Category: Net Neutrality

  •  

    Listeners will know that the FCC has been ineffectual for some time, because it’s been short of full staffing. Big media players torpedoed, with the most scurrilous of means, the nomination of public interest advocate Gigi Sohn, but eventually Biden nominee Anna Gomez was sworn in as fifth commissioner.

    In the wake of that, FCC chair Jessica Rosenworcel has now announced that the FCC is to be an active player again.

    FCC chair Jessica Rosenworcel

    FCC chair Jessica Rosenworcel (9/26/23): “Repeal of net neutrality put the agency on the wrong side of history, the wrong side of the law, and the wrong side of the public.”

    At the National Press Club this week, Rosenworcel (9/26/23) said that the FCC will vote on a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking at its next meeting in mid-October. And they will center the role of Title II, the part of federal communications law that gives the agency the power to even go about overseeing corporate control of the internet: to push against price gouging, anti-privacy moves, access-throttling—the whole range of things that makes people hate their internet service providers, and makes it a less hospitable arena for activism and organizing. That’s before you even get to whether they are allowed to shut off service during crises like Covid.

    The FCC, under the sway of corporations and their lobbyists, abandoned that responsibility years ago, under former chair Ajit Pai, appointed by Donald Trump based on his career as a lawyer for Verizon.

    With Title II invigorated, the FCC can engage net neutrality rules—which prevent internet service providers from slowing access for those that don’t pony up, and speeding it along for those that do. All of which machinations we as end-users may not be aware of, but that will absolutely affect what we see and know and act on.

    WSJ: Newly Empowered FCC Chair Moves to Rekindle Net-Neutrality Fight Between Tech and Telecom Giants

    The Wall Street Journal (9/26/23) framed the idea that telecom companies should be regulated as something only of concern to “tech giants.”

    Net neutrality has always been overwhelmingly supported by the US public. Few wonder anymore whether broadband access is a fundamental right, like water or electricity—or whether you should lose access if you live in an underserved area, rural or urban.

    But corporate powers and government enablers have shown they will work very hard to prevent it; remember Ajit Pai pretending that the FCC couldn’t acknowledge the flood of public comments it got because, um… technical sabotage…that turned out to be a brazen lie?

    Net neutrality, backed by the FCC’s Title II authorization, is nothing less than the ability to monitor and regulate hugely powerful companies’ control over an essential element of public life—the ability to inform yourself, communicate, participate socially and politically.

    In other words, expect pushback, both loud and subtle. We’ve already seen headlines like the Wall Street Journal’s suggestion (9/26/23) that a “Newly Empowered FCC Chair Moves to Rekindle Net Neutrality Fight Between Tech and Telecom Giants.”

    Fighting? That’s bad. And who cares about a fight between tech and telecom giants?

    There is something very important for all of us at stake here. So look out for coverage that suggests otherwise.

    The post The FCC Restores Its Responsibility to Oversee Corporate Control of Internet appeared first on FAIR.

    This post was originally published on FAIR.

  •  

    Remember Ajit Pai, the former Verizon lawyer Trump put in charge of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC)? When he gutted net neutrality rules and kneecapped the agency’s ability to regulate telecom monopolies, voters from across the political spectrum were outraged. The internet erupted in protest.

    The Hill: 4 in 5 Americans say they support net neutrality: poll

    Democrats like Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi responded to popular opinion by promising to restore net neutrality rules (The Hill, 3/20/19).

    Millions of people from across the political spectrum called their elected officials and submitted comments to the FCC, and thousands took to the streets. It was a rare moment of genuinely popular public revolt that defied partisan DC logic. If there’s one thing everyone can agree on, it’s that we don’t want our cable or phone company screwing us over more than they already do, selling our browsing habits and real-time location to advertisers, or dictating what websites we can visit or which apps we use.

    Indeed, the FCC’s net neutrality rules—banning Internet Service Providers from blocking apps, throttling, discriminating or charging scammy fees—were overwhelmingly popular with the general public, regardless of political views.

    When Pai repealed those rules, Democrats capitalized on the moment, loudly proclaiming that they were the party that would stand up to Big Cable and their deep-pocketed lobbyists. In speeches and fundraising emails, they promised they would fix this mess if they regained the White House.

