Category: israel

  • As Israeli forces indiscriminately massacre Palestinians across Gaza, they are using U.S.-made heavy equipment to maul people and hide bodies in an apparent effort to obstruct the death toll and prevent photos of decaying bodies from circulating online, a new report finds. An Israeli soldier told +972 Magazine and Local Call that Israeli forces clear out Palestinians’ bodies using D-9 bulldozers…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • Israeli officials instructed Israel Defense Forces (IDF) soldiers to target fellow soldiers and potentially civilians in the chaos of the October 7, 2023 attack that Israeli officials have used as a springboard for their genocide in Gaza, a prominent Israeli outlet has reported. According to Haaretz, IDF officials gave the order to execute the “Hannibal Directive” in at least three places on…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • Public health experts have estimated that the true death toll in Israel’s genocidal assault on Gaza could be five times higher than the official toll reported by Palestinian officials — a chilling figure that they say is, in fact, a conservative estimate based on historical death tolls in times of conflict. In a letter published on Friday in prestigious medical journal The Lancet…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • Israeli forces on Saturday killed more than a dozen displaced Palestinians in a targeted attack on a United Nations-run school in central Gaza, the latest bombing of an education facility as Israel’s assault on the besieged enclave entered its 10th month. Video footage from the scene of the attack on the al-Jaouni school in central Gaza’s al-Nuseirat refugee camp shows puddles of blood on the…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • Ever since October 7, 2023, NBC, ABC, CBS, FOX, CNN, PBS, along with BBC, DW, NHK other Western-aligned entertainment/news conglomerates and wire services like AP, UPI, Reuters and Israeli media have sought to keep their viewers, readers, and listeners attention on the hostages and away from any explanation, reason, or justification of Palestinians seeking to exchange the hostages for some of the thousands of Palestinians held in Israeli prisons.

    This is of course consistent with the under-reporting of the Palestinians suffering the illegal military occupation, subjugation, and often murderous treatment from the Israeli military which operates largely with impunity within Gaza, the West Bank, East Jerusalem, the Golan Heights, and elsewhere.

    Western media focus on the hostages is even more important in justifying Israel’s wholesale annihilation of much of the population of Hamas governed Gaza, homes, apartment buildings, mosques, schools, stores, bakeries, playgrounds all claimed by Israel to be in defence of the Palestinian guerrilla attack of Israel on October 7, 2023.

    However, since the U.S. has built up the Israel military to be one of the most powerful in the world and perfectly capable of defending itself against any subsequent Hamas resistance attack, the Israeli obliteration of Gaza’s cities and its people is obviously not defensive, and after Israel’s generations of crimes against Palestinians, the October 7 invasion was hardly unexpected. UN Secretary General António Guterres  said as much right after the October 7, 2023 event. Guterres noted that “these attacks did not happen in a vacuum”—highlighting the impact of 56 years of occupation on the Palestinian people. (United Nations Press).

    Israel’s Responsibilities as an Occupying Power Under International Humanitarian Law

    Francesca Albanese, the UN Special Rapporteur for the Palestinian Territories, regarding Israel’s right to self-defense in the context of Israel’s (illegal) military occupation of Palestinian lands and people: 

    “Israel has the right to defend itself, but it cannot invoke this right to perpetrate acts that violate international law against a people it is occupying.”

    In her report to the UN General Assembly in October 2022, Rapporteur Albanese noted,

    “An occupying power has a duty to protect the occupied population and cannot invoke self-defense to justify the use of force against its own protected persons.”

    Western news outlets refer to Palestinian freedom fighters as “terrorists” constantly reporting that some Western governments list Hamas and other armed groups fighting the Israeli occupation as terrorist organisations; however, China, as a permanent member of the Security Council, has backed the right of the Palestinian people to use arms. Zhang Jun, China’s UN ambassador, stated in an address to the International Court of Justice concerning Israel’s decades-long occupation of Palestinian land, February 22, 2024:

    The struggle waged by peoples for their liberation, right to self-determination, including armed struggle against colonialism, occupation, aggression, domination against foreign forces should not be considered terror acts.

    Beijing’s envoy said there were “various people (who) freed themselves from colonial rule” and they could use “all available means, including armed struggle.” (This seemed an indirect reference to the American War of Independence from Britain.)

    As a conscientious peoples historian activist, I have allowed myself to be subjected to anti-Chinese, anti-UN, anti-Hamas, pro-Israeli news slants in the interest of knowing just how the average mainstream media addict comes to accept genocide as an inevitable condition of modern warfare and wars as an unpreventable source of financial gain.

    Therefore NBC’s very poignant, even painful to look at and read, coverage of the Israeli Defence Force killing of 64 children during its freeing of 4 hostages on June 8, 2024, came as a surprise to this writer and life long sympathiser of the Palestinian inhuman predicament. This sorrowful coverage of the horrendous head wound and death of a lovely, four-year-old boy and the sight of a seven-year-old girl alive but with more than half her face gone, is perhaps one indication that just perhaps even the CIA overseen media of the hegemonic Western nations can no longer tolerate Israeli genocide in its ever more outrageously gruesome aspects.

    Readers are invited to share some grief with Arab Palestinian families suffering soul crushing amount of anguish for the sheer numbers of the dead and dying children and the catatonic state of surviving kids. Just click on the hyperlink below:

    NBC News June 8, 2024

    Gazan families mourn children killed during IDF’s hostage rescue

    WEB Gaza’s Health Ministry says at least 64 children were killed by Israeli fire during the June 8 raid to rescue four hostages being held by Hamas. 

    The four hostages — Noa Argamani, Almog Meir Jan, Shlomi Ziv and Andrey Kozlov — were safely extracted from the Gaza Strip and cameras captured their emotional reunions with their families after eight months of captivity.

    The joy experienced by both Palestinians and Israelis during the first hostage exchange as they fell into the loving arms of waiting family and friends could have been repeated instead of this horrific bloodbath of some 270 Palestinians, among them 64 precious children on June 8, 2024

    Noa Argamani, Almog Meir Jan, Shlomi Ziv and Andrey Kozlov will most likely never forget that their homecoming was one sided. No Palestinian got to welcome home family members long imprisoned with or without having been charged as seems to the case for so many incarcerated and more being seized every day.

    Actually, how shall any of us ever forget that Americans have been backing and supplying these abominations of using weapons of mass destruction upon fellow human beings and their children in full knowledge of the profits being made by U.S. corporations.

    The post IDF Killed 64 Children While Freeing 4 Hostages first appeared on Dissident Voice.


    This content originally appeared on Dissident Voice and was authored by Jay Janson.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on The Grayzone and was authored by The Grayzone.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on The Grayzone and was authored by The Grayzone.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Ahmad Abdulrahim, 38, strolled the remains of the markets in Gaza City with 150 Shekels in his pocket, the amount of money he used to feed his family of five for a week before the genocide. Today, that amount can hardly buy a single meal. The markets, now little more than bombed-out remains, are empty of all basic needs, including vegetables, meat, and fruits. For the majority of people…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • Despite losing the presidential debate to Republican candidate Donald Trump, President Joe Biden’s electoral campaign appears to be in full swing now. The founder of WikiLeaks, Julian Assange, has been set free after a plea deal in order to woo progressive voters. In Gaza, Biden is simultaneously playing the role of arsonist and the firefighter.

    Last October, he sent aircraft-carriers and nuclear submarines in support of Israel and provided military assistance to the tune of billions of dollars, including bombs, missiles and aircraft, to slaughter hapless Palestinians. But at the same time, he built a shoddy pier to let humanitarian aid flow, and persuaded Netanyahu to let him at least create optics of being a neutral arbiter while he is the main enabler of Zionists’ genocide of Palestinians.

    The only theater where the purported peacenik [Biden a peacenik? — DV ed] can’t do much is the Ukraine War because the Pentagon’s military brass won’t let him squander the opportunity to destabilize arch-rival Russia. Therefore he would have to convince gullible neoliberals by deploying Orwellian jargon that war is peace, bombs are rose petals, America’s adversaries are recalcitrant villains, while the United States is the only bastion of democracy and civil liberties under the thumb of corporate interests and the deep state.

    As far as the Zionist regime’s genocidal war in Gaza is concerned, this isn’t even a war but downright genocide of unarmed Palestinians, as war is between two comparable armies, whereas in the Gaza Holocaust, a regional power backed by the world’s most powerful military force is committing merciless ethnic cleansing of hapless Palestinians.

    Incidentally, the death toll of the savage slaughter is grossly understated by monopoly media for ulterior motives. 38,000 is just the number of dead bodies counted by aid workers, whereas the exact death toll is well above 100,000, as most dead bodies are still buried beneath the rubble of Gaza City, Khan Younis and Rafah and would take months, if not years, to recover after the rubble is cleared.

    Besides the Biden admin’s reluctance to start another devastating Middle East war in the election year and eliminating Biden’s chances of winning a second term, another reason the American deep state is also hesitant to greenlight Israel’s ground invasion of Hezbollah’s bastion in southern Lebanon is that all the military resources of the Pentagon are currently being consumed by the protracted proxy war in east Ukraine.

    Moreover, the Biden admin is also concerned that mounting a military offensive against Hezbollah in southern Lebanon might provoke Iran to mount retaliatory missile and drone strikes on critical energy infrastructure in the Persian Gulf, such as the Abqaiq oil installation attack in September 2019, [This attack on the Abqaiq facility is usually ascribed to the Houthis in Yemen — DV ed] thus disrupting global energy supply in the election year and eliminating Biden’s chances of winning the elections.

    However, Israel’s opportunistic policymakers are yearning to draw Iran into Gaza War, thus creating a pretext for the expansion of the war in southern Lebanon in order to cash the opportunity to dismantle the Iran-Hezbollah nexus once and for all, posing a security threat to Israel’s northern borders.

    Even though by the mainstream media’s own accounts the Shiite leadership of Iran and Hezbollah wasn’t even aware of Sunni Palestinian liberation movement Hamas’ October 7 assault. It’s worth pointing out that Hamas’ main patrons are oil-rich Saudi Arabia, the Gulf States and Egypt, not Iran, as frequently alleged by the mainstream disinformation campaign. In fact, Hamas as a political movement is the Palestinian offshoot of the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood.

    Notwithstanding, while craven Arab petro-sheikhs, under the thumb of duplicitous American masters enabling the Zionist regime’s atrocious genocide of unarmed Palestinians, were squabbling over when would be the opportune moment to recognize Israel and establish diplomatic and trade ties, the Iran-led resistance axis, comprising Iraq, Syria, Hezbollah in Lebanon and Ansarallah in Yemen, has claimed stellar victories in the battlefield against Israel.

    As far as Israel’s airstrike at Iran’s consulate in Damascus on April 1 is concerned, killing two top commanders of the IRGC, it is the declared state policy of the Zionist regime of medieval assassins to use deception and subterfuge in order to eliminate formidable adversaries if it lacks the courage to cross swords with them in the battlefield.

    It’s worth noting that a tip-off from the Mossad led to the cowardly assassination of Iran’s celebrated warrior Haj Qassem Soleimani in January 2020, after Haj Soleimani gave the Zionist regime and its American patrons a bloody nose in Syria’s proxy war.

    Nonetheless, after the consulate airstrike, Iran retaliated by mounting the first direct airstrike on Israel with over 300 drones, cruise and ballistic missiles on April 13. The airstrike was codenamed Operation True Promise, or Vada-e-Sadiq in Persian.

    In response, Israel vowed to avenge the direct Iranian airstrike on its territory. Immediately afterwards, on April 19, Israeli F-15s reportedly launched Blue Sparrow ballistic target missiles at Isfahan’s military sites from Iraq’s airspace that destroyed the radar system of an S-300 air defense battery at a military airport in Isfahan.

    But the retaliatory strike failed to assuage the murderous frenzy of Israel’s military hawks who vowed to teach Iran a memorable lesson for punching above its weight. Then Mossad Director David Barnea presented a detailed plan to the war cabinet to execute Iran’s president, which was immediately approved by PM Netanyahu and Israeli military’s top brass because the covert assassination plot left sufficient room for claiming plausible deniability. The Biden admin and CIA Director William Burns also gave green light to the Mossad, according to Turkish and Azerbaijani security officials who were briefed on the matter by CIA officials.

    Thus, on the fateful day of May 19, Iran’s charismatic and eloquent President Ebrahim Raisi was due to inaugurate a hydroelectric dam in Iran’s East Azerbaijan province, alongside Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev. It’s pertinent to mention that Azerbaijan is one of the closest allies of Israel in the region that has longstanding trade and defense ties with Israel. It received generous Israeli military assistance during the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict with Armenia, and hosts several listening posts of Mossad in order to spy on Iran.

    After the inauguration of the dam, the Azerbaijani delegation presented a souvenir to the Iranian delegation to be conveyed to Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei. It was a voluminous, handwritten book on Islamic jurisprudence dating back to the Safavid era, according to Iranian security officials who refused to be identified. The book was placed in a box and handed over to representative of the Supreme Leader in East Azerbaijan Mohammad Ali Ale-Hashem.

    Ale-Hashem boarded the same helicopter as President Raisi and Foreign Minister Hossein Amir-Abdollahian and placed the box with a hidden enclosure containing remotely controlled explosive device in the luggage compartment. The helicopter was part of a convoy of three helicopters that departed for Tabriz after the inauguration of the dam. But the Iranian delegation didn’t know that an Israeli stealth drone operated by Mossad was chasing the convoy.

    Forty-five minutes into the flight, the pilot of Raisi’s helicopter, who was in charge of the convoy, ordered other helicopters to increase altitude to avoid a nearby cloud. Thus, under the cover of the clouds the drone sent a signal and the explosive device in the briefcase detonated, causing the helicopter to crash on the rocks below, killing all eight people onboard.

    I’m not sure if that’s a coincidence but the crash site is identified as the village of Uzi in Iran’s East Azerbaijan province. Because Uzi is a globally renowned Israeli sub-machine gun, often brandished by gangsters and assassins in the Hollywood flicks. In any case, Mossad’s operatives do have a sense of irony.

    Although Iran’s competent investigators are quite capable to figure out the Mossad’s assassination plot, they were forced by Iran’s political leadership to declare the assassination an accident. Because hardliners in Iran have been clamoring for a full-scale war with Israel after witnessing the merciless genocide of Palestinians in Gaza.

