Category: Palestine

  • This story originally appeared in Mondoweiss on July 24, 2025. It is shared here with permission.

    Israel is accelerating its efforts to cement its permanent control over the West Bank through a number of sweeping legal and institutional changes, according to a new report from Adalah, The Legal Center for Arab Minority Rights in Israel.

    The 87-page report, Legal Structures of Distinction, Separation, and Territorial Domination, describes the ways in which the Netanyahu government is rapidly building on a long-standing legal matrix that further threatens Palestinians’ right to self-determination. 

    “These developments are not something new to us,” Dr. Suhad Bishara, Legal Director of Adalah and lead author of the report, told Mondoweiss. “All eyes are on Gaza, justifiably so,” she said. “However… it is important to highlight the intensity of the structural changes that have taken place since the current government took over in December 2022.”

    “What is happening in the West Bank is dangerously fast-forwarding annexation policies in a blatant violation of international law,” Bishara said. “Israel is intensifying measures to change the status of the West Bank, the status of many Palestinians living in Area C who are subject to intensified displacement induced by settler violence and Israeli policies.” She said, “This is in addition to settler expansion and further restrictions on Palestinian development in the area.”

    Thoroughly researched and footnoted, the report documents how the current extremist government has built on what Adalah describes as “foundational mechanisms through which Israel has entrenched a land regime that facilitates territorial domination and racial segregation.” 

    Area C comprises over 60 percent of the West Bank, and is under full Israeli military control. 

    Here are the mechanisms of territorial domination Adalah examines in these areas.

    Civilian governance for Israeli settlers; military rule over Palestinians

    Beginning in the late 1970s, Israel abandoned its security-based justifications for approving settlements and adopted a policy based on civil, not military grounds. The report describes how, soon after, the Civil Administration — the Israeli body governing the West Bank — was established to formalize the division between military and civilian affairs.

    As a result, “Israel has steadily transferred governance over Israeli settlers in the West Bank from military to civilian control, entrenching permanent territorial dominance and greatly expanding the settlement enterprise,” according to the report.

    Most recently, structural reforms — such as the appointment of Bezalel Smotrich to serve as both Finance Minister and a Minister in the Defense Ministry — have resulted in increasing legal authority for the pro-settler civil servants working with Smotrich in the West Bank. These reforms have cemented the two distinct legal structures that govern life in Palestinian villages and Israeli settlements: the former, in which the military rules, and the latter, administered according to Israeli law. 

    1. Administration by local authorities

    Adalah’s report dives into the weeds as it describes one of the more concerning mechanisms that reveals Israel’s intent to annex the whole of the West Bank. Having transitioned the settlements from military administration to civilian rule — and having handed over significant legal and administrative decision-making to pro-settler civil servants — Israel can argue that the settlements operate now under Israeli sovereignty. But applying Israeli law in occupied territory, Adalah maintains, is a violation of international human rights law and constitutes “a measure of de facto annexation.” 

    2. Financial incentives for settlements 

    Readers of the report won’t be surprised to learn that, as Adalah writes, “Israeli settlements receive extensive financial benefits through direct government subsidies, preferential policies, and financial incentives… [covering] multiple sectors, including land allocation, housing, infrastructure, and agriculture.” 

    Still, it is remarkable—as documented in the Adalah report—how in contravention of international law, Israel continues each year to pour billions of shekels into the development of settlements in the West Bank. Readers of the report will learn of “the legal mechanisms behind these incentives and how Israeli law facilitates their distribution.” 

    3. Declaring State land 

    According to Adalah, Israel’s designation of State Land in the West Bank is “the primary legal mechanism through which Israeli authorities have taken possession of Palestinian land since the late 1970s.” Those already familiar with Israel’s use of this means of de facto annexation will be surprised by the extraordinary amount of Palestinian land so designated. The report includes information obtained by Peace Now through a Freedom of Information Act request that shows a shocking fact: in under a one-year period, Israel has designated more Palestinian land as State Land than it had in an 18-year period.

    From 1998 to 2016, just over 21,000 dunams were declared as State Land. But in just over nine months (from the end of February 2024 through early December 2024), over 24,200 dunams were declared as State Land. This acceleration is historically unprecedented.

    The planning system in Area C

    Adalah includes an entire section on the legal and structural framework in place in Area C to further expand Israel’s settlement project, fulfilling one of the Netanyahu government’s guiding principles shared the day before his swearing-in as Prime Minister in December 2022: “The Jewish people have an exclusive and inalienable right to all parts of the Land of Israel,” promising to expand settlements throughout “Judea and Samaria,” the Israeli term for the occupied West Bank. 

    Paralleling the judgments of the ICJ, UN experts, and international, Palestinian, and Israeli human rights groups, the report ends by listing the five international crimes that Adalah finds Israel guilt of: violations of International Humanitarian Law; the deepening of the illegal mechanism of de facto annexation; the denial of Palestinian people’s right to self-determination; the deepening of the apartheid system in the occupied Palestinian territory; and the commission of war crimes and crimes of aggression on the part of Israel.

    The most recent newsletter from Ir Amim, an Israeli NGO, describes Israel’s expanding control over illegally annexed East Jerusalem. Asked to comment, Tess Miller, Public Outreach staff at Ir Amim (“City of Nations” or “City of Peoples” in Hebrew) told Mondoweiss that “the mechanisms of displacement that we monitor and advocate against within Jerusalem are not separate from the mechanisms seen today in Gaza and the West Bank.”

    “What we are witnessing,” Miller said, “time after time, place after place, is violent control granted to those willing to advance the state’s agenda of expanding Jewish presence and diminishing Palestinian presence.” Ir Amim’s newsletter documents home demolitions, evictions, and starkly discriminatory housing and land confiscation policies.

    “Together,” Miller said, “they all contribute to the accelerating erasure of the Palestinian people from their own cities, neighborhoods, and lands — enabled by the complicity of an increasingly radicalized Israeli public and the international community’s persistent refusal to take meaningful action.”

    According to Adalah’s Dr. Bishara, it is hoped that the Adalah report, read by advocates for Palestinian rights, stakeholders, and states alike, “will generate international pressure against these long-term changes in the West Bank that violate international law and threaten the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination.”

    This post was originally published on The Real News Network.

  • Approximately 100 incarcerated Iranian trans people are missing, presumed dead, after an Israeli strike on the infamous Evin Prison. Authorities inside Iran, and political prisoners from inside the prison, are saying these missing individuals were killed in the bombardment. Israeli officials and media have framed the attack on Evin as “symbolic”: Israel wanted to show Iranians that it…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • Columbia University has agreed to pay a $200 million fine and make other significant concessions to the Trump administration in a deal to restore federal grants canceled earlier this year as part of the president’s assault on institutions of higher education. Under the terms of the settlement, which was released Wednesday, Columbia agreed to “conduct a thorough review” of its educational…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • After a man assaulted a woman marching for Palestine on a recent fundraising walk, Hastings Friends of Al-Mawasi have announced another in defiance at the blatant act of intimidation.

    Thug assaults woman on a fundraising walk in Hastings for Palestine

    At the previous walk, the woman, who was planning to greet the walkers as they arrived in Bexhill, was waiting at the De La Warr Pavilion wearing a traditional Palestinian keffiyeh. This was when a man approached her without warning to grab the keffiyeh from her neck and called her a ‘terrorist’. A violent assault ensued and police have launched an investigation.

    A Sussex Police statement on the attack said:

    Police received a report of an assault on a woman by a man in Bexhill at about 1.30pm on Sunday, 20 July. It happened on the beach side at the front of the De La Warr Pavilion. Officers are investigating, and witnesses or anyone with information can report it to Sussex Police online, quoting serial 414 of 20/07.

    In a separate incident, another man carrying an Israeli flag followed walkers along the route shouting threats and abuse.

    The group plans to hold another fundraising walk from Hastings to Bexhill on Sunday 10 August.

    Far-right emboldened by the proscription of Palestine Action

    Richard Wistreich who is a member of Hastings Jews for Justice and was wearing a HJJ t-shirt on the day said:

    Because I was the only walker visibly identifiable as Jewish, I was singled out for a rabid verbal attack. He not only screamed in my face that I am not a Jew, repeatedly calling me a Nazi (in fact, my father narrowly escaped being annihilated in the Holocaust, as many in my family were), but threatened to hit me (I’m twice his age). Such deeply antisemitic abuse reveals his profound ignorance.

    The walk, which was attended by dozens of local people, including young children, raised over £4,300 for people in Al-Mawasi. The town in Gaza has longstanding links to Hastings. Hastings Borough Council recently voted to formally support and promote the friendship link between Hastings and Al-Mawasi. Councillor Becca Horn, Hastings’ Mayor, said she was shocked by the attack and hoped to attend the next fundraising walk.

    It appears there has been a marked escalation of threatening and abusive behaviour in the past few weeks, aimed at people in the town who show sympathy or support for the people of Palestine.

    Local businesses in Hastings displaying support for Palestine under attack

    Steph Warren is the owner of the Stella Dore Gallery in Hastings. It is one of a number of local businesses that have been targeted with stickers about ‘Hamas’ and ‘antisemitism’. She said:

    I have proudly displayed posters in my window advertising community events like the recent ‘Oh Big Blue’ poetry exhibition by children in Gaza, and there is no way I am going to be intimidated by these pro-genocide hate-mongers. I hope many more people will join me on the fundraising walk on the 10th, and show that these cowardly bullies are the minority who will never silence the vast majority of our town who stand for peace and justice.

    Stooge Cafe were also undeterred by the actions of what they called “a tiny, sad minority” and said:

    We know our customers appreciate our display of solidarity… just last week we had two Palestinian families drop in for drinks after seeing our sign. They said it gave them some comfort knowing that there is community support for them, that folks like us are disgusted by our government.

    It’s no coincidence peaceful protesters are labelled ‘terrorists’

    Grace Lally, one of the organisers of Hastings Friends of Al-Mawasi, said:

    It’s no coincidence that in the weeks since the Government labelled Palestine Action as terrorists, and the police started arresting peaceful anti-genocide protestors, we have seen an increase in threatening and violent behaviour by people who support Israel’s genocidal actions. The local Labour MP, Helena Dollimore, recently accused Palestine campaigners of endangering her, when they called on her personally to condemn Israel. But it is clear that by falsely labelling anti-genocide campaigners as some kind of threat, our MP and our government are emboldening violent thugs who now feel empowered to treat even young children on a fundraising walk as if they are ‘terrorists’ who deserve to be hounded and abused.

    For the woman who was attacked in Bexhill (who doesn’t wish to be named) the parallels with the violence being meted out to people in Palestine are clear. She wrote:

    What happened to me, a single act of violence, echoes the deeper, ongoing violence that Palestinians endure every day. It was a glimpse into the hatred they face simply for existing. And yet, they continue to resist, to survive, to hold onto their humanity in the face of unimaginable cruelty. My bruises will heal. But Gaza continues to bleed. We are failing to see that if genocide is allowed and international law is being broken with impunity, then in times of conflict, we are all at risk of the same fate. In this sense, we are all Palestinian. We must not look away and we can not allow this hatred and violence to stain our own communities.

    Pattern of aggressive men targeting women expressing support for Palestine

    Hastings residents have reported further incidents to the police in recent weeks. This includes a woman who far-right and Zionists thugs targeted for abuse leaving her home. This appeared to be owing to a Palestine poster in her window. She subsequently received an intimidating message directly to her phone.

    The pattern of aggressive men targeting women seems to be another feature of these incidents. Given this, a local women’s group issued a statement saying:

    Hastings Women’s Voice is horrified to hear that a woman supporting Hastings Friends of Al-Mawasi was physically attacked on Sunday on the seafront. Sending our solidarity and sending our best wishes. Women’s Voice deplores all violence, but particularly violence against women, and stands shoulder to shoulder with those campaigning against the genocide in Gaza.

    Hastings Mosque also issued a statement extending their solidarity and calling for a community response:

    To our dear sister, we extend our heartfelt duas and unwavering support. You are not alone. You belong. You are cared for…Let this terrible act not sow fear, but awaken our collective conscience. Let it deepen our solidarity and strengthen our resolve to build a community where everyone, regardless of faith, ethnicity, or cause they stand for, can walk with dignity and without fear.

    The fundraising walk will leave the Stade at 11am on Sunday 10th of August aiming to arrive in Bexhill De la Warr Pavilion at around 1pm. For sponsorship forms or more information contact hastingsalmawasi@gmail.com

    Featured image supplied

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • International condemnation for Israel’s actions in Gaza is growing, with horrific and heartbreaking photographs of babies and children it is deliberately starving even making it as far as the front page of the Daily Express. However, instead of taking meaningful action, foreign secretary David Lammy has instead lied to numerous media outlets about the UK’s role in arming Israel.

    Even former Conservative home secretary Kit Malthouse condemned Lammy’s stance, asking if he can:

    see the personal risk to him, given our international obligations, that he may end up at The Hague because of his inaction?

    Lammy’s barefaced lies over arms to Israel

    Lammy claimed that the UK is not sending any military equipment to Israel that the genocidal state is using in Gaza. He also denied that the UK is providing Israel with spare parts for the F-35 fighter jets.

    The UK makes 15% of every F-35 combat aircraft that Israel is using to drop 2000lb bombs on children in Gaza. While his government did suspend a small number of arms sales to Israel, it made an exemption – known as the F-35 carve out – for F-35 parts going into the global stockpile that Israel can and is accessing.

    In the recent GLAN/Al-Haq court case over their continued supply, his government admitted there is a clear risk that Israel is using F-35s to commit war crimes and that Israel is not committed to complying with international humanitarian law. Its own Export Control Joint Unit (ECJU) found that:

    it is uncontentious that conduct which could, in principle, satisfy the physical component of genocide continues to take place in Gaza.

    Throughout the entire court case there was no suggestion that the UK is not supplying spare parts to Israel via the global stockpile. Instead, the argument was simply that it was in the interests of national security to allow this flow of spare parts to continue. Furthermore there is no evidence that his government has made any attempt to work with F-35 partner nations to stop Israel receiving these parts.

    However, F-35 spare parts are not the only concerning part of the UK’s arms trade with Israel. Export licensing figures show that the government licensed £142m worth of military equipment to Israel in 2024.

    Israeli arms companies gearing up for the UK’s biggest arms fair under Labour’s watch

    Lammy, and others in his government, have tried to justify this massive increase in exports. Notably, they have done so on the basis that the majority were connected to an arms project for export to another country. However, as a letter dated 15 July, cosigned by 56 MPs and peers, asks:

    Why is the UK continuing such co-production with a state that the government has acknowledged is not committed to International Humanitarian Law?

    Such close collaboration with the Israeli arms industry still supports the Israeli war machine responsible for its genocide in Gaza.

    Meanwhile, the UK’s largest arms fair, DSEI, is set to welcome Israeli delegates and arms companies in September. The government is yet to confirm whether it will invite an official Israeli delegation as it has in previous years.

    However, Israeli arms companies are already gearing up for the event. For example, Israeli Aerospace Industries is already advertising its presence at the event with a brochure of military equipment Israel uses to commit genocide.

