This content originally appeared on Just Stop Oil and was authored by Just Stop Oil.
This post was originally published on Radio Free.
This content originally appeared on Just Stop Oil and was authored by Just Stop Oil.
This post was originally published on Radio Free.
Members of Fossil Free London, Energy Embargo for Palestine and the Free West Papua Campaign gathered outside BP’s London HQ in St James’s Square last night ahead of BP’s AGM, taking place today. Campaigners held a banner reading ‘stop fuelling genocide and climate breakdown’, and chanting ‘Shut down BP’.
Since the wake of Israel’s genocide on Gaza, BP has come under fire for its supply of energy supplies to Israel. In September 2024, Energy Embargo for Palestine identified in a research report that 30% of Israel’s total energy supplies passes through the Baku-Tblisi-Ceyhan (BTC) pipeline, which has gone on to fuel military operations in Gaza.
The post Shut Down BP: It Is Complicit In Israel’s Genocide In Gaza appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.
This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.
This content originally appeared on Human Rights Watch and was authored by Human Rights Watch.
This post was originally published on Radio Free.
This content originally appeared on Just Stop Oil and was authored by Just Stop Oil.
This post was originally published on Radio Free.
The first phone call between Putin and Trump was described as ‘frank’. Putin did it his way, as Frank Sinatra might have said. Say what we like, the Russian leader rejected the proposal for an immediate ceasefire. At the same time, London GPs were sending out text messages asking if people had served in HM Forces, which of course some misconstrued as the preliminaries of a call-up. The UK was meanwhile continuing to support Ukraine despite Putin saying a ceasefire would never work if foreign military aid and intelligence was still being shared. Nor did it help that the mass shutdown of Heathrow Airport after a fire at a nearby electricity substation aroused additional suspicion, conforming as it did to the hybrid form of war so favoured by Russia in Europe. Despite Counter Terrorism Command on the case, a mistake by an electrical engineer wax suggested.
‘One Trident sub could ‘incinerate 40 Russian cities’: Why Putin should fear Britain’s nuclear arsenal,’ read another London headline. This was just as US, UK and Turkish defence companies were informed they would be excluded from the new figure of €150 billion ($163 billion) in EU defence funding, unless of course they signed defence and security pacts with Brussels. More remarkable perhaps was Trump welcoming the idea of the US—as a former British colony—re-joining the Commonwealth. ‘I Love King Charles,’ he posted on Truth Social: ‘Sounds good to me!’ An affinity unmatched, it should be said, by the number of British subjects reportedly refused entry into the US despite valid visas.
‘So it was these two great leaders coming together for the betterment of mankind,’ rhapsodised US envoy Steve Witkoff about the Trump-Putin confab, ‘and it was honestly a privilege and an honour for me to sit there and listen to that conversation.’ Despite the Times of London reminding readers that Putin had flattered and deceived 5 US presidents, Trump spoke of improved relations, with the two agreeing that negotiations on the 30-day truce should begin ‘immediately’—which our very own wily Sam Kiley of the Independent called ‘an entirely Putin-constructed process.’ Witkoff then confirmed it was Putin who had ordered the Russian military to halt attacks on energy plants in Ukraine, though the actual timing of the Russian hit of the Ukrainian energy infrastructure of Slovyansk in the Donetsk would be disputed by Witkoff. This was before the Special Envoy’s snub of Keir Starmer’s peace efforts in a Tucker Carlson (anti-Zelenskyy, pro-Putin) interview. ‘So bold are Putin’s ceasefire demands,’ came the next London headline, ‘it’s hard to believe he is entirely serious.’
It was considered no surprise therefore that the Russian leader delayed the call with Trump by more than 50 minutes. Had it been Zelenskyy, we have to assume smoke would have billowed from US ears. Then news reached London of the NHL (National Hockey League) saying it would be ‘inappropriate’ to comment on Russia and the US hosting hockey matches together. At least the more punctual Trump and Zelenskyy chat was termed ‘a very good telephone call,’ much of it ‘in order to align both Russia and Ukraine in terms of their requests and needs.’ Trump even offered to help return the missing 35,000 children from occupied areas of Ukraine, though it remained unclear how he would navigate his own recent funding cut to Yale University’s Humanitarian Research Lab which was responsible for the database on the mass abductions.
‘Obviously this is the world descending into worse and worse standards of targeting civilians,’ said the late UK politician Clare Short about Iraq and Gaza. So much for the presently broken ceasefire in Gaza. A tragedy of such epic proportions, it deserves far more than my feeble mention. (‘Life is the farce we all must play,’ wrote Arthur Rimbaud.) There have been so many instances of Israeli–Palestinian ceasefires that even the most persevering of Egyptian, UN or Qatari mediators must want to walk. Recent temporary truces in 2008, 2014, 2021, 2023 were all shattered. Just like the one last week shortly after UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy stated that Israel was breaking international humanitarian law—before being shut down by his own party. Gazan ceasefires are so fragile that Palestinians must know in their hearts they will be followed by renewed tensions or violence.
