Category: Palestine

  • Activists aboard the Global Sumud Flotilla vow to continue their mission to set sail to Gaza, insisting nothing will stop them from breaking Israel’s blockade and bringing aid to Gaza. Members of the Flotilla have reported two suspected drone attacks on their boats while docked in Tunisian waters. Still, the first wave of Flotilla ships departed the Sidi Bou Said port in Tunisia where they were stationed on the night of September 11, and the rest are set to depart on September 12. “We know who has interest in stopping these flotillas, in stopping this mission to Gaza,” Mariana Mortágua, a member of the Portuguese Parliament who joined the Global Sumud Flotilla, told Democracy Now!, indicating that Israel had a role in the attacks on the ships.

    The post Global Sumud Flotilla Vows To Continue Mission Despite Attacks appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • The Somalia resistance group Al-Shabaab issued a statement on Sept. 4 claiming responsibility for an attack on U.S. military forces in retaliation for U.S. support for Israel in the ongoing genocidal war in Gaza. The U.S. forces were at a base located near Kismayo Airport in southern Somalia.

    Blogger Muhammad Od reported in a You Tube video on Sept. 5: “According to a statement by the movement, quoted in the local Baidoa Online website, the operation targeted the ‘American camp’ in response to the war in Gaza, and resulted in ‘heavy losses among U.S. soldiers and the destruction of military vehicles.’”

    Od noted that in its X account, AFRICOM acknowledged the attack but claimed it was “indirect” with no serious damage.

    The post Somalia Resistance Targets US AFRICOM Base Over Gaza Genocide appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • To live in Gaza means nothing is guaranteed — neither your wealth, your buildings, your career, nor even your legacy. Only your mind and its principles endure. Growing up in a war-battered reality compelled us to cling to education, just as my father, a retired mathematics teacher, always told me: “I have not invested in entrepreneurs, but in one lasting, fruitful, and ever-present project — your…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • Albert Einstein is one of the most famous and influential scientists of all time. His theories and equations regarding time, energy, space, and gravity are foundational to modern physics.

    Less well known, Einstein was a very political figure, with strong beliefs and a willingness to act on them. The book “Einstein on Israel and Zionism” documents what he thought about Palestine, discrimination against Jews in Europe, and what he would probably say about Israel were he alive today.

    Background on Albert Einstein

    Born in Germany in 1879. Albert Einstein was a precocious student, mastering mathematics and appreciating philosophy, especially the philosophy of Thomas Kant, at a young age. With his father’s permission, he left Germany at age 15 to avoid being drafted into the army. He became a Swiss citizen and completed his education in Switzerland. Einstein graduated from the University of Zurich and began his landmark research and writing. In 1905, he published four groundbreaking papers, and his fame spread rapidly. In 1914, Einstein was enticed by Max Planck and other German scientists to return to Germany shortly before World War 1 began. Antisemitism against Jews in Germany, especially against Jews migrating from Eastern Europe, was widespread. Einstein said, “When I came to Germany (in 1914) … I discovered for the first time that I was a Jew.”

    Einstein opposed the intense nationalism of World War I.  While many prominent Germans signed a “Manifesto of the Ninety-Three” which justified Germany’s belligerence, Einstein was one of the few who signed a contrary “Manifesto to Europeans” which said, “The struggle raging today will likely produce no victor; it will leave probably only the vanquished … the time has come where Europe must act as one in order to protect her soil, her inhabitants, and her culture.”

    In 1933, as Adolph Hitler came to power in Germany, Einstein immigrated to the U.S. at the invitation of Princeton University. He became a U.S. citizen in 1940.

    Einstein fought against anti-Semitism.

    After WW1, the economy in Germany was bleak, and there was a sharp rise in anti-Semitic attacks. Einstein wrote, “East European Jews are made the scapegoats for the malaise in present-day German economic life, which in reality is a painful after-effect of the war.”

    Einstein developed his sense of being Jewish and his wish to see a “safe haven” for discriminated Jews. He supported the campaign for migration to Palestine. In 1921, he toured the U.S. with Chaim Weizman, president of the World Zionist Organization. Their goal was to raise funds for Hebrew University in Jerusalem. Einstein wrote to a friend, describing the tour’s success. He was especially impressed with the support and funds raised from Jewish American doctors. However, in an early forewarning, Einstein also noted that “a high-tensioned Jewish nationalism shows itself that threatens to degenerate into intolerance and bigotry; but hopefully this is only an infantile disorder.”

    Einstein was a “cultural” Zionist.

    Einstein believed that Palestine could be a “safe haven and homeland” for Jews if they lived in peace and equality with the indigenous Arabs. This was termed a “cultural zionist”. Like some other prominent Jews, such as philosopher Martin Buber and the head of Hebrew University, Judah Magnes, Einstein wanted an independent and sovereign Palestine to be a binational state, NOT a “Jewish state.”.  As the German translator of Einstein’s documents, Michael Schiffmann, explained, “This volume clearly demonstrates that Einstein, right from the beginning, championed what was in accord with elementary morality: The creation of a ‘Jewish home’ in Palestine would turn into a crime if it resulted in the dispossession of the native Arab population.” Another translator explained, “Professor Einstein’s nationalism has no room for any kind of aggressiveness or chauvinism.” “For him, the domination of Jew over Arab in Palestine, or the perpetuation of a state of mutual hostility between the two peoples, would mean the failure of Zionism.”

    In 1929, in the wake of Arab- Jewish conflicts in Palestine, Einstein wrote, “The first and most important necessity is the creation of a modus vivendi with the Arab people. … We Jews must show above all that our own history of suffering has given us sufficient understanding and psychological insight to know how to cope with this problem …. Let us therefore above all, be on our guard against blind chauvinism of any kind, and let us not imagine that reason and common sense can be replaced by British bayonets…. We must not forget for a single moment that our national task is, in its essence, a supra-national matter, and that the strength of our whole movement rests in its moral justification, with which it must stand or fall.”

    Einstein advocated “the creation of an Arab-Jewish community that brings those two tribally related peoples to each other while excluding nationalist fanatics.”

    He believed, “All Jewish children (in Palestine) should be obligated to learn Arabic.”

    Balfour Declaration and differing zionist goals

    The editor of this book, journalist and Columbia University professor Fred Jerome, provides the historic context. He explains how Herzl proposed to the British that European Jewish immigration to Palestine “would form part of the rampart against Asia, serving as an outpost of civilization against barbarism.” Jerome explains, “Supporting Zionism and a Jewish settlement in the Middle East clearly had a direct value to the British and other colonial powers as they sought to extend their grasp further into Africa and Asia.”

    The 1917 Balfour Declaration facilitated Jewish migration to the land of Palestine. When conflict with the indigenous population erupted, this was also advantageous because it justified the installation of tens of thousands of British troops in a key region close to Egypt and the vital Suez Canal.

    Einstein believed that Britain (which took over management of Palestine after WW1) was intentionally promoting division between Arabs and immigrating Jews. He believed they were practicing a divide-and-conquer policy, as done in other British colonies, to prevent the locals from uniting, assuming control of the land, and expelling the colonial power.

    In 1948, Einstein wrote, “When a real and final catastrophe should befall us in Palestine, the first responsible for it would be the British, and the second responsible for it the terrorist organizations built up from our own ranks.”

    Einstein urged equality and a binational state.

    Einstein was remarkably clear and consistent. In 1946, he wrote, “I am firmly convinced that a rigid demand for a ‘Jewish state’ will have only undesirable results for us.”

    He also said, “Only direct cooperation with the Arabs can create a dignified and safe life. If the Jews don’t comprehend this, the whole Jewish position in the complex of Arab countries will become, step by step, untenable. What saddens me is less the fact that the Jews are not smart enough to understand this, but rather that they are not just enough to want it.”

    Einstein was egalitarian and anti-fascist. He urged to “institute complete equality for the Arab citizens living in our midst… The attitude we adopt toward the Arab minority will provide the real test of our moral standards as a people.” ”

    The famous American journalist Izzy Stone (I.F. Stone)  was also a progressive Jew. He wrote, “To have the greatest Jewish figure of the period oppose a Jewish state as unfair to the Arabs was a very noble thing.” ”

    Einstein condemned Jewish nationalism and terrorism.