    Lammy and this Labour government complicit in the ‘worst war crimes imaginable’ and history will condemn them

    Campaign Against Arms Trade’s media coordinator Emily Apple said:

    We are not equivocating – the evidence is clear – David Lammy is lying about the UK’s arms trade with Israel. The world is finally seeing the unspeakable horrors that Israel is inflicting on children in Gaza, yet Lammy is continuing to defend the indefensible. He is complicit in the worst war crimes imaginable, and he will face the consequences of his actions.

    Lammy claims our arms export license system is the most robust in the world. The questions asked by over 50 parliamentarians show this isn’t the case. Far from cutting off arms sales to Israel, not only has this government increased them, it is getting ready to roll out the red carpet for Israeli arms companies and delegates at the London arms fair. Moreover his government has deliberately chosen to set aside this so-called ‘robust’ regime to protect the F-35 components – the UK’s single biggest contribution to Israel’s genocide in Gaza.

    This government’s position is unconscionable. Instead of imposing a full two-way arms embargo, it has prioritised the profits of arms dealers over Palestinian lives, and criminalised protesters doing what they think is necessary to stop a genocide as terrorists.

    History will condemn Lammy and his government. But Palestinian people can’t wait for history. These atrocities are happening now, and it is down to every one of us to sound the alarm and do everything we can to stop them.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • No-one will have missed the recent media hype surrounding the opposite candidacies of US President Trump and UN rapporteur Francesca Albanese for this year’s Nobel Peace Prize. This blog with its focus on human rights defenders and their awards would be amiss in not taking note, even if the Nobel Prize is foremost a peace prize not necessarly a human rights award. [see also my piece of 2012 https://global.comminit.com/content/nobel-prize-peace-not-necessarily-human-rights]

    So, it is not excluded that the ‘making peace at any cost’ considerations will prevail, but my bet is that the Peace Prize Committee will be careful in ignoring the massive support from the world’s human rights community who have massively come out against the Trump administration’s sanctions against Albanese. Human rights should trump ‘peace’ on this occasion.

    Nominations for a Nobel Peace Prize for Francesca Albanese are gathering steam. See the links below:

    https://www.frontlinedefenders.org/en/statement-report/united-states-america-sanctions-united-nations-special-rapporteur-assault-human

    https://www.scmp.com/news/us/diplomacy/article/3318822/trump-says-he-deserves-nobel-peace-prize-not-everyone-agrees

    https://english.pnn.ps/news/47558

    https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/latest-news/un-experts-condemn-us-sanctions-on-special-rapporteur-francesca-albanese-amid-report-on-corporate-complicity-in-israels-occupation-genocide/

    https://www.thearabweekly.com/eu-gingerly-criticises-washingtons-unprecedented-sanctions-un-rapporteur

    https://www.ynetnews.com/article/bku2skjbgl

    https://www.hrw.org/news/2025/07/10/us-imposes-sanctions-on-un-special-rapporteur

    This post was originally published on Hans Thoolen on Human Rights Defenders and their awards.

  • James O’Brien seems to have fallen foul of the Zionist lobby after reading out a listener’s letter on his LBC show. Listener, Chris, had written to the presenter who read out:

    I do think it’s worth saying that these warped views are not just an Israeli problem. My wife was brought up Jewish, and at Shabbat school in a leafy Hertfordshire town, she was taught that one Jewish life is worth 1000s of Arab lives, and that Arabs are cockroaches to be crushed, whilst young children are being taught such hatred and dehumanisation, undoubtedly on both sides, then they will always be able to justify death and cruelty, and it does indeed start young.

    O’Brien explained that he was reading the letter out because of his interest in “objectivity.”

    Complaints have since flooded in from right-wing media outlets, and the Board of Deputies of British Jews have demanded O’Brien is taken off air. For their part, LBC have removed the online clip of the offending section, and the presenter has apologised:

    As with all the texts and messages that I read out on the programme, I did so in good faith, but the message has understandably upset a lot of people, and I regret taking those unsubstantiated claims at face value and am genuinely sorry for that, and it is very important that I get that out there.

    The deleted clip can still be seen here:

    James O’Brien in for criticism

    However, it could well be the case that James O’Brien’s apology is not enough. As mentioned, the Board of Deputies of British Jews (BoD) were forceful in their criticism:

    The BoD are a notoriously Zionist organisation. In 2020, president Marie van der Zyl said:

    he Board of Deputies of British Jews represents the views and interests of the UK Jewish community. In the main, this is a Zionist community and Israel is of central importance to the identity of many of us.

    The group have since submitted evidence to the government putting forward their argument that anti-Zionism is anti-Semitism. And, just last month five elected representatives of the BoD were suspended after criticising Israel’s genocide in Palestine. The Spectator published a strong criticism of O’Brien reading out Chris’ letter, and even said that his apology wasn’t good enough. Jewish News called the choice to read out the letter “antisemitic blood libel.”

    I never thought leopards would eat MY face

    The furious response of right-wing Zionists is unsurprising. But, after James O’Brien’s attitude towards his former colleague, Sangita Myska, there’s not much sympathy circulating for him. As the Canary reported in 2024, speculation was rife that Myska was fired from LBC over her critiques of Israel’s genocide.

    The following clip is thought to have been the offending interview which led to Myska’s departure:

    Myska tells Avi Hyman, an Israeli government spokesperson, that:

    What the Iranians, of course, have said is that this is a retaliatory strike after Israel struck its consulate in Syria. Now we all know that the way diplomacy works is consulates and embassies are considered sovereign territory of the government that is concerned. What Israel did by taking that action against Iran was taken was escalate to what is already an incredibly fragile situation.

    Hyman calls her expression of verifiable fact:

    an outrageous framing of the reality.

    Myska’s remarks are provable: Israel did strike an Iranian consulate, which under international law should have diplomatic immunity from such attacks.

    Regardless, she departed from LBC. However, O’Brien insisted that Myska was not fired because of her stance on Israel but implied that it was due to a low level of listeners:

    Karma for James O’Brien?

    Now that James O’Brien is facing the Zionist lobby calling for his head, he’s receiving much less sympathy:

    Dr. Shola Mos-Shogbamimu was even more direct:

    Evidently, the apology isn’t going to cut it:

    The comparisons to Corbyn also rolled in:

    So much so:

    And, editor of Tribune Magazine Karl Hansen summed up exactly what it means for the BoD to come for O’Brien:

    Is he wrong?

    As delicious as it is to see James O’Brien get a taste of his own medicine, it doesn’t change that he didn’t do anything wrong in reading that letter. As is often the case with Zionists, they may well dispute the content and facts behind the letter. But, the point here is that Zionists are indeed radicalised and indoctrinated with hatred of Arabs.

    It takes barely any research at all to find footage of Israeli settlers chanting “death to Arabs.” Israeli Defence Minister Yoav Gallant has referred to Palestinians as “human animals.” Israeli settlers attack Palestinian homes and families with vicious brutality – and the IDF allows it to happen. Netanyahu is not a rogue actor; the state of Israel is fully behind the Zionist ideology that fuels the genocide in Palestine.

    These atrocities do not happen in isolation, nor do they happen without a pathway. The letter O’Brien read out pointed to a dehumanisation of Arabs that is vital to the process of Zionist attitudes to Palestine. That dehumanisation is the foundation of Israel’s genocide. No wonder the objections to O’Brien are so vociferous.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Maryam Jameela

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • A damning new Declassified UK report shows the Labour government’s own advisers told it Palestine Action didn’t pose a clear violent threat. Yet amid pressure from pro-Israel lobbyists, who have significant influence on Keir Starmer’s Labour Party, the state opted to ban the group anyway. This unprecedented crackdown came amid ongoing UK support for the Israeli state’s genocide in Gaza.

    Declassified‘s John McEvoy notes that “officials struggled to produce evidence the group posed a national security threat”. In particular, MI5’s Joint Terrorism Analysis Centre (JTAC) told the government “the majority of direct action by Palestine Action would not be classified as terrorism”. It also admitted that “PA branded media will highly unlikely explicitly advocate for violence against persons”.

    The Proscription Review Group (PRG), meanwhile, admitted that it knew of no precedent for banning a non-violent direct action group on terror grounds. And both JTAC and the PRG told the government in March that only 3 out of 385 actions could possibly cross the threshold for banning Palestine Action.

    Lobby pressure and establishment media complicity over Palestine Action

    McEvoy adds that the government was aware that:

    a ban on Palestine Action might give credence to claims that the pro-Israel lobby exerts influence over decision-making.

    A Community Impact Assessment for the government – from “the Ministry of Housing, RICU (Research, Information and Communications Unit), and NPCC (National Police Chiefs’ Council)” – detailed previous reports of pro-Israel groups and individuals putting pressure on the government. Those wanting harsher consequences for direct action against companies complicit in Israel’s war crimes against Palestinians included, unsurprisingly:

    The Community Impact Assessment also noted the dangers for free speech and democracy of banning Palestine Action, including that such a decision:

    could energise further calls from pro-Israel advocates to ban more moderate pro-Palestinian groups, emboldened by the precedent set.

    It also seems likely, McEvoy suggests, that US president Donald Trump “may have weighed in on the issue”. And he points out that British establishment propaganda outlets played their part too by spreading misinformation relating to Iran. But as he insists:

    The JTAC assessment of Palestine Action’s sources of funding makes no mention of Iran whatsoever, and nor does the Intelligence and Security Committee’s recent report on Iranian state threats to Britain.

    The fact that government officials nonetheless sought to plant the idea of Iranian links, McEvoy says:

    raises the prospect that a state-linked disinformation campaign was waged against Palestine Action in order to manufacture public consent for proscription.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Ed Sykes

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Q: How long did you teach mathematics at Cal State University, Northridge?

    David Klein:  I was there for a little more than three decades. Before that, I taught at UCLA and USC, and before that at Louisiana State University in Baton Rouge. There, I got into some trouble. I was arrested for taking over a U.S. Senator’s office along with half a dozen Quakers in protest of weapons to the Nicaraguan Contras. I also had a little run-in with the Ku Klux Klan and was sued by right-wing Central American students for bringing in speakers they didn’t like. They sued me for “mental anguish”. Of course, the suit was thrown out of court, but it was a distraction. So, when I got the position at CSUN, I was very happy to get a permanent position there.

    Q:  So “mental anguish” …. that’s a recurring theme of the critics.

    DK:  Yes, it’s one of their tools. Claiming to feel bad about what we talk about.

    Q:  How did you become interested in Israel-Palestine?

    DK:  Well, it was kind of gradual. When I was a kid, I was very pro-Israel. And then in college, I started to have doubts and talked to more people. And the more I learned, the more obvious it was that this was a settler colonial state that was engaged in pretty much what the United States did to the Native Americans. And then there was a real spike in my understanding and activity with the 2009  “Cast Lead” assault on Gaza by Israel. That really increased my activism. It was just a new level of outrage that I and many people felt.

    Q:  I understand you didn’t talk about politics in your mathematics classes, but that you were otherwise active. What did you do, and what attacks or censorship did you experience?

    DK: That’s right. I was careful not to bring it up in my classes since it didn’t really have direct relevance. But I was the faculty advisor for Students for Justice in Palestine and for the Student Green Party and a few other student groups. So, I created a webpage, a BDS resource webpage on the university server from my faculty webpage. Then, I wrote an open letter that was signed by many CSU faculty, administrators, and students to the chancellor of the entire CSU system, demanding that CSU end the study abroad program in Israel for a variety of reasons.

    That got some news coverage and brought a lot of attention to my website. So, that was the start of a lot of attacks.

    There were hundreds of calls to my university president that I be fired. There were some threats, some kind of death threats. There were some threats to the administration to withhold financial contributions. There was just lots of slander. Some of it came from the campus itself, but it was mostly outside from the Zionist Organization of America, a group called AMCHA, and other groups. And then there were some politicians who joined in the attacks. The local congressman, Brad Sherman, and a California assembly member, Bob Blumenfield, who later became a city council member.

    An Israeli-supported law firm pressured then Attorney General Kamala Harris to prosecute me. And they separately asked the Los Angeles City attorney to do that. But those requests came to nothing. Still, I was required to produce massive amounts of emails, anything regarding Israel-Palestine, and regarding logistical planning to bring in guest speakers Ilan Pappe and Norman Finkelstein. These threats and demands went on and on for a long time. And on my website, I  posted a page of the threats, the nasty comments, and the calls for my removal. They were signed by doctors and other professionals, but used really low-level language.  The ugliness that it brought out was amazing.

    Q: So you were part of organizing and hosting famous academics such as Norman Finkelstein and Ilan Pappe. How did those visits go, and what were the results?

    DK: The Norman Finkelstein visit lasted a week. He gave three lectures, and there was a group of us who wanted to hire him at CSUN after he lost tenure at DePaul University. And so that included 30 faculty members from various departments, including the science departments and social studies, social science departments, and a wide range. And it was going well. We got the approval of a department that wanted to hire him, the journalism department, and it went up to the top, and we were all set to go. And then, at the last minute, it was vetoed by the campus president. Norman asked me to write an article about the whole thing, which I did.

    The visit of Ilan Pappe came later in 2012.  We had to have campus police escorts because of the threats. But he was very persuasive and compelling. Both of these guests were. The students were very engaged and it went well.

    Q:  I know that there was a big campaign to prevent the tour by Ilan Pappe, but ultimately, the presidents of several CSU universities defended his right to speak. Is that correct?

    DK: Three of the campus presidents wrote a letter defending academic freedom. It was an open letter, but it went to the chancellor of the entire CSU system. The visits went smoothly logistically because of that. And it was pretty rare that campus presidents would stand up for academic freedom and freedom of speech for speakers like Ilan Pappe, who very strongly promotes Palestinian human rights.

    Q: You’ve been an active supporter of the cultural and academic boycott of Israel. Why do you think this is important?

    DK: It’s an important part of the general Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions movement. Academics and culture are very important within Israel. And so this particular aspect of BDS lends what we think is special leverage to isolate the Zionist state because of its actions. Israeli universities are deeply complicit in the persecution and genocide of Palestinians. Maya Wind’s new book, “Towers of Ivory and Steel”, documents that very clearly. Focusing on academics is very pertinent to what’s going on. And the cultural boycott has a very large impact. Everybody recognizes when a famous artist, a singer, or a musician refuses to go to Israel and states the reasons.

    Q: But critics of Israel and supporters of BDS are under attack. Do you think the censorship and attacks are the same as in the past? Or is it getting worse?

    DK:  It’s getting much worse. The accusation of anti-semitism has been weaponized. Students, teachers, and professors are facing frivolous lawsuits. Students are facing expulsions. Faculty are facing job loss. Both are facing arrests and deportations for opposing genocide because it might hurt the feelings of the killers. Zionist students and outside advocates of genocide claim to feel unsafe because of demonstrations against Israel’s genocide. And they call human rights activists “anti-semitic”.  Even the Jewish activists. And so it’s much more intense now than in the past. They were just sort of getting warmed up on people like me, and now they’ve really sharpened their knives.

    Q:  Do you have any strategy suggestions for campus activists who oppose the genocide happening in Gaza?

    DK: Yes. I think we would do well to be less defensive and go on the offense. Pleading academic freedom and denying that we’re anti-semites is not really going very far. I think we need to move in the direction of accusing the accusers. Israeli soldiers are intentionally killing babies and children, shooting boys in their testicles, torturing doctors to death, and more broadly, carrying out the extermination of the entire Palestinian people. These are the worst of the worst. And we need to point to them, not just defend ourselves from their empty accusations.