    Trump lost the election. But astonishingly, two years into the Biden administration, Trump still more or less runs the FCC. Pai is no longer employed at the agency, but his disastrous policies remain firmly in place. And unless we rekindle some of that collective outrage we felt when net neutrality was repealed, it’s looking increasingly likely that those Trump-era handouts to abusive telecom giants will continue for the foreseeable future.

    Dark money smears

    NBC: Smear campaign targets nominee who would be FCC’s first openly gay commissioner

    Right-wing media responded to Gigi Sohn’s nomination with a homophobic smear campaign (NBC, 2/3/23).

    Last week, Gigi Sohn, who had been Biden’s nominee to fill the FCC’s crucial fifth seat, withdrew her nomination. Sohn is an eminently qualified candidate and well-known public interest champion who has dedicated her career to closing the digital divide. She was also a historic pick: the first openly LGBTQ nominee to the position. With Democrats holding the Senate majority, she should have been swiftly confirmed.

    Instead, her nomination languished, as she faced a months-long, industry-funded smear campaign. Front groups for cable and phone companies flooded swing states with false and misleading ads. Pundits painted Sohn as “anti-police” because she had liked a few tweets in support of Black Lives Matter.

    The Fraternal Order of Police (FOP) piled on, painting Sohn as dangerous because she sits on the board of the highly respected Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), which rightly opposes government backdoors in encrypted messaging (an issue the FCC has zero jurisdiction over, by the way).

    The FOP has a longstanding reputation for “pay-to-play” lobbying. The group’s executive director, Jim Pasco, maintains a lucrative side business lobbying for corporations, which has sparked controversy when the FOP mysteriously adopts positions favorable to his outside clients. Pasco’s wife, Cybele Daley, was a registered lobbyist for AT&T as recently as 2009. She is currently the vice president of the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA), copyright-maximalist lobbyists for Hollywood frequently criticized by Public Knowledge, the free expression nonprofit that Sohn co-founded.

    The FOP has never been known to take a position on FCC nominations in the past. Its arrival to the fight seems suspicious at best.

    Other groups opposing Sohn’s nomination are even more clearly paid shills for the telecom industry, like the Taxpayers Protection Alliance, which has been exposed in the past for “astroturfing” on behalf of telecom companies. Don’t forget these same companies were caught red-handed orchestrating a massive flood of fraudulent comments praising the net neutrality rules repeal that were submitted to the FCC in 2017, using real people’s stolen information.

    Emboldened by industry-funded smears and Republican talking points, the right-wing media machine started cranking out even more slime, culminating in blatantly homophobic, QAnon conspiracy–style attacks attempting to paint Sohn as some kind of sexual deviant or predator. A particularly nasty and dishonest article in the Daily Mail (1/26/23) included a photo of Sohn and her wife.

    Democrats could have stood up to these utterly disingenuous attacks. Party leaders could have forcefully condemned the smear campaign at any of the three Senate hearings that Sohn testified at, and made it clear that Senate Democrats wouldn’t allow homophobia and corruption to derail a qualified nominee’s confirmation process. Instead, they hung Sohn out to dry. Senate Democratic leadership, including Commerce Committee chair Maria Cantwell (D.–Wash.) and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D.–N.Y.), were shamefully silent about the homophobia and lies hurled at their party’s nominee.

    The FOP’s leadership has a long history of racist and bigoted comments, and has routinely opposed police reforms. The organization endorsed Donald Trump for President. Twice. But in the end, a small handful of Senate Democrats chose to side with the FOP, Big Telecom and Fox News over labor unions, environmental groups, LGBTQ+ organizations, civil rights leaders, teachers, librarians, human rights advocates and small business associations—more than 400 in all—who supported Sohn’s confirmation.

    And in the process, they handed Republicans a blueprint for how to sink any future nominee they don’t like, especially if they happen to be gay. It’s not just shameful, it’s an embarrassing strategic failure.

    The battle for the net

    So what happens next? Biden will have to nominate someone else to fill the FCC’s fifth seat. We can be sure that lobbyists for the likes of Comcast, Verizon and AT&T are already circulating their lists of “approved” candidates. And, given everything that has happened, we have every reason to be worried that Biden could take one of those names.