    Einstein was clear and consistent in condemning Zionist ultra-nationalism and terrorism. Einstein wrote, “I  have come across Zionism only after my move to Berlin, in the year 1914 at the age of 35……The time has come to take care that this movement avoids the danger of degenerating into blind nationalism.” ”

    In 1948, Einstein and twenty-eight other prominent American Jews sent a 750-word letter to the New York Times. In the letter, they assailed the upcoming visit of Menachim Begin, who was formerly the head of the terrorist Irgun and current leader of Israel’s new Herut (Freedom) party. This party is the predecessor of today’s Likud Party, led by Benjamin Netanyahu. The letter compares Begin and his organization to Nazi and Fascist parties. The massacre of about 200 Palestinians in the village of Deir Yassein, carried out by Begin and his organization, is described. The letter also says, “Within the Jewish community, they have preached an admixture of ultra-nationalism, religious mysticism, and racial superiority.”

    At different times over this period, Einstein expressed his concern that Judaism would be damaged by ultra-nationalism (political Zionism). He said, “I am afraid of the inner damage Judaism will sustain – especially from the development of a narrow nationalism within our own ranks.”

    He also said, “I think that nationalism is always a bad thing, even if it is Jews among whom it is raging.”

    After Israel replaced Palestine

    After Israel declared its “independence” in 1948, Einstein recognized that his struggle to create a binational state rather than a “Jewish” state was lost. He did not change his views that this was negative, but recognized the new reality.

    Due to his international prominence, Einstein was invited to serve as the figurehead President of Israel after the death of Chaim Weizmann. He declined, saying privately that he would have had to tell them things they would not like to hear.

    Einstein supported the non-aligned movement and leaders like Nehru of India, Sukarno of Indonesia, and Nasser of Egypt. When a famous Egyptian journalist visited the U.S. and requested an interview with Einstein, he used the occasion to reach out to the Egyptian president discreetly. He hoped to serve as a catalyst for rapprochement between Israel and the Arab states. Unknown to Einstein, the Israelis were doing just the opposite: they were planting bombs and carrying out sabotage actions against U.S. and British targets in a false flag effort, trying to sow chaos and implicate the Egyptians. Instead of seeking compromise and reconciliation, the Israeli leadership was exacerbating conflict with Egypt and other Arab states.

    In a January 1955 letter, Einstein expressed his wishes regarding Israel: “First: Neutrality with regard to the international East-West antagonism….   Second, and most importantly: We must incessantly strive to treat the citizens of Arab descent living in our midst as our equals in every respect, and we must develop the necessary understanding for the difficulties of their situation, naturally accompanying it.” ”

    Einstein was an internationalist and pacifist.

    Einstein opposed McCarthyism and the suppression of free speech that was pervasive in the early 1950s. He was a good friend to the legendary African American Paul Robeson when Robeson was being attacked by the right as well as the FBI. Einstein supported Progressive Party candidate Henry Wallace in the 1948 presidential race. He was especially concerned with the rise of the Cold War. He opposed the nuclear arms race and the establishment of NATO.

    Based on Einstein’s biography and political views, it is clear that he would be horrified and strongly oppose Israel’s genocidal actions and apartheid against Palestinians. He would be outraged at the suppression of free speech and blind support for Israel as it practices fascism based on an “admixture of ultra-nationalism, religious mysticism, and racial superiority.” He would also be very sad.

    The post Albert Einstein, Palestine and Israel Today first appeared on Dissident Voice.

    This post was originally published on Dissident Voice.

  • Juice Media and the Global Sumud Flotilla have published a video about Israel, together with a statement that:

    The Israeli Government has made an ad about the Global Sumud Flotilla headed for Gaza, and it’s surprisingly honest and informative.

    The Gaza Sumud Flotilla of more than fifty humanitarian vessels is en route to Gaza to try to break Israel’s criminal starvation siege that has killed almost 700,000 people, almost all civilians, according to expert analysis by medics and statisticians of the Israeli military’s own data. Israel has already bombed at least two of the flotilla’s vessels in international waters.

    Readers will decide whether the video could possibly be genuine – or is satire-but-true-anyway:

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Skwawkbox

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • UNICEF has warned of the serious humanitarian consequences of Israel’s military offensive on Gaza City, stressing that it is having a “devastating and extremely cruel” impact on more than 450,000 children who are already suffering from psychological trauma and severe exhaustion after two years of continuous war.

    UNICEF: the catastrophic consequences of Israel’s actions

    Edward Paabed, UNICEF’s regional director for the Middle East and North Africa, said in a statement on Friday that the use of explosive weapons in densely populated areas, such as Gaza City, leads to “double the catastrophic consequences.” including the killing and maiming of civilians, including children, and the destruction of homes, schools, health facilities, and vital water networks, threatening to render the city uninhabitable.

    He noted that famine is now a reality, with more than 10,000 children diagnosed with acute malnutrition in the past two months alone, while some 2,400 children with severe acute malnutrition face the risk of starvation if treatment is interrupted. He expressed grave concern about the situation of premature babies in incubators, patients in intensive care units, and children with disabilities, who need to be safely evacuated amid ongoing military operations.

    UNICEF warned of an “impending disaster” as the offensive expands amid limited shelter and services, calling on Israel to fulfill its international legal obligations and ensure safe and sustained access for humanitarian aid through all crossings, in addition to protecting civilians and essential infrastructure such as hospitals and shelters from being targeted.

    The organization also called for humanitarian workers to be given unhindered access to children and their families and to provide life-saving assistance wherever they are in the sector, stressing that freedom of movement to safer areas must be a choice available to civilians, not a measure imposed on them by force.

    UNICEF stressed that any further escalation of the attack on Gaza City would tragically compound the suffering of children and strip them of their last remaining protection, calling for urgent action to save their lives and guarantee their basic rights.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Alaa Shamali

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • With a growing number of countries around the world recognizing Palestinian statehood, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Thursday declared that “there will be no Palestinian state” as he signed an agreement to develop a key settlement in the West Bank — prompting calls for the international community to hold Israel accountable for its illegal occupation and apartheid policies in…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • Israeli forces arrested at least 1,000 Palestinians in a single day on Thursday during a wide-ranging raid on Tulkarem in the northern West Bank, Abdullah Kamil, the governor of the Tulkarem area, told local media. The raid came following a roadside bomb attack on an armored Israeli military vehicle earlier in the day, taking place near a checkpoint outside the city. The attack wounded two Israeli…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • The Government Media Office in Gaza has accused the Israel occupation army of committing “crimes of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and forced displacement” against the residents of Gaza City through a systematic campaign of destruction of residential neighborhoods and civilian infrastructure since the start of the ground offensive on August 11, 2025, until today.

    Widespread destruction of residential infrastructure

    In an official statement, the office explained that Israel has completely destroyed more than 1,600 multi-story residential towers and buildings, in addition to 2,000 other buildings that have been severely damaged. It has also targeted 13,000 tents that were sheltering thousands of displaced people.

    Since the beginning of September alone, the occupation has completely destroyed 70 residential towers and buildings, severely damaged 120 others, and burned and destroyed more than 3,500 tents for displaced persons.

    According to the statement, these buildings contained more than 10,000 housing units inhabited by about 50,000 people, while the targeted tents housed more than 52,000 displaced persons, meaning that the occupation destroyed homes and tents that housed more than 100,000 people and led to the displacement of more than 350,000 citizens to the center and west of the city.

    Israel’s systematic targeting of civilians in Gaza

    The media office emphasized that what is happening is not targeting of the resistance, as Israel claims, but rather systematic opening of fire on unarmed civilians, including children, women, and the older people.

    It added:

    The occupation army did not open the gates of hell on the resistance, as its Minister of War Yoav Katz said, but rather on unarmed civilians, destroying homes, hospitals, schools, mosques, and tents, in a flagrant violation of international humanitarian law and the Geneva Conventions.

    The statement noted that the targeting included most of the main neighborhoods in Gaza City, including: Shuja’iyya, Al-Zaytoun, Al-Tuffah, Al-Daraj, Al-Rimal North and South, Tel Al-Hawa, Sheikh Radwan, Al-Sabra, Al-Nasr, Sheikh Ajlin, and Al-Shati camp. It explained that these neighborhoods were systematically divided and destroyed, turning them into areas that repelled residents as part of a policy of “ethnic cleansing.”

    Documented war crimes and an urgent call

    The media office affirmed that Israel’s acts constitute full-fledged war crimes, calling on the international community and its human rights and humanitarian institutions to intervene urgently to stop the aggression and provide protection for civilians. It added that the continued silence of the international community encourages the occupation to continue its policy of genocide and forced displacement.