    By defining opposition to genocide as antisemitic, they’ve turned antisemitism into a virtue. Hitler could have only dreamed of this kind of linguistic transformation. And in this sense, the Zionists are the biggest antisemites on the planet. They’re the worst of humanity. So I think that the least vulnerable among us should take the lead, especially US-born tenured professors.

    And we should focus on where the real power is.  For K-12 schools, it is the school boards. But for almost all colleges and universities in the United States, whether they’re public or private, the board of trustees is the institution’s highest decision-making or governance body.

    Members of the board are typically very rich. They have a lot of political power within the country, not just in universities. To give one example, Miriam Adelson is on the USC Board of Trustees. Miriam Adelson was married to the late Sheldon Adelson. He was a very rich billionaire. Both of them are rich billionaires. And Miriam Adelson’s Foundation contributes $200 million each year to Israel. And she was one of the biggest Trump donors as well. So, there are a lot of university trustees like that. They come from weapons manufacturers, the oil and gas industry, and other major corporations. And they’re overwhelmingly Zionist.

    University presidents, who appear to be in charge of their campuses, serve at the pleasure of the boards and can be hired and fired at the whim of these boards of trustees. So the boards of trustees are the real power at universities. They are behind the persecution of opponents of genocide. The college presidents who do cave in to the Zionist censors should face no-confidence votes from their faculty senate on campus. But, there really hasn’t been enough focus on the boards of trustees. And I think that’s the next step. There are a number of people who are coming to the same conclusion on campuses and universities.

    A lot of research would be involved to find out who these people are, what their background is, expose them to the public, and show what they’re doing, and try to get them kicked out. Replace them with decent human beings. It’s like you’re either for genocide or against it. If you don’t care, that doesn’t say much good about you. So being anti genocide is the minimal criterion for human decency. After all, if they’re going after and attacking people who are trying to stop a genocide, that makes them horrible human beings, and they shouldn’t be in charge of anything.

    Q: Do you have any final comments?

    DK: I think the importance of the Palestinians’ fight for survival can hardly be overstated. Their struggle is not only for themselves, but it’s at the forefront of a worldwide struggle against global fascism. And that includes the climate catastrophe, because global fascism can only accelerate planetary suicide.

    David Klein is Professor Emeritus of Mathematics at California State University, Northridge (CSUN). 

    The post Palestinians Fight for Survival is at the Forefront of a Worldwide Struggle against Global Fascism first appeared on Dissident Voice.

    This post was originally published on Dissident Voice.

  • This is Democracy Now!. I’m Amy Goodman.

    More than 100 humanitarian groups are demanding action to end Israel’s siege of Gaza, warning mass starvation is spreading across the Palestinian territory.

    The NGOs, including Amnesty International, Oxfam, Doctors Without Borders, warn, “illnesses like acute watery diarrhea are spreading, markets are empty, waste is piling up, and adults are collapsing on the streets from hunger and dehydration.”

    Their warning came as the Palestinian Ministry of Health said the number of starvation-related deaths has climbed to at least 111 people.

    This is Ghada al-Fayoumi, a displaced Palestinian mother of seven in Gaza City.

    GHADA AL-FAYOUMI: “[translated] My children wake up sick every day. What do I do? I get saline solution for them. What can I do?

    “There’s no food, no bread, no drinks, no rice, no sugar, no cooking oil, no bulgur, nothing. There is no kind of any food available to us at all.”

    AMY GOODMAN: Thousands of antiwar protesters marched on Tuesday in Tel Aviv outside Israel’s military headquarters, demanding an end to Israel’s assault and a lifting of the Gaza siege. This is Israeli peace activist Alon-Lee Green with the group Standing Together.

    ALON-LEE GREEN: “We are marching now in Tel Aviv, holding bags of flour and the pictures of these children that have been starved to death by our government and our army.

    “We demand to stop the starvation in Gaza. We demand to stop the annihilation of Gaza. We demand to stop the daily killing of children and innocent people in Gaza.

    “This cannot go on. We are Israelis, and this does not serve us. This only serves the Messianic people that lead us.”

    AMY GOODMAN: This comes as the World Health Organisation has released a video showing the Israeli military attacking WHO facilities in central Gaza’s Deir al-Balah. A WHO spokesperson condemned the attack, called for the immediate release of a staff member abducted by Israeli forces.

    TARIK JAŠAREVIĆ: “Male staff and family members were handcuffed, stripped, interrogated on the spot and screened at gunpoint.

    “Two WHO staff and two family members were detained.”

    AMY GOODMAN: Meanwhile, health officials in Gaza say Israeli attacks over the past day killed more than 70 people, including five more people seeking food at militarised aid sites. Amid growing outrage worldwide, UN Secretary-General António Guterres said on Tuesday the situation in Gaza right now is a “horror show”.

    UN SECRETARY-GENERAL ANTÓNIO GUTERRES: “We need look no further than the horror show in Gaza, with a level of death and destruction without parallel in recent times.

    “Malnourishment is soaring. Starvation is knocking on every door.”

    AMY GOODMAN: For more, we’re joined by Michael Fakhri, the UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food. He is a professor of law at University of Oregon, where he leads the Food Resiliency Project.


    Israel waging ‘fastest starvation campaign’ in modern history    Video: Democracy Now!

    Dr Michael Fakhri, welcome back to Democracy Now! If you can respond to what’s happening right now, the images of dying infants starving to death, the numbers now at over 100, people dropping in the streets, reporters saying they can’t go on?

    Agence France-Presse’s union talked about they have had reporters killed in conflict, they have had reporters disappeared, injured, but they have not had this situation before with their reporters starving to death.

    DR MICHAEL FAKHRI: Amy, the word “horror” — I mean, we’re running out of words of what to say. And the reason it’s horrific is it was preventable. We saw this coming. We’ve seen this coming for 20 months.

    Israel announced its starvation campaign back in October 2023. And then again, Prime Minister Netanyahu announced on March 1 that nothing was to enter Gaza. And that’s what happened for 78 days. No food, no water, no fuel, no medicine entered Gaza.

    And then they built these militarised aid sites that are used to humiliate, weaken and kill the Palestinians. So, what makes this horrific is it has been preventable, it was predictable. And again, this is the fastest famine we’ve seen, the fastest starvation campaign we’ve seen in modern history.

    AMY GOODMAN: So, can you talk about what needs to be done at this point and the responsibility of the occupying power? Israel is occupying Gaza right now. What it means to have to protect the population it occupies?

    DR FAKHRI: The International Court of Justice outlined Israel’s duties in its decisions over the last year. So, what Israel has an obligation to do is, first, end its illegal occupation immediately. This came from the court itself.

    Second, it must allow humanitarian relief to enter with no restrictions. And this hasn’t been happening. So, usually, we would turn to the Security Council to authorise peacekeepers or something similar to assist.

    But predictably, again, the United States keeps vetoing anything to do with a ceasefire. When the Security Council is in a deadlock because of a veto, the General Assembly, the UN General Assembly, has the authority to call for peacekeepers to accompany humanitarian convoys to enter into Gaza and to end Israel’s starvation campaign against the Palestinian people.

    AMY GOODMAN: People actually protested outside the house of UN Secretary-General António Guterres yesterday. People protested all over the world yesterday against the Palestinians being starved and bombed to death. Those in front of the UN Secretary-General’s house said they don’t dispute that he has raised this issue almost every day, but they say he can do more.

    Finally, Michael Fakhri, what does the UN need to do — the US, Israel, the world?

    DR FAKHRI: So, as I mentioned, first and foremost, they can authorise peacekeepers to enter to stop the starvation. But, second, they need to create consequences.

    The world has a duty to prevent this starvation. The world has a duty to prevent and end this genocide. And as a result, then, what the world can do is impose sanctions.

    And again, this is supported by the International Court of Justice. The world needs to impose wide-scale sanctions against the state of Israel to force it to end the starvation and genocide of civilians, of Palestinian civilians in Gaza today.

    AMY GOODMAN: Well, I want to thank you so much for being with us, Michael Fakhri, UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food, speaking to us from Eugene, Oregon.

    Republished under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States Licence.

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • In what could become a landmark ruling, a Belgian judge recently ordered the Flemish government to halt the transit of goods that could be used to continue or expand the genocide in Gaza. The decision follows a joint campaign by four organizations – Intal, Vredesactie (Peace Action), 11.11.11, and the Human Rights League – which was triggered by the discovery of containers in the port of Antwerp addressed to Israeli company Ashot Ashkelon Industries. The containers included materials used for the assembly of Merkava tanks, the same model implicated in the attack that killed six-year-old Hind Rajab.

    The post Belgian Court Bans Military Shipments To Israel In Activist Victory appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • One of the most inflammatory Republican representatives in the House was appointed to the high-powered House Foreign Affairs Committee on Tuesday — the same day he called for Israel to “starve” Palestinian civilians in Gaza. On social media Tuesday morning, Rep. Randy Fine (R-Florida) cheered a report saying that 15 Palestinians in Gaza, including four children, had died from famine in a…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • More than a hundred aid organizations warned Wednesday that “mass starvation” is spreading in Gaza, as Israel’s genocidal ethnic cleansing of Palestinians reaches an unspeakable turning point. As the crisis of humanity deepens, another Gaza Freedom Flotilla has set sail in the hopes of breaking Israel’s blockade and bringing life-saving supplies to the besieged Gaza Strip. Calling from the Handala ship while en route to Gaza, American labor organizer Chris Smalls, co-founder and former president of the Amazon Labor Union, speaks with TRNN editor-in-chief Maximillian Alvarez about the threats and sabotage attempts the Freedom Flotilla has already faced on its journey—and why that won’t deter the crew from their humanitarian mission.

    Additional resources:

    Credits:

    • Studio Production: Maximillian Alvarez
    • Post-Production: David Hebden
    Transcript

    The following is a rushed transcript and may contain errors. A proofread version will be made available as soon as possible.

    Maximillian Alvarez:

    Israel’s US backed genocidal ethnic cleansing of Palestinians and Gaza is reaching an unspeakable turning point. The Israeli government is deliberately starving millions of civilians, men, women, children, seniors, Palestinians, who are on the brink of death, desperate for any scrap of sustenance are being lured to so-called aid distribution sites administered by the so-called Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, which is headquartered here in the us, and then they’re being summarily slaughtered by Israeli forces. More than a hundred aid organizations warned today that mass starvation was spreading in Gaza and aid workers are themselves among those suffering from the lack of adequate food. People are collapsing in the streets according to the United Nations Humanitarian Agency. Four children were among the 15 people who died from severe malnutrition in the last 24 hours. According to NBC news. As the crisis of humanity deepens another Gaza Freedom Flotilla has set sail in the hopes of breaking Israel’s blockade and bringing lifesaving supplies to the besieged Gaza Strip.

    And Chris Smalls, American labor organizer, co-founder and former president of the Amazon Labor Union is among the peace activists who are on board the ship as we speak. And Chris is calling us from the Honah right now. Chris, thank you so much for joining us, man. I really, really appreciate it. I wanted to start by asking if you could just talk us through why you decided to join the Gaza Freedom Flotilla and what it could possibly feel like for you right now, sailing towards a place where a genocide is happening and you know that the forces that are carrying it out are going to try to stop you.

    Chris Smalls:

    Yeah, thank you. Thank you for having me, and thank you for amplifying this important subject right now, which is Gaza. That’s the main focus. And as a labor leader, as you mentioned, as a tax paying US citizen whose tax paying dollars is going towards the slaughtering of nearly half a million people in less than two years, I can no longer be complicit or participate in. And as a labor leader once again, I decided to join the ELA mission. Like many others, I was inspired by the Madeline. I’ve known many of the activists that’s on the Madeline Thunberg is a comrade is mine, Yasmeen is a comrade is mine. Thiago comrade is mine. I met over the past years of my travels and for me, I already signed up months ago and I knew I was ready to go out there and try to make a difference in any way possible, even putting my life on the line right now as we speak.

    You know that this, as you mentioned, this is one of the most dangerous militaries in the world, the most monstrous, inhumane military in the world. They have been known in 2010, they jumped on the Flo Tiller and killed 10 of the activists. So just knowing that that’s at risk, I knew that this is something that’s very important for the times that we are. It’s a really dark time in humanity, and I just once again, can’t stand on the wrong side of history. I want to be on the right side of history and enjoy the picket line. The people of Gaza is a working class issue, and we have to be on the right side of the picket line.

    Maximillian Alvarez:

    Hell yeah, man. That’s I think, beautifully and powerfully put. And I wanted to talk about what it’s going to be like for y’all as you get closer in a minute, but I wanted to first talk about what it was like just getting started for you guys because just hours before the Freedom Flotilla was going to set sail from the Italian port of Gallipoli, two attempts of sabotage on the ship were made. Can you tell us what happened?

    Chris Smalls:

    Yeah, of course. We have 24 7 watts. I take shifts. Everybody takes a shift, do two hour watches throughout the night, throughout the day, and even with the 24 7 watch in past missions. This is mission number 37. For those who don’t know, this is boat number 37, and this has been happening since 2008 and past attempts, they have sent scuba divers, they have done things to sabotage. They just dropped a bomb on the last mission last month in Malta. They have done things to sabotage these missions before we even take place or set cell on sea. And Israel has announced to their media and to their audience that they were going to do anything in their power to try to stop us from leaving Italy. So we woke up the morning to set cell as normal, and we, surprisingly, as we were doing our check around the boat to check making sure that the donations and everything that we receive are safe, nothing, no contraband, things like that, no weapons, anything like that was given to us.

    And yeah, our captain and our crew discovered or wrote that was professionally tied to the rotor. It wasn’t a normal rope. It wasn’t a rope that can sometimes be picked up at sea when you’re traveling across. That happens sometimes. This was deliberately tied. And then the second attempt was we have to have a fresh tank of water so that we can take showers and wash our hands in the sink and even cook our food. And instead of getting fresh tank of water, we got a tank of acid, ro acid, which would’ve corroded our pipes, and more importantly, it would’ve probably killed and burned all 21 of us and unli us. So thank God we were able to catch that, and it delayed us two hours, but we were able to once again, managed to get out to see, despite their attempts, nothing was going to deter us. And yeah, we’re now, we’re three to four days out from Gaza Seaport. We’re getting close to where Israeli forces intercepted the Madeline. And yeah, we could face the same fate of going to Israel’s prison once again. But we are well aware and we are ready. We’re prepared for all of that.

    Maximillian Alvarez:

    You and I have talked many times before we’ve even done events together here in Baltimore, and it’s no secret that you’ve had some of the most powerful forces in the world coming after you, including Amazon and Jeff Bezos. Do you feel like that’s prepared you to take this level of threat on or does this feel like even more terrifying than anything you’ve faced?

    Chris Smalls:

    No, it’s the same amount of threat. I was the Amazon whistleblower for COVID, which was a life or death situation, and here I am again putting my life on the line. This is a life or death situation. Amazon is deliberately attached to this genocide. For those who don’t know, the Iron Dome is Amazon. It’s ran by AWS, ran by Amazon Web Services. They are the intelligence that is used to target and surveil and kill innocent Palestinians, specifically women and children. So if you’re supporting the Amazon, you are absolutely supporting genocide.

