Category: Palestine

  • A Palestinian para-cycling team and a Los Angeles social justice apparel brand are joining forces. For Your Viewing Pleasure (FYVP), led by a Palestinian-Native American designer, has released a four piece collection with the Gaza Sunbirds.

    100% of the profits will go towards the Gaza Sunbirds’ aid and community projects in the strip as well as their international sporting missions.

    The cycling team’s story

    This collaboration tells the story of 20 athletes who refused to give up despite amputation, bombardment and famine.

    After six years of training under Israeli occupation, the Gaza Sunbirds aim to make history by sending Palestine’s first ever para-cyclists to the Paralympics and FYVP will bring them closer to this dream.

    A powerful part of the journey to the LA 2028 Games, working with the brand will build awareness of the cycling team’s mission in the US market.

    FYVP holds a prominent position in the LA community and the significance of this project is in its reflection of grassroots efforts between two Palestinian-led groups to support the future of Gaza on the ground and on the international sporting stage.

    The launch coincides with this year’s Giving Tuesday and its refocus on doing good following the frenzied spending of Black Friday and Cyber Monday, in order to encourage conscious consumerism.

    FYVP designs pieces that spark conversations around Palestinian liberation, refugee solidarity, and LGBTQIA+ equality.

    As a queer, female-owned brand committed to collective liberation, these values align deeply with the Gaza Sunbirds cycling team.

    It is this intersection between solidarity, advocacy, and fundraising that brings them together. And it portrays an extension to FYVP’s mission that “what you wear is a platform for your beliefs”.

    The collection

    Featuring both a short and long sleeved t-shirt ($52 & $65), sweatshirt ($75) and two tote bags ($42), the collection holds the story of the Gaza Sunbirds team at its heart.

    The designs embody the concept of resilience, the symbolism of the Palestinian flag, and the importance of amplifying the cause of mobility justice.

    In tandem with this concept, the Gaza Sunbirds and FYVP hope to bring forward conversations about intersectionality and connect the struggles of oppressed groups in order to amplify their respective missions.

    This shows in FYVP’s conviction in every step of the production process, where they work exclusively with immigrant-owned and run businesses in LA.

    FYVP co-founder Lara Salmon said:

    People of conscience around the world are now seeing the direct correlation between systems of oppression. I think social media and independent journalism has pulled back the veil on military and police brutality, from Palestine to the illegal ICE kidnappings unfolding across the U.S.

    For the Gaza Sunbirds and FYVP, there are three pillars to the sporting mission tied to this collaboration: representation, resistance and recognition.

    The impact of Israel’s occupation goes beyond permit refusals: the Israeli army has killed more than a thousand athletes during two years of attacks on Gaza.

    Representation

    Representation carries great significance, especially in the context of continued Israeli sportswashing such as the recent participation of the Israel Premier Tech cycling team at races across Europe this Summer.

    For Palestinians, the sporting arena is one of the only global settings where their country is widely and officially acknowledged.

    It is also a place where they can show their strength and resilience, inspiring the thousands of children in Gaza who have lost limbs and hope due to Israeli aggressions.

    Gaza Sunbirds cycling team co-founder Karim Ali said:

    The Gaza Sunbirds are showing the world that disability, bombardment, and a lack of resources will not hold them back and that they will continue to advocate for their community.

    From world class cycling competitions to garments worn proudly by a supportive international community, their flag will fly proudly and always carry hope.

    Featured image supplied

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Jersey-based anti-genocide and peace activist Natalie Strecker was acquitted this morning, despite the best efforts of the Starmer regime to stack her trial on ‘terror’ charges against her.

    But Strecker said that while the past year had been one of the worst of her life, she wants the focus to remain on the people of Palestine and Israel’s crimes against them:

    I, Natalie Strecker, following one of the worst and most stressful years of my life, have finally been vindicated of the charges of inviting support for a proscribed organisation. I am grateful to the court and the jurats, for their deliberations and correctly concluding that, despite maybe clumsy wording on occasion, I never intended to invite support for any of the groups cited. I also thank them for the respect and fellow feeling they demonstrated to me throughout the proceedings.

    I would like to take the opportunity to thank my incredible legal team, Mark and Tim for their assistance during this difficult time, I could not have asked for better representation.  I also thank all of my friends, who have faithfully supported me during these difficult days, I love you all. I thank, too, all those in our community who have offered support and words of encouragement throughout this journey, it has meant everything. To my much loved husband, my mother-in-law, and family, I am so very sorry that you had to be put through this, and I am eternally grateful for your love and support.

    This has personally been an incredibly traumatic and dehumanising time, compounded by old wounds triggered by the manner in which I was arrested. I am a care survivor, a survivor of abuse, because of the failings of our government and institutions as a child.

    I walk out of court today with my head held high and in the knowledge that it was my character that was put on trial, and I won.

    However, the Palestinian people, the most dehumanised community on our planet, continue to be subjected to genocide, apartheid and the most brutal ethnic cleansing. It is a stain on our collective conscience, and I implore islanders to keep doing all they can to bring it to an end, alongside working to end all the other genocides taking place, such as those in Sudan and the Congo.

    As for myself, I remain committed to the struggle for a kinder, fairer world, in which the right to freedom, justice, equality and a life of dignity are guaranteed for all in our human family.

    Thank you and free Palestine.

    Featured image via Natalie Strecker

    By Skwawkbox

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Israeli military forces have attacked and shut down the HQ of the Union of Agricultural Work Committees (UAWC), a non-profit organisation established almost forty years ago to help Palestinian farmers, arresting staff members and accusing the UAWC of ‘involvement in and support for terrorism’:

    West Bank union shut down

    In a statement, human rights group the Al-Haq Organisation said:

    This morning, Monday, 1 December 2025, the Israeli Occupying Forces (IOF) raided and sealed the headquarters of the Union of Agricultural Work Committees (UAWC) in Al-Bireh/Ramallah, as well as its office in Hebron. Several staff members were arrested, and office equipment was confiscated.

    The IOF left a military order prohibiting the organisation’s work and engagement with its activities.

    This attack is part of Israel’s systematic dismantling of Palestinian organisations that work on human rights, the rule of law, and support community steadfastness.

    We call on the international community, including human rights defenders and institutions, to condemn this assault and demand the release of all detained UAWC staff members.

    In 2014, the UAWC won two separate awards for its work: the United Nations Development Agency’s ‘Equator Prize’ for the union’s role in sustainable development and the fight against poverty through its Seed Bank initiative, and the US Food Sovereignty Alliance’s Food Sovereignty Prize for its contribution to making the West Bank self-sufficient in food production.

    Small wonder that Israel, which has been relentlessly destroying Palestinian farms, olive groves and water resources, has smeared the UAWC as a ‘terrorist’ organisation.

    Featured image via Al-Haq

    By Skwawkbox

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • It’s the final day of the Palestine Action judicial review. To mark it, 18 international organisations have signed the following solidarity statement on UK state repression.

    International solidarity statement on UK state repression – taking action to prevent a genocide is not terrorism

    On 5 July 2025, the UK government enforced the unprecedented decision to proscribe Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation.

    This is a dark time for democracy and a deeply oppressive moment for those of us who take action against the arms trade and against complicity in genocide and mass and structural violence.
    Prior to proscription, support for Palestine Action was widespread. It crossed movements, classes, ethnicities, and age groups.

    Direct action and civil disobedience that directly target the tools of war have a long-standing history in the transnational peace and anti-war movements. People who would not themselves climb on top of an arms factory roof, or attend marches or other campaigning events, have supported those who did. This support did not disappear overnight when hundreds of thousands woke up as potential ‘terrorist’ supporters on the morning of 5th July.

    Since the proscription, police have arrested 2710 people holding signs in support of Palestine Action, and Palestine solidarity groups that organise peaceful protests have been threatened with arrest or even had access to their funds cut off indefinitely.

    In one case, three people were arrested for holding placards saying ‘Oppose Genocide. Ban Starmer not Palestine Action’. During the application for a Judicial Review challenging the proscription, government lawyer James Eadie stated these arrests were “police overreach” and that the placards are “lawful” under the legislative provision permitting campaigning for de-listing.

    In the Netherlands, Australia, Belgium and elsewhere, Palestine Action supporters and pro-Palestine activists have been increasingly surveilled, restricted and repressed.

    Palestine Action’s proscription also exposes the UK government’s routine instrumentalisation of counter-terrorism laws to persecute marginalised groups and individuals that challenge injustice and violence against civilians in ways that it does not approve—especially in this moment of heightened solidarity with the Palestine liberation movement.

    In this sense, the proscription starkly exposes this pernicious misuse of counter-terrorism laws against those who ideologically challenge the government by seeking to end arms supplies to a genocide.

