Category: Palestine

  • The second annual People’s Conference for Palestine opened Friday afternoon, August 29, bringing together thousands of people of conscience in Detroit, Michigan. “Through this conference, I invite all of you to take part in the rich revolutionary tradition of Detroit,” said Nelson Garay, a member of Detroit’s People’s Assembly, a grassroots coalition fighting back against Trump’s policies. “In one voice, let us declare that we will not stand for the dehumanization of the Palestinian people, and we will not stand for anything less than their true liberation from a genocidal, apartheid state.”

    Taher Dahleh, an organizer with the Palestinian Youth Movement and an activist in the labor movement through his membership in the Communication Workers of America, opened the conference by describing the major milestones in the Palestine solidarity movement since last year.

    The post People’s Conference For Palestine Draws Thousands Against Genocide appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • Pacific Media Watch

    Today, 1 September 2025, is being marked as a Black Monday following the latest deadly strikes by the Israeli army against journalists in the Gaza Strip as part of a worldwide action by the Paris-based global media freedom watchdog Reporters Without Borders and the community politics organisation Avaaz.

    On August 25, one of these strikes targeted a building in the al-Nasser medical complex in central Gaza, a known workplace for reporters, killing five journalists and staff members of local and international media outlets such as Reuters and the Associated Press.

    Two weeks earlier, on the night of August 10, an Israeli strike killed six reporters, including Al Jazeera correspondent Anas al-Sharif, who was the intended target.

    According to RSF data, more than 210 journalists have been killed by the Israeli army in the Gaza Strip in nearly 23 months of Israeli military operations in the Palestinian territory.

    At least 56 of them were intentionally targeted by the Israeli army or killed while doing their job. This ongoing massacre of Palestinian journalists requires a large-scale operation highly visible to the general public.

    With this unprecedented mobilisation planned for today, RSF renews its call for urgent protection for Palestinian media professionals in the Gaza Strip, a demand endorsed by over 200 media outlets and organisations in June.

    Independent access
    The NGO also calls for foreign press to be granted independent access to the Strip, which Israeli authorities have so far denied.

    “The Israeli army killed five journalists in two strikes on Monday, August 25. Just two weeks earlier, it similarly killed six journalists in a single strike,” said Thibaut Bruttin, executive director of RSF.

    “Since 7 October 2023, more than 210 Palestinian journalists have been killed by the Israeli army in the Gaza Strip.

    “We reject this deadly new norm, which week after week brings new crimes against Palestinian journalists that go unpunished. We say it loud and clear: at the rate journalists are being killed in Gaza by the Israeli army, there will soon be no one left to keep you informed.

    “More than 150 media outlets worldwide have joined together for a major operation on Monday, 1 September, at the call of RSF and Avaaz.

    “This campaign calls on world leaders to do their duty: stop the Israeli army from committing these crimes against journalists, resume the evacuation of the journalists who wish to leave Gaza, and ensure the foreign press has independent access to the Palestinian territory.

    More than 150 media outlets in over 50 countries aretaking part in the operation on Monday, 1 September.

    They include numerous daily newspapers and news websites: Mediapart (France), Al Jazeera (Qatar), The Independent (United Kingdom), +972 Magazine (Israel/Palestine), Local Call (Israel/Palestine), InfoLibre (Spain), Forbidden Stories (France), Frankfurter Rundschau (Germany), Der Freitag (Germany), RTVE (Spain), L’Humanité (France), The New Arab (United Kingdom), Daraj (Lebanon), New Bloom (Taiwan), Photon Media (Hong Kong), La Voix du Centre (Cameroon), Guinée Matin (Guinea), The Point (Gambia), L’Orient Le Jour (Lebanon), Media Today (South Korea), N1 (Serbia), KOHA (Kosovo), Public Interest Journalism Lab (Ukraine), Il Dubbio (Italy), Intercept Brasil (Brazil), Agência Pública (Brazil), Le Soir (Belgium), La Libre (Belgium), Le Desk (Morocco), Semanario Brecha (Uruguay), Asia Pacific Report (New Zealand) and many others.

    Pacific Media Watch collaborates with Reporters Without Borders.

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • RNZ News

    New Zealand police say planning is well underway ahead of a pro-Palestinian march that will shut the Auckland Harbour bridge later this month.

    The organisers are expecting thousands to turn out for the “March for Humanity” which is due to be held on September 13.

    Police told RNZ they were working with partner agencies, and expected to inform the public on how the march would impact on them.

    A protester holds up a "March The Bridge" flyer for Gaza
    A protester holds up a “March The Bridge” flyer for Gaza at last Saturday’s rally in Auckland’s Queen Street. Image: APR

    They said they remained in contact with the march organisers.

    The organisers say it will be a follow-on from recent protest marches that walked over the Sydney Harbour Bridge and Brisbane’s Victoria Bridge.

    The organisers say it will be a follow-on from recent protest marches that walked over the Sydney Harbour Bridge and Brisbane’s Victoria Bridge.

    Those events attracted 50,000 to 300,000 protesters.

    The Auckland march is being organised by Aotearoa for Palestine, a coalition of Palestinians and tangata whenua. They want the government to sanction Israel for what they say is a genocide being carried out in Gaza.

    This article is republished under a community partnership agreement with RNZ.

    Auckland harbour bridge at sunset
    Auckland Harbour Bridge . . . following on from recent protest marches that walked over the Sydney Harbour Bridge and Brisbane’s Victoria Bridge in Australia. Image: RNZ/Tom Kitchin

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • COMMENTARY: By Walden Bello

    I am alarmed by reports that Filipino journalists were flown in by the Israeli government to participate in what is essentially a whitewashing campaign for the ongoing genocide in Gaza.

    At least two articles, atrocious excuses for journalism, have come out of this trip.One is a piece by Wilson Lee Flores for The Philippine Star, entitled “Israel beyond the headlines: Where ancient stones speak.

    By attempting to divert attention from the massacre of Palestinian civilians to “the Old City’s labyrinthine alleys,” Flores acts as an apologist for war crimes, akin to writing a travel blog about Nazi Germany.

    In a Facebook post, Flores further parrots Israel’s propaganda by highlighting how the brutal IDF employs both men and women to carry out atrocities, a cynical weaponisation of “feminism.”

    Even more repulsive is the piece from the Daily Tribune about “Gaza’s Fake Famine” from Vernon Velasco. It is a parody of a story, overly simplifying the famine of Gaza to a matter of food truck logistics, and uncritically quoting an IDF Officer.

    Fittingly, the article contains three photos of shipping containers but not a single photo of a human being.

    This runs counter to facts laid out by UN officials, including Joyce Msuya, the UN’s Assistant Secretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs, who points out how half a million people face “starvation, destitution, and death”.

    ‘Moral failure’ over Gaza
    A study published in the prestigious medical journal Lancet points to the “moral failure” as 1-2 million people live in the most extreme food insecurity level (phase 5 or catastrophe famine) according to the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC).

    "By attempting to divert attention from the massacre of Palestinian civilians to 'the Old City’s labyrinthine alleys,' Flores acts as an apologist for war crimes"
    “By attempting to divert attention from the massacre of Palestinian civilians to ‘the Old City’s labyrinthine alleys,’ Flores acts as an apologist for war crimes, akin to writing a travel blog about Nazi Germany.” Image: TPS “Life” screenshot APR

    This famine unfolds as shameless journalists make food vlogs kilometres away.

    The facts are clear. At least 63,000 people have been killed and 150,000 injured, with women and children making up a significant portion of the casualties. The UN has also reported that nearly 90 percent of Gaza’s population (around 1.9 million people) has been displaced.

    Widespread destruction has left over 70 percent of Gaza’s infrastructure destroyed, including more than 94 percent of hospitals either damaged or destroyed. No amount of narrative spin or “complexity” can sanitise this genocide.

    As we celebrate National Press Freedom Day, I implore friends in the press to not fall for the lies of the murderous Zionist regime.

    It would be tragic for journalists to provide cover for a regime that has murdered at least 240 of their peers.

    Filipino journalists must shed the unhealthy culture of silence and non-intervention, and not hesitate to criticise errant colleagues.

    They must make it clear that these recipients of Zionist gold are a disgrace to Philippine journalism. The Philippine government must look into the activities of the Israeli Embassy and their manipulation of local media narratives to sanitise their genocide.

    Filipino journalists must stand in solidarity with their slain colleagues abroad, not with their killers.

    Walden Bello is a Filipino academic and analyst of Global South issues who was awarded Amnesty International Philippines’ Most Distinguished Defender of Human Rights Award in 2023. He has also served as a member of the House of Representatives of the Philippines.

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • In an unprecedented move, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio on 29 August revoked visas for Palestinian Authority (PA) leaders scheduled to attend the UN General Assembly in New York in September.

    The State Department justified the move by citing PA payments to the families of Palestinian martyrs, President Mahmoud Abbas’ plan to use a “constitutional declaration” to declare an independent Palestinian state at the General Assembly meeting, and Palestinian efforts to hold Israel accountable for war crimes in international courts.

