Category: Palestine

  • After two years of continuous effort in research, agitation and direct action, the organizers of the Palestinian Youth Movement (PYM) celebrated a landmark organizing victory in late June. Their “Mask Off Maersk” campaign had sought to prove the complicity of the Danish freight-logistics titan A.P. Møller – Maersk A/S in the genocide in Gaza.

    Maersk, as it’s generally known, was found by PYM to be contributing to the ongoing crimes against humanity in Gaza by shipping arms transfers to the perpetrating Israeli military; these shipments included critical parts for the F-35 fighters that have been used to bomb Gaza’s civilian population.

    The post Palestinian Youth Movement Makes Genocide Support Costly For Maersk appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • Checkpoint 300 is between two of the most important centers of Palestinian life, Jerusalem and Bethlehem. Built into Israel’s West Bank wall (the “separation barrier”), the checkpoint complex is itself an extraordinary organization of space: turnstiles and corridors corral and subordinate a colonized population for inspection and validation by soldiers and security staff. Crushing queues…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • Asia Pacific Report

    “Grow a spine for Palestine!” was a frequent theme among about 5000 people protesting in the heart of New Zealand’s largest city today as the protesters demanded that the coalition government should recognise the state of Palestine and stop supporting impunity for Israel.

    More than 62,000 people, mostly women and children, have been killed in Israel’s war on Gaza in the past 22 months and the country’s military have doubled down on their attacks on residential areas in the besieged enclave.

    Several speakers, including opposition parliamentarians, spoke at the rally, strongly condemning Israel for its genocidal policies and crimes against humanity.

    Many children took part in the rally at Te Komititanga Square and the return march up Queen Street in spite of the bitterly wet and cold weather. Many of them carried placards and Palestinian flags like their parents.

    One young boy carried a placard declaring “Just a kid standing in front of his PM asking him to grow a heart and a spine”. The heart was illustrated as a Palestinian flag.

    Other placards included slogans such as “Wanted MPs with a spine” and “Grow a spine for Palestine”, and “They try to bury us forgetting we are seeds” with the resistance watermelon symbol.

    Many placards demanded sanctions and condemned Israel, saying “Gaza is starving. Words won’t feed them — sanction Israel now”, “NZ government: Your silence is complicity with Israeli genocide” and “Free Palestine now”.

    Disillusionment with leaders
    One poster expressed disillusionment with both the coalition government and opposition Labour Party leaders, Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Chris Hipkins, denouncing “apologists for genocide”.

    Another poster challenged both Hipkins and Luxon over “what values” they stood for. It said:

    “Our ‘leaders’ have refused to call for a ceasefire even after 10,000+ innocent civilians have been brutally murdered in their own homes, including 4000+ CHILDREN all under the name of “Kiwi values”.

    “They, like a lot of other world politicians, are apologists for genocide.”

    A "Palestine forever" banner at the head of the Auckland march
    A “Palestine forever” banner at the head of the Auckland march today as it prepares to walk up Queen Street. Image: APR

    Frustration has been growing among the public with the government’s reluctance to declare support for Palestinian statehood after 96 consecutive weeks of protests organised by the Palestinian Solidarity Network Aotearoa (PSNA) and other groups, not just in the largest city of Auckland and the capital Wellington, but also in Christchurch and in at least 20 other towns and communities across the motu.

    The “spine” theme in chants and posters followed just days after Parliament suspended Green Party co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick following a fiery speech about Gaza when she said government MPs should grow a spine and sanction Israel for its atrocities.

    She had refused to apologise to the House and supporters at the rally today gave her rousing cheers in support of her defiance.

    ‘We need your help’
    Te Pati Māori co-leader Debbie Ngarewa-Packer told the crowd: “We need you to help her put the pressure on so that we can fight together in that place [Parliament] for our people to free, free Palestine; from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free.

    “Return our dignity Aotearoa. Stand up for what is right. There is only one side to support in genocide, only one side. And Te Pati Māori will only work with those.”

    When Swarbrick spoke to the crowd, she repeated her goal to find six government MPs “with a spine” to support her bill to “sanction Israel for its war crimes”.

    She also said the Palestinian people were being “starved and slaughtered by Israel” in Gaza, adding that their breath was being “stolen from them” by the IDF (Israeli “Defence” Force).

    “It is our duty, all human beings with breath left in our lungs, with the freedom to chant and to move and to demand action from our politicians, to do all that we can to fight for liberation for all peoples,” she said.

    Other politicians speaking were Orini Kaipara, the Te Pati Māori candidate for the Tāmaki Mākaurau byelection, and Kerrin Leoni, mayoral candidate for Tamaki.

    Targeted assassinations
    Earlier, the targeted assassinations of six journalists by the Israeli military last Sunday — taking the toll to 272 — was condemned by independent journalist and Asia Pacific Report editor Dr David Robie. He also criticised the NZ media silence.

    Noting that New Zealand journalists had not condemned the killings or held a vigil as the Media Alliance (MEAA) had done in Australia, he cited an Al Jazeera journalist, Hind Khoudary, whose message to the world was:

    “We are being hunted and killed in Gaza while you watch in silence. For two years, your fellow journalists here have been slaughtered.

    What did you do? Nothing.”

    Green Party co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick (left) and Te Pati Māori co-leader Debbie Ngarewa-Packer
    Green Party co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick (left) and Te Pati Māori co-leader Debbie Ngarewa-Packer at today’s rally in Te Komitanga Square, Auckland. Image: APR

    A recent poll on whether New Zealanders want sanctions to be imposed on Israel, showed that of those who gave an opinion, 60 percent favoured sanctions.

    The PSNA commissioned survey by Talbot Mills in July with 1216 respondents gave a similar result to one commissioned by Justice for Palestine a year ago.

    Popular support for sanctions
    PSNA co-chair John Minto said the numbers showed strong popular support for sanctions. The 60 percent overall rose to 68 percent for the 18–29 year category.

    “The government is well out of step with public opinion and ignores this message at its peril.  There is popular support for sanctions against Israel,” he said.

    “People see that Israel is committing the worst atrocities of the 21st century with impunity. It is starving a whole population.

    “It has destroyed just about every building in Gaza. It is assassinating journalists. It holds 7000 Palestinian hostages in its jails without charge.  Its goal of occupying all of Gaza and ethnically cleansing its people into the Sudan desert, is all public knowledge.”

    Minto said Israel’s “depraved Prime Minister” who was wanted by the International Criminal Court (ICJ) for war crimes and crimes against humanity, had boasting that if Israel was really committing genocide, “it could have killed everyone in Gaza in a single afternoon”.

    “The poll shows New Zealand First supporters are most opposed to sanctions against Israel (59 percent of those who gave an opinion were opposed) so it’s little surprise Winston Peters is dragging the chain.”

    "Just a kid" with his message to Prime Minister Christopher Luxon
    “Just a kid” with his blunt message to Prime Minister Christopher Luxon. Image: APR
  • After two years of continuous effort in research, agitation and direct action, the organizers of the Palestinian Youth Movement (PYM) celebrated a landmark organizing victory in late June. Their “Mask Off Maersk” campaign had sought to prove the complicity of the Danish freight-logistics titan A.P. Møller – Maersk A/S in the genocide in Gaza. Maersk, as it’s generally known, was found by PYM…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • Israeli forces abducted a Palestinian child near an aid site in Gaza in June and took him to a notorious prison camp where they subjected him to severe torture for nearly a month, a children’s rights group has found, adding abduction and imprisonment to a growing list of atrocities reported at Israel’s aid sites. On June 29, after Israel had already killed nearly 600 Palestinians near aid…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • Israel’s manufactured famine is being used, according to Amnesty International, as a “weapon of war.” However, public support for the famine amongst Israelis is also disturbingly widespread. During a speech to a large audience on 28 July, which was streamed live on TVs and social media in Israel, Rabbi Ronen Shaulov said:

    All of Gaza, and every child in Gaza should starve to death. I have no mercy for them…even though they are still young and hungry, I hope they starve to death.

     

    Starvation as policy: decades of blockade

    Restricting the entry of food and aid into Gaza has been a decades-long policy of the Israeli occupation. And, it has been consciously designed to control and exert pressure over the civilian population.

    In 2006, after Hamas’s electoral victory, a senior adviser to the Israeli Prime Minister said that when it came to tightening the blockade that:

    The idea is to put the Palestinians on a diet, but not to make them die of hunger.

    In 2011, under court order, Israel released documents showing it calculated the minimal daily calorie intake required to avoid malnutrition in Gaza, planning aid only for subsistence – not nutritional health.

    Restrictions have intensified, reaching a new level of depravity. The humanitarian catastrophe now unfolding was manufactured from day one with the goal of ethnically cleansing Gaza. Crossings have been closed, food and medicine blocked, warehouses and bakeries destroyed, farmland obliterated. Only 1.5% of Gaza’s cropland remains accessible.

    According to Gaza’s Media Office, vegetable production has plummeted from 405,000 tonnes to 25,000. On top of that, 665 livestock and poultry farms have been destroyed. Beyond aid prevention, 44 food kitchens and 57 food distribution centres have been bombed. Palestinians queuing for water and food have been continually targeted.

    Since March 2 there has been a blockade on aid – initially total, now partial. Despite pressure forcing the occupation to allow the ‘limited’ entry of trucks, on 27 July, more than 430 food items, including frozen meats, dairy products, frozen vegetables and fruits, are still prohibited from entering.

    Pre-genocide, 500 aid trucks entered daily. Now at least 600 are needed, but between July 27–Aug 12, only 1,535 trucks entered—92 per day, according to Gaza’s Media Office. This is “a drop in the ocean” , compared to what is needed by Gaza’s starving population. Even those permitted to cross the border still face many problems.

    Chaos at the checkpoints: aid access and lawlessness

    The United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA’s) spokesperson in Gaza, Olga Cherevko, said that:

    Our convoys continue to face delays at checkpoints, where we have to wait hours for authorisation to move. Once we enter the strip, we find that the routes given by the Israeli authorities are often congested, dangerous or impassable, and roads are severely damaged.

    With no organised distribution in most areas, crowds mob the few trucks that cross. Looting is rife amid a deliberately manufactured insecurity created by the occupation arming and protecting criminal gangs in Gaza.

    Amjad Al-Shawa is director of the Palestinian Non-Governmental Organizations Network (PNGO), a coalition that unites over 130 independent Palestinian civil society organisations working in a variety of areas.

    He said:

    Its an unprecedented situation. We are not only suffering from starvation, but also from engineered chaos, imposed by the Israelis from day one of this war, through the systematic attacks on the rule of law, and the order bodies in Gaza- the Civil Police, the Attorney General, the court system, the jails, the prisons.

    Everything was attacked. Also the escorting teams for the aid supplies, the warehouses, the distribution points- all these were attacked. So these things led to such chaos, and also people are starving. Such conditions have led to disputes between individuals, and families.

    The battle is how to survive. There is no other option, just to risk your life to get a piece of bread or some flour.

    The purpose of this policy of engineered starvation and chaos is fundamentally to turn people against each other. This policy exists to undermine resilience, spread anarchy, and destroy the possibility of a Palestinian state. One way the occupation is doing this is by arming and protecting gangs, such as that led by Yasser Abu Shabab, previously jailed by Hamas, for drug smuggling and theft.

    Manufactured famine: aid distribution as deadly trap

    Rana Yassin lives in Tel al-Hawa, a neighbourhood in the southern part of Gaza City. Her brother had gone to the flour trucks, to try and get some food. Instead, he came back frightened and empty handed.

    Yassin said that:

    My brother was feeling very sad because he saw my little sister starving in front of his eyes. She was crying before sleeping, from hunger. So he made the decision to go to the flour trucks at the Kerem Shalom border crossing the next day. He told me it was very crowded and the condition there is crazy. People were fighting to get a packet of flour, but even if you are lucky enough to get something, people will steal it from you. He said the thieves had knives, and randomly shot at people, along with the army. These people aren’t of us.

    We didn’t see these people living with us in the days before the war. These are not Gazan people-really! We are very honest people, very generous, very good people. Who are these people? We don’t know. The things they are doing – stealing other people’s food and selling it, are not the principles we have been raised on. We were raised to give our neighbour food, if he is hungry and he is poor. We help each other. These people, of course, are supported by Israel, because they know when the trucks arrive, and they are protected by the army- which shoots other people, but lets them steal.

    Aid restrictions

    The latest Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) Alert tells us that the worst-case scenario of famine is now unfolding in Gaza. Two famine indicators – acute malnutrition and severely reduced food consumption – are already surpassed in parts of the enclave. Namely, more than one in three people now regularly go days without food, and over half a million are in famine-like conditions, while the rest suffer emergency-level hunger. Gaza is at Phase 5 ’catastrophe’, where food vanishes and communities fall apart. Warnings, issued as early as December 2023, went unheeded.

    To enable the ethnic cleansing and genocide to continue, the occupation has not permitted the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) to bring any aid into Gaza since March 2. That’s in spite of the fact that the organisation have operated with great efficiency in Gaza since 1950. Instead, the so-called Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), run by US mercenaries and the Israeli military, has replaced UNRWA’s four hundred decentralised aid points with just four heavily militarised ‘aid distribution sites’.

    GHF has nothing to do with providing aid, and everything to do with control. Armed guards patrol these sites, while the biometric data and digital IDs of the starving population, who have turned up in the hopes of some food, are collected to identify those of interest to the occupation. These checkpoints are nothing more than death traps for desperate, starving Palestinians. People have no choice but to risk death for a piece of bread, or some flour.

    GHF aid distribution sites: ‘Bloodbaths’

    Al-Shawa said that:

    Israel is trying its best to paralyse the humanitarian structure- the UN, and international and national NGOs, who are committed to the humanitarian principles. If this will continue, there will be total collapse of the humanitarian system in Gaza, where people will be left with nothing, and at the same time it will be a step forward to issue the forcible deportation of the people, through the establishment of a concentration camp in the south.

