Category: privacy

  • One of the most essential branches of English liberty is the freedom of one’s house. A man’s house is his castle.
    —James Otis, Revolutionary War activist, on the Writs of Assistance, 1761

    What the Founders rebelled against—armed government agents invading homes without cause—we are now being told to accept in the so-called name of law and order.

    Imagine it: it’s the middle of the night. Your neighborhood is asleep. Suddenly, your front door is splintered by battering rams. Shadowy figures flood your home, screaming orders, pointing guns, threatening violence. You and your children are dragged out into the night—barefoot, in your underwear, in the rain.

    Your home is torn apart, your valuables seized, and your sense of safety demolished.

    But this isn’t a robbery by lawless criminals.

    This is what terror policing looks like in Trump’s America: raids by night, flashbangs at dawn, mistaken identities, and shattered lives.

    On April 24, 2025, in Oklahoma City, 20 heavily armed federal agents from ICE, the FBI, and DHS kicked in the door of a home where a woman and her three daughters—all American citizens—were sleeping. They were forced out of bed at gunpoint and made to wait in the rain while agents ransacked the house, confiscating their belongings.

    It was the wrong house and the wrong family.

    There were no apologies. No compensation. No accountability.

    This is the new face of American policing, and it’s about to get so much worse thanks to President Trump’s latest executive order, which aims to eliminate federal oversight and empower local law enforcement to act with impunity.

    Titled “Strengthening and Unleashing America’s Law Enforcement to Pursue Criminals and Protect Innocent Citizens,” the executive order announced on April 28, 2025, removes restraints on police power, offers enhanced federal protections for officers accused of misconduct, expands access to military-grade equipment, and nullifies key oversight provisions from prior reform efforts.

    Trump’s supporters have long praised his efforts to deregulate business and government under the slogan of “no handcuffs.” But when that logic is applied to law enforcement, the result isn’t freedom—it’s unchecked power.

    What it really means is no restraints on police power, while the rest of us are left with fewer rights, less recourse, and a constitution increasingly ignored behind the barrel of a gun.

    This isn’t just a political shift. It’s a constitutional unraveling that hands law enforcement a blank check: more weapons, more power, and fewer consequences.

    The result is not safety; it’s state-sanctioned violence.

    It’s a future in which no home is safe, no knock is required, and no officer is ever held accountable.

    That future is already here.

    We’ve entered an era in which federal agents can destroy your home, traumatize your family, and violate the Fourth Amendment with impunity. And the courts have said: that’s just how it works.

    These rulings reflect a growing doctrine of unaccountability enshrined by the courts and now supercharged by the Trump administration.

    Trump wants to give police even more immunity, ushering in a new era of police brutality, lawlessness, and the reckless deployment of lethal force on unarmed civilians.

    This is how the rights of ordinary Americans get trampled under the boots of unchecked power.

    There was a time in America when a person’s home was a sanctuary, protected by the Fourth Amendment from unlawful searches and seizures.

    That promise is dead.

    We have returned to the era of the King’s Writ—blanket search powers once used by British soldiers to invade colonial homes without cause. As James Otis warned in 1761, such writs “annihilate the privilege” of privacy and due process, allowing agents of the state to enter homes “when they please.”

    Trump’s new executive order revives this tyranny in modern form: armored vehicles, night raids, no-knock warrants, federal immunity. It empowers police to act without restraint, and it rewards those who brutalize with impunity.

    Even more alarming, the order sets the stage for future legislation that could effectively codify qualified immunity into federal law, making it nearly impossible for victims of police violence to sue.

    This is how constitutional protections are dismantled—not in one dramatic blow, but in a thousand raids, a thousand broken doors, a thousand courts that look the other way.

    Let’s not pretend we’re safe. Who will protect us from the police when the police have become the law unto themselves?

    The war on the American people is no longer metaphorical.

    Government agents can now kick in your door without warning, shoot your dog, point a gun at your children, and suffer no legal consequences—so long as they claim it was a “reasonable” mistake. They are judge, jury, and executioner.