I’ve mentioned in the past WWI Christmas ceasefires returning to slaughter. While the Korean War Armistice of 1953 between North Korea, China, and the UN Command (mainly South Korea and the US) compares favourably to what we might see one day in Ukraine, the Korean War is still just a ceasefire. As for the 1973 Paris Peace Accords which began as a ceasefire, these did end US military involvement but fighting resumed soon afterwards between North and South Vietnam. There was the 1991 Gulf War in which Coalition forces declared a ceasefire after driving Iraqi forces out of Kuwait. It ended combat operations but tensions remained and eventually led to the 2003 Iraq War. At least in Northern Ireland there was the 1998 Good Friday Agreement between the British and Irish governments, and most Northern Irish political parties, resulting in a political ceasefire that ended decades of sectarian violence. Since 2016 we’ve seen several localised and temporary Syrian Civil War ceasefires brokered by the UN, Russia, and Turkey. The Nagorno-Karabakh ones of 1994, 2020, and 2023 have just been followed by the Swiss Federal Assembly’s National Council and Council of States adopting a resolution titled ‘Peace Forum for Nagorno-Karabakh: The Possibility of Armenian Return.’ In short, ceasefires are everywhere and don’t always last.
Meanwhile, Ukraine launched a massive drone attack near a Russian strategic bomber base. A vast and portentous apocalyptic cloud was filmed rising immediately afterwards into the sky above Engels, home to Russian Tu-95 and Tu-160 nuclear capable heavy strategic bombers. This type of thing would have been at least one good reason why those follow-up discussions in Riyadh—for what were the first parallel negotiations since 2022—included Sergei Beseda, former head of the FSB spy agency’s fifth directorate.
As Russia launched another drone attack on Kyiv this time killing seven people including a five-year-old child, some flights at Heathrow Airport resumed but still with one or two Brits convinced it was sabotage, ignoring the fact cock-ups usually trump conspiracies. It was of course the same week that the death of former KGB colonel turned UK secret agent Oleg Gordievsky was announced, a Russian who influenced far more Cold War policies than Putin before and after he was betrayed by KGB spy Aldrich Ames of the CIA. One of Gordievsky’s MI6 Moscow handlers carried a green Harrods bag and ate a Mars bar in order to confirm Gordievsky’s imminent getaway to him to a UK safe house. Let’s just hope there are no more such shenanigans and nothing but a constructive openness before a nice, long and lasting Easter ceasefire.
The post Letter from London: Hands Free in the Valley of Death appeared first on CounterPunch.org.
This content originally appeared on CounterPunch.org and was authored by Peter Bach.
This post was originally published on Radio Free.
This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Radio Free Asia.
This post was originally published on Radio Free.
This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Radio Free Asia.
This post was originally published on Radio Free.
LONDON — Hong Kong rights groups, Tibetans, Uyghurs and local residents gathered at the historic former Royal Mint Court on Saturday to rally against China’s proposed ‘mega-embassy’, voicing fears that Beijing would use the building to harass and monitor dissidents living abroad.
It’s the second mass protest in in five weeks at the site near the Tower of London. Organizers estimated that 6,000 people participated.
The protesters dispersed peacefully after the rally and no one was arrested.
The Chinese government purchased the historic building in 2018 with plans to build what would become Beijing’s largest diplomatic facility globally.
An architect working on the project revealed some of the details of the project, including a tunnel connecting two of the former Royal Mint buildings, basement rooms and accommodation for hundreds of staff.
This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Matthew Leung, Ka Kit Chan and Jasmine Man for RFA Cantonese.
This post was originally published on Radio Free.
This content originally appeared on Just Stop Oil and was authored by Just Stop Oil.
This post was originally published on Radio Free.
This content originally appeared on Just Stop Oil and was authored by Just Stop Oil.
This post was originally published on Radio Free.
This content originally appeared on Just Stop Oil and was authored by Just Stop Oil.
This post was originally published on Radio Free.
This content originally appeared on Just Stop Oil and was authored by Just Stop Oil.
Far-right miscreant Elon Musk got a taste of the opposition to him in London – as protesters occupied his Tesla showroom over his multiple crimes against people and planet.
At midday on Saturday 1 March, the Tesla showroom in Westfield Shepherd’s Bush was disrupted by Climate Resistance protestors. A massive banner with the demand “Abolish billionaires” was dropped over the Tesla logo from a balcony above as a group of 30 staged a sit-in inside the showroom. The disruption took place as part of the new Abolish Billionaires campaign from campaign group Climate Resistance.
The post Tesla Showroom Occupied By Activists In Clear Message To Elon Musk appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.
This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.