    “The Palestinian Authority must also cease its attempts to circumvent the negotiations through international legal campaigns, including appeals to the International Criminal Court and the International Court of Justice, and efforts to secure unilateral recognition of a possible Palestinian state,” the State Department said in a statement.

    The post Washington Blocks Palestinian Leaders From Attending UN General Assembly appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • A new semester is beginning at the City University of New York (CUNY) with the fight against repression and for Palestine at the center. While we are facing intense crackdowns, including the firing of four faculty members over their pro-Palestine activism and the suspension of at least one student, there is also a movement fighting back. Amid these attacks, we’ve also had victories — most recently, a court decision forcing CUNY to disclose its investments in Israel. 

    As Israel escalates its genocidal campaign in Gaza, including a famine, with full support from the U.S. government, CUNY has targeted faculty who speak out against it. This comes as President Trump intensifies his attacks on immigrants, mobilizes the National Guard in major cities, and escalates a broader assault on democratic rights. 

    The post CUNY Classes Begin With Divestment Win appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • On Friday 29 August 2025 Jewish Artists for Palestine disrupted the Melbourne Symphony Orchestra at the BBC Proms, silencing the orchestra, forcing the performance to restart and bringing the live broadcast on BBC Radio 3 to a halt. With this action we’ve sent a clear message: we reject Zionist funding, censorship and complicity in our cultural institutions. We also call out the BBC for their ongoing complicity and inability to acknowledge the genocide.

    As Jewish artists and cultural practitioners we are calling out and disrupting the BBC, Royal Albert Hall and Melbourne Symphony Orchestra’s complicity. We call upon all cultural workers to rise up in their own institutions, against Israel’s continued apartheid, genocide and ethnic cleansing in Palestine.

    The post Jewish Artists For Palestine Disrupt BBC Proms appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • As the United Nations’ world food crisis authority finally declared a famine in Gaza, direct action demonstrators protested war profiteer Microsoft, whose technology is used to aid the U.S./Israeli war, which is committing genocide in Gaza.

    After months of protests in Seattle, on Aug. 20 and 21 worker-led activists took the struggle to Microsoft’s vast campus in Redmond, Washington, where No Azure for Apartheid and Bilyad Seattle exposed Microsoft’s complicity.

    On Aug. 20, around 35 current and former Microsoft workers and solidarity activists set up a protest encampment on the East Campus Plaza of Microsoft. They claimed it as the Martyred Palestinian Children’s Plaza. They left when Microsoft asked them to leave, but returned the next day and declared their occupation is not going anywhere!

    The post Workers’ Intifada Against Microsoft appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.


  • Bahri or National Shipping Company of Saudi Arabia is a giant maritime company in the Middle East. But, behind this commercial image, there is a provocative and worrying history of its geopolitical process, especially the means of transporting weapons and the manner in which Saudi Arabia participates in the geo conflict such as in Yemen and Gaza.. Since 2015, Saudi Arabia has been a major component of the Saudi-led coalition in Yemen, which also comprises the UAE, Bahrain, Egypt, Sudan, Jordan, Morocco and Kuwait. This military effort by this coalition has caused high civilian fatality, dislocation of millions of people and in humanitarian terms is one of the worst disasters in the world, as reported by the United Nations. This article will attempt to create an enlightened balanced discussion of these controversies as it gives some background and insight to a novice reader yet with the professional and analytical style.

    Bahri Saudi Shipping Company

    Bahri, which is a national shipping company of the Saudi Arabia, engages mostly in international marine logistics as well as the transport of crude oil, chemicals and bulk products and general merchandise. It also has big ships in oil products, dry bulk and specialised transportation. In an area of the world where maritime trade is one of the most essential veins, strategically based in the Red Sea and other trade gateways, the location of Bahri activities puts it in the realm of intersections between regional and international political dynamics, and as such, extends its operational being beyond commerce.

    Weapons Transport to Israel Amid Gaza Genocide

    In August 2025, the Saudi-owned Bahri Yanbu was at the centre of an international outcry after dockworkers in the port of Genoa, Italy, intercepted the ship after suspicions rose that it was carrying a heavy load of weapons bound to Israel. Independent observers and humanitarian organisations reported that among the cargo were Italian produced armed materials like Oto Melara naval guns, armoured vehicles, tanks, ammunition and explosives. The interception came at a time when Israel was actually undertaking heavy handed military actions in Gaza which are generally regarded as genocidal in character. A moral stance on becoming participants in the further crime in Gaza was one of the factors that drove the dockworkers into a blockade.

    The consequences of this happening are huge. It brought into the spotlight the secret dealings-or at least acquiescence by Saudi Arabia to supply Israeli war machine despite the fact that Saudi Arabia holds official stands in favour of the Palestinian cause. According to critics, these moves are not only defied to the international humanitarian law, but go further to normalise and entrench the military and economic relations between both nations (Saudi Arabia and Israel). This change belongs to the larger scheme of things in Middle East where traditional enmity towards Iran and strategic interests have muted the old Saudi public opinion on the Palestine case in a silent bid of geopolitical balance.

    However, Bahri made a formal refusal to have any relations with supply of arms to Israel. The company made outright claims that it has never ever travelled to Israel in any form and fully complies with the formal policies of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia in supporting Palestine and the entire international maritime laws. Bahri highlighted that it has strict monitoring and auditing practices that are aimed at striving to comply. Nonetheless, despite the rebuttals, the incident in Genoa has initiated combined efforts to conduct independent operations and exert more investigation to the maritime affairs of Saudi Arabia, which exemplified a cloudy backdrop of the policy regarding Saudi Arabia compared to its ethical statements.

    Yemen’s Conflict and Arms Supply

    Probably the most sinister one in the recent history of Saudi Arabia foreign policy is the invasion of Yemen that the Saudi Arabia government has been carrying out since 2015. Saudi Arabia is at the forefront of a coalition that has been involved in large volume airstrike campaigns, naval blockade and ground offensives against the Houthi rebels, who have forced the internationally recognised Yemeni government out of big sections of their country. The ongoing conflict in Yemen is viewed by many observes, including the analysts in Al Jazeera and other local media stations as a kind of proxy warring between the majority-Sunni Saudi Arabia and the majority Shia Iran with the two nations, most times, supporting conflicting sides on the ground. Saudi Arabia also supports the Yemeni government of President Abdrabbuh Mansur Hadi that had been recognised by the UN Security Council resolutions in Resolution 2216 (2015).

    The maritime activities of Bahri are once more in the limelight as it transports weapons and military equipment to Saudi forces that partake in Yemen. Research carried out by anti-war movements and human rights groups in Europe found out that the Bahri ships are regularly transporting arms to Saudi Arabia including ammunition, explosives and heavy arms through European ports like Antwerp. The CSO estimates by Amnesty international reveal that since the commencement of the war, Bahri has delivered hundreds of millions of euros of American and European, military equipment.

    This weapon provision has been closely associated with a high number of the war crime charges charged against Saudi-led coalition such as civilian target attack and starvation weapons used in blocking of the sea by the coalition. The condition in Yemen is termed the worst humanitarian crisis in the world since more than 24 million people approximately 80 percent of the total population are in need of aid and millions have been starved, stricken by diseases, displaced, and basic services are becoming non-functional due to continuous conflict as stated by the United Nations and various humanitarian agencies. The importance of Bahri in this war as a logistic lifeline highlights the corporate aspects of this Saudi war machine and the intense intertwining of the business interests with devastating geopolitics.

    Geopolitical Agenda

    To appreciate the role of Bahri Saudi Shipping Company in such conflicts, it is important to understand Saudi geopolitical agenda in general. Saudi Arabia is a traditional foe of the occupation policies of Israel but over the past ten years is slowly moving towards an avoidance of confrontation with Israel over mutual fears of allowing Iran to consolidate its influence in the region. In the past, Saudi Arabia has opposed the occupation policies of Israel, but over the last ten years there has been growing signs of it engaging in limited relations with Israel due to a shared worry of Iran and its growing role in the region, especially in Syria, Lebanon, and Yemen (Israel-Saudi Arabia relations).

    According to the reports this rapprochement has involved activities such as secret intelligence-sharing at least on the issue of Iranian missile programs, discreet delegations meeting each other in the third nations and initial discussions of prospective technology and trade association. In the example, Wall Street Journal (2025) and Congress.Gov (2025) cover the cases when Israeli and Saudi officials met to align security policies against Iran.

    At the same time, Saudi Arabia still tends to regard Yemen as the essential buffer area that must be maintained to ensure access to the important strategic waterways, such as the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, which is essential to overall oil traffic and vital to the regional security. The kingdom views the Houthi movement as a proxy of Iranian policy and a serious direct threat to its southern borders, which influenced the long and violent military operation that is criticised by the international community and labeled as war crimes.

    The fact that Saudi Arabia publicly defends Palestinian rights and at the same simultaneously advances its strategic relations with the state of Israel and intensifies its military operations in Yemen presents a complex, at times self-contradictory policy based on the logic of realpolitik, the calculations of regional power interests, and the unification of the domestic and foreign policy of the Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman.

