Category: military

  • SPECIAL REPORT: By Johnny Blades, RNZ Pacific journalist

    Armed conflict in West Papua has caused an exodus of displaced people into one of the most remote parts of neighbouring Papua New Guinea.

    The latest flashpoint in the conflict is in the Indonesian-administered Bintang Mountains regency, where state forces are pursuing West Papua Liberation Army fighters who they blame for recent attacks on health workers in Kiwirok district.

    Since violence surged in Kiriwok last month, Indonesian security forces have targetted suspected village strongholds of the OPM-Free Papua Movement’s military wing.

    At least 2000 people are recorded by local groups to have fled from the conflict either to other parts of Bintang Mountains (Pegunungan Bintang) or crossed illegally into the adjacent region over the international border.

    Hundreds of people have fled across to Tumolbil, in Yapsie sub-district of the PNG province of West Sepik, situated right on the border.

    A spokesman for the OPM, Jeffrey Bomanak, said that those fleeing were running from Indonesian military operations, including helicopter assaults, which he claimed had caused significant destruction in around 14 villages.

    “Our people, they cannot stay with that situation, so they are crossing to the Papua New Guinea side.

    “I already contacted my network, our soldiers from OPM, TPN (Liberation Army). They already confirmed 47 families in Tumolbil.”

    Evidence of the influx
    A teacher in Yapsie, Paul Alp, said he saw evidence of the influx in Tumolbil last week.

    “It is easy to get into Papua New Guinea from Indonesia. There are mountains but they know how to get around to climb those mountains into Papua New Guinea.

    “There are foot tracks,” he explained, adding that Papua New Guineans sometimes went across to the Indonesian side, usually to access a better level of basic services.

    A village destroyed in Pengunungan Bintang regency, Papua province.
    A village destroyed in Pengunungan Bintang regency, Papua province. Image: ULMWP/RNZ

    Alp said West Papuans who had come to Tumolbil were not necessarily staying for more than a week or so before returning to the other side.

    He and others in the remote district confirmed that illegal border crossings have occurred for years, but that it had increased sharply since last month.

    For decades, the PNG government’s policy on refugees from West Papua has been to place them in border camps, the main one being at East Awin in Western Province, with support from the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees.

    Thousands of displaced Papuan have ended up at East Awin, but many others who come across simply melt into the general populace among various remote villages along the porous border region.

    Threadbare security
    Sergeant Terry Dap is one of a handful of policemen in the entire Telefomin district covering 16,333 sq km and with a population of around 50,000.

    He said a lot of people had come across to Tumolbil in recent weeks, including OPM fighters.

    “There’s a fight going on, on the other side, between the Indonesians and the West Papuan freedom fighters.

    “So there’s a lot of disruption there [in Tumolbil]. So I went there, and I talked to the ward development officer of Yapsie LLG [Local Level Government area], and he said he needed immediate assistance from the authorities in Vanimo [capital of West Sepik].”

    “They want military and police, to protect the sovereignty of Papua New Guinea, and to protect properties to make sure the fight doesn’t come into PNG.”

    Sergeant Dap said he had emailed the provincial authorities with this request, and was awaiting feedback.

    Papua New Guinea police
    Papua New Guinea police … “There’s a fight going on, on the other side, between the Indonesians and the West Papuan freedom fighters.” Image: Johnny Blades/RNZ

    More civilians crossing over
    According to Bomanak, the impacts of displacement from recent attacks in Kiwirok district are ongoing.

    “This problem now is as we have damage in village, more civilians will cross over in Papua New Guinea side.

    “Five to six hundred villagers, civillians, mothers and children, they’re still in three locations, out in jungle in Kiwirok, and they’re still on their way to Papua New Guinea,” he warned.

    On the PNG side, Sergeant Dap said some of the people coming across from West Papua have traditional or family links to the community of Tulmolbil

    But their presence on PNG soil creates risk for locals who are fearful their communities could get caught in the crossfire of Indonesian military pursuing the Papuan fighters.

    Dap said he spoke with the OPM fighters who had come to Tumolbil, and encouraged them not to stay long.

    “I’ve talked to their commander. They said there’s another group of people coming – about one thousand-plus coming in,” he said.

    “I told them, just stay for some days and then you go back, because this is another country, so you don’t need to come in. You go back to your own country and then stay there.”

    Violence in mountainous Pengunungan Bintang regency, near the border with PNG, October 2021.
    Clashes in the mountainous Pengunungan Bintang regency, near the border with PNG, in October 2021. Image: RNZ

    The policeman has also been involved in efforts by PNG authorities to encourage vaccination against covid-19.

    Mistrust of covid vaccines is deep in PNG, where only around 2 or 3 percent of the population has been inoculated, while a delta-fuelled third wave of the pandemic is causing daily casualties.

    Sergeant Dap said convincing people to get vaccinated was difficult enough without illegal border crossings adding to the spread of the virus and the sense of fear.

    This article is republished under a community partnership agreement with RNZ.

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • Asia Pacific Report newsdesk

    Two small babies were shot by the Indonesian military in Intan Jaya two days ago, claims the United Liberation Movement of West Papua (ULMWP).

    One of them has died, and the other is in critical condition. Thousands more West Papuans have been displaced in Intan Jaya and Maybrat as Indonesia bombs villages.

    Hundreds of internal refugees are fleeing into PNG.

    Baby Nopelinus Sondegau
    Two-year-old Nopelinus Sondegau, a Papuan baby alleged to have been killed by the Indonesian military. Image: ULMWP

    One two-year-old, Nopelinus Sondegau, was killed by the Indonesian forces, ULMWP interim president Benny Wenda said in a statement.

    A five-year old, Yoakim Majau, was also shot. The bullet was still in the baby’s shoulder.

    “These killings are happening under the eye of the world while the Indonesian President [Joko Widodo] and ministers pretend that nothing is happening during talks with Pacific and Melanesian leaders,” said Wenda.

    “These killings are happening as Indonesia tries to turn West Papua’s killing fields into a tourist destination.”

    Wenda called for urgent United Nations intervention.

    “Indonesia cannot use coronavirus as an excuse to delay the visit of the UN High Commissioner, recently called for by the Basque Parliament, any longer,” he said.

    “Indonesia has hosted national games in West Papua during coronavirus, Indonesia has sent thousands of troops to West Papua during coronavirus, now Indonesia is killing small children during coronavirus.

    “There can be no more excuses. Amnesty International, Red Cross, all international journalists, must be allowed in to monitor this urgent situation.

    “My people are screaming for help. Where is the world?”

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • RNZ Pacific

    France has detailed an unprecedented security set-up for New Caledonia’s third and final independence referendum on December 12.

    The French authorities made the announcement as the pro-independence FLNKS called on its supporters to boycott the vote after France refused to delay it until next year.

    If the call is heeded, the anti-independence side is all but certain to again have a majority as it did in the 2018 and 2020 referendums.

    To ensure a safe voting process in December, French High Commissioner Patrice Faure said 1400 armed police will be flown in from France, including 15 mobile units.

    High Commissioner in New Caledonia, Patrice Faure
    French High Commissioner in New Caledonia Patrice Faure … 1400 armed police will be flown in from France. Image: The Pacific Journal

    Just over a week ago, a contingent of 250 armed police arrived in Noumea as first reinforcements for the referendum.

    In coming weeks, an additional 100 members of the national police and 250 members of the armed forces are expected.

    Elite tactical response unit
    The police’s elite tactical response unit will also be reinforced to deal with any situation that may arise.

    One hundred and sixty vehicles, 30 armoured carriers, two helicopters and a transport aircraft are due in the next weeks.

    Sixty investigators will be flown in to stay for as long as needed.

    There will also be a cyber unit dedicated to respond to hate speech and calls for violence on social media.

    General Christophe Marietti, who oversees the security operation, said the deployment — which is twice the size of the one at the 2018 referendum — is meant to be “reassuring, dissuasive and reactive”.

    After the 2018 plebiscite, rioting south of Noumea closed the main road, which police managed to reopen after two days.

    Both the French High Commissioner and Overseas Minister Sebastien Lecornu have said the vote would go ahead as announced in June despite the calls to defer it because of the covid-19 pandemic and the devastating impact on the indigenous Kanak people.

    Elections held on time
    Lecornu said in democracies votes were held on time and only an out-of-control pandemic could make a date change possible.

    More than 10,000 people caught covid-19 since the start of the latest community outbreak in early September and more than 260 people — mainly indigenous Kanaks — have died.

    The FLNKS said its campaign was being hampered because covid-19 measures restrict meetings.

    It also argues that the Kanak people are in mourning, and therefore the referendum should be postponed until September next year.

    The wish to delay the vote is also being supported by the Melanesian Spearhead Group.

    The anti-independence camp has meanwhile resumed its referendum campaign, dismissing the rivals’ concerns by pointing out that the issue at stake has been debated for the past three years.

    It also said that it was the pro-independence politicians who in April wanted a third referendum when others were against holding another one.

    Final referendum held early
    Lecornu has said 18 months after the December 2020 referendum, another vote would be held on the next status of New Caledonia.

    Paris outlined in a paper in July what the consequences would be of either a yes or a no vote.

    A no vote would open the way for an arrangement of partial reintegration into France while a yes vote would, after a transition phase, usher in a sharp rupture.

    An FLNKS politician, Pierre-Chanel Tutugoro, said that amid the current debate, two important historic aspects emanating from the 1983 roundtable in Nainville-les-Roches remained.

    He said the French state had recognised the innate and active right to independence of the colonised Kanak people.

    He also said the Kanak people accepted to include in any future decolonisation process all the various communities that had settled in New Caledonia as part of France’s colonisation.

    This article is republished under a community partnership agreement with RNZ.

  • Women serving in the UK military face a considerable risk of emotional bullying, sexual harassment, and physical assault, a study has found.

    Systemic abuse

    Those who are younger, have held the rank of officer, or had a combat or combat support role were the most likely to have suffered such treatment, according to a study published in the BMJ Military Health journal.

    Of the 750 women veterans who were surveyed, 22.5% said they had been sexually harassed, while 5.1% recalled having been sexually assaulted. Emotional bullying was suffered by 22.7% of those women, while 3.3% said they had been physically assaulted.

    There are currently around 16,500 women serving in the UK military and they make up approximately 11% of personnel. Women have been able to serve in the UK military for many years and all roles were opened up to them, including deployment to frontline combat, in 2018.