On Monday 17 February, Extinction Rebellion climate activists occupied McKinsey & Co and its London headquarters to demand it cuts all ties to its fossil fuel industry clients and starts putting planet before profit. Dozens of police arrived on the scene and arrested four campaigners, including two who were stood outside the building holding a banner. The protest began at midday when activists sprayed fake crude oil over the building’s glass and steel exterior. A group of climbers scaled the entrance portico, lighting up smoke flares and unfurling a massive banner reading, “McKinsey & Company: Cut the Ties to Fossil Fuels”.
The post Chaos In London As McKinsey & Co Targeted By Extinction Rebellion appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.
This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.
An architect working on China’s controversial plans for a new ‘mega-embassy’ in London has revealed some of the details of the project, including a tunnel connecting two of the former Royal Mint buildings, basement rooms and accommodation for hundreds of staff.
Plans submitted to a government inquiry indicate large-scale remodeling of the buildings on the former Royal Mint site, including a large basement area with a security airlock for vehicles, suites of basement rooms and a new tunnel connecting two of the existing buildings.
A political commentator told RFA Cantonese that underground embassy and consular facilities can be much harder for security services in host countries to monitor, citing Ireland’s refusal of a Russian Embassy planning application in 2020 on national security grounds.
China purchased the former Royal Mint — near the Tower of London — in 2018 with plans to build what would become Beijing’s largest diplomatic facility globally. Plans showed that it was expected to be 10 times the size of a regular embassy.
Beijing has made two applications to build the massive new facility in London both of which were rejected by the Tower Hamlets Borough Council — the local council overseeing the neighborhood — amid a vocal campaign by rights groups.
British Metropolitan Police had earlier spoken against the planned embassy due to safety and security concerns, but withdrew its objections last month after the central government took over responsibility for the decision.
Then the council said it won’t argue against the project at a planning inquiry.
On Oct. 8, an estimated 4,000 people gathered in front of the proposed site to protest the plans, saying China would use the ‘mega-embassy’ to monitor dissidents and ordinary Chinese living outside the country.
What’s the tunnel for?
Oliver Ulmer, director of David Chipperfield Architects, told the planning inquiry in London on Feb. 12 that a new tunnel would link the main basement to that of the Siemens Registry building “to provide access.”
“The basement … will be reconfigured to provide support spaces to the embassy functions on the floors above,” he said. “These will consist primarily of facilities to support the catering of events.”
Changes will be made for “the provision of necessary security required for the embassy use,” Ulmer told Planning Inspector Claire Searson as part of a 10-day inquiry into the plan.
The plans show a large basement with a security airlock, with access to two suites of unlabeled rooms, one via the new tunnel.
However, the plans are labeled as having been “redacted for security reasons,” making any further public information on the facility unlikely.
The new ‘super-embassy,’ if approved, will include 200 residential units, from studios to three-bedroomed apartments, suggesting a large increase in the number of embassy personnel compared with current staffing levels.
The planning application comes amid growing concerns over Chinese Communist Party infiltration of various aspects of British life, and warnings from Hong Kongers in exile over growing acts of violence by Beijing supporters and officials alike.
Overseas activists frequently report being targeted by agents and supporters of the Chinese state, including secret Chinese police stations in a number of countries.
RELATED STORIES
London council won’t argue against China’s ‘super-embassy’ at key hearing
Thousands rally against China’s ‘mega-embassy’ in London
London council rejects China’s ‘super-embassy’ plan – again
Activists vow to fight China’s bid for new ‘super embassy’ in London
China is currently believed to have 116 diplomats in the United Kingdom with diplomatic immunity, according to Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office figures from 2020, cited in The Times newspaper.
The number of apartments suggests that number could see a very sharp increase if the embassy plans are given the go-ahead by Angela Rayner, Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government.
In March 2020, the Irish government revoked an approved planning application for a massive expansion of the Russian Embassy in the city, saying it was “likely to be harmful to the security and defence of the State and the State’s relations with other states.”
The Russians called the decision “ludicrous” at the time.
But political scholar Benson Wong said the use of basement facilities for espionage-related activities was highly likely.
“Underground tunnels can effectively prevent host country security forces from conducting surveillance of foreign diplomatic missions to collect intelligence or carry out wiretapping,” Wong said. “This means the embassy can carry out any espionage or intelligence work in a secure environment.”
“If the Labour government does nothing and allows the new Chinese Embassy to take liberties, I think the impact could be disastrous,” Wong said.
The project plans also include a formal entrance hall with ‘screening facilities’ for diplomatic visitors, a cultural exchange center and a ‘heritage interpretation center’ and conference and exhibition facilities, Ulmer told the inquiry.
A new visa application center is also planned, along with “student service” and “business services” facilities, he said.
The outdoor space includes plans for a courtyard garden with increased biodiversity and “Chinese influences,” Ulmer said.
Translated by Luisetta Mudie. Edited by Malcolm Foster.
This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Matthew Leung for RFA Cantonese.
This post was originally published on Radio Free.
