Category: Palestine

  • This September, activist groups across five continents plan to strike two of the world’s most powerful insurance companies: AXA and AIG. Together, they are launching a powerful wave of global resistance with a synchronised campaign of disruption. The aim is to expose the companies’ role in fueling genocide, climate destruction, and social collapse.

    Under the banner ‘Insure Our Survival‘, thousands of campaigners in Africa, Europe, Asia, and the Americas will take action from 8 September. Organisers are calling the wave of action a “coordinated global backlash” against the insurance giants underwriting fossil fuel expansion and weapons war criminal states are using in mass atrocities – particularly in Palestine.

    The post Launching A Global Campaign Against The Insurers Of Israel’s Genocide appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • ANALYSIS: By John Hobbs

    Aotearoa New Zealand once earned praise for its “principled” and “independent” foreign policy. Think nuclear-free Pacific, for example.

    Yet that reputation doesn’t hold true when it comes to Gaza and the Palestinian desire and right to self-determination.

    Under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide, states must take positive steps to prevent genocide. The New Zealand government appears to be failing in this obligation.

    Researcher John Hobbs
    Researcher John Hobbs . . . “So far, our ministers have chosen carefully crafted diplomatic language buried under joint country statements to influence the situation in Gaza.” Image: John Hobbs

    So far, our ministers have chosen carefully crafted diplomatic language buried under joint country statements to influence the situation in Gaza, while at the same time protecting relationships with allies, particularly the US.

    An example of these was a statement issued last month, in which New Zealand joined a group of 28 “concerned” countries to express horror at the “suffering of civilians in Gaza”, which, it says, “has reached new depths”. The statement calls for the lifting of restrictions on the “flow of aid” and demands “an immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire.”

    Just to be clear, the “flow of aid” is the life-saving food and water that’s needed to prevent the mass starvation of Palestinians as famine driven by Israel deepens.

    Demands for a ceasefire have been made on numerous occasions in the UN General Assembly and the UN Security Council, to no effect.

    Failure to sanction Israel
    Yet countries like New Zealand fail to sanction Israel for its non-compliance. Indeed, they do worse. These same countries continue to trade with Israel, and a number of them continue to provide weapons and arms.

    According to trade data, New Zealand in 2023 imported goods and services of US$191 million from Israel and exported US$16.4 million the other way.

    Most recently, New Zealand joined 14 other countries to “express the willingness or the positive consideration of our countries to recognise the State of Palestine, as an essential step towards the two-State solution.”

    The statement is heavily caveated by saying that “positive consideration” is one option — so it’s not clear if all, or indeed any, of the countries will end up recognising Palestinian statehood.

    By contrast, UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has issued a separate statement, saying the UK would recognise the state of Palestine in September if Israel doesn’t agree to a ceasefire.

    Starmer’s concern for the starvation of civilians in Gaza hasn’t stopped the UK from sending military arms to Israel. But this is at least a clearer stance than New Zealand has been able to muster.

    More than 147 UN member states out of 193 formally recognise Palestinian statehood now.

    Level of solidarity
    And while recognition of statehood is largely symbolic, it does signal a level of solidarity with the Palestinian people. Inexplicably, New Zealand has been unwilling to take that step, while calling it a future option under “two-state” diplomacy.

    New Zealand has trundled out its support of the two-state solution since at least 1993, reinforced by its co-sponsorship, in 2015-16, of a UN Security Council resolution condemning Israeli settlement expansion.

    That resolution declared settlements in occupied territories illegal under international law and urged member states to distinguish in its dealings between Israel and the territories occupied since 1967.

    Since then, Israel has continued to transfer its citizens to the West Bank and Gaza. More than 750,000 Israeli settlers are now living illegally in the West Bank and East Jerusalem — areas where a future Palestinian state would be located.

    Meanwhile, New Zealand has failed to take any meaningful action — sanctions or suspension of trade, for example — to implement the requirements of the Security Council resolution. That the government consistently frames its response as supporting a two-state solution beggars belief in light of such inaction.

    New Zealand’s refusal to sanction Israel is nothing but shameful.

    When foreign affairs minister Winston Peters expressed shock about the “intolerable situation” in Gaza, RNZ asked him whether New Zealand would entertain placing sanctions on Israel. He responded by saying that we are a “long, long way off doing that.”

    The genocide in Gaza is happening with the support of countries like New Zealand, through inaction and failure to implement sanctions.

    And statements about recognising statehood provide the appearance of supporting an end to the genocide, but change nothing in reality.

    John Hobbs has been a career public servant, working in a number of government departments (most recently the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet). He also worked for a number of ministers on secondment from government agencies. He is currently undertaking a PhD at the National Centre for Peace and Conflict Studies, Te Tumu School of Māori, Pacific and Indigenous Studies, Otago University. This article was first published by E-Tangata and is republished by Asia Pacific Report with the author’s permission.

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said that he feels “very” attached to the extremist vision of “Greater Israel,” a plan for the conquest of not just historic Palestine but also parts of Egypt, Jordan, and potentially other countries. In an interview with Israeli outlet i24 on Tuesday, Netanyahu said in Hebrew that he is on a “historic and spiritual” mission…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • We speak with Rachel Griffin Accurso, the educator known to millions around the world as Ms. Rachel, who has become a leading advocate for children in Gaza. Her YouTube channel for young children became wildly popular during the COVID-19 pandemic and today has more than 16 million subscribers. Since the start of Israel’s war on Gaza, Accurso has used her social media reach to speak out for…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • Anas al-Sharif, killed in an Israeli strike in Gaza, last Sunday has triggered protests around the world, including journalists in Israel. He left behind a powerful farewell message — his final testament to his people, his family, and the world.

    Palestine Chronicle staff

    Palestinian journalists Anas al-Sharif and Mohammed Qraiqea were killed last Sunday in an Israeli bombardment that struck a journalists’ tent near Gaza City’s Al-Shifa Hospital.

    Cameramen Ibrahim Zaher and Mohammed Noufal also died in the attack, which was carried out by an Israeli drone. The Israeli army admitted targeting al-Sharif shortly after the strike.

    Al-Sharif, 28, from Jabaliya refugee camp, was an award-winning journalist who became a leading global voice from Gaza during the war. He inspired thousands.

    Protest and vigils have been held around the world from South Africa’s Cape Town to Manila in the Philippines and London in the UK to honour al-Sharif and his colleagues in condemnation of this targeted murder.

    Less than two weeks ago, the Committee to Protect Journalists had warned that his life was in “acute” danger due to repeated threats from an Israeli military spokesperson.

    Before his death, al-Sharif prepared a farewell message to be shared if he was killed. His family and colleagues posted it to his social media accounts after the news of his death.

    Below is the full English translation of that message.

    Anas al-Sharif’s final message
    “This is my will and my final message.

    “If my words reach you, know that Israel has succeeded in killing me and silencing my voice.

    “First, peace be upon you and God’s mercy and blessings.

    “God knows I gave all I had — strength and effort — to be a support and a voice for my people, ever since I opened my eyes to life in the alleys of Jabaliya refugee camp. My hope was to live long enough to return with my family and loved ones to our original town, Asqalan (al-Majdal), now under occupation.

    “But God’s will came first, and His decree is final.

    “I have lived pain in all its details and tasted loss many times. Yet I never stopped telling the truth as it is, without falsification or distortion — so that God may bear witness over those who stayed silent, accepted our killing, and did nothing to stop the massacre our people have endured for more than a year and a half.

    “I entrust you with Palestine — the jewel of the Muslim crown and the heartbeat of every free person in this world. I entrust you with its people and children, whose pure bodies have been crushed under Israeli bombs and missiles.


    Australian journalists protest over the killings.      Video: MEAA

    “Do not let chains silence you or borders restrain you. Be bridges toward the liberation of the land and its people, until the sun of dignity and freedom rises over our stolen homeland.

    “I entrust you with my family: my beloved daughter Sham; my dear son Salah; my mother, whose prayers were my fortress; and my steadfast wife Bayan (Umm Salah), who carried the responsibility in my absence with strength and faith. Stand by them after God.

    “If I die, I die steadfast in my principles. I bear witness that I am content with God’s decree, certain of our meeting, and convinced that what is with God is better and everlasting.

    “O God, accept me among the martyrs, forgive me my sins, and make my blood a light that illuminates the path of freedom for my people. Forgive me if I fell short, and pray for me with mercy, for I have kept my pledge and never changed.

    “Do not forget Gaza… and do not forget me in your prayers.”

    Anas Jamal al-Sharif

    April 6, 2025

    Palestinian journalist Anas al-Sharif with his daughter Sham and his son Salah
    Palestinian journalist Anas al-Sharif with his daughter Sham and his son Salah. Image: via social media

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • On November 9, 2023, just over one month into Israel’s genocide in Gaza, a group of U.S.-based journalists published an open letter. “We stand with our colleagues in Gaza and herald their brave efforts at reporting in the midst of carnage and destruction,” the letter’s authors wrote. “We also hold Western newsrooms accountable for dehumanizing rhetoric that has served to justify ethnic cleansing…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • Israeli authorities are reportedly in discussions to resettle Palestinians to war-torn and hunger-stricken South Sudan, as Israel seeks to advance its plans for the forcible expulsion of all Palestinians from the Gaza Strip. The Associated Press reported on the talks on Tuesday, citing six sources familiar. This includes former Bush administration official Joe Szlavik, the head of a U.S.

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • Israeli authorities are reportedly in discussions to resettle Palestinians to war-torn and hunger-stricken South Sudan, as Israel seeks to advance its plans for the forcible expulsion of all Palestinians from the Gaza Strip. The Associated Press reported on the talks on Tuesday, citing six sources familiar. This includes former Bush administration official Joe Szlavik, the head of a U.S.

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • The post The West is in panic as Israel’s plan for ‘full control’ of Gaza heralds a new Nakba first appeared on Dissident Voice.

    This post was originally published on Dissident Voice.

  • It was a sign of someone desperate that his message has failed to take wing and make its way to better lands. With the strategy of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in the Gaza Strip sundered and falling over, leaving only a thick butcher’s bill (over 60,000 deaths for starters), extraordinary suffering and humanitarian catastrophe, he thought it wise to confront foreign press outlets on a late Sunday in the hope that the tide might turn away from his exemplary viciousness. There had been, he moaned like a wounded starlet, a “global campaign of lies” about Israel’s war in Gaza. In doing so, he merely inflated the arguments against him with boisterous credit and almost irrefutable plausibility.

    The conference, which gave “an opportunity to puncture the lies and tell the truth,” involved the following points: Hamas still has thousands of fighters in Gaza; it vowed to repeat what it had done on October 7, 2023; it continued to expound the goal of wishing to destroy Israel even as it subjugated Gazans, stole their precious food, and shot those seeking to move to safe zones, the latter term being itself a monstrosity in the context of this conflict. Paternally, Netanyahu, as the punishing father figure, thought he had deciphered the true desire of those in Gaza, which presumably would not have entailed the killing of Palestinians by the tens of thousands and starving the rest.  Everything could be blamed on a militant organisation he had done so much to praise as a countering force against Fatah in the West Bank.  As things stood now, Gazans seemed to be suffering from a highly developed sense of Stockholm syndrome, “begging us, and they’re begging the world: ‘Free us, Free us, and free Gaza from Hamas’.”

    With a solid body of mendacity to work with, Netanyahu proceeded to build an edifice of fantasy few others outside Israel could contend with: that the same Israeli forces who starve, kill, and maim the civilian populace of the Strip have no wish to impose an occupation but “free it from Hamas terrorists. The war can end tomorrow if Gaza, or rather if Hamas, lays down its arms and releases all the remaining hostages.” Israeli policy was not one of starving the Palestinians into famine, wrecks, skeletal ruin, and physiological malfunction. That hideous criminal pursuit fell to Hamas, apparently responsible for the violent looting of aid trucks and the deliberate creation of “a shortage of supply.” Fantastically, Netanyahu blamed the United Nations for refusing “to distribute the thousands of trucks that we let into Gaza through the Kerem Shalom crossing,” a delightful complaint given his government’s overt hatred for a body he always wished to be rid of from the occupied territories. The synapses in Netanyahu-Land seemed frailer than ever, if not altogether snapped.

    He then belted out the now-familiar five-point vision of the Strip once Hamas is defeated. This elusive “day after” includes the following objectives: the disarming of Hamas, the freeing of all hostages, the demilitarising of the Gaza Strip, granting Israel “overriding security control”, the creation of a non-Israeli administration that will not “educate its children for terror, doesn’t pay terrorists and doesn’t launch terrorist attacks against Israel.” Unlike other proposals advanced by France, the UK, and Canada, the Palestinian Authority is also excluded from the arrangements, since no Palestinian politician is worth the Israeli PM’s time. Netanyahu’s idea of a politically viable Palestinian is one manacled to the security regime of other powers.