    The UK government shared in a court hearing that its basis for proscription was that 3 out of almost 400 group actions reached the ‘terrorism’ threshold, and that Palestine Action had sought to influence the government, despite its main target being the arms companies and contractors that supply Israel.

    This draconian and indiscriminate response to the group’s actions is of course unsurprising given the ever-closer union between the UK government and the arms industry and the many ways in which the arms industry influence is tied-up with government in western arms producing countries.

    The far-reaching implications of these developments for our movements – and for the already limited tools at our disposal to challenge potentially illegal arms transfers – cannot be overstated.

    As organisations and groups that campaign, advocate and litigate against the arms trade, we will not stay silent while our governments are continuing to supply arms to Israel (such as parts for F-35 jets via the global programme) – especially when the legal pathways – through which the government claims we should be able to challenge transfers that clearly violate international law – are failing us.

    In many cases, governments have themselves admitted that there is a ‘clear risk’ that Israel will use them to commit serious international law violations, including war crimes and crimes against humanity, and that it is unequivocally clear that Israel is unwilling to comply with international law.

    Our governments are failing us. They manipulate to their benefit the application of arms trade regulatory frameworks at the international, regional and domestic levels. Instead of taking the only moral and law-compliant option available to them—the imposition of a full two-way arms embargo—they continue to supply arms to Israel.

    The UK government’s latest move to criminalise as ‘terrorists’ groups and individuals doing what they feel is necessary to stop an unfolding genocide, is the most repressive and dangerous response so far.

    It paves the way for other governments to do the same and gives governments and courts a green-light to dismiss legal challenges against the arms trade.

    So our message is clear.

    We denounce governments’ complicity in genocide and mass structural violence, and will continue to strongly condemn and repudiate government actions that enable the arms trade to Israel and other such contexts.

    While as organisations or individuals, some of us may not be organising, advocating for or taking part in direct action, we are adamant that such actions, as part of our solidarity with the Palestinian people’s freedom and liberation struggle, do not amount to acts of ‘terrorism’, and we will continue to support the legal challenge against proscription.

    We will resist the UK government’s repressive actions and will continue demanding that all governments and arms companies immediately impose and comply with a two-way embargo on all arms supplies to Israel.

    Signatories:

    Action Sécurité Ethique Républicaines (ASER)

    Alternativa Antimilitarista.MOC/ADNV

    Antimilitaristes-MOC València

    Bretxa Observatori

    Cairo Institute for Human Rights Studies (CIHRS)

    Campaign Against Arms Trade

    Centre Delàs d’Estudis per la Pau

    European Legal Support Center

    Grupo Antimilitarista de Carabanchel

    Internationale der Kriegsdienstgegner*innen (IDK)

    La Bacora Col·lectiu feminista de Catarroja

    Mujeres de Negro contra la Guerra – Madrid

    PAX (the Netherlands)

    Patxanguilles antifeixistes

    Sare Antifaxista (Antifasist Basque Country)

    Shadow World Investigations

    War Resisters’ International

    War Resisters’ League

    Featured image via the Canary

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Jersey-based anti-genocide activist Natalie Strecker has been found not guilty at her trial on ‘terror’ charges for supporting the Palestinians’ right of resistance to Israel’s occupation, which is guaranteed under international law.

    The government had told the ‘jurat’s of the trial – lay judges – to ignore that international law, but the ‘not guilty’ verdict was delivered just now anyway.

    This is the latest in a string of acquittals under supposed ‘anti-terror’ legislation that the Starmer regime has weaponised against the pro-Palestine movement and journalists who expose Israel’s trial, but his ‘lawfare’ war continues to cause huge stress and expense to its humanitarian victims as Starmer fights to protect Israel and its interests.

    Featured image via Natalie Strecker

    By Skwawkbox

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • The Prisoners for Palestine movement describes itself as “a prisoner-led collective in Britain representing all those detained under charges related to Palestinian liberation”. Several of the imprisoned activists are currently on a hunger strike, with some describing the protest as “the latest hunger strike since 1981”. Despite this, the media is largely silent on the topic, which is why the following protest will take place today:


    BBC ignore hunger strikes

    The six hunger strikers are:

    • Amu Gib.
    • Qesser Zuhrah.
    • Heba Muraisi.
    • Jon Cink.
    • Teuta ‘T’ Hoxa.
    • Kamran Ahmed.

    Prisoners for Palestine are tracking the progress of each hunger striker here.

    On 19 November, Prisoners for Palestine wrote:

    Eighteen days since the start of the Prisoners For Palestine rolling, indefinite hunger-strike, and more than a month since the Home Secretary was notified of the prisoners’ intentions, and of their demands, there has still been no response from the British government.

    They added:

    This week saw the start of the first of the 3 Filton 24 trials at Woolwich Crown Court, with Zoe Rogers, Fatema Zainab (Ray) Rajwani, Jordan Devlin, Samuel Corner, and Charlotte ‘Lottie’ Head, accused of breaking into an Elbit Systems facility in Filton, Bristol, and causing damage to a weapons shipment due to be sent to the Israeli military, for use in Gaza. Elbit produces 85% of the deadly Quadcopter drones used to target civilians, particularly children, in the Gaza Genocide. The Filton 24 maintain that they have upheld international law, while it is Elbit, and the British government who are the criminals.

    The Right to a Fair Trial is a key demand of the hunger-strikers. Not only were they violently arrested, and held as ‘terrorists’, despite not being charged with any terrorist offence, but all 6 activists now on trial have been held for more than a year already, with long waits still ahead for most of the other prisoners. There has, provably, been interference in the judicial process by the Israeli government, Elbit Systems, their biggest weapons maker, and the collusion of the British government, police, and Crown Prosecution Service, as well as the withholding of evidence. It is for this reason that the hunger-strikers are also demanding immediate bail.

    As of today’s date, two of the Palestine Action hunger strikers have been hospitalised (Teuta ‘T’ Hoxa and Kamran Ahmed).

    The BBC protest will take place today at 5:30pm:Prisoners for Palestine flyer

    Featured image via Prisoners for Palestine / Alexander Svensson (Wikimedia)

    By Willem Moore

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • A ceasefire can be a strange thing. The assumption, generally speaking, is that the parties to it restrain themselves for a period of time, ordering their forces and disciplining their charges from straying. But straying happens, transgressions inevitable. Some are genuine enough: silly misunderstandings, hot headed confusion, a fear that the other side has broken it. Room for error, and a degree of death and injury, is crudely permitted.

    In the case of the Israel-Hamas ceasefire, transgressions have become the lingua franca of the parties, though Israel remains, by far, the perpetrator par excellence. The latter’s departures from the agreement have been so vicious as to prompt the observation that they are pursuing a mutilated reading of the agreement, essentially a “reducefire”. The deaths of 347 Palestinians in Gaza since October 10, including 136 children, do not point to cooling restraint.

    On October 28, at least 104 Palestinians were slaughtered in a single day. This might have suggested a breach so serious as to suggest a repudiation. Not so, claimed Qatari Prime Minister, Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdul Rahman Al Thani. “Fortunately,” he told a US audience, “I think the main parties – both of them [Israel and Hamas] – are acknowledging that the ceasefire should hold and they should stick to the agreement.”

    What is becoming apparent is that the ceasefire has led to a state of affairs where Israeli forces have been permitted enormous latitude in the way it inflicts violence on local Gazans. The UN Women’s Chief of Humanitarian Action, Sofia Calltorp, reveals how Gazan women told her “again and again: there may be a ceasefire, but the war is not over. The attacks are fewer, but the killings continue.” Agnès Callmard, Secretary General of Amnesty International, goes so far as to declare that the ceasefire has created “a dangerous illusion that life in Gaza is returning to normal.” What has in fact happened is a mere reduction of “the scale of [Israel’s] attacks” and the meagre allowance of humanitarian aid into the Strip.

    In a briefing note released on November 27, the organisation is adamant that “Israeli authorities are still committing genocide against Palestinians in the occupied Gaza Strip, by continuing to deliberately inflict conditions of life calculated to bring about their physical destruction.” Expulsions continue, prosecutions of alleged atrocities and war crimes by Israeli forces non-existent. The means to build the crucial infrastructure required to sustain life is being hampered, while unexploded ordnance, contaminated rubble and sewage, remain unaddressed.

    Structural realities have also intruded. The Israeli Defense Forces remain in control of over 58% of Gaza. According to a clutch of special rapporteurs and experts in the employ of the United Nations, including Francesca Albanese, Ben Saul and Irene Khan, 40 active Israeli sites continue to operate “beyond the agreed withdrawal line, in clear breach of the ceasefire terms.” They also warn that the UN Security Council resolution authorising the deployment of an International Stabilisation Force (ISF), with Egypt and Israel coordinating border matters alongside a spanking new Palestinian trained police force “risks replicating – if not aggravating – the model of security coordination that has entrenched Israel’s settler-colonial apartheid regime in the West Bank”.

