Category: Press Release

  • Statement from Tim Gray, Executive Director, Environmental Defence

    Toronto | Traditional territories of the Mississaugas of the Credit, the Anishinaabeg, the Haudenosaunee, and the Huron-Wendat – Today, Steven Guilbeault, Canada’s Minister of Environment and Climate Change, announced a new study to examine existing and new threats to Rouge National Park.

    This study is needed due to the Ontario government’s decision to remove 4,700 acres of land from the protection of the Greenbelt directly adjacent to Rouge National Park. The province’s action left the federal government with no choice but to act. The ecological integrity of the park, federally listed endangered species, indigenous rights, farming and action on climate change are just some of the values put at risk by the provincial government’s decision to remove the legislated protections for the Duffins Rouge Agricultural Preserve (DRAP) and to remove these lands from the Greenbelt.

    “Premier Ford left Minister Guilbeault with no choice but to act to protect key ecological, cultural and economic values within and surrounding Rouge National Park. The province’s reckless actions require a thorough evaluation and then federal action to protect values of national and international significance,” said Tim Gray.

    “There are no good reasons for the provincial government to have broken their promise to protect the Greenbelt. Nowhere is this more true than for the farms, forests and wetlands of DRAP. Fortunately, these lands could now have a protected future instead of being bulldozed for car-dependent sprawl.”

    In addition to the DRAP lands, there are adjacent and nearby lands owned by Transport Canada and the Toronto Region Conservation Authority that should be considered in the study for inclusion in an expanded Rouge National Park for the benefit of all Canadians.

    “We, and millions of other Ontarians, look forward to working with the federal government to ensure that all the values of Rouge National Park, DRAP and other surrounding lands are protected in perpetuity.”

    ABOUT ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENCE (environmentaldefence.ca): Environmental Defence is a leading Canadian environmental advocacy organization that works with government, industry and individuals to defend clean water, a safe climate and healthy communities.

    – 30 –

    For more information or to request an interview, please contact:

    Brittany Harris, Environmental Defence, media@environmentaldefence.ca

    The post Statement welcoming the new federal study to address threats to Rouge National Park and key portions of the Greenbelt removed by the Ontario government appeared first on Environmental Defence.

    This post was originally published on Environmental Defence.

  • Ottawa | Traditional, unceded territory of the Algonquin Anishinaabeg People – Environmental Defence experts on climate change, clean transportation and climate finance react to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) AR6 Synthesis Report, released today.

    Julia Levin, Associate Director, National Climate:

    “The world’s scientists have once again rung the alarm bells on the frightening future that awaits if we fail to tackle the climate crisis this decade. The science is clear: fossil fuels are causing the climate emergency. A rapid and equitable phaseout of fossil fuels must be the centerpiece of any science-based strategy. The good news is that we can rapidly transition towards 100 per cent renewable energy if governments stop caving to oil and and gas companies. Decades of obstruction by the fossil fuel industry have led us to the brink of catastrophe. And now those same actors are trying to delay climate action by advancing dangerous distractions like carbon capture.”

    Aliénor Rougeot, Climate and Energy Program Manager:

    “Today’s report shows we have a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to build a cleaner, healthier, and more prosperous future. Let’s seize it. The transition away from fossil fuels is no longer a matter of if, but when. Governments need to show us their plans for how we will make this transition fair, orderly, and beneficial for workers and communities in every part of the country. The upcoming federal budget is Canada’s next chance to do so. The time for bold action and investments in real solutions is now.”

    Julie Segal, Senior Manager Climate Finance:

    “Our global economy and financial system are still designed for climate failure, yet blowing past 1.5C is untenable. Greenhouse gas emissions this past decade were higher than ever. An economy that keeps our planet alive is not a cost, but an investment opportunity into cleaner energy and safer buildings. Dollars must be redirected into three- to six-times more clean investment now. In this coming federal budget, Canada has to demonstrate that it knows climate justice is intrinsic to climate action, by stepping up with dollars to support the countries most vulnerable to climate change, while shifting every private and public dollar at home to a sustainable economy.”

    Nate Wallace, Clean Transportation Program Manager:

    “The IPCC could not be more clear – we have a limited window to prevent the catastrophic impacts of a heating climate and it requires deep reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, now. Next week’s federal budget is one of the few opportunities we have left to turn the ship before it crashes. That means Canada  cannot allow huge pandemic-related budget holes in public transit agencies’ operating budgets turn into a vicious cycle of service cuts and fare hikes that would drive riders into their polluting cars, and take a generation or more to recover from. Instead of hitting pause on funding new transit projects until 2026, Canada should be accelerating public transit expansion plans now with federal funds in the upcoming budget.”

    ABOUT ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENCE (environmentaldefence.ca): Environmental Defence is a leading Canadian environmental advocacy organization that works with government, industry and individuals to defend clean water, a safe climate and healthy communities.

    – 30 –

    For more information or to request an interview, please contact:

    Allen Braude, Environmental Defence, media@environmentaldefence.ca

    The post Environmental Defence experts react to the new report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) appeared first on Environmental Defence.

    This post was originally published on Environmental Defence.

  • Lack of labelling requirements under CEPA leaves consumers uninformed about harmful ingredients in their products

    Ottawa | Traditional, unceded territory of the Algonquin Anishinaabeg People – MPs missed an opportunity to drive faster action on the reduction of toxic substances by voting down a proposed amendment to the Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA), that would have required the federal government to ensure harmful chemicals in consumer products are labelled.

    Addressing toxic chemical exposure, transparency and disclosure of hazardous substances in the products people living in Canada use every day is a critical gap in the federal government’s bill to modernize CEPA. Greater transparency is needed to give consumers the basic “right to know” about the products we use. It would also force product manufacturers to reformulate their ingredients and materials to use less harmful substances in the Canadian marketplace. The right to know about the presence of harmful substances is an important element of the right to a healthy environment.

    Establishing transparency and disclosure for product ingredients is a basic element for driving industry accountability for the impacts of product-based exposures. In the absence of labelling requirements under CEPA, consumers will be left in the dark about ingredients that could harm their health or the environment. This lack of transparency has real-life consequences for the health of people in Canada and the environment. Exposure to harmful chemicals will continue to put people and ecosystems at risk.

    Groups supporting this statement:

    Environmental Defence

    Breast Cancer Action Quebec

    Background information:

    • MPs on the House of Commons Environment Committee (ENVI) rejected amendments moved by MP Laurel Collins and MP Monique Pauzé that would have established a mechanism for labelling harmful ingredients in products.
    • Bill S-5, which seeks to reform CEPA for the first time in more than two decades, recently completed its review by the ENVI Committee. The ENVI Committee last reviewed CEPA in 2017 and recommended amendments to the Act to require mandatory labelling of harmful product ingredients.

    – 30 –

    For more information or to request an interview, please contact:

    Paula Gray, media@environmentaldefence.ca, 705-435-8611

    Viorica Lorcencova, viorica.lorcencova@acsqc.ca, 514-443-8437

    The post MPs fail to create product labelling requirements for harmful chemicals appeared first on Environmental Defence.

    This post was originally published on Environmental Defence.

  • 15 environmental groups signed an open letter calling on Minister Freeland for federal funding to save public transit systems

    Ottawa | Traditional, unceded territory of the Algonquin Anishinaabeg People – Today, a coalition of 15 environmental groups, including Environmental Defence, Équiterre, Greenpeace Canada, the David Suzuki Foundation and Climate Action Network Canada, signed an open letter calling on Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland to intervene once again to save public transit systems from financial crisis related to lower farebox revenues due to the pandemic.

    They also called on the Finance Minister to accelerate the rollout of the permanent public transit funding program, to put transit systems on a secure financial footing and on a path towards service expansion at a pace consistent with meeting Canada’s climate goals.

    As the open letter to Minister Freeland states: “Public transit systems across the country are at risk of falling into a death spiral. That is a vicious cycle of service cuts and fare hikes that push people away from public transit and into their cars, further decreasing revenue, leading to further service cuts. If this is allowed to happen, it will make cities more congested, increase carbon emissions, and have the greatest impact on society’s most vulnerable. The federal government has saved public transit from disaster before, and it can do it again.”

    Cities across Canada have budgeted hundreds of millions of dollars in transit operating support that they are expecting federal and provincial governments to fill, as they have for the past two years. Previous federal operating support for transit was conditional upon provincial matching contributions, prompting some provinces to step up where they otherwise would not have.

    • The Canadian Urban Transit Association estimates that for every 10 per cent loss in transit ridership below pre-pandemic levels, transit systems across Canada collectively lose $470 million per year. Ridership is currently at approximately 70 per cent Canada-wide.
    • The City of Toronto has budgeted $366 million in its 2023 budget in expected transit assistance from federal and provincial governments, and the TTC expects a further $350-$420 million sized hole in its budget in 2024.
    • A January 2023 internal survey by the Ontario Public Transit Association has estimated an operational deficit of at least $510 million for Ontario’s entire public transit sector.
    • The Association du transport urbain du Québec estimates that Quebec systems have a collective deficit of $560 million in 2023.
    • Metro Vancouver’s transit system, TransLink, has requested $250 million from the federal government, to be matched by British Columbia, to prevent service cuts and to enable the agency to get out of ‘survival mode’ to focus on service expansion.

    “Canada’s climate community stands behind saving public transit. In a climate emergency, our political leaders must do the same. This joint statement highlights our common conviction that allowing a public transit death spiral to occur is an unacceptable policy choice. The upcoming federal budget will be a litmus test of whether Canada is serious about cutting transportation emissions,” said Nate Wallace, Clean Transportation Program Manager at Environmental Defence.

    List of signatory groups

    Environmental Defence Canada
    Canadian Association of Nurses for the Environment
    Citizens Environmental Alliance of Southwestern Ontario
    Climate Action Network Canada (CanRAC)
    Conservation Council of New Brunswick
    The Council of Canadians
    The David Suzuki Foundation
    Ecology Action Centre
    Équiterre
    Grandmothers Act to Save the Planet (GASP)
    Greenpeace Canada
    Green13
    JustEarth Coalition
    MiningWatch Canada
    Music Declares Emergency Canada

    Open Letter

    https://environmentaldefence.ca/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Open-Letter-Minister-Freeland-2023-Federal-Budget-Public-Transit-Funding.pdf

    Issue Backgrounder

    https://environmentaldefence.ca/report/stopping-the-public-transit-death-spiral/

    Additional Resources

    https://cutaactu.ca/canadian-transit-systems-need-renewed-operating-support/

    ABOUT ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENCE (environmentaldefence.ca): Environmental Defence is a leading Canadian environmental advocacy organization that works with government, industry and individuals to defend clean water, a safe climate and healthy communities.

    – 30 –

    For more information or to request an interview, please contact:

    Allen Braude, Environmental Defence, abraude@environmentaldefence.ca

     

    The post Climate Groups Sound the Alarm on Public Transit Death Spiral appeared first on Environmental Defence.

  • ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENCE, KEEPERS OF THE WATER

    Toronto | Traditional territories of the Mississaugas of the Credit, the Anishinaabeg, the Haudenosaunee, and the Huron-Wendat – Yesterday, in response to the spill of over 5.3 million liters of toxic wastewater from Imperial Oil’s tar sands tailings ponds, the federal government issued a Fisheries Act direction – requiring the company to take immediate action to prevent any seepage from entering fish-bearing waters. This followed testing by federal officers showing the leaking wastewater is harmful to fish.

    Imperial Oil failed to report this ongoing, large-scale leak of toxic tailings water to both the Alberta and federal governments and should be prosecuted under the Fisheries Act. The federal government should be seeking convictions under the Act for both individuals and the company as a deterrent against such behaviour in the future. Issuing only a clean-up order after the company engaged in such flagrantly misleading actions only encourages Imperial and other polluters to duplicate this type of damaging behaviour in the future.

    Quotes:

    “The federal government is doing the right thing by taking action under the Fisheries Act in response to Imperial Oil’s disastrous spill. This is an important step to limit the damage done to fish and downstream communities. But why is Imperial Oil not being prosecuted under the Fisheries Act? The leak was covered up for ten months. Those responsible for the irreparable damage done must be held accountable. We join Chief Allan Adam in urging the government to use all legal tools available to them to respond to this disaster.” Said Aliénor Rougeot, Climate and Energy Program Manager, Environmental Defence Canada

    “While we don’t have a lot of answers yet, confirmation of the harm to wildlife is essential information, and it is different from what Imperial, the AER, and Danielle Smith told us. Alberta is Canada’s biggest oil and gas producer, yet First Nations and Métis settlements still live in poverty. Not all of our people benefit from the oil industry’s presence in our territories. They are taking the so-called resources and leaving toxic zones where the biodiversity that has sustained us for tens of thousands of years is being purposely poisoned. They are taking the life surrounding us, leaving us with a death and destruction path growing further downstream daily. We stand in solidarity with the Nations and support their demands for justice and accountability.” Said Jesse Cardinal, Executive Director of Keepers of the Water

    Background information:

    • The Fisheries Act is one of Canada’s only pieces of federal legislation protecting freshwaters. It prohibits the disposal of substances harmful to fish into fish-bearing waters or into any place that may reasonably enter fish-bearing waters.
    • In 2020, the Commission for Environmental Cooperation – an environmental watchdog created under NAFTA – concluded there is ample evidence that tailings ponds are leaking into groundwater. It found that tailings ponds appeared to be operating in violation of the federal Fisheries Act.
    • See our tailings fact sheet for more information.

    ABOUT ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENCE (environmentaldefence.ca): Environmental Defence is a leading Canadian environmental advocacy organization that works with government, industry and individuals to defend clean water, a safe climate and healthy communities.

    About KEEPERS OF THE WATER (keepersofthewater.ca): Keepers of the Water are First Nations, Métis, Inuit, environmental groups, concerned citizens, and communities working together for the protection of water, air, land, and all living things within the Arctic Ocean Drainage Basin.

    -30-

    For more information or to request an interview, please contact:

    Paula Gray, Environmental Defence, media@environmentaldefence.ca

    Jesse Cardinal, Keepers of the Water, ed@keepersofthewater.ca

    The post Statement from Indigenous and environmental experts on the federal government’s enforcement of the Fisheries Act in response to Imperial Oil leak appeared first on Environmental Defence.

    This post was originally published on Environmental Defence.