    The team of British-based scientists, who made contact with those who took part in the research through a UK charity which supports women veterans, believe there is an urgent need to provide more support to military women. All forms of bad treatment left the women at risk of post-traumatic stress disorder, according to the study.

    Sexual harassment was “significantly” linked to a situation where the women found themselves in pain or fatigued due to the mental distress causes they were suffering. It was also found that sexual assault could be linked with the women having “a greater risk of alcohol difficulties”, while emotional bullying left them to cope with issues such as anxiety, depression, low social support, and loneliness.

    The study found that women who held a rank as an officer were at greater risk of sexual harassment as well as emotional bullying, but the scientists also state that “even women holding higher power positions may be at risk of victimisation from their own superiors”. Since women were in the minority within the military “it cannot be ruled out that victimisation of women holding higher ranks may be perpetrated by their own peers as well as those in lower ranks”.

    “Fear of the consequences”

    The study states:

    Many women do not report adverse service experiences due to fear of the consequences of doing so and may continue to suffer from increased mental health distress during and after military service. It is essential to consider whether current reporting procedures may not provide sufficient confidentiality to encourage women to report adverse experiences and more appropriate disclosing procedures should be considered.

    Furthermore, it is essential to consider whether existing support is adequate to support the mental health needs of women who experienced military adversity.

    They add that it may be worth considering whether organisational and leadership changes can be made to better protect military women. The scientists say that no firm conclusions can be drawn about cause and effect behind their findings as it was an observational study. Further research is needed.

    It involved women, who were mostly aged over 61, who answered questions about their experiences and feelings of their former lives in the military. The experiences of these older women may not be similar to a younger generation of army personnel. The study was also based around self-reported events, which means it could under-estimate or over-estimate the true picture of what was experienced.

    A spokesperson for the Ministry of Defence said:

    We are committed to improving the experience for women in the armed forces in every area of their lives and do not tolerate abuse, bullying​, harassment or discrimination.

    We have taken a range of steps to improve the experiences of women in our armed forces, as we continue to do for all serving personnel. This includes launching a 24/7 confidential and independent whole-force bullying, harassment and discrimination helpline with trained advisors to support personnel.

    All allegations are taken very seriously, with unlawful behaviour investigated ​by the relevant police service as necessary.

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • The system of dragging Palestinians before Israeli military courts is seemingly little more than a sham. In 2011, +972 Magazine reported 99.7% of Palestinians in the West Bank were convicted in such trials. The trials usually last about 10 minutes and the testimony of an Israeli soldier is enough to secure a conviction. So the court is little more than:

    a place of transition…between the freedom you had as a subject of occupation closed within walls and checkpoints and the prison cell where you will probably be imprisoned for the next few years.

    The odds of a fair trial are stacked against Palestinians. They’re conducted in Hebrew and the poor translations do little to help Palestinians understand what is happening or even what they’re accused of. So each trial essentially boils down to plea bargaining. The Palestinian defendant pleads guilty to get a lesser sentence.

    But does any of this really surprise you given what we know about the apartheid state of Israel? Probably not. Indeed, it all sounds pretty familiar to be honest. That is, of course, until you hear about the trial of a human rights defender from Hebron, Issa Amro. Amro’s case is interesting because he’s one of the .3%. And while he wasn’t acquitted of all charges against him, he was acquitted of the majority.

    Now, he and Israeli playwright Einat Weizman want to highlight his case to motivate people around the world to take action. They’re currently rehearsing a play about his case which they hope will motivate us to “make a revolution”.

    Weizman’s video gives an idea of the situation with military courts:

    Issa Amro’s case

    In January 2020, an Israeli military court convicted Amro “of 6 out of 18 charges that were labelled by Amnesty International as ‘politically motivated’”. But unlike most other Palestinians, Amro received a proper trial. He was defended by Israeli lawyer Gabi Laskey. Weizman told The Canary she believes he’s in the minority because of his status as a human rights defender and the presence of foreign diplomats at the trial.

    And while Amro avoided going to prison, he received a fine and a suspended sentence. He told The Canary he’s appealing this in January 2022. And while it’s good news he wasn’t sent to prison, what of the 99.7%? What can be done about those people? This, in part, is his motivation for collaborating with Weizman. Amro said he sees the play as:

    part of the activism against the Israeli occupation

    He sees his appeal hearing in a similar light. Because he’s appealing to:

    challenge the military court and to confront the military system. Because as Palestinians we are not allowed to practice our general assembly…which is allowed according to the international law.

    So I’m appealing to challenge, confront the Israeli military system and I’m hoping to bring more international awareness and international attention to increase the cost of the Israeli occupation on the occupiers

    Weizman’s play will take a fresh and creative approach to resisting the Israeli occupation. She’s calling it How to Make a Revolution? The three acts of the play puts the sham Israeli military court system on trial.

    The play

    The first act is located in Ofer military court. It explains the trial details and how Amro managed to escape the system. Meanwhile, Amro will provide commentary that deconstructs the military court system and shows how it operates. This style of delivery allows him to charge Israel for its crimes as well as describing how he became an activist.

    The second act includes the role of Palestinian Authority (PA) and how it also went after him. This act describes the PA as the “sub-contracts of Israeli occupation”. The final act is set in a centre in Hebron run by Amro. This centre represents “liberated territory”. It’s where Amro and others can act, give lectures, invite groups, and talk about resistance. Amro uses this part of the play to answer the question of “How to make a revolution?”. This response, according to Weizman:

    is a direct action [that] you see on stage. It’s art.

    But of course to know more people will have to go and see it. Weizman and Amro believe this will help make a difference for Palestinians fighting the Israeli occupation.

    Amro also added:

    The PA is obliged by the agreement and now obliged by the security forces (Israeli) to cooperate with them. If they don’t cooperate with them they will not exist any more. So for the PA officials to keep their seats, and to keep their power, and their control, and their privilege, they cooperate with the Israeli military and the Israeli government

    Time to “make a revolution” – a British legacy

    Weizman said they’re currently making a demo of the play. They’ll then show it in the UK, Norway, and the United States, as well as other countries. In each country they’ll try to connect that particular country’s role and history in Palestine with the current apartheid situation.

    Weizman told The Canary the military court system is directly related to the former British mandate in Palestine from 1918 until 1947. She said in the play we draw:

    a line between the Israeli colonialism to the British colonialism to show the British audience their responsibility for this situation. Because they…still have a responsibility. And their legacy is part of what is happening these days. The mandate rules are still being used in the military courts. So it’s not like something that is happening in a long distant strange country. It’s something that people here (in the UK) have the responsibility for

    She said if they take it to the US, they’ll use it to show US citizens their responsibility in Palestine. In Norway, they’ll “take out the British mandate and we will put the Oslo agreement in”, to show Norwegians their responsibility. The 1993 Oslo agreement was supposed to be a peace agreement between Palestine and Israel. However, Palestinian activist Mustafa Barghouti described it as:

    the greatest idea Israel ever had. It let them continue the occupation without paying any of the costs.

    Weizman says the key message of the play is its name: How to make a revolution? So it’s not just about watching the play – but also doing something about the occupation of Palestine. She says one piece of action involves boycotting Israel.

    Einat Weizman (L) and Issa Amro (R) in Hebron
    Helping to raise awareness

    Naturally, putting together such a production involves a cost. So the organisers are asking people to give whatever they can through a gofundme page. This will also help to get the play’s message out there. Fundraiser Natalie Strecker said:

    Your support will help us to expose the workings of the occupation, give a voice to those it tries to silence, and – ultimately – work towards its end. Small acts can make a big difference.

    Weizman hopes the play will go online on the Finborough theatre’s online channel and from there they can take it around the world and get people to take action. Amro urges people in Ireland and the UK to:

    Keep doing the good work and not to lose hope. And to continue their awareness, their networking their support and to think about how to make the occupation costly. And to write to their officials, meet their officials…do social media, do actions and activities.

    Featured image via YouTube – 99.7%Convictions

    By Peadar O'Cearnaigh

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • Asia Pacific Report newsdesk

    Australia needs to be put on notice by Pacific Islands Forum (PIF) leaders over abandoning its commitments under the South Pacific’s nuclear free accord — the Treaty of Rarotonga — by signing up to the controversial security pact, AUKUS, says the Pacific Network on Globalisation (PANG).

    The deal by the Australian, the United Kingdom, and the United States governments is “highly problematic” and “heightens risks for nuclear proliferation” in the region, PANG coordinator Maureen Penjueli said.

    “Security and defence pacts today are about the Pacific Ocean — which is our home — but it has never been with Pacific people, let alone our governments,” she said.

    AUKUS is promoted as a trilateral partnership between the three allies to enable Australia to boost its military capacity by acquiring nuclear-powered submarines for its navy.

    However, Australia, was a key part of PIF and also a party to the Rarotonga Treaty, the region’s principal nuclear non-proliferation and disarmament agreement, Penjueli said.

    The accord legally binds member states “not to manufacture, possess, acquire or have control of nuclear weapons (Article 3)”, as well as “to prevent nuclear testing in their territories (Article 6)”. The treaty further places an emphasis on keeping the region free from radioactive wastes.

    Penjueli said that Pacific people had had first-hand experience of the threats of nuclear weapons testing, and continued to live with the sideeffects of historical nuclear catastrophes to this day.

    Long list of nuclear threats
    “We see AUKUS as just one in a long list of nuclear threats and issues that the region as a whole has been confronted with,” she said.

    “We see Australia playing a key, often unilateral role, taking decisions around peace and security which is not aligned with Pacific peoples’ immediate priorities around security, in particular human security.

    “AUKUS raises serious concerns over Australia’s intentions for its island neighbours.”

    Pacific Island governments and civil society had been at the forefront in advocating for a nuclear free and independent Pacific.

    They have expressed strong opposition to AUKUS since it was announced in September, which experts say undermines regional solidarity on the issue of a nuclear free Pacific.

    Australuan foreign policy analyst Dr Greg Fry said that the more immediate threat to the South Pacific nuclear-free zone lay not in the nuclear submarines, which were not due until 2040 and beyond, “but in the fundamental shift in Australian-US defence arrangements which were announced alongside AUKUS”.

