Category: Palestine

  • Taxpayers Against Genocide (TAG) filed a petition in May to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights requesting that it investigate the United States for its material support of Israel’s war crimes and that it order the U.S. to immediately halt all military aid and weapons transfers to Israel. The grassroots group submitted the petition on behalf of Palestinian Americans with family and close ties to Gaza and other U.S. taxpayers opposed to Washington’s use of public funds to support genocide and crimes against the Palestinians. IACHR is a principle and autonomous organ of the Organization of American States whose mission is to promote and protect human rights in the American hemisphere.

    The post Lawsuit Implores International Court To Halt US Funding Of Gaza Genocide appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • In mass raids of homes, shops, factories, and even bystanders on the streets since noon today (11 Sep) and continuing at the time of writing, Israeli occupation forces have taken more than 1,500 Palestinians hostage in a mass arrest campaign targeting civilians in the West Bank city of Tulkarm.

    The scale of the illegal arbitrary detention of ordinary Palestinians can be sensed from this clip of a column of apparently blindfolded and shackled hostages being marched along by occupation troops, which has emerged this evening:

    Well over 10,000 Palestinians are imprisoned in Israel, many under severe conditions including torture, sexual torture, rape and deliberate starvation. Thousands have not been charged with any crime. Many are children.

    The new wave of detentions came on the same day that Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu vowed publicly that there will never be a Palestinian state, as he rubber-stamped Israel’s grossly illegal plan to annex large portions of the occupied West Bank.

    Israel is a terror state.

    By Skwawkbox

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has commemorated the anniversary of the September 11, 2001, attack on the U.S. by vowing more aggression against Qatar as condemnation of Israeli forces’ strike on Doha grows this week. In a filmed statement in English, Netanyahu likened the Doha attack to the U.S.’s 2011 assassination of Osama bin Laden — even though the Hamas political officials…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • Democratic senators have concluded that Israel is carrying out an ethnic cleansing campaign in Gaza in which the U.S. “is complicit” in a report released after their recent visit to Israel and Palestine. In their 19-page report, Senators Chris Van Hollen (D-Maryland) and Jeff Merkley (D-Oregon) say that their visit made clear that Israel is carrying out collective punishment against…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • We speak to two activists aboard the Global Sumud Flotilla as it prepares to set sail for Gaza in an attempt to break the Israeli blockade. In recent days, two drone attacks on the flotilla ships, which are docked in Tunisia, have been reported. “We know who has interest in stopping these flotillas,” says Mariana Mortágua, a Portuguese parliamentarian who has joined the Global Sumud Flotilla and…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • Current and former tech workers with the No Azure for Apartheid coalition continue to disrupt business as usual at Microsoft’s global headquarters in solidarity with Palestinians facing a genocide, and in protest of Microsoft’s contracts with the Israeli military to provide tech that Israel uses to surveil, kill, and retroactively justify the killing of Palestinians. In this episode of Working People, which is a critical follow-up to our last episode, we speak with a panel of five tech workers and No Azure for Apartheid coalition members who have all been fired by Microsoft in the past year in response to their protest actions: Anna Hattle, Joe Lopez, Hossam Nasr, Nisreen Jaradat, and Riki. Even after losing their jobs, however, these workers have vowed not to stop organizing and protesting until Microsoft meets their demands to “fully and perpetually divests from Israel’s economy of occupation, apartheid, and genocide.”

    Additional links/info:

    Featured Music:

    • Jules Taylor, “Working People” Theme Song

    Credits:

    • Audio Post-Production: Jules Taylor
    Transcript

    The following is a rushed transcript and may contain errors. A proofread version will be made available as soon as possible.

    Maximillian Alvarez:

    Alright. Welcome everyone to Working People, a podcast about the lives, jobs, dreams, and struggles of the working class today. Working People is a proud member of the Labor Radio Podcast Network and is brought to you in partnership within these Times Magazine and the Real News Network. This show is produced by Jules Taylor and made possible by the support of listeners like you. My name is Maximillian Alvarez and today we are returning to the front lines of what is probably the most important and most sorely undercovered labor struggle happening in the country right now. As you guys know from our last episode and my coverage for the Real News Network, current and former tech workers have been rebelling at one of the biggest and most powerful tech companies in the world putting their jobs, livelihoods, and even their bodies on the line to disrupt business as usual at Microsoft.

    Members of the No Azure for Apartheid Coalition have been taking bold and escalating protest actions in solidarity with Palestinians facing a genocide and in protest of Microsoft’s contracts with the Israeli military to provide tech that Israel uses to surveil, kill and retroactively justify the killing of Palestinians and Gaza and the West Bank. In our last episode, you heard audio of speeches, chance and exclusive interviews that I recorded when I was on the ground in Redmond, Washington on August 19th and 20th, where current and former tech workers along with community supporters set up an encampment in the East Campus Plaza of Microsoft’s global headquarters establishing a liberated zone and renaming the plaza. The martyred Palestinian Children’s Plaza Police violently dismantled the encampment on August 20th and arrested 20 members of the no Azure for Apartheid Coalition. Now, local reports initially said that there were 18 arrests, but the coalition publicly clarified that 20 people were arrested.

    Then on August 26th when I was already back here in Baltimore, coalition members were back at Microsoft HQ as the coalition posted on the day of their action. Just now, current and former tech workers from Microsoft, Google, Oracle and more have been successfully able to occupy the office of Brad Smith, Microsoft Vice Chairman and President to protest Microsoft’s indispensable role empowering the genocide in Gaza and the mass surveillance of Palestinians. They are presenting their demands to the executives at their place of work as a direct escalation to show that worker pressure has reached a tipping. Point four, Microsoft employees were fired for participating in that sit-in a company spokesperson said in a statement that the firings were quote, due to serious violations of established company policies and our code of conduct, including participating in recent onsite demonstrations that created significant safety concerns for our employees we wish to emphasize.

    Again, the statement continued that such conduct is entirely unacceptable and stands in direct opposition to our company values and policies. Now in a news conference after the sit-in, Brad Smith himself spoke about the protests. He even mentioned the no Azure for Apartheid coalition by name, and he addressed the bombshell reports from The Guardian and 9 7 2 Magazine exposing Israel’s use of Microsoft Azure Cloud services to store recordings of millions of mobile phone calls and texts by Palestinians and Gaza in the West Bank. We’re committed to ensuring that our human rights principles and our contractual terms of service are upheld in the Middle East. Smith said at that news conference and he stressed that the company is investigating the revelations from the Guardian report. We are working every day to get to the bottom of what is going on and we will Now, we’ve actually linked to the full press conference video in the show notes for this episode, so you can go watch it for yourself.

    But in today’s episode, which is a critical follow-up to our last episode, you’re going to hear directly from a panel of five tech workers who are part of the know Azure for Apartheid Coalition and who have all been fired by Microsoft in the past year. Some were fired after the recent encampment and sit-in, others were fired earlier in the year. But as you’ll hear in our conversation, they do not regrets standing up for Palestinians and for speaking out against big tech’s complicity in their genocide and in Israel’s apartheid system. Even if doing so costs them the jobs that they’ve worked their whole lives to get. And they have vowed not to stop until Microsoft meets their demands to quote fully and perpetually divest from Israel’s economy of occupation, apartheid and genocide. So here we go. This is part two of our deep dive into the tech worker revolt for Palestine at Microsoft.

    Anna Hattle:

    My name is Anna Hattle. I worked at Microsoft for five years before getting fired recently after being arrested both at the encampments and at the sit-in and Brad Smith’s office.

    Joe Lopez:

    My name is Joe Lopez or Jose. I worked at Microsoft for around four years before getting fired, after disrupting Sanya Nadal’s keynote speech at Microsoft Build this year.

    Hossam Nasr:

    Hi, I’m Hossam Nasr. I’m a fired Microsoft worker and an organizer with no Azure for apartheid. I was fired last year in October after organizing a visual for the Palestinians work called Reza on Microsoft’s campus, and I was one of the first organizers with no Azure for apartheid, and I was recently arrested twice over the past couple of weeks, once at the encampment on Microsoft’s campus. And lastly, during the sit-in in Brad Smith’s office,

    Nisreen Jaradat:

    My name is Nisreen Jaradat. I worked with Microsoft for nearly seven years before being fired for participating in the Liberation Zone encampments and the rally that we did outside during the Brad Smith’s office. And I’m also an organizer with no Azure for Apartheid. Hey,

    Riki:

    I’m Riki. I’m an organizer with the much for apartheid. I was also fired a couple weeks ago for participating in the sit-in at Brad Smith’s office where we had seven of us arrested. But yeah, excited to be here.

    Maximillian Alvarez:

    Well, Anna, Joe, Hassan, Rine, Ricky, it’s really an honor to be on this call with you all and my heart’s very heavy just hearing all of these intros and I imagine our listeners are feeling the same because you have all been putting your bodies, your livelihoods, your everything on the line for this cause. And I saw that firsthand when I was there covering the encampment that y’all put up on Microsoft’s campus on August 19th and 20th. But I just wanted to really start by impressing upon folks listening that this is as real as it gets. And we are here talking to folks who, as you heard, have been fired because of the actions that they have taken to try to stop a genocide and to try to stop their employers complicity in that genocide. And you’re going to hear more from them about why they took that step and what has happened since I left Redmond and this struggle continued where the struggle goes from here and what listeners like you can do to help our brothers, sisters and siblings who are being slaughtered across the world in Palestine.

    And you guys also recently heard my interview with two Palestinians in Gaza about what they’re going through right now. So that’s what I mean when I say this is as real as it gets. And I am truly grateful to all of you for being here, and I really want to make the most of the time that we have together. So I’m going to keep my portions here short so that folks can hear directly from y’all. So let’s go around the table and have each of y’all tell us a bit more about yourself and how and why you got involved in the no Azure for Apartheid Coalition and this effort to get Microsoft to end its complicity in the genocide and contracts with Israel and take us through the preparations to the encampment and to the days of the encampment itself.

    Anna Hattle:

    Sure. As far as how I got involved in the campaign, I want to say that coming out of school I had a lot of convictions and thoughts about the world and so on and so forth that I didn’t know what to do with those and I was searching for ways to act on the things that I’d learned. And I think when I came into my job at Microsoft, I was always looking for that. And then when the genocide began, I think all of us and so many people everywhere knew that we had to figure out some way to try to answer the call for Palestine. And when I learned, I think a little over a year ago that there was actually something related to the position that I have at Microsoft and something that was related to something that I felt that I could do something about, I felt like I immediately needed to jump on that.

    And I think at that time I didn’t really realize the depth of Microsoft’s complicity. I just thought this is about Palestine, this is something that it’s about Microsoft, so I have context and I can make a contribution I need to join. And I think the campaign quickly educated me on how deeply entrenched Microsoft is in the occupation and genocide. And from there it became something that became so clear that it was worth putting energy into. Yeah, I think the thing that has also been really inspiring for me is connecting with so many other Microsoft workers who feel so strongly about this and working to build collective power around that and then exercise that power to pressure Microsoft. And this is my first time experiencing labor organizing in this way and feeling honestly just in my life, a sense of agency about being able to create the impact that is needed. So I’m really proud of what the campaign and the workers have been able to do together. The encampment that happened in the sit-in are just a testament to the creativity, the hard work, the dedication of so many people and so many of whom are not visible with us right now, but contributed to hopefully something that a tech company like this has never seen before.

    Joe Lopez:

    Yeah, I will echo that. I think that this is a really special campaign and there’s a lot of people working really hard to try and put an end to this genocide from all many different avenues. But I think Microsoft definitely is very complicit in the ways that they support is real with their technology. And so it’s a really important target for us to attack right now. I would say I’m probably the newest member of No Azure for Apartheid on this call right now. I had been paying attention to the ongoing genocide in Gaza for a while, but not really fully understanding how the company that I worked for was complicit as well. But after seeing Vanya and Al disrupt the 50th anniversary celebration for Microsoft in April, it really forced me to take a closer look and see how entrenched Microsoft really is in the technological backbone that’s being used to surveil Palestinians and to power the Israeli war machine.

    And so that kind of set me on the path of knowing that I wanted to leave the company, but also feeling inspired to do something on my way out. And so I reached out to Noah through Instagram actually and just let them know that I wanted to leave Microsoft and if there was a way that I could make an impact on my way out, I wanted to do it. And that’s how I ended up getting involved and eventually disrupting the keynote speech by CEO Satya Nella on May 19th. And since then I’ve still been organizing. I was fired after that, but I participated in the encampments a couple of weeks ago and also to sit-in and I think it’s really important to send a message to Microsoft that they can try and suppress their workers. They can try and fire us and try and shut down our speech, but we’re not going to leave and we’re not going to stop taking action until they decide to actually take an action to end their complicity.

    Hossam Nasr:

    I think for me, I was born and raised in Egypt and I came here for college. I organized a little bit in my college years before starting my first job at college, which was at Microsoft. I worked there for three years before I was fired. And I think especially being Arab Muslim immigrant, I think a lot of the time you are taught, I was taught to sort of keep my head down, don’t ruffle any feathers, don’t speak out, just lay low, rise up in the ranks and wait until you have more power and more privilege to actually speak up. And I think that I always pushed back against that framing. I’m not here saying that I bought into that, but I did think that there was a balance in my view at the time. I thought that there was a balance between using the privilege and the voice that I did have in this particular moment, and between also trying to somehow stay under the radar and so that I can rise up in the ranks and whatnot.