  • (Denver, CO — March 10, 2023) Today, Governor Jared Polis signed into law legislation that fixes Colorado’s post-conviction DNA testing statute to help ensure that wrongly convicted Coloradans can access DNA testing that can prove their innocence. The legislation was passed overwhelmingly in Colorado’s House and Senate last month. 

    “This victory marks the day that many more innocent Coloradans got the chance to prove their innocence in court,” said Innocence Project State Policy Advocate Bay Scoggin. “This bill makes critical changes to a decades-old law. Colorado had lagged behind other states in updating its post-conviction DNA statute according to best practices learned over the last two decades — until now. We are very grateful to the Korey Wise Innocence Project at the University of Colorado, Representative Daugherty, the bill’s primary sponsor, and all the co-sponsors who showed such great leadership in getting this bill done. We can’t wait to see the results.”

    “It’s been encouraging to see such strong bipartisan support for this important improvement to Colorado’s DNA testing statute. The law gives new hope to the wrongfully convicted who will now have a fair opportunity to secure the DNA testing they need to prove their innocence,” said Jeanne Segil, Policy Director at the Korey Wise Innocence Project.

    In the 20 years since Colorado’s original post-conviction DNA testing statute was enacted, it has only allowed a handful of petitioners to access DNA testing. This has resulted in only three DNA-related exonerations in this state, including the case of Robert “Rider” Dewey. This is far fewer DNA-based exonerations than other states of a similar size that have more modern post-conviction DNA testing statutes. Most states have adjusted their mechanisms for post-conviction DNA testing to reflect advances in DNA technology and a more nuanced understanding of the role of DNA evidence. Colorado now joins these states.

    The law, which will go into effect on October 23, 2023, will improve Colorado’s post-conviction statute by making these updates to the current law: 

    • Changes the standard for obtaining testing, allowing people with reasonable claims of innocence to access evidence in the state’s control.
    • Allows formerly incarcerated people to access DNA testing to prove their innocence and clear their names.
    • Allows for subsequent petitions for DNA testing, particularly in cases where advances in DNA technology make it possible to obtain clearer results.
    • Ensures that all parties have a voice in determining the means and methods of testing, and allows for the testing to be conducted at private laboratories upon agreement of all parties.
    • Enables courts to vacate convictions upon receiving DNA evidence that proves a person’s innocence.
    • Ensures that victims’ rights are respected and the Victims Rights Act is followed.

    The post New Colorado Law Makes it Easier for the Wrongly Convicted to Prove Innocence Using DNA Evidence appeared first on Innocence Project.

  • Now is the time for climate finance leadership from government

    Statement by Julie Segal Manager, Climate Finance, Environmental Defence

    Toronto | Traditional territories of the Mississaugas of the Credit, the Anishinaabeg, the Haudenosaunee, and the Huron-Wendat – Canadian political leaders must step forward on climate finance and build on OSFI’s new disclosure guidelines. Prime Minister Trudeau and Minister Freeland should set clear rules for the financial sector to ensure investments get in line with 1.5C. Canada’s financial institutions should cut emissions, not just count them – in a sinking boat you have to plug the leaking holes, not just disclose them. Without government leadership to align financial flows with climate targets, our economy risks sinking. Prime Minister Trudeau set climate goals which Canada can only meet if private finance flows in the right direction.

    OSFI said it best: “Delaying climate policy action increases the overall economic impacts and risks to financial stability.” In other words, Canadian’s savings are at risk as climate change worsens, and neglecting to set the right rules leaves Canada’s financial system at risk of capsizing. 

    ABOUT ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENCE (environmentaldefence.ca): Environmental Defence is a leading Canadian environmental advocacy organization that works with government, industry and individuals to defend clean water, a safe climate and healthy communities.

    – 30 –

    For more information or to request an interview, please contact:

    Alex Ross, Environmental Defence, media@environmentaldefence.ca

    The post Statement from Julie Segal on the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions’ (OSFI) new climate disclosure rules, guideline B-15 appeared first on Environmental Defence.

    This post was originally published on Environmental Defence.

  • Statement by Nate Wallace, Clean Transportation Program Manager, Environmental Defence

    Ottawa | Traditional, unceded territory of the Algonquin Anishinaabeg People –The TTC’s budget crisis is not unique. Cities across the country are counting on hundreds of millions of dollars in expected public transit support which must come in the 2023 federal budget – and be matched by provinces. If it doesn’t, public transit systems across the country are at risk of falling into a death spiral. That is a vicious cycle of service cuts and fare hikes that push people away from public transit and into their cars, further decreasing revenue, leading to further service cuts. If this is allowed to happen, it will make cities more congested, increase carbon emissions, and have the greatest impact on society’s most vulnerable. The federal government has saved public transit from disaster before, and it can do it again.

    When the TTC responded to operating deficits in the 1990s with service cuts and fare hikes, ridership dramatically declined and took 17 years to recover. If the job of saving public transit is abandoned before ridership can recover from the pandemic, this same story will be repeated in Toronto and in cities across Canada. And all the money spent to date preventing cuts will have been wasted. In a climate emergency, we can’t afford to put progress on hold for another generation.

    Issue Backgrounder:

    https://environmentaldefence.ca/report/stopping-the-public-transit-death-spiral/ 

    ABOUT ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENCE (environmentaldefence.ca): Environmental Defence is a leading Canadian environmental advocacy organization that works with government, industry and individuals to defend clean water, a safe climate and healthy communities.

    – 30 –

    For more information or to request an interview, please contact:

    Alex Ross, Environmental Defence, media@environmentaldefence.ca

    The post Statement from Nate Wallace, Clean Transportation Program Manager at Environmental Defence, on Toronto Deputy Mayor Jennifer McKelvie’s request for emergency transit funding appeared first on Environmental Defence.

  • Toronto | Traditional territories of the Mississaugas of the Credit, the Anishinaabeg, the Haudenosaunee, and the Huron-Wendat – A new report makes it clear that there is more than enough land already in the planning pipelines to build over 2 million homes by 2031, far more than the 1.5 million housing units the Province wants built across Ontario. This makes it evident there is no planning rationale for building on the Greenbelt or mandating sprawl development.

    As many experts have pointed out since the beginning of the Ontario government’s push for settlement boundary expansions in the Greater Golden Horseshoe (GGH), the region has a large supply – more than 350 km2 at last count – of unbuilt “greenfield” land already designated for development. There is so much existing land inside urban boundaries that the region would need to double the rate of land consumption in the 21st century in order to consume it all within three decades. With good faith efforts to enhance the density and walkability of new developments, and to direct the bulk of growth to existing neighborhoods that need it, there is no reason to expect that the GGH would ever need to expand beyond existing urban boundaries, let alone into the Greenbelt.

    The new report, entitled: Review of Housing Unit Capacity Identified in Initial Land Needs Assessments Prepared for Upper and Single Tier Municipalities in the Greater Golden Horseshoe and authored by Registered Professional Planner Kevin Eby, reveals that even without accounting for such improvements in land use, and despite recent changes designed to promote more wasteful land use patterns, no additional farms, forests or protected Greenbelt areas would be needed to meet the provincial government’s goal of building 1.5 million homes in Ontario by 2031. The research was provided to the member organizations of the Alliance for a Liveable Ontario and its key findings include:

    • Even without improvements in land use, and accounting for government interventions designed to reduce land efficiency, cumulative capacity inside existing urban boundaries at the time the new 2022 official plans were being prepared already exceeded two million units in the GGH alone.

    • That is almost twice the cumulative number of housing units required to be built by 2031 within the 25 GGH municipalities that have been recently assigned new housing targets by the Province.

    • Many municipalities required no, or extremely limited, urban area expansions to accommodate population growth forecast by the Growth Plan to 2051.

    • No additional overall housing capacity would be required in the GGH to meet the GGH’s share of the 1.5 million housing target for the Province of Ontario by 2031.

    This research suggests that the dismantling of environmental protection and anti-sprawl rules undertaken by the provincial government starting in 2020 are not – as the government has implied – required to achieve the construction of more housing.  Such measures included:

    • Removal of 7400 acres of protected Greenbelt lands.

    • Expansion of urban boundaries by thousands of hectares through provincial approval – or wholesale replacement of – City and Regional Official plans.

    • Proposed continued use of Minister’s Zoning Orders to facilitate development of additional greenfield housing development.

    • Proposed elimination of upper-tier municipal planning functions.

    • Removal of Conservation Authorities’ ability to work with municipalities on planning issues, including natural heritage conservation.

    • Potential forced sale of lands owned by Conservation Authorities capable of accommodating future housing.

    • Proposed elimination of the Growth Plan for the GGH.

    The homes required to reach the projected 2 million number could be built in the range of types and forms, and at the lower than beneficial densities that have occurred in the past, and still achieve this goal. Even more homes could be created in this same area if forms and densities were built that would provide optimal arrangements for supporting public transit, walkability, higher amounts of public amenities and lower infrastructure costs.

    The new research report summarizes information that is publicly available from regional governments across the GGH and demonstrates how many homes were planned to be built inside the urban boundaries that existed before the 2022 boundary expansion. The summary of projected housing numbers also reflect planned building at the densities that the municipalities had chosen during their respective Lands Needs Assessment processes. These housing densities are generally lower than recommended by the Growth Plan to ensure that optimal numbers of people are living per acre to facilitate affordable transit and infrastructure costs. Therefore, the 2 million total projected homes that could be built represent a conservative estimate of total possible future supply to 2031.

    ABOUT ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENCE (environmentaldefence.ca): Environmental Defence is a leading Canadian environmental advocacy organization that works with government, industry and individuals to defend clean water, a safe climate and healthy communities.

    – 30 –

    The following member organizations of the Alliance for a Livable Ontario have supported this work and are available to comment on its implications:

    Olivia O’Connor, ACORN, Hamilton. hamilton@acorncanada.org

    Michelle Tom, More Neighbours Hamilton. michtom20@gmail.com, twitter handle: @morehamont

    Brittany Harris, Communications Manager, Environmental Defence. media@environmentaldefence.ca

    Ian Borsuk, Acting Executive Director, Environment Hamilton. iborsuk@environmenthamilton.org

    Chief Kelly LaRocca, Mississaugas of Scugog Island First Nation. klarocca@scugogfirstnation.com

    Max Hansgen, President, National Farmers Union, Ontario. president@nfuontario.ca

    Jane Fogal, Halton Hills Climate Action. jane.fogal@gmail.com

    Kim Bradshaw, Stop Sprawl Halton. kabradshaw@live.com

    David Crombie, Friends of the Golden Horseshoe. davidcrombie@rogers.com

    Anne Bell, Ontario Nature. anneb@ontarionature.org

    The post NEW REPORT: More than enough land available to build over 2 million homes in the Greater Golden Horseshoe by 2031, without touching the Greenbelt or expanding urban boundaries appeared first on Environmental Defence.

    This post was originally published on Environmental Defence.

  • Statement by Aly Hyder Ali, Oil and Gas Program Manager, Environmental Defence

    Ottawa | Traditional, unceded territory of the Algonquin Anishinaabeg People – A new report from InfluenceMap confirms the impact of oil and gas lobbying efforts which Environmental Defence has been tracking: that Canada’s six largest oil and gas companies, along with the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP), have been a major obstacle to Canada achieving its climate goals.

    Despite publicly claiming support for climate action, the oil and gas companies along with CAPP have consistently pushed for the expansion of the fossil fuel industry, in direct opposition to the International Energy Agency’s call for a rapid phase out of fossil fuels.

    Not surprisingly, these companies and CAPP are adamantly against the proposed oil and gas emissions cap that is projected to be implemented by the end of this year. The oil and gas sector’s emissions are the largest and the fastest growing source of climate pollution in Canada – having increased by nearly 20 per cent since 2005. Without a strong and ambitious emissions cap, Canada has no chance of limiting its pollution and doing its part to keep global average temperatures below 1.5 C.

    If it were left up to oil and gas companies, they would be allowed to operate without accountability and continue polluting at the expense of all of our futures. Their public net-zero commitments are nothing but a weak attempt at greenwashing their destructive operations. As the InfluenceMap report shows, behind the scenes they are working hard to advocate against much needed emissions reducing regulations, such as the oil and gas emissions cap, while pushing for more production despite the consequences for the climate.

    Environmental Defence’s latest monthly roundup of Canada’s oil and gas industry lobbying the federal government is here.

    ABOUT ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENCE (environmentaldefence.ca): Environmental Defence is a leading Canadian environmental advocacy organization that works with government, industry and individuals to defend clean water, a safe climate and healthy communities.

    – 30 –

    For more information or to request an interview, please contact:

    Allen Braude, Environmental Defence, media@environmentaldefence.ca

     

    The post Statement on InfluenceMap’s report on Canada’s oil & gas industry undermining climate policy appeared first on Environmental Defence.

    This post was originally published on Environmental Defence.

  • Toronto | Traditional territories of the Mississaugas of the Credit, the Anishinaabeg, the Haudenosaunee, and the Huron-Wendat – The plan is a real improvement to Canada’s approach to managing the transition to a low-carbon economy, and we welcome the government’s commitment to bringing affected parties to the table. However for this plan to have an impact, it needs to be backed by new budget commitments and robust legislation. 

    We are pleased the government is proposing a dedicated institution and an independent advisory body. Both were key elements to successful fair transitions in other jurisdictions. It is also encouraging for the plan to explicitly mention unions, workers’ rights, Indigenous rights, equity, and social dialogue.

    For this plan to be credible, it must be backed by new commitments in Budget 2023, at a much larger scale than what is currently offered. The government needs to allocate $15 billion a year for economic diversification for communities currently reliant on high-carbon industries, and for transition support such as training, income bridging, and early retirement programs.

    This plan must also be followed by legislation that includes regional and sector planning mechanisms so workers, employers and communities have certainty about how Canada will manage the energy transition and ensure that it is a fair transition that recognizes regional needs and differences.

    We are also concerned by the plan’s focus on false solutions to the climate crisis – such as carbon capture for fossil fuel production and fossil hydrogen – as a source of future jobs and income. A ‘sustainable jobs’ plan based on these unproven technologies could leave workers stranded in a high-carbon past while the rest of the world has moved on.

    ABOUT ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENCE Environmental Defence is a leading Canadian environmental advocacy organization that works with government, industry and individuals to defend clean water, a safe climate and healthy communities.