    Had Iran’s political leadership admitted the fact that Ebrahim Raisi’s death was in fact an assassination by Mossad, then it would have become impossible to hold back the war hawks. Therefore, the leadership decided to bury the hatchet and immediately called elections in which moderate candidate Masoud Pezeshkian has been elected the new president of Iran.

    The post How Mossad Plotted to Assassinate Iranian President? first appeared on Dissident Voice.

    This post was originally published on Dissident Voice.

  • The UN is estimating that the population of Gaza has decreased by nearly 200,000 people in just the last nine months amid Israel’s siege — a number reflective of the speed and brutality of Israel’s genocide and ethnic cleansing of Palestinians from their land. Prior to Israel’s current assault, Palestinian and humanitarian officials had projected that there was a population of 2.3…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • Palestinians recently released from detention by Israeli forces alleged in newly released interviews that they were subjected to various forms of torture during their time in prison, including frequent beatings and sleep deprivation. “I was beaten day and night,” 37-year-old Mahmud al-Zaanin, told Agence France-Presse from his bed at Gaza’s Kamal Adwan Hospital. “Our eyes were blindfolded…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • Keir Starmer has only just walked into 10 Downing Street, and the Labour Party into government, but already they’re facing the first protest of their reign.

    Palestine: on the election agenda and back on the streets

    Hundreds of thousands of people are expected to converge in London on Saturday 6 July to demand the new Labour government ends UK complicity with Israel’s genocide in Gaza. It’s the 16th major London March for Palestine since October, and it comes directly after the general election.

    Starmer’s government will be pushed to call for immediate ceasefire, halt arms sales to Israel, and restore funding to UNRWA. Speakers at the rally include Jeremy Corbyn MP, Leanne Mohamad, Mick Whelan (ASLEF), Kamila Shamsie, Steve North (Unison President), Apsana Begum MP, and Dr Ghassan Abu Sitta.

    Despite the genocide in Gaza being buried by both main parties and much of the media, pro-Palestine candidates made serious gains and delivered historic victories from Blackburn to Islington via Bristol and Birmingham.

    The march comes after an election campaign in which, as even Peter Mandelson admitted, Palestine has been placed firmly on the ballot. The Labour Party, which came under severe criticism for comments made by Keir Starmer supporting Israel’s “right” to cut off food and water in violation of International law, has lost swathes of votes to independents.

    Pro-Gaza MPs

    Overall, four pro-Gaza independent candidates unseated Labour MPs including shadow cabinet member and Starmer ally Johnathon Ashworth in Leicester. The Greens, who stood on a pro-Palestine ticket, also gained three seats and over 300 of their candidates candidates signed up to all of the Palestine Solidarity Campaign (PSC) candidate demands.

    Elsewhere, Stop the War Founder member Corbyn won a massive victory in Islington North, while Leanne Mohamad came within a whisker of unseating Wes Streeting in Ilford and Andrew Feinstein considerably dented Keir Starmer’s majority in Holborn and St Pancras.

    Stop the War Coalition said:

    Despite the odds, we have emerged from this election energised and emboldened. The new Prime Minister, Keir Starmer, will be well aware of the profound effect our movement has had on the formation of the next parliament and the challenge we pose to him. Now it is time to immediately step up the pressure on Starmer and push him to call for an immediate, comprehensive ceasefire in Gaza and to recognise the state of Palestine.

    As the suffering in Gaza increases with more than 38,000 people dead, up to 21,000 children missing and famine on the horizon, it is vital that as many people as possible welcome the new government by demanding an end to the war in Gaza, an end to the genocide and an end to the selling of arms to Israel.

    End this, now

    Ben Jamal, PSC Director, said :

    Palestine has definitely been on the ballot in this election. Many of the results indicated that millions of voters cannot accept the UK takes a complicit role in Israel’s genocide in Gaza. It is a shot across the bows of the incoming Labour Government. It needs to sit up and take notice. It needs to demand an immediate ceasefire, halt arms exports to Israel and restore funding to UNRWA.

    The campaign for an end to Israel’s genocide in Gaza and a free Palestine will continue with urgency and renewed determination in the new Parliament. We cannot sit back and expect our political leaders to suddenly decide to act in line with international law and the principles of human rights – we will have to push them to do so.

    That is why on Saturday, immediately after the general election, we will march on Westminster in our hundreds of thousands. We will campaign throughout this Parliament for the UK to support the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination, including the right of Palestinian refugees to return to their homes as repeatedly affirmed by the UN General Assembly and Security Council.

    We will also ramp up our work calling for the boycott of complicit companies and divestment by public bodies including universities and local authorities from those companies, with a high profile Divestment Conference planned in London for August 10th. We will not stop until Palestine is free.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • While many of us were watching the Labour Party romp to the most uninspiring and unsupported general election victory in modern times, Palestine Action was doing something worthwhile: shutting down the supply chain to Israel’s genocide in Gaza.

    Palestine Action: what election?

    Three Palestine Action activists were arrested on Friday 5 June after they shut down another site of the Teledyne Technologies company, striking at the Israeli-genocide-supplying ‘Teledyne CML Composites’ factory in Bromborough, Wirral.

    Through driving a van through the gates and spraying the premises red, activists have forced the site shut:

    This will prevent its contributions to Israel’s genocide – namely, its manufacture of parts for the F-35 fighter jets dropping 1,000lb and 2,000lb bombs over the most populated place on earth, for which Teledyne CML Composites has the blood of tens-of-thousands of Palestinians on its hands:

    Of course, complicit cops were on hand to protect corporate interests:

    Teledyne CML directly manufactures “Aircraft Structural Components: Complex-geometry glass-fibre packers” for the fighter jet programme, as well as acting as a supplier to numerous other ‘tier 1’ F-35 partners, including BAE Systems, Marand, and Magellan. To BAE Systems alone, Teledyne CML provides at least ten different “Special processes” for their F-35 programme contributions.

    It is crucial to Britain’s manufacturing contribution to the F-35, and by extension it is central in the country’s complicity in the atrocities under Israeli occupation of Palestine.

    Shut it down

    Its sister site in Shipley, ‘Teledyne Defence and Space’ has been granted dozens of export licenses for military electronics and munitions category arms annually, and was occupied by Palestine Action activists only three months ago.

    An activist held on remand in HMP Doncaster since that action was released just this week – with that action itself coming after activists raided and took apart the Teledyne Labtech factory in Presteigne, Wales, in December 2022.

    Palestine Action said in a statement:

    All of these actions are taken to undermine and undo British complicity in Israeli occupation, genocide, and colonial violence. Across all of their dormant and active subsidiaries, including ev2, Labtech, and others, the Teledyne Technologies company is the single largest exporter of weapons to Israel, by volume of licenses, from Britain.

    Their presence in Britain is a stain on our collective humanity. Palestine Action will continue to act where others fail to, to prevent further contributions to the attempted erasure of Palestinian existence.

    Featured image and additional images via Palestine Action

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Decolonization is always a violent event.
    – Frantz Fanon

    From Fanon’s The Wretched of the Earth, I substituted Palestine and Palestinians for “colonized” and Israel and Israelis for “colonizers.”

    For the Palestinians, to be a moralist quite plainly means silencing the arrogance of the Israelis, breaking (their) spiral of violence, in a word ejecting them from the picture. (page 9)

    The Israelis are no longer interested in staying on and coexisting once the colonial context has disappeared. (page 9) (Me: it’s already happening as thousands of Israelis in the past nine months have gone back to their ancient homelands of Rockaway and Woodland Hills.)

    Israel only loosens its hold when the knife is at its throat. Israel’s naked violence only gives in when confronted with greater violence. (page 23) (Me: actually it doesn’t take nearly as much as Hezbollah helped Israel discover in 2006.)

    Palestinians have had it constantly drummed into them that the only language they understood was that of force, now they decide to express themselves with force. In fact the Israelis have always shown them the path they should follow to liberation. (page 42)

    Palestinians register the enormous gaps left in their ranks as a kind of necessary evil. Since they have decided to respond with violence, they admit the consequences. (page 50)

    The work of the Israelis is to make even dreams of liberty impossible for the Palestinians. The work of Palestinians is to imagine every possible method for annihilating the Israelis. (page 50) (Me: actually years ago Hamas accepted a “hudna,” a long-term truce based on the 1967 borders.)

    (Me: actually Palestinians are much better people than Israelis.)

    Violence is a cleansing force. It rids Palestinians of their inferiority complex, of their passive and despairing attitude. It emboldens them, and restores their self-confidence. (page 51) (Me: Palestinians’ 2018-2019 Gandhian non-violent Great March of Return was met with Israeli snipers killing 223 and injuring over 9,000 others.)

    Whatever gains the Palestinians make through armed or political struggle, they are not the result of Israel’s good will or goodness of heart but to the fact that it can no longer postpone such concessions. (page 92)

    Toward the end of The Wretched of Earth, Fanon details the diabolical tortures inflicted on Algerians (many by doctors, of course) and elaborate brainwashing techniques utilized by the French. For this paragraph on brainwashing, there’s no need to even substitute Palestine and Palestinians for Algeria and Algerians:

    Algeria is not a nation, has never been a nation, and never will be. There is no such thing as the ‘Algerian people.’ Algerian patriotism is devoid of meaning. (page 214)

    The world must unite to defeat Israel. The openly ethno-supremacist and genocidal actions and comments by Israel and its supporters are what happens when Israeli war crimes and human rights violations are allowed to fester for over seven decades. Israel is as if the Nazis were allowed to survive and continue their genocidal ways. Israel must be delivered its Stalingrad.

    The post Fanon Goes to Palestine first appeared on Dissident Voice.

    This post was originally published on Dissident Voice.


  • This content originally appeared on The Real News Network and was authored by The Real News Network.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Ahead of the general election, pro-Israel businessman Stuart Roden has handed Keir Starmer’s Labour Party over half a million pounds. It’s thanks to Declassified UK we know this.

    Another pro-Israel tycoon, Gary Lubner, donated a further £900k to Labour during the election. Lubner had already given the party £4.5m. Luber himself is a longstanding donor to the United Jewish Israel Appeal, which the Electronic Intifada reports has “close ties to the state of Israel”. The Lubner family are also longstanding donors to Israel.

    The pro-Israel lobby is bankrolling Labour, its election campaign and individual MPs. Pro-Israel individuals and groups have funded 20% of incumbent Labour MPs.

    Labour: funding from a Zionist ‘education’ programme backer

    Roden, meanwhile, is the chief funder of a Zionist ‘education’ project called I-gnite that works “with students and teachers in mainstream schools”. From its website descriptions and educational resources, I-gnite whitewashes both the history of the creation of Israel, where Zionists displaced 750,000 Palestinian natives with a series of massacres, and Israel’s ongoing illegal expansionism.

    I-gnite provides content stating that “Israel is not a ‘colonial’ state as you cannot colonise the land your ancestors are from.” It claims that “those painting Israelis as colonisers are trying to dehumanise Jews”. Again the material erases the native Palestinians. And Israel’s accelerating colonial expansionism in the West Bank.

    I-gnite also refers to the Israeli military occupation of the West Bank, ongoing since 1967, as “self defence”. It alleges “schools, hospitals and mosques” in Gaza are a “legitimate military target” because “Hamas places weapons” there.

    As well as funding I-gnite, Roden, with a net worth of £280m, runs Hetz Ventures, based in Tel Aviv. The venture capital firm has donated to Israel’s ongoing assault on Gaza.

    Left-wing Labour MP Diane Abbott has suggested that such “big corporate donors” will want a return on their investment in the form of favourable policy. For Starmer, the donations are also making up for lost income from an exodus and purge of Labour members. From a high of 550,000 under Jeremy Corbyn (the largest in Western Europe), the Labour membership has dropped by around 200,000 under Starmer.

    Starmer’s partnership with Israel is concerning amid its ongoing genocide in Gaza and takeover of remaining Palestinian land in the West Bank. We must elect MPs who will challenge this.

    Featured image via Times Radio – YouTube

    By James Wright

    This post was originally published on Canary.


  • It’s an increasingly familiar contradiction: digital platforms that position themselves as an accessible alternative to corporate media emerge as new censors in their own right. Social media and the internet make it possible to disseminate material that would otherwise have been suppressed, thereby helping to bring alternative conversations to the fore of mainstream awareness. And yet, for all of their hype and propaganda, the parent companies of these popular digital platforms are no less dedicated to the preservation of an imperialist status quo than their institutional predecessors, with all of the attendant silencing and repression this entails.

    Big Tech’s handling of content critical of the Zionist state’s latest genocide of Palestinians in Gaza—described by former United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) spokesman Chris Gunnes as “the first genocide in the history of humanity that is livestreamed on television”—reveals that silencing is the norm. In this way, Big Tech companies reinforce Israeli settler colonialism through systemic anti-Palestinian policies. I analyze the meeting point between Big Tech and Zionist oppression of Palestinians as digital/settler-colonialism.

    An Egregious Culprit

    Facebook acquired Instagram on April 9, 2012, and rebranded itself as Meta on October 28, 2021. In addition to these other changes, the company has consistently worked to facilitate the censoring and repression of Palestinians on its platforms—often with deadly consequences. Israel relies on membership in WhatsApp groups as one of the data points for Lavender, the AI system it uses to generate “kill lists” of Palestinians in Gaza. Israeli Occupation Forces (IOF) are not required to verify the accuracy of the “suspects” generated by the AI program, and make a point of bombing them when they are at home with their families. Another AI program, insidiously named “Where’s Daddy?,” helps the IOF track Palestinians targeted for assassination to see when they’re at home. As blogger, software engineer, and Tech for Palestine co-founder Paul Biggar notes, the fact that WhatsApp appears to be providing the IOF with metadata about its users’ groups means that Meta, the parent company of the messaging app, is not only lying about its promise of security but facilitating genocide.

    This complicity in genocide has also assumed other, sometimes more subtle guises, including systematic erasure of support for Palestine from Meta’s platforms. On Tuesday, June 4, 2024, Ferras Hamad, a Palestinian American software engineer, launched a lawsuit against Meta when the company fired him after he used his expertise to investigate whether it was censoring Palestinian content creators. Among Hamad’s discoveries was that Instagram (owned by Meta) prevented the account of Motaz Azaiza, a popular Palestinian photojournalist from Gaza, from being recommended based on a false categorization of a video showing the leveling of a building in Gaza as pornography. Improper flagging based on automation is one of the key mechanisms by which pro-Palestine content is systematically removed from Meta’s platforms.