    With Trump’s new order, the architecture of a police state is no longer theoretical. It is being built in real time. It is being normalized.

    Nowhere is this threat more visible than in the unholy alliance between ICE and militarized police forces, a convergence of two of the most dangerous arms of the modern security state.

    Together, they’ve created a government apparatus that acts first and justifies itself later, if at all. And it runs counter to everything the Bill of Rights was designed to prevent: punishment without trial, surveillance without suspicion, and power without accountability.

    When ICE agents armed with military-grade equipment conduct predawn raids alongside SWAT teams, with little to no accountability, the result is not public safety. It is state terror. And it’s exactly the kind of unchecked power the Constitution was written to prevent.

    The Constitution is intended to serve as a shield, particularly the Fourth Amendment, which safeguards against unreasonable searches and seizures. But in this new reality, the government has nullified that shield.

    All of America is fast becoming a Constitution-free zone.

    The Founders were aware of the dangers of unchecked power. That’s why they gave us the Fourth Amendment. But rights are only as strong as the public’s willingness to defend them.

    If we allow the government to turn our homes into war zones—if we continue to reward police for lawless raids, ignore the courts for rubber-stamping abuse, and cheer political leaders who promise “no more handcuffs”—we will lose the last refuge of freedom: the right to be left alone.

    As I make clear in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People and in its fictional counterpart The Erik Blair Diaries, the Constitution cannot protect you if the government no longer follows it—and if the courts no longer enforce it.

    The knock may never come again. Just the crash of a door. The sound of boots. And the silence that follows.

    The post Home Invasions on the Rise: Constitution-Free Policing in Trump’s America first appeared on Dissident Voice.

    This post was originally published on Dissident Voice.

  • Days out from a federal election and almost nothing has been uttered on tech policy in a month-long campaign, with political leaders overlooking or undercooking transformative issues like artificial intelligence, digital infrastructure and regulation. Voters could be forgiven for not realising that Australia is a contender in the global race to build the world’s first…

    The post The silence on tech policy is setting off alarm bells appeared first on InnovationAus.com.

    This post was originally published on InnovationAus.com.

  • On Tuesday, April 8, I was unlawfully detained and interrogated by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) at the Tampa airport while returning to the United States from international travel. I was told that “most of your rights are suspended,” because “this airport is a border crossing,” including my right to a lawyer. I was interrogated by a counterterrorism agent and treated like a criminal and a terrorist — synonyms this empire has long made interchangeable with being Black, Muslim and politically active.

    For roughly over three hours I was held without access to legal counsel, aggressively questioned, patted down and subjected to an invasive groin search.

    The post Department Of Homeland Security Targets Black Muslim Activist appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • Google recently announced it would acquire Israeli-American cloud security firm Wiz for $32 billion. The price tag — 65 times Wiz’s annual revenue — has raised eyebrows and further solidified the close relationship between Google and the Israeli military.

    In its press release, the Silicon Valley giant claimed that the purchase will “vastly improve how security is designed, operated and automated—providing an end-to-end security platform for customers, of all types and sizes, in the AI era.”

    Yet it has also raised fears about the security of user data, particularly of those who oppose Israeli actions against its neighbors, given Unit 8200’s long history of using tech to spy on opponents, gather intelligence, and use that knowledge for extortion and blackmail.

    The post Wiz Acquisition Puts Israeli Intelligence In Charge Of Google Data appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • On Thursday, the U.S. Department of Education opened an investigation into California’s Department of Education over Assembly Bill 1955, a law passed last year that limits the forced outing of transgender students to their parents. The bill, already the subject of multiple legal challenges, has become a lightning rod for anti-trans activists who claim it infringes on parental rights.

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • Australia’s privacy regulator scored a $14 million boost in Tuesday’s Budget as it attempts to reduce a backlog of cases while also overseeing the government’s fledgling Digital ID system and document verification scheme. The Office of the Australia Information Commissioner (OAIC) has been asked to reduce its staff numbers again, however, having already endured a…

    The post Privacy watchdog beefed up for enforcement action appeared first on InnovationAus.com.