    -30-

    For more information or to request an interview, please contact:

    Alex Ross, Environmental Defence, media@environmentaldefence.ca 

    The post Statement from Alienor Rougeot, Environmental Defence Climate and Energy Program Manager on the Sustainable Jobs Action Plan by the Government of Canada appeared first on Environmental Defence.

    This post was originally published on Environmental Defence.

  • Centre block parliament hill Canada

    Bill S-5 amendment improves CEPA but falls short of what is required

    OTTAWA | TRADITIONAL, UNCEDED TERRITORY OF THE ALGONQUIN ANISHNAABEG PEOPLE – MPs missed an opportunity to drive faster action on toxic substances by voting down a proposed amendment to the Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA), that would have required the federal government to account for delays longer than two years.

    While CEPA requires the federal environment minister to develop risk management strategies for each substance found to be toxic, implementation of planned control measures can be delayed by years, or even decades. Addressing this problem is a critical gap in the federal government’s bill to modernize CEPA, say environmental and health groups.

    MPs on the House of Commons environment committee (ENVI) rejected an amendment moved by MP Laurel Collins and also supported by MP Monique Pauzé that would have established an accountability mechanism to help ensure risk management plans stay on track. Instead, the committee adopted a weaker amendment requiring updates on regulatory timelines and reasons for delay in the CEPA annual report.  While this will be a  welcome addition to the annual report, groups say greater accountability is needed to fix the problem of long delays that has plagued regulation of  toxic substances in Canada.

    Bill S-5, which seeks to reform CEPA for the first time in more than two decades, is currently being reviewed by ENVI. The government introduced the bill first in the Senate, where it passed last Spring.

    ENVI reviewed CEPA in 2017 and recommended amendments to the Act to “update, improve and prescribe timelines for all actions under CEPA”  Our joint submission on Bill S-5 reinforced this recommendation. Establishing timelines for action and clear requirements for reporting on progress are basic elements for accountability, there is no justifiable reason to omit accountability mechanisms from CEPA.

    In the absence of clear timelines for action under CEPA, lengthy delays of years or even more than a decade are not uncommon as substances move through the various steps. These delays result in years of unnecessary risk to human health and the environment, as well as uncertainty.

    These delays have real life consequences for the health of people in Canada and the environment. For example, PBDE neurotoxic flame retardants used in consumer products were assessed as toxic in 2006 but the draft regulations restricting PBDEs in products were only published last year, a delay of 16 years. In the meantime, exposure to these chemicals continues at levels above Canada’s environmental quality guidelines and put people and ecosystems at risk.

    ENVI is scheduled to continue clause-by-clause consideration of Bill S-5 on Thursday, and has yet to vote on several other priority matters. In particular, we call on the committee to adopt amendments to:

    • set a higher bar around confidentiality claims to ensure public access to information
    • ensuring that right to a healthy environment implementation framework will include progress on air quality and toxic substances, and
    • require labelling of substances that are, or may be, toxic in consumer products.

    The federal government has claimed Bill S-5 is about “strengthening protections for Canadians and the environment from harmful chemicals and pollutants.” Environmental and health groups call on MPs on the environment committee to strengthen these critical aspects of the bill to ensure the promise is met.

    Groups supporting this statement:

    Ecojustice
    Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment (CAPE)
    Environmental Defence
    David Suzuki Foundation
    Breast Cancer Action Quebec

    – 30 –

    For more information or to request an interview, please contact:

    Paula Gray, media@environmentaldefence.ca, 705-435-8611

    Viorica Lorcencova, viorica.lorcencova@acsqc.ca, 514-443-8437

    Jane McArthur, jane@cape.ca, 647-952-4525

    Brendan Glauser, bglauser@davidsuzuki.org, 604-356-8829

    Sean O’Shea, Ecojustice, soshea@ecojustice.ca, 416-368-7533 ext. 523

    The post MP committee fails to establish timelines for action on toxic chemicals appeared first on Environmental Defence.

    This post was originally published on Environmental Defence.

  • ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENCE, KEEPERS OF THE WATER

    Toronto | Traditional territories of the Huron-Wendat, the Anishnaabeg, Haudenosaunee, Chippewas and the Mississaugas of the Credit First Nation – On February 4th, 5.3 million litres leaked from Imperial Oil’s tailing “pond,” enough to fill two Olympic-sized swimming pools in a single incident. The tar sands’ tailings “ponds” now contain over 1.4 trillion litres of toxic waste and cover an area more than two times the size of the city of Vancouver.

    Quotes:

    “Indigenous communities have known about tailings leaking for years, and nothing has been done despite numerous complaints and incidents. The Alberta and Federal governments have turned a blind eye to the oil industry in the oil sands for forty-five years, allowing disasters like this to happen. This leak is a wake-up call and must lead to much more active and ambitious efforts to make industry pay for the destruction they cause.” Jesse Cardinal, Executive Director, Keepers of the Water

    “Governments have been negligent by allowing tailings growth to continue. There are nineteen toxic tailings “ponds,” each of which pose an immense danger to human and ecological health. The Imperial Oil leak adds to the mountain of evidence that the toxic tailings “ponds” are unsafe for nearby Indigenous communities and biodiversity. Oil sands operators are irresponsibly managing their dangerous waste. Governments need to step in immediately to prevent any more chemicals from reaching the environment, and must ensure companies are cleaning up the tailings.” Aliénor Rougeot, Climate and Energy Program Manager, Environmental Defence

    Additional information:

    • The Alberta Energy Regulator issued an order on February 6th to Imperial Oil, Canada’s 3rd largest oil sands producer, in response to two incidents in which wastewater from toxic tailings leaked into the environment.
    • The second incident is that the same facility has been leaking from another area since May.
    • In 2020, the Commission for Environmental Cooperation, an environmental agency created under NAFTA, confirmed the tar sands tailings ponds were leaking toxic chemicals into groundwater and that these leaks are a violation of Canada’s Fisheries Act.

    About ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENCE (environmentaldefence.ca): Environmental Defence is a leading Canadian environmental advocacy organization that works with government, industry and individuals to defend clean water, a safe climate and healthy communities.

    About KEEPERS OF THE WATER (keepersofthewater.ca): Keepers of the Water are First Nations, Métis, Inuit, environmental groups, concerned citizens, and communities working together for the protection of water, air, land, and all living things within the Arctic Ocean Drainage Basin.

    -30-

    For more information or to request an interview, please contact:

    Paula Gray, Environmental Defence, media@environmentaldefence.ca

    Jesse Cardinal, Keepers of the Water, ed@keepersofthewater.ca

    The post Statement from Indigenous and environmental experts on Imperial Oil’s tailings pond 5.3 million litres leak appeared first on Environmental Defence.

    This post was originally published on Environmental Defence.

  • For immediate release: January 27, 2023

    ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENCE

    Phil Pothen, Counsel & Ontario Environment Program Manager, and Tim Gray, Executive Director, available for comment on federal jurisdiction and duty to prevent destruction of Duffins Rouge Agricultural Preserve lands

    Toronto | Traditional territories of the Mississaugas of the Credit, the Anishinaabeg, the Haudenosaunee, and the Huron-Wendat – Following the statement by Federal Environment Minister Guilbeault that the federal government has a legislative responsibility to intervene to stop projects that would destroy parts of the Greenbelt, and statements by Premier Ford that the Greenbelt is provincial jurisdiction, Environmental Defence lawyer, Phil Pothen, and Executive Director, Tim Gray, will be available for comment regarding the federal government’s jurisdiction and duty to intervene.

    WHAT: Comments from Environmental Defence Executive Director and from Environmental Defence lawyer following statements by Minister Guilbeaut and Premier Ford

    WHO: Environmental Defence Executive Director, Tim Gray, and Counsel & Ontario Environment Program Manager, Phil Pothen

    WHERE: 33 Cecil Street, Toronto or by telephone or video link

    WHEN: Friday, January 27, 2023

    ABOUT ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENCE (environmentaldefence.ca): Environmental Defence is a leading Canadian environmental advocacy organization that works with government, industry and individuals to defend clean water, a safe climate and healthy communities.

    – 30 –

    For more information or to request an interview, please contact:

    Brittany Harris, Environmental Defence, media@environmentaldefence.ca

    The post Environmental Defence lawyer and Executive Director both available for comment on federal jurisdiction and obligation to prevent destruction of Duffins Rouge Agricultural Preserve lands appeared first on Environmental Defence.

    This post was originally published on Environmental Defence.

  • Toronto | Traditional territories of the Mississaugas of the Credit, the Anishinaabeg, the Haudenosaunee, and the Huron-Wendat – More than 60 environmental and health organizations and businesses across Canada are calling on the federal government to Expand the Single-Use Plastics Ban by adding six new categories:

    • All takeout containers, cups and lids
    • Bottles and caps
    • Sachets, pouches and wrappers
    • Bags, film and wrap
    • Filtered cigarettes
    • Produce stickers

    These six new categories encompass a wide range of plastic products and packaging that dominate coastal beach cleanups, pose risks to wildlife and human health, and are problematic for waste management. On the heels of the first phase of the ban coming into effect last month, environmental and health organizations are sounding the alarm that current federal actions to reduce waste and pollution fail to meet the scope and urgency of the growing crisis. 

    The coalition is also calling for the elimination of various known problematic substances, including PVC, polystyrene (“Styrofoam”), PFAS, bisphenols, and phthalates used in a wide range of plastic products and packaging. This call to action, championed by leading environmental groups, was sent in an open letter to ministers Steven Guilbeault and Jean-Yves Duclos today. 

    Various jurisdictions are taking action on a number of the items and substances highlighted. The federal, provincial and territorial governments have identified many of the items in the proposed six categories as problematic because they (1) regularly end up in the environment, (2) are harmful to habitats and species, and/or (3) cause significant challenges in end of life management. 

    In order to avoid false solutions like chemical recycling and incineration, groups are also calling for truly zero waste, reuse-centred systems to support the phase out of the aforementioned categories.

    Karen Wirsig, Senior Plastics Program Manager for Environmental Defence, said:

    Unnecessary single-use plastics drive the pollution crisis that is choking our rivers, lakes and oceans, harming wildlife and threatening our health. Voluntary corporate commitments are not working to reduce plastic pollution. Bans are an effective way of eliminating the most hazardous items and forcing improvements to packaging, including convenient return and refill.

    Sarah King, Head of Oceans & Plastics Campaigns for Greenpeace Canada, said:

    “The federal government knows that the list of problematic plastics goes far beyond the current six items. Every day, plastic production and pollution threaten the health of people, the climate and ecosystems — in Canada and globally. A shift to a truly zero waste, circular economy is possible, but not with a ban only covering 3% of Canada’s plastic waste. Dozens of groups agree it’s time to expand the ban.”

    Emily Alfred, Waste Campaigner for the Toronto Environmental Alliance, said:

    “In every community, residents and businesses are grappling with the same problem: way too much unnecessary, wasteful and harmful plastic. We need national regulations to ban these harmful plastics and make the shift towards the solutions that are already out there: waste-free, non-toxic reusables.” 

    Beatrice Olivastri, CEO, Friends of the Earth Canada, said:

    “Expanding the ban to the next six single-use plastic products is important for the health of people and the planet. The ban must stop manufacture for export as well as domestic use and manufacture. When the world comes to Canada in early 2024 for the plastic pollution treaty negotiations, Canada should show leadership with this expanded ban in place.”

    Lisa Gue, National Policy Manager, David Suzuki Foundation, said:

    “Most problems are best addressed at the source, and plastic pollution is no exception. That’s why Canada’s move to ban a first set of unnecessary, single-use plastics is so important. But we can’t stop here. We must expand the ban if Canada wants to achieve its goal of ending plastic pollution by 2030. We must accelerate the shift to more sustainable alternatives.”

    ENDS

    Notes to media

    [1] The import and manufacturing of stir sticks, straws, checkout bags, cutlery, and takeout containers made from “problematic plastics” is banned since Dec. 20, 2022. The sale and distribution of these items will be banned December 2023.

    [2] The import and manufacturing of six-pack rings will be banned June 2023, with a sale and distribution ban June 2024.

    [3] The current federal ban, covering the aforementioned six items, will only affect 3% of plastic waste generated

    – 30 –

    For more information or to request an interview, please contact:

    Brittany Harris, Communications Manager, Environmental Defence, media@environmentaldefence.ca

    Brandon Wei, Communications officer, Greenpeace Canada, brandon.wei@greenpeace.org

    Alexandra Caterbow, Communications Director, Health and Environment Justice Support, info@hej-support.org 

    Beatrice Olivastri, CEO, Friends of the Earth Canada, beatrice@foecanada.org

    Brendan Glauser, Communications Director, David Suzuki Foundation, bglauser@davidsuzuki.org

    Colleen Ans, Living Green, Living Well Coordinator, Green Action Centre, colleen@greenactioncentre.ca

    The post Environmental, health orgs and businesses call on Canada to Expand the Single-Use Plastics Ban appeared first on Environmental Defence.

    This post was originally published on Environmental Defence.

  • (Jan. 24, 2023 — Hilo, Hawaii) Today, Judge Peter K. Kubota dismissed Albert “Ian” Schweitzer’s conviction for the 1991 rape and murder of Dana Ireland, based on new DNA testing that excluded Mr. Schweitzer and his co-defendants, and identified a single unknown male suspect. Additional newly discovered evidence presented to the court revealed that although DNA testing at Mr. Schweitzer’s original trial excluded him and his co-defendants, the State used false jailhouse informant testimony to build its case, which led to the wrongful conviction of Mr. Schweitzer, his younger brother Shawn Schweitzer, and Frank Pauline, Jr., who is now deceased. Ian walked free today after 25 years of wrongful incarceration.

    Image of Ian Schweitzer in court on Tuesday, Jan. 24, 2023 in Hilo, Hawaii. (Marco Garcia/The Innocence Project)

    “After 25 years of incarceration for a crime Mr. Schweitzer did not commit, he is eager to have his name cleared and return home to his family. From the beginning, the DNA in this case provided powerful evidence that these three men are innocent,” said Susan Friedman, one of Ian’s Innocence Project attorneys. “Yet, the state built its case on false informant testimony and misapplied forensic evidence. We are grateful to the Hawaii County Prosecuting Attorney for their collaboration during this re-investigation. The new scientific evidence is clear — Mr. Schweitzer did not commit this crime.” 

