the group in keffiyehs and Palestine flags weren’t protesting the theatre performance at all. Instead, they were queuing together for refreshments in a public cafe – at least a couple of hundred metres away from the open air show. What’s more, it was the JC’s interviewees – who proudly self-professed as Zionists – that actually enacted a vile tirade of racist abuse against the group of cafe patrons.

    Fiddler on the Roof protest was an “utter lie”

    Given this, the Canary asked the group of cafe customers what happened from their perspective. We’ve maintained their anonymity for their own safety after the incident.

    Firstly, the cafe group emphasised to the Canary how the reporting was an “utter lie”. One member expressed how:

    We were getting a coffee after a Palestine Support event about a mile away from Regents Park. We knew nothing about any screening. We were all standing in the queue, chatting in pairs etc, waiting to order, and obviously just relaxing.

    However, things suddenly soon took a turn. The cafe group member said that it was at this point that they were:

    accosted by a group of Zionists who immediately started telling us to get out of the cafe, because some of us were (still) carrying Palestine flags.

    Eventually, he said that:

    We began to realise they had some kind of event going on because after several minutes one the women there started saying “you know we’re doing a screening today!” We tried to find out what she was talking about but she didn’t tell us.

    It was only an hour or two later when I took a walk to investigate some orchestral sounds I’d heard that I discovered the cinema (which I didn’t even know existed!) and a poster for Fiddler on the Roof. I went back to the group and explained that that’s what I had found and we were all mutually stunned that anyone would believe that peace protesters would have been anywhere to protest about a film like Fiddler on the Roof.

    Another member of the cafe group told the Canary that in the videos the Zionist theatre-goers supplied to the press, it appeared:

    They also cut out of their video the fact that we asked multiple times what “what’s screening?” when they said “you’re here because of the screening aren’t you?”

    One member who spoke to the Canary articulated that they had personal connections to Fiddler on the Roof, which made the accusations all the more shocking to them:

    I was particularly amazed because the Jewish side of my family were the very same people that the film is about – Russian Jews who left due to the Cossack pogroms!

    Racist abuse and threats

    Aside from the corporate outlets purposely leaving out these vital details, they also omitted footage showing the extreme prejudice and bigotry the Zionist theatre-goers directed at the cafe group. One of the cafe group customers described the vile racist and abusive comments the Zionists shouted at them:

    They called us animals, pigs one of them called my friend a dirtbag

    Notably, they singled out a Black Somalian member of the cafe group and “went right up into” her face and:

    said very aggressively “look at your face”

    The cafe group explained that they felt the hate-fueled verbal assault:

    had massive potential to descend into public disorder because of the suddenness, the volume, the physically threatening nature of the Zionist attack on our group.

    Notably, a member said to the Canary how:

    one man in particular looked like he was going to punch one of our group so I stepped in between them to ensure that he was aware there were several males there.

    Eventually the aggressive man who kept rolling his sleeves up and was being held back by several women, this group went back outside to the tables.

    What’s more, other people in the cafe appeared to recognise the risk of the Zionist party escalating the hate incident too. The cafe group member described how:

    Other customers were worried for our safety, as evidenced by one man – of large physique – approaching us and saying if you need any help I’m just outside here – just shout for me.

    Vitally, he felt that the fact that their group:

    reacted rationally to their improved behaviour meant that the situation eventually de-escalated as we started to disengage with them.

    Zionists were the aggressors at Fiddler on the Roof

    To make matters worse, the cafe group told us how the Zionists verbally assaulted them while they were out socialising with their children.

    Speaking separately to Migration Films about the incident, one of the children present told them it made him feel:

    Distressed and scared, because I didn’t know what they were going to do

    Migration Films also corroborated the group’s accounts with cafe staff:

    They independently confirmed that the group of Zionists were the aggressors. Notably, one staff member stated that:

    The guys with the Palestine flags – they just came in – they were just peaceful, they were just going about their way. And I think people just didn’t like that they had their Palestine flags in there.

    Videos on X also backed up their story:

    Corporate media spin against pro-Palestine solidarity

    Of course, it wouldn’t be the first time that the Jewish Chronicle had entirely fabricated a story to slander anti-racists and people critical of Israel. The Canary consistently covered the outlet’s vile smear campaign against dedicated anti-racists and socialists in the Labour Party during Jeremy Corbyn’s time as party leader.