    This is the real plan of the Israelis, through the GHF and through these attacks on the Palestinian civilians, wherever they are. Now all ages are suffering from starvation. It has appeared now, on the faces, and the energy of everyone. Myself, my children- everyone is affected.

    Through their new report, Human Rights Watch (HRW) spoke with a whistleblower – a former contractor that worked with GHF. They also interviewed multiple witnesses who saw violence at aid distribution sites. HRW also spoke to humanitarian workers and doctors who treated those that were injured or killed during aid distributions to understand more about how GHF operates.

    What it found was a deeply flawed and problematic method of aid distribution, which lead HRW to accuse GHF of turning its sites into regular “bloodbaths”.

    Israel’s deliberate massacres at GHF aid sites

    Omar Shakir is the Israel and Palestine director at Human Rights Watch (HRW). He investigates human rights abuses in Israel, the West Bank, and Gaza. And, he explained that:

    We are able to confirm that Israeli forces are routinely opening fire on starving Palestinian civilians seeking aid at these sites, and we determine that those acts amount to wilful killings and are therefore war crimes. But our findings aren’t just limited to the killings.

    These companies are operating in militarized areas on land that has been largely raised by the Israeli army and ethnically cleansed of Palestinians. So Palestinians are forced to trek many, many kilometres over many hours to reach these aid sites. Because of the nature of how desperate the situation is – because Israel is deliberately starving civilians- there are many thousands of people, while the Israeli army uses live ammunition, essentially as crowd control. We’ve talked to people who’ve gone to, in some cases, scores of aid distributions, often coming back empty handed, witnessing friends and relatives that have been gunned down.

    Even if all the sites were to operate at full capacity, they would not be able to even bring in one tenth of the food, the number of trucks worth of food that was being brought in during the ceasefire by the UN mechanism.

    By reviewing GHF’s Facebook posts, which is where they make their official announcements, HRW also learnt that GHF’s four sites are only open for an average of 11 minutes. Even then, they’re not even open every day. Sometimes, they announced that sites were closed at the end of distribution. But they had not even announced when distribution had begun, making it impossible for Palestinians to know when aid was being distributed.

    Shakir said:

    So basically it’s a free for all. Suddenly the site is open. People run, they sprint. They’re being fired on by contractors using lethal and non lethal use of force. We also corresponded with these contractors, and they have acknowledged using live fire. They say they fire in the air or at people’s feet, but the evidence suggests that they’re firing on the crowd. So it’s a scenario where only the strong and powerful are able to, if they’re lucky, get food.

    As of 14 August, according to the Gaza Ministry of Health, since 27 May, 1,881 aid seekers have been killed, and 13,863 injured. Deaths from famine and malnutrition total 239, including 106 children. Huge numbers of injured people have been flooding into Gaza’s hospitals, because of repeated attacks and the targeting of aid seekers.

    Hospitals are overwhelmed, and deaths are rapidly rising

    Dr Atef Al-Hout is the director of Nasser Medical Complex in Khan Yunis, the only major hospital still functioning in Southern Gaza Strip. We spoke with him recently, and were told a mass casualty event had taken place. 287 injured people, and more than 40 martyrs had been brought to the hospital. They had been at what he calls “the inhumane aid distribution area”.

    Dr Al-Hout said that:

    We have all kinds of cases here, including those resulting from shelling that targeted residential areas, in what are known as ‘safe zones’, and injuries from the aid distribution area. The situation is extremely critical and continues to deteriorate. The number of martyrs is increasing daily. We are treating more than double the number of patients compared to 22 months ago, while medical supplies are critically low: Before the war, our hospital had 342 beds, but today we are treating over 800 patients. We’ve added a 100 bed field hospital, there are tents in the courtyard, and patients are even being treated on the floor in the corridors, because of severe overcrowding.

    Supplies are critically low, so patients have to go three to four days without having their wound gauze dressings changed because there is not enough supply, and this can lead to blood poisoning and life-threatening complications. There are also no painkillers, IV fluids or intravenous nutrition, which are essential for patients with injuries and malnutrition.

    Stocks of blood and plasma units are also running very low in several hospitals. This is not only because of the growing number of mass casualty events, but also the rise in malnutrition, which prevents a person being able to donate their blood to help the injured.

    Malnutrition: ‘tired from the slightest effort’

    Dr Mohammed Wael Shaheen is resident orthopaedic surgeon and head of the Medical Delegation Committee at Al-Aqsa Martyr’s Hospital, Deir Al-Balah, in the central Gaza Strip where he works. He said:

    Everyone is suffering from malnutrition here, and there is a shortage of food which contain essential elements that strengthen the blood, such as vegetables, fruits, meat, eggs and other items. These have been missing in Gaza since March, due to the blockade.

    Although Al-Aqsa Martyr’s hospital now provides one meal -a small plate of rice, pasta, or a Palestinian dish called Majadra – for its medical staff during their 24-hour shift, Dr Shaheen said:

    Of course, this is not enough to even sustain a small child for two days, let alone medical staff throughout their shift. Medical staff, as well as their patients, are suffering from malnutrition and are unable to work continuously. I used to be able to stand in the operating room for ten, twelve, or fifteen hours straight, without feeling the slightest bit of fatigue, exhaustion or lack of concentration, but now I can’t even last two to three hours. After that, you feel a severe headache, dizziness, nausea, and exhaustion. You cannot continue to stand, and you cannot complete your work. You get tired from the slightest effort you make at these times.

    One of the most vulnerable groups to malnutrition are children, and UNICEF has warned all under fives  – over 320,000 children – are at risk of acute malnutrition, the deadliest form of undernutrition. Dr Al-Hout said:

    Children, especially infants are arriving in horrific conditions, as breastfeeding mothers do not have milk to feed their babies, due to their own malnutrition, and milk, though very rare in the local markets, is unaffordable, at more than $100 per carton- which is enough for a child for four days.

    The toll on children and families: starvation and trauma

    Dr Shaheen confided that:

    Malnutrition in children is a terrible thing. It is frightening when you see young children with their thin, emaciated bodies, and their parents and families unable to do anything for them. I mean, it chills the bones.

    Even a heart of stone would break. How can the people of the free world not be moved? The scenes are unbelievable. We see children in the wards, their chest bones and hand bones protruding from weakness, emaciation, and humiliation. No one in the free world, the honorable world, can imagine that, God forbid, this could be their child or one of their relatives.

    Nine-year-old Maryam used to be a healthy happy child, but is now too weak to move. Doctors have not been able to discover any illnesses other than acute malnutrition from starvation. The number of children in Gaza like Maryam are increasing daily.

    Abdulaziz Dawas, Maryam’s father is appealing for help. He said:

    We began to notice her weight loss around five or six months ago, especially in the last two months. Although Maryam’s malnutrition is extremely severe, I haven’t been able to find a doctor who can assess her condition because all of her tests are clean. Before the war, Maryam was like a princess and weighed 25kg. She now weighs 9kg, has acute diarrhea and blood in her stools, and is in a critical condition. Her situation is deteriorating daily, in a very serious way. She is dying quickly, and we need to save her life. My message to the whole world is that my daughter needs evacuating, it’s the only solution. Please help us!

    You can donate to Maryam’s Go Fund Me here.

    Profound long-term effects on Palestinian children’s cognitive development

    Childhood malnutrition has mental symptoms as well as physical. It can impair brain development – which can have profound long-term effects. Malnourished children struggle with concentration, memory, and learning. Mental development issues can become irreversible if malnutrition continues through early development.

    Palestine has one of the highest literacy rates in the world. But unless aid and medical supplies are allowed to now flow freely across the borders, to all parts of the Gaza Strip, the occupation’s enforced starvation campaign will lead to a generation of Palestinians suffering from cognitive decline, with a destroyed future.

    Parents in Gaza often sacrifice meals so their children can eat. Yassin, who has a two year old son, said:

    When we buy food we eat hardly anything, and keep the rest for our son. We say we have eaten enough during our lives, but he is a child and doesn’t deserve to feel hungry. So we always keep the biggest portion for him. Most days we don’t have anything except bread-two pieces of bread- and duqqa made with lentils. Yousef doesn’t like it, so refuses to eat, so keeps crying and sleeps with hunger. He wakes up in the morning hungry, saying mummy can you give me cake? Can you give me egg? I want apple. We have nothing but duqqa again. In the end he eats a little bit, because he is hungry.

    Yassin said she is unable to buy Yousef multivitamins because the occupation has blocked their entry into the Strip.

    Malnutrition and contaminated water leading to an explosion of infections and diseases

    Good nutrition is also essential for older people and those with chronic illnesses, who have weakened immune systems, such as kidney and cancer patients. But in Gaza, these people are not only hungry, thirsty, and malnourished, but also unable to receive dialysis treatment or chemotherapy, and cannot get essential medicines. Dr Al-Hout said that the condition of these patients is deteriorating by the day, and their death rates are rapidly increasing in Nasser hospital. Only 580 of the approximately 1200 dialysis patients being treated at Nasser Hospital before October 2023 are now still alive.

    Overcrowding, lack of sanitary conditions, and contaminated water, combined with immune deficiency due to malnutrition and starvation, is leading Palestinians – especially children – to face extremely high risks of severe, and sometimes fatal infections and diseases.

    Gaza’s water infrastructure has purposely been targeted by the occupation. That includes desalination plants, pipelines and sewage systems. Effectively, contaminated water has become a critical humanitarian crisis. Water-borne diseases have increased by almost 150%, with diseases such as polio making a comeback after an absence from the Strip of 25 years. Thousands of cases of Hepatitis A are emerging this year, and there is a surge in meningitis cases among children, amid the total health system collapse.

    Severe ‘environmental and public health consequences’

    Malnutrition and severely polluted drinking water is also spreading a rare neurological condition, called Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS), which results in paralysis of the legs, followed by respiratory failure. GBS is treatable, but the destruction of the healthcare system and blockade on medicines means it can now prove fatal. According to the World Health Organisation (WHO), 30% of GBS patients require Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission, so their only hope in Gaza would be medical treatment abroad.

    Maher Salem, director general of planning, water and sanitation in the Gaza municipality, said much of the population is now suffering from limited or no access to clean water, and this is having a devastating impact. Wells, reservoirs, and pumping stations have all been damaged or destroyed.

    Salem said:

    In Gaza City there are eight main sewage pumping stations but all have been destroyed since the beginning of the ongoing aggression. As a result, the entire wastewater system in Gaza City has been non functional, leading to severe environmental and public health consequences. Across the Strip, 175,000 metres of sewage network, out of 500,000 metres has been destroyed, and only a limited number of the 66 sewage pumping stations remain partially functional, mostly in the Southern areas- but even those are operating under extreme limitations due to fuel shortages, damage and access restrictions.

    Surviving Israel’s famine: Gaza’s struggle for dignity

    Wells are used to extract water from the coastal aquifer, the sole groundwater source in the Gaza Strip, but this groundwater is heavily contaminated by untreated sewage and saltwater, making it unfit for direct human consumption without treatment. This is carried out using small desalination units and brackish water desalination plants. But the occupation’s blockade has led to a severe shortage of electricity and fuel, which complicate the pumping and distribution of water from the wells. Only 14 wells remain undamaged, while 49 are totally destroyed, and 20 severely damaged. Before October 2023, Salem said the total production from wells in summer was 80,000m3 daily but is now only 12,000m3, with 60% lost due to leakage.

    Ibrahim Al Khalili, a freelance journalist, born, raised, and based in Gaza City, said that due to this destruction, the majority of families are now completely dependent on water tankers. He said:

    People wait in long lines with containers, sometimes for hours, and they have been targeted previously, such as in al-Nuseirat refugee camp when the Israeli military targeted the water distribution point where many children were lining up, just to get a gallon of water for their families. They ended up being brutally killed.

    The water is often slightly salty tasting, not ideal for drinking, but people have no other choice. Some families survive on as little as two litres of water per person per day, for everything- drinking, cooking, washing and hygiene, and this lack of water, as well as the contaminated supplies, can really impact people’s health. It’s very horrific and heartbreaking, to witness all this.

    Al Khalili, who told the Canary it is more than ten hours since his last meal, said he will eat in the next two hours:

    I will prepare bread, with nothing – that is my dinner.

    Working for a month to make two days worth of food

    Once looters and gangs have taken over the humanitarian aid, they sell it in the markets for sky high prices. So even people with money in Gaza have been left struggling.

    Al Khalili said:

    When you find flour, it is very expensive, around $25-$30 a kilo, and this is a problem even if you have the money in your bank account. I get paid electronically, but they don’t deal with electronic payments here – they just receive cash. So when we need to withdraw the cash, we lose 52% of our money just to get the cash in hand, or to buy something to eat. The average monthly income per person ranges between $120-$180 USD. That means if someone is lucky enough to find a job, and works all month, he can just secure 4-5kg of flour to feed his kids – which is not sufficient for two days! For me, I work just to survive. The money that comes in goes straight back out.

    Mahmoud Basal, the Palestinian civil defence spokesman in Gaza has, so far, been on hunger strike for 27 consecutive days, and has said on his social media posts:

    This hunger is not pain. It is protest, it is mourning, it is love turned into resistance…My body is withering but it has not collapsed—because within it I carry the cry of two million souls, besieged by famine and hunted by death in every alley…Do not speak of human rights while you watch an entire people being starved deliberately. Do not praise “international justice” while you allow us to die slowly under siege. You may not live in Gaza but you are complicit in its suffering through your silence…To the officials of this world, I say: Save Gaza.

    Airdrops: a dehumanising distraction from real action

    Basal has also spoken out about airdrops. He said aid is not entering Gaza in a humane way, and:

    the world still accepts that we receive scraps through the path of humiliation and blood.

    Airdrops are expensive, inefficient, dangerous, and undignified. They do nothing to address the real problem of aid entry being blocked at the border. However, multiple countries continue with them, including the UK – which is supporting air drops in co-operation with Jordan.