    According to Dr Fry, these arrangements included the possible home-basing of American submarines, surface vessels, and bombers, in Australia, as well stockpiling of munitions.

    Home basing threat
    “Home basing would require the presence of nuclear weapons in Australia. This raises questions for article 5 of the Rarotonga Treaty which bans the stationing of nuclear weapons in the treaty zone.

    “It would, therefore, require Australia to notify the Secretary-General of the PIFS under article 9 of the treaty.”

    Dr Fry said Australia’s assurances that the nuclear reactors powering the submarines would not be in danger of accidently releasing radioactive material into the Pacific Ocean needed to be examined against the history of accidents involving nuclear submarines.

    “There has already been a serious accident in the Pacific. In 2005, the US nuclear attack submarine USS San Francisco ran into a sea mount near the Caroline Islands in the Federated States of Micronesia.

    “Although the nuclear reactor was undamaged, it was reported as ‘remarkable’ that it was not given the extensive damage to the submarine,” he said.

    “Aside from the obvious nuclear concerns, the partnership is also widely noted to be an effort by the Australia-UK-US governments to counter the growing influence of China in the Pacific.

    “It [AUKUS] also means Australia is even more fully integrated with US forces in a new cold war with China right now,” said Dr Fry.

    Major policy shift
    He added that “this is a major shift in policy from one where we pretended we were friends to both China and US”.

    Penjueli said that several Pacific countries have had long diplomatic relations with China and the Asian superpower was not considered a problem.

    “Our countries have taken much more nuanced policies with China. It is time that Australia is put on notice at the Forum. It is clearly part of our neighbourhood but it is acting outside of the norms of Pacific Islands Forum.”

    She said that while AUKUS had taken the limelight, it was not the only cause for nuclear anxiety for the region.

    The revelation by a Japanese utility company about plans to release nuclear waste from the Fukushima nuclear power plant — one of the world’s worst atomic disasters — into the Pacific Ocean had also set the alarm bells ringing.

    “Japan is also a partner to the forum and the announcement has infuriated regional governments and activist groups,” Penjueli said.

    “Our governments have opposed nuclear testing, they have opposed the movement of nuclear shipments of radioactive waste and they have strongly opposed the announcement by Japan to dump radioactive water into the Pacific Ocean.

    “The Pacific Ocean is not a dumping ground for nuclear materials, nor is it a highway for nuclear submarines.”


    This content originally appeared on Asia Pacific Report and was authored by APR editor.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Via America’s Lawyer: Hundreds of service members were promised compensation for medical malpractice over a year ago. So why haven’t they seen a penny from the Pentagon yet? RT correspondent Brigida Santos joins Mike Papantonio to explain how troops and veterans are still awaiting payouts to the tune of $2 billion. Also, Juul has been in the hot seat since 2019, […]

    The post US Troops Not Receiving Payments For Medical Malpractice & FDA Still Won’t Regulate Juul E-Cigarette appeared first on The Ring of Fire Network.

    This post was originally published on The Ring of Fire.

  • UK military ‘assistance’ programmes in the global south run the risk of destabilising already volatile regions and arming dangerous groups. A report by the NGO Saferworld warned that these small-scale deployments could end up doing more harm than good.

    The report, titled Playing with matches? UK security assistance and its conflict risks, is wide-ranging. It’s focuses include human rights abuses and the arming of potentially dangerous groups.

    Gifts

    A briefing attached to the report explains:

    The UK is increasingly providing training and equipment to support other security forces to do the bulk of frontline fighting, policing and containment of perceived threats abroad. From training the Somali military to providing heavy machine guns to Kurdish forces fighting Islamic State, UK personnel and either gifted or commercially sold military equipment can be found across the world.

    The training in the report often appears to be tactical military training and the equipment “gifted” varies from helmets and body armour to small arms and vehicles. For example:

    Between 2016 and 2018, the UK gifted vehicle or body armour to Jordan, Libya, Somalia and Lebanon.

    Additionally, heavy weapons were given to some groups, such as 40 machine guns to the Kurdish Peshmerga.

    Playing with matches?

    Saferworld acknowledge that a lot of training is “relatively routine” but they also say some involves “risks of causing harm”:

    For instance, forces that the UK trains or arms may harm civilians or may use that support to pursue agendas at odds with UK interests. Arms provided by the UK may even end up in the hands of unauthorised recipients. These risks are arguably heightened when training or equipment is provided within fragile or conflict-affected countries.

    The 60-page document warns that UK sniper rifles may have been diverted to Russian special forces and Syrian armed groups. 

    The report also documents allegations that UK-trained or -supplied security forces in Somaliland and Nigeria killed protestors. On the training of Egyptian forces by UK personnel, the report warns that the assistance is more political than practical.

    However, the joint exercises may confer legitimacy on the military regime as a partner of the UK, by reinforcing an image within Egypt of the military as the most competent actor within society compared to civilian institutions

    Potential tensions

    Saferworld said that assisting particular groups can also backfire. For example:

    UK supplies of policing equipment to security forces involved in crackdowns on peaceful protests in Hong Kong and the USA also prompted public scrutiny.

    Saferworld also warned UK arms companies involved in assistance are implicated in corruption as far afield as Saudi Arabia and Brazil:

    Too often, it is also alleged that UK government officials and politicians have ‘looked the other way’, failed to report evidence of malpractice or have done their best to cover up substantial wrongdoing.

    Post-War on Terror

    While large deployments like Iraq and Afghanistan seem to be off the table, these small-scale programs of military intervention also involve risks. And if this is the form UK military action now takes, it needs to be accountable and transparent.

    Featured image – Wikimedia Commons/Cpl Jamie Hart

    By Joe Glenton

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • By Rebecca Kuku in Port Moresby

    Many allegations have been leveled against Papua New Guinea’s disciplinary forces over the years, alleging that police and soldiers sell firearms.

    However, Papua New Guinea Defence Force (PNGDF) Commander Major-General Gilbert Toropo denies these claims, saying all firearms are inspected and are accounted for on a fortnightly basis.

    He said that the military had a system in place to ensure accountability for weapons in the force.

    PNGDF commander Major-General Gilbert Toropo … “Today, people can get such military specification weapons anywhere through the borders.” Image: Wikipedia

    With recent reports of the use of firearms in tribal fights across parts of the country, many have started to ask where they are getting the guns from.

    General Toropo said such statements must be backed up with evidence.

    “Today, people can get such military specification weapons anywhere through the borders,” he said.

    “So these allegations have to be supported with evidence. It is unfair to make generalised statements which only undermine our efforts to make PNGDF a force that our people and governments can trust.

    “It’s easy for people to make statements that only discredit the force [and] that are very hard to retract,” he said.

    Attempts made to get comments from the Royal Papua New Guinea Constabulary (RPNGC) were unsuccessful.

    Unwritten rule
    Back at Independence in 1975, there were already a few guns in the community, but as the former Provincial Secretary of Chimbu, Barungke Kaman, said some 40 years ago, there was an unwritten rule that they would not be used in tribal fights, where participants would stick with traditional weapons.

    When asked about the consequences of those unwritten rules being dropped, Kaman responded at that time that “there would then be mayhem”.

    Well those rules have long since been dropped, said Institute of National Affairs (INA) executive director Paul Barker.

    Barker said tribal leaders today were hiring gunmen — or hitmen — often from outside their own clans, to target opponents, and the other side responded in the same way.

    “We had the gun summit and task force, led by former commander Jerry Singirok and respected senior police officers, like John Toguata, but little action has ever been taken by government to follow up,” he said.

    “This is partly because those that are involved in the gun trafficking and arming of groups, sometimes called warlords, are often closely linked to politics and politicians, helping deliver support and countering opponents, or law enforcement officials.”

    According to the United Nations Trust Facility Supporting Cooperation on Arms Regulation (UNSCAR) that backs action on guns regulation, Papua New Guinea has about 51,957 illegal and unlicensed firearms.

    Tougher PNG gun laws
    In 2018, to address the widespread use of firearms in crimes and in tribal fights, Parliament passed tougher gun laws that included penalties of up to K10,000 (NZ$4000) or five years’ jail for the use of unlicensed firearms or the misuse of licensed weapons, with the manufacturing of guns now attracting up to 10 years’ jail time.

    But Barker said users and manufacturers of guns seemed to consider themselves astonishingly immune from arrest and prosecution by law enforcement.

    Some operating within PNG’s cities have even been ready to be interviewed by international film crews and barely conceal their identities or whereabouts or activities, as though they consider themselves protected from police action.

    Rebecca Kuku is a senior PNG Post-Courier journalist. She also reports for The Guardian’s Pacific Project.

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • Wikileaks founder Julian Assange is facing another extradition hearing on 27-28 October. The US authorities are appealing an earlier ruling that Assange should not be extradited to the US on health and safety grounds.

    Now the US and its allies are to be put on ‘trial’ by a tribunal. They are accused of committing atrocities, for example in Iraq, and of torture at Guantánamo Bay. While the tribunal possesses no legal powers, it’s intention is to set the record straight and demonstrate that Assange is not the criminal here.

    The tribunal – referred to as the Belmarsh Tribunal, after the prison where Assange continues to be held – will commence proceedings on 22 October.  There are 20 members of the tribunal, including:

    • Historian Tariq Ali
    • Former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn
    • Former Ecuadorian president Rafael Correa
    • Pentagon Papers whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg
    • Former MI5 intelligence officer Annie Machon
    • Award-winning film maker Ken Loach
    • Hellenic parliament member Yanis Varoufakis.
    What it’s all about

    Via a press release, Tariq Ali explains the tribunal’s origins:

    The Tribunal takes inspiration from the Sartre-Russell Tribunal, of which I was also a member. In 1966, Bertrand Russell and Jean-Paul Sartre issued a call for a War Crimes Tribunal to try the United States for crimes against humanity in their conduct of the war in Vietnam. A number of us were sent to North Vietnam to observe and record the attacks on civilians. I spent six weeks under the bombs, an experience that shaped the rest of my life.

    “The tribunal convened in Stockholm in 1967. The jury members included Sartre, Simone de Beauvoir, Isaac Deutscher, Vladimir Dedijer, Mahmud Ali Kasuri, and David Dellinger, among others. The aim was not legal but moral: to bring the crimes to the notice of the public.

    “In London on 22 October 2021, we will do the same. Assange must be freed and the many crimes of the War on Terror placed centre stage.”