    If the industry gets to install its preferred commissioner for the crucial fifth deciding vote, it will effectively own the agency that’s supposed to regulate it. Just like it did when Ajit Pai was in charge.

    Vice: Restore Net Neutrality, Or Facebook Will Dominate The Internet Forever

    The stakes are too high to let the FCC coast on under policies set by Donald Trump (Vice, 11/17/21).

    We can’t let that happen. The stakes are too high. The pandemic only exacerbated the digital divide, and ended any debate over whether access to affordable high-speed Internet is a “necessity” or not. Kids were sitting outside of Taco Bell using the wi-fi to go to school on Zoom. There is absolutely no reason we cannot ensure that every single child in this country has access to an internet connection they can use for school—except that for too long the agency tasked with protecting the public interest has been captured by the industry it’s supposed to oversee.

    As Big Tech has gotten bigger, net neutrality has only become more important. While attention in DC has shifted from Comcast and Verizon to Amazon and Instagram, the problems with monopoly power and surveillance capitalism are widespread. Unless net neutrality rules are revived, it’s only a matter of time before Big Tech giants start cutting deals with Big Telecom gatekeepers, crushing competition from smaller players and startups and solidifying their dominance.

    Beyond restoring Title II oversight and net neutrality protections, the FCC could use its rulemaking authority to crack down on cell phone carriers’ shady data collection practices. Stopping the collection and abuse of cell phone location data is one of the most concrete things the Federal government can do to protect the privacy and safety of people seeking, providing and facilitating abortions. One data broker was exposed selling the location data of people who had entered Planned Parenthood clinics. The FCC could also investigate and crack down on certain types of surveillance devices, like Amazon’s creepy flying Ring drones.

    But they can’t do any of that until the Senate confirms a fifth commissioner. And they won’t do any of that if that fifth commissioner is a sleeper agent for the telecom industry. So it’s time to get organized.

    This morning, more than 60 civil society organizations sent a letter to President Joe Biden, calling on him to “immediately put forth a new nominee” who:

    • “has a history of advocacy for the public interest;
    • “is free of industry conflicts of interest;
    • “demonstrates a clear commitment to championing the rights of low-income families and communities of color;
    • “and supports Title II oversight and laws that ensure the FCC the authority to prevent unjust discrimination and promote affordable access.”

    When Biden nominated Gigi Sohn, it seemed like an opportunity to finally slam shut the revolving door between the telecom industry and the FCC. The industry saw this as a threat to their status as unregulated monopolies, so they threw money bombs and leveraged their immense influence in DC to kill her nomination.

    Now all eyes are on Biden. Will he nominate another public interest champion who will implement his stated agenda at the FCC? Or will he start the revolving door spinning again? We’re about to find out.


    ACTION ALERT: If you want to make your voice heard, you can use BattleForTheNet.com to call on President Biden to nominate another public interest champion for the FCC.

    The post ACTION ALERT: Trump Rules Remain at FCC as Democrats Cave to Big Cable, Fox News appeared first on FAIR.

    This post was originally published on FAIR.



  • More than five dozen advocacy organizations on Friday implored U.S. President Joe Biden to swiftly select a Federal Communications Commission candidate who will serve the public interest, not the telecommunications industry.

    The coalition’s letter stresses that a fifth commissioner is urgently needed to end the current 2-2 deadlock and enable the FCC to “increase digital equity and media diversity, bolster online privacy and safety protection, and reassert its rightful authority over broadband to ensure everyone in the United States has access to this essential service.”

    The message to Biden comes after Gigi Sohn removed herself from consideration last week, citing the “legions of cable and media industry lobbyists, their bought-and-paid-for surrogates, and dark money political groups with bottomless pockets” who distorted her “over 30-year history as a consumer advocate into an absurd caricature of blatant lies.”

    “We call on you to immediately put forth a new nominee—specifically, one who has a history of advocacy for the public interest and is free of industry conflicts of interest.”