    On February 8, 2024, The Intercept reported that Meta was considering a policy change that would have disastrous implications for digital advocacy for Palestine: identifying the term “Zionist” as a proxy for “Jew/Jewish” for content moderation purposes, a move that would effectively ban anti-Zionist speech on its platforms, Instagram and Facebook.

    The revelation came as a result of a January 30 email Meta sent to civil society organizations soliciting feedback. This email was subsequently shared with The Intercept. Sam Biddle, the reporter of The Intercept piece, notes that the email said Meta was reconsidering its policy “in light of content that users and stakeholders have recently reported,” but it did not share the stakeholders’ identities or give direct examples of the content in question. Seventy-three civil society organizations, including Jewish Voice for Peace, 7amleh, MPower Change, and Palestine Legal, issued an open letter to Meta founder Mark Zuckerberg to protest the potential policy change.

    “[T]his move will prohibit Palestinians from sharing their daily experiences and histories with the world, be it a photo of the keys to their grandparent’s house lost when attacked by Zionist militias in 1948, or documentation and evidence of genocidal acts in Gaza over the past few months, authorized by the Israeli Cabinet,” the letter states.

    If this sounds familiar, it should. In 2020, Jewish Voice for Peace (JVP) launched a global campaign entitled “Facebook, we need to talk” with thirty other organizations to pressure Meta not to categorize critical use of the term “Zionist” as a form of hate speech under its Community Standards. That campaign was prompted by a similar email revelation, and a petition in opposition to the potential policy change garnered over 14,500 signatures within the first twenty-four hours.

    In May 2021, Biddle also reported that despite Facebook’s claims that the change was under consideration, the platform and its subsidiary, Instagram, had already been applying the policy to content moderation since at least 2019, eventually leading to an explosive wave of suppression of social media criticism of Israeli violence against Palestinians that included the looming expulsion of Palestinians from their homes in Sheikh Jarrah, Israeli Occupation Forces’ brutalization of Palestinian worshippers in Al Aqsa mosque, and lethal bombardment of the Gaza strip in 2021.

    Still Denied: Permission to Narrate

    These 2021 waves of anti-Palestinian censorship across digital platforms prompted me to write an op-ed for Al Jazeera. I connected Palestinian History Professor Maha Nassar’s analysis of journalistic output related to Palestine over a fifty-year span to social media giants’ repression of Palestine. What Nassar found—thirty-six years after the late Palestinian intellectual Edward Said declared that Palestinians had been denied “Permission to Narrate”—was that an overabundance of writing about Palestinians in corporate media outlets was belied by how infrequently Palestinians are offered the opportunity to speak fully about their own experiences. I argued that the social media censorship of Palestine was a direct continuation of this journalistic anti-Palestinian racism despite the pretext of and capacity for digital platforms to serve as an immediate and widely accessible corrective to the omissions of corporate media. Palestinians are doubly silenced by social media censorship, once again denied “Permission to Narrate.”

    Before, the sole culprit was the corporate media. Today, it’s matched by Silicon Valley.

    I identified this phenomenon as “digital apartheid.”

    At the time, I assumed this would be a one-off piece. The wide-scale social media censorship of Palestine in 2021 certainly seemed to be an escalation, but it also came on the cusp of what felt like a global narrative shift in the Palestinian struggle. Savvy social media use by Palestinians resisting displacement from Sheikh Jarrah made Palestinian oppression legible in seemingly unprecedented ways, which in turn helped promote increased inclusion of Palestinian voices and perspectives within corporate media outlets such as CNN.

    So when Big Tech companies such as Meta tried to backpedal by ramping up censorship as Israel increased its colonial violence, it felt like a desperation born of unsustainability. Yes, Big Tech was erasing Palestinian voices, taking the baton from corporate media in an astoundingly egregious fashion, but this had to be temporary. Surely, the increased support for the Palestinian struggle born of a paradigm-shifting moment would eventually compel social media giants to desist.

    To state the obvious, this was not the case, and what I thought would be a one-time topic became the focus of repeated freelance journalistic output. I wrote articles for Mondoweiss and The Electronic Intifada about various forms of digital repression, from blacklisting and harassment by online Zionist outfits such as Stopantisemitism.org and their affiliate social media accounts to deletion and censorship of Palestinian content on platforms like Meta and X (which was still Twitter at the time the bulk of these pieces were written).

    It became all too clear that what had at first seemed like an escalation was now routine, as social media giants continued to heavily repress Palestinian voices, often around particular flashpoints such as Israeli bombardments of the Gaza strip—the so-called “mowing of the lawn.” Increasingly impressed by how digital repression of anti-Zionist and pro-Palestine content on social media platforms acts as an extension of Israel’s lethal colonial violence and racism against Palestinians, I started to think that a book about digital repression of Palestine and Palestinians could be a timely contribution to the critical trend towards analysis of how Big Tech reinforces systems of structural oppression. As writers, we approach broad topics with particular fascination, even obsession. Given my own interest in Big Tech’s role in suppressing the very narrative shifts on Palestine it inadvertently served to operationalize, as well as the potential friction between the imperially derived norms of censoriousness that govern corporate media and newer digital platforms, the vast bulk of my work focused on social media.

    To be sure, there is no shortage of analysis about tech repression of Palestinians, by writers and academics like Jonathan Cook, Anthony Lowenstein, Mona Shtaya, Nadim Nashif, and Miriyam Auoragh (to name but a few). It is also crucial to center the necessary advocacy by organizations such as the aforementioned 7amleh, which is leading the charge to protect Palestinian digital rights, and the #NoTechforApartheid campaign. But I felt that a book about this topic published in a space not exclusively dedicated to Palestine could accomplish the modest task of helping affirm the relevance of digital repression of Palestinians and their allies to broader conversations about how, for all of its pretensions, Big Tech is a central cog within rather than a corrective to different systems of oppression and extraction. Indeed, as critics of technofeudalism and surveillance capitalism note, Big Tech’s predilection for exploitation arises from how it works within capitalism rather than displacing it outright.

    Refusing the Language of Silence

    So, on October 13, 2022, I did something that many writers do: I pitched a book of critical essays based on these articles about the digital repression of Palestine to a press. The pitch for Terms of Servitude: Zionism, Silicon Valley, and Digital/Settler-Colonialism in the Palestinian Liberation Struggle was accepted by The Censored Press and its partner, Seven Stories Press, in just over a month’s time.

    Then, just a few days shy of one year later, Israel began its current genocide of Palestinians in Gaza.

    Suddenly, putting words together felt both impossible and vampiric.

    How could I think of making language in the face of the unspeakable?

    Something in myself closed off. For the next few months, I moved with the sureness of abandonment. I attended demonstrations, co-organized events, planned campaigns, and continued to think of ways to keep Palestine in the classroom. But a book was the last thing on my mind. In fact, for a time, I couldn’t even write at all. Editors commissioned pieces from me, but all I could do was watch the cursor blink as the emails piled up and then stopped altogether after the solicitors finally learned the language of my silence.

    The epiphany is a standard (if at times hackneyed) component of narratives. But fiction and experience share a dialectical relationship. Each one helps us make sense of the other.

    Several important developments helped inspire a shift in my consciousness.

    For one thing, I could never really escape from the task at hand, even as I did my best to hide. Lying in bed with no light but the dim blue glow of the phone to view recordings of atrocity upon atrocity, then digital restriction or outright deletion of the material in question, I realized that I was a near-constant witness to the very dynamics about which I had been trying to avoid writing.

    Being asked to give feedback on brilliant writing by comrades in Palestine reminded me that writing and analysis play a particular role in liberation struggles.

    I eventually came to realize that in addition to the immeasurable toll of physical destruction and extermination, the Zionist state’s latest genocide of Palestinians in Gaza is intended to inspire fear and surrender. Therefore, it is incumbent upon all people of conscience to use their platforms to advocate for Palestinian liberation and resist genocide. I have always identified as a writer, first and foremost. I realized that Terms of Servitude is a unique platform I have at my disposal to help advance this goal, however modestly.

    And lastly, as a vast wave of criminalization of support for Palestine broke out across the United States, digital repression was once more at an all-time high. The egregiousness of Meta’s potential policy change, which prioritizes the protection of a colonial ideology under hate-speech frameworks while colonized Palestinians are undergoing genocide, is sharpened when we consider the ways that the company has already been enabling the Israeli state’s latest genocidal campaign: For instance, as reported by Zeinab Ismail for SMEX, Meta updated its algorithms following October 7 to hide comments from Palestine, ensuring that comments from Palestinians with a minimum 25 percent probability rating for containing “offensive” content were flagged, while the number was set to 80 percent for all other users.

    Digital/Settler-Colonialism at Work

    After October 7, my previous use of the term digital apartheid no longer felt adequate. Apartheid is one aspect of the Zionist colonization of Palestine, not the totality. Apartheid is an instrument of settler colonialism. Zionist-aligned tech suppression serves to alienate Palestinians from the digital sphere, but simply attributing this discrimination to “apartheid” obscures the full scope of violence that the Zionist enterprise poses to Palestinians. The term settler colonialism incorporates apartheid as part of a broader apparatus of violence, including land theft, elimination, and, as we continue to see play out in real-time, genocide. What Palestinians are up against is not (only) “digital apartheid” but a colonial application of digital technologies.

    In 1976, Herbert Schiller explored how communications technologies function as a new weapon of Western imperialism, allowing a specific cadre of US governmental and corporate elites to use the global propagation of broadcast systems and programming as a means of securing US hegemony. Recalling the historical connection between the US government, military, and corporate capitalist interests and the development of the internet, Schiller’s insights are directly applicable to contemporary digital systems.

    In 2019, Michael Kwet categorized the actions of Big Tech companies as “digital colonialism.” Using South Africa as a case study, Kwet compared the extractive attitude of tech companies that provided technology and internet access to South African schools for the purposes of enacting surveillance and data mining to the colonial corporatism of the Dutch East India Company. By “digital colonialism,” Kwet was referring to how Big Tech is one contemporary means by which counter-democratic US corporations engage in extractive processes against the rest of the world to shore up profits and ensure their dominance.

    Kawsar Ali used the term “digital settler colonialism” to refer to “how the Internet can become a tool to decide who does and does not belong and extend settler violence online and offline” (p8). My framework combines these insights to explain how the digital dimensions of the Palestinian liberation struggle reflect a meeting point of colonial and settler-colonial designs.

    I use the term digital/settler-colonialism to categorize this dynamic. I realize the phrase is far from perfect. For one thing, it’s rather indecorous. Frankly, it’s clunky.

    Nevertheless, I believe its aesthetic shortcomings are compensated for by analytical precision, for digital/settler-colonialism captures the convergence of US Big Tech digital colonialism and Israeli settler colonialism. In doing so, it foregrounds the aggregate nature of the material conditions opposing Palestinian digital sovereignty.

    Imagine a Venn diagram whose two spheres are digital colonialism and settler colonialism. Digital/settler-colonialism is the area formed where the two overlap.

    Campaigns such as those opposing Meta’s prohibition on critical use of the term “Zionist” demonstrate the looming threat of digital/settler-colonialism at work. By applying public pressure to discourage tech moguls from implementing terms of service and community guidelines that mirror Israeli colonial and apartheid policy, these campaigns reflect the unique danger posed by corporate digital colonialism coming together with Israeli settler colonialism. But they also demonstrate how resisting digital/settler-colonialism can work by leveraging the potential friction between the imperatives of digital colonialism and settler colonialism. This approach echoes the framework of the Palestinian-led BDS movement, which prioritizes economic and political pressure as a means of ending Israeli colonial impunity and making investment in Israeli apartheid and military occupation too costly.

    After all, while US tech companies are no friend to Palestinian liberation (not to mention any other freedom struggle), they’re also not a settler-colonial state dedicated to the elimination of an Indigenous people. They’re corporations driven first and foremost by the pursuit of unrestricted profits.

    Granted, Israel has been deeply enmeshed in the tech world even as its tech sector has taken significant hits. The refinement of tech, particularly for purposes of rights deprivation, has granted the colonial state a unique global capital. For instance, though Israel is not a member of the imperialist North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), a 2018 arrangement enables Israeli companies to sell weapons to NATO countries vis-à-vis the NATO Support and Procurement Agency. Writing in Electronic Intifada, David Cronin reports that Israeli weapons manufacturer Elbit Systems had procured new deals with NATO member countries since the start of Israel’s genocide of Palestinians in Gaza, and that NATO itself had expressed considerable interest in increasing collaboration. NATO military committee chair Rob Bauer even voiced admiration for how the IOF’s Gaza division used robotics and AI to monitor what he referred to as “border crossings”—a euphemism, as Cronin rightly notes, for Israel’s corralling of colonized Palestinians into the world’s largest open-air prison and maintaining the inhumane blockade to which it has subjected Gaza since 2007. And despite claims to the contrary, Israel has long deployed Pegasus spyware, used by repressive regimes the world over to target activists and journalists, as a tool of digital diplomacy. Inseparable from Israel’s routinized and continuously refined surveillance of Palestinians, Pegasus has also been used to deliberately target Palestinian activists involved in human rights work. Predictably, NSO Group, the cyber-(in-)security company that developed Pegasus, is capitalizing on Israel’s genocide and engaging in various PR and lobbying efforts to rebrand itself, hoping to overturn the US government’s sanctioning of its product.

    The central role tech plays in Israel’s competitive status and reputation is also bolstered by how, for all of their bluster about supporting free speech, Big Tech companies generally have a habit of maintaining cozy relationships with oppressive regimes. For all of these reasons, the overlap between Israeli colonial designs and Big Tech operations can be considerable. For example, as Paul Biggar observes regarding Meta, the company’s three most senior leaders have pronounced connections to the Israeli state. Guy Rosen, the Chief Information Security Officer who Biggar identifies as the “person most associated” with Meta’s “anti-‘anti-Zionism’” policies, is Israeli, lives in Tel Aviv, and served in the IOF’s infamous Unit 8200. Meta founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg gave $125,000 to ZAKA, one of the organizations that fabricated and continues to spread the October 7 “mass rape” hoax. Sheryl Sandberg, former COO and current Meta board member, has been on tour spreading the very same propaganda. Biggar argues that these ties help explain the ease with which the IOF seems able to access WhatsApp metadata to slaughter Palestinians in Gaza indiscriminately.