    Conclusion

    The controversies surrounding Bahri Saudi Shipping Company reveal much more than a logistics enterprise; they expose a nexus of geopolitical interests, ethical dilemmas, and the harsh realities of Middle Eastern conflicts. The ship interception in Genoa spotlighted Bahri’s alleged role in facilitating arms shipments during an ongoing genocide in Gaza, while its broader operations underpin Saudi Arabia’s war efforts in Yemen, exacerbating one of the world’s worst humanitarian disasters.

    While the company officially denies transporting weapons to Israel and asserts full compliance with policies and international law, evidence from protests, investigations, and independent reports portrays a different picture—one of a state and its corporate instruments engaged in complex and controversial power plays with severe human costs.

    For novice readers, it is essential to recognise that Bahri operates at the intersection of commerce and conflict, reflecting Saudi Arabia’s evolving and contentious role on the world stage. The ongoing scrutiny of these activities underscores the urgent need for transparency, accountability, and adherence to international humanitarian norms in international shipping—and for the global community to hold such actors to those standards.

    The post Bahri’s Dark Geopolitical Ties first appeared on Dissident Voice.

    This post was originally published on Dissident Voice.

  • The Palestine Chronicle is not a militant organization. It is a modest, independent publication, sustained by small donations and animated by a singular mission: to bear witness. It tells the untold stories of Palestine, documenting dispossession, resistance and the endurance of a people condemned to silence.

    In a media landscape dominated by powerful conglomerates repeating the language of governments, the Chronicle insists on a journalism of proximity — grounded in daily lives, in the rubble of Gaza, in voices otherwise erased. Its true offense, in the eyes of its detractors, is not invention but truth.

    At the heart of this endeavor stands Ramzy Baroud. His career is the antithesis of clandestine.

    The post The Attack On Palestine Chronicle appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • The U.S. State Department announced on Friday that it is “denying and revoking visas” for Palestinian officials ahead of the UN General Assembly meeting in New York City next month, where several states are expected to recognize a Palestinian state. In a statement, Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s office said that it is denying visas to members of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO)…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • As Israel pushes deeper into Gaza City, President Donald Trump met Wednesday to discuss plans for a postwar Gaza with his son-in-law and former Middle East envoy, Jared Kushner, and former British Prime Minister Tony Blair. This comes as Israeli business leaders are reportedly involved in developing a postwar Gaza plan that includes the creation of a “Trump Riviera” and a manufacturing zone named…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • Israel announced on Friday that it has begun the “initial stages” of its siege on Gaza City, declaring the capital city a “dangerous combat zone” and ending its daytime pauses for the supposed purpose of allowing the passage of humanitarian aid, despite a famine declaration across the area last week. “We have begun the preliminary operations and the first stages of the attack on Gaza City…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • Sheik Saeed Al-Amour, 61, is a community leader, and a prominent land rights activist. On August 28, Israeli colonial settlers, all illegal under international law, stormed onto his land near his home in the village of Al-Rakeez, Masafer Yatta, in the Southern occupied West Bank.

    They released sheep onto it to destroy his olive trees. Video footage taken at the time, show the settlers brutally pushing Saeed, who is disabled, to the ground:

    According to Saeed’s son, Issa Al-Amour, who we spoke with yesterday, the family suffers from almost daily attacks on their land.

    He said:

    Today, at seven in the morning, a settler came with sheep and brought them into our land and assaulted my father. We called the police but, unfortunately, the settler claimed that my father had beaten him, and the police took my father into investigation. The settler is called Amichai, and is the owner of the sheep, but he usually brings children to bring the sheep onto Palestinian lands.

    Saeed was released this afternoon, after being made to pay a fine of 1,500 Shekels – equivalent to more than £330, even though it was him who was attacked, and he has official papers and documentation proving he is the owner of the land.

    Israeli settlers running amok

    In April, a settler shot Saeed at close range, and because of the delay caused by the occupation’s soldiers preventing the ambulance from reaching him, and also the severity of the injury, doctors ended up amputating his leg- while he was handcuffed to the hospital bed, according to Al Jazeera.

    Saeed and his son ended up in court, blamed with attacking the settlers, and had to pay bail money- this time the equivalent of more than £1100- while the violent settler walked free.

    These settlers, who carry out systematic assaults on Palestinian farmers, civilians and peace activists, and terror attacks on Palestinian towns and villages, are heavily funded and supported by the occupation’s regime, and their actions are intended not only to intimidate, but to erase Palestinian history and culture, while also destroying livelihoods, and ethnically cleansing the territory.

    These intentions have been made loud and clear with Netanyahu, earlier this month, telling Israeli i24NEWS channel that he feels “very much” connected to the “Greater Israel” vision. This encompasses the occupied Palestinian territories, plus significant parts of Egypt, Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, Iraq and Saudi Arabia.

    Uprooting trees

    For decades, settlers have uprooted, burned, and destroyed Palestinian trees, especially olives, many of which are hundreds of years old. A report by the Applied Research Institute of Jerusalem states that in 2024 there were more than 150 attacks destroying trees in the occupied West Bank, resulting in the uprooting of more than 21,000, mainly olive trees.

    It is now often impossible to tell the difference between settlers and soldiers, who are all armed, often wear the same clothing, and not only provoke the Palestinian population, but also participate in the attacks on them.

    The occupation permits these settlers, who are all illegal under international law, to live in illegal settlements and outposts on land belonging to Palestinians, in the West Bank. They can be from any country in the world, the only stipulation being they must be Jewish.

    The attacks continue unabated. Saeed again ended up hospitalised, when settlers assaulted him earlier this month. They broke his crutch during the attack, which occurred when they released livestock onto his land. But Saeed and his family are determined to defend their home.

    ‘We’re afraid’

    Issa says:

    Of course we are afraid, because the settlers are armed but we will not leave. We will stay here on our land, until our last breath.

    In July 2024, the International Court of Justice declared Israel’s presence in the occupied Palestinian territory as illegal, leading human rights experts to say this reaffirmed that ‘freedom from foreign military occupation, racial segregation and apartheid is absolutely non-negotiable”.

    For more information about the everyday struggles faced by Saeed, watch Channel 4’s interesting short film about him.

    By Charlie Jaay

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • In a special session of the UN Security Council, the 15 members, with the exception of the United States, called for an immediate end to the worsening famine in the Gaza Strip, a halt to the war, and a reversal of Israel’s plan to expand its military operations within the Strip.

    UN: deep concern over Israel’s actions in Gaza

    In a joint statement issued on Wednesday evening, 14 countries expressed “deep concern” about the humanitarian situation, stressing that the famine officially declared by the United Nations in the Gaza Strip is not a natural disaster but a “man-made crisis.” The countries condemned “the use of starvation as a weapon of war,” considering it a clear violation of international humanitarian law.

    The statement stressed the need for an immediate, permanent, and unconditional ceasefire, the release of all prisoners, and the urgent flow of humanitarian aid. It also called on Israel to lift all restrictions on the entry of aid and to reverse its military decision to take control of Gaza City.

    In contrast, the United States was the only country that refused to join the statement, with its ambassador to the United Nations, Dorothy Shea, rejecting what she described as “the lie of starvation policy” and criticizing the UN-backed Integrated Food Security Phase Classification report, claiming that it “failed the test.”

    Last Friday, the UN report confirmed that famine has become a reality in the Gaza Strip, affecting more than half a million people, with warnings that it could spread to Deir al-Balah and Khan Yunis in the coming weeks.

    A war of extermination

    This comes as the Israeli army continues a large-scale military operation to occupy Gaza City, concentrated in the neighborhoods of Shuja’iyya, Al-Zaytoun, and Al-Sabra in the south and east, and in the Jabalia camp in the north, causing new waves of displacement and migration.

    Since October 2023, Israel has been waging a war of extermination against the people of Gaza with US support, including killing, starvation, destruction, and forced displacement, ignoring international appeals and orders from the International Court of Justice to stop the war. As of Wednesday, this war has resulted in 62,895 martyrs and 158,927 wounded, most of them women and children, in addition to 9,000 missing and hundreds of thousands displaced, while starvation alone has claimed the lives of 313 Palestinians, including 119 children.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Alaa Shamali

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Former United States secretary and Biden advisor, Jacob Lew, has stumbled into a series of embarrassing admissions in an interview with The New Yorker. Veteran journalist Isaac Chotiner had questions for Lew about the Biden administration’s handling of Israel in the early days of the genocide. Chotiner pressed Lew on America’s relationship to Israel’s internal demands for ethnic cleansing:

    This is a war that a former defense minister to Netanyahu has referred to as ethnic cleansing. Whether you agree with this characterization or not, there is a certain point at which the U.S. could choose to stop helping Israel.

    Lew describes how the US government at the time advised on not only Israel’s humanitarian obligations as the occupying power, but on their conduct:

    We were engaging not just on humanitarian assistance; we were engaging on the conduct of the war. I’m not saying that everything went the way we would’ve advised, and I’m not saying we didn’t call them in the middle of the night many times saying, What on earth happened just now?
    So, which is it? Did the US exert its influence over Israel over its conduct on war, or not?

