Category: israel

  • The number of Palestinians murdered by Israel‘s attacks on Gaza since 7 October has surpassed 40,000. Nearly 16,500 of the victims of Israeli terrorism were just children.

    Another 10,000 people are lying dead underneath hundreds and thousands of tonnes of rubble.

    Israel: evaporating children with impunity

    One Al Jazeera correspondent, Hani Mahmoud, suggested the 40,000 figure is “a very conservative reading of the number of casualties across Gaza”:

    There are still those who are missing and trapped under the rubble, who haven’t been identified, haven’t been collected, haven’t been counted yet.

    There are those who are missing, whose family members don’t know anything about their whereabouts. There are those who were evaporated, given the intensity and the scale of the bombs.

    Evaporated. Wiped off the face of the earth for having the misfortune of being born in another part of the world to you and I.

    Displaced children, bombed in their beds as they sleep in makeshift tents. Israel has already destroyed their homes. It was a dire situation long before 7 October 2023, but now it is a catastrophe, a humanitarian crisis, created in Washington and delivered by their colonial outpost in the Middle East.

    The world is utterly complicit with the Israeli terrorist regime. If this happened in any European country — quite literally any — how would other countries react?

    The damage unleashed by Israel’s relentless bombardments of the Gaza Strip and the undefinable toll of misery and suffering experienced by a hungry population, struggling to find safety in an area where there is no sanctuary to be found.

    How would we react?

    How would we react if this was happening in Paris, Madrid or Milan?

    On average, Israel has killed about 130 humans every day in Gaza over the past 10 months. The unprecedented scale of the Israeli occupation military’s destruction of homes, hospitals, schools and places of worship is way beyond anything a majority of us have experienced in our lifetime.

    How would we react if this was happening in Amsterdam, London or Brussels?

    The accumulative effects of Israel’s barbaric war on Gaza could mean the true death toll could reach more than 186,000 human beings. War has indirect health implications beyond the direct harm from the violence itself, and it will continue to cause many indirect deaths in the coming weeks, months and years through life-ending diseases and the destruction of health facilities and food distribution centres.

    How would we react if this was happening in Athens, Budapest or Vienna?

    While we were distracted with a general election and the Farage-incited race riots that swept across England, Israel has gone about unleashing some of its most brutal aggressions to date.

    Did anyone else notice how so many far-right rioters in England were also fanatical Israel supporters? Strange that.

    The savagery is unfathomable

    The horrific massacre at al-Tabin school in the Daraj neighbourhood in central Gaza City, this past week, condemned by the global south, claimed the lives of more than 100 innocent civilians, a majority of whom were women and children seeking shelter from the never ending cycle of violence.

    Israel claimed the school was yet another Khamas “control and command centre”, without providing a single piece of evidence to support their ludicrously dishonest and repetitive assertions.

    But this is a military that savagely massacred dozens of its own people on 7 October – witnessed by numerous Israeli citizens while getting its kill lists from leaked WhatsApp data.

    It’s all very well and good for the morally bankrupt and entirely complicit Western leaders to say it’s unacceptable and tragic, but it means absolutely nothing if they refuse to follow it up with some sort of meaningful action — something they have failed to do

    The same global nuclear powers can scream and shout as much as they like about Israel’s right to self-defence, but what about the Palestinians right to self-defence? They’ve been suffering under a brutal occupation for nearly eighty years.

    Britain, the United States, and its embarrassingly sycophantic allies continue to both-side a genocide as if it hasn’t been live-streamed around the world for all to see for themselves.

    The elites think you are fucking stupid. They are relying on the same meticulous pro-Israel spoon-feeding that has served them so well for generations.

    But I sincerely believe we are past that now. The Gaza genocide has opened the eyes of the world to the unbridled evil of Israel and all of those that continue to offer their backing — politically, financially and militarily — to the gravest of crimes committed against humanity in a vast majority of our lifetimes.

    Israel and the West think we’re all stupid

    Those poor, deluded people that thought Keir Starmer was going to stride on in and put an end to Britain’s complicity in genocide must be feeling ashamed of their very existence right now.

    And what about these Trump-supporting ‘pro-Palestine influencers’ that deservedly earn a decent crust for the work they do in highlighting and exposing the atrocities being committed by Israel?

    While they have been absolutely right to call out Joe Biden’s complicity, how do they plan to sell the ultra-Zionist Trump to their hoards of followers when the loathsome orange turd gives his genocide maniac friend, Bibi, the go ahead to wipe out the remaining third of Gaza and commit his very own Nagasaki for the 21st century?

    As tens of thousands have perished in Gaza, Israel has stepped up its de facto capture of Palestinian land in the West Bank. Israeli authorities have approved strategic land seizures — almost 6,000 acres this year alone, marking the most significant territorial changes in the West Bank in decades.

    Extremist settlers — essentially a violent, armed militia — are descending on Palestinian villages in the West Bank, wreaking havoc upon innocent Palestinians, under the protection of the Israeli state. The death and destruction isn’t exclusive to Gaza.

    Netanyahu and his far-right allies in government have emboldened the extreme far-right settler movement. And while Netanyahu publicly condemns these settler attacks, the sheer extremism of the Zionist militia simply reflects the extremism of the Israeli government.

    History will not treat us kindly

    Whether the final death toll of the Gaza genocide is 50,000, 100,000 or even the staggering 186,000 that was predicted in the Lancet, earlier this year, historians will look back on these moments and ask why the West supported the genocidal, racist, apartheid endeavour that is Israel.

    In a week where we have witnessed newborn twins brutally murdered in Gaza by an Israeli airstrike as a father registered their births, the unbearably painful sight of Palestinians having to use plastic bags to collect the body parts of their loved ones, murdered by Israel while sheltering in a school, and yet another Palestinian baby beheaded by an Israeli attack on innocent civilians, our calls to end the genocide of Gaza must grow louder and stronger than ever before.

    Featured image via Rachael Swindon

    By Rachael Swindon

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Ekecheiria, also known as the “Olympic Truce,” is a quaint notion dating to Ancient Greece, when three kings prone to warring against each other – Iphitos of Elis, Cleosthenes of Pisa and Lycurgus of Sparta – concluded a treaty permitting the safe passage of all athletes and spectators from the relevant city-states for the duration of the Olympic Games.  The truce had a certain logic to it, given that many of those granted safe passage would have been serving soldiers or soldiers in waiting.

    In 1894, the founder of the International Olympic Committee (IOC), Pierre de Coubertin, fantasised about the Games as a peace promoting endeavour which, when read closely, suggests the sublimation of humanity’s warring instincts.  Instead of killing each other, humans could compete in stadia and on the sporting tracks, adoring and admiring physical prowess.  “Wars break out because nations misunderstand each other.  We shall have no peace until the prejudices which now separate the different races shall have been outlived.  To attain this end, what better means than to bring the youth of all countries periodically together for amicable trials of muscular strength and agility.”

    Panting over torsos, sinews and muscles, de Coubertin gushingly wrote his “Ode to Sport” in 1912.  Sport was peace, forging “happy bonds between the peoples by drawing them together in reverence for strength which is controlled, organised and self-disciplined.”  It was through the young that respect would be learned for “one another,” thereby ensuring that “the diversity of national traits becomes a source of generous and peaceful emulation.”  Sport was also other things: justice, daring, honour, joy and, in the true spirit of eugenic inspiration, the means to achieve “a more perfect race, blasting the seeds of sickness”.  Athletes would, accordingly, “wish to see growing about him brisk and sturdy sons to follow him in the arena and [in] turn bear off joyous laurels.”

    The Olympic Charter also states that Olympism’s central goal “is to place at the service of the harmonious development of humankind, with a view to promoting a peaceful society concerned with the preservation of human dignity.”

    In the 1990s, the IOC thought it prudent to revive the concept of such a truce.  As the organisation explains, this was done “with a view to protecting, as far as possible, the interests of the athletes and sport in general, and to harness the power of sport to promote peace, dialogue and reconciliation more broadly.”  In 2000, the IOC founded the International Olympic Truce Foundation, adopting the dove as a signature symbol of the Games.  By the London Olympics of 2012, the 193 nations present had signed onto an Olympic Truce.

    From such lofty summits, hypocrisy and inconsistency will follow.  The IOC, hardly the finest practitioner of fine principle, has been prone to injudicious standards, rampant corruption and tyrannical stupidity.  The IOC recommendation to ban Russian athletes took all but four days after the attack on Ukraine in February 2022 on the premise that Russia had breached the sacred compact of sporting peace.  In the mix, Belarus, designated as arch collaborator with Russian war aims, was also added.

    During the 11th Olympic Summit held on December 9, 2022, the IOC Executive Board noted that the Olympic Games would not “address all the political and social challenges in the world.  This is the realm of politics.”  Having advocated that platitudinous, false distinction, the Executive Board could still claim that the Games “can set an example for a world where everyone respects the same rules as one another.”

    The IOC did make one grudging concession: Russian and Belarusian athletes could compete as Individual Neutral Athletes (AINs) subject to meeting eligibility requirements determined by the Individual Neutral Athlete Eligibility Review Panel.  Each athlete’s participation was subject to respecting the Olympic Charter, with special reference to “the peace mission of the Olympic Movement”.

    These statements and qualifications, intentionally or otherwise, are resoundingly delusional.  The Games are events of pompous political significance, with athletes often being administrative and symbolic extensions of the nation stage they represent.  Authoritarian regimes have gloatingly celebrated hosting them.  They have been staging grounds for violence, notably in the killing of 12 Israeli athletes at the 1972 Munich Games by the Palestinian terrorist group Black September.