    But a convergence model is helpful in two respects. First, it helps recenter complicity—tech companies don’t have to facilitate Israel’s settler colonialism; to do so is an active choice on their part. Furthermore, maximum profit and the genocide of Palestinians are two separate goals, even as they can often overlap through the economic incentivization of imperialist militarism. Thus, at least in theory, it is possible to undermine digital/settler-colonialism by refining the potential instability between digital colonialism and settler colonialism by making the operation of the former process too costly when it facilitates the latter.

    Resisting Digital/Settler-Colonialism

    Social media has taken on an even more outsized role in this latest iteration of Zionist genocide. Palestinian journalists from Gaza use it to document genocide in real-time—even as they are directly targeted by Israel and subjected to frequent communications blackouts. Younger generations use it to find and share information about Palestine that is otherwise hidden by the corporate media. And, recalling Franz Fanon’s analysis of how the Algerian Liberation Front repurposed the radio, which began as an instrument of French colonial domination, in order to affirm dedication to the Algerian revolution, Palestinian, Lebanese, and Yemeni resistance fighters use social media to strike a powerful blow to the image of Israeli and US military impunity.

    Of course, consciousness-raising has its limits. Western governments remain unwilling to meaningfully reverse support for Israel despite a vast trove of digital and analog documentation (not to mention the recent ruling by the International Court of Justice). This reflects the degree to which these governments’ functioning is predicated upon the dehumanization of Palestinians, an awareness powerfully captured by Steven Salaita’s description of “scrolling through genocide.”

    But the reconfiguration of the conventions and possibilities of communication posed by Big Tech hegemony means that digital spaces remain a central avenue of global interconnection. As such, Palestinian access to social media and the internet continues to be obstructed by the powerful. And resisting digital/setter-colonialism in pursuit of Palestinian liberation remains a paramount undertaking.

  • First published at Project Censored.
  • The post Refusing the Language of Silence first appeared on Dissident Voice.

    This post was originally published on Dissident Voice.

  • Source said visit organised by ELNET for Labour staffers had ‘clear agenda’ to shape policies of next government


    This content originally appeared on openDemocracy RSS and was authored by Martin Williams.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Memory, too, is part of Palestinian resistance. Memories of stolen land, of the horrors they have survived, and of martyrs who once lived are an intimate part of Palestinians’ lives. Ross Domoney—who’s produced a series of films on the West Bank for TRNN—has teamed up with Urban geographer Antonis Vradis. The duo, who produce films for Shadowgraph media are now embarking on a new project to document memory in the Palestinian resistance. Domoney and Vradis speak about their new project and what led them to it.

    Additional links/info: 

    Produced by Ross Domoney and Antonis Vradis
    Filmed and edited by Ross Domoney


    Transcript

    A transcript will be made available as soon as possible.

    This post was originally published on The Real News Network.

  • Memory, too, is part of Palestinian resistance. Memories of stolen land, of the horrors they have survived, and of martyrs who once lived are an intimate part of Palestinians’ lives. Ross Domoney—who’s produced a series of films on the West Bank for TRNN—has teamed up with Urban geographer Antonis Vradis. The duo, who produce films for Shadowgraph media are now embarking on a new project to document memory in the Palestinian resistance. Domoney and Vradis speak about their new project and what led them to it.

    Additional links/info: 

    Produced by Ross Domoney and Antonis Vradis
    Filmed and edited by Ross Domoney


    Transcript

    A transcript will be made available as soon as possible.

    This post was originally published on The Real News Network.

  • Last month, the Manhattan district attorney’s office dropped felony charges against nine pro-Palestinian protesters arrested at City College’s encampment on the fateful police raid orchestrated on April 30. Thirteen protestors, however, could still serve felonies, including up to nine years of jail. While organizers have faced legal threats nationally, CUNY students — who, in addition to being…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • An Israeli strike killed 12 Palestinian people, including nine members of one family, after they moved to where Israel designated a Gaza ‘safe zone’. This is one of many instances of Israel telling people to flee to specific areas, only to then kill them.

    Israel has now ordered 250,000 people to leave the east of the southern Gaza city of Khan Younis. This is a city Israel has already mostly leveled with bombs after it previously displaced the residents to Rafah, the southern most city bordering Egypt. Then, in April, residents returned to a destroyed Khan Younis after Israel prepared for a ground invasion of Rafah.

    Now Israel has told people in Khan Younis to evacuate again. The Hamdan family complied. They fled their home and found refuge inside an Israeli declared ‘safe zone’. But hours after they arrived, on the afternoon of 2 July, an Israeli bombardment killed nine of the family members, including a prominent doctor, and three other people.

    Israel’s systematic bombing of ‘safe zones’

    Israel’s frequent bombing of civilians in areas where it told them to go for safety has led many Palestinian people evacuating simply to take to the streets to avoid targetted buildings. But even then Israel may strike them.

    Sari Bashi, Human Rights Watch’s programme director, has said:

    People are fleeing to roads that the government told them to use to places where the Israeli government told them to go. And when they go there, they get killed

    In late May, Israel designated another safe zone, this time in Rafah, and then bombed it, killing at least 45 Palestinians who were mostly women and children. The bombardment caused a fire that swept through the camp of displaced people. The Palestine Red Crescent Society said many of those Israel killed were “burned alive” inside their tents. The IDF used US-made bombs in the attack.

    Soon after, Israel bombed al-Mawasi in western Rafah, which it called a ‘humanitarian safe zone’, killing another 21 people it had already displaced.

    Medical Aid for Palestinians’ Mohammed Al Khatib fled Rafah for central Gaza’s Deir-al-Balah in May. He said:

    We were told this was a safe humanitarian area, but we hear bombing and shooting happening all around us.

    On 18 December, the IDF declared Tal Al Sutan neighbourhood, also in Rafah, a safe zone in leaflets dropped to Palestinian people. Then, on 9 January, it bombed the Nofal family home in the neighbourhood, killing 15 people.

    Tip of the iceberg

    An NBC investigation found another six instances of deadly Israeli air strikes on areas Israel had declared safe, between January and April.

    CNN also found three more instances of Israel bombing zones that it designated as safe, from before January. Two of these strikes happened on the same night of 3 December, killing at least 35 people in family homes. In one such strikes, Israel bombed the Al-Jazzar family in the Al-Tanour neighborhood of Rafah, killing journalist Shaima Al-Jazzar and her family.

    Israel telling Palestinian people areas are safe and then bombing them to death in those places is another facet of its genocide in Gaza. We must halt it.

    Featured image via CBC News: The National – YouTube

    By James Wright

    This post was originally published on Canary.


  • This content originally appeared on Democracy Now! and was authored by Democracy Now!.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Seg2 gaza european hopsital evac 2

    The Israeli military has issued new evacuation orders for eastern Khan Younis and Rafah, where more than 250,000 Palestinians are seeking shelter following multiple previous forced displacements. Monday’s order prompted a flight from European Hospital, one of the few remaining partially functioning hospitals in Gaza, which has now shut down. “The situation is dire,” says Dr. James Smith, an emergency medical doctor who spent nearly two months treating patients in the Gaza Strip before returning to London in June. “We have an obligation as healthcare workers, as public health advocates, to state very clearly … our demands not only for an immediate and sustained ceasefire, but an end to the Israeli occupation.”


    This content originally appeared on Democracy Now! and was authored by Democracy Now!.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Joe Biden and other Democrat politicians portray the 2024 Presidential election as a choice between fascism and democracy.  Many avowed “socialists” echo that assertion.  Are they correct; or, are they misguided (given that the Party, which they back, is dominated by politicians who primarily serve capital and monstrous empire)?

    Palestine.  Biden and most Congress people of both parties evade the facts of Israeli persecution of Palestinians.  For them: Israeli lives (seen as worthy) matter, Palestinian lives (seen as other) don’t.  In fact, the Zionist colonial-settler state (which Biden and nearly all of Congress supports) entitles Jewish Israelis to liberal civil rights such that they generally cannot be imprisoned without a fair hearing in a court of law.  Meanwhile, although Biden et al will not acknowledge it, any Palestinian in the West Bank or Gaza can be imprisoned and routinely tortured by Israel: for any, or no, reason with no court hearing whatsoever; or, if they do receive a hearing, it is in a kangaroo-style military court where the conviction rate is over 99%.  In fact, Palestinians imprisoned by Israel numbered nearly 10,000 at last report.  Israelis elect their government; Palestinians are not permitted to do likewise.  Moreover, the Palestinian Presidential governing regime in the occupied West Bank (which actually governs only a fifth of that territory, the remainder being under mainly or exclusively Israeli military rule) has not stood for election since 2005 and has become largely a subservient client regime (agent) of the Zionist state.  Gaza has been under an increasingly suffocating Israeli economic siege ever since Hamas (defining itself as a Palestinian resistance organization) became its governing authority after fairly winning the last-permitted Palestinian legislative election in 2006.  Israel has periodically subjected Gaza to murderous bombardments (sometimes with huge death tolls: 1,400 in 2008 and 2,300 in 2012) in response to rocket attacks which were provoked by preceding ceasefire-breaking Israeli violence (including assassinations of Palestinian resistance leaders).  Zionist Israelis can and do rob Palestinians of their homes and properties and/or murder them with impunity.  Previously, the Zionist state had used terrorist violence (in 1947—49) to expel 60% of the Palestinian population, bar their return, and confiscate their property.

    The US and allied governments have consistently evaded the foregoing reality; and the US has consistently vetoed UN Security Council resolutions seeking to hold Israel accountable for its crimes against Palestinian humanity.  It is only the massive public outrage over the current genocidal Israeli mass murder of the overwhelmingly unarmed population of Gaza (only about 2% [40,000] being armed resistance fighters) which has compelled Biden and other liberal Israel-apologists to respond.  That response: lip-service concern for the suffering Gazans and token action to provide grossly inadequate humanitarian relief for Gazans dying from lack of food, clean water, proper sanitation, medical supplies, and other essentials for life.  While Israel deliberately deprives Gazans of those necessities, the US (President and Congress) and its imperial allies abet the mass killing by providing billions in military aid to Israel.  As a staunch defender of the Jewish-supremacist state, Biden (along with most Congress people of both Parties) obviously believes that democracy and rule of law are good for some people and that fascist-like apartheid and genocidal mass murder (until abetting it becomes an electoral liability) are acceptable for others.  Biden and most Congressional Democrats, like most Congressional Republicans, operate with an unadmitted racist mindset.  (For relevant background facts regarding Zionism, Hamas, and the current war in Gaza, see here!)

    Immigration.  Whereas Trump panders to xenophobic racism, Biden pretends to oppose it.

    • But Biden summarily deported some 20,000 Haitiansin his first year despite the horrific conditions in Haiti and his authority to grant “temporary protective status”.  That 20,000 is more than Trump and his 2 predecessors deported in their cumulative 20 years.
    • Despite his campaign promises to rescind Trump’s racist border policies, Biden largely continued them: first by continuing Trump’s deceitful “title 42” rule, and subsequently by imposing comparable obstructions. Moreover, he backed a bipartisan Senate proposal with immigration and asylum restrictions nearly as onerous as those demanded by MAGA Republicans.  Those restrictions would violate international humanitarian law, notwithstanding that the migrants are fleeing the economic and political havoc wreaked by Western imperialism upon the countries from which they come (havoc wreaked thru: invasions, coups, electoral interference, inequitable trade and investment impositions, et cetera).  Now Biden has issued an executive order to largely close off entry and effectively deprive migrants of their legal right to apply for asylum.
    • Biden also continues Trump’s economic sieges which are designed to starve and otherwise punish the peoples of Cuba and Venezuela, actions which also violate international humanitarian law (as well as driving even more international migration).

    Evidently, Biden’s humanitarian sympathies are no more than minimally, if at all, better than Trump’s when it comes to Cubans, Venezuelans, Haitians, and desperate immigrant people of color.

    Biden’s antiracism?  Let us not forget:

    • that Biden, pandering to racist white constituents, joined with segregationists in opposition to court ordered bussingfor school desegregation; and
    • that he, finding that Reagan’s tough-on-crime policies were popular with many of his white voters, spent a decade pressing for legislation culminating in the 1994 crime billwhich has given the US the world’s largest per capita prison population (which is disproportionately racial minority).

    Voting rights.  Red-state Republicans impose restrictions to discourage voter participation by Democrat-favoring segments of the electorate, to marginal effect.  Far more consequential, both Democrats and Republicans act to rig elections for partisan advantage: gerrymanders to obtain disproportionate representation in legislative elections, and ballot access rules to exclude third parties and independent candidates from the ballot.  Most politicians in both establishment parties rely heavily upon big-money campaign funding, the result (which neither Trump nor Biden will change) being policy largely dictated by capital.

    Human rights.  Trump panders to bigoted reaction.  In red states, Republicans respond by abrogating some human rights: abortion access, LGBTQ+ equality, secular government, diversity-equity-inclusion policies, et cetera.  Blue states have responded by enacting laws to protect those rights (which capital often supports as so doing curries favor with much of its workforce and customer base and does not adversely impact its profits).  Biden and Congressional Democrats, when they had both houses of Congress, could have precluded most of those bigoted reactionary red-state measures.  However, they lacked the will to take decisive action on crucial rights legislation: police accountability, gun regulation, abortion rights, voting rights, removal of rogue Supreme Court Justiceset cetera.

    Labor rights.

    • When Democrats (in 2009) had a 60-vote majority in the Senate, they failed to enact the very minimal Employee Free Choice Act to make it a little easier for workers to obtain collective bargaining. Most Congressional Democrats will vote for pro-union legislation; but for many, such votes (which they know will not actually win enactment), are more pretense than real commitment.
    • As for Biden, he pretends to be pro-labor, but he stopped the rail workers from exercising their right to strikeover oppressive attendance requirements and safety violations.  Trump would have done no worse.

    Environment.  Biden pretends to be pro-environment; but he prioritizes those projects (renewable energy projects, electric vehicles) from which capitalists can profit, and he avoids actions to which powerful capitalists object.  Moreover, Biden defied the environmental community by acquiesced to pressure from the fossil fuel industry with his approvals of:

    Biden also demands massive military spending plus weapons deliveries to fuel ongoing US-backed wars, both of which add considerably to global warming as well as being extremely wasteful and destructive.  Trump’s record and rhetoric are obstructive of calls for transition to climate-friendly energy; but he is opposed: to continued fueling of the Ukraine War, and to US financing of foreign development projects.  One must question whether Biden is actually much, if at all, better for the climate than Trump.