    Biden’s abandonment of Palestinians

    When asked what was the content of those late night calls, Lew describes:

    The general pattern was that in-the-moment stories were inaccurate, and that the Israeli military and government establishment were not in a position to fully explain yet. We could almost never get answers that explained what happened before the story was fully framed in international media, and then when the facts were fully developed, it turned out that the casualties were much lower, the number of civilians was much lower, and, in many cases, the children were children of Hamas fighters, not children taking cover in places.
    Here, Lew appears to not realise what he has just said. Namely, that he considers it acceptable for children to be killed if they are “children of Hamas fighters.” Chotiner immediately pulls him up on it:
    Sorry, what did you just say?
    In many cases, the original number of casualties—
    No, I meant the thing about who the children were.
    They were often the children of the fighters themselves.
    And therefore what follows from that?
    What follows is that whether or not it was a legitimate military target flows from the population that’s there.
    Hold on, Mr. Secretary. That’s not, in fact, correct, right? Whether it’s a legitimate target has to do with all kinds of things like proportionality. It doesn’t matter if the kids are the kids of—
    Lew, remarkably, doubles down:
    If you’re the commander of a Hamas unit and you bring your family to a military site, that’s different. I’m not saying everything fits into that, and I’m not saying it’s not a tragedy.
    So, according to Biden’s former advisor, it’s not ideal that children are killed. But, it is certainly understandable if they’re the children of Hamas members. Chotiner, again, points out that it doesn’t make a difference who the children are when it comes to international law. However, Lew is adamant that this is the reality of the situation.
    That one interaction reveals much about the strategic decisions America takes in its undying support of Israel. There is no situation in which America will oppose Israeli interests. It’s been made heartbreakingly irrelevant by this point, but international law technically forbids the killing and maiming of children during any conflict. Apparently, the exception to that if US strategists believe it’s justified.

    ‘Blood-soaked demon’

    Online commenters saw Lew’s characterisation for what it was:

    Writer Pete Forester showed just how cruel and asinine Lew’s remarks were:

    And, writer Tariq Kenney-Shawa pointed out that just because Israel claim someone is in Hamas doesn’t mean they are:

    Israel have routinely claimed everyone from children, aid seekers, and basically anyone they want to (or have) bombed are Hamas. That includes the “Hamas camera” which apparently was the reason they bombed a hospital just days ago. When combined with the fact that Israel’s own data reveals that a sickening 83% of the people they’ve killed are civilians, Israel’s assertions that Hamas is everywhere is as compelling as international law.

    Denial of manufactured famine

    Chotiner begins the interview by referencing an article Lew wrote along with former US ambassador to Turkey, David Satterfield. In the piece, the two argue that the Biden administration effectively held off famine in Gaza. Instead, it laid the blame for the current famine squarely at Trump’s feet. Chotiner pushes Lew to elaborate on what the Biden administration did differently to the Trump administration in relation to American consultancy with Israel on humanitarian requirements.

    Lew responds:

    And every time there were reports of famine that were not accurate, it made it harder to do the job of getting more aid in. We were trying to make the critique in a balanced way to keep pressure on Hamas—and to not abandon Israel’s just effort to defeat an enemy that attacked it on October 7th, killing twelve hundred people—while still saying that you have an obligation every day, even if it’s at some risk, to keep the aid crossings open to Gaza. It was arduous work.
    The risk of strengthening Hamas, if Hamas got hold of the fuel or the food, was a serious question. It wasn’t a made-up concern
    Again, the spectre of Hamas rears its head as a boogeyman and scapegoat for the moral failings of the US and Israel. Lew’s remarks suggest that the possibility of Hamas potentially gaining access to aid made the very real threat of starvation an acceptable outcome for civilians.
    Chotiner pushes Lew to admit that the Biden administration’s policy was to support Israel in allowing enough trickles of aid through so as to avoid all-out famine, but no more. Lew states:
    I think the reports of famine were premature and exaggerated.
    Chotiner points out that people were still starving to death in 2024. And, Lew’s remarks are even more galling in light of Lew’s dismissal of reports of famine given that, as journalist Brian Tashman alleges, Lew:
    threatened the group that issued the famine alert last year until they withdrew their famine alert.
    Chotiner pushes Lew on the assertion that the US government directed its efforts towards allowing Benjamin Netanyahu remain in power. Their next exchange reads:
    So when you say that, “Allowing Netanyahu to cite a need to satisfy U.S. demands was crucial then—and remains crucial today,” what do you mean? Netanyahu doesn’t want to piss off the super far-right ministers in his government by having it seem that Israel is delivering aid. So you’re saying that allowing Netanyahu to cite the need to satisfy U.S. demands is crucial to him remaining in power, correct?
    You’re putting words in my mouth. I’m not going to let that happen. What I’m saying is in order to get a decision through his Cabinet, he needed to be armed with positions that he was able and willing to use. And what we would say is, “We need you to do this, and if that is a strategic concern then you do what we need.” I understand that you can see that as political cover, but it’s political cover to get a policy enacted, not to preserve a coalition. Our goal was to get aid in, and we were trying to help drive the decision-making process in a constructive way. I think that’s very different from taking political sides in a domestic context in another country.
    It appears to be lost on Lew that his description of a US consideration of Netanyahu’s position amongst his far-right cabinets is “political cover” to preserve an Israeli government propped up by the US itself.

    Israeli interests above all

    Lew’s quibbling of which administration is responsible for the Israeli manufactured genocide in Gaza, once again, reveals much about America’s relationship with Israel. Lew’s account of his role as a high level advisor to Biden confirms what we have known for some time about America’s role in Israel’s genocide in Palestine. Rather than urging Israel to follow its humanitarian obligations, or to stop the relentless bombing and increasing list of war crimes, they leveraged their considerable sway over Israel not to save Palestinian lives, but to preserve Israel’s global standing and obliteration of Palestine.
    America have been, and continue to be the shield that protects Israel as they terrorise Palestine. As much as Lew may wish to pretend otherwise, there is no significant break in policy or position when it comes to Israel between the Biden and Trump administrations.
    Featured image via the Canary

    By Maryam Jameela

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • On Wednesday, the United Nations (UN) Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People called for urgent international action to end the worsening Israeli-caused famine in the Gaza Strip, considering that what is happening is not the result of a natural disaster but a systematic policy practiced by Israel against more than two million besieged people.

    In a statement published on its website, the committee said that more than half a million people are facing starvation and death in Gaza, noting that the humanitarian situation is deteriorating day by day as the near-total destruction caused by bombing and suffocating siege spreads.

    The committee strongly condemned what it described as a policy of “starvation as a weapon of war,” stressing that it constitutes a flagrant violation of international law and calling on states to fulfill their legal obligations and take immediate action to stop this catastrophe. It also stressed the need for an immediate and permanent ceasefire, ensuring unimpeded access for humanitarian aid to all areas of the Strip, and holding those responsible for obstructing relief efforts and targeting civilians accountable.

    Warnings in the UN Security Council

    The same concerns were echoed at a UN Security Council meeting on the situation in the Middle East, where Ramez Al-Akbarov, Deputy UN Coordinator for the Peace Process, and Joyce Musoya, Assistant Secretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs, expressed “grave concern” about the spreading famine and humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza.

    Al-Akbarov said that the sector was “sinking deeper and deeper into a catastrophic situation” with rising civilian casualties, mass displacement, and severe hunger. He explained that the results of the latest food security analyses confirmed that a famine was indeed underway, while Israel’s decision to take complete control of Gaza on August 8 had led to “another deadly escalation” against the population.

    The UN official noted that Israeli shelling is now targeting tents for displaced persons, schools, hospitals, and residential buildings, compounding the suffering of civilians who cannot find shelter or safe food.

    For her part, Masuya warned that more than 500,000 people are currently facing severe hunger, destitution, and death, with the number expected to exceed 640,000 by the end of September if the situation continues as it is. She added:

    This famine is not the result of drought or natural disaster, but a catastrophe created by a bloody conflict that has left thousands dead and wounded and caused widespread destruction and mass displacement.

    Tight siege and deliberate starvation

    Since 2 March, Israel has closed all Gaza crossings and allowed only a very small number of trucks loaded with aid to enter, which the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) has described as a dangerous acceleration in the pace of famine.

    According to the UN committee, what Gaza is experiencing today is a “man-made disaster” that will only end with a political decision to end the siege and bombing and restore civilians’ right to life and dignity.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Alaa Shamali

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Shut The System (STS) activists smashed windows and sprayed blood-red paint at the offices of the right-wing think-tank, Policy Exchange, on Old Queen Street in Westminster on Friday 29 August.

    Policy Exchange: activists stick it to right-wing think tank

    The activists oppose Policy Exchange’s advocacy for increasingly authoritarian restrictions on human rights such as the right to free speech and the right to assemble. These include new laws to clamp down on legitimate climate protest and the proscription of Palestine Action. The direct action organisation has no convictions for violent offences.

    Policy Exchange's building sprayed with red paint.