    “Injustice is at the core of this case — historically one of the most high profile cases Hawaii has ever seen. The growing public pressure to hold someone accountable for this horrific crime — combined with the incessant media attention — outweighed the tainted false testimony used to wrongly convict the Schweitzer brothers and Mr. Pauline, as well as the clear DNA evidence that proved their innocence,” Ken Lawson, co-director of the Hawaii Innocence Project.

    The Pressure to Get Justice Ends in Wrongful Conviction

    On Dec. 24, 1991, Ms. Ireland was struck by a vehicle on Kapoho Kai Drive on Hawaii Island while cycling home, and sustained life-threatening injuries. Ms. Ireland had also been sexually assaulted and left on a fishing trail in the Waa Waa subdivision. Ms. Ireland died from severe blood loss at the hospital the following day. 

    From the beginning, local and state news regularly covered the case. The community supported the Ireland family by helping to raise money for a reward and holding a candlelight vigil and parade on the one-year anniversary of Ms. Ireland’s murder. As time passed there was mounting public pressure to solve the case. In April 1994, a petition was started requesting that the Hawaii attorney general appoint an independent prosecutor to investigate Ms. Ireland’s murder.  

    In May 1994, what seemed to be a break in the case came from incentivized informant John Gonsalves — Mr. Pauline’s half brother — who claimed to law enforcement that Mr. Pauline had information on Ms. Ireland’s murder. A month later, Mr. Pauline, who was incarcerated on unrelated charges, falsely confessed to being in a car with Ian and Shawn when they committed the crime. Mr. Pauline gave multiple statements to police, which were riddled with inconsistencies, in an attempt to gain favor for himself and Mr. Gonsalves, who was facing significant drug charges at the time. Mr. Pauline later recanted his confession on July 6, 1996. The Schweitzer brothers and Mr. Pauline were nonetheless indicted. Subsequent DNA testing on the rape kit and spermatozoa on the hospital gurney sheet on which Ms. Ireland was transported excluded all three co-defendants. The indictments against the Schweitzer brothers were dismissed, but not those against Mr. Pauline, who had confessed. 

    In 1999, Ian and Shawn were re-indicted based on new allegations from a jailhouse informant, Michael Ortiz. Mr. Ortiz claimed that Ian confessed to him while they were both incarcerated. Mr. Pauline was tried and convicted in August 2000, and Ian was convicted in February 2000. Ian was sentenced to life for second-degree murder, plus 20 years for kidnapping and 20 years for sexual assault to run consecutively. Mr. Pauline was sentenced to life for second-degree murder and given two concurrent life sentences for kidnapping and first-degree sexual assault. Mr. Pauline died in prison in 2015 after being attacked by a prisoner. 

    New DNA Evidence Reinforces Innocence

    A key piece of evidence at both Ian and Mr. Pauline’s trials was a Jimmy’Z t-shirt found near the victim’s body, which was soaked in her blood. At both trials, the prosecution presented witnesses who claimed the shirt belonged to Mr. Pauline even though he strenuously denied this, and argued the shirt did not fit. 

    Since Ian’s conviction, there have been significant advancements in forensic DNA testing. In light of this, additional items from Ms. Ireland’s rape kit, as well as the Jimmy’Z t-shirt were tested. Despite the State’s contention that the Jimmy’Z t-shirt was worn by Mr. Pauline during the crime, DNA testing excluded Mr. Pauline and the Schweitzer brothers from DNA recovered from the t-shirt. New DNA results of an armpit cutting and semen stain prove that the “habitual wearer” of the shirt was the same unknown person — “Unknown Male #1” — whose DNA was recovered from items in Ms. Ireland’s rape kit that were tested before Ian’s trial. “Unknown Male #1” was linked to Ms. Ireland’s vaginal swab, hospital gurney sheet, underwear, pubic combings, and the Jimmy’Z t-shirt. Ian, Shawn, and Mr. Pauline have been excluded from all the DNA recovered from the evidence in this case. These findings further solidified the innocence of all three men.

    Unregulated Informant Testimony Perpetuates Injustice 

    Throughout this case, law enforcement’s dependence on unreliable informant testimony had devastating consequences. In exchange for his testimony, Mr. Gonsalves was sentenced to probation, although he initially faced significant prison time, and the State promised not to transfer him for federal prosecution. Mr. Ortiz was facing a retrial and 10-year sentence, but had his sentence reduced to time served after he began cooperating with law enforcement in this case. 

    Jailhouse informant testimony has played a leading role in 19% of the Innocence Project’s 241 exonerations and releases to date. The promise or expectation of receiving leniency or other benefits in exchange for testimony creates a strong incentive for witnesses to lie. In many wrongful convictions these benefits provided in exchange for their testimony are never disclosed. The Innocence Project has long advocated for nationwide reform which includes system-wide tracking, complete disclosure of informant testimony, as well as jury instructions to inform jurors about the included incentives and potential fallibility of jailhouse informant evidence.

    “Given that the use of informants remains unregulated in many states, including Hawaii, the present ecosystem incentivizes people behind bars to testify against innocent people facing charges in exchange for a benefit, including leniency in their own case. Indeed, many informants provide unreliable testimony in multiple cases over time since their activities are not tracked,” said Barry Scheck, Innocence Project’s Co-Founder and Special Counsel. “This denies justice not only to the innocent, but also to the victims of crime whose perpetrators can become informants in exchange for leniency.”

    Faulty Forensic Science 

    This case is a stark example of how faulty forensic evidence can lead to wrongful conviction.

    The misapplication of forensic science has contributed to 53% of wrongful convictions in Innocence Project cases. 

    In the original autopsy, a circular injury was noted on Ms. Ireland’s breast resembling a bite mark. At Ian’s trial the prosecution alleged that Mr. Pauline had bitten Ms. Ireland, which was supported by the medical examiner’s testimony. Mr. Ortiz, the jailhouse informant, also claimed that Ian stated that Mr. Pauline had bitten Ms. Ireland’s breast. In the reinvestigation of this case, Ian’s board-certified forensic odontologist, Dr. Adam Freeman, concluded the injury was not a human bite mark. To date, at least 38 known wrongful convictions and indictments have stemmed from invalidated bite mark evidence. For decades, forensic odontologists testified that they could identify the source of a bite mark, but years of research have wholly undermined this assertion. The significant changes in the understanding of bite mark evidence have led the American Board of Forensic Odontology (ABFO) to revise its standards and guidelines to prohibit an ABFO Diplomate from concluding that an individual is the source of a bite mark. 

    A central question during Ian’s trial was whether his Volkswagen Beetle was involved in this crime. Investigators spent the first three years of the investigation searching for pickup trucks and large vehicles. This was based on witness reports of the types of vehicles seen in the area around the time of the crime. Investigators also believed these were the only type of vehicles that could have driven down the steep trail where the victim was found. However, police abandoned this theory once Ian became a suspect and alleged that his Volkswagen Beetle was involved in this crime, despite the fact that he didn’t purchase the vehicle until three months after the crime. At trial, flawed expert testimony alleged that Ian’s Volkswagen Beetle could have been responsible for the damage to Ms. Ireland’s bicycle. During the reinvestigation Matthew Marvin, a tire tread expert at Ron Smith & Associates, reviewed the tire tread evidence and concluded that, based on the measurements taken by crime scene investigators, Ian’s Volkswagen Beetle could not have produced the reported tire tracks at the Waa Waa crime scene. Although there was less evidence available at the scene of the bicycle collision, Mr. Marvin concluded that the Volkswagen Beetle likely did not produce the tire tracks at this scene either and that the same vehicle may have produced the tire tracks at both scenes.

    Ian Schweitzer is represented by Hawaii Innocence Project’s (HIP) Co-Director Kenneth Lawson, Associate Director Jennifer Brown, HIP volunteer attorneys William Harrison and Brooke Hart, and former HIP Director Virginia Hench; and Innocence Project Senior Staff Attorney Susan Friedman, Co-Founder and Special Counsel Barry Scheck and Post-Conviction Litigation Fellow Natalie Baker. 

    The post Ian Schweitzer Exonerated of Murder After 25 Years in Hawaii appeared first on Innocence Project.

    This post was originally published on Innocence Project.

  • ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENCE, ECOJUSTICE, DAVID SUZUKI FOUNDATION, FRIENDS OF THE EARTH CANADA, SAFE FOOD MATTERS

    Toronto | Traditional territories of the Mississaugas of the Credit, the Anishinaabeg, the Haudenosaunee, and the Huron-Wendat – Environmental and food groups are challenging Health Canada’s failure to conduct a rigorous scientific assessment of glyphosate before renewing the approval for a product containing it. 

    Ecojustice, on behalf of the David Suzuki FoundationEnvironmental Defence CanadaFriends of the Earth Canada and Safe Food Matters, filed the judicial review application in Federal Court.  

    The groups argue that Health Canada’s Pest Management Regulatory Agency (PMRA) has a duty to only renew registrations for pesticide products if it can determine with reasonable certainty that no harm will occur to human health and the environment.  

    The groups also say that under the Pest Control Products Act, Health Canada has a legal responsibility to use the most up-to-date and accurate science when renewing glyphosate products. Since the re-evaluation of glyphosate in 2017, scientific evidence has evolved – these new scientific studies on glyphosate show potential risks that Health Canada needs to evaluate.  

    There are many emerging potential risks associated with glyphosate, including impacts on the microbiome, neurodegenerative and reproductive toxicity, adverse impacts on monarch butterflies and ecological harm to freshwater ecosystems that Health Canada has not previously considered. U.S. courts have also recently criticized the approach that North American regulators took in determining whether glyphosate is a human carcinogen and in October 2022 the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency withdrew its risk assessment. 

    In December 2022, Health Canada renewed the registration for the herbicide “Mad Dog Plus” for five more years. The product, which contains glyphosate as the active ingredient, is used on a variety of crops and trees. Health Canada renewed the registration without updating the risk assessment for glyphosate.   

    According to the PMRA’s annual sales report, glyphosate is by far the most heavily used pesticide active ingredient in Canada. In 2020, over 50 million kilograms of glyphosate were sold in Canada. For comparison, only one other pest control product’s active ingredient sold more than 10 million kilograms. 

    In addition to the lawsuit that’s been filed, environmental, health and food groups supported a House of Commons petition calling on the Minister of Health to ban the sale and use of glyphosate to protect human health and the environment. The petition closed on Jan. 13 after receiving more than 18,000 signatures.  

    Representatives from the groups made the following statements:  

    Laura Bowman, lawyer, Ecojustice said: 

    “Health Canada has a long track record of granting renewals for harmful pesticides without requiring new information on their impacts on human health and ecosystems. We need Health Canada to stay on top of the science, particularly for glyphosate, which is the most widely used pesticide in Canada by a large margin.” 

    “The most recent science shows that glyphosate may pose dangers to human health and can cause ecosystem damage. We are suing Health Canada because products containing glyphosate should not be renewed without first considering the most up-to-date scientific evidence.” 

    Lisa Gue, National Policy Manager, David Suzuki Foundation said: 

    Glyphosate-based pesticides have had devastating impacts on monarch butterflies. In November, Environment Canada started consultations to protect the monarch as an endangered species. The Pest Management Regulation Agency needs to evaluate impacts on species at risk, like monarchs, before moving ahead with these product renewals.”   

    Cassie Barker, Toxics Senior Program Manager, Environmental Defence Canada said: 

    “Health Canada is supposed to regulate – not rubber-stamp – these hazardous pesticides. If we are going to achieve significant pesticide use reduction by 2030 globally and domestically, we need health and environmental leadership from this government. Human and pollinator health will continue to suffer until this government steps up and moves us away from these over-used and under-regulated pest products.” 

    Beatrice Olivastri, CEO, Friends of the Earth Canada said: 

    “We’re going to court because we no longer trust Health Canada’s PMRA to do its job in assessing whether products with glyphosate should be allowed to return to our marketplace.  We see rubber stamping when, instead, PMRA should be studying recent results of independent research, especially bearing on the microbiome. Based on current research, Friends of the Earth believes glyphosate-based products should not be allowed for use in Canada.” 

    Mary Lou McDonald, President, Safe Food Matters said:  

    “This is the fourth time we’ve had to sue PMRA over glyphosate, which is no easy task for a small NGO. PMRA needs to listen to what the Federal Court of Appeal said in our recent win: show us that your decisions protect Canadians and the environment.   

    “We think PMRA has been captured — why else would they turn a blind eye to current science?  Whatever the reason, and despite all ‘transformations’, they are still not protecting Canadians. The PMRA appears to be captured by industry and is unacceptably slow at responding to the science.”    

    – 30 –

    For more information or to request an interview, please contact:

    Paula Gray, Communications Manager, Environmental Defence, media@environmentaldefence.ca, 705-435-8611

    Lisa Gue, National Policy Manager | David Suzuki Foundation
    lgue@davidsuzuki.org 

    Zoryana Cherwick, communications specialist | Ecojustice
    zcherwick@ecojustice.ca, 613 903 5898 ext. 712 

    Beatrice Olivastri, CEO | Friends of the Earth Canada
    beatrice@foecanada.org, 613 724-8690  

    Mary Lou McDonald | President, Safe Food Matters
    mlmcdonald5@gmail.com  

    The post Environmental and food groups take Health Canada to court over glyphosate product renewal appeared first on Environmental Defence.

    This post was originally published on Environmental Defence.

  • Ottawa | Traditional, unceded territory of the Algonquin Anishinaabeg People – Today, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Natural Resources and to the Minister of Environment and Climate Change, Julie Dabrusin announced the next steps Canada will take to advance its Regulated Zero-Emissions Vehicle Sales Target – a new requirement for automakers to ramp up availability of electric vehicles across Canada. Environmental Defence, Équiterre, Ecology Action Centre and the David Suzuki Foundation are responding with a joint statement welcoming the regulations as a strong step towards reducing emissions and the cost of living for Canadians. 