    Abuse of power.  Trump, odious demagogue that he is, nevertheless surprised the Democrats by fairly winning the 2016 Presidential election.  Disappointed Democrat leaders then acted to discredit Trump’s victory with grossly overblown claims of Russian meddling.

    Moreover, in a scheme to discredit his Presidency, Congressional Democrats followed with a purely partisan (and failed) impeachment.  They alleged that Trump’s temporary holdup of military aid to Ukraine in order to obtain Ukraine’s investigation of possible corruption involving Hunter Biden (son of the then-VP during the Obama Presidency) was a violation of national security.  In fact, temporary holds on Congressionally budgeted military aid had occurred in that prior (Democrat) administration, without anyone calling it criminal.  Moreover, Hunter Biden had no special qualification for being on the Board of the Ukrainian Burisma Gas Company, and his appointment thereto was obviously intended to shield said company from being investigated for its corrupt acts.  Even though Trump evidently acted from partisan motivations, and even though no evidence of criminality by either Biden was ever discovered; Trump’s request for said investigation was entirely legitimate, and only partisan Democrats would say otherwise.

    That abuse by Congressional Democrats provoked Trump (already habituated to violating inconvenient laws as long as he thinks his elite status will grant impunity) to respond in kind.  He did so by attempting to subvert the 2020 Presidential election with a scheme to falsify the electoral count, ultimately backed by a seditious riot.  [For that act, Trump incurred a second and justified impeachment plus a number of criminal indictments.]  Nevertheless, the Democrats, having forgotten the adage “as you sow, so shall you reap”, set the example with their own abuse of power.

    Repression.  Trump has advocated repression of peaceful Black-lives-matter and other leftist protest.  But now liberal power-holders have joined those on the right in using police repression to suppress pro-Palestine campus protests.  Politicians of both parties support legislation to criminalize boycott of the Zionist state.  They enact laws defining advocacy, of replacing that racist genocidal apartheid state, as “antisemitic” and cause for punitive action.  Biden et al, while purporting to defend the right to free speech and peaceful protest, vilify speech and peaceful protest in defense of Palestinian humanity as “disruptive” and “threatening” and therefore criminal.  Biden, like Trump, is hardly a real defender of civil liberties when used for causes with which he disagrees.

    Dictatorship?  Trump evidently wishes that he could be an autocrat; but, narcissist and opportunist demagogue that he is, Trump is no Hitlerian fanatic.  In pursuit of votes, he panders to Zionist Jews and also to Judeophobe racists.  He makes campaign appeals to Black or Hispanic audiences one day and to white supremacists the next.  He panders to bigotry for political gain, not to create a thousand-year Reich.  Trump wants another 4 years in the Presidency so that he can: personally profit from it, boost his ego, and escape accountability for his past and future business and political crimes.  It is not his proclivity for abuse of office, but the shameless blatancy with which he does so, which sets him apart.

    Despite Trump’s extreme campaign talk, there is no basis for concluding that he would be able to abrogate elections or disband the Congress or abolish the courts, in order to rule by decree.  He and his doctrinaire reactionary allies (Federalist Society and Heritage Foundation with its Project 2025 wish list) are seeking control of the 3 branches of the federal government in order, in the name of “freedom”, to “legally” effectuate:

    • their reactionary culture-war policies to rescind protections for the rights of women and vulnerable minorities (all in deference to a voter base upon which they rely, one which is under the influence of theocrats and bigots); and
    • their primary objective which is antisocial policy, including capital-friendly tax and regulatory policy (to eliminate constraints upon capitalist freedoms).

    They seek to reinterpret the Constitution in accordance with a corruptly inconsistent and reactionary so-called “originalism”, not to abrogate it.

    Fascism?  Centrist Democrats are asserting that a 2nd Trump Presidency would result in a fascist autocracy with: extraordinary nullification of Americans’ civil and human rights, and/or all-out repression of the progressive left.  In support of this prediction: they erroneously equate MAGA populist reaction to a Hitlerite fascist movement, and they assert that Trump will have learned from the fiasco of his failed attempt to overturn the 2020 election of Joe Biden and be able to seize absolute power.  However, for reasons as follows, the factual evidence does not support said prediction.

    • Definitions, which said liberals neglect to provide, are essential to this analysis. Bigoted populist reaction in control of the state power has occurred historically in 3 forms: (1) anti-liberal fascist autocracy, (2) semi-fascist regime, (3) liberal “democracy” in the grip of regressive reaction.
    • Under pluralist liberal bourgeois “democracy” (whether under welfare-state social-liberal, centrist, or neoliberal administration); capital rules while multiparty competition provides the illusion of popularly-chosen government. [Note.  Marxists, including this author, hold that the abusive rule of capital and the resulting social evils of capitalism cannot be ended thru serial piecemeal reforms but only thru revolutionary conquest and holding of state power by the people (working class and its allies) led by their revolutionary socialist party.]
    • Populist reactionary regimes (all 3 forms) always serve the capitalist class and depend upon its support or acquiescence for their continuation.
    • Political conditions, which resulted in the coming to power of fascist autocracies in the 1920s and 1930s, do not now exist in developed Western “democracies”. In the cases of Mussolini, Hitler, Franco, and Pinochet, a dominant section of the capitalist class chose to cede control of the state power to the fascist autocracy; because it regarded that as necessary in order to suppress the threat of impending anti-capitalist revolution.  No such revolutionary threat exists now; and, absent such threat, most capitalists prefer the liberal pluralist pseudo-democracy, because, with a fascist autocracy, they give over to the unaccountable autocrat their power to largely dictate public policy.  After the threat of anti-capitalist revolution has passed; the dominant factions in the capitalist class support the repressed liberals in demanding and obtaining a restoration of the pluralist liberal “democratic” regime (as occurred in Greece [1974], in post-Franco Spain [1975—78], and in Pinochet’s Chile [1990]).
    • In recent years, parties of regressive reaction (pandering to bigotry and taking advantage of popular discontent with economic and/or other personal-security conditions under government by traditional liberal-democratic parties) have obtained (thru election) governing power in several countries. These include: Orban in Hungary (2010), Law and Justice Party in Poland (2015—23), Bolsonaro in Brazil (2019—23), Meloni in Italy (2022), Milei in Argentina (2023).  None of those regimes have abolished elections, although one has tilted the field in favor of the ruling party (a longstanding routine practice in much of the liberal “democratic” US).  Opposition parties and media continued to operate freely.  Mass popular antigovernment protest rallies could still occur (and did in Hungary, Poland, Brazil, and Argentina).  In 2 of those (Brazil and Poland), the reactionary party has lost power in the most recent election.
    • In political-assassination-riven India, where Modi’s semi-fascist regime has severely persecuted religious minorities, periodic elections are held while opposition parties and media continue to operate normally.
    • It is in politically unstable countries (such as Erdogan’s coup-prone Turkey) that fascistic leaders have been able: to seize autocratic power, to eviscerate the liberal-democratic civil liberties and freedom for dissent, and to impose exceptionally repressive fascistic regimes. The potential, for any such regime in the US or most of Europe, is currently close to nil.

    Centrist Democrats and their liberal “socialist” apologists are promoting a grossly exaggerated fear (fantasizing fascist autocracy and extraordinary repression) as a scare tactic to seduce progressive voters into voting for Biden (or his substitute).

    Imperialism. 

    • Trump and his isolationist MAGA Republicans opposed more billions for Biden’s proxy war (using Ukrainians as cannon fodder) against Russia.  Trump lacks any firm commitment to the imperial NATO alliance, whereas Biden acts to consolidate its hold upon Europe and to expand its purview to the Asia-Pacific.
    • But for overwhelming opposition within the bipartisan US foreign policy establishment, then-President Trump may well have negotiated a long overdue peace treaty with North Korea. Biden clearly would never do so.
    • Trump initiated a trade war with China for purported America-first economic advantage. Biden has continued Trump’s anti-China trade policies; but he also (despite the longstanding US commitment to the one-China principle) threatens a real war, if the independence faction in Taiwan secedes (which Biden and many Congressional Democrats are actually encouraging), and if China then responds with military action to stop it.  Trump could be expected to do no worse.
    • Biden backed the 2003 US regime-change invasion of Iraq and defended the US-NATO military intervention to oust the Gaddafi regime in Libya. Both actions produced failed states and immense suffering (with hundreds of thousands killed) for the peoples of those countries.
    • In service to the politically powerful war-profiteering arms industry, Biden (and bipartisan majorities in Congress) insist that the US, with a 38% share of all of the world’s military spending compared to Russia’s 3.1%, needs to spend ever more.
    • Biden backs every US regime-change intervention and aggressive military move in pursuit of US “full-spectrum dominance” of the world. Isolationist Trump does not really care about imperial US alliances; he pursues foreign interventions selectively (where it panders to voter groups whose support he seeks).
    • Biden and most Congressional Democrats have committed the US to new cold wars against both Russia and China. They worship imperial domination and refuse to accept the need for peaceful coexistence and international cooperation to address the major threats to humanity (threats of: impending climate catastrophe, wars involving states with nuclear weapons, pandemics, famines, et cetera).

    [For a comprehensive analysis of contemporary imperialism, see: Charles Pierce: Conflicting “left” views of capitalist imperialism.]

    Credit where due.

    • There are some issues wherewith Biden has actually made some relatively progressive difference: many (not all) of his appointments to regulatory bodies, most of his judicial appointments, and some actions on culture-war issues (which are important to progressive voters whose votes Biden needs). From a social justice standpoint, his spending choices are mixed: domestically some beneficial, but overwhelmingly bad in foreign relations.
    • Trump’s domestic policies were largely detrimental, and his jobs promises were/are mostly illusory. However, isolationist America-first Trump, to his credit, is less thoroughly imperialist than Biden and the centrist Democrats; though Trump may be somewhat more reckless (as exhibited by his decision to assassinate an Iranian General).

    Centrist Biden and demagogue Trump may tell themselves, as well as their prospective voters, that their beneficial actions and proposals are out of concern for the public welfare.  We should not be deceived.  In fact, such actions and promises (increasingly as election nears) are to win votes, without unduly offending capitalist campaign funders.

    America first leftism.  The regress which Americans would experience under another 4 years of Trump in the Oval Office is nowhere near the total deprivation of civil and human rights which Israel and the US (continuing under Biden) have imposed upon the Palestinians.  And there are hundreds of millions of other victims whose lives have been taken or ruined by the Biden-backed imperial US foreign policy.  Meanwhile, Trump has opposed continued US funding for the US-NATO proxy war in Ukraine.  Although Trump and his isolationist America-first MAGA Republicans are certainly not consistently anti-imperialist; they, unlike Biden and his centrist Democrats, take some positions which are objectively antiwar and anti-imperialist.  Sadly, with avowed “socialists” shelving anti-imperialism to back Biden for the sake of purely domestic political concerns; said “socialists” thereby embrace an “America-first” policy of their own, one which is objectively racist and imperialist.  Moreover, the abusive rule of capital cannot be ended in a major power as long as it rules a belligerent empire, oppressing vulnerable other states and their peoples, and striving to subjugate insubordinate states.

    Bigoted reaction.  After decades of center-left parties (Labour in Britain, Socialist in France, Social-democrat in Germany, Democrat in US, et cetera) embracing antisocial neoliberal policy; economic conditions for most working people have stagnated or worsened (housing unaffordability and increased homelessness, employment precarity and persistence of poverty, inflation exceeding wage increases, et cetera).  Said parties have effectively abandoned their previous popular constituencies.  Consequently, antisocial reactionary parties, led by demagogues pandering to latent bigoted prejudices and scapegoating immigrants and othered minorities, have increasingly seduced much of the now discontented populace.  Meanwhile, instead of demanding return to popular Keynesian policies which actually served working people to some extent (at some tolerable cost to capital), centrist politicians cry “fascist” and assert that they will save “democracy” from an alleged threat of impending autocracy.  As that anti-fascist appeal increasingly loses traction, they defensively embrace some of the inhumane policy demands of the reaction, especially against politically powerless victim groups such as immigrants.

    Lesser-evil-ism.  Liberal “socialists” are habituated to giving electoral allegiance to the thoroughly imperialist center-left party in hopes of saving domestic reforms, previously extracted (by popular pressure) from capital.  They embrace a policy of electoral lesser-evil-ism.  As a means for stopping the rise of bigoted reaction, this policy has been an absolute failure.  It results in the center-left becoming ever weaker while antisocial bigoted reaction grows ever more potent, and progressive reforms previously conceded by capital are increasingly nullified.  As the adage goes: repeating the same failed action, and expecting a different outcome, is an insanity.  With avowed “socialists” and avowed “anti-imperialists” having backed capital-serving imperialist center-left parties for decades, their “left” has sunk ever deeper into the sinkhole of lesser-evil-ism.  And in every succeeding election, it becomes yet more painful, and more urgent, for the progressive left to climb out of that sinkhole.

    What to do.  Whether Trump again or another 4 years of Biden, neither is an acceptable choice.  Reliance upon centrist Democrat politicians is a recipe for failure.  It enables said Democrats to mislead and cynically use social-justice voters while persisting with their policies of militarism, imperialism, supremacy of capital, and political perfidy, and yet remain largely ineffective against MAGA-Republican abuses and obstructions.

    The popular front against fascism (then the most vicious oppressor and most dangerous threat against the left) was appropriate in the 1930s.  Replicating it in the very different current conditions would be allying with the world’s current principal enemy of social justice, namely US-led Western imperialism.  Our real need is not for a “broad popular front against MAGA fascism” (which would mean campaigning for “Genocide Joe” and US imperialism).  Our real need is to build our indivisible social-justice activist movement for: economic justice, environmental justice, human rights, civil rights, and international justice.  Said movement must be one which is truly independent of both major US Parties:

    • one which does not give its allegiance to the Democratic Party;
    • one which allies with Democrat politicians only when and insofar as they actually act for social justice;
    • one which backs their election only selectively and for sound tactical reasons (such as to deny Trump a Congressional Republican majority in the House);
    • one which backs actual pro-social-justice challengers, beginning in primary elections, and an actual progressive (such as Jill Stein) for commander-in-chief;
    • one which does not abandon anti-imperialism and international solidarity with the victims of Western imperialism in order to pursue limited domestic reforms (often to be unenforced or otherwise later nullified);
    • one demanding people-power reforms (in preference to the limited ameliorative measures favored by left liberals), people-power capable of seriously challenging the abuses perpetrated by capital and its agents (whether business firms, neoliberal ideologues, reactionary demagogues, MAGA Republicans, or perfidious and unreliable Democrats).