    The office concluded its statement by emphasizing that the Israeli occupation is deliberately committing “crimes of genocide and ethnic cleansing” in Gaza City, stressing that the international community is required to take immediate action, not only through condemnation, but also through practical steps to stop the aggression and hold the leaders of the occupation accountable before the competent international courts.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Alaa Shamali

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • The UN General Assembly adopted a resolution endorsing the so-called “New York Declaration,” which calls for the recognition of the Palestine state and the promotion of the two-state solution as a means of achieving a just and lasting peaceful settlement of the Palestinian issue.

    UN resolution on Palestine

    The resolution, submitted by France and Saudi Arabia, is entitled:

    New York Declaration on the peaceful settlement of the question of Palestine and the implementation of the two-state solution.

    It was supported by 142 countries, opposed by 10, and 12 abstained, according to an official statement released by the United Nations.

    The declaration calls for an end to the war in the Gaza Strip and for a just and comprehensive settlement based on the effective implementation of the two-state solution, ensuring a better future for Palestinians, Israelis, and the peoples of the region. It also stressed the rejection of any territorial or demographic changes imposed by force, foremost among which is the forced displacement of Palestinians, considering it a flagrant violation of international humanitarian law.

    The declaration renewed its condemnation of all attacks against civilians, including indiscriminate attacks and acts of terrorism, as well as provocations, incitement, and destruction of property.

    In response, the Israeli government rejected the resolution and described the UN vote as a “political circus divorced from reality,” continuing its hardline stance rejecting any commitment to a two-state solution.

    Although previous Israeli governments dealt with the idea of a Palestinian state selectively without publicly declaring their rejection, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu gradually moved toward outright rejection, after hinting in 2009 at conditional acceptance of a demilitarized Palestinian state. His current government, considered the most extreme in Israel’s history, has repeatedly declared its definitive rejection of this solution, ignoring the growing international consensus on it.

    Welcomed by many

    On Friday, Arab and Islamic countries and organizations welcomed the UN General Assembly’s adoption of a resolution supporting the “New York Declaration” on the recognition of the Palestinian state, considering it new support for Palestinian rights and a step toward implementing the two-state solution.

    International and human rights organizations warn that Israel’s continued extermination in Gaza, coupled with its policy of settlement expansion in the West Bank, undermines any real possibility of implementing the two-state solution.

    This comes amid Israel’s ongoing genocide in Gaza since 7 October 2023, which, according to official Palestinian data, has resulted in 64,756 martyrs and 164,059 wounded, most of them women and children, in addition to hundreds of thousands of displaced persons. while starvation has claimed the lives of 413 Palestinians, including 143 children, as of last Friday.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Alaa Shamali

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Video has emerged from Gaza showing the slaughter of more Palestinian aid-seekers yesterday at the Zikim ‘aid’ station run by the US-Israel-run ‘Gaza Humanitarian Foundation’ (GHF).

    Warning: the video below contains graphic footage:

    GHF: far-right racists

    The murders come after an investigation revealed this week that a Muslim-hating biker gang named Infidels MC is contracted to provide ‘security’ at these death sites, helping occupation forces in their almost-daily murder of desperate Palestinians coming to the sites for food amid Israel’s months-long starvation blockade.

    Well over two thousand Palestinians have been killed and more than fifteen thousand wounded at GHF sites since they began operating in May.

    Featured image via screengrab

    By Skwawkbox

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • The suspect in the murder of far-right speaker Charlie Kirk is a white, gun-loving, Trump-coddling, apparent member of the ‘Groypers’: a ‘loose coalition of ultra-right white nationalists whose founder Nick Fuentes believes Kirk was ‘too weak’ in his racist positions. The group had engaged in at least one so-called ‘Groyper war’ against Kirk’s far-right Turning Point USA after Kirk condemned white nationalism and Kirk’s security wouldn’t let Fuentes reach him.

    A Groyper and Netanyahu: two peas in a pod

    Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu, never one to miss an opportunity to incite Islamophobia, blames Muslims for Kirk’s alleged murder by an ultra-right white nationalist. The wanted war criminal said:

    This is a worldwide problem. The people on the, you know, on the extremes, the Islamists, the radical Islamists, and their union with the ultra-progressives.

    They often speak about human rights, they speak about free speech, but they use violence to try to take down their enemies, whether it’s President Trump, who’s been almost assassinated twice, or, you know, they try to kill me here, too. But they got Charlie Kirk, and it’s just heartbreaking.

    Israel lobby groups in the US, including the so-called ‘Anti-Defamation League’, had been accusing Kirk of antisemitism for the mildest criticism of Israel, despite his support for Israel’s genocide in Gaza, causing Kirk to admit he was afraid of Israel and its supporters. Now he’s dead, apparently murdered by someone who thought he wasn’t fascist enough, Kirk is being shamelessly used to attack the left.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Skwawkbox

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • The private security firm hired to secure Gaza aid distribution sites, where Israeli soldiers have shot over one thousand Palestinians as they seek food, employs dozens of members of an explicitly anti-Islam US motorcycle gang, BBC reported on 11 September.

    A BBC investigation identified at least 10 members of the Infidels Motorcycle Club (Infidels MC) working for UG Solutions (UG), which provides security at the deadly Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) aid sites in Gaza.

    At least seven members of Infidels MC work in senior positions with UG in Gaza.

    Infidels MC was formed in 2006 by US soldiers who fought in Iraq during and after the 2003 invasion. They are known for having tattoos that say “kafir” or “infidel” in Arabic.

    The post Anti-Islam US Biker Gang In Charge Of ‘Security’ For Gaza Humanitarian Foundation appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • Funeral in Doha for 5 people killed in the September 10 Israeli strike. Photo: AFP

    Responding to Israel’s September 10 attack aimed at Hamas negotiators in Qatar, all 12 members of the UN Security Council issued a toothless statement of condemnation that didn’t even mention Israel by name. This cowardly response underscores the pathetic international reaction to nearly two years of genocide.

    Israel believes it can do whatever it wants, wherever it wants, with no consequences–which has been true for two years now. It has already destroyed Gaza. It is expanding settlements, annexing the West Bank, threatening Lebanon, Syria, Yemen, and Iran. It has attacked aid flotillas, bombed refugee camps, and assassinated negotiators. Now it has bombed a U.S.-allied Gulf capital. And still, the world hesitates.

    One would think that the bombing of Qatar — a U.S. ally, the home of U.S. Central Command, and the very place where ceasefire negotiations were being brokered–would be a game-changer. The strike killed five Hamas staffers and a Qatari security officer. The senior Hamas leaders survived, but the real target was not just them. The target was diplomacy itself.

    Trump, for his part, has been playing a double game: issuing ultimatums to Hamas while allowing Israel to bomb the very negotiators the U.S. asked Qatar to host. His excuse that his envoy “called too late” to warn Doha is laughable. The truth is simpler: Washington could have stopped this. Its air defenses sat idle. Its umbrella of “protection” never opened. The U.S. is not a bystander; it is complicit.

    Netanyahu bragged about authorizing a “surgical precision strike” in Doha on what he called “terrorist chiefs.” But let’s be clear: this was state terrorism, carried out in broad daylight against a sovereign country at the heart of U.S. strategy in the Gulf. It was an assassination attempt deliberately timed to blow up the possibility of a ceasefire by killing the very negotiators needed to reach one. For nearly two years, the Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, has consistently obstructed ceasefire talks. The strike on Doha is final proof that Israel has no interest in peace — only endless war.

    In Europe, close Israeli allies Germany, France, and Britain condemned the strike, as did China and Russia. Even in Israel, the attack provoked outrage from hostage families. Einav Zangauker, whose son is captive in Gaza, said Netanyahu had “essentially sentenced my Matan to death.” She asked the question millions are asking: Why does Israel blow up every small chance for a deal?

    And the Arab world? Qatar’s prime minister Mohammed Al Thani called the attack “state terrorism,” warning the region that Netanyahu is destabilizing everything and that Netanyahu needs to be brought to justice. Saudi Arabia called it “a violation of international law and an unacceptable aggression against a fellow Arab state.” Jordan warned of “dangerous escalation.” The UAE expressed “grave concern.”

    Yet words are cheap. Where is the action? Where is the red line? Arab states have watched Palestinians burned alive in tents, starved at aid lines, bombed in their homes for two years — and offered little more than statements.

    If the world allows Israel to get away with bombing Doha, then no country in the Middle East is safe. Arab leaders who rushed to normalize with Israel under Trump’s so-called Abraham Accords–the UAE, Morocco, Bahrain, Sudan–now find themselves exposed as collaborators while Netanyahu bombs Arab capitals with impunity. The very least they must do right now is rescind those accords, and the rest of the Arab world must denounce any moves to normalize relations.

