A wave of fresh bombings and military ground operations by Israel were underway in the city of Khan Younis on Friday as images of Palestinian families once again forced to flee plastered global news sites and world leaders, including the United States, refused to intervene to stop the relentless assault being inflicted on the people of Gaza. Al-Jazeera reports the southern city — which its…
For as long as it has existed, the Olympics has shrouded itself in the language of international fraternity and peace. Yet more than 10 months into Israel’s genocide in Gaza, the International Olympic Committee (IOC) has yet to take action against the pariah state’s participation in the Paris games. Edge of Sports host Dave Zirin speaks with Jibril Rajoub, head of the Palestinian Olympic Committee, for an exclusive interview. Rajoub describes the hardships and obstacles Palestine’s athletes have overcome from the “fascist, racist occupation” to attend the Paris Olympics, and calls out the silence from the IOC regarding Israel’s genocide.
Studio Production: Jules Boykoff Post-Production: David Hebden, Adam Coley
Transcript
Dave Zirin:
Hey, this is Dave Zirin from Edge of Sports TV, only on the Real News Network. I’m speaking with Jibril Rajoub, who, among many titles, is also the head of the Palestinian Olympic Committee. We’re coming to you from Olympic Paris. Mr. Rajoub, thank you for joining us.
Jibril Rajoub:
Appreciate your kindness. Hopefully that, through this platform, I can convey the message of my people to the French people, which is a message of hope, peace, love, and determination to enjoy our fundamental rights. Right of self-determination, to live in peace, security, in our sovereign, independent, Palestinian state.
Dave Zirin:
What has the challenge been for you to bring an Olympic team to Paris, given the context of everything that’s been happening since October?
Jibril Rajoub:
I have the worst challenge, which is exclusive for the Palestinians. A fascist and racist occupation trying to liquidate, to destroy my Palestinian people through official terror, aggressions. Trying to negate us. But the other face of the picture is our commitment, our ambitions, and even our commitment to expose our justice cause through the ethics and the values of sport. Sport is a strategic choice. Athletes, to expose our justice cause, [are] the most effective tool, and this is… I think the Israelis don’t like and don’t want [this], because they want to present us totally in a different shape and character.
But I am insisting, and I am working in spite [of the] closure, killing, suffocation, ethnic cleansing in Gaza, destroying all the facilities of sport—and even some of them are used as concentration camps in the West Bank. We had to suspend all official sport activities, because of the Israeli crazy and stupid and fascist choices on the ground. But in spite of that, you see that we came with eight athletes trying to convey a message to the international community: It’s the time to end the suffering of the Palestinian people.
Dave Zirin:
What makes sports so effective in conveying your message and your cause?
Jibril Rajoub:
I think sport today is a global language. Sport is a humanitarian, peaceful means. [And] therefore, I myself—I suffer. And I don’t want to see anyone suffer. I have spent 17 years in Israeli jails, which was worse than the Bastille. But in spite of that, I don’t want to cause suffering to anyone, no matter who is he and where is he coming from. I do believe that using sport, using athletes as an asset in our resistance and in our struggle, it’s very effective. And even here in France, the way that we were received, and all over the world, is encouraging me and motivating me to continue this path. A peaceful, a non-violent tool—sport, athletes, football, and so on.
Dave Zirin:
That goes to my next question. How has the Palestinian delegation, the Palestinian athletes, how have you been welcomed, treated, received here in Paris?
Jibril Rajoub:
Very friendly. With roses, smiling. Wherever we go, the French people, the normal people, are welcoming us in a friendly, smiling, lovely way. Even the president of France received me well and encouraged me to continue. And also, he’s trying to send a message of hope to our people. And I think he can. He can [play] a great role in the current situation, to send a message of hope to the Palestinians. Frustration, losing hope, will lead to bad consequences. We expect France—French people, French parliament, government, and the president—in the current situation, to play [a] crucial [role]… It’s important not to let the Palestinians [lose] hope. It’s the time. Believe me, it’s the time. Otherwise, pushing us to the vicious cycle of bloodshed and killing, they are playing on the hands of this fascist, crazy, stupid Bibi and his racist government. Bibi is the same model of hopeless. Bibi and his government is a real threat for regional stability and global peace. They’re expansionists, they’re fascists. The way that they are behaving, the way that they are talking about the Palestinians, as if we are not existing.
They cannot deny that more than seven… about seven million Palestinians live in historic Palestine. Could they ignore? Could they continue on this apartheid?
Dave Zirin:
Wow.
Jibril Rajoub:
The ball is in the court of the international community, the free peoples, France. The French Revolution two centuries ago inspired the whole world. 13th of July, 1789 inspired the whole world. It’s the time. It’s the time for the disciples of that revolution to come up and say, “Enough is enough.”
Dave Zirin:
As you well know, there is the Olympic Charter. There is also something called the Olympic Truce. Israel has violated the Charter and the Truce flagrantly.
Jibril Rajoub:
Israel is insisting to violate all the principles, all the truces, all the charters, and continue their crazy and fascist doctrine to dictate facts by killing, by destroying, by occupying, by suffocating the Palestinians. The Israelis have no right because of the Holocaust, which we denounce, which we are against. We did not do that. Someone else! Why should we be a scapegoat? Why should we pay the price? Do the grandsons of the victims of the Holocaust have the right to do the same against the Palestinian people? The killing of tens of thousands in Gaza. The destruction of the whole infrastructure. What does this mean? For what? Do they have the right? [What is their] justification? Because of the Holocaust? We are not responsible and we should not. And this inferiority complex for the Europeans should be removed. And even for the Jews themselves, they have to understand that this crazy and stupid and rightist, fascist government is a real threat for their own existence.
Dave Zirin:
So why, given that they have violated the Olympic Charter, that they have violated the Olympic Truce—why is Israel allowed to still compete at the Olympics?
Jibril Rajoub:
The athlete who raised the flag, a judo champion, he himself signed a missile, sending it to the kids of Gaza, ‘From me to you.’ Does he have the right to attend? The president of the Olympic Committee of Israel visited, encouraged. And even some players and athletes were part of the Israeli occupying forces killing [inaudible]. Having official sport activities in the Occupied Territories—East Jerusalem, West Bank—is a clear cut violation of the Olympic Charter and [inaudible] statutes.
The ball is in the court of Europe, who are responsible for the Holocaust. And it’s the time for them to raise [inaudible]. It was not a great honor for France and for the IOC to have the Israelis. It’s not a political issue for me. It’s a moral issue. It’s a legal issue. It’s a sport issue. It’s ethical issue. But this is the Holocaust inferiority complexity in Europe, which is leading, which is motivating.
Dave Zirin:
What does the International Olympic Committee not understand?
Jibril Rajoub:
Brother, I am not the expert person. I did my best, and I will continue on two directions. From one side, I will keep developing sport, encouraging the youth in Palestine to follow the ethics and the values of a sport as an effective platform to expose the suffering of our people. And, at the same time, to keep on working on all fronts in order to have Israel sanctioned, being punished by IOC and FIFA. Believe me, when I go to the history of South Africa, 60 years, 80 years, last century, it was kindergarten [compared to] what the Israelis are doing against the Palestinians.
Dave Zirin:
Wow. I also really wanted to ask you about the Algerian judoka who did not compete against… I know that’s Algeria, not Palestine. But should athletes not even compete against Israeli athletes here? What counsel would you give athletes, especially athletes who are appalled by what’s happening?
Jibril Rajoub:
Once again, I think the Israelis did lose their right to attend and to compete. And I don’t think that anyone who, for sport reasons, cannot play should be sanctioned. I would like to address an Israeli athlete with the ethics of the game. Could he tolerate competing against a Nazi athlete? Believe me, this is the same. This is the same. Don’t ask the victim. Ask the criminal.
Dave Zirin:
Our show is, of course, in the United States. Our article that we publish will be in the United States. What message do you have for the people of the United States, and the politicians of the United States who are arming Israel?
Jibril Rajoub:
They are arming, they are supporting, they are defending, and they are protecting, I think, for their own ethics and values, right of self-determination, human rights principles, and even for their own national security interests in the Middle East and all over the world. I call for them to raise a red card to Israel. The Israelis have the right to live in peace and security, but within their internationally recognized borders. The establishment of a Palestinian sovereign state next to the state of Israel. The emergence of such a state will contribute to regional stability, global peace. And the Israelis, I am sure, then have the right and will enjoy security and stability. The Israelis cannot continue their expansionist and their fascist policies on the ground and at the same time think that they can enjoy security and being integrated in the Middle East. No security, no integration without the emergence of an independent sovereign state.
Dave Zirin:
You’ve been so generous with your time, but one more question. What do sports mean?
Jibril Rajoub:
For me?
Dave Zirin:
No, no, no. To the people of Gaza. And how has this war taken that away from them?
Jibril Rajoub:
Please, please, please, please. All sports facilities in Gaza, 100 persons, destroyed—athletes, employees, staff of a sport, killed. Hundreds still missing. I don’t know whether they are under rubble or in Israeli jails. And also hundreds have been injured. Sport is no more existing in Gaza. What is existing is our determination, our commitment, our principles. In the West Bank, because of the Israeli suffocation policy, we have to suspend all leagues and sport activities. The movement with those settlers, fascist settlers, the disciples of Baruch Goldstein who are behaving like the bully of neighborhoods against the Palestinians. We cannot move. We cannot do anything. And also sport is no more working in the West Bank. It’s the time. It’s the time now.
Dave Zirin:
Wow. And I must ask you one last question. Does it feel sometimes like your head is just going to explode when you have all of this Olympic pageantry and joy while people in Gaza suffer so much?
Jibril Rajoub:
Not easy. Not easy. But frustration, giving up, surrendering is not part of my Palestinian national doctrine. My commitment to my people, [our] national aspirations—it’s a genetic issue. Giving up? White flag? Never, never. And I will keep leading the youth, the athletes, the fans in the right direction to achieve our people’s national aspirations and our people’s legitimate right, fundamental right, to live in their own independent Palestinian sovereign state, according to the UN resolutions and legitimacy. Okay, brother.
Dave Zirin:
Jibril Rajoub, thank you so much for joining us on Edge of Sports.
Jibril Rajoub:
All the best. Thanks to Catherine.
Dave Zirin:
We’ll be back after this.
Maximillian Alvarez:
Thank you so much for watching the Real News Network, where we lift up the voices, stories, and struggles that you care about most. And we need your help to keep doing this work, so please tap your screen now, subscribe, and donate to the Real News Network. Solidarity forever.
We speak with the co-chair of the Uncommitted National Movement, who briefly met with Vice President Kamala Harris this week as the Democratic presidential candidate is under pressure to define her platform on Palestine. Layla Elabed spoke with Harris before her rally in Michigan to press her on a ceasefire in Gaza and an arms embargo on Israel. “I was very emotional in that brief exchange. I did feel like her sympathy and empathy towards me was very genuine, but Palestinian children cannot eat words,” says Elabed. “We need action.”