    Humanitarian assistance remains at a painful trickle, an obscene state of affairs given the levelling devastation wrought by the war (85% of water and sanitation facilities were damaged or destroyed; likewise 92% of homes). The charity Oxfam does not spare any details in what is needed: “The most pressing needs include food and healthcare and shelter, as well as water, sanitation and hygiene services (WASH) including menstrual products and waste management services.” While some food and goods have become more available in local markets, they remain prohibitively expensive for Gaza’s residents.

    Between October 10 and 21, seventeen international non-government organisations had essential aid shipments for Gaza, including water, food, tents, and medical supplies, blocked, with Israeli authorities claiming they were not authorised to do so. Some 99 requests by international NGOs to deliver aid were rejected, along with six requests from UN agencies. “This includes,” stated Oxfam last month, “agencies that continue to have long-standing INGO registration with Palestinian and Israeli authorities and are legally permitted to operate by the latter while new registration processes are ongoing.”

    A system of brutality, practised, insistent, even casual, has been entrenched against those in Gaza and, increasingly, the West Bank. The summary execution of two men in Jenin by Israeli soldiers after their surrender was lauded by Israel’s National Security Minister, Itamar Ben-Gvir, who thought the killings the very thing “expected of them”. Implicit is the suggestion that Palestinians are required to behave in specific, tolerated ways: humbly submit to their apparently generous oppressors, suffer ceaseless purgatorial deprivation and accept a ceasefire in name only.

    The post Gaza’s Prolonged Purgatory first appeared on Dissident Voice.

    This post was originally published on Dissident Voice.

  • On 19 October, 250 people gathered for a Lantern Walk in solidarity with Palestine in Brockwell Park, South London.

    The fundraiser was organised by parents and children from a local school to support the Sameer Project, an aid project in North Gaza. In the lead-up, they were instructed by the school to refrain from using its name in communications and materials, and not to distribute leaflets outside the school gates. Concerned parents quizzed the school which spoke of complaints and legal threats.

    Despite these hostile censorship attempts, families showed up in force — defying the rain, waving flags, and playing music. In conversation with the Canary, a member of Parents for Palestine explains why they joined:

    For two years we have been witnessing the most horrific massacres being committed by Israel … they have not raised flags or fundraised as they did for Ukraine. This is unacceptable when children in Gaza are made to bury their loved ones … Our schools need to do better.

    Censoring Palestine: Hackney parents speak-up

    This is one of the milder instances of censorship. Parents and teachers who spoke to the Canary expressed fears of reprisals and the erasure of free expression. They spoke of children being reported over keffiyehs, pins, or football shirts …why…for making parents — yes adults — uncomfortable.

    One parent in Hackney shared another troubling experience:

    At a meeting about the school and federation management’s allegedly anti-racist practice and curriculum, Palestine solidarity was again shut down and a white Israeli mum was allowed to shout over people, saying she felt “unsafe” as a “Jew and Israeli”. When a mixed race mum shared that she felt the lack of solidarity with Palestine was also racist, the conversation was then shut down and she was told off, despite never raising her voice and actually trembling.

    Another Hackney parent organised a diversity week event where the title was forcibly sanitised — seeing Palestine replaced with “multicultural”. In another case, a school was threatening to refer an 8 year-old child to Prevent for having a Palestine flag stitched to their coat. 

    Rising Islamophobia and censorship over Palestine

    The unease attached to Palestinian solidarity in schools is not separate from the rising tide of Islamophobia. CAGE UK, an advocacy organisation, documented a 455 percent increase in acts of repression against Palestinian solidarity since 2021. Out of 214 cases, 209 involved Muslims, including referrals to Prevent and unfounded allegations of “terrorism”. 

    Not even teachers are being spared.

    A spokesperson for Maslaha, an anti-racism organisation, told the Canary

    We’ve been talking to teachers who have explicitly been told not to discuss Palestine in classrooms. They’re reminded to “stay neutral” or to “remember the Teachers’ Standards” […] frequently being told their schools “can’t do anything political”. This is despite assemblies and lessons on Ukraine being welcomed. Children raising Palestine in class are treated as a “safeguarding concern,” under the Prevent Duty.

    While there are no clear, top-down orders to muzzle Palestine solidarity, the murkiness of the government’s “impartiality” guidelines, the fear of dismissals, and the general stress headteachers face, result in self-censorship, one headteacher explains:

    Headteachers are managing exceptional pressures. As a result, leaders often do not have the capacity to engage in conflict with governing bodies over public positioning, even when our personal convictions are strong.

    Many [teachers] respond as individuals, rather than institutions. We focus on universal principles […] and make anti-war statements without explicitly naming the context.

    Small victories, big impact

    In response to these  repressive tactics, families and the communities have stood their ground. CAGE shared some examples of its clients fighting back in conversation with the Canary: 

    One London-based analyst at a major media outlet who was instructed to remove his T-shirt that stated ‘Free Gaza’ said: “I am leaving this company… I cannot stay somewhere where there is a double standard and I am treated like an outsider for a T-shirt”.

    There’s also Layla, banned from school grounds a parent filed a complaint against her child for donning a Palestine badge. 

    With our support, she challenged the school, demanding to know why standing for Palestine led to her being treated unfairly. We advised her throughout her meetings and communications with the school, which eventually led them to back down.

    On a more local level, grassroots campaigns in support of Palestine are flourishing. The Lewisham-based Apartheid Free Schools has been actively campaigning against the misconception across UK schools that Palestine is an isolated issue, different from other struggles against occupation and apartheid. In a statement to the Canary, one of the parents involved wrote:

    We envision a Lewisham whose schools are apartheid free. We do not want institutions to which we entrust our children to indirectly or unknowingly support apartheid and the human rights violations of other children.

    Some schools have started to back down as parents ramp up pressure. Some have even endorsed the boycott of public institutions that support Israel. Recently, a Cambridge school suspended trips to the Science Museum until it divests from companies complicit in Israel’s genocide in Gaza. Another school cancelled a visit by Damian Egan, the Bristol North East MP and Labour Friends of Israel Vice Chair. Bristol Palestine Solidarity Campaign at the time describe the cancellation as “a win safeguarding, solidarity, and for the power of trade unionists, parents, and campaigners”.

    The victories are incremental but they are a sign that pupils, parents and teachers are prepared to push back to voice their horror at the injustice and violence they’ve been witnessing for two years.

    Featured image via Unsplash

    By Abla Kandalaft

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • In one of the most memorable moments of the 2025 Arab Cup, the Palestinian spirit has once again proven undefeatable. This occurred in their match against the host, Qatar, showcasing the indomitable Palestinian spirit.

    Victorious Palestine: defying the odds

    A last-minute own goal by Qatari player Sultan al-Burkaik in the 91st minute sealed a stunning victory for the Palestinian team that echoed with the enduring Palestinian spirit.

    From the opening whistle, the team’s determination was palpable. They were resolute, refusing to settle for a draw after a hard-fought match. And with just 15 minutes to go their fate turned — a moment defying all expectations and exemplifying the Palestinian spirit.

    The goal turned the tournament’s opening match into a symbolic victory for Palestine. Meanwhile, the stadium erupted in thunderous chants of solidarity for Gaza in defiance against the genocidal actions of Israel.

    This one’s for Gaza

    This was more than a football match. It was a statement of survival, pride, and resistance. From the first whistle to the final goal, the Palestinian team embodied more than sporting excellence.

    On the pitch, the perseverance of Gaza’s people was felt through every ball pass, tackle, and save. Each charged with the spirit of generations who have fought relentlessly for freedom.

    On that pitch, the collective pulse of every child, mother, father, and family brutally slain in the struggle for justice was resurrected.

    The message was clear: Gaza is not broken, and Palestine will not capitulate.

    Resilience in the face of adversity

    As the final whistle blew, the players stood victorious. Meanwhile, the people of Gaza celebrated in their makeshift homes — a fleeting moment of joy and a brief return to normalcy. This occurred in an environment where the murder of civilians by Israel has tragically become the new norm. This victory transcends football. It was a reminder that, despite the relentless challenges and hardships, Palestinians will rise and stand proud on and off the pitch.

    Palestine takes 3 points in Group A with this win, leaving Qatar without any points following their first match.

    The 2025 Arab Cup opening will go down in history as a crowning moment for Palestinian football and Palestinians worldwide.

    Featured image via the Canary/Al Jazeera Arabic

    By Alaa Shamali

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • The UN Committee Against Torture has released a new report accusing Israel of employing a “de facto state policy” of torture in an “organized and widespread” manner.