    Qatar is convening an emergency Arab-Islamic summit and has called for a collective Arab response. This must be more than words: a coordinated campaign to cut trade, sever ties, and impose sanctions on the rogue Israeli state.

    From there, the crisis will move to New York. As the new session of the UN opens and the U.S. continues to use its veto to stop the Security Council from taking action, the General Assembly must put the crisis at the top of its agenda. It must invoke the Uniting for Peace resolution to call for the following:

    • A UN protection force to deliver humanitarian aid, protect civilians, preserve evidence of war crimes, and facilitate reconstruction;
    • Comprehensive sanctions and military embargo;
    • Withdrawal of Israel’s General Assembly credentials;
    • Reactivation of the UN’s long-dormant anti-apartheid mechanism, and
    • Establishing a war crimes tribunal.

    The world is watching, and millions of people across continents are demanding an end to this genocide. The UN General Assembly still has the opportunity to rise to the occasion, proving that international law is more than just words on paper. The bombing of Doha should be the breaking point — the moment the world finally acts.

    The post From Doha to the UN: Turning Israel’s Terror Into Global Action first appeared on Dissident Voice.

    This post was originally published on Dissident Voice.

  • Israel might claim that they were not attacking Qatar per se, but rather Hamas in Qatar, but that is neither a distinction nor a difference. Qatar is considered neutral territory in the region, a place where representatives of Hamas, the Israeli government, the US, Egypt, and other interlocutors could meet and negotiate safely. Qatari territory was, until now, tacitly inviolable.

    Israel’s attack is clearly a sign of desperation. From Israel’s point of view, Hamas went too far in accepting Israel’s ceasefire terms. Those terms were designed to be unacceptable but to have the appearance of justification, so as to be able to condemn a Hamas rejection.

    Apparently, Israel made an offer that was unintentionally reasonable enough for Hamas to accept. Israel doesn’t want a ceasefire, only another pretext to continue the Gaza genocide to its ultimate conclusion. Not that a pretext is needed, from Israel’s point of view, but a fig leaf is always preferable to cover the last bit of embarrassing exposure.

    Nevertheless, the Israeli attack on Qatar reveals the depths of Israeli despair. Israel can no longer afford a ceasefire – not even to satisfy the demands for the release of Israeli captives. Its vaunted military consists of little more than an air force with unlimited US bombs and refueling facilities. The last ceasefire significantly reversed the ethnic cleansing of northern Gaza, and the infantry is so decimated by unaccustomed casualties, flight abroad, and refusal to serve, that it can barely muster the equivalent of a single division. A second ceasefire would be disastrous. Meanwhile, Hamas has more recruits than it can use, and an unlimited supply of unexploded Israeli ordnance to repurpose in workshops deep underground.

    Increasingly, it appears that the outcome in Gaza may include no ceasefire or pause, much less a truce, dénouement, or agreement, but rather a fight to the finish, with only one side left standing. Alternatively, Israel could decide to withdraw strategically rather than see its population dwindle inside a fortress of die-hard fanatics unable to dominate the territory that it covets.

    In fact, the uncertainties threaten to take us into unknown territory. Israel’s status as a pariah state is growing dramatically, while its dependence on a dwindling number of supporters makes the unthinkable increasingly plausible. Will the world finally defy or prevail upon the US to end the genocide? Will Israel use or threaten to use its nuclear arsenal on its neighbors to make them accept an unwilling Palestinian population into their territory? Will a joint Israeli-US attempt to destroy Iran unleash a global military conflict, with unpredictable consequences?

    We can only hope that a receding supply of saner minds will be adequate to the daunting task ahead.

    The post The desperation of Israel’s Qatar attack first appeared on Dissident Voice.

    This post was originally published on Dissident Voice.

  • For over 27 hours, Israeli forces have carried out mass arrests, kidnapping Palestinians from the streets of Tulkarm City, a city in the Northern occupied West Bank:

    Mass arrests are collective punishment

    Roads are blockaded and gates to the city closed:

    Israeli Occupation Forces (IOF) have also raided Palestinian homes and businesses, including pharmacies, shops and buses, destroying their contents, while arresting and beating their owners. The Palestinian Red Crescent Society said the IOF have also prevented medical crews reaching some of the wounded:

    According to Israeli publication Haaretz, an explosive device was detonated earlier yesterday, ‘lightly wounding’ two of the occupation’s soldiers. Residents described the military assault and arrests as ‘collective punishment and a show of force’. Although the number of arrests is unclear, the Palestinian Prisoner’s Society reports that it is, so far, in the hundreds:

    These forcible disappearances are taking place as the ongoing siege on Tulkarm and its two refugee camps, Tulkarm and Nur Shams has entered its 228th consecutive day amid daily raids and strict military measures targeting residents and their property, in which Palestinian homes have even been occupied by the IOF, and turned into military barracks:

    Another Palestinian journalist arrested

    Witnesses have said the IOF have ‘arrested everyone they saw’, including pharmacists, municipality staff, health workers, teachers, and men who were in their cars, on buses, and in mosques. One of those taken away yesterday was Palestinian journalist Alaa Al-Jarad. He was arrested after Israeli occupying forces broke into his home last night, assaulting both Alaa and his wife during the raid on their home:

    While Israeli occupation forces are carrying out genocide in the Gaza Strip, they have also stepped up collective punishment and forced displacement in the occupied West Bank. Not only is the highest rate of home demolitions in the West Bank, since 1967, currently underway, but Netanyahu has also officially approved the E1 plan. Construction in the E1 area would effectively cut off the occupied West Bank from East Jerusalem, and would undermine any chances of a Palestinian state. Plans to build 3400 illegal settlement units in the E1 area are currently taking place.

    40,000 forcibly displaced from their homes already

    Since January, 2025, there has been a major military offensive against three Palestinian refugee camps in Tulkarm and Jenin, in the Northern West Bank, which has forcibly displaced 40,000 Palestinians from their homes. 

    When attacks happen, such as the one earlier this week, in which Palestinian gunmen killed six Israelis in occupied East Jerusalem, the occupation steps up its collective punishment on Palestinians even more. It is not just the city of Tulkarm that is bearing the brunt of the occupation’s violence but also other towns and villages, which are now ‘under siege’, with a large presence of IOF.

    Far-right occupation leaders, such as Police Minister Ben Gvir have demanded ‘vengeance’ for the attack and have vowed to increase West Bank raids. 

    The Commission of Detainees and Ex-Detainees Affairs, and the Palestinian Prisoner’s Society released a statement last night, during the mass arrests in Tulkarm which included the following:

    The scenes being witnessed in Tulkarm are an extension of the scenes of mass humiliation we have witnessed in Gaza during this genocide. We are currently witnessing an unprecedented rise in the number of Palestinian political prisoners and detainees held behind bars by the occupation…The abuse of Palestinians and the unprecedented scale of arbitrary arrests must be halted through accountability and real international pressure.

    There have been 19,000 arrests in the West Bank since 7 October 2023, and this is a form of collective punishment for Palestinians. More than 11,000 Palestinians are currently detained in Israeli prisons, many of them without charge or trial.

    Featured image and additional images/video supplied

    By Charlie Jaay

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Israeli airstrikes have reportedly hit the offices of two newspapers in Yemen. Journalist Inés El-Hajj said the 10 September attack killed 25 media workers. And, a statement from the Yemeni Journalists Union condemned the:

    direct targeting of the offices of 26 September newspaper and Al-Yemen newspaper in the capital, Sana’a.

    It added that:

    According to initial figures, the attack left 46 martyrs and more than 165 wounded, most of them unarmed civilians — a crime that shames humanity and adds to Israel’s record of crimes against journalists and civilians.

    The union stressed that Yemen’s media workers have been “facing systematic targeting by Israeli aggression”. And, it called for:

    urgent action by the international community and UN human rights bodies to condemn this crime, hold the perpetrators accountable, and put an end to Israel’s policy of impunity.

    It also appealed to journalists’ unions around the world – “foremost the Arab Journalists Union and the International Federation of Journalists” – to:

    raise their voices and stand in solidarity with Yemeni and Palestinian journalists facing systematic targeting.

    Yemeni media workers have already suffered significantly as a result of years of brutal war at home, but not on the same scale as this Israeli attack.

    Israel extends policy of murdering journalists to Yemen

    Western-backed Israeli war criminals have consistently targeted journalists during the Gaza genocide. These reporters have literally risked – and too often lost – their lives to report on the apartheid state’s crimes against humanity. And the killing spree continues to this day. The UN’s Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights notes that:

    At least 248 journalists have now been killed in Gaza, more than in any other conflict in modern times.