LondonMetric, the landlords of Elbit’s ‘UAV Tactical Systems’ drone factory, has sold the site on after a targeted direct action campaign calling on them to cut ties with Israel’s largest weapons company. After struggling to find a buyer, LondonMetric have now relinquished their interest in Elbit Systems, despite what it claims is a strong commercial potential of the site. Business at ‘UAV Tactical Systems’ has been regularly disrupted and prevented due to its production of Israeli military drones [1].
The result comes after concerted efforts by Palestine Action, joined by the Youth Front for Palestine (YFFP), against the offices and premises of LondonMetrics.
The post Elbit Drone Factory Landlords Cut Ties appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.
This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.
Days after thousands of people rallied in London to protest plans for a new Chinese “super-embassy,” the local council has said it won’t argue against the project at a key government hearing, sparking allegations of political pressure from the highest levels of government.
The Chinese government purchased the historic Royal Mint in 2018 — near the Tower of London — with plans to build what would become Beijing’s largest diplomatic facility globally. Rights groups and protesters warned that the facility would facilitate espionage and Beijing’s “long-arm” law enforcement.
On the first day of a 12-day planning inquiry, Morag Ellis KC, a lawyer acting on behalf of Tower Hamlets Borough Council, said the council wouldn’t be offering any evidence opposing the plan, despite having previously rejected the Chinese government’s planning application on two occasions.
She said the main reason was the withdrawal by the city’s Metropolitan Police of its objections to the project.
“In the light of the Metropolitan Police services changed position and the external transport advice, which mirrored that of the statutory highway authorities, it would have been irresponsible to seek to pursue the putative reason for refusal,” Ellis told the hearing on Tuesday.
The hearing was packed with observers in the public gallery, with groups of people speaking Mandarin lining up early to get a seat. At least a dozen would-be observers were turned away after the venue reached capacity.
Ellis also cited advice by transportation consultants iTransport, and that of government highway authorities.
“On the 12th of January this year, the Borough issued its revised statement of case, explaining why it was no longer in a position to present evidence in support of the putative reason for refusal,” Ellis said.
China resubmitted its application to build the massive new facility in London despite being rejected in 2022 amid a vocal campaign by rights groups.
The Metropolitan Police had earlier spoken against the planned embassy due to safety and security concerns, particularly relating to expected large-scale protests outside the facility, which includes plans for offices, residential quarters and cultural venues.
“The Metropolitan Police Service’s Public Order Command are content that, on balance, there is sufficient space for future protests to be accommodated without significantly impacting the adjacent road network,” the force said in a Jan. 17 letter confirming its change of position, which it said was based on a three-year-old council document.
The U-turn sparked allegations that the plan is being pushed through by strong political pressure from the highest levels of government.
Simon Bell, a lawyer speaking on behalf of the neighboring Royal Mint Court Residents Association, which opposes the plan, said it was “clear that there has been a political pre-determination of these applications at some of the highest levels of central Government.”
He said a three-year-old assessment by the council couldn’t predict the size of future demonstrations, and cited the Met Police’s failure to contain Saturday’s protest at the proposed site.
“Roads were blocked and considerable police presence confirmed the residents’ fear for their safety and security,” Bell told the hearing. ”If this is a taste of what is to come in respect of a proposed embassy, one can only imagine how the adverse effect of protests will impact on the residents’ safety and security, during any construction period, let alone after the embassy has come forward.”
RELATED STORIES
Thousands rally against China’s ‘mega-embassy’ in London
London council rejects China’s ‘super-embassy’ plan – again
Activists vow to fight China’s bid for new ‘super embassy’ in London
Luke de Pulford, executive director of the cross-party Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China, said the police appeared to have been “influenced by forces other than the merits of the application.”
“The public understanding is that the police are operationally independent and that their decisions regarding public safety ought to brook no interference,” he said.
The planning application comes amid growing concerns over Chinese Communist Party infiltration of all aspects of British life, and warnings from Hong Kongers in exile over growing acts of violence by Beijing supporters and officials alike.
Overseas activists frequently report being targeted by agents and supporters of the Chinese state, including secret Chinese police stations in a number of countries.
Simon Cheng, co-founder of the advocacy group Hongkongers in Britain, said the proposed embassy posed a “serious risk to public safety, local infrastructures, and fundamental democratic freedoms,” and warned that it would become a “flashpoint of large-scale protests against Chinese Communist Party human rights abuses.”
“This embassy will … be an extension of Chinese Communist Party’s authoritarian reach into Britain,” Cheng said. “We have already seen the evidence of Chinese diplomatic outposts being used for, for example, monitoring and intimidating exile activists like Hong Kongers, Tibetans, Chinese dissidents in the UK [and] Uyghurs.”
“This embassy will make it even easier for Chinese authorities to track, intimidate, and suppress critics of such a regime.”
Cheng said the embassy could also empower efforts to suppress free speech on British soil.