    I think that balance and that calculation for me completely ended on October 7th, 2023 and the start of the genocide that really shook my worldview and that shook my life personally and witnessing the extreme levels of depravity of the genocide and seeing it so clear and contrasting that with the levels gaslighting that I was seeing from every facet of my life, from my school to my employer, to my elected officials, every single facet of my life in this country was just hell bent on convincing me that Palestinian life has no value and I refuse to accept that. So for me, I think it became a thing of I threw that calculation out the window and I refused to abide by that. So I was like, I’m not going to withhold any ounce of privilege or voice. I have to speak up about Palestine and I don’t care about the repercussions.

    So I think quickly I tried to do that in every opportunity I saw in the streets here in Seattle or at work. And I was motivated to do that at work because the first thing that I saw when I logged on to Outlook on the first business day after October seven was an email from my leadership saying, we stand with Israel and a big banner with an Israeli flag that says, donate to Israel. And again, no mention of Palestinian people, no mention of the occupation, no mention of any of that. And again, that really angered me. And I started to, I think at first I started to just work within what the so-called proper channels and sending emails to my leadership and talking to my managers and asking questions and all of that. And I think very, very quickly I realized that that’s at that end and that’s not really going to affect any real change.

    And quickly, I think I had the conviction that it is the way to affect change is to have external pressure. It’s to not appeal to the humanity of these executives, but to apply pressure on them and that we need to be organized. That was one of the main things that I learned from this genocide in general, is that we are not outnumbered. We are out organized. So it was very important for me that I don’t do something that is just as an individual thing or an individual action of rage, but rather to build an infrastructure, an organization, a community that is bigger than the sum of its parts. And I think quickly I met other workers at Microsoft who felt similarly. And that group, we became organized under the banner of No Tech for Apartheid, which is this campaign that was started by former and current Google and Amazon workers to protest Project Nimbus, the 1.2 billion contract between Google, Amazon, and the Israeli government.

    So we were inspired by them and wanted to kind of replicate that campaign for Microsoft. We organized under their banner for a few months starting with our main focus was just understanding Microsoft’s ties to Israel. And our first action was actually releasing that research in the report that we titled Marriage Made in Hell, a play on a quote by Benjamin Netanyahu actually who described Microsoft’s and Israel’s relationship as a marriage made in heaven. So after that, I think that we launched officially no Azure for apartheid as our campaign. We honed in on our demands after we understood more Microsoft’s simplicity and we started doing more actions to again apply pressure on the company. We launched the petition. And I think for me, I was never intentionally trying to get fired, but I realized that eventually that was going to happen as a consequence of my activism, and I was prepared to pay that price.

    I didn’t expect that to happen because of a visual of all things, but that’s what ended up being. And I think after that, that was a galvanizing moment for me to again, make sure that this does not have the intended effect that they had, which is to sort of scare people or dissuade them from joining the campaign. I wanted to have the opposite effect. So again, I made sure to invest in the campaign even more to make sure that people feel actually more empowered to join the campaign after that and to not be disempowered by the repression. And I think after that, we, thankfully, our numbers grew even more. Our signatures grew even more and we started having more creative actions to apply pressure in different ways. We started doing these conference disruptions, disrupting keynotes, disrupting the 50th anniversary both on Microsoft campus and in the Seattle State Town Hall.

    And I think after a period of that, I think there was kind of leading to your question about the encampments. I think for me and a lot of us in the campaign, there was a moment where it felt like we need to escalate even more and we need to bring the movement to the seat of power to the throne of Microsoft executives at their offices, at their homes. And we took inspiration from the student movement. We were really inspired by the student in Tado and how that galvanized the entire Palestine movement around them and how that really created a moment of deep crisis for not just the universities but for the entire ruling elite that are causing this genocide to persist for so long. And we took inspiration from that and we said that if the students were able to create that level of crisis, if they were able to galvanize the movement in that way, is it time for the labor contingent to do the same? Is it time for our labor organizing rise to rise to the occasion in that way and carry forward the mental of the struggle? So that was really our inspiration behind the encampments and why we set them up in the Marr Palestinian Children’s Plaza, which formerly known as the East Campus Plaza. And unfortunately we were violently swept, but it was unfortunately to be expected given the pattern of behavior we’ve seen from Microsoft.

    Nisreen Jaradat:

    I joined Microsoft in 2018 and I very much had rose colored glasses at the time. I really believed in Microsoft’s mission and all of that. And I think kind of an awakening moment for me was in 2021, I recall signing a petition that called for a human rights review of Israeli contracts and stuff, and basically nothing happening with that. And then later on we learned that Satya’s response to that was to meet with the head of unit 8 2 0 0 a few months later and approved the mass theft of all Palestinian communications in a 10 minute meeting. And she called an incredibly powerful brand moment. And then after that, there were a lot of things that I was trying to do just on my own very much within the so-called proper channels, so raising HR tickets and going to the legal team and there’s stuff by myself which fizzled out.

    And then when this genocide started, I tried to do the same and it was very pretty clear that I wasn’t going to get anywhere. So when I heard that there was this group that was organizing, it’s like, great, I can’t do it on my own. Nobody can do this on their own. I was like, why don’t I join? And it was one of the best decisions of my life to join because I really learned that not only is our labor power, but our collective action is power and we keep each other safe, and it’s been just amazing organizing with this community, and when I started organizing, I wasn’t intending to get fired. There’s a lot of work that people do in the background, critical work for the campaign, which I was doing a lot of. I think that kind of changed for me after Microsoft built and I saw the way that Microsoft was responding to protests that people were getting brutalized and pepper sprayed and just I violently dragged out of sessions for our peaceful disruption.

    Also, when Microsoft also decided to respond to that by banning the words Palestine genocide and apartheid, it was clear that they were cracking down on all forms of Palestinian or pro-Palestinian speech, and it became very important for me to respond to that because I wasn’t going to be told that I can’t say the name of my whole Land Palestine and I wasn’t going to be told that I can’t answer this call or that we can’t call a genocide. A genocide and apartheid apartheid. So very trivially bypassed the email restriction and I sent a mass email, which is the exact thing they were trying to prevent, and instantly got suspended for that for about six weeks, and then I came back, they reinstated me and I joined the encampments and a rally outside of Brett Smith’s office where we delivered the petition. When we delivered the petition, we carried a scroll that was 18 feet long.

    It had the names of 2000 workers. Microsoft at the time was trying to say that workers were not representative of the liberation zone encampments. That was a complete lie. It was representative of the workers. It was literally an attempt at erasure of Palestinian and pro-Palestinian voices to say that we didn’t count as workers. And so we came and workers gave speeches, including me, I was still a worker at the time, and we delivered the petition scroll with the names of 2000 Microsoft workers who were also calling for Microsoft to divest from genocide and Microsoft security responded by specifically targeting the protesters who were carrying scroll and tore that scroll. Thankfully, they didn’t succeed in carrying the complete scroll, but that is how they responded. They literally violently responded to a piece of paper, so you can just imagine how they treat actual protestors. It was very, very important to me to take part in these encampments and in this rally, even though I knew from the pattern that Microsoft has that being fired was a likely outcome, I thought it was very important because every single moment is the right moment to escalate. There’s no time to wait and say Palestine somebody else’s problem. The time to escalate is right now. My only regret is that I didn’t do something like that sooner.

    Riki:

    Yeah, I can go into my story of coming into noaa. I graduated from college in 2023 and I had done an internship at Microsoft. I thought of them as one of these evil big tech companies by the least evil of those. I think a lot of people who are in my shoes share that sentiment or that thought that there’s Google and Amazon, they don’t really care anymore that they’re evil. They’re fine with people knowing that. And Microsoft is kind of like, oh, we help hospitals or something.

    Maximillian Alvarez:

    Jeff Bezos is gone full bond villain, whereas you still got the Microsoft sweater vest aesthetic.

    Riki:

    Yeah, yeah. It’s very much like, oh, we’re a company that really helps the world. We help people. I think I’ve definitely learned through this campaign that that is a very calculated kind of PR facade that they have been building, especially over the past few years. But I started Microsoft 2023 and then so I have been working there or I was working there for about two years in Azure storage, which is basically the cloud computing. If you want to store some kind of media on Microsoft servers, that’s where that would happen. I actually didn’t know too much about no for apartheid before joining. I actually was just going to lunch on East campus and stumbled into the vigil last November, and I think I had heard about No Tech for Apartheid, which is largely focused on Amazon and Google. I had seen No for Apartheid show up on Instagram, I think, but I didn’t know too much about the campaign, and I ran into the visual there and I was like, it’s like that there’s some protest happening here.

    Microsoft and I learned that it was worker led and that they’re trying to bring in workers, and so I joined the campaign through that. I think over the past time that I’ve been with Noah, it’s been very energizing to see how effective we, we’ve moved together and what an awesome kind of organization. This isn’t just like Microsoft is a company of 300,000 workers and one of the highest valued companies in the world, and we are in comparison a small but very mighty group of people who have kind of backed Microsoft into a corner in the present moment. So I’m very proud of being this part of this campaign, and I think we’ve had over this past almost a year that I’ve been a part of this campaign, we’ve had this series of all these different actions. We had the conference disruptions, we had disruptions of the 50th anniversary things or events that Microsoft was trying to put on.

    Basically we’ve just been shitting all over Microsoft’s parade every time they try and have one, and I think it’s really cool to see the impact of, they desperately don’t want people to look at what we’re trying to bring to light. And every time they do that, we recent the narrative, I remember after Build, I think a lot of the media sentiment surrounding build was largely focused on the protests, and that was a huge win for our campaign. I think up until this point, I’ve been not helping with the backend operations of the campaign and helping be someone documenting these events and not someone who’s a visible face of this campaign up until the Brad Smith sit in. That was the right time for me to become one of this group of these fired workers, these arrested workers. I think that was, I don’t regret that at all, and I feel like that was the right time for me to play those cards and for me to really step up for Palestine.

    I don’t personally have too many ties to Palestine. I certainly have more now after being part of this movement. Currently it’s the center of all the power structures that are trying to oppress a lot of that centers on Palestine, and I think just over the past two years I’ve kind of seen, we’ve taken off the cover and I can kind of see a lot of the wiring underneath all this ways in which the economy of genocide and war pr hearing that is going on as a result and all this propaganda that happens. So that’s kind of why I’m here. Just as someone who cares about the world and wants to see a world in which not only Palestine is free, but all of us are free, I

    Maximillian Alvarez:

    Think that’s beautifully and powerfully put, and I myself as a journalist, trying to get people to care about this and stop this and to fight for life and humanity and fight against this just inhumane, genocidal slaughter in which all of our souls are being sucked down the drain. What kind of world, what kind of people are we going to be after turning to our children and saying, we allowed this to happen? That’s the kind of thing that I’m sure we’ve all been thinking about over the course of this horrific genocide in Gaza. I am always trying to get folks to just care about that on its own. He’s like, these are human beings. That should be enough for you. Women, children, men, older people, like everyone. This is just life being obliterated. That should be enough for you. But if somehow that’s not enough, then you should care about it for your own fucking sake.

    Pardon my French, because now here we are back in the Imperial core and that boomerang’s coming to whip us in the ass ice is going to have access to Israel’s surveillance technology that they’re going to be spying on us with. Do you care about it? Now I’m getting heated, but you could tell from all of us here, me especially that this is the urgency that we’re talking about. This is the urgency that we’re trying to cover at the Real News. Whether it’s students camping out on their campuses, whether it’s tech workers, like taking this brave step to occupy the literal campus of one of the biggest companies in the world, to get that message across and to get others to join that struggle. All of it is important. And all of it is as we’re speaking right now, there is a whole bunch of flotillas like sailing towards Gaza.

    That urgency, I think is deeply felt in our listeners and folks around the world, and the more intense that action becomes, it feels like the more intense the reaction from the powers that be is. And so I wanted to, this is by way of getting us to this second portion here where I wanted to kind of talk about that. I wanted to talk about the effect of the actions y’all have been taking, the effect of the organizing you’ve been doing, both in terms of expanding the coalition, making this message more broadly felt understood, impossible to ignore, but also the empire strikes back effect of you losing your jobs of, I mean, I was there holding a camera like 10 feet from Hassam. There were like 10 cops on him, basically hog tying him and then carrying him out while he’s shouting Free Palestine. I saw one of the no Azure for apartheid coalition members get shot at point blank range with a pepper ball gun.

    I’m talking two feet away from them, but I didn’t see what happened afterwards. I showed our audience at the Real News. I showed people on YouTube. This is what I saw, but then my perspective kind of went another way while some of y’all were carried off to the police station. I was there with Ms. Reen and interviewed her before she and coalition members left together, and then a goddamn drone was following me back to my car for the next four blocks. Right. I mean, so people have seen my side, but I wanted to ask if y’all could talk about more like, yeah, help us fill in this story on the effects side, what are you hearing from coworkers at Microsoft, other tech workers outside of Microsoft, the reaction and response from Microsoft and the police? How is it impacting you and your life?