    A spokesperson from the Palestine faction of STS said:

    Policy Exchange’s malign influence suppressing effective protest is unsurprising considering the reported $30k donation to Policy Exchange by ExxonMobil. We have targeted Policy Exchange today not in response to any particular action, but in recognition of the role they have played in making the UK the less tolerant, more unequal, increasingly authoritarian and poorly governed nation it is today.

    Policy Exchange has advocated for and assisted the government to draft legislation. In particular, it has influenced elements seeking to restrict the effectiveness of climate-related protest, as revealed by Rishi Sunak while serving as prime minister.

    The STS spokesperson continued:

    Policy Exchange’s corrupt entanglement with governments and elites directly suppresses the proud tradition that champions women’s suffrage, the end to apartheid in South Africa, toppled the injust Poll Tax and held the government accountable for prosecuting illegal wars.

    Anti-protest law à la Policy Exchange

    Policy Exchange lobbied for additional anti-protest laws in the Public Order Act 2023. These created new offences enabling easier prosecution for protest tactics such as locking-on, tunnelling, and even peaceful protest marches.

    In the Public Order Act, former home secretary Suella Braverman attempted to introduce a vague definition of ‘serious disruption’ as anything that is “more than minor”. When parliament blocked this attempt, the home secretary used obscure powers to introduce this definition by the back door. The Divisional Court subsequently found this unconstitutional, in a case brought by Liberty.

    The STS spokesperson explained:

    The authoritarian agenda advocated by Policy Exchange and its attempt to equate protest with extremism has emboldened multiple governments to adopt policies which would have been unthinkable in the UK only a decade ago, not least labelling Palestine Action as terrorists. Protest and direct action are not extremist activities, they are an essential aspect of any functioning democracy.

    The action contributes to an escalating ‘summer of sabotage’ that Shut The System on Monday declared on 18 August. To launch it, activists cut electric cables and communications at offices of JP Morgan Chase, Barclays, and Allianz, three of the world’s worst financial backers of fossil fuel expansion and arms Israel is using in the genocide in Gaza. Activists took further action at a Barclay’s branch in Oxford, smashing windows.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Mainstream media has been abuzz with the news of five “Hollywood luminaries” throwing their support behind the upcoming film The Voice of Hind Rajab.

    Brad Pitt, Rooney Mara, Joaquin Phoenix, Alfonso Cuarón, and Jonathan Glazer have joined the film as executive producers after previewing a cut of the film ahead of its Venice Film Festival premiere.

    As the Canary’s Alaa Shamali highlighted:

    The Voice of Hind Rajab is based on real audio recordings of Hind, as she cried for help, saying she was trapped among the bodies of her relatives inside a car in the Tel al-Hawa neighborhood of Gaza, before the call was cut off and she was later found dead. This tragic moment, which reverberated around the world as a symbol of humanity’s failure, has been transformed into a 90-minute fictional drama that combines documentary and art, raising questions of memory and justice.

    On the face of it then, it seems like a positive thing that Hollywood stars are amplifying Palestinian stories. However, it shouldn’t have taken the Israeli occupation forces firing 355 bullets at a six-year-old to do it. Nor should it come 22 months into a genocide in which Israel has massacred at least 63,000, including 19,000 children, and wounded over 150,000 more Palestinians. It’s a disgrace that Palestinian filmmakers and artists are not being listened to on their own merits. Hollywood have not only dragged their heels on calling out the genocide, but have also silenced the voices and experiences of Palestinians.

    The Voice of Hind Rajab: celebrity reputation opportunism

    It’s only fair to start by underlining that it’s not the first time some of these celebs have spoken out.

    For example, Glazer was the sole exception to a 2024 Oscars that saw otherwise damning silence. In a speech, he decried the instrumentalisation of Jewishness and the Holocaust in justification of Israel’s genocide. It’s worth noting however that Glazer’s spiel was at best, a tentative criticism since it preposterously equated Israel’s brutal genocidal onslaught in Gaza and the murder of more than 50,000 Palestinians, to 7 October.

    Meanwhile, Phoenix was among the early names calling on then US president Biden to demand a ceasefire in 2023. He also signed a letter in support of Glazer’s Oscars speech alongside 450+ other celebrities. In May, he followed this up by backing another letter condemning the film industry for its silence on Gaza. Recently, he also went on American podcaster Theo Von’s show and lambasted the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) and Israel’s engineered famine:

    @aljazeeraenglish

    Academy award-winning actor, Joaquin Phoenix calls #Gaza situation “horrible” and questions the use of aid distribution methods over established channels. #news

    ♬ original sound – Al Jazeera English – Al Jazeera English

    Mara also signed the letter to Biden, and the recent one in May, the latter alongside Cuarón.

    However, plenty on X felt the move reeked of PR opportunism:

    And to a large extent, it’s hard not to agree. Because let’s be real, a handful of open letters, while welcome, is not what genuine solidarity looks like. Have they thrown their collective billions behind the vital mutual aid efforts – like the Sameer Project – feeding Gaza? Perhaps they have, but it’d be a shock that any celeb hasn’t taken the opportunity to paraded their philanthropy en masse. Have they turned out to protests or taken direct action? Not that I’ve seen – or can find – either.

    And, these individuals aren’t even the story. The real story here is that Hollywood is using censorship and silencing to manufacture consent for Israel’s genocide in Palestine. Middle East Eye’s William Johnson wrote:

    Free speech once meant everything to the US arts and entertainment industries.

    But since Israel declared war on Gaza, artists, actors and production staff have alleged that there is a concerted campaign by industry executives to silence solidarity with beleaguered Palestinians.

    Dozens of workers at every level of the arts and entertainment world: from actors and dancers to carpenters, set dressers, animators, composers and screenwriters have told Middle East Eye that they have been punished for speaking out on Israel’s war on Gaza which has claimed more than 57,700 lives since October 2023.

    The film industry has a problem. It is all too willing to prop up genocidal Israel and to silence Palestinians. Those in the most powerful positions of this industry have their role to play in this genocide. A few famous producers attaching themselves to a film about Hind Rajab, making themselves the story, is like using a thimble to save a drowning boat.

    Hollywood: agitprop for the military industrial complex

    Fundamentally, Hollywood complicity in warmongering is as American as apple pie. From it’s very inception, the industry has been pumping out ceaseless soft propaganda for the genocidal war criminals. As I previously wrote:

    Hollywood is – and always has been – a vehicle of US imperial hegemony. Films operate as a mechanism of US propaganda for its militaristic colonial expansionism across the globe.

    It was only the start of this year that film mega-franchise Marvel put out its propagandistic new Captain America film. This hitched US imperial supremacy to Israel through the introduction of superhero Sabra – in essence, a personification of Israel’s apartheid regime. This was in spite of, and amid, the settler state’s continuing genocide in Gaza.

    The Pentagon’s entanglement with Marvel and Hollywood studios more broadly only cements the entertainment industry’s collusion with the US military industrial complex further.

    In this way, Hollywood movies serve as a soft power strategy for subtly reinforcing US cultural domination on an international stage. Hollywood promotes the US’s white imperial project through screen. It sanitises the US and West’s militaristic expropriation of foreign territories, and its deliberate programme of destabilisation and domination throughout the globe using glorifying imagery and narratives to seed this in the psyche of international audiences.

    Of course, the capitalist entertainment racket has just reinforced its moral vacuity with more of the same imperialism-mongering agitprop. The case of staunch Zionist celeb and de facto Israel ‘cultural ambassador’ Gal Gadot tells you all you need to know about the entertainment biz’s priorities.

    That’s also nothing to even speak of these Hollywood names’ particular role in this. Brad Pitt is the obvious offender. His 2014 zombie dystopia World War Z bristled in unbridled Zionist apartheid glorification, Hasbara propaganda, and apologism.

    Some have also questioned how a powerful white man with allegations of assault against ex-wife Angela Jolie, and their two children, could possibly be a champion of Hind Rajab and the children of Gaza:

    https://twitter.com/lenajohnson007/status/1961036547064500511

    Limits of solidarity

    And once again, what these five Hollywood heavyweights stepping up – 22 months into a brutal genocide – painfully demonstrate, is not a tide-turning, dam-breaking, watershed moment of shining solidarity. Instead, they show its limits.

    It’s a rinse and repeat of the spineless, amoral scoundrels at the Oscars Academy who refused to stand behind No Other Land’s Oscar-winning Palestinian director Hamdam Ballal after his lynching by far-right Zionist settlers. Less than 10% of the Academy’s membership spoke out then. To their credit though, Cuarón and Glazer were at least among them. Now, the media is rushing to praise five famous faces for throwing their support behind the film. It’s not enough, and it’s frankly not good enough either.

    And let’s not forget that since Israeli settlers lynched Ballal, Israel has only continued to escalate its ethnic cleansing of the Masafer Yatta community in the occupied West Bank. In other words, Palestinians can win an Oscar, expose Israel’s crimes to the whole damn planet, and the settler war criminals can still get away with it.

    There is power and poignancy in projecting Palestinian lives and stories – that isn’t in dispute. Absolutely, stars should be stepping up to support Palestine. Yet stepping up in this instance, should mean stepping aside so Palestinian cultural artists and producers can platform their lived realities in their own words and voices. Any film industry, even the remotest bit committed to anti-racism, to basic human rights and Indigenous agency, would – and should – do that much.