    Unsurprisingly, a number of people have previously won legal cases against the Jewish Chronicle for its libelous and fictitious reporting. Moreover, throughout Israel’s ongoing genocide and war crimes, the Zionist media site has run relentless stories branding pro-Palestine protesters as antisemitic.

    Similarly, right-wing GB News has deployed a hostile media campaign against people speaking out against Israel committing genocide in Gaza. One of the cafe group customers explained to the Canary how one woman said to them that they:

    shouldn’t carry the Palestinian flag in public because it was “provocative”.

    Naturally, the GB News piece took this a step further. National Jewish Assembly chairman Gary Mond told the GB News presenters that:

    Lots of Jews feel this way, that the Palestinian flag is really a terror flag – it’s not the flag of any particular individual country.

    Of course, this was a palpably fallacious and bigoted statement on a number of counts. For one, over 75% of the United Nations member states – 145 separate parties – recognise Palestinian statehood. What’s more, none of that is to mention the fact that Israel itself is a settler colonial Western-imposed state, currently illegally occupying Palestinian territories.

    On top of this, it blatantly played up Israel’s rancid racist propaganda painting all Palestinians and supporters as “terrorists”. Moreover, GB News failed to detail Mond’s affiliations with Israel and its Zionist project. For instance, until April 2023, Mond was also a board executive for the Zionist apartheid-enabling organisation, the Jewish National Front (JNF).

    Of course, the similarity between Mond’s reaction and the Zionist theatre-goers response demonstrates the Israeli propaganda machine in action. In other words, right-wing outlets like GB News platforming Israeli propagandists has fed fuel to the fire of the racist apartheid and genocidal state’s motivated antisemitism smear campaign.

    Threatening the Zionist ‘political ideology’

    Given that both the Jewish Chronicle and GB News had form on this however, the antisemitism smears were completely on brand. However, even the so-called Independent uncritically regurgitated the factually erroneous report.

    Again, it shouldn’t come as a surprise. Russian oligarch Evgeny Lebedev owns the largest shareholding in the corporate news outlet, so it’s name is a glaring misnomer. What’s more, the Centre for Media Monitoring (CfMM), an arm of the Muslim Council of Britain, has identified distinct media bias in the UK mainstream press’s coverage of Israel’s genocide in Gaza. The Independent was among these outlets showing a clear pro-Israel bias across its reporting.

    In its report on this incident, the outlet sought a comment from head of policy at the Community Security Trust (CST) Dave Rich, who told it:

    Fiddler On The Roof isn’t just a Jewish musical: it’s the family story of most Jewish families in this country. Holding an anti-Israel protest there is pure antisemitism.

    But as the Canary has previously noted, the CST is hardly a non-partisan organisation. In fact, director of right-wing pro-Israel group Labour Against Antisemitism (LAAS) Alex Hearn recently invoked a report by the CST to smear black Labour MP Clive Lewis as antisemitic. In particular, the report claimed that antisemitism had sky-rocketed after 7 October. However, as the Canary noted, the CST had purposely conflated antisemitism with anti-Zionism. We wrote that:

    This has been glaringly obvious as the Western corporate media and right-wing politicians have branded pro-Palestine protest demonstrations as antisemitic on multiple occasions.

    So once again, the corporate press has done this over even minor expressions of support for Palestine. In this instance however, it was simply for wearing symbols of Palestinian solidarity in public. As one of the cafe group members expressed to the Canary:

    The sense is that Palestine activists seem to be designated as worthy of any kind of common assault by many Zionists who feel they have a right to abuse us because we threaten their political ideology.

    Zionists’ ‘insidious’ antisemitism accusations

    Ultimately, one of the cafe group customers felt that the incident showed:

    how vile, aggressive, and racist Zionists can be when they simply see a Palestinian flag, and how insidious they are in accusing people of antisemitism without justification.

    Already, following the verbal assault in public and the subsequent media misreporting, Zionists have doxxed one group member. In particular, they have tried to intimidate him in his private life, targeting his business. He told the Canary that:

    They were trying to shock me with the news that they have “found me” obvs implied threat to business…. Haven’t checked yet but if reviews can be left I will no doubt have a few very unflattering ones to delete etc.!