    Jeremy Corbyn says it’s all about accountability:

    Wikileaks exposed crimes of US empire in Afghanistan, Iraq and beyond. At the Belmarsh Tribunal, we will turn the world the right way up, placing crimes of war, torture, kidnapping and a litany of other gross human rights abuses on trial.

    The perpetrators of these crimes walk free, often still prominent public figures in the US, U.K. and elsewhere. They should be held accountable for the lives they destroyed and the futures they stole.

    To understand why the imprisonment of Assange is a travesty of justice, it’s important to appreciate some of the many crimes, including war crimes, exposed by WikiLeaks.

    War crimes

    As reported on by The Canary, during one of Assange’s extradition hearings Reprieve human rights lawyer Clive Stafford Smith provided details of some of the war crimes committed by the US.

    In a March 2019 article, the Canary’s John McEvoy reported that “according to a highly sensitive 2006 UK military report into Iraq, UK and US war planning “ran counter to potential Geneva Convention obligations””. He added how a “US cable from April 2009 [published by WikiLeaks] shows UK business secretary Peter Mandelson “pushing British oil and other corporate interests in Iraq””. A “2009 cable also reveals that the government of former PM Gordon Brown “put measures in place to protect [US] interests” during the Chilcot inquiry into the invasion of Iraq”. Another “US cable also shows how the US and UK governments “rigged the International Criminal Court (ICC) to stop it being able to hold [Tony] Blair and [George W.] Bush accountable for the crime of aggression over Iraq””.

    In 2018, journalist Mark Curtis reported that a WikiLeaks published cable revealed that former foreign secretary David Miliband helped “the US to sidestep a ban on cluster bombs and keep the weapons at US bases on UK soil, despite Britain signing the international treaty banning the weapons the previous year”.

    More allegations

    In 2016, The Canary reported on several allegations of US war crimes based on testimony given by whistleblower Chelsea Manning.

    Another article in The Canary referred to a cable published by WikiLeaks that “suggested that the US had intended to convince Spanish officials to interfere with the National Court’s judicial independence”. This was in connection with an allegation “that the [six US officials] accused conspired with criminal intent to construct a legal framework to permit interrogation techniques and detentions in violation of international law”. The cable shows that the US secretly pressurised the Spanish government to ensure no prosecutions took place.

    The Canary also reported on allegations of a cover-up relating to hundreds of UK war crimes in Iraq and Afghanistan. These included UK involvement in the use of torture centres in both countries. One such centre was Camp Nama where it’s alleged:

    British soldiers and airmen helped operate a secretive US detention facility in Baghdad that was at the centre of some of the most serious human rights abuses to occur in Iraq after the invasion. Many of the detainees were brought there by snatch squads formed from Special Air Service and Special Boat Service squadrons.

    Britain was also implicated in the extraordinary rendition (kidnapping and imprisonment) of detainees.

    Underestimating deaths

    As for the number of Iraqis killed during the war, The Canary reported on figures far higher than the official estimates.

    According to journalist Nafeez Ahmed:

    the US-led war from 1991 to 2003 killed 1.9 million Iraqis; then from 2003 onwards around 1 million: totalling just under 3 million Iraqis dead over two decades.

    Ahmed added that the overall figures of fatalities from Western interventions in Iraq and Afghanistan since the 1990s – from direct killings and the longer-term impact of war-imposed deprivation – constituted:

    around 4 million (2 million in Iraq from 1991-2003, plus 2 million from the ‘war on terror’), and could be as high as 6-8 million people when accounting for higher avoidable death estimates in Afghanistan.

    Back to front

    The prosecution of Assange is arguably political. Indeed, journalist John McEvoy points out how mass media has responded to recent news of a plot to kill Assange with “ghoulish indifference”.

    UN special rapporteur on torture Nils Melzer has commented how Assange has been “systematically slandered to divert attention from the crimes he exposed”. In other words, the Belmarsh Tribunal will at the very least help remind us that it’s the perpetrators of war crimes who should be prosecuted – not the person who helped reveal those crimes.

    As such, Assange should be released forthwith.

    Featured image via Veterans for Peace / Wikimedia Commons

    By Tom Coburg

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • By Arjuna Pademme in Jayapura

    Advocates warn that the the involvement of the Indonesian military (TNI) in a food estate programme initiated by the government last year may enable potential human rights violations.

    “Military deployment will be followed by the act of securing land grabbing, for example,” said rights NGO Imparsial director Gufron Mabruri in an online discussion this week.

    “There is the potential for human rights violations to occur, especially if the community resists and confronts the security forces.”

    Such potential for human rights violations, Mabruri said, was confirmed by the absence of any accountable mechanism, Mabruri said.

    The TNI has its own military court to prosecute members suspected of committing crimes.

    However, the military court is closed to the public and is seen as a shield for impunity in many cases.

    ‘Separatist’ stigma a problem
    Mabruri also warned that the stigma of Papuans as alleged “separatists” should be taken into consideration when putting the national soldiers on civil programmes.

    “Moreover, armed groups in Papua are now labeled as terrorist organisations. This will make things escalate quickly when there is a conflict between the TNI and the community,” he said.

    He suggested President Joko Widodo and the House of Representatives evaluate all military engagement practices in various sectors because it would weaken civil institutions.

    Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI) researcher M. Haripin also said that the involvement of the military in the food estate project was very problematic, as seen in past involvement.

    “Some might think that this is too presumptuous because the military situation has changed. However, for me even now, the military is still very problematic and we cannot put aside our past history and our present concerns,” Haripin said.

    Indeed, ever since it was launched last year until now, the food estate programme has been under heavy criticism, especially with the involvement of the military in its implementation.

    “There is the risk of creating ‘khaki capital’, or the political economy of the military, in the TNI-supported food estate,” he said.

    “Corporations earn profits while soldiers ensure that everything goes according to plan,” he said.

    Arjuna Pademme is a Tabloid Jubi reporter. Republished with permission.

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • Via America’s Lawyer: The Pentagon apologizes for its recent drone strike which killed 7 innocent children in Afghanistan. Mike Papantonio and Farron Cousins discuss more. Also, the EPA announces it will ban the use of the pesticide chlorpyrifos which is linked to developmental disorders in children. Mike Papantonio is joined by Attorney Sara Papantonio to walk us through the chemical’s history, and discusses why did […]

    The post Pentagon Continues To Bomb Civilians & EPA Took 50 Years To Ban DEADLY Pesticide appeared first on The Ring of Fire Network.

    This post was originally published on The Ring of Fire.

  • Protestors occupied the Liverpool arms fair on 11 October to ‘prevent firms from showcasing weapons of mass destruction’.

    Activists from Palestine Action scaled the roof of the ACC Arena, calling for the event to be stopped. Palestine Action said activists are occupying the event space to stop the “normalisation of war crimes” facilitated through the event.

    This is alongside action from several other groups across Liverpool:

    “Festival of criminality”

    AOC Europe – known as the Liverpool arms fair – began on 12 October. Some of the companies exhibiting at the fair include Elbit Systems, BAE Systems, and ELTA. Elbit is Israel’s largest arms producer and BAE makes parts for fighter jets used in Israel.

    A spokesperson for Palestine Action said:

    This event cannot be allowed to go ahead. Liverpool’s residents don’t want arms dealers and war criminals gathering in their city, and its presence is an insult to our Palestinian, Iraqi, Afghan citizens, and all others whose homelands have been devastated by the products of Raytheon, Elbit, ELTA, and the other despicable firms meeting in the ACC.

    After the council and event organisers failed to act, our activists have taken it upon themselves to uphold human rights by disrupting this festival of criminality.

    Support

    Campaign Against Arms Trade (CAAT) and Network for Police Monitoring (Netpol) have both voiced their support for the protestors.

    Many had already campaigned against the arms fair, and a petition to stop it has reached more than 6,000 signatures. Alongside Palestine Action, protestors from Liverpool Against the Arms Fair have been on the streets to show their opposition.

    Arms trade

    Arms companies exhibiting at the fair are known to sell arms to countries known for human rights abuses. For example, BAE Systems, the UK’s biggest arms dealer, sells weapons to Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Turkey and the UAE. According to CAAT:

    BAE’s Typhoon and Tornado aircraft have been central to Saudi Arabia’s devastating attacks on Yemen – attacks that have killed thousands and created a humanitarian disaster. Further Typhoon aircraft have been delivered to Saudi Arabia during the bombing and BAE and the UK government are pushing hard for a new contract.

    Liverpool Against the Arms Fair stated:

    At the fair, arms merchants, whose weapons have been used to target civilian populations around the world, including in Palestine and Yemen, are due to market and sell their repressive products. Hosting the fair is a severe abrogation of the moral and ethical duties of the Council and is inimical to the values of the City.

    The council has faced increasing pressure and protest over its decision to host the arms fair with the band Massive Attack cancelling a gig at the venue. The council didn’t listen. So now it’s down to ordinary people to take action to show the dealers in death and destruction that they’re not welcome in Liverpool.

    Featured image via Palestine Action

    By Jasmine Norden

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • RNZ Pacific

    The New Caledonian government has asked the French army to help deal with the covid-19 outbreak as the territory’s medical services are stretched.

    Almost 10,000 people have tested positive for covid-19 since the virus was detected in the community in early September, and more than 200 of them have died.

    The government said that within three weeks the military could set up 10 intensive care units at the main Noumea hospital and treat between 30 and 60 people over several weeks.

    In addition, an air bridge is being set up to France to transport five intubated patients and others needing care in order to relieve pressure on the Noumea hospital, where in the past month 1300 patients have been admitted.

    An Aircalin airliner is being modified to carry out this mission.

    About 90 percent of critical care units are in use amid concern that a second covid-19 wave is likely to sustain demand while the hospital needs to maintain capacity for patients suffering from other conditions.

    Currently, 69 covid-19 patients are being cared for in hotels, mainly in Noumea but also in the Loyalty Islands.

    Health pass now needed
    The authorities eased restrictions at the beginning of this week while rolling out a health pass now needed to go to restaurants and museums or for domestic air and ferry travel.

    They urge the public to be vigilant and prudent, saying the next days will be critical for how the pandemic develops.

    Schools are being reopened today, with students obliged to wear masks.

    There has been a rush to get the online version of the health pass, clogging and slowing the system producing it.