    They have also been boycotted for very political reasons.  The United States did so in 1980 for the Moscow Games, along with 64 other nations, in response to the Soviet Union’s invasion of Afghanistan in 1979.  The Soviet Union returned the favour at the Los Angeles Olympics held in 1984, giving President Ronald Reagan a chance, in an election year, to speak of the “winning” American ideal and “a new patriotism spreading across our country.”

    In keeping with the erratic nature of such a spirit, it was appropriately hypocritical and distasteful of IOC practice to permit the Israeli athletic contingent numbering 88 athletes to compete at the Paris Games. All this, as slaughter and starvation continued to take place in Gaza (at the time, the Palestinian death toll lay somewhere in the order of 39,000).

    Permitting Israel’s participation prompted Jules Boykoff, an academic of keen interest in the Games, to suggest that “the situation is more and more resembling the situation that led the IOC forcing Russia to participate as neutral athletes.”  The body’s “approach to ignore the situation places its selective morality on full display and throws into question the group’s commitment to the high-minded ideals it claims to abide.”

    These ideals remain just that, a cover that otherwise permits political realities to flourish.  Predictably, the Paris spectacle, both before and after, was always going to feature the tang and sting of resentment.  Far from being apolitical exponents of their craft, various members of the Israeli Olympic team have been more than forthcoming in defending the warring cause.  Judokas Timna Nelson-Levy and Maya Goshen have been vocal in their defence of the Israeli Defense Forces.

    Palestinian participants have also done their bit.  During the opening ceremony, boxer Wasim Abusal wore a shirt showing children being bombed, telling Agence France-Presse that these were “children who are martyred and die under the rubble, children whose parents are martyred and are left alone without food and water.”  Such views are not permitted for Russian or Belarusian athletes, who must compete under the deceptive flag of neutrality.

    The organisers of the Paris Games also found it difficult to keep a lid on an occasion supposedly free of political attributes. The Israel-Paraguay football march was marked by scornful boos as the Israeli national anthem was performed.  Reports also note that at least one banner featured “GENOCIDE OLYMPICS”.  Three Israeli athletes also received death threats, according to a statement from the Paris prosecutor’s office.

    It’s such instances of political oddities that permit the following suggestion: make all athletes truly amateurish by abolishing their associations with countries.  Most nation states, soldered and cemented compacts of hatred, based upon territory often pinched from previous occupants, are such a nuisance in this regard.  If Olympism is to make sense, and if the ravings of the physique obsessed de Coubertin are to be given shape, why not get rid of the State altogether, thereby making all participants neutral, if only for a few weeks?

    The post The Distasteful Nonsense of Olympism first appeared on Dissident Voice.

    This post was originally published on Dissident Voice.

  • This week, leftists on multiple social media platforms debated whether the acronym “ZOG” is an accurate or acceptable descriptor for the United States government. The term “ZOG,” which stands for Zionist Occupied Government, was popularized by The Turner Diaries — a 1978 novel by neo-Nazi William Luther Pierce. Pierce was the founder and chairman of National Alliance, a white supremacist political…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • Sebastian Rowan was taken to jail on a Wednesday evening. That Friday, he defended his Ph.D. dissertation proposal. The University of New Hampshire graduate student was arrested in May when police swept a tent encampment students launched at a pro-Palestine protest on campus. Rowan was held overnight in jail, where he paced the cell practicing his thesis presentation…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • In October 2023, Fadiah Barghouti’s home in Ramallah was raided by Israeli forces. Soldiers broke down her door and smashed everything that they could get their hands on. They were searching for her son Basel, whom they beat along with her other son, saying they would all “pay the price for supporting Hamas.” It was a claim Barghouti was familiar with: Her husband Mahmoud is currently being held…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • Nowhere is safe in Gaza, and this is particularly true for sites of key civilian infrastructure like hospitals and schools. Since October, Israel has damaged or destroyed 80 percent of Gaza’s schools and all its universities, decimating a core pillar of Palestinian society. In spite of this scholasticide, Palestinian educators and students remain committed to ensuring class remains in session. The Real News reports from Rafah, speaking directly with children and their teachers resisting genocide through education.

    Producer: Belal Awad, Leo Erhardt
    Videographer: Ruwaida Amer
    Video Editor: Leo Erhardt


    Transcript

    Hind Khoudary:
    I’m currently in a school that was targeted by Israeli forces with at least
    3 air strikes. At one thirty AM in the morning people were sleeping when
    the Israeli forces targeted them. All of the floor is still their blood.
    Children, women are terrified but unfortunately, they don’t have anywhere
    to go. They’re still sheltering in the school.

    Narrator:
    With more than 80 per cent of schools in Gaza damaged or destroyed, it may
    be reasonable to ask if there is an intentional effort to comprehensively
    destroy the Palestinian education system.
    This is a direct quote from a UN panel of experts, in reference to Israel’s
    alleged targeting of educational infrastructure in Gaza.

    Upsound:
    Look how they ripped it open. They completely destroyed the school.

    Iman Ismail, Arabic Teacher:
    We have around 70 children in each class. Their psychological state was
    ruined. I’ve noticed that the kids really missed school, they were really
    eager to start learning again. The difficulties: firstly, the uptake has
    been slow, because of the interruption to their schooling. Secondly, the
    weather—it’s very hot in the tents in general. The sound of explosions from
    the air strikes, during class. We hear explosions a lot during class.

    Narrator:
    The term Scholasticide, coined in 2009 by Oxford Professor Karma Nabulsi,
    specifically references the “systematic destruction of Palestinian
    education by Israel”.

    Since October 7th, the term has regularly been put to use.

    All 12 of Gaza’s universities have been destroyed. 625,000 students are
    without a place to study in the crowded camps of Rafah. However, teachers
    and community organisers have defiantly set up tent-classrooms. Reflecting
    the palestinian belief, in what Nabulsi describes as the enormous “role and
    power of education, in an occupied society”.

    Salma Abu Awdeh:
    We came here despite the difficult circumstances, to learn, to play and to
    distract ourselves. We’ve made new friends here and we’re learning the core
    subjects: Arabic, English and Math.

    Narrator:
    Gaza’s children try to focus on their lessons and teachers try to maintain
    a semblance of normalcy, all the while the buzz of drones in the background
    remains a constant reminder.

    Salma Abu Awdeh:
    The displacement was really hard. We were displaced from one place to the
    next, we haven’t settled. From Beit Hanoun we were displaced to Gaza City,
    and from Gaza City we were displaced to Deir Al Balah. Here we’re staying
    in a school, and life is really hard. My dream is for the war to end and
    that all I hoped for in my life comes true and that I will succeed and
    become a doctor.

    Malek Hamoudeh:
    I missed school a lot. When we go we learn, we benefit. Before the war I
    used to go with my friends to school. We would play and learn too, with our
    teachers who would distract us. We would write and learn.

    Narrator:
    Malek Hamoudeh is 10 years old, his father was killed in the last months by
    an Israeli air strike.

    Malek Hamoudeh:
    I lost my dad suddenly, he was martyred like that. He was lost suddenly, we
    were sitting like this, my cousin came and told me: “Your dad was killed”.
    My heart was, I couldn’t. I felt like I was going to die from how upset I
    was about my dad. He was out, yeah. He was looking for something to eat
    when the house was hit.

    Ghadir Hamoudeh, Malek’s Mom:
    Even if there is war, and fear and air strikes, it doesn’t mean that we
    stop living our lives.

    We need to do things that matter. OK? We need to memorize the Quran, revise
    our lessons, we have to keep going to the center where we registered.

    Ghadir:
    OK, 6 times 9?

    Malek:
    54

    Ghadir:
    54 good, 9 times 9?

    Malek:
    9 times 9, errr, 9 times 9… 81?

    Ghadir:
    81, right.

    Ghadir:
    After my husband was killed, I had to be mother and father. I try to give
    them a type of safety. It’s hard to deal with children who have lost their
    father, in an atmosphere of war and fear. To the point that my children,
    whenever I go out or have chores, they say: “we’re scared
    you could be killed and we’ll lose you.

    Don’t go, stay with us.” But the war doesn’t let me stay, I have to go to
    the market, to provide them with food, with drink, with water.
    This has all fallen to me. Especially since we’ve been living in a tent.
    There’s no water, no electricity, no basic necessities of life. Even the
    temperature in the tent is too hot. As much as possible we adapt, but the
    situation is really hard for us.

    Malek Hamoudeh:
    I’ve lived the worst days of my life during this war.

    Interviewer:
    Why?

    Malek Hamoudeh:
    Because of displacement and being away from my dad and from my land. It’s
    extremely exhausting, no water and no electricity and lots of things. The
    heat in the tent: we’re living in extreme heat. It’s hot and there’s no
    electricity and there are no lights and there aren’t any of the basic
    things that we need.

    This post was originally published on The Real News Network.

  • An interview with Waleed Shahid.

    This post was originally published on Dissent MagazineDissent Magazine.

  • Dozens of masked and armed Israeli settlers descended upon the Palestinian town of Jit in the occupied West Bank on Thursday, setting houses aflame and killing at least one Palestinian in what human rights advocates and the president of Israel have labeled as a pogrom. At least 100 Israeli settlers entered the village at night, some outlets reported, burning homes and cars…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • The BBC has changed a headline after facing pressure. Initially, the headline failed to say that Israel carried out the airstrike, which killed two newborn twins in Gaza:

    The father of Asser and Ayssel said “I didn’t even have the time to celebrate them”. They were only four days old. He was out collecting their birth certificates when Israel killed them and their mother.

    Israel has killed 115 babies who were born since the bombardment of Gaza began.