    But that’s not what these Hollywood wonders giving major white saviour vibes are actually doing with their support for Hind Rajab.

    ‘Perfect victims’, like Hind Rajab

    It’s that moment when rich white people speak over, after barely speaking up when it would have made a difference. Essentially, all they’ve actually done is throw their weight behind it at the eleventh-hour. They have swooped in for all the gains and glory. The fanfare over them latching onto the film at the last-minute epitomises this problematic paradigm perfectly as well. It took five big names – five white wealthy celebs – for the corporate media to spin into a frenzy over the film. As ever, Palestinian stories are only legitimate when forced through the lens of the white status quo.

    Some on X have also underscored how this is the classic ‘perfect victim’ issue all over:

    They’ve got behind Hind Rajab’s story because it’s safe. One poster recounted the poignant words Egyptian-Canadian novelist Omar El Akkad posted in late October 2023:

    The Voice of Hind Rajab is a vital retelling of Israel’s abhorrent war crime (one of many). Ultimately though, these Hollywood stars’ backing of the film alone is, at best, hollow handwringing:

    At worst, it’s opportunistic reputation laundering while Israel continues to slaughter more children just like Hind, and they still fail to take concrete action.

    At the end of the day, Hollywood is hardly the place for punching up to power. It’s a vehicle to preserve and protect the interests of the elite. What this shows as ever, is that the powerful entertainment institutions will never truly afford Palestinians a voice in their own right. When it comes down to it, alone, Palestinian’s words count for nothing in the eyes of Hollywood, unless filtered through the worldviews of  wealth and whiteness.

    However, Hind’s story doesn’t need the validation from Hollywood hotshots looking to profit from Palestinian trauma. Hind’s story has already taken on a life of its own. Its eulogised in the hearts and words of Palestinians, bravely, fiercely projecting their own stories out into the world – one that unconscionably continues to fail them. And it’s in their words and voices that Hind’s story will resonate louder than any Hollywood feature ever could.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Hannah Sharland

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Ms Rachel has been named by Rolling Stone as one of the top 25 influential creators of 2025. The children’s entertainer has faced a steady stream of attacks from the Zionist lobby after her vociferous support for Palestine. As is now depressingly common, the more Ms Rachel has called for an end to the genocide and starvation in Palestine, particularly for her child audience, she’s been ruthlessly attacked.

    However, Rolling Stone said of the creator, real name Rachel Accurso, that:

    In a landscape increasingly saturated with e-commerce and milquetoast principles, Accurso has spent the past year embodying what it means to be an influencer who chooses to live in the same reality as her audience, rather than removed from them entirely.

    Miss Rachel stands for Palestine

    On her Instagram, Ms Rachel made it clear that speaking up during a genocide doesn’t preclude success:

     

    View this post on Instagram

     

    A post shared by Ms Rachel (@msrachelforlittles)

    And, Ms Rachel hasn’t flinched away from the reality of what life is like for children in Palestine. Whilst anybody would find it difficult to explain Israel’s genocide in Palestine to children, Miss Rachel has made a point of engaging with children in Palestine. In one clip, Mariam from Gaza is sobbing as she asks why she is being punished with injuries from an airstrike. She says:

    I didn’t even do anything…if I had done something, I would say so, but I didn’t.

    In response, Ms Rachel shared the clip and said:

    Mariam we know you didn’t do anything wrong. The whole world knows that you didn’t do anything wrong. This is not your fault – you’re just a kid. Grow-ups of the world are supposed to protect children and some grown-ups are not doing that. It’s their fault that you were not protected. I am so sorry that you were hurt.

    Ms Rachel clearly knows that children from around the world will come to her social media. She could easily have chosen to post a fundraiser for Palestine and kept it moving – even that would have been more than many celebrities have done. But, instead, she’s making the choice to see the humanity of Palestinian children at a time when their lives – and deaths – mean nothing to so many governments. Israel’s settler colonial project is at its most powerful when states and people from around the world believe the lie that Palestinian lives aren’t worth anything. The last couple of years of genocide have shown that for many people, those are their beliefs.

    Choices

    Another notable choice from Ms Rachel is her insistence that this is a simple situation. A few days ago, she shared a post explaining that the situation is not complex – it’s a clear genocide. In her caption, she wrote:

    Your silence or what you said will be remembered.

    You can handle being uncomfortable. What matters are their precious lives, not your comfort.

    What would you want someone to do for you? Choose to speak for them. I love you!

    Her Instagram feed is full of her meeting children from Palestine and Sudan, and being loving and kind towards them. Her heartbreak over inaction and complicity in Gaza is clear to see. And, she’s showing more moral clarity and courage than many elected officials.

    Featured image via YouTube screenshot/TODAY with Jenna & Friends

    By Maryam Jameela

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • The Labour Party government has now confirmed that it has decided to bar Israel’s official delegation from taking part in the UK’s largest arms fair. Israel had been planning to attend the Defence and Security Equipment International (DSEI) in London this September.

    While campaigners have welcomed the news, they’ve also slammed the UK government for its “cowardly” handwringing – since it was actually the Israeli government that pulled its country pavilion from the event.

    Israel disinvited from DSEI arms fair

    The Defence and Security Equipment International (DSEI) opens at London’s ExCeL centre on 9 September. DSEI takes place biennially. Its website has been indicating the presence of a dedicated Israeli country pavilion.

    Now however, the Labour Party government has confirmed that it has barred the Israeli official delegation from attending the event. An AFP news report carried a statement from the Ministry of Defence (MOD) which read:

    We can confirm that no Israeli government delegation will be invited to attend DSEI UK 2025.

    It continued that:

    The Israeli government’s decision to further escalate its military operation in Gaza is wrong.

    There must be a diplomatic solution to end this war now, with an immediate ceasefire, the return of the hostages and a surge in humanitarian aid to the people of Gaza.

    Pro-Palestine and anti-arms trade campaigners have been highlighting how allowing an official delegation from the Israeli state to attend DSEI whilst it is committing a genocide and repeated attacks in the West Bank would have been an egregious act of complicity.

    However, responding to the news, they’ve also underscored that banning the Israeli government delegation does not go far enough. Notably, the government is still permitting Israeli arms companies to take part in the event.

    Israeli arms companies still taking part

    Earlier this week, Campaigns Against the Arms Trade  (CAAT) had identified a number of arms giants complicit in Israel’s genocide that are planning to attend DSEI.

    These included several Israeli companies such as Rafael and Israel’s largest arms company, Elbit Systems, who make 85% of the drones used by the Israeli Defence Force (IDF). Other Israeli defence companies that have armed and sustained the genocide, such as IAI and Uvision, will still be able to attend. They will be exhibiting and selling their weapons and equipment which they grotesquely market as “battle tested”.

    Alongside them are many UK and international companies complicit in Israel’s ongoing genocide in Gaza. For instance, this includes F35 manufacturers Lockheed Martin and BAE Systems. Israel is using F35s to drop 2000lb bombs on children in Gaza.

    CAAT has lambasted the UK government for continuing to facilitate Israeli arms companies at DSEI:

    While CAAT welcomes the government’s decision not to invite an official Israeli delegation to DSEI, it is cowardly and symbolic. It was not the UK government that decided to pull the plug on the Israel country pavilion, but the Israeli government. Meanwhile, it is welcoming companies such as Elbit Systems, Israel’s largest defence company who make 85% of the drones used by the Israeli Defence Force, Rafael, and Israel Aerospace Industries to market their genocide tested weapons to a global audience.

    This is the government pretending to take action while safeguarding the profits of arms dealers. At the same time it’s banning an official Israeli delegation, it is on the cusp of awarding a £2bn contract to Elbit Systems. These are not the actions of a government committed to taking action against Israel. These are the actions of a government complicit in a genocide.

    Israel is committing genocide. It has created a man-made famine. Babies are dying from starvation. Israel is bombing hospitals and killing journalists. These heart breaking atrocities are war crimes. Nothing could be clearer.

    It is also clear that our government is not committed to taking any action that disrupts the profits of arms dealers. It is therefore down to campaigners across the country coming together to take action to uphold international law on the streets of East London.

    Protesters gearing up to call out DSEI ‘business as usual’

    Echoing this, the Palestine Solidarity Campaign (PSC) has also argued that in the midst of a genocide, it is outrageous that these companies attempt to conduct “business as usual”. It is calling for the UK government to cancel DSEI entirely.

    The group has called a protest on 10 September at 5pm outside the DSEI fair. It aims to create a wall of noise for the arms dealers profiting and enabling Israel’s genocide against Palestinians.

    PSC deputy director Simon Foster said:

    This is a welcome step, and is testament to all those who have campaigned against DSEI’s role in arming Israel’s oppression of Palestinians. It shows our protests and campaigns are having an impact. But it falls far short of the arms embargo and end to all military cooperation that the government should be enacting to fulfil its duties under the Genocide Convention.