    Anna Hattle:

    Thanks. Yeah, there’s so much to talk about in terms of impact. So I’ll try to summarize asbestos I can. But I think to start with the encampment itself, I think one thing that people were surprised by is honestly the positive reactions that we were getting from workers. Even workers who were scared of what was happening, who were maybe too scared to ever participate or step inside the encampment, for example. But people who were mouthing the chance back to us, people who would put a shy thumbs up as they were walking by people who were taking flyers that were explaining why the encampment was created. And I think that even the campaign is kind of shocked by the underlying, I think support, of course there’s lots of Zionists and lots of opposition, but I think that there’s a sense that undergirding all of that, there is popular support for what we’re doing.

    And as far as the company response, I think that these escalations and in particular the ones that we’re talking about now, these most recent ones have built on this series of increased escalations over the past several months, which they’ve already been responding to in force. So for example, I think in May when we sent them the petition with 2000 worker signatures demanding that they cut ties, they that day put out their weak statement where they admitted to additional complicity in the genocide. And so we’ve been seeing already that they have seen this campaign as a force to be reckoned with, but I think now they’re truly in what feels like crisis mode. And I think that this is kind of part of what we anticipated is that there would be a huge amount of repression to onion and preparation and escalation as they’re scrambling to see what we do next.

    And I think we saw over the campus overall that there was an increase in security, and especially after the sit-in and the occupation, there are parts of the campus that are now locked down and now people are not able to get in buildings that they aren’t specifically assigned to. And I think that the energy that we’re getting from them is that they’re doing everything they can to stop something like this happening. Again, I’ll maybe let other people speak to this more, but immediately after the sit-in in Brad Smith’s office, he held a press conference, like an impromptu press conference in that same office to talk about what we did and to naming the campaign and trying to disavow what we were doing and making statements that were obviously and verifiably false about what we did, what we were there to do. And so I think that at this point it feels like they are scrambling and also doing work to potentially create a runway for themselves to make actually some progress on meeting certain demands We’ve seen in the past that they’re kind of setting themselves up for a potential divestment action. And so I want to let other folks talk about that a little bit. But yeah, overall I think we are really, I think, happy to see the kind of impact that this has been having. I

    Joe Lopez:

    Got 50 to a hundred messages on LinkedIn after I did my disruption and sent my email of people from within Microsoft saying, I didn’t know that this was going on. I didn’t know that the company I worked for had these deep ties with the Israeli military. Thank you for doing something and thank you for speaking up and I’m going to look into this. And I know that alone just made it worth it knowing that I lost my job, but I also got people to pay attention. And I think, I know people are scared to act in a public way, but there’s no smallest amount of impact that you can have. Even just signing a petition or taking a pledge that you’re not going to allow your work to support the apartheid regime. Those things matter and they add up. And so just seeing all the workers within Microsoft the way that they’re touched by what we’re doing, it means a lot. And yeah, that’s allow others to speak, but that’s impacted me a lot

    Hossam Nasr:

    Ultimately having been with the campaign basically sit since hounding, I’ve seen how every single time we do something, Microsoft’s response has always been just to respond with brute force. And as we have escalated our campaign, so has their force and their repression escalated as well. But make no mistake, that’s been their toolbox from the beginning. When we first launched our petition in May of 2024, the first thing they did within a day of publishing that petition was actually try to take down the links, the internal links that we had, that petition when we had the visual. Again, the most simple action that we could think of on campus, I bet now they wish we’d only do visuals now, but back then they fired two of us for organizing that visual. And when we had people in the campaign or work with the campaign to send mass emails in protest or as announcing the resignation, again, the response was to just completely ban the use of the words Palestine visa genocide in any internal email going out from anybody to anyone, even if it’s an email to yourself, which was crazy.

    And I think we’ve seen the same thing happen in response to conference protests. They again responded with just insanely militarizing their conference spaces, adding a huge amount of security and even armed retired police and responding with pepper spray to our protests during their latest conference, their biggest conference in May of this year, Microsoft build. And that was no different this time either. And I think this time again, we’ve seen since this was our biggest escalation so far, it was their biggest escalation of their force as well. They responded with extreme force pretty quickly. Like you said, one of our comrades during the encampment was shot with pepper balls seven times in the back with point playing range. Some of us were dragged and tackled and completely unnecessary and unjustified use of force on behalf of the police that Microsoft, again invited to campus against a peaceful encampment against a peaceful group of their workers and former workers who are protesting their complicity and genocide. And I think that’s been coupled also with the repression. It doesn’t just take this form of hard violence, but also takes the form of surveillance and intimidation, weaponizing HR investigations, which has happened to me a lot of the time before I was, I didn’t back down, so they had to fire me. I think that’s happened to a lot of people on this call as well before they were also fired.

    Your experience with the drone, that’s been also an experience that we’ve seen more recently on campus. They literally, the drone, when four of us decided to go tabling the Friday after the sit-in at Brad’s office, we were literally just four people on public property trying to table, and they called at least that I saw two police cars, a police van. They sent the drones, they brought out the head of security. They are panicking, and I’m sure you’ve heard they’ve even tried to get the FPI involved and named me specifically by name and communication with the FPI. But I think ultimately the point is, I think when you are at the crosshairs of these imperial forces, you’re doing something right. When you are getting under the skin of these powerful war criminals so badly, you’re doing something right. And when you have the police and even the FBI and Microsoft security weaponized against you in this way, you’re doing something right.

    So this has not deterred us. And if anything, I think it’s made us stronger and it simply just doesn’t work. I think the simplest proof of that is that we came back less than a week after our encampment was violently dispersed and we occupied the president’s office and all the people who were arrested during the encampment were also there at the sit-in and were arrested again. And that’s a message that we need to emphasize and we continue to emphasize every single time we can to Microsoft that again, the repression and the violence and that brute force tactic simply does not work. And the only way to stop our movement, the only way to make these to end this crisis that they have created with their own actions is to end their complicity in the genocide. That is the real crisis. That is the real moral test of our time, and that is ultimately the only thing that’s going to make people not show up and not escalate every single time.

    Nisreen Jaradat:

    I think Microsoft knows that they’re in trouble. I think that Microsoft is scared of their workers discovering and fully understanding that they’ve been misled into abetting a genocide and working for a digital arms manufacturer that is masquerading as a tech company. And I think that that’s why Microsoft responds the way it does with brute force with trying to silence any sort of even vague criticism of its dealings with the Israeli occupation forces forces. And I think that our success is really showing and the fact that they’re clearly scrambling right now. As Anna mentioned, Brett Smith in his press conference said a lot of statements that didn’t even make sense that were wrong while answering his court summons by the way, and the jumping from narrative to narrative that didn’t make any sense. Well, this isn’t worker led, but then firing four workers and tearing the scroll of 2000 signatures, calling the community members who risked so much protesting outside agitators when they’re the ones who live in gated communities surrounded by boats. So it really shows how much they’re scrambling right now, and I think it’s becoming more obvious that the only way to get out of this crisis is to divest from genocide.

    Riki:

    Yeah, I think like Msre said, Microsoft is kind of backed into a corner right now more so than they’ve ever been from our actions and our continual organizing, the basically unrelenting pressure that we’re trying to put on them both from inside the company and from without. I think we’re in the strongest position we’ve ever been in to negotiate with Microsoft. I think there’s going to be a lot of ’em trying to give us very insufficient wins to try and get us off their tail, just basically symbolic victories. But it all comes back to getting that divestment. I think for me, just as someone who was arrested who was fired, I’ve been doing fine. I also got a lot of mostly positive LinkedIn messages. Some people were just hating for no reason basically.

    So yeah, I think it’s important for people who are in positions of privilege like we were to and who are a part of these willingly or not part of these structures that enable this genocide, that enable this current economy of war profiteering. It’s important for us to make those stands and to make our own sacrifices to basically for the people who are not fortunate enough to be able to have a choice in that. So that’s very much what I’ve been thinking about recently where I stand. I’m really hoping that I other worker movements follow in some of our footsteps and the footsteps of students who have sacrificed a lot as well in making these kind of principles and also strategic kind of sacrifices to enable our collective goals.

    Maximillian Alvarez:

    That’s a perfect sort of segue to this kind of final round here. And I know we only have a few minutes left before I got to let you all go, but I really want to go back around the table and ask y’all to just any final messages that you have for folks out there listening, like the folks who are in unions, folks who are not in unions, folks who work in tech, folks who work outside of tech. I mean all manner of working people listen to this show. And so I want to end with you guys sort of giving final messages about where things go from here for the no Azure for Apartheid coalition, for the no tech, for Apartheid movement, and for what y’all have called the worker in. So that’s what I want us to focus on in this final round. And I guess by way of getting there, I just wanted to kind of share a thought that was kind of welling up in me as I’ve been listening to all of you talk, and it struck me at some point that we could have all grown up together.

    I mean, we could have all gone to college together. We’re not that far apart. And to work at a place like Microsoft, I imagine you guys had to bust your asses your whole lives to get there. And you like my immigrant family, they look at me in the degrees that I have as the pride of our family. And I guess what I’m trying to say is I can really deeply understand, but also really only imagine what it must be like to be willing to sacrifice that or put that on the line, the job that you’d worked your entire life to get to for a cause that you believe in so deeply and to put your bodies and all that work, your livelihood, your security, everything like that on the line. As workers, I don’t want that to be lost on people. I feel like so many, after doing hundreds and hundreds of interviews with so many different kinds of working folks over the years, I feel like most of the time the point of those conversations is to get people to see their own value and their worth as human beings, their power as workers.

    But you guys are kind of in a different position where it’s like you’re paid according to how valuable you and your work is, and you are using that as way to fight back against a genocide. And that feels, again, really significant and something that I think everyone in the labor world should really take notice of. And really anyone who’s in the labor movement should care about this struggle, frankly. With all that from me, I just wanted to toss it back to y’all and ask again, let’s take this back down to the worker level and you as workers and listeners as working people hearing this, what do you want to leave folks with about where we go from here and any messages to them listening about what they should do to be part of this movement or how they can use their power as workers to fight for life and justice and light?

    Anna Hattle:

    Thanks, max, to your point, I think after getting fired and after with so many other people facing the reality of state violence and repression, I have so many people reaching out to me expressing care and expressing, I think also what you said, which is that is a huge sacrifice to make. And I think that my initial reaction in my heart is just that I appreciate that care so much, and what I want people to know is I think it would be the greatest honor in my life to give up something so small if it’s in service of this cause it’s such a small price to pay if it can advance even a millimeter, the liberation of Palestine or an end to the genocide. And so of all of the things that I’ve tried to accomplish in my life, I think fighting for this is more of an honor than anything else.

    And so I know that I have a certain amount of privileges potentially in my life that might make that true, and not everyone feels that they can or are willing to pay that price. And I would encourage people to think about that if that’s really true. But also even if you’re not there and you can’t do that or you don’t have to be there in order to organize, in order to build collective power and in order to make an impact. And I think that’s something that I really want more people to know both at Microsoft and just elsewhere because there’s so much repression of labor organizing everywhere. Their whole goal is to scare everyone and to feel like they’re threatening your livelihoods and so that you don’t take hold of your power and do something with it. And so there, even if you’re scared and even if you’re not ready or willing to risk those things, there’s so many things you can do.

    You just have to get started and you just have to connect to the movement and make steps to plug in. And I think to your point, one of our goals is one, of course to bring more people into the campaign and the movement, Microsoft workers and beyond. And it’s great to also have community support for the things we’re trying to do, whether it’s answering calls to boycott Microsoft or sign petitions or just show the executives that there is huge public pressure in addition to the pressure that workers are exerting on them, but also to all workers. Hopefully we can continue to be in dialogue and inspire each other about creative ways to exert that pressure. And knowing that we’re in a context where, particularly at Microsoft, I think it’s a notoriously kind of anti-union environment. There’s so many anti-union environments in this climate, but making something that as Hasam said before, is greater than the, some of its parts is difficult, but not impossible as you might imagine. And so if we continue to inspire each other and figure out new ways to exert that pressure and to escalate, I think that overall there’s so much potential for unions, for the labor movement, for people at composite companies and entities everywhere to exert that pressure. We know that’s where our power is. And if we were all already organized and all ready to exert that pressure, maybe we wouldn’t have to be here right now. So maybe we’re not there yet, but now’s the time.

    Joe Lopez:

    Yeah, that’s really well said. And just to add on, I think a lot of people right now, especially in the us, are feeling a sense of frustration. I know at the beginning of this year that really peaked for me with the current administration taking power and I felt so powerless, didn’t really do anything about it. But I hope if one thing people take away from this, our demonstrations and what we’ve achieved so far, I hope it’s that you do have power no matter where you are, every worker across the us, across the globe, you can contribute in some way. And I was not a huge activist before. I had always paid attention to global and US news, but taking ownership of my actions and actually contributing to this movement in some way has been a huge emotional outlet for me. Honestly, I feel like I’m taking back the power that’s been taken away from us over the years. And so if you work in the us, I’m sure the company that you work for has some complicity. If you pay tax dollars in the US, your government has some complicity in this genocide. So take a look at the BDS list of complicit companies, investigate your employer may be contributing to genocide and talk to your coworkers about it and see what you can do, follow our example, and I’m sure you can achieve something amazing.