    Criticism of the BBC

    Others further criticised the BBC. They said the new headline still left it open to question as to whether Israel killed the infants, in suggesting it’s only a claim:

    On 10 August, the BBC faced more backlash. This time, its headline called out Israel first try. But it did not mention that the strike was on a school:

    An Al Jazeera investigation into the Israeli strike in question – on al-Tabin school in Gaza City – found it was “deliberately timed to cause maximum casualties”. It said there were a “large number of displaced people deliberately targeted”. In five weeks, Israel has bombed at least 18 schools in Gaza.

    People on social media branded another BBC headline, from December 2023, as a “lesson in propaganda”:


    The Israeli airstrike killed Palestinian professor Refaat Alareer who taught literature at the Islamic University of Gaza. He co-founded the organisation We are Not Numbers, which trained young writers through matching them with more experienced ones.

    And it’s not just the headlines. In another BBC piece, the outlet painted Israel’s aim to colonise Gaza as “Who wouldn’t want a beach house?”

    Also, content analysis from the Centre for Media Monitoring found that the BBC and other corporate outlets show “overwhelming” bias in favour of Israel. The report found outlets remove context through failing to mention Israel’s occupation of Palestine, as well as that the BBC failed to challenge genocidal language from Israeli officials.

    Featured image via Reuters – YouTube

    By James Wright

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • The state is further punishing Palestine Action activists for standing up to Elbit Systems’ complicity in Israel’s ongoing genocide in Gaza.

    Palestine Action: the state abusing the law

    Three more Palestine Action activists are charged with aggravated burglary and criminal damage allegedly in connection to an action against Elbit Systems UK on Tuesday 6 August. The action caused over £1million in damage to the heavily guarded Filton-based research hub of Israel’s biggest weapons producer, which was opened in the summer of 2023.

    In total, 10 activists have been charged in connection to the Filton action — all of whom were first detained without charge for nearly a week and interrogated constantly under the powers granted by the Terrorism Act.

    First, cops held seven Palestine Action activists under the Terrorism Act, giving the police powers to detain them without charge for up to 14 days. Whilst they were detained, counter-terrorism police interrogated the activists numerous times.

    A week after the first arrests, charges were brought against seven of the now-dubbed ‘Filton10’ – none of which were offences under the Terrorism Act. Despite this, the state continued to abuse counter-terror powers to detain and interrogate further activists, whilst also dedicating nationwide resources to protect Israel’s biggest weapons firm.

    As the Evening Standard reported, one of the seven – Hannah Davidson – has been charged despite not physically being at the action. This has echoes of the ‘Whole Truth Five’ – the Just Stop Oil activists who have been sent to prison for years, for planning action on the M25.

    Now, three more people have been charged.

    Charged for trying to stop a genocide

    Elbit Systems frequently uses Gaza as a laboratory to develop new weaponry. At Elbit Systems Second Quarter 2024 Results, CEO Bezhalel Machlis said “The portfolio was improved drastically and this war has been an accelerator for many developments. The IDF (Israel Defense Forces) is using these technologies now and in the future, we will bring them to the rest of the market as well”.

    Since 7 October, the Israeli military has killed and injured over 140,000 Palestinians. Despite International Court of Justice rulings on the plausibility of a genocide being committed in Gaza, Elbit Systems have been allowed to maintain operations in Britain.

    Palestine Action says:

    Under Section 1 of the Genocide Convention, all parties have a responsibility to prevent genocide and punish those responsible for its commission. Rather than abide by their legal and moral duties, the British state has deployed extensive resources towards protecting a company perpetrating genocide.

    Palestine Action refuse to be intimidated into allowing a genocide to happen. We never backdown to a crackdown.

    Featured image via Palestine Action/the Canary

    By Steve Topple

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • With a click, with a shock
    Phone’ll jingle, door’ll knock, open the latch
    Something’s coming, don’t know when but it’s soon . . .

    — “Something’s Coming,” West Side Story, lyrics by S. Sondheim, music by L. Bernstein.

    Shock should not be the word, but when World War III breaks fully loose many who are now sleeping will be shocked.  The war has already started, but its full fury and devastation are just around the corner.  When it does, Tony’s singular fate in West Side Story will be the fate of untold millions.

    It is a Greek tragedy brought on by the terrible hubris of the United States, its NATO accomplices, and the genocidal state of Israel and the Zionist terrorists who run it.

    Tony felt a miracle was due, but it didn’t come true for him except to briefly love Maria and then get killed as result of a false report, and only a miracle will now save the world from the cataclysm that is on the way, whether it is initiated by intent, a false report, an accident, or the game of nuclear chicken played once too often.

    Let us hope but not be naïve.  The signs all point in one direction.  The gun on the wall in the first act of this tragic play is primed to go off in the final one.  Every effort to avoid this terrible fate by seeking peace and not war has been rejected by the U.S. and its equally insane allies.  Every so-called red line laid down by Russia, Iran, Hezbollah, Hamas, the Palestinians, and their allies has been violated with impunity and blatant arrogance.  But impunity has its limits and the dark Furies of vengeance will have their day.

    “It is the dead, not the living,” said Antigone, “who make the longest demands.”  Their ghostly voices cry out to be avenged.

    I wish I were not compelled by conscience to write this, but it seems clearly evident to me that we stand on the edge of an abyss.  The fate of the world rests in the hands of leaders who are clearly psychotic and who harbor death wishes.  It’s not terribly complex.  Netanyahu and Biden are two of them.  Yes, like other mass killers, I think they love their children and give their dog biscuits to eat.  But yes, they also are so corrupted in their souls that they relish war and the sense of false power and prestige it brings them.  They gladly kill other people’s children.  They can defend themselves many times over, offer all kinds of excuses, but the facts speak otherwise.  This is hard for regular people to accept.

    The great American writer who lived in exile in France for so many years and who was born 100 years ago this month, James Baldwin, wrote an essay – “The Creative Process” – in which he addressed the issue of how becoming a normal member of society dulls one to the shadow side of personal and social truths.  He wrote:

    And, in the same way that to become a social human being one modifies and suppresses and, ultimately, without great courage, lies to oneself about all one’s interior, uncharted chaos, so have we, as a nation, modified or suppressed and lied about all the darker forces in our history.

    And lie and suppress we still do today.

    Imagine, if you will, that Mexico has invaded Texas with the full support of the Russian, Chinese, and Iranian governments.  Their weapons are supplied by these countries and their drone and missile attacks on the U.S. are coordinated by Russian technology.  The Seven Mile Bridge in Florida has been attacked.  The U.S. Mexican border is dotted with Russian troops on bases with nuclear missiles aimed at U.S. cities.

    It’s not hard to do.  That is a small analogy to what the U.S./NATO is doing to Russia.

    Do you think the United States would not respond with great force?

    Do you think it would not feel threatened with nuclear annihilation?

    How do you think it would respond?

    The U.S/NATO war against Russia via Ukraine is accelerating by the day.  The current Ukrainian invasion of Russia’s Kursk region has upped the ante dramatically.  After denying it knew in advance of this Ukrainian invasion of Russia, the demented U.S. President Joseph Biden said the other day when asked about the fighting in Kursk, “I’ve spoken with my staff on a regular basis probably every four or five hours for the last six or eight days. And it’s — it’s creating a real dilemma for Putin.  And we’ve been in direct contact — constant contact with — with the Ukrainians.”  Do you think Kamala Harris was kept in the dark?

    Now how do you think the Russians are going to respond?  How many red lines will they allow the U.S. to cross without massive retaliation?  And what kind of retaliation?

    Switch then to the Middle East where the Iranians and their allies are preparing to retaliate to Israel’s attacks on their soil. No one knows when but it seems soon.  Something is coming and it won’t be pretty.  Will it then ignite a massive war in the region with the U.S. and Israel pitted against the region?  Will nuclear weapons be used?  Will the wars in Ukraine/Russia and the Middle East join into what will be called WW III?

    While the U.S. continues to massively arm Israel, Russian is arming its ally Iran and likely training them in the use of those weapons as the U.S. is doing in Ukraine. The stage is set.  We enter the final act.

    Natanyahu wants and needs war to survive.  So he thinks.  Psychotic killers always do.

    The signs all point in one direction.  No one should be shocked if the worst comes to pass.

    “Phone’ll jingle, door’ll knock, open the latch.”

    If you have time.

    The post Something’s Coming, We Don’t Know What It Is But It Is Going To Be Bad first appeared on Dissident Voice.

    This post was originally published on Dissident Voice.

  • The official death toll from Israel’s genocidal war on Gaza has surpassed 40,000 Palestinians, according to the Gaza health ministry — but with thousands missing under the rubble or dead from disease or starvation, the true death toll is likely far higher. According to the health ministry, as of Thursday, officials had counted 40,005 killed and 92,401 wounded by Israel. This includes at least…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • Israeli forces have killed thousands of newborns and babies in Gaza in the last 10 months of its genocide, a rights group reports after Israel killed a pair of twin newborns who were just 4 days old on Tuesday. According to Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor, Israel has killed 2,100 Palestinian babies under the age of two since October, out of a total of 17,000 children killed.

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • Health officials in Gaza said Thursday that the official death toll from Israel’s 10-month war has topped 40,000, though that is believed to be a vast undercount of the true figure. The grim milestone was reached just days after the Biden administration greenlit $20 billion in additional weapons sales to Israel, including 50 F-15 fighter jets, tank ammunition, mortar rounds…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • Democrats could drive support in key swing states this fall if Vice President Kamala Harris calls for an end to weapons transfers to Israel amid its genocide in Gaza, new polling finds even as the Biden administration doubles down on its military support of Israel. The latest Institute for Middle East Understanding (IMEU) Policy Project/YouGov poll released Wednesday finds that large…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • Amnesty International has branded the US approving $20bn in arms sales to Israel a “disgrace”.