This content originally appeared on Democracy Now! and was authored by Democracy Now!.
Palestinian prisoners have spoken of sexual assault and starvation in Israeli jails. Bethan McKernan reports
Itamar Ben-Gvir, Israel’s far-right national security minister, has presided over a transformation of the country’s prison system. The human rights group B’Tselem has described the jails as “torture camps” where abuse is systemic.
I can’t really find the words to express how depressing it is to watch the life get sucked out of the anti-genocide movement in the United States because one of the candidates running for president this year happens to come from the administration that’s been overseeing said genocide.
Kamala Harris shouted down protesters against the US-backed incineration of Gaza during a campaign rally on Wednesday, responding to their chants of “we won’t vote for genocide” by telling them they’re helping Trump win.
Demonstrators in the crowd at Harris’s Detroit rally repeatedly shouted out as the vice president spoke to an airplane hangar packed with supporters, “Kamala, Kamala you can’t Hide, we won’t vote for genocide.” The crowd booed and drowned out the protesters with chants of “Kamala.”
“I’m here because we believe in democracy. Everyone’s voice matters, but I am speaking now. I am speaking now,” Harris said to applause.
As protesters continued to interrupt, Harris delivered a more blunt warning.
“You know what, if you want Donald Trump to win then say that. Otherwise I’m speaking,” she said.
Shortly after Biden withdrew from the race and endorsed Harris, I noted that we were “already seeing some strong ‘shut up shut up SHUT UP about Gaza’ energy from Kamala supporters toward those to their left,” and since that time this phenomenon has been growing steadily worse. Now we’ve got this freakish dynamic where criticizing an administration that is guilty of the crime of genocide will get people telling you “Hey, nobody’s perfect!” like it’s some petty little quibble.
And I can’t help watching all this and wondering what Aaron Bushnell would think. On February 25 Bushnell self-immolated in front of the Israeli embassy in Washington while screaming “Free Palestine” to draw attention to the horrors his country was helping to inflict upon the people of Gaza, and now the cause he gave his life for in the most agonizing way possible is being intentionally subverted by people who claim to care about justice and human rights. What would this look like to him?
If, before igniting the accelerant, Bushnell had been granted a vision of Harris silencing anti-genocide protesters to the applause of her followers months in the future, would he still have gone through with it? Or would he have cast his lighter aside and collapsed in a fit of despair while Gaza burns, like the rest of us are doing right now?
Five months. In a bit over five months we went from seeing an active-duty airman light himself on fire to turn America’s eyes toward Gaza, followed by a highly energized student protest movement against their country’s facilitation of genocidal war crimes, to seeing those student protests crushed with the approval of the current president, and then his would-be successor telling anti-genocide protesters to shut the fuck up and fall in line so that Democrats can win.
Every time a light gets sparked in the darkness, the empire scrambles to snuff it out. Which wouldn’t be so depressing if not for all the brainwashed masses falling all over themselves to help them do it.
Ah well. The fight goes on. Even if these pricks are going to set the whole world on fire, we can still at least try to make it difficult for them.
Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Michigan) has slammed the White House for denouncing Rep. Cori Bush (D-Missouri) after the Missouri lawmaker was defeated by a historic spending blitz by pro-Israel lobbyists seeking to oust any dissent on Israel’s genocide and apartheid from Congress. On social media on Wednesday, Tlaib pointed out that the very lobbyists behind Bush’s defeat are responsible for helping…
Israeli journalist Yehuda Schlesinger called for the institutionalised rape of Palestinian detainees on Israel’sChannel 12. He went unchallenged.
“There are no innocent people” in Gaza
Responding to a question about footage and accounts of Israeli soldiers and guards raping Palestinians, Schlesinger said:
The only problem I have is that it’s not a regulated policy of the state to abuse the detainees because, first of all, they deserve it, and it’s great revenge… maybe it will serve as a deterrent.
Speaking again to Channel 12 in April, Schlesinger said “there are no innocent people” in Gaza and that they “deserve a hard agonising death”.
There are no innocents in Gaza. There are no ordinary citizens in Gaza. Every adult was trained to kill. Every woman is a monster. Every boy aspires to be a martyr. Every baby will grow up to be a terrorist. Wipe out, kill, destroy, destroy.
For Israel, is rape a weapon?
With regard to a question on video evidence of Israeli soldiers raping a Palestinian, US state department spokesperson Matthew Miller said that it “ought to be investigated fully by the government of Israel”.
But there are issues with Israel investigating itself. Former US state department official John Paul toldCNN in December:
I was part of the human rights vetting process for arms going to Israel, and a charity called Defense for Children International – Palestine drew our attention at the State Department to the sexual assault, actually the rape, of a 13-year-old boy that occurred in an Israeli prison in the Moskobiyyeh
We examined these allegations, we believe they were credible, we put them… to the government of Israel. And you know what happened the next day? The IDF went into the DCIP offices and removed all their computers and declared them a terrorist entity.
The boy was actually 15. Paul resigned from the state department in October over the continued “provision of lethal arms to Israel”.
Israel: many reports of rape
According to reports from witnesses and victims, the sexual abuse of Palestinian detainees borders on the routine. In late July, the UN reported Israel subjected detainees to sexual abuse and ill-treatment and that they “received consistent reports of [Israeli] personnel inserting objects into detainees’ anuses”.
Israeli human rights organisation B’tselem has also reported numerous accounts of the “attempted anal rape of a Palestinian detainee”.
The witnesses described blows to the genitals and other body parts of naked prisoners; the use of metal tools and batons to cause genital pain; the photographing of naked prisoners; penises being grabbed; and strip-searches
for the sake of humiliation and degradation. The testimonies also reveal cases of gang sexual violence and assault committed by a group of prison guards or soldiers
Rather than condemning the sexual violence, Israeli government ministers and protestors have demonstrated against soldiers facing punishment for an alleged gang rape.
The call for ‘revenge rape’ is no doubt partly spurred on by widespread corporate media reports that Hamas committed mass rape on 7 October. But a UN inquiry, which looked at forensic reports and witnesses, found no evidence that Hamas raped anybody during the attack.
“Astounding”
On social media, people reacted to the reports of abuse:
let me get this straight: Israel’s genocide began under the “Hamas did mass r@pe” hoax without any evidence, but now that there’s testimonies & video footage of Israelis conducting systematic rape of Palestinians, the world is supposed to stand by and do nothing?
Others reacted to the discussion with Israeli journalist Schlesinger on Channel 12:
Just astounding. This is a mainstream talk show in Israel, and they are debating whether to legalize, and institutionalize, retributive rape of civilians and combatants, as a matter of policy https://t.co/t8Jv3KfQsj
The headline above, about yet another Israeli operation to ethnically cleanse the Palestinians in the tiny, besieged and utterly destroyed enclave of Gaza, was published in yesterday’s Middle East Eye.
When I began studying Israeli history more than a quarter of a century ago, people claiming to be experts proffered plenty of excuses to explain why Israelis should not be held responsible for the 1948 ethnic cleansing of some 750,000 Palestinians from their homes – what Palestinians call their Nakba, or Catastrophe.
1. I was told most Israelis were not involved and knew nothing of the war crimes carried out against the Palestinians during Israel’s establishment.
2. I was told that those Israelis who did take part in war crimes, like Operation Broom to expel Palestinians from their homeland, did so only because they were traumatised by their experiences in Europe. In the immediate aftermath of the Holocaust, these Israelis assumed that, were the Jewish people to survive, they had no alternative but to drive out the Palestinians en masse.
3. From others, I was told that no ethnic cleansing had taken place. The Palestinians had simply fled at the first sign of conflict because they had no real historical attachment to the land.
4. Or I was told that the Palestinians’ displacement was an unfortunate consequence of a violent war in which Israeli leaders had the best interests of Palestinians at heart. The Palestinians hadn’t left because of Israeli violence but because they has been ordered to do so by Arab leaders in the region. In fact, the story went, Israel had pleaded with many of the 750,000 refugees to come home afterwards, but those same Arab leaders stubbornly blocked their return.
Every one of these claims was nonsense, directly contradicted by all the documentary evidence.
That should be even clearer today, as Israel continues the ethnic cleansing and slaughter of the Palestinian people more than 75 years on.
1. Every Israeli knows exactly what is going on in Gaza – after all, their children-soldiers keep posting videos online showing the latest crimes they have committed, from blowing up mosques and hospitals to shooting randomly into homes. Polls show all but a small minority of Israelis approve of the savagery that has killed many tens of thousands of Palestinians, including children. A third of them think Israel needs to go further in its barbarity.
Today, Israeli TV shows host debates about how much pain soldiers should be allowed to inflict by raping their Palestinian captives. Don’t believe me? Watch this from Israel’s Channel 12:
?SHOCKING?
Israel is quite possibly the only nation in the world where it is permissable and commonplace to go on TV and openly declare that the RAPING of prisoners should be a LEGITIMATE and OFFICIAL POLICY of the state and must be widely implemented. pic.twitter.com/1PyRXk8fxU
2. If the existential fears of Israelis and Jews still require the murder, rape and ethnic cleansing of Palestinians three-quarters of a century on from the Holocaust, then we need to treat that trauma as the problem – and refuse to indulge it any longer.
3. The people of Gaza are fleeing their homes – or at least the small number who still have homes not bombed to ruins – not because they lack an attachment to Palestine. They are fleeing from one part of the cage Israel has created for them to another part of it for one reason alone: because all of them – men, women and children – are terrified of being slaughtered by an Israeli military, at best, indifferent to their suffering and their fate.
The official death toll in Gaza is a lie. The casualty numbers are far, far higher.
4. No serious case can be made today that Israel is carrying out any of its crimes in Gaza – from bombing civilians to starving them – with regret, or that its leaders seek the best for the Palestinian population. Israel is on trial for genocide at the world’s highest court precisely because the judges there suspect it has the very worst intentions possible towards the Palestinian people.
We have been lied to for decades about the creation of Israel. It was always a settler colonial project. And like other settler colonial projects – from the US and Australia to South Africa and Algeria – it always viewed the native people as inferior, as non-human, as animals, and was bent on their elimination.
What is so obviously true today was true then too, at Israel’s birth. Israel was born in sin, and it continues to live in sin.
We in the West abetted its crimes in 1948, and we’re still abetting them today. Nothing has changed, except the excuses no longer work.
Much of Gaza has been reduced to rubble by 10 months of Israel’s bombing. Counting the dead has become a challenge for the Palestinian health ministry, as the death toll nears 40,000.
As part of its belligerence, Israel has repeatedly questioned the credibility of the daily figures put out by the ministry. However, several United Nations agencies that operate in Gaza have said the figures are credible and they are frequently cited by international organisations.
A grim exercise in data collection
Two Agence France-Presse (AFP) correspondents witnessed health facilities enter deaths in the ministry’s database.
Gaza health officials first identify the bodies of the dead. This is done by the visual recognition of a relative or friend, or by the recovery of personal items.