    Hossam Nasr:

    Yeah, I think first of all, just thank you for everything that you said, max. And I think to answer your first part of your question, I think like you said, the action that the actions that we took over the past couple of weeks with the encampment and then with the sitin marked a significant escalation in our campaign and our tactics. And that was an intentional, and it was to send a message, and it was also a call to other workers to, like you said, to join the worker in Alda, to take the mental of the revolution of the struggle that the students had carried last year that have really created that deep crisis within the ruling elite. That really was the moment that we came closest as a movement to bring the empire to its sneeze, to force and enter this genocide and to enter the complicity in apartheid.

    And I think the reason why, there’s many reasons why we can talk about that forever, but I think part of the reason why this movement was so effective is because it’s really struck at the heart and at the core of the elites, right? There was a reason that it was Columbia. There was a reason that it was Harvard and Stanford and those really elite colleges that made the headlines and then ultimately had the most repression. And I think, like I said, ultimately once you really start to challenge empire, you will face the wrath of the empire. And that is a sign of your success actually. We expect repression to come and we stand undeterred by its prospect, even as someone who is an immigrant in this country, in this climate. But ultimately, I think the message I want to send to every person, every person of conscience, every worker, is that I think, like Anna said, a lot of people say, that’s a big sacrifice.

    This is your livelihood, et cetera. I think that is actually a very cheap price to pay. It’s a very, very cheap sacrifice. I don’t think it even rises to the level of the word sacrifice when it’s compared to the meal sacrifices that are being forced upon the Palestinian people in Za every single day. And it’s especially the case when I want everyone to sit with this. We are not mere observers of this genocide. We are all active participants, whether we like it or not, through your labor, through your tax dollars, through simply being part of this country, you are enabling this genocide in one way or the other. Your tax dollars are funding it, your labor is enabling it in one way or the other. So that comes with a moral duty. Honestly. We live in this empire and we enjoy its fruits. The quality of life I have here is probably a lot higher than I would have if I was back home in Egypt.

    That is because of I am enjoying the fruits of this global empire. And that comes with a responsibility. And I think that people really need to sit with that and the implications of that and not sort of honestly wave their hands and say, there’s nothing I can do. Because the other thing I want everyone to recognize is that you are not powerless. You have power. Your labor is your power. Your voice is your power. Your body in some cases is your power. And we have a responsibility to use that privilege whenever we have the chance. And I think that the last thing I’ll say is we cannot let fear of repression or retaliation cripple us. For me personally, during the visual in October, 2024, this was a very different time. The campaign was at a different place. We were much smaller in number. That was probably the first thing we ever did on Microsoft’s campus.

    And I had no idea at the time that it would lead to my firing. I had no idea before Trump had even gotten elected, that the prospect of the deportation for me would be somewhat of a more real possibility than a theoretical one. But still, I think in that visual, I said a lot of the time I’m asked, are you not scared of being fired? Are you not scared of being arrested? Are you not scared of being deported? And my answer is always, are you not scared? Are you not scared of being complicit in this genocide? Are you not scared of being silent in the face of the Holocaust of our time? Are you not scared of what you will tell your children and grandchildren when they ask you, what were you doing when the genocide imp was happening? So again, I want to leave people with that, and I want them to really to sit with before thinking about the cost of speaking up, think about the cost of not speaking up and think about what will you think of yourself 10 years from now, 20 years from now, when everyone will have been against this?

    Nisreen Jaradat:

    Wherever you are in the world, it’s both your moral right and your moral responsibility to stand up against the abatement of genocide. And something that I heard a lot from people in this campaign was the sentence we keep each other safe. And throughout my time with this campaign, that’s really, really proved to be true. And it’s something that I really learned. And I agree that it is a cheap excuse and there are things you can do that are not as risky. And like I said, I contributed to some of the critical work for the campaign in the background for a full year before I made the act choice to be more visible. There’s always things that people can do, and there’s always community, and there’s always people that will support you and stand up for you. So my advice would just be to get organized. And we can’t just keep saying, oh, this is going to be somebody else’s problem. Oh, I can’t risk it. There’s always something that you can do.

    Riki:

    Yeah, I think pretty much what everyone was saying, I would echo, I think the powers that be want us to feel hopeless, to be distracted by other things, to ignore what’s going on, to not realize our own potentials. And I think it is important that we find whatever way we can to contribute. And certainly Noag for Project has been an amazing outlet for that. And I think there’s so many other outlets for that that exist in other places, in that it’s there if you go search for it. And that it’s also important to not do these things alone as well, because with community that helps you build that stamina to keep and to fight against this hopelessness and to be with others that empower you. I think that’s all really important. I think there’s sometimes this idea of there will be someone who will come out of the woodwork and save us all, and I don’t think that’s true. All these movements of the past have been collective and certainly there have been more visible faces in those movements, but we are all kind of drops of water in basically if you imagine a dam, we are all drops of water and eventually there will be enough water to where the dam will break and we will break through and I think I see the cracks forming now on the dam, which is something that’s very galvanizing for me, but it’s something that we have to keep working on.

    Hossam Nasr:

    Follow at no Azure for apartheids on all social media and sign the petition at no azure for apartheid.com. There’s also ways there on the website if you’re a Microsoft worker to join the campaign or you can fill out the form at noa oaa.cc/join. And if you’re a Microsoft worker, you can also sign the pledge to pledge to not do any work or service, any support for tickets that come from the Israeli military or companies that are working with Israeli military.

    Maximillian Alvarez:

    All right, gang. That’s going to wrap things up for us this week. I want to thank our guests, Anna Hattle, Joe Lopez, Hossam Nasr, Nisreen Jaradat, and Riki, all fired Microsoft Workers, all members of the know Azure for Apartheid Coalition. And of course, I want to thank you all for listening and I want to thank you for caring. We’ll see y’all back here next week for another episode of Working People and if you can’t wait that long, then go explore all the great work that we’re doing at the Real News Network where we do grassroots journalism that lifts up the voices and stories from the front lines of struggle. Sign up for the real new newsletter so you never miss a story. And help us do more work like this by going to the real news.com/donate and becoming a supporter today. I promise you we really need it and it really makes a difference. I’m Maximillian Alvarez. Take care of yourselves. Take care of each other. Solidarity forever.

    This post was originally published on The Real News Network.

  • A BBC investigation has revealed that a group of Islamophobic biker gang bigots have been providing security at Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) sites. UG Solutions, a private contractor, has employed members of the Infidels Motorcycle Club to work at the US- and Israel-backed aid sites.

    As the BBC reported:

    Infidels MC was set up by US military veterans of the Iraq war in 2006 and members see themselves as modern Crusaders, using the Crusader cross as their symbol – a reference to the medieval Christians who fought Muslims for control of Jerusalem.

    The gang is currently hosting anti-Muslim hate speech on its Facebook page and has previously held a pig roast “in defiance of” the Islamic holy month of Ramadan.

    This is only the latest scandal to involve GHF. Many Palestinians have been slaughtered whilst queuing for aid at GHF sites.

    Biker gang bigots work for GHF

    As the Canary’s Charlie Jaay reported, GHF have been lambasted by the United Nations (UN) and other humanitarian groups, including Doctors Without Borders (also known as Médecins Sans Frontières/MSF). Jaay wrote:

    UN agencies, MSF, and many other humanitarian groups, have warned that this model risks the safety and dignity of Palestinians seeking aid, and not only violates basic humanitarian principles—including neutrality, impartiality, and humanity—but directly endangers the safety of people in desperate need of assistance.

    In fact, MSF called GHF:

    a mechanism of dehumanisation and orchestrated killing.

    Now, the BBC investigation has revealed that there are at least 10 members of the biker gang working in Gaza. And, 7 members of this gang are in senior positions. GHF said that is has:

    a zero-tolerance policy for any hateful, discriminatory biases or conduct.

    Of course, that statement flies in the face of the fact that they exist as a US and Israel-sponsored death machine that slaughters starving Palestinians. For their part, UG Solutions have insisted that its employees are qualified and, bizarrely, said that they do not filter people out for:

    personal hobbies or affiliations unrelated to job performance.

    Infidels MC

    So, what are these “personal hobbies or affiliations”? One of these team leaders who also belongs to the biker gang, Josh Miller, has the word “crusader” tattooed on his fingers, as well as “1095.” The latter, as the BBC explained:

     is the year when the leader of the Catholic church, Pope Urban II, launched the first crusade, attacking Muslims as a “vile race.”

    On the Infidels MC Facebook page, one post outlined how the use of 1095 refers to the start of:

    a military campaign by western European forces to recapture Jerusalem and the Holy Land from Muslim control.

     Edward Ahmed Mitchell, deputy director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), said:

    When you see anti-Muslim bigots today celebrating 1095, celebrating the Crusades, they are celebrating the wholesale massacre of Muslims – the erasure of Muslims and Jews from the holy city of Jerusalem.

    In one flyer from the biker gang’s social media should:

     a woman wearing a burka that has been torn off from the neck down, exposing her chest.

    And, the BBC ultimately found that:

    The Infidels MC Facebook page has hosted clearly Islamophobic discussions. In 2020 the club shared a link to a false, satirical article claiming four US Democratic politicians, two of them Muslim, wanted the Bible to be deemed hate speech.

    According to an estimate from a former contractor, it is believed that around 40 of 320 people were recruited from Infidels MC.

    Rotten core

    Mitchell, the representative from CAIR, was forthright:

    Putting the Infidels biker club in charge of delivering humanitarian aid in Gaza is like putting the KKK in charge of delivering humanitarian aid in Sudan. It makes no sense whatsoever.

    It’s bound to lead to violence, and that’s exactly what we’ve seen happen in Gaza.

    The Islamophobia of this biker gang is steeped in absurd fantasies of the crusades. The fact they revealed their existence to the BBC investigations team by accidentally replying all to an email is testament to their fuckery. They’re such virulent bigots that they’re almost cartoonishly racist. But, given the deadly chaos that GHF have orchestrated over Palestinians, it’s still a despicable and abhorrent racism.

    What better legacy for the war on terror could there be, than a bunch of disgraced ex-military men turned private contractors? As ever, the spectre of 9/11 continues to unleash untold violence on generations of Muslims.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Maryam Jameela

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Wednesday 10 September was the National Television Awards, the star-studded glittering celebration of TV with a little less pomp and ceremony than the BAFTAs. Crucially, what makes the NTAs different to the BAFTAs is that instead of industry insiders voting for their mates, the NTAs are all voted for by the public. This means the results are nothing short of batshit and often an insight into the mood of the nation for all the wrong reasons, but this year saw something happen that many did not see coming. If there’s one thing that’s for certain about the NTAs, it’s that Ant and Dec are always going to win best TV presenter. This is because they have for the last twenty-three fucking years, at this point it’s the Ant and Dec award for best Ant and Dec, or so we thought. Enter Gary Lineker.

    Public proves they don’t listen to ALL the MSM bile

    The shock of the night was that despite it appearing that the general public had spent the last few months believing all the MSM bile, they knew what was right and fair. That’s right, instead of the beloved/ irritating as fuck Geordie duo winning again, the public voted for Gary Lineker as best presenter.

    Despite months of a media smear campaign and him being branded an antisemite, the public saw sense and sent a clear message to the BBC about their decision to force Lineker out.

    Gary was forced to leave the BBC sooner than planned in May, after he shared an Instagram post from the group Palestinian Lobby explaining Zionism, which included the rat. This was the ammo the BBC had wanted for a while after the presenter refused to stay silent on the genocide Israel is committing, as they claim it breached social media impartiality guidelines.

    The BBC knew they couldn’t control Lineker

    This wasn’t Gary Lineker’s first time speaking out against those in power. In 2023, he was suspended from presenting Match of the Day after he compared the way the then Tory government spoke about immigration to the rhetoric used in 1930s Germany. The suspension led to colleagues walking out in solidarity and refusing to present the show in his stead. It was bizarrely then broadcast without any commentary at all.

    He’s also previously gotten in trouble for talking about sewage in rivers and seas, overseas political donations and calling out the government on more than one occasion.

    In an interview that was published the same day as his suspension Lineker spoke about how important it was that people with a platform spoke up about atrocities. He told the telegraph

    You either have empathy or you don’t. it’s more important now than ever before that people raise their voices, because we live in dangerous times. I’ll definitely continue pushing humanitarian issues”

    Gary Lineker uses platform once again

    Gary Lineker’s departure was met with outcry by fans and those with, as he said, empathy, but the BBC went into overdrive smearing him as an antisemite. That’s why it was a shock when he won.

    Gary was as shocked as anyone. In his acceptance speech, he said

    It’s not lost on me why i might have won this award, aside from presenting Match of the Day, the most iconic football show on television for 26 years.

    After thanking those who’ve helped him on his journey, he finished with this:

    I think it demonstrates that perhaps it’s okay sometimes for us to use our platform to speak up on behalf of those who have no voice.

    Whilst in fairness, that was a pretty wishy washy statement to make and not one that takes a huge stance, the right wing rags have decided he took “a huge swipe at BBC” (GB News).