    Nadia Daar, Amnesty International USA’s chief strategy and impact officer, said:

    The Biden administration’s approval of weapons sales to the Israeli government amounting to $20 billion is unthinkable.

    War crimes and human rights violations by Israeli forces against Palestinians across the Occupied Palestinian Territories are ongoing. Palestinians in the occupied Gaza Strip remain at risk of genocide and are suffering from an engineered famine amid ongoing intense Israeli military attacks. Nowhere is safe for civilians in the Gaza Strip.

    Israel has continued blocking humanitarian aid, including food and medical supplies, from entering Gaza. The state has frequently bombed areas that it previously designated as a ‘safe zone’, underscoring that civilians aren’t safe anywhere in Gaza.

    “If there were not an Israel, we’d have to invent one”

    In October 2023, US president Joe Biden reiterated the longstanding position that Israel is key to the Middle East-side of US empire- hegemony:

    I’ll say this 5,000 times in my career. The iron clad commitment the United States has to Israel. Based on our principles, our ideas, our values. I’ve often said… if there were not an Israel, we’d have to invent one.

    Biden also affirmed this in the 1980s, saying the US would “invent” an Israel to “protect [US] interests in the region”.

    The $20bn in additional weapons sales to Israel is predominantly $18.82bn in F-15 type fighter jets, which can be used to bomb Palestine. Israel, meanwhile, has acted aggressively against any ceasefire with Hamas. It has struck targets in Damascus and Tehran.

    With Israeli regional aggression and the weapons sales in mind, US talk of arranging a ceasefire could be little more than a PR exercise.

    Indeed, Jewish Voice for Labour said the new weapons package meant the US has “ever deeper complicity with genocide”.

    And Campaign Against Arms Trade said:

    The US decision to authorise a further $20 billion in arms sales to Israel as it continues its genocidal war in Gaza, is disgraceful, immoral, and contrary to international law.

    As well as breaking international law, the arms sales breach the US’ own Leahly Law. This prohibits military support to foreign militaries that commit human rights abuses.

    In June, dozens of UN experts called on the international arms manufacturers themselves and their over trillion dollar financial investors to halt sales to Israel or risk “complicity in international crimes, possibly including genocide”.

    In response to the US weapons sales, Amnesty International further stated:

    In light of this latest action by the Biden administration, Amnesty International urges the U.S. Congress to take urgent action to uphold U.S. and international law by blocking the sales, including through the introduction of a joint resolution of disapproval.

    Amnesty International also reiterates its calls for the U.S. government to immediately suspend all weapons sales and transfers to the Israeli government and for the implementation of an immediate and permanent ceasefire.

    Featured image via WSJ – YouTube

    By James Wright

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Only two days ago, the US approved $20bn in weapons sales to Israel. In the same week, Kamala Harris called for a ceasefire at her rally in Arizona after pro-Palestine protesters interrupted her, for the second time in a week. Meanwhile, pro-Israel lobby groups have paid her $5,395,227.

    Obviously, Harris is a far cry from Trump. However, questions have to be asked. How disingenuous must a person be to call for a ceasefire whilst both accepting money from and providing weapons to a genocidal state?

    Hypocrisy from Kamala Harris

    This weekend, Kamala Harris condemned Israel’s attack on the al-Taba’een school in Gaza. She also called for a ceasefire and highlighted the excessive civilian casualties. However since then, the US approved another $20 bn in weapons sales to Israel. Two faced or what?

    Back in 2017, Harris delivered a speech at the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) policy conference. During that speech, she said:

    I believe the bonds between the United States and Israel are unbreakable, and we can never let anyone drive a wedge between us.

    She continued:

    I believe Israel should never be a partisan issue, and as long as I’m a United States senator, I will do everything in my power to ensure broad and bipartisan support for Israel’s security and right to self-defense.

    So either Harris is unaware of international law – that countries do not have the right to self defence in territories they are occupying – or she is choosing to ignore it. Instead, she is supporting genocide, ethnic cleansing and apartheid:

    At least they have a bond that even the deaths of 40 000 Palestinians cannot break.

    Keep telling yourself that, Kamala

    In the same speech, Kamala Harris also mentioned:

    I fondly remember those Jewish National Fund boxes that we would use to collect donations to plant trees for Israel

    It is well documented that the Jewish National Fund (JNF) has helped steal Palestinian land, acquired properties through force and whitewashed the theft of Palestinian land. Friends of JNF UK supported the planting of the Hiran Forest. They used this project to displace Palestinians and destroy the village of Umm-al-Hiran. Obviously, this is against international law:

    The JNF also assigned $1m to support young Israeli settlers to reside in illegal settlements in the occupied West Bank. The funds were earmarked for vocational training and skill development. But hey, who needs legitimate training when you can just steal other people’s land?

    The JNF’s website states it ‘prides itself on honouring the pioneers of the past’. However, the over 400 communities the JNF supports are completely segregated. They are only open to Jewish people. The JNF does not allow Palestinians a look in.

    The JNF have also facilitated Israel erasing Palestinian communities completely – from their history to their culture.

    So Harris can keep telling herself she donated to ‘plant some trees’ – but we all know what that means.

    Condemning peaceful protests

    At the end of last month, Kamala Harris released a statement condemning peaceful protesters in Washington DC. The protests took place at the same time that Benjamin Netanyahu, Israeli Prime Minister was addressing congress:

    Her statement could have been dished out by an Israeli PR firm, as people on X pointed out:

    Conflating peaceful protesters with support for terrorism is getting old. As is conflating criticism of Israel with antisemitism.

    Looking for support in the wrong places

    A poll from IMEU policy project showed that Kamala Harris would earn more votes by supporting an arms embargo on Israel, than on opposing it:

    The voters are asking Harris to impose an arms embargo and a ceasefire. Will her campaign listen?

    What difference does it make whether its Biden, Trump or Harris sending the bombs to Israel? At the end of the day, it all means the same – thousands more dead Palestinians.

    Feature image via MSNBC/Youtube

    By HG

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Czech, Polish, and Slovenian PMs travel to Kyiv in 2022

    In June, rumors swirled in the media that the Biden administration was holding discussions with Israel and Ukraine about the possibility of transferring aging Patriot air defense systems currently in Israel to Ukraine. The CNN reported: “The systems would likely need to be transferred to the US first, where they would undergo refurbishment, before being sent to Ukraine.”

    In April, the Israel Defense Forces said it would soon “retire its Patriot systems,” as noted by the Financial Times, though the report elided providing a valid reason for scraping the much-touted air defense system. Since then, a gag order appears to have been issued on reporting about military co-operation between Israel and Ukraine, as it is a sensitive and strictly off-limits topic.

    Russian news agency Sputnik reported on August 12 that Poland had signed an agreement on the production of 48 launchers of the Patriot surface-to-air missile system, United States Ambassador to Poland Mark Brzezinski claimed on Monday during the signing ceremony.

    Under a deal worth $1.23 billion (4.7 billion zloty), the M903 launch stations will be produced at Stalowa Wola steelworks in Poland in co-operation with US defense giant Raytheon Technologies Corp. for which the US approved a $2 billion defense loan to Poland last month. The air defense systems production will run through 2027-2029.

    The US has been increasingly looking to outsource production of the systems, with a joint US-Japan project hitting a stumbling block in July, the report noted, though it failed to clarify how Poland’s primitive defense production industry would produce launchers for advanced Patriot missile systems when it could hardly produce 155 mm artillery shells that Ukraine, under the patronage of the US, had to import from a number of European and Asian countries during the two-year-long war.

    Clearly, a behind-the-scenes understanding has been reached that instead of refurbishing “aging Israeli Patriot systems” in the US, the launchers would instead be transferred to Poland where they would be refurbished under the supervision of Raytheon’s technicians and then deployed in the Ukraine War.

    During the two-year conflict, Israel’s thriving military-industrial complex has provided plenty of weapons, specifically its cutting-edge drone and missile technology, to Ukraine, but mainstream media, on the instructions of the US security establishment, has been especially careful not to report on the “sensitive topic.”

    Instead, Western media bent over backwards to publish misleading reports at the beginning of the Ukraine War that Ukraine’s Jewish President Volodymyr Zelensky pleaded for Iron Dome missile interceptors, a risible request that Israel allegedly “contemptuously rebuffed,” after which the Zelensky regime had a fictitious spat with Israeli policymakers.

    The clear objective of creating this smokescreen around clandestine military co-operation between Washington’s servile surrogates, Ukraine and Israel, was in deference to Israel’s regional security interests. Because Israel frequently mounts airstrikes on Iran-backed militant groups in Lebanon and Syria, whereas Russia has deployed troops, aircraft and S-400 air defense system at Syria’s Mediterranean coast. If Russia gets even an inkling of Israel’s military assistance to Ukraine, then Israel would have to rethink its belligerent attitude.

    Nonetheless, besides pledging to refurbish Israeli Patriot missile launchers for Ukraine, Poland also inked a bilateral security agreement with Ukraine on July 8. Among other substantial commitments, the security agreement signed in Warsaw provided for the development of a mechanism for Poland to shoot down Russian missiles and drones fired in the direction of Poland in Ukrainian airspace, which would legally amount to an unequivocal declaration of war between a NATO member state, Poland, and Russia.

    President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelensky during a joint press conference with Prime Minister of Poland Donald Tusk stated: “We are especially grateful for the special arrangements, and this is reflected in the security agreement. It provides for the development of a mechanism to shoot down [by Poland] Russian missiles and drones fired in the airspace of Ukraine in the direction of Poland. I am confident that our teams and the teams of the ministries of defense, together with our military, will work together to work out how we can quickly implement this point of our agreements.”