“The Chinese government has a history of pressuring businesses, universities, and local institutions to align with its interests,” he said. “It is about whether Britain is willing to host and legitimise an embassy that will serve as a hub for authoritarian influence.”
Translated by Luisetta Mudie.
This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Matthew Leung for RFA Cantonese.
This post was originally published on Radio Free.
LONDON – Waving flags and carrying placards, protesters representing Tibetan, Uyghur, Chinese and Hong Kong rights groups rallied on Saturday against China’s proposed ‘mega-embassy’ in London, voicing fears that Beijing would use the building to harass and monitor dissidents living abroad.
Organizers said around 4,000 people joined the protest at the proposed site of the embassy at the historic former Royal Mint Court – near the Tower of London – just days ahead of a crucial inquiry session to start on Tuesday. Police did not respond to requests for a crowd size estimate.
The Chinese government purchased the historic building in 2018 with plans to build what would become Beijing’s largest diplomatic facility globally. Plans show that it is expected to be 10 times the size of a regular embassy and house cultural exchange centers and 225 apartment units.
Nearly 30 different rights groups came together for the protest, organizers said. Many were masked and dressed in black. They waved flags and carried placards that said, “UK Government, don’t reward repression. Say no to China’s super embassy,” “Stop Chinese secret policing in the UK” and other slogans.
Police could be heard shouting for order as large crowds spilled out across the intersection by the Mint, and several protestors wrestled with and shouted at a line of police officers. About halfway through the protest, officers could be seen dragging a woman to a police van, prompting protestors to block the van and shout for her release.
At least two people were arrested on suspicion of breaching Section 14 conditions, which require that protesters stay within a designated area, Tower Hamlets Police said.
No counter-protests from Chinese nationalists were seen.
Twice rejected
The local Tower Hamlets Council has twice rejected the planning application, putting the embassy plan on hold.
In October, British Deputy Prime Minister and Secretary of State Angela Rayner announced that she would take over the decision-making of the embassy’s fate.
A public inquiry will be held in front of a planning inspector from Feb. 11-18, after which Raynor will decide whether or not permission should be granted, the council said in a statement.
Previously, the Metropolitan Police had objected to Beijing’s plans to redevelop the former Royal Mint Court site into the Chinese Embassy, citing a lack of space to safely accommodate protestors. However, in January 2025, they withdrew their objection, citing a Beijing-sponsored report that claims the site surrounding the proposed embassy can safely fit up to 4,500 people.
“Chinese embassies are like a watchdog and serve as a base to control so-called minorities like Tibetans, Uyghurs, Hong Kongers and also to human rights defenders and other Chinese dissidents,” said Tsering Passang, founder and chair of the U.K.-based Global Alliance for Tibet & Persecuted Minorities, or GATPM.
“To have our voices and concerns heard, we have gathered here ahead of the public inquiry session,” Passang said. “We are also demonstrating that the site is inappropriate for an embassy, as there is not enough space for safe demonstrations at the site.”
‘Spy base’
At Saturday’s protest, several British politicians, including former Security Minister Tom Tugendhat, Labour parliamentarian Blair McDougall, Shadow Justice Secretary Robert Jenrick and former Tory leader Iain Duncan Smith, spoke out in solidarity with the protestors, saying it would be a “grave mistake” if permission was granted to build the embassy.
They warned that British intelligence services have indicated the Chinese Embassy would become a massive “spy base,” threatening not only exile communities of Hong Kongers, Tibetans and Uyghurs, but also local residents and British national security.
They criticized the U.K. government for their apparent support for the project and disregarding public opinion.
“Tower Hamlet came out this morning and said they stand by their original objection. That means that the local council didn’t approve it, no local residents wanted it, and a large number of politicians in Westminster do not want it either,” Smith told RFA.
“So the government is now using its powers to bully all the organizations to get the decision that they want,” he said.
Smith went on to say that the U.K. government’s apparent support for the embassy approval was “promised” by Prime Minister Keir Starmer to Chinese President Xi Jinping at their meeting on Nov 18, 2024, on the sidelines of the G20 Summit in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
“I think it’s an act of self-harm and a betrayal of the British people to have it here,” he said.
‘We will continue our protest’
Rahima Mahmut, U.K. project director of the World Uyghur Congress, said it was perhaps the largest protest in London against the Chinese regime in recent history.
Due to the large turnout, the protest spilled out across most of the junction between Tower Bridge Road and Tower Hill. This prompted the police to close the intersection, forcing vehicles to turn back and find alternative routes and temporarily paralyzing traffic.
A local resident named Nas, who didn’t want his full name used for security reasons, said the blockage of traffic shows why the site is unsuitable.
He also noted that the area has one of Britain’s largest Muslim communities, raising fears among the local community that the Chinese government would impose its values on the area and impact local mosques, if the plan is approved.