    A New Caledonian demonstration against the mandatory vaccination against covid-19
    A demonstration against New Caledonia’s mandatory vaccination against covid-19 and against the health pass. Image: Clotilde Richalet/Hans Lucas/RNZ

    However, there have also been demonstrations across New Caledonia against the introduction of the health pass.

    The gatherings — sometimes exceeding crowd size limits — were held outside the Congress and government building in Noumea as well as at the SLN nickel plant.

    So far 53 percent of those over the age of 12 have been fully vaccinated or just under 46 percent of the total population.

    Medical personnel as well as airport and port workers must get vaccinated by year’s end or face a US$1750 fine.

    This article is republished under a community partnership agreement with RNZ.

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • Listen to a reading of this article:

    So hey they’ve started mounting sniper rifles on robodogs, which is great news for anyone who was hoping they’d start mounting sniper rifles on robodogs.

    At an exhibit booth in the Association of the United States Army’s annual meeting and exhibition, Ghost Robotics (the military-friendly competitor to the better-known Boston Dynamics) proudly showed off a weapon that is designed to attach to its quadruped bots made by a company called SWORD Defense Systems.

    “The SWORD Defense Systems Special Purpose Unmanned Rifle (SPUR) was specifically designed to offer precision fire from unmanned platforms such as the Ghost Robotics Vision-60 quadruped,” SWORD proclaims on its website. “Chambered in 6.5 Creedmoor allows for precision fire out to 1200m, the SPUR can similarly utilize 7.62×51 NATO cartridge for ammunition availability. Due to its highly capable sensors the SPUR can operate in a magnitude of conditions, both day and night. The SWORD Defense Systems SPUR is the future of unmanned weapon systems, and that future is now.”

    Back in May the US Air Force put out a video on the “Robotic Ghost Dog” these weapons are designed to be used with, showing the machines jogging, standing up after being flipped over, and even dancing. All of which becomes a lot less cutesy when you imagine them performing these maneuvers while carrying a gun designed to blow apart skulls from a kilometer away.

    At one point in the video a Senior Master Sergeant explains to the host how these robodogs can be affixed with all kinds of equipment like communications systems, explosive ordnance disposal attachments, gear to test for chemicals and radiation, and the whole time you’re listening to him list things off you’re thinking “Guns. Yeah guns. You can attach guns to them, why don’t you just say that?”

    The SPUR prototype is just one of many different weapons we’ll surely see tested for use with quadruped robots in coming years, and eventually we’ll likely see its successors tested on impoverished foreigners in needless military interventions by the United States and/or its allies. They will join other unmanned weapons systems in the imperial arsenal like the USA’s notorious drone program, South Korea’s Samsung SGR-A1, the Turkish Kargu drone which has already reportedly attacked human beings in Libya without having been given a human command to do so, and the AI-assisted robotic sniper rifle that was used by Israeli intelligence in coordination with the US government to assassinate an Iranian scientist last year.

    And we may be looking at a not-too-distant future in which unmanned weapons systems are sought out by wealthy civilians as well.

    In 2018 the influential author and professor Douglas Rushkoff wrote an article titled “Survival of the Richest” in which he disclosed that a year earlier he had been paid an enormous fee to meet with five extremely wealthy hedge funders. Rushkoff says the unnamed billionaires sought out his advice for strategizing their survival after what they called “the event”, their term for the collapse of civilization via climate destruction, nuclear war or some other catastrophe which they apparently viewed as likely enough and close enough to start planning for.

    Rushkoff writes that eventually it became clear that the foremost concern of these plutocrats was maintaining control over a security force which would protect their estates from the rabble in a post-apocalyptic world where money might not mean anything. I encourage you to read the following paragraph from the article carefully, because it says so much about how these people see our future, our world, and their fellow human beings:

    “This single question occupied us for the rest of the hour. They knew armed guards would be required to protect their compounds from the angry mobs. But how would they pay the guards once money was worthless? What would stop the guards from choosing their own leader? The billionaires considered using special combination locks on the food supply that only they knew. Or making guards wear disciplinary collars of some kind in return for their survival. Or maybe building robots to serve as guards and workers — if that technology could be developed in time.”

    Something to keep in mind if you ever find yourself fervently hoping that the world will be saved by billionaires.

    LinkedIn cofounder Reid Hoffman has said that more than half of Silicon Valley’s billionaires have invested in some type of “apocalypse insurance” such as an underground bunker to ensure they survive whatever disasters ensue from the status quo they currently benefit so immensely from. The New Yorker has published an article about this mega-rich doomsday prepper phenomenon as well. We may be sure that military forces aren’t the only ones planning on having eternally loyal killing machines protecting their interests going forward.

    We are ruled by warmongers and sociopaths, and none of them have healthy plans for our future. They are not kind, and they are not wise. They’re not even particularly intelligent. Unless we can find some way to pry their fingers from the steering wheel of our world so we can turn away from the direction we are headed, things will probably get very dark and scary.

    ____________________________

    My work is entirely reader-supported, so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around, following me on Soundcloud or YouTube, or throwing some money into my tip jar on Ko-fi or . If you want to read more you can buy my books. The best way to make sure you see the stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list for at  or on Substack, which will get you an email notification for everything I publish. Everyone, racist platforms excluded,  to republish, use or translate any part of this work (or anything else I’ve written) in any way they like free of charge. For more info on who I am, where I stand, and what I’m trying to do with this platform, 

    Bitcoin donations:1Ac7PCQXoQoLA9Sh8fhAgiU3PHA2EX5Zm2

    This post was originally published on Caitlin Johnstone.

  • Listen to a reading of this article:

    We live in a far less free society than most of us think.

    It looks like we’re free. We don’t get thrown in prison for criticizing our government officials. We can vote for whoever we want. We can log onto the internet and look up information on any subject we’re interested in. If we want to buy a product we have many brands we are free to choose from.

    But we’re not free. Our political systems are set up to herd people into a two-party system that is controlled on both sides by plutocrats. The news media that people rely on to form ideas about what’s going on and how they should vote are controlled by the plutocratic class and heavily influenced by secretive government agencies. Internet algorithms are aggressively manipulated to show people information which favors the status quo. Even our entertainment is rife with Pentagon and CIA influence.

    How free is that? How free is your speech if there are myriad institutional safeguards in place to prevent speech from ever effecting political change?

    It doesn’t matter what you’re allowed to say if it doesn’t matter what you say. It doesn’t matter if you’re allowed to call the oligarchic puppet put in office by the last fake election a dickhead. It doesn’t matter if you’re allowed to Google any information you want only to find whatever information Google wants you to find.

    What is the functional difference between a regime which directly censors the internet to prevent dissent and a regime which works with Silicon Valley plutocrats to control information via algorithms and has a system in place which prevents dissent from having any meaningful impact?

    There is none.

    We live in a profoundly unfree society that is disguised as a free society. Western liberal democracy is just totalitarianism dressed in drag.

    And it’s only getting worse. Propaganda is a still-developing science.

    Last month Ottawa Citizen reported that the Canadian military used the Covid outbreak as an excuse to test actual military psyop techniques on its own civilian population under the pretense of assuring compliance with pandemic restrictions.

    Some excerpts:

    • “Canadian military leaders saw the pandemic as a unique opportunity to test out propaganda techniques on an unsuspecting public, a newly released Canadian Forces report concludes.”
    • “The plan devised by the Canadian Joint Operations Command, also known as CJOC, relied on propaganda techniques similar to those employed during the Afghanistan war. The campaign called for ‘shaping’ and ‘exploiting’ information. CJOC claimed the information operations scheme was needed to head off civil disobedience by Canadians during the coronavirus pandemic and to bolster government messages about the pandemic.”
    • “A separate initiative, not linked to the CJOC plan, but overseen by Canadian Forces intelligence officers, culled information from public social media accounts in Ontario. Data was also compiled on peaceful Black Lives Matter gatherings and BLM leaders.”
    • “’This is really a learning opportunity for all of us and a chance to start getting information operations into our (CAF-DND) routine,’ the rear admiral stated.”
    • “Yet another review centred on the Canadian Forces public affairs branch and its activities. Last year, the branch launched a controversial plan that would have allowed military public affairs officers to use propaganda to change attitudes and behaviours of Canadians as well as to collect and analyze information from public social media accounts.”
    • “The plan would have seen staff move from traditional government methods of communicating with the public to a more aggressive strategy of using information warfare and influence tactics on Canadians.”

    So they’re not just employing mass-scale psychological operations on the public, they’re testing them and learning from them.

    And we can probably assume that anything which may have been learned was also shared with the government agencies of other NATO members.

    In a new article titled “Behind NATO’s ‘cognitive warfare’: Western militaries are waging a ‘battle for your brain’“, The Grayzone’s Ben Norton reports on how recent NATO-sponsored discussions have explicitly advocated the need to advance the science of cognitive warfare for offensive as well as defensive purposes.

    Some excerpts:

    • “NATO is spinning out an entirely new kind of combat it has branded as cognitive warfare. Described as the ‘weaponization of brain sciences,’ the new method involves ‘hacking the individual’ by exploiting ‘the vulnerabilities of the human brain’ in order to implement more sophisticated ‘social engineering.’
    • “While the NATO-backed study insisted that much of its research on cognitive warfare is designed for defensive purposes, it also conceded that the military alliance is developing offensive tactics, stating, ‘The human is very often the main vulnerability and it should be acknowledged in order to protect NATO’s human capital but also to be able to benefit from our adversaries’s vulnerabilities.’”
    • “In a chilling disclosure, the report stated explicitly that ‘the objective of Cognitive Warfare is to harm societies and not only the military.’”
    • “The study described this phenomenon as ‘the militarization of brain science.’ But it appears clear that NATO’s development of cognitive warfare will lead to a militarization of all aspects of human society and psychology, from the most intimate of social relationships to the mind itself.”
    • “In other words, this document shows that figures in the NATO military cartel increasingly see their own domestic population as a threat, fearing civilians to be potential Chinese or Russian sleeper cells, dastardly ‘fifth columns’ that challenge the stability of ‘Western liberal democracies.’”
    • “Naturally, the NATO researcher claimed foreign ‘adversaries’ are the supposed aggressors employing cognitive warfare. But at the same time, he made it clear that the Western military alliance is developing its own tactics.”