    Maximillian Alvarez:

    Well, I want to end on that note and ask if you have final messages to anyone watching this about what they can do to not be complicit in this genocide, what they can do to fight against it, what they can do to ensure the safety of the freedom flotilla as you guys try to bring lifesaving aid to starving people in Gaza.

    Chris Smalls:

    Yeah. Well, everybody should know that we have 21 passengers on board. All civilians, all activists, all volunteers. One third of the crew is Americans, but this hasn’t been done in recent times. Three of us are New Yorkers, myself included. And for the US citizens that are watching this, your tax paying dollars are going towards this genocide, whether you like it or not. So you can either be complicit or participate or once again, you can speak up and use anything in your power because we all have a role to play. And I encourage everybody to reach out to your US representatives, whoever they may be, progress it or not left or right and try to amplify to keep all eyes on the honah because that’s what’s going to keep us safe as Americans, as volunteers on this mission, that anything can happen to us, that Israel has no jurisdiction or international waters.

    Everything that we’re doing is legal legally deemed by the International Court of Justice last year. And they have no right to intercept us or kidnap us and take us to prison. We are not setting set for Israel. We’re going to Palestine, and we need everybody to know the facts and the truth and use whatever platform you can to amplify that, to keep our eyes on us. And once again, raise hell and raise your voices, raise your social media platforms, share, tweet, whatever you can do to keep us safe. And hopefully we can have a safe passes and I can see you guys back at home.

    Maximillian Alvarez:

    I have to ask this last question, ma’am, because you mentioned that you’re aware of the very real threats to your safety and even to your life on this mission. If this is your last mission, what do you want your message to the world to be with this mission?

    Chris Smalls:

    Well, obviously as a father, the one thing I don’t want to happen is my kids being in the world that we live in right now. Every time a Palestinian child dies, a piece of humanity dies with it. And that’s words of Diago who was on the Mad League, and that’s real. We should be ashamed to sit by and stand by and watch these innocent people be slaughtered every day, live stream. And I had enough of it. Every day I opened up my Instagram. Every day I opened up my Twitter or any social media platform, all we see is death. And I know as a father, as a civilian, I can’t stand with it. And it could be my last time talking or last time being on a mission forever. But I hope that people will remember and know that once again, this is a world that we do not want to live in, and that’s what we have to fight for humanity. Gaza is showing us how to love.

    This post was originally published on The Real News Network.

  • All we have left is water — and even clean drinking water is becoming nearly impossible to find. Sometimes I wonder: What if they cut that off too? Will I survive just three days? It seems that my death won’t come from an Israeli missile or a Gaza Humanitarian Foundation’s bullet — it will come from hunger. Slow. Silent. Cruel. And I ask myself: How can a world so devoid of humanity watch such an…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • “With only rare exceptions,” Norman Solomon writes, “US news media and members of Congress continue to dodge the reality of genocide against Palestinians in Gaza, normalizing atrocities on a mass scale.” How did we end up in this Orwellian situation, where the reality of genocide is so thoroughly denied by pundits and politicians even as that genocide is unfolding in front of our eyes? How do we combat this level of inhumane violence and propaganda? Solomon, co-founder of Roots Action, joins The Marc Steiner Show for an urgent discussion about Israel’s manufactured genocide of Palestinians and how the media manufactures consent to, at best, hide and, at worst, justify Israel’s heinous actions.

    Guests:

    Additional resources:

    Credits:

    • Producer: Rosette Sewali
    • Studio Production: David Hebden
    • Audio Post-Production: Stephen Frank
    Transcript

    The following is a rushed transcript and may contain errors. A proofread version will be made available as soon as possible.

    Marc Steiner:

    Welcome to The Marc Steiner Show here on The Real News. I’m Marc Steiner. It’s great to have you all with us again.

    As we begin this conversation, let me give you the grim reality of what’s happening in Gaza as we tape this conversation. Over 58,000 Gazans, the vast majority of whom are non-combatants, women, and children, have been killed, 140,000 wounded, 370,000 buildings severely damaged, 79,000 destroyed altogether. And Gazans are being pushed into smaller and smaller corners of an already small land, no running water, illness spreading, and there’s mass starvation. As someone who over the last 57 years has been working for peace and a two-state solution or some form of dwelling together, this is absolutely devastating.

    And as we see the right rising in the Holy Land, in Israel, it’s also taking hold here in the United States, and we’re on a precipice here in the good old United States of America where neofascism is rising. And our guest covers that deeply. He quotes Congressman Ro Khanna, who said, “What’s going on is chilling. They’re banning all international students from coming to Harvard. Think about that. All foreign students banned. They could do this in other universities. They have fired seven of the 18 directors of the NIH, totally dismantling future medical research in our country. It dismantled the FDA, firing people who approve new drugs. They’re systematically firing people at the FAA, the Arab Administration. They’re openly talking about defying the United States Supreme Court orders. J.D. Vance just said, justify the orders they’re calling the universities the enemy. This is very chilling.” That was Ro Khanna’s quote.

    So today, we talk with Norman Solomon. Norman Solomon is the co-founder of rootsaction.org. He’s the executive director of the Institute for Public Accuracy and the author of numerous books, including War Made Easy: How Presidents and Pundits Keep Spinning us to Death, and War Made Invisible: How America Hides the Human Toll of the Military Machine. His website is www.normansolomon.com — That’s Solomon with all Os — And he has incredibly detailed well-written articles, and joins us now.

    So great, Norman, it’s good to see you. Glad you’re here. Welcome.

    Norman Solomon:

    Thanks a lot, Marc.

    Marc Steiner:

    You’ve been doing — That’s what you do, you write. But you’ve been doing a lot of writing both about Israel-Palestine and about what’s going on with the Democrats, and it really feels as if, on both fronts, the state of the Democratic Party and the horrendous slaughter taking place in Gaza, that we are on a precipice, I think, in some ways deeper and more dangerous than ones that I’ve noticed in a long time.

    Norman Solomon:

    It’s hard to fathom. There are so many layers of it, to be in a country, the United States, that literally makes possible an ongoing genocide. It’s not a metaphor, it’s not an exaggeration. This is genocide going on. And yet, we’re living in that country that, under President Biden and now under President Trump, is literally enabling it, giving the weapons to make it all possible, and really the political support to enable it as well.

    And then we have the domestic repression that, really, I’m in my mid-70s now, I can’t remember it ever being this bad, even in the depths of the Nixon administration and the crackdowns, the class war, the repression, the disappearances, the troops, I want to say, often with their faces covered, their identities. This is the kind of authoritarian regime that we would have nightmares for. It can’t happen here, but it is happening. So in terms of foreign policy, in terms of what’s happening in this country, it certainly is very upsetting if we’re paying attention. And at the same time, we know we can never give up. We have to organize and turn this around.

    Marc Steiner:

    So one of the things you just said, it took me back to my youth when I was a teenager as a civil rights worker in the South 16, 17, 18 years old. What we’re seeing now, to me, is akin to that, the terror that civil rights workers, the terror the Black community was under in the South is growing here in this country now, but in Israel it is a fact of life every day. 60,000 Palestinians killed so far in that teeny strip of land.

    And I wonder how you begin to approach a couple of things, lemme just start here. We both come from the Jewish community. We both come from that world, and I grew up with people with numbers on their arms in my house. So how do we become those who oppressed us? It’s like the shift is turned. We’re doing exactly what was done to us. I guess that’s what I’ve been wrestling with and arguing, I spoke about it at a synagogue just the other week, for us to pay attention. How do we make us pay attention to that?

    Norman Solomon:

    This is so fundamental. What does “never again” mean?

    Marc Steiner:

    Right.

    Norman Solomon:

    Does it mean never again for all, any people or does it mean for our clan, our tribe, our self-identified ethnocentric group? And it’s a really basic question. And there’s also the matter of who we are and where the allegiances are tos so to speak, humanitys or some sort of self-identity.

    It’s really stunning to me that so many progressives, whether Jewish or not, who were involved in supporting the Civil Rights Movement that took off in the ’60s, as you refer to, Marc, are now, unfortunately, in so many cases, winking, nodding, being silent about, or even supporting what, essentially, in the West Bank, for instance, is the Klan running everything, that is a clear parallel of people being terrorized, killed by extrajudicial means. And there’s no protection being provided, in that case, by the government, as a matter of fact, the Israeli government’s part of it.

    And then as, you refer to, the horrendous slaughter going on daily in Gaza, and pretty soon it’s going to be the two-year mark, while there are some really terrible things going on in many parts of the world, the reality is that genocide is a very clearly internationally defined definition. So many people grew up with the belief, the understanding that that’s actually the worst possible thing that could go on, and yet it is going on. So that’s one just beyond upsetting reality.

    And parallel to that and intertwined is that it is the United States of America that makes it all possible. And so, when you live in that United States of America, that constantly gives us the question: who the hell are we? And I know as somebody growing up in the United States in the ’50s and ’60s, I was very frightened by watching The Diary of Anne Frank. And that whole question really hovered, and sometimes it was explicit in the ’50s, in the ’60s and beyond: How could the German people stand by and allow that to happen?

    And I got more than a glimmer of that during the escalation of the Vietnam War because there was so much acceptance, support, or just looking the other way, and more than 3 million people died in Vietnam as a result of that active and passive support. And so that question is still with us here in the summer of 2025: How could people allow genocide to happen when “their own government” is doing it?

    Marc Steiner:

    I want to jump on this one thing I think it’s important to talk about for a moment, because there’s a lot of pushback on the use of the word “genocide” when it comes to what’s going on in Gaza at the moment. Let’s talk about how we, how you define that word and why it’s being used in Gaza. People could say genocide is the Holocaust, genocide was what happened in Cambodia, genocide is what this country did to the Indigenous people. Talk about the use of that word in terms of Gaza, because there’s a lot of confusion and anger around the use of that word.

    Norman Solomon:

    There is, and I find it notable that a lot of politicians and others and activists who routinely, over the years and decades, have cited reports from Amnesty International, from Human Rights Watch, as authoritative, as telling us what was going on in Africa or elsewhere in the world, and citing, yeah, Amnesty International has said this or that, or Human Rights Watch. last December, both Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International issued hundreds of pages reports definitively, unequivocally saying that what Israel was doing in Gaza, and now is continuing to do, is genocide. There was no watering it down, there was no equivocation. So we have these gold standard human rights global organizations saying it without question. And part of, as I read about it and read the scholars part of it is the intent are the forces, the governments, the authorities intentionally trying to make it, for instance, very difficult or impossible for new births to take place, which is certainly the case in Gaza.

    The destruction of all the hospitals, the filtering out and blocking of humanitarian aid, medicine, food, nutrition, water and so forth. And also polar in part, trying to destroy the culture and ethnic reality of a particular group. All of that falls directly in line with what Israel’s been doing. There are so many smoking guns in terms of what has been said by Israeli officials for almost two years now. This is what they’re doing. And unfortunately, Israeli society is mostly there. Hebrew University last month released the results of a poll among Jewish Israelis and found that upwards of 60%, almost two thirds said that they believe there are no innocence in Gaza. There are no innocent people in Gaza whatsoever. And I had to think of some interviews that were done, some of the most heinous, top Nazi criminals who were part of inflicting the Holocaust on Jews, on gays, on gypsies,

    Marc Steiner:

    Gypsies.

    Norman Solomon:

    And they were asked there children, you were sentencing to death in those camps. And some of the response was, yeah, but they would’ve grown up to be adult Jews or gypsies or homosexuals or communists, and we couldn’t have that. There’s a lot of resonance and echoing of that attitude among not just the right wing leadership of the Israeli government, but among the majority of the population. And one thing I’ve been thinking about Mark, is that at this point, Israeli society is a genocidal society, and the United States in terms of polling is not in favor of that genocide, but for almost two years now and up through the present moment, the US government is a genocidal government because it’s making all this possible.

    Marc Steiner:

    So there may not be a connection to what I’m saying with there may be, I’m curious, your thoughts. You’re seeing an impotent democratic party with no sea muscle or strength intellectually or politically just stand up to this or anything else and kind of going along with it all and not the entire group. I mean, there’s a growing strong progressive wing inside the Democratic party that are standing up. So how does that political dynamic play into this moment

    Norman Solomon:

    Really important? Because for one thing, if the Democratic party had been truly lowercase d Democratic and had responded to the viewpoints about Gaza during the first months of the war on Gaza, back when Biden was still running for president and then Kamala Harris, then the position at the top of the Democratic Party would’ve been for a cutoff of military aid. As long as the slaughter continued in Gaza, they would’ve said no, an arms embargo on Israel. The polling was clear by early of last year, but because the party is under a hammerlock of the pro-Israel, right or wrong forces, corporate forces and so forth, it basically countermanded and ignored what the public wanted, including the total US public, but certainly even more so among Democrats. So when you have a party that doesn’t even pay attention to its base, is afraid of its base, which cares more about the big donors, not the small donors, but the big ones, and also the punditocracy, which has been callous and with few exceptions willing to ratify or at least accept this genocide going on in Gaza, then you have a party that’s an elitist party at the top.

    Marc Steiner:

    As you were saying that, one of the things I thought about because as a bumper sticker I made some 40, 50 years ago when I used to make them called existence is contradiction. And I raise that because when we say the power of the Israeli lobby, the pro Zionist world, while it’s real, it also raises the spec of antisemitism, which is always bubbling below the surface just like racism. It’s always bubbling below the surface. So I’m curious in the midst of our struggles, I mean there was just a huge convention here in Baltimore with a lot of young Jewish people who were standing up to this, which was really heartening. But the question is how do you respond to that? How do you respond to the danger of antisemitism that could kind of leap out at any moment and what we’re facing and how to say we have to stop Israel from committing the slaughter against Palestinians.

    Norman Solomon:

    The strongest force for antisemitism is the Israeli government, and specifically in the last year and three quarters, the Israeli war on people in Gaza. And so there’s this ultimate, in many ways, big life scam that Zionism has more intensely propagated in the world. And that is the scam, is that the Israeli government equals Judaism. And once you buy that absurdity, then as Volter says, when you buy into an absurdity, any atrocity becomes possible because opposition to the Israeli government gets equated with antisemitism. And we’ve seen that with a vengeance in the last more than a year, the attacks on universities, the attacks on basically free speech where you criticize Israel, you do it fundamentally. You dare to say that the Israeli project has been suppressing the rights of Palestinian people, which is clearly true since the late 1940s. And then you get branded as antisemitic. And I think you’re referring to what I read about was a wonderful conference in Baltimore not long ago of a Jewish voice for peace.

    Marc Steiner:

    Yes.

    Norman Solomon:

    And here’s thousands and thousands of Jewish activists who’ve been doing civil disobedience and protesting the war on Gaza for almost two years now, and they’re accused of being anti-Semitic. And that really takes the mask off of the propaganda process that the Israeli government and its allies have been relying on for decades. The reality is that all sorts of bigotry is deadly against Jews, against Muslims, against all sorts of people around the world. So it’s really all of one cloth in a sense. We fight against that kind of

    Marc Steiner:

    Bigotry. One of the pieces I was reading today that you wrote, you’ve written so much really good stuff that we’ll be linking to here on the page. You can just go through it all. It’s worth taking time with it. But you’re right about Congressman Connor and about the neo fascism bubbling up right here and how it’s really connected, I think, to what’s happening in Israel. And you wrote, they’re banning all international students from coming to Harvard. Seven of the 18 directors of the NIH have been fired, dismantling medical research, dismantling the FDA, firing people to approve new drugs, firing people in the FAA, and then you have a right wing supreme court. And so moving to the states for a moment, that analysis is you, right? Where does that lead us? Where does that take us? What do you think we’re facing?