    The report highlights how Israel does not have any legislation criminalizing torture, adding that Israeli law protects officials from culpability.

    “The committee was deeply concerned about reports indicating a de facto state policy of organized and widespread torture and ill-treatment during the reporting period, which had gravely intensified since 7 October 2023,” the UN report said.

    The post UN Report: Israel Maintains ‘De Facto State Policy Of Organized Torture’ appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • Campaigners have called a decision by the Clwyd Pension Fund to update its investment exclusion policy a “milestone”. The unanimous vote to remove investments complicit in the oppression of Palestinians is the first by a pension fund in Wales. Clwyd Pension Fund committee members moved to bring the portfolio into compliance with the UN OHCHR database. This covers all business enterprises involved in specified activities related to the unlawful Israeli settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem.

    The Clwyd Pension Fund is administered by Flintshire County Council and is part of the Local Government Pension Scheme. It covers Denbighshire, Wrexham and Flintshire. It pays out £125m in 53,000 pensions each year to members of the scheme. Assets under management total £2.57bn.

    A campaign bears fruit

    The vote followed a vigorous campaign of lobbying by the NE Wales Palestine Solidarity Campaign branch. PSC Cymru co-chair David McKnight said:

    Although the OHCHR database is limited to illegal Israeli settlements, this vote is very significant as other motions passed don’t necessarily mean actual divestment. This one does.

    Wrexham county councillor Anthony Wedlake said the Clwyd Pension Fund has now completed a process he initiated with the support of other Clwyd Pension Fund members in November 2024. This includes a survey of members that showed they did not wish to be complicit in the genocide of the Palestinian people. The survey of pension members asked if they agreed with divestment. The results, from September 2025, were an overwhelming 84.2% in favour.

    Wedlake added:

    the decision means the CPF will not invest in any assets on the UN OHCR database. Also, the CPF will no longer have funds in companies on the database, even those funds invested on CPF’s behalf in the WPP [Wales Pension Partnership].

    Wedlake currently sits for the Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition and is Group Leader of the Progressive Independents.

    He said the previous investments were “relatively small” but nonetheless are now no longer in the CPF’s portfolio. He added:

    I am committed to do all I can to stop the genocidal acts and war crimes of the Israeli State. I am grateful to my colleagues on the CPF and its members for supporting the process which led to this landmark decision. No longer will CPF be tacit supporters of genocide and I hope that the decision inspires those throughout the UK campaigning for disinvestment. My next steps are to continue to fight for the WPP to completely disinvest assets complicit in genocide.

    Divestment across Wales

    The Clwyd Pension Fund committee members further decided, at their meeting on 26 November in Ty Dewi Sant, Ewloe, to engage with the Wales Pension Partnership about implementing the fund’s Exclusions Policy. The Wales Pension Partnership manages investments on behalf of local government pension funds in Wales.

    The meeting also voted to completely divest its Tactical Asset Allocation Fund, meaning no further divestment is required to be compliant with the decision to update the exclusion policy. The only assets listed on the UN OHCR database were all within the Clwyd Pension Fund’s Tactical Asset Allocation Fund. Companies within the fund previously included AirBnB, Bookings Holdings Inc, Expedia Group and Motorola Solutions.

    The Clwyd Pension Fund vote is the first by an actual pension fund in Wales to divest. Nine local authorities in Wales have voted to divest their funds, but are reliant on the Wales Pension Partnership to implement the divestment decision. Palestine Solidarity Campaign has a timeline of divestment milestones. Bridgend was the most recent council in Wales to vote to divest (19 November).

    Featured image via Unsplash/Nikolas Gannon

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Jersey police admitted wrongly attributing messages to anti-genocide activist Natalie Strecker during their gathering of ‘terrorism’ ‘evidence’ against her, the Royal Court on the island heard during her trial on charges of supporting a banned proscribed organisation.

    After trawling through some fifty thousand messages, the police identified ‘around 35’ it considered problematic. The vast quantity of available messages versus small yield are strongly reminiscent of the ‘fishing expedition’ modus operandi of Israel lobby groups. Inevitably, this has also been the case in other actions against pro-Palestine activists on the English mainland.

    Strecker stands firm

    Strecker, a peace activist who has worked with Jersey’s Palestine Solidarity Campaign, faced two charges related to inviting support for a proscribed organisation. These charges are believed to relate to comments about the right of Palestinians to armed resistance against the Israeli occupation and of Lebanese militia to oppose Israel’s attacks on Lebanon. That right is guaranteed under international law, which the two ‘jurats’ deciding the case have been told to ignore, raising fears that the government is determined to fix the outcome.

    Strecker denies both charges. Giving evidence, Jersey cop Luke Freeman told the court that the local force had downloaded posts and messages from Strecker’s devices and scoured them for anything it thought it could use, but admitted that a ‘bug’ had caused the police to wrongly attribute ‘many’ messages to Strecker.

    The verdict in the case is scheduled to be delivered tomorrow morning at 10am.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Skwawkbox

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • The Palestine men’s national football team have reached the Arab Cup for their second appearance in the tournament. But, in a world where teams are measured by victories and trophies, the team stands distinctly from their competitors. The squad have been born under Zionist occupation. They’ve forged their way through rubble and closed borders. They’ve moved whilst carrying the name of a homeland that has often been absent from maps, but never from the hearts of many.

    Arab Cup welcomes Palestine

    Since the beginning of the last century, Palestinians have been building their first stadiums in Jerusalem, Jaffa and Gaza. The first football association of Palestine was launched in 1928, one of the oldest Arab and Asian associations. However, sport was not immune to politics. Zionist bodies took control of the association with the support of the British Mandate. Then, the name Palestine began to disappear from international competitions. The pitch became a battleground for existence rather than a playing field.

    After the Nakba, the Palestinian Football Association was founded in its modern form in 1952. But, the road to international recognition was long and bitter, until the Palestinian national team became a full member of FIFA in 1998. From that day on, the Fedayeen began to walk a path unlike any other national team.

    Complicated travel arrangements, closed borders, players banned from travelling, intermittent training camps, and matches sometimes played without spectators, and sometimes without the players themselves due to arrest, injury, or martyrdom.

    Nevertheless, Al-Fida’i persevered, because for them, playing was not just a sport, but part of their daily resistance in their own way.

    Asian Challenge Cup

    The year 2014 marked a major turning point when the team won the Asian Challenge Cup and reached the Asian Cup finals for the first time in its history. This was not only a sporting achievement, but also a historic event that brought Palestine back to the continent’s biggest stage and proved that this team was capable of overcoming not only its opponents but also its limitations.

    Among 47 Asian federations, the Fedayeen managed to secure a place in three consecutive editions of the Asian Cup. They did so in spite of being the only team that includes players from Gaza, the West Bank, Jerusalem, refugee camps, Chile, Sweden, Denmark and Latin America. The team is geographically dispersed, but emotionally united by the spirit of Palestine.

    Today, the Palestinian national team is competing in the Arab Cup with a different spirit. It is not entering the tournament solely in search of a title, but in search of genuine joy that emerges from the rubble of the siege. They are entering to say that Palestine is still here, and that its voice is heard through a player running, a flag raised, or an anthem sung by thousands of voices.

    Al-Fida’i is not just a team; it is the memory of an undefeated nation and a mirror of a people who know how to make play a form of life amid the ruins.

    Every time the players take to the field, the world feels that Palestine, despite everything, is still running, breathing, and resisting.

    Featured image via YouTube screenshot/CGTN Sports Scene

    By Alaa Shamali

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • The memorial service for David Lear, the photographer who tragically died during while filming a protest in support of hunger-striking political prisoners was held yesterday. Trade unionist Steve Hedley, who knew David well, has written the following about his late friend, submitted with the approval of David’s family.

    David Lear if he had to go would probably have scripted his exit from this mortal coil in exactly the way it unfolded. David was taken by God on the 15th November whilst at a protest for Palestinian hunger striker Kamran Ahmed. David was outside Pentonville prison with other protesters and simultaneously broadcasting a livestream of the events unfolding. He even had his favourite tea bags on him as he’d just returned from the shop. We had just witnessed a local racist attacking a supporter of the hunger strike and David had raced across the road to capture the offender on camera. David had health problems and his heart gave way. Perhaps the adrenaline of events contributed to his demise but we can only speculate. He was, I believe, too good for this world and now sits with the almighty.

    David Lear remembered

    I loved David, we agreed on a lot, Socialism, Palestine, justice, but disagreed a lot as well on things like climate change and the need for political parties. We never quarrelled – which given my temperament is a testament to his patience and good humour. We would communicate daily even if it was to share memes or alternatively vent for hours on the phone decrying the state of the world and, of course, coming up with solutions that often included “rehabilitating” MPs, councillors and anyone involved in bourgeois politics.