    This post was originally published on InnovationAus.com.

  • This content originally appeared on The Real News Network and was authored by The Real News Network.

  • Australia’s privacy watchdog has lost more than 30 per cent of its workforce in less than six months thanks to a budget cut that has triggered morale issues among the remaining staff left to pick up the pieces. The Office of the Australian Information Commission (OAIC) began its “organisation redesign” in the back half of…

    The post Privacy watchdog axes 30pc of staff appeared first on InnovationAus.com.

    This post was originally published on InnovationAus.com.

  • After Donald Trump’s election in November, big-time donor and billionaire adviser Elon Musk began to outline his plans to slash government spending through something called the “department of government efficiency” (DOGE), a name referencing a 2010s dog meme and a cryptocurrency created as a joke in 2013. But it wasn’t clear exactly what form Musk’s task force would take until Inauguration…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • A federal judge early Saturday morning blocked Elon Musk’s highly controversial Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, from further access to a sensitive and closely guarded Treasury Department payment system, warning of “irreparable harm” presented by the threat to the personal and financial data of millions of Americans. In an emergency order that followed from a lawsuit filed by 19…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • With less than a week until President-elect Donald Trump takes office, North Carolina Gov. Josh Stein (D) has taken new steps to enhance state protections for abortion providers and shield patients’ reproductive health information. “I don’t know what will happen, but what I am trying to communicate to the people of this state is that they have a champion in me for their personal privacy and…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • California State Sen. Scott Wiener (D-11th district) has introduced Senate Bill 59, the “Transgender Privacy Act,” to enhance privacy protections for transgender and nonbinary people. The bill aims to automatically seal and keep confidential all court records related to gender transitions, reducing the risk of involuntary outing. “The incoming Trump Administration and Republican…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • It is an unprecedented case. And it risks triggering an unprecedented threat to journalism. The UK police have repeatedly tried to obtain the passwords to the phones of the British independent journalist, Richard Medhurst, the first reporter arrested in London under Section 12: his analyses and comments on Israel’s bloodbath in Gaza – which Amnesty International has characterised as genocide – have been interpreted by the police as support for organisations banned from the UK, such as Hamas and Hezbollah.

    The son of two UN peacekeepers, Medhurst was arrested last August at London’s Heathrow Airport

    The post Journalist Could Face Prison For Refusing To Give Passwords To Police appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • After years of conflicting decisions by federal district courts across the country on whether Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agents can search your cell phone and laptop at ports of entry, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that, “the routine inspection and search of a traveler’s electronics, or for that matter, any other type of property, at the border may be conducted without a warrant, probable cause, or even individualized suspicion of wrongdoing.”

    In reaching the decision, the court agreed with several other circuit courts, but put itself at odds with others and many (lower) federal district courts around the country.

    The post Cellphone Seizures And The Courts appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.

    This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.

  • US Big Tech firms pressured the Albanese government about the findings of its landmark Privacy Act Review last year ahead of Attorney General Mark Dreyfus’s decision to reject one of the reviews most seismic recommendations. Last September, Mr Dreyfus went against a key recommendation in the Privacy Act Review to give Australians an unqualified right…

    The post Big Tech scuppers Australians’ right to opt out of targeted ads appeared first on InnovationAus.com.

    This post was originally published on InnovationAus.com.

  • The federal government will spend more than $50 million enforcing Australia’s world-first social media ban for under-16s over the next four years, as it steps up its oversight of Big Tech giants. The new funding, revealed in the 2024-24 Mid-Year-Economic and Fiscal Outlook (MYEFO) on Wednesday, will be used for regulatory oversight of the new…

    The post Enforcing the social media age ban will cost $50m appeared first on InnovationAus.com.

    This post was originally published on InnovationAus.com.