    The vendetta between Russia and Poland, clearly punching above its weight, goes a long way back. In a highly symbolic move expressing solidarity with Ukraine, the prime ministers of Poland, the Czech Republic and Slovenia traveled together to the embattled Ukrainian capital of Kyiv and met with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on March 15, 2022, weeks after Russia’s intervention in February.

    The “Three Musketeers” took hours-long train trip on their journey from the west Ukrainian city of Lviv to the capital Kyiv, allegedly “endangering their lives” due to security risks involved in traveling within a war zone, though there was no risk to their lives, as such, because they had requested prior permission for the official visit from the Kremlin, which was graciously granted keeping in view diplomatic conventions.

    Accompanying the trio of premiers was a “special guest” of the Zelensky regime, Jaroslaw Kaczynski—then the deputy prime minister of Poland, the head of Law and Justice (PiS) Party to which the president and prime minister of Poland belonged and the infamous “puppet master” who hired and fired government executives and ministers on a whim.

    Jaroslaw Kaczynski is the twin brother of late President Lech Kaczynski, who died in a plane crash at Smolensk, Russia, in 2010 along with 95 other Poles, among them political and military leaders, as they traveled to commemorate the Katyn massacre that occurred during the Second World War.

    Subsequent Polish and international investigations led by independent observers conclusively determined that the crash-landing was an accident caused by fog and pilot error. Still, Kaczynski had long suspected that Russian President Vladimir Putin had a role in provoking the accident, and was harboring a personal grudge against the Russian president.

    The Polish electorate dispensed poetic justice to kingmaker Kaczynski as he was ousted from power following the last October’s parliamentary elections in Poland due to his myopic and vindictive policies and Donald Tusk was elected prime minister of the coalition government.

    Tusk is a seasoned politician and diplomat who was the President of the European Council from 2014 to 2019. It was expected of him to display statesmanship and revisit the confrontational approach of his predecessors. But clearly, he is going down the same path of perdition that proved fatal not only for egocentric and spiteful politicians but for the Poles as a nation.

    The post Will Poland Refurbish Israeli Patriots for Ukraine War? first appeared on Dissident Voice.

    This post was originally published on Dissident Voice.

  • Czech, Polish, and Slovenian PMs travel to Kyiv in 2022

    In June, rumors swirled in the media that the Biden administration was holding discussions with Israel and Ukraine about the possibility of transferring aging Patriot air defense systems currently in Israel to Ukraine. The CNN reported: “The systems would likely need to be transferred to the US first, where they would undergo refurbishment, before being sent to Ukraine.”

    In April, the Israel Defense Forces said it would soon “retire its Patriot systems,” as noted by the Financial Times, though the report elided providing a valid reason for scraping the much-touted air defense system. Since then, a gag order appears to have been issued on reporting about military co-operation between Israel and Ukraine, as it is a sensitive and strictly off-limits topic.

    Russian news agency Sputnik reported on August 12 that Poland had signed an agreement on the production of 48 launchers of the Patriot surface-to-air missile system, United States Ambassador to Poland Mark Brzezinski claimed on Monday during the signing ceremony.

    Under a deal worth $1.23 billion (4.7 billion zloty), the M903 launch stations will be produced at Stalowa Wola steelworks in Poland in co-operation with US defense giant Raytheon Technologies Corp. for which the US approved a $2 billion defense loan to Poland last month. The air defense systems production will run through 2027-2029.

    The US has been increasingly looking to outsource production of the systems, with a joint US-Japan project hitting a stumbling block in July, the report noted, though it failed to clarify how Poland’s primitive defense production industry would produce launchers for advanced Patriot missile systems when it could hardly produce 155 mm artillery shells that Ukraine, under the patronage of the US, had to import from a number of European and Asian countries during the two-year-long war.

    Clearly, a behind-the-scenes understanding has been reached that instead of refurbishing “aging Israeli Patriot systems” in the US, the launchers would instead be transferred to Poland where they would be refurbished under the supervision of Raytheon’s technicians and then deployed in the Ukraine War.

    During the two-year conflict, Israel’s thriving military-industrial complex has provided plenty of weapons, specifically its cutting-edge drone and missile technology, to Ukraine, but mainstream media, on the instructions of the US security establishment, has been especially careful not to report on the “sensitive topic.”

    Instead, Western media bent over backwards to publish misleading reports at the beginning of the Ukraine War that Ukraine’s Jewish President Volodymyr Zelensky pleaded for Iron Dome missile interceptors, a risible request that Israel allegedly “contemptuously rebuffed,” after which the Zelensky regime had a fictitious spat with Israeli policymakers.

    The clear objective of creating this smokescreen around clandestine military co-operation between Washington’s servile surrogates, Ukraine and Israel, was in deference to Israel’s regional security interests. Because Israel frequently mounts airstrikes on Iran-backed militant groups in Lebanon and Syria, whereas Russia has deployed troops, aircraft and S-400 air defense system at Syria’s Mediterranean coast. If Russia gets even an inkling of Israel’s military assistance to Ukraine, then Israel would have to rethink its belligerent attitude.

    Nonetheless, besides pledging to refurbish Israeli Patriot missile launchers for Ukraine, Poland also inked a bilateral security agreement with Ukraine on July 8. Among other substantial commitments, the security agreement signed in Warsaw provided for the development of a mechanism for Poland to shoot down Russian missiles and drones fired in the direction of Poland in Ukrainian airspace, which would legally amount to an unequivocal declaration of war between a NATO member state, Poland, and Russia.

    President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelensky during a joint press conference with Prime Minister of Poland Donald Tusk stated: “We are especially grateful for the special arrangements, and this is reflected in the security agreement. It provides for the development of a mechanism to shoot down [by Poland] Russian missiles and drones fired in the airspace of Ukraine in the direction of Poland. I am confident that our teams and the teams of the ministries of defense, together with our military, will work together to work out how we can quickly implement this point of our agreements.”

    The vendetta between Russia and Poland, clearly punching above its weight, goes a long way back. In a highly symbolic move expressing solidarity with Ukraine, the prime ministers of Poland, the Czech Republic and Slovenia traveled together to the embattled Ukrainian capital of Kyiv and met with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on March 15, 2022, weeks after Russia’s intervention in February.

    The “Three Musketeers” took hours-long train trip on their journey from the west Ukrainian city of Lviv to the capital Kyiv, allegedly “endangering their lives” due to security risks involved in traveling within a war zone, though there was no risk to their lives, as such, because they had requested prior permission for the official visit from the Kremlin, which was graciously granted keeping in view diplomatic conventions.

    Accompanying the trio of premiers was a “special guest” of the Zelensky regime, Jaroslaw Kaczynski—then the deputy prime minister of Poland, the head of Law and Justice (PiS) Party to which the president and prime minister of Poland belonged and the infamous “puppet master” who hired and fired government executives and ministers on a whim.

    Jaroslaw Kaczynski is the twin brother of late President Lech Kaczynski, who died in a plane crash at Smolensk, Russia, in 2010 along with 95 other Poles, among them political and military leaders, as they traveled to commemorate the Katyn massacre that occurred during the Second World War.

    Subsequent Polish and international investigations led by independent observers conclusively determined that the crash-landing was an accident caused by fog and pilot error. Still, Kaczynski had long suspected that Russian President Vladimir Putin had a role in provoking the accident, and was harboring a personal grudge against the Russian president.

    The Polish electorate dispensed poetic justice to kingmaker Kaczynski as he was ousted from power following the last October’s parliamentary elections in Poland due to his myopic and vindictive policies and Donald Tusk was elected prime minister of the coalition government.

    Tusk is a seasoned politician and diplomat who was the President of the European Council from 2014 to 2019. It was expected of him to display statesmanship and revisit the confrontational approach of his predecessors. But clearly, he is going down the same path of perdition that proved fatal not only for egocentric and spiteful politicians but for the Poles as a nation.

    The post Will Poland Refurbish Israeli Patriots for Ukraine War? first appeared on Dissident Voice.

    This post was originally published on Dissident Voice.

  • The president of Columbia University announced her resignation late Wednesday, months after she authorized a violent police crackdown on student demonstrators urging the school to divest from Israel over the country’s devastating assault on the Gaza Strip. Minouche Shafik said in her announcement that recent months have been “a period of turmoil where it has been difficult to overcome…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.


  • This content originally appeared on Democracy Now! and was authored by Democracy Now!.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • :Mohammed Abu al-Qumsan had just collected the birth certificates of his three-day-old twins when he received the news: his Gaza apartment had been bombed by Israel, killing the babies and their mother.

    Footage of a distraught Abu al-Qumsan, weeping and falling as he still holds the birth certificates, has been widely circulated on social media. His heartbreak has become the latest emblem of the devastating toll of Israel’s genocide in Palestine.

    Israel’s relentless bombing

    With tears streaming down his face, he said:

    I was in the hospital at the time when the house was targeted.

    There was a call, after the birth certificates were printed.

    The caller asked, ‘Are you okay and where are you?’ I told them I was at Al-Aqsa Martyrs Hospital, and I was told that my house had been bombed.

    Abu al-Qumsan had left his wife, their babies, and his mother-in-law in the fifth-floor flat they shared in Deir al-Balah, in the central Gaza Strip. The area has been relentlessly bombed by Israeli forces.

    He continued:

    I was informed that they are in Al-Aqsa Martyrs Hospital and I told them I am at the entrance to the hospital.

    I went inside the hospital with the birth certificates in my hands… and they told me they are in the morgue.