    Of course, it’s also precisely the corporate media’s fabricated antisemitism smears like this that have emboldened violent, racist right-wing and Zionists attacks against Palestinians, and people showing support for Palestine in public. One of the cafe group customers argued that:

    It’s a similar philosophy to the recent EDL marchers who feel they can be as violent as they like if they encounter anyone who threatens their political ideology.

    In that way, this racist verbal assault and corporate media antisemitism smear cannot be extricated from the violent racist pogroms fascists carried out across the UK.

    If anyone was making a mockery of the meaning behind Fiddler on the Roof, it was the racist Zionists.

    They viciously impinged on the social lives of the cafe customers. Wearing traditional keffiyehs and sporting Palestinian flags in public is a mark of solidarity and an expression of cultural pride, in the midst of Israel’s abhorrent genocide. As ever though, to Zionists, the only tradition that matters is Israel’s violent crusade of ethnic cleansing.

    They’ll readily weaponise spurious allegations of antisemitism to silence anyone remotely showing solidarity in their public or private lives. It shows that Israel’s propaganda reaches far beyond its illegally occupying borders. Zionists and media apologists continue to prop it up in Israel’s allied Western coloniser core – while pushing pro-Palestine voices to the margins.

    Feature image via the Canary

    By Hannah Sharland

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Following over a month of warnings, Gaza recorded its first case of polio since the highly contagious virus was eradicated there 25 years ago, prompting a Friday call by United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres for a temporary truce to enable a vaccination drive in the embattled strip. The Gaza Health Ministry said Friday that an 10-month-old infant in the central city of Deir al…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • There’s less than three months to go until the U.S. presidential election on November 5, 2024. And like the sun rising, billionaires are increasingly making huge donations, or finding other ways to garner influence, to shape the election’s outcome and gain greater access and influence with its potential winner. We all have our own interests, causes, and commitments…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • In the eastern reaches of the Mediterranean Sea lie vast reserves of natural gas. For more than a decade, Israel has generated billions of dollars in revenue for state coffers by plundering the depths of the Tamar gas field; in 2019, fossil fuel companies also began producing gas at the larger, nearby Leviathan field. But it is a United States-based company that operates the bulk of Israel’s…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • The number of Palestinians murdered by Israel‘s attacks on Gaza since 7 October has surpassed 40,000. Nearly 16,500 of the victims of Israeli terrorism were just children.

    Another 10,000 people are lying dead underneath hundreds and thousands of tonnes of rubble.

    Israel: evaporating children with impunity

    One Al Jazeera correspondent, Hani Mahmoud, suggested the 40,000 figure is “a very conservative reading of the number of casualties across Gaza”:

    There are still those who are missing and trapped under the rubble, who haven’t been identified, haven’t been collected, haven’t been counted yet.

    There are those who are missing, whose family members don’t know anything about their whereabouts. There are those who were evaporated, given the intensity and the scale of the bombs.

    Evaporated. Wiped off the face of the earth for having the misfortune of being born in another part of the world to you and I.

    Displaced children, bombed in their beds as they sleep in makeshift tents. Israel has already destroyed their homes. It was a dire situation long before 7 October 2023, but now it is a catastrophe, a humanitarian crisis, created in Washington and delivered by their colonial outpost in the Middle East.

    The world is utterly complicit with the Israeli terrorist regime. If this happened in any European country — quite literally any — how would other countries react?

    The damage unleashed by Israel’s relentless bombardments of the Gaza Strip and the undefinable toll of misery and suffering experienced by a hungry population, struggling to find safety in an area where there is no sanctuary to be found.

    How would we react?

    How would we react if this was happening in Paris, Madrid or Milan?

    On average, Israel has killed about 130 humans every day in Gaza over the past 10 months. The unprecedented scale of the Israeli occupation military’s destruction of homes, hospitals, schools and places of worship is way beyond anything a majority of us have experienced in our lifetime.

    How would we react if this was happening in Amsterdam, London or Brussels?

    The accumulative effects of Israel’s barbaric war on Gaza could mean the true death toll could reach more than 186,000 human beings. War has indirect health implications beyond the direct harm from the violence itself, and it will continue to cause many indirect deaths in the coming weeks, months and years through life-ending diseases and the destruction of health facilities and food distribution centres.