    Norman Solomon:

    We’re facing tremendous repression and an effort to stamp out the opposition to the bigotry, to the rule of the billionaires. And we’re facing autocracy. It’s a cult led by Trump. The stakes could not be higher in terms of what has survived and been incubated as democratic processes in this country. We have structures that, it may sound like a cliche, but it’s true. People died for the right to vote. People died for some ways that the voices and opinions and desires of people at the grassroots could overwhelm the power of the elites. I ran across a quote from the first chief justice of the US Supreme Court, John Jay, who said that people who own the country should run it. And that’s what we’re seeing in New York City right now. The rage ha hath no fury, like the corporate power scorned. I

    Speaker 3:

    Like that

    Norman Solomon:

    We have people like Michael Bloomberg and other gazillionaires, and they can’t fathom the idea that Ani who would challenge the power of the big banks and the real estate interests and so forth to run the city that they largely own. It’s just unfathomable to those who are in power that you could actually have democratic socialism. And on the one hand, we can say, well, as is true with foreign policy, there’s a ruling class and they’ve always, they’re the descendants of a long centuries long process of imperial adventure and enforced by military and economic power. So that’s who they are. At the same time, there’s a huge split in the ruling class, especially domestically. And while the Democratic and Republican parties are so often just in lockstep in foreign policy, when you get to domestic policy now more than ever, it is a huge difference. And there’s a sort of a fringe demagoguery that we hear sometimes on the left that there’s no significant difference between the Democratic and Republican party.

    So tell that to a young woman in Texas who wants to get an abortion, tell it to people who are being disappeared. Just look at the dozens of Supreme Court decisions just in the last few months. And you see that the justices who have been appointed by Republicans are bringing the hammer down on the most basic aspects of civil liberties. So there is a huge, huge difference. And I think part of our challenge is to recognize, and you referred to this I think a few minutes earlier with different words, but it’s too bad. It sounds sort of stodgy and stuffy and academic, but dialectics that truths exist in contradiction to each other. And it’s our challenge to understand in this moment what those contradictions portend not only for the future that we can anticipate, but what the hell we should do. So while we fight against the US militarism that has so many terrible results overseas, and of course it rebounds here as Martin Luther King Jr.

    Said what he called the demonic destructive suction tube. A military spending destroys lives here at home by diverting resources. The fact is that here in the United States, we have a fascistic party. It’s called the Republican Party, and we have the imperative to defeat it. And while ultimately electoral work is a subset of social movements, it really is crucial who is sitting in the White House, who is running the Congress, whose speaker of the house, who’s majority leader in the Senate. And it’s ironic when we hear people who are into protesting who say, it doesn’t really matter, or we don’t want to put energy into electoral results when everything we are demanding ultimately has to be implemented through government action or is being set aside and destroyed through government inaction. So it’s like walking on both legs. We have to fight for a strong social movement and build it. And at the same time, we need this electoral work. And concretely, that means we need to take control of the Congress away from Republicans next year.

    Marc Steiner:

    I can hear a lot of people listening to our conversation groaning when they hear that because of the lack of faith in Democrats. And I think about historically where we are now on two levels. If you look at what happened in Germany and Italy in the 1930s and how the neo fascists who were a minority in both countries, the fascists took over, they won the election, they took over the country, and they turned everything around, which is in some ways what’s happening before our eyes. And we’re not making that comparison just like the fascists because of the colonial heritage have taken over what’s called Israel. I mean, and that dynamic is at play. So where do you see the forces coming together to counter that?

    Norman Solomon:

    I think, yeah, we needed a united front. We needed a united front against the Republican party in terms of not only these terrible things being done daily that we see in the news from the Trump regime and from the Republican Congress, but also united front to defeat them in elections. And I think in terms of literature, magical thinking can be wonderful, but in politics, we should be really against magical thinking.

    Speaker 3:

    We

    Norman Solomon:

    Should really have our feet on the ground. And there is no way to take the Congress away from Republicans next year except through Democratic party candidates. That is just the reality, the idea that Democrats are inherently the epitome of evil. Well tell it to Ilhan Omar, tell it to Rashida Lib. These are wonderful people who would not be in Congress if they had run on any line other than the Democratic party line. So we have this challenge to keep fighting.

    Marc Steiner:

    I was thinking about what’s happening Israel Palestine and the fact that during the sixties in the Civil Rights Movement, which I was a part of, 60 to 70% of all the white people in the movement and giving their lives sometimes were Jews down south. And I think that we have to harken in some ways back to our labor and civil rights roots to make a battle, to save the future. I think we are on that precipice.

    Norman Solomon:

    We’re on a precipice that many people have already been pulled over and have been thrown over and are being destroyed as we speak. And it goes to so many questions of identity and what we believe in and what kind of society we can create. One of the notable things to me, which gets very little publicity is that, okay, you have what, 7 million Jews in this country, increasingly, especially the younger ones, identify as anti Zionist, right? A large proportion of Jews in this country surveyed are saying that they believe the Israeli government is committing genocide. And then the largest Christian Zionist organization in this country has 10 million members, way larger. So there’s this terrible bargain that has been struck because many of those Christian Zionists don’t like Jews. Some of them are virulently antisemitic, but they have a biblical narrative that says, well, the Jews in Israel and what’s called Israel is sort of a stepping stone to where they’re headed in terms of their holy journey.

    Marc Steiner:

    They want us dead so they can take over. Yeah,

    Norman Solomon:

    It’s very cynical, but very sincere. And that kind of alliance reminds me of what happened took shape 20 and 30 years ago where you had corporate power, which going way back to the 1970s, the infamous Lewis Powell memo that said, Hey, we have to really organize as right wingers to crush progressives to make sure that the rich and the corporate people keep running the country. Don’t let these black people have more power. And so that was really a blueprint that was effectively followed. And then you had the rise of the so-called moral majority. You had Jerry Falwell and people who were evangelical right-wing Christians. They opposed women’s rights, they opposed abortion rights. And those two tendencies that became so strong during the 1970s and eighties, they struck a bargain. And I think that the Wall Street people, the corporate forces, they didn’t particularly care about abortion rights one way or the other, or women’s rights.

    What they cared about is maximizing profits, which is what they always care about, and not have labor unions or others get in the way. And then meanwhile, I think a lot of the hardcore evangelical Christians, they didn’t really care about Wall Street one way or the other, but they struck this tremendously powerful deal. And we’ve seen the results. Now we have this reality that a new configuration of alliances is in place. The Republican Party has its own splits, but there we are. And that’s I think we come back to again and again, the need for front, and this is I think, a form of dialectics. There are some people in that necessarily united front that I hope will gain more and more power and defeat Republicans next year. Some of we’re going to find odious and we need to keep fighting their militarism and their class war from the top down because the only antidote to that, so to speak, is class war that would be more effective from the bottom up for working people, for wannabe working people, for children, for the elderly. That’s the battle that needs to be joined. One of the first steps is you defeat the neo fascists that are already in power. I’ve heard of a parable attributed to Malcolm X that if you’re facing somebody who’s pointing a gun at you and you’re also facing somebody who’s trying to poison you, the first step is to knock the gun out of the hand. Who’s pointing the gun at you? We’re facing a gun right now, and it’s the fascistic Republican party.

    Marc Steiner:

    We have to have many more conversations. I think what you just outlined on both fronts, what’s happening in Israel Palestine at this moment and the rise of neo fascism here are really important. And I think you eloquently put it in a lot of your writing that we’ll be linking to, so people who can check out what you’re saying, because I think they need to read it. And I think that you raise the issue here, which we can come back to at another time, which is part of the root of this, which is the Powell memo that people have forgotten about. And I remember doing shows about that years back. And I think it’s important to understand this history, to understand what we face and how we organized the fight against it. And so I just want to thank you, Norman, for being here today, but also for all the work you’ve done and the writing you’ve done and the analysis you give us, it’s really important. I look forward to wrestling with more ideas with you very soon.

    Norman Solomon:

    Hey, thanks a lot, mark. And thanks for the Mark Steiner show and the Real News Network.

    Marc Steiner:

    We’re all in this together.

    Norman Solomon:

    Yeah,

    Marc Steiner:

    Once again, let me thank Norman Solomon for joining us today, and we’ll link to his work. You can Google it at www.norissmonsolmon.com. And that’s Solomon with o’s. And thanks to David Hebdon for running the program today, and our audio editor Steven Frank for working his magic Roset Ali for producing the Mark Steiner show and the tireless Keller Ra for making it all work behind the scenes. And everyone here through Real News for making this show possible. Please let me know what you thought about, what you heard today, what you’d like us to cover. Just write to me at m ss@therealnews.com and I’ll get right back to you. Once again, thank you to Norman Solomon for joining us today. But for the crew here at The Real News, I’m Marc Steiner. Dan Val, keep listening and take care.

    This post was originally published on The Real News Network.

  • A long-running right-wing daily paper in the U.K. ran a front-page feature on Israel’s starvation campaign in Gaza this week, staking out a position on the genocide that seemingly outflanks the purportedly left-wing Labour Party as Prime Minister Keir Starmer refuses to take decisive action to stop Israel’s assault. Taking up the Daily Express’s entire front page on Wednesday was a picture of…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • Virginia Commonwealth University is withholding the diploma of a Palestinian American student because of her campus activism. In a hearing Tuesday, officials examined the case of VCU student Sereen Haddad, who was told she would not receive her diploma at her graduation this year because of her participation in a peaceful memorial commemorating violent police arrests at a student encampment for…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • The Charity Commission has sought advice from the Attorney General regarding the legality of charities donating millions to illegal Israeli settlement projects in the occupied Palestinian territory (OPT). This includes UK Toremet, who the International Centre of Justice for Palestinians (ICJP) has targeted in a crucial legal campaign.

    UK charities donating to Israeli settlement projects in the OPT

    The two UK-registered charities, Kasner Charitable Trust and UK Toremet Ltd, are responsible for transferring a total of £5.7m to an Israeli high school in the illegal settlement of Susya in the West Bank, between 2017 and 2021.

    ICJP wrote complaints to the Charity Commission in May 2024 and August 2024, regarding UK Toremet raising funds for four organisations responsible for blockading and disrupting aid to Gaza and/or extremist settler violence. This included UK taxpayer-funded Gift Aid.

    Of these four organisations, Im Tirtzu, Tzav 9, Torat Lechima, and Hashomer Yosh, the UK government sanctioned the latter two in October 2024. Alongside this, the US government and the European Union also sanctioned Tzav 9.

    The Charity Commission issued UK Toremet with an Action Plan following ICJP’s complaint. However, it is clear that such muted regulatory action is insufficient to tackle UK Toremet’s ongoing settlement complicity. The Attorney General must call for the Charity Commission to stringently investigate all Israeli organisations fundraising through UK Toremet’s platform. This is especially vital given ICJP’s investigations into further UK Toremet links, including raising funds for groups that the UK has now sanctioned.

    Not isolated incidents: time for the Charity Commission to step up

    UK Toremet systematically facilitates fundraising for Israeli organisations that operate in the OPT. The Charity Commission cannot treat the school in Susya as an isolated incident. There must be a blanket policy investigating groups that UK Toremet facilitates fundraising for. It is clear that it is either unable or unwilling to carry out due diligence on all the charities using its platform who may be acting in violation of international law.

    ICJP has also included evidence relating to UK Toremet in two submissions to the UN Special Rapporteur on human rights in the OPT Francesca Albanese. In December 2024, ICJP answered a call to evidence ahead of her report on private sector crimes. And, in July 2025, ICJP submitted evidence regarding UK Toremet, ahead of her report on corporate complicity.

    But, UK Toremet is not an isolated example either.  As it stands, the Attorney General and Charity Commission are merely reactive about individual instances when charities get flagged. Instead, ICJP is demanding that they proactively investigate and take action against British charities that may be facilitating international crimes in the OPT. This should include Achisomoch Aid Company (AAC) and JNF UK, two charities the ICJP has submitted complaints about previously.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Israel’s manufactured starvation of Palestinians in Gaza has apparently come to the attention of Western media and politicians. That’s in spite of Palestinians themselves, healthcare professionals, and hundreds of charities begging them to pay attention for months.

    Shock at Israel actions in Gaza…

    On their homepage, the BBC led with the headline:

    More than 100 aid agencies say ‘mass starvation’ spreading across Gaza.

    The Guardian also led with Gaza as their primary topic running the following:

    Mass starvation spreading across Gaza, aid agencies warn, as pressure on Israel grows – Middle East crisis live.

    The paper also ran with an exclusive citing pressure on ministers:

    Starmer under pressure from cabinet to recognise Palestinian statehood.

    And, even the Daily Express joined in:

    Meanwhile, a number of prominent politicians have made like scum, and risen to the top. Genocide apologist and president of the EU, Ursula von der Leyen, politely asked Israel to “deliver on its pledges”:

    How else could Ursula express her entirely sincere response to Israel besieging Gaza for decades, bombing infrastructure essential for survival, and manufacturing starvation for Palestinians but to say:

    Israel must deliver on its pledges.
    Far be it for us to say, but we’re not super sure that’s going to fly at the Hague. Indeed, Francesca Albanese was similarly sceptical of von der Leyen’s remarks:
    So little, so late, President @vonderleyen: After you have given Israel 21 months a free pass in Gaza, it will take more than words to prevent Israel from completing its genocidal mission and overt ethnic cleansing campaign. And even more, to repair what’s left of the EU credibility.
    The EU have, disgracefully, not only ignored Israel’s barbarous actions – they’ve enabled the impunity with which Israel have committed genocide in Palestine. As the Canary reported last week:

    Twenty seven foreign ministers from the EU refused to suspend the EU-Israel Association Agreement in a move that Amnesty International have called a:

    cruel and unlawful betrayal.

    If only there was something a tiny organisation like the EU could do to stop Israel.

    Speaking of something lacking, David Lammy said:

    As ever, food scarcity is not the problem. Palestinians are not starving because they don’t have food. They’re starving because Israel is refusing to allow food, water, or basic medical equipment reach them. How will releasing hostages save Palestinians? Something tells us Lammy isn’t referring to these hostages:

    Since 7 October, thousands of Palestinians – including medical staff, patients and residents fleeing the conflict, as well as captured fighters – have been taken from Gaza to Israel, usually shackled and blindfolded. Thousands more have been detained in the West Bank and Israel. They have generally been held in secret, without being given a reason for their detention, access to a lawyer or effective judicial review, the report states.

    His false equivocation is typical of a politician who has spent the years of this ongoing genocide minimising Israel’s actions and facilitating them. In May 2025, new trade data showed that the UK has continued to export arms to Israel, despite a supposed ban. As the Guardian reported:

    The findings have led the former Labour shadow chancellor John McDonnell to call for a full investigation, adding it was a resigning matter if the foreign secretary, David Lammy, was shown to have misled parliament in breach of the ministerial code when he told MPs in September that much of what the UK sends to Israel was “defensive in nature”.