    David told me he  was of Jewish/German and English heritage, was raised in Wales from the age of 3 and could speak the language. He was an atheist who later became a Christian and converted to Islam later in his life (he never actually told me of his conversion and I didn’t know until his funeral was announced). He embodied all that is good in the three Abrahamic traditions: kindness, generosity, honesty and absolute fearlessness.

    David hated hypocrites and challenged injustice at every turn. He stood up to the police, fascists, Zionists, the government, the local council, and to trade union bureaucrats. He did these things to help others and had no selfish motives. We actually met on a picket line where David put himself in danger from thug security guards to cover a story about  Petrit Mihaj being sacked. Ironically David’s honesty led him a decade later to stand outside the trade union office that subsequently sacked Petrit again, for months, covering a picket that nobody in the mainstream media or the so-called left media would touch. The man was heroic, in fact a Celtic hero who loved his native Wales and Ireland, which he also campaigned to free from British rule.

    David’s passion

    David ’s career straddled working for the BBC on Panorama, telecommunications, independent media and, of course, fearless reporting. His company, Islington Free News, which he ran with his partner in crime Donny, kept politicians and bureaucrats of all persuasions on their toes and accountable. I met two of David’s children, his daughter and his son Lawrence, on pickets they’d attended with them. Lawrence has an encyclopaedic knowledge of transport and his daughter is a campaigner for justice like her father. She’s also a mother herself and his grandchild brought David enormous joy and pride. He is sorely missed by us all, but I know his family are absolutely devastated.

    David’s true passion as a campaigner was to seek justice for Palestine. He was outraged by the Gaza genocide and sickened that our Labour government continues to arm Israel. He was fully in support of the Filton 24 and other political prisoners. David raged about the creeping authoritarianism which sought to  silence dissent in Britain by criminalising protest and ridiculously labelling it terrorism. He had a vast knowledge about previous direct action groups like the suffragettes. He rang me in a fury when he saw Yvette Cooper, Harriet Harman and many other hypocrites dressed like suffragettes in Parliament whilst simultaneously banning Palestine action as a proscribed organisation.

    Expose injustice

    A fitting tribute to David would be for everyone to continue his work to  expose injustice and to speak the truth. Above all he would want us to ensure that the hunger strikers were freed and Palestine was liberated. We should all aspire to be like David Lear.

    A candlelit vigil will be held for David on Saturday 6th December at 6pm outside Pentonville prison (nearest station Caledonian Road on the Piccadilly line or Caledonian Road and Barnsbury on the Overground). Please attend if you can to remember a class fighter the likes of which will never be seen again.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Skwawkbox

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • There had been high hopes that Dublin park, disgracefully named after Israeli war criminal Chaim Herzog, was set to be renamed. However, a last minute u-turn almost certainly due to political manoeuvring behind the scenes following loud interventions from the Irish government has likely scotched the change.

    Dublin City Council Chief Executive Richard Shakespeare released the following statement on the evening of Sunday November 30:

    The authority to change a placename is contained within Part 8 of the Local Government Act 2001. The process involves the adoption by resolution of a proposal to substitute a new placename by the elected members, the holding of a public consultation and a secret ballot of qualified electors should a proposal be approved. While the provisions of the Act were commenced in 2019, the regulations required to govern the process for a secret ballot are not yet in place. The Report to the elected members does not take account of the correct statutory procedure and is missing information for a valid resolution to be adopted.

    Therefore, in the circumstances I am proposing to withdraw the report from the Agenda with a recommendation that the matter be referred back to the Commemorations and Naming Committee for consideration of the statutory procedure. On behalf of the Executive of the City Council, I wish to apologise for this administrative oversight. A detailed review of the administrative mis-steps will now be undertaken and a report furnished to the Lord Mayor and Councillors.

    Translated to English, this gobbledegook means ‘we desperately trawled through the report looking for any little detail we could twist into some arcane procedural violation, thus saving us a backlash from our US and Israeli overlords.’

    Paul Murphy of People Before Profit was certainly of that opinion, saying on social media:

    What a joke. So much for local democracy. Once Micheál Martin jumps for his US masters, then the Council executive jumps too. No coincidence that this is happening at the same time as the Mail on Sunday is reporting that the Occupied Territories Bill will be shelved.

    Dublin park fiasco: Irish government slithers to escape challenging so-called ‘Israel’

    The Occupied Territories Bill (OTB) is legislation intended to decrease Ireland’s trade with illegal settlements. It has gone through a torturous process already, all for a weak bill that falls far short of what should be instituted – total cessation of all trade with the Zionist entity. There appear to be continued attempts in the Irish government to delay and water down the bill. Those running the country have been heavily complicit in the terror regime’s genocide by allowing use of Shannon airport for arms shipments, and importing vast quantities of Israeli products.

    Taoiseach Micheál Martin had piled additional pressure on the council with antisemitic nonsense. As has been said many times before, conflating Jewish people in general with a land theft project carrying out a holocaust is obscenely slanderous to the many who oppose so-called Israel’s actions. Nonetheless, Martin proceeded:

    The proposal to rename Herzog Park should be withdrawn in its entirety and not proceeded with.

    The proposal would erase the distinctive and rich contribution to Irish life of the Jewish community over many decades, including actual participation in the Irish War of Independence and the emerging State.

    The proposal is a denial of our history and will without any doubt be seen as antisemitic.

    It is overtly divisive and wrong. Our Irish Jewish community’s contribution to our country’s evolution in its many forms should always be cherished and generously acknowledged.

    This motion must be withdrawn and I ask all on Dublin City Council to seriously reflect on the implications of this move.

    Martin is correct to suggest the name removal would be seen as antisemitic – the question is by who, and whether they’re arguing in anything approaching good faith. Needless to say, the Office of the President of Israel opposes renaming the Dublin park. They said:

    Removing the Herzog name, if it happens, would be a shameful and disgraceful move.

    Herzog family is a chain of criminality

    Interestingly, the current occupant of the above role is the vile spawn of Chaim Herzog himself. His son Isaac was one of the most prominent proponents of mass extermination in Gaza, saying in the early phase of Israel’s genocide:

    It’s an entire nation out there that is responsible. This rhetoric about civilians not aware, not involved—it’s not true.

    Incitement to genocide is a crime under the Genocide Convention. This has not stopped fellow genocidaire British Prime Minister Keir Starmer rolling out the red carpet for this advocate of mass slaughter. The apple didn’t fall far from the tree, as father Chaim was a key figure in the vast multitude of crimes that have led to the abomination that is the present day pseudo-state incorrectly called ‘Israel’.

    Herzog senior served in the Zionist Haganah paramilitary group, which carried out atrocities in the years leading up to the Nakba, and during the mass ethnic cleansing process itself. Following this, he is described as having “built and led the establishment of IDF Military intelligence”. In 1967 he became military governor of occupied East Jerusalem and the West Bank, and was integral in the ethnic cleansing of Jerusalem’s Mughrabi Quarter, calling the area a “toilet” that the Zionists “decided to remove”. The ethno-supremacist land thief rejoiced at the possibility of a Greater Israel, raving after the so-called Six Day War that the:

    …Israel Defence Forces [sic] smashed [the Arab armies’] defences and liberated the West Bank up to the Jordan. Bethel, Nablus, Givon, Hebron, Bethlehem, Jericho, Shilom, the Etzion block. It was as if a page had been taken out of the Bible and we were privileged to live to see it.

    He finally went on to become the sixth president of the Zionist entity. While in the role he:

    …commuted the prison sentences of two members of the Jewish terrorist underground who had been convicted of plotting to blow up one of Islam’s holiest shrines…

    The terrorists had been aiming to destroy the Dome of the Rock in Jerusalem. Zionism is a fundamentally racist project, so the type of character who can occupy so many senior roles within such a system can logically only ever be one of enormous disrepute.

    Belfast also venerates Zionist ethnic cleanser

    Aside from Dublin, Herzog has also been celebrated in Belfast, which suffers the misfortune of being his city of birth. A display in an exhibition area of Belfast City Hall venerates the racist zealot to this day. Residents of North Belfast have thankfully been spared the indignity of visible association with him, after a plaque in Cliftonpark Avenue was taken down by the council in 2014 following regular attacks. This is a useful prompt for any civically minded citizens in Dublin examining what course of action might be viable should the renaming definitively fail.