    How would we react if this was happening in Athens, Budapest or Vienna?

    While we were distracted with a general election and the Farage-incited race riots that swept across England, Israel has gone about unleashing some of its most brutal aggressions to date.

    Did anyone else notice how so many far-right rioters in England were also fanatical Israel supporters? Strange that.

    The savagery is unfathomable

    The horrific massacre at al-Tabin school in the Daraj neighbourhood in central Gaza City, this past week, condemned by the global south, claimed the lives of more than 100 innocent civilians, a majority of whom were women and children seeking shelter from the never ending cycle of violence.

    Israel claimed the school was yet another Khamas “control and command centre”, without providing a single piece of evidence to support their ludicrously dishonest and repetitive assertions.

    But this is a military that savagely massacred dozens of its own people on 7 October – witnessed by numerous Israeli citizens while getting its kill lists from leaked WhatsApp data.

    It’s all very well and good for the morally bankrupt and entirely complicit Western leaders to say it’s unacceptable and tragic, but it means absolutely nothing if they refuse to follow it up with some sort of meaningful action — something they have failed to do

    The same global nuclear powers can scream and shout as much as they like about Israel’s right to self-defence, but what about the Palestinians right to self-defence? They’ve been suffering under a brutal occupation for nearly eighty years.

    Britain, the United States, and its embarrassingly sycophantic allies continue to both-side a genocide as if it hasn’t been live-streamed around the world for all to see for themselves.

    The elites think you are fucking stupid. They are relying on the same meticulous pro-Israel spoon-feeding that has served them so well for generations.

    But I sincerely believe we are past that now. The Gaza genocide has opened the eyes of the world to the unbridled evil of Israel and all of those that continue to offer their backing — politically, financially and militarily — to the gravest of crimes committed against humanity in a vast majority of our lifetimes.

    Israel and the West think we’re all stupid

    Those poor, deluded people that thought Keir Starmer was going to stride on in and put an end to Britain’s complicity in genocide must be feeling ashamed of their very existence right now.

    And what about these Trump-supporting ‘pro-Palestine influencers’ that deservedly earn a decent crust for the work they do in highlighting and exposing the atrocities being committed by Israel?

    While they have been absolutely right to call out Joe Biden’s complicity, how do they plan to sell the ultra-Zionist Trump to their hoards of followers when the loathsome orange turd gives his genocide maniac friend, Bibi, the go ahead to wipe out the remaining third of Gaza and commit his very own Nagasaki for the 21st century?

    As tens of thousands have perished in Gaza, Israel has stepped up its de facto capture of Palestinian land in the West Bank. Israeli authorities have approved strategic land seizures — almost 6,000 acres this year alone, marking the most significant territorial changes in the West Bank in decades.

    Extremist settlers — essentially a violent, armed militia — are descending on Palestinian villages in the West Bank, wreaking havoc upon innocent Palestinians, under the protection of the Israeli state. The death and destruction isn’t exclusive to Gaza.

    Netanyahu and his far-right allies in government have emboldened the extreme far-right settler movement. And while Netanyahu publicly condemns these settler attacks, the sheer extremism of the Zionist militia simply reflects the extremism of the Israeli government.

    History will not treat us kindly

    Whether the final death toll of the Gaza genocide is 50,000, 100,000 or even the staggering 186,000 that was predicted in the Lancet, earlier this year, historians will look back on these moments and ask why the West supported the genocidal, racist, apartheid endeavour that is Israel.

    In a week where we have witnessed newborn twins brutally murdered in Gaza by an Israeli airstrike as a father registered their births, the unbearably painful sight of Palestinians having to use plastic bags to collect the body parts of their loved ones, murdered by Israel while sheltering in a school, and yet another Palestinian baby beheaded by an Israeli attack on innocent civilians, our calls to end the genocide of Gaza must grow louder and stronger than ever before.

    Featured image via Rachael Swindon

    By Rachael Swindon

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Ekecheiria, also known as the “Olympic Truce,” is a quaint notion dating to Ancient Greece, when three kings prone to warring against each other – Iphitos of Elis, Cleosthenes of Pisa and Lycurgus of Sparta – concluded a treaty permitting the safe passage of all athletes and spectators from the relevant city-states for the duration of the Olympic Games.  The truce had a certain logic to it, given that many of those granted safe passage would have been serving soldiers or soldiers in waiting.