The deceased’s information is then entered in the health ministry’s digital database. Usually this includes name, gender, birth date, and ID number.
When bodies cannot be identified because they are unrecognisable or when no one claims them, staff record the death under a number, alongside all the information they were able to gather.
Any distinguishing marks that may help with later identification, whether personal items or a birthmark, are collected and photographed.
Central registry
Gaza’s health ministry has issued several statements setting out its procedures for compiling the death toll.
In public hospitals under the direct supervision of the territory’s Hamas government, the “personal information and identity number” of every Palestinian killed during the war are entered in the hospital’s database as soon as they are pronounced dead.
The data is then sent to the health ministry’s central registry on a daily basis.
For those who die in private hospitals and clinics, their information is taken down on a form that must be sent to the ministry within 24 hours to be added to the central registry, a ministry statement said.
The ministry’s “information centre” then verifies the data entries to “ensure they do not contain any duplicates or mistakes”, before saving them in the database, the statement added.
Gaza residents are also encouraged by Palestinian authorities to report any deaths in their families on a designated government website. The data is used for the ministry’s verifications.
The ministry is staffed with civil servants that answer to the West Bank-based Palestinian Authority as well as to the Hamas-led government in Gaza.
‘High correlation’
An investigation conducted by Airways, an NGO focused on the impact of war on civilians, analysed the data entries for 3,000 of the dead and found “a high correlation” between the ministry’s data and what Palestinian civilians reported online, with 75% of publicly reported names also appearing on the ministry’s list.
The study found that the ministry’s figures had become “less accurate” as the war dragged on, a development it attributed to the heavy damage to health infrastructure resulting from the war. For instance, at southern Gaza’s Nasser Hospital, one of the few still at least partly functioning, only 50 out of 400 computers still work, its director Atef al-Hout told AFP.
The press office of Gaza’s Hamas government estimates that nearly 70% of the roughly 40,000 people Israel has killed are women (about 11,000) or children (at least 16,300).
Several UN agencies, including the agency in charge of Palestinian refugees (UNRWA), have said the ministry’s figures are credible. UNRWA chief Philippe Lazzarini said in October:
In the past -the five, six cycles of conflict in the Gaza Strip – these figures were considered as credible and no one ever really challenged these figures.
In fact, a study by British medical review The Lancet estimated that 186,000 deaths can be attributed to the war in Gaza, directly or indirectly as a result of the humanitarian crisis it has triggered.
The Lancet also estimated that the death toll will likely be higher from what it calls “indirect deaths”:
The total death toll is expected to be large given the intensity of this conflict; destroyed health-care infrastructure; severe shortages of food, water, and shelter; the population’s inability to flee to safe places; and the loss of funding to UNRWA, one of the very few humanitarian organisations still active in the Gaza Strip.
Hidden deaths, thanks to Israel
Israel have continued to target hospitals over the past few months. Naturally, this has devastated the already severely reduced capacity of health professionals to respond to the sheer numbers of dead people. Thousands more people are trapped under rubble, with their bodies yet to be recovered. The UNRWA has said it would take up to 15 years and many hundreds of millions to clear all the rubble.
Just like the entire mass media, many governments, even the independent media and critics of the war would have us accept that between 98% and 99% of Gaza’s entire population has survived—albeit the sick, injured, and more Palestinians about to die. This is lethally improbable!
Even in death, Palestinians know no justice and no peace. Each of those bodies trapped under the rubble, people dying from disease and malnutrition, people dying while running to shelter, had hopes, dreams, aspirations. Now, such is the behemoth of the Israeli genocide and the Western support behind it, those people are forgotten by the West even in death.
EU, UK and France urge Israel’s government to distance itself from comments by its finance minister, Bezalel Smotrich
The EU, France and UK have condemned a senior Israeli minister for suggesting it might be “justified and moral” to starve people in Gaza.
The comments from Israel’s finance minister, Bezalel Smotrich, in which he said “no one in the world will allow us to starve two million people, even though it might be justified and moral in order to free the hostages”, sparked international outrage.
As the threat of further escalation of tensions looms in the Middle East after months of Israel’s widespread aggression in the region, new polling finds that the majority of Americans prefer that the U.S. refrain from sending troops to fight on behalf of Israel. Polling released Tuesday by the Chicago Council on Global Affairs found that 55 percent of Americans oppose the use of U.S.
ambassador to Japan Rahm Emanuel is reportedly skipping an annual memorial ceremony for the U.S.’s atomic bombing of Nagasaki after organizers of the event decided to exclude the Israeli ambassador from the event due to pressure from activist groups. The U.S. embassy said that Emanuel would not attend the event because he did not want to “be involved in a politicized event…
Hamas has named Yahya Sinwar as successor to former senior political leader Ismail Haniyeh, who was assassinated in Tehran last week, shortly after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s warmly received visit to the United States. Sinwar helped to found the precursor to Hamas’s current militant wing and is believed to have orchestrated the organization’s October 7 attack on Israel.
A court in Berlin has convicted a protestor for leading a chant of “from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free” back in October. Judge Birgit Balzer issued a £515 fine for German-Iranian Ava Moayeri.
Moayeri’s lawyer Alexander Gorski said the decision was “a dark day for freedom of expression”. Balzer took it upon herself to reject previously upheld arguments in German courts that the phrase was “ambigious” in meaning.
Erasing Palestinian struggle
Moayeri argued her use of the phrase was in support of “peace and justice” in Israel and Palestine. But Balzer said the phrase denies “the right of the state of Israel to exist”, because of the context of the Hamas attacks on 7 October.
But the chant refers to the land between the Mediterranean sea and the Jordan river. That means Israel and Israeli occupied Palestine. When it comes to context, the judge only appears to recognise the Hamas attack, not the Israeli occupation of the West Bank and Gaza, ongoing since 1967.
An International Court of Justice (ICJ) ruling on 19 July not only found that Israel has maintained “effective control” over Gaza since it withdrew military bases and settlements there in 2005. The ICJ also found that Israel is an apartheid state, again breaching international law.
But of course, the only context here is the Hamas attack.
Pro-Israel crackdown
The Berlin conviction is not the first time Germany has engaged in what Moayeri’s lawyer called “state oppression” with regard to Israel.
Police shut down the Palestine Congress in Berlin in April and banned former Greek finance minister Yanis Varoufakis as well as other speakers from the country.
Judge Balzer said that support for Israel was a key component of German identity due to Nazi responsibility for the Holocaust.
But the argument seems to be that a German should support Israel even as it carries out what the ICJ in January called a “plausible genocide” in Gaza, on top of the occupation and apartheid.
In 2019, Germany designated boycotting Israel, the use of basic economic freedom of trade and purchase, as outright “antisemitic”.
And in 2022, Germany banned Nakba Day demonstrations. These were remembering the massacres and displacement of Palestinians in the 1948 establishment of Israel.
German arms exports to Israel were up 10-fold in 2023, with the country supplying €326.5m of military equipment. The nation has continued arms sales to Israel since 7 October.
Pro-Palestine groups are urging the Kamala Harris campaign to come out strongly against Israel’s genocide in Gaza after the selection of Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz as Harris’s running mate on Tuesday, saying that the ticket must work to earn back the trust of a huge swath of voters who are disgusted with the Biden administration’s unconditional support of Israel. In statements on Tuesday…
On June 8, Israel rescued four hostages held by Hamas at the Nuseirat refugee camp in the Gaza Strip. Yet the operation left a trail of destruction, killing at least 274 Palestinians and injuring 698, according to local authorities. Corpses lined the pavement because the morgues were full, while film footage captured civilians rushing children caked with blood through hospital corridors.
Over 20 pro-Palestine organisations have condemned a “propagandistic, genocide-enabling” report by Human Rights Watch.
Crucially, Palestinian civil society groups issued a scathing statement over the publication which “pays lip service” to the “root causes” of the 7 October attacks, and litters its analysis with long-debunked Israel lines.
HRW: a political bias that devalues Palestinian lives
On 17 July, Human Rights Watch (HRW) released the report in question. It titled this:
“I Can’t Erase All the Blood from My Mind” – Palestinian Armed Groups’ October 7 Assault on Israel
As the name suggests, the publication explores the events of 7 October. The report authors conducted interviews in person and remotely with:
144 people including: 94 survivors of the October 7 attacks; family members of survivors, hostages and those killed; first responders who collected human remains from the attack sites; medical experts who examined the human remains and provided forensic advice to the Israeli authorities; officials from the municipalities affected by the attacks; journalists who visited the attack sites after Israeli forces secured the areas; analysts of Palestinian political and armed groups; and international investigators.
Overall, it claims to detail:
numerous incidents of violations of international humanitarian law—the laws of war—by Palestinian armed groups on October 7, 2023; it does not include violations since then. These include deliberate and indiscriminate attacks against civilians and civilian objects; willful killing of persons in custody; cruel and other inhumane treatment; sexual and gender-based violence; hostage taking; mutilation and despoiling (robbing) of bodies; use of human shields; and pillage and looting.
However, a group of Palestinian organisations have called the integrity of the report into question. Notably, they underscored point after point how the report:
says everything about the organization’s political bias.
Tellingly, they highlighted that after months of Israel’s livestreamed genocide, HRW hasn’t demanded:
a permanent ceasefire, let alone name Israel’s crime as a genocide, as have many UN experts and prominent scholars of genocide
The statement therefore expressed how this:
further exposes the organization’s racist and colonial devaluation of Palestinian lives. It has chosen to abstract the actions of the oppressed from the context of oppression in the service of Israel’s colonial domination over all Palestinians and its genocide in the Gaza ghetto.
HRW on Palestine: convenient omissions
Also, the Palestinian organisations detailed how HRW utilised passive voice to obscure the perpetrator of genocide – Israel – or even a mention of Israel’s actions as genocide. In one especially notable passage, the report read:
Between October 7, 2023, and July 1, 2024, the hostilities resulted in at least 37,900 Palestinians killed, and 87,060 others injured, according to Gaza’s Health Ministry.
Moreover, the group’s statement described how HRW entirely ignored the apartheid and military occupation context of 7 October. As such, the groups argued that:
By deliberately ignoring this essential context of colonial oppression, the report ignores that the right of all peoples resisting foreign occupation and colonization to resort to armed struggle is recognized, in accordance with international law. Even when referring to Israeli soldiers held captive by Palestinian resistance forces, the report calls them “hostages,” erasing any distinction between them and civilian captives.
HRW’s Palestine report also did not mention:
How multiple claims of violence on 7 October turned out to be Israeli propaganda, some even now refuted by Israel’s own military reports.
How Israel deployed its Hannibal Directive and targeted Israeli citizens.
A report on the attack on the Nova festival where an Israeli pilot admitted firing indiscriminately at cars on the site.
The Palestinian organisations said that:
While acknowledging that some assertions of Palestinian violations from the day have been proven false, the report fails to address the now well exposed, systematic campaign of propaganda by Israel, its organs, and officials which was echoed by deeply complicit Western leaders and media outlets before being retracted by most. By deliberately ignoring the orchestrated campaign to dehumanize Palestinians the report attempts to revive that misinformation campaign.