    Where the Belfast plaque has gone is anyone’s guess, which is a shame, though not for the kind of reasons Taoiseach Martin has raised for the Dublin case. He was on the right track when he decried erasure, however; hiding these artefacts away entirely is a mistake, when instead they should be in a museum to acknowledge the error of their original purpose. Just as the statue of Edward Colston lies amidst a display indicating the reasons for its demise, so too should this be the fate of Dublin’s Chaim Herzog plaque. Stick it in a museum, along with an apology for ever having it on a park in the first place. Alongside it can be a new plaque, listing all the crimes of the Zionist reprobate, though it’ll need a lot of aluminium and a large viewing area to fit all of them in.

    The BBC report that:

    The Group Leaders of Dublin City Council will meet at 13.00 local time on Monday to discuss the matter and [Lord Mayor Ray] McAdam will address the issue during the evening’s council meeting.

    A “final decision” will be made during the meeting on whether Monday’s vote will take place, the lord mayor said.

    Featured image via Unsplash/Valerie

    By Robert Freeman

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • The jury in the case of Jersey anti-genocide activist Natalie Strecker last week was told to ignore international law, according to former Derby North MP Chris Williamson, who went to Jersey for the first two days of the three-day hearing, which closes on Monday 1 December.

    Strecker, a well-known peace activist endorsed during the trial by peace prize winner Issa Amro, faces two charges of expressing support for a proscribed (banned) organisation, based on social media posts about Israel’s illegal occupation of Palestine.

    Williamson told Skwawkbox that, in a show of the government’s eagerness to make an example of Strecker – part of Keir Starmer’s ‘lawfare’ war on activists and journalists who expose Israel’s genocide in Gaza – the government had sent one of its top barristers to guide the local prosecuting lawyer, even though Jersey has its own separate legal system.

    And, explosively, that the ‘jurat’ – Jersey’s term for jurors – had been told that they must ignore international law in the case:

    International law guarantees an unequivocal right of resistance, including armed resistance, to people under illegal occupation. Legal experts say that UK terrorism legislation breaches international law by blocking this right.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Skwawkbox

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • After more than two years of Israel’s genocide in Gaza, popular outrage has mounted against the weapons manufacturers enabling the slaughter. The antiwar movement in the United States has begun targeting local nodes of the weapons supply chain in cities from Oakland to Brooklyn and Boston. These campaigns have deployed a breadth of strategies: pressuring local municipalities to divest, physically disrupting the supply chain through direct action, encouraging airports to adopt arms embargo policies and demanding public and private industrial landlords evict weapons companies.

    The post 40-Year Fight Against Cluster Bombs; Lessons To Stop US-Israel Weapons Pipeline appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • The Ontario Federation of Labour (OFL) became the fourth Canadian labour federation to adopt a hot cargo resolution against Israeli goods last week. The resolution has the OFL declare trade relationships and services with Israel to be “hot cargo” that workers will not touch.

    “Hot cargo” is used to define goods that workers will not handle due to its association with exploitation or oppression.

    The New Brunswick Federation of Labour was the first to adopt a resolution supporting the boycott of Israel when it passed a resolution against handling weapons bound for Israel in May. Since then, three other provincial federations of labour have taken similar actions in Nova Scotia, Newfoundland and Labrador, and Ontario.

    The post The Ontario Federation Of Labour Adopts ‘Hot Cargo’ Resolution appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • Italy is on general strike for the third time in less than three months, following a call by the grassroots union Unione Sindacale di Base (USB). Pickets, industrial actions, and demonstrations were organized in over 40 cities, with massive rallies demanding an end to rearmament plans and the war budget shaped by Giorgia Meloni’s government.

    On Friday, workers stressed that their mobilization is tied both to worsening material conditions at home and to international events, specifically the struggle of the Palestinian people – whose fate, they insist, is inseparable from Europe’s expanding war economy.

    The post Italy Holds Third General Strike In Three Months appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • Italy is on general strike for the third time in less than three months, following a call by the grassroots union Unione Sindacale di Base (USB). Pickets, industrial actions, and demonstrations were organized in over 40 cities, with massive rallies demanding an end to rearmament plans and the war budget shaped by Giorgia Meloni’s government.

    On Friday, workers stressed that their mobilization is tied both to worsening material conditions at home and to international events, specifically the struggle of the Palestinian people – whose fate, they insist, is inseparable from Europe’s expanding war economy.

    The post Italy Holds Third General Strike In Three Months appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • On 29 November, it was reported that Israel had murdered two children via a drone strike. They’d been gathering firewood for their father at the time, as the elder man himself is a wheelchair user. The drone strike which killed them hit close to a school which was sheltering displaced people.

    The children’s names were Fadi Abu Assi and Goma Abu Assi.

    Since killing the children, the Israeli Defence Forces (IDF) have tried to claim it was actually the victims who violated the ceasefire:

    Israel—Continuing fire

    Following their murder, the boys’ uncle said:

    They are children…what did they do? They do not have missiles or bombs, they went to gather wood for their father so he can start a fire.

    According to Gaza’s Health Ministry, Israel has killed 352 Palestinians since the October 10 ceasefire. Accordingly, Hamas are demanding mediators step in to stop Israel from killing them. The most consequential mediator is of course Donald Trump, but the president seems more focussed on other matters right now:


    People have reacted viscerally to the IDF online:

    They also reacted strongly to how the media are covering it:


    You can help to exert pressure by writing to your MP and demanding our government stand up to Israel’s violations. You can also support agencies which are helping Palestinians on the ground.

    Featured image via the Abu Assi family

    By Willem Moore

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • The United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) announced that it recorded approximately 9,300 cases of severe malnutrition among children under the age of five in the Gaza Strip during the month of October 2025.

    In its statement, the organisation warned that high levels of malnutrition continue to seriously threaten children’s lives and health. And with the onset of winter, weather conditions are exacerbating the crisis through the spread of disease and falling temperatures. As a result, increasing mortality rates are soaring among the most vulnerable groups.

    Gaza’s starving population

    UNICEF explained that tests conducted by its teams and partners in Gaza last month revealed these large numbers of children suffering from acute malnutrition. And, the organisation confirmed that large shipments of winter supplies remain stuck at the border. They have called, once again, for humanitarian aid to be delivered safely and without hindrance.

    In this context, Catherine Russell, Executive Director of UNICEF, said:

    Despite progress, thousands of children under the age of five remain acutely malnourished in Gaza, while many more lack proper shelter, sanitation and protection against winter.

    And, Russell also stressed the urgency of the situation:

    Too many children in Gaza are still facing hunger, illness and exposure to cold temperatures, conditions that are putting their lives at risk. Every minute counts to protect these children.

    It is estimated that the Gaza Strip needs around 300,000 tents and prefabricated housing units to provide minimum shelter for the population, following the widespread destruction caused by Israel’s war of extermination over the past two years.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Alaa Shamali

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Arab Cup coach Ihab Abu Jazar is a native of Palestine with a storied football career as both player and coach. Hailing from Rafah in the southernmost part of Gaza, he knows exactly what it means to play football under war and grow up under siege.

    And, he spent many years on the pitches of the Gaza Strip as a player and coach before becoming the technical director of the Palestinian national team. Undoubtedly, he is now carrying with him the memory of a city ravaged by conflict and a people waiting for any moment of joy in which to celebrate life.

    From Gaza to the Arab Cup

    Abu Jazar did not come to the national team from a traditional career path, but rather burdened with memories of war, the loss of friends, and the sound of rockets that were closer to the pitches than the goalposts. This background made his speech at half time in the qualifying match between Palestine and Libya a pivotal moment unlike any other familiar sporting speech.

    Abu Jazar’s speech between halves of the Palestine-Libya match was not merely technical guidance. It was an explicit reference to the pain of Gaza, when he entered the dressing room and stood in front of his players, saying in his Gazan dialect, familiar to every Palestinian:

    Don’t forget who we are playing for. We are excellent in the match, but there are people in tents, there is an entire people, there are people in Jerusalem, there are people who cannot find food because of hunger, siege and war. You are the ones who want to make them happy temporarily. They must be happy so they can forget death, destruction and war. We are about to die, but God willing, we will win.

    The speech was not just meant to boost morale, but was a reminder of the pain of a nation living under fire. It was a reminder to the players, were it needed, that their performance was no longer just a game, but the only source of joy for millions who had lost the meaning of normal life.

    Joy for Palestine

    While the original 90 minutes ended in a goalless draw, the Palestinian players took their coach’s words to heart and won the penalty shootout 4–3. In doing so, they secured a place in the Arab Cup alongside Qatar, Tunisia, and Syria. Their qualification was not just a sporting achievement, but a crowning glory for a people trying to steal a moment of victory from the rubble of war.

    Today, Abu Jazar is seen as more than just a coach. He is a living witness to a war that continues to ravage his city and a symbol of Gaza’s unbreakable spirit. Every time he stands on the sideline, he carries with him Rafah, with all its tears, salt, and renewed hope that football can still work miracles when the world is unable to stop the tragedy.