    In 1894, the founder of the International Olympic Committee (IOC), Pierre de Coubertin, fantasised about the Games as a peace promoting endeavour which, when read closely, suggests the sublimation of humanity’s warring instincts.  Instead of killing each other, humans could compete in stadia and on the sporting tracks, adoring and admiring physical prowess.  “Wars break out because nations misunderstand each other.  We shall have no peace until the prejudices which now separate the different races shall have been outlived.  To attain this end, what better means than to bring the youth of all countries periodically together for amicable trials of muscular strength and agility.”

    Panting over torsos, sinews and muscles, de Coubertin gushingly wrote his “Ode to Sport” in 1912.  Sport was peace, forging “happy bonds between the peoples by drawing them together in reverence for strength which is controlled, organised and self-disciplined.”  It was through the young that respect would be learned for “one another,” thereby ensuring that “the diversity of national traits becomes a source of generous and peaceful emulation.”  Sport was also other things: justice, daring, honour, joy and, in the true spirit of eugenic inspiration, the means to achieve “a more perfect race, blasting the seeds of sickness”.  Athletes would, accordingly, “wish to see growing about him brisk and sturdy sons to follow him in the arena and [in] turn bear off joyous laurels.”

    The Olympic Charter also states that Olympism’s central goal “is to place at the service of the harmonious development of humankind, with a view to promoting a peaceful society concerned with the preservation of human dignity.”

    In the 1990s, the IOC thought it prudent to revive the concept of such a truce.  As the organisation explains, this was done “with a view to protecting, as far as possible, the interests of the athletes and sport in general, and to harness the power of sport to promote peace, dialogue and reconciliation more broadly.”  In 2000, the IOC founded the International Olympic Truce Foundation, adopting the dove as a signature symbol of the Games.  By the London Olympics of 2012, the 193 nations present had signed onto an Olympic Truce.

    From such lofty summits, hypocrisy and inconsistency will follow.  The IOC, hardly the finest practitioner of fine principle, has been prone to injudicious standards, rampant corruption and tyrannical stupidity.  The IOC recommendation to ban Russian athletes took all but four days after the attack on Ukraine in February 2022 on the premise that Russia had breached the sacred compact of sporting peace.  In the mix, Belarus, designated as arch collaborator with Russian war aims, was also added.

    During the 11th Olympic Summit held on December 9, 2022, the IOC Executive Board noted that the Olympic Games would not “address all the political and social challenges in the world.  This is the realm of politics.”  Having advocated that platitudinous, false distinction, the Executive Board could still claim that the Games “can set an example for a world where everyone respects the same rules as one another.”

    The IOC did make one grudging concession: Russian and Belarusian athletes could compete as Individual Neutral Athletes (AINs) subject to meeting eligibility requirements determined by the Individual Neutral Athlete Eligibility Review Panel.  Each athlete’s participation was subject to respecting the Olympic Charter, with special reference to “the peace mission of the Olympic Movement”.

    These statements and qualifications, intentionally or otherwise, are resoundingly delusional.  The Games are events of pompous political significance, with athletes often being administrative and symbolic extensions of the nation stage they represent.  Authoritarian regimes have gloatingly celebrated hosting them.  They have been staging grounds for violence, notably in the killing of 12 Israeli athletes at the 1972 Munich Games by the Palestinian terrorist group Black September.

    They have also been boycotted for very political reasons.  The United States did so in 1980 for the Moscow Games, along with 64 other nations, in response to the Soviet Union’s invasion of Afghanistan in 1979.  The Soviet Union returned the favour at the Los Angeles Olympics held in 1984, giving President Ronald Reagan a chance, in an election year, to speak of the “winning” American ideal and “a new patriotism spreading across our country.”

    In keeping with the erratic nature of such a spirit, it was appropriately hypocritical and distasteful of IOC practice to permit the Israeli athletic contingent numbering 88 athletes to compete at the Paris Games. All this, as slaughter and starvation continued to take place in Gaza (at the time, the Palestinian death toll lay somewhere in the order of 39,000).