     

    Now, with his home obliterated and his famliy gone, Abu al-Qumsan stood in a humanitarian zone in Al-Mawasi holding unused pink and yellow baby clothes. He never got the chance to show his wife that their babies had been legally named: Aser, the boy, and Aysal, the girl:

    On the same day I obtained their birth certificates, I also had to submit their death certificates, for my children, and also for their mother.

    I did not get the chance to celebrate their arrival. Their clothes are new, they did not wear them.

    He also held some nappies, explaining that they had spent three months trying to find some to buy, so scarce are basic supplies.

    One social media user expressed their horror and grief at this callous murder:

    ‘Living in terror’

    Abu al-Qumsan married his wife Jumana, a pharmacist, in July last year, before the war plunged their lives into chaos. She endured a traumatic pregnancy as they fled from place to place to escape the bombardments. Despite carrying twins, she insisted on volunteering in hospitals until her seventh month. Her husband said:

    Since the beginning of the war, I have been afraid every day, living in terror, and I was afraid that she would miscarry.

    We lost friends, family, and people who were very dear to us,

    We were in a lot of pain, we were very scared. We ran a lot.

    I want to know why she was killed in this way. I want to know why she was targeted. In the house, in a safe area.

    Like many Palestinian civillians that Isreal keeps murdering, Abu al-Qumsan said:

    There was no prior warning of the bombing of the house. I have nothing to do with military action. We are civilians.

    People in Palestine are evidently trapped, travelling from place to place as Israel indiscriminately bombs safe zones. How could these days-old babies killing possibly be justified? And their mother, one of the very few remaining medical professionals? And their father, now losing his entire world?

    Additional reporting by Agence France-Presse

    Featured image via YouTube screenshot/Guardian News

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Seg1 gaza sale

    Health officials in Gaza said Thursday that the official death toll from Israel’s 10-month war has topped 40,000, though that is believed to be a vast undercount of the true figure. The grim milestone was reached just days after the Biden administration greenlit $20 billion in additional weapons sales to Israel, including 50 F-15 fighter jets, tank ammunition, mortar rounds, tactical vehicles and advanced air-to-air missiles. The U.S. approved the sales despite growing calls for an arms embargo on Israel. “This is just a continuation of a policy that has been going on now for 10 months of the U.S. providing to Israel all the arms that it requests,” says Josh Paul, a veteran State Department official who worked on arms deals and resigned in protest over Gaza policy in October. “It is a dark day for American foreign policy.” We also speak with Jan Egeland, the secretary general of the Norwegian Refugee Council, who says it’s “incomprehensible” that the U.S. keeps supplying Israel with weapons. “There should be no more arms going into that place before there is a ceasefire.”


    This content originally appeared on Democracy Now! and was authored by Democracy Now!.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Nearly 40,000 Palestinians have been killed in Israel’s war on Gaza, according to the official death toll, though the true casualty figure is likely far higher with thousands of the dead unaccounted for. Meanwhile, Israeli forces have raided towns and villages across the occupied West Bank, and settlers under military protection have repeatedly stormed the Al-Aqsa Mosque compound in recent days.

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • Israel’s army routinely forces detained and innocent Palestinian civilians to be human shields, an investigation from Israeli outlet Haaretz has found. Several sources testified that this was done with the knowledge of senior officers. That includes IDF chief of staff Herzl Halevi.

    Haaretz quoted Israeli soldiers who said:

    our lives are more important than their lives.

    One example of “human shielding in action”, in the words of Francesca Albanese, the UN’s special rapporteur to the occupied Palestinian territory, happened in June where Israeli forces tied an injured Palestinian man to a military vehicle, driving with him on top.

    And in January, Israeli forces used a Palestinian shop owner as a human shield in the occupied West Bank. That’s after they raided his mobile phone shop.

    Israel’s use of human shields goes back a long way

    This conduct precedes Israel’s ongoing, genocidal assault. Defence for Children International reported in May 2023 that Israeli forces used four Palestinian children, including two toddlers, as human shields. In the occupied West Bank, Israeli forces made the Palestinian children stand in front of military vehicles. At the same time, they launched tear gas and live ammunition at Palestinian people confronting their raid.

    Defence for Children International further reported on Israeli forces using a 16 year old Palestinian as a human shield in February 2023. Israeli forces handcuffed him and forced him to walk in front of them during a military incursion into the occupied West Bank. Simultaneously, they fired live ammunition and then killed two other Palestinians.

    Back in 2013, the UN reported on the Israeli army using Palestinian children as shields. It cited numerous cases between January 2010 and March 2013.

    “Almost all those using children as human shields… have remained unpunished and the soldiers convicted for having forced at gunpoint a nine-year-old child to search bags suspected of containing explosives only received a suspended sentence of three months and were demoted”, the UN report said.

    The use of human shields is a war crime under international law.

    Featured image via Firstpost – YouTube

    By James Wright

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Rep. Ilhan Omar handily won her primary race in Minnesota’s 5th District on Tuesday, effectively securing her reelection to Congress in the face of an onslaught of pro-Israel cash aimed at unseating progressive supporters of a Gaza cease-fire and other popular policy positions. Omar defeated her main challenger, former Minneapolis city councilmember Don Samuels, by more than 16,000…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • The following article is a comment piece from the Islamic Human Rights Commission (IHRC)

    IHRC has written to the PM Keir Starmer to express our concerns about the government’s response to Israel’s genocide against the Palestinians and its increasingly belligerent actions taking the region to the brink of a major war, after his call with Iran’s president.

    Starmer: stop appeasing Israel

    In a joint statement with the leaders of France and Germany and in a call with Iranian president Masoud Pezeshkian, PM Starmer urged Iran to refrain from retaliating for the assassination of Ismail Haniyeh.

    According to the letter, the response highlights all that has been wrong in Britain’s stand on the genocide in Gaza and its fallout.

    Instead of reacting to Israel’s violation of Iran’s sovereignty in carrying out the extra-judicial and extra-territorial assassination of Hamas leader, Ismail Haniyeh, in Tehran on 31 July, with international outrage and sanctions against Israel, the PM has joined a wave of demands calling on Iran to de-escalate.

    “Such calls are an abnegation of responsibility and international law. They are a diabolical example of “blaming the victims” and western exceptionalism. You do not stop a bully by asking its victims to submit to him. You demand the bully stop his aggression,” says the letter.

    By appeasing Israel, the PM is simply showing the Zionist state a green light to attack sovereign states with impunity. And while PM Starmer talks about giving peace a chance, his government continues to provide diplomatic cover and military support to Israel to continue its pogrom against the Palestinians in Gaza.

    Labour must step up

    It is clear that having failed to achieve its military objectives in Gaza and elsewhere in Palestine, Israel is now trying to pull western powers into a wider regional war. Netanyahu craves a wider, zero-sum, war pitting the Muslim world against the West. It is Britain’s duty to stop him, not assist him in his megalomaniacal crusade.

    Since the genocide started last October, millions of Britons have marched on our streets to try and apply pressure on Britain and other governments to put a stop to it. However, that central demand, which is shared by the majority of the country and echoed by the International Court of Justice, has fallen on deaf ears.

    It is high time that our government stepped up to fulfil its international and moral responsibility and provide protection for the Palestinians instead of legitimising Israeli war crimes and asking the targets of Israel’s belligerence to be passive victims.

    Featured image via 10 Downing Street

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Palestine Action has been hitting the corporate media headlines in recent days. It’s over activists’ detention under terrorism laws, and subsequent charging. However, not only did said corporate media get some of the facts wrong – they also missed the fact that, much like Just Stop Oil’s ‘Whole Truth Five’, one of the activists has been charged even though they weren’t physically at the action.

    Palestine Action: detained and charged

    Seven Palestine Action activists were denied bail on Tuesday 13 August at Westminster Magistrates Court after being charged with offences such as aggravated burglary, criminal damage, and violent disorder.

    The seven were charged after six were arrested for entering Elbit Systems UK’s research and development centre in Filton, Bristol on Tuesday 6 August. They allegedly caused over £1m in damage to the research hub owned by Elbit Systems, Israel’s biggest weapons producer.

    Video footage released by Palestine Action shows Israeli weapons, including quadcopter drones seen used during the Gaza genocide, being destroyed inside the Filton premises:

    All of the seven were held under the Terrorism Act, giving the police powers to detain them without charge for up to 14 days. Whilst they were detained, counter-terrorism police interrogated the activists numerous times.

    As the Canary previously reported, in recent days people have been protesting outside the police stations holding the activists.

    In relation to the charges made, which was followed by a misinformation campaign in the media, Palestine Action says:

    Despite arrests under the Terrorism Act, giving the police the ability to detain without charge for up to 14 days, none of the activists have been charged with terrorism offences. Although the deliberate smear campaign we are seeing in mainstream media would indicate otherwise. This not only vindicates the activists, but proves the state was abusing their powers by holding them under draconian laws which saw them interrogated day after day – all in a bid to protect Israel’s biggest weapons manufacturer.

    Incorrect reporting

    Some mainstream media has indicated that the activists had been charged under terror laws.

    Palestine Action says this is incorrect.

    It claimed the CPS stated the court can determine whether the offences have a ‘terrorist connection’ under section 69 of the Sentencing Act 2000. This will only become relevant if the activists are convicted of the alleged offences, and does not constitute terrorism charges.

    Palestine Action contends that:

    this sentencing power was only mentioned as a means for the state to justify detaining activists without charge for seven days, and to prejudice the public by associating the action with terrorism.

    As the Evening Standard reported, one of the seven – Hannah Davidson – has been charged despite not physically being at the action. This has echoes of the ‘Whole Truth Five’ – the Just Stop Oil activists who have been sent to prison for years, for planning action on the M25.