    Philippe Lazzarini, commissioner general of UNRWA, said on X:

    Airdrops are at least 100 times more costly than trucks. Trucks carry twice as much aid as planes. If there is political will to allow airdrops – which are highly costly, insufficient & inefficient, there should be similar political will to open the road crossings. As the people of Gaza are starving to death, the only way to respond to the famine is to flood Gaza with assistance.

    Israeli occupation forces are now deployed over 88% of the Gaza Strip, with these ‘Red Zones’ out of bounds to Palestinians, so much of the aid airdropped by parachute becomes inaccessible to the starving population. Additionally, airdrops are especially dangerous in one of the most crowded places on Earth. Multiple deaths have resulted from airdrop accidents, as each pallet of food plus a parachute weigh more than 540kg, while ones carrying water bottles weigh more than a tonne.

    Al Shawa, PNGOs director, summed up the situation:

    People are suffocated in a very limited space of land, with the total Palestinian population crowded into just 12 percent of the land. It’s extremely risky to drop the aid over the heads of the people, over the tents. There are now about 47,000 people over a square kilometre of the Gaza Strip, and there is no space for air drops.

    Violations of international law, and the need for accountability

    As the occupying power, Israel has obligations under international law to ensure the unhindered entry of essential supplies but it has, instead, carried out a systematic policy of starvation, weaponising aid and using it as a silent tool of genocide, to target those Palestinians who have managed to survive the bombing and bloodshed.

    Dr Al-Hout said that:

    This is an unprecedented humanitarian catastrophe, a deliberate systematic killing of two million people in Gaza. What is happening is unlike anything in modern human history-a combination of mass killing and starvation.

    Women, children and the elderly are being exterminated by hunger, and the areas they were instructed to flee to are being targeted and bombed. What we are witnessing is not just a famine, but deliberate starvation, systematically imposed by the occupation forces who are preventing aid from reaching the area. The silence of the international community only emboldens the occupation to continue its crimes.

    Gaza’s destruction is not an accident, but a calculated assault: a campaign waged through hunger, displacement, and the breaking of bodies and spirits, which is a culmination of decades of dehumanisation.

    As life inside Gaza edges ever closer to collapse, and as the world watches – silent, complicit, and distracted – history will remember not only the scale of suffering inflicted but also the choices made by those with the power to stop it.

    The demand for action remains as urgent as ever: the immediate opening of all crossings into Gaza, the safe and unhindered delivery of aid throughout the Strip, a permanent ceasefire, investment in local food production, and accountability for the occupation’s many atrocities towards Palestinian people.

    Please donate to Maryam’s Go Fund Me page here.

    Featured image and additional images via the Canary

    By Charlie Jaay

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • The Israeli military operates a special unit known as the “Legitimization Cell” that exists to create propaganda justifying the military’s targeting of civilian infrastructure and civilians, particularly journalists, in order to ensure that Israel maintains its legitimacy on the world stage, an investigation finds. According to a +972 Magazine and Local Call investigation published Thursday…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • The Israeli ambassador’s diary has exposed how she spends her time: meeting with an array of Labour Party donors, businessmen, and pro-Israel lobbyists.

    Tzipi Hotovely: Israeli ambassador advocating for genocide

    Tzipi Hotovely has spent nearly two years inciting genocide against Palestinians. She suggested that “every school, every mosque, every second house” in Gaza was able to access underground tunnels. Therefore, they were valid targets for Israel.

    She also claimed that Hamas bases all its headquarters in Gaza’s hospitals. This is a narrative that Israel has used relentlessly to justify murdering Palestinians, whilst also stripping them of a functioning healthcare system.

    ‘Very close working relationship’

    An investigation by Declassified UK has revealed that Tzipi Hotovely, the Israeli ambassador in London, has a very close working relationship with pro-Israel lobby organisations in Britain.

    Both Conservative and Labour Friends of Israel (CFI and LFI) claim not to be funded by Tel Aviv. However, they both “regularly liaise with the Israeli ambassador in London”.

    They also revealed:

    Hotovely met four times with Stuart Polak, a director and honorary president of CFI who once described being made a member of the House of Lords as a “once in a lifetime opportunity” to advocate for Israel.

    The pair were joined by seasoned Israeli diplomats Yossi Amrani and Meirav Eilon Shahar in July and September 2024, respectively.

    Amrani is currently the head of the Israeli foreign ministry’s diplomatic division, and was until recently its ambassador to Greece. Shahar is Israel’s deputy director for strategic affairs in the foreign ministry, formerly working as its ambassador at the UN.

    The Israeli ambassador also met with figures associated with LFI on four occasions, including Michael Rubin, Jon Pearce MP, and Lord Jonathan Mendelsohn.

    Unsurprisingly, her diary also included meetings with Luke Akehurst, MP for Durham North and former director pro-Israel lobby group, We Believe in Israel.

    Other meetings include a variety of Labour Party donors. This raises concerns about how close party funders are to the Israeli Government, along with oil giants and members of the House of Lords.

    Oh, and BBC journalists. So much for unbiased reporting?

    Meanwhile, a cross-party group of MPs have called on Starmer to “immediately expel” Hotovely from the UK.

    The UK has been complicit in Israel’s genocide from the start. So it should come as no surprise that Keir Starmer is further enabling both the genocide and a terrorist state’s influence over the UK government by allowing her to stay as long as she has.

    Feature image via the Canary

    By HG

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Martyred journalist Anas Al-Sharif’s brother has revealed that Israeli authorities offered a sickening deal to Anas just before his death. They told him that if he stopped reporting on Gaza, he and his family could leave safely. Anas refused. Then, Israel killed him for shining a light on Israel’s genocide.

    AJ+ reported that:

    Anas’ brother says the Al Jazeera journalist chose to keep reporting the truth until his last breath.

    When offered the deal, just 4 days before his death, Anas said:

    Either I live and see the end of the war, or I die a martyr.

    Israel targeted Anas Al-Sharif

    Israel repeatedly threatened Anas before killing him. As the Canary’s Charlie Jaay reported:

    The occupation launched a long-running smear campaign against him, in 2023, accusing him – with zero evidence – of belonging to the military wing of Hamas, and he experienced death threats. Less than two weeks ago, the Canary reported on IOF spokesperson, Avichay Adraee’s false accusations against Al-Sharif, which led the journalist to accurately predict that this campaign against him was a precursor to his assassination.

    Anas’ employers, Al Jazeera, hoped that by keeping him on the air, he would be protected. Al Jazeera Managing Editor Mohamed Moawad said:

    We took the hard decision to keep Anas on air because it felt like the only guarantee, that they would not kill him while he was on Al Jazeera’s screens.

    But, Israel did target him irrespective of his position. Indeed, so vital was Anas’ reporting on their genocide, that Israel killed him for doing his job. The Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ), who had previously pleaded for the world to intervene against the serious threat to Anas’ life, released a statement reading:

    Israel has a longstanding, documented pattern of accusing journalists of being terrorists without providing any credible proof.

    CPJ Regional Director Sara Quduh said:

    Israel is murdering the messenger. Israel wiped out an entire news crew. It has made no claims that any of the other journalists were terrorists. Thats murder. Plain and simple.

    Quduh explained that as one of the best-known reporters, Anas’ murder was due to his diligent reporting:

    It is no coincidence that the smears against al-Sharif — who has reported night and day for Al Jazeera since the start of the war — surfaced every time he reported on a major development in the war, most recently the starvation brought about by Israel’s refusal to allow sufficient aid into the territory.

    War crime

    Israel has repeatedly targeted Palestinian journalists, for fear of their continued exposure of Israel’s atrocities. And, global powers have largely not only allowed this to happen but emboldened Israel’s extermination of the Palestinian press. As always, individual organisations are working to hold Israel to account. The Hind Rajab Foundation (HRF) and the Palestinian Center for Human Rights (PCHR) have come together to take Anas’ killers to the International Criminal Court (ICC).

    In a joint statement they wrote:

    By any measure, Anas Al-Sharif should still be alive.

    They explained that the murder of Anas and the other press colleagues who were also killed – Mohamemd Qreiqeh, Ibrahim Zaher, Mohammed Noufal, and Moamen Aliwa – was:

    not just another tragedy in a long war on the press. This was a clear-cut criminal act—a war crime and part of a broader genocidal campaign—and it demanded a direct, targeted legal response.

    The two have now filed a case for the ICC where they:

    • demonstrate the chain of command and operational decisions taken by Israeli commanders that led to Anas’ killing
    • provide documentation for other instances of premeditated murder of journalists by Israel

    In doing so, they’re attempting to make the case that Isreal has an established policy of killing journalists. HRF and PCHR have compiled evidence that Israel is utilising the following strategy when targeting Al Jazeera journalists:

    1. Label them terrorists without any plausible proof.
    2. Smear them publicly to dehumanize and justify their killing.
    3. Eliminate them in targeted strikes.

    Strategic extermination

    HRF chairperson Dyab About Jahjah said:

    The assassination of Anas Al-Sharif was so blunt, so arrogant, and so drenched in contempt for human life, truth, the legal order, and humanity itself, that it cannot and will not be allowed to pass into silence.

    The two groups are clear that their complaint to the ICC is not symbolic; they are bringing their case forward because they believe they have the necessary evidence to incite arrest warrants and prosecutions.

    Anas prepared a final will and statement – a remarkable position for a 28 year old to be in, knowing his people’s oppressors were coming for him. He wrote:

    Allah knows I gave every effort and all my strength to be a support and a voice for my people, ever since I opened my eyes to life in the alleys and streets of the Jabalia refugee camp.

    Like an overwhelming number of Palestinians, Anas is one of those who were born in refugee camps. To the very end, Anas fought for his people, knowing he would be killed for doing so:

    I entrust you with Palestine—the jewel in the crown of the Muslim world, the heartbeat of every free person in this world. I entrust you with its people, with its wronged and innocent children who never had the time to dream or live in safety and peace. Their pure bodies were crushed under thousands of tons of Israeli bombs and missiles, torn apart and scattered across the walls.

    I urge you not to let chains silence you, nor borders restrain you. Be bridges toward the liberation of the land and its people, until the sun of dignity and freedom rises over our stolen homeland.

    The HRF and PCHR are making themselves into those bridges of liberation. Onslaught after onslaught from Israel, horrific war crime after horrific war crime – but each atrocity, each universe extinguished in the form of each Palestinian must be reckoned with.

    Featured image via YouTube screenshot/Middle East Eye

    By Maryam Jameela

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • The world—eight billion strong—stands at a precipice. In Gaza, a people are being systematically pulverized, displaced, and erased. And the architects of this devastation—Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and the governments that arm him—continue their campaign with brazen impunity.

    This is not merely a geopolitical crisis. It is a moral apocalypse.

    Where are the men and women of conscience? Where are the statesmen of principle, the diplomats of dignity, the theologians of truth? Where are the poets who once sang of justice, the journalists who once exposed tyranny, the clergy who once wept for the oppressed?

    Haba! Shall we stand idly by while the machinery of annihilation grinds on? Shall we watch, mute and inert, as Palestinian lives are extinguished with clinical precision?

    The silence of the so-called international community is not neutrality—it is complicity. It is cowardice dressed in the garb of diplomacy.

    This is not war. It is extermination. It is the calculated obliteration of a people’s history, culture, and breath.

    And those who supply the weapons, those who offer political cover, those who equivocate in the face of atrocity—they are not bystanders. They are collaborators.

    But not all are silent.

    In Canada, rallies erupt weekly. In the United States, university students defy repression to stand with Palestine. In Sydney, Australia, tens of thousands march. In Cyprus, Israeli Jews are asked to leave unless they disavow the genocide. Businesses across the globe refuse service to those who support apartheid. And South Africa—wounded but wise—has brought a case before the foot-dragging World Court, backed by other nations who still remember what justice tastes like.

    So the question is not merely “who is killing?” It is “who is abetting?” Who profits from the blood? Who harvests dividends from the arms trade while quoting scripture?

    Donald Trump seeks a peace prize while backing genocide. State and corporate media sanitize the slaughter. Western governments offer platitudes while funding the carnage.

    You may not know the pains burning in my heart.

    I am a fellow who was raised by my grandmother, who witnessed the Second World War at her age of 14 years and recounted to me horrible stories of how children were bulldozed in Germany. I wish I would never witness the same evils of wars in my lifetime. I am scared to will myself to sleep, haunted by how children, women, and innocent peoples—who know nothing about politics and wars—are killed , or rather slaughtered, on the surface of the earth while the whole world looks the other way.

    What is the United Nations for? Where is the Arab League? What is the Arab League for? Where are the churches, mosques, Buddhist temples, Jewish synagogues, and Judaist sanctuaries? Where is the moral outcry from those who claim to speak for God?

    Let us dispense with euphemisms. Let us abandon the polite language of policy briefings and press releases.

    This is genocide unfolding in real time. And the world’s moral paralysis is its accomplice.

    To those who still possess a shred of conscience: rise. Speak. Write. March. Refuse the narcotic of neutrality. Refuse the seduction of silence. Refuse to let history record your indifference as innocence.

    Let Gaza live. Let Palestine breathe. Let the human spirit rebel against the machinery of death.

    This is not a plea. It is a cry. A cry from the ashes. A cry from the rubble. A cry from the soul of humanity itself.

    And let us remember, as I once wrote: “Creation does not dwell in gated gardens, but in the compost of our contradictions. In the cracked walls of our conscience. In the sacred mess of becoming.”

    To desecrate a soul with exclusion, exploitation, or neglect is to deface the sacred itself. The ancestors do not sleep. They walk with us, whispering truth into our silence.

    The post A Cry from the Ashes: Who Still Has a Conscience? first appeared on Dissident Voice.

    This post was originally published on Dissident Voice.

  • ANALYSIS: By Gordon Campbell

    The word “Gaza” is taking on similar connotations to what the word “Auschwitz” meant to a previous generation. It signifies a deliberate and systematic attempt to erase an entire people from history on the basis of their ethnic identity.

    As a result, Israel is isolating itself as a pariah state on the world stage. This week alone has seen Israel target and kill four Al Jazeera journalists, just as it had executed eight Red Crescent medical staff and seven other first responders back in March, and then dumped their bodies in a mass grave.