  • Key analysis of the impact of sweeping changes to privacy law won’t be released by the government, which has invoked a blanket protection to keep it hidden as the reform process stretches to more than half a decade. Attorney General Mark Dreyfus this week defied a Senate order to release the cost benefit analysis of…

    The post Privacy reform analysis ‘hidden under a rock’ appeared first on InnovationAus.com.

    This post was originally published on InnovationAus.com.

  • On its final sitting day of the year, the Senate passed 31 bills after the Albanese government struck deals around the chamber. The flurry of legislation includes key changes to privacy law, mergers and acquisitions, multinational tax, social media and industry policy. The late-night session adjourned just after 11pm but debates were largely restricted, and…

    The post All the tech and innovation bills from the govt’s Senate storm appeared first on InnovationAus.com.

    This post was originally published on InnovationAus.com.

  • The Western Australian government has pushed its public sector privacy and information sharing bill through parliament with few amendments at its last opportunity before the state election, despite ongoing concerns from a privacy experts. The WA government on Thursday cut short the debate on the Privacy and Responsible Information Sharing bill to ensure the long-awaited…

    The post WA squeezes privacy bill through in the Parliament’s last breath appeared first on InnovationAus.com.

    This post was originally published on InnovationAus.com.

  • The privacy and information watchdog has slashed dozens of staff in response to a 23 per cent budget cut by government and a review by management consultants, sparking fears it will be ill equipped to deal with key policy changes like the social media ban. Senior officials confirmed the cuts on Wednesday and said a…

    The post OAIC slashes staff to meet $11m budget crunch appeared first on InnovationAus.com.

    This post was originally published on InnovationAus.com.

  • That was when they suspended the Constitution. They said it would be temporary.

    —Margaret Atwood, The Handmaid’s Tale

    This is how it begins.

    This is how it always begins, justified in the name of national security.

    Mass roundups. Raids. Indefinite detentions in concentration camps. Martial law. The erosion of habeas corpus protections. The suspension of the Constitution, at least for select segments of the population. A hierarchy of rights, contingent on whether you belong to a favored political class.

    This is what you can expect in the not-so-distant future.

    Once you allow the government to overreach the restraints imposed  by the Constitution, no matter what that threat might be, it will be that much harder to restrain it again, no matter which party is at the helm.

    We’ve seen this played out time and again.

    Some years ago, for instance, at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Salt Lake Tribune Editorial Board suggested that government officials should mandate mass vaccinations and deploy the National Guard “to ensure that people without proof of vaccination would not be allowed, well, anywhere.”[1]

    In other words, they wanted the government to use the military to round up and lock up the unvaccinated in concentration camps.

    That didn’t happen, but it so easily could have.

    Now the script has been flipped, and it’s the soon-to-be Trump Administration promising to use the military to round up and lock up undesirables in concentration camps.

    At this moment in time, those so-called “undesirables” are illegal immigrants, but given what we know about the government and its expansive definition of what constitutes a threat to its power, any one of us could be next up in the police state’s crosshairs.

    Once you give the government a taste of that kind of power—to disregard the Constitution, even for a day; to use the military for domestic policing; to rely on mass deportations and concentration camps in order to sidestep due process procedures—it won’t be so easy to rein it in when it runs amok.

    And it will run amok.

    You don’t have to be an illegal immigrant or a conspiracy theorist or even anti-government to be worried about what lies ahead. You just have to recognize the truth in the warning: power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.

    This is why significant numbers of people are worried: because this is the slippery slope that starts with supposedly well-meaning intentions for the greater good and ends with tyrannical abuses no one should tolerate.

    We’ve already allowed the government to significantly undermine our constitutional republic.

    We’ve allowed ourselves to be seduced by the false siren song of politicians promising safety in exchange for relinquished freedom. We placed our trust in political saviors and failed to ask questions to hold our representatives accountable to abiding by the Constitution. We looked the other way and made excuses while the government amassed an amazing amount of power over us, and backed up that power-grab with a terrifying amount of military might and weaponry, and got the courts to sanction their actions every step of the way. We chose to let partisan politics divide us and turn us into easy targets for the government’s oppression.