    Sohn, the new letter states, “was eminently qualified to serve as a commissioner. But after 16 months of organized and well-funded attacks by dark-money groups—which were carried out by lobbyists, enabled by complicit elected leaders, and amplified in partisan media—Sohn made the understandable decision to withdraw from consideration.”

    Organizations behind the letter—including Common Cause, Demand Progress Education Fund, Electronic Frontier Foundation, Fight for the Future, Free Press Action, Our Revolution, Public Knowledge, Revolving Door Project, and RootsAction.org—were outraged over both the telecom industry smear campaign against Sohn and top Democrats’ refusal to fiercely defend the nomination. Her withdrawal has sparked fears that Biden will choose an industry-friendly candidate.

    “Now, we call on you to immediately put forth a new nominee—specifically, one who has a history of advocacy for the public interest and is free of industry conflicts of interest; demonstrates a clear commitment to championing the rights of low-income families and communities of color; and supports Title II oversight and laws that ensure the FCC the authority to prevent unjust discrimination and promote affordable access,” the coalition wrote to Biden.

    “We ask you to actively press the Democratic majority in the Senate to swiftly confirm your nominee,” the groups added. “We cannot permit senators to prevent forward progress any longer at the behest of the very corporations the FCC is meant to regulate.”

    Free Press Action president and co-CEO Craig Aaron similarly argued in a Common Dreams opinion piece last week:

    We must oppose and reject any return to business as usual that furthers industry capture of the FCC.

    Instead, we need to demand an independent candidate with public-interest bona fides and a clear commitment to racial justice and civil rights. They must show they’re willing to stand up to lies. They must be unequivocal in their support for restoring the FCC’s authority, and making sure that the internet is open, affordable, available, and reliable for everyone. They must demonstrate a commitment to engaging the public, not just meeting with lobbyists.

    Sohn’s defeat also “has implications that go far beyond the FCC,” Aaron noted. “The Republicans and their Democratic enablers are setting out markers for who’s allowed to serve in government.”

    “They made clear that public servants will be pilloried while ex-corporate lobbyists sail through,” he wrote. “Women and LGBTQIA+ folks—Sohn would have been the first lesbian to serve as an FCC commissioner—will be slandered. Tweeting about police violence can be disqualifying (in the Senate, retweets do equal endorsements). Questioning the propriety of Fox News—even as it’s being exposed for aiding and abetting election lies and insurrection—is unacceptable. A basic understanding of U.S. history and racism may be disqualifying.”

    Sohn “deserved better,” Aaron tweeted. “But I hope we—and the White House and Democratic Party, especially—can learn so it doesn’t happen again.”

    This post was originally published on Common Dreams.

  •  

    Fox News: Biden FCC nominee's reputation as hard left partisan alarms Republicans

    Fox News (11/11/21) has repeatedly reported on the nomination of Gigi Sohn to the FCC board to depict her as a “deeply divisive pick with a track record of hard left advocacy.”

    President Joe Biden nominated consumer advocate Gigi Sohn to the Federal Communications Committee last October, yet the Senate has still failed to bring her nomination to a vote (FAIR.org, 4/19/22). Behind the scenes, corporate media, afraid of having a staunch defender of the public interest on the commission, are lobbying against her. One of those corporations, Comcast, owns a major cable news network that has been conspicuously silent about the stalled nomination.

    While Fox News has brought up Sohn’s nomination nine times since November (to call her “radical” and “scary”—e.g., Tucker Carlson Tonight, 11/30/21), Comcast-owned MSNBC hasn’t mentioned her on any of its programs. (There was a one-sentence reference to her in a Steve Benen post on MSNBC.com12/7/21—about Republican hypocrisy on “mean tweets.”)

    It’s not that MSNBC won’t touch any stories about obstruction of Biden nominees, which has reached an unprecedented level in the Senate. It’s reported on Sen. Ron Johnson (R.–Wisc.) attempting to block Biden’s nominee to be an envoy on antisemitism (Deadline: White House, 2/10/22); on Republicans holding up his nominees for US attorney in Washington, DC (Rachel Maddow Show, 10/20/21), and myriad ambassadorships (Andrea Mitchell Reports, 12/8/21); and on their blockades against nominees for the Federal Reserve board (Andrea Mitchell Reports, 2/17/22).