    Lineker winning this award shows that despite the government and MSM trying to turn the UK’s attention away from Gaza and against the Palestinian people who are being decimated by Israel, what we really value is someone who is prepared to risk their livelihood to do the right thing.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Rachel Charlton-Dailey

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Our latest visual, created in partnership with Prism Reports, visualizes a months-long Prism investigation conducted by journalist Laura Albast, on pro-Israel bias in mainstream U.S. newsrooms, particularly after Oct. 7, 2023.

    Read the full investigation here. Special thanks to Yara Ramadan for her design collaboration on this visual.

    The report takes a deep, investigative dive into the experiences of repression and silencing that journalists face in the U.S. while attempting to cover the genocide accurately and factually. This collaboration between Prism and Visualizing Palestine reveals and illustrates what happens to stories about Palestine in U.S. newsrooms, from inception to reporting, editing, and publication.










    Albast spoke with nearly a dozen journalists across the U.S. who described resistance from editors and managers surrounding coverage that centered, or even mentioned, Palestinians. Journalists, who are either Palestinian, Arab, or Muslim, told Prism that they were shut out of coverage around Israel’s genocide in Gaza, while white, Jewish, or Israeli—oftentimes former soldiers —journalists took the lead. They said they witnessed Palestinian voices and stories being quashed, as external Zionist groups unleashed campaigns of complaints and harassment against such reporting.

    Albast deftly pulls together firsthand accounts from journalists and investigations that demonstrate pro-Israel bias at newsrooms like The New York Times, NPR, The Wall Street Journal, and even progressive media organizations like More Perfect Union. As anti-genocide readers turn away from complicit media, many turn to independent media that align with their values. While much of this reporting centers on Palestinian journalists in the U.S., Albast also includes non-Palestinian reporters, whose experiences underscore how even those more broadly connected to the region, as well as those trying to tell the truth, can be sidelined. We are left to ask, however, what does the future hold for these journalists in the U.S.?

    The post What Happens to Stories About Palestine in U.S. Newsrooms? first appeared on Dissident Voice.

    This post was originally published on Dissident Voice.

  • In the heart of Gaza, where the sounds of explosions mingle with the cries of the wounded, hospitals stand as the last bastions trying to protect civilians from death. But these bastions are no longer safe; they have become direct targets for Israel, while doctors and nurses fight with nothing but their expertise and their hearts.

    In hospitals, amid destroyed walls and blood-stained floors, stories of true resilience are being written, no less powerful than the heroism of the fighters.

    Despite the constant bombing, hospitals continue to operate 24 hours a day, sometimes without electricity, sometimes without medicine, in a continuous attempt to save those who can be saved. Every operating room tells a story of a new daily challenge, every corridor is filled with the voices of children and patients, and every doctor faces death himself as he tries to keep others alive.

    Doctors without protection, nurses exhausted in Gaza

    At Al-Shifa Hospital, Dr. Ahmed told the Canary:

    We sometimes perform operations without full anesthesia, sometimes using old, worn-out tools. Every child’s cry here breaks my heart, but we have no choice but to continue.

    The hospital has been bombed several times in recent weeks, and doctors have sometimes been forced to work amid partial rubble, crouching on the floor during operations or shielding their patients with their bodies.

    Nurses stand for hours without rest, carrying the wounded on their shoulders and transporting them between the hospital’s bustling wards.

    Um Samer, a 20-year-old nurse, says:

    Sometimes I cry silently in the corridors, but I can’t leave anyone behind. Every patient here is my family now, and every heart beating in front of me is a reason for me to keep going.

    Most of the medical staff no longer have safe homes and often sleep in the hospital, next to patients or in the corridors, while they hear explosions outside and are unable to protect themselves.

    Behind the news

    Despite all this, doctors and nurses in Gaza insist on conveying hope. They not only save the wounded, but also preserve the dignity of patients amid the chaos, calming children, providing food and blankets, and reassuring patients that they are not alone.

    Hospitals in Gaza are not just places of treatment, but symbols of resilience. Doctors and nurses, who have become victims before they are saviors, write stories of true heroism every day.

    In every operating room, in every corridor, in every heart they save, Gaza proves that life can endure despite all the instruments of death, and that humanity does not die even in the darkest circumstances.

    The destruction of hospitals in Gaza was not just a loss of buildings and equipment, but a complete collapse of the health sector on which hundreds of thousands of civilians depend. Doctors and nurses are now working under direct threat, amid a constant shortage of medicines and supplies, while emergency rooms have become tragic theaters where life and death struggle for every moment. Every rescue operation has become a battle, and every patient is a test of the health system’s ability to withstand the machinery of war.

    Feature image via the Canary

    By Alaa Shamali

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • The Gaza genocide is a last stand for the West’s billionaire class. If it passes with impunity, they’ll effectively win the class war.

    Gaza: a test of how much brutality they can get away with

    Obscenely-rich individuals are already winning the class war against the rest of us. They have more wealth than perhaps ever before, which continues to grow, rapidly. Their wealth exceeds that of all but two countries. They also spread propaganda via media outlets and social media, while funnelling money directly into political campaigns, to help protect and increase their power.

    But with Gaza, they’re testing out how much brutality they can get away with. While they’re not the ones dropping bombs or holding guns in their hands (for now), their support for the US-Israeli genocide is very much out in the open. And if they face no punishment for this, it could be game over for the class war. Because it could emerge from the shadows and go full-on dystopian. Some companies are already frothing at the mouth to establish an era of techno-dictatorship.

    Billionaire rule out in the open

    The US has a long history of genocidal imperialist terror. So perhaps unsurprisingly, it has also become the epicentre of the billionaire battle for global domination. In April, Statista said it had “a record 902 billionaire citizens, almost a third of all worldwide billionaires”. It leads the top ten of countries with most billionaires. Alongside it are Western allies Germany, Canada, Italy, and the UK.

    Donald Trump’s 2024 election victory, thanks in part to establishment crony Joe Biden’s shameless genocide participation, marked an escalation in the billionaire takeover in the US. It allowed an actual billionaire to become president, pack his team with other billionaires, and openly surround himself with a fascist billionaire mafia.

    Trump has just had 13 billionaires around for a dystopian White House dinner. And he’s now wasting around a billion dollars simply to put up “Department of War” signage.

    The billionaires have the real control. Israeli fascism is just a tool.

    It’s clear that billionaires control the West today. Whether it’s liberal or conservative lapdogs in power, the push to scrap protections for ordinary people is relentless. And the reason Israel has been getting away with genocide is because its crimes serve a bigger purpose. The settler-colonial state has long been an outpostproxy, and tool for imperialism in the oil-rich West Asia. It doesn’t just help to ensure Western billionaires access to the region’s resources. It also uses Palestine as a brutal laboratory for tech giants and arms dealers, whose tools of destruction and control benefit from ‘battle testing’ on Palestinian refugees.

    As journalist Jonathan Cook insists, Israel is just a tool and a distraction. Those with real power in the world are the billionaires. They can deny direct involvement in the genocide, but they overwhelmingly support the apartheid state. And we can absolutely guarantee that the pro-Israel lobby only has big influence in Western politics because its behaviour aligns with the interests of billionaires.

    If Israel gets away with its genocide in Gaza, it will only embolden the West’s billionaire class even more. They’ll be able to drop the veil covering their war on vast majority of the world’s population. And they’ll feel confident enough to use force and technology to win the class war once and for all.

    Now is not the time for half measures. We need to tackle billionaire control head on, by any means necessary.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Ed Sykes

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • An urgent campaign has been launched requesting that the Metropolitan Police Service (Met) “initiate an immediate investigation into Israeli President Isaac Herzog for incitement to terrorism pursuant to the Terrorism Act 2000”.

    Met email campaign: report Isaac Herzog for the war criminal he is

    Those who are in sympathy with Palestine (or anyone who just wants to see the law applied properly) are being encouraged to immediately email the Met and report Herzog’s remarks at an event on September 10. Speaking at the London base of think tank Chatham House, the Zionist war criminal asserted that:

    Sometimes people should be ‘removed’ if they won’t make a deal.

    This was in reference to the illegal attack conducted by so-called Israel against the Hamas leadership council in Qatar, which failed to kill any of the senior figures targeted, but did result in the deaths of at least six other innocent people.

    The email campaign (link creates draft email in your default provider), which appears to have been produced by a group called Campaign Against Anti-Muslim Hate argues that the relevant provisions under the Terrorism Act 2000 include:

    • Section 58: Encouragement of terrorism
    • Section 59: Publication likely to be understood as encouragement
    • Sections 11 and 12: Membership of or support for a proscribed terrorist organisation [presumably this is for Herzog’s support of the Israeli Genocide Forces, described by Miko Peled as: “One of the best trained, best equipped, best fed terrorist organisations in the world”.
    • The Act’s extraterritorial application to offenses committed or incited on UK territory

    Herzog’s statements explicitly endorsing violence

    The email goes on to say that, “Given Herzog’s physical presence on UK soil when making these statements, and their explicit role in endorsing violence”, the Met ought to:

    • Conduct a prompt, comprehensive investigation into Herzog’s conduct and speech while on UK soil
    • Consider authorizing and issuing an arrest warrant consistent with applicable law
    • Provide transparent communication on actions and decisions taken

    While the Terrorism Act 2000 is a hugely flawed piece of legislation, as evidenced by its use against anti-genocide group Palestine Action, the remarks by Herzog undeniably meet the UN’s guiding framework for defining terrorism, which states that at minimum, terrorism entails:

    intimidation or coercion of populations or governments through the threat or perpetration of violence, causing death, serious injury or the taking of hostages.

    Herzog ought to already be facing an International Criminal Court (ICC) arrest warrant for his genocidal rhetoric in the early stages of the Israeli Holocaust in Gaza, when he said:

    It’s an entire nation out there that is responsible. This rhetoric about civilians not aware, not involved — it’s not true. They could’ve risen up, fought against that evil regime.

    The obvious suggestion is that all Palestinians are legitimate targets, justifying the Zionist entity’s subsequent campaign of mass murder on a civilian population.

    Labour government rolls out the red carpet to war criminal Israeli president

    Instead of ending up in the Hague, this modern-day Nazi has instead had the red carpet rolled out for him during his visit to Britain. While the mainstream media dutifully conveyed the likely fiction of a “tough” meeting with Starmer, the likelihood of war crimes enthusiast Starmer holding any Israeli to account is slim. The British genocider-in-chief did describe the Zionist pseudo-state’s attack on Qatar as “completely unacceptable”, but this is safely in line with the US position.

    The vassal state Starmer runs doesn’t really tend to have a foreign policy of its own. Instead, on any international issue, Britain will typically “sit by the phone and wait until the Americans tell us what to do”, as Palestine documentary maker Richard Sanders recently put it. Hence war criminals are given the VIP treatment, and it falls to civil society to attempt to ensure they face justice.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Robert Freeman

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Famous comedian Jerry Seinfeld has described the ‘Free Palestine’ movement as being worse than the KKK. His comments, made as Israel’s ongoing genocide of the Palestinian people has resulted in an ongoing, manmade famine, have not gone down well:

    As always happens when Seinfeld says something controversial, people have used the situation to highlight that he once dated a 17-year-old.


    Jerry Seinfeld: barely legal

    If you’re a British person who isn’t convinced Seinfeld is all that famous, the reason for that is because the BBC gave Seinfeld (the show) a really odd time slot, which meant it never found an audience. Seinfeld was huge around the world, though, and Seinfeld (the man) became a household name.

    As reported by the Duke Chronicle, Seinfeld has generated controversy for the following comments:

    “Free Palestine is, to me, just — you’re free to say you don’t like Jews. Just say you don’t like Jews,” Seinfeld said.

    “By saying Free Palestine, you’re not admitting what you really think,” he continued. “So it’s actually — compared to the Ku Klux Klan, I’m actually thinking the Klan is actually a little better here because they can come right out and say, ‘We don’t like Blacks, we don’t like Jews.’ Okay that’s honest.”

    Seinfeld isn’t the first person to claim that supporting Palestinian liberation is a way of secretly being antisemitic. He is part of an increasingly shrinking group, however, because as Israel’s genocide has continued – and as senior Israelis have made their genocidal intent clear – fewer, and fewer people have bought into this obvious bullshit.

    As people have highlighted, figures like former Israeli defense minister Yoav Gallant have made comments like the following:

    It takes a special kind of arrogance to read comments like this and think ‘you know who the real supremacists are? The people who want to stop this‘.

    As you’d expect, people had a lot to say:

    Jerry Seinfeld is actively collaborating in genocide. https://t.co/95Dewh8bYx

    — Nathan Kalman-Lamb (@nkalamb) September 11, 2025

    People highlighted past comments from Seinfeld:

    People also suggested the alleged ‘funnyman’ is not as funny as he likes to think:

    Unhealthy interests

    People did get one thing wrong, however, and that was referring to Seinfeld as a ‘paedophile’. Those making the claim include Shaun King (who has a less than stellar reputation himself):

    Here’s what Far Out reported in 2023:

    The truth is that Seinfeld once dated a 17-year-old when he was 38 himself – a fact that sits rather unsettling through the lens of today’s acceptability. In the early 1990s, Seinfeld was involved with Shoshanna Lonstein, although the pair claimed their relationship was initially based on mere friendship. However, it came to light that Seinfeld and Lonstein’s relationship was far more than just friendly. They had met in Central Park in 1993 when Seinfeld had noticed Lonstein on a park bench and decided to approach her. Apparently, the two hit it off, and Lonstein agreed to give Seinfeld her number.