    The government is continuing to allow Israeli arms companies to exhibit their weapons of ethnic cleansing in London, alongside other arms companies that enable and profit from genocide. DSEI should be cancelled in its entirety.

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • COMMENTARY: By Gordon Campbell

    Chances are, anyone whose family is dying of starvation would not be looking for New Zealand to have a prolonged debate over how they deserve to be defined.

    Yet a delay in making even the symbolic gestures seems to be all that we have to offer, as hundreds of thousands of Palestinians continue to be systematically starved to death by Israel.

    Could be wrong, but I doubt whether anyone in Gaza is waiting anxiously for news that New Zealand government has finally, finally come to the conclusion that Palestine deserves to be recognised as state.

    READ MORE:

    So far, 147 out of 193 UN member states reached that conclusion ahead of us. Some of the last holdouts — Canada, the United Kingdom, France and Australia — have already said they will do so next month.

    So far, none of that diplomatic shuffling of the deck has stopped the Gaza genocide. Only significant economic and diplomatic sanctions and an extensive arms embargo (one that includes military-related software) can force Israel to cease and desist.

    You don’t need to recognise statehood before taking those kind of steps. Last week, Germany — which does not recognise the state of Palestine — imposed a partial arms embargo on Israel that forbids sales of any weaponry that might be used to kill Palestinians in Gaza. Not much, but a start — given that (after the US) Germany has been the main foreign arms supplier to the IDF.

    Meanwhile, the Luxon government has yet to make up its mind on Palestinian statehood. Our government repeatedly insists that this recognition is “complex.” Really? By saying so, we are embarrassing ourselves on the world stage.

    Trying to appease Americans
    While we still furrow our brows about Palestinian statehood, 76 percent of the UN’s member nations have already figured it out. Surely, our hesitation can’t be because we are as mentally challenged as we are claiming to be.

    The more likely explanation is that we are trying to appease the Americans, in the hope of winning a trade concession. Our government must be gambling that an angry Donald Trump will punish Australia for its decision on Palestine, by lifting its tariff rate, thereby erasing the 5 percent advantage over us that Australian exporters currently enjoy.

    By keeping our heads down on Palestine, we seem to be hoping we will win brownie points with Trump, at the expense of our ANZAC mates.

    This isn’t mere conspiracy talk. Already, the Trump administration is putting pressure on France over its imminent decision to recognise Palestine statehood. A few days ago, Le Monde reported that the US ambassador to France, Charles Kushner — yes, Ivana Trump’s father-in-law — blundered into France’s domestic politics by writing a letter of complaint to French president Emmanuel Marcon.

    In it, Kushner claimed that France wasn’t doing enough to combat anti-Semitism:

    “Public statements haranguing Israel and gestures toward recognition of a Palestinian state embolden extremists, fuel violence, and endanger Jewish life in France,” [Kushner] wrote.

    “In today’s world, anti-Zionism is anti-Semitism – plain and simple.”

    Breaking every civilised rule
    Simple-minded is more like it. People who oppose the criminal atrocities being committed in Gaza (and on the West Bank) by the Zionist government of Israel are not doing so on the basis of racial prejudice. They’re doing so because Israel is breaking every rule of a civilised society.

    Any number of UN conventions and international laws forbid the targeting of civilian populations, homes, schools, ambulances and hospitals . . . not to mention the deliberate killing of hundreds of medical staff, journalists, aid workers etc.

    Not to mention imposing a famine on a captive population. Day after day, the genocide continues.

    For Kushner to claim the global revulsion at Israel’s actions in Gaza is motivated by racism is revealing. To Israel’s apologists within Israel, and in the US (and New Zealand) only Israeli lives really matter.

    Footnote: New Zealand continues to bang on about our support for the “two state” solution. Exactly where is the land on which Christopher Luxon thinks a viable Palestinian state can be built, and what makes him think Israel would ever allow it to happen?

    Thirty years ago, Israeli settlement expansion fatally undermined the Oslo framework for a Palestinian state situated alongside Israel.

    Since then, the fabled “two state solution” has become the tooth fairy of international politics. It gives politicians something to say when they have nothing to say.

    Republished with permission from Gordon Campbell’s Werewolf column in partnership with Scoop.

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • Israel struck the Nasser hospital four times on Monday, a BBC investigation has revealed. The strikes on the southern Gaza hospital killed up to twenty people. The death toll includes five journalists.

    The attack followed the pattern of a so-called double-tap strike. In a double-tap, the first responders who arrive after the initial attack are struck again. This method actively targets civilians. It has been used by groups like Al Qaeda and states like the US, the now-overthrown Assad government in Syria and Russia.

    The BBC’s video analysis showed “the hospital was struck four times in total”.

    BBC Verify and expert analysis claims:

    that two staircases were hit almost simultaneously in the first wave, and while what was thought to be a single later attack was in fact two separate strikes hitting the same place within a fraction of a second.

    Israel’s double-tap strikes hit Nasser hospital four times

    The BBC said:

    In the first incident, an Israeli strike hit the exterior staircase on the hospital’s eastern side at 10:08 local time (07:08 GMT), killing journalist Hussam Al-Masri who was operating a live TV feed for Reuters.

    This incident led to the bizarre Israeli claim that the target had been a “Hamas camera”:

    BBC Verify has now “identified another previously unreported blast at a northern wing staircase at practically the same time, which was overshadowed by the “double-tap” strike on the eastern staircase”.

    New footage shows smoke rising and damage at both staircases, while emergency workers said the hospital’s operating department was hit.

    Proportional?

    “A reasonable attacker must expect scores of civilian casualties since a hospital is full of protected persons,” Professor Janina Dill of Oxford University, an expert in global security, told the BBC:

    She added that the “mere presence of equipment that belongs to an adversary” does not lead a medical facility to lose its ‘protected status’ under the laws governing warfare.

    As the Canary has reported, Israel has made a habit of killing Palestinian journalists. As the BBC acknowledges in it’s report, Israeli has banned international journalist from Gaza. This leaves only Palestinian reporters and crew, who have died in considerable numbers.

    According to 26 August figures, Israel had killed up to 270 media workers since Israel began its war. You can read their names here.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Joe Glenton

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • COMMENTARY: By Ian Powell

    “Prime Minister Christopher Luxon says his Israeli counterpart Benjamin Netanyahu has ‘lost the plot’ and has condemned attacks on Gaza.

    “It is among the strongest language the New Zealand leader has used against Netanyahu and comes amid reports of intense aerial attacks on Gaza after Israel’s decision to launch a fresh military operation.”

    These are the opening two paragraphs of The New Zealand Herald coverage by political reporter Jamie Ensor of Prime Minister Luxon’s public declaration that Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu had lost the plot.

    His comment was in the context of the Israeli government’ genocide of Palestinians in Gaza and their increasing persecution on the Israeli occupied West Bank (August 13): Netanyahu lost the plot says Luxon.

    Spectrum of NZ government’s response to genocide
    The New Zealand government’s response to this ethnic cleansing by genocide strategy in Gaza has ranged on a spectrum between pathetically weak to callous disregard.

    Previously I’ve described this spectrum as between limp and deplorable; both have their own validity.

    Consequently, the many New Zealanders who were appalled by this response might have been somewhat relieved by Luxon’s frankness.

    Perhaps a long overdue change of direction towards humanitarianism? In the interests of confusion avoidance this is a rhetorical question.

    However, there is a big problem with Luxon’s conclusion. Quite simply, he is wrong; there is a plot and it is based on a perverse biblical origin.

    Why NZ Prime Minister Luxon got it wrong.        Video: RNZ

    Just over three weeks from the 7 October 2023 Hamas-led attack across the border in the Israeli occupied former Palestinian land, Netanyahu made the following broadcast,  including on You Tube (October 30): Netanyahu’s biblical justification.

    The ‘”war criminal” is explicit that there is a plot behind the ethnic cleansing through genocide strategy in Gaza. It is a dogmatically blood thirsty and historically inaccurate biblical centred plot.

    In his own words:

    “You must remember what Amalek has done to you, says our Holy Bible — and we do remember. And we are fighting — our brave troops and combatants who are now in Gaza, or around Gaza, and in all other regions in Israel, are joining this chain of Jewish heroes — a chain that started 3000 years ago, from Joshua until the heroes of the Six-Day War in 1948 [sic], the 1973 October War, and all other wars in this country.

    “Our heroic troops — they have only one supreme goal: to completely defeat the murderous enemy and to guarantee our existence in this country.”

    Netanyahu was referring to the Book of 1 Samuel (Chapter 15, Verse 3) which states:

    “Now go and smite Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have, and spare them not; but slay both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass.”

    Samuel was a prophet through who the Jewish God Yahweh commanded one Saul to conduct a total war of annihilation against the Amalekites.

    The Amalekites were a biblical nation who, so biblical history goes, had attacked the Israelites during their “Exodus” from Egypt.

    From apartheid to ethnic cleansing to recognition of Palestine
    Previously I have published four posts on the Gaza genocide. The first (March 15) discussed it in the context of the apartheid in the South Africa of the past and apartheid as continuing defining feature in Israel since its creation in 1948: When apartheid met Zionism.