    Permitting Israel’s participation prompted Jules Boykoff, an academic of keen interest in the Games, to suggest that “the situation is more and more resembling the situation that led the IOC forcing Russia to participate as neutral athletes.”  The body’s “approach to ignore the situation places its selective morality on full display and throws into question the group’s commitment to the high-minded ideals it claims to abide.”

    These ideals remain just that, a cover that otherwise permits political realities to flourish.  Predictably, the Paris spectacle, both before and after, was always going to feature the tang and sting of resentment.  Far from being apolitical exponents of their craft, various members of the Israeli Olympic team have been more than forthcoming in defending the warring cause.  Judokas Timna Nelson-Levy and Maya Goshen have been vocal in their defence of the Israeli Defense Forces.

    Palestinian participants have also done their bit.  During the opening ceremony, boxer Wasim Abusal wore a shirt showing children being bombed, telling Agence France-Presse that these were “children who are martyred and die under the rubble, children whose parents are martyred and are left alone without food and water.”  Such views are not permitted for Russian or Belarusian athletes, who must compete under the deceptive flag of neutrality.

    The organisers of the Paris Games also found it difficult to keep a lid on an occasion supposedly free of political attributes. The Israel-Paraguay football march was marked by scornful boos as the Israeli national anthem was performed.  Reports also note that at least one banner featured “GENOCIDE OLYMPICS”.  Three Israeli athletes also received death threats, according to a statement from the Paris prosecutor’s office.

    It’s such instances of political oddities that permit the following suggestion: make all athletes truly amateurish by abolishing their associations with countries.  Most nation states, soldered and cemented compacts of hatred, based upon territory often pinched from previous occupants, are such a nuisance in this regard.  If Olympism is to make sense, and if the ravings of the physique obsessed de Coubertin are to be given shape, why not get rid of the State altogether, thereby making all participants neutral, if only for a few weeks?

    The post The Distasteful Nonsense of Olympism first appeared on Dissident Voice.

    This post was originally published on Dissident Voice.

  • This week, leftists on multiple social media platforms debated whether the acronym “ZOG” is an accurate or acceptable descriptor for the United States government. The term “ZOG,” which stands for Zionist Occupied Government, was popularized by The Turner Diaries — a 1978 novel by neo-Nazi William Luther Pierce. Pierce was the founder and chairman of National Alliance, a white supremacist political…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • Sebastian Rowan was taken to jail on a Wednesday evening. That Friday, he defended his Ph.D. dissertation proposal. The University of New Hampshire graduate student was arrested in May when police swept a tent encampment students launched at a pro-Palestine protest on campus. Rowan was held overnight in jail, where he paced the cell practicing his thesis presentation…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • In October 2023, Fadiah Barghouti’s home in Ramallah was raided by Israeli forces. Soldiers broke down her door and smashed everything that they could get their hands on. They were searching for her son Basel, whom they beat along with her other son, saying they would all “pay the price for supporting Hamas.” It was a claim Barghouti was familiar with: Her husband Mahmoud is currently being held…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • Nowhere is safe in Gaza, and this is particularly true for sites of key civilian infrastructure like hospitals and schools. Since October, Israel has damaged or destroyed 80 percent of Gaza’s schools and all its universities, decimating a core pillar of Palestinian society. In spite of this scholasticide, Palestinian educators and students remain committed to ensuring class remains in session. The Real News reports from Rafah, speaking directly with children and their teachers resisting genocide through education.

    Producer: Belal Awad, Leo Erhardt
    Videographer: Ruwaida Amer
    Video Editor: Leo Erhardt


    Transcript

    Hind Khoudary:
    I’m currently in a school that was targeted by Israeli forces with at least
    3 air strikes. At one thirty AM in the morning people were sleeping when
    the Israeli forces targeted them. All of the floor is still their blood.
    Children, women are terrified but unfortunately, they don’t have anywhere
    to go. They’re still sheltering in the school.

    Narrator:
    With more than 80 per cent of schools in Gaza damaged or destroyed, it may
    be reasonable to ask if there is an intentional effort to comprehensively
    destroy the Palestinian education system.
    This is a direct quote from a UN panel of experts, in reference to Israel’s
    alleged targeting of educational infrastructure in Gaza.

    Upsound:
    Look how they ripped it open. They completely destroyed the school.