    Overall 186 journalists have died at the hands of the IDF since October 7, 2023, and at least 1400 medical staff as of May 2025.

    On Monday night a five-year-old disabled child starved to death. Reportedly, he weighed only three kilograms when he died. Muhammad Zakaria Khudr was the 101st child among the 227 Palestinians now reported to have died from starvation.

    Meanwhile, Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Foreign Minister Winston Peters keep on saying that with regard to New Zealand recognising a Palestinian state, it is a matter of “Not if, but when.” Yet why is “ but not now” still their default position?

    At this rate, a country that used to pride itself on its human rights record — New Zealand has never stopped bragging that this is where women won the right to vote, before they did anywhere else — will be among the last countries on earth to recognise Palestine’s right to exist.

    What can we do? Some options:

    1. Boycott all Israeli goods and services;
    2. Engage with the local Palestinian community, and support their businesses, and cultural events;
    3. Donate financial support to Gaza. Here’s a reliable link to directy support pregnant Gaza women and their babies;
    4. Lobby your local MP, and Immigration Minister Erika Stanford — to prioritise the inclusion of hundreds of Gazans in our refugee programme, just as we did in the wake of the civil war in Syria, and earlier, in Sudan;
    5. Write and phone your local MP, and urge them to support economic sanctions against Israel. These sanctions should include a sporting and cultural boycott along the lines we pursued so successfully against apartheid South Africa
    6. Contact your KiwiSaver provider and let it be known that you will change providers if they invest in Israeli firms, or in the US, German and UK firms that supply the IDF with weapons and targeting systems. Contact the NZ Super Fund and urge them to divest along similar lines;
    7. Identify and picket any NZ firms that supply the US/Israeli war machines directly, or indirectly;
    8. Contact your local MP and urge him or her to support Chloe Swarbrick’s private member’s bill that would impose economic sanctions on the state of Israel for its unlawful occupation of the West Bank and Gaza. Swarbrick’s Bill is modelled on the existing Russian sanctions framework.If 61 MPs pledged support for Swarbrick’s Bill, it would not have to win a private members ballot before being debated in Parliament. Currently 21 MPs (the Greens and TPM) formally support it. If and when Labour’s 34 MPs come on board, this will still require another six MPs (from across the three coalition parties) to do the right thing. Goading MPs into doing the right thing got Swarbrick into a world of  trouble this week. (Those wacky Greens. They’re such idealists.);
    9. We should all be lobbying our local MPs for a firm commitment that they will back the Swarbrick Bill. Portray it to them as being in the spirit of bi-partisanship, and as them supporting the several UN resolutions on the status of the occupied territories. And if they still baulk ask them flatly: if not, why not?
    10. Email/phone/write to the PM’s office, and ask him to call in the Israeli ambassador and personally express New Zealand’s repugnance at Israel’s inhumane actions in Gaza and on the West Bank. The PM should also be communicating in person New Zealand’s opposition to the recently announced Israeli plans for the annexation of Gaza City, and expansion of the war in Gaza.
    11. Write to your MP, to the PM, and to Foreign Minister Winston Peters urging them to recognise Palestinian statehood right now. Inquire as to what further information they may need before making that decision, and offer to supply it. We need to learn how to share our outrage; and
    12. Learn about the history of this issue, so that you convince friends and family to take similar actions.

    Here’s a bare bones timeline of the main historical events.

    This map showing (in white) the countries that are yet to recognise Palestinian statehood speaks volumes:

    Those holdout nations in white tend to have been the chief enablers of Israel’s founding in 1948, a gesture of atonement driven by European guilt over the Holocaust.

    This “homeland” for the Jews already had residents known to have had nothing to do with the Holocaust. Yet since 1948 the people of Palestine have been made to bear all of the bad consequences of the West’s purging of its collective guilt.

    Conditional justice
    The same indifference to the lives of Palestinians is evident in the belated steps towards supporting the right of Palestinians to self-determination. Even the recognition promised by the UK, Canada, France and Australia next month is decked out with further conditions that the Palestinians are being told they need to meet. No equivalent demands are being made of Israel, despite the atrocities it is committing in Gaza.

    There’s nothing new about this. Historically, all of the concessions have been made by the Palestinians, starting with their original displacement. Some 30 years ago, the Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO) formally recognised Israel’s right to exist. In response, Israel immediately expanded its settlements on Palestinian land, a flagrant breach of the commitments it made in the Oslo Accords, and in the Gaza-Jericho Agreement.

    The West did nothing, said little.  As the New York Times recently pointed out:

    In a 1993 exchange of letters, the Palestine Liberation Organization’s chairman, Yasir Arafat, recognized the “right of the State of Israel to exist in peace and security” and committed the PLO to peaceful negotiations, renouncing terrorism and amending the Palestinian charter to reflect these commitments. In return, Israel would merely recognize the PLO as the representative of the Palestinian people — and only “in light of” Mr Arafat’s commitments. Palestinian sovereignty remained remote; Israeli occupation continued apace.

    This double standard persists:

    This fundamental unfairness has informed every diplomatic effort since. The rump Palestinian government built the limited institutions it was permitted under the Oslo Accords, co-operated with Israeli security forces and voiced support for a peace process that had long been undermined by Israel. Led by then-Prime Minister Salam Fayyad, the Palestinian Authority’s statehood campaign in the 2000s was entirely based on playing the game according to rules set by Israel and the Western-dominated international community. Yet recognition remained stalled, the United States blocked Palestine’s full membership in the United Nations — and still, no conditions were placed on the occupying power.

    That’s where we’re still at. Luxon, Peters and David Seymour are demanding more concessions from the Palestinians. They keep strongly denouncing the Hamas October 7 atrocities — which is valid — while weakly urging Israel to abide by the international laws and conventions that Israel repeatedly breaches.

    When a state deploys famine as a strategic weapon, doesn’t it deserve to be condemned, up front and personal?

    Instead, the language that New Zealand uses to address Israel’s crimes  is almost invariably, and selectively, passive. Terrible things are “happening” in Gaza and they must “stop.” Children, mysteriously, are “starving.” This is “intolerable.”

    It is as if there is no human agent, and no state power responsible for these outcomes. Things are just somehow “happening” and they must somehow “cease.” Enough is enough, cries Peters, while carefully choosing not to name names, beyond Hamas.

    Meanwhile, Israel has announced its plans to expand the war, even though 600 Israeli ex-officials (some of them from Shin Bet, Israel’s equivalent to the SIS) have publicly said that Hamas no longer poses a strategic threat to Israel.

    As mentioned, Israel is publicly discussing its plans for Gaza’s “voluntary emigration” and for the permanent annexation of the West Bank. Even when urged to do so by Christopher Luxon, it seems that Israel is not actually complying with international law, and is not fulfilling its legal obligations as an occupying power. Has anyone told Luxon about this yet?

    Two state fantasy, one state reality
    At one level, continuing to call for a “two state” solution is absurd, given that the Knesset formally rejected the proposal a year ago. More than once, Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu has publicly denounced it while also laying Israel’s claim to all of the land west of Jordan, which would include the West Bank and Gaza.

    Evidently, the slogan “ from the river to sea” is only a terrorist slogan when Hamas uses it. Yet the phrase originated as a Likud slogan.Moreover, the West evidently thinks it is quite OK for Netanyahu to publicly call for Israeli hegemony from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea.

    Basic rule of diplomacy: bad is what they do, good is what we do, and we have always been on Team Israel.

    Over the course of the three decades since the Oslo Accords were signed, the West has kept on advocating for a two state solution, while acting as if only one of those states has a right to exist. On what land do Luxon and Peters think that a viable Palestinian state can be built?

    One pre-condition for Palestinian statehood that Luxon cited to RNZ last week required Israel to be “not undermining the territorial integrity that would then undermine the two state solution.” Really? Does Luxon not realise that this is exactly what Israel has been doing for the past 30 years?

    Talking of which . . .  are Luxon and Peters genuinely expecting Israel to retreat to the 1967 borders? That land was agreed at Oslo and mandated by the UN as the territory needed for a viable Palestinian state. Yet on the relatively small area of the West Bank alone, 3.4 million Palestinians currently subsist on disconnected patches of land under occupation amid extreme settler violence, while contending with 614 Israeli checkpoints and other administrative obstacles impeding their free movement.

    Here’s what the land left to the Palestinians looks like today:

    A brief backgrounder on Areas A, B and C and how they operate can be found here.  Obviously, this situation cannot be the template for a viable Palestinian state.

    What is the point?
    You might well ask . . . in the light of the above, what is the point of recognising Palestine as a state? Given the realities on the ground, it can only be a symbolic gesture. The reversion to the 1967 borders (a necessary step towards a Palestinian state) can happen only if the US agreed to push Israel in that direction by withholding funds and weaponry.

    That’s very hard to imagine. The hypocrisy of the Western nations on this issue is breath-taking. The US and Germany continue to be Israel’s main foreign suppliers of weapons and targeting systems. Under Keir Starmer’s leadership as well, the UK sales of military equipment to Israel have sharply increased.

    New export licensing figures show that the UK approved licenses for £127.6 million worth of military equipment to Israel in single issue licenses between October to December 2024. This is a massive increase, with the figure in this three-month period totaling more than 2020-2023 combined.

    Thanks to an explicitly enacted legal exemption, the UK also continues to supply parts for Israel’s F-35 jets.

    UK industry makes 15% of every F-35 in contracts [estimated] to be worth at least £500 million since 2016, and [this] is the most significant part of the UK arms industry [relationship]with Israel . . . at least 79 companies [are] involved in manufacturing components.

    These are the same F-35 war planes that the IDF has used to drop 2000 pound bombs on densely populated residential neighbourhoods in Gaza. Starmer cannot credibly pose as a man of peace.

    So again . . . what exactly is the point of recognising Palestine as a state? No doubt, it would boost Palestinian morale if some major Western powers finally conceded that Palestine has a right to exist. In that narrow sense, recognition would correct a historical injustice.

    There is also optimistic talk that formal Palestinian statehood would isolate the US on the Security Council (Trump would probably wear that as a badge of honour) and would make Israel more accountable under humanitarian law. As if.

    Theoretically, a recognition of statehood would also enable people in New Zealand and elsewhere to apply pressure to their governments to forthrightly condemn and sanction Israel for its crimes against a fellow UN member state. None of this, however, is likely to change the reality on the ground, or prevent the calls for Israel’s “accountability” and for its “compliance with international law” from ringing hollow.

    As the NYT also says:

    After almost two years of severe access restrictions and the dismantling of the UN-led aid system in favour of a militarised food distribution that has left more than 1300 Palestinians dead, [now 1838 dead at these “aid centres”  since late May, as of yesterday] . . . The 15 nations [at a UN meeting in late July that signed a declaration on Gaza] still would not collectively say “Israel is responsible for starvation in Gaza”. If they cannot name the problem, they can hardly hope to resolve it.

    In sum . . . the world may talk the talk of Palestinian statehood being a matter of “not if, but when” and witter on about the “irreversible steps” being taken toward statehood, and finally — somewhere over the rainbow — towards a two state solution.  Faint chance:

    “For those who are starving today, the only irreversible step is death. Until statehood recognition brings action — arms embargoes, sanctions, enforcement of international law — it will remain a largely empty promise that serves primarily to distract from Western complicity in Gaza’s destruction.

    Exactly. Behind the words of concern are the actions of complicity. The people of Gaza do not have time to wait for symbolic actions, or for sanctions to weaken Israel’s appetite for genocide. Consider this option: would New Zealand support an intervention in Gaza by a UN-led international force to save Gaza’s dwindling population, and to ensure that international humanitarian law is respected, however belatedly?

    Would we be willing to commit troops to such a force if asked to do so by the UN Secretary-General? That is what is now needed.

    Footnote One: On Gaza, the Luxon government has a high tolerance for double standards and Catch 22 conditions. We are insisting that the Palestinians must release the remaining hostages unconditionally, lay down their arms and de-militarise the occupied territories. Yet we are applying no similar pre-conditions on Israel to withdraw, de-militarise the same space, release all their Palestinian prisoners, allow the unrestricted distribution of food and medical supplies, and negotiate a sustainable peace.

    Understandably, Hamas has tied the release of the remaining hostages to the Israeli cessation of their onslaught, to unfettered aid distribution, and to a long-term commitment to Palestinian self-rule.  Otherwise, once the Israeli hostages are home, there would be nothing to stop Israel from renewing the genocide.

    We are also demanding that Hamas be excluded from any future governing arrangement in Gaza, but – simultaneously – Peters told the House recently that this governing arrangement must also be “representative.” Catch 22. “Representative” democracy it seems, means voting for the people pre-selected by the West. Again, no matching demands have been made of Israel with respect to its role in the future governance of Gaza, or about its obligation to rebuild what it has criminally destroyed.

    Footnote Two: There is only one rational explanation for why New Zealand is currently holding back from joining the UK, Canada, France and Australia in voting next month to recognise Palestine as a full UN member state. It seems we are cravenly hoping that Australia’s stance will be viewed with such disfavour by Donald Trump that he will punish Canberra by lifting its tariff rate from 10%, thereby erasing the 5% advantage that Australia currently enjoys oven us in the US market.

    At least this tells us what the selling price is for our “independent” foreign policy. We’re prepared to sell it out to the Americans – and sell out the Palestinians in the process – if, by sitting on the fence for now, we can engineer parity for our exports with Australia in US markets. ANZAC mates, forever.

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • The following is a statement from the International Centre of Justice for Palestinians, Palestine Solidarity Campaign, Global Legal Action Network, Campaign Against Arms Trade, Health Workers 4 Palestine, and War on Want.

    As UK organisations working on human rights, we urge the government to urgently facilitate the visa applications of over 40 Palestinian students in Gaza who have been offered scholarships, but have been unable to get their applications processed due to not being able to provide their biometrics.