    At the time, Lonstein was just 17 years old, and the two ended up dating for four years. However, Seinfeld was adamant that their relationship did not begin in terms of being romantic and most likely sexual until Lonstein turned 18.

    In many US states, the age of consent is 18, but as Cracked note:

    Of course, the age of consent in New York is 17, and even in states where the age of consent is 18, such as California, a “conviction for statutory rape, alone, does not require sex offender registration.”

    So there we have it.

    Even if Seinfeld did have sex with Lonstein when she was 17, that wouldn’t have legally made him a paedophile (so long as the act took place in his home state); he was merely just a creepy older man who would have been criminalised for doing the same thing elsewhere.

    If you yourself are a middle-aged man who’s worried they may be mistaken for a paedophile, there’s a simple way to avoid this happening, and that’s to never date what people would legally or ethically consider to be a child. We also advise you avoid likening freedom movements to racist white supremacist lynch mobs, because that won’t go down well either.

    If you’d like a breakdown of how Seinfeld found himself in ‘comedy purgatory’, we recommend the following video from The Elephant Graveyard:

    Featured image via Ralph_PH – Wikimedia

    By Willem Moore

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • In the Shuja’iyya neighborhood east of Gaza City, the muezzin’s call to prayer no longer reaches as it once did, as the Grand Mosque was destroyed in hours of Israel’s continuous bombing. Among the rubble, dozens of families live separate stories, but they share a common theme: the search for life under fire.

    Although destruction looms over every corner, small scenes of life remain: the smell of bread baking on a wood fire among the rubble, the sounds of children trying to play with empty cans, and a neighbor who insists on greeting his neighbor every morning even though the doors are no longer there.

    These simple details, scattered among the ruins, show that Gaza still clings to some semblance of life amid the machinery of death.

    A family trapped between two destroyed houses

    In a narrow corner between two cracked walls lives Abu Rami’s family of seven. After their home was demolished, they refused to flee south, fearing greater loss in the unknown.

    Rami’s mother says:

    Every night we sleep to the sound of planes, our children’s blankets are dust, and their breakfast is a piece of dry bread, but we have chosen to stay here, where our neighbors know us, even if there is nothing left of our home.

    A school turned into a camp in Shuja’iyya, Gaza City

    In one school, like many others, more than 90 displaced families are crammed into classrooms. The blackboard that was once used for math is now used to list the names of missing children.
    Walid, one of the displaced persons, says:

    There are more than 40 people in each classroom. We sleep close together and don’t know how to get through the night. Water is distributed by the drop, and there is barely enough food for half of us.

    Children make toys out of rubble

    On the rubble of a residential building in the Al-Ramal neighborhood, three children were playing with empty metal cans, pushing them with their feet as if they were small cars. Their laughter seemed strange amid the scene.

    The mother of one of the children, who lost her husband a few weeks ago, whispered:

    I try to let them play… I don’t want them to live in constant fear, even though the war has stolen their childhood.

    A doctor without tools

    Dr. Sami never leaves the Al-Shifa Medical Complex. He is an orthopedic surgeon who has been working non-stop for weeks. He recounts:

    Sometimes we perform operations without full anesthesia. I can’t forget the children’s screams. We are breaking all the rules of medicine, but we have no choice. Even we sleep in the corridors next to the patients.

    The scene at the temporary market in Shuja’iyya, Gaza City

    On Al-Wahda Street, vegetable sellers have set up a small market on the ruins of a collapsed building. Some of them are selling three eggplants or a small bag of onions.

    Abu Samir, a 60-year-old vendor who lost his shop, says:

    I sell whatever I can find so that I feel alive. Everyone who buys from me says, ‘May God give you patience.’ Selling has become more like consolation than commerce.

    Gaza today is not just a besieged geography, but a mosaic of individual stories: a mother searching for her children on lists, a child making a toy out of scrap metal, a doctor fighting death with his bare hands. These small details, hidden among the rubble, are what truly tell the story of Gazans’ daily lives under bombardment.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Alaa Shamali

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • For over half a century, Palestinian families have suffered a cruel double blow. Not only do they face the devastating loss of loved ones killed amid Israel’s ongoing occupation, but many also endure the prolonged agony of being denied the right to bury their dead with dignity.

    This is due to the Israeli occupation’s systematic policy of withholding the corpses and remains of hundreds of Palestinians killed by its forces – whether resistance fighters, detainees, or civilians – which forms part of what academics call necropolitics: the politics of death, and the power of authorities to decide who lives and who dies.

    Withholding of martyr’s bodies: Israeli occupation’s system of control over Palestinian

    In the case of Palestine, the Israeli regime’s policy of withholding bodies, and even setting strict rules for funerals and mourning, is part of a broader system of colonial domination which seeks to control Palestinian life, death, and memory.

    Mourning is weaponised, to enforce occupation and erode collective identity, stripping Palestinians of dignity and closure, and inflicting suffering far beyond death. Families feel completely desperate, not only because they have lost their child or loved one, but because they are unable to carry out a burial, and so have had their final act of saying goodbye stolen from them.

    Adalah – The Legal Centre for Arab Minority Rights in Israel, actively intervenes in cases where Palestinian families are denied the bodies of their deceased relatives by the Israeli occupation, offering legal representation by petitioning the Israeli Supreme Court to demand the release of the bodies for burial.

    Nareman Shehadeh-Zoabi, an attorney at Adalah’s civil and political rights department who has led many of the recent cases on this policy, explained:

    Withholding bodies inflicts unbearable pain on families. Burial is the final act of love, the closure that allows them to accept the reality of death. Without it, some cannot believe their sons are gone, clinging to the hope they are still alive. Parents feel they have failed, even unable to do this last duty for their child. As a lawyer, it is heartbreaking to face mothers who cannot understand the logic behind this policy. No explanation eases their suffering. Denying families the right to bury their loved ones is a cruelty that deepens grief and prevents healing.

    Cemeteries of numbers dehumanise Palestinians

    This practice has become a key instrument of occupation, gradually becoming institutionalised and embedded into Israeli law, with the remains and corpses of hundreds of Palestinians now being withheld by the occupation.

    Rather than returning them for a dignified burial, some are frozen in morgues, while others are buried in unmarked graves in military-controlled cemeteries. These ‘cemeteries of numbers’, located in closed military zones which are inaccessible to the public, have become emblematic of dehumanisation. Bodies are stripped of names and identities, marked only by numbered metal plaques, with each number corresponding to individual files kept by Israeli security authorities.

    The Jerusalem Legal Aid and Human Rights Centre (JLAC) documents cases and coordinates campaigns for the return of bodies, through the ‘National Campaign for the Retrieval of Martyrs’ Bodies‘, which it launched in 2008:

    Israel

    According to its documentation, 726 Palestinian bodies are currently being withheld by the occupation and, of these, 256 are buried in the ‘cemeteries of numbers’. The bodies include 85 prisoners, at least 10 women, and 67 children. All other bodies are men over 18 years old, who were killed in a variety of situations, including extra judicial killings or forcibly disappeared in unclear situations:

    Decades long suspicions that Israel harvests the organs of dead Palestinians

    The campaign’s data does not include bodies withheld from the Gaza Strip, although up to 1,500 Gazan corpses, many unidentifiable and decomposed, are now held in refrigerated containers in the Sde Timan military detention centre in Israel, notorious for its human rights abuses.

    Many Palestinian bodies in Gaza have also been wrapped in plastic bags, dumped on top of each other in mass graves, with families left completely unaware of what has happened to their loved ones, or whereabouts they are buried. The occupation has dug up and confiscated bodies from these mass graves and various hospitals in Gaza, and withheld them from the families:

    According to Euro-Med Monitor, some of the bodies which have been returned have shown evidence of organ theft, including missing vital organs such as livers, hearts, and kidneys, as well as cochleae and corneas. Accusations of organ trafficking by the occupation have been going on for decades, and the human rights organisation is calling for an independent international committee to be created to investigate organ theft suspicions.

    Abdallah Alzighari is president of the Palestinian Prisoner’s Club, which advocates for the rights of thousands of Palestinians held in Israeli prisons by providing legal support, documenting conditions, and offering assistance to detainees’ families. He said:

    The Israeli occupation system is considered the only state in the world that practices this humanitarian and moral crime, whereby not only is the body of the martyr punished by being detained in the refrigerators or cemeteries of numbers, but it is also a collective punitive policy against the families of the martyrs in general. This contravenes all international laws and agreements. It is the right of these martyrs, whose bodies are being held by the occupation, to be buried in accordance with religious, moral and national teachings, so they may be honoured by having a place where their families can visit them at any time they wish, so they may feel reassured and at peace when they practice the traditions related to burying their son, who has been absent from them for many long years, inside the occupation’s prisons.

    Palestinian bodies as bargaining chips

    Israeli authorities acknowledge again and again that the main purpose of withholding these bodies, and causing this unimaginable harm and desperation to the families, is for use as political tools – bargaining chips in negotiations with armed groups.

    The policy has its roots in the days of British colonial rule in Palestine, with Regulation 133(3), imposed in 1945, allowing military authorities to withhold bodies as long as they deemed necessary, for ‘security reasons’. Following the 1967 occupation, Regulation 133(3) was embedded in Israeli military orders, and has now become systemic, with the Knesset and the occupation’s judicial system playing a pivotal role in legitimising this policy.

    September 2024 saw the court allow, for the first time, the body of a Palestinian citizen of Israel to be held for purposes of leverage in future negotiations. The body was that of Walid Daqqa, who died of cancer in prison, at the age of 62, in April 2024.

    Daqqa, who came from a Palestinian town in central Israel was in prison for decades, for the alleged kidnap and murder of an Israeli soldier – a crime he repeatedly denied. His body has still not been returned to his family.

    Miriam Azem, Adalah’s international advocacy coordinator said:

    The withholding of Palestinian bodies was already a widespread policy before October 2023, due to the Security Cabinet adopting two cabinet decisions that formally introduced this as an Israeli policy, and effectively allowed the policy of withholding bodies without any kind of time limit for purposes of negotiations. But over the last two years it has been vastly extended, both in terms of scope and who it’s being applied towards. For the first time, Israel is also using this policy against its own citizens. Palestinians holding an Israeli citizenship are now being withheld in their death by Israeli authorities for negotiations, to release Israeli hostages from Hamas.

    According to Adalah, there are at least nine bodies of Palestinian citizens of Israel currently being withheld by the Israeli occupation authorities, as bargaining chips for future negotiations with groups such as Hamas. This policy has been confirmed in several rulings, including in January 2025, when the Israeli Supreme Court rejected petitions from Adalah against the state’s withholding of the bodies of six Palestinian citizens of Israel, classifying them as security prisoners and allowing the continued retention of their remains, without requiring individual case assessments:

    Israel

    Israel denying Palestinian families the bodies of their murdered children

    This even applies in cases involving minors, such as the recent ruling in July 2025 allowing the continued withholding of the body of 14-year-old Wadia Shadi Sa’d Elyan, from East Jerusalem, who was shot and killed by Israeli occupation forces near the West Bank settlement of Ma’ale Adumim, in February 2024.

    Israeli authorities allege he was involved in a stabbing attack on an Israeli police officer, but video footage shows him being shot from behind while fleeing the scene, and then again while laying motionless on the road.

    Despite this evidence, the court accepted the state’s position that the body may continue to be held for leverage in prisoner exchange negotiations. Adalah, who represented Elyan’s family in court, argued that the prolonged withholding of Elyan’s body violates not only Israeli and international law, but also the rights and dignity of the deceased and his family.

    If the return of a loved ones body is agreed by the occupation, this usually only occurs if family members agree to certain conditions – often severe restrictions on the funeral, such as limited attendance, a nighttime funeral, and monetary guarantees. Families are often also forced to provide guarantees they will not hold autopsies and they will bury the bodies within a certain number of hours, so as to prevent any investigation into the circumstances of the killings taking place.

    Many never receive remains, or receive bodies so decomposed and mutilated that they can barely be recognised, not only making identification extremely difficult, but also causing lasting pain and anger. For Muslims, a prompt burial is very important, and is not only seen as a way of honouring the deceased, but also of allowing the soul to move into the afterlife.

    No healing without a burial

    Issam Aruri, director of JLAC, says that as in all cultures, religions, and beliefs, the funerals, burial and the practices that follow are also part of the healing process for families and friends to start a new chapter in their lives:

    Israel

    According to Aruri, there can be a long-lasting psychological toll on families of those whose bodies are being withheld, especially if they have no gravesite to visit, or if they are forced into restricted conditions for a funeral. He said that:

    When you have a body that you didn’t see or touch or having a last look at, you feel stuck somewhere – you feel guilty if you go to a party, you remember them during a family dinner or other occasions. Many families believe that their beloved ones didn’t die, and they keep waiting that some day or night they will be released and knock the door.

    Once, when we succeeded in the release of a few bodies, one of them after 7 years, we went to show our condolences to the family, and the father told us: ‘I cant thank you enough, because for the first time in 7 years my wife slept a whole night. For 7 years she kept having a nightmare, waking up at night because she imagined that our son was screaming somewhere, under torture’.