    Featured image via Palestine Action

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Israel’s zealots are ignoring the pleas of the top brass. They want to widen the circle of war, whatever the consequences.

    ANALYSIS: By Jonathan Cook in Middle East Eye

    There should be nothing surprising about the revelation that troops at Sde Teiman, a detention camp set up by Israel in the wake of Hamas’s October 7 attack on southern Israel, are routinely using rape as a weapon of torture against Palestinian inmates.

    Last month, nine soldiers from a prison unit, Force 100, were arrested for gang-raping a Palestinian inmate with a sharp object. He had to be hospitalised with his injuries.

    At least 53 prisoners are known to have died in Israeli detention, presumed in most cases to be either through torture or following the denial of access to medical care. No investigations have been carried out by Israel and no arrests have been made.

    Why should it be of any surprise that Israel’s self-proclaimed “most moral army in the world” uses torture and rape against Palestinians? It would be truly surprising if this was not happening.

    After all, this is the same military that for 10 months has used starvation as a weapon of war against the 2.3 million people of Gaza, half of them children.

    It is the same military that since October has laid waste to all of Gaza’s hospitals, as well as destroying almost all of its schools and 70 percent of its homes. It is the same military that is known to have killed over that period at least 40,000 Palestinians, with a further 21,000 children missing.

    It is the same military currently on trial for genocide at the International Court of Justice (ICJ), the highest court in the world.

    No red lines
    If there are no red lines for Israel when it comes to brutalising Palestinian civilians trapped inside Gaza, why would there be any red lines for those kidnapped off its streets and dragged into its dungeons?

    I documented some of the horrors unfolding in Sde Teiman in these pages back in May.

    Months ago, the Israeli media began publishing testimonies from whistleblowing guards and doctors detailing the depraved conditions there.

    The International Committee of the Red Cross has been denied access to the detention camp, leaving it entirely unmonitored.

    The United Nations published a report on July 31 into the conditions in which some 9400 captive Palestinians have been held since last October. Most have been cut off from the outside world, and the reason for their seizure and imprisonment was never provided.

    The report concludes that “appalling acts” of torture and abuse are taking place at all of Israel’s detention centres, including sexual violence, waterboarding and attacks with dogs.

    The authors note “forced nudity of both men and women; beatings while naked, including on the genitals; electrocution of the genitals and anus; being forced to undergo repeated humiliating strip searches; widespread sexual slurs and threats of rape; and the inappropriate touching of women by both male and female soldiers”.

    There are, according to the investigation, “consistent reports” of Israeli security forces “inserting objects into detainees’ anuses”.

    Children sexually abused
    Last month, Save the Children found that many hundreds of Palestinian children had been imprisoned in Israel, where they faced starvation and sexual abuse.

    And this week B’Tselem, Israel’s main human rights group monitoring the occupation, produced a report — titled “Welcome to Hell” — which included the testimonies of dozens of Palestinians who had emerged from what it called “inhuman conditions”. Most had never been charged with an offence.

    It concluded that the abuses at Sde Teiman were “just the tip of the iceberg”. All of Israel’s detention centres formed “a network of torture camps for Palestinians” in which “every inmate is intentionally condemned to severe, relentless pain and suffering”. It added that this was “an organised, declared policy of the Israeli prison authorities”.

    Tal Steiner, head of the Public Committee Against Torture in Israel, which has long campaigned against the systematic torture of Palestinian detainees, wrote last week that Sde Teiman “was a place where the most horrible torture we had ever seen was occurring”.

    In short, it has been an open secret in Israel that torture and sexual assault are routine at Sde Teiman.

    The abuse is so horrifying that last month Israel’s High Court ordered officials to explain why they were operating outside Israel’s own laws governing the internment of “unlawful combatants”.

    The surprise is not that sexual violence is being inflicted on Palestinian captives. It is that Israel’s top brass ever imagined the arrest of Israeli soldiers for raping a Palestinian would pass muster with the public.

    Toxic can of worms
    Instead, by making the arrests, the army opened a toxic can of worms.

    The arrests provoked a massive backlash from soldiers, politicians, Israeli media, and large sections of the Israeli public.

    Rioters, led by members of the Israeli Parliament, broke into Sde Teiman. An even larger group, including members of Force 100, tried to invade a military base, Beit Lid, where the soldiers were being held in an attempt to free them.

    The police, under the control of Itamar Ben Gvir, a settler leader with openly fascist leanings, delayed arriving to break up the protests. Ben Gvir has called for Palestinian prisoners to be summarily executed — or killed with “a shot to the head” — to save on the costs of holding them.

    No one was arrested over what amounted to a mutiny as well as a major breach of security.

    Bezalel Smotrich, Israel’s finance minister, helped whip up popular indignation, denouncing the arrests and describing the Force 100 soldiers as “heroic warriors”.

    Other prominent cabinet ministers echoed him.

    Three soldiers freed
    Already, three of the soldiers have been freed, and more will likely follow.

    The consensus in Israel is that any abuse, including rape, is permitted against the thousands of Palestinians who have been seized by Israel in recent months — including women, children and many hundreds of medical personnel.

    That consensus is the same one that thinks it fine to bomb Palestinian women and children in Gaza, destroy their homes and starve them.

    Such depraved attitudes are not new. They draw on ideological convictions and legal precedents that developed through decades of Israel’s illegal occupation. Israeli society has completely normalised the idea that Palestinians are less than human and that any and every abuse of them is allowed.

    Hamas’s attack on October 7 simply brought the long-standing moral corruption at the core of Israeli society more obviously out into the open.

    In 2016, for example, the Israeli military appointed Colonel Eyal Karim as its chief rabbi, even after he had declared Palestinians to be “animals” and had approved the rape of Palestinian women in the interest of boosting soldiers’ morale.

    Religious extremists, let us note, increasingly predominate among combat troops.

    Compensation suit dismissed
    In 2015, Israel’s Supreme Court dismissed a compensation suit from a Lebanese prisoner that his lawyers submitted after he was released in a prisoner swap. Mustafa Dirani had been raped with a baton 15 years earlier in a secret jail known as Facility 1391.

    Despite Dirani’s claim being supported by a medical assessment from the time made by an Israeli military doctor, the court ruled that anyone engaged in an armed conflict with Israel could not make a claim against the Israeli state.

    Meanwhile, human and legal rights groups have regularly reported cases of Israeli soldiers and police raping and sexually assaulting Palestinians, including children.

    A clear message was sent to Israeli soldiers over many decades that, just as the genocidal murder of Palestinians is considered warranted and “lawful”, the torture and rape of Palestinians held in captivity is considered warranted and “lawful” too.

    Understandably, there was indignation that the long-established “rules” — that any and every atrocity is permitted — appeared suddenly and arbitrarily to have been changed.

    The biggest question is this: why did the Israeli military’s top legal adviser approve opening an investigation into the Force 100 soldiers — and why now?

    The answer is obvious. Israel’s commanders are in panic after a spate of setbacks in the international legal arena.

    ‘Plausible’ Gaza genocide
    The ICJ, sometimes referred to as the World Court, has put Israel on trial for committing what it considers a “plausible” genocide in Gaza.

    Separately, it concluded last month that Israel’s 57-year occupation is illegal and a form of aggression against the Palestinian people. Gaza never stopped being under occupation, the judges ruled, despite claims from its apologists, including Western governments, to the contrary.

    Significantly, that means Palestinians have a legal right to resist their occupation. Or, to put it another way, they have an immutable right to self-defence against their Israeli occupiers, while Israel has no such right against the Palestinians it illegally occupies.

    Israel is not in “armed conflict” with the Palestinian people. It is brutally occupying and oppressing them.

    Israel must immediately end the occupation to regain such a right of self-defence — something it demonstrably has no intention to do.

    Meanwhile, the chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC), the ICJ’s sister court, is actively seeking arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his Defence Minister, Yoav Gallant, for war crimes.

    The various cases reinforce each other. The World Court’s decisions are making it ever harder for the ICC to drag its feet in issuing and expanding the circle of arrest warrants.

    Countervailing pressures
    Both courts are now under enormous, countervailing pressures.

    On the one side, massive external pressure is being exerted on the ICJ and ICC from states such as the US, Britain and Germany that are prepared to see the genocide in Gaza continue.

    And on the other, the judges themselves are fully aware of what is at stake if they fail to act.

    The longer they delay, the more they discredit international law and their own role as arbiters of that law. That will give even more leeway for other states to claim that inaction by the courts has set a precedent for their own right to commit war crimes.

    International law, the entire rationale for the ICJ and ICC’s existence, stands on a precipice. Israel’s genocide threatens to bring it all crashing down.

    Israel’s top brass stand in the middle of that fight.

    They are confident that Washington will block at the UN Security Council any effort to enforce the ICJ rulings against them — either a future one on genocide in Gaza or the existing one on their illegal occupation.

    No US veto at ICC
    But arrest warrants from the ICC are a different matter. Washington has no such veto. All states signed up to the ICC’s Rome Statute – that is, most of the West, minus the US — will be obligated to arrest Israeli officials who step on their soil and to hand them over to The Hague.

    Israel and the US had been hoping to use technicalities to delay the issuing of the arrest warrants for as long as possible. Most significantly, they recruited the UK, which has signed the Rome Statute, to do their dirty work.

    It looked like the new UK government under Keir Starmer would continue where its predecessor left off by tying up the court in lengthy and obscure legal debates about the continuing applicability of the long-dead, 30-year-old Oslo Accords.