    Some reports put the figure closer to 300.

    As UN experts have said:

    On the one hand, Israel continues to deny access to any international media and on the other, it kills with impunity local journalists who are the world’s only professional lens into the agony of genocide and famine unfolding in Gaza.

    Reporters Without Borders (RSF) is currently working with “campaigning platform Avaaz” and “hundreds of media outlets” on:

    a campaign calling for the protection of Palestinian journalists in Gaza, the emergency evacuation of reporters seeking to leave the Strip, an end to impunity for Israeli crimes against Gaza’s reporters and that foreign press be granted independent access to the territory.

    Stop Israel’s silencing of the truth about its genocide and regional rampage of terror

    The Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) says:

    Israel is engaging in the deadliest and most deliberate effort to kill and silence journalists that CPJ has ever documented. Palestinian journalists are being threatened, directly targeted, and murdered by Israeli forces, and are arbitrarily detained and tortured in retaliation for their work. Israel has systematically destroyed media infrastructure in Gaza, and tightened censorship throughout the West Bank and Israel.

    It adds that:

    By silencing the press, Israel is silencing those who document and bear witness to what human rights groups say is a genocide.

    There is in fact an overwhelming consensus among genocide scholars, human rights groups, and ethical legal experts that Israel is committing genocide against the Palestinian people in Gaza. Some were calling Israel’s treatment of Palestinians genocide long before 2023. And attacking journalists is nothing new for the settler-colonial state either. As University of Arizona associate professor Maha Nassar wrote in August 2025:

    Israel’s killing of journalists follows a pattern of silencing Palestinian media that stretches back to 1967.

    This week, Israel has extended its massacre of journalists to Yemen. The latter has long attracted the wrath of the apartheid state by targeting ships heading in its direction, as a statement of resistance against the genocide in Gaza. Meanwhile, the US and Britain (along with Western propaganda outlets), have backed Israel’s attacks on the already war-torn Yemen. In recent days, Israel even assassinated Yemen’s prime minister and most of his cabinet as its regional campaign of terror continued with impunity.

    Featured image via YouTube screenshot/Al Jazeera English

    By Ed Sykes

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Since the beginning of the genocide in Gaza, there has been no end to evidence on social media from Israeli occupation forces (IOF) soldiers openly boasting of their crimes, and feeling emboldened by the world’s silence.

    Intent to commit genocide is usually difficult to prove, but not in the case of “the most documented genocide in history”. Palestinian human rights organisations such as Al- Haq even have a registry of hundreds of Israeli genocidal statements on Gaza – many of them made before 7 October 2023.

    IOF celebrating war crimes on social media

    Equipped by the world’s silence over the genocide in Gaza, the IOF have been openly celebrating their war crimes on social media:

    Sali Israel Hazut is one of these soldiers. He lives in Tel Aviv, and describes himself on Facebook as self-employed in “earthworks, excavation and demolition”. Hazut is also an IOF soldier, who has been bragging on TikTok and Facebook about his many war crimes in Gaza. Plenty of photos, videos, and reels serve as evidence of his participation in the genocide.

    According to his posts, by 9 October 2023, Hazut was in Gaza City. Accompanying a horrendous video of dying and injured Palestinians in the aftermath of a bomb blast, he wrote:

    Whoever enters the mud should take into account that he will get dirty. Let the IDF mow.

    Multiple videos show Hazut in close proximity to dead bodies. Videos dated 7 October 2024 show him in his JCB truck, while soldiers take a closer look at bodies left on a dirt track. Although it is unclear how the occupation murdered these people, Hazut can be heard laughing and joking with other criminals at the scene:

    In the second video, a star of David can be seen, drawn onto the plastic which is wrapped around one of the bodies:

    The bodies are then loaded into the bucket of Hazut’s bulldozer and are then dumped on the ground, while a gathering crowd, taking photos on their phone, can be seen in the shadows.

    Videos of genocide

    Those of Hazut’s videos which are not of dead bodies show destruction of either civilian infrastructure or buildings which, most likely, had been Palestinian homes, or even schools and hospitals, before the IOF began their genocidal actions on the civilian population of Gaza:

    @salipower5

    ♬ original sound – סאלי פאוור5

    Hazut has also posted a video of a fuel truck being destroyed – amid a severe fuel crisis in Gaza, where fuel is not only needed to keep hospital patients in Gaza alive-especially premature infants and children, but is also essential to produce, treat and distribute water to more than two million Palestinians. Without fuel Palestinians die. On TikTok, Hazut has put some of these videos to music:

    In November 2023, a week after controversial ‘Israeli journalist’, Zvi Yehezkeli advocated mass violence against the Palestinians, by saying hundreds of thousands of them should be killed in order to achieve the objective of destroying Hamas, Hazut wrote on social media, under a video of Yehezkeli:

    One of the people I personally really admire.

    Last month, Yehezkeli also called for the killing of all journalists in the Strip.

    Evidence of war crimes in horrifying abundance

    Social media posts from those serving in the IOF, such as Sali Israel Hazut, serve as powerful evidence because soldiers are documenting on camera what international law prohibits – the targeting of civilians and destruction of civilian infrastructure.

    Many thousands of foreigners come to Israel and join the IOF, to help it with its mission of ethnically cleansing Palestine of all non Jews, not caring about the daily violations of international law taking place, not just in Gaza where the military is responsible for a genocide, but also in the West Bank, where the main job of soldiers is to guard illegal settlements, and protect illegal settlers. It is therefore a fact that those serving in the IOF are complicit in war crimes against Palestinians, and pressure is mounting to hold them to account.

    Although many dual nationals serve in the occupation’s military, anyone from any country in the world can volunteer with the IOF, although they need to be within the required age bracket, and priority is given to those with at least one Jewish grandparent. Foreign fighters joining the IOF include those from the US, Britain, France, Italy, Australia, Ukraine, Russia, Germany, India, and South Africa, among others.

    Shortly after 7 October 2023, it was reported that over 100 British nationals and British-Israeli dual nationals went to fight with the IOF, and attempts are underway to hold them to account. 10 British nationals – including both dual British-Israeli citizens and volunteers with solely British nationality – currently stand accused of war crimes and crimes against humanity for actions in Gaza.

    British nationals accused of war crimes in Gaza

    In April, a detailed 240-page dossier was submitted to the Met’s War Crimes Unit, known as SO15, on behalf of the Gaza-based Palestinian Centre for Human Rights and the UK Public Interest Law Centre. The allegations against these individuals include deliberately targeting and killing civilians and aid workers, coordinated attacks on hospitals and protected sites, forced displacement of people, and other serious violations. The dossier covers events from October 2023 to May 2024 and presents eyewitness testimonies and various types of evidence.

    According to Paul Heron, founder of PILC, and the organisation’s consultant solicitor, the list of alleged criminals was much longer, but was narrowed down to 10 suspects who served in Gaza, and were reported to SO15, purely based on the evidence.

    Heron said:

    These were the ones we thought we had the most evidence on to provide. The police have come back with further questions, so we are now engaging our researchers to do another deep dive on some of the questions being asked, and hope to provide a supplementary report by the end of the year. We would then hope that if there is enough evidence on the 10 that, should they be in the UK or intend to return to the UK, they may be arrested and charged by the Met police.

    Heron hopes there is no political interference, and the police assigned to the case will have enough resources to dig deep and amass further compelling evidence to prosecute these war criminals.

    Holding the perpetrators of genocide to account

    The submission of this report to SO15 is part of a growing worldwide movement to try and hold these perpetrators of genocide to account. In July, French publication Le Monde reported that several hundred French dual nationals had gone to Gaza to fight with the IOF. A complaint has been filed against two of these French-Israeli soldiers, accusing them of war crimes. Around the world, arrest warrants have been mounting up against these criminals, largely due to the work of the Belgium-based Hind Rajab Foundation (HRF), which was founded in 2024 and is trying to bring IOF soldiers to justice, primarily through legal actions at the international level.

    HRF has filed a complaint with the International Criminal Court (ICC) against more than 1,000 Israeli soldiers accused of war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide in Gaza, backed by over 8,000 pieces of evidence such as videos, audio recordings, forensic reports, and social media documentation. These soldiers have been individually identified and are accused of participating in systematic attacks on civilians during the Gaza conflict.

    The foundation uses soldiers’ own social media posts and videos, where many soldiers openly display or confess to their actions, as crucial evidence to hold them accountable and pursues cases in multiple countries, by filing complaints against soldiers who travel or reside abroad. While some accused soldiers manage to flee before arrest, these cases set legal precedents for international accountability.