‘Human rights for some!’
In particular, the statement pinpointed one especially “glaring” example. This was HRW’s assertion that gender-based violence was “systemic”. By contrast, the Palestinian organisations identified that HRW acknowledged that it was unable to “gather verifiable information” to prove this, but concluded so regardless.
What’s more, this spoke to the statement’s broader point that the HRW report was loaded with unverified “evidence” of war crimes and crimes against humanity.
Ultimately, the Palestinian organisations drew attention to the “asymmetry” of the Israel-Palestine “colonial relationship”. Critically, it drove home how HRW’s partisan report whitewashed Israel’s current and historic crimes against Palestinians.
Notably, it referred to the conservative estimate in the recent Lancet study. This found that Israel’s ongoing genocidal siege in the Gaza strip could kill 186,000 Palestinian people. Using this, the statement identified that this would amount to approximately 163,000 civilians, or 200 times the number of Israeli citizens killed. Given this, it argued that:
It seems HRW not only ignores Israel’s settler-colonial reality and the oppressor-oppressed relationship of power and resistance; it also values every civilian Israeli life 200 times more than any civilian Palestinian life. Human rights for some!
Overall, the statement concluded that HRW is complicit in Israel’s genocidal assault on Gaza:
Israel’s genocide in Gaza is armed, funded, rationalized, and defended by the colonial West, headed by the US. It is also enabled by the complicity of states, institutions, corporations, and racist mainstream media outlets – as well as organizations claiming the mantle of human rights yet engaging in an unethical attempt to whitewash the most grotesque, systematic violations of human rights. This HRW report does exactly that.
Gaza’s Civil Defence agency said it received the bodies of 80 unidentified Palestinians from Israel on Monday, which it buried in a mass grave. Civil Defence director Yamen Abu Suleiman told Agence France-Presse (AFP):
We received 80 bodies inside 15 bags, with more than four martyrs in each bag, each wrapped in a single shroud.
Abu Suleiman said Israeli authorities did not provide any information about the bodies, including their names or where they were found or taken from. He added:
We do not know if they are martyrs (killed in Gaza) or prisoners from (Israel’s) jails…This is a war crime, a crime against humanity.
about 9,500 Palestinians from Gaza and the West Bank were in Israeli captivity, according to estimates from Addameer Prisoner Support and Human Rights Association, a rights group based in the West Bank city of Ramallah that supports Palestinian prisoners.
AFP journalists on the scene saw men in hazmat suits inspecting the corpses wrapped in blue plastic sheeting, before unloading them from the shipping container they had arrived in.
The bodies were then laid in a line for burial in a mass grave dug in the sand, with scores of Palestinians watching from the side.
They were later buried at the Turkish cemetery, near Khan Yunis, the main city in the southern part of Gaza.
A mother’s search
Onlookers were stricken with grief that has become commonplace in Palestine. one person, Tabesh Abu Ata from the Turkish cemetery said:
You will ask me the reason why I put all the bodies in a mass grave?
Because I have no capabilities to bury each one in an individual grave, (there are no) stones or tiles [for that].
Salwa Karaz, a displaced woman from Gaza City in the north, told AFP that she had gone to the cemetery hoping to find her 32-year-old son Marwan, who went missing in January. He left behind an eight-month-old son. She told AFP:
When we learned that 80 bodies had been handed over, we came to search in hopes of finding him among them.
As of now, we have not learned anything.
We will try to identify him through his clothes. He was wearing brown pants, a navy blue shirt, a black jacket, and beige boots.
She last saw him leaving on his bicycle from their shelter in Deir el-Balah, central Gaza.
Exacerbated suffering
In a statement released Monday, Hamas said Israel’s delivery of bodies without identities:
exacerbates the suffering of the families of martyrs and the missing, who seek to know the fate of their abducted children or to bury their martyrs in a dignified manner.
In December, Hamas government sources said Israel returned the bodies of 80 Palestinians killed in Gaza after taking them from morgues and graves to check there were no hostages among them. The bodies were then buried in Gaza, the sources added.
The Quds News Network detailed the disrespect and inhumanity shown to Palestinians:
Breaking | Media coverage: The Gaza Government Media Office reports that the Israeli army violated the corpses of 80 Palestinians, delivering them mutilated with stolen organs. The Israeli army also refuses to disclose their names and the locations from which their bodies were… pic.twitter.com/iQo38KCJ9x
Heartbreakingly, In Context Media showed that all this is nothing new:
Israel has stolen 2,000 Palestinian bodies from Gaza cemeteries since October 7.
Gaza’s Government Media Office reports that although the IDF returned some of the corpses, they "desecrate[d] the dignity of the bodies of 89 martyrs, handing them over as skeletons and decomposed… pic.twitter.com/mY5lVR4n0r
It should be unfathomable that Israel kills enough Palestinians to warrant mass graves. Not only that, it doesn’t allow for safe identification of bodies for a death toll, many remained trapped under rubble, and now the rotting, decomposing corpses of Palestinians are dumped as though they weren’t humans, but debris.
The fact remains that if even one white Western person had experienced such treatment, everybody would be up in arms. And, rightly so – this happening to even one person is enough to spark grief, outrage, and horror at the despicable treatment of a person.
But, when it comes to Palestinians, the world doesn’t bat an eyelid as tens of corpses are dumped all at once, without ceremony. The fact Palestinians have to endure this as a regular event is unconscionable. And yet, it will happen again, undoubtedly.
This failure to clearly articulate the current status of the UK’s arms export licencing regime compounds impunity for Israel’s genocide against Palestinians, and is against the public interest.
Israel arms exports: what is going on?
Despite what some reports have claimed, the UK does not have an “arms embargo” in place, and continues to supply UK components and equipment for use in Israel’s ongoing genocide in Gaza.
As long as the government refuses to sufficiently explain its position, it allows incorrect reports of an embargo to spread while UK continues to supply arms and components to Israel. Most importantly, existing licences in place include the Open General licence that allows unlimited deliveries of components for Israel’s F-35 combat aircraft, which they are using on a daily basis to bomb Gaza, including with 2000lb bombs.
A suspension of export licences should have been initiated as soon as the UK government was aware of reports of Israel’s violations of international law, ten months ago.
Foreign secretary David Lammy has said the government are seeking new legal advice regarding Israel’s compliance with international law in their war in Gaza, to inform their decisions on whether to halt some or all arms exports to Israel.
It has been reported that this review includes attempting to link specific weapons to specific incidents. Such a review should not be necessary, in the face of the overwhelming evidence of Israeli war crimes presented by the UN and numerous organisations on the ground.
The International Criminal Court’s Chief Prosecutor has requested arrest warrants for Israeli leaders for war crimes including “extermination”, while the ICJ has ruled that Israel’s actions could plausibly amount to genocide. Israel is continuing to obstruct the flow of aid to Gaza, leading to horrific levels of hunger and disease.
Stop the “obscene slaughter”
CAAT’s research coordinator Sam Perlo-Freeman said:
The case for an immediate arms embargo has been overwhelming for months, and the government’s review appears to be an exercise in kicking the can down the road, while desperately digging for some excuse to maintain the flow of F-35 components, by far the most significant of UK arms sales to Israel.
A possible suspension of processing of new licence applications could indicate at least that the government is serious in its intent to consider a change in policy. CAAT urges the government to implement a full two-way arms embargo on Israel immediately, as the most concrete step the UK can take to bring an end to this obscene slaughter.
The Israeli military is using cloud storage and artificial intelligence services provided by U.S. tech titans for “direct participation and collaboration” in what many critics around the world call Israel’s genocidal assault on Gaza, according to an investigation published this week. Two Israeli publications — +972 Magazine and Local Call — on Sunday published a joint investigation revealing…
The images of members of US Congress giving Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu multiple standing ovations during his recent visit to Washington DC are certain to go down in history. But as Netanyahu spoke of “finishing the job” in Gaza, to raucous applause, there were others with a far different perspective who also intended to make their voices heard on the Hill. Peace activists Aziz Abu Sarah and Maoz Inon also recently addressed members of Congress—but with a message of peace and reconciliation, not genocide. Abu Sarah, who is Palestinian, and Inon, who is Israeli, share some things in common. Both have lost close relatives, and both believe that peace is still worth fighting for. Abu Sarah and Inon join The Marc Steiner Show for a discussion on their shared vision for a future beyond apartheid and genocide.
Studio Production: Cameron Granadino Post-Production: Alina Nehlich
Transcript
The following is a rushed transcript and may contain errors. A proofread version will be made available as soon as possible.
Marc Steiner:
Welcome to the Marc Steiner Show here on The Real News. I’m Marc Steiner. It’s great to have you all with us once again. My guests today are Maoz Inon and Aziz Abu Sarah. They were supposed to be on my program early this month while they were here in Baltimore, but unfortunately got COVID and now they’re back in Israel-Palestine, but they’re joining me today. Maoz Inon runs the Abraham Hostels and lost both of his parents when Hamas attacked Kibbutz Netiv HaAsara on October the seventh. Aziz Abu Sarah is a former Plus972 writer, Palestinian peace activist, journalist, also a tourism entrepreneur who founded the Mejdi Tours, lives in East Jerusalem. And when Aziz was 10 years old, his brother was beaten to death by Israeli Police. Both men have felt a horrendous pain that comes out of this conflict in deeply personal ways. Somehow they both emerged as warriors for peace. And gentlemen, welcome. It’s good to have you with us.
Aziz Abu:
Thank you, Marc. Thank you for having us.
Marc Steiner:
I’m really sorry I couldn’t meet you while you were here, but I did not want you to have to go back home with COVID, so I had to cancel our interview. But let me start with what happened while you were here, you went to Congress and you spoke in Congress to some congressman. Talk about that. I want to hear just what happened when you came here, what your reception was like and what you made of all that, because you were here the same time that Netanyahu was giving that speech that I did watch, which we’ll talk about as well. But first let me talk about the two of you and what you experienced in Congress when you were here and Abu Sarah, let me start with you, Aziz.
Aziz Abu:
Well, we came here to tell Congress that peace is possible. We wanted to say that there’s an alternative vision and that Netanyahu’s vision is the wrong vision and that it was actually a mistake to invite Netanyahu to address Congress. If anything, it’s people like us, not just us, but people like us peacemakers, who should have been invited to address Congress. Because we present a vision of coexistence. We present a vision of reconciliation. We present a vision where Israelis and Palestinians can live together. And as you mentioned, Maoz lost his parents, I’ve lost my brother and if the two of us can work together, then it’s possible. Instead, unfortunately, we got to hear a vision that promises that the future is even worse than the present, the current reality today. So we wanted to tell Congress that come and talk to us. Listen from people who are peacemakers, listen to people who know how to make peace possible.