    Consider for yourself.

    We are in the grip of martial law. We have what the founders feared most: a “standing” or permanent army on American soil. This de facto standing army is made up of weaponized, militarized domestic police forces which look like, dress like, and act like the military; are armed with guns, ammunition and military-style equipment; are authorized to make arrests; and are trained in military tactics.

    We are in the government’s crosshairs. The U.S. government continues to act as judge, jury and executioner over a populace that have been pre-judged and found guilty, stripped of their rights, and left to suffer at the hands of government agents trained to respond with the utmost degree of violence. Consequently, we are at the mercy of law enforcement officers who have almost absolute discretion to decide who is a threat, what constitutes resistance, and how harshly they can deal with the citizens they were appointed to “serve and protect.” With alarming regularity, unarmed men, women, children and even pets are being gunned down by the government’s standing army of militarized police who shoot first and ask questions later.

    We are no longer safe in our homes. This present menace comes from the government’s army of bureaucratized, corporatized, militarized SWAT teams who are waging war on the last stronghold left to us as a free people: the sanctity of our homes.

    We have no real freedom of speech. We are moving fast down a slippery slope to an authoritarian society in which the only opinions, ideas and speech expressed are the ones permitted by the government and its corporate cohorts. In more and more cases, the government is declaring war on what should be protected political speech whenever it challenges the government’s power, reveals the government’s corruption, exposes the government’s lies, and encourages the citizenry to push back against the government’s many injustices. The ramifications are so far-reaching as to render almost every American who criticizes the government an extremist in word, deed, thought or by association.

    We have no real privacy. We’re being spied on by a domestic army of government snitches, spies and techno-warriors. This government of Peeping Toms is watching everything we do, reading everything we write, listening to everything we say, and monitoring everything we spend. Beware of what you say, what you read, what you write, where you go, and with whom you communicate, because it is all being recorded, stored, and catalogued, and will be used against you eventually, at a time and place of the government’s choosing.

    We are losing our right to bodily privacy and integrity. The debate over bodily integrity covers broad territory, ranging from forced vaccinations, forced cavity searches, forced colonoscopies, forced blood draws and forced breath-alcohol tests to forced DNA extractions, forced eye scans, and forced inclusion in biometric databases: these are just a few ways in which Americans continue to be reminded that we have no real privacy, no real presumption of innocence, and no real control over what happens to our bodies during an encounter with government officials. The groundwork being laid is a prologue to what will become the police state’s conquest of a new, relatively uncharted, frontier: inner space, specifically, the inner workings (genetic, biological, biometric, mental, emotional) of the human race.

    We no longer have a right to private property. If government agents can invade your home, break down your doors, kill your dog, damage your furnishings and terrorize your family, your property is no longer private and secure—it belongs to the government. Hard-working Americans are having their bank accounts, homes, cars electronics and cash seized by police under the assumption that they have allegedly been associated with some criminal scheme.

     We have no due process. The groundwork has been laid for a new kind of government where it won’t matter if you’re innocent or guilty, whether you’re a threat to the nation, or even if you’re a citizen. What will matter is what the government—or whoever happens to be calling the shots at the time—thinks. And if the powers-that-be think you’re a threat to the nation and should be locked up, then you’ll be locked up with no access to the protections our Constitution provides.

    We are no longer presumed innocent. The burden of proof has been reversed. Now we’re presumed guilty unless we can prove our innocence beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law. Rarely, are we even given the opportunity to do so. The government has embarked on a diabolical campaign to create a nation of suspects predicated on a massive national DNA database. Having already used surveillance technology to render the entire American populace potential suspects, DNA technology in the hands of government coupled with artificial intelligence will complete our transition to a suspect society in which we are all merely waiting to be matched up with a crime.