    The threat of legal consequences has now led to the occupation implementing new restrictions which ban soldiers from posting certain incriminating content. Israeli news publication Ynet has even published a guide for soldiers on how to ‘avoid arrest’ when travelling abroad.

    UK government refuses to prosecute British war criminals: totally complicit

    The Foreign Enlistment Act 1870 prohibits British nationals from enlisting in a foreign army. During the Israeli occupation’s 2014 war on Gaza known as Operation Protective Edge, which killed more than 2250 Palestinians in 50 days, a petition was presented to the UK government calling on British citizens, who served in the IOF and were deployed to the occupied territories, to be prosecuted.

    But the British government responded by saying the act doesn’t apply to Israel, as it only stops British citizens from engaging in a war with another foreign army and the UK does not recognise Palestine as an independent state.

    Many of these foreign fighters who are joining the IOF and going to Gaza, are involved in combat operations where widespread allegations of war crimes have been reported. These fighters have, until now, enjoyed total impunity. Hopefully this is about to change. As for Hazut, if he is a full Israeli citizen, the only chances of him being arrested and put on trial for war crimes would be either if a warrant was issued for his arrest from the ICC, or a third country carries out an extrajudicial arrest, and tries him from there for war crimes and crimes against humanity.

    Our government is totally complicit in the ongoing genocide, as it not only continues to send weapons to, and trade with the Israeli regime, but also trains Israeli Occupation Forces (IOF) personnel in Britain. The very fact that the government has squirmed out of holding heinous IOF soldiers to account can only be testament to their commitment to Israel’s genocide.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Charlie Jaay

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • As Skwawkbox has previously reported, the death toll in Gaza from Israel’s genocidal war on civilians has far exceeded media reports for the best part of two years – around 450,000 by the summer, almost all of them civilians, according to the Israeli military’s own data.

    But the latest analysis published in medical journal The Lancet puts the estimated death toll far higher – and the proportion of children among the victims of Israel’s terrorism even higher than the fifty percent previously estimated.

    Israel’s genocidal campaign sees Gaza death toll increased

    Amid Israel’s wholesale destruction of Gaza, as many as 120,000 bodies remain unrecovered and therefore not included in official death figures, but the impact of starvation and disease after months of Israel’s blockade of food and even basic medicines has now overtaken the toll of those murdered violently by the occupation.

    A study by the Lancet based on the slaughter of the first nine months of the Israeli-imposed Gaza massacre found that the total number of violent deaths by April 2025, almost five months ago, was 136,000. The Lancet also estimated at least four ‘indirect’ deaths from starvation, disease and other causes linked to the genocide but not directly caused by violence, for every violent death. Even using that “conservative” figure, the 136,000 violent deaths by April mean 544,000 Palestinian deaths from the imposed deprivation.

    This means a total Gaza death toll from Israel’s genocide so far would be a staggering 680,000 deaths – by 25 April this year – and much higher now, after five more months of mass murder and starvation.

    And as lawyer Ali Jamal Awad noted, the study also puts the number of babies and children murdered at a far higher proportion of the total than the fifty percent estimated previously:

    On September 3, 2025, Dr. Gideon Polya and Professor Richard Hil calculated the total death toll for Gaza since October 7.

    My fingers are shaking as I’m writing this.

    Based on all the data collected, the death toll in Gaza is at least 680,000.

    But even worse, 380,000 are infants under five years of age, 99,000 children five or older, 63,000 women and 138,000 men.

    Israel launched its genocide in Gaza on a claim that Palestinian fighters had beheaded babies and baked them in ovens on 7 October 2023. None of that was true. But the terror state has committed a slaughter of infants and children on a scale that Skwawkbox wishes were unimaginable – and a scale higher by a factor of more than ten than the ‘63,000’ that the BBC and other UK media persist in using, a horrific enough number but one that doesn’t even come close to reality.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Skwawkbox

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • The vice-president of the International Court of Justice (ICJ), Julia Sebutinde, has faced calls to quit after making shocking remarks. The Ugandan judge told her congregation at Watoto Church that:

    the Lord is counting on me to stand on the side of Israel.

    The Pentecostal church was established in Kampala by Canadian missionaires, and explicitly promotes Christian Zionism.

    Her statement has pushed the International Commission of Jurists to write to the president of the ICJ, Justice Yuji Iwasawa. The letter calls for an investigation into Sebutinde’s comments, and her subsequent removal from the South Africa v Israel case due to concerns over impartiality. Naturally, both Sebutinde’s comments and this letter have sparked some discussion with experts in international law. Many view the Ugandan judge’s remarks as posing a potential threat to perceptions of the Court’s independence.

    However, as welcome as this attention is – to say nothing of Sebutinde’s plagiarism from Zionist sources – one central thing has been overlooked: the depth of influence of Christian Zionism in Sebutinde’s record of judgements.  

    ICJ’s Sebutinde: bending settler-colonial reality using the law:

    Much of Sebutinde’s approach can be summed up In her dissenting opinion to the Order for Provisional Measures in the case of South Africa v Israel. Notably, she voted against all six provisional measures and, tellingly, described Israel’s ongoing settler-colonisation of Palestine as “essentially and historically a political or territorial” dispute. The conclusion she reached during this opinion was that a settlement required diplomatic negotiations, and not judicial intervention. By positioning the Zionist colonisation of Palestine as a historical, political, and ideological issue—and consequently not a violation of international law—she rehearses the discourse of Israeli permanent security. Such a logic makes Palestinians responsible for the genocidal violence inflicted upon them. This perverse framing shields Israel’s genocidal war in Gaza as lawful self-defence. And, in turn, this also sheds light on the assumptions that shape her perspective on the (il)legality of Israel’s occupation of Palestine. 

    Her dissenting opinion to the ICJ’s Advisory Opinion on the Legal Consequences arising from the Policies and Practices of Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territory is an explicitly Christian Zionist manifesto masquerading as a legal opinion. Her plagiarism from Zionist sources such as the Jewish Virtual Library raises serious concerns about the materials relied upon to support her dissenting opinion. However, it is her conclusions regarding Palestinian self-determination, right to return, and illegal Israeli settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territories that are truly shocking. 

    Foundation of British settler-colonialism

    She condenses the multifaceted and diverse histories of Jewish life in Palestine into a “national group” established in “Ancient Israel.” She does so through employing Zionist archaeology as historical and material evidence to support biblical accounts of the presumed historical events surrounding the Israelite conquest of Canaanite lands. These “visible remains, buried in the soil” shape the ideological contours of Sebutinde’s appraisal of the past, present, and future of Israel’s settler nationhood in Palestine.

    To provide her ideological perspective doctrinal support, she draws on the British Mandate for Palestine as a key source to assess the legitimacy of Israeli settler-colonialism. She provides a convoluted legal argument that designates Palestine as ‘terra nullius’ – absent of sovereign legal title. In such an interpretation, Israel would possess territorial sovereignty on all land from the Mediterranean Sea to the Jordan River.

    Consequently, the Occupied Palestinian Territories become “disputed”. Through her framework, the illegal occupation becomes legal, Palestinian self-determination becomes limited to “autonomy”, and the illegal Israeli settlements in the West Bank become an assertion of Israel’s “right to settle”. Sebutinde occludes the fundamentally colonial nature of the British Mandate for Palestine and its racial regime of land settlement. In doing so, her opinion uses international law’s authority and limits of interpretation to perform a settler-colonial reality-bending exercise that renders the existence of an independent and free Palestinian nation as a breach of international law. In other words, she uses Britain’s established settler-colonial relationship to Israel to provide a legal justification for Israel’s existence that flies in the face of both reality and good legal sense.

    The statehood trap of the Judeo-Christian worldview: 

    Sebutinde’s opinion demonstrates how the Judeo-Christian worldview still underpins international law. The widespread belief in the rationality and equality of international law means very little here.

    Jamaican literary critic and theorist Sylvia Wynter articulates that the Judeo-Christian worldview emerged from Europe’s secular transformation. This transformation preserved the underlying structures and meanings of Christianity in its shift towards rational imperial civilisation. Secularity, especially in relation to international law, transposed sovereign authority over the religious authority of God. And so, it’s not actually a step too far for Sebutinde to connect a biblical “Ancient Israel” with the modern-day settler-state of Israel.