    Home Office denying Palestinian students visas to study in the UK

    Over 40 Palestinian students have places across 30 British universities, and the cohort includes doctors, midwives and mental health professionals. They are currently unable to fulfil a Home Office requirement to provide their biometric data in order to travel, because the UK-authorised Visa Application Centre (VAC) in Gaza has been closed since October 2023, which is where biometric checks must be conducted. Israel’s blockade of Gaza means that these individuals are also unable to travel to centres in neighbouring countries to carry out their checks as part of their application requirements.

    This Catch-22 means the scholars will be unable to travel to the UK to study, unless the UK government intervenes and grants them a biometrics deferral. The UK government is yet to take a decision on whether or not it will assist the students, or issue a response to their requests, despite the students’ months-long efforts to overcome the roadblock. This obstacle placed in-front of the students, through no fault of their own, jeopardises their professional development and the countless benefits that they would no doubt bring to Palestinians in Gaza – unless the UK government acts immediately.

    UK government must urgently facilitate safe passage

    The government must grant Palestinian students a biometrics deferral and facilitate their safe passage to a third country to complete their biometrics for their visa application at a VAC, including through diplomatic pressure, if necessary, to ensure that the students can exit Gaza. The government must then facilitate safe passage for these students to the UK.

    Precedent has been set for both these procedures in the most recent decision of the High Court of Justice on the 28th July in a similar case regarding family reunification. In that case, the Home Secretary deferred the biometric information requirement in April 2024 and considered the case regardless. Ultimately, in January 2025, the Home Secretary confirmed that:

    she was minded to grant the claimants entry clearance, subject to them attending a VAC to enrol their biometric information and satisfying security checks.

    Additionally, the Court decided that the government was wrong in its assessment not to provide diplomatic support to the applicants in asking the Israeli authorities to evacuate their relatives to a third country.

    It is absurd that the UK government has not waived the biometrics requirement despite being aware of the current situation on the ground in Gaza. To demand that applicants submit their biometrics without a biometrics centre available or functioning, is discriminatory against Palestinians; the government would be aware that there is no way to fulfil that requirement at the moment, and has failed to produce an alternative policy mechanism after over 22 months of these conditions. This is not an issue that is exclusive to these more than 40 students, it also extends to cover any other Palestinians in Gaza that wish to apply for a visa to come to the UK for any other purpose.

    Unacceptable administrative red tape for Palestinian students under Israel’s siege

    These Palestinian students have been offered scholarships despite going through the most arduous of circumstances. They took tests, wrote essays and conducted interviews despite ongoing displacement and restriction of electricity and Wi-Fi. This is a testament to the resilience and strength of Palestinians, even when undergoing a live streamed genocide and being starved to death. It is unacceptable that after overcoming all of these hurdles, administrative red tape may prevent them from taking up their university places. They risk not only losing out on their scholarships, but may well be further traumatised, wounded, malnourished or killed by Israel’s bombardment of Gaza and starvation policies.

    In contrast to the UK, countries such as France, Ireland and Italy have successfully evacuated students through government co-ordinated efforts, via Embassies in Amman, Tel-Aviv, or Jerusalem, and through humanitarian corridors coordinated by organisations such as the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC).

    Signatories:

    International Centre of Justice for Palestinians

    Palestine Solidarity Campaign

    Global Legal Action Network

    Campaign Against Arms Trade

    Health Workers 4 Palestine

    War on Want

    Featured image via the Canary

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • On Saturday, August 16, demonstrators are set to march in protest of Israel’s starvation of Gaza in a “Mass March for Humanity” through the streets of New York City. Over 200 organizations have endorsed, coming from an array of diverse backgrounds including the Palestinian diaspora, pro-Palestine solidarity groups, labor unions, anti-war groups, faith groups, and others. Buses are set to travel from across the northeastern United States, including from Baltimore, Boston, Burlington, New Hampshire, Philadelphia, Providence and Washington, DC. “​​Genocide will never stop without global intervention,” Dr. Nidal Jboor, the cofounder of Doctors Against Genocide, told Peoples Dispatch.

    The post Thousands To Join ‘Mass March For Humanity’ Against Starvation Of Gaza appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • In February 2023, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital quietly removed a display of artwork from one of its corridors.

    The artwork, a collection of decorated plates, had been designed by schoolchildren in Gaza. It depicted symbols of peace and the desire for an independent Palestinian state.

    The plates had been on the walls of the hospital for over a decade, but a strongly worded letter from UK Lawyers for Israel (UKLFI) ensured they were promptly taken down.

    UKLFI director Caroline Turner was quick to claim victory. “We are pleased that the hospital has responded positively to its patients’ complaints,” she declared.

    The post A Landmark Complaint Vs Pro-Israel Group Silencing Dissent appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • Twenty-four US-allied nations and three senior EU officials have signed a joint statement calling for Israel to lift all restrictions on aid entering the Gaza Strip, warning that the Israeli-imposed famine has reached “unimaginable levels.”

    The statement, published by the British Foreign Ministry, comes as Palestinians continue to starve to death every day in Gaza due to the US-backed Israeli blockade.

    “The humanitarian suffering in Gaza has reached unimaginable levels. Famine is unfolding before our eyes. Urgent action is needed now to halt and reverse starvation. Humanitarian space must be protected, and aid should never be politicized,” the statement reads.

    The post Twenty-Four US-Allied Nations Urge Israel To Lift All Restrictions On Aid appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • Pacific Media Watch

    Union members of Australia’s Media, Entertainment and Arts Alliance (MEAA) have made a video honouring the 242 Palestinian journalists and media workers killed by the Israeli military since October 2023 — many of them targeted.

    The death toll has been reported by the Gaza Media Office since the latest killing of six media workers last Sunday, four of them from the Qatar-based global television channel Al Jazeera.

    This figure is higher than the 180 deaths recorded by the International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) and other media freedom agencies.

    “While international media remains locked out of Gaza, Palestinian journalists work under fire, starvation and sickness to report the reality on the ground,” says the MEAA.

    “Targeting journalists is a war crime.

    “As colleagues, we remember them.”

    In this video, MEAA members say the names of many Gazan journalists who have been killed by the Israeli military.

    • Music in the MEAA “Stop Killing Journalists” video is composed by Connor D’Netto and performed by Jayson Gillham. The video is edited by Jack Fisher and (A)manda Parkinson for MEAA and was released on YouTube yesterday.


    Stop Killing Journalists              Video: MEAA


    This content originally appeared on Asia Pacific Report and was authored by Pacific Media Watch.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • UN experts said on Wednesday that Israel’s slaughter of doctors and nurses and systematic destruction of the health care system in Gaza amounts to “medicide,” as Israel continues to block key medicines and medical supplies from entry into the besieged enclave. “As human beings and UN experts, we cannot remain silent about the war crimes committed before our eyes in Gaza…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich is advancing a longstanding illegal settlement plan in the occupied West Bank which would split the region and “permanently bury the idea of a Palestinian state,” the minister said. Under the plan, Israel will build more than 3,000 homes on stolen Palestinian land in the E1 settlement area. The settlements would cut off East Jerusalem from the rest of…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • This story originally appeared in The Maple on Aug. 12, 2025. It is shared here with permission.

    The CBC made an agreement with a Jordanian air base commander not to record or show aerial images of Gaza while reporting on board a recent aid drop flight, according to a spokesperson for the public broadcaster.

    The agreement was based on instructions from Israeli officials.

    The Jordanian officials said the Israelis warned that filming out of the plane’s windows over Gaza would supposedly “jeopardize flights,” wrote CBC head of public affairs Chuck Thompson in an email to The Maple.

    “Filming out the windows was not permitted; this was made clear to us in advance by the Jordanian officials,” wrote Thompson.

    Asked if either the Israeli or Jordanian officials elaborated on how filming out of the plane’s windows would jeopardize the flights, Thompson deferred to the officials themselves.

    Meanwhile, the British broadcaster ITV News seemingly did not agree to the same censorship order, and showed footage of the destruction of Gaza caused by Israel’s nearly two-year bombardment of the enclave.

    An ITV segment broadcast on August 4 opened with stark images of the Gaza landscape in ruins. In a voiceover, ITV international editor Emma Murphy — who, like her CBC counterpart, flew on board a Jordanian aircraft — said: 

    “Building by building, Gaza is being erased. Cities like broken skeletons, laid waste by war. Graveyards of life and lives. The streets, homes and coffee houses of old, now cast to the ground. The soul of this place along with the souls who lived here, brought to ruin in the rubble and dust.”

    Murphy noted that Israel bans foreign journalists from entering Gaza and explained that when she joined an air drop the previous week, she was told “Israel didn’t want images from above being filmed or shown.”

    The segment highlighted images captured from on board the aircraft of a Gaza hospital, seniors’ home, school and residential buildings destroyed by Israel.

    “This landscape of destruction looks otherworldly. Yet it’s not. It is this world, and what is happening may yet come to define one of its darkest eras, one that casts a stain on humanity, which will endure for generations.”

    In January, the United Nations used satellite imagery to estimate that 69 per cent of all structures in Gaza were damaged or destroyed as a result of Israel’s attacks.

    The CBC’s report, which also aired on August 4, did not show images of Gaza from the aircraft.

    CBC reporter Susan Ormiston told viewers from on board a different Jordanian plane to the one carrying the ITV crew: “We cannot show you what we see outside these windows. The Israelis have forbidden any media images of what’s happened down on the ground. But we can see the flattened landscape of neighbourhoods.”

    The Royal Jordanian Airforce website states that two of its aircraft have participated in aid drops over the past few days. Thompson said the CBC and ITV film crews were on board separate flights.

    The Maple emailed ITV questions about its apparent decision to not agree to the censorship order, but did not receive a response.

    Thompson defended the CBC’s coverage of the aid drop flight and its reporting on Israel’s war on Gaza in general. He said that despite the agreed-upon filming restrictions, the broadcaster considered the aid drop story to be in the public interest and journalistically worthwhile.

    “It should be noted that for this story, we also organized our freelance videographer to capture images of the aid landing inside Gaza on the ground,” Thompson wrote.

    “Beyond this particular story, we have been telling Canadians what’s been happening in Gaza on the ground in a myriad of other ways.”

    Asked why the CBC crew did not travel on board a Canadian aid drop flight that reportedly flew just behind one of the Jordanian aircraft, Thompson said: “Canadian defence officials told us it was not possible to get on their plane.”

    In an emailed statement received after this story was published, Department of National Defence spokesperson Andrée-Anne Poulin told The Maple:

    “After assessing the layout of the inside of the CC-130 Hercules aircraft, including space necessary for mission-essential personnel, the Air Task Force leadership determined that inviting a journalist and/or cameraperson onboard would not have been safely feasible.”

    In an extended version of the CBC segment, Ormiston said the crew was not allowed on the Canadian flight due to “Israeli restrictions and risk considerations.”

    Jason Toney, director of the advocacy group Canadians for Justice and Peace in the Middle East’s media accountability project, told The Maple the CBC’s editorial decision to not film Gaza “clearly acquiesced to an Israeli directive, and they failed the Canadian public.”

    “I think it’s just another example of Canadian media complicity in the ongoing genocide.”

    Toney said that simply describing the destruction of Gaza verbally, as Ormiston did, was not sufficient given the unique opportunity the CBC crew had to visually lay bare the devastation caused by Israel’s attacks.

    “We hear numbers about what percentage of Gaza has been damaged or destroyed, and those numbers are very shocking, but without a visual accompaniment to understand the scope of that destruction, Canadians and people around the world are really limited in what they’re able to grasp of what’s really going on on the ground.”

    “The only visuals that we’re getting out of Gaza are very limited. They’re what Palestinian journalists on the ground are able to show us, and as we know, they are not only trying to report, they’re trying to survive.”

    According to Reporters Without Borders, Israel has killed “more than 200” journalists in Gaza since October 2023, including at least 46 who were targeted specifically because of their journalistic activities.

    This past Sunday, Israel killed five Al Jazeera staff and one other journalist, including correspondent Anas al-Sharif, who was the primary target of the attack. An analyst at the Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor said there was “zero evidence” showing al-Sharif took part in any hostilities, as claimed by Israel.

    Toney said that while the CBC has published some strong reporting on Israel’s war on Gaza, he accused the public broadcaster of engaging in a pattern of “self censorship” in its coverage.

    He noted that the CBC rarely uses the word “genocide,” even with qualifiers that cite reputable sources, when reporting on Israel’s ongoing attacks.

    Criticisms of the CBC’s coverage of Israel’s war on Gaza are not new.

    In December 2023, The Breach found that CBC News’ The National featured 42 per cent more Israeli voices than Palestinian in the first month of its coverage of Israel’s attacks.

    The Breach also highlighted how the public broadcaster used sanitized language to describe Israel’s war on Gaza, while favouring much stronger words to describe the Hamas-led attacks of Oct. 7, 2023.

    The CBC defended its decision to do so on the basis that attacks on Gaza are “carried out remotely.” In a statement to The Breach, the public broadcaster said it rejected any suggestion that its defence constituted “an admission of a double standard.”

    Last year, The Breach published a pseudo-anonymous essay by a former CBC employee who accused the broadcaster of “whitewashing” Israel’s attacks on Gaza and engaging in editorial double standards that applied more scrutiny to Palestinian guests than Israelis and Israel’s supporters.

    The former employee also wrote: “Most shows on the network seemed to avoid airing any mention of ‘genocide’ in the context of Gaza.”

    According to The Breach, the CBC began to use the word on some occasions following the International Court of Justice’s hearings in early 2024 on South Africa’s ongoing genocide case against Israel.

    In a statement responding to the essay, CBC editor in chief Brodie Fenlon wrote that the article’s “broad conclusions are not true. We don’t whitewash or censor our journalism.”

    “That said, there’s no doubt some CBC journalists will see in this account moments that ring true to their own experience […] Among the systemic issues we are currently addressing, newsroom culture is a challenge we are seized with at the CBC, one we are continually working to improve.”

    The essay prompted more CBC employees to come forward. Five told The Breach that the essay resonated with them, shared similar experiences of dealing with anti-Palestinian bias and said they feared being labelled as antisemitic. 