    Quotes

    “This regulation will help Canadians escape high gas prices by getting behind the wheel of an affordable electric car. Requiring automakers to meet sales targets will make them break ZEVs out of the luxury market and go mainstream with more affordable, mass market models. Our recent report highlighted how a strong credit system would result in ZEV prices declining by 20 per cent for the average Canadian consumer. While automakers talk a good game about the electric transition, we know that this is the only policy strong enough to break manufacturers’ gasoline vehicle production bias and ensure we meet our sales targets. Left to their own devices, they would have kept us in gas guzzlers or on a waiting list for a luxury electric car.Said Nate Wallace, Clean Transportation Program Manager, Environmental Defence

    The Ecology Action Centre applauds the federal government’s efforts to increase the total national supply of electric vehicles in Canada. While provincially regulated supply targets in BC and Quebec have served to bolster EV sales in those provinces, they have not increased the overall national supply of electric vehicles and have exacerbated supply shortages and wait times in the rest of the country. Strong federal regulation is the only solution to this problem, and specific measures aimed at ensuring supply equity will be needed in order to ensure that affordable, clean cars are available across the country.” Said Thomas Arnason McNeil, Climate Policy Coordinator for Sustainable Transportation, Ecology Action Centre

    “Canadians across the country are eager to get their hands on electric vehicles, and this long-awaited regulation will help them purchase one more quickly and at a more affordable cost. With a credit system that is stringent enough, this zero-emission vehicle standard will act as a comprehensive policy and help Canada catch up with leading jurisdictions in transport electrification. The auto industry will finally have to stop delaying the transition to low-carbon transportation, as well as promoting large, fuel-inefficient vehicles, which are feeding the climate crisis.” Said Andréanne Brazeau, Mobility Policy Analyst, Équiterre

    The federal government’s announcement today of a regulated sales requirement for zero emission vehicles promises to bring an end to auto industry profiteering from selling gas guzzlers that worsen climate, pollute our air and sicken our kids. Instead, we’ll benefit by saying goodbye to tailpipe emissions and from a focus on producing more affordable EVs. Thanks to Canada’s relatively clean electricity and the much greater energy efficiency of EVs, the operating costs for the average vehicle owner will also be lower. We need the government to commit to finalizing this reg in the next six months. The sooner it’s on the books, the better.” Said Tom Green, Senior Climate Policy Adviser, David Suzuki Foundation

    Backgrounder:

    ABOUT ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENCE Environmental Defence is a leading Canadian environmental advocacy organization that works with government, industry and individuals to defend clean water, a safe climate and healthy communities.

    Since 1993, Équiterre has been helping to find solutions, transform social norms and encourage ambitious public policies through research, support, education, mobilization and awareness building initiatives. This progress is helping to establish new principles for how we feed ourselves, how we get around and how we produce and consume, that are designed for our communities, respectful of our ecosystems, in line with social justice and of course, low in carbon.

    The Ecology Action Centre is a member-based environmental charity in Miꞌkmaꞌki/Nova Scotia taking leadership on critical issues ranging from biodiversity protection to climate change to environmental justice. The EAC strives to catalyze change through policy advocacy, community development and acts as a watch-dog for the environment. It takes a holistic approach to the environment and our economy to create a just and sustainable society. 

    Founded in 1990, the David Suzuki Foundation is a national, bilingual non-profit organization headquartered in Vancouver, with offices in Toronto and Montreal. Through evidence-based research, education and policy analysis, DSF works to conserve and protect the natural environment, and helps create a sustainable Canada.

    -30-

    For more information or to request an interview, please contact:

    Alex Ross, Environmental Defence, media@environmentaldefence.ca 

    Brendan Glauser, David Suzuki Foundation, Communications Director, bglauser@davidsuzuki.org,

    Anthony Côté Leduc, Media Relations, Équiterre acoteleduc@equiterre.org

    Thomas Arnason McNeil, Climate Policy Coordinator for Sustainable Transportation, Ecology Action Centre, thomas.arnasonmcneil@ecologyaction.ca

    The post Statement in Response to Federal Government Announcement on the Regulated Zero-Emission Vehicle Sales Target appeared first on Environmental Defence.

    This post was originally published on Environmental Defence.

  • Canada demonstrates leadership in landing a global deal but must take commitment further by tackling crises at home

    Montréal/Tiohtià:ke | Traditional, unceded lands of the Kanien’kehá:ka/Mohawk Nation, a gathering place for many First Nations, including the Anishinaabeg  – Yesterday, the Kunming-Montreal Agreement was announced at COP15 in Montreal to halt and reverse global biodiversity loss by 2030. As the host country, Canada has a responsibility to demonstrate leadership in tackling the dual crises of biodiversity loss and climate change, both globally and at home. 

    Environmental Defence joins the voices of national nature and environment groups in welcoming the new framework and congratulating Canada’s leadership on landing an ambitious global deal and advancing conservation in Canada. The hard work now is to translate this commitment into action on the ground here in Canada. 

    Quotes:

    “Canada missed an opportunity to back up its international talk with real action by staying silent on the issue of tar sands tailings “ponds” and the regulations being developed to authorize their release into the Athabasca River. Canada’s handling of the toxic tailings will be a real-world test of whether the government is sincere and will act in line with Canada’s stated COP15 priorities: biodiversity protection, meaningful partnership with Indigenous peoples, and science-based policies. As part of their implementation plans for the COP15 Agreement, Canada must follow up with a commitment to addressing tar sands tailings pollution in a manner that respects the rights and the well-being of the impacted Indigenous nations.” Aliénor Rougeot, Climate and Energy Program Manager

    “Several important Indigenous-led initiatives were announced during COP15, including the new plan to create an Indigenous-protected area around Great Bear Lake, and the creation of the First Nations National Guardians Network. But at the same time, the government of Canada is standing alongside Enbridge Inc. and ignoring and violating Indigenous rights and sovereignty on several fronts with its handling of the Line 5 pipeline.

    Canada and Enbridge’s actions are working to circumvent the Tribal rights and sovereignty in the U.S. legal system of the Tribes fighting to shut down the pipeline and protect their waters. Canada must put the Great Lakes protection and the inherent and treaty rights of Indigenous peoples ahead of the fossil fuel economy, and withdraw its use of the 1977 pipeline treaty that makes no mention of Indigenous rights. Until then, Canada cannot say that it is truly protecting the Great Lakes.” Michelle Woodhouse, Water Program Manager 

    “It is significant that the world has recognized how destructive pollution can be for biodiversity in Target 7 of the new agreement. For the first time, parties are committing to reduce the overall risk from pesticides and highly hazardous chemicals by at least half by 2030. This is an important move, and we look forward to working with Environment and Climate Change Canada, Health and Agriculture ministers to rapidly develop action plans for Canada to reduce pesticides and other highly hazardous chemical inputs in agriculture, forestry and other uses by at least 50 per cent. Cassie Barker, Toxics Senior Program Manager

    “This agreement sets the stage for negotiations to resume on a global plastics treaty in May 2023. Canada is part of a high-ambition coalition seeking to end plastic pollution worldwide by 2040. This will require legally-binding measures that address the full lifecycle of plastics, including limits on the production and use of plastics, and eliminate harmful chemical additives. Stopping pollution from plastics at all stages of its existence – from resource extraction through to waste disposal – is essential for protecting wildlife, natural habitats, biodiversity and human health in Canada and around the world.” Karen Wirsig, Plastics Senior Program Manager 

    ABOUT ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENCE (environmentaldefence.ca): Environmental Defence is a leading Canadian environmental advocacy organization that works with government, industry and individuals to defend clean water, a safe climate and healthy communities.

    – 30 –

    For more information or to request an interview, please contact:

    Paula Gray, Environmental Defence, media@environmentaldefence.ca

    The post Statement on the Final Outcome of COP15 appeared first on Environmental Defence.

    This post was originally published on Environmental Defence.

  • MONTREAL |UNCEDED TERRITORY OF THE KANIEN’KEHA:KA – Canadian environmental groups welcome the Kunming-Montreal Agreement at COP15 in Montreal to halt and reverse global biodiversity loss by 2030 and applaud Canada’s leadership, which was instrumental in landing the deal.

    This historic deal was adopted under the UN Convention on Biological Diversity, including Canada.

    Under this agreement, governments have committed to conserving at least 30% of land and of ocean globally, respecting the rights of Indigenous Peoples and recognizing contributions of Indigenous and traditional territories towards this goal.

    Governments have also committed to eliminating subsidies harmful to nature while increasing international finance for biodiversity conservation. Specifically, developed countries will contribute USD 20 billion a year until 2025, increasing to 30 billion a year until 2030, into international finance for developing countries to mobilize conservation efforts globally.

    This win for people and the planet will need a whole-of-government and whole-of-society approach to achieve these ambitious goals. Governments at all levels, businesses, and society must act together to halt and reverse biodiversity loss and address the climate crisis in the coming years to build on the momentum achieved at COP15.

    Environmental groups applaud Steven Guilbeault, Canada’s Minister of Environment and Climate Change, for his leadership at COP15 in landing an ambitious global deal and advancing conservation in Canada by committing to:

    • A domestic strategy and action plan to halt and reverse nature loss in Canada that should include new legislation for accountability to biodiversity commitments
    • Over $800 million in support of Indigenous-led conservation
    • Over $600 million in new commitments for international biodiversity finance
    • Over $20 million of federal funding to expand conservation in the Yukon through the Canada-Yukon Nature Agreement
    • A joint feasibility assessment with First Nations and the Province of Manitoba to establish the Seal River Watershed as an Indigenous Protected Area

    With merely eight years until 2030, it’s crucial Canada takes meaningful action now to support implementation of this deal at home. Canada urgently needs this domestic action plan, including new legislation to hold all levels of government accountable while upholding the rights and jurisdiction of Indigenous peoples and working in full partnership with them to protect nature.

    Canadian environmental groups will work with all levels of government, Indigenous peoples, and the private sector in Canada to translate the Kunming-Montreal Agreement into ambitious federal, provincial, and territorial action to deliver on promises made in Montreal.

    Quotes

    “It is significant that the world has recognized how destructive pollution can be for biodiversity in Target 7 of the new Biodiversity agreement. For the first time, parties have agreed to an explicit objective on pesticides, committing to reduce overall risk from pesticides and highly hazardous chemicals by at least half by 2030. This is an important move, and we look forward to working with ECCC, Health and Agriculture ministers to rapidly develop action plans for Canada to reduce pesticides and other highly hazardous chemical inputs in agriculture, forestry and other uses by at least 50 per cent.” Cassie Barker, Toxics Senior Program Manager, Environmental Defence

    “We are encouraged by Canada’s leadership on the road to this historic global agreement to halt and reverse biodiversity loss by 2030 – a short eight years from now.  To do its part at home to meet targets and ensure a future for nature, Canada’s provinces and territories must work together with the federal government and Indigenous governments to put in place concrete action plans to protect 30% of land and ocean in Canada that will prioritize Indigenous-led conservation and protect the most important ecosystems and vulnerable species through strong and effective conservation measures that respect Indigenous rights.” Sandra Schwartz, National Executive Director, Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society (CPAWS)

    “This historic global deal provides hope that we can collectively halt the planet’s current path towards extinction in a way that centres Indigenous rights and knowledge. Implementation of this agreement will be the crucial issue, and must start now. We commend Canada’s leadership in setting out ambition for a national action plan to halt and reverse nature loss here at home, with new legislation to ensure accountability.” Gauri Sreenivasan, Director of Policy and Campaigns, Nature Canada

    “While the adoption of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework was occurring, the room’s atmosphere had a combination of elation over the world doing something incredible together and a sense of awesome responsibility for the work ahead to make the ambition real. Setting targets for reversing species loss, reducing pesticides and protecting the most at-risk habitats is amazing. These targets are coupled with the need to truly respect the rights of Indigenous Peoples while confronting colonialism and resource extraction harms to all people and the biodiversity we are a part of.” Jay Ritchlin, Director-General Western Canada and Nature programs at the David Suzuki Foundation

    “Years in the making, the Global Biodiversity Framework has finally come to fruition with the world agreeing to halt and reverse nature loss by 2030. Crucially, the results of COP15 in Montreal not only makes a strong commitment to protect and restore the planet’s lands and waters, it does so with recognition of Indigenous Peoples’ rights, title, knowledge and stewardship. Now this ambitious text must be turned into urgent action, and the hard work of implementation begins.” Megan Leslie, president and CEO, WWF-Canada

    “This historic declaration is a shared starting point for tackling the extinction crisis and restoring nature worldwide. Today we mark this important moment — and tomorrow the hard work begins to translate ambition into action. Here in Canada, as in the global deal, Indigenous rights and accountability measures are key to success. New legislation to protect nature and biodiversity in Canada, as Minister Guilbeault acknowledged last week, is urgently needed to make these new commitments a reality.” Reykia Fick, Nature and Food Campaigner, Greenpeace Canada

    “The Kunming-Montreal post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework has the potential to reshape the world’s exploitive relationship with nature. Whether the deal lives up to this potential will depend on how individual countries, such as Canada, implement it domestically. We urge the Government of Canada to move to enshrine Canada’s 2030 nature targets in an accountability law where 30×30 is the floor rather than the ceiling, clear timelines are set out, protection and restoration practices are decolonized, and which ensures future governments are held to account for meeting Canada’s nature targets. This law must be developed in ethical cooperation with Indigenous leadership and represents an opportunity to reimagine the role of Indigenous governance alongside our existing colonial system of laws.” Melanie Snow, Legislative Affairs Specialist, Ecojustice

    The new agreement opens the door for Canada and Indigenous communities to focus comprehensively on the marine and coastal environment. This will require a shift in the direction of Fisheries and Oceans Canada where existing programs need to align on a biodiversity and climate agenda, and ensure accountability. Canada must also take this ambition and leadership to international ocean fora. In the next three months, significant global ocean conservation opportunities include concluding a new treaty to protect high seas biodiversity on the 50% of the planet and ensuring that deep seabed mining does not start.” Susanna Fuller, VP conservation & Projects, Oceans North

    “We welcome the adoption of a strong international Global Biodiversity Framework at COP-15, one that centres Indigenous rights and global justice. This is a hopeful moment in the fight to protect the nature that sustains us. Canada’s strong leadership in the negotiations offers further hope for the true test – implementation. The concrete actions needed to reverse our current planetary path of self-destruction depend on urgent and collective government action as well society-wide transformation.” Maggy Burns, Executive Director, Ecology Action Centre