    In a 2017 essay titled “The War on Sensemaking“, writer Jordan Greenhall made an observation that I have thought about ever since: that the science of modern propaganda has been in research and development for more than a century now, and has necessarily advanced scientifically just as much as other fields in the military have.

    “In 1917, a young Edward Bernays was asked to help the American war effort by applying his uncle Sigmund Freud’s theories of the unconscious to a new German technique called ‘propaganda’,” Greenhall writes. “The technology of war moves quickly. In the span of one and a half centuries, the last war leapt from long rifles to repeating rifles to gatling guns all the way to Little Boy. The warfighters of the current war haven’t dawdled. The wars of culture, meaning and purpose have seen innovation on an ‘exponential technology curve.’ The artisanal efforts of Bernays and Goebbels have been left far in the past by modern methods.”

    Think about how many technological advancements there have been in the military over the last century. Our rulers have been refining their methods of manipulating our sensemaking abilities to their advantage throughout that entire time, and only a small minority of us have even begun to realize that that manipulation is even happening. We’re just learning to play checkers while they’re mastering 3-D chess.

    I don’t have any solutions to this problem other than to spread consciousness of the fact that it is happening. Propaganda only works if you don’t understand (A) that it is happening to you and (B) how it is occurring, and a basic awareness of the fact that there’s a globe-spanning campaign to manipulate human thought to the advantage of the powerful is the first step toward having that understanding. Having the humility to understand that you yourself can be manipulated and deceived is the second step.

    My hope is that humanity will transcend its psychological susceptibility to manipulation and move into a healthy relationship with mental narrative as our adapt-or-die precipice draws nearer. But time will only tell.

    ____________________________

    My work is entirely reader-supported, so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around, following me on Soundcloud or YouTube, or throwing some money into my tip jar on Ko-fi or . If you want to read more you can buy my books. The best way to make sure you see the stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list for at  or on Substack, which will get you an email notification for everything I publish. Everyone, racist platforms excluded,  to republish, use or translate any part of this work (or anything else I’ve written) in any way they like free of charge. For more info on who I am, where I stand, and what I’m trying to do with this platform, 

    Bitcoin donations:1Ac7PCQXoQoLA9Sh8fhAgiU3PHA2EX5Zm2

    Featured image via Pixabay.

    This post was originally published on Caitlin Johnstone.

  • The trial of former soldier Dennis Hutchings is underway in Belfast. And once again, the accused is from the lower ranks. Not one of the powerful commanders who gave the orders is facing trial.

    The former Household Cavalry trooper faces a charge of attempted murder. His alleged victim was John Pat Cunningham. Cunningham was 27 and had learning difficulties. He was shot in the back after fleeing an army patrol in 1974. Hutchings has pleaded not guilty to the offence.

    Hutchings has won the support of many in the military community. This includes former Tory veterans minister Johnny Mercer, who has been with him in Ireland. A DUP politician even joined the pair for a photo opportunity. Carla Lockhart claimed on Twitter that Hutchings was a victim of politicised courts:

    Familiar pattern

    Hutchings served in the Household Cavalry as a non-commissioned officer. That means he was part of the workforce not the boss class of officers. In fact, barring a few exceptions, most of the soldiers accused of war crimes from Ireland, Iraq, and Afghanistan served in ‘the ranks’. And here there is a question about accountability.

    What the average soldier does on the ground reflects how they are trained and led. Yet the burden of legal cases always seems to fall on low-ranking personnel and never on the generals and politicians in charge. So what’s the alternative?

    The poor bloody infantry

    Derry writer and politician Eamonn McCann captured this sentiment in a head-to-head debate with ex-general and peer Richard Dannatt in 2019.

    Speaking on the Bloody Sunday massacre, McCann said:

    What we’re seeing [is] what Kipling called the “poor blood infantry”. Your rank-and-file soldiers, they have to carry the can. Somebody organised it, somebody gave the Paras to understand that it would be okay if you go in there and shoot innocent people. Where are they?

    And he went on:

    And I agree with the person who said [gestures to the audience] where are the IRA leaders? Why are the foot soldiers being dragged up all the time? Where are the bosses? The bosses are sitting pretty, and none more so than the bosses of the British Army, now made Lords and the rest of it. And none of them were ever held to account.

    Real justice

    That’s not to say low-ranking soldiers who carry out atrocities should get away scot-free. However, the fact that courts only seem to look at working class squaddies, who have little say over the broader scope of operations, is intolerable.

    The senior officers with the actual power who give the orders should also be in the dock.

    Featured image – Wikimedia Commons/Kenneth Allen

    By Joe Glenton

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • By Maria Baru in Sorong, West Papua

    Brother Frater Anton Syufi of the Papua’s Order of Saint Augustine (OSA) has been arrested by the Jayapura city district police for wearing a banned Morning Star (BK) independence flag T-shirt while watching a soccer match between Papua and East Nusa Tenggara at Indonesia’s National Games at Mandala Stadium.

    This was conveyed by Frater Kristianus Sasior, also from the OSA, who assisted Brother Syufi at the Jayapura district police.

    Syufi, who was arrested at 4 am last Sunday and detained until 7 pm, was finally released at 10 pm because police did not find any other issues to charge him with.

    Morning Star flag
    The Morning Star flag of West Papua … outlawed. Image: SIBC

    “The police said he was detained because he wore a BK T-shirt. The police said that he was disturbing the Papua PON XX [20th National Games], said Brother Sasior.

    “There is a prohibition on wearing things with the BK design. Brother Frater Anton did not [show] it intentionally because he was wearing two layers of clothing.

    “When his favourite team won he jumped up and down and opened his outer shirt so police saw the costume underneath with the BK design.

    “He was summoned and taken to Jayapura city district police. The police said they were still waiting for the head of the intelligence unit to arrive so we were [also] still waiting”, explained Sasior when contacted by Suara Papua by phone from Sorong.

    A similar story was conveyed by Evenisus Kowawin who said that Syufi was detained for wearing the Morning Star T-shirt while watching the soccer match.

    “Frater Anton was arrested because he wore a BK shirt. Police saw the shirt then dragged him out, interrogated him then took him to the district police. He’s currently still at the police [station],” explained Kowawin.

    Translated by James Balowski for IndoLeft News. Slightly abridged due to repetition. The original title of the article was “Pakai Baju Bintang Kejora Nonton Pertandingan PON, Seorang Frater Ditahan Polisi di Jayapura”.

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • Via America’s Lawyer: RT correspondent Brigida Santos joins Mike Papantonio to explain how lawmakers are voting to end U.S. support for the Kingdom’s deadly bombing campaign against civilians in Yemen. Also, Pfizer announces a global recall of its anti-smoking medication Chantix after studies linked long-term use of the drug to certain cancers. Mike Papantonio is joined by attorney Joshua Harris to outline the long-term dangers […]

    The post House Lawmakers Attempt To End Saudi Bombing In Yemen & FDA Recalls Chantix Due To Cancer Link appeared first on The Ring of Fire Network.

    This post was originally published on The Ring of Fire.

  • Asia Pacific Report newsdesk

    The interim president of the United Liberation Movement of West Papua (ULMWP) has accused Indonesia of holding its 20th National Games “on the bones of my people”.

    “While we mourn for three years of Indonesian military operations, these games are a dance on top of our graves, on top of our suffering, on top of our cries,” Benny Wenda said today in a statement.

    “I call on my people to ignore these games and focus on liberating us from this tyranny.”

    The two-week Papuan Games (PON XX), centred mainly on the new Lukas Enembe Stadium complex in Jayapura, were opened on Saturday by President Joko Widodo.

    Wenda said that the ULMWP had gathered new information that in the past three years at least 26 local West Papuan political figures and 20 intellectual and religious leaders had died in suspicious circumstances after speaking out about human rights and injustice.

    “Some of them were official heads of their local districts, others were prominent church people,” said Wenda in the statement.

    “Many turned up dead in hotel rooms after unexplained heart attacks, usually with no forensic evidence available.

    ‘Systematic killing’
    “This is systematic killing, part of Jakarta’s plan to wipe out all resistance to its rule in West Papua.

    “These deaths have occurred at the same time that Indonesia has sent more than 20,000 new troops into West Papua. They are killing us because we are different, because we are Black.”

    Wenda said that while President Widodo visited “my land like a tourist”, more than 50,000 people had been internally displaced by Indonesian military operations in Nduga, Intan Jaya, Puncak and Sorong since December 2018.

    Lukas Enembe Stadium
    The Lukas Enembe Stadium and the Papuan National Games complex. Image: Tribun News

    “High school children and elders were recently arrested and blindfolded like animals in Maybrat. The PON XX is a PR exercise by the Indonesian government to cover up the evidence of mass killings,” Wenda said.

    “Any use of the Morning Star flag, or even its colours, has been totally banned during the games. One Papuan Catholic preacher was arrested for wearing a Morning Star [independence] flag t-shirt during a football match.

    “Our Papuan rowing team was banned from the games for wearing red, white and blue, the colours of our flag.

    “This has happened at the same time as 17 people were arrested for holding the Morning Star in Jakarta. A West Papuan woman was sexually assaulted by police during the arrests.

    Papuan Games a ‘PR stunt’
    “Indonesia continues to hold this PR stunt even while Vanuatu and PNG call for a UN visit to West Papua in line with the call of the Pacific Islands Forum (PIF) and the Organisation of African, Caribbean and Pacific States.”

    President Joko Widodo
    Indonesian President Joko “Jokowi” Widodo, who officially inaugurated the National Games last Saturday, buys nokens – traditional Papuan woven bags – from a craftswoman in Jayapura. Image: President Widodo’s FB page

    Wenda said there was no reason Indonesia could not allow the visit of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights to take place.

    He asked that if Indonesia wanted to use the covid-19 crisis as an excuse to stop the visit, why was the Jakarta government sending tens of thousands of troops into West Papua.

    “Why are they holding the National Games in the middle of military operations and a pandemic?” Wenda asked.

    “President Widodo, do not ignore my call to find the peaceful solution that is good for your people and my people.”

    The ULMWP repeated its call to “sit down to arrange a peaceful referendum, to uphold the principle of self-determination enshrined by the international community”, Wenda said.

    “You cannot pretend that nothing is happening in West Papua. The world is beginning to watch.”