    There is no healing without a burial and all the accompanying processes.

    Withholding of bodies is also used as collective punishment: a war crime

    In addition to acting as a tool for political bargaining, this policy is a means of collective punishment, as each body represents a family torn apart by doubled grief, a community deprived of closure, a culture denied the rites vital to religious and social healing, and by withholding the bodies of Palestinian children, the occupation knows it can significantly increase the trauma it inflicts on the relevant families.

    Khaled Quzmar, director of Defense for Children International – Palestine (DCIP) told the Canary:

    Israeli media have announced many times that it’s a kind of punishment for the family. It is also meant to be a deterrent, a message to all the other children, who are thinking of doing any action against Israel, that he is going to pay the price by subjecting the family to collective punishment like house demolition, attacks, prison, and also by keeping the body of their child.

    He explained that children are always considered children, and never criminals, in international law. Even if they have committed the crime of killing someone, in court they will be considered a victim of certain circumstances, a victim in need of protection, rehabilitation, and reintegration into society, rather than a criminal deserving of punishment. But things are different for Palestinian children.

    Quzmar said that:

    The ICJ concluded that the occupation is illegal. To those who are attacked and killed by Israel, it is not only a war crime, but a crime against humanity and, in the case of children, it violates the Israeli obligation under the Child Rights Convention, which it signed and adopted. This behaviour is not happening to Israeli children, only against the Palestinian children, and by attacking them, detaining them, and withholding their bodies, I can say it is double or triple crimes that are committed against the child and against his family. Not one of those children are being treated as a human being, as a child, according to the law, but are all subject to the mentality of the Israeli army.

    Israel violations of international law – yet again

    International law proscribes collective punishment of civilians, cruel treatment of the dead, and enforced disappearance, which are all applicable here. International law, with the Geneva Conventions, demands prompt return, identification, and dignified burial of the dead. The UN Human Rights Council and international commission have condemned the Israeli occupation’s policy of withholding the bodies of Palestinian martyrs, viewing it as a violation of humanitarian principles, and explicitly recognising the practice as a form of psychological torture.

    Despite legal setbacks, Palestinian civil society continues to resist through organisations such as JLAC, and seeks dignity beyond death by launching vigils, protests, and legal petitions. Each recovered body is not only a personal closure, but a collective act of resistance against the erasure of memory.

    To learn more, read JLAC’s excellent publication titled The Warmth of our Sons.

    Featured image via JLAC and additional images and video supplied, or via JLAC

    By Charlie Jaay

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • An as-yet-unidentified drone dropped an incendiary device onto the lead boat of the Gaza flotilla on 8-9 September. Moored in the Tunisian port of Sidi Bou Said, the flotilla’s goal is to break the siege of Gaza. Hours later, a second attack took place.

    UN special rapporteur on Palestine Francesca Albanese tweeted an image of the munition used:

    Albanese added:

    Expert sources suggest that it was an incendiary grenade wrapped in plastic materials dipped in fuel, which could have been set on fire before landing on the ship.

    Attacking a flotilla: an established Israeli tactic

    Attacking humanitarian boats is established Israeli practice, sometimes with deadly results.  So is dropping incendiary devices by drone. This footage is from south Gaza in March 2024:

    The spray and spatter of the burning material is visibly similar to that which hit the deck of the Flotilla’s ‘Family Boat’ in Tunisia.

    Here is a side-by-side from an open source intelligence (OSINT) expert for comparison:

    Ambulance attacks

    Israel used a similar method to attack ambulances in Gaza in 2 September. Middle East Eye reported:

    The Israeli military used a drone to drop incendiary grenades on an ambulance at Al-Sheikh Radwan Clinic in Gaza City… it is currently unknown whether there were paramedics or patients in the ambulance.

    Healthcare workers and infrastructure have been routinely targeted during the Israeli assault on Gaza. And a UN body even described this as “medicide” in August 2025:

    Health and care workers have been continuously targeted, detained, tortured and are now, like the rest of the population, being starved.

    Legalities of drones dropping incendiaries

    The increased use of drone-borne incendiary devices in Gaza and elsewhere has attracted controversy. The NGO Action on Armed Violence (AOAV) said:

    While militaries extol their tactical advantages, these weapons’ indiscriminate nature and potential for civilian harm have led to renewed calls for stricter regulation under international humanitarian law (IHL), especially under Protocol III of the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW).

    The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) defines incendiary weaponry as:

    Weapons or munitions primarily designed to set fire to objects or to cause burn injury to persons through the action of flames, heat, or a combination thereof, produced by the chemical reaction of a substance delivered on the target. Incendiary weapons can take the form of flamethrowers, fougasses, shells, rockets, grenades, mines bombs and other containers of incendiary substances (e.g., napalm, phosphorous).

    The ICRC added that it is “prohibited in all circumstances” to use incendiary weapons “against the civilian populationcivilian objects, forests or other kinds of plant cover”.

    Incendiary weapons delivered by drone

    The use of incendiary weapons has increased in recent years, including their delivery by drone. A 2020 Human Rights Watch (HRW) examines their use in Afghanistan, Syria and Gaza:

    They inflict excruciating burns, sometimes to the bone, and can cause respiratory damage, infection, shock, and organ failure.

    The current Gaza flotilla aims to reach its destination in mid-September. 

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Joe Glenton

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • It’s all part of a stratagem, bleak and brutal. With Palestinian recognition being promised by France, the UK, Canada and Australia at the 80th session of the United Nations General Assembly, Israeli aggression is becoming more brazen and panicked. Time must be bought on one vital front: creating a Greater Israel, involving the annexation of Gaza and extinguishing, as far as possible, the power of the Palestinian Authority in the West Bank. What follows from this is the termination of Palestinian statehood altogether, including its political representatives.

    Israel’s efforts have, for that purpose, focused on killing Hamas militants at enormous cost to Palestinian civilians while also attempting to eradicate the diplomatic presence of the organisation. The attack on a building in Doha, Qatar on September 9 was a case in point. The intention of the attack by the IDF, involving 15 Israeli fighter jets and an unspecified number of drones, was killing senior Hamas officials involved in discussing a ceasefire proposal advanced by US President Donald Trump. Were it to be accepted, that proposal would see the release of all Israeli hostages (dead and alive) in exchange for Palestinian prisoners, followed by a ceasefire of 60 days duration and ongoing negotiations towards an agreement concluding the war. Qatar had been putting pressure on Hamas to accept the proposal.

    While Hamas personnel were killed, such senior negotiators as Khalil al-Hayya (who lost his son), Zaher Jabarin, and Khaled Mashal, were spared. Seven perished in the strike, with Qatar losing two security officers. Yet again, Israel’s military action demonstrated a reading of international law that tilts towards anarchical self-assurance, indifferent to any sovereignty that is not its own. As Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu reasoned, Qatar was hosting terrorists. “I say to Qatar and all nations who harbour terrorists, you either expel them or you bring them to justice. Because you don’t, we will.”

    Israeli officials, in keeping with an established, somewhat jaundiced view of international relations, advanced a novel, unhinged reading of the attack on Qatari soil. Israeli Ambassador to the US, Yechiel Leiter, offered his dash of drivel by suggesting that this would “actually advance the efforts for a ceasefire and peace.” And as for the Hamas leaders, “if we didn’t get them this time, we’ll get them the next time.”

    A condemnation of Netanyahu’s comments followed from Qatar’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, which described them as a “shameful attempt … to justify the cowardly attack that targeted Qatari territory, as well as the explicit threats of future violations of state sovereignty.”

    Qatar’s Prime Minister Mohammed bin Abdulrahman bin Jassim Al Thani, undoubtedly stung that his country’s modernised military had failed to protect the capital, drew the obvious conclusion. The strike had been motivated by Israel’s desire to eliminate “any chance of peace” in Gaza, and effectively sealed the fate of the Israeli hostages still being held in the Strip. “Everything in the meeting is very well known to the Israelis and the Americans. It’s not something that we are hiding.”

    He also demanded some “collective response” to the attack. “There is a response that will happen from the region. This response is currently under consultation and discussion with other partners in the region,” he explained to CNN. What that will look like is by no means clear, given the temperamental nature of relations between the various Gulf states. Al Jazeera’s Charles Stratford reports that a legal committee is being pooled to consider “all legal avenues to have Netanyahu tried for breaking international law.”

    Even Israel’s least conditional sponsor felt that things had gone too far. “I’m not thrilled by it,” stated Trump as he arrived at a restaurant in Washington. “It’s not a good situation but I will say this: We want the hostages back, but we’re not thrilled about the way it went down today.” He went further, saying he was “very unhappy about it, very unhappy about every aspect.” The President had every reason to harbour such sentiments, given the value of US-Qatar relations and the hosting of US forces at Al-Udeid, the largest US airbase in the Middle East. If Doha can be attacked with impunity, an American military presence becomes less impressive. This was a point Iran’s state-run Press TV found too delicious to avoid. “Did you know,” went the network’s post on X, “that Qatar hosts one of the US’s biggest military bases in the Persian Gulf, with many air defense systems present, yet none of the American THAAD systems fired a single shot to defend Qatar against the Israel invasion?”

    The Israeli PM’s list of legal woes is further reason time is being bought. Israel’s strikes across the Middle East this year have been efforts to keep war in the spotlight, peace suspended, and Netanyahu out of jail. The war in Gaza, the attacks on the Houthis in Yemen, the strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities or the targeting of Syria, have all become matters of personal self-interest and prolongation. Were there a serious risk of pacific calm breaking out, if only momentarily, Netanyahu would have to face something he fails to take seriously: the force of the law.

    The post Buying Time: Israel’s Rogue Attack on Qatar first appeared on Dissident Voice.

    This post was originally published on Dissident Voice.

  • Raz Segal, an Israeli historian and an associate professor of Holocaust and Genocide Studies at Stockton University, analyzes how the weaponization and distortion of the Holocaust, in the midst of the genocide in Gaza, has been used to serve the narrative of Zionists and the Israeli government. He tells host Chris Hedges on this episode of The Chris Hedges Report:

    “We know that Holocaust education eventually was more focused on transmitting this feeling of exceptionality than actually teaching about Holocaust as history, as real history, as normal history, as a part, indeed, of the making of the modern and late modern world.”

    Segal recounts his personal experience learning about the Holocaust in Israel, revealing a Zionist perspective that is both skewed and contradictory.

    The post Chris Hedges Report: The Death Of Holocaust Studies appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • A British veteran has joined the largest aid flotilla to Gaza in history and is calling on the Royal Air Force (RAF) to end its intelligence support to Israel.

    Malcolm Ducker, who served as a fighter pilot in the RAF between 1972 and 1979, is sailing with a flotilla of over 50 boats loaded with aid for Gaza.

    The initiative is being led by the Global Sumud Flotilla (GSF), a “coalition of everyday people… who believe in human dignity and the power of nonviolent action.”

    The first boats departed from Spanish ports on Sunday but were briefly delayed due to bad weather. More ships are set to join the flotilla in Tunisia in the coming days before arriving in Gaza in mid-September.

    The post From Royal Air Force Fighter Pilot To Gaza Blockade Buster appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • Israel attempted to assassinate top Hamas leaders in Qatar on Tuesday, after large explosions were heard in the capital city of Doha, and smoke columns rose from the building targeted in the attack. A joint statement by the Israeli army and Israel’s internal intelligence agency confirmed that it was targeting Hamas’s senior leadership in a “precise strike.” The statement added that the targeted leaders were “directly responsible” for the October 7 attack and that “measures were taken in order to mitigate harm to civilians.”

    Israeli media said that the strike targeted the office of the lead Hamas negotiator in the ongoing ceasefire talks, Khalil al-Hayya, in addition to other members of the negotiating team.

    The post Israel Bombed Qatar To Assassinate Hamas’s Lead Ceasefire Negotiators appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • Numerous members of a hateful anti-Islam biker gang that promotes violence against Muslims are serving as military contractors at the deadly U.S.-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) sites, with many of them in leadership positions, a new investigation finds. At least 10 members of the Infidels Motorcycle Club are working in Gaza for contractor UG Solutions, BBC revealed.

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • Global condemnation is mounting after Israel bombed Qatar’s capital Doha, attempting to take out senior Hamas leaders who had gathered to consider a U.S. proposal for a Gaza ceasefire. Hamas leadership survived the strike, which killed six. We speak with Jeremy Scahill, co-founder of Drop Site News, who has reported extensively on Gaza ceasefire negotiations and is one of the few Western…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • Every day we witness a new chain of brutal crimes committed by the Israeli occupation. Why does no one dare to stop it? How can a world stripped of humanity watch us burn alive? How are we expected to answer sudden phone calls ordering us to evacuate, threatening: “We will destroy everything around you”? Has everything we own become Israeli property to be demolished at will?