“We are not here just for today, we will continue our protest,” Passang said. “With the collaboration of local residents we are showing a clear message to the U.K. government and also letting the Chinese government know that oppression of religious freedom, freedom of speech and human rights will not be tolerated.”
Additional reporting by Alim Seytoff for RFA Uyghur, Passang Dhonden for RFA Tibetan. Edited by Kalden Lodoe and Malcolm Foster.
This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by By Jasmine Man for RFA Mandarin, Matthew Leung for RFA Cantonese, Tenzin Pema for RFA Tibetan.
This post was originally published on Radio Free.
This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Radio Free Asia.
This post was originally published on Radio Free.
This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Radio Free Asia.
This post was originally published on Radio Free.
A new year has begun, yet Israel’s atrocities in Palestine persist. In Gaza, the situation is more dire than ever. Health workers are stretched to breaking point, particularly in northern Gaza, where not a single hospital remains functional. Their resilience in the face of unimaginable suffering is nothing short of heroic, but they cannot do it alone.
On Monday 7 January, health workers and supporters gathered outside parliament to demand urgent action. Jeremy Corbyn addressed the crowd calling for IDF troops to withdraw from Gaza and the West Bank, as well as from southern Lebanon and Syria; and for the British government to stop supplying arms to Israel.
The post #WeWillMarch Groups Challenge Police Over Palestine Demo Permit appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.
This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.
This content originally appeared on Just Stop Oil and was authored by Just Stop Oil.
This post was originally published on Radio Free.
This content originally appeared on The Grayzone and was authored by The Grayzone.
This post was originally published on Radio Free.
A video of an explosion has been repeatedly shared in Chinese-language social media posts that claim it shows London being hit by a missile in September.
But the claim is false. The clip shows a planned explosion on a film set in London, not a missile attack.
The video was shared on Douyin, a Chinese version of TikTok, on Sept. 5.
The 10-second video captures a building engulfed in flames, with smoke billowing out.
“The footage shows the aftermath of a surprise missile attack against London in the early morning of Sept. 1 – first such air attack against the U.K in 80 years,” the claim reads.
Many online users connected the claim of a missile attack in London to the Russian-Ukrainian war, sparking fears that it could herald World War III.
According to a 2022 report by The Independent, Andrey Gurulyov, a member of Vladimir Putin’s United Russia party, stated on Russian state television that London would be the first NATO strategic target for Russian missiles if a conflict between NATO and Russia broke out.
In May 2023, the U.K. confirmed it would supply Storm Shadow missiles to Ukraine to help repel Russian forces “in Ukraine.”
A July report by the Chinese edition of Russia’s state-run media, Sputnik, cited the Kremlin criticizing the British decision as irresponsible.
But the claim about the missile attack in London is false.
A film set
A combined keyword search and reverse image search found the same clip shared in media reports, including the Evening Standard, Daily Mail and The Sun, and the BBC.
“A HUGE fire has erupted near The O2 after a planned explosion at a film set ‘spread out of control’ and sent black smoke into the sky,” The Sun reported on Aug. 31.
The O2 is a multi-purpose indoor arena in southeast London.
“The controlled explosion was right on the river’s edge at a Silvertown commercial site with locals nearby catching it on video and hearing loud cracks,” The Sun reported.
Translated by Shen Ke. Edited by Shen Ke and Taejun Kang.
Asia Fact Check Lab (AFCL) was established to counter disinformation in today’s complex media environment. We publish fact-checks, media-watches and in-depth reports that aim to sharpen and deepen our readers’ understanding of current affairs and public issues. If you like our content, you can also follow us on Facebook, Instagram and X.
This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by By Dong Zhe for Asia Fact Check Lab.
This post was originally published on Radio Free.
Read RFA coverage of this story in Mandarin from London and Canada
Hundreds of Hong Kongers gathered in London over the weekend to mark the fifth anniversary of 2019 attacks by riot police on unarmed train passengers with baton’s and tear gas in Prince Edward subway station.
Around 500 people gathered in London’s Trafalgar Square on Saturday, raising the colonial-era flag of British Hong Kong and singing the banned protest anthem “Glory to Hong Kong,” before lowering the flag to half-mast to mourn those who died during the months-long protests against Hong Kong’s vanishing autonomy under Chinese rule.
The protesters then marched to the Hong Kong Economic and Trade Office in London, shouting “Hong Kong is not China!” and “One Hong Kong, one nation!” and handing out information leaflets about the attacks to passers-by.
Police were present at the march, and while the demonstration drew stares from some people around Chinese-owned businesses as the march passed through Chinatown, there was no physical or verbal altercation.
Details of the attacks by riot police at the height of the 2019 protest movement remain shrouded in secrecy. Journalists and activists are having difficulty piecing together a coherent picture of what exactly happened in the station as much of the evidence remains in the hands of the authorities.