    A former human rights lawyer, Starmer has repeatedly backed Israel’s “plausible” genocide, even arguing that the starvation of Gaza’s population, including its children, could be justified as “self-defence” — an idea entirely alien to international law, which treats it as collective punishment and a war crime.

    But now with a secure parliamentary majority, even Starmer appears to be baulking at being seen as helping Netanyahu personally avoid arrest for war crimes.

    The UK government announced late last month that it would drop Britain’s legal objections at the ICC.

    That has suddenly left both Netanyahu and the Israeli military command starkly exposed — which is the reason they felt compelled to approve the arrest of the Force 100 soldiers.

    Top prass pretexts
    Under a rule known as “complementarity”, Israeli officials might be able to avoid war crimes trials at The Hague if they can demonstrate that Israel is able and willing to prosecute war crimes itself. That would avert the need for the ICC to step in and fulfil its mandate.

    The Israeli top brass hoped they could feed a few lowly soldiers to the Israeli courts and drag out the trials for years. In the meantime, Washington would have the pretext it needed to bully the ICC into dropping the case for arrests on the grounds that Israel was already doing the job of prosecuting war crimes.

    The patent problem with this strategy is that the ICC isn’t primarily interested in a few grunts being prosecuted in Israel as war criminals, even assuming the trials ever take place.

    At issue is the military strategy that has allowed Israel to bomb Gaza into the Stone Age. At issue is a political culture that has made starving 2.3 million people seem normal.

    At issue is a religious and nationalistic fervour long cultivated in the army that now encourages soldiers to execute Palestinian children by shooting them in the head and chest, as a US doctor who volunteered in Gaza has testified.

    At issue is a military hierarchy that turns a blind eye to soldiers raping and sexually abusing Palestinian captives, including children.

    The buck stops not with a handful of soldiers in Force 100. It stops with the Israeli government and military leaders. They are at the top of a command chain that has authorised war crimes in Gaza for the past 10 months – and before that, for decades across the occupied territories.

    What is at stake
    This is why observers have totally underestimated what is at stake with the rulings of the ICC and ICJ.

    These judgments against Israel are forcing out into the light of day for proper scrutiny a state of affairs that has been quietly accepted by the West for decades. Should Israel have the right to operate as an apartheid regime that systematically engages in ethnic cleansing and the murder of Palestinians?

    A direct answer is needed from each Western capital. There is nowhere left to hide. Western states are being presented with a stark choice: either openly back Israeli apartheid and genocide, or for the first time withdraw support.

    The Israeli far-right, which now dominates both politically and in the army’s combat ranks, cares about none of this. It is immune to pressure. It is willing to go it alone.

    As the Israeli media has been warning for some time, sections of the army are effectively now turning into militias that follow their own rules.

    Israel’s military commanders, on the other hand, are starting to understand the trap they have set for themselves. They have long cultivated fascistic zealotry among ground troops needed to dehumanise and better oppress Palestinians living under Israeli occupation. But the war crimes proudly being live-streamed by their units now leave them exposed to the legal consequences.

    Israel’s international isolation means a place one day for them in the dock at The Hague.

    Israeli society’s demons exposed
    The ICC and ICJ rulings are not just bringing Israeli society’s demons out into the open, or those of a complicit Western political and media class.

    The international legal order is gradually cornering Israel’s war machine, forcing it to turn in on itself. The interests of the Israeli military command are now fundamentally opposed to those of the rank and file and the political leadership.

    The result, as military expert Yagil Levy has long warned, will be an increasing breakdown of discipline, as the attempts to arrest Force 100 soldiers demonstrated all too clearly.

    The Israeli military juggernaut cannot be easily or quickly turned around.

    The military command is reported to be furiously trying to push Netanyahu into agreeing on a hostage deal to bring about a ceasefire — not because it cares about the welfare of Palestinian civilians, or the hostages, but because the longer this “plausible” genocide continues, the bigger chance the generals will end up at The Hague.

    Israel’s zealots are ignoring the pleas of the top brass. They want not only to continue the drive to eliminate the Palestinian people but to widen the circle of war, whatever the consequences.

    That included the reckless, incendiary move last month to assassinate Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh in Iran — a provocation with one aim only: to undermine the moderates in Hamas and Tehran.

    If, as seems certain, Israel’s commanders are unwilling or incapable of reining in these excesses, then the World Court will find it impossible to ignore the charge of genocide against Israel and the ICC will be compelled to issue arrest warrants against more of the military leadership.

    A logic has been created in which evil feeds on evil in a death spiral. The question is how much more carnage and misery can Israel spread on the way down.

    Jonathan Cook is a writer, journalist and self-appointed media critic and author of many books about Palestine. Winner of the Martha Gellhorn Special Prize for Journalism. Republished from the author’s blog with permission.


    This content originally appeared on Asia Pacific Report and was authored by APR editor.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • The push towards an all-out war in the Middle East is moving out of its sleepwalking phase to that of conscious eschatological reckoning.  A blood filled, fiery Armageddon will reveal the forces of virtue, linking the evangelicals of the United States with the right-wing Jewish nationalists in Israel.  That appalling prospect is certainly not one to discount: the messianic are always a frightful bunch, thinking history and selectively pruned religions texts to be on their side.

    Each week now comes with some measure of sabotage, mutilation and disruption to prospects of peace.  In his July 24 address to the US Congress, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu outlined his crude Manichean vision in routine barking fashion.  In doing so, his intention, as Noa Landau pithily put it, was not to end the war in Gaza so much as prolong it.

    For Netanyahu, the strained chords of civilisational rhetoric are never far away.  He would like other powers to muck in, battling the fiends he calls an “axis of terror”.  Impediments to the Jewish state’s war efforts had to be rejected.  To impose them would see other countries of similar kidney shackled.  “If Israel’s hands are tied, America is next.  I’ll tell you what else is next: the ability of all democracies to fight terrorism will be imperilled.”

    Room was reserved to attack the International Criminal Court, whose chief prosecutor has sought warrants of arrest against himself and Defence Minister Yoav Gallant, and the presidents of notable US universities.  As for protesting students, they had chosen to “stand with evil.  They stand with Hamas.  They stand with rapists and murderers.”  With daring outrage, he blotted out any notion that Palestinian civilians were being butchered, despite a death toll in the densely populated strip hovering near 40,000.  Indeed, civilian deaths had been “practically none,” with Israel scrupulous in “getting civilians out of harm’s way, something people said we could never do”.

    With this blood crusted Weltanschauung, acts of destabilising mayhem are automatic.  Showing an utter contempt for Israeli hostages, let alone any humanity for the Palestinians they regard with expansive condescension, the Netanyahu government thought it wise to carry out two assassinations: that of Hamas’ political chief and chief negotiator Ismail Haniyeh, and Hezbollah’s top military chief Fuad Shukr, both killed within twenty-four hours in Beirut and Tehran respectively.

    The response to the assassinations in Israel was one of relish – at least for those of the Itamar Ben-Gvir school of thought.  As David Issacharoff, writing in Haaretz, described it, “Israel has become a Matryoshka doll of pyromaniacs.”  From his skewed vantage point as National Security Minister, assassinations are staple food for the state.  The killing of Hezbollah’s second in command, ostensibly for his alleged role in an attack on a Druze village in the Golan Heights, drew the gleeful response that “Every god has his day”.

    Despite certain Israeli media reports claiming an order from Netanyahu that ministers were to stay silent over Haniyeh’s killing, the enthusiasts were voluble in rapture.  Heritage Minister Amichay Eliyahu, also of Ben-Gvir’s Otzma Yehudit party, expressed his glee on social media, claiming that “this is the right way to clean the world of this filth.”  There were to be “No more imaginary ‘peace’/surrender agreements, no more mercy for these sons of death.”

    Other cabinet ministers also joined the gloating chorus.  “Careful What You Wish For,” wrote Minister for the Diaspora Amichai Chikli over a video of Haniyeh in a conference hall while people chanted “Death to Israel.”  Communications Minister Shlomo Karhi resorted to biblical verse: “So may all your enemies perish, O Lord.”

    Despite no official confirmation of Israel’s role in the killing of the senior Hamas official, the Government Press Office posted, if only briefly, an image of Haniyeh which left no room for nuance: “Eliminated: Ismail Haniyeh, Hamas highest-ranking leader, was killed in a precise strike in Tehran, Iran.”

    The richly violent musings of Ben-Gvir and his circle of sanctified terror have even proven indigestible for some members of the war cabinet.  Defence Minister Gallant, not immune from the urge to dehumanise the residents of Gaza, accused his national security counterpart of being a “pyromaniac”.  On the X platform, he declared his opposition against “any negotiations to bring him into the war cabinet – it would allow him to implement his plans.”  The same Gallant, however, was also in celebratory mood about the assassinations.

    Even outside the war cabinet, the views of Ben-Gvir, not to mention his overall influence, travel with toxic rapture.  In the background, incandescently inspiring, is Rabbi Dov Lior, a figure of glowing nationalist fury. It was he who incited members of the Jewish Underground to conduct various terrorist attacks in the 1980s against Palestinians.  (The same group also unsuccessfully plotted to blow up the Dome on the Rock.)

    This, as former UK diplomat Alastair Crooke observes, is the State of Judea doing battle against the State of Israel.  He quotes Moshe “Bogie” Ya’alon, former Chief of Staff of the IDF, who sees such bloody eschatology as resting on a fundamental concept: “Jewish supremacy” or “Mein Kampf in reverse”.  For Rabbi Lior, the next big war cannot come soon enough, one, he anticipates, that is bound to feature Gog and Magog.

    The post Bloody Eschatology: Israel and the next Big War first appeared on Dissident Voice.

    This post was originally published on Dissident Voice.