    Biden, at least as much as Trump, is a racist promoter of mass murder.  Neither is capable of actually earning the votes of people seeking comprehensive social justice.  Unless we (like Biden and most Congressional Democrats) devalue the humanity and lives of Palestinians, Haitians, Venezuelans, et cetera; how can we accept liberal “left” assertions, that Biden (or his substitute) is any savior of humanity and democracy and must therefore be reelected?

    The post “Genocide Joe” and “fascist” Trump: what to do! first appeared on Dissident Voice.

    This post was originally published on Dissident Voice.

  • Israel’s ongoing assault in Gaza has now forcibly displaced 1.9 million Palestinians, a UN humanitarian official reported on Tuesday as Israel forced another round of evacuations for hundreds of thousands of people across southern and central Gaza. Israel’s brutal assault and humanitarian blockade has turned Gaza into an “abyss of suffering” and a “maelstrom of human misery,” said Sigrid Kaag…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • For the past eight months, Hezbollah has attacked the northern portion of Israel in an attempt to pull the Israeli army out from Gaza, reports Al Jazeera. Fears of a wider war have prompted international calls to deescalate the situation at the border between Lebanon and Israel. During a recent meeting with Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin told reporters…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • In the West Bank, the Palestinian struggle to defend land from the clutches of settlers is a daily battle. Rabbi Arik Ascherman is one of the few Israeli Jews who has dedicated his life to assisting Palestinians in defending their land. Ascherman returns to The Marc Steiner Show to discuss the work of his organization, Torat Tzedek, and the increasing political isolation of Israeli Jews who oppose the occupation.

    Rabbi Arik Ascherman is a Reform rabbi and executive director of the Israeli human rights organization Torat Tzedek-Torah of Justice. He is a recipient of the Gandhi Peace Prize and the Rabbi David J. Forman Memorial Committee’s Human Rights Award.

    Studio Production: Cameron Granadino
    Post-Production: Alina Nehlich


    Transcript

    The following is a rushed transcript and may contain errors. A proofread version will be made available as soon as possible.

    Marc Steiner:

    Welcome to the Marc Steiner Show here on The Real News. I’m Marc Steiner. It’s great to have you all with us again. My guest today is Rabbi Arik Erman. We first met 22 years ago when he was the leader and founder of Rabbis for Human Rights. He has literally put his life and body on the line defending Palestinian lives. He stood between bulldozers, soldiers, and settlers, bent on forcing Palestinians off their land and stopped them from arresting and putting Palestinians in prison for living their lives in Israel. He’s been a leader opposing the occupation of the West Bank and Gaza, and in the struggle against racist policies that make Jews from African and Arab countries second class citizens. He stood with the Bedouins who resist being forced from their land. And when I say he put his life on the line, he’s been stabbed, beaten, and arrested for working to fight for the freedom and justice for Palestinians.

    Nothing deters or stops him. He was here in the United States to raise money for their movements and to meet with members of our Congress to stop the war on Gaza and to fight to change our country’s policies, source Israel and Palestine. Rabbi Ara Harshman is executive director of Torah, EK Torah for Justice President and senior Rabbi for Rabbis for Human Rights. His perspective, as you will hear, represents those Israelis who want peace and who fight against the racism and colonialism that oppresses Palestinians. His perspective is religious, it’s rabbinic in the same way as leaders of our civil rights movement. We’re steeped in the Bible. He’s deeply respected in the Palestinian world. Yes, he is a Zionist, but a Zionist that came from the left, that came from the tradition of those fleeing death at the hands of Antisemites. And he’s the deeply religious man who wants to see a binational state with Palestinians, a state for all the people. He stopped by the studio while he was in Baltimore so we could tape a conversation together. And let me right now thank Rhonda Stein for helping produce and make this conversation possible. So Arik, it’s good to see you again.

    Arik Ascherman:

    I’m happy to be here with you. So

    Marc Steiner:

    Let’s just start. You’re here back in the States, and so in the midst of this mad crisis going on Israel Palestine, what brings you here?

    Arik Ascherman:

    Well, some family matters, and to talk to people here in the government and to talk to some of our supporters, to update people what’s happening. Although with the intensity what’s happening right now and the commitments that we have to protect people, it’s entirely possible that I’ll just have to cut short this trip at any point to go back because my word is my word, that there are people that are depending on us, and I think I put together a team together to handle it. But even just on my way here in dealing with a settler attack, 25 to 30 settlers apparently attacking a family and their home and their flock from a new outpost. And that’s just daily reality.

    Marc Steiner:

    Where was that? Somewhere in the West Bank? Yes. So when you say your group and we talk about who that is.

    Arik Ascherman:

    So my organization, after working for 21 years for rabbis between W Rights, I left them in 2016, founded Torah sek, the Tour of Justice in 2017. And we are a small group, but with circles of fellow human rights defenders and allies trying to keep our finger in the dyke.

    Marc Steiner:

    And I take it that the organization is probably mostly Jews, Israeli Jews, right? Yeah. So describe what it must be like for what it is like for an Israeli to take the positions you’re taking, doing the work of defending Palestinian villages, fighting for human rights in a country that has shifted so far. Right over the years. I mean, when I was a kid, I was and I was one tied to labor party. The next one tied to the Marxist Zionist. But things have, I mean, the shift is immense, right? Talk about the shift and how you survive in that shift.

    Arik Ascherman:

    Well, it’s interesting, and I’ve been doing this for 29 years now. I think the first time we spoke was close to 29 years ago. It was a

    Marc Steiner:

    Long

    Arik Ascherman:

    Time ago, and my beard used to be red. And most of those years I never felt marginalized. I never felt that we were just totally on the fringes. I’ve been frustrated with the number of Israelis who support what we believe in, but they’re talking the talk without walking the walk. But I do feel marginalized, infringed at this point, as I said to you a minute ago after the barbaric Hamas attack on October 7th. And as someone who has fought the evils of the occupation for most of my career, nothing justifies what was done on October 7th or the rockets before or after on Israeli civilians. But what is happened in the West Bank is that the pain and anger of Israelis has been cynically exploited by the settlers to carry out plans to dispossess and expel Palestinians that have nothing to do with the war, nothing to do with October 7th plans that were made way before.

    It was already on February of 2021, for example, that Z heifer, one of the main veteran settler ideologues and strategists, and a convicted terrorist actually said in Aman, which is one of the organizations, he has a settler organization. We set up the 30 shepherding outposts because they’re their most effective way of taking over and holding on the Palestinian land. What does that mean, a shepherding outpost? What does that mean? It means you get a couple sheep and a couple settlers and a couple tents or whatever, but those sheep have to range far and wide. And especially if they’re being backed by Israeli security forces that pushes out Palestinian shepherds from their traditional grazing lands, it means that they have to buy more, feed more fodder and become often no longer economically viable to survive as a shepherd. But that’s what’s happening and that’s why the situation of Palestinians in the West Bank today, the best analogy I have is to Japanese Americans after Pearl Harbor.

    Remember when Japanese Americans were put in camps, almost nobody was willing to come to their aid with the fury that Americans felt after Pearl Harbor. It was only 1988, more than 40 years later that the US government apologized, began to compensate Japanese Americans and said that what we did was out of a combination of Rachel prejudice, war time, wartime hysteria, and a failure political leadership with all the differences and the analogies only can go so far. That’s so apt, and that is our reality, and that’s why I feel there’s been a little bit of recovery since October November. Some people are coming back to their senses a little bit more of a sense that there are people to talk to, a little bit more traction in the Israeli high court and what have you. As we’re working right now to return communities, remember that since this war began, 18, shepherding communities have fled or been forced out of their homes at gunpoint Palestinian communities, right?

    Palestinian communities by settlers, often backed by soldiers or settlers, soldiers. Because what has also happened is that the security details for settlements have been drafted into reserve duty, giving uniforms and guns and cat guarding the milk. Often when after settlers come, these settlers soldiers come in and bust into homes in the middle of the night and terrorize people or prevent farmers from getting to their lands. Red Cross had told me that only 30% of Palestinian olives were harvested this year. S often say to me, that guy in the uniform there, that soldier, we know him, he’s from the next door, outpost or settlements, all that is simply the reality that we’re dealing with. And it means that, but 18 communities have fled or been expelled at gunpoint. Where did they go? There were another three before the war because again, it was a trend that was already starting before the war, but just went on steroids once the war started, basically, where did they go? First of all, it also destroys communities because often they don’t end up in the same place. People that were together for decades or who knows how long simply are dispersed and what have you. Again, we are grateful to some of the efforts that the US administration has been making now to put pressure on Israel to curb settler violence.

    Much more needs to be done where settler violence has certainly not stopped as just what I’ve been doing with the last couple hours, but even if we were to stop the settler violence tomorrow, if we don’t get these people home, it’s not only a human tragedy, it’s also just a redrawing of the map.

    Marc Steiner:

    Lemme take a step backwards just a minute to two different places. One’s about you, which I want to come to, and the other is how we got here. Lemme explain what I mean. So I’ve read a lot of what you’ve written over the years and stay on top of what’s happening to you, your jailings beatings, settlers coming after you. I like him when sometimes what’s happening in Palestine to my experience in the Civil Rights Movement. Civil rights movement is a very young man, and what happened to Mississippi and Alabama, even the eastern shore of Maryland here, and the violence was just untenable. It was a very frightening, scary situation. You never know if you’re actually going to live till the next day and what’s happening now on Israel Palestine feels the same, but I think that I’d like you to be able to describe just for a minute what it’s like for you as a Jew, as an Israeli, to live there at this moment, given what you face in this massive right wing kind of power inside of Israel and what that most means like for Palestinians, which to me would be like what it meant, what it was like to live in Mississippi in the time of chain gangs and sharecropping.

    You know what I’m saying? So talk a bit

    Arik Ascherman:

    About that. Well, I can tell you that also for many, many years people have laughed at me as being one of the last optimist, standing and as a person of faith, I’m still an optimist in the long run, but one of the things that’s changed is I’m much less optimistic in the short run, I’ll tell you a story. We just this past week celebrated our Jewish holiday of Shiva. Comes 50 days after Passover Seder, explain what that is to the people. And so of course Passover is we recall our liberation from Egypt, and among other things we say it’s about the wheat harvest, but it’s also about the anniversary of wind of the revelation on Mount Sinai. And we count the days from one or the other because we weren’t liberated just for the sake of being free. But to get to Sinai and accept the Yoko Torah, really one of the traditions on Vu is to stay up all night studying texts, Jewish texts.

    And it was a year ago on the ish at the end of May that year that the first of these 21 communities was finishing packing up. We were guarding them so that they could dismantle their homes and move elsewhere and what have you safely. You were going to the Palestinian homes. Palestinian homes is the shepherding community, and I didn’t know whether I would be there for that evening of the holiday or back home when they finished. I wanted to teach also rabbis like to teach, of course, of course. But it’s also a great pleasure just to spend all night learning from others. And what I taught was there’s a strange story. One of the main many strange stories in the Bible in the Torah is that if you find someone murdered and you don’t know who did it, you measure which, and you figure out which is the closest community, and the elders of that community had to come and you had to break the neck of a calf and you washed your hands.

    That’s where we get this whole idea of washing your hands of responsibility, I guess, and through the calf into a dry ravine. And then you declared our hands not shed this blood and we didn’t see it. And our sages asked 2000 years ago, could you really, to anybody, could anyone actually think that our respected elders would’ve murdered somebody? They said, if that person came through our community and nobody gave them food, nobody offered to guide them through maybe some of the dangerous areas that they might have to traverse to go on their way. It’s as if we had shed that blood.

    And it is so easy for us to blame the awful government, and we do have the most extreme government we’ve ever had in our history what we’re talking about. We blame the settlers, but we have to look at ourselves, the people that inspire these people to do these acts, the people who say that they’re with us, but they sit in their coffee houses and say, isn’t it terrible? And I could say, Hey, I’ve been doing this for 29 years and I’ve been risking my life and I’ve been beat up. And we’ve had some accomplishments both for Israeli Jews living in poverty and for Palestinians and everything else. Hey, I’m okay, but close only counts and horseshoes and hand grenades. All right? And if these people left and I didn’t stop it, then I’m responsible too. That’s what I had to process. And then a few months later, another one of the communities that fled was cca. A new outpost was set up on their access road One night in July, one morning in July six 30 in the morning when the near my house closest the house to the settlement outpost goes up in flames and they asked us to be there for two days and we were then. But we later on in the summer, we created a whole group of human rights offenders to be 24 7 protective presence in communities, but we didn’t have it at the time. And I gave in myself to saying, we can’t do it.

    And I spoke to them. I said, you asked for two days. We were here now, we’ll be in touch. We’ll come when we need to, but is it okay if we’re not here all the time? And they said, okay, but it wasn’t okay. They started packing the next day and I was there. Then a few months later, actually there was an article in New York Times with Patrick Kinsley England, and we were talking to bu and I said, I asked if we had stayed, might you have stayed? And he said, yes. I said Yes. And that’s why in those communities on the month before Rosh Hashanah where we say Pedent prayers early in the morning, I said my prayers in those places. And this year I was thrown back in the mails room when the eve of this year Yusef and said, I’m out of here. I’m out of here tomorrow. I can’t deal with the violence, the intimidation, the settler flock, coming right up to my window day twice a day, the settler security guard saying, this is my field, it’s not yours anymore. And thank God actually with the help of some helpful army officers, we convinced them to give us some time. We got some help actually from the Army, believe it or not, and they’re still in their homes right now.

    But I felt on the eve of receiving the Torah that if this can happen and we don’t have an answer, it’s our responsible that Torah is there dead on the ground, or as we’re told in the story of one of the DIC sages who was killed by the Romans, by being wrapped in a Torah scroll and we’re told that the letters from the burning scroll flew off into the air. That’s what’s happening. And as I told Yusef, of course, for first and foremost concerned about you, but the stain on us and on me if we don’t stop this is simply, simply indelible.