While police and government officials have hit out at ‘malicious rumors’ that someone died, the selective release of stills from surveillance footage from cameras inside the station has done little to assuage public mistrust in the official narrative.
Call for investigation
A woman who gave only the surname Wong for fear of reprisals said she has been living in the U.K. for three years now, and has attended every rally marking the Aug. 31, 2019, attacks.
Wong said the attacks were one of the most iconic events in the entire anti-extradition movement, adding that she “can’t accept” that the Hong Kong police charged into a subway station and “indiscriminately attacked” people.
She said the government has yet to fully investigate the incident, and called for the truth about what happened in the subway station to be made public.
The parents of a 6-year-old marcher told RFA Mandarin that they had “mixed feelings” about being allowed to hold peaceful demonstrations in the United Kingdom after moving to the country in June.
They said they felt an obligation to tell people in Britain about how their freedoms were built on the sacrifices of others, and that Hong Kongers had been forced to emigrate to the U.K. by the ongoing political crackdown in their home city.
In Canada, around 40 protesters gathered outside the Chinese Consulate in Calgary, burning photos of Hong Kong Chief Executive John Lee and security chief Chris Tang, who was chief of police at the time of the protest movement, when rights groups hit out at the use of “excessive force” by the authorities.
39 minutes
Public anger against the police treatment of protesters began with the intense tear-gassing of unarmed crowds who had no escape route at the start of the anti-extradition protests.
It gained momentum when officers took 39 minutes to respond to hundreds of emergency calls when unidentified mobsters in white T-shirts attacked passengers and passers-by at Yuen Long MTR on July 21, 2019.
And it took on a much darker turn following the bloody attacks on train passengers, after which the MTR refused to release video footage from trains and platforms despite persistent rumors that at least one person died in the attacks.
Photos of Lee’s second-in-command Eric Chan and Secretary for Justice Paul Lam were also burned.
Protest organizer Paul Cheng, who organized the protest, called them Hong Kong’s “Gang of Four,” and called on the Canadian government to sanction them.
“They helped the Communist Party destroy Hong Kong and kill Hong Kong,” Cheng told RFA Mandarin at the protest. “They are the Communist Party’s running dogs. The Communist Party is the culprit in the killing of Hong Kong, and they are its accomplices.”
Cheng, who emigrated to Canada more than 40 years ago, says he remembers the freedoms once enjoyed by the city’s 7 million residents, adding that things are very different now.
First sedition conviction
Last Thursday, a Hong Kong court found two editors of the now-defunct Stand News guilty of conspiring to publish seditious material, marking the first sedition conviction against any journalist since Hong Kong’s handover from Britain to China in 1997.
The publication’s former editor-in-chief, Chung Pui-kuen, and former acting editor-in-chief, Patrick Lam, could face a maximum prison term of two years under colonial-era sedition laws.
A former Hong Kong journalist who gave only the nickname Stephen for fear of reprisals said he used to work as a journalist in the city, and was particularly saddened by those convictions.
“All Hong Kong media have the same tone now,” he said. “There’s no opposing voices, just a unified message.”
Meanwhile, Vancouver-based activist Christine described physical and mental “torment” after leaving the city she once called home.
“I can’t let it go, to be honest,” she said. “It’s not easy. But fortunately, there is a group of us with the same aspirations, so we can use that discomfort as motivation.”
“So we come out on days that need to be commemorated, which is better than pretending I’ve forgotten about it,” she said.
Translated by Luisetta Mudie. Edited by Malcolm Foster.
This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by By Jasmine Man and Liu Fei for RFA Mandarin.
This post was originally published on Radio Free.
Saudis living in the UK claim Riyadh is targeting them for speaking out on human rights and jailing of female activists
Saudi exiles living in the UK have spoken of threats to their lives and harassment over their support for improvements in human rights in their home country.
Saudi Arabia has been attempting to present itself as a reformed state since the murder of the journalist Jamal Khashoggi by a Saudi hit squad at its consulate in Istanbul in 2018.
It has spent billions on sporting deals and promoting tourism in the country and was recently named host of a UN commission on women’s rights, despite what Amnesty International called its “abysmal” record on women’s rights.
Continue reading…This post was originally published on Human rights | The Guardian.
This content originally appeared on The Grayzone and was authored by The Grayzone.
This post was originally published on Radio Free.
A play about the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre that can no longer be staged in Hong Kong has premiered in London ahead of the 35th anniversary of the bloodshed, in a bid to outrun a widening crackdown on political dissent in the city.
In “May 35th” by Candace Chong, an elderly couple modeled on the real-life families of the victims of the massacre sets out on the night of June 4, 1989, to hold a ritual for their son where he was killed by the People’s Liberation Army 35 years ago.
Its title is a reference to a code-word for June 4 used by Chinese internet users to evade censorship by the government.
“You can’t call it June 4 — you have to call it May 35th, which means that it doesn’t exist,” producer Ming Wai Lit told RFA Mandarin in a recent interview. “[But] we have witnessed history, and we have a responsibility to make the truth known.”