    The stage for the next slaughter is set, namely, the dismantling of “the two remaining Hamas strongholds in Gaza City and the Central Camps. Contrary to false claims, this is the best way to end the war, and the best way to end it speedily.” Netanyahu feigns a humanitarian streak in stating that the civilian population will be allowed to “leave the combat areas to designated safe zones.” The process of ethnic cleansing, or simply cleansing of the population, is to continue.

    Oblivious to Netanyahu’s fortified wall of prejudice is the fact that much of the groundwork for precisely those outcomes he hopes to avoid has already been laid. Whether it be Hamas or any other militant organisation, the notion of pacifist subordinate figures content with their status in any territory where Israel has the last word on everything is absurdly unrealistic.

    Doing everything to make his case even less convincing, Netanyahu then told Israeli journalists after seeing the foreign scribblers off that he had never halted all humanitarian aid to Gaza. Even the patriotic Times of Israel found this a bit rich, noting that “his government had enacted that policy earlier this year.” The paper went on to quote the announcement from the premier’s office on March 2: “Prime Minister Netanyahu has decided that, as of this morning, all entry of goods and supplies into the Gaza Strip will cease.”

    Netanyahu also refused to accept the proposition that Gaza’s population was starving. Shortages in supply, yes; starvation, no. “If we had wanted starvation, if that had been our policy, 2 million Gazans wouldn’t be living today after 20 months.” The same could be said about the supreme crime of all: “if we wanted to commit genocide, it would have taken exactly one afternoon.” A wise head might have told him that few who commit genocide or engineer circumstances of mass murder ever make the intention that obvious.

    The post A Shield of Lies: Netanyahu’s Battle Against the World first appeared on Dissident Voice.

    This post was originally published on Dissident Voice.

  • This September, activist groups across five continents plan to strike two of the world’s most powerful insurance companies: AXA and AIG. Together, they are launching a powerful wave of global resistance with a synchronised campaign of disruption. The aim is to expose the companies’ role in fueling genocide, climate destruction, and social collapse.

    Under the banner ‘Insure Our Survival‘, thousands of campaigners in Africa, Europe, Asia, and the Americas will take action from 8 September. Organisers are calling the wave of action a “coordinated global backlash” against the insurance giants underwriting fossil fuel expansion
    and weapons war criminal states are using in mass atrocities – particularly in Palestine.

    AXA and AIG: insuring genocide and climate breakdown

    In the UK, the mobilisation will see a wide range of groups from across the Palestine solidarity and climate justice movements unite to kick off the two weeks of action with a two-day mass blockade of AXA’s London offices on Monday 8 and Tuesday 9 September.

    Organisers say the actions against these insurance companies will:

    Cause major reputational damage and disruption to the benefit of their competitors.

    They will expose the direct links between AXA’s corporate portfolio and both the fossil fuel projects driving climate breakdown and the arms trade sustaining Israel’s assault on Gaza.

    Multiple watchdog groups have identified AXA and AIG as major enablers of destruction. The pair profit from human rights abuses and projects that will push the world beyond
    2°C warming. All the while, they sell policies to protect against the very disasters they help worsen: floods, fires, famine, and forced displacement.

    Protests in more than 30 cities are expected. They’ll range from office shutdowns to art-led performances, and digital disruptions. Groups from over 20 countries will take part, with major actions already confirmed across five continents.

    Spokesperson for Insure Our Survival (UK) Lucy Porter said:

    AXA is complicit in genocide and ecocide. They insure the bombs that kill babies in Palestine, and bankroll fossil fuel projects that rip apart our life-support systems. From the
    Global South to the Global North, we stand together in solidarity – defending human rights, defending the future. This is a global, coordinated campaign, and we will strip AXA of its brand, its influence, and its ability to hide behind PR lies. Boycott AXA. Tell your friends, your family, your workplace: drop them now, and don’t stop until they end their war and climate crimes.

    Ugandan activist Nicholas Omonuk added:

    AIG’s refusal to drop EACOP means they back Total Energies as it uproots families, seizes farmland, poisons rivers, and unleashes more CO₂ than the entire annual emissions of Uganda. This is insurance for a carbon bomb that is already devastating our communities from Uganda to Tanzania and accelerating global climate collapse.

    Member of Global Movement to Gaza Ru said:

    From the shores of Gaza to the streets of London, we are united against the corporations that insure both climate collapse and genocide. AXA and AIG enable Israel’s blockade and bombardment, and profit from the destruction of our planet’s life support systems. We will not let them hide – we will blockade, boycott, and build a world where our futures are no longer underwritten by war.

    Boycott insurance companies and hit them where it hurts

    As part of the mobilisation, organisers are calling for a full boycott of the worst offending insurers. These include: AXA, Allianz, Aviva, Direct Line and LV= and all their sub-brands.

    Campaigners say switching policies is “quick, free, and easy” and urge consumers to:

    hit them where it hurts – their bottom line.

    They plan to send an warning to the Industry it cannot ignore. Spokesperson for Insure Our Survival (UK) Jamie Anderson said:

    With more groups joining weekly, the invisible power of insurers is now being dragged into the spotlight. Mounting evidence reveals what AXA, AIG and the other big insurers don’t have to disclose: how they use our insurance money to financially support Israel, war, arms and climate breakdown.

    To every insurer funding war and climate collapse: your customers are waking up. Change now — or be next to face the global backlash.

    Featured image supplied

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.


  • AMY GOODMAN: This is Democracy Now!, democracynow.org. I’m Amy Goodman, with Juan González.

    Global condemnation is mounting over Israel’s assassination of one of the most prominent journalists in Gaza, the Al Jazeera correspondent Anas al-Sharif, along with four of his colleagues at the network and another freelance journalist.

    UN Secretary-General António Guterres is calling for an independent investigation after the five Al Jazeera journalists were killed in a targeted Israeli strike outside Al-Shifa Hospital in a tent clearly marked in Gaza City. European Union officials and international press freedom groups have also denounced the assassinations.

    The sixth journalist, freelance reporter Mohammed al-Khalidi, was also killed in the same strike. Minutes before the strike, al-Sharif posted to X, “If this madness does not end, Gaza will be reduced to ruins, its people’s voices silenced, their faces erased — and history will remember you as silent witnesses to a genocide you chose not to stop.”

    On Monday, crowds of mourners gathered for a funeral procession for al-Sharif and his colleagues, marching from Al-Shifa to Sheikh Radwan Cemetery in central Gaza, carrying the journalists’ bodies wrapped in white sheets.

    A dark blue flak press jacket and a Palestinian flag were placed on al-Sharif’s remains. People embraced as they decried Israel’s relentless targeting of journalists in Gaza.

    Meanwhile, at rallies and vigils worldwide, people are demanding accountability for the attack on journalists, including in Tunisia, Belfast, Dublin, Berlin, London, Oslo, Stockholm and Washington, DC.

    For more, we go to Geneva, Switzerland, where we’re joined by Irene Khan, UN special Rapporteur on Freedom of Opinion and Expression. She served as secretary-general of Amnesty International from 2001 to 2009.

    Irene Khan, welcome back to Democracy Now! In late July, you publicly denounced Israel’s threats against Anas al-Sharif. Can you talk about what you understood at that time, and then this young 28-year-old reporter’s response to your press statement?

    IRENE KHAN: Yes, well, Anas actually contacted me, and Al Jazeera contacted me to tell me of this impending threat on his head. They had seen it before. He’s not the first one, as you know.

    There are some — anything between 26 to 30 journalists — who have been targeted in this campaign of assassination. And Anas wanted me to go public, he wanted others to go public, to stop what Israel was doing.

    But at the same time, he thanked me for my support, and then he said nothing would stop him from speaking the truth. And in a way, he signed his own death warrant by that, because, as you know, he and the others, Al Jazeera’s entire team in northern Gaza, were killed, murdered, just as Israel ramps up its military action on the city, Gaza City.

    So, there is a clear pattern here of killing journalists to clear the path, to silence voices, to stop the international, global opinion from being informed of the genocide in Gaza.


    Assassination: Israel’s killing of Palestinian journalist Anas al-Sharif   Video: Democracy Now!

    JUAN GONZÁLEZ: And, Irene Khan, the number of journalists — so, more than 200 have been killed in Gaza. That’s more than all the journalists killed in World War I, World War II, Korea, the Korean War, the Vietnam War and the Afghanistan War combined.

    Your sense of the Israeli impunity here in being able to basically kill the corps of journalists that are still able to report from Gaza?

    IRENE KHAN: Well, you also have to take into account that Israel has refused to give access to international media. So these are all local Gazan journalists who are putting their lives on the line to keep the world informed. Many of them — you named some 200 — many of them, of course, have been killed in the intensity of the battle. Many of them have been killed while asleep in their own apartments. But these cases, the cases of Anas now, and his colleagues, and a number of other cases of targeted killing, is really murder.

    It is not killing in the context of war. It is a deliberate strategy to stop independent voices reporting. So it’s as much a threat to independent journalism as it is to the journalists themselves, as well as a blatant attempt by the Israelis to stop the world witnessing what they are doing.

    JUAN GONZÁLEZ: And these killings also came as the Israeli government announced they’re unleashing a new operation in the area of Gaza. Who will be left to document this operation now?

    IRENE KHAN: Well, absolutely. And that is why Anas got in touch with me, because he realised what was happening. You know, from his message on LinkedIn and from his message that he has sent to me and to others, it was very, very clear.

    He has been there on the ground since October 2023. He could see the pattern. He could see what was happening. He knew they were coming for him.

    And that is why it is incumbent on all of us now not to just condemn, but actually to act, before independent media is totally obliterated from Gaza.

    AMY GOODMAN: Irene Khan, I want to ask what you’re calling for, and the significance of Netanyahu holding this news conference on Sunday and saying — he has now said that the Israeli military can bring in journalists, but they’re most concerned about protecting their safety.

    A few hours later is when Israel assassinated these six journalists. Now, it is the first time, NPR reports, since October 2023 that Israel so quickly took responsibility for their assassination.

    You know, compare it to Shireen Abu Akleh, May 11, 2022, when Israel said it was not clear, and then, you know, so many studies were done, but it became very clear. Talk about what you are calling for at this point.

    IRENE KHAN: It’s not actually an admission of taking responsibility, because there is no accountability in it. It’s actually a brazen attempt to show the world that the Israeli army can work as it wishes, regardless of international humanitarian law that protects journalists as civilians.

    Now, what I’m calling for is, of course, independent investigation, truly independent investigation. But I’m also calling for protection of journalists on the ground and for access to international journalists.

    Israel always covers these assassinations and murders with allegations and smear campaigns — the journalists are simply agents of Hamas or members of Hamas — and that kind of gives Israel a veil of impunity.

    It’s important for international journalists to be on the ground so they can actually investigate and expose this false story and the string of assassinations that Israel is carrying out.

    And I think we need to remember the message that Israel’s action is sending to the rest of the world, because there are other spots, other conflict areas, where also others are learning that you need to be just brazen and go ahead and kill journalists, and you can get away with it.

    AMY GOODMAN: Irene Khan, we’re speaking to you in Geneva, Switzerland — Geneva, the Geneva Conventions. Can you talk about how the conventions specifically protect journalists?

    IRENE KHAN: Well, the convention gives journalists civilian status, which means that, like all other civilians, they should not be targeted during the war.

    The problem is the journalists are not just civilians. They are the kind of civilians that have to go to the frontline and not run away somewhere else. You know, they are not like women and children, who can move and seek shelter elsewhere.

    They have to be where the fighting is. And that exposes them. They are much more like humanitarian workers. And journalists need to be recognised as humanitarian workers. There needs to be — I believe there needs to be additional protection given to them, because it shows how vulnerable they are, on the one hand, to attacks, and, on the other hand, how important their work is to the rest of the world, to any peace process, to any attempt to have accountability and justice for the victims.

    JUAN GONZÁLEZ: Last month, the union representing reporters at the French press agency AFP warned that the agency staff were in danger of starving to death, and they issued an open letter condemning what Israel was doing in terms of denying food, not just to the population in general, but also to journalists, as well.

    Your response?

    IRENE KHAN: Well, absolutely. These journalists are local journalists, as I said, so they have faced all the problems that the population is facing. They’ve had their own families killed. They have to hunt for food, even as they hunt for news.

    So, they have been put in a terrible situation. And that’s why Israel has to open the gates, not under military protection, but allow journalists independently to come and investigate. It has to stop the starvation, the blockade. It has to allow humanitarian assistance to come in. And it has to agree to a ceasefire and, of course, stop the genocide.

    AMY GOODMAN: I want to end with the words of Anas al-Sharif himself. Anticipating his own murder by Israeli forces, he wrote a preprepared message that was posted on his X account after his death. Al Jazeera read part of his message on air.