    “This Kunming-Montreal deal is a transformational opportunity for biodiversity justice, a moment to secure a safe future away from current colonial, destructive and suicidal pathways. We welcome Canada’s critical role in ensuring the adoption of the Global Biodiversity Framework. This must be a bottom line for ambition and an early demonstration of Canada’s efforts to address the underlying causes of the biodiversity and climate crises. With the mass extinctions we’re witnessing, the rapid disappearance of places and species we love and upon which we depend, the Montreal – Kunming deal must propel us forward into a new era of urgent action and solidarity.” Eddy Pérez, International Climate Diplomacy Director at Climate Action Network – Réseau action climat Canada (CAN-Rac)

    “Birds Canada is heartened by the adoption of the Kunming-Montreal Global Diversity Framework and what it could mean for wild bird populations around the world. We congratulate the Canadian delegation for the strong leadership they showed at COP15. We at Birds Canada look forward to working with the Government of Canada, Indigenous peoples and local communities across the country in the implementation of this new framework.” Patrick Nadeau, President & CEO, Birds Canada 

    “B.C. Nature would like to congratulate the Canadian delegation and Minister Guilbeault for the strong leadership they showed at COP15 and for the adoption of the Kunming-Montreal Global Diversity Framework. In a time of unprecedented threats to biodiversity, this agreement demonstrates the potential for the international cooperation necessary to turn the tide on species loss. We sincerely hope that the goals set forth serve as a floor rather than a ceiling and that through supporting Indigenous-led conservation and local communities across Canada and the world, this agreement marks the turning point for stemming biodiversity loss.” Stewart Guy, Executive Director, B.C. Nature

    “The SeaBlue Canada coalition welcomes this historic agreement, particularly the acknowledgement of Indigenous rights and the commitment to 30 per cent protection of our ocean by 2030. Let us take this shared momentum and ensure quality and equitable protection on the ground. The countdown to 2030 starts today.” Jennifer Josenhans, National Coordinator, SeaBlue Canada Coalition

    “Wildsight welcomes the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework as a historic step towards protecting global biodiversity by 2030 and applauds the recognition of Indigenous People’s rights and knowledge within the framework. We look forward to Canada’s continued leadership to support Indigenous-led conservation and enact an accountability law that enshrines nature protection targets.” Wyatt Petryshen, Mining Policy and Impacts Researcher, Wildsight

    “The Alliance of Canadian Land Trusts welcomes the Kunming-Montreal post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework that will advocate for nature across the globe.  Over 140 community land trusts across Canada are prepared to contribute towards halting and reversing nature loss by 2030 through conservation of private land that consists of some of the most endangered natural spaces in Canadian South.” Renata Woodward, Executive Director, Alliance of Canadian Land Trusts

    “The ChariTree Foundation welcomes the historic Kunming-Montreal global biodiversity deal to safeguard nature. This trailblazing deal will give children around the world more opportunities to get outdoors and fall in love with nature. That’s important because you protect what you love, and that means more kids will grow up to protect nature too.” Andrea Koehle Jones, Founder & Lead Children’s Environmental Education Advocate, The ChariTree Foundation

    – 30 –

    For more information or to request an interview, please contact:

    Paula Gray, Communications Manager, Environmental Defence, media@environmentaldefence.ca, 705-435-8611

    The post Canadian Nature Groups Welcome Global Deal to Reverse Nature Loss by 2030 at COP15 appeared first on Environmental Defence.

    This post was originally published on Environmental Defence.

  • A necessary step towards reducing the 4.4 million tonnes of plastic Canadians discard every year 

    Toronto | Traditional territories of the Huron-Wendat, the Anishnaabeg, Haudenosaunee, Chippewas and the Mississaugas of the Credit First Nation – “Plastic pollution is a global environmental crisis that destroys ecosystems, harms wildlife and threatens human health. This crisis requires immediate action from governments around the world, and Canada’s ban of some single-use plastics is a welcome first step.

    Starting after midnight on Tuesday, five harmful single-use products can no longer be made or imported for sale in Canada: checkout bags, stir sticks, straight straws, cutlery and certain takeout containers. Within one year, we will see the end of these items in Canada.

    This first phase of bans is a significant step, but the crisis is not averted. Plastic pollutes at every stage of its existence, from extraction of the oil and gas used to make it, to the refining, manufacturing, use and ultimate disposal. Plastic particles are found everywhere researchers have looked for them, from the highest mountain peaks to the deepest ocean trenches. They’re in human lung tissues, blood and placentas. The equivalent of one dump truck of plastic waste enters the oceans every minute around the world.

    We call for additional action to tackle plastic pollution, including expanding the bans to other harmful single-use plastics and developing widespread, convenient, accessible and affordable services for reusable and refillable packaging and products.

    Global coordination on measures to reduce plastic production and use worldwide is also needed, as is a commitment from governments to resist the plastics and petrochemical lobby, which seeks to protect private profits, not the environment and human health. We are pleased that Canada is among the 45 countries that have so far joined a ‘high ambition’ coalition to negotiate a global treaty by 2024 to end plastic pollution.”

    ABOUT ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENCE (environmentaldefence.ca): Environmental Defence is a leading Canadian environmental advocacy organization that works with government, industry and individuals to defend clean water, a safe climate and healthy communities.

    – 30 –

    For more information or to request an interview, please contact:

    Brittany Harris, Environmental Defence, media@environmentaldefence.ca

    The post Statement from Karen Wirsig, Plastics Program Manager, on the first phase of Canada’s single-use plastic bans coming into effect appeared first on Environmental Defence.

    This post was originally published on Environmental Defence.

  • Ontarians join the rising chorus of support for the Greenbelt with new holiday song “12 Acts of Destruction”

    Toronto | Traditional territories of the Huron-Wendat, the Anishnaabeg, Haudenosaunee, Chippewas and the Mississaugas of the Credit First Nation – Following the recent passage of Bill 23 and Premier Ford’s proposal to remove 7,400 acres from the Greenbelt, remove wetland protections and force sprawl onto farmland, Environmental Defence has created a new holiday song, “12 Acts of Destruction,” that musically describes 12 ways that the attacks on the Greenbelt and Ontario’s environment will harm the people and wildlife that call this province home.

    An in-person singalong of “12 Acts Of Destruction” featuring musicians and activists will take place on Wednesday, December 21 at 5pm on the steps of Old City Hall in Toronto.

    The new song, which is a play on the classic “12 days of Christmas,” showcases the devastating impacts of Premier Ford’s attack on Ontario’s environment including: wetlands drained, forests chopped, species fleeing, farms a-missing and suburbs sprawling. Access lyrics, videos, recordings and song sheet here: https://environmentaldefence.ca/handsoffthegreenbelt/12-acts-of-destruction/

    “Premier Ford’s tale of lies and greed will see precious farmland, forests and wetlands taken out of the protected Greenbelt. This will not solve the housing affordability crisis, but will make a few land speculators and developers very wealthy,” said Tim Gray, Environmental Defence. “We created this song as a way to highlight the devastating impacts of Premier Ford’s plans, in a way that sticks in people’s minds. We encourage all Ontarians to sing and share their version of the song on social media using #HandsOffTheGreenbelt.”

    WHAT: “12 Acts of Environmental Destruction” in-person singalong

    WHEN: Wednesday, December 21 at 5pm

    WHERE: On the steps of Old City Hall, Queen and Bay Street in Toronto

    WHO: Amateur and professional musicians, activists and local groups, and spokespeople from Environmental Defence

    Visit the “12 Acts of Destruction” webpage to access videos, song sheets, social media graphics and song recordings here: https://environmentaldefence.ca/handsoffthegreenbelt/12-acts-of-destruction/

    For more information about other “Hands Off The Greenbelt” and “Repeal Bill 23” events taking place in Ontario can be found here: www.handsoffthegreenbelt.ca

    ABOUT ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENCE (environmentaldefence.ca): Environmental Defence is a leading Canadian environmental advocacy organization that works with government, industry and individuals to defend clean water, a safe climate and healthy communities.

    – 30 –

    For more information or to request an interview, please contact:

    Alex Ross, Environmental Defence, media@environmentaldefence.ca

    The post Media Advisory: Greenbelt Singalong at Old City Hall steps on Wednesday at 5pm appeared first on Environmental Defence.

    This post was originally published on Environmental Defence.

  • Ontario is on a costly collision course with Ottawa

    With the release of Ontario’s Independent Electricity System Operator’s Pathways to Decarbonization Report, the province of Ontario is setting itself on a collision course with the federal government. Ottawa has pledged to deliver a net-zero electricity sector by 2035, however the IESO is arguing that Ontario needs 8000 megawatts of gas-fired generation in 2035 and is only planning to decarbonize the electricity sector by 2050, 15 years later. 

    If this pathway is followed, either Canada will fail to meet its emissions reduction commitments or Ontario ratepayers will be on the hook paying for gas plants to sit idle. This is because the Ontario Minister of Energy has directed the IESO to structure contracts with new gas plants to ensure they get paid even if they are forced to shut down due to federal climate change laws. 

    Regardless, this plan will be costly for Ontarians. Either we will have to pay billions of dollars in unnecessary carbon costs each year because of the plan to rely on gas, or we’ll pay billions of dollars to gas plants that are not generating power. 

    It is good to see that the IESO is planning on increasing renewable generation, but the province should be planning on procuring much more wind, solar and storage, rather than relying on gas and a massive build-out of nuclear power. Ontario’s competitiveness depends on clean power. Committing to gas until 2050 will deter investment in the low-carbon economy.   

    ABOUT ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENCE (environmentaldefence.ca): Environmental Defence is a leading Canadian environmental advocacy organization that works with government, industry and individuals to defend clean water, a safe climate and healthy communities.

    – 30 –

    For more information or to request an interview, please contact:

    Alex Ross, Environmental Defence, media@environmentaldefence.ca

    The post Statement from Keith Brooks, Environmental Defence, Programs Director, on the IESO’s Pathways to Decarbonization Report appeared first on Environmental Defence.

    This post was originally published on Environmental Defence.

  • Toronto | Traditional territories of the Huron-Wendat, the Anishnaabeg, Haudenosaunee, Chippewas and the Mississaugas of the Credit First Nation –  Today, the provincial government affirmed its violation of its commitment to the people of Ontario to never touch the Greenbelt. The amendments to Ontario’s regulations found here and here confirm that 15 separate parcels of land totalling 7,400 acres, including 4,950 acres from the Duffins Rouge Agricultural Reserve on the boundary of Rouge National Park, would be removed from the Greenbelt.

    In addition to repudiating repeated past commitments, this decision ignores the overwhelming public opposition to this proposal that was received by the government and its MPPs. Tens of thousands of letters were sent by residents and over 80 protests were held in communities across the province. Such a public response is unprecedented and reflects the level of disgust and opposition to the attacks on the Greenbelt felt by Ontarians.

    The government’s greenlight of bulldozing Greenbelt land will do nothing to reduce the overall housing shortage, let alone home prices in the Greater Golden Horseshoe. In addition to the vast untapped capacity to build homes in existing neighborhoods and built up areas, the Greater Golden Horseshoe region has very large areas of undeveloped land sitting unused, despite having been designated for development and included within urban boundaries. These unused “designated greenfield areas” span roughly 350 square kilometres, an area larger than the City of Vancouver.

    The government’s stripping away of these lands under Greenbelt protection does not end the fight to save them. In addition to demanding a repeal of these regulations, and the related Bill 39, we will support the public in using every legal avenue to keep the bulldozers at bay. We will continue to mobilize to stop the destructive attacks on the farms, forests, wetlands of the Greenbelt, and instead demand that our governments build affordable, transit-enabled homes and communities within our existing towns and cities.

    ABOUT ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENCE (environmentaldefence.ca): Environmental Defence is a leading Canadian environmental advocacy organization that works with government, industry and individuals to defend clean water, a safe climate and healthy communities.

    – 30 –

    For more information or to request an interview, please contact:

    Alex Ross, Environmental Defence, media@environmentaldefence.ca

    The post Statement from Phil Pothen, Ontario Environment Program Manager, regarding the Ontario Government’s harmful decision to proceed with removing 15 protected areas from the Greenbelt appeared first on Environmental Defence.

    This post was originally published on Environmental Defence.

  • ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENCE, SIERRA CLUB, BAD RIVER BAND OF LAKE SUPERIOR CHIPPEWAS, THE ANISHINABEK NATION

    Montréal/Tiohtià:ke | Traditional, unceded lands of the Kanien’kehá:ka/Mohawk Nation, a gathering place for many First Nations, including the Anishinaabeg – On Dec 17 at 12:30 PM ET, Indigenous water protectors and environmental experts from Canada and the United States will hold a press briefing at COP15 about the threat posed by the Line 5 pipeline to the biodiversity and Indigenous Nations of the Great Lakes. Speakers will discuss why Line 5 is an imminent ecological disaster, how the pipeline violates Indigenous rights, what alternatives are available and what can be done to support Indigenous Nations and environmental defenders working to protect the Great Lakes.

    Line 5 is a dangerous, 70-year-old pipeline that crosses directly through the heart of the Great Lakes, which hold over 80 per cent of North America’s freshwater. The pipeline is in a state of ill repair, has had several safety violations occur and has leaked at least 33 times, spilling over 4.5 million litres of oil into surrounding lands and waters. Line 5 is a direct threat to the Great Lakes, the surrounding communities and the inherent rights and treaty rights of Indigenous Nations of the Great Lakes. 

    More information can be found here: https://environmentaldefence.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Line-5-Report-S20.pdf 

    WHAT: Press Briefing on An Imminent Ecological Disaster in the Making: Why Canada must put Great Lakes protection and inherent Indigenous rights ahead of the Line 5 pipeline.

    WHERE: Media Center Room 220 D, Montreal Convention Centre (Palais des Congrès de Montréal), 1001 Pl. Jean-Paul-Riopelle, Montréal, QC H2Z 1H5.

    Live stream available here.

    WHEN: Saturday, December 17 at 12:30 PM ET

    WHO: The following spokespeople will be in attendance:

    Aurora Conley, Anishinaabe from the Bad River Band of Lake Superior Chippewas Tribe 

    Travis Boissoneau, Anishinabek Nation Deputy Grand Council Chief of the Lake Huron Region

    Michelle Woodhouse, Water Program Manager, Environmental Defence; Métis water protector

    Tessine Murji, Conservation Organizer, Sierra Club Illinois

    Don Waller, Great Lakes Biologist; retired professor University of Wisconsin-Madison

    ABOUT ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENCE (environmentaldefence.ca): Environmental Defence is a leading Canadian advocacy organization that works with government, organizations, and the public to defend clean water, a safe climate and healthy communities.