Armed with a dated map of Tiananmen Square, a candle and some matchsticks, a cleaner’s work permit, and a family secret buried for over 30 years, the couple in the play sets out on their risky mission to honor the life of their son, according to the play’s publicity material at London’s Southwark Playhouse, which is premiering a recently translated English-language version of the play.
For Lit, the commemoration of the massacre that ended weeks of student-led pro-democracy protests on Beijing’s Tiananmen Square and in other cities across China is inextricably bound up with Hong Kong’s own pro-democracy movement, and the ongoing crackdown on dissent under two draconian national security laws.
Estimates of death toll for the killing of students and other activists by Chinese tanks and troops in June 1989 range up to 10,000.
The last candlelight vigil
For three decades, thousands of people gathered every June 4 in Hong Kong’s Victoria Park to hold a candlelight vigil for the victims, until the gathering was banned in 2020 and its organizers jailed.
“2019 turned out to be the last candlelight vigil in Hong Kong,” Lit said in a 2022 interview with RFA Mandarin. “It made me deeply sad that Hong Kong couldn’t even accommodate some candles and people mourning.”
“The fact that this kind of ritual can no longer happen in Hong Kong shows that there is no going back to the free Hong Kong of the past,” she said.
“May 35th” was still being staged in Hong Kong in 2019, but after Beijing imposed the National Security Law on the city in 2020, it became impossible to find a venue.
After the play was performed in front of a live stream audience of more than half a million during the pandemic, there were still security concerns, Lit said.
“On the night of the performance, we were worried that the police would come to our house and that we wouldn’t be able to do the live broadcast to the world,” she said.
So Lit reached out to human rights lawyer and vigil organizer Chow Hang-tung, who is now in prison awaiting trial under both the National Security Law and the more recent Article 23 security law.
“I got in contact with Tung, who acted as our voluntary legal advisor that night, and stayed till the performance was over. But then she was arrested because of the Alliance,” she said in a reference to the now-disbanded vigil organizer, the Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements of China.
“Thinking back to that is pretty emotional for me, and also full of irony, because we thought we could use the law to protect ourselves, but now the law is being used as a tool to abuse and harm people,” Lit said.
No venues
Lit’s production company Stage June Fourth, which is presenting the English version of the play with support from Amnesty International and the U.K.’s Arts Council, was founded in 2009 on the 20th anniversary of the Tiananmen bloodshed.
But it was too risky for it to continue in Hong Kong, she said.
“In 2019, we were still able to legally perform on this theme,” Lit told RFA Mandarin as the play opened in London. “We had a good box office and received good reviews from the industry. We won the Best Production, Best Director, Best Screenwriter and Best Lighting Design at the Drama Society Awards that year.”
“It is hard to imagine that just five years later, none of these things are possible any more,” she said. “It’s impossible to find a venue, so it can’t be performed.”
Even in the United Kingdom, it was hard to find people willing to put their names to the project, Lit said.
“Some people felt uneasy during the selection process, and some decided not to participate after being chosen for the part due to the political risks,” Lit said. “So it took a lot of time to confirm the actors.”
Even now, none of the three main actors, all of whom have British nationality, is using their real name, she said.
“That was unexpected,” Lit said. “I didn’t think British actors would have a strong connection with Hong Kong, but because of the National Security Law and the unknown quantity that is Article 23, they didn’t know how far-reaching the risks could be.”
‘Fear is all-pervasive’
Even back in 2022, Lit had noticed that the space for creative expression had gotten smaller in the wake of the first national security law, telling RFA Mandarin at the time that “fear is all-pervasive in the theater industry.”
Part of the problem is the vague wording used by the new legislation, and the unwillingness of Hong Kong officials to clarify it in concrete terms.
“You don’t know where the lines are drawn, and what used to be a red line in the past is now a sea of red — the lines are everywhere,” Lit said in the earlier interview.
“Even if something was legal before, you don’t know if it will become illegal in future.”
She said the authorities even then were trying to rewrite the history of Hong Kong’s 2019 protest movement, much as they did for the 1989 pro-democracy movement in Tiananmen Square.
“They will tell a different story and completely bury the truth,” Lit said, adding that she remains inspired by the play, especially a line in which the elderly bereaved father says before his death: “My son fought for this, even though it didn’t succeed. He fought for it anyway.”
Here again, Lit sees the parallels with Hong Kong’s experience.
“The current situation in Hong Kong is a huge setback, but we tried, and we fought,” she said. “Even though we didn’t succeed, we fought for it anyway.”
Translated by Luisetta Mudie. Edited by Malcolm Foster.
This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by By Jasmine Man and Chen Zifei for RFA Mandarin.
This post was originally published on Radio Free.
This content originally appeared on Democracy Now! and was authored by Democracy Now!.
This post was originally published on Radio Free.