    In response to questions from The Breach, Chuck Thompson wrote: “We have taken a number of measures to support staff through [the story], always working toward a more inclusive newsroom environment.”

    “Our coverage is strong and has improved, in part thanks to internal feedback by many employees from a wide range of backgrounds and seniority levels, including months ago from the author of The Breach essay. Critical voices are not silenced, they are encouraged.”

    The CBC has also been criticized for acquiescing to pressure campaigns from HonestReporting Canada, a billionaire-funded pro-Israel charity that, in its executive director’s words, seeks to “control the narrative” in Canadian media coverage of Israel.

    Israel’s war on Gaza has to date killed at least 61,709 Palestinians, according to Gaza health officials, and is almost universally recognized as a genocide by major international human rights organizations, as well as by leading genocide scholars.

    The actual death toll has likely been significantly undercounted, according to a study published by The Lancet in February. A letter sent to the same publication last year suggested that “it is not implausible to estimate that up to 186,000 or even more deaths could be attributable to the current conflict in Gaza.”

    A recent Angus Reid poll found that 52 per cent of Canadians agree that Israel is committing a genocide, and 64 per cent see the current humanitarian situation as a “moral outrage.”

    Famine Photo Op

    Canada’s aid drop over Gaza on August 4 was organized by the Canadian Armed Forces, and was the first that involved the use of a Canadian aircraft. The aid flights, which involved a total of six countries and departed out of Jordan, were organized in co-ordination with the Israeli military.

    Such aid drops have been heavily criticized as carefully stage-managed but ultimately ineffective and dangerous publicity stunts that do little to alleviate the famine in Gaza, which Israel has caused by deliberately blocking sufficient aid access.

    The Israeli-imposed starvation crisis has so far killed 217 Palestinians, including 100 children, according to Al Jazeera. 

    In late July, an Integrated Food Security Phase Classification alert warned: “The worst-case scenario of Famine is currently playing out in the Gaza Strip … Mounting evidence shows that widespread starvation, malnutrition, and disease are driving a rise in hunger-related deaths.”

    The alert stated that more than 20,000 children in Gaza City were admitted for treatment for acute malnutrition between April and mid-July, with more than 3,000 severely malnourished.

    Following several months of images of starving children pouring out from the besieged enclave, governments around the world pressured Israel into announcing it would allow more aid to enter Gaza in July.

    But the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs said on August 5 that the quantities of aid remain insufficient and “massive food shortages” persist.

    Doctors have warned the long-term effects of prolonged starvation may already be irreversible for some Palestinians, especially children.

    Meanwhile, multiple reports found that Israeli troops and American contractors shot at starving Palestinians at aid sites organized by the U.S.-Israeli backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF).

    In a recent report, the organization Doctors Without Borders said GHF-run distribution centres in Gaza are sites of “orchestrated killing and dehumanization” that must be shut down and replaced by existing UN-run distribution systems. 

    In July, the UN Human Rights Office reported that since May, at least 1,373 Palestinians have been killed while seeking food, 859 of them within the vicinity of GHF sites.

    Last October, Israeli lawmakers voted to ban UNRWA, a UN-run Palestinian aid agency. 

    The Israeli government approved a plan last week for the Israeli military to directly re-occupy Gaza City, a move that will likely force all of the city’s remaining civilian residents into camps. 

    The proposal is a precursor to the Israeli government’s larger plan to take complete military control of the entire enclave.

    The leaders of some countries allied with Israel, including CanadaGermany and the United Kingdom, condemned the plan.

    Editor’s note, Aug. 12, 2025, 1:40 p.m. EST: This story has been updated to include a statement from the Department of National Defence that was received after the story’s publication.

    This post was originally published on The Real News Network.

  • The School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) have expelled the president of the university’s Palestine society. Haya Adam, a Law and International Relations student had been suspended for months. Now, it would appear that Haya’s expulsion is the most direct recrimination from university management yet for speaking out about the genocide. SOAS’ Liberated Zone – a group of students organising to end Israel’s genocide – said in a statement:

    After a year-long open ended suspension, and multiple disciplinary actions solely for speaking out for Palestine, SOAS has taken the final, most extreme step to silence student activism – a first of its kind expulsion of a student in the midst of her degree.

    Haya’s expulsion is a brutal reminder that SOAS, despite its facade, serves as a tool of empire and represses those who oppose it.

    As the group mention, SOAS are famous for their international approach to academia. They provide students and researchers with a platform to study and research languages, cultures, and politics of, as their name suggests, Africa, Asia, and the Middle East. In fact, the Centre for Palestine Studies was founded in 2012 at the university.

    So, why exactly is a university who houses such apparent internationalist critical thinkers expelling people who speak out about Palestine?

    SOAS betrayal of values

    The SOAS Liberated Zone answered this question rather succinctly:

    SOAS’s refusal to divest and boycott alongside the violent suppression of student activists has proved to us that SOAS is merely another tool of empire and is not ‘the world’s university’.

    We are outraged at management’s response to pro-Palestine activists, rather than listening to their students who are calling out genocide and urging complicity with international law, management has opted to brutalise its students, punishing them for their moral compasses instead of looking themselves in the mirror and addressing the root of the problem, complicity in genocide.

    And, the group were clear about the message from the university:

    Her expulsion is a clear message of intent from the university to intimidate others from following in her footsteps and speaking out.

    Haya’s expulsion is, unfortunately, a pattern of support of suppression from SOAS. Earlier this year, a couple of students from the same university, the SOAS 2, were charged by the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS). As the Canary’s Hannah Sharland reported:

    the CPS currently has preposterous terrorism charges levied against a Palestine advocate and SOAS University of London student. Specifically, in March, the Met Police arrested and charged one of the now so-called ‘SOAS 2’ under Section 12 of the Terrorism Act. The other student was arrested at the same time, and is currently on bail pending further investigation.

    The force imposed this repressive overreach of terrorism powers for the crime of?

    Speaking out for Palestine.

    Of course, the criminalisation of these students and the expulsion of Haya comes among the absurd government and police orchestration of criminalisation of dissent.

    Continued mobilisation

    Former SOAS student and research director at advocacy group CAGE, Dr. Asim Qureshi, burnt his Masters degree in protest at Haya’s expulsion:

    Dr. Qureshi also wrote to SOAS with a formal request to rescind his degree after Haya’s expulsion. And, he singled out the hypocrisy of SOAS’ apparent decolonial background:

    Journalist Matt Kennard called the expulsion “disgraceful”

    Writer Laleh Khalili pointed out the fact that genocide apologist David Lammy has an honorary degree from the same university:

    And, Middle East Eye characterised the silencing of Palestine protestors across British universities as a “mounting repression”:

    Cultural problem

    Haya spoke to The New Arab about her expulsion. In the interview, she explained how she is accused of breaking the university’s code of conduct. She stated that part of the allegations levelled at her were due to her criticism of a SOAS Student Union co-president as a “careerist.” Haya said:

    By the legal definition of harassment and their definition of the SOAS dignity policy, I did not actually meet those standards. I’m going to appeal the decision, and I’m going to challenge it in any way that I can.

    SOAS have maintained that it has not expelled any students for their views on Palestine. However, many of the student body are firmly standing behind Haya as a prominent organiser on campus for Palestine. Over 20 societies from the SOAS Student Union have condemned the expulsion, stating:

    We see the repression on the student body for protesting the genocide against Gaza and its forced starvation on its people as an attack on all students within SOAS and across the student body as a whole.

    SOAS has been complicit in the genocide in Gaza, through their academic investments and partnerships, and has continuously suppressed students for speaking up against it.

    Despite SOAS’ protestations otherwise, their own students are calling out what they see as the university’s silencing and repression. And, we are firmly in a climate where objections to Israel’s genocide, or even support of Palestine, can lead to censure and arrests. It would be foolish to consider Haya’s expulsion as anything but an attempt to create a climate of fear over speaking out.

    Sign the petition here to revoke Haya’s expulsion. 

    Featured image via YouTube screenshot/Fourman Films

    By Maryam Jameela

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • In Gaza – the deadliest place in the world for aid workers – an unparalleled, Israel-created humanitarian collapse is unfolding alongside a political crackdown on the very organisations struggling to keep people alive. Starvation is being weaponised, with most International NGOs – some who have delivered aid in the occupied Palestinian territory for decades – unable to deliver a single truck of lifesaving supplies since 2 March.

    Israel silencing INGOs operating in Gaza

    Instead of clearing the growing backlog of goods, Israeli authorities have rejected requests from dozens of NGOs to bring in lifesaving goods, citing that these organisations are “not authorized to deliver aid”.

    In July alone, over 60 requests were denied under this justification. While millions of pounds worth of food, medicine, and other essential items are now stranded at the borders, and in warehouses across Jordan and Egypt, aid agencies say they are now being pushed out, under bureaucratic new rules introduced in March by the occupation.

    International non-governmental organisations (INGOs) are now required to register with the occupation or lose permission to operate.

    Registration can be denied under vague, politicised criteria, such as alleged efforts to ‘delegitimise’ the state of Israel, or expressing support for accountability for Israeli violations of international law.

    Other disqualifiers include public support for a boycott of the occupation within the past seven years – by staff, a partner, board member, or founder – failure to meet exhaustive reporting requirements, or merely speaking out about conditions they witness on the ground. It’s forcing INGOs to choose between delivering aid and promoting respect for the protections owed to affected people.

    According to Bushra Khalidi, Oxfam policy lead:

    Oxfam has over $2.5 million worth of goods that have been rejected from entering Gaza by Israel. This registration process signals to INGOs that their ability to operate may come at the cost of their independence and ability to speak out.

    Only allowed to operate if they give the occupation their sensitive data

    INGOs must also hand over sensitive donor information and full lists of Palestinian staff for so called ‘security vetting’, which could not only breach General Data Protection Regulation privacy laws, but also endanger staff safety. If they refuse, they could be shut down in Gaza, the West Bank, and East Jerusalem within weeks.

    Back in May, 55 organisations warned that these new measures could:

    cripple independent humanitarian operations and undermine international law.

    They said it would mark a serious escalation in restrictions on humanitarian and civic space, setting a dangerous precedent. UN agencies and NGOs have warned that without immediate action, most international NGO partners could be de-registered by the occupation by 9 September or sooner, forcing them to withdraw all international staff and preventing them from providing critical, life-saving humanitarian assistance to Palestinians.

    A group of UN Special Rapporteurs on human rights have also spoken out, publishing a letter to the Israeli government on August 12, stating deep concern that the INGO registration measures:

    weaken the ability of INGOs to operate independently and impartially and to carry out their humanitarian and human rights work without interference or fear of reprisal.

    And they said that:

    the obligation to report on INGO personnel, in the context of occupation, armed conflict and serious violations of international law, could raise serious protection and reprisal concerns.

    ‘Authorisation’ denials

    Despite the Israeli occupation’s repeated public claims that there is “no limit” on aid entering Gaza, convoy after convoy has been turned back. Since the full siege began on 2 March 2025, most major NGOs have not managed to get a single truckload through, and vast stocks of humanitarian goods have been left stranded in Jordan, Egypt – and in some cases, just kilometres from Gaza.

    Its threat to deregister humanitarian NGOs, owing to the new bureaucratic hurdles it has introduced – as well as its longstanding restrictions – is another inhumane move to deny urgently needed supplies to a desperate population.

    CARE International UK’s head of policy and advocacy Dorothy Sang said that:

    CARE has been given an unlawful ultimatum by the Israeli government demanding it must submit sensitive information or face being shut down. We have been present in Gaza for decades, and have always operated under well-established UN coordination and distribution mechanisms. The new registration process is not an administrative measure but a deliberate obstacle that violates international humanitarian principles. Every aid clearance rejection, every delayed approval, every blocked truck is a death sentence for Palestinians. Without taking concrete action, the UK government continues to risk complicity in this conflict. It is indefensible British-made weapons that could be used in the siege are still being licensed. The prime minister must lead with action, suspend all arms exports, and demand the Israeli government opens all land crossings and offers safe and unrestricted passage across Gaza.

    Hospitals left without the basics, doctors and aid workers work while hungry

    The blockade is biting hardest in Gaza’s hospitals, now operating with dwindling stocks of basic medicines, sterile dressings, and surgical kits. Aid groups say children, disabled people, and older residents are dying not just from injuries but from preventable illnesses and hunger. Even aid workers are now reporting to work hungry.

    While UN famine monitors have confirmed that the worst case scenario of famine is already under way, the Palestinian Ministry of Health in Gaza has recorded 106 child deaths from starvation and malnutrition, out of a total of 235 – as of August 13 – with the death rate significantly increasing over the past two weeks. 1,859 Palestinians have been killed, and over 13,594 injured – mainly by Israeli forces – while seeking food, since late May.

    Aid agencies argue that Israel’s INGO rules are part of a bigger strategy to control who delivers aid and how,  replacing independent humanitarian channels with those aligned with political and military objectives. Central to this is the so called GHF aid distribution system, promoted as a humanitarian solution but condemned by the UN as “death traps”, and called “bloodbaths” by Human Rights Watch.

    This system funnels desperate civilians towards dangerous distribution points, creating yet another site of mass killings while cutting out long trusted Palestinian and international aid providers, such as UNRWA, who has been operating-with great efficiency and within international law in the occupied Palestinian territory since 1950.

    A worsening picture for Gaza

    Since Hamas took control of Gaza in 2007, Israel has maintained a land, sea, and air blockade, justified on security grounds but repeatedly described by UN experts and humanitarian bodies as a form of collective punishment prohibited under international law.

    For years, entry of goods – from food to medical supplies, was regulated through numerous permits, inspections, and approvals. During previous military campaigns by the occupation, delays sometimes stretched for months, but long established NGOs could usually negotiate clearances through UN channels. What makes 2025 different is that these INGO rules institutionalise a higher level of political control, tying humanitarian access to compliance with demands for sensitive data.