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • In his last minutes of freedom before Israel Defense Forces arrested him, Dr. Hussam Abu Safiya, clad in a medic’s white coat, walked alone toward two Israeli tanks. His captors awaited him amid the rubble of Gaza’s Kamal Adwan hospital. An artist swiftly created a dramatic poster showing Dr. Safiya striding through the ruins of the hospital he directed. The artist, David Solnit…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • On Sunday 7 September, a BMW drove through a pro-Palestine protest in Switzerland. As the crowd ran out of the way, thankfully no one was killed:

    In the aftermath of the event, a group the Guardian described as a “pro-Israel hate network” celebrated the event:

    A “moment of panic” in Switzerland

    Reportedly, around 1,500 to 2,000 people had gathered in the town of Lausanne to protest Swiss complicity in the ongoing genocide in Gaza. It’s reported the car “deliberately” drove into the crowd, which seems apparent from the video.

    A protester told 24 heures (translation from blue News):

    We were all sitting there calmly when suddenly a BMW sped up and accelerated as it drove towards the crowd. There was a moment of panic and people ran away. Everyone was shocked, there could have been fatalities

    People commented on the incident online:

    One man noticed that more recent reporting states the driver thought the protesters were climate activists:

    Using Google Translate on the article in question, the driver claims he didn’t realise it was a pro-Palestine protest and simply thought he could drive through the crowd to save time. It’s unclear if these arguments will hold up in any potential court proceedings.

    The Shirion Collective: a Zionist hate network

    As noted above, the Shirion Collective described the event as “glorious”. Those retweeting the post expressed similar sentiments:


    The Shirion Collective has 77k followers on X/Twitter, but it’s more than just a social media account. Describing the operation as “conspiracy-minded”, Guardian report found:

    Shirion has harassed pro-Palestinian activists, including many Jews, offered bounties for the identity of pro-Palestinian protesters, spread conspiracy narratives centered on figures like George Soros, and boasted of an AI-surveillance platform but offered few concrete details of how the technology functions.

    The article notes that Shirion claims to use AI to track down pro-Palestine voices, and that they claim to have paid out bounties for those who identify such individuals. Extremism expert Heidi Beirich described Shirion as a “grift” with ‘confused ideology’, which she noted is common in this space. As of June 2024, the group had brought in tens of thousands of dollars via crowd funding.

    In the same piece, the Guardian identified the man behind Zionist hate network Shirion as one Daniel Linden, who lives in Florida and has written guidebooks for OnlyFans. Recent posts from Shirion give an idea of the group’s ethos:

    They posted the following after Israel illegally bombed a building in the sovereign nation of Qatar where Hamas representatives had come to engage in peace talks:


    They also posted this:

    One recent post from Shirion carries a quote from Linden which suggests the Palestinian people being subjected to genocide by Zionist Israel are worse than the citizens of Nazi Germany:

    Featured image via X/Twitter

    By Willem Moore

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • A second boat in the activist flotilla setting sail to Gaza has been attacked in as many days, with activists blaming Israel and vowing to continue their journey to break Israel’s near-total humanitarian aid blockade. On Tuesday night, a flaming object fell on the Global Sumud Flotilla’s (GSF) “Alma” boat, docked in Tunisian waters and sailing under the British flag.

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • After Israel committed and then denied, with the eager help of western ‘mainstream’ media, its first night-time drone strike on a boat of the humanitarian Global Sumud Flotilla sailing to break Israel’s criminal starvation siege of Gaza, volunteer crew member Faeyz Hamzeh posted video of the attack that put beyond doubt that it was a drone bombing and not, as media had claimed, a mechanical fault, that set the boat on fire.

    Last night, Israel bombed a flotilla vessel for the second time – and the media have colluded in the same way. So Hamzeh has published a new video. This one shows the footage of both bombings; there is no doubt that they are bombings. But he also put them side by side with night-time drone bombings Israel perpetrated around the same time on civilians in Gaza.

    And his verdict was unequivocal: “The whole world knows who did it”. See the near-identical weapons for yourself in this version of Hamzeh’s video that Skwawkbox has edited to enlarge each scene in turn:

    Nor is this Israel’s first rodeo in terms of bombing humanitarian vessels in international waters. It did the same with a Freedom Flotilla Coalition boat near Malta in May and seized two subsequent vessels and their crews.

    Despite this, western media continue to try to cast doubt on the obvious truth:

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Skwawkbox

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • The attack yesterday (9 September) in Qatar by the illegitimate state often referred to as ‘Israel‘ proceeded in a fashion we’ve become accustomed to throughout the genocide in Gaza – cause widespread destruction, kill many people, but fail to achieve the main objective. The goal in this case was to eliminate the entire leadership of the five-man temporary committee currently governing Hamas, as a means of sabotaging the negotiations taking place for a Gaza ceasefire deal. While they managed to kill Humam al-Hayya, son of one committee member Khalil al-Hayya, the leaders themselves have seemingly escaped unscathed. Among them is Khalid Meshal, a survivor of a notorious prior assassination attempt almost 30 years ago (note the salivating New York Times headline in the link, echoing the glee and excitement with which Western media greeted the pager attacks on Hezbollah).

    Israel bomb attack Qatar: Khalid Meshal survives assassination attempt, not for the first time

    On that occasion, it was again the now wanted war criminal Benjamin Netanyahu that attempted to end his life. The first botched effort to murder Khalid Meshal took place in Jordanian capital Amman in 1997, and was the subject of an excellent two-part documentary by Al Jazeera.

    Two Mossad agents disguised as tourists waited on the street outside Meshal’s office, one with a plaster cast on his arm intended to look like that applied to a broken bone, but which in fact concealed a:

    high-tech and previously unknown delivery system to blast a fatal overdose of a synthetic opiate called Fentanyl.

    As Meshal walked past, the would-be assassin sprayed the substance in Meshal’s ear before attempting to flee with his colleague. They were pursued by Meshal’s bodyguard Muhammad Abu Saif, who chased them through the streets of Amman, where he eventually caught them on foot. The brawl that ensued on a verge alongside a main road between Abu Saif and the two Zionist thugs eventually attracted the attention of the Jordanian police, who apprehended the Mossad two. Six more Mossad agents were found to be in the Israeli embassy, and were prevented from leaving the country by Jordanian authorities.

    Meshal’s condition deteriorated, leaving him in a coma. The brutal act caused a diplomatic storm, with Jordan and the Zionist entity having signed a peace deal only three years prior. The attack humiliated the Jordanian leader king Hussein, and fearing the repercussions from the country’s large Palestinian population were Khalid Meshal to die, he demanded Netanyahu provide the antidote. This was delivered in person by the head of Mossad, Danny Yatom, and Meshal ultimately made a full recovery.

    Stirring a diplomatic storm

    The rash and lawless attack proved a political disaster for Netanyahu, as in exchange for the release of the Mossad agents, he was compelled to release from prison the founder of Hamas Ahmed Yassin.

    The 1997 attempt at killing Khalid Meshal is another example of what Ronen Bergman characterised in his book Rise and Kill First: The Secret History of Israel’s Targeted Assassinations as an “addiction” to assassination among Zionist leaders. This violence first approach, and the failure by the international community to ever hold the rogue state to account, has brought mass death and destruction to West Asia.

    The current fallout from the attack in Doha has parallels to the one in Amman, as a “third country” attack (i.e. one outside Palestine or ‘Israel’) again provokes a diplomatic storm. It embarrasses Qatar, who has attempted to woo Trump, most notably by supplying him with an ostentatious new plane to be used as the new Air Force One. The country also hosts the largest American base in the region. Trump has acknowledged that the US knew of the attack and did not attempt to stop it, and has now been forced to backpedal, saying that:

    Unilaterally bombing inside Qatar, a Sovereign Nation and close Ally of the United States, that is working very hard and bravely taking risks with us to broker Peace, does not advance Israel or America’s goals.

    Craven Zionist strategy of ‘might makes right’

    The bombing of nations used as base for mediating conflict appears to a Zionist strategy intended to ensure that no mediation can ever occur, and that only “might makes right” can prevail, brutalising the entire region in the process.

    Compliant Arab states have been content for the genocide in Gaza to continue, so long as ultimately, Zionist violence does not touch them. The increasingly rash and expansionist Zionist settler-colony appears to have no restraint, however, and this may eventually prompt even these craven despots to reconsider their current approach. Khalid Meshal should be testimony to this.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Robert Freeman

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • On Monday 8 September, Banksy unveiled his latest piece at the Royal Courts of Justice in London. As an obvious critique of Britain using the law to intimidate protesters, the piece quickly proved controversial with UK authorities. Obviously uncomfortable with the message, the police launched an investigation, and the courts deployed what can only be described as an ‘anonymous riot gimp’ to scrub the artwork from the walls:

    This chain of events contrasts uncomfortably with the news that the UK government has decided Israel “isn’t committing genocide”.

    This means the UK can decide that Banksy’s latest piece is potentially criminal in hours but they can’t call a genocide a genocide nearly two years in.

    It’s all so very predictable of this current Labour government.

    Banksy: war on piece

    Regardless of whether you think Banksy should be allowed to paint on public buildings, he has done for years now, and Britain celebrated him for it. As such, it’s suspicious the police are now finally springing into action. Reporting on the potential criminal proceedings, the Independent wrote:

    Banksy could finally see his identity revealed after police launched an investigation into his latest artwork at the Royal Courts of Justice in London.

    The Metropolitan Police is examining whether the recent work, which shows a judge in a wig and gown beating a protester holding a blood-splattered placard, is enough to put him in front of the court where his name would be revealed to the public.

    Potentially Banksy could away with this by simply not coming forwards? Presumably there are financial avenues the police could pursue to uncover his identity, but if not, we may end up with a situation in which thousands of UK citizens come forwards to claim ‘I am Banksy‘.

    Several videos and images have come out of the image being removed, which originally looked like this:

    At some point the riot gimp donned a high vis jacket, perhaps worried people couldn’t see him defacing the artwork at a distance:

    Multiplying the symbolism by 1,000%, the shadow of the image they tried to scrub is arguably more powerful than the original:

    Complicity

    As Skwawkbox reported for the Canary on 9 September:

    The UK government, after almost two years of providing political cover for Israel’s genocide and more than a year directly assisting it, has announced its carefully considered conclusion that… you’ve guessed it: Israel is not committing genocide.

    People had a strong reaction to this online:

    The government explained that it doesn’t consider it to be genocide because:

    As per the Genocide Convention, the crime of genocide occurs only where there is specific “intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group.” The Government has not concluded that Israel is acting with that intent.

    We’re not sure where Labour was looking, but it certainly wasn’t at the widely documented instances of senior Israeli politicians making their genocidal intent clear.

    Amnesty International reported on this too, stating:

    In its analysis, the organization also considered alternative arguments such as ones that Israel was acting recklessly or that it simply wanted to destroy Hamas and did not care if it needed to destroy Palestinians in the process, demonstrating a callous disregard for their lives rather than genocidal intent.

    However, regardless of whether Israel sees the destruction of Palestinians as instrumental to destroying Hamas or as an acceptable by-product of this goal, this view of Palestinians as disposable and not worthy of consideration is in itself evidence of genocidal intent.

    Many of the unlawful acts documented by Amnesty International were preceded by officials urging their implementation. The organization reviewed 102 statements that were issued by Israeli government and military officials and others between 7 October 2023 and 30 June 2024 and dehumanized Palestinians, called for or justified genocidal acts or other crimes against them.

    Of these, Amnesty International identified 22 statements made by senior officials in charge of managing the offensive that appeared to call for, or justify, genocidal acts, providing direct evidence of genocidal intent. This language was frequently replicated, including by Israeli soldiers on the ground, as evidenced by audiovisual content verified by Amnesty International showing soldiers making calls to “erase” Gaza or to make it uninhabitable, and celebrating the destruction of Palestinian homes, mosques, schools and universities.

    Contrast

    Maybe if Banksy paints the statements of senior Israelis on the walls of listed buildings, UK politicians will finally have to acknowledge them?

    Or maybe not.

    The moment when Labour could have held Israel accountable is long gone, as our government is just as implicated as the Tories they replaced at this point. And much like with Banksy’s latest piece, these politicians will struggle to wipe away the stain of what they’ve done.

    Featured image via Good Law Project – X/Twitter

    By Willem Moore

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez has announced an arms embargo on Israel as part of a package of measures aimed at “stopping the genocide in Gaza” and “supporting the Palestinian population”. The move, which needs to be ratified by Spain’s parliament before taking effect, is a lesson to the UK and EU, which refuse to fulfil their obligations under international law – or even to acknowledge that Israel is committing genocide.

    Spain: taking action against Israel

    Spain has also banned two of Israel’s most senior fascist ministers from entering any of its territory, after Israel put sanctions on Spanish officials, Spanish Deputy PM and Minister of Labour Yolanda Diaz and Youth and Children’s Minister Sira Rago, because it took exception to their condemnation of Israel’s genocide in Gaza and its oppression and murder in the West Bank.

    Announcing the ban, Spanish Foreign Minister Jose Manuel Albares said that far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich – Smotrich has proudly declared himself a fascist (and homophobe) – are now on Spain’s list of sanctioned individuals because both are directly involved in promoting Israel’s genocidal war on Gaza.

    Spain has outraged Israel by recognising Palestinian statehood last year and stating that it will not tolerate the Trump-Netanyahu ethnic cleansing plan.

    In the UK, by contrast, the Starmer government continues to welcome Israeli officials involved in the genocide, including Israeli president and accused war criminal Isaac Herzog this week.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Skwawkbox

    This post was originally published on Canary.