    The second (May 28) discussed what underpins the Zionist support for ethnic cleansing through genocide: Reasons for supporting ethnic cleansing of Palestinians.

    This theme was followed through in the third (June 4) in the context of recognising the state of Palestine: Ethnic cleansing, genocide and Palestine recognition.

    From Netanyahu to Zelda
    In the context of the truer number of Palestinian deaths in Gaza, my fourth previous post (July 2) was more directly closer to the theme of this post: How to biblically justify 400,000 Palestinian deaths.

    I quoted a genocide supporter going by the name of “Zelda” justifying Israel’s war in similar vein to Bejamin Netanyahu:

    “Gaza belongs to Israel! This is not just a political claim; it is a sacred, unbreakable decree from Almighty God Himself. If any government from around the world recognises Palestine, the United States needs to declare it part of the Axis of Evil

    “The land was promised by divine covenant to the people of Israel, chosen by God to be His light in the darkness. No enemy, no terrorist, no foreign power can wrest it away. Those who reject this truth stand against God’s will and will face His judgment.

    “If Palestinians want aid and peace, they must recognise Israel’s God-given right and leave Gaza forever. Only under God’s blessing can this land flourish, and all who defy His plan will be cast down.”

    From Zelda to Alfred
    On July 4, I received the following email from a reader called Alfred. In his words (be warned, at the very least this is a mind-boggling read):

    “Accidentally I came across your blog on ‘How To Justify 400,000 Palestinian Deaths In Gaza: Ask ‘Zelda’ (Thursday, 3 July 2025). It was an interesting read.
    With all due respect, I would like to place before you my ‘two cents’
    Consider this history Mr Ian:
    1) Before the modern state of Israel there was the British mandate, Not a Palestinian state.
    2) Before the British mandate there was the Ottoman empire, Not a Palestinian state.
    3) Before the Ottoman empire there was the Islamic mamluk sultanate of Egypt, Not a Palestinian state.
    4)Before the Islamic mamluk sultanate of Egypt there was the Ayyubid dynasty, Not a Palestinian state. Godfrey of Bouillon conquered it in 1099.
    5) Before the Ayyubid dynasty there was the Christian kingdom of Jerusalem, Not a Palestinian state.
    6) Before the Christian kingdom of Jerusalem there was the Fatimid caliphate, Not a Palestinian state.
    7) Before the Fatimid caliphate there was the byzantine empire, Not a Palestinian state. 8. Before the Byzantine empire there was the Roman empire, Not a Palestinian state.
    9) Before the Roman empire there was the Hasmonaean dynasty, Not a Palestinian state. 10) Before the Hasmonean dynasty there was the Seleucid empire, Not a Palestinian state.
    11) Before the Seleucid empire there was the empire of Alexander the 3rd of Macedon, Not a Palestinian state.
    12) Before the empire of Alexander, the 3rd of Macedon there was the Persian empire, Not a Palestinian state.
    13) Before the Persian empire there was the Babylonian empire, Not a Palestinian state.
    14) Before the Babylonian empire there was the kingdoms of Israel and Judea, Not a Palestinian state.
    15) Before the kingdoms of Israel and Judea there was the kingdom of Israel, Not a Palestinian state.
    16) Before the kingdom of Israel there was the theocracy of the 12 tribes of Israel, Not a Palestinian state.
    17) Before the theocracy of the 12 tribes of Israel there was the individual state of Canaan, Not a Palestinian state.
    In fact, in that corner of the earth there was everything but a Palestinian state!
    Interesting history isn’t it?
    Yes, I agree with Zelda’s statement that …
    ‘The land was promised by divine covenant to the people of Israel, chosen by God to be His light in the darkness.’
    Mr Ian, if you go back to the Bible to read the Old Testament history, we see that God declares time and again that they (Israelites) are His chosen people, and He will bring them back to land of Israel. (Which has started to happen, as you observe world events). He also condemns His own chosen that if they turn away from Him, he will turn away His face. And that was what He did to the 10 of the 12 tribes of Israel. They were wiped out. And the sort of genocide that we see today in Gaza, was prevalent in that time, when Gentile nations were even wiped out if they stood between the Israelites and the ‘promised land’ (Israel). Even the lives of His own chosen people were not valuable to Him, and was at stake (holocaust recently) when they turned away from Him, as those many of their enemies (or opponents)!

    8000-year-old history is repeating itself now in Gaza, I believe.
    Alfred

    Mapping the success of Zionist ethnic cleansing of Palestine.

    The views of both Zelda and Alfred are not off the planet in terms of supporting Israel’s ethnic cleansing of Palestinians through genocide.

    They are thoroughly consistent with Netanyahu’s well-thought out plot. Both are part of his “echo chamber”.

    Who has really lost the plot?
    The genocide towards Palestinians will not end in Gaza. All the evidence is that Palestinians in the occupied West Bank are next.

    Gaza the precursor to West Bank Palestinians.

    There the ethnic cleansing is continuing in the form of persecution and repression, including imprisonment (hostage-taking by another name).

    But it is escalating and, unless there is a change in direction, it is only a matter of time before persecution and repression morph into genocide.

    Benjamin Netanyahu has not lost the plot. However, Christopher Luxon has. His criticism of Netanyahu is a flimsy attempt to avoid doing what a humanitarian government with a “plot” should do. This includes:

    1. Recognising the Palestinian Territories as an official independent state;
    2. Sanctioning Israeli Defence Force (IDF) visitors;
    3. Close the Israel Embassy;
    4. Impose trade and bilateral sanctions; and
    5. Suspend Israel from the United Nations.

    Ian Powell is a progressive health, labour market and political “no-frills” forensic commentator in New Zealand. A former senior doctors union leader for more than 30 years, he blogs at Second Opinion and Political Bytes, where this article was first published. Republished with the author’s permission.

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • In July 2025, a new international maritime initiative was launched: the Global Sumud Flotilla. It was formed by four major coalitions: the Global Campaign to Return to Palestine, the Freedom Flotilla Coalition, the Maghreb Sumud Convoy, and the Southeast Asian Nusantara Sumud Initiative. The Global Sumud Flotilla is set to depart on August 31, 2025. Its goal is clear: to break Israel’s illegal blockade on Gaza, to deliver urgent humanitarian aid, and to expose the genocidal war waged on Palestinians. 

    The flotilla is composed of dozens of small civilian vessels carrying activists, parliamentarians, doctors, and trade unionists, alongside humanitarian cargo.

    The post The Global Sumud Flotilla appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • A new opinion poll by the Sadat Center at the University of Maryland finds a sea change in the American public on the conflict between the Israelis and the Palestinians. For the first time, the percentage of Americans who say they sympathize with Palestinians (28%) exceeds the percentage who sympathize with Israelis (22%)[!!!] Some one fourth (26%) of Americans say they are equally sympathetic to both. So 54% of Americans now sympathize with Palestinians, either primarily or equally with Israelis. Some 12% don’t like either one, and 13% don’t know. So of the Americans who have an opinion and feel knowledgeable, actually 67.5% either sympathize mainly with the Palestinians or equally with them and Israelis.

    The post More Americans Now Sympathize With Palestinians Than With Israelis appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • All but one of the 15 members of the UN Security Council – the US – declared that the famine in Gaza is a “manmade crisis” and warned that using starvation as a weapon of war is prohibited under international law and constitutes a war crime, during a meeting on 27 August.

    The 14 council members announced in a statement that they support an immediate, unconditional, and permanent ceasefire, the release of all hostages, a significant surge of aid throughout Gaza, and for Israel to immediately and unconditionally lift all restrictions on relief deliveries.

    “Famine in Gaza must be stopped immediately,” the statement read. “Time is of the essence. The humanitarian emergency must be addressed without delay and Israel must reverse course.”

    The post Washington Stands Alone At United Nations Security Council appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • On Sunday, August 10, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu made a dramatic announcement: After 674 days of barring foreign media from Gaza, Israel was planning to begin staging guided tours, under Israeli military control, for embedded members of the foreign press.

    “We have decided, and have ordered, directed the military, to bring in foreign journalists—more foreign journalists, a lot,” said Israel’s premier, in a rambling, paranoid half-hour press conference—staged, he said, to dispel “the global campaign of lies” against Israel. “There’s a problem with assuring security, but I think it can be done in a way that is responsible and careful to preserve your own safety.

    The post On The Ethics Of Embedding With Génocidaires appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • An advocacy group is calling on Rep. Ritchie Torres (D-New York) to donate to humanitarian efforts in Gaza after newly released disclosures revealed the staunchly pro-Israel politician’s investments in weapons contractors as he’s campaigned for the U.S.’s backing of Israel’s genocide. Sludge reported on Monday that Torres recently filed a financial disclosure revealing investments in Lockheed…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • Top Biden administration officials have begun rewriting their ironclad support of Israel throughout the end of President Joe Biden’s term, now claiming to oppose Israel’s starvation policy in Gaza as it’s officially tipped into famine — a famine that they fully laid the groundwork for over the first 16 months of the genocide. In an interview with “The Bulwark” published Wednesday…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.