    However, it’s important to keep in mind that she is not an anomaly of the legal system, but instead its logical end. As critical legal theorist Peter Fitzpatrick explains, statehood in its contemporary form still actually continues to accommodate theology as the organising principle of geopolitical relationships. The very establishment of the state of Israel relied on the foundational violence of the Nakba: a violent Judeo-Christian implementation of statehood in a very particular manner. Such a model of statehood is fraught with limitations and runs the continual risk of coercing the liberation of Palestine into the form of statehood only. Ultimately, it’s crucial that the global community doesn’t prioritise the shallow “recognition of a Palestinian State” by Euro-American states at the expense of abandoning the multitude of Palestinian freedom dreams. 

    Featured image via YouTube screenshot/Academy for Cultural Diplomacy

    By Anamika Misra

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • The vice-president of the International Court of Justice (ICJ), Julia Sebutinde, has faced calls to quit after making shocking remarks. The Ugandan judge told her congregation at Watoto Church that:

    the Lord is counting on me to stand on the side of Israel.

    The Pentecostal church was established in Kampala by Canadian missionaires, and explicitly promotes Christian Zionism.

    Her statement has pushed the International Commission of Jurists to write to the president of the ICJ, Justice Yuji Iwasawa. The letter calls for an investigation into Sebutinde’s comments, and her subsequent removal from the South Africa v Israel case due to concerns over impartiality. Naturally, both Sebutinde’s comments and this letter have sparked some discussion with experts in international law. Many view the Ugandan judge’s remarks as posing a potential threat to perceptions of the Court’s independence.

    However, as welcome as this attention is – to say nothing of Sebutinde’s plagiarism from Zionist sources – one central thing has been overlooked: the depth of influence of Christian Zionism in Sebutinde’s record of judgements.  

    ICJ’s Sebutinde: bending settler-colonial reality using the law:

    Much of Sebutinde’s approach can be summed up In her dissenting opinion to the Order for Provisional Measures in the case of South Africa v Israel. Notably, she voted against all six provisional measures and, tellingly, described Israel’s ongoing settler-colonisation of Palestine as “essentially and historically a political or territorial” dispute. The conclusion she reached during this opinion was that a settlement required diplomatic negotiations, and not judicial intervention. By positioning the Zionist colonisation of Palestine as a historical, political, and ideological issue—and consequently not a violation of international law—she rehearses the discourse of Israeli permanent security. Such a logic makes Palestinians responsible for the genocidal violence inflicted upon them. This perverse framing shields Israel’s genocidal war in Gaza as lawful self-defence. And, in turn, this also sheds light on the assumptions that shape her perspective on the (il)legality of Israel’s occupation of Palestine. 

    Her dissenting opinion to the ICJ’s Advisory Opinion on the Legal Consequences arising from the Policies and Practices of Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territory is an explicitly Christian Zionist manifesto masquerading as a legal opinion. Her plagiarism from Zionist sources such as the Jewish Virtual Library raises serious concerns about the materials relied upon to support her dissenting opinion. However, it is her conclusions regarding Palestinian self-determination, right to return, and illegal Israeli settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territories that are truly shocking. 

    Foundation of British settler-colonialism

    She condenses the multifaceted and diverse histories of Jewish life in Palestine into a “national group” established in “Ancient Israel.” She does so through employing Zionist archaeology as historical and material evidence to support biblical accounts of the presumed historical events surrounding the Israelite conquest of Canaanite lands. These “visible remains, buried in the soil” shape the ideological contours of Sebutinde’s appraisal of the past, present, and future of Israel’s settler nationhood in Palestine.

    To provide her ideological perspective doctrinal support, she draws on the British Mandate for Palestine as a key source to assess the legitimacy of Israeli settler-colonialism. She provides a convoluted legal argument that designates Palestine as ‘terra nullius’ – absent of sovereign legal title. In such an interpretation, Israel would possess territorial sovereignty on all land from the Mediterranean Sea to the Jordan River.

    Consequently, the Occupied Palestinian Territories become “disputed”. Through her framework, the illegal occupation becomes legal, Palestinian self-determination becomes limited to “autonomy”, and the illegal Israeli settlements in the West Bank become an assertion of Israel’s “right to settle”. Sebutinde occludes the fundamentally colonial nature of the British Mandate for Palestine and its racial regime of land settlement. In doing so, her opinion uses international law’s authority and limits of interpretation to perform a settler-colonial reality-bending exercise that renders the existence of an independent and free Palestinian nation as a breach of international law. In other words, she uses Britain’s established settler-colonial relationship to Israel to provide a legal justification for Israel’s existence that flies in the face of both reality and good legal sense.

    The statehood trap of the Judeo-Christian worldview: 

    Sebutinde’s opinion demonstrates how the Judeo-Christian worldview still underpins international law. The widespread belief in the rationality and equality of international law means very little here.

    Jamaican literary critic and theorist Sylvia Wynter articulates that the Judeo-Christian worldview emerged from Europe’s secular transformation. This transformation preserved the underlying structures and meanings of Christianity in its shift towards rational imperial civilisation. Secularity, especially in relation to international law, transposed sovereign authority over the religious authority of God. And so, it’s not actually a step too far for Sebutinde to connect a biblical “Ancient Israel” with the modern-day settler-state of Israel.

    However, it’s important to keep in mind that she is not an anomaly of the legal system, but instead its logical end. As critical legal theorist Peter Fitzpatrick explains, statehood in its contemporary form still actually continues to accommodate theology as the organising principle of geopolitical relationships. The very establishment of the state of Israel relied on the foundational violence of the Nakba: a violent Judeo-Christian implementation of statehood in a very particular manner. Such a model of statehood is fraught with limitations and runs the continual risk of coercing the liberation of Palestine into the form of statehood only. Ultimately, it’s crucial that the global community doesn’t prioritise the shallow “recognition of a Palestinian State” by Euro-American states at the expense of abandoning the multitude of Palestinian freedom dreams. 

    Featured image via YouTube screenshot/Academy for Cultural Diplomacy

    By Anamika Misra

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • The phone numbers of a string of Israeli government officials – including PM Benjamin Netanyahu, defence minister Israel Katz and fascist ‘security’ minister Itamar ben-Gvir – have been obtained by Turkish hackers and passed to the Palestinian Observer for publication in a major embarrassment to the colonial occupation.

    Israeli government ministers’ phone numbers leaked

     

    View this post on Instagram

     

    A post shared by Ani Says (@ani.says2)

    Worse, at least one – defence minister Israel Katz – was then pranked by the hackers, who managed to get him to answer a WhatsApp video call before recording him and telling him Israel is headed for destruction:

    Katz has since disconnected the number. One local commenter referred to previous comments by an Israeli PM – apparently Katz’s boss Netanyahu – who said that no politician who got hacked by Israel’s enemies was fit to serve in a senior position:

    Petulantly trying to save face, Katz ranted that he was going to destroy the ‘terrorists’:

    Let them continue to call and threaten and I will continue to order the elimination of their fellow terrorist leaders.

    As well as the trio mentioned above, the hackers also obtained and published the numbers of Knesset Speaker Amir Ohana, government ministers including Yariv Levin, Eli Cohen, Dudi Amsalem, Yoav Kisch, Miri Regev, Miki Zohar, Avi Dichter and Nir Barkat, and for good measure the number of former defence minister and wanted war criminal Yoav Gallant.

    Featured image via screengrab

    By Skwawkbox

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • The Hind Rajab Foundation (HRF) has reported that the Starmer regime rejected, out of hand and with no legal basis for doing so and in complete violation of its obligations under international law, HRF’s war crimes complaint against Israeli president Isaac Herzog, who has been welcomed and entertained by the UK government this week. The foundation is named after 5 year old Hind Rajab, a Palestinian child that Israeli forces fired 355 machine gun bullets into.

    Rebuke for government

    Responding to Starmer’s government, HRF explained:

    On 10 September 2025 the HRF, represented by their UK solicitors, the European Legal Support Center (ELSC, @elsclegal) and Stop the War Coalition (@stwuk), both represented by the Public Interest Law Centre, filed a criminal complaint to the relevant UK authorities seeking the arrest of Israeli President Isaac Herzog for grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions.

    The HRF, ELSC and Stop the War Coalition had already taken the preliminary step of writing to the Police, Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) and Attorney General’s Office on 9 September 2025. So far British authorities have refused to act, using weak arguments. More steps will be taken.

    The UK has a binding obligation under Article 146 of the Fourth Geneva Convention to “seek out and prosecute” those reasonably suspected of grave breaches when present in its territory. To refuse action against Herzog while citing dubious evidential grounds, without offering the required guidance, is not only a legal error by the CPS but is both shocking and dangerous, sending a message of impunity at a time when accountability is urgently needed.