    As ever, Lammy’s actions are not in step with his words, paltry as they are.

    So, why now?

    As ever, there’s a legal challenge looming for the British government. As the Canary reported just yesterday:

    The pre-action letter is on behalf of three children, who the legal challenge refers to as child Y, S, and S. It states that the UK government has failed to take reasonable steps to ensure it is sufficiently informed and has taken account of the inadequate treatment options for Gazan children before deciding not to pursue medical evacuations. It argues that privately funded evacuation and medical care in the UK, which is the only existing potential option for critically ill Gazan children, is not realistically available to children Y, S, and S.

    However, that’s not the only reason. Over the course of Israel’s genocide, there have been waves of false interest from both mainstream media and politicians. Whilst Israel’s actions themselves have never wavered – they’ve consistently been on a campaign of death and destruction against Palestine – the condemnations from certain characters has wavered. It feels important to confront that the response from Westerners often wanes depending on a specific construction of the perfect victim.

    After all, that question keeps coming up: why now? Has some new information emerged? Perhaps there is new testimony which reveals something both the media and government were not aware of? Or, maybe experts from the UN or Amnesty International have released a new report with evidenced claims?

    The level of information hasn’t changed. Palestinians have been begging for their lives. So, why now?

    Craven opportunism over Gaza

    There has been report after report featuring independently verified information. Palestinian journalists have documented the genocide they themselves are suffering through. Neither the information nor the pressure from charities has changed. And, the crux of the matter is that while certain media outlets and politicians may spotlight Palestine occasionally, it’s far too fucking late. There have been media outlets, Al Jazeera, Middle East Eye, and more who have consistently documented the genocide and laid bare Israel’s atrocities. Certain politicians and thousands of experts with decades of experience have pleaded alongside Palestinians to stop the genocide.

    The likes of the BBC and David Lammy have been, at best, inconsistent and arbitrary in their superficial condemnation of Israel. They might pay attention today, but they certainly won’t tomorrow.

    Such a relationship to genocide invariably creates a dynamic where it appears as though, if only there was more evidence, more heartfelt testimony from Palestinians, more, more, more, then perhaps these craven apologists might notice and do something.

    But, unfortunately, that has no bearing on reality. Israel’s genocide in Gaza is the most well-documented genocide in real time. Information has never been the problem.

    Featured image via YouTube screenshot/Al Jazeera English

    By Maryam Jameela

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • With the Trump imperium passing the half-year mark, the posture of the US empire is ever clearer. Whether animated by “America First” or globalism, the objective remains “full spectrum dominance.” And now with the neocon capture of the Democrats, there are no guardrails from the so-called opposition party.

    Call it the “new cold war,” the “beginning of World War III,” or – in Trump’s words – “endless war,” this is the era that the world has entered. The US/Zionist war against Iran has paused, but no one has any illusions that it is over. And it won’t likely be resolved until one side decisively and totally prevails. Ditto for the proxy war with Russia in Ukraine. Likely the same with Palestine, where the barbarity of war worsened to genocide. Meanwhile, since Obama’s “pivot to Asia,” the empire is building up for war with China.

    In Latin America and the Caribbean, the empire’s war on the world assumes a hybrid form. The carnage is less apparent because the weapons take the form of “soft power” – sanctions, tariffs, and deportations. These can have the same lethal consequences as bombs, only less overt.

    Making the world unsafe for socialism

    Some Western leftists vilify the defensive measures that Cuba, Venezuela, and Nicaragua must take to protect themselves from the empire’s regime-change schemes. In contrast, Washington clearly understands that these countries pose “threats of a good example” to the empire. Each subsequent US president, from Obama on, has certified them as “extraordinary threats to US national security.” Accordingly, they are targeted with the harshest coercive measures.

    In this war of attrition, historian Isaac Saney uses the example of Cuba to show how any misstep by the revolutionary government or societal deficiency is exaggerated and weaponized. The empire’s siege, he explains, is not merely an attempt to destabilize the economy but is a deliberate strategy of suffocation. The empire aims to instigate internal discontent, distort people’s perception of the government, and ultimately erode social gains.

    While Cuba is affected the worst by the hybrid war, both Venezuela and Nicaragua have also been damaged. All three countries have seen the “humanitarian parole” for their migrants in the US come to an end. Temporary Protected Status (TPS) was also withdrawn for Venezuelans and Nicaraguans. The strain of returning migrants, along with cuts in the remittances they had sent (amounting to a quarter of Nicaragua’s GDP), further impacts their respective economies.

    Higher-than-average tariffs are threatened on Venezuelan and Nicaraguan exports to the US, together with severe restrictions on Caracas’s oil exports. Meanwhile, the screws have been tightened on the six-decade US blockade of Cuba with disastrous humanitarian consequences.

    However, all three countries are fighting back. They are forming new trade alliances with China and elsewhere. Providing relief to Cuba, Mexico has supplied oil, and China is installing solar panel farms to address the now-daily power outages. High levels of food security in Venezuela and Nicaragua have strengthened their ability to resist US sanctions, while Caracas successfully defeated one of Washington’s harshest migration measures by securing the release of 252 of its citizens who had been incarcerated in El Salvador’s torturous CECOT prison.

    Venezuela’s US-backed far-right opposition is in disarray. The first Trump administration had recognized the “interim presidency” of Juan Guaidó, followed by the Biden administration declaring Edmundo González the winner of Venezuela’s last presidential election. But the current Trump administration has yet to back González, de facto recognizing Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro.

    Nicaragua’s right-wing opposition is also reeling from a side-effect of Trump’s harsh treatment of migrants – many are returning voluntarily to a country claimed by the opposition to be “unsafe,” while US Homeland Security has even extolled their home country’s recent achievements. And some of Trump’s prominent Cuban-American supporters are now questioning his “maximum pressure” campaign for going too far.

    Troubled waters for the Pink Tide

    The current progressive wave, the so-called Pink Tide, was initiated by Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador’s landslide victory in 2018. His MORENA Party successor, Claudia Sheinbaum, won by an even greater margin in 2024. Mexico’s first woman president has proven to be perhaps the world’s most dignified and capable sparring partner with the buffoon in the White House, who has threatened tariffs, deportations, military interdictions, and more on his southern neighbor.

    Left-leaning presidents Gabriel Boric in Chile and Gustavo Petro in Colombia are limited to a single term. Both have faced opposition-aligned legislatures and deep-rooted reactionary power blocs. Chilean Communist Party candidate Jeanette Jara is favored to advance to the second-round presidential election in November 2025, but will face a challenging final round if the right unifies, as is likely, around an extremist candidate.

    As the first non-rightist in Colombia’s history, Petro has had a tumultuous presidential tenure. He credibly accuses his former foreign minister of colluding with the US to overthrow him. However, the presidency could well revert to the right in the May 2026 elections.

    Boric, Petro, Uruguay’s Yamandú Orsi, and Brazil’s Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva met in July as the region’s center-left presidents, with an agenda of dealing with Trump, promoting multilateralism, and (we can assume) keeping their distance from the region’s more left-wing governments.

    With shaky popularity ratings, Lula will likely run for reelection in October 2026. As head of the region’s largest economy, Lula plays a world leadership role, chairing three global summits in a year. Yet, with less than a majority legislative backing, Lula has triangulated between Washington and the Global South, often capitulating to US interests (as in his veto of BRICS membership for Nicaragua and Venezuela). Regardless, Trump is threatening Brazil with a crippling 50% export tariff and is blatantly interfering in the trial of former right-wing President Jair Bolsonaro, accused of insurrection. So far, Trump’s actions have backfired, arousing anger among Brazilians. Lula commented that Trump was “not elected to be emperor of the world.”

    In 2021, Honduran President Xiomara Castro took over a narcostate subservient to Washington and has tried to push the envelope to the left. Being constitutionally restricted to one term, Castro hands the Libre party candidacy in November’s election to former defense minister Rixi Moncada, who faces a tough contest with persistent US interference.

    Bolivia’s ruling Movement Toward Socialism (MAS) Party is embroiled in a self-destructive internal conflict between former President Evo Morales and his former protégé and current President, Luis Arce. The energized Bolivian right wing is spoiling for the August 17th presidential election.

    Israeli infiltration accompanies US military penetration

    Analyst Joe Emersberger notes: “Today, all geopolitics relates back to Gaza where the imperial order has been unmasked like never before.” Defying Washington, the Hague Group met in Colombia for an emergency summit on Gaza to “take collective action grounded in international law.” On July 16, regional states – Bolivia, Cuba, Colombia, Nicaragua, and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines – endorsed the pledge to take measures in support of Palestine, with others likely to follow. Brazil will join South Africa’s ICJ complaint against Israel.

    At the other end of the political spectrum are self-described “world’s coolest dictator” Nayib Bukele of El Salvador and confederates Javier Milei of Argentina and Daniel Noboa of Ecuador. As well as cozying up to Trump, they devotedly support Israel, which has been instrumental in enabling the most brutal reactionaries in the region. Noboa duly tells Israel’s Netanyahu that they “share the same enemies.”

    In February, the US Southern Command warned: “Time is not on our side.” The perceived danger is “methodical incursion” into our “neighborhood” by both Russia and China. Indeed, China has become the region’s second-largest trading partner after the US, and even right-wing governments are reluctant to jeopardize their relations with Beijing. The empire’s solution is to “redouble our efforts to nest military engagement,” using humanitarian assistance as “an essential soft power tool.”

    Picking up where Biden left off, Trump has furthered US military penetration, notably in Ecuador, Guyana, Brazil, Panama, and Argentina. The pandemic of narcotics trafficking, itself a product of US-induced demand, has been a Trojan Horse for militarist US intervention in Haiti, Ecuador, Peru, and threatened in Mexico.

    In Panama, President José Mulino’s obeisance to Trump’s ambitions to control the Panama Canal and reduce China’s influence provoked massive protests. Trump’s collaboration in the genocide of Palestinians motivated Petro to declare that Colombia must leave the NATO alliance and keep its distance from “militaries that drop bombs on children.” Colombia had been collaborating with NATO since 2013 and became the only Latin American global partner in 2017.

    Despite Trump’s bluster – what the Financial Times calls “imperial incontinence” – his administration has produced mixed results. While rightist political movements have basked in Trump’s fitful praise, his escalating coercion provokes resentment against Yankee influence. Resistance is growing, with new alliances bypassing Washington. As the empire’s grip tightens, so too does the resolve of those determined to break free from it.

    The post Trump’s Latin American Policies Go South first appeared on Dissident Voice.

    This post was originally published on Dissident Voice.

  • Israeli occupation forces have been murdering dozens of starving people almost every day in recent weeks. Since the start of their genocide in Gaza, it was already clear for many that the occupied Palestinian territory was a concentration camp. But now, we are constantly seeing images of shockingly thin children which one former UN official says are “reminiscent of those taken in Nazi concentration camps”. One year ago, UN experts already clarified that:

    Israel’s intentional and targeted starvation campaign against the Palestinian people is a form of genocidal violence and has resulted in famine across all of Gaza.

    In May this year, a UN humanitarian spokesperson said “Gaza is the hungriest place on Earth” due to Israel’s efforts. Famine expert Alex de Waal, meanwhile, has described how Israel has “minutely engineered” the “most intense, most severe” deliberate starvation campaign since the Second World War.

    There’s no excuse for not calling it famine after “over four months of a medieval siege“, according to ex-UN official Moncef Khane. But because Israel has intentionally decimated Gaza’s health system and made international data gathering near-impossible, an official international designation of ‘famine’ is unlikely until it’s too late.

    Even the Daily Express is disgusted

    The situation is now so disgusting that even the strongly right-wing Daily Express, once infamous for its lack of empathy, has had enough. In fact, it possibly had the most humane and serious front page of all the mainstream newspapers on 23 July:

    The Daily Express is generally awful (though it hasn’t been quite as awful as it once was since it came under new ownership in 2018). But as most Western governments continue their longstanding complicity in the horrors that Israeli war criminals are inflicting on people in Gaza, the paper has chosen to do the right thing and call its readers’ attention to the brutality.

    Deep shame

    In a new open letter, over 100 aid and human rights organisations have slammed Western “symbolic gestures” as “a smokescreen for inaction”. They say:

    Massacres at food distribution sites in Gaza are occurring near-daily.

    As the UN’s Philippe Lazzarini has stated, Israel has created “a sadistic death trap” for starving people in Gaza, killing over a thousand since the end of May.

    The open letter adds, agonisingly, that:

    Children tell their parents they want to go to heaven, because at least heaven has food.

    Israel (with the complicity of its Western allies) has actively blocked the international aid system from stepping in. And the group insist:

    Governments must stop waiting for permission to act. We cannot continue to hope that current arrangements will work. It is time to take decisive action: demand an immediate and permanent ceasefire; lift all bureaucratic and administrative restrictions; open all land crossings; ensure access to everyone in all of Gaza; reject military-controlled distribution models; restore a principled, UN-led humanitarian response and continue to fund principled and impartial humanitarian organisations. States must pursue concrete measures to end the siege, such as halting the transfer of weapons and ammunition.

    Anything less is unacceptable.

    As Amnesty International says “Israel is continuing to use starvation as a method of warfare, a war crime, and as a tool to commit genocide against Palestinians in the occupied Gaza Strip”, some lone voices in Britain have been speaking up. Independent MP Jeremy Corbyn has stressed that:

    Empty words cannot hide the truth: the UK government is complicit in crimes against humanity.

    Internationally, the Hague Group of 30 nations has sought to challenge Western complicity with the genocide, promising recently to act to ensure the enforcement of international law. 12 of those have committed to implementing six measures immediately, including blocking arms transfers to Israel and reviewing “all public contracts, to prevent public institutions and funds from supporting Israel’s illegal occupation of the Palestinian Territory and entrenching its unlawful presence”.

    Corbyn has asked the British government to back this international action:

    However, it seems clearer and clearer that only a big increase in mass resistance in Western nations will be able to stop our government’s complicity. All media outlets, meanwhile, have an ethical and professional duty to expose our politicians’ outrageous ongoing support for the genocide in Gaza – and that includes the Daily Express.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Ed Sykes

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Over the weekend, a pensioner was arrested in Leeds for holding a placard displaying a joke from Private Eye about Palestine Action. Jon Farley was detained by police at a silent protest for holding the following image:

    As Farley was handcuffed he explained to officers that the joke was from Private Eye magazine, and offered to show them a copy that was in his backpack. However, Farley was arrested under section 12 of the Terrorism Act 2000. The act makes support for a proscribed organisation, in this instance, Palestine Action, illegal.

    Private Eye

    Farley said:

    I thought, this is all a bit surreal. I clearly wasn’t any kind of physical threat. There was no need for them to act in the way they did.

    He was released six hours later after questioning. But, his bail conditions state that he is not to attend any Palestine Action rallies. As the Guardian reported, Farley had never done such a thing in any case, and it would be illegal irrespective of his bail conditions.

    Farley said:

    I was just very shocked at first and then relieved, but now I’m thinking, hang on a minute, what happened here?

    What really concerns me is the whole atmosphere of intimidation.