    ABOUT SIERRA CLUB (sierraclub.org): Sierra Club is one the largest grassroots environmental organizations in the United States that works to educate and enlist humanity to protect and restore the quality of the natural and human environment.

    BAD RIVER BAND OF LAKE SUPERIOR CHIPPEWAS (badriver-nsn.gov/): The Bad River Reservation was established by the 1854 Treaty of Lapointe with the U.S. government and was sited along the shores of Lake Superior and Chequamegon bay. Bad River is the largest Chippewa reservation in Wisconsin. 

    THE ANISHINABEK NATION (anishinabek.ca): The Anishinabek Nation is the oldest political organization in Ontario and can trace its roots back to the Confederacy of Three Fires, which existed long before European contact. The Anishinabek Nation is a political advocate for 39 First Nations throughout the province of Ontario from Golden Lake in the east, Sarnia in the south, Thunder Bay and Lake Nipigon in the north. 

    -30-

    For more information or to request an interview, please contact:

    Paula Gray, Communications Manager, Environmental Defence, media@environmentaldefence.ca

    The post Media Advisory: Line 5 Pipeline’s Threat to the Great Lakes – Press Briefing with an international coalition of Indigenous Nations and environmental experts at COP15 UN Biodiversity Conference appeared first on Environmental Defence.

    This post was originally published on Environmental Defence.

  • ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENCE, DEMOCRACY WATCH

    Toronto | Traditional territories of the Huron-Wendat, the Anishnaabeg, Haudenosaunee, Chippewas and the Mississaugas of the Credit First Nation – Today, Environmental Defence and Democracy Watch called on the Ontario Provincial Police to investigate whether the provincial government’s apparent leak of secret plans to allow residential development on 15 specific areas within the Greenbelt amounted to a criminal breach of trust by a public officer. It seems very likely that before any authorized public disclosure of the province’s plans to remove these specific lands from the Greenbelt, some government official, government MPP or employee leaked that information privately.

    Recent investigative reporting by the Globe and Mail, Toronto Star, The Narwhal, and CBC, has revealed multiple transactions to purchase Greenbelt land conducted prior to the November 4th announcement of the plan to remove 15 parcels of land from the protected Greenbelt. These transactions would seem to have been irrational if all the parties were unaware that these Greenbelt lands would be proposed for removal.

    Prior to November 4th – and continuing right up to that day – publicly-available information regarding the present and future status of these Greenbelt lands offered no rational basis for prospective purchasers to expect that significant residential, commercial or industrial development of these lands would be permitted at any time in the foreseeable future.  On the contrary:

    • The Premier and the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing made repeated and unambiguous public statements that the government would “maintain the Greenbelt in its entirety” and would not “touch the Greenbelt”, “build on the Greenbelt” or even “entertain any conversations about a land swap.”
    • There was no shortage of existing “designated greenfield area” or of “whitebelt” farmland and natural areas outside the Greenbelt, and that would reasonably have led an investor to expect that the government would not breach its express commitments to never remove any land from the Greenbelt.
    • There was certainly no public process, or public set of criteria released prior to November 4th, to suggest that these specific areas would be the ones selected for removal. On the contrary, all public consultations soliciting input on Greenbelt Area Boundaries (see ERO 019-4485, ERO 019-4483 and ERO 019-4803) were strictly limited to proposals for adding land to the Greenbelt, and were framed assiduously to preclude any implication that the government would entertain or consider proposals to remove any land from the Greenbelt.

    Given that the integrity of the Ontario government’s policy making process is essential and fundamental to ensure the public interest is upheld and protected, and the significant potential negative financial, social and economic consequences of the decisions in question for other landowners and the Ontario public, it is imperative that the OPP investigate whether this apparent leak of the government’s secret plans to break its Greenbelt pledge constituted a criminal Breach of Trust by Public Officer, contrary to s. 122 of the Criminal Code of Canada:

    • A breach of trust by public officer occurs when a public official departs markedly from the standards of confidentiality or other conduct demanded of an individual in their position, for the purpose other than the public good.
    • Pursuant to sections 2 and 3 of the Member’s Integrity Act, and sections 5 and 6 and O.Reg 381/07 and O.Reg. 382/07 of the Public Service of Ontario Act (PSOA), it seems clear that providing confidential information concerning a pending government decision, and/or giving anyone or any company preferential treatment, such as through early access to information, would breach the standards Ontario politicians, Cabinet ministers and their staff, and government employees are required to meet.
    • Minister of Municipal Affairs Steve Clark has denied that he authorized any advance leak of the government’s secret plans to pave the Greenbelt.
    • There can be little doubt that the government’s public announcement of its intention to strip these lands of Greenbelt protection – and thus to open them for property development – has considerably increased their market value.

    The questions that should be addressed in the OPP’s investigation include:

    • When did government official(s) first discuss the possibility of removing these specific clusters of lots from the Greenbelt?
    • Who initiated and oversaw this process within government?
    • Did any of the landowners in the area or who have bought land affected by the Greenbelt decision apply or in other ways seek to initiate this process?
    • Given the absence of a publicly transparent process concerning the potential removal of Greenbelt lands, how was the decision arrived at to proceed and how were lands to be removed from the Greenbelt selected? Were there other sites considered, where were they and who conducted this analyses?
    • Which government official(s), or PC MPP leaked internal government information about the government’s secret plans to remove certain lands from the Greenbelt, and about which lands in particular would be affected, to individuals or corporate entities outside of the government?
    • When and how was this confidential information provided, in any way directly or indirectly, to the land owners, their agents or lobbyists whose lands were selected? And, with regard to the communication of that information:
    • WHO was present/involved?
    • WHAT was discussed?
    • WHERE are the notes of those meetings/communications?
    • Were municipalities consulted or informed and was any information provided or promises made to the owners via municipal staff or elected officials?

    QUOTES:

    “Removal of thousands of acres of legally protected farmland, forests and wetlands from the Greenbelt threatens us all. A government doing so in a manner shrouded in secrecy that appears to benefit a select group of property owners, including recent purchasers, needs to be thoroughly investigated by the OPP,” said Tim Gray, Executive Director, Environmental Defence.

    “The Supreme Court of Canada has ruled that it damages our democracy if a situation even appears to raise questions about the integrity of a government policy-making process, and that law enforcement must be strict and strong to prevent this damage, so given the Greenbelt policy change smells badly, the OPP must investigate,” said Duff Conacher, Co-founder of Democracy Watch.

    ABOUT ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENCE (environmentaldefence.ca): Environmental Defence is a leading Canadian environmental advocacy organization that works with government, industry and individuals to defend clean water, a safe climate and healthy communities.

    ABOUT DEMOCRACY WATCH (democracywatch.ca): Cleaning up and making governments and corporations more accountable to you, and making Canada the world’s leading democracy.

    – 30 –

    For more information or to request an interview, please contact:

    Allen Braude, Environmental Defence, media@environmentaldefence.ca

    Duff Conacher, Co-founder of Democracy Watch, info@democracywatch.ca

    The post Environmental Defence and Democracy Watch call for OPP investigation of insider information leaks to sprawl developers in advance of Greenbelt land removals appeared first on Environmental Defence.

    This post was originally published on Environmental Defence.

  • Sustainable Agriculture strategy must be matched by Canadian ambition and action on pesticide reduction

    Montreal | Traditional, unceded territory of the kanien’kehá:ka First Nation – Canada needs to take a stand at COP15 to reduce pesticide use, urged environmental groups today, as federal Minister of Agriculture Marie-Claude Bibeau announced consultations on a sustainable agriculture strategy. 

    Target 7, under the Post-2020 Biodiversity Framework, focuses on reducing pressures on biodiversity and promoting sustainable use. Pesticide companies have lobbied nations at COP15 to remove language from Target 7 that would commit the parties to pesticide reductions.

    Environmental Defence, Ecojustice, the David Suzuki Foundation and Friends of the Earth, agree Canada needs to take a stand against any industry claims denying human health concerns and species decline associated with pesticide use.

    Pesticide use has experienced unmitigated growth globally, causing significant impacts on biodiversity. Sales of pesticides in Canada increased by a staggering 30 per cent in the last ten years. Pesticides, used largely in agriculture, can contaminate soil, water, and other vegetation. In addition to killing insects or weeds, pesticides pose health risks to a host of other organisms including birds, fish, beneficial insects, non-target plants, and humans. The groups say a reduction in toxic pesticide use and elimination of highly hazardous pesticides must be an outcome of COP15 negotiations. 

    Cassie Barker, Toxics Senior Program Manager, Environmental Defence said: 

    “We can reduce pesticide use and enhance food security. Pesticide over-use contributes to human rights abuses against migrant workers, destroys biodiversity in forests, infringes on Indigenous rights and food sovereignty, and contributes to unsustainable food system practices such as monocropping large areas of land for animal feed. 

    “Big agriculture is over-using pesticides with virtually no oversight – spraying every day instead of using pesticides judiciously to control pest outbreaks. We need to shift towards agroecological approaches to managing food that focus on efficient, stable and renewable food production.”

    Beatrice Olivastri, CEO, Friends of the Earth Canada said:

    “Pesticide use is rapidly accelerating in Canada. From 2019 to 2020 alone, there was an 8.4 per cent increase in pesticide use in Canada. Similar rapid expansions of pesticide use are seen globally. In order to move towards a sustainable food system in Canada and globally, one that does not harm bees, birds, butterflies nor pollutes water and soil, a targeted commitment to pesticide reduction is essential. Canada needs to eliminate excessive and unnecessary uses of pesticides and shift towards ecologically positive pest management systems and less toxic alternatives.”

    Laura Bowman, lawyer, Ecojustice said:

    “Pesticides are causing biodiversity loss and this problem is only worsening.  Canada needs to reform the federal pesticides management system to ensure that Canada better controls the rapidly expanding use of pesticides.” 

    “Clear recognition of the need for pesticide use reductions would align Canada with the approaches of other countries, including those in the EU which has legislated commitments to reduce pesticides by 50 per cent.”

    Jay Ritchlin, Director of Nature Programs, David Suzuki Foundation said:

    “Canada’s Minister of Agriculture needs to make clear reducing overall pesticide use, and risk are essential. Toxic pesticides harm human health and the environment. An explicit pesticide reduction target in the Global Biodiversity Framework and a stronger approach to regulating pesticides in Canada can rapidly and drastically reduce pesticide presence in the environment, our food and our bodies.”

    – 30 –

    For more information or to request an interview, please contact:

    Paula Gray, Communications Manager, Environmental Defence, pgray@environmentaldefence.ca

    Beatrice Olivastri, CEO, Friends of the Earth Canada
    beatrice@foecanada.org, 613-724-8690 (attending COP15 in Montreal)

    Sean O’Shea, Communications Strategist, Ecojustice
    soshea@ecojustice.ca, 416-368-7533 ext. 523

    Stephanie O’Neill, Communications Specialist, David Suzuki Foundation, soneill@davidsuzuki.org, 780-964-1192

    The post Environmental groups call on the federal Minister of Agriculture to support pesticide reductions at COP15 appeared first on Environmental Defence.

    This post was originally published on Environmental Defence.

  • Wind farm near Tehachapi, California

    Federal government releases new policy aimed at ending international public financing for fossil fuels, next step is ending domestic financing 

    Unceded Algonquin Anishinaabe Territories [Ottawa, ON] – Today the Government of Canada released a plan to end new public finance for fossil fuels abroad and instead prioritize clean energy projects. The policy, which comes into effect on January 1, 2023, marks a critical first step towards eliminating Canada’s massive levels of support for oil and gas and aligning federal support with a climate-safe future. The Government of Canada estimates that this policy will redirect $2.5 billion in fossil financing towards accelerating the urgent implementation of climate goals.

    The new policy applies across all federal departments, agencies and Crown corporations but will predominantly impact Export Development Canada (EDC), a Crown corporation with a long history of funneling billions in support to the oil and gas industry. This new policy will end a significant portion of EDC’s support for fossil fuels and redirect those funds to support the clean energy transition.

    Although the policy contains some exceptions for fossil gas, fossil hydrogen and carbon capture, utilization and storage (CCUS) technology, the policy lays out a number of robust conditions that projects must meet. Any project receiving support must align with a pathway consistent with limiting global heating to 1.5°C. If applied with integrity, it is unlikely that any fossil fuel project would meet these conditions.

    Unlike most of Canada’s peers, the policy leaves the door open for fossil fuel projects on national security grounds, and further detail is needed on how this will be interpreted. The International Energy Agency is clear that investments in energy efficiency and renewable energy are the solution to the current energy crisis, not investments in new oil and gas.

    The new restrictions will impact support for international fossil fuel projects. However, the bulk of public financing for fossil fuels currently supports domestic activity. The Government of Canada has already committed to ending inefficient fossil fuel subsidies by the end of 2023 and to ending all domestic public finance for fossil fuels. This new policy reiterates those commitments, though it does not include a timeline or process for the latter. Given that the federal government has already provided up to $18 billion in traceable support to oil and gas companies so far this year, it is critical that Canada make good on these commitments and phase out support for all fossil fuels – domestically and abroad, without loopholes.

    With this new policy, Canada joins a group of first movers who have implemented the pledge signed at last year’s UN climate conference (COP26) to end their direct international public financing for fossil fuels by the end of 2022 and fully prioritize their public finance for the clean energy transition. The landmark agreement, known as the Glasgow Statement, is the first multilateral commitment to address public finance for oil and gas. If all signatories follow through on their pledge with integrity, it will directly shift $38 billion a year from fossil fuels to clean energy and help direct even larger sums of public and private money away from investments in climate-harming fossil fuels.

    Further detail is needed to ensure these funds are shifted to support renewable energy projects that respect and protect human rights, particularly the rights of Indigenous peoples, and uphold the principle of free, prior and informed consent.

    Quotes

    Julia Levin, National Climate Program Manager, Environmental Defence Canada
    “We applaud the Government of Canada for showing much-needed climate leadership today. This new policy, if applied with integrity, should end Canada’s track record as one of the worst providers of international fossil finance in the G20 and shift billions towards climate solutions. Now the government must quickly take the final step and end all fossil financing – without any loopholes for fossil gas, fossil hydrogen or CCUS. This will free up billions of dollars to support a fair transition for workers and communities, and set Canada up to thrive as the world moves beyond oil and gas.”