    Qualifying was not just a sporting achievement, but a small window of hope for the people of Gaza, who today live in tents and under the rubble of war. Abu Jazar, whose home and city remain under fire, has taught us that sport is not an escape from reality, but sometimes a vital space for resistance.

    With this qualification, Ihab Abu Jazar has become a symbol of a coach who came from the heart of suffering, leading his players with the spirit of a city that continues to resist, and with words that created an unforgettable moment in the history of the Palestinian national team.

    Featured image via Instagram

    By Alaa Shamali

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • The Israeli occupation forces (IOF) claim it has killed more than 30 Palestinian resistance fighters in Eastern Rafah who have attempted to exit their tunnels, as of November 28. An estimated 60-80 fighters from Hamas’ military wing, al-Qassam Brigades, remain beneath eastern Rafah. According to a prominent Hamas official, the fighters are “under siege” .

    Attack on fighters in Rafah tunnels undermines ‘ceasefire’ agreement and violates of international law

    The ‘ceasefire’ agreement required the IOF to reposition behind the ‘yellow line‘, for Phase 1 of Trump’s ‘peace plan’. So there are now around 40 active military positions held by the IOF in Gaza, outside of the yellow line.

    INTERACTIVE - Where Israeli forces are positioned yellow line gaza map-1761200950

    This line does not only allow the IOF to remain in control of more than half of the Gaza Strip. It also means Hamas tunnel shafts, which are behind the yellow line, are now in areas controlled by the occupation. These areas are supposed to be no go areas for Palestinians. So resistance fighters operating underground, who were active at the moment the ‘ceasefire’ took effect, are now isolated. They are also vulnerable to attack by ‘Israel’.

    Hamas publicly acknowledged this situation for the first time, on November 26, when it released a statement. It said the occupation had committed a brutal crime “through the pursuit, elimination, and arrest of the besieged mujahideen (fighters) in the tunnels of Rafah”. Hamas claims that by killing and arresting them, while they are leaving the tunnels, ‘Israel’s’ actions “constitute a flagrant violation of the Gaza ceasefire agreement, and is compelling evidence of the ongoing attempts to undermine the agreement”.

    Hamas says it holds the occupation “fully responsible” for the fighters’ safety. It also criticises ‘Israel’ for “undermining the efforts of mediators”. Hamas says they have been working towards ending the suffering of its fighters and facilitating their return home.

    ‘Israel’ refused safe passage for fighters from Rafah tunnels back to liberated areas of Gaza

    The US has reportedly been pressuring the Israeli regime to allow safe passage for Hamas fighters trapped in the Rafah tunnels. But Netanyahu’s Office has refused this idea, stating it “is not allowing safe passage for 200 Hamas terrorists”.

    In its statement, Hamas is calling on mediators to continue pressuring the occupation to allow the safe return of its fighters. It notes that the Qassam Brigade fighters stuck in the tunnels are a “unique model of sacrifice, heroism, and patience”. It calls them “a symbol of the dignity and freedom of the Palestinian people”. Dignity, patience, sacrifice and heroism are all virtues the Israeli occupying forces will never ever embody.

    The Israeli regime has reportedly sent a proposal to senior Hamas officials. It claims it would permit Palestinian resistance fighters to emerge from the tunnels if they surrender. These Palestinians must also agree to be detained in the occupation’s prisons. They would then supposedly be eligible for release if they agreed to disarm.

    But al-Qassam Brigades affirms:

    The enemy should know that in our dictionary, surrendering and handing oneself over to the occupier has no meaning.

    Defense Minister Israel Katz posted on X that he would “prioritise the destruction of the tunnels as the central task in the yellow zone”. Yet after more than two years of relentless attacks in Gaza, the Zionist regime has been unable to destroy the majority of Hamas tunnels. Katz himself claims that 60 percent still remain.

    Tunnels — A vital tool for resistance

    Tunnels in Gaza date back decades. Early uses were by groups like the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine to evade capture and resist incursions. Hamas expanded its tunnel network post-1987. This was mainly due to the outbreak of the First Intifada, a grassroots uprising against ‘Israel’s’ then 20 year military occupation. It began in December 1987, and resulted in 1100 Palestinians killed and more than 100,000 injured.

    Hamas was founded that same year as an Islamist resistance group for the liberation of Palestine. It began developing underground infrastructure for smuggling weapons, evading Israeli forces, and sustaining operations amid intensified crackdowns. Tunnels then shifted from sporadic use to systematic expansion. They enabled the resistance to bypass military patrols and import essentials under blockade pressures.

    The Israeli occupation’s frequent lockdowns and destruction of Gaza’s infrastructure like its airport and seaport by 2001, fuelled tunnel growth. These were a “safety valve” for goods and arms. Hamas, alongside other factions, oversaw deeper, longer tunnels to fund operations and counter Israeli superiority. These tunnels were viewed as tools of defiance during the First Intifada. This era laid the groundwork for tunnels to become integral to resistance logistics by the 1990s.

    Tunnels form an underground network, which is a vital tool for the resistance. They allow the Palestinian resistance to withstand Israeli occupation forces, and offer protection, mobility and strategic surprise, despite relentless destruction efforts.

    Armed resistance against occupation is legal, ethnic cleansing and genocide are not

    These structures symbolise immense ingenuity against superior military power. The resistance may not match the Israeli occupation’s strength, advanced technology or firepower, but it demonstrates resourcefulness and adaptability. The criminal Israeli regime relies on its cutting edge equipment and well funded forces. Al-Qassam and other resistance groups rely only on their intimate knowledge of guerrilla tactics and the terrain. And their extensive network of underground tunnels to challenge the occupying power.

    Palestinians remain subject to an occupying power that alters borders, terms and obligations with impunity. What was sold as a pause in violence has instead left these Palestinian freedom fighters isolated. They are cut off from their communities and are being denied protections that should be guaranteed under international law. The entrapment of these men makes clear no ceasefire can hold when one side can systematically violate it, and not be held accountable.  While this injustice continues, Palestinians remain at the mercy of an occupation that aims to ethnically cleanse the entire Gaza Strip, through a genocide if it can get away with it.

    Featured image via AlJazeera website

    By Charlie Jaay

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • At the Arab Cup 2025, held this year in Qatar, the echo of football fans is not as loud as the echo of humanitarian concerns. In stark contrast to international football tournaments hosted in the West, coaches in the Arab Cup have already made it clear how Palestine is held closely in everyone’s hearts. In doing so, the tournament has already demonstrated a commonality with Arabs across the region.

    Arab Cup focus on Palestine

    Abdullah Abu Zema, both native and former coach of Jordan, sat in front of the waiting cameras with his usual simplicity. But, something in his tone of voice seemed different. When the presenter of Alkass Sports asked him which team he would have chosen if he had not played for Jordan, he did not hesitate, did not look back, and said:

    I would have chosen Palestine.

    It was not just a sporting statement; it was a voice for two peoples who were not separated by a border or a concrete wall.

    When asked what he would change if he had a magic wand, he did not think of himself or his own interests, but of the wound that had been growing for decades:

    I would choose to liberate Palestine.

    His words were heartfelt, and the sentiment was as though he had placed his hand on the heart of the entire nation.

    Red card for Zionism

    In another interview on the same programme, the great Moroccan Hussein Ammouta, known to Arab stadiums and hearts, sat down. He could have said that his wish was to win a championship, or to make a sports project a success, or even to achieve personal glory. Instead, he chose something greater than his name, something that satisfied his conscience.

    Joining Abu Zema, Ammouta said:

    If I had a magic wand, I would end the wars and bring victory to Palestine.

    Then he added a sentence that alone sums up the story of Arab anger:

    And if I had a red card, I would raise it in the face of the Zionist entity.

    The card Ammouta referred to was not just a piece of paper. It was a sporting cry against an occupation that has crossed all boundaries. It was a red card issued by a coach who knows that sport is not a neutral playing field when it comes to human beings and justice.

    That night, the focus was not on the game of  football, but the Arab heart speaking without fear, without hesitation, without calculation. These statements reminded the public that sport is not just about competition and goals, but also a platform that is powerful when many from Western football are silent, and a voice when other voices are absent.

    Between a Jordanian coach and a Moroccan coach, a rare Arab moment was born, a moment when sport said what the news bulletins refused to say.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Alaa Shamali

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • MP Shockat Adam just slammed deputy prime minister David Lammy’s despicable stance on Gaza during a powerful speech at the Your Party conference.