    We have lost the right to be anonymous and move about freely.  At every turn, we’re hemmed in by laws, fines and penalties that regulate and restrict our autonomy, and surveillance cameras that monitor our movements. Likewise, digital currency provides the government and its corporate partners with a mode of commerce that can easily be monitored, tracked, tabulated, mined for data, hacked, hijacked and confiscated when convenient.

    We no longer have a government of the people, by the people and for the people. In fact, a study conducted by Princeton and Northwestern University concluded that the U.S. government does not represent the majority of American citizens. Instead, the study found that the government is ruled by the rich and powerful, or the so-called “economic elite.” Moreover, the researchers concluded that policies enacted by this governmental elite nearly always favor special interests and lobbying groups. In other words, we are being ruled by an oligarchy disguised as a democracy, and arguably on our way towards fascism—a form of government where private corporate interests rule, money calls the shots, and the people are seen as mere subjects to be controlled.

    We have no guardians of justice. The courts were established to intervene and protect the people against the government and its agents when they overstep their bounds. Yet through their deference to police power, preference for security over freedom, and evisceration of our most basic rights for the sake of order and expediency, the courts have become the guardians of the American police state in which we now live. As a result, sound judgment and justice have largely taken a back seat to legalism, statism and elitism, while preserving the rights of the people has been deprioritized and made to play second fiddle to both governmental and corporate interests.

    We have been saddled with a dictator for life. Secret, unchecked presidential powers—acquired through the use of executive orders, decrees, memorandums, proclamations, national security directives and legislative signing statements and which can be activated by any sitting president—now enable past, president and future presidents to operate above the law and beyond the reach of the Constitution.

    We are one crisis or state of emergency away from having the Constitution terminated.

    Mind you, the powers-that-be want the Constitution terminated.

    They want us to be censored, silenced, muzzled, gagged, zoned out, caged in and shut down.

    They want our speech and activities monitored for any sign of “extremist” activity.

    They want us to be estranged from each other and kept at a distance from those who are supposed to represent us. They want taxation without representation. They want a government without the consent of the governed.

    Connect the dots.

    This was never about politics, populist movements, or making America great again.

    This is what happens when good, generally decent people—distracted by manufactured crises, polarizing politics, and fighting that divides the populace into warring “us vs. them” camps—fail to take note of the looming danger that threatens to wipe freedom from the map and place us all in chains.

    It’s what happens when any government is empowered to adopt a comply-or-suffer-the-consequences mindset that is enforced through mandates, lockdowns, penalties, detention centers, martial law, and a disregard for the rights of the individual.

    As I make clear in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People and in its fictional counterpart The Erik Blair Diaries, the slippery slope begins in just this way, with propaganda campaigns about the public good being more important than individual liberty, and it ends with lockdowns and concentration camps.

    The danger signs are everywhere.

    ENDNOTE:

    [1] Jenni Fink, “Utah Newspaper Pushes for National Guard to Block Unvaccinated From Socializing,” Newsweek (Jan. 17, 2022).

    The post This Is How It Begins: The Deep State Wants to Terminate the Constitution first appeared on Dissident Voice.

    This post was originally published on Dissident Voice.

  • New research reveals serious privacy flaws in the data practices of new internet connected cars in Australia. It’s yet another reason why we need urgent reform of privacy laws. Modern cars are increasingly equipped with internet-enabled features. Your “connected car” might automatically detect an accident and call emergency services, or send a notification if a…

    The post Modern cars are surveillance devices on wheels appeared first on InnovationAus.com.

    This post was originally published on InnovationAus.com.

  • Hardware giant Bunnings breached the privacy of potentially hundreds of thousands of Australians when it used facial recognition technology on in-store CCTV footage, the privacy watchdog has found. In a long-awaited finding on Tuesday, Privacy Commissioner Carly Kind determined that the retailer’s use of the facial recognition system without consent over three years was disproportionate…

    The post ‘Most intrusive’: Bunnings facial recognition breached privacy laws appeared first on InnovationAus.com.

    This post was originally published on InnovationAus.com.