    Claire O’Manique, Public Finance Analyst, Oil Change International
    “Oil and gas is usually the elephant in the room in Canadian climate policy. Today’s guidance is a notable break from this norm, and if applied with integrity — including not misusing the national security loophole — it will make a multi-billion dollar dent in our public support for oil and gas. As Minister Wilkinson signalled, an urgent next step is the federal government keeping their promise to end public support for oil and gas at home as well by the end of 2023. In addition, Canada must start using our public finance to support a worker- and community-led just transition away from oil and gas in Canada.”

    Vanessa Corkal, Senior Policy Advisor, International Institute for Sustainable Development
    “With this new policy, Canada has taken a vital step forward to align its financial flows with its climate ambition. The government is sending a clear signal: we cannot continue to pour fuel on the fire. Redirecting this support to clean energy will accelerate the global energy transition and support long-term stability and job creation. The next step is to keep this momentum going with the complete phaseout of fossil fuel subsidies and domestic public finance in the coming year.”

    Karen Hamilton, Director, Above Ground
    “Today Canada took a significant step forward, by ruling out public financing for some types of oil and gas projects abroad. We’re nonetheless concerned to see that Ottawa is exempting projects that use CCUS, a false climate solution promoted by industry at the expense of the millions, if not billions, of vulnerable people suffering most from the climate emergency. We hope the government revisits that decision, and moves forward with a plan to end public financing for domestic oil and gas activity as well.”

    Tamara Morgenthau, Senior Attorney at the Center for International Environmental Law
    “Canada’s policy is a needed step in the right direction — away from bankrolling destructive fossil fuels and toward financing a renewable energy transition. However, the loopholes it carves out for fossil gas, fossil hydrogen, and carbon capture and storage, threaten to undermine this progress and prolong reliance on fossil fuels. To fulfill its human rights and climate change obligations, Canada must follow the science and phase out all fossil fuels, coal, oil, and gas – no exceptions.”

    Ketty Nivyabandi, Secretary General of Amnesty International Canada
    We welcome Canada’s important step today to restrict public support for the international fossil fuel sector. To fully protect human rights, Canada must phase out all fossil fuels and prioritize a rapid, equitable transition to renewable energy alternatives which do not violate human rights and Indigenous communities in particular.”

    Eddy Pérez, International Climate Diplomacy Director, Climate Action Network – Réseau action climat Canada
    “Civil society has been fighting for more than a decade for Canada to end its suicidal support to the industry that is putting us in conflict with nature and making us sicker and poorer. Today’s announcement represents a major milestone, and a win against the destructive corporate interests that too often dominate Canada’s policy and investment decisions. Ending international support for oil and gas means we can instead invest in solutions, justice, and partnership instead, and increase support for climate action and biodiversity conservation in the Global South.”

    Émile Boisseau-Bouvier, Climate Policy Analyst, Équiterre
    “From 2019 to 2021, Canada supported fossil fuels 11 times more than renewables. We can’t meet our climate goals and achieve a successful energy transition if Canadians’ money is funding the problem rather than the solutions. This announcement is a welcome one, as it marks the beginning of a break with the status quo and should ultimately move the country out of its dual posture of being both the firefighter and the arsonist: fighting climate change while funding oil and gas. We are now eagerly awaiting details on ending fossil fuel subsidies within our borders, another major hindrance to the energy transition.”

    Background Information

    • Backgrounder: Canada under Pressure to End International Public Finance for Fossils Ahead of End of Year Deadline.
    • The text of today’s plan from the Government of Canada, Guidelines for Canada’s International Support for the Clean Energy Transition
    • Canada ranks among the worst in the G20 for providing fossil fuels public financing. By comparison, Canada’s support for clean energy is relatively meager. From 2019 to 2021, Canada supported an annual average of CAD 11.1 billion in public finance to fossil fuels. This was more than 11 times its support to clean energy ($1 billion), compared to the G20 average of 4:1 fossil finance to clean energy.
    • 39 countries and institutions signed the Glasgow Statement at the UN COP26 Climate Change Conference in Glasgow.
    • In May 2022, 113 organizations sent a letter to Cabinet Ministers urging the government to demonstrate true leadership by going beyond the commitments made to date and eliminate all subsidies, public financing and other forms of financial support from the Government of Canada and federal crown corporations directed to the oil and gas sector by the end of 2022.
    • Oil Change International’s implementation tracker has been monitoring signatory progress in fulfilling their Glasgow promise. Of the 16 high-income signatories that provide international public finance for energy, in addition to Canada, seven signatories have policies aligned or nearly aligned with the Glasgow Statement (United Kingdom, Denmark, European Investment Bank, France, Finland, New Zealand and Sweden). The Netherlands and Belgium have new policies that further restrict fossil fuel support but leave major loopholes, including a breach of the end of 2022 deadline.

     

    FOR MORE INFORMATION OR TO ARRANGE AN INTERVIEW,  PLEASE CONTACT:

    Barbara Hayes, Environmental Defence, bhayes@environmentaldefence.ca,

    Vicky Coo, Climate Action Network – Réseau action climat Canada, vickycoo@climateactionnetwork.ca

    Anthony Côté Leduc, Équiterre, acoteleduc@equiterre.org

    Vanessa Corkal, IISD, vcorkal@iisd.ca

    Claire O’Manique, Oil Change International, claire@priceofoil.org

    The post Canada delivers on climate promise, takes significant step towards ending public fossil finance  appeared first on Environmental Defence.

    This post was originally published on Environmental Defence.

  • Advocates protest CropLife event at NatureCOP, as delegates consider first global pesticide reduction target 

    Montreal | Traditional, unceded territory of the kanien’kehá:ka First Nation –  Demonstrators dressed as bees and butterflies raised concerns today about the presence and profile of the pesticide industry at NatureCOP (COP15), the global biodiversity summit taking place in Tiohtià:ke/Montréal. Environmental groups are calling on governments to embrace pesticide reduction targets as part of the global biodiversity framework being negotiated at the biodiversity summit.

    Pesticide industry association CropLife hosted an event for delegates this afternoon. A leaked report revealed CropLife Europe’s efforts to undermine pesticide reduction targets included in the European Union’s 2020 Biodiversity Strategy. Canada lacks a parallel strategy to reduce pesticide use while pesticide sales data show use of chemicals is rising. Three companies — Bayer, Corteva and Syngenta-ChemChina, all represented on CropLife Canada’s board — control more than 70 per cent of the global pesticide market, as well as 61 per cent of proprietary seed sales (including genetically modified).

    In addition to human health concerns associated with pesticides (each year 385 million farmers and farmworkers suffer from acute pesticide poisoning), pesticides are a factor in the decline of many species. For example, overuse of glyphosate-based herbicides has eradicated milkweed from much of the landscape. It’s essential to the survival of monarch butterfly larvae. Environment and Climate Change Canada is currently consulting on a 2016 recommendation to formally list monarchs as endangered under the federal Species at Risk Act. Likewise, birds that feed on insects are negatively affected by insecticides, which have reduced the quality and quantity of their insect prey. Aerial insectivores have declined by 60 per cent in Canada since the 1970s.

    The draft global biodiversity framework under consideration at COP15 would require parties, including Canada, to reduce pesticide use by two-thirds by 2030 (Target 7). If approved in the final text, this would be the first time parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity have agreed to a global pesticide reduction target.

    When asked at today’s event, a spokesperson said CropLife does not support the proposed pesticide use reduction target in the global framework.

    COP15 delegates need to be aware of greenwashing and not allow industry influence to scuttle the proposed target on pesticide use reduction. We are calling on the Government of Canada to publicly support the pesticide reduction target included in the draft framework agreement and to align federal pesticide regulation to achieve this goal.

    Quotes:

    “We need more ambition to halt and reverse biodiversity loss. It’s unacceptable to have those who profit from pesticides undermining negotiations. We must move beyond corporate science and industry lobbyists and build a bold action plan for planetary health.” – Cassie Barker, Toxics Senior Program Manager, Environmental Defence

    The Montreal nature summit must connect the dots between pesticides and biodiversity loss. We call on Canada, as host, to show leadership with a clear commitment to reducing pesticide use and risk.” – Lisa Gue, National Policy Manager, David Suzuki Foundation

    Birds that feed on flying insects, such as swallows, are in free-fall in Canada and beyond. The loss of their main source of food — insects — is a key factor in their disappearance. We must decrease, not increase, pesticide use if we want to see swallows return with the onset of each spring.” – Silke Nebel, PhD, Vice-President Science and Conservation, Birds Canada

    “CropLife international has caused unimaginable damage to biodiversity around the globe. They’ve repeatedly lobbied for the status quo overuse and overreliance on toxic chemicals. They do not belong here and they should never have been given room to speak at COP15.” – Charlotte Dawe Conservation and Policy campaigner for the Wilderness Committee

    “So much of current and recent biodiversity loss is driven by agricultural intensification, including use and dependency on pesticides and herbicides. The associated ecological costs include damaged soil ecology, monoculture forests vulnerable to environmental stresses and insect and bird species population collapses. It’s time for Canada to step up with a strategy to reduce pesticide use and dependency before it’s too late” – Ted Cheskey, Naturalist Director and bird expert. Nature Canada 

    “Biodiversity is essential for all life and the health of living things, including humans. Biodiversity loss and ecosystem changes, as evidenced, for example, in the decline of monarch butterflies, increases the risks for infectious diseases in plants, animals and humans. A global pesticide reduction target is critical for the protection of biodiversity and for human health.”  Melissa Lem, M.D., President, Board of Directors, Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment (CAPE)

    “We’ve known for a long time that some industry interests use controversial techniques, such as seeding doubts about the science, intimidation of critics and use of ghost writers, which slow and derail important political decisions — as we have seen with tobacco, climate and pesticides. These corporate interests have caused enough harm and should not have a place at the table in the negotiations for the future of biodiversity and life on this planet.” – Thibault Rehn, coordinator, Vigilance OGM

    “I do not know any farmer who uses pesticides to poison themselves or poison the biodiversity of our planet. Pesticides are a societal issue, a public health matter, not only a problem that concerns the agricultural sector.” – Serge Giard, farmer with Parkinson’s disease, president of  Victimes des pesticides du Québec

    “As pesticide resistance is building, rather than reducing use to preserve efficacy (as with antibiotics), the industry is teeing up more potent chemicals. Pesticides pollute the environment and harm workers’ and public health. What role is CropLife playing in preserving that which their products are designed to kill?” – Meg Sears, Chair, Prevent Cancer Now

    “First we must stop the damage to biodiversity, so the world needs a significant reduction in pesticide use and a shift to managing pests rather than the current outright war on all insects. CropLife is in the business of selling as much pesticide product as they can for profit. Their interests cannot align with those who seek to stop the damage and restore and conserve biodiversity. Governments should view CropLife and its members as polluters who must pay for the damage they’re inflicting on our global biodiversity.” – Beatrice Olivastri, CEO, Friends of the Earth Canada

    Background information:

    – 30 –

    For more information or to request an interview, please contact:

    Paula Gray, Environmental Defence, pgray@environmentaldefence.ca

    The post Pesticide interests must not obstruct action to protect wildlife and nature at COP15 appeared first on Environmental Defence.

    This post was originally published on Environmental Defence.

  • Statement from Phil Pothen, Ontario Environment Program Manager, Environmental Defence

    Toronto | Traditional territories of the Huron-Wendat, the Anishnaabeg, Haudenosaunee, Chippewas and the Mississaugas of the Credit First Nation – MPPs who voted this afternoon to force passage of Bill 39 – the so-called “Better Municipal Governance Act, 2022” – have directly participated in breaking their government’s clearest, most emphatic promise to Ontario voters, and endorsed a vast transfer of public wealth to a few select real estate investors. That is because the substantive impact of Schedule 2 of the bill – Duffins Rouge Agricultural Preserve Repeal Act – is to remove strong legal protection for the Greenbelt’s unique Duffins Rouge Agricultural Preserve.

    While the Ontario government has proposed to remove large areas of the Greenbelt, special legal protections for the key triangle of Greenbelt land connecting Rouge National Park to Duffins Creek mean that this 4000 acre jewel of the Greenbelt could not be opened to development without the active participation of individual MPPs. Each and every one of them was elected on the government’s express and repeated commitment that it would “not consider any proposals to remove or develop any part of it.”

    The passage of Bill 39, Duffins Rouge Agricultural Preserve Repeal Act, will enable a massive transfer of land value effectively held in trust for the public into the hands of a few well-connected real estate investors. This is because the Duffins Rouge Agricultural Preserve was formerly public land, bought, paid for and belonging to the people of Ontario as a reserve, and rented out to farmers to maintain it as an agricultural preserve. While it was nominally “sold” to private owners, and ultimately found its way into the hands of the current owners, it was for a tiny fraction of market value, because the most valuable portion of the property rights were retained in trust for the people of Ontario in the form of an easement.

    That easement protected the public interest in preserving the Duffins Rouge Agricultural Preserve strictly as agricultural and natural heritage land. Bill 39 removes that easement, thereby transferring development rights worth millions – if not billions – of dollars to private real estate investors without payment of that money to the public.

    It is clear that this extraordinary reversal of promises – and handover of public wealth – will not help accelerate housing construction. That is because the supply of “greenfield” land is not one of the factors constraining housing supply in Durham Region, where the Duffins Rouge Agricultural Preserve is located. Even prior to the current round of urban boundary expansion, Durham has the GTA’s largest supply of farms and natural areas already designated for development and included within settlement boundaries, but sitting unused. While Durham Region consumed roughly 1,546 hectares of greenfield land in the 18 years between 2001 and 2019, it has roughly six times that much land, 9,509 hectares, sitting unused within its boundaries.

    ABOUT ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENCE (environmentaldefence.ca): Environmental Defence is a leading Canadian environmental advocacy organization that works with government, industry and individuals to defend clean water, a safe climate and healthy communities.

    – 30 –

    For more information or to request an interview, please contact: Allen Braude, Environmental Defence, abraude@environmentaldefence.ca

    The post Statement: Bill 39 is a public giveaway and breach of MPPs’ promise to not to touch the Greenbelt appeared first on Environmental Defence.

    This post was originally published on Environmental Defence.