    Speaking about Israel’s genocide in Gaza and Britain’s complicity in it, he said:

    One of the most frustrating things that I find in parliament is when they tell me… that ‘we are doing everything we can to stop this conflict from happening’…

    One exchange that will stand with me forever: when David Lammy, the then foreign secretary, was asked, ‘let’s have economic sanctions like we did on apartheid South Africa to make a change’… and David Lammy, who summons his slavery ancestry at every opportunity that he can, says this: ‘it is simply too expensive for this country to have economic sanctions against Israel’.

    Adam said:

    Let me tell you, David, one of the biggest obstacles for the abolition of slavery was ‘it was too damn expensive’. The irony now that the child of somebody who was from slavery is saying ‘it’s too expensive’ is unbelievable!

    A statement linked to his speech added:

    Remember, “The most common way people give up their power is by thinking they don’t have any.”

    The only people whose interest it is for you to believe you have no power are those who do!

    Adam also highlighted in his speech that:

    Apartheid was not ended by [F.]W. de Klerk. It was thousands of Nelson Mandelas. It was thousands and thousands of ordinary people like you and me that made that change.

    As the Canary has reported previously, Shockat Adam didn’t just help to free Leicester from the awful Jon Ashworth. He has also been a consistent opponent of Israeli war crimes and prime minister Keir Starmer’s elitist government. And while he may not align completely with every issue Your Party will stand for, he is clear that unity is the best way to defeat the far right and its Labour-Tory enablers.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Ed Sykes

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Great work again from photographer Chiara Contrino, who captured Saturday’s National March for Palestine and kindly provided them to Skwawkbox:

    As usual, Jewish campaigners against Israel’s genocide were at the forefront of the protest:

    But — also as usual — that didn’t stop a tiny pro-Israel counter-demonstration claiming that opponents of genocide are ‘Jew haters’:

    Interesting that they were ashamed enough to wear masks.

    The National March for Palestine once again demonstrated the scale, resilience, and diversity of the movement demanding an end to genocide and a free Palestine.From families and students to trade unionists, elders, and Jewish anti-genocide blocs, the crowd formed a cross-section of Britain. It’s a section that refuses to bow to smear campaigns or state repression.

    While pro-Israel counter-protesters mustered only a tiny presence, the sheer size and energy of the march showed where public opinion lies — firmly with justice, dignity, and liberation for the Palestinian people.

    Featured images via Chiara Contrino

    By Skwawkbox

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • The White House is having difficulty launching its so-called Gaza International Stabilization Force (ISF), as countries that previously expressed willingness to deploy troops to the project now seek to distance themselves from it, according to a 29 November report in the Washington Post.

    The ISF “is struggling to get off the ground as countries considered likely to contribute soldiers have grown wary” over concerns their soldiers may be required to use force against Palestinians.

    Indonesia had stated it would send 20,000 peacekeeping troops. However, officials in Jakarta speaking with the US news outlet said they now plan to provide a much smaller contingent of about 1,200.

    The post Gaza ‘Stabilization Force’ Fails To Launch; Nations Unwilling To Commit appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • Solidarity movements with Palestine have made important gains in the past few months. Labour for Palestine reports that labour federations in Ontario, Nova Scotia, and Newfoundland and Labrador all recently passed Hot Cargo resolutions – making the cutting of all services and relationships with Israel including with the Israeli labour group, Histradut, union policy.

    The Jewish Faculty Network published The CIJA Report, a scathing indictment of the Centre for Israel and Jewish affairs (CIJA) for its anti-Palestinian Racism and genocide denial.

    The post November 29 Is UN International Day Of Solidarity With Palestinians appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • On June 20, members of Palestine Action broke into a Royal Air Force base at Brize Norton, Oxfordshire, going on to spray paint two military aircraft activists claimed were being used in “direct participation in the commission of genocide and war crimes across the Middle East.” This was deemed so horrible as to draw the ire of then Home Secretary Yvette Cooper, who went on to invoke section 3 of the Terrorism Act to proscribe the organisation.

    At the time, it seemed impulsive, rash, and most likely intended to placate Israeli voices that something was being done about these bleeding hearts in Albion. Toby Cadman, Member of the International Bar Association’s War Crimes Committee Advisory Board, was in no doubt that the proscription was fashioned “as a blunt instrument to silence certain voices on Palestine at a moment when public opinion and government policy are sharply at odds.”

    It did not take long for those well-versed in human rights to protest this scrappy measure as absurd and needlessly authoritarian. The UN Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner, which counts among its members Francesca Albanese, Ben Saul, and Irene Khan, issued a press release in early July expressing its bafflement at the proscription. “According to international standards, acts of protest that damage property, but are not intended to kill or injure people, should not be treated as terrorism.” Since the addition of Palestine Action to the naughty list of outlawed organisations, over 2,200 arrests have been made citing terrorism legislation, with 254 people charged with terrorism offences merely for participating in peaceful protests.

    Even within government circles, this measure did not fly smoothly. That most terrier-like human rights activist and former diplomat Craig Murray got his hands on a leaked report by the Joint Terrorism Analysis Centre (JTAC) revealing that the impulsive decision to proscribe the organisation had been a fumbling episode riddled with mendacity. The JTAC could hardly be said to be devotees of Palestine Action, but they did struggle, at points, to see the alleged, outsized terrorist demon shadowing their actions. “The majority of the group’s activity would not be classified as terrorism under Section 1 of the Terrorism Act 2000.”

    The process is well underway to challenge the order as a breach of Articles 10 and 11 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which protect freedom of expression, freedom of assembly, and freedom of association. On October 17, the Court of Appeal confirmed that Huda Ammori, co-founder of Palestine Action, could seek judicial review of the Home Office’s proscription decision. Three judges upheld the July decision by the lower court to grant judicial review, rejecting the flimsy arguments by the Home Office that Ammori could merely seek to “deproscribe” the organisation via application to the Secretary of State, then appeal further to the Proscribed Organisations Appeal Commission (POAC), if refused. This could hardly be an adequate remedy.

    The appeals court also found that the Secretary of State had failed to consider that the acts of protest used by Palestine Action could not meet the criminal threshold. The wider support shown for the organisation had also been ignored. The judges further singled out a mischief common to many governments: that the addition of Palestine Action to the list of proscribed organisations was done for an improper purpose. Organisations dedicated to civil disobedience should not fall within the proscription regime, yet here we were, seeing rattled politicians terrified by the actions of a less-than-incendiary organisation.

    To give the finding a fine rounding off, the judges also noted that the criminalisation of the organisation potentially breached the Equality Act 2010, notably section 149. There had been little regard paid to eliminating discrimination, advancing equality of opportunity, and fostering good relations.

    The organisation has been able to count on powerful submissions to advance its cause. Liberty, the UK’s foremost domestic human rights organisation, paired with Amnesty International as intervening parties to assist the High Court in reaching its decision.

    The feisty arguments of these bodies against the proscribing of Palestine Action draw from Lord Hoffman’s firm observation in a case concerning, rather strikingly, the actions of organised protesters keen to create mayhem on a US airbase. Not only did the judge refer to that “long and honourable history” of civil disobedience in the UK, but he also thought reference to the suffragettes a reliably sturdy comparison. When it came to such actions as the destruction of property, it was “the mark of a civilised community” that such protestation and demonstration could be accommodated. There was a fundamental “moral difference” between those engaged in civil disobedience and those engaged in ordinary lawbreaking.

    On November 26, Raza Husain KC urged the court to consider that the proscription was “repugnant to the tradition of the common law and contrary to the European Convention on Human Rights.” The government had “imposed extreme measures on a protest group (which enjoyed widespread popularity among the British public) seeking to expose, protest and prevent serious violations of international law by Israel, and the complicity of the UK government and companies in the UK therewith, including by seeking to obstruct the continuing supply of weapons and components to Israel.”

    Ultimately, issues of proportionality will be central to any successful judicial review. The property damage that arose in the case could not be compared with those instances counter-terrorism legislation was intended to cover, which considers the intent to commit acts of violence against people. The organisation’s object had to be considered, distinguishing aims abhorrent to a society respecting human rights from those intended to uphold international law.

    Saul, the UN Special Rapporteur on counter-terrorism and human rights, also intervened in the case to challenge the proscription as unlawful for being incompatible with Articles 10, 11, and 14 (the non-discrimination provision) of the ECHR, and grounds of public law.  Assistance to that end has been provided by notes from the UN special rapporteur on the rights of peaceful assembly and association, Gina Romero, and from Khan, the UN Special Rapporteur for the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression.

    Across the globe, protests are being curtailed by jittery authorities eager to see a rabid terrorist in the clothing of a demonstrator. This clownish effort by the Starmer government against Palestine Action, one of a long and running list, has brought the importance of civil disobedience and lawful assembly to the fore. Will the high court bite?

    The post Clownish Proscriptions: Challenging the Palestine Action Ban first appeared on Dissident Voice.

    This post was originally published on Dissident Voice.