    And, the officers who arrested Farley were apparently confused as to the application of the law. Farley recounted that:

    I found out later somebody said to one of the police: ‘You know you can buy Private Eye in the newsagent just next to the van you’re putting him in, are you going to arrest Ian Hislop?’

    So they’re coming out with all this guff about: ‘If it’s in print, it’s fine. But if you carry it on the demo [it’s illegal].’ That sounds to me like the police making up the law.

    For his part, Private Eye editor Ian Hislop said of Farley’s arrest:

    I did think it was mind-boggling. I mean, ludicrous.

    Hislop also jokingly bemoaned that officers didn’t seem to know what Private Eye was:

    That’s really depressing, isn’t it? That’s probably the most appalling thing.

    Future impact

    On social media, Private Eye’s social media account said:

    Writer Marc Jones called the arrest “dystopian”:

    Another social media user said:

    Stand up for Gaza

    West Yorkshire Police said:

    We are sorry that the man involved is unhappy with the circumstances of this arrest. As this is a new proscribed organisation, West Yorkshire police is considering any individual or organisational learning from this incident.

    Unfortunately, while police work out how to apply the law it would appear that citizens are at risk from a draconian and farcical law.

    Farley, however, remains unbowed. He told the Socialist Worker:

    We’ve got to stand up. We’ve got to stand up for Gaza. We can’t let them stop us speaking out.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Maryam Jameela

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • The ongoing genocide in Gaza demands urgent, decisive international intervention. The existing global movement calling for an end to Israel’s crimes must urgently refocus on a concrete, actionable strategy: one that centres on leveraging the United Nations’ Uniting for Peace Resolution – an established but under-utilised legal mechanism that can bypass the Security Council’s deadlock and authorize protective military action to halt mass atrocities.

    The need for change in our approach to Gaza

    For nearly two years, millions across the globe have taken to the streets chanting “free Palestine” and “stop the genocide”. But despite intense activism and repeated calls for a ceasefire, the violence and humanitarian crisis in Gaza have only escalated. Starvation, disease, and a collapsed medical system plague the civilian population, while Israel’s ethnic cleansing continues unabated, moving closer to what has been described as a “final solution” for Gaza’s people.

    This is all happening while UN human rights experts affirm that Israel’s conduct follows patterns of genocidal crimes, and the international legal framework recognises the obligation to prevent such atrocities. But, the UN Security Council has been paralysed, primarily due to repeated vetoes of resolutions by the United States blocking any meaningful ceasefires, humanitarian access, or accountability measures.

    The harsh truth is, that after months of shouting and marching, and meeting after meeting of Security Council members, the situation has deteriorated exponentially. The time for vague demands and slogans has now passed, and we urgently, and dramatically, need to change our strategies and refocus our actions, before it is too late.

    During a recent interview with the Canary, former senior UN official and international human rights lawyer Craig Mokhiber, told us:

    The only way to stop the genocide is to get a force in there that is mandated to, firstly, protect civilians…to secure and support the distribution of humanitarian aid…and preserve the evidence of Israel’s war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide.

    The Uniting for Peace Resolution: a legal and strategic opportunity

    The key lies with a powerful but underutilised UN mechanism, which bypasses Security Council paralysis, known as the Uniting for Peace Resolution. First adopted in 1950, it provides an alternative route when the Security Council is deadlocked, by empowering the UN General Assembly to convene an Emergency Special Session (ESS) within 24 hours, at the call of one member state or through a majority, enabling it to make recommendations, to maintain or restore international peace and security.

    The first use of the Uniting for Peace Resolution was against two NATO members, France and the United Kingdom, during the Suez Crisis in 1956. A UN peacekeeping force was established, known as the United Nations Emergency Force (UNEF), and was dispatched to the Sinai. This force successfully secured and supervised the cessation of hostilities. The same could be done now.

    The UN General Assembly has already voted twice since October 7 under the Uniting for Peace Resolution, but because these efforts lacked substance and clear demands, no actionable plan to protect Gaza’s civilians, or stop the violence, has happened. As Mokhiber explained:

    So far, the General Assembly resolutions adopted under Uniting for Peace during the Gaza genocide have failed to include actions with real teeth, such as a protection force, the stripping of Israel’s UN General Assembly credentials, and the establishment of an accountability mechanism. This is due largely to diplomatic pressure from the allies of the Israeli regime- the US, the UK, and others, and to efforts to secure the highest possible number of affirmative votes. But the most significant resolution adopted in September of 2024 was also the most expansive and garnered an overwhelming majority, showing there is room for more, particularly after another year of worsening atrocities.

    We must all unite behind an urgent demand: UN-mandated multinational armed protective force into Gaza now

    Eric Ruben is an American Jew, and part of a global initiative called People Against Genocide Everywhere. Both of his parents were anti-Zionist Jews, and his father was a reporter at the Nuremberg war crime trials. Ruben told the Canary:

    So, I was raised on pretty much a belief that no genocide is acceptable, no way, no how. I have been very frustrated by seeing all this wasted potential on the streets, hundreds of thousands of people, protesting with amorphous demands. After 22 months the situation has just got worse. It’s been like the old definition of insanity, doing the same thing over and over, getting the same results and expecting something different. I know we can do something to stop the genocide. I know we can. The question is whether we have the ability to mobilize the people in time. Craig’s been a voice in the wilderness. Although his experience is right on the mark, and people listen, it’s not been translated into any discernible action on the ground, and that’s what we’re trying to do right now.

    Working with Mokhiber, to help their demand become reality, People Against Genocide Everywhere is calling for the global movement to unite behind a clear, urgent demand: the immediate deployment of a UN-mandated multinational armed protective force into Gaza. Ruben explained:

    We must harness the power of the people who have been protesting, who feel very frustrated about the fact that their protests have done nothing. Their energy is sincere, and now we’re giving them an opportunity for their protest to actually support what they’ve always wanted to do, which is support the people of Gaza, and stop the genocide.

    A concrete three-phase campaign plan

    People Against Genocide Everywhere is hoping that, with the support and cooperation of activists around the world, a concrete three-phase plan can be enacted, to ensure a UN protective force is deployed into Gaza. This would involve the following:

    Phase One: Trigger an Emergency Special Session (ESS)

    The first critical step is for one UN member state – in any region – to formally request an Emergency Special Session (ESS) of the UN General Assembly. This request activates a 24-hour countdown for the General Assembly to convene and address the crisis. Coordinated, immediate pressure must be applied worldwide to compel governments to initiate this process, including mass demonstrations, letter deliveries to political leaders, and sustained peaceful picket lines at federal offices and UN missions.

    Phase Two: Passing a robust Uniting for Peace Resolution

    Once the ESS is underway, the focus must shift to ensuring swift adoption of a comprehensive General Assembly Uniting for Peace Resolution. This resolution must authorize the deployment of a UN mandated multinational armed protective force to Gaza and must include the following measures.

    The UN mandated multinational armed protective force should be armed for self-defense, equipped with monitoring technologies, and mandated to:

    • Safeguard Palestinian civilians
    • Support the UN’s unrestricted entry and distribution of humanitarian aid
    • Preserve evidence of potential war crimes and violations of human rights
    • Facilitate reconstruction of Gaza

    Hold Israel and the West accountable for crimes in Gaza

    The Resolution should also include a call on all member states to:

    • Mandate a ceasefire and for Israel to withdraw all armed forces from Gaza, and stop all attacks on Gaza by air, land, and sea.
    • Call on all member nations to implement a total embargo on arms to Israel
    • Cease all trade, investment, economic, diplomatic, and cultural relations with the Israeli government
    • Strip Israel of its UN credentials
    • Reaffirm the right of the Palestinian people to use all necessary means to resist colonial domination and foreign occupation, including through armed struggle, in accordance with international law.

    Phase Three: Countries must commit troops and resources – the streets hold them accountable

    After the resolution passes, which requires a two-thirds majority, the real test begins: every nation that votes ‘yes’ must publicly state what resources they will contribute—troops, planes, ships, humanitarian aid. People in the streets must hold their governments to account, demanding transparency:

    • How many troops will be sent?
    • What military support will be provided?
    • What humanitarian resources will assist Gaza?

    Weekly demonstrations and picket lines must continue outside government offices until each country publishes a clear, public commitment. This is the power of people uniting to transform promises into action. The ultimate call is for the multinational protective force to deploy within 96 hours, prepared to respond to any aggression against civilians or UN personnel.

    The critical role of picket lines: sustaining pressure and visibility

    A central pillar of this campaign strategy is the establishment and maintenance of continuous, strategic picket lines at key sites such as federal government buildings, UN offices, diplomatic missions, and major ports. These pickets serve several vital purposes:

    1. Maintaining urgency and visibility. Constant presence reminds government officials and UN personnel that the world’s eyes are watching and that inaction will not be tolerated. This counters bureaucratic inertia and diplomatic stalling tactics.
    2. Economic and political pressure. Ports are vital economic hubs. Even a slight slowdown in port operations – through picket lines that many dockworkers may respect by refusing to cross – can send a powerful financial message to governments, incentivizing them to act.
    3. Solidarity and morale. Holding picket lines at UN offices encourages internal UN staff to support and advocate for protective measures, underscoring broad international consensus.
    4. Flexible local action. Organised locally, these picket lines empower communities worldwide to reclaim agency in this global crisis, ensuring the campaign does not rely solely on high-level diplomatic negotiations.

    This sustained civic engagement strategy is not just symbolic protest, but is a well-calculated pressure tactic designed to compel governments to heed demands for immediate UN intervention.

    Why this shift matters

    The fuel behind previous global protests was invaluable, and changed the discourse worldwide, says Ruben:

    At the beginning, it was very important because it went up against the trope that if you’re against Israel, you’re antisemitic. So that was incredibly important, especially with a lot of Jewish organizations, who took that to the streets. That was an incredibly important thing, because that trope doesn’t exist anymore. Demonstrations also called out the lies that said Hamas was under every hospital, every building, every school and every mosque.

    That battle has been won. The narrative that stopped millions from speaking out has collapsed, thanks to these efforts.

    But now, the question is no longer about raising awareness. Now, we must demand action – real, enforceable, and timely action, because it will soon be too late.

    How You Can Make a Difference Today:

    • Take to the streets and demand that it is your government that will make the call for an Emergency Special Session of the UN General Assembly without delay.
    • Organise sustained pickets at government buildings, UN offices, and ports to apply political and economic pressure, if that call is not made immediately.
    • Unite behind the one message that will save lives: “Deploy a UN-mandated multinational armed protective force into Gaza now”, and pressure your government to demand and support a comprehensive Uniting for Peace Resolution that stops the war, delivers humanitarian aid, and protects civilians.
    • Hold elected officials accountable post-resolution by demanding full disclosure and commitment for sending support and aid.
    • Sign the petition calling for the UN General Assembly to deploy an Emergency Armed Multinational Protection Force to Gaza!

    The momentum we built by chanting “free Palestine” must now translate into concrete demands and unstoppable pressure on governments worldwide. Every hour we hesitate, the less time there will be for the people of Gaza.

    Demand a United Nations Emergency Special Session NOW.

    For more information, see here.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Charlie Jaay

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • OPEN QUESTION: By Bryan Bruce

    Dear Rt Hon Winston Peters,

    There was a time when New Zealanders stood up for what was morally right. There are memorials around our country for those who died fighting fascism, we wrote parts of the UN Charter of Human Rights, we took an anti-nuclear stance in 1984, and three years prior to that, many of us stood against apartheid in South Africa by boycotting South African products and actively protesting against the 1981 Springbok Rugby Tour.

    To call out the Israeli government for genocide and ethnic cleansing in Gaza is not to be antisemitic. Nor is it to be pro- Hamas. It is to simply to be pro-human.

    While acknowledging the peace and humanitarian initiatives on the Foreign Affairs website, I note there is no calling out of the genocide and ethnic cleansing that cannot be denied is happening in Gaza.

    The Israeli government is systematically demolishing whole towns and cities — including churches, mosques, even removing trees and vegetation — to deprive the Palestinian people the opportunity to return to their homeland; and there have been constant blocks to humanitarian aid as part of a policy forced starvation.

    There is no doubt crimes against international law have been committed, which is why the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague has issued warrants for the arrest of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Yoav Gallant, his former defence minister, for alleged crimes against humanity.

    So, my question to you is: why are you not pictured standing in this photograph (below) alongside the representatives from 33 nations at the July 16 2025 Gaza emergency conference in Bogotá?

    The nations that took part in the Gaza emergency summit in were:

    Norway, Portugal, Slovenia, Spain, Turkey, Colombia, South Africa, Bolivia, Cuba, Honduras, Malaysia, Namibia, Algeria, Bangladesh, Botswana, Brazil, Chile, China, Djibouti, Indonesia, Iraq, Ireland, Lebanon, Libya, Mexico, Nicaragua, Oman, Pakistan, Palestine, Qatar, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Uruguay and Venezuela.

    representatives from 33 nations at the July 16 2025 Gaza emergency conference in Bogotá
    Representatives from 33 nations at the July 16 2025 Gaza emergency conference in Bogotá. Image: bryanbruce.substack.com

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • In one of the biggest displays of labor organizing against anti-Palestinian racism, the National Education Association’s (NEA) policymaking body voted on July 5 to cut all ties with the Anti-Defamation League (ADL). The vote was a product of years of grassroots organizing within the NEA. This activity within the union was bolstered by the growth of the Drop The ADL campaign, an initiative by a wide range of progressive organizations to educate communities about the ADL’s anti-Palestinian bias and opposition to free speech in schools.

    The post NEA Leadership Rejects Member Vote To Sever Ties With ADL appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • At least 15 Palestinians died of starvation in Gaza over the past 24 hours, bringing the death toll from hunger and malnutrition to 101 since the start of the genocide, including 89 children, according to the Palestinian Health Ministry on July 22.

    “This is a silent massacre. The Ministry of Health holds the Israeli occupation and the international community fully responsible. We urgently call for the immediate opening of all crossings to allow the entry of food and medicine,” the ministry said.

    Euro-Med Monitor reported that one Palestinian died of hunger every 80 minutes on Sunday, accusing Israel of pursuing “a systematic starvation policy against 2 million residents.”

    The post Israeli-Made Famine In Gaza Reaches Critical Point appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • As the genocide in Gaza continues, imperialist governments that have made Israel’s crimes possible are escalating their attacks on the movement for Palestine. From the targeting of international students to the recent firing of four CUNY faculty over Palestine activism, universities remain an important site of struggle against the genocide.

    Despite the repression, there have been victories which show that it pays to take up the fight against these attacks on the movement for Palestine. One example is at Princeton University, where 13 activists from the Princeton community recently got charges dropped after more than a year.

    The post How Pro-Palestine Activists At Princeton Got Their Charges Dropped appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • This story originally appeared in Mondoweiss on July 22, 2025. It is shared here with permission.

    For 100 days, Palestinians in the occupied West Bank town of Idna have been surviving without running water. The town of some 40,000 inhabitants has been relying on rain reservoirs and water tanks sold by vendors. The town’s water crisis was provoked by the April decision of Israeli national water company Mekorot to reduce the daily provision of water to the Hebron governorate of the southern West Bank. The water supply shrank from 32,000 cubic meters to 26,000, which included completely shutting down Mekorot’s water line for Idna.