    The Rachel Maddow Show (4/18/22) reported on the American Accountability Foundation, a new right-wing dark money group launching smear campaigns against a whole slate of Biden nominees, uncovered by the New Yorker‘s Jane Mayer (4/16/22). Though Sohn is spotlighted on the group’s hit list, Maddow (and Mayer) didn’t mention her as a target.

    Ars Technica: Comcast trying to “torpedo” Biden FCC pick Gigi Sohn, advocacy group says

    Comcast just hired a lobbying firm to try to torpedo Gigi Sohn’s nomination to the FCC,” the group Free Press declared in January 2022 (Ars Technica, 1/13/22).

    Two differences between all of these obstructions covered by MSNBC and the one against Sohn: Democrats are among those stalling Sohn, and MSNBC owner Comcast is actively lobbying against her (Ars Technica, 1/13/22).

    If Sohn is confirmed and takes the fifth seat on the FCC, the currently deadlocked board could actually take action to restore net neutrality rules, implemented under Obama and repealed under Trump, that ensure smaller companies and organizations have equal access to fast broadband speeds. It could also ensure equal access to broadband for American households, regardless of race or income, and protect against further media mergers that reduce consumer choice.

    A functional FCC isn’t in the interests of Comcast and other big media corporations; it is, however, very much in the interests of MSNBC‘s viewers, as people who use the internet and watch TV, which is why the outlet’s silence is so noteworthy and troubling.


    ACTION: Tell MSNBC to cover the obstruction of consumer advocate Gigi Sohn’s nomination to the FCC.

    CONTACT: You can send a message to Rachel Maddow at Rachel@msnbc.com (or via Twitter:@Maddow). Andrea Mitchell is at Andrea.Mitchell@nbc.com (or on Twitter @MitchellReports). Chris Hayes and Lawrence O’Donnell can be reached via Twitter: @ChrisLHayes and @Lawrence, respectively. MSNBC‘s Twitter account is @MSNBC. Please remember that respectful communication is the most effective.

    See FAIR’s previous action alert, with a link to call your senator: “Big Media Want Gigi Sohn Kept Off FCC Board” (4/19/22).

     

    The post ACTION ALERT: Urge MSNBC to Cover Biden FCC Pick Blocked by Big Media appeared first on FAIR.

    This post was originally published on FAIR.

  •  

    President Joe Biden nominated media activist Gigi Sohn to the Federal Communications Commission in October, to fill a Democratic seat vacant since January 2021. He renominated Sohn this January. Why has she not been confirmed yet? Advocates suspect the corporate media lobby is trying to sink the nomination of the staunch consumer advocate.

    Sohn would take the fifth seat at the FCC, which is currently deadlocked with two Democratic and two Republican appointees. (Only three FCC board members can be from the same political party; in practice, three are from the president’s party and two are from the other major party.) Without a fifth member, the agency is largely nonfunctional—which is just peachy for the corporations it’s meant to regulate.

    WSJ: A Media Censor for the FCC?

    What Rupert Murdoch’s Wall Street Journal (11/8/21) objects to is less corporate control of information.

    Sohn’s stalled nomination has gotten remarkably little press—with the notable exception of the Wall Street Journal, which has run three editorials (11/8/21, 12/6/21, 1/28/22) and an op-ed (11/30/21) opposing her, calling Sohn a “media censor” who wants to “silence conservative voices.”

    It might seem curious, then, that right-wing outlets like OAN and NewsMax have supported Sohn’s nomination. (OAN‘s CEO later disavowed the statement of support by OAN‘s president, who is also his son.) The Journal acknowledged this in one of its editorials (12/6/21) and tried to wave away their support as “pure self-interest,” arguing again that Sohn “wants less political diversity on the airwaves” and would be “polarizing and destructive.” But it’s a tough argument to make convincingly when some of the very outlets she supposedly wants to see suppressed have spoken out in favor of her nomination. The reason Sohn has found right-wing backers—yet the Journal and its owner, Rupert Murdoch, oppose her—is because this isn’t really a right vs. left battle: It’s big vs. small.