    Without opening the borders and allowing the unhindered, and unlimited passage of all aid, no volume of airdrops, alternative schemes, or partial openings can prevent further deaths, and these registration restrictions definitely will not help.

    A statement calling for an end of Israel’s weaponised aid impunity

    As a response to the ongoing catastrophic situation in Gaza, and these new measures being imposed by the occupation, more than 100 international NGOs, including CARE and Oxfam, have signed a statement calling on all states and donors to:

    ● Press Israel to end the weaponisation of aid, including through bureaucratic obstruction, such as the INGO registration procedures.
    ● Insist that INGOs are not forced to share sensitive personal information, in violation of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), or compromise staff safety or independence as a condition for delivering aid.
    ● Demand the immediate and unconditional opening of all land crossings and conditions for the delivery of lifesaving humanitarian aid.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Charlie Jaay

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Tensions are growing between the Labour Party right and young members, as the party’s stance on Gaza creates moral confusion.

    The Labour right are at it again

    As first reported by Hattie Simpson in the New Statesman, Keir Starmer’s pledge to recognise a Palestinian state in September has deepened the feud between the party’s young members and Labour HQ.

    This pledge is dependent on Israel not agreeing to a ceasefire, which has emphasised to young members how out of touch the Labour leadership truly are.

    According to the New Statesman:

    Senior figures within the youth movement describe what they see as a profound “naivety” from the leadership about the scale and seriousness of younger members’ anger. Instead of recognising students’ frustration as part of a wider humanitarian concern, party officials continue to frame the dissent as a fringe issue: an ideological hangover from Corbynism or a potential antisemitism liability (a characterisation which Labour HQ firmly denies).

    Labour HQ has threatened young members with “reputational damage or future career jeopardy” for speaking out on Gaza.

    On the New Statesman podcast, Hattie Simpson said:

    It’s been made very, very clear to lots of students that if you talk about this [Gaza], you are stepping out of line

    Warwick Labour

    Only last week, Warwick Labour – the party’s society at Warwick University – put out a statement in support of local councillor, Grace Lewis, and her decision to step away from them to join Your Party.

    The party quickly disaffiliated from Warwick Labour after this. It rebranded as ‘Warwick Labour Movement’.

    Meanwhile, according to the New Statesman, Your Party has:

    Already begun to position itself as a political refuge for young people alienated by Labour’s direction under Starmer.

    Trips to Israel

    The New Statesman also reported that one backbench MP contacted a young member’s (non-Labour) employer after they couldn’t attend an organised study trip to Israel. They warned the employer to be “wary” and “not trust them”.

    Others have reportedly been offered stable jobs after graduation if they agreed to toe the party line. Obviously, Labour strongly refuted those claims.

    ‘Pompoms for genocide’

    According to Novara Media, Young Labour’s membership has fallen from 100,000 members to a mere 30,000.

    On its YouTube channel, Aaron Bastani said that young people within the party are realising that they have no real influence on political outcomes. Instead, they have become “cheerleaders”. However, when that turns into “pompoms for genocide and thousands of children being mutilated”, young people lose interest.

    The longer Labour continue to ignore this feud, the more young people will become disillusioned. A whole generation of potential voters or previous voters is turning its back. And the right wing only has itself to blame.

    Feature image via screengrab

    By HG

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Two legal rights organisations have filed a complaint against the director of prominent UK-based Zionist lobby group UK Lawyers for Israel (UKLFI).

    Complaint lodged against UK Lawyers for Israel

    The European Legal Support Center (ELSC) and the Public Interest Law Centre (PILC) have submitted a formal complaint to the Solicitors Regulation Authority. It’s against director of UK Lawyers for Israel Caroline Turner, and alleges breaches of the SRA’s Principles and Code of Conduct. It includes the group’s use of Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPPs). These are lawsuits intended to limit freedom of expression on matters of public interest.

    Additionally, the two organisations are calling for an investigation into whether UKLFI is operating as an unregulated law firm. They are urging the SRA to bring it under regulatory oversight.

    UKLFI, established in 2011, describes its mission as countering the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement and what it calls the “delegitimisation of Israel”.

    The complaint includes eight threatening letters UKLFI sent to individuals and organisations between January 2022 and May 2025. They demonstrate a seeming pattern of vexatious and legally baseless correspondence, it aimed at silencing and intimidating Palestine solidarity efforts. ELSC and PILC obtained the letters with the consent of the organisations or individuals receiving them.

    Contributing to a ‘wave of repression’ against Palestine advocates

    The complaint requests that the SRA suspend Caroline Turner to prevent further breaches of professional standards and to set a precedent against the use of SLAPPs. It also demands that the SRA regulate UK Lawyers for Israel as a law firm, given its use of UK legal professionals’ reputations to lend credibility to its work, despite being unregulated.

    In a recent report, CAGE International accused UKLFI of contributing to a “wave of repression” by filing complaints against individuals and organisations who stand in solidarity with Palestine.

    Led By Donkeys further exposed the group’s tactics in a film, which highlighted UKLFI’s efforts to silence Palestine advocates. In July 2025, Middle East Eye reported that the UK Charity Commission had confirmed that it is investigating UKLFI’s charitable wing, following complaints submitted by both CAGE and Led By Donkeys.

    Violating the SRA Code of Conduct

    UK Lawyers for Israel’s letters prominently state that its:

    patrons and members include some of the most distinguished members of the UK legal profession

    It lists regulated solicitors and barristers. However, the two organisations consider that, as an unregulated entity, UKLFI’s reliance on these names creates a false impression of regulatory oversight that is misleading and unethical. Specifically, they believe that the actions of UKLFI violate SRA Principle 2 (upholding public trust) and Code of Conduct 8.8 (accuracy in publicity).

    The complaint demonstrates a wider concern about how political groups are utilising legal and regulatory systems in the UK to suppress solidarity with Palestine during the ongoing Israeli genocide against Palestinians.

    It highlights the growing threat of such groups using SLAPPs and lawfare as tools to stifle free expression and advocacy on Palestinian liberation. Without urgent regulatory intervention, ELSC and PILC are concerned that these organisations will continue to use these tactics to suppress conversation about Israel’s perpetration of war crimes and crimes against humanity, and silence those who speak out against Israel.

    UK Lawyers for Israel chilling public participation

    It is ELSC and PILC’s view that UK Lawyers for Israel’s actions constitute material and ideological support for the Israeli genocide against Palestinians.

    ELSC’s Monitor Officer in Britain, Tara, warns:

    UKLFI is actively suppressing solidarity with Palestine. Our research documents how UKLFI’s threatening letters to organisations have triggered concrete reprisals, including workers disciplined or fired for Palestine solidarity, reputations smeared through coordinated campaigns, and events cancelled under pressure. This is a systematic strategy to criminalise solidarity with Palestine and shield genocide complicity. This complaint is a demand for accountability.

    Paul Heron, PILC’s Solicitor adds:

    UKLFI are acting in a manner that chills public participation and intimidates those who stand in solidarity with Palestine. No solicitor is above the SRA’s regulatory framework. We are calling for a full investigation into their conduct and into UKLFI as an organisation that effectively acts as a law firm.

    We will not allow legal threats to shut down the public’s right to speak out on Palestine. The SRA has a duty to step in, to uphold professional standards, and to protect civil society from intimidation dressed up as law.

    Featured image via screengrab

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Netanyahu’s mass ethnic cleansing strategy pulls the rug out from under the West’s cherished pretext for supporting Israeli criminality: the fabled two-state solution.

    ANALYSIS: By Jonathan Cook

    If you thought Western capitals were finally losing patience with Israel’s engineering of a famine in Gaza nearly two years into the genocide, you may be disappointed.

    As ever, events have moved on — even if the extreme hunger and malnourishment of the two million people of Gaza have not abated.

    Western leaders are now expressing “outrage”, as the media call it, at Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s plan to “take full control” of Gaza and “occupy” it.

    At some point in the future, Israel is apparently ready to hand the enclave over to outside forces unconnected to the Palestinian people.

    The Israeli cabinet agreed last Friday on the first step: a takeover of Gaza City, where hundreds of thousands of Palestinians are huddled in the ruins, being starved to death. The city will be encircled, systematically depopulated and destroyed, with survivors presumably herded southwards to a “humanitarian city” — Israel’s new term for a concentration camp — where they will be penned up, awaiting death or expulsion.

    At the weekend, foreign ministers from the UK, Germany, Italy, Australia and other Western nations issued a joint statement decrying the move, warning it would “aggravate the catastrophic humanitarian situation, endanger the lives of the hostages, and further risk the mass displacement of civilians”.

    Germany, Israel’s most fervent backer in Europe and its second-biggest arms supplier, is apparently so dismayed that it has vowed to “suspend” — that is, delay — weapons shipments that have helped Israel to murder and maim hundreds of thousands of Palestinians over the past 22 months.

    Netanyahu is not likely to be too perturbed. Doubtless, Washington will step in and pick up any slack for its main client state in the oil-rich Middle East.

    Meanwhile, Netanyahu has once again shifted the West’s all-too-belated focus on the indisputable proof of Israel’s ongoing genocidal actions — evidenced by Gaza’s skeletal children — to an entirely different story.

    Now, the front pages are all about the Israeli prime minister’s strategy in launching another “ground operation”, how much pushback he is getting from his military commanders, what the implications will be for the Israelis still held captive in the enclave, whether the Israeli army is now overstretched, and whether Hamas can ever be “defeated” and the enclave “demilitarised”.

    We are returning once again to logistical analyses of the genocide — analyses whose premises ignore the genocide itself. Might that not be integral to Netanyahu’s strategy?

    Life and death
    It ought to be shocking that Germany has been provoked into stopping its arming of Israel — assuming it follows through — not because of months of images of Gaza’s skin-and-bones children that echo those from Auschwitz, but only because Israel has declared that it wants to “take control” of Gaza.

    It should be noted, of course, that Israel never stopped controlling Gaza and the rest of the Palestinian territories — in contravention of the fundamentals of international law, as the International Court of Justice (ICJ) ruled last year. Israel has had absolute control over the lives and deaths of Gaza’s people every day — bar one — since its occupation of the tiny coastal enclave many decades ago.

    On 7 October 2023, thousands of Palestinian fighters briefly broke out of the besieged prison camp they and their families had endured after Israel momentarily dropped its guard.

    Gaza has long been a prison that the Israeli military illegally controlled by land, sea and air, determining who could enter and leave. It kept Gaza’s economy throttled, and put the enclave’s population “on a diet” that saw rocketing malnourishment among its children long before the current starvation campaign.

    Trapped behind a highly militarised fence since the early 1990s, unable to access their own coastal waters, and with Israeli drones constantly surveilling them and raining down death from the air, the people of Gaza viewed it more as a modernised concentration camp.

    But Germany and the rest of the West were fine supporting all that. They have continued selling Israel arms, providing it with special trading status, and offering diplomatic cover.

    Only as Israel carries through to a logical conclusion its settler-colonial agenda of replacing the native Palestinian people with Jews, is it apparently time for the West to vent its rhetorical “outrage”.

    Two-state trickery
    Why the pushback now? In part, it is because Netanyahu is pulling the rug out from under their cherished, decades-long pretext for supporting Israel’s ever-greater criminality: the fabled two-state solution.

    Israel conspired in that trickery with the signing of the Oslo Accords in the mid-1990s.

    The goal was never the realisation of a two-state solution. Rather, Oslo created a “diplomatic horizon” for “final status issues” — which, like the physical horizon, always remained equally distant, however much ostensible movement there was on the ground.

    Lisa Nandy, Britain’s Culture Secretary, peddled precisely this same deceit last week as she extolled the virtues of the two-state solution. She told Sky News: “Our message to the Palestinian people is very, very clear: There is hope on the horizon.”

    Every Palestinian understood her real message, which could be paraphrased as: “We’ve lied to you about a Palestinian state for decades, and we’ve allowed a genocide to unfold before the world’s eyes for the past two years. But hey, trust us this time. We’re on your side.”

    In truth, the promise of Palestinian statehood was always treated by the West as little more than a threat — and one directed at Palestinian leaders. Palestinian officials must be more obedient, quieter. They had to first prove their willingness to police Israel’s occupation on Israel’s behalf by repressing their own people.

    Hamas, of course, failed that test in Gaza. But Mahmoud Abbas, head of the Palestinian Authority (PA) in the occupied West Bank, bent over backwards to reassure his examiners, casting as “sacred” his lightly armed security forces’ so-called “cooperation” with Israel. In reality, they are there to do its dirty work.

    Nonetheless, despite the PA’s endless good behaviour, Israel has continued to expel ordinary Palestinians from their land, then steal that land — which was supposed to form the basis of a Palestinian state — and hand it over to extremist Jewish settlers backed by the Israeli army.

    Former US President Barack Obama briefly and feebly tried to halt what the West misleadingly calls Jewish “settlement expansion” — in reality, the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians — but rolled over at the first sign of intransigence from Netanyahu.

    Israel has stepped up the process of ethnic cleansing in the occupied West Bank even more aggressively over the past two years, while global attention has been on Gaza — with the Israeli newspaper Ha’aretz warning this week that settlers have been given “free rein”.

    A small window into the impunity granted to settlers as they wage their campaign of violence to depopulate Palestinian communities was highlighted at the weekend, when B’Tselem released footage of a Palestinian activist, Awdah Hathaleen, inadvertently filming his own killing.

    Extremist settler Yinon Levi was released on grounds of self-defence, even though the video shows him singling out Hathaleen from afar, taking aim and shooting.

    Alibi gone
    It is noticeable that, having stopped making reference to Palestinian statehood for many years, Western leaders have revived their interest only now — as Israel is making a two-state solution unrealisable.

    That was graphically illustrated by footage broadcast this month by ITV. Shot from an aid plane, it showed the wholesale destruction of Gaza — its homes, schools, hospitals, universities, bakeries, shops, mosques and churches gone.


    Apocalyptic scenes in Gaza               Video: ITV News

    Gaza is in ruins. Its reconstruction will take decades. Occupied East Jerusalem and its holy sites were long ago seized and Judaised by Israel, with Western assent.