    This water crisis isn’t new, and it isn’t limited to Idna. Every summer, multiple parts of the West Bank experience prolonged water cuts that can extend for up to a month, mainly due to the lack of water supply by Mekorot, which controls most of the water resources in Palestine.

    In Idna, residents met in the municipality hall on Monday to discuss the crisis. The mayor of the town shared the Israeli company’s argument for cutting off their water: that some residents were “illegally stealing water.”

    “The mayor said that it is not the municipality’s responsibility to look for those who steal water, but to provide water to residents, which is being made impossible,” Rami Nofal, a local journalist and resident of Idna, told Mondoweiss. “Every summer, we go through water cuts, and the argument that some individuals steal water from the main line is not an excuse to leave 40,000 people without water for three months,” he said. 

    The mayor went on to assure the crowd that the Palestinian Authority is trying to fix the crisis with Mekorot, but no news of a solution was forthcoming. “In Idna, like in the rest of the West Bank, we receive water on specific days of the week, and my neighborhood’s turn was in April, just a few days before the complete cut was scheduled,” Nofal went on. “I bought a water tank of 13 cubic meters for 180 shekels, and this is the water that my family and I are saving to survive on.”

    Tanks of this sort dot the roofs of all buildings in the West Bank, as water shortages are chronic. “We have to watch for every instance of water consumption,” Nofal explained. “Every time my children open the faucet, I tell them to close it back as soon as they can. We economize while washing and even when flushing the toilet.”

    Palestinian people with empty jerrycans wait in long queues to receive clean water amid the ongoing Israeli attacks in Khan Yunis, southern Gaza on September 08, 2024. Photo by Abed Rahim Khatib/Anadolu via Getty Images

    How the water system works on the West Bank

    Mekorot was established in the 1930s under the British Mandate. After the establishment of the State of Israel, the company was given the exclusive right to explore and exploit water in the country. After 1967, that included the lands of the West Bank and Gaza, which Israel occupied. Mekorot expanded its operations and was assigned to build the national carrier, a line of water pipes that transports water from the northern part of the country, around the West Bank through Israel’s 1948 proper, to the southern dry areas of the Naqab desert. A large part of this water used to feed the Jordan river before the construction of the carrier in the 1960s.

    Ihab Sweiti, of the Palestinian water authority, told Mondoweiss that “natural water sources in Palestine are mostly underground, and they classify into four natural reservoirs; the eastern and western acquifers on both sides of the central hill country, the Jordan Valley Basin, and the coastal acquifer, which is the main water source for Israel and the Gaza Strip. The eastern and Jordan Valley reservoirs are mainly in the West Bank, and the western reservoir extends into Israel, too.”

    “Since the occupation of 1967, Mekorot dug more wells in the West Bank, ending up controlling about 25 wells, which it uses to provide water to Israeli settlements and to sell water to many Palestinian municipalities, like Idna,” Sweiti continued.

    “When the Mekorot company informed us that they were cutting the water supply from the west Hebron area, including Idna, they said that the reason was that there were too many illegal extensions made by Palestinians along the water line.” 

    Sweiti says that the Israeli company claims the stealing of water for the towns and villages in the area reduced the water share for the Israeli settlements. Sweiti admits that Palestinians make irregular extensions along Mekorot’s line, but the data belies the claim that the share of Israeli settlements has been reduced. 

    According to the Palestinian Hydrology Group, Palestinians consume an average of 70 liters of water per person per day, while Israelis consume 300. For Israeli settlers in the West Bank, however, the average rises to 800 liters per person a day.

    According to the World Health Organization, the healthy average for daily water consumption is 100 to 120 liters per individual per day, which is far above the Palestinian average consumption rate and much further below the daily average consumption of Israeli settlers. According to the Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics figures from March 2023, the individual water share of Israeli settlers in the West Bank compared to that of Palestinians is seven to one.

    Under international law, both Israeli settlements in the West Bank and Israel’s exploitation of the West Bank’s water are illegal. The 4th Geneva Convention, which regulates cases of occupation, explicitly prohibits both the transfer of the citizens of the occupying power to the occupied territory and the exploitation of natural resources of the occupied territory unless it is to the benefit of the occupied population.

    When the Oslo Accords were signed in 1993 between the PLO and Israel, water rights were classified as part of the strategic “final status” negotiations phase, along with Palestinian refugees, borders, the status of Jerusalem, and Israeli settlements. The final status negotiations were supposed to conclude in Camp David in the year 2000, but the accords collapsed. Since then, the administration of water distribution continues to take place according to the Oslo Accords’ provisional mechanism: vastly unequal distribution, and total Israeli control.

    This mechanism is based on the formation of a joint committee in which Israeli and Palestinian water authorities regularly review and update the number of wells that Palestinians are allowed to dig or exploit and the quantity of water they can extract and distribute based on population growth.

    This regular meeting of the joint committee is supposed to take place every few years. According to Ihab Sweiti, the last meeting happened in 2023, before the war on Gaza started. “We, the Palestinian Water Authority, had several new wells  on the agenda that we wanted to get Israeli approval to dig and operate, and there were two other wells that had already received Israeli approval, including in the west of Hebron.” 

    Only technical discussions were left, Sweiti says, but the war on Gaza paralyzed everything. “It is all still pending.”

    Palestinians, including children, carry water jerry cans from mobile tanks as families who fled their homes to live in Nasser Hospital due to the Israeli attacks continue in Khan Yunis, Gaza on November 12, 2023. Photo by Abed Zagout/Anadolu via Getty Images

    ‘People will literally go thirsty’

    In Idna, even the irregular extraction of water by Palestinians was cut short by the Israeli army. “On Sunday, occupation forces raided the area outside Idna where the water line passes, dug the ground, and destroyed all the irregular extensions made by some Palestinians,” Rami Nofal noted. “ As a result, now even water tanks are no longer available. If this continues, in two weeks the crisis will get out of control.” 

    “People in Idna will literally go thirsty,” Nofal stressed.

    Sweiti maintains that irregular extensions to the main line are a problem for Palestinians, not just Israeli settlements. “The water extracted, which is not accounted for, is eventually deducted from Palestinians’ share,” Sweiti says. “But the area where the line passes is located in Area C, where Israel doesn’t allow the Palestinian Authority to have any presence.” 

    This means that the Palestinian Authority has no powers to impose order or maintain water infrastructure for Palestinian communities, Sweiti explains. 

    “Cutting water off from an entire area or city is not a solution,” he says. “The solution is to allow us Palestinians to run our own water supply and have our own water sources.” 

    This post was originally published on The Real News Network.

  • For the second time this week, activists have successfully shut down Sheffield-based arms manufacturer Forged Solutions that supplies parts to genocidal Israel.

    Forged Solutions: activists shut down Sheffield F-35 parts factory

    From 6am on Tuesday 22 July, a Palestine protest group blockaded Sheffield-based arms manufacturer Forged Solutions.

    The Sheffield group Stop Arming Israel halted all traffic heading into the site before the first shift arrived for work at Forged Solutions.

    Protestors stood in front of the entrance to the site holding banners, and a queue of lorries had to turn back:

    Palestine protesters wearing keffiyehs stand in a line across the entrance to Forged Solutions, holding a long banner that reads: Stop arming Israel.

    Predictably, police turned up to the scene and confronted the blockade:

    Palestine protester wearing a keffiyeh on their head stands in front of a police car with multiple police officers stood beside it.

    However, protesters held their ground:

    Stop Arming Israel: UK company’s direct participation in genocide

    The Forged Solutions Group produces parts for the F-35 fighter jets. Israel has used these aircraft in Western-backed war crimes across Palestine, Yemen, Lebanon, and Syria. The company even boasts on its website that it provides parts for “tanks and submarines, to military jets”.

    This is an escalation against the Meadowhall site, after protesters shut the weapons manufacturer down on 16 July. Over 500 people also protested outside it on 17 June – travelling from across the country. The group describes it as a form of “peoples sanctions”. They have joined a series of similar blockades, pickets, and occupations that are regularly shutting down arms factories across the UK.

    A spokesperson for the Stop Arming Israel group stated:

    The Stop Arming Israel group aims not only to target complicity but also direct participation in the genocide in Palestine. Forged Solutions has a long history of supplying parts to companies like Pratt and Whitney and Safran Aero Booster which go on to make engines for fighter jets like the F-35, F-16 and F-15. All of these planes are used by the occupation in its genocide of the Palestinians meaning that Forged Solutions is a participant in the genocide.

    Whilst the British Establishment continues to support the Zionist occupation and criminalise resistance to genocide, Stop Arming Israel stands firmly with the Palestinians by disrupting the supply of weapons and death. Freedom to all oppressed peoples.

    From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free.

    Another protestor explained their involvement in the blockade:

    As Sheffield residents, we are left with no choice but to take matters into our own hands and blockade the Forged Solutions factory. We have lobbied the council and the mayoral authority countless times about the city’s complicity in the ongoing genocide of the Palestinian people. The most effective action we can take is to directly halt the activities of this factory and disrupt the supply chain of weapons being exported to Israel. Forged Solutions can continue to deny their involvement – we will continue our disruption.

    Featured image and additional images supplied

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • As Israel continues its abhorrent genocide unchecked, a legal challenge is being launched against the UK government on behalf of critically ill children from Gaza who require urgent medical attention. It argues that the government has failed to consider the dire situation on the ground in Gaza when turning down calls for the medical evacuation of Palestinians requiring treatment to the UK.

    UK government unconscionably failing critically ill children in Gaza

    The pre-action letter is on behalf of three children, who the legal challenge refers to as child Y, S, and S. It states that the UK government has failed to take reasonable steps to ensure it is sufficiently informed and has taken account of the inadequate treatment options for Gazan children before deciding not to pursue medical evacuations. It argues that privately funded evacuation and medical care in the UK, which is the only existing potential option for critically ill Gazan children, is not realistically available to children Y, S, and S.

    The pre-action letter also lays out that the UK government’s failure to facilitate medical evacuations from Gaza, stands in contrast to its history of facilitating medical evacuations during conflict. This includes steps it has taken in other recent conflicts. It also differs from the approach other countries have taken. For instance, it contrasts significantly from actions the UK government took in March 2022 when it medically evacuated 21 Ukrainian children with cancers for treatment in the UK. This was following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. By comparison, only two people have been medically evacuated from Gaza, and these have been privately funded.

    A number of other countries, including European Union (EU) countries, Ireland, and the US have also facilitated medical evacuations from Gaza. EU countries have collectively facilitated medical evacuations of over 200 patients to date. However, the children and their families say in their legal letter that there remains a desperate need for further evacuations. Children Y, S, and S and their families are asking the UK government to play its part. They are calling for it to reconsider its position on evacuating seriously ill and injured children from Gaza for treatment in the UK.

    Child Y: a two-year-old who could suffer a catastrophic bleed without urgent care in the UK

    The families of the three children say the severe impact of the ongoing siege in Gaza on healthcare systems in the region and the difficulties accessing treatment support their argument that the UK should be medically evacuating them. They are challenging the UK government over its position not to facilitate medical evacuations. They claim the government’s position fails to take into account the inadequacy of the existing treatment options for Gazan children like Y, S, and S.

    Child Y is two-years-old and has what is believed to be a serious condition, called an arteriovenous malformation in his cheek. This is where blood vessels are tangled. It causes daily bleeding and anaemia (a lack of healthy red blood cells). Doctors assessing child Y have advised that he needs a biopsy to accurately diagnose his condition and to start treatment.

    There are concerns that child Y could instead have a tumour. Medical professionals assessing him believe that it could grow and become inoperable if medical evacuation does not take place soon. Child Y’s family and medical professionals have said that he has not been able to access the medical tests and diagnosis, or the treatment he needs in Gaza. They have expressed that as a result, it has not been possible to properly stabilise his condition, which puts him at constant risk of a catastrophic bleed.

    Child S and child S: five-year-old siblings without access to vital medication and treatment

    Child S and child S are five-year-old siblings who have been diagnosed with cystinosis nephropathy – a chronic condition known as leaky kidney that impacts kidney function. The treatment for cystinosis nephropathy requires medication that is currently not available in Gaza and their deteriorating condition means they need more tests to determine what further treatment they require.

    Without access to specific medication and treatment, their parents and medical professionals fear that the siblings’ condition will continue to rapidly deteriorate. Ultimately, it could lead to chronic kidney disease and organ failure. Reports indicate that those in Gaza who suffer from kidney conditions or failure are unable to access suitable, consistent treatment. Dialysis equipment and trained staff were already limited before Israel’s genocide. It has now destroyed or overwhelmed them altogether.

    UK charity Children Not Numbers has been supporting the children. It has been working to facilitate access to medical treatment in Gaza and, where required, the evacuation for children abroad from Gaza.

    Children Not Numbers argues that without medical evacuation, proper diagnosis, and treatment abroad the chances of recovery and survival decreases for the likes of child Y, S, and S as time passes. The organisation has said that 60 of the children it has been supporting have died from otherwise treatable conditions. This was while waiting for medical evacuation from Gaza. On top of this, several others have died very shortly after medical evacuation having waited too long for treatment abroad.

    Palestinian children deserve the universally recognised right of healthcare. Yet the UK government doesn’t think so.

    Carolin Ott and Tessa Gregory of Leigh Day and Raza Husain KC and Eleanor Mitchell of Matrix Chambers are representing Child Y, S, and S.

    Carolin Ott said:

    It is reported that the UK government has explained its failure to facilitate medical evacuations from Gaza on the basis that it supports treatment options in Gaza and the surrounding region and that there are visas available for privately funded medical treatment in the UK. However, these mechanisms are profoundly inadequate to meet the urgent needs of children in Gaza.

    Without the option of evacuation to the UK, many Gazan children – including Y, S and S – will continue to face serious harm and possibly death due to the unavailability of the treatment they desperately need. In the past, UK Governments have rightly recognised that during armed conflict medical evacuations, particularly for children, are sometimes necessary and has facilitated them. In the face of the incredibly desperate situation on the ground in Gaza, our clients feel that the time has come for this UK Government to step up.

    Solicitor in Children Not Numbers’ legal team, Kate Takes, said:

    Children Y, S and S are seriously ill and deteriorating because they’ve been without proper medical treatment for so long. They, like so many children in Gaza, cannot get the treatment they urgently need due to the dismantling and destruction of the healthcare system. Our international and on-the-ground medics work tirelessly to think of ways to provide some form of treatment and stabilise the children we support but, without the necessary resources, expertise, and nutrition there are significant limits to what can be done. In these two cases, our medical teams involved with the children’s treatment and care are extremely worried about their prognosis, which deteriorates every day that they are unable to obtain the treatment they need. Without treatment they will not survive, they need to be evacuated from Gaza urgently. The region is under significant pressure to treat and support the thousands of medical evacuees that have been received since October 7th.

    We believe that all children deserve the universally recognised right of healthcare. Children Y, S and S and so many others urgently require medical treatment, which the UK can provide with its world class paediatric medical facilities. France, Spain, Italy, Greece, Romania, Ireland, Belgium, Germany have all taken sick and injured children from Gaza with treatment and support being provided at government expense. We hope that the previous compassion shown by the UK towards innocent children affected by armed conflicts, most notably those coming from Ukraine, is one that will continue in relation to the humanitarian crisis the children of Gaza are experiencing.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.