  • The federal opposition has accused the government of wedge tactics by bundling a right to sue with other privacy reforms and new doxxing laws, and is threatening to withhold its Senate vote unless the package is split. The rift looms as another delay to the landmark reforms, which follow years of reviews and community consultation…

    The post Coalition demands split of privacy package appeared first on InnovationAus.com.

    This post was originally published on InnovationAus.com.

  • The post A Robot’s Perspective on Humans first appeared on Dissident Voice.


    This content originally appeared on Dissident Voice and was authored by Allen Forrest.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • The Western Australian parliament has been asked to consider changes to a signature public sector privacy and data sharing bill, amid criticisms that the proposed legislation delivers only “privacy lite” protections. The amendments to the bill – brought by independent Legislative Council member Wilson Tucker – would bring it closer to the European Union’s General…

    The post WA ‘privacy lite’ data sharing bill back for debate appeared first on InnovationAus.com.

    This post was originally published on InnovationAus.com.

  • Right-wing anti-abortion figures with ties to Leonard Leo, the architect of the U.S. Supreme Court capture, have been using special interest groups to attack our elections for years, but with abortion access on 10 different states’ ballots this year, they have been ramping up their efforts. One anti-abortion ally of Leo is Sean Fieler, a billionaire hedge funder and precious metals miner.

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • Dakar, October 30, 2024—The Committee to Protect Journalists calls for the release of journalist Bakary Gamalo Bamba, director of the bimonthly newspaper Le Baobab, who has been detained since October 20 on charges of invasion of privacy.

    “Guinean authorities should immediately and unconditionally release journalist Bakary Gamalo Bamba, who has been jailed since October 20, when he recorded a judge as part of his work,” said Angela Quintal, head of CPJ’s Africa program, in Johannesburg. “The fact that Guinean law protects against journalists being jailed for their work, except for narrow circumstances, only enhances the injustice of Bamba’s arrest and detention.”

    On October 20, Francis Kova Zoumanigui, a judge and president of Guinea’s Court for the Repression of Economic and Financial Crimes, slapped Bamba and doused him with wine after discovering that the journalist was recording their meeting at the judge’s home in Conakry, the Guinean capital, according to a statement by the Syndicate of Press Professionals in Guinea (SPPG). Bamba, 68, said during his trial that he recorded their discussion so that he could take notes about a case he was investigating, did not intend to name the judge in his report, and that a security agent for Zoumanigui had beaten him on the judge’s instruction.

    Zoumanigui told CPJ that Bamba didn’t present himself as a journalist and had not been mistreated. “I don’t wish him any jail time, but I had to clean up my image after the false accusations spread by the press,” he added.

    On Tuesday, a judge rejected Bamba lawyer’s request to release the journalist and set November 12 as the date for closing arguments.

    Bamba’s detention violates Guinea’s press freedom law, which states that journalists should not be jailed for offenses committed in the exercise of his profession, according to the SPPG. Under Article 132, a journalist living in Guinea may not be detained for their work, except for a few specific offenses, such as contempt for the head of state and dissemination of false news.


    This content originally appeared on Committee to Protect Journalists and was authored by CPJ Staff.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • The Tech Council of Australia wants to narrow the scope of a proposed tort for serious invasions of privacy, expressing concerns about the additional costs that the measures could create. Appearing before the Senate inquiry into the Privacy Act reform bill on Tuesday, the Tech Council’s new head of policy and strategy Harry Godber says…

    The post Tech Council and business groups want privacy reform narrowed appeared first on InnovationAus.com.

    This post was originally published on InnovationAus.com.

  • Australia’s privacy commissioner says the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner is mulling regulatory action against a number of companies that are skirting privacy laws when developing artificial intelligence models. Commissioner Carly Kind revealed early work by her office that she says is at a “pre-investigation phase”, as the regulator released new guidance setting out…

    The post Australia’s privacy tsar sets sights on AI training appeared first on InnovationAus.com.

    This post was originally published on InnovationAus.com.