    Sohn has worked for decades in communications policy advocating for an open and accessible Internet. She was a top aide at the FCC during the Obama administration, helping implement net neutrality rules that were later repealed under Trump. Net neutrality ensures that broadband providers have to provide equal data speeds to all companies, blocking them from offering “fast lanes” for big corporations that can pay extra while throttling others. This unequal access would give unfair advantages to big corporations and stifle competition from smaller outfits.

    Ars Technica: Comcast trying to “torpedo” Biden FCC pick Gigi Sohn, advocacy group says

    “For more than a year, the FCC has been operating without a full slate of commissioners, hampering its ability to advance all of the important tasks on its agenda,” a coalition of advocacy groups noted (Ars Technica, 1/13/22).

    Perhaps even more concerning for TV network OAN—and NewsMax, which also has a TV channel—is media conglomerate control over the airwaves. Sohn spoke out against Sinclair Broadcast Group‘s attempted merger with Tribune Media Company, which would have dramatically consolidated the local broadcast TV market. In the face of mounting public opposition—and evidence of Sinclair‘s intention to violate FCC ownership rules—Trump appointee and Sinclair champion Ajit Pai was forced to put the brakes on the merger (New Yorker, 10/15/18).

    According to the independent media advocacy group Free Press (Ars Technica, 1/13/22), the Journal isn’t the only media company working to block Sohn’s appointment. Comcast recently hired lobbyists with close ties to Arizona and West Virginia to work on telecom policy. Arizona Sen. Kyrsten Sinema and West Virginia Sen. Joe Manchin are seen as key swing votes on Sohn’s nomination.

    “The industry serves to benefit from Gigi not moving forward and the FCC delaying its push for net neutrality and other government regulations,” telecom lobbyist John Feehery told the Washington Examiner (12/15/21). “This helps their bottom line in the next few months by delaying regulations, because the FCC would be gridlocked and slowed down on these issues,”

    The FCC needs to fill its fifth seat to do its critical work regulating the country’s media infrastructure. Sohn is clearly qualified. The Senate needs to confirm her when it returns from recess.

    ACTION:

    Tell your senators to push for the confirmation of Gigi Sohn to the FCC board.

    CONTACT:

    Find your senators’ contact info here.

     

    Please remember that respectful communication is the most effective. Feel free to leave a copy of your message in the comments thread here.


    Featured image: Gigi Sohn (cc photo: Stanford Center for Internet and Society)

     

    The post ACTION ALERT: Big Media Want Gigi Sohn Kept Off FCC Board appeared first on FAIR.

    This post was originally published on FAIR.

  • On Friday, President Joe Biden signed an executive order calling on federal agencies, including the Federal Communications Commission and Federal Trade Commission, to enact measures protecting internet users against the anti-competitive practices of large telecommunications and internet companies.

    The post Biden Executive Order Calls on FCC to Restore Net Neutrality appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • Broadband allows people to participate in the digital world, which encompasses our daily lives. It connects people with their families and friends, news on what is happening in the country and abroad, and gives access to an unlimited amount of important information and resources. During the COVID-19 pandemic, broadband has been critical in supporting online school and work, access to healthcare and medical information, and even vaccine distribution. Eighty-seven percent of people reported that the internet has been important to them during the outbreak, and fifty-three percent of people reported that broadband is essential for critical purposes and everyday tasks.

    If broadband is so essential, then why doesn’t current federal policy enable the Federal Communications Commission to regulate broadband as we regulate other public utilities — similar to the way we treat electricity, water, and phones?

    The post We Already Knew Broadband Should Be A Public Utility appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • The US Department of Justice under President Joe Biden has dropped a department lawsuit filed under former President Donald Trump that challenged California’s net neutrality rules. California’s law, considered more strict than federal rules adopted during the Obama administration, could set the baseline for future federal rules. 

    The DOJ formally dismissed the lawsuit Monday. The suit was first filed in 2018 under ex-US Attorney General Jeff Sessions, a Trump appointee. Former California Gov. Jerry Brown, a Democrat, signed the California law in October 2018. California adopted the new rules after a Republican-led FCC in 2017 repealed federal rules that had been established under President Barrack Obama. 

    The post DOJ Drops Lawsuit To Block California Net Neutrality Law appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.