    Iman Ismail, Arabic Teacher:
    We have around 70 children in each class. Their psychological state was
    ruined. I’ve noticed that the kids really missed school, they were really
    eager to start learning again. The difficulties: firstly, the uptake has
    been slow, because of the interruption to their schooling. Secondly, the
    weather—it’s very hot in the tents in general. The sound of explosions from
    the air strikes, during class. We hear explosions a lot during class.

    Narrator:
    The term Scholasticide, coined in 2009 by Oxford Professor Karma Nabulsi,
    specifically references the “systematic destruction of Palestinian
    education by Israel”.

    Since October 7th, the term has regularly been put to use.

    All 12 of Gaza’s universities have been destroyed. 625,000 students are
    without a place to study in the crowded camps of Rafah. However, teachers
    and community organisers have defiantly set up tent-classrooms. Reflecting
    the palestinian belief, in what Nabulsi describes as the enormous “role and
    power of education, in an occupied society”.

    Salma Abu Awdeh:
    We came here despite the difficult circumstances, to learn, to play and to
    distract ourselves. We’ve made new friends here and we’re learning the core
    subjects: Arabic, English and Math.

    Narrator:
    Gaza’s children try to focus on their lessons and teachers try to maintain
    a semblance of normalcy, all the while the buzz of drones in the background
    remains a constant reminder.

    Salma Abu Awdeh:
    The displacement was really hard. We were displaced from one place to the
    next, we haven’t settled. From Beit Hanoun we were displaced to Gaza City,
    and from Gaza City we were displaced to Deir Al Balah. Here we’re staying
    in a school, and life is really hard. My dream is for the war to end and
    that all I hoped for in my life comes true and that I will succeed and
    become a doctor.

    Malek Hamoudeh:
    I missed school a lot. When we go we learn, we benefit. Before the war I
    used to go with my friends to school. We would play and learn too, with our
    teachers who would distract us. We would write and learn.

    Narrator:
    Malek Hamoudeh is 10 years old, his father was killed in the last months by
    an Israeli air strike.

    Malek Hamoudeh:
    I lost my dad suddenly, he was martyred like that. He was lost suddenly, we
    were sitting like this, my cousin came and told me: “Your dad was killed”.
    My heart was, I couldn’t. I felt like I was going to die from how upset I
    was about my dad. He was out, yeah. He was looking for something to eat
    when the house was hit.

    Ghadir Hamoudeh, Malek’s Mom:
    Even if there is war, and fear and air strikes, it doesn’t mean that we
    stop living our lives.

    We need to do things that matter. OK? We need to memorize the Quran, revise
    our lessons, we have to keep going to the center where we registered.

    Ghadir:
    OK, 6 times 9?

    Malek:
    54

    Ghadir:
    54 good, 9 times 9?

    Malek:
    9 times 9, errr, 9 times 9… 81?

    Ghadir:
    81, right.

    Ghadir:
    After my husband was killed, I had to be mother and father. I try to give
    them a type of safety. It’s hard to deal with children who have lost their
    father, in an atmosphere of war and fear. To the point that my children,
    whenever I go out or have chores, they say: “we’re scared
    you could be killed and we’ll lose you.

    Don’t go, stay with us.” But the war doesn’t let me stay, I have to go to
    the market, to provide them with food, with drink, with water.
    This has all fallen to me. Especially since we’ve been living in a tent.
    There’s no water, no electricity, no basic necessities of life. Even the
    temperature in the tent is too hot. As much as possible we adapt, but the
    situation is really hard for us.

    Malek Hamoudeh:
    I’ve lived the worst days of my life during this war.

    Interviewer:
    Why?

    Malek Hamoudeh:
    Because of displacement and being away from my dad and from my land. It’s
    extremely exhausting, no water and no electricity and lots of things. The
    heat in the tent: we’re living in extreme heat. It’s hot and there’s no
    electricity and there are no lights and there aren’t any of the basic
    things that we need.

    This post was originally published on The Real News Network.

  • An interview with Waleed Shahid.

    This post was originally published on Dissent MagazineDissent Magazine.

  • Dozens of masked and armed Israeli settlers descended upon the Palestinian town of Jit in the occupied West Bank on Thursday, setting houses aflame and killing at least one Palestinian in what human rights advocates and the president of Israel have labeled as a pogrom. At least 100 Israeli settlers entered the village at night, some outlets reported, burning homes and cars…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.