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • Via America’s Lawyer: In its war against Julian Assange, CIA officials had outlined plans to kidnap and assassinate the WikiLeaks founder who exposed the glaring deficiencies of U.S. intelligence gathering. Plus, President Biden calls Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla a “good friend” despite targeted efforts by his company to fight against drug price reform touted by Democrats and […]

    The post Julian Assange Assassination Plan Exposed & Pfizer CEO Spending Millions To Fight Drug Price Reform appeared first on The Ring of Fire Network.

    This post was originally published on The Ring of Fire.

  • Via America’s Lawyer: House representatives are finally standing up to Saudi Arabia. RT correspondent Brigida Santos joins Mike Papantonio to explain how lawmakers are voting to end U.S. support for the Kingdom’s deadly bombing campaign against civilians in Yemen. Transcript: *This transcript was generated by a third-party transcription software company, so please excuse any typos. Mike Papantonio:             House lawmakers have approved an […]

    The post National Defense Amendment Looks To End Bombing Campaign In Yemen appeared first on The Ring of Fire Network.

    This post was originally published on The Ring of Fire.

  • The future of warfare is being shaped by computer algorithms that are assuming ever greater control over battlefield technology. Will this give machines the power to decide who to kill?    

    The United States is in a race to harness gargantuan leaps in artificial intelligence to develop new weapons systems for a new kind of warfare. Pentagon leaders call it “algorithmic warfare.” But the push to integrate AI into battlefield technology raises a big question: How far should we go in handing control of lethal weapons to machines?

    We team up with The Center for Public Integrity and national security reporter Zachary Fryer-Biggs to examine how AI is transforming warfare and our own moral code. 

    In our first story, Fryer-Biggs and Reveal’s Michael Montgomery head to the U.S. Military Academy at West Point. Sophomore cadets are exploring the ethics of autonomous weapons through a lab simulation that uses miniature tanks programmed to destroy their targets.

    Next, Fryer-Biggs and Montgomery talk to a top general leading the Pentagon’s AI initiative. They also explore the legendary hackers conference known as DEF CON and hear from technologists campaigning for a global ban on autonomous weapons.

    Machines are getting smarter, faster and better at figuring out who to kill in battle. But should we let them?

    This post was originally published on Reveal.

  • By Ihsanuddin in Jakarta

    Indonesian police forcibly broke up a protest marking the 1962 Rome Agreement in front of the US Embassy in Central Jakarta this week and arrested 17 Papuan activists.

    One of the demonstrators, former political prisoner Ambrosius Mulait, said the 17 arrested protesters were forcibly taken away by police as soon as they arrived at the US Embassy.

    “We hadn’t even started the action and were forced to get into crowd control vehicles,” said Mulait about the protest on Thursday.

    Mulait also said that police were “repressive” when they were arresting the protesters by firing teargas until a physical clash broke out between demonstrators and police.

    “Some of our comrades were assaulted by the police,” he said.

    Central Jakarta district police chief Senior Commissioner Hengki Hariyadi confirmed that 17 Papuan activists were arrested.

    Hariyadi said that they did not allow the protest action because Jakarta was currently under a level 3 Enforcement of Restrictions on Public Activities (PPKM) in order to prevent the spread of the covid-19 pandemic.

    “During a Level 3 PPKM all activities which have the potential to create crowds are prohibited, in this case they did not have a permit to express an opinion in pubic, so it was without a recommendation from the security forces,” said Hariyadi.

    The protest by the Papuan activists made six demands:

    • [The right to hold] an action in the context of marking the 59th anniversary of the Rome Agreement [that led to Jakarta’s colonisation of Papua];
    • President Joko “Jokowi” Widodo to withdraw all TNI (Indonesian military) and Polri (Indonesian police) from Papua because they were making the situation for the Papuan people “uncomfortable”;
    • Release political prisoner Victor Yeimo who is currently in ill health and is being detained at the Mobile Brigade (Brimob) command headquarters in Jayapura;
    • Reject the extension of Special Autonomy for Papua which had failed to bring prosperity to the Papuan people;
    • Give Papuans the right to self-determination (through a referendum);and
    • Reject racism and fully resolve human rights violations in Papua.

    IndoLeft News backgrounds the crisis:
    The 1962 Rome Agreement was signed by Indonesia, the Netherlands and the United States in Rome on September 30, 1962.

    The agreement provided for a postponement of a referendum on West Papua’s status which had been scheduled to be held in 1969 under the New York Agreement signed on August 15, 1962, that the referendum would use a consultative process, that the UN’s report on the implementation of the referendum would be accepted without open debate and on US commitments to invest in resource exploration and provide funds for development programmes in West Papua.

    Translated by James Balowski for IndoLeft News. The original title of the article was “Polisi Tangkap 17 Aktivis Papua yang Akan Demo di Depan Kedubes AS”.

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • The UK’s minister for Africa has condemned talks between the Malian government and a Russian mercenary firm. In a statement, Vicky Ford said the Wagner Group was “a driver of conflict”. She added that one of the organisation’s key funders, Yevgeniy Viktorovich Prigozhin, is subject to sanctions for his past actions. But the whole thing smacks of hypocrisy.

    Ford warned:

    The UK is deeply concerned by consultations between the Malian government and the organisation known as the Wagner Group, in which Yevgeniy Viktorovich Prigozhin holds a position of responsibility. Prighozin is subject to UK sanctions for significant foreign mercenary activity in Libya and multiple breaches of the UN arms embargo.

    And she added:

    The Wagner Group is a driver of conflict and capitalises on instability for its own interests, as we have seen in other countries affected by conflict such as Libya and the Central African Republic.

    She made no mention of the UK’s own private military industry, which according to 2018 estimates makes £50m a year just from government contracts.

    Civil war

    The UK currently has troops deployed to Mali in a UN role. As The Canary reported in January 2021:

    The conflict in Mali has been ongoing since 2012 with the French – a former colonial ruler – intervening militarily in 2013. As of December 2020, 47 French soldiers had been killed. It is a perilously complex situation that began with a northern Malian separatist movement – including jihadist allies – opposing the central government based in Bamako, southern Mali. Coups occurred in 2012 and 2020.

    But there’s a problem with Ford’s analysis. Russian mercenaries are certainly no angels, but the UK is hardly one to talk. Because the instability in Mali has been directly fuelled by the NATO war in Libya. That war resulted in weapons looted from Muammar Gaddafi’s armouries flooding south and into Mali.

    And to say the Wagner Group drives conflict is to ignore the UK role, to take just one example, in Afghanistan. Afghanistan’s brutal 20 year US/UK occupation collapsed just weeks ago.

    Stealing resources?

    Ford had more to say about the Wagner Group. She warned:

    Wagner has committed human rights abuses, undermined the work of international peacekeepers, and sought control of mineral resources, to the detriment of local citizens and their economy. Wagner does not offer long-term security answers in Africa.

    She added that the UK thought the Malian government should “reconsider their engagement with Wagner in light of the implications that any deal would have on stability within its own borders and the wider region”.

    Once again, the UK’s involvement in Iraq went unacknowledged. The UK itself sought to control natural resources – critically, Iraqi oil, as journalist and scholar Nafeez Ahmed wrote in 2014.

    And the UK’s billions in arms sales to Saudi Arabia? Not a single mention. Despite their obvious impact on stability in places like Yemen.

    New Cold War, same victims

    Clearly these mercenaries are a violent tool of Russian foreign policy. Nevertheless, the idea that UK foreign policy is somehow morally better is simply deluded.

    Recent polls show that most Europeans believe there is a new Cold War underway between China and Russia and the West. The fear must be that the new Cold War, like the old one, will not be cold at all. At least not in the Global South. And, once again, the primary victims will be the people who live there.

    Wikimedia Commons/Kassim Traore.

    By Joe Glenton

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • EDITORIAL: By the PNG Post-Courier

    Ten years ago, a dinghy carrying 5 medical research institute scientists disappeared in Papua New Guinea’s West New Britain waters.

    The scientists — 3 men and 2 women — have never been found.

    A few weeks ago, the PNG Medical Research Institute finally closed its book on the missing five.

    PNG Post-Courier
    PNG POST-COURIER

    What remains interesting in this case is an open finding in a coronial inquest several years ago, which did not rule out an act of piracy in its conclusion.

    Last Friday, hundreds of angry protesters marched in the town of Buka, raising their voices against piracy and venting their anger against the new Autonomous Region of Bougainville for failing to take action against sea pirates.

    They, just like every other Papua New Guinean, have every right to know how their loved ones have vanished without a trace while travelling along the shores or out in the open oceans.

    In recent years in East New Britain, sea pirates caught by police were prosecuted and sentenced to death.

    In the Gulf of Papua, travellers from Gulf and Western fall victim to sea and river pirates.

    Along the Northern Province waters and Milne Bay waters, sea piracy is becoming a common law and order issue. In the last two years, wanted criminal Tommy Baker led a string of piracy attacks.

    He is still on the run.

    Papua New Guinea has a vast coastline and many islands.

    In fact, our coastline is said to be 5,152 km (3,201 miles) long. And out in the open seas, there are many big islands and even more smaller islands, many uninhabited.

    Policing the vast coastline and the islands is nonexistent.

    Once in a while, we hear of piracy, boats shot up, people robbed, women kidnapped and sexually abused, children subjected to trauma.

    Some victims are never to be heard of or seen again.

    In the absence of anything resembling a coast guard, the government needs to have a policy on this that works for public confidence, public protection and interest.

    The NMSA needs to seriously consider this as a national threat to the safety of our travelling public who use small craft and smalls ships for movement of passengers and cargo.

    Police boats given to maritime provinces are virtually useless given that they are hardly used on anti-piracy patrols due to lack of funding.

    Boat travellers and seagoing ships are tired of this. Incidences of piracy are now being reported on our country’s big rivers and waterways. This is adding to the fear our people face.

    Some years ago, the NMSA made it compulsory for small boats to be registered, and owners to provide emergency equipment on their craft.

    This law is not effective, just as taxi meters for taxi operators is non operable on land.

    In this age of rocket science, internet and robots, and drones, finding missing boats or hijacked craft using GPS, should be made mandatory and the costs passed onto dinghy manufacturers to include Emergency Position Indicator Radio Beacon on their products.

    Frankly, we have had enough of piracy on the high seas and on our rivers.

    This editorial was published by the PNG Post-Courier today, 29 September 2021.