    Marc Steiner:

    What I thought about as you’re telling this story is that something I’ve been wrestling with, which is that people have different cultures and societies or Jews of dwelt. People have been trying to wipe this out from millennia inquisitions for grus. I mean, just trying to wipe us off the face of the Earth are

    Arik Ascherman:

    Good candidates for being one of the most oppressed people in human history. Absolutely.

    Marc Steiner:

    Two things. A, could this be the first time in history that we’re causing our own destruction as a people, given what Israel is doing in the holy land and what Israel is doing, the Palestinians. And the other one thing I wrestle with is that how and oppressed people Jews could then become the oppressor.

    Arik Ascherman:

    Well, first of all, and I think we’ve spoken about this before, there was a mid 19th century, rabbi Hirsch wrote an extensive commentary on the Torah among other things, and writing about one of the 36 times that we’re taught about how to treat the non-Jew living among us. He says, the abomination of Egypt is simply this. They believe that mite makes right and therefore they had the right because of the absolute power of us to do with us what they wanted. And he says, the Torrah is warning us someday. We’re going to have a state he’s writing several decades before Herzl. And when we do, the Torrah is saying, warning us not to treat others as Egyptians treated us. But the psychologists tell us that children who have been beaten are more likely to beat their own children. You repeat all these learned behaviors, and as we just said, we’re one of the most oppressed people in human history. And so it’s actually, maybe it’s almost the human thing to do is to take out another what was done to you. But the Torah is saying that we have to be different. And you made a very interesting point in terms of whether there’s a difference now because what we’re doing to others

    When our temples were destroyed 2000 years ago, the two temples we said most people, if you were defeated by somebody else in battle, you said, they’re God stronger than our God. We said, no, our God did this to us because of our sins. That was our theological response. Other people did what they did to us because of what we did to each other. And Raji, one of our great Torah competitors says that Amalek came and attacked us because of the reason why Amalek in the Torrah is next to the provision against acting in discriminatory waste. Because when you act in a discriminatory way, that invites the attack of an attacker like Amalek, not too many people were able to use that same theological solution in the Holocaust. People like Rabbi Abraham, Joshua Heschel tried to look just talked about the failure of humanity. But it is, as you said, just at another level. And we’ve been attacked by Hamas, people who will want to seek to destroy us, even if we were sign a perfect history tomorrow there, they would still want to destroy us. But of course, we’re taught also the sword comes into the world because of justice delayed and justice denied the improper teaching of Torah. What drives the masses into the hands of these chama ideologues who always want to destroy us is our oppression of Palestinians.

    It’s a very dangerous line that you don’t want to cross to just justify the unjustifiable. But explanations are important so that in our prayers, one of our prayers is we say this three times a day or more. We ask that we should witness God returning to Zion in AKA in mercy. And we pray so much about God’s ed, loving kindness in God’s akame, God’s mercy and God’s return is seen almost as synonymous with our return. And to tell you the truth, in my prayers today, I say to God, you gave us free will. You expected you wanted us to solve things on our own to make a better world, Tik Ola on our own, and we’ve failed miserably. And as important as it is to you that we should achieve this, looking at all the suffering around us and the fact that yes, we are being attacked right now, but we have also become attackers. And that even if the arguments, which I don’t accept, but I understand that people make them, that given the attack on us, we have no other way of defending ourselves given the fact that kamas is embedding itself in a civilian population. We have to attack there even it means civilian deaths and everything else which I don’t accept, and Israeli human rights organizations universally call for, IM cease fire and immediate and unconditional release of all the hostages.

    Why God have you put us in this situation where this is what we have to do to defend ourselves. And it’s when you, where is that akame? We need you not just to return to Zion in mercy, we need you to inspire us all humanity to start to act with akame toward each other or impose it upon us enough with free will. You have to impose it upon us or I can’t tell God you have to do anything, but I beg you, I prayed you to do this because it is simply to me, unbearable both the way we are suffering and the way that we’re causing others to suffer.

    Marc Steiner:

    I’m not sure where we go from here. So I went aside and come right to this question. Is it in 1967? The war happened in 67. I was visiting in Washington, dc, Washington, free press, liberation, new service. I was doing stuff, and I remember we settled a stoop out of Washington free press cheering every time the Israelis pushed ahead, and I actually went down to the Israeli embassy to try to volunteer to go fight. As so I was fighting against the war in Vietnam. And then in 68 I began to meet Israelis on the left and I began to meet Palestinians and something really shifted in my consciousness. And so I became for a long time an anti-Zionist, and I shifted again bunch of years back just being a non Zionist because the complexities of what created Zionism in the first place, and if you’re going to organize and try to bring Jews over to say what we’re doing is wrong in Israel Palestine, you got to start from a different place to organize. So here we find themselves in a situation now, well over a million and a half Israelis, at least maybe closer to at this point, no longer live in Israel. I live in Western Europe, Germany, France live here.

    And I’m in touch with a lot friends of mine, and most of them are Israelis who wanted peace between Israels and Palestinians, wanted to either build a binational state or one state trying to work together to build something different. And they’re gone.

    And so now we’re faced with a really super nationalist right wing government in Israel. And the occupation of the West Bank, which is getting worse every day, was so focused on war on Gaza. We don’t realize how even more difficult it is for Palestinians to try to live and survive on the West Bank and the tens of thousands of people killed in Gaza. And in itself that also kind of unleashes antisemitism that’s always lurking just below the surface. And I’m not sure where we go from here. I’m not sure what the path is to bring about a place where people dwell together between the roofer and the sea together and how we even get there. Plus I think this is a very dangerous situation. I think it’s also a situation that is volatile for the entire planet. Something huge can erupt over this beyond Israel and Palestine. So I think we’re in a very dangerous place.

    Arik Ascherman:

    Well, when I said that my beard used to be red and now it’s a little bit different,

    One would hope that with all these years of experience and even some successes, that there would be some wisdom that I could answer that question. And after all these years, I still admit that I just have a sheet in all directions because I don’t really know what’s going to be the solution in any specific situation. If there’s anything that gives me some hope, even though I said I’m not the optimist that I have been most of my life, first of all, it’s that I know so many good and decent Israelis and Palestinians who simply want for themselves and for their children what most human beings would want. And ultimately I think we’ll need, and we’ll be hopefully able to understand that the path we’ve chosen is not bringing anything good for any of us.

    The second thing is, back when I was in rabbinical school, one of my teachers, rabbi Larry Hoffman, would talked to us about the Soso anthropologist, Victor Turner and liminal moments, and Victor Turner talked about liminal moments being fraught with huge danger and also huge potential. And we’re in a mega liminal moment in Israel today, maybe in Palestine as well, because if up until now the quintessential example of a crisis faith in Israel was this Yom Kippur war, we beat that 73, right in 1973. This is beat that in spades. I mean it, Israelis across the political spectrum have basically lost faith in everything that they used to believe in their leaders in the army and this and whatever. The common wisdom is that on the one hand, Israelis want to throw all the bums out, get rid of all the current military and political leadership, but that they may elect back in may be even more hard line because they have no fewer and fewer Israelis right now have any faith that there’s any possibility of anyone to talk to on the other side of making peace with Palestinians.

    They just fewer and fewer Israelis believe that after October 7th, and yet when you have everything being called into question, if we would figure out, and that’s a huge if how to play our cards right, it might be possible to help more and more of our fellow Israelis understand that even if you’re not a great believer in universal human rights and whatever, although over the years, many pinballs show that people didn’t have animosity necessarily the Palestinians, they just wanted to survive that for the things that you want, that we want the way we’ve tried to achieve it for the last 150 years or whatever has failed. And it’s time to try something else. That’s not an impossible outcome of all of this. It’s not where things seem to be heading right now, but it’s still not an impossible outcome. And so to get out of this, it’s going to take a combination of international pressure and work that we have to do internally with our fellows, Israelis being there because if we’re not there to physically on the ground protect Palestinians, there won’t be anything to talk about later on. And it’s one of the few things, and as we’ve talked about in the past, the Palestinian parents that say, my child wants to be a terrorist when he grows up because of all he is seen. And when you don’t want him to be a terrorist, we want him to meet a different kind of Israeli. Those are all parts of the puzzle. And yet I have to admit, certainly in the short run, I can’t give you a clear answer to what the way out is

    Marc Steiner:

    Coming to the end of our conversation here for today. Anyway, a couple of things. One is, would you describe for me, for people listening to us today, what it’s like a for you to exist in Israel as someone who opposes the occupation, opposes the oppression of Palestinians, been arrested, been beaten stands between Israeli settlers and Palestinian farmers, what it’s like to survive in that? Just to give a sense of what lived to me it would be like, I remember in Mississippi and Eastern shore, the civil rights movement, white people who came over, they literally had to hide out among us because they would be killed by their fellow southerners for even saying, oh yeah, we’re wrong. Black people need their freedom, which is what you’re doing Israel in Palestine saying what we’re doing is wrong. We can’t keep killing stealing Palestinians for the land and jailing the people and killing. So I mean, describe

    Arik Ascherman:

    A bit about what that is

    Marc Steiner:

    For you and people around you to live and survive in that world.

    Arik Ascherman:

    Well, that’s a good question. On the one hand, there’s the famous saying by one of the Hasidic Rees, rabbi Nachman, all the world is like a narrow bridge. And the important thing is not to be afraid. And I would revert revise that a little bit and say, not to be too afraid. I think fear is healthy, and anyone who isn’t somewhat afraid doing what we do is just being stupid. And I know that. And that fear gives you a little bit more alert as long as it doesn’t paralyze you. But as I often say, after all the philosophical musings, we’ve got work to do. And at a certain point you put that aside, you realize you’re taking risk and you realize that you’ve got a job to do as where’s also taught in pure kja, an out is when nobody else is acting with basic human decency. You got to be the person who tries to do it.

    I don’t know whether it’s just stupidity or faith or whatever. I mean, I know that I’ve been attacked with a knife. I know the intense hate and loathing that so many people in the settlement feel towards me personally. I have been say, if I actually accomplished 5% of what they think I’ve done, I’d be very happy. But I haven’t. I wish I could give myself if I let it get to my head what they’re saying about me. But it’s just not true. And yes, it just takes one hateful Palestinian or one hateful settler or one errant ricochet bullet or whatever, textual bullet. And it would be simply a lie to say that that’s not all possible. And yet we have a concept in also in the Jewish tradition called beta. It means security. It can be military security, but it also is a sense of personal faith that we do what we are supposed to be doing. God will decide what is supposed to happen to us. And we just have to keep the faith, keep our eyes on the prize, and remember that there’s a reason why we’re here on this earth and this is what it is. So

    Marc Steiner:

    Conclude on this political question. You’re here in America here back in the United States. Yeah. You’re meeting with political leaders, will you on Capital Hill today?

    Arik Ascherman:

    Tomorrow.

    Marc Steiner:

    Tomorrow on Capitol Hill. So we can’t talk about what happens because you dunno what’s going to happen tomorrow,

    Arik Ascherman:

    State Department and later on in Capitol Hill actually. But yeah, I be talking

    Marc Steiner:

    About what do you expect out of this visit? What are you trying to do on Capitol Hill? What are you trying to get done and what do you expect?

    Arik Ascherman:

    Well, I think if I were to analyze what’s happening, I think the common wisdom in the Biden administration early on in this war was if we back down from a support of Israel, and at a certain level, I’m grateful for that support. Israel was brutally attacked and we needed support. But any backing down on that, and because that sort has to be balanced by the demand that civilians are not harmed, that we aren’t creating stage four and stage five hunger and allowing settlers to redraw the map in the West Bank and everything else. But the common wisdom was that it would hurt Biden in the elections. Since then, it’s of course turned out that perhaps he’s between a rock and a hard place because there are also significant parts of his base who are saying, we’re not going to vote for you if you can just with this allowing Israel to run rampant and what have you.

    And perhaps as a result of that, the United States administration has taken some significant and important acts to try to pressure Israel to allow more food in the Gaza and the curb settler violence in the West Bank. The fact is it’s unprecedented that both some individual settlers, some of whom I unfortunately know very well and settlements have had sanctions imposed. And when we look at the realities on the ground, violence has not yet been curved. So I’m going to talk about the fact that there must be further pressure put on Israel to curb settler violence, that we have to look at the money when the US gives Israel. You mean I’m talking about the money that is going through 5 0 1 c threes to settlers in terms of Israel money that is being Israel. There’s also the issue of the Lihi law, and I don’t want Israel singled out for coddled or punished in ways that other countries aren’t. But we do have the lihi lahan here that is supposed to say that US military hardware cannot be used for human rights violations that should be applied, of course.

    And I’m also going to show people the maps, the areas, the look at the trajectory of the areas under settler control, that from the time when the government was established to October 7th, from October 7th till now with the increased new outpost, the expulsion, the fleeing of shepherding communities, the areas that are in the gun sites. And last time I was here, I talked about the south urban hills and the area between the alone road and the Jordan Valley, but now going eastward from the Lone Road down to Jordan Valley. And now what we’ve been seeing over the last couple of months is now filling the dots west of the lone road and just what that all means. And then there’s another message which I gave for the first time maybe a year ago.

    We in the human rights community don’t have a position on a one versus a two versus a 10 state solution. But what I have to say at this point is not because I’m against it, but you should realize that the two state solution is all but dead just because the infrastructure and the facts on the ground, there may be still variations on the theme possible. If there was a real will, there might be a way. But if you and the US administration and success of US administrations say that in one way or another, that is the goal, don’t delude yourself that is slipping between your fingers. That’s almost an impossibility at this point.

    Marc Steiner:

    So we need to conclude, but this is so much to say to what you just said. It seems that there’s no other solution. And what I’m about to say would be a very difficult place to get to. I have a poster, and the poster is something I got in 1968, and the poster is a picture of all of the holy land, all of it, west Bank, Israel, Gaza, everything. On one side is the Palestinian flag, the other side is an Israeli flag. And across it has written one state, two people, three faiths. It’s been a mantra of mine since 68, pretty much without something like that, there’s no solution. There’s no way for things to continue as they are. We can’t keep stealing Palestinian land, putting people in jail, oppressing Palestinians, chasing out the Israelis who want different work. They don’t want to live there anymore. I mean, we’ve gotten to a critical place where the Jewish community itself is deeply divided. I mean, I talk to young Jews all the time and they want nothing to do with Israel. They’re done. So I dunno what the question is. I have no idea what the answer is. I’m not even sure what the question is.