    Suddenly, Western capitals are noticing that the last remnants of the proposed Palestinian state are about to be swallowed whole by Israel, too. Germany recently warned Israel that it must not take “any further steps toward annexing the West Bank”.

    US President Donald Trump is on his own path. But this is the moment when other major Western powers — led by France, Britain and Canada — have started threatening to recognise a Palestinian state, even as the possibility of such a state has been obliterated by Israel.

    Australia announced it would join them this week after its foreign minister, a few days earlier, said the quiet part out loud, warning: “There is a risk there will be no Palestine left to recognise if the international community don’t move to create that pathway to a two-state solution.”

    That is something they dare not countenance, because with it goes their alibi for supporting all these years the apartheid state of Israel, now deep into the final stages of a genocide in Gaza.

    That was why British Prime Minister Keir Starmer desperately switched tack recently. Instead of dangling recognition of Palestinian statehood as a carrot encouraging Palestinians to be more obedient — British policy for decades — he wielded it as a threat, and a largely hollow one, against Israel.

    He would recognise a Palestinian state if Israel refused to agree to a ceasefire in Gaza and proceeded with the West Bank’s annexation. In other words, Starmer backed recognising a state of Palestine – after Israel has gone ahead with its complete erasure.

    Extracting concessions
    Still, France and Britain’s recognition threat is not simply too late. It serves two other purposes.

    Firstly, it provides a new alibi for inaction. There are plenty of far more effective ways for the West to halt Israel’s genocide. Western capitals could embargo arms sales, stop intelligence sharing, impose economic sanctions, sever ties with Israeli institutions, expel Israeli ambassadors, and downgrade diplomatic relations. They are choosing to do none of those things.

    And secondly, recognition is designed to extract from the Palestinians “concessions” that will make them even more vulnerable to Israeli violence.

    According to France’s Foreign Affairs Minister, Jean-Noel Barrot: “Recognising a State of Palestine today means standing with the Palestinians who have chosen non-violence, who have renounced terrorism, and are prepared to recognise Israel.”

    In other words, in the West’s view, the “good Palestinians” are those who recognise and lay down before the state committing genocide against them.

    Western leaders have long envisioned a Palestinian state only on condition that it is demilitarised. Recognition this time is premised on Hamas agreeing to disarm and its departure from Gaza, leaving Abbas to take on the enclave and presumably continue the “sacred” mission of “cooperating” with a genocidal Israeli army.

    As part of the price for recognition, all 22 members of the Arab League publicly condemned Hamas and demanded its removal from Gaza.

    Boot on Gaza’s neck
    How does all of this fit with Netanyahu’s “ground offensive”? Israel isn’t “taking over” Gaza, as he claims. Its boot has been on the enclave’s neck for decades.

    While Western capitals contemplate a two-state solution, Israel is preparing a final mass ethnic cleansing campaign in Gaza.

    Starmer’s government, for one, knew this was coming. Flight data shows that the UK has been constantly operating surveillance missions over Gaza on Israel’s behalf from the Royal Air Force base Akrotiri on Cyprus. Downing Street has been following the enclave’s erasure step by step.

    Netanyahu’s plan is to encircle, besiege and bomb the last remaining populated areas in northern and central Gaza, and drive Palestinians towards a giant holding pen — misnamed a “humanitarian city” — alongside the enclave’s short border with Egypt. Israel will then probably employ the same contractors it has been using elsewhere in Gaza to go street to street to bulldoze or blow up any surviving buildings.

    The next stage, given the trajectory of the last two years, is not difficult to predict. Locked up in their dystopian “humanitarian city”, the people of Gaza will continue to be starved and bombed whenever Israel claims it has identified a Hamas fighter in their midst, until Egypt or other Arab states can be persuaded to take them in, as a further “humanitarian” gesture.

    Then, the only matter to be settled will be what happens to the real estate: build some version of Trump’s gleaming “Riviera” scheme, or construct another tawdry patchwork of Jewish settlements of the kind envisioned by Netanyahu’s openly fascist allies, Bezalel Smotrich and Itamar Ben Gvir.

    There is a well-established template to be drawn on, one that was used in 1948 during Israel’s violent creation. Palestinians were driven from their cities and villages, in what was then called Palestine, across the borders into neighbouring states. The new state of Israel, backed by Western powers, then set about methodically destroying every home in those hundreds of villages.

    Over subsequent years, they were landscaped either with forests or exclusive Jewish communities, often engaged in farming, to make Palestinian return impossible and stifle any memory of Israel’s crimes. Generations of Western politicians, intellectuals and cultural figures have celebrated all of this.

    Former British Prime Minister Boris Johnson and former Austrian President Heinz Fischer are among those who went to Israel in their youth to work on these farming communities. Most came back as emissaries for a Jewish state built on the ruins of a Palestinian homeland.

    An emptied Gaza can be similarly re-landscaped. But it is much harder to imagine that this time the world will forget or forgive the crimes committed by Israel — or those who enabled them.

    Jonathan Cook is a writer, journalist and self-appointed media critic and author of many books about Palestine. Winner of the Martha Gellhorn Special Prize for Journalism. This article was first published Middle East Eye and republished from the author’s blog with permission.

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • Protesters are gearing up for the next mass ‘Lift The Ban’ demonstration against the Labour Party government’s proscription of Palestine Action – this time, on Saturday 6 September.

    It’s calling for people to sign up to swamp the Metropolitan Police – and cause maximum embarrassment for the Labour’s bare-faced liar of a home secretary Yvette Cooper. The action aims to push the government to finally ditch the preposterous ban on the non-violent direct action group.

    Palestine Action ‘Lift The Ban’ protest: protests readying for another round

    Following the Met’s sweep of arrests Saturday 9 August, Defend Our Juries plan to stand up again to the government’s unprecedented proscription of non-violent direct action group Palestine Action.

    Despite the Met arrests more than 500 peaceful protesters holding placards, the public will demonstrate their defiance once more.

    The next mass action to ‘Lift The Ban’ on Palestine Action will take place in London on Saturday 6 September, in Parliament Square.

    It will be a conditional commitment action, and will proceed as long as at least 1,000 people commit to it.

    Undeterred: cardboard signs against genocide are not a crime

    A spokesperson for Defend Our Juries said:

    With all the real challenges facing the country, it is absurd that the Labour government has generated a political crisis over people quietly holding cardboard signs against genocide in Parliament Square. This won’t be forgiven or forgotten.

    In a desperate attempt to justify their position Keir Starmer and Yvette Cooper have resorted to lying to the public about Palestine Action, claiming it to be a violent organisation, which they know to be false.

    The political ineptitude is staggering. The only beneficiaries of this policy, which is the brain-child of Lord Walney, a paid lobbyist, are the Israeli Government and Elbit Systems, the main manufacturer of the weapons of genocide, with factories across Britain.

    The public response to our protests has been overwhelming. Despite (or because of) the legal risks, the government has turned an arrest for terrorism into a badge of honour. We have been inundated with offers of support from all quarters.

    The next action will take place on 6 September, in Parliament Square at 1pm. Based on the response to date, we expect there to be even more people than there were last Saturday, 9 August. The protest will go ahead as long as at least 1,000 people commit to taking part. That could well be enough for the ban to be lifted.

    If 5,000 people show up, we’re certain the ban will be gone, and with it, most likely, Yvette Cooper.

    Despite the dirty tricks of the Met police, lawlessly attacking our communication channels, the protests are now unstoppable. The only way out for the Government is to lift the ban, and to stop all arms exports to Israel now, as required by international law.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • There is increasing evidence that “widespread starvation, malnutrition and disease” are driving a rise in hunger-related deaths“ in Gaza, a group of United Nations and aid organizations have repeatedly warned.

    A July 29 alert by the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification, a global initiative for improving food security and nutrition, reported that the “worst-case scenario of famine is currently playing out in the Gaza Strip,” as access to food and other essential items is dropping to an “unprecedented level.”

    More than 500,000 Palestinians, one-fourth of Gaza’s population, are experiencing famine, the U.N. stated. And all 320,000 children under age 5 are “at risk of acute malnutrition, with serious lifelong physical and mental health consequences.”

    The post Starving Indigenous Peoples Then And Now appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • A militant crowd organized by the Boston Coalition for Palestine faced off against a phalanx of cops guarding a Capital One Café and shut down the streets of Harvard Square in Cambridge for nearly two hours during the sweltering afternoon heat of Aug. 10. The action was in response to a violent attack by Cambridge police a week earlier at the same storefront on activists with BDS (Boycott, Divest, Sanction) – Boston.

    Capital One Café — the target of a month-long campaign by BDS – Boston — is run by the ninth largest bank in the U.S. Besides luring people like students into its credit card debt trap through gimmicks like “cafés,” the otherwise online-only Capital One Financial has amassed much of its $490.6 billion in assets by extending lines of credit to the military-industrial complex.

    The post ‘Capital One, You Can’t Hide!’: Cambridge Escalates For Palestine appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • This September, activist groups across five continents plan to strike two of the world’s most powerful insurance companies: AXA and AIG. Together, they are launching a powerful wave of global resistance with a synchronised campaign of disruption. The aim is to expose the companies’ role in fueling genocide, climate destruction, and social collapse.

    Under the banner ‘Insure Our Survival‘, thousands of campaigners in Africa, Europe, Asia, and the Americas will take action from 8 September. Organisers are calling the wave of action a “coordinated global backlash” against the insurance giants underwriting fossil fuel expansion and weapons war criminal states are using in mass atrocities – particularly in Palestine.

    The post Launching A Global Campaign Against The Insurers Of Israel’s Genocide appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • ANALYSIS: By John Hobbs

    Aotearoa New Zealand once earned praise for its “principled” and “independent” foreign policy. Think nuclear-free Pacific, for example.

    Yet that reputation doesn’t hold true when it comes to Gaza and the Palestinian desire and right to self-determination.

    Under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide, states must take positive steps to prevent genocide. The New Zealand government appears to be failing in this obligation.

    Researcher John Hobbs
    Researcher John Hobbs . . . “So far, our ministers have chosen carefully crafted diplomatic language buried under joint country statements to influence the situation in Gaza.” Image: John Hobbs

    So far, our ministers have chosen carefully crafted diplomatic language buried under joint country statements to influence the situation in Gaza, while at the same time protecting relationships with allies, particularly the US.

    An example of these was a statement issued last month, in which New Zealand joined a group of 28 “concerned” countries to express horror at the “suffering of civilians in Gaza”, which, it says, “has reached new depths”. The statement calls for the lifting of restrictions on the “flow of aid” and demands “an immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire.”

    Just to be clear, the “flow of aid” is the life-saving food and water that’s needed to prevent the mass starvation of Palestinians as famine driven by Israel deepens.

    Demands for a ceasefire have been made on numerous occasions in the UN General Assembly and the UN Security Council, to no effect.

    Failure to sanction Israel
    Yet countries like New Zealand fail to sanction Israel for its non-compliance. Indeed, they do worse. These same countries continue to trade with Israel, and a number of them continue to provide weapons and arms.

    According to trade data, New Zealand in 2023 imported goods and services of US$191 million from Israel and exported US$16.4 million the other way.

    Most recently, New Zealand joined 14 other countries to “express the willingness or the positive consideration of our countries to recognise the State of Palestine, as an essential step towards the two-State solution.”

    The statement is heavily caveated by saying that “positive consideration” is one option — so it’s not clear if all, or indeed any, of the countries will end up recognising Palestinian statehood.

    By contrast, UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has issued a separate statement, saying the UK would recognise the state of Palestine in September if Israel doesn’t agree to a ceasefire.

    Starmer’s concern for the starvation of civilians in Gaza hasn’t stopped the UK from sending military arms to Israel. But this is at least a clearer stance than New Zealand has been able to muster.

    More than 147 UN member states out of 193 formally recognise Palestinian statehood now.

    Level of solidarity
    And while recognition of statehood is largely symbolic, it does signal a level of solidarity with the Palestinian people. Inexplicably, New Zealand has been unwilling to take that step, while calling it a future option under “two-state” diplomacy.

    New Zealand has trundled out its support of the two-state solution since at least 1993, reinforced by its co-sponsorship, in 2015-16, of a UN Security Council resolution condemning Israeli settlement expansion.

    That resolution declared settlements in occupied territories illegal under international law and urged member states to distinguish in its dealings between Israel and the territories occupied since 1967.

    Since then, Israel has continued to transfer its citizens to the West Bank and Gaza. More than 750,000 Israeli settlers are now living illegally in the West Bank and East Jerusalem — areas where a future Palestinian state would be located.

    Meanwhile, New Zealand has failed to take any meaningful action — sanctions or suspension of trade, for example — to implement the requirements of the Security Council resolution. That the government consistently frames its response as supporting a two-state solution beggars belief in light of such inaction.

    New Zealand’s refusal to sanction Israel is nothing but shameful.

    When foreign affairs minister Winston Peters expressed shock about the “intolerable situation” in Gaza, RNZ asked him whether New Zealand would entertain placing sanctions on Israel. He responded by saying that we are a “long, long way off doing that.”

    The genocide in Gaza is happening with the support of countries like New Zealand, through inaction and failure to implement sanctions.

    And statements about recognising statehood provide the appearance of supporting an end to the genocide, but change nothing in reality.

    John Hobbs has been a career public servant, working in a number of government departments (most recently the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet). He also worked for a number of ministers on secondment from government agencies. He is currently undertaking a PhD at the National Centre for Peace and Conflict Studies, Te Tumu School of Māori, Pacific and Indigenous Studies, Otago University. This article was first published by E-Tangata and is republished by Asia Pacific Report with the author’s permission.

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said that he feels “very” attached to the extremist vision of “Greater Israel,” a plan for the conquest of not just historic Palestine but also parts of Egypt, Jordan, and potentially other countries. In an interview with Israeli outlet i24 on Tuesday, Netanyahu said in Hebrew that he is on a “historic and spiritual” mission…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.