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • In July, Northern Ireland secretary Brandon Lewis announced plans for a statute of limitations on ‘Troubles’-related incidents. The so-called ‘Troubles’ were a conflict that happened in Ireland between 1968 and 1998. Should the plans become law, it would mean an amnesty from criminal prosecution for British military personnel as well as loyalist and republican paramilitaries who fought in that conflict.

    There’s been widespread criticism of this proposal. In fact, one human rights group said it meant “a retrospective ‘license to kill’ for the British Army and RUC”. On 25 September, as reported by The Canary, protests against the plans took place across the island of Ireland. The Time for Truth Campaign (TFTC) organised these protests. Spokesperson for the TFTC Ciarán MacAirt believes:

    Britain is only interested in burying its war crimes in Ireland and protecting its war criminals.

    So victims’ families are:

    mobilizing to protect our basic human rights and will demand no less than equal access to due legal process and investigations which are compliant with Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

    Johnson bluster

    Boris Johnson says the amnesty would allow the north of Ireland to “draw a line under the Troubles” and allow its people “to move forward”. But his predictions of better times ahead have become tiresome if not dangerous.

    Johnson also claimed his post-Brexit deal with the EU was “oven-ready”. Yet in the past month, people in the UK have struggled to buy essential food. And there have been major problems in getting fuel delivered to the UK. So Troubles victims’ families will need to bring to bear whatever pressure they can in order to ensure another destructive Johnson plan doesn’t see the light of day. Campaigners believe they can’t move forward or draw a line under anything until they get the truth.

    A day of action

    Campaigners took to the streets in towns, cities, and villages across the island of Ireland to voice their opposition. The Canary spoke with the organisers of the Dublin event. It took place on Talbot Street next to the Dublin-Monaghan bombing memorial.

    This memorial commemorates the 17 May 1974 bombing of Dublin and Monaghan. It was the greatest loss of life in one day during the entire conflict. And campaigners believe the British state colluded with loyalist paramilitaries in this bombing.

    Memorial in Dublin city centre to the 34 victims of the 1974 Dublin-Monaghan bombings

     

    It’s about “truth and justice”

    Dublin City councillor Mícheál Mac Donncha said he was at the protest, as part of TFTC, to seek:

    truth and justice from the British government for its many atrocities during the conflict. And the many unsolved murders and attacks on people and torture.

    Mac Donncha added:

    The proposals from the British government to effectively amnesty its own members… is outrageous. It has nothing to do with conflict resolution in Ireland or justice or truth. It’s purely for English party political reasons – the Tory party – regardless of the pain it inflicts in Ireland. And regardless indeed of what part of the community the victims comes from.

    There is united political opposition across the political spectrum in Ireland against this proposal, which must be dropped.

    And when asked if he felt the protests taking place would have any effect, he said:

    Certainly yes. And I think the pressure is already on. There may be some signs of wavering already on the part of the British government. They haven’t brought in this legislation yet, essentially it’s threatened legislation… I think that this pressure will be very important in causing the British government to relent and to stick by international agreements

    When asked about what the Irish or other governments could do about these proposals, author and campaigner Margaret Urwin said:

    We’re in constant touch with the Irish government about it and I think they did… succeed in persuading the British to postpone until the autumn at least.

    We know that a letter signed by 26 Congressmen has been sent to Brandon Lewis. So, we’re just hoping that enough pressure will come to bear on the British so that they won’t do it.

    And Urwin believes the proposed amnesty is twofold. She said while it’s about stopping the prosecution of army veterans it’s also:

    to stop any information coming out about collusion at a higher level… [which would] expose their dirty war in Ireland

    Addressing the crowd. Margaret Urwin (right hand side) & Cllr Mícheál Mac Donncha (2nd from right)
    Behaviour that “would have embarrassed Chile’s Pinochet dictatorship”

    As Urwin mentioned, pressure is already mounting on Johnson to drop these plans. After having expressed the Irish government’s opposition, Irish foreign affairs minister Simon Coveney added on 25 September that the amnesty could “re-traumatise” victims.

    In advance of 25 September protests, MacAirt said:

    The families of the Time for Truth Campaign are mobilizing against Britain’s insidious and perfidious proposals which would have embarrassed Chile’s Pinochet dictatorship.

    This campaign has sent a clear message to Johnson and Lewis. These families have a right to justice, and they will continue to fight for it.

    Featured image via Unsplash – Taras Chernus

    By Peadar O'Cearnaigh

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • Asia Pacific Report newsdesk

    Papua human rights activist and lawyer Veronica Koman has called for an independent inquiry into the attack on health workers in the Kiwirok district, Star Highlands, Papua, saying there are two versions of how the tragedy happened.

    A healthcare worker, 22-year-old Gabriella Maelani, was killed during the attack by the West Papua National Liberation Army-Free Papua Organisation (TPNPB-OPM) resistance movement.

    “There is one version which is clearly being shared a lot in the media. And there is a second version circulating among the Papuan people,” Koman told CNN Indonesia.

    Koman said that the chronology of events which was being broadcast by most news media depicted the alleged brutality of the TPNPB-OPM during the attack.

    In the second version alleged the attack was triggered when a person wearing a doctor’s uniform shot at the TPNPB, causing a shootout inside the healthcare building, Koman said.

    She said that in Papua many TNI (Indonesian military) personnel held dual posts as teachers and doctors. She believed this caused a great deal of suspicion in Papua.

    Nevertheless, she was saddened by the news that a healthcare worker died, although she said that the truth about the chronology of events must still be investigated.

    Death of healthcare worker
    Based on information she had received, the death of the healthcare worker was not because they were tortured by the TPNPB as alleged.

    “The Papuan people’s version is that it’s not true that there was torture. Gabriella jumped [into a ravine] while escaping, she wasn’t thrown into the ravine by the OPM,” she said.

    Koman called for an independent investigation. According to Koman, finding out which chronology was correct would influence several factors, particularly racism against the Papuan people.

    “If for example the alleged barbaric actions are not true, it will influence the stigma and racism against the Papuan people. And that is very barbaric,” she said.

    “Looking for examples of human rights issues, we can separate it. The ones adversely affected should be the OPM, not the ordinary Papuan people.

    “In general with minority groups, including the Chinese, when one person does wrong, everyone is adversely affected. LGBT [lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender] for example, if a gay person does something, the whole community is adversely affected. So it’s important to straighten it out.”

    Koman also said care was needed to be taken with the witness testimonies.

    Information under duress
    She questioned whether or not the witnesses provided information under duress.

    “There would have been many soldiers around them … So they could have been pressured,” she said.

    Earlier, the TPNPB-OPM admitted responsibility for attacking public facilities such as a community healthcare centre and school building in the Kiwirok district on September 13 and 14.

    They claimed that the attack was a form of resistance demanding Papuan independence from Indonesia.

    The Presidential Staff Office said that “armed criminal groups” (KKB) — as officials generally describe Papuan armed independence fighters — violated human rights law after the healthcare worker died during the attack on September 13.

    Presidential Staff Deputy V Jaleswari Pramodhawardani said that the armed group had violated several laws such as the healthcare law, the nurses law, the hospital law and the healthcare quarantine law.

    Translated by James Balowski for IndoLeft News. The original title of the article was “Veronica Koman Klaim Ada 2 Versi Penembakan Nakes di Papua”.

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • Via America’s Lawyer: The Pentagon apologizes for its recent drone strike which killed 7 innocent children in Afghanistan. Mike Papantonio and Farron Cousins discuss more. Transcript: *This transcript was generated by a third-party transcription software company, so please excuse any typos. Mike Papantonio:             The Pentagon was forced to admit last week that they completely botched a recent drone strike and ended up […]

    The post Pentagon Admits To Botched Drone Strike After Killing Several Children appeared first on The Ring of Fire Network.

    This post was originally published on The Ring of Fire.

  • The Afghan war may be over, but the vast global network of US military bases still threatens peace, an American think tank has warned. The Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft (QI) has published a report on the 750 remaining US military bases in 80 countries.

    Its report comes as the US is undertaking a Global Posture Review. The review will examine the US military footprint around the world. And QI said this is a chance to close down bases. Given the cost and the fact many bases are in authoritarian and undemocratic states, it’s hard to argue otherwise.

    Expensive and destabilising

    The report contains some astonishing statistics on US military installations, including that:

    • “The United States has at least three times as many overseas bases as all other countries combined”.
    • “U.S. bases abroad cost taxpayers an estimated $55 billion annually”.
    • “The United States has nearly three times as many military bases abroad… as U.S. embassies, consulates, and missions”.
    • “Bases abroad have helped the United States launch wars and other combat operations in at least 25 countries since 2001”.
    • “U.S. installations are found in at least 38 non-democratic countries and colonies”.

    But it also noted that a full list hasn’t been published by the Pentagon since fiscal year 2018.

    When is a base a base?

    The authors acknowledge that some bases might not even be counted as bases. They say the Pentagon is wary of how a military presence is defined:

    Frequently the Pentagon and U.S. government, as well as host nations, seek to portray a U.S. base presence as “not a U.S. base” to avoid the perception that the United States is infringing on host nation sovereignty (which, in fact, it is).

    Closer to home

    QI’s breakdown showed that many US bases are in Global South countries. And many of these have authoritarian governments. But European countries are also colonised by the American military, including the UK. This week saw the family of a teenager killed by a US citizen working on a military base reach a resolution a civil claim.

    19-year-old Harry Dunn was killed after being struck by a car in 2019. Anne Sacoolas, allegedly an intelligence officer for the US government, claimed diplomatic immunity and fled to the US. Sacoolas may have been working at RAF Croughton, Northamptonshire. Despite the name, RAF Croughton is a US spy base.

    Closures

    QI says closing bases is politically possible. They say that recent presidents from Bill Clinton though to Donald Trump all closed bases around the world regularly. There’s nothing to stop Biden, who has pledged to reset US foreign policy, doing the same.

    It said the review meant there was a “historic opportunity” to reduce the US military footprint, saving taxpayer cash and improving “national and international security in the process”.

    And QI has a point. Closing bases is a good idea in economic, political, and moral terms. The question is, will the new administration muster the political will to do so?

    Featured image via Wikimedia Commons/ Sgt Chris Stone

    By Joe Glenton

    This post was originally published on The Canary.