Listen to people who suffered because of this conflict and see that there is a possibility for a future that doesn’t include bombing and killing and hurting and continuing this cycle of violence. And we did get some positive responses. We had 12 members, I think more of Congress come and listen to us at an event that we did at the same time as Netanyahu was speaking. And then we met with two dozen of Congressional offices while we were in Washington. And people were really happy to hear that there is a possibility. I think people, like you mentioned earlier in our conversation, some people are finding it hard to be hopeful, and we came here to create that hope together with them.
Marc Steiner:
Maoz.
Sarah Maoz Inon:
Yeah, first Marc, it’s great to be here on your show.
Marc Steiner:
Thank you.
Sarah Maoz Inon:
For me, surprisingly the visit to DC was much more emotional than I thought it will be, because Prime Minister Netanyahu found the time to spend a week in the US, a weekend in Miami. He invited the hostages’ family to the US while refusing to meeting them back home. He was tokenizing the hostages’ family and he found the time to do so. But he never find the time, not him, not any of his cabinet member, not anyone from his coalition to call me or any of the other bereaved families. He never send us condolences. He never send his empathy. He never send us a letter or came to the Shiva, to the Jewish way of mourning. He completely ignored us and still ignoring us. And for him, receiving a standing ovation in the Congress was one of the most shameful day in the history of the Congress.
And I said it to all the House representative we met that it was very difficult to me the way he was acknowledged and received in the US and it was a wrongdoing by the Congress. And we, Aziz and I came to offer a radical vision of hope, of reconciliation and of peace and our messages were accepted in a great way. They were eager to learn about the Palestinian-Israeli peace movement, a growing movement. They were eager to hear feedback regarding the US policy and how it should be changed. They were eager to hear about Aziz and I work to bridge to break the walls of ignorance, of fear, of hate, and to start dialoguing and channeling our pain, our sorrow, into creating a better future in the Middle East.
And of course, our politicians lacking this ability, this leadership, they’re lacking political imagination. And that’s why Aziz and I and many others, Palestinian-Israelis decided to stand, up to stand up and be there in the front line of the peace process. So we offered and ask for a dialogue, for a partnership, for a long-term relationship between the peace movement to the representative and to the State Department.
Marc Steiner:
So given what we are all facing now is war on Gaza. Thousands of Israelis have been killed, but 40,000 Palestinians have been killed in Gaza alone, mostly women and children. The war doesn’t seem to be stopping. The Netanyahu government doesn’t seem to even consider peace in any level or peace negotiations. And so where do you take the vision that you two hold so deeply from here, given the reality of what we face on the ground? And both of you have experienced this deep personal pain and became peacemakers, but there are now thousands and thousands of Palestinians and some thousands of Israelis as well, but tens of thousands of Palestinians who experienced the same pain, losing everything they had in their lives. And so how do you transform that into a large movement for peace? What would that look like? How do you do it beyond the kind of sacrifices both of you have made? I mean, it must be a very difficult time for both of you.
Aziz Abu:
I think what we telling people is very simple. We saying we have lost family members. I’ve lost my brother, Maoz lost his parents, and we are able to come together. We understand that the current reality is awful. We are angry about the current reality. You can’t tell people don’t be angry. You can’t tell people don’t feel the pain. We feel the pain. We cry with our people every time I read the news. Look, this week I’m reading the news about people being abused and killed and tortured in prison. That’s how my brother was killed, so it makes me very, very angry as I read these news. But what we are saying is let us make this anger fuel us into working together rather than be more hateful.
Because if we become hateful, we will guarantee that more and more people will end up joining us. That the future that we are going to have is going to be even worse than the current reality. So let us not let our anger make us make more people go through the reality that we live and lose just like we lost and have people killed in their families like people have been killed in our families. That’s one. But the second thing we tell people in the recipe, you have to dream. You have to dream about a better day. You can’t only be focused on the moment of today. You have to dream about the future that is better than the current future.
You have to have a vision for that future. And without vision, people perish. Without vision, we do not know where to go. If we don’t have an aim a to where we go, we will get nowhere. So one of the most amazing thing that unfortunately wasn’t even as we met people in government and the US didn’t know about is on July 1st, the Israeli-Palestinian peace movement had a 6,000 people meet, the biggest rally for peace that has existed in the last maybe 20 plus years. And that shows that there is a possibility, that there is a vision, that people are tired of this reality. And if we want to stop the many, many future potential wars, if we want to stop, you mentioned 40,000 people have been killed in Gaza. Unless we provide a current vision today, what do we expect that those people in Gaza are going to do in the future?
What do we expect that people who lost family members also and have been killed in Israel will do in the future? It’s going to be a cycle of revenge that will never end. So the antidote to extremism, the antidote to violence, the antidote to war, the antidote to all of those is us, is the vision that we are modeling today. The vision that says Israelis and Palestinians are not on opposite sides and are not enemies. And we are on the same side of justice, of equality, of dignity, of peace, and we are trying to convince everybody else to join us, because there is no other alternative.
Marc Steiner:
So Maoz, let me ask you, how do you see the movement for peace and building for peace in life between Israelis and Palestinians? How do you feel that on the Israeli side, the people you know, family, friends, your colleagues?
Sarah Maoz Inon:
I will start by sharing the most important lesson I learned since October 7th and it’s the lesson of hope. That hope is not something you can find, not something you can lose or that someone else will bring you. Hope is an action. It’s a verb. We create hope. We make hope. And it’s very simple to explain how to create hope. You always do it with others. You cannot do it on your own. You do it with others, Israelis and Palestinians and international community by envisioning a better future and by acting to make this vision into a reality. So this is a fundamental lesson that we shared on our visit to DC. And both Aziz and I are entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurs know how to make a vision into a reality. And it is also a very simple formula, a recipe of five steps, how to make it happen. And it start with the dream. That’s step number one.
Step number two is the values that you build on this dream. And Aziz just showed them with us. It’s equality and dignity, shared acknowledgement and recognition, reconciliation and healing, security and safety. Those are the values of the future. And on top of those values, we are now building a coalition, a coalition of Israelis, of Palestinians, international community, a civil society organization, a politician, ex-politician, influencers. So we’re building, it’s a growing coalition, a growing movement, growing, and we have a roadmap. The first step is build a roadmap, a blueprint. And the fifth is execution. And the roadmap has four chapters, amplify our voices, build a legitimacy as the future, as the leaders of the future. Policy change from tools of distractions to tools of constructions.
And the first part of the roadmap is building a political power. So in between this framework, we are working, we are working very hard on the ground, but it showed on all other conflict areas throughout the world that without international intervention and support, the local peace movement will fail. So this is exactly why it was so important for us to be in DC to tell them at the moment the US is investing only 50 million a year in the Israeli-Palestinian civil society, but the minimum is $5 billion in military aid. So invest so much in military aid. So of course the result will be what we’re experiencing now. So there must be a change in the policy. So this is exactly what we discussed with the representative here in Israel. Now I’ll get to your question in Israel.
Marc Steiner:
Sure.
Sarah Maoz Inon:
All Israelis and Jewish will ask will tell you we want peace. It’s part of our culture, our religion. We want peace, but we lost hope in peace. And what they mean is they lost hope that our current politicians, we have no leaders now, not in Palestine, nor in Israel, our current politicians don’t know how to take us there to the promised land, to the lasting peace. So this is why the civil society is so important. So we are now do public speaking in schools, gap year program, college, university, all over, webinars, interviews. We are amplifying the message, amplifying the voices of peace.
And we are grouping together with other peace activists, Palestinian, Israelis, young, adult, elderly. So this is how we are creating a movement and we’re creating big public events and we do small retreats. Like I’m speaking from now, I’m missing a very important presentation of Accord Institute that the research showing that 64% from two weeks ago, 64% of the Jewish Israelis, 64, it’s the majority want to reach conflict resolution that will be sponsored by the US that would lead to normalization with Arab world and a Palestinian state. This is 64%.
Marc Steiner:
Of Jewish Israelis?
Sarah Maoz Inon:
Jewish Israelis, yes. But again, those 64% as basically zero representation in the Knesset, in the parliament house. So this is why we need to build our political power, because our politicians thrive on division, on bloodshed, and we were hijacked by those politicians. And we need to get be empowered and be supported by US, by the EU, by other countries. Because peace, again, it’s back to the three most important words, peace is possible.
Marc Steiner:
So taking from what both of you have said and given the reality we face, the devastation we seeing in Gaza at the moment, and you made a point here and I think is really critical, is the United States is the linchpin in many ways to creating this peace, to making it happen, to bringing people together. I think about when Jimmy Carter was president, bringing in their Camp David Accords, the attempt was made. And so something even with more vigor has to happen like that.
Sarah Maoz Inon:
Marc, it was also Secretary of the State, James Baker, that in ’91. First Israeli, Palestinian, and the Arab nation to meet in Madrid as the First Intifada was still going on. He didn’t wait for a ceasefire, it didn’t wait for the war to end. He forced a dialogue, he forced negotiation. And when we are speaking, when we said it, exactly those examples to the representatives and the staff and State Department, some of them didn’t know about it.
Marc Steiner:
No, exactly. Yes.
Sarah Maoz Inon:
Yeah. So he said, this is the US policy. The US policy is not to give military aid with no condition to the state of Israel. The history of the US policy is exactly the opposite. And what you are doing now is damaging Palestinians, you are damaging Israelis, and you are ensuring the war and the conflict will continue.
Aziz Abu:
Yeah, I think what ended up happening, Marc, is we got so comfortable with the status quo. We got so comfortable with what was known and became very popular term in Israel and Palestine, and even within the US government and this administration and the last administration for sure is a conflict management. We are going to keep things as is because we’ve tried to solve it, it didn’t work, so let’s just keep it as is. And we will manage to have an acceptable level of violence. A couple hundred people get killed a year, we can live with that. That became the policy, that became acceptable. And what Maoz and I are saying, this is not acceptable. What we want isn’t to go back to October 6th. What we want isn’t to go back to this. Let’s get to a level of violence, a level of reality that we willing to live with or our politicians are living to live with.
Instead, we need a conflict resolution. People don’t want a vision that doesn’t guarantee that this is it. This has to be the last time we go at violence. And if that’s not the vision, two years from now, you’re going to be hosting people like us and talking to them about the same thing. And that’s what we cannot allow our politicians to do again. That’s what we cannot allow our governments to do again. And that reform we’re talking about isn’t only, let’s be clear, I’m not talking only about reform in the Israeli government. I’m talking also reform on the Palestinian side. We need younger people in the Palestinian government. We need elections.
We need a transitional period that brings all those involved in politics in Palestine and run elections that brings young people. Last time we had elections was in 2006. It’s absurd. It’s been 18 years since we had election, 19 years for our presidential elections. It’s time to tell those leaders. Netanyahu has been in power on and off for almost 30 years. Abbas has been on and off because he was Prime Minister before and so on for over 25 years. It’s time for these people who have failed us, who have again and again led us to the hell we live in today to say, okay, let somebody else try it. It’s that simple.
Marc Steiner:
I really want to get your visions about how you organize and build that because it takes organizing on the ground, both in the Palestinian world and the Israeli world, but it also takes organizing here in the United States. And I start with the Jewish world and I start with the Arab-American world, but especially the Jewish world in this country. I mean, more and more younger Jews are detaching themselves from Israel and going against what’s going on and want to build a new future. So question is, how do you two see organizing that political energy both in Israel, Palestine, and the United States, and what has to happen to create that? Because we can’t, as I said to a friend the other day about this, people have been trying to wipe Jews out for 2,000 years. Now we’re doing it to ourselves with the policies and what we’re doing. So how do you both envision building that movement, both where you live and here in this country and how we make that bridge? What’s your ideas?
Sarah Maoz Inon:
Yeah, it’s a very good question, and I’m not sure if we have time, but I must say it’s so fun and great to be in your show that I hope you will invite us again.
Marc Steiner:
I’d love to have you both back. Absolutely.
Sarah Maoz Inon:
It’s through partnership and coalition. We don’t want you, Marc, just to do this interview with us, to put it on your podcast channel and that’s it. Forget about us. We want to be your partners. And this is what we say to everyone. So there are already a peace organization that got presence in the US, like Combatants for Peace, American Friends of Peace now, and others. So we already working with them and there will be more peacemakers, Palestinian, Israelis that will come to do advocacy in D.C. We are now putting that together. And they’re also a great, the Palestinian and Israeli in the diaspora are a major part, can play a major role in supporting the peacemakers and our movement.
So we see it as a global movement. Each one will do his part, we’ll synchronize it together and we share the same vision and the same values, and we we’ll work to make this vision into a reality. So it’s not just one thing, it’s many things that many of us need to do, but together we can change the future. We cannot predict it, but we can change the future. So we came back very optimistic after visiting Baltimore, New York and D.C., and we are waiting for the next visit. And we’re also welcoming everyone to come if it’s representatives or media or common people like us, come to the region. We are offering an amazing six or seven day package that really get you to know with the challenges on the ground, but most important with the opportunities.
Aziz Abu:
Yeah, I’ll give you an example, Marc, where when we talk about this is not just hear us and feel good for us and give us your thoughts and prayers. We are not asking for your thoughts and prayers, we’re asking for you to be with us. And I’ll give you an example. Maoz had an interview with a Italian journalist a few months back and she asked him, “What do you want?” And he said what we told you here, “We want you to amplify our voices, to make our voices legitimate. We are the leaders of the future. If our politicians are not doing it, we are doing it.” And so on and so on. And she said, “How do I help you do that?” He said, “Go back and get us the opportunity to spread this message.” And because she’s Italian, Maoz asked her if she knows the Pope, and it sounds like crazy to go, “If you know the Pope, get us in.” And a couple weeks later she called back and she said, “Okay, you’re going to come and meet the Pope.”
Marc Steiner:
That’s how it happened. That’s how you met the Pope.
Aziz Abu:
That’s how we met the Pope. It’s through a journalist who put our name in for a conference where the Pope was speaking. We ended up not just speaking with him, but being invited to hug him, to have this intimate moment with him and to really feel how much he cares. But most importantly beyond the Pope is he asks us, “What do I do now? How do I help you?” And it shows first, a leadership that we lack among many of our politicians all over the world. And we say, “Take our words to your next meeting.” He was heading to the G7 meeting and we said, “Take our words and tell them we need civil society to be highlighted. We need peacemakers to be on the table. We need politicians to recognize they’ve failed and they need us.” And he said, “Okay.” And so a few weeks later, a couple of weeks later, he’s at the G7.
And you read the communique coming out of the G7, and word by word, the things we’ve asked him to ask them to put into their communique, made it into the communique. He’s got Joe Biden, Macron, everybody, all these leaders from G7, for the first time to say, yes, peace without civil society, without peacemakers is not possible. So now we need everybody who’s listening to us to also go and say, we don’t want these words to be just words. We need it to translate how the US Europe, how the G7 do their policies. But that’s an example of how one person could change so much in the political realm.
And the biggest problem we face today is people who are indifferent or people who believe I cannot make a difference. Everyone listening to us today can make a difference. You sharing our stories make a difference. You connecting us to more people make a difference. You getting us to speak into wherever possibilities, that makes a difference. Churches, synagogues, mosques, whatever religious affiliation, not religious affiliation, families, groups. We have so many voices who should be heard and right now, unfortunately are not the ones being heard. So we need to change that.
Marc Steiner:
And I think in many ways we’re on the cusp of the horrendous nature of the war that we’re in now in Gaza, actually in all that pain and that destruction gives us a path to peace. This is the time.
Sarah Maoz Inon:
This is the time. And like I said, also in the past when the people of Israel were in the desert walking for 40 years to the promised land, they were crying for water. They were walking in the desert crying for water. And this is exactly what we are doing now. The war has been waging, this war for 10 months, but the conflict for a century and we are now crying for peace. This is the most human thing to do, to cry, but also to work and make peace. It won’t happen without us. So now is the time to make peace.
Marc Steiner:
So we will stay in touch.
Sarah Maoz Inon:
Love to.
Marc Steiner:
We will find other conversations to create together with other people around you as well. And I look forward to working with you and keeping the fight for peace going. We have to have it. There’s no other way.
Sarah Maoz Inon:
Yes.
Aziz Abu:
Thank you, Marc, and welcome to being part of us. We now we are working together.
Marc Steiner:
So again, I’m really sorry we didn’t get a chance to meet, but we will meet. Maoz Inon and Aziz Abu Sarah, thank you so much for taking the time today and we’ll talk again soon on the air and we’ll keep in touch and we’ll be fighting for a peace.
Sarah Maoz Inon:
Thank you.
Aziz Abu:
Thank you very much.
Marc Steiner:
Once again, I want to thank Maoz Inon and Aziz Abu Sarah for joining us today. We’ll be hearing more from them and others in their movement in the coming months. And thanks to Cameron Grandino for running the program, producer Rosette Sewali for putting all this together, audio editor, Alina Nehlich, making it sound good and the tireless Kayla Rivara for making it all work behind the scenes. And everyone here at The Real News for making this show possible. Please let me know what you though about what you heard today, what you’d like us to cover. Just write to me at mss@therealnews.com. I’ll get right back to you. I’m looking forward to your ideas. Once again, thank you to Maoz Inon and Aziz Abu Sarah for their work and for joining us today. But we’ll bringing you more about this struggle and struggle for peace in the Middle East in the future. So for the crew here at The Real News, I’m Marc Steiner. Stay involved, keep listening, and take care.
On July 31, Chairman of the Hamas Political Bureau Ismail Haniyeh attended the inauguration of Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian. Hours later, he was reported killed in an “Israeli strike” along with his bodyguard in Tehran.
Simultaneously, Israel claimed it had killed senior Hezbollah commander Fuad Shukr in an airstrike in Lebanon’s capital, Beirut, and that its intelligence had confirmed that another top Hamas leader Mohammed Deif was also killed in a July 13 Israeli strike in Khan Younis, Gaza.
The reason the manipulative Zionist regime cunningly plotted to assassinate Ismail Haniyeh during his visit to Iran is two-fold. Firstly, the Islamic Republic over the years has established the reputation of being the torchbearer of the Palestine cause, particularly in the Islamic World.
While the craven Arab autocracies, under the thumb of duplicitous American masters enabling the Zionist regime’s atrocious genocide of unarmed Palestinians, were pondering over when would be the opportune moment to recognize Israel and establish diplomatic and trade ties, the Iran-led resistance axis, comprising Iraq, Syria, Hezbollah in Lebanon and Ansarallah in Yemen, has claimed stellar victories in battlefields against Israel.
It’s worth pointing out, however, that Hamas’ main patrons are private donors in oil-rich Saudi Arabia, the Gulf States and Egypt, not Iran, as frequently alleged by the mainstream disinformation campaign. In fact, Hamas as a political movement is the Palestinian offshoot of the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood. And by mainstream media’s own accounts, the Shiite leadership of Iran and Hezbollah weren’t even aware of the Sunni Palestinian liberation movement Hamas’ October 7 assault.
Secondly, the treacherous murder of Ismail Haniyeh in Tehran was clearly designed to inflame the sectarian conflict. Lately, it has become a customary propensity of Orientalist apologists of Western imperialism to offer reductive historical and theological explanations of Sunni-Shi’a conflict in the Middle East region in order to cover up the blowback of ill-conceived Western military interventions and proxy wars that have ignited the flames of internecine conflict in the Islamic world.
Some self-anointed “Arabists” of the mainstream media posit that the sectarian division goes all the way back to the founding of Islam, 1400 years ago, and contend that the conflict emerged during the reign of the fourth caliph, Ali bin Abi Talib, in the seventh century A.D. Even though both sects of Islam peacefully coexisted during the medieval era in the Middle East, Central Asia and the Mughal India, where several provinces, particularly the glorious State of Awadh, were governed by benevolent Shiite nawabs.
One wonders what the Western-led war on terror’s explanation would be of such “erudite historians of Islam” – that the cause of purported “clash of civilizations” between Christians and Muslims is to be found in the Crusades when Richard the Lionheart and Saladin were skirmishing in the Levant and exchanging courtesies at the same time.
Fact of the matter is that in modern times, the Sunni-Shi’a conflict in the Middle East region is essentially a political conflict between the Gulf Arab autocrats and Iran for regional dominance which is being presented to lay Muslims in the veneer of religiosity.
Saudi Arabia, which has been vying for supremacy as the leader of the Sunni bloc against the Shi’a-led Iran in the regional geopolitics, was staunchly against the invasion of Iraq by the Bush Administration in 2003.
The Baathist regime of Saddam Hussein constituted a Sunni Arab bulwark against Iran’s meddling in the Arab world. But after Saddam was ousted from power in 2003 and subsequently when elections were held in Iraq which were swept by Shi’a-dominated politico-religious parties, Iraq has now been led by a Shi’a-majority government that has become a steadfast regional ally of Iran. Consequently, Iran’s sphere of influence now extends all the way from territorially-contiguous Iraq and Syria to Lebanon and the Mediterranean coast.
Moreover, during the invasion of Iraq in 2003, the Bush Administration took advantage of the ethnic and sectarian divisions in Iraq and used the Kurds and Shi’as against the Sunni-led Baathist regime of Saddam Hussein. And during the occupation years from 2003 to 2011, the once dominant Sunni minority was politically marginalized which further exacerbated ethnic and sectarian divisions in Iraq.
The Saudi royal family was resentful of Iran’s encroachment on the traditional Arab heartland. Therefore, when protests broke out against the Shia-led Syrian government in the wake of the Arab Spring uprisings of 2011, the Gulf States along, with their regional Sunni allies, Turkey and Jordan, and the Western patrons gradually militarized the protests to dismantle the Iran-led resistance axis, comprising Iraq, Syria, Hezbollah in Lebanon and Ansarallah in Yemen.
Similarly, during the Libyan so-called “humanitarian intervention” in 2011, the Obama administration provided money and arms to myriads of tribal militias and Islamic jihadists to topple the Arab-nationalist Gaddafi government. But after the policy backfired and pushed Libya into lawlessness, anarchy and civil war, the mainstream media pointed the finger at Egypt, UAE, Saudi Arabia and Russia for backing the renegade general, Khalifa Haftar, in eastern Libya, even though he had lived for more than two decades in the US right next to the CIA’s headquarter in Langley, Virginia.
Regarding the Western powers’ modus operandi of waging proxy wars in the Middle East, since the times of the Soviet-Afghan jihad during the eighties, it has been the fail-safe game plan of master strategists at NATO to raise money from the oil-rich emirates of Saudi Arabia, Qatar, UAE and Kuwait; then buy billions of dollars’ worth of weapons from the arms markets in the Eastern Europe; and then provide those weapons and guerilla warfare training to the disaffected population of the targeted country by using security agencies of the latter’s regional adversaries. Whether it’s Afghanistan, Libya or Syria, the same playbook was executed to the letter.
More to the point, raising funds for proxy wars from the Gulf Arab States allows Western executives the freedom to evade congressional scrutiny; the benefit of buying weapons from unregulated arms markets of Eastern Europe is that such weapons cannot be traced back to Western capitals; and using jihadist proxies to achieve strategic objectives has the advantage of taking the plea of “plausible deniability” if the strategy backfires, which it often does. Recall that al-Qaeda and Taliban were the by-products of the Soviet-Afghan jihad, and the Islamic State and its global network of terrorists were the blowback of the invasion of Iraq in 2003 and the proxy war in Syria.
Apart from Syria and Iraq, two other flashpoints of Sunni-Shi’a conflict in the Middle East region are Bahrain and Yemen. When peaceful protests broke out against the Sunni monarchy in Bahrain by the Shi’a majority population in the wake of the Arab Spring uprisings in 2011, Saudi Arabia sent thousands of troops across the border to quell the uprising.
Similarly, as the Arab Spring protests toppled longtime dictators of the Arab World, including Ben Ali in Tunisia and Hosni Mubarak in Egypt, Yemenis also gathered in the capital’s squares demanding removal of Ali Abdullah Saleh.
Instead of conceding to protesters’ fervent demand of holding free and fair elections to ascertain democratic aspirations of demonstrators, however, the Obama administration adopted the convenient course of replacing Yemen’s longtime autocrat with a Saudi stooge Abdrabbuh Mansur Hadi.
Having the reputation of a “wily Arabian fox” and being a Houthi himself, Ali Abdullah Saleh wasn’t the one to sit idly by and retire from politics in ignominy. He colluded with the Houthi rebels and incited them to take advantage of the chaos and political vacuum created after the revolution to come out of their northern Saada stronghold and occupy the capital Sanaa in September 2014. How ironic that Ali Abdullah Saleh was eventually killed by Houthis in December 2017 because of his treacherous nature.
Meanwhile, a change of guard took place in Riyadh as Saudi Arabia’s longtime ruler King Abdullah died and was replaced by King Salman in January 2015, while de facto control of the kingdom fell into hands of inexperienced and belligerent Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman.
Already furious at the Obama administration for not enforcing its so-called “red line” by imposing a no-fly zone over Syria after the false-flag Ghouta chemical weapons attacks in Damascus in August 2013 and apprehensive of security threat posed to the kingdom from its southern border along Yemen by Houthi rebels under the influence of Iran, the crown prince immediately began a military and air warfare campaign against Houthi rebels with military assistance from the crown prince of Abu Dhabi and de facto ruler of UAE, Mohammad bin Zayed al-Nahyan, in March 2015.
Mindful of the botched policy it had pursued in Libya and Syria and aware of the catastrophe it had wrought in the Middle East region, the Obama administration had to yield to the dictates of Saudi Arabia and UAE by fully coordinating the Gulf-led military campaign in Yemen not only by providing intelligence, planning and logistical support but also by selling billions of dollars’ worth of arms and ammunition to the Gulf States during the conflict.
Now, when the fire of inter-sectarian strife is burning on several different fronts in the Middle East and the Sunni and Shi’a communities are witnessing a merciless slaughter of their brethren in Syria, Iraq, Yemen and Bahrain, then it would be preposterous to look for the causes of the conflict in theology and medieval history. If the Sunni and Shi’a Muslims were so thirsty for each other’s blood since the founding of Islam, then how come they managed to survive as distinct sectarian groups for 1400 years?
Fact of the matter is that in modern times, the phenomena of Islamic radicalism, jihadism and consequent Sunni-Shi’a conflict are only as old as the Soviet-Afghan jihad during the 1980s when the Western powers with the help of their regional allies trained and armed Afghan jihadists to battle the Soviet troops in Afghanistan.
More significantly, however, the Iran-Iraq War from 1980 to 1988 between the Sunni and Baathist-led Iraq and the Shi’a-led Iran after the 1979 Khomeini revolution engendered hostility between the Sunni and Shi’a communities of the region for the first time in modern history.
And finally, the conflict has been further exacerbated in the wake of the Arab Spring uprisings in 2011 when the Western powers and their regional client states once again took advantage of the opportunity and nurtured militants against the Arab nationalist Gaddafi government in Libya and the Baathist-led Assad administration in Syria.
During the early hours of the morning of Tuesday 6 August, six Palestine Action activists were arrested after they broke inside and damaged weaponry inside the highly secured Bristol manufacturing hub of Israel’s largest weapons company, Elbit Systems.
Palestine Action repurpose a PRISON VAN against Israel
A larger group from Palestine Action used a prison van to smash through the outer perimeter and the roller shutters into the building:
A glimpse into how actionists used a repurposed prison van to break inside Elbit’s heavily guarded weapons facilitypic.twitter.com/JHxs9Wt9GM
Once six were inside, they began damaging the contents inside, including machinery and Israeli quadcopter drones:
Elbit: actively enabling genocide
Elbit’s Horizon facility at Belvedere Close in Filton is a key premises for the arms company, described as a research, development, and manufacturing hub for electronic warfare, land vehicle, simulation, and vision technologies. Freedom of Information disclosures show Filton’s ‘Elbit Systems UK’ has existent export licenses for the sale of weaponry to Israel.
The Filton site was opened in July of last year, with Israeli Ambassador Tzipi Hotevely in attendance to show off the Bristol produced-weapons technologies of the “Israeli defence company”. Also in attendance was Elbit’s CEO Bezalel Machlis, who recently boasted, too, of Elbit’s crucial role in supporting the ongoing genocide and of the graditude received by Elbit from the Israeli military for their services.
Products seen inside the factory are the same as those used in the Gaza genocide, including Elbit’s ‘Torch-X Command and Control’ systems, Thor quadcopter drones and its nv33 Night Vision technologies.
Elbit Systems, more broadly, supplies up to 85% of Israel’s military drones and land-based equipment, while its British exports to Israel mostly concern drone and aircraft components, military electronics, and target and acquisition systems.
The action is the latest instalment of Palestine Action’s campaign against Elbit Systems, which has seen the Filton site targeted for the first time. Their ‘UAV Engines’ site in Staffordshire has been disrupted for five consecutive days up to today, as activists mobilised with vehicular and ground lock-ons and community mass pickets.
Palestine Action: ordinary people must act
A Palestine Action spokesperson has stated:
Israel’s biggest weapons producer, Elbit Systems, uses Gaza as a laboratory to develop it’s weaponry. Activists directly intervened in this genocidal process by taking aim at Elbit’s research, development and manufacturing hub.
As a party to the Genocide Convention, Britain has a responsibility to prevent the occurrence of genocide. When our government fails to abide by their legal and moral obligations, it’s the responsibility of ordinary people to take direct action.
There is only one country in the world right now, in the midst of Israel’s slaughter in Gaza, where Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is guaranteed dozens of standing ovations from the vast majority of its elected representatives.
That country is not Israel, where he has been a hugely divisive figure for many years. It is the United States.
On Wednesday, Netanyahu was back-slapped, glad-handed, whooped and cheered as he slowly made his way – hailed at every step as a conquering hero – to the podium of the US Congress.
This was the same Netanyahu who has overseen during the past 10 months the slaughter– so far – of some 40,000 Palestinians, around half of them women and children. More than 21,000 other children are reported missing, most of them likely dead under rubble.
It was the same Netanyahu who levelled a strip of territory – originally home to 2.3 million Palestinians – that is expected to take 80 years to rebuild, at a cost of at least $50bn.
It was the same Netanyahu who has destroyed every hospital and university in Gaza, and bombed almost all of its schools that were serving as shelters for families made homeless by other Israeli bombs.
It was the same Netanyahu whose arrest is being sought by the chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Court for crimes against humanity, accused of using starvation as a weapon of war by imposing an aid blockade that has engineered a famine across Gaza.
It was the same Netanyahu whose government was found last week by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) to have been intensifying Israel’s apartheid rule over the Palestinian people in an act of long-term aggression.
It was the same Netanyahu whose government is standing trial for committing what the ICJ, the world’s highest judicial body, has termed a “plausible genocide”.
And yet, there was just one visible protester in the congressional chamber. Rashida Tlaib, the only US legislator of Palestinian heritage, sat silently grasping a small black sign. On one side it said: “War criminal”. On the other: “Guilty of genocide”.
One person among hundreds mutely trying to point out that the emperor was naked.
Cocooned from horror
Indeed, the optics were stark.
This looked less like a visit by a foreign leader than a decorated elder general being welcomed back to the Senate in ancient Rome, or a grey-haired British viceroy from India embraced in the motherland’s parliament, after brutally subduing the “barbarians” on the fringes of empire.
This was a scene familiar from history books: of imperial brutality and colonial savagery, recast by the seat of the imperium as valour, honour, civilisation. And it looked every bit as absurd, and abhorrent, as it does when we look back on what happened 200 or 2,000 years ago.
It was a reminder that, despite our self-serving claims of progress and humanitarianism, our world is not very different from the way it has been for thousands of years.
It was a reminder that power elites like to celebrate the demonstration of their power, cocooned both from the horrors faced by those crushed by their might, and from the clamour of protest of those horrified by the infliction of so much suffering.
It was a reminder that this is not a “war” between Israel and Hamas – let alone, as Netanyahu would have us believe, a battle for civilisation between the Judeo-Christian world and the Islamic world.
This is a US imperial war – part of its military campaign for “global, full-spectrum dominance” – carried out by Washington’s most favoured client state.
The genocide is fully a US genocide, armed by Washington, paid for by Washington, given diplomatic cover by Washington, and – as the scenes in Congress underlined – cheered on by Washington.
Or as Netanyahu stated in a moment of unintentional candour to Congress: “Our enemies are your enemy, our fight is your fight, and our victory will be your victory.”
Israel is Washington’s largest military outpost in the oil-rich Middle East. The Israeli army is the Pentagon’s main battalion in that strategically important region. And Netanyahu is the outpost’s commander in chief.
What is vital to Washington elites is that the outpost is supported at all costs; that it doesn’t fall to the “barbarians”.
Outpouring of lies
There was another small moment of inadvertent truth amid Netanyahu’s outpouring of lies. The Israeli prime minister stated that what was happening in Gaza was “a clash between barbarism and civilisation”. He was not wrong.
On the one side, there is the barbarism of the current joint Israeli-US genocide against the people of Gaza, a dramatic escalation of the 17-year Israeli siege of the enclave that preceded it, and the decades of belligerent rule under an Israeli system of apartheid before that.
And on the other side, there are the embattled few desperately trying to safeguard the West’s professed values of “civilisation”, of international humanitarian law, of the protection of the weak and vulnerable, of the rights of children.
The US Congress decisively showed where it stood: with barbarism.
Netanyahu has become the most feted foreign leader in US history, invited to speak to Congress four times, surpassing even Britain’s wartime leader, Winston Churchill.
He is fully Washington’s creature. His savagery, his monstrousness is entirely made in America. As he implored his US handlers: “Give us the tools faster and we’ll finish the job faster.”
Finish the job of genocide.
Performative dissent
Some Democrats preferred to stay away, including party power broker Nancy Pelosi. Instead, she met families of Israeli hostages held in Gaza – not, of course, Palestinian families whose loved ones in Gaza had been slaughtered by Israel.
Vice President Kamala Harris explained her own absence as a scheduling conflict. She met the Israeli prime minister, as did President Joe Biden, on Thursday.
Afterwards, she claimed to have pressed Netanyahu on the “dire” humanitarian situation in Gaza, but stressed too that Israel “had a right to defend itself” – a right that Israel specifically does not have, as the ICJ pointed out last week, because Israel is the one permanently violating the rights of the Palestinians through its prolonged occupation, apartheid rule and ethnic cleansing.
But the dissent of Pelosi – and of Harris, if that is what it was – was purely performative. True, they have no personal love for Netanyahu, who has so closely allied himself and his government with the US Republican right and former president Donald Trump.
But Netanyahu simply serves as an alibi. Both Pelosi and Harris are stalwart supporters of Israel – a state that, according to the ICJ’s judgment last week, decades ago instituted apartheid rule in the Palestinian territories, using an illegal occupation as cover to ethnically cleanse the population there.
Their political agenda is not about ending the annihilation of the people of Gaza. It is acting as a safety valve for popular dissatisfaction among traditional Democratic voters shocked by the scenes from Gaza.
It is to deceive them into imagining that behind closed doors, there is some sort of policy fight over Israel’s handling of the Palestinian issue. That voting Democrat will one day – one very distant day – lead to an undefined “peace”, a fabled “two-state solution” where Palestinian children won’t keep dying in the interests of preserving the security of Israel’s illegal settler-militias.
US policy towards Israel has not changed in any meaningful sense for decades, whether the president has been red or blue, whether Trump has been in the White House or Barack Obama.
And if Harris becomes president – admittedly, a big if – US arms and money will continue flowing to Israel, while Israel will get to decide if US aid to Gaza is ever allowed in.
Why? Because Israel is the lynchpin in a US imperial project for global full-spectrum dominance. Because for Washington to change course on Israel, it would also have to do other unthinkable things.
It would have to begin dismantling its 800 military bases around the planet, just as Israel was told by the ICJ last week to dismantle its many dozens of illegal settlements on Palestinian territory.
The US would need to agree a shared global security architecture with China and Russia, rather than seek to bully and batter these great powers into submission with bloody proxy wars, such as the one in Ukraine.
The coming fall
Pelosi, remember, smeared students on US campuses protesting Israel’s plausible genocide in Gaza as being linked to Russia. She urged the FBI to investigate them for pressuring the Biden administration to support a ceasefire.
Netanyahu, in his address to Congress, similarly demonised the demonstrators – in his case, by accusing them of being “useful idiots” of Israel’s main foe, Iran.
Neither can afford to recognise that millions of ordinary people across the US think it is wrong to bomb and starve children – and to use a war with an unachievable aim as the cover story.
Hamas cannot be “eliminated” through Israel’s current bout of horrifying violence for a very obvious reason: The group is a product, a symptom, of earlier bouts of horrifying Israeli violence.
As even western counter-terrorism experts have had to concede, Israel’s genocidal policies in Gaza are strengthening Hamas, not weakening it. Young men and boys who lose their family to Israeli bombs are Hamas’s most fervent new recruits.
That’s why Netanyahu insisted Israel’s military offensive – the genocide – in Gaza could not end soon. He demanded weapons and money to keep his soldiers in the enclave indefinitely, in an operation he termed as “demilitarisation and deradicalisation”.
Decoded, that means a continuing horror show for the Palestinians there, as they are forced to continue living and dying with an Israeli aid blockade, starvation, bombs and unmarked “kill zones”.
It means, too, an indefinite risk of Israel’s war on Gaza spilling over into a regional war, and potentially a global one, as tripwires towards escalation continue to grow in number.
The US Congress, however, is too blinded by championing its small fortressed state in the Middle East to think about such complexities. Its members roared “USA!” to their satrap from Israel, just as Roman senators once roared “Glory!” to generals whose victories they assumed would continue forever.
The rulers of the Roman empire no more saw the coming fall than their modern counterparts in Washington can. But every empire falls. And its collapse becomes inevitable once its rulers lose all sense of how absurd and abhorrent they have become.
The fact that the Democrats currently occupy the White House has done little to ruffle the equation of blood and gore in the Middle East, notably regarding the fate of the Palestinians. The ongoing Israeli campaign of stunning ruthlessness against the Gaza unfortunates is certainly a worry for some Democratic strategists, if only because certain voters are finally expressing an opinion on the subject. Israel, right or wrong, is no longer an entirely plausible proposition.
In swing states such as Michigan, the cranky and disgruntled on the issue, certain given the potential role of Arab American voters, is not negligible. In May, a published Arab American Institute (AAI) poll revealed that support for President Joe Biden among Arab Americans had collapsed to a mere 20%. This was telling, given that Biden had won 60% of the same voting bloc in 2020.
The potential consequence of that shift has not gone unnoticed among pro-Israeli voices keen to arrest any potential tide. On the electoral battleground, Representative Jamaal Bowman can count himself as one of the first Democratic figures to lose a primary for his stance against Israel’s treatment of Palestinians. (It should be said that his stance on Israel has not always been a consistent one.) Bowman had previously defeated the hawkish Eliot Engel in New York’s 16th congressional district in the Bronx and southern Westchester County, the latter known for his cosy relationship, not only with Israel but with weapons manufacturers.
Last month, it was Bowman’s turn to taste defeat, a fate more or less assured by the muscular support offered by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) to his centrist opponent George Latimer, which came to a stunning US$14 million. The scandalously hefty spending in that primary made it the most expensive in the history of the House of Representatives.
At the highest levels, the scene is set for the pudding of mawkish insincerity. The presumptive Democratic nominee for the White House is certainly offering this in spades. Kamala Harris’s comments on the slaughter in Gaza and Israel’s overall policy towards Palestinians suggest political moulding and shifting, a ploy intended to stave off electoral threat. Votes are at hand, and Israel’s tenacious brutality is not going down well in certain parts of the constituency. But the usual acknowedgments and doffing the cap to supporting Israel always follow.
The Vice President persists in reasserting her “unwavering commitment” to Israel’s sacrosanct right to defend itself. This is then coupled with the concern – as she expressed to Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu – of “the scale of human suffering in Gaza, including the death of far too many innocent civilians”. (Harris-speak suggests that innocent civilians will always die in the cause.)
Cheap, calculated language follows. “The images of dead children and desperate, hungry people fleeing for safety – sometimes displaced for a second, third, or fourth time – we cannot look away in the face of these tragedies. We cannot allow ourselves to become numb to the suffering, and I will not be silent.”
Eman Abdelhadi of the University of Chicago finds such sentiments from Harris parch dry, arguing that a lack of “an actual commitment to stop killing the children of Gaza” invalidates any claims to empathy. “To be empathetic to someone that you’re shooting in the head is not exactly laudable. We don’t need empathy from these people. We need to stop providing the weapons and the money that is actively killing the people that they’re supposedly empathising with.”
Within the Democrats, there is some movement of disgruntlement, though this is the sort that rarely rises above the gravitas of paper ceremony and gesture. Thomas Kennedy, a figure who co-founded the Miami-Dade Democratic Progressive Caucus in early 2017, wrote for The Intercept earlier this year explaining why he had left the Democratic campaign in disgust. “I am submitting my resignation in large part because of the Biden administration’s inexcusable support of Israeli war crimes and the mass killing of Palestinians in Gaza”. He also adds another reason: “the DNC’s role in protecting President Joe Biden from a democratic process that could check that complicity.”
A survey available from the Brookings Institution suggests that electoral tremors among Democratic voters regarding support for Israel’s ongoing campaign will be manageable. Bowman’s remarks that Israel is responsible for genocide tend to figure among a mere 7% of Democratic candidates. From the survey work done by the thinktank, 18% of the candidates took what was described as “a more moderate position, saying that the US should make support for Israel conditional and call for a ceasefire.”
The survey continues to note “a divide in the Democratic party, but the anti-Israel candidates compose only 2% of the primary winners. Outside the most extreme position, the party is split fairly evenly, with most candidates displaying sympathy for Israel, but hesitancy to voice full-throated unconditional support.”
In this show of performative grief for the plight of Palestinians, the Democrats can feign concern while still continuing the military and political support Israel has become so accustomed to. The result is one of theatre that does little to alter the catastrophe taking place in Gaza, leaving the political furniture virtually untouched.
A top Israeli official suggested on Monday that he believes it is “morally justified” for Israel to wipe out Gaza’s population through famine and starvation, in chilling statements that pro-Palestine advocates say openly indicate genocidal intent. Speaking at a conference hosted by the far right Israel Hayom newspaper, Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich complained about having to allow…
As humanitarian groups warn that multiple epidemics are likely ongoing in Gaza, one report has revealed that there has been a major uptick of cases of viral hepatitis B, which infects the liver, as sanitary conditions continue to deteriorate and Israel’s genocide rages on. Haaretz reports that over 100,000 cases of viral hepatitis B have been recorded in Gaza…
Ashraf al-Muhtaseb is a musician who described leaving Israel’s jails with no hearing in his left ear, four fractured ribs and a broken hand, so ill and weak from hunger he could no longer walk.
Dropped at an Israeli checkpoint on his own, he says he began crawling towards his home in the occupied West Bank town of Hebron, until a passerby picked him up.
Violence, extreme hunger, humiliation and other abuse of Palestinian prisoners has been normalised across Israel’s jail system, according to Guardian interviews with released prisoners, with mistreatment now so systemic that rights group B’Tselem says it must be considered a policy of “institutionalised abuse”.
Former detainees described abuse ranging from severe beatings and sexual violence to starvation rations, refusal of medical care, and deprivation of basic needs including water, daylight, electricity and sanitation, including soap and sanitary pads for women.