    AL JAZEERA REPORTER: “If these words reach you, know that Israel has succeeded in killing me and silencing my voice, I have lived through pain in all its details, tasted suffering and loss many times, yet I never once hesitated to convey the truth as it is, without distortion or falsification, so that God may bear witness against those who stayed silent and accepted our killing.”

    He ends, “Do not forget Gaza… And do not forget me in your sincere prayers for forgiveness and acceptance.”

    AMY GOODMAN: The words of Anas al-Sharif, posted after he was killed by the Israeli military along with five other journalists. Five of them were with Al Jazeera.

    Irene Khan, I want to thank you so much for being with us, UN Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Opinion and Expression, speaking to us from Geneva, Switzerland. To see our interview with the managing editor of Al Jazeera, go to democracynow.org.

    Democracy Now! is produced with Mike Burke, Renée Feltz, Deena Guzder, Messiah Rhodes, Nermeen Shaikh, María Taracena, Nicole Salazar, Sara Nasser, Charina Nadura, Sam Alcoff, Tey-Marie Astudillo, John Hamilton, Robby Karran, Hany Massoud, Safwat Nazzal. Our executive director is Julie Crosby.

    I’m Amy Goodman, with Juan González, for another edition of Democracy Now!

    The original content of this programme is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States Licence.

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • By Tuwhenuaroa Natanahira, RNZ Māori news journalist in Parliament

    New Zealand’s Prime Minister says the war in Gaza is “utterly appalling” and Israeil Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has “lost the plot”.

    Prime Minister Christopher Luxon’s comments came on a tense day in Parliament today, where the Green Party’s co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick was “named” for refusing to leave the House following a heated debate on the government’s plan to consider recognising Palestinian statehood.

    Speaking to media, Luxon said Netanyahu had “gone too far”.

    “I think he has lost the plot and I think that what we’re seeing overnight — the attack on Gaza City — is utterly, utterly unacceptable,” he said.

    Luxon said Israel had consistently ignored pleas from the international community for humanitarian aid to be delivered “unfettered” and the situation was driving more human catastrophe across Gaza.

    “We are a small country a long way away, with very limited trade with Israel. We have very little connection with the country, but we have stood up for values, and we keep articulating them very consistently, and what you have seen is Israel not listening to the global community at all,” Luxon said.

    “We have said a forcible displacement of people and an annexation of Gaza would be a breach of international law. We have called these things out consistently time and time again.

    “You’ve seen New Zealand join many of our friends and partners around the world to make these statements, and he’s just not listening,” the Prime Minister said.

    Considering statehood
    The government is considering whether it will join other countries like France, Canada and Australia in recognising Palestinian statehood at a UN Leader’s Meeting next month.

    Luxon said recent attacks could “extinguish a pathway” to a two-state solution.

    “I’m telling you what my personal view is, as a human being, looking at the situation, that’s how I feel about,” he said.

    Opposition Labour Leader Chris Hipkins has called the war an “unfolding genocide”, echoing the comments made by former prime minister Helen Clark, who visited the Rafah border crossing between Egypt and the Palestinian territory this week. as part of The Elders’ delegation.

    “She’s used the words ‘unfolding genocide’, and yes, I do agree with that. That’s a good description of the situation at the moment.”

    Hipkins said calling it an “unfolding genocide” meant that New Zealand was not “appointing ourselves judge and jury” because there was still a case to be heard before the International Court of Justice (ICJ).

    “Recognising that there is an unfolding genocide in Gaza is an important part of the world community standing up and saying, we’re not going to tolerate it.

    “We should recognise that there is now a growing acknowledgement around the world that there is an unfolding genocide in Gaza, and I think we should call that for what it is, and the world community needs to react to that to prevent it from happening,” Hipkins said.

    This article is republished under a community partnership agreement with RNZ.

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • By Niva Chittock, RNZ News WorldWatch presenter/producer

    Former New Zealand prime minister Helen Clark says she has witnessed Israel deliberately obstructing life-saving humanitarian aid into Gaza.

    Together with former Irish president Mary Robinson, Clark visited the Rafah border crossing between Egypt and the Palestinian territory this week.

    The two former world leaders are part of The Elders, an independent, non-government organisation of global leaders working together for peace, justice, human rights and sustainability.

    The group has regularly spoken out about the situation in Gaza since Israel announced war on Hamas in October 2023.


    Their joint statement said they saw evidence of food and medical aid being denied entry to Gaza, “causing mass starvation to spread”.

    “What we saw and heard underlines our personal conviction that there is not only an unfolding, human-caused famine in Gaza, there is an unfolding genocide,” the statement said.

    “The deliberate destruction of health facilities in Gaza means children facing acute malnutrition cannot be treated effectively.”

    At least 36 Palestinian children starved to death last month, they said.

    Israel has repeatedly denied famine and genocide were happening in Gaza.

    Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said this week that if his army had a policy of starvation “no one would be alive two years into the war”.

    Figures disputed
    Israel also disputed the figures provided by authorities in the Palestinian territory, but had not provided its own.

    No shelter materials had entered Gaza since March this year, the statement said, leaving families already displaced multiple times without protection.

    Former Irish President Mary Robinson and former New Zealand Prime Minister Helen Clark visiting the Rafah border crossing.
    Former Irish president Mary Robinson and former New Zealand prime minister Helen Clark have visited the Rafah border crossing. Image: The Elders/RNZ

    “Many new mothers are unable to feed themselves or their new-born babies adequately, and the health system is collapsing,” Clark said.

    “All of this threatens the very survival of an entire generation,” she said.

    ‘Truth matters’
    “The uncomfortable truth is that many states are prioritising their own economic and security interests, even as the world is reeling from the images of Gazan children starving to death,” Robinson said.

    “Political leaders have the power and the legal obligation to apply measures to pressure this Israeli government to end its atrocity crimes.”

    “This is all the more urgent in light of Prime Minister Netanyahu’s Gaza City takeover plan. President Trump has the leverage to compel a change of course. He must use it now,” she said.

    Hamas authorities said Israeli air attacks had increased in recent days as the Israel Defence Force (IDF) prepared to take over Gaza City, home to some one million Palestinians.

    Netanyahu had defended his plan, saying the best option to defeat Hamas was to take the city by force.

    The plan has been heavily criticised by Israelis, Palestinians, international organisations and other countries.

    Israel has repeatedly denied famine and genocide were happening in Gaza.
    Israel has repeatedly denied famine and genocide were happening in Gaza. Image: The Elders/RNZ

    ‘Re-engage’ ceasefire talks
    Robinson and Clark urged Hamas and Israel to re-engage in ceasefire talks and immediately release Israeli hostages and arbitrarily detained Palestinian prisoners, and for Israel to immediately open all border crossings into Gaza.

    They also called for states to suspend existing and future trade agreements with Israel, as well as the transfer of arms and weapons to Israel, urging the world to follow the lead of Germany and Norway.

    Norway’s Sovereign Wealth Fund divested from Israeli firms linked to violations of international law this week, while Germany’s chancellor suspended exports of arms to Israel.

    “We call for recognition of the State of Palestine by at least 20 more states by September, including G7 members, EU member states and others,” their joint statement said.

    Australia was the latest to announce it would made the decree at a UN General Assembly next month if its conditions were met, following in the footsteps of Canada, France and the UK.

    At least 20 countries had on Wednesday called for aid to urgently be released into Gaza, saying suffering in the Palestinian territory had reached “unimaginable” levels.

    New Zealand was not among them, and had not yet made any pledge to recognise a Palestinian state, but the government said it was a matter of “when not if” it would.

    This article is republished under a community partnership agreement with RNZ.

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • Pacific Media Watch

    Australia’s Media, Entertainment and Arts Alliance has condemned the continued targeted killing of media workers in Gaza and the baseless smearing of working journalists as “terrorists”, following the deaths of five Al Jazeera staff over the weekend.

    Al Jazeera journalists Anas Al Sharif and Mohammed Qreiqeh, and camera operators Ibrahim Zaher, Mohammed Noufal, and assistant Moamen Aliwa were killed on Sunday when Israel bombed a tent housing journalists in Gaza City, near Al-Shifa Hospital.

    Shockingly, the Israeli military confirmed the targeted killing on social media, with a post to X accompanied by a target emoji.

    The latest deaths come after Israel had conducted a long smear campaign of unsubstantiated allegations against Al Sharif and other journalists, labelling them “Hamas and Islamic Jihad terrorists”, which the International Federation of Journalists has condemned.

    As Al Jazeera has said, this was a “dangerous attempt to justify the targeting of journalists in the field”.

    “Tragically, these warnings have now come to fruition,” the MEAA said in a statement.

    “The targeting of journalists is a blatant attack on press freedom, and it is also a war crime.

    “It must stop.”

    Call for ‘unfettered coverage’
    MEAA also said the Israeli ban preventing the world’s media from accessing the region and providing unfettered coverage of the worsening humanitarian crisis must stop.

    The silencing of Palestinian journalists via a rising death toll that the Gaza Media Office puts at 242 must also stop, the union said.

    “In his final words, Al-Sharif said he never hesitated for a single day to convey the truth as it is — without distortion or falsification,” said MEAA

    “His reports brought to the world the reality of the horrors being inflicted by the Israeli government on the civilians in Gaza.

    “He asked the world to not forget Gaza and to not forget him.”

    MEAA said it stood up against attacks on press freedom around the world.

    • Pacific Media Watch says there has been no equivalent condemnation by New Zealand journalists, who have mostly remained silent during the 22 months of Israel’s war on Gaza.


    This content originally appeared on Asia Pacific Report and was authored by Pacific Media Watch.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • “I was in Auschwitz 6-7 weeks ago,” world-renowned author and physician Dr. Gabor Maté says, “at the very spot where my grandparents landed, before they were sent to the gas chambers, where my mother and I almost ended up in June of 1945. We came very close. And nothing in the world ever resembles the horror of Auschwitz, but the spirit of it, the inhumanity, the cruelty of it, the starving of people, the killing of starving people—that’s going on right now, and the world is watching.” In this urgent installment of our ongoing series “Not in Our Name” on The Marc Steiner Show, Marc speaks with Dr. Maté about growing up Jewish in the wake of the Holocaust and being Jewish in the midst of Israel’s genocide of Palestinians in Gaza.

    Guest:

    Additional resources:

    Credits:

    • Producer: Rosette Sewali
    • Studio Production: Cameron Granadino
    • Audio Post-Production: Stephen Frank
    Transcript

    The following is a rushed transcript and may contain errors. A proofread version will be made available as soon as possible.

    Marc Steiner:

    Welcome to the Marc Steiner Show here on The Real News. I’m Marc Steiner. It’s great to have you all with us once again.

    My guest today is Dr. Gabor Maté. He’s a physician that was born in Hungary amidst the Holocaust. Family members were killed, imprisoned, and he was sent to live with others to save his young life. His life is dedicated as a physician, a healer, an author, a speaker, an activist addressing the trauma of life, war, and oppression. He’s the author of numerous books, which we’ll link to, and we’re going to talk a bit about an essay he wrote in 2014: “Beautiful Dream of Israel has Become a Nightmare”, and he’s written a more recent one for Toronto Star, and joins us now this conversation.

    And Gabor, welcome back. Good to have you on The Real News.

    Gabor Maté:

    Hi, Marc. Hi.

    Marc Steiner:

    So one of the things that I was thinking a lot about with your coming on the program today and the work that you’ve done in the past is something I’ve been wrestling with, which is how the oppressed become the oppressor. And there’s no better example in our world today than Israel, a place you and I both grew up loving as young Zionists, but switched. What is that dynamic that allows us to become one of the most vicious oppressors on the planet?

    Gabor Maté:

    There’s nothing unusual about that. It happens all the time. People that are severely traumatized often become traumatizers themselves. Men who are abused in childhood often become abusers. Women who are abused often become abusers of their children. So when that trauma is not worked through, not grieved, and not healed, then it’s very common for it to be passed on then to somebody else who’s vulnerable. People then try to deal with their own vulnerability that they’re terrified by by becoming powerful and inflicting pain on somebody else.

    Marc Steiner:

    And this becomes a collective trauma. I mean, right?

    Gabor Maté:

    It can happen both individually, it can happen collectively. Now, it’s certainly true that in 1948, some of the Israeli soldiers who massacred Palestinians, they perceived themselves as fighting against just another antisemitic enemy, one such as they just escaped from in Europe. But you know, Marc, there’s only so far that I want to go in ascribing psychological causes only by themselves to a historical phenomenon.

    Now, it’s certainly true that we have the sad spectacle not just of what’s happening over there, but around the world, how our fellow Jews are not believing it, denying it, or even justifying it. And yes, the psychological base of that is a traumatized, victimized sense of self. And so that the support for Israel and the denial of Israel’s brutal oppression of the Palestinians come out of deep Jewish pain and kind of a transference of that pain outward. That’s true. But that by itself does not explain what’s happening in the Middle East. You can’t understand what’s happening there without also looking at the larger question of Western colonialism, Western imperialism, and the force of the imperial powers without which Israel would not even exist. And, as The Wall Street Journal quoted an American official saying two or three days ago, that without the United States, Israel is nothing. And so that we’re not just talking about psychological dynamics here. That explains some of the attitudes, but it doesn’t by itself explain the events.

    Marc Steiner:

    So let’s talk about that for a moment, though. So, we are witnessing, there’s something that came out post Holocaust, Jews denied but then allowed entry into Palestine, took over the country. And, as I think people have described earlier, Jews were made into a beachhead for American imperialism, in many ways, in the Middle East.

    Gabor Maté:

    It did not begin after the Holocaust, it began in the 19th century. The Zionist movement first arose, it actually began with Christian Zionists. Before there were Jewish Zionists, there were Christians who believe that the Jews need to go back to Palestine to fulfill the prophecies. And that was very powerful in Britain, number one. Number two, the Jewish colonization, the modern Jewish, there have always been Jews living in the Holy Land, in Palestine, always, but they’re living in peace with the local population. They were part of the Middle East, the Mizrahi Jews.

    But in terms of Western Jews from Europe coming there, that started in the 19th century, late 19th century. It was called colonial. They called themselves colonists, and [did] what colonists do. And so they bought land from absentee landlords, and then they kicked off the population of those lands. And there were Jews who then said, there were Jewish thinkers who [in the] late 19th century said that if this continues, all we’re going to do is create one small Levantine people tormenting another Levantine people. So this process goes back to the 19th century.

    As far as the imperial interference is concerned, it was 1917 that the antisemitic British foreign secretary [Arthur] Balfour, who, in 1905, when Jews were being massacred in Ukraine and Russia, who was against Jewish immigration to save these Jews, the same guy, in 1917, issues the Balfour Declaration. And in 1920, Winston Churchill, that great democrat imperialist, says that the establishment of a Jewish entity in Palestine accords with the best interest of the British Empire. And that’s what allowed the Jews to come in from Europe before the Holocaust. After the war, as the British Empire wanes and the American empire waxes, rises, then that becomes the dominant. But the imperial project was one without which Israel could never have been established.

    So what I’m talking about here is not just the question of antisemitism and the horrors of the Holocaust and the reaction to that. It goes back to Eastern European antisemitism, but it also goes back to the interests of the great powers that was served by the Jewish colonial movement. That’s why I’m hesitant just to explain everything in terms of trauma and trauma response. Yeah, that’s there, and it explains a lot about attitudes, but it doesn’t explain the events, not by themselves.

    Marc Steiner:

    That historical perspective is critical. That takes us to what we face today at this very moment. I interviewed earlier today doctors in Gaza, and what they’re describing. And I think this, in some ways — And maybe you’ll dissuade us or take it even deeper — I think we’re facing a very dangerous, critical moment, probably the most I’ve seen in my lifetime when it comes to Israel-Palestine and what this right-wing Israeli government is doing, what’s happening in Gaza, the absolute slaughter that’s taking place in Gaza now. So I’m curious where you think, in your analytical perspective, where this could be taking us.

    Gabor Maté:

    Well, you have a situation today where 31 leading Israeli figures, including a former attorney general, a former speaker of the Knesset, are calling for dire sanctions against their own country.

    Marc Steiner:

    I saw that just before I walked into the studio to talk to you.

    Gabor Maté:

    To stop the horror.

    And then we have Jewish figures in America denying that the starvation is even taking place, and non-Jewish figures. So on the one hand, we have this horrible reality, and then we have even the denial of that reality. So, it’s such a strange situation, and it is the worst thing I’ve seen in my whole life.

    I was in Auschwitz six weeks, six, seven weeks ago, at the very spot where my grandparents landed before they were sent to the gas chambers where my mother and I, me as an infant, and my mother and I almost ended up in June of 1945. We came very close. And nothing in the world ever resembles the horror of Auschwitz, but the spirit of it, the inhumanity, the cruelty of it, the starving of people, the killing of starving people, that’s going on right now and the world is watching now.

    Where’s this going? Everybody talks about Netanyahu and the right-wing government. It’s not about Netanyahu. Netanyahu didn’t start the settlements. Netanyahu didn’t start the project of expansion. Netanyahu didn’t start the occupation. That was started by the left wing of the Zionist strain in Israel, by the labor movement. And so it’s not about Netanyahu, it’s not about this particular right-wing government. This right-wing government is just a logical extension, the logical outcome of the inevitable progression of the Zionist project.

    Once you decide that this country belongs to me and not to the people that live here or have lived here for hundreds of years, once you decide that Marc Steiner and Gabor Maté have the right to go there tomorrow and get land on the West Bank the day after and be citizens and be given rights and the people living there have no rights whatsoever, once you make that decision, Gaza is inevitable.

    And Primo Levi, the great Jewish writer, and he writes in his book, If This is a Man, or the American title is Survival in Auschwitz, he said that once you decide that the other is the enemy, then the lager is inevitable, the concentration camp is inevitable. What are they doing in Gaza right now, Gaza has been called, by Israelis, the world’s largest concentration camp.

    So where is this going depends very much on what the world, and particularly the United States, is willing to put up with. Because the Zionist logic is driving the Palestinians out of the West Bank, out of Gaza, out of their homes. This happens every day in the West Bank. We barely even talk about it. We keep talking about Gaza, as we should, we don’t talk about it enough, but in the West Bank is going on every day as well. So where’s that going? That’s where it’s going. It’s going to ethnic cleansing and, if necessary, mass killing. And that’s been going on for 80 years now. That’s where it’s going unless somebody stops it.

    The only people in a position to stop it are the Americans, and so far they have funded it, cheerleaded, it justified it, protected it, denied it, enabled it. So it all depends on what the US is willing to put up with and what it’s not willing to put up with, and right now the outlook is not good. So I don’t have high hopes for any kind of a just resolution.

    Marc Steiner:

    It seems to me, clearly the Democrats said nothing, what’s in the White House now will clearly not do anything to stand in the way of what Israel is doing. It makes me think that we are on a really dangerous international precipice for this beyond Israel-Palestine.

    Gabor Maté:

    What makes you say that?

    Marc Steiner:

    Because you see across the globe a right-wing surge politically, and this is one of the pinnacles, and one of the ones that’s [inaudible] of life at the moment. And it’s this weird, to me, confluence of this absolute oppression that Israelis are perpetrating on Palestinians that also bubbles up the hidden antisemitism that’s always there underneath just waiting to arise. And as I wrote the other day, this may be the first time in the history of Jews that we have caused it to bubble up.

    Gabor Maté:

    Well, there have been studies that have shown every time the Israeli defense forces, so-called, go into action, anti-Jewish sentiment rises. And now the Israelis say that’s because Jews are not supposed to defend themselves. No, it isn’t. It’s because when you massacre people and you torture them and you jail them, and when you starve them, and when you oppress them, when you demolish their homes, when you destroy their wells, when you burn down their olive trees, and then you send in the army… There was an article in Haaretz, the Israeli newspaper, yesterday. During the Iran war, the brief war with Iran, the Israeli army occupied some homes in the West Bank — Not Jewish homes, of course, Palestinian homes.

    When they left, they left excrement in the cooking pots. When the world sees this, and then the Israeli government says, we’re doing this in the name of the Jewish people, and hundreds and thousands of rabbis around the world say they’re doing this in the name of the Jewish people, and the Anti-Defamation League, B’nai B’rith, and all manner of Jewish institutions say, Israel is acting in the name and the defense of the Jewish people, then what [is] the world supposed to think about the Jewish people? And then we complain about the rise of antisemitism.

    No, there is antisemitism that has nothing to do with what Israel does or doesn’t do. There’s antisemitism with people who just hate Jews, just like there is anti-Black sentiment, which has nothing to do with anything Blacks have ever done or not done, or anti-Asian. So there’s a rise in racism all around the world. But in terms of the rise of anti-Jewish sentiment, consider that that’s at least in significant degree an outcome of horrific acts being committed in the name of the Jewish people, and justified by Jewish leaders as happening in the name of the Jewish people. Of course, that’s not true. You and I are Jewish people, they’re not doing this in our name, but they say they are. So if the average person believes them, who’s to blame them?

    Marc Steiner:

    So how important and significant do you think this rising movement of Jews, not in our name here in this country and across the globe, is in terms of the struggle that we’re facing now? Do you see it analytically as significant? Does it have a role to play? What’s your analysis of this movement and where it takes us?

    Gabor Maté:

    Well, it’s morally significant for sure. And there’s always been a strain in Jewish tradition that was a prophetic tradition that said that the state and the king and the rulers and the chauvinism, they’re not the high values. The high values are the godly virtues of justice and mercy. So there’s always been that Jewish strain, thank God. And so what we are seeing now is a requisiteness of that strain of Jewish culture in response to the horrors, and it’s very significant.

    But of course, the fact that 1,300 Israeli academics have called Israel’s actions war crimes, the fact that Israeli Jewish scholars of Holocaust have called what Israel is during genocide, the fact that, within the last two days, B’Tselem, the Israeli civil human rights organization, and Israeli Physicians for Human Rights have said that what’s happening right now in Gaza is genocide, these are Jews, Israeli Jews saying this, that by itself won’t stop anything because politically, Jews in the United States who criticize Israel get fired from their academic jobs. In Canada, doctors who speak out against the torture of Palestinian doctors get fired. In other words, what I’m saying is there’s a system in place here that neutralizes, at least temporarily, it doesn’t matter how many beautiful Jewish voices speak out, how much morality, how much ethical outrage and concern many Jews have expressed — And they have. That does not affect the politics… So far.

    Marc Steiner:

    So far. I can’t even count the number of times over the decades that I’ve been called a Judenrat in public or in public gatherings when we speak.

    Gabor Maté:

    Oh yeah, well, you know, I’m a self-hating Jew, I’m a [inaudible], I’m a victim of the Stockholm Syndrome, whatever the hell anybody thinks that is [Steiner laughs]. But there’s got to be some twisted psychological explanation for why any Jew would speak out against Jewish-committed injustice because they can’t argue with the facts, they can’t argue with the reality, so they have to disparage and invalidate the person. So that’s why we get called these names. That’s the cost of living, you might say.

    Marc Steiner:

    [Laughs] It is. As we were going at the start of this conversation, you talked about what’s happening in Canada right now. Talk a bit about that. I hadn’t heard of it, I’m sure people listening to us have not heard of it.

    Gabor Maté:

    Well, Canada, that’s supposed to be this sane alternative to the US. That’s rather exaggerated. Now compared to the US, almost anybody looks sane [Steiner laughs], so it’s an easy mistake to fall into. But let’s look at one thing only. Canada, in a few months, processed 1 million Ukrainian immigration visas, Ukrainians who were escaping from the war. In a few months, they processed a million. In three years, Canada has not processed 5,000 visas from Gaza.

    This is not to take anything away from Ukrainians suffering. But if you look at the actual situation and threat to Ukrainian civilians, it’s not anything compared to the threat and the suffering experienced by Gazan civilians. And it’s not that Canada should not have processed those Ukrainian visas. Of course it should have, in the name of humanity. But what do you say about a country that can’t even process 5,000 Gazan visas?

    And in Canada, physicians, medical personnel who ahve spoken out against the torture of Palestinian doctors, which is documented, and the death in captivity of Palestinian medical personnel, and the attacks on the hospital, and the deliberate assassinations of physicians, in Canada, medical people who speak out against that are fired or come under threat. So that’s Canada. We talk a very pretty game sometimes, but in practice, we’re in lockstep with the rest of the Western colonial world.

    Marc Steiner:

    That’s something that, only as we were starting, that I didn’t realize was happening, and I was, in my naivete, maybe was shocked.

    So I wonder, as we conclude together today, in all the years you’ve been covering trauma, in all the years you’ve been talking about this issue and more, and when none of us are prescient, but I wrestle a lot with where all this is taking us, the world we’re sitting in right at this moment. We’re watching what Israel is doing to the Palestinian people in Gaza and in the West Bank to Palestinians. But we’re seeing, as I said earlier, this rise in the right across the globe. And I’m curious what you’re thinking about in terms of where this may be taking us and how we confront it.

    Gabor Maté:

    Well, the world goes through these cycles, so we have to take a long-term view here. We’ve seen before the rise of right-wing dictatorships, haven’t we? We have also seen the cowardice and the acquiescence and the collaboration of the so-called democratic West with those right-wing regimes. We’ve seen as democratic West foster and foment right-wing dictatorships all across Latin America, or in the 1930s in Germany, and in Spain, and in Portugal. We have seen the West allow fascist Italy to trample Ethiopia into the dust. We’ve seen this before.

    We’ve also seen, at the same time as all those things are happening, people fighting against that, people trying to make a difference, people putting themselves on the line, people forming movements. And we’re seeing that now. So that Gaza has been a huge wake-up call for billions of people, hundreds of millions of people across the world, including in North America, including Americans who believe in the American dream, and they have this ideal of the American Constitution. This former Green Beret, lieutenant colonel who recently resigned from the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation and talked about the crimes against, the atrocities, that his people, the organization were committing. And he says, I believe in the US Constitution, and that’s why I’m opposing what’s going on. And so, people are waking up.

    So, we’re seeing both the spread of right wing and the rise of right-wing dynamics around the world. We’re also seeing an increasing number of people waking up and standing against it. Ultimately, how history will decide, I can’t predict. I’m just saying I’m seeing both trends, and the only question is not what’s going to happen in the long term, nobody knows, it’s where do we stand today? Where does each one of us stand today? That’s the only decision that’s in front of us.

    Marc Steiner:

    And I do see a lot of hope in these movements that, here in Baltimore, every time there’s a demonstration sponsored by a younger Jewish generation opposing what’s happening, the numbers get larger and larger.

    Gabor Maté:

    Yeah. Well, that’s wonderful. That’s really wonderful. I just want to make one more comment, if I could.

    Marc Steiner:

    Please do.

    Gabor Maté:

    How should I say this politely?

    Marc Steiner:

    Don’t worry about it [laughs].

    Gabor Maté:

    It’s a bit of an obscenity that I’m asked so much to speak on this subject because I happen to be Jewish and because I happened to be, as an infant, to have survived the Holocaust. Why does that make me any kind of a special authority? If you consider the Holocaust, was the Holocaust validated because Germans came and said, I’m a German and I’m against this? Or did we believe the victims?

    Why aren’t we listening to the Palestinians as they tell their stories, as they recount their history, as they tell you about their dire, horrible experiences for decades and decades in [Gaza]? What gives me, or for you, for that matter, any kind of authority? Because we’re Jewish? I mean, I understand it, I understand that, OK, here are Jews talking about it, so let’s listen. But I’m telling you, it’s a bit of an obscenity that voices like mine are listened to more than the authentic voices of the people who are experiencing this horror. Those are the voices we should be listening to. So as much as I appreciate any opportunity [to talk] about the subject, I’m saying there’s something out of balance here.

    Marc Steiner:

    That’s really, really a very critically important comment, statement to make.

    Gabor Maté:

    Thank you.

    Marc Steiner:

    We have to uplift these Palestinian voices now.

    Gabor Maté:

    Absolutely.

    Marc Steiner:

    That we try to do here and we’ll continue to do. I think that’s really critical. I think it was a little wake up call, too, for me. Spending so much time talking about Jews dries up. It’s important to really understand who needs to be heard.

    Gabor Maté:

    It’s not about us right now.

    Marc Steiner:

    No, it’s not about us. It’s not about us.

    Well, Gabor Maté, I want to thank you once again. It’s always insightfully interesting and good to talk with you. I appreciate the work you do, your taking the time with us, and maybe the next time we meet, we’ll have a panel with Palestinians and Israelis and Jews, we’ll all talk together, which I think would be important to do.

    Gabor Maté:

    Thanks for having me.

    Marc Steiner:

    Thank you so much.

    And once again, let me thank Gabor Maté for joining us today. And thanks to Cameron Granadino for running the program, Stephen Frank for editing today’s broadcast, Rosette Sewali for producing The Marc Steiner Show and bringing these guests to us, and the tireless Kayla Rivara for making it all work behind the scenes, And everyone here at The Real News for making this show possible.

    Please let me know what you thought about what you heard today, what you’d like us to cover. Just write to me at mss@therealnews.com and I’ll get right back to you.

    Once again, thank you to Dr. Gabor Maté, and we’ll be linking to his work and more. So for the crew here at The Real News, I’m Marc Steiner. Stay involved, keep listening, and take care.

    This post was originally published on The Real News Network.

  • Mourners have carried out the funerals of assassinated Palestinian journalists in Gaza. Horrifying footage has shown journalists ripped to pieces, covered in blood and body parts, and later in white funeral shrouds stained with blood. Israel’s repeated attacks on journalists are the height of impunity, and a brutal attempt to remove the people reporting on the genocide of their own people.

    However, in remarks that are characteristic of a bloated and rotting Western media system, veteran journalist John Simpson said last week:

    The world needs honest, unbiased eyewitness reporting to help people make up their minds about the major issues of our time. This has so far been impossible in Gaza. Journalists around the world should support calls for reporters to be allowed into Gaza.

    Anyone who is yet to ‘make up their minds’ about Israel’s genocide in Gaza is an ignorant and immoral fuckwit. How many more internationally renowned organisations need to declare genocide? How many UN experts need to explain over and over again that Israel is committing war crimes? That it is purposely targeting journalists and their families?

    Palestinian journalists are journalists

    Of course, we all know what Simpson means when he calls for:

    honest, unbiased eyewitness reporting.

    He means Western journalists – those unbiased and diligent reporters who’ve….erm…ignored Israel’s genocide for years now. Simpson implicitly rejects the Palestinian journalists who’ve risked their lives to livestream the genocide of their own people. And, in doing so, he upholds the rotting edifice of Western journalism: objectivity.

    It should be understood as a standard of a bygone time, but, Westerners cling to the facade of objectivity with the desperation of children grasping for certainty and meaning. After all, who could understand the behemoth of a killing machine that Israel has built, without understanding settler colonialism, white supremacy, and the military industrial complex? In that situation, who wouldn’t cling to the lie of Western objectivity as some kind of standard for reporting? A comforting lie, if nothing else.

    It takes a truly evil – and colonial – outlook to consider that Palestinian journalists who have been killed for their journalistic efforts are somehow ‘biased.’ Simpson’s dismissal of Palestinian journalism is an implicit demand for anyone who isn’t Palestinian – and therefore ‘biased’ – to report on the genocide.

    Neutrality

    Why? Who could be trusted more than the people who are being exterminated to report on what they see? Simpson’s remarks are the sometimes unspoken but always heavy assumptions about who can be trusted. Who can be believed? Being white and from the West are synonyms for neutrality and being unbiased: for trust. After all, how could the East ever spit out a decent journalist from a population of savages and uncivilised brutes?

    Just yesterday, Palestinians in Gaza carried out the funerals of the journalists who have pushed through unimaginable trauma and bloodshed to do their jobs. Along with Anas Al-Sharif, Al Jazeera reported that the funerals of more of their reporters were carried out:

    The strike late on Sunday killed seven people, including correspondent Mohammed Qreiqeh, along with camera operators Ibrahim Zaher, Moamen Aliwa, and Mohammed Noufal. Freelance reporter Mohammed al-Khaldi was also among those killed. Reporters Without Borders (RSF) said three more journalists were wounded in the attack.

    At least 238 journalists have been killed since late 2023. As the Canary’s Palestinian correspondent, Alaa Shamali wrote, journalists like Anas Al-Sharif are more than just reporters:

    Anas Al-Sharif was not just a reporter conveying cold news, but a messenger of truth from Gaza to the world. He knew that the camera could be a reason for him to be targeted, but he believed that the lens was the most powerful weapon to break the wall of silence. He climbed rooftops, searched for internet signals in the corners of hospitals, and cut through destroyed streets to film hungry children and mothers searching for bread amid the rubble.

    Shamali continued:

    With his execution at the hands of Israel, Gaza has lost more than a journalist; it has lost a witness who carried its pain on his shoulders, and a bridge connecting its alleys to the eyes of the world. His reports remain in the archives, but they are not mere media material; they are fragments of the spirit of a city that continues to struggle for life.

    Heartbreaking losses

    Simpson’s comments represent a prevailing belief across Western countries that Palestinians cannot speak for themselves, and certainly cannot do so to the lofty standards of Western corporate media. It is unspeakably horrific to see Anas’ lifeless body covered in ashes, deformed by the blast that killed him, his flesh still glowing from the embers of his slaughter. The screams of bystanders as they realise more of their people are assassinated by the Zionists. The stillness of Anas’ body as his head flops to the side, weighted and weightless. His press vest reduced to bloody tatters.

    The world is used to seeing him reporting on the genocide of his people, both in spite of and because of his fear, heartbreak, grief, and terror of Israel’s genocide. And, the world is too used to seeing Palestinians torn limb from limb, and doing nothing. It’s not enough for a bloodthirsty West that Palestinians are seen in their most terrifying moments, bodies and bodies and bodies piling up. So extensive is the dehumanisation of Palestinians that Western standards of truth, honesty, and good journalism are so warped as to twist the knife of Palestinians whether dead, alive, or dying.

    Anyone who can be ‘objective’ or ‘unbiased’ about this is fucking lying.

    Featured image via YouTube screenshot/ABC News (Australia)

    By Maryam Jameela

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Israeli forces’ killing of four Al Jazeera journalists and two freelance journalists on Sunday is part of Israel’s “deliberate” campaign to eliminate and silence any potential witnesses to its “live-streamed genocide” in Gaza, especially ahead of its upcoming siege and ethnic cleansing of Gaza City, UN experts have warned. In a statement released Tuesday, UN Special Rapporteur for the freedom…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • When it comes to recognising Palestinian statehood, the UK and US seem unable to grasp what their solemn obligations are. Fortunately, UN Resolution 37/43 of December 1982 is there to help.

    It comprehensively reaffirms previous resolutions and treaties on the universal right to self-determination and the speedy granting of independence to colonial countries and peoples to provide an effective guarantee that human rights may be observed. And note the words “speedy granting”. Palestinians have been kept waiting for over 100 years for an effective guarantee of their human rights.

    37/43 considers that denying the Palestinian people their inalienable rights to self-determination, sovereignty, independence, and return to Palestine, and the repeated acts of aggression by Israel against the peoples of the region, constitute a serious threat to international peace and security. In general:

    It calls on all States to implement fully and faithfully the resolutions of the United Nations regarding the exercise of the right to self-determination and independence by peoples under colonial and foreign domination.

    It reaffirms the legitimacy of the struggle of peoples for independence, territorial integrity, national unity, and liberation from colonial and foreign domination and foreign occupation by all available means, including armed struggle.

    It strongly condemns the continued violations of the human rights of people still under colonial and foreign domination and alien subjugation.

    It strongly condemns those Governments that do not recognize the right to self-determination and independence of all peoples still under colonial and foreign domination and alien subjugation, notably the Palestinian people.

    It strongly condemns the expansionist activities of Israel in the Middle East and the continual bombing of Palestinian civilians, which constitute a serious obstacle to the realization of the self-determination and independence of the Palestinian people.

    It urges all States, competent organizations of the United Nations system, specialized agencies, and other international organizations to extend their support to the Palestinian people in the struggle to regain their right to self-determination and independence in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations.

    It demands the immediate and unconditional release of all persons detained or imprisoned as a result of their struggle for self-determination and independence, full respect for their fundamental individual rights and the observance of article 5 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights which says: “No-one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.” Also Article 19 under which “everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers”.

    It urges all States, specialized agencies, and competent organizations of the United Nations system to do their utmost to ensure the full implementation of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples and to intensify their efforts to support peoples under colonial, foreign, and racist domination in their just struggle for self-determination and independence.

    Can the UN be relied on?

    Let’s remind ourselves about the Purposes of the United Nations:

    To maintain international peace and security, and to that end: to take effective collective measures for the prevention and removal of threats to the peace, and for the suppression of acts of aggression or other breaches of the peace, and to bring about by peaceful means, and in conformity with the principles of justice and international law, adjustment or settlement of international disputes or situations which might lead to a breach of the peace;

    To develop friendly relations among nations based on respect for the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples, and to take other appropriate measures to strengthen universal peace.

    And what does the UN Charter expect of its Member States in a situation like Israel’s genocide in Gaza and escalation of its decades-long brutal and illegal occupation of the West Bank, including East Jerusalem?

    The Charter’s stated aims are “to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war…. and to reaffirm faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person, in the equal rights of men and women and of nations large and small, and to establish conditions under which justice and respect for the obligations arising from treaties and other sources of international law can be maintained, and to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom”. Sounds good.

    And the Charter’s numerous Articles explain the dos and don’ts. Here are some:

    • A Member of the United Nations which has persistently violated the Principles contained in the Charter may be expelled from the Organization by the General Assembly upon the recommendation of the Security Council.
    • All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations.
    • All Members shall give the United Nations every assistance in any action it takes in accordance with the present Charter, and shall refrain from giving assistance to any state against which the United Nations is taking preventive or enforcement action.
    • The Members of the United Nations agree to accept and carry out the decisions of the Security Council.
    • The parties to any dispute, the continuance of which is likely to endanger the maintenance of international peace and security, shall, first of all, seek a solution by negotiation, enquiry, mediation, conciliation, arbitration, judicial settlement, resort to regional agencies or arrangements, or other peaceful means of their own choice. The Security Council shall, when it deems necessary, call upon the parties to settle their dispute by such means.
    • Should the Security Council consider that measures taken so far are inadequate, it may take such action by air, sea, or land forces as may be necessary to maintain or restore international peace and security. Such action may include demonstrations, blockades, and other operations by air, sea, or land forces of Members of the United Nations.
    • All Members of the United Nations, in order to contribute to the maintenance of international peace and security, undertake to make available to the Security Council, on its call and in accordance with a special agreement or agreements, armed forces, assistance, and facilities, including rights of passage, necessary for the purpose of maintaining international peace and security.
    • In order to enable the United Nations to take urgent military measures, Members shall hold immediately available national air-force contingents for combined international enforcement action.
    • The Members of the United Nations shall join in affording mutual assistance in carrying out the measures decided upon by the Security Council.
    • In the event of a conflict between the obligations of the Members of the United Nations under the present Charter and their obligations under any other international agreement, their obligations under the present Charter shall prevail.

    What of the International Court of Justice (ICJ)?

    This is the principal judicial organ of the United Nations, and its function forms an integral part of the Charter. All Members of the United Nations are thus parties to the Statute of the ICJ, although some (such as China, India, Russia, and the US) reject the ICJ’s jurisdiction, which undermines the whole idea of universal accountability.

    Each Member of the United Nations undertakes to comply with the decision of the International Court of Justice in any case to which it is a party. If any party to a case fails to perform the obligations incumbent upon it under a judgment rendered by the Court, the other party may have recourse to the Security Council, which may, if it thinks necessary, make recommendations or decide upon measures to be taken to give effect to the judgment.

    A state which is not a Member of the United Nations may become a party to the Statute of the International Court of Justice on conditions to be determined in each case by the General Assembly upon the recommendation of the Security Council.

    The UN seems to have all angles covered and the necessary machinery to deal with the world’s evils. So what can possibly go wrong?

    Lots. And some say it was designed to fail.

    The likes of Starmer, Lammy, Trump, and Vance appear ignorant of the obligations their countries signed up to. Even when enlightened, they don’t care. And if one or two leading nations (the ‘Permanent’ Members on the Security Council) aren’t aligned with the UN’s high ideals, its somewhat ludicrous procedural rules can frustrate the UN’s purpose and render the world’s champion of rights and justice powerless to act, which is what we are witnessing now.

    The post No excuse for refusing Palestinians their state a moment longer first appeared on Dissident Voice.

    This post was originally published on Dissident Voice.

  • On the final day of the Second Pan-American Congress this month, more than 60 delegates from 12 countries made their way into the Secretary of Public Education headquarters in downtown Mexico City. As leaders from the Americas walked through the building’s passages and patios, many stopped to take pictures in front of the walls lined with murals from famous artists, including Diego Rivera.

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • Since May, the US and Israeli-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) has been posing as a lifeline for starving Palestinians in the besieged Gaza Strip. But with over 650 aid-seekers killed and thousands more wounded at the sites, and with Gaza continuing to starve, what purpose does the GHF actually serve? Almost every single international humanitarian organization—from The United Nations and Oxfam to Amnesty International—has condemned the GHF for weaponizing aid and using aid distribution sites as death traps. In this urgent, on-the-ground report, TRNN speaks with Palestinians in Gaza about the horrific truth of the GHF and its “aid distribution” operations.

    Credits:
    Producers: Belal Awad, Leo Erhardt
    Videographers: Ruwaida Amer, Mahmoud Al Mashharawi
    Video Editor: Leo Erhardt

    Transcript

    Mahmoud Jamil Warshagha: 

    When they ran out of targets in Gaza, they resorted to killing civilians trying to get aid. The Americans and the Israelis are setting a trap for us. 

    Mahmoud Jamil Warshagha: 

    Whoever goes there dies. Whether it’s the American point, Netzarim or Zikim.

    Islam Jalal Alza’nin: 

    Here’s the shot. Here—see? It went in through here and out from here. This isn’t aid. This is so they can kill the young men. 

    Narrator: 

    These images are from aid distribution sites set up by the Gaza Humanitarian foundation (GHF) since May 26, 2025. 

    The US and Israeli-backed GHF uses private military contractors to bypass UN systems which Israel claims are being exploited by Hamas. But with over 650 killed and thousands more wounded at the sites, and Gaza continuing to starve—what purpose does the GHF actually serve? 

    Mahmoud Jamil Warshagha has survived multiple GHF sites in his search for food.

    Mahmoud Jamil Warshagha: 

    The body parts landed on us. The body parts of these men fell on top of us in the ditch. The firing from the sniper, the quadcopter and from everywhere was all whistling right by us. We were trapped there for two hours, surrounded by gunfire. Whoever lifted their head was killed. There’s no hope. Raise your head like this and they’ll shoot you. The army was not acting like we were citizens going to get aid, they, no—they were ambushing civilians. To kill them. The people of Gaza are not able to access the American aid. This American aid is just a way for them to kill us conveniently. They are killing us at the aid sites. They’re not feeding us. 

    Islam Jalal Alza’nin: 

    My son was the kindest person in the world to me. Everyone loved him and respected him. He was a kind person. Everyone loved him. May God have mercy on you my son. Even his laugh was so unique. This is the bag he left with. Here is his blood on it. I kept it because his blood is on it, his scent. Here’s the shot—it came out of his back. Came in here and out here. God is sufficient for us, and the best protector—that’s it. He said: “They’re giving aid” I told him, “Don’t go, Muhammad. I don’t want you to go: we will eat sand, just don’t go.” He said: “I see my sisters hungry, can I not go? I’ll go, but I promise you I’ll be careful. I’ll keep my distance. When they hand out the aid I’ll run and grab food, but I will stay far from the Israelis and be careful. I’ll bring us a bag of flour.”

    I went outside and asked: “Where’s Muhammad?” People were coming up to me, telling me he was martyred. One woman grabbed me and said, “Say: May God have mercy on him.” I grabbed her and shook her violently. I said, “No, my son, don’t say that about him. My son promised he would come back.” I was so upset I tried to throw myself in front of a car. People held me back. I told them, “That’s it. I’m nothing. I am nothing without Muhammad.” He is my foundation. That’s it—if he’s not alive, then I don’t want to live. Life no longer has meaning for me. They held me and didn’t let me go to him or see him. 

    The next day I went to the hospital. They hadn’t buried him yet, I went to see his body. There were many bodies there—there were a lot of martyrs. A journalist there told me that it was her brother who had carried my son back. That there were so many dead and injured, but somehow God inspired him to pick my son’s body out of all the dead. “We put him on the board and came back with him.” He told me “don’t be upset that we put him on a wooden board.” This is a blessing from God. Here, look at his picture. His face is full of flour. He’s covered in flour. These people who are carrying him, none of them are his relatives. 

    Mahmoud Jamil Warshagha: 

    From the sign, when you get to the American checkpoint. That’s when terror sets in. There are no hills or anything to hide, you keep walking, you stop at the sign, then a quadcopter comes and it says: “You Arabs! You cattle!” in this manner. “In half an hour we will open the gate for you.” Then the ship and the quadcopter and the tank all start firing at you. They all fire at you. People start to crawl and slide. Some are injured, some are killed, no one cares. People want to eat. We’ve reached the stage where people’s brains are working only on how to eat and how to feed their children. They don’t want to warn us, they are just mocking us. My eyes saw bodies ripped apart. No one picks them up. No one picks them up. When we leave we bring them back with us. We find their bodies after three days, their blood drained. We take a board of wood and place some bodies on it and bring them back. 

    Narrator: 

    Almost every single international humanitarian organisation, including The UN, Oxfam, Amnesty and hundreds more – have condemned the GHF sites for weaponizing aid. But there are some who still claim that they are safe. Retired British Army officer Richard Kemp posted a video from one of the sites: 

    CLIP: “It’s all lies generated by Hamas” 

    Narrator: 

    But even as Kemp claims everyone is safe—the sound of gunshots can be heard in the background. 

    Mahmoud Jamil Warshagha: 

    Yes, the Americans, they have weapons. They have weapons. They’re wearing armour, armour, and each one is two metres tall, Holding M16 guns we’ve never seen before, And they have tanks, next to them protecting them. This is what we see when we get there. You leave—having survived the Israelis you then face the gangs on the road back. Who say: “Either I hit you or you give me your bag.” We live this scene every day. 

    Islam Jalal Alza’nin: 

    They were all young men, like my son. One of the boys killed with him was also 20. The martyrs were all youth, 18 or 20. Why did they go? Because they wanted to live. For bread. Not to fight. They had no weapons or anything. They’re going to get flour, and my son was carrying flour. The boys told me that he was carrying a bag of flour: I mean, how can you shoot someone carrying flour? He wasn’t carrying weapons or something to throw at the Israelis. 

    Narrator: 

    The weaponization of aid is not new. In 2006, Israel imposed a blockade on Gaza, controlling every calorie, every medical shipment and every fuel truck. Over the last two years Israel has routinely constricted entry of aid into Gaza, culminating in a complete blockade that lasted nearly 3 months. Today ‘Humanitarian corridors’ have become kill zones and ‘Distribution points’ have become opportunities for target practice. 

    A video released by Al Jazeera tells a story. A young man carries a bag of flour on his back, unarmed, unthreatening and yet… Just like Muhammad, he too ends his life covered in flour. 

    Islam Jalal Alza’nin: 

    It’s been two years, enough. We have nothing left in us. Enough suffering. There are no young people left. This is his grave. 

    Mahmoud Jamil Warshagha: 

    After my last attempt when I nearly died and the two people next to me died and I couldn’t do anything for them. I have sworn never to go back. If they really wanted to give us aid, they would come and distribute it to us. “Here, take your package and go.” But no, they’re treating us like cattle, we’re trampling, we’re trampling, crushing and killing each other inside, while they watch us from behind a fence, holding a gun, four or five metres away, watching what’s happening. 

    Mahmoud Jamil Warshagha: 

    Israelis don’t give warnings. The way they warn you is to kill 100 people in front of you. To warn you, they will kill 100 people in front of you. So they’re warning us with strikes? If a quadcopter drops a grenade on 30 or 40 people, is that how they warn us? If that’s a warning, how would it look if they wanted to kill? With an F16 they want to warn us? With a tank? As soon as the aid lorries arrive, the brother no longer knows his brother. There was one guy who got injured by shrapnel, when the aid arrived, his brother abandoned him to get food for his kids. He abandoned his brother. Even when he came back with the most basic thing, he would feed it to his sisters or to his mother, before he would eat. 

    Islam Jalal Alza’nin: 

    Him and his friends would buy something and they would say to him: “here’s your share” and he would put it aside for his sisters. He would see me depressed and sad and he would grab me and take me for a walk around. He would take his sisters, he was so kind to them. If he got angry at one of them, when they did something wrong, he would come back later and make up and explain to her. Everyone used to say, “he’s more mature than his age.” He’d taken on so much responsibility. No, he wasn’t afraid. Hunger forced him, against his will, to go. Seeing his sisters like that—hungry—forced him to go.

    This post was originally published on The Real News Network.

  • “Assassination,” wrote George Bernard Shaw in The Shewing-Up of Blanco Posnet, “is the extreme form of censorship”. Such extremism visited Al Jazeera journalist Anas al-Sharif and his colleagues in Gaza City late on August 10. Resting in a tent located outside the main gate of Gaza City’s al-Shifa Hospital, he was killed alongside Al Jazeera correspondent Mohammed Qreiqeh, camera operators Ibrahim Zaher, Mohammed Noufal, and Moamen Aliwa, and freelance reporter Mohammed al-Khaldi.

    Palestinian journalist Wadi Abu al-Saud recalls the drone attack taking place at 11.22 pm. Having entered the tent opposite, he had raised his phone to make a call when an explosion occurred. “A piece of shrapnel hit my phone. I looked back and saw people burning in flames. I tried to extinguish them. Anas and the others had died instantly from the airstrike.” In two subsequent videos, al-Saud vows to “return to my life as a citizen. The truth has died and the coverage has ended.”

    IDF international spokesman Lt. Colonel Nadav Shoshani, straining verisimilitude, claimed that intelligence obtained prior to the strike proved that “Sharif was an active Hamas military wing operative at the time of his elimination”. The reporter must have been frightfully busy then, able to juggle his tasks with Al Jazeera, filing news bulletins while playing the ambitious militant. But distinctions are meaningless for Shoshani, who went on to accuse the slain journalist of receiving “a salary from the Hamas terror group and terrorist supporters, Al-Jazeera, at the same time.”

    Evidence is typically sketchy, but the Lieutenant Colonel was untroubled, as the “declassified portion of our intelligence on al-Sharif” was merely small relative to the whole picture. That picture, the IDF contends, revealed Sharif’s credentials as leader of a rocket-launching squad alongside membership of the Nukhba Force company in Hamas’s East Jabalia Battalion. This proved far from convincing to Muhammed Shehada, analyst at the Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor, who made the solid, pertinent observation that al-Sharif’s “entire daily routine was standing in front of a camera from morning to evening.”

    Particularly troubling in this killing is that the IDF seemed to be laying the groundwork for justified assassination last month, when army spokesman Avichai Adraee reshared a video on social media making the accusation that al-Sharif was a member of Hamas’s military wing.  This proved chilling for the United Nations special rapporteur on freedom of expression, Irene Khan. “Fears for al-Sharif’s safety are well-founded as there is growing evidence that journalists in Gaza have been targeted and killed by the Israeli army on the basis of unsubstantiated claims that they are Hamas terrorists.”

    The Committee to Protect Journalists was suitably perturbed by Adraee’s remarks to issue a demand last month that the “international community” protect al-Sharif. “This is not the first time Al-Sharif has been targeted by the Israeli military, but the danger to his life is now acute,” said CPJ Regional Director Sara Qudah. “Israel has killed at least six Al Jazeera journalists in Gaza during the war. These latest unfounded accusations represent an effort to manufacture consent to kill Al-Sharif.”

    The other journalists killed in the strike are not deemed worthy of mention by the IDF, affirming the tendency in Israeli military doctrine to kill those around the designated target as a perfectly tolerable practice. Again, the rulebook of international humanitarian war is discarded in favour of a normalised murderousness.

    The rulebook has also been abandoned regarding journalists working in Gaza, conforming to a pattern of indifference to distinctions between militants or civilians in Israel’s sanguinary targeting. By December 2023, the Committee to Protect Journalists was already declaring that the war in the Strip had been the deadliest ever recorded by the organisation for press members. (The number currently stands at over 190; the global total for 2020-23 was 165.)  “Israel is murdering the messengers,” concludes Qudah. “Israel wiped out an entire news crew. It has made no claims that any of the other journalists were terrorists. That’s murder. Plain and simple.”

    In a statement, Al Jazeera Media Network described the killings as “yet another blatant and premeditated attack on press freedom.” The order to kill al-Sharif, “one of Gaza’s bravest journalists, and his colleagues, is a desperate attempt to silence the voices exposing the impending seizure and occupation of Gaza.”

    The murder of al-Sharif and his colleagues by Israeli forces constituted the effective wiping out of Al Jazeera’s team, one of the few able to offer consistent, unsmothered coverage about the IDF’s remorseless campaign in Gaza. Since the October 7, 2023, attacks by Hamas, Israel has prohibited foreign reporters from entering Gaza except under strict supervision by the Israeli military. Those accompanied by the IDF have been at the mercy of Israeli selectiveness as to where to go and barred from speaking to Palestinians.

    In a note to be published in the event of his death, al-Sharif stated that he “lived the pain in all its details”, tasting “grief and loss repeatedly”. This did not deter him from conveying “the truth as it is, without distortion or misrepresentation, hoping that God would witness those who remained silent, those who accepted our killing, and those who suffocated our very breaths.” He also reflected on what images of sheer barbarity had failed to do, with “the mangled bodies of our children and women” failing to move hearts or stop massacres.  In dying along with his colleagues, al-Sharif had been butchered in a climate of hyper-normalised violence, thinly veiled by the barbaric justifications of Israeli national security.

    The post Slaying and Censoring the Journalists: The Murder of Anas al-Sharif first appeared on Dissident Voice.

    This post was originally published on Dissident Voice.

  • On both 10 and 11 August, a direct action group called ‘DISMANTLE’ targeted two companies which enable Israel’s genocide of the Palestinian people.

    DISMANTLE: a direct action group targets key supplier to Teledyne

    In the early hours of 10 August, the group targeted Stemmer Imaging of Tongham, Surrey. Stemmer are a key supplier to Teledyne, who supply the Israeli military with vital equipment, including parts for the F-35 jets, which are central to their offensive air capability.

    In a short video posted by the DISMANTLE group, an activist uses a traditional shepherd’s sling, as used in Palestine for centuries, to hurl projectiles at the Stemmer Imaging premises. DISMANTLE concluded with a short statement by demanding:

    Stemmer – cut ties with Teledyne.

    It signed off with:

    Together we can DISMANTLE the Zionist entity.

    Labour government taking its cues from Israel

    In September 2024, foreign secretary David Lammy announced that Britain would be suspending 30 Arms Licenses to Israel. He told MPs that:

    the assessment I have received finds that for certain UK arms exports to Israel there exists a clear risk that they might be used to commit or facilitate a serious violation of International Humanitarian Law.

    However, the 30 arms licenses comprise less than 10% of the total export licenses relating to the Israeli military. Moreover, as business and trade secretary Jonathan Reynolds subsequently clarified, it would not affect the supply of F-35 parts, which the Israeli air force have continued to use in Gaza.

    American-owned Teledyne operates at six locations in Britain, and employs Lord Richard Dannatt as an adviser. In 2022, Lord Dannatt wrote to two government ministers, urging them to crackdown on activists who had targeted the Teledyne plant in Presteigne, Wales.

    The activists, linked to the currently proscribed group ‘Palestine Action’, were convicted of breaking into the plant, and causing £1m in damage.

    In court, the prosecution denied that Dannatt had sought to interfere in the case. However, he had written to the then home secretary Suella Braverman warning that:

    the threat from Palestine Action has more widespread implications for security and the economy within the United Kingdom.

    He said that he would be:

    very grateful to receive assurance that the threat from Palestine Action is fully recognised by our security services and appropriate action either planned or being taken.

    In 2024, the peer wrote to Dan Jarvis, Labour security minister, along similar lines. Dannatt is now facing conduct inquiries over two sets of allegations that he broke parliamentary rules prohibiting peers from lobbying.

    Caterpillar gets the DISMANTLE treatment

    Early on the morning of 11 August, the DISMANTLE group carried out a second action. This time it targeted the London offices of PwC, an auditing company used by Caterpillar. Activists painted the front of the plush building with slogans.

    Caterpillar make the huge D9 bulldozers, that Israel has used as a weapon of war for many years. The violent settler state first used armoured D9s in the Sinai war in 1956. These have become synonymous with the wholesale demolition of Palestinian homes, and entire villages. Israel has used the D9s extensively, in the same manner, in Lebanon, and throughout Gaza.

    In 2003, Israel crushed to death Rachel Corrie, a young American peace activist, who had gone to Gaza as part of the International Solidarity Movement with a Caterpillar D9. She was trying to prevent the destruction of Palestinian homes.

    Following its graffiti attack on PwC auditors, DISMANTLE issued a statement in which it said:

    This week Netenyahu announced his plans to occupy all of Gaza. The IDF will certainly use Caterpillar’s tools to attempt to do so.

    Caterpillar is deeply complicit – and so are any companies they work with. We call on PwC to stop working with Caterpillar.

    Featured image supplied

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • The Israeli security cabinet approved a plan presented by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on August 8 to fully occupy the Gaza Strip and forcibly displace the residents of Gaza City from the north of the territory to the south. The news of the plan spread rapidly among those of us in Gaza, leaving us in a state of shock and despair. We had been following the updates in hopes of hearing…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • Independent media outlet SKWAWKBOX has spent over ten years holding the powerful and political to account. One perfect example is two articles he released on Tuesday 12 August, where it exposed not only Keir Starmer’s government’s complicity with Israel’s assassination of five Al Jazeera journalists – but also the BBC’s attempt to whitewash the Zionist entity’s war crimes.

    The BBC: laying cover for Israel

    Firstly, on a live news broadcast on Monday 11 August, the BBC posed what was a despicable question: is it “proportional” for Israel to kill five journalists when it was “only targeting one”?

    This chilling formulation, reported by SKWAWKBOX on 12 August, casts the killing of media workers as a matter of arithmetic rather than atrocity—a grotesque inversion of compassion.

    Such framing exposes the BBC’s deeper failings in its Gaza war coverage. A thorough analysis by the Centre for Media Monitoring, covering nearly a year of BBC reporting, highlighted a persistent pattern: the minimisation of Palestinian suffering, omissions of critical historical context, and a marked amplification of Israeli propaganda.

    This is reinforced by internal dissent: in July 2025, over 400 media professionals—including 121 currently with the BBC—signed a letter condemning what they described as institutional anti‑Palestinian racism and distortion driven by fear of being labelled “anti‑Israel”. 

    By couching the murder of journalists in the language of proportionality, the BBC not only dehumanises those who were killed, but also sanitises violence, turning a deliberate assault on press freedom into a cold mathematical debate. In an era where Gaza journalists are being systematically killed—many while clearly identifiable as press—the BBC’s framing is normalising such moral apathy.

    Then, SKWAWKBOX also took aim at the Labour Party government.

    Starmer: up to his neck in Israel’s war crimes

    As the Canary has documented, the RAF has conducted over 500 surveillance flights above Gaza since December 2023, cloaked in secrecy and ostensibly justified as efforts to locate Israeli hostages. 

    Yet the evidence is damning. A US‑contracted plane, leased by the MOD for these operations—ostensibly to compensate for a shortage of RAF Shadow R1 jets—was recently exposed after mistakenly revealing its flight path over Khan Younis.

    Intelligence gathered by these flights is “routinely shared” with Israeli forces, raising urgent questions about whether the UK is effectively aiding lethal operations—despite its performative rhetoric condemning Israel’s attacks.

    So, as SKWAWKBOX concluded:

    An outsourced spy plane operating for the UK from the RAF’s Akrotiri base in Cyprus was almost certainly operating over Gaza, despite attempts to hide its flight path, just thirty minutes before an Israeli airstrike that murdered six journalists in the early hours of yesterday morning.

    This duplicity is further underscored by the Starmer government’s refusal to release critical footage that could shed light on the killing of British aid workers, even though the RAF had recorded that very moment over Gaza. With civil liberties eroded at home and press freedom murdered abroad, the UK’s role resembles that of an enabler, not a neutral mediator.

    Disgraceful

    The Labour government’s posture is untenable: searing criticism in words, but enabling complicity in action. Its surveillance flights do not simply observe—they may well abet war crimes. Meanwhile, the BBC’s adoption of such detached, procedural language betrays its purported values of impartiality and humanity. In the face of real death, there is no proportion—only moral clarity.

    And overall, the UK state – via the Starmer government and its public service broadcaster – is entirely complicit in Israel’s war crimes. But as always, it is down to independent media like SKWAWKBOX to expose this.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Steve Topple

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • In a move that perfectly encapsulates the moral bankruptcy of both Israel’s public relations machine and much of the Western press, forty-five US journalists have descended on Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories—not to witness the devastation in Gaza, but to take part in a choreographed tour designed, funded, and controlled by the Israeli government.

    The delegation, lavishly hosted at Jerusalem’s King David Hotel, began their trip on 11 August via an audience with Israeli president Isaac Herzog:

    Then, the itinerary on 12 August includes a visit to the Nova Music Festival site, stops near the Gaza fence and so-called “aid entry points” (on the Israeli side) and meetings with the Israeli foreign minister, Speaker of the Knesset, prime minister, and Ambassador Huckabee:

    There will be no sight of bombed-out hospitals, no interviews with bereaved Palestinian families, no first-hand experience of the blockade’s crushing impact.

    Let’s be clear: this is not journalism. This is stage-managed propaganda, and the so-called “journalists” participating are, wittingly or not, acting as extensions of Israel’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, which is bankrolling the entire trip:

    Silencing the truth about Israel’s genocide in Gaza

    The hypocrisy is staggering. While this delegation is feted by Israeli officials, not a single international journalist has been allowed into Gaza since the war began.

    Israel continues to impose an absolute blockade on independent media access to the Strip, effectively controlling the narrative by denying the world a raw, unfiltered view of the destruction. This censorship is not incidental—it is strategic. By keeping reporters out, Israel ensures that the only imagery and testimony the global public receives is filtered through its military’s carefully vetted footage and statements.

    The result is a grotesque distortion of reality. As Israel kills or displaces tens of thousands of Palestinians, Western MSM presents the genocide as somehow abstract—stripped of its immediacy and reduced to bloodless euphemisms like “conflict” or “clashes.” This is not journalism in the public interest; it is information warfare.

    US journalists and their complicity with Israel

    The presence of these 45 US journalists on an Israeli government-funded junket raises profound ethical questions.

    Accepting an all-expenses-paid trip from Israel—accused by human rights organisations and UN officials of committing war crimes—should be a clear violation of journalistic independence. Yet these media outlets, many of which loudly proclaim their commitment to truth and accountability, appear content to let their reporters be shepherded through a Potemkin tour of Israel’s preferred talking points.

    This is not simply bias—it’s structural complicity. Western media has a long history of privileging Israeli narratives while marginalising Palestinian voices, often adopting the language of “security” and “self-defense” to justify military aggression. The Gaza junket is merely the latest, and most brazen, example.

    The cost of manufactured consent

    The damage goes far beyond one media tour.

    By participating in this charade, these US journalists help manufacture public consent for Israel’s ongoing assault on Gaza. Every sanitised photo-op, every official quote unchallenged, helps launder a war in which civilians are paying the ultimate price.

    Meanwhile, Palestinian journalists—hundreds of whom Israel has assassinated—remain the primary source of truth, their work often dismissed or ignored by the same outlets now happily amplifying Israeli state messaging.

    If journalism is, as it claims, the first draft of history, then this junket represents an act of deliberate historical revisionism. Independent media is currently writing the truth about Gaza. But thanks to Israel’s blockade and Western corporate media’s moral collapse, much of its “coverage” will be remembered not as reporting, but as propaganda in its purest form.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Steve Topple

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Pacific Media Watch

    The Paris-based media freedom watchdog Reporters Without Borders (RSF) has condemned the Israeli military’s “disgraceful tactic” to cover up war crimes in the wake of the killing of six journalists in Gaza on Sunday.

    It has called for an emergency meeting of the UN Security Council to stop the massacre of journalists, RSF said in a statement.

    The August 10 Israeli strike killed six media professionals in Gaza, five of whom currently work or formerly worked for the Qatari television network Al Jazeera and one freelance journalist.

    The strike, which has been claimed by the Israeli army, targeted Al Jazeera reporter Anas al-Sharif, whom it accused, without providing solid evidence, of “terrorist affiliation”.

    RSF said the military had repeatedly used this tactic against journalists to cover up war crimes, while the army has already killed more than 200 media professionals.

    “RSF strongly condemns the killing of six media professionals by the Israeli army, once again carried out under the guise of terrorism charges against a journalist,” said RSF’s  director-general Thibaut Bruttin.

    “One of the most famous journalists in the Gaza Strip, Anas al-Sharif, was among those killed.

    “The Israeli army has killed more than 200 journalists since the start of the war. This massacre and Israel’s media blackout strategy, designed to conceal the crimes committed by its army for more than 21 months in the besieged and starving Palestinian enclave, must be stopped immediately.

    “The international community can no longer turn a blind eye and must react and put an end to this impunity.

    “RSF calls on the UN Security Council to meet urgently on the basis of Resolution 2222 of 2015 on the protection of journalists in times of armed conflict in order to stop this carnage.”

    Targeted strike on tent
    The Israeli army killed Al Jazeera reporter Anas al-Sharif in a targeted strike on a tent housing a group of journalists near al-Shifa Hospital in Gaza.

    The strike, claimed by Israeli authorities, also killed five other media professionals, including four working or having worked for Al Jazeera — correspondent Mohammed Qraiqea, video reporter Ibrahim al-Thaher, Mohamed Nofal, assistant cameraman and driver that day, and Moamen Aliwa, a freelance journalist who worked with Al Jazeera — as well as another freelance journalist, Mohammed al-Khaldi, creator of a YouTube news channel.

    The attack also wounded freelance reporters Mohammed Sobh, Mohammed Qita, and Ahmed al-Harazine.

    This attack, claimed by the Israeli army, replicates a tactic previously used against Al Jazeera journalists. On 31 July 2024, the Israeli army killed reporters Ismail al-Ghoul and Rami al-Rifi in a targeted strike, following a smear campaign against the former, who, like Anas al-Sharif, was accused of “terrorist affiliation”.

    Hamza al-Dahdouh, Mustafa Thuraya and Hossam Shabat, who also worked for the Qatari media outlet, are among the victims of this method denounced by RSF.

    As early as October 2024, RSF warned of an imminent attack on Anas al-Sharif following accusations by the Israeli army.

    The international community, led by the European Union, the United Kingdom, and the United States, ignored these warnings.

    Under Resolution 2222 of 2015 on the protection of journalists in armed conflict, the UN Security Council has a duty to convene urgently in response to this latest extrajudicial killing by the Israeli army.

    Since October 2023, RSF has filed four complaints with the International Criminal Court (ICC) requesting investigations into what it describes as war crimes committed by the Israeli army against journalists in Gaza.

    The New Zealand-based Pacific Media Watch collaborates with Reporters Without Borders (RSF).

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • More than a decade ago, crowds would chant “Saeb Jundiya” whenever he appeared on the pitch wearing the Palestinian national team captain’s armband. He confidently directed his teammates, competed against continental teams, and stood in front of the cameras with the smile of a captain who knows the value of his jersey.

    Today, there are no cameras or crowds, just a long line of people waiting their turn to fill up gallons of drinking water. Between the past and the present, Jundiya’s life encapsulates the story of Gaza, besieged by Israel’s genocide and deprived of the basic necessities of life.

    Saeb Jundiya: an eventful sporting career

    Saeb Jundiya is not just a soccer player, but a symbol of Palestinian sport. He played for the Palestinian national team for many years and was one of its stalwart defenders. He led the team in official matches against major Asian teams and participated in international football forums, presenting a proud image of his country.

    After his retirement, he moved into coaching, supervising local Palestinian clubs and continuing his mission to serve football despite the difficult circumstances.

    From the pitch to water queues

    But war and siege have turned the equation upside down. In Gaza, football is no longer a source of income or even a stable activity. With the destruction of infrastructure and the suspension of sporting activities, Saeb Jundiya found himself forced to look for alternative sources of income to feed his children.

    Today, he spends hours of his day providing drinking water, moving between the few points that are still operating. It is a scene that sums up how a star of the pitch can become a citizen fighting for survival.

    Sports comparison: a gap between two worlds

    Around the world, football legends live a life of luxury after retirement, such as Zinedine Zidane, who spends his days between luxury villas and green fields, or Pep Guardiola, who earns millions coaching major clubs.

    Saeb Jundiya, former captain of his country’s national team, struggles to provide for his family’s basic needs. The difference is not in talent or dedication, but in geographical luck, a stable environment, and a sports infrastructure that guarantees athletes a decent life after retirement.

    An athlete in Gaza versus an athlete in the world

    A soccer coach in Europe may spend his day following his team’s training sessions, visiting sports centers, or planning for an upcoming match, while a Palestinian coach in Gaza plans how to obtain water, cooking gas, or enough food for his family for the coming days.

    Sport here is not a profession, but a dream threatened with extinction, and with every war, athletes are brought back to square one, trapped between the walls of harsh reality.

    Saeb Jundiya: a message beyond sports

    The story of Saeb Jundiya is not just the tale of a player who lost the spotlight of the stadium, but a mirror reflecting the reality of Gaza with all its contradictions: passion and love for life, but under a siege that stifles ambition.

    A football legend like Jundiya has the right to continue his life on the pitch, not in water queues, and the world has a duty to see his story as a call to support Palestinian athletes and protect their legacy.

    In the end, Saeb Jundiya remains a leader, even if his field today is different. He is leading the battle for survival in Gaza, just as he once led the Palestinian national team in the most difficult matches.

    Featured image supplied

    By Alaa Shamali

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • By Craig McCulloch, RNZ News acting political editor

    New Zealand Green Party co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick has been ejected from Parliament’s debating chamber and told to leave for the rest of the week after a fiery speech about the war in Gaza.

    The incident occured during an urgent debate this afternoon which was called after the coalition government’s announcement that it would come to a formal decision in September over whether to recognise the state of Palestine.

    As Swarbrick came to the end of her contribution, she challenged coalition MPs to back her member’s bill allowing New Zealand to apply sanctions on Israel “for its war crimes”.

    Green co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick asked to leave Parliament after Gaza speech   Video: Parliament TV

    “If we find six of 68 government MPs with a spine, we can stand on the right side of history,” Swarbrick said.

    Almost immediately, Speaker Gerry Brownlee condemned the remark as “completely unacceptable” and demanded she “withdraw it and apologise”.

    Swarbrick shot back a curt — “no” — prompting Brownlee to order her out of the chamber for the remainder of the week.

    “Happily,” Swarbrick said, as she rose to leave.

    Green Party whip Ricardo Menéndez March later stood to question the severity of punishment, saying Parliament’s rules suggested Swarbrick should be barred for no more than a day.

    Brownlee later clarified that Swarbrick could come back to the debating chamber on Wednesday, but only if she agreed to withdraw and apologise.

    “If she doesn’t, then she’ll be leaving the House again,” he said.

    “I’m not going to sit in this chair and tolerate a member standing on her feet . . .  and saying that other members of this House are spineless.”

    ‘What the hell is the point?’ — Swarbrick
    Speaking outside the debating chamber, Swarbrick described the ruling as “ridiculous” and the punishment excessive.

    “As far as the robust debate goes in that place, I think that was pretty mild in the context of the war crimes that are currently unfolding.”

    She drew a comparison with comments made by former prime minister Sir John Key in 2015 when he challenged the opposition to “get some guts”.

    Swarbrick said she was tired and angry at the massacre of human beings.

    “What the hell is the point of everything that we do if the people in my place, in my job don’t do their job?” she said.

    “If we allow other human beings to be just mercilessly slaughtered, to be shot while waiting for food aid, what hope is there for humanity?”

    Swarbrick was not the only MP to run afoul of the Speaker during today’s debate.

    Earlier, Labour MP Damien O’Connor was told to either exit the chamber or apologise after interjecting while Foreign Minister Winston Peters was speaking. O’Connor stood and left.

    Brownlee also demanded ACT MP Simon Court say sorry — which he did — after Court accused Swarbrick of “hallucinating outrage”.

    Government urges caution, opposition demands action
    In his speech, Court said any recognition of a Palestinian state must be conditional on all Israeli hostages being returned and Hamas being disarmed and dismantled.

    “Security must come before politics,” he said.

    No National MPs spoke during the urgent debate.

    Peters — who is also NZ First leader — told MPs the matter of Palestinian statehood was not a straightforward or clear-cut issue.

    “There are strong opinions on both sides,” he said. “That is why we are approaching this issue carefully, judiciously and calmly.”

    Peters also took umbrage with the opposition’s complaints, pointing out Labour never moved on the matter when it was in government.

    In a 10 minute speech, Labour foreign affairs spokesperson Peeni Henare said New Zealand was being left behind as the coalition walked into a “sunset of denial”.

    “How many more people will suffer and how many more people will die?”

    ‘Despicable’ justifications
    Te Pāti Māori co-leader Debbie Ngarewa-Packer told MPs it was “despicable” to hear the justifications for another month’s delay.

    “What will be left? Rubble? Martyred spirits? What is that you want to have left in a month’s time?” she said. “I have never been more ashamed to be in the House than I am today.”

    In her speech, Swarbrick told MPs libraries of evidence demonstrated that the events unfolding in Palestine were “ethnic cleansing… apartheid [and]… genocide”.

    “We are a laggard, we are an outlier,” she said. “We are one of the very few countries in the world who so far refuse to acknowledge the absolute bare minimum.”

    Earlier, during Parliament’s Question Time, ACT leader and Deputy Prime Minister David Seymour objected to Swarbrick having a Palestinian scarf, or keffiyeh, draped across her seat.

    “I invite you to consider what this House might look like if everybody who had an interest in a global conflict started adorning their seats with symbols of one side or another of a conflict,” he said.

    “I think that would bring the House into disrepute and no member should be allowed to do such a thing.”

    Brownlee said Seymour raised a good point, only for Swarbrick to then wrap the scarf around her neck.

    “Oh, here we go,” he said. “Well, stay warm. We’ll move on now.”

    This article is republished under a community partnership agreement with RNZ.

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • This is my will and my final message. If these words reach you, know that Israel has succeeded in killing me and silencing my voice. First, peace be upon you and Allah’s mercy and blessings.

    Allah knows I gave every effort and all my strength to be a support and a voice for my people, ever since I opened my eyes to life in the alleys and streets of the Jabalia refugee camp. My hope was that Allah would extend my life so I could return with my family and loved ones to our original town of occupied Asqalan (Al-Majdal). But Allah’s will came first, and His decree is final. I have lived through pain in all its details, tasted suffering and loss many times, yet I never once hesitated to convey the truth as it is, without distortion or falsification.

    The post Journalist Anas Al-Sharif’s Final Message Released After Israel Assassinates Him appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.