    The organisation said that it and its co-complainants had provided:

    a Case Summary providing clear and detailed evidence of Herzog’s personal role (i.e. as an accessory to war crimes) in Israel’s policy of starvation, the systematic destruction of Gaza, and other acts that may constitute war crimes and crimes against humanity, on 1 O September 2025…

    [including] Herzog’s own public statements erasing civilian protection, his denial of famine in Gaza in the face of overwhelming UN documentation, and his visits to military sites – including Nahal Oz and Gaza – where his presence coincided with or directly preceded destructive military campaigns such as Operation Oz and Nir.

    And it detailed the state apparatus’s response, or lack of it:

    Despite this compelling material, the Metropolitan Police have failed to arrest Herzog or to indicate any reasons for failing to act, and on the evening of 10 September 2025 a CPS lawyer writing on behalf of the Director of Public Prosecutions (OPP) rejected the criminal complaint and the separate application for permission to seek a judicial arrest warrant on the grounds of “insufficient admissible evidence”.

    HRF chair Dyab Abou Jahjah said:

    History will not absolve the British authorities for failing to arrest Isaac Herzog. In doing so, the police have abandoned the Palestinian victims of 𝚐𝚎𝚗𝚘𝚌𝚒𝚍𝚎, organised starvation, and destruction in 𝙶𝚊𝚣𝚊, and have placed themselves on the side of impunity rather than justice.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Skwawkbox

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Carolyn Gelenter is the daughter of a Holocaust survivor. She has been consistently protesting against Israel’s genocide in Gaza and she decided to risk arrest on 6 September as part of the protest in London’s Parliament Square against the government’s ban on non-violent direct-action group Palestine Action. And after the arrest eventually came, she had the perfect response to a police officer who got snarky with her.

    Gelenter was among the many hundreds of people who took part in “one of the largest acts of mass civil disobedience in British history“. The police arrested 890 people, the vast majority under the Terrorism Act for holding placards in support of Palestine Action.

    Don’t get angry at anti-genocide protesters. Get angry at this government!

    Speaking to the Canary this week, Gelenter said:

    When I was being discharged, there was a new team on, or a couple of new detectives on, and I cracked a joke about, ‘it’s a good day to commit a crime’. And he said, ‘well, actually, it’s not because… you’re wasting our resources by doing this… we’re not out there on the streets where we should be.’

    And I went, ‘now, hold on a minute… I didn’t take, and neither did anybody else take, this action lightly. We did it because we were compelled to do it, out of a sense of conscience… the right thing to do. And it’s not us you should be getting angry at. I feel for you, and it’s disgusting your conditions, but who you should be getting angry at is Yvette Cooper and Keir Starmer, not at me… It’s my right to protest, and I was exercising my democratic right in what I consider to be not a democracy anymore… I can’t exercise my democratic right because, actually, you arrested me. So it isn’t a democratic right anymore to protest around certain things. So don’t get angry at me.’

    She also managed to ask one of the police officers involved in her arrest a question. She asked:

    maybe you think this is okay or not, but what if you had to do something that was really against your conscience? You know, there must be things even you would say are against your conscience. Would you do it?

    He answered, after thinking “long and hard”:

    well, I would, because I have to obey orders.

    Gelenter added:

    Therein lies the banality of evil.

    Here she was referring to Jewish intellectual Hannah Arendt‘s description of a Nazi criminal who was ‘just following orders’. Many Nazis sought to use this cop-out defence after the Second World War. Arendt was also incredibly prescient in many ways about what the state of Israel looked likely to become, arguing herself for peaceful coexistence in Palestine.

    It may indeed be easier to do evil if someone has ordered you to do it. But that, of course, doesn’t make it any less evil.

    Dignity in non-violence

    The Metropolitan Police has itself admitted that the authoritarian ban on Palestine Action will “overwhelm the justice system”, taking “officers out of neighbourhoods to the detriment of the Londoners who rely on them”.

    Defend Our Juries organised the action on 6 September, and noted that officers had:

    violently assault[ed] peaceful protesters including the elderly, in order to try and arrest over a thousand people for holding cardboard signs.

    The group added that the ban was “a preposterous waste of resources”. The police, however, tried to smear protesters as aggressive and violent. Speaking about the people who actually took the action to risk arrest, Gelenter said:

    Most people were sitting down or lying down.

    And, she insisted:

    it was a real testament to all of those who took the action to get arrested that they were very calm. And even the police made a comment about ‘it’s so nice to have people who are really polite and kind’.

    Some protesters in the area not taking the action tried to shame the police officers as they arrested people, but Gelenter made it clear that:

    the people on the actual action were incredibly dignified and very non-violent.

    Making her own stance clear, she asserted:

    I don’t want just the Gaza stuff to end. I want a world where love means something, and gratitude and kindness and compassion. Is that so wrong, to want a world like that?

    Featured image via Unsplash/Nikolas Gannon

    By Ed Sykes

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Israel attacked the Qatari capital of Doha on Tuesday, killing six people. The target was a gathering of Hamas’ leadership who were meeting to consider the latest proposal from the United States for an end to the genocide and the release of the remaining Israeli hostages being held in Gaza.

    There is a lot to unpack in this attack. While there is neither evidence nor reason to believe the U.S. was directly involved, Washington’s claim that they were taken completely by surprise by the attack seems like only part of the story in light of some of President Donald Trump’s statements.

    Qatar, meanwhile, initially said it was suspending its role as mediator for talks between Israel, the U.S., and Hamas, but soon after said it would continue in that role, although its efforts are obviously hampered by the Israeli attack.

    The post Understanding Israel’s Attack On Qatar, And What It Means For The Region appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz said on 10 September that Tel Aviv will strike at “enemies” wherever they are in the world, one day after an illegal Israeli airstrike that failed to assassinate senior leaders of Hamas in Qatar.

    Referring to the attack, dubbed “Operation Summit of Fire,” Katz said, “Israel’s security policy is clear – Israel’s long arm will act against its enemies wherever they may be.”

    “There is no place where they can hide,” the defense minister went on to say.

    “Everyone who was involved in the 7 October massacre will be held fully accountable. Anyone who engages in terrorism against Israel will be targeted.”

    The post Israeli War Chief Vows To Strike Enemies ‘Wherever They Are’ appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • In the coming days, dozens of civilian ships will depart from Tunisia, Spain, and Italy as part of the Global Sumud Flotilla – the largest effort yet to break Israel’s illegal blockade of Gaza. On board will be several health activists from the People’s Health Movement (PHM). Among them is Moroccan pharmacist and human rights defender Aziz Rhali. In this interview, physician Juliette Mattijsen, member of PHM Europe’s coordinating group and researcher on planetary health education, speaks with Rhali about his path in the global health movement and his commitment to supporting Palestinian health workers during the genocide.

    The post Health Workers’ Solidarity With Palestine Practiced On The Ground appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • Taxpayers Against Genocide (TAG) filed a petition in May to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights requesting that it investigate the United States for its material support of Israel’s war crimes and that it order the U.S. to immediately halt all military aid and weapons transfers to Israel. The grassroots group submitted the petition on behalf of Palestinian Americans with family and close ties to Gaza and other U.S. taxpayers opposed to Washington’s use of public funds to support genocide and crimes against the Palestinians. IACHR is a principle and autonomous organ of the Organization of American States whose mission is to promote and protect human rights in the American hemisphere.

    The post Lawsuit Implores International Court To Halt US Funding Of Gaza Genocide appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • In mass raids of homes, shops, factories, and even bystanders on the streets since noon today (11 Sep) and continuing at the time of writing, Israeli occupation forces have taken more than 1,500 Palestinians hostage in a mass arrest campaign targeting civilians in the West Bank city of Tulkarm.

    The scale of the illegal arbitrary detention of ordinary Palestinians can be sensed from this clip of a column of apparently blindfolded and shackled hostages being marched along by occupation troops, which has emerged this evening:

    Well over 10,000 Palestinians are imprisoned in Israel, many under severe conditions including torture, sexual torture, rape and deliberate starvation. Thousands have not been charged with any crime. Many are children.

    The new wave of detentions came on the same day that Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu vowed publicly that there will never be a Palestinian state, as he rubber-stamped Israel’s grossly illegal plan to annex large portions of the occupied West Bank.

    Israel is a terror state.

    By Skwawkbox

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has commemorated the anniversary of the September 11, 2001, attack on the U.S. by vowing more aggression against Qatar as condemnation of Israeli forces’ strike on Doha grows this week. In a filmed statement in English, Netanyahu likened the Doha attack to the U.S.’s 2011 assassination of Osama bin Laden — even though the Hamas political officials…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.