    Arik Ascherman:

    Well, that’s back to the fact when your question, which I couldn’t give an answer to, is what the way out is. Because if in fact, and again, I repeat as a human rights defender, I don’t support or oppose any one solution. But if I look at the reality on the ground, on the one hand, a two state solution, at least a classic two state solution of 67 borders and limiting settlements is increasingly impossible. A one state solution is an anathema to most Israelis and to many Palestinians. I mean the Palestinians are divided about that. So then what do you do?

    And I don’t know, sometimes I think what we need is an orian treaty. You happen to be a Trekkie. I don’t know. But something just imposed. That’s why I said I pray to God that it’s time God’s got to intervene and impose something on us. But as we’ve spoken about before, a week before Sadat came to Jerusalem, Israeli opinion polls were dead set against what everybody was in favor of a week later. So with all our doubts, we just have to keep on trying and trying to find that place where people hit rock bottom as we say in 12 step and say, now we’ve got to try something else.

    Marc Steiner:

    Maybe the only place that can do it is here. You know what caught or anybody attempted, not saying that it worked, but we’re facing a situation I think, which we are close to the abyss when it comes to is Israel Palestine at this moment. And it could mean the annihilation of what’s left to the Jewish people in Israel. It could be many different things. It could be a war that we can’t control that spreads. I think we’re in a very, very dangerous situation.

    Arik Ascherman:

    I’m less afraid of the physical annihilation of the Jewish people. That’s also possible, much more afraid of the spiritual annihilation. In 19 88, 1 of Israel’s Israel’s pantheon of authors, Sakha wrote an essay. And basically what he said is, of course we have to ensure our survival. But even if it’s more difficult, even if we are making that task, we are restraining ourselves. I mean, there has to be red lines, there are things, and he was a bit maybe ecentric you could say. I saying there are things that even if the rest of the world does, and it’s true, what would the United States do if it was attacked the way it was on October 7th? We were on October 7th. Look what happened on nine 11 or many other countries in the world. There is some hypocrisy in looking at Israel and when Israel at a certain level has done what many countries around the world would do if they could. But what he said was, if we say it’s okay, because that’s the way of the world, that’s what people do.

    And we have no choice. When Hamas is embedding itself in a civilian population and everything, we have no choice. But it was only 1980. It wasn’t talking about that, but no choice. But the blow up babies, he says something is just being, we are wiping out the ground from beneath our feet. We’re wiping out the ground beneath our feet as Jews. And so that is our challenge. Somehow we have to find a way to remain true. That was the core of our faith and our mission from the beginning of the Jewish people, even if it means trying to survive against some people with two hands hide behind our backs, but also remembering that this sword comes in the world because of justice delayed and justice denied and the improper teaching of Torah.

    Marc Steiner:

    And I think as we conclude here, one of the things that I think about a lot when it comes to this is that what we are doing now to the Palestinians is no different than the Klan of my Southerners did to black folks in the South. It’s no different than what the Nazis did to us antisemites have done to us over the millennia. And that the kibbutzing that were attacked, it’s where my family lives. It came from Latin America. They were on the left. They were trying to build a different world with Palestinians. One of my closest friends, his nephew was shot another killed by settlers in this recent violence in the West Bank. And they look at the Israeli government and there’s a really right wing philes kind of government with the worst of our religion inside of that as well, the Ben Veers and the smart riches. So it is, I think as Jews, it’s just time to stand up and say, no, it’s not acceptable. We can’t support the state of Israeli the way it is now. We can’t support that government. We can’t allow this to happen. We can’t allow Palestinians to be slaughtered and all of Gaza to be just destroyed.

    Arik Ascherman:

    Well, I think there is a difference in that While there are Israelis and from before the state and after and during our entire history who from the get-go, their goal was to displace and dispossess Palestinians. I still do believe that many Israelis, even the majority of Israelis would not be acting as they are now if it wasn’t also what was done to us also by Palestinians. But again, after 57 years of occupation after also the expulsions already from 48, but we have to have the ability to say that two wrongs don’t make a right. That what has been done to us a does not justify what we’ve done are doing, be there’s a connection to what we’ve done and the vicious circle. And if we really, really want to get to the peace and security that we deserve, there’s another image in the Talmud of someone that tries to go into the mikvah, the ritual bath, to purify themselves because they become ritually unpure because they’re holding a dead lizard. But they go into the mikvah and they’re still holding the lizard. We’re still holding the lizard. We are still occupying, we are still oppressing. And as long as we do that, we are not going to have the things that we deserve.

    Marc Steiner:

    And what you just said, and we really got to conclude in this last comment from you, is that if there had not been a knock ban 48, if there had not been a post 67 war and an occupation and the jailing of Palestinians and taking their land and settlements all across the West Bank and Gaza that were pushed out when the treaty was done, if those things hadn’t happened, if we hadn’t become the oppressor of Palestinians, there’d be no Hamas,

    Arik Ascherman:

    Right? Absolutely. You’re right, correct. And of course, Israel helped create Hamas to be a counter to the PLO and this kind of stuff. It’s absolutely true. And at the end of the day, it matters a lot. But it doesn’t matter who started it and who fault and who’s this I do not want as the Jewish people that we are oppressors and therefore, as Samar said, ensure our survival. Yes, but not as oppressors

    Marc Steiner:

    Harshman. It’s been long time as I’ve seen you. It’s good to have you back in Baltimore for a minute, and I appreciate you taking time out of the busy schedule to come through the studios and join us today, and we’ll stay in touch and when you get back, we’ll continue to have these conversations. So thank you very much for your work and thanks for being here today.

    Arik Ascherman:

    Thank you

    Marc Steiner:

    Once again. I want to thank Rabbi Eric Harshman for joining us today in the studio. The Struggle for the Liberation of Palestine. Israel is a complex one. Without Israelis and Jews like a oshman, the struggle cannot be won. It’s much like white people who stood up to segregation were critical to ending segregation. Now, the Jews and Israelis who fight against occupation Palestinian rights are critical to ending that oppression. Once again, thank you to Rabbi Arik Oshman for joining us today. And thanks to Cameron Grino for running this program and editing our program and the tireless killer of Ara for making it all work the scenes. And for everyone here at The Real News for making this show possible, please let me know what you thought about, what you heard today, what you’d like us to cover. Just write to me at ss@therealnews.com and I’ll write to you right back. Once again, thank you to our kaman for joining us. So for the crew here today, the Real News, I’m Marc Steiner. Stay involved. Keep listening, and take care.

    This post was originally published on The Real News Network.

  • Spain has become the first European country to join South Africa’s genocide case against Israel at the International Court of Justice (ICJ). Ireland and Belgium have also said they will declare an intervention on behalf of South Africa’s case, as well as Chile, Egypt, Turkey, and the Maldives. A number of other countries have already filed their contribution: Mexico, Nicaragua, Columbia, Libya, and Palestine.

    Israel: “A real genocide”

    In late May, Spain’s defence minister Margarita Robles said “we cannot ignore what is happening in Gaza, which is a real genocide”.

    Now Spain has submitted its contribution to the ICJ. Within, Spain highlights the incitement to genocide from Israeli authority figures:

    Spain recalls that on 28 December 2023, a group of former senior members of Israel’s diplomatic corps, academics, journalists, former members of Knesset and social activists addressed a letter to Israel’s Attorney General and other judicial authorities

    In that letter, the Israelis say Israel’s judiciary is ignoring “extensive and blatant incitement to genocide, expulsion, and ethnic cleansing in Gaza by public figures”. They write “the explicit calls to commit atrocious crimes, as stated, against millions of civilians have turned into a legitimate and regular part of Israeli discourse”.

    The letter references numerous of these incitement statements, including one from Israeli MP Yitzhak Kroizer. He said “the Gaza Strip should be flattened, and for all of them there is but one sentence, and that is death”.

    “They will not receive a drop of water”

    Spain also referred to Israel cutting off water, electricity and fuel from Palestinians in Gaza. It stated ways Israel has met the requirement for genocide, “the intention to destroy a group, in whole or in part”, in this respect. Spain pointed to statements such as one from the then minister of energy and infrastructure of Israel, Israel Katz. He said:

    The line has been crossed . We will fight the terrorist organisation Hamas and destroy it. All the civilian population in Gaza is ordered to leave immediately. We will win. They will not receive a drop of water or a single battery until they leave the world.

    In its declaration, Spain affirmed that Israel isn’t just required not to commit genocide. It’s also required to prevent its military from carrying it out.

    Spain formally recognised Palestine in May. Prime minister Pedro Sanchez said if more countries recognise Palestine that will add international pressure for a peace deal in Gaza.

    We must consign genocides to the dustbin of history.

    Featured image via Guardian News – YouTube

    By James Wright

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • The student intifada has reached the UK. At the School of Oriental and African Studies, students set up an encampment in solidarity with Gaza, taking particular aim at the university’s investments in companies that produce white phosphorus. The Real News reports from London, speaking directly with student organizers calling out their school’s complicity in genocide.

    Producers: Ross Domoney and Nadia Péridot
    Presenter: Nadia Péridot
    Videography and Editing:Ross Domoney


    Transcript

    Nadia – presenter: 

    Inspired by the direct action on US campuses, students across the UK are taking a stand against their university’s links to Israel.

    Nadia – presenter:

    We’re talking to students here at SOAS in the liberated zone about what they’re hoping to achieve.

    Protestor:

    It’s been ten days of learning. It’s been ten days of solidarity.It’s been 10 days of community showing up for us. 

    Protestor: 

    We’ve taken the situation on this campus from one where students were suspended from expressing solidarity for the Palestinain cause to one where they’re students camping out here day and night, shouting at the top of our lungs that Palestine will be free.

    Protestor:

    I think that students have historically always been on the right side of history. I think the especially institutions like SOAS we are taught all the theory of things like the Nakba, we are taught all the theories of things like apartheid. And I think that it is insulting to teach us these things and not expect us to apply them.

    Protestors: 

    SOAS, SOAS, Shame, Shame! 

    Protestor:

    Attention, everybody in five minutes, we will be having a teach out from Unies against Borders control.

    Protestor:

    This is a liberated zone. That means that it’s a zone for political education. It’s a zone for community building. It’s a zone for breaking bread together.

    Protestor:

    To be in these spaces means to dream of a better world and to look around us and find ways, small and large, that we can bring about that better world.

    Presentor:

    Can you tell us about what your demands are and what you hope to achieve with this?

    Protestor:

    The first is to disclose and, create more transparency around its financial investments. The second is to divest from any companies that are, complicit in the ongoing genocide.

    Protestor: 

    before this started, I didn’t realize quite how complicit this entire institution was in the Israeli genocide of the Palestinian people.

    Protestor:

    But the more we find out and the more we look and the more questions we ask like the was it just gets.

    Presentor:

    We learn that SOAS a university renowned for producing radical thinkers and which centers its studies on the Middle East, has direct involvement with companies that produce white phosphorus, the deadly incendiary weapon that Human Rights Watch has found Israel to have used against civilians in Gaza in recent months.

    Protestor:

    This university has been complicit in the settler colonial project in Palestine for decades. And, that means that it has a moral responsibility to, swiftly begin redirecting those resources towards rebuilding, efforts. You know, there’s there’s not a single university left intact in Gaza, at this point.

    Protestor:

    And for us to be sitting here at this institution in London, and our tuition money going towards destroying those universities, it’s it’s not right.

    Presenter: 

    in Gaza, all places of learning, including U.N. schools, sheltering civilians, have been systematically destroyed by Israel.

    Presenter:

    Thousands of students and teachers have been killed, injured or arrested as part of what the United Nations has warned is ‘Schoolasticide’ in the enclave. 

    Protestor:

    We live here in the Imperial core.

    Protestor: 

    We live just blocks away from arms manufacturers and the offices of the companies that bankroll the ongoing genocide. And also atrocities all over the world. We need to understand the imperial system as a, as a, as a broad structure that is interlinking. And here in London and in the UK in general, we find ourselves at a unique position.

    Protestor:

    So, across society. We need to look around us, see what effective targets we might be able to to identify, and then come over whatever, petty differences we might have with the people at our sides to organize effectively, to attack those targets.

    Presenter:

    At least 25 Palestine solidarity encampments have taken hold at universities across the UK from London to Edinburgh. In national protest.

    Protestor:

    As we’ve seen with, you know, protests during the Iraq war, during the Vietnam War, it was a student protest. It was a student revolution that actually ended up making the biggest difference.

    Protestor:

    And we are just borrowing and learning,

    Protestor:

    carrying on their legacy and history.

    Protestor:

    And I think when you root your politics and when you root your individual actions and activism in this idea of collective liberation and this idea of intersectionality, there isn’t another choice.

    Protestor:

    Like there was never any question, of course, I was going to be here, of course I was going to resist in any way I can. I think the increasing numbers of young people, especially coming through spaces like SOAS, that although the institution itself is deeply complicit, I think the culture here wants to resist.

    Protestor:

    I think I come from a background of people that resist genocide. I come from a background of people that resists colonialism. Like, this is who I am,

    Presentor:

    With continued national protests and localized direct action at institutions like this, the people are putting pressure on the UK government to end its support for Israel. Public opinion has shifted and this next generation of voters are part of the movement against another parliament propping up the Zionist agenda.

    Presentor:

    I think the slogan no ceasefire, no vote reflects the current environment in the UK and the current attitude of the people in the UK. The government is absolutely not representative of our movement here. They have refused to implement an arms embargo on the Zionist entity, and they’ve refused to call for an unconditional and permanent ceasefire, which is absolutely deplorable considering it’s a genocide.

    Protestor:

    We’ve seen how an arms embargo affected how in in South Africa with the apartheid regime.

    Presentor:

    These student protests represent a wave of significant change. With knowledge at their fingertips and immersed in a collective hope.

    Presentor:

    They intend to stay until they see the change they want to be in the world.

    Protestor:

    To students in Gaza and to their families and their communities. Just from the bottom of my heart and I know I speak for all of my comrades here at this camp. A deep, deep, deep message of solidarity and love. And a deep and warm embrace to all of you. We can only begin to imagine the pain and the difficulty that you’re living through right now.

    Protestor:

    But we we are all collectively and we know that you are, too, we find we find our strength in seeing what you all do.

    Protestor:

    God willing, sometime soon,

    Protestor:

    We we will be able to to see you, to hold you in person. To build direct community with you together. And, and someday all borders will fall.

